WEBVTT - Breaking Down the Trump Indictment with Andy McCarthy

0:00:00.040 --> 0:00:03.000
<v Speaker 1>We've been covering the indictment of Donald Trump in the

0:00:03.040 --> 0:00:06.000
<v Speaker 1>past couple of episodes. Today we're going to dig in,

0:00:06.360 --> 0:00:09.320
<v Speaker 1>just get into great detail about the thirty four accounts

0:00:09.320 --> 0:00:12.080
<v Speaker 1>he's facing, the case that Alvin Bragg is trying to

0:00:12.119 --> 0:00:15.320
<v Speaker 1>make against him, and if he will be successful. We'll

0:00:15.360 --> 0:00:18.479
<v Speaker 1>also get into what options Donald Trump has in front

0:00:18.480 --> 0:00:23.200
<v Speaker 1>of him before his December hearing that he's facing. We're

0:00:23.239 --> 0:00:25.599
<v Speaker 1>going to get into all of it with Annie McCarthy.

0:00:25.640 --> 0:00:28.880
<v Speaker 1>He's a Fox News contributor a contributing editor at The

0:00:28.960 --> 0:00:32.320
<v Speaker 1>National Review. He's also a former Chief Assistant United States

0:00:32.360 --> 0:00:35.040
<v Speaker 1>Attorney and the Southern District of New York, so he

0:00:35.120 --> 0:00:39.320
<v Speaker 1>understands the New York court system. So stay tuned for

0:00:39.440 --> 0:00:48.479
<v Speaker 1>this episode with Annie McCarthy. So, Annie McCarthy, I'm so

0:00:48.560 --> 0:00:50.760
<v Speaker 1>glad to have you on the show. I've just obviously

0:00:50.800 --> 0:00:53.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm familiar with your work work colleagues at Fox, but

0:00:53.479 --> 0:00:56.920
<v Speaker 1>just in watching you on TV and reading everything you've written,

0:00:56.920 --> 0:00:59.080
<v Speaker 1>you just do such a good job just thoroughly breaking

0:00:59.080 --> 0:01:01.520
<v Speaker 1>this down. I'm so thankful for you to take in

0:01:01.560 --> 0:01:04.160
<v Speaker 1>the time to join the show. Well, thanks so much, Lisa,

0:01:04.160 --> 0:01:07.520
<v Speaker 1>It's great to be here, you know, so Andy. Obviously

0:01:07.560 --> 0:01:11.920
<v Speaker 1>a wild time in American history. This is clearly unprecedented.

0:01:12.000 --> 0:01:14.839
<v Speaker 1>So thirty four felon accounts. Can you take us through

0:01:15.000 --> 0:01:19.120
<v Speaker 1>in detail what exactly Alvin Bragg is accusing Donald Trump

0:01:19.160 --> 0:01:24.200
<v Speaker 1>of doing. Well, the basic crime in terms of what

0:01:24.240 --> 0:01:28.240
<v Speaker 1>the legal counts are, is very different, Lisa, from the story.

0:01:28.880 --> 0:01:30.679
<v Speaker 1>So why don't Why don't I start with what the

0:01:30.720 --> 0:01:34.120
<v Speaker 1>crimes are and then I can get to why the

0:01:34.160 --> 0:01:38.479
<v Speaker 1>story is incoherent? That'd be great. So the crimes are

0:01:39.080 --> 0:01:43.759
<v Speaker 1>what in New York is generally the misdemeanor of falsifying

0:01:44.160 --> 0:01:48.920
<v Speaker 1>business records and to commit that crime, which is you

0:01:48.920 --> 0:01:51.920
<v Speaker 1>would get less than a year from in jail, even

0:01:51.960 --> 0:01:57.080
<v Speaker 1>on the books. But in New York, Alvin Bragg basically

0:01:57.120 --> 0:01:59.320
<v Speaker 1>doesn't prosecute anything. So this is the kind of case

0:01:59.360 --> 0:02:05.400
<v Speaker 1>that wouldn't need to be brought against somebody normally. But

0:02:05.520 --> 0:02:08.720
<v Speaker 1>what you would have to prove is that somebody made

0:02:08.800 --> 0:02:14.160
<v Speaker 1>false entries in their business records and they It's not

0:02:14.280 --> 0:02:16.040
<v Speaker 1>enough to show that the entries of false. You have

0:02:16.080 --> 0:02:18.560
<v Speaker 1>to show that the person did it with fraudulent intent,

0:02:19.040 --> 0:02:22.400
<v Speaker 1>which usually means that you're trying to swindle someone, right,

0:02:22.400 --> 0:02:26.240
<v Speaker 1>You're trying to take money or property. The state argues

0:02:26.240 --> 0:02:28.920
<v Speaker 1>for a kind of a more broad based definition than that,

0:02:28.960 --> 0:02:33.560
<v Speaker 1>but for now, that's that's pretty much what falsifying business

0:02:33.600 --> 0:02:38.560
<v Speaker 1>records means. Now in New York, falsifying business records only

0:02:38.639 --> 0:02:42.720
<v Speaker 1>has a two year statute of limitations. And the course

0:02:42.760 --> 0:02:46.120
<v Speaker 1>of behavior that we're talking about happened in twenty seventeen,

0:02:46.919 --> 0:02:49.919
<v Speaker 1>So ordinarily, if that's what you charge, he'd be out

0:02:49.919 --> 0:02:52.680
<v Speaker 1>of luck now because that would have been time barred

0:02:52.720 --> 0:02:57.280
<v Speaker 1>by probably by twenty nineteen, no later than twenty twenty.

0:02:58.040 --> 0:03:00.320
<v Speaker 1>But what Bragg is trying to do, and the reason

0:03:00.360 --> 0:03:03.040
<v Speaker 1>he had to go to a grand jury is juice

0:03:03.160 --> 0:03:06.720
<v Speaker 1>up into a felony from a misdemeanor. The reason I

0:03:06.760 --> 0:03:08.720
<v Speaker 1>say that's why he went to the grand jury. In

0:03:08.760 --> 0:03:13.119
<v Speaker 1>the United States, the Fifth Amendment guarantees you the right

0:03:13.160 --> 0:03:17.280
<v Speaker 1>to be indicted by a grand jury, which means the

0:03:17.320 --> 0:03:20.480
<v Speaker 1>community has to make sure that the government has enough

0:03:20.480 --> 0:03:22.760
<v Speaker 1>evidence before the case can proceed to trial. So what

0:03:22.840 --> 0:03:24.919
<v Speaker 1>a grand jury is supposed to do is find probable

0:03:24.960 --> 0:03:28.800
<v Speaker 1>cause that the government has a case, and then you

0:03:28.880 --> 0:03:33.239
<v Speaker 1>move on to the indictment stage. But under the Fifth Amendment,

0:03:33.320 --> 0:03:38.080
<v Speaker 1>you only get an indictment right for a felony. For

0:03:38.160 --> 0:03:43.080
<v Speaker 1>a misdemeanor, the prosecutor can charge himself by what's known

0:03:43.080 --> 0:03:46.120
<v Speaker 1>as an information. So here the reason Bragg was in

0:03:46.160 --> 0:03:47.840
<v Speaker 1>the grand jury as he wanted this to be a

0:03:47.880 --> 0:03:53.200
<v Speaker 1>felony case. And in New York, you can inflate the

0:03:55.360 --> 0:04:00.280
<v Speaker 1>falsification of records from a misdemeanor into a felony if

0:04:00.280 --> 0:04:03.440
<v Speaker 1>you can show that by committing the misdemeanor, committing the

0:04:03.480 --> 0:04:09.040
<v Speaker 1>falsification of records, the defendant was trying to conceal another crime.

0:04:10.240 --> 0:04:14.320
<v Speaker 1>So what he alleges is that Trump was trying to

0:04:14.360 --> 0:04:18.920
<v Speaker 1>conceal another crime by making full centuries in the Trump

0:04:19.000 --> 0:04:22.600
<v Speaker 1>organization records, or at least causing false entries to be made.

0:04:22.960 --> 0:04:29.320
<v Speaker 1>So that's the thirty four counts are all basically that charge.

0:04:30.080 --> 0:04:33.479
<v Speaker 1>And the way he gets to thirty four is there

0:04:33.560 --> 0:04:37.960
<v Speaker 1>was a series of payments that Trump made to Michael Cohen.

0:04:38.680 --> 0:04:41.719
<v Speaker 1>Michael Cohen used to be Trump's lawyer. He's the one

0:04:41.760 --> 0:04:45.640
<v Speaker 1>who laid out the money for this hush money agreement,

0:04:45.640 --> 0:04:50.240
<v Speaker 1>which is known as a non disclosure agreement. He paid

0:04:50.279 --> 0:04:54.599
<v Speaker 1>one hundred and thirty thousand dollars to Stormy Daniels, the

0:04:54.680 --> 0:04:59.040
<v Speaker 1>porn star whose real name is Stephanie Clifford. And then

0:04:59.440 --> 0:05:06.919
<v Speaker 1>the arrange with Trump was to repay Cohen over the

0:05:07.040 --> 0:05:10.080
<v Speaker 1>months of twenty seventeen, so basically he got a monthly

0:05:10.839 --> 0:05:14.680
<v Speaker 1>check and to bring that about. What would happen is

0:05:15.320 --> 0:05:20.240
<v Speaker 1>Cohen would provide an invoice. Either Trump or the Trump

0:05:20.360 --> 0:05:22.600
<v Speaker 1>organization would write a check for him, and then an

0:05:22.720 --> 0:05:26.640
<v Speaker 1>entry went into the books. So even though this whole

0:05:27.400 --> 0:05:30.599
<v Speaker 1>thing is really one payback of a loan, it was

0:05:30.640 --> 0:05:36.160
<v Speaker 1>split into installments monthly. So Bragg basically broke it down

0:05:36.240 --> 0:05:39.760
<v Speaker 1>into those installments, but not content with that. He broke

0:05:39.800 --> 0:05:43.520
<v Speaker 1>down each installment to three separate acts, the invoice, the

0:05:43.600 --> 0:05:47.000
<v Speaker 1>writing of the check, and the book entry. So that's

0:05:47.000 --> 0:05:50.360
<v Speaker 1>how he gets up to thirty four. And we can

0:05:50.360 --> 0:05:52.839
<v Speaker 1>talk about that, but that's kind of a practice that

0:05:52.960 --> 0:05:56.919
<v Speaker 1>the Justice Department in federal cases tells prosecutors they shouldn't do.

0:05:57.360 --> 0:06:00.520
<v Speaker 1>I think when I tried the blind shake in nineties

0:06:00.560 --> 0:06:04.640
<v Speaker 1>for you know, terrorism and mass murder conspiracies and all

0:06:04.640 --> 0:06:07.920
<v Speaker 1>that stuff, I think I brought five counts. So this

0:06:08.000 --> 0:06:12.279
<v Speaker 1>is thirty four for the heavy duty crime undoubtedly of

0:06:12.320 --> 0:06:15.520
<v Speaker 1>falsifying business records. So anyway, those are the those are

0:06:15.520 --> 0:06:19.840
<v Speaker 1>the legal that's the legal counts, and I think it's

0:06:19.880 --> 0:06:25.159
<v Speaker 1>important Lisa to say counts, because those are allegations. I

0:06:25.240 --> 0:06:27.760
<v Speaker 1>have a hard time calling them crimes because I think

0:06:27.760 --> 0:06:29.800
<v Speaker 1>one of the big flaws in this indictment is that

0:06:29.839 --> 0:06:34.440
<v Speaker 1>he hasn't actually stayed at a crime, because that the

0:06:34.480 --> 0:06:38.880
<v Speaker 1>felony that we just discussed. You're supposed to show that

0:06:38.920 --> 0:06:42.839
<v Speaker 1>the person falsified the records to conceal another crime. Bragg

0:06:42.920 --> 0:06:45.640
<v Speaker 1>does not state in the indictment what the other crime

0:06:45.720 --> 0:06:50.240
<v Speaker 1>is that Trump supposedly was concealing. So right off the bat,

0:06:50.279 --> 0:06:52.720
<v Speaker 1>I think he's got a problem in not stating a crime,

0:06:52.760 --> 0:06:56.280
<v Speaker 1>because that's really the main function of a indictment is

0:06:56.320 --> 0:07:00.360
<v Speaker 1>to tell the defendant what he's accused of doing so

0:07:00.400 --> 0:07:02.640
<v Speaker 1>that he can prepare his defense. So I think, just

0:07:02.720 --> 0:07:07.159
<v Speaker 1>as a legal, technical, clinical matter, the indictment fails in

0:07:07.279 --> 0:07:11.160
<v Speaker 1>what the basic purpose of an indictment is. But let

0:07:11.160 --> 0:07:14.640
<v Speaker 1>me just say quickly the reason I say the story

0:07:14.920 --> 0:07:22.480
<v Speaker 1>is incoherent is Bragg's rationale for charging this case when

0:07:22.520 --> 0:07:25.480
<v Speaker 1>it's perfectly obvious that no one other than Donald Trump

0:07:25.560 --> 0:07:31.080
<v Speaker 1>would ever have been charged with this is that Bragg's

0:07:31.120 --> 0:07:34.920
<v Speaker 1>theory is Trump stole the twenty sixteen election by fraud,

0:07:35.520 --> 0:07:40.840
<v Speaker 1>namely by not disclosing these arrangements, these hush money deals,

0:07:41.200 --> 0:07:44.160
<v Speaker 1>and there are at least he lays out three of

0:07:44.160 --> 0:07:47.560
<v Speaker 1>them in the Statement of Facts that he filed along

0:07:47.600 --> 0:07:52.480
<v Speaker 1>with the indictment. But the thing about it is non

0:07:52.480 --> 0:07:55.880
<v Speaker 1>disclosure agreements are legal. In fact, there are a staple

0:07:56.160 --> 0:07:59.960
<v Speaker 1>in the civil justice system of how litigation gets closed

0:08:00.160 --> 0:08:04.440
<v Speaker 1>out and people make agreements. We frequently hear that, you know,

0:08:04.960 --> 0:08:07.400
<v Speaker 1>a lawsuit was dropped and the party settled and it

0:08:07.520 --> 0:08:09.840
<v Speaker 1>was an exchange of money and everybody agreed not to

0:08:09.840 --> 0:08:12.600
<v Speaker 1>talk about it anymore. That happens all the time. So

0:08:13.520 --> 0:08:17.560
<v Speaker 1>there's nothing illegal about non disclosure agreements. So, according to

0:08:17.600 --> 0:08:26.080
<v Speaker 1>brag Trump stole the twenty sixteen election by fraud. And

0:08:26.160 --> 0:08:29.080
<v Speaker 1>yet when you look at the indictment, the charges run

0:08:29.600 --> 0:08:35.240
<v Speaker 1>from February fourteenth, twenty seventeen, to December fifth, twenty seventeen,

0:08:35.800 --> 0:08:40.840
<v Speaker 1>so they start basically four months after the twenty sixteen

0:08:40.880 --> 0:08:45.000
<v Speaker 1>election was already over. It's inconceivable that you could commit

0:08:45.040 --> 0:08:47.760
<v Speaker 1>a fraud in twenty sixteen based on acts that you

0:08:47.760 --> 0:08:51.800
<v Speaker 1>don't carry out until months after the twenty sixteen event

0:08:51.960 --> 0:08:55.760
<v Speaker 1>is over. So the think it doesn't make any sense factual.

0:08:55.920 --> 0:08:57.720
<v Speaker 1>So why do you think he went with the twenty

0:08:57.840 --> 0:09:01.080
<v Speaker 1>seventeen date? What I had heard is I think the

0:09:01.120 --> 0:09:04.880
<v Speaker 1>transaction was in I believe October of twenty sixteen. So

0:09:05.000 --> 0:09:07.720
<v Speaker 1>why do you think he went with twenty seventeen? Do

0:09:07.760 --> 0:09:10.760
<v Speaker 1>you know the basis of that? Yeah, the same reason

0:09:10.840 --> 0:09:13.640
<v Speaker 1>that he only charged it gets when it got down

0:09:13.640 --> 0:09:18.199
<v Speaker 1>to counts. He only charged the Stormy Daniels nondisclosure agreement,

0:09:19.480 --> 0:09:23.000
<v Speaker 1>not the transactions attendant to the other two hush money

0:09:23.080 --> 0:09:25.160
<v Speaker 1>arrangements that they talk about in the statement of facts.

0:09:25.559 --> 0:09:29.240
<v Speaker 1>The reason is he needs Trump to be an active participant.

0:09:29.760 --> 0:09:32.920
<v Speaker 1>What happened in October of twenty sixteen is that Michael

0:09:33.000 --> 0:09:37.440
<v Speaker 1>Cohen paid the money to Stormy Daniels. What happened from

0:09:37.559 --> 0:09:41.880
<v Speaker 1>February to December of twenty seventeen is that Trump paid

0:09:42.160 --> 0:09:45.920
<v Speaker 1>Michael Cohen. So in order to get the counts against Trump,

0:09:47.120 --> 0:09:50.720
<v Speaker 1>he has to go to Trump's personal activity. So that's

0:09:50.800 --> 0:09:54.240
<v Speaker 1>the stuff that happened in twenty seventeen. So that makes sense.

0:09:54.360 --> 0:09:57.040
<v Speaker 1>So but even right there, in laying this out at

0:09:57.080 --> 0:10:00.400
<v Speaker 1>the beginning, I mean, there's already three glaring issues. I mean,

0:10:00.440 --> 0:10:03.400
<v Speaker 1>one he's already essentially being denied due process even in

0:10:03.400 --> 0:10:05.959
<v Speaker 1>the indictment itself, because it doesn't lay out what crime

0:10:06.040 --> 0:10:09.040
<v Speaker 1>he was pursuing in the pursuit of a felony, and

0:10:09.080 --> 0:10:12.240
<v Speaker 1>then secondly you have the statute of limitations concerns, and

0:10:12.280 --> 0:10:15.240
<v Speaker 1>then you know, thirdly, you have the timeline of it

0:10:15.280 --> 0:10:19.240
<v Speaker 1>just being acidinine that somehow he was defrauding an election

0:10:19.320 --> 0:10:22.880
<v Speaker 1>when the transactions are after the facts, you know right there.

0:10:22.960 --> 0:10:24.920
<v Speaker 1>You know, I'm not an attorney, but you know, even

0:10:25.040 --> 0:10:28.120
<v Speaker 1>just from a common sense perspective, you know, that's all

0:10:28.160 --> 0:10:31.880
<v Speaker 1>a head scratcher. Also, you know, I would assume that

0:10:32.040 --> 0:10:34.599
<v Speaker 1>the crime that he's allegedly concealing, or if this is

0:10:34.640 --> 0:10:37.120
<v Speaker 1>having to do with the twenty sixteen election, those would

0:10:37.160 --> 0:10:40.480
<v Speaker 1>be you know, federal aspects. So what jurisdiction does a

0:10:40.559 --> 0:10:44.559
<v Speaker 1>local DA have to enforce federal law? Yeah, let me

0:10:44.600 --> 0:10:46.280
<v Speaker 1>answer that, And I want to come back to the

0:10:46.320 --> 0:10:48.680
<v Speaker 1>first point you made, because I think it's really important,

0:10:48.800 --> 0:10:52.600
<v Speaker 1>which is the process problem. The reason. You know, Bragg

0:10:52.720 --> 0:10:55.800
<v Speaker 1>is not an idiot. He's been a prosecutor for a

0:10:55.840 --> 0:10:58.240
<v Speaker 1>long time. I think he's not a very good prosecutor,

0:10:58.280 --> 0:11:01.040
<v Speaker 1>and he's been unethical way he brought this case. But

0:11:01.080 --> 0:11:05.160
<v Speaker 1>he's not stupid. There's a reason why he doesn't want

0:11:05.200 --> 0:11:09.920
<v Speaker 1>to say what the other crime is. He knows that

0:11:10.080 --> 0:11:13.280
<v Speaker 1>is problematic, that he hasn't that he hasn't done that.

0:11:14.080 --> 0:11:19.000
<v Speaker 1>And the reason, Lisa, is every other crime that he

0:11:19.080 --> 0:11:22.120
<v Speaker 1>wants to cite is a problem for him. And the

0:11:22.200 --> 0:11:24.920
<v Speaker 1>two main ones that he has sort of thrown out

0:11:24.960 --> 0:11:33.439
<v Speaker 1>there without committing himself are federal campaign finance violations and

0:11:33.640 --> 0:11:38.679
<v Speaker 1>state campaign finance violations. But he knows that on the

0:11:38.720 --> 0:11:43.439
<v Speaker 1>federal side, he doesn't have jurisdiction to enforce federal law,

0:11:44.040 --> 0:11:46.400
<v Speaker 1>and on the state side, he knows that the state

0:11:46.440 --> 0:11:50.720
<v Speaker 1>election laws apply only to state. Why you know, state

0:11:50.760 --> 0:11:54.760
<v Speaker 1>elections elections for the state office. And this is obviously

0:11:55.240 --> 0:11:58.320
<v Speaker 1>an election for the presidency. That if imagine how chaotic

0:11:58.360 --> 0:12:01.560
<v Speaker 1>it would be if every aid had their own election

0:12:01.640 --> 0:12:04.480
<v Speaker 1>laws that applied to federal elections, so that if you

0:12:04.559 --> 0:12:07.480
<v Speaker 1>stood for national office, you would have to comply, especially

0:12:07.520 --> 0:12:11.040
<v Speaker 1>for the presidency, with the fifty different sets of laws.

0:12:11.080 --> 0:12:16.520
<v Speaker 1>So clearly, when Congress comes in and has a set

0:12:16.559 --> 0:12:20.160
<v Speaker 1>of election laws that apply to federal elections, that preempts

0:12:20.200 --> 0:12:22.720
<v Speaker 1>the state laws. They can't apply their laws. And the

0:12:22.720 --> 0:12:25.439
<v Speaker 1>state by their own terms to state laws don't apply

0:12:25.520 --> 0:12:29.080
<v Speaker 1>to federal elections. So that's why Bragg doesn't want to

0:12:29.360 --> 0:12:33.400
<v Speaker 1>go there. And what he's relying on as an ambiguity

0:12:33.480 --> 0:12:38.720
<v Speaker 1>in the statute. What the the felony Falsification of Record

0:12:38.800 --> 0:12:43.720
<v Speaker 1>statute says is it's a felony if by falsifying the

0:12:43.760 --> 0:12:48.720
<v Speaker 1>records the person intended to commit or conceal and the

0:12:48.840 --> 0:12:55.080
<v Speaker 1>term is another crime. So the statute doesn't say another

0:12:55.480 --> 0:12:58.320
<v Speaker 1>New York state crime. But since we're dealing with the

0:12:58.400 --> 0:13:01.960
<v Speaker 1>New York State penal Code, the presumption has to be

0:13:02.080 --> 0:13:04.720
<v Speaker 1>that when it talks about another crime, it's talking about

0:13:04.720 --> 0:13:08.600
<v Speaker 1>another New York crime. There's no reason to think it

0:13:08.720 --> 0:13:13.120
<v Speaker 1>meant another federal crime, or that you can put federal

0:13:13.200 --> 0:13:17.120
<v Speaker 1>in there just because the state legislature did or it

0:13:17.160 --> 0:13:22.480
<v Speaker 1>did not, you know, cite to what authority the crime

0:13:22.520 --> 0:13:25.000
<v Speaker 1>they were talking about was. You have to assume it

0:13:25.040 --> 0:13:27.840
<v Speaker 1>was a New York crime, because otherwise, what's the limiting principle?

0:13:27.960 --> 0:13:30.760
<v Speaker 1>You know, is a crime against the law of France

0:13:30.880 --> 0:13:33.480
<v Speaker 1>good enough? You know, is a Shariah crime good enough?

0:13:34.800 --> 0:13:37.480
<v Speaker 1>So obviously what the New York legislature was talking about

0:13:37.520 --> 0:13:39.760
<v Speaker 1>was a New York crime, and Bragg knows that, and

0:13:39.840 --> 0:13:43.880
<v Speaker 1>that's the reason he doesn't want to state a federal crime. Also,

0:13:45.120 --> 0:13:47.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, he's got other problems with that. Number One,

0:13:48.200 --> 0:13:53.920
<v Speaker 1>I don't think these expenditures, whatever you think of them,

0:13:54.080 --> 0:14:01.000
<v Speaker 1>amount to a to in kind campaign contributions under federal law.

0:14:01.640 --> 0:14:06.079
<v Speaker 1>So he not only has to show that these were

0:14:06.720 --> 0:14:10.600
<v Speaker 1>if he had jurisdiction to enforce federal law, he would

0:14:10.600 --> 0:14:12.360
<v Speaker 1>not have to. He would not only have to show

0:14:12.400 --> 0:14:18.000
<v Speaker 1>that these were in kind federal campaign donations, he would

0:14:18.000 --> 0:14:21.240
<v Speaker 1>also have to show that Trump knew that, and that

0:14:21.320 --> 0:14:24.560
<v Speaker 1>he was intentionally trying to conceal that when the records

0:14:24.560 --> 0:14:29.160
<v Speaker 1>were falsified. And there's no reason to believe. I frankly

0:14:29.200 --> 0:14:32.119
<v Speaker 1>don't think there's any reason to believe these were campaign

0:14:32.960 --> 0:14:38.800
<v Speaker 1>finance actions under federal law. The thought that Trump knew

0:14:38.840 --> 0:14:41.840
<v Speaker 1>they were is far fetched. And I would just point

0:14:41.880 --> 0:14:45.000
<v Speaker 1>out that in the last big campaign finance case that

0:14:45.240 --> 0:14:48.440
<v Speaker 1>drew a lot of attention to John Edwards case, which

0:14:48.440 --> 0:14:52.720
<v Speaker 1>involved a lot more money than this one, the Federal

0:14:52.760 --> 0:14:57.480
<v Speaker 1>Election Commission and the Department of Justice, the two components

0:14:57.480 --> 0:15:00.400
<v Speaker 1>of the federal government that actually do have jurisdic SHOA

0:15:00.440 --> 0:15:04.480
<v Speaker 1>campaign finance violations disagreed on whether these were in kind

0:15:04.840 --> 0:15:08.520
<v Speaker 1>payments or not. So the thought that Trump would know

0:15:08.640 --> 0:15:12.720
<v Speaker 1>what a campaign finance violation was when the two regulatory

0:15:12.840 --> 0:15:15.080
<v Speaker 1>arms of the federal government can't agree on it is

0:15:15.520 --> 0:15:18.960
<v Speaker 1>very far fetched. And that puts aside, you know, a

0:15:19.000 --> 0:15:22.160
<v Speaker 1>whole host of other problems such that, such as that

0:15:23.680 --> 0:15:27.200
<v Speaker 1>most campaign finance violations are handled by paying a fine

0:15:27.720 --> 0:15:30.400
<v Speaker 1>to the FEC. They don't criminalize them. People don't get

0:15:30.400 --> 0:15:33.560
<v Speaker 1>indicted for them. The Obama campaign had a two point

0:15:33.600 --> 0:15:37.360
<v Speaker 1>five I think it was million dollars violation in two

0:15:37.400 --> 0:15:39.880
<v Speaker 1>thousand and eight. You'll be shocked to learn, Lisa, that

0:15:39.920 --> 0:15:44.120
<v Speaker 1>the Obama Justice Department decided not to indict the Obama campaign.

0:15:44.280 --> 0:15:47.120
<v Speaker 1>Now that's shocking, Yeah, it is shocking. And they let

0:15:47.120 --> 0:15:50.080
<v Speaker 1>them get off with like a three hundred thousand dollars fine.

0:15:50.120 --> 0:15:54.360
<v Speaker 1>So that you know, Hillary Clinton's campaign got fined by

0:15:54.400 --> 0:15:57.680
<v Speaker 1>the FEC for mischaracterizing the way that they used to

0:15:57.720 --> 0:16:02.400
<v Speaker 1>steal dossier, right, They they categorized it as legal fees

0:16:02.480 --> 0:16:06.360
<v Speaker 1>and it was actually opposition research. So you know, they

0:16:06.360 --> 0:16:10.160
<v Speaker 1>don't criminalize this ordinarily. They're just you know, they're criminalizing

0:16:10.160 --> 0:16:12.040
<v Speaker 1>it for this guy, even though they don't actually have

0:16:12.200 --> 0:16:15.880
<v Speaker 1>a crime. So I think you're right to point out

0:16:15.960 --> 0:16:19.800
<v Speaker 1>that the big flaw in the indictment is the failure

0:16:20.960 --> 0:16:24.280
<v Speaker 1>to state what the crime is, and that if I

0:16:24.280 --> 0:16:26.560
<v Speaker 1>could that just it brings me back to your original

0:16:26.600 --> 0:16:31.720
<v Speaker 1>point about due process, because there's three real problems with

0:16:31.760 --> 0:16:36.120
<v Speaker 1>this that I don't see how Bragg can overcome. One

0:16:36.280 --> 0:16:39.400
<v Speaker 1>is just the obvious. The point of an indictment is

0:16:39.440 --> 0:16:41.920
<v Speaker 1>to put a person on notice of what the crime

0:16:42.080 --> 0:16:45.520
<v Speaker 1>is so he can prepare his defense. If you don't

0:16:45.520 --> 0:16:48.040
<v Speaker 1>tell the guy what he's accused of, he can't prepare

0:16:48.080 --> 0:16:50.920
<v Speaker 1>a defense. So the indictment fails even as an indictment.

0:16:51.000 --> 0:16:53.160
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't do the thing an indictment supposed to do.

0:16:53.960 --> 0:16:59.880
<v Speaker 1>The second point of an indictment in American constitutional law

0:17:01.160 --> 0:17:03.480
<v Speaker 1>is an indictment is supposed to be the way that

0:17:03.560 --> 0:17:06.600
<v Speaker 1>you plead double jeopardy if you ever get charged again

0:17:06.640 --> 0:17:09.760
<v Speaker 1>with the same crime. So, in other words, again the

0:17:09.800 --> 0:17:13.359
<v Speaker 1>indictment has to stay say what you're accused of. So

0:17:13.400 --> 0:17:15.919
<v Speaker 1>if another prosecutor down the road ever tried to do

0:17:15.960 --> 0:17:18.440
<v Speaker 1>that again, your indictment is your evidence that they can't

0:17:18.440 --> 0:17:21.600
<v Speaker 1>do that, because you've already been prosecuted for that crime.

0:17:21.840 --> 0:17:24.720
<v Speaker 1>But again, if the indictment doesn't state the crime, then

0:17:24.720 --> 0:17:28.960
<v Speaker 1>it can't perform that function as your double jeopardy defense either.

0:17:29.520 --> 0:17:33.239
<v Speaker 1>And then I think the third thing, which should end

0:17:33.320 --> 0:17:35.639
<v Speaker 1>up being a pretty big issue I would think in

0:17:35.680 --> 0:17:41.679
<v Speaker 1>the pre trial motions is the prosecutor's function in the

0:17:41.800 --> 0:17:44.760
<v Speaker 1>grand jury is to be the legal advisor for the

0:17:44.800 --> 0:17:49.359
<v Speaker 1>grand jury when they make their finding when they vote

0:17:49.359 --> 0:17:52.480
<v Speaker 1>for the indictment. And what technically, what the grand jury

0:17:52.520 --> 0:17:56.240
<v Speaker 1>has to find when they indict is that every essential

0:17:56.280 --> 0:18:01.760
<v Speaker 1>element of a crime is supported by probable cause. Every crime,

0:18:01.760 --> 0:18:04.439
<v Speaker 1>whether it's a federal crime or a state crime, is

0:18:04.480 --> 0:18:09.119
<v Speaker 1>broken down into components which the law regards as or

0:18:09.200 --> 0:18:13.280
<v Speaker 1>calls essential elements. So for example, if I accused you

0:18:13.359 --> 0:18:18.360
<v Speaker 1>of armed bank robbery, the essential elements would be that, yeah,

0:18:18.480 --> 0:18:20.960
<v Speaker 1>you didn't do it. You're not guilty. See I didn't

0:18:20.960 --> 0:18:24.200
<v Speaker 1>do it. We're already we're already advancing the ball here,

0:18:24.400 --> 0:18:28.719
<v Speaker 1>just like the essential elements would be that you know

0:18:28.840 --> 0:18:32.320
<v Speaker 1>you entered and robbed the bank, you were armed, and

0:18:32.359 --> 0:18:34.280
<v Speaker 1>you intended to do it. In other words, it wasn't

0:18:34.280 --> 0:18:37.520
<v Speaker 1>an accident or a mistake. So that's the kind of

0:18:37.520 --> 0:18:39.960
<v Speaker 1>thing we're talking about when you say that somebody you have,

0:18:40.080 --> 0:18:42.480
<v Speaker 1>the government has to prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt

0:18:42.520 --> 0:18:45.440
<v Speaker 1>at trial, or the grand jury has to find probable

0:18:45.480 --> 0:18:48.359
<v Speaker 1>cause in order to indict. That's what we're talking about

0:18:48.440 --> 0:18:51.800
<v Speaker 1>on those essential elements. And the reason this is important

0:18:52.000 --> 0:18:57.000
<v Speaker 1>is Bragg. If the grand jury indictment is proper, Bragg

0:18:57.080 --> 0:19:00.920
<v Speaker 1>has to have given the grand jury legal instructions on

0:19:00.960 --> 0:19:03.640
<v Speaker 1>all of the elements they had to find in order

0:19:03.760 --> 0:19:06.399
<v Speaker 1>to find that there was probable cause to indict Trump.

0:19:07.080 --> 0:19:10.119
<v Speaker 1>So if he didn't put the crime the Trump was

0:19:10.160 --> 0:19:13.920
<v Speaker 1>supposedly concealing in the grand jury, I think the chances

0:19:13.960 --> 0:19:16.920
<v Speaker 1>are very high that he didn't instruct the grand jury

0:19:17.119 --> 0:19:20.000
<v Speaker 1>on what that crime was. And I don't see how

0:19:20.040 --> 0:19:23.080
<v Speaker 1>the grand jury could have properly indicted on that crime

0:19:23.720 --> 0:19:28.560
<v Speaker 1>unless Bragg told them what the crime was that Trump

0:19:28.640 --> 0:19:31.120
<v Speaker 1>was supposedly concealing. But it seems to me it would

0:19:31.160 --> 0:19:33.560
<v Speaker 1>be very peculiar if he went through that with the

0:19:33.600 --> 0:19:36.119
<v Speaker 1>grand jury, told the grand jury what the crime was,

0:19:36.160 --> 0:19:38.280
<v Speaker 1>and then didn't put it in the indictment. That would

0:19:38.320 --> 0:19:43.240
<v Speaker 1>be very strange. So I suspect that he probably violated

0:19:43.280 --> 0:19:46.000
<v Speaker 1>the law in the grand jury which will be an

0:19:46.000 --> 0:19:48.200
<v Speaker 1>issue in the pre trial motions. We're going to take

0:19:48.200 --> 0:19:54.760
<v Speaker 1>a quick commercial break more with Andy McCarthy. The Feds

0:19:54.800 --> 0:19:59.240
<v Speaker 1>decided not to pursue campaign finance charges regarding these payments.

0:19:59.400 --> 0:20:02.120
<v Speaker 1>Do you know why and does that mean anything for

0:20:02.200 --> 0:20:05.280
<v Speaker 1>this case that Trump's facing out of New York City? Yeah? So,

0:20:05.320 --> 0:20:08.040
<v Speaker 1>I think that the way the Southern District of New York,

0:20:08.040 --> 0:20:11.760
<v Speaker 1>which is my old office in the Federal Prosecutors in Manhattan,

0:20:12.160 --> 0:20:15.240
<v Speaker 1>they were trying to build a case against Trump, and

0:20:15.400 --> 0:20:17.360
<v Speaker 1>a lot has been made of the fact that they

0:20:17.440 --> 0:20:21.480
<v Speaker 1>got Michael Cohen to plead guilty to two charges of

0:20:22.320 --> 0:20:26.800
<v Speaker 1>campaign finance fraud in connection with these payments. One was

0:20:26.880 --> 0:20:30.119
<v Speaker 1>for Stormy Daniels, the other was for the other woman involved,

0:20:31.040 --> 0:20:34.920
<v Speaker 1>Karen McDougall, who Trump also is. Allegedly had a fling

0:20:34.960 --> 0:20:37.399
<v Speaker 1>with like in two thousand and six two thousand and seven,

0:20:37.440 --> 0:20:40.480
<v Speaker 1>and she was paid one hundred and fifty thousand dollars

0:20:40.520 --> 0:20:44.040
<v Speaker 1>at least in value. But the reason they haven't charged

0:20:44.080 --> 0:20:49.040
<v Speaker 1>that transaction is no money changed hands involving Trump and

0:20:49.119 --> 0:20:51.800
<v Speaker 1>the Trump people. Rather, what happened in that case was

0:20:52.240 --> 0:20:54.920
<v Speaker 1>she was paid one hundred and fifty thousand dollars by

0:20:55.000 --> 0:20:59.240
<v Speaker 1>Trump's friends at the National Enquirer for the exclusive rights

0:20:59.280 --> 0:21:04.119
<v Speaker 1>to her story, and Trump Cohen, and Cohen was supposed

0:21:04.160 --> 0:21:08.040
<v Speaker 1>to reimburse the National Choir and then Trump would have

0:21:08.040 --> 0:21:12.439
<v Speaker 1>reimbursed Cohen, except the National Inquirer decided it was the

0:21:12.480 --> 0:21:15.200
<v Speaker 1>better part of valor that they just eat that expense

0:21:15.240 --> 0:21:19.760
<v Speaker 1>and not take it from Cohen. So ultimately the only

0:21:20.240 --> 0:21:24.560
<v Speaker 1>value that changed hands was between the National Choir and McDougall.

0:21:24.640 --> 0:21:27.160
<v Speaker 1>So that's the reason Trump isn't charge with that. But

0:21:27.200 --> 0:21:34.159
<v Speaker 1>the federal prosecutors charged Cohen with that, and as a result,

0:21:34.200 --> 0:21:37.639
<v Speaker 1>you hear a lot of apologists for Bragg say that,

0:21:37.720 --> 0:21:41.000
<v Speaker 1>of course he's a campaign finance violations as to Trump,

0:21:41.560 --> 0:21:45.800
<v Speaker 1>because Cohen already played guilty to them. And what I

0:21:45.840 --> 0:21:49.440
<v Speaker 1>think people need to understand about that is Cohen played

0:21:49.480 --> 0:21:53.160
<v Speaker 1>guilty because the Southern District had him over a barrel.

0:21:54.720 --> 0:21:57.400
<v Speaker 1>They had a big fraud case on Cohen. He had

0:21:57.440 --> 0:22:00.720
<v Speaker 1>a bank fraud charge which in federal laws thirty year

0:22:00.800 --> 0:22:05.399
<v Speaker 1>count involving a multimillion dollars line of credit, and he

0:22:05.480 --> 0:22:09.800
<v Speaker 1>had five tax evasion charges that involved four million dollars

0:22:09.840 --> 0:22:13.200
<v Speaker 1>of undeclared income. So he was looking at a lot

0:22:13.240 --> 0:22:15.600
<v Speaker 1>of time in prison. He wasn't going to get anything

0:22:15.640 --> 0:22:18.080
<v Speaker 1>close to thirty years, but he might have gotten seven

0:22:18.200 --> 0:22:21.800
<v Speaker 1>or eight years in prison for this, And like most

0:22:21.960 --> 0:22:26.359
<v Speaker 1>defendants who are in that position, his only way out

0:22:27.000 --> 0:22:30.760
<v Speaker 1>was to cooperate with the government in making other cases,

0:22:31.119 --> 0:22:34.600
<v Speaker 1>because then under the federal sentencing guidelines, the prosecutors can

0:22:34.640 --> 0:22:39.240
<v Speaker 1>files what's a motion that's available under the guidelines, which

0:22:39.280 --> 0:22:42.280
<v Speaker 1>gives the court the authority to sentence the guide to

0:22:42.400 --> 0:22:47.119
<v Speaker 1>no time or much less time than the sentencing guidelines prescribe.

0:22:47.640 --> 0:22:52.840
<v Speaker 1>So Cohn's problem is that all of these fraud counts

0:22:52.880 --> 0:22:55.600
<v Speaker 1>that he was involved and don't implicate Trump at all.

0:22:55.600 --> 0:22:58.760
<v Speaker 1>This was his own business that he was involved in

0:22:58.760 --> 0:23:02.200
<v Speaker 1>in New York, and the Southern District wanted to build

0:23:02.200 --> 0:23:05.320
<v Speaker 1>a case against Trump. The only thing they had on

0:23:05.400 --> 0:23:10.719
<v Speaker 1>Trump that involved Cohen were these two hush money arrangements,

0:23:11.160 --> 0:23:14.720
<v Speaker 1>so they got Cohen to plead guilty to those two counts.

0:23:14.760 --> 0:23:17.240
<v Speaker 1>I think the reason Cohen agreed to do it is

0:23:18.080 --> 0:23:22.680
<v Speaker 1>the fraud counts against him were so severe that the

0:23:22.720 --> 0:23:27.439
<v Speaker 1>campaign finance counts, which were comparatively from minor amounts of money,

0:23:27.840 --> 0:23:31.440
<v Speaker 1>did not add anything to his sentencing. Exposure. It didn't

0:23:31.520 --> 0:23:34.600
<v Speaker 1>change what his sentence would have been at all, So

0:23:34.640 --> 0:23:38.760
<v Speaker 1>all it was was adding two more counts onto a

0:23:38.840 --> 0:23:41.280
<v Speaker 1>laundry list of things he was already going to plead

0:23:41.280 --> 0:23:44.760
<v Speaker 1>guilty to. It didn't add any time, So from his perspective,

0:23:45.160 --> 0:23:48.280
<v Speaker 1>all it did was make him a more attractive witness

0:23:48.760 --> 0:23:52.200
<v Speaker 1>because he was willing to say that Trump was implicated

0:23:52.240 --> 0:23:57.520
<v Speaker 1>in these campaign finance violations. And from the Southern District standpoint,

0:23:57.560 --> 0:23:59.919
<v Speaker 1>it was a no lose proposition because they're trying to

0:24:00.000 --> 0:24:03.320
<v Speaker 1>build a case against Trump. When Cohane pleaded guilty, that

0:24:03.400 --> 0:24:05.960
<v Speaker 1>meant the case would never be tried, so the campaign

0:24:06.040 --> 0:24:10.000
<v Speaker 1>finance violations would never be challenged. And in pleading guilty,

0:24:10.040 --> 0:24:12.320
<v Speaker 1>you waive your right to appeal, so the Southern District

0:24:12.400 --> 0:24:14.639
<v Speaker 1>was never going to have to defend those charges on appeal,

0:24:15.080 --> 0:24:18.480
<v Speaker 1>So everybody wins right. And what they were trying to

0:24:18.480 --> 0:24:21.520
<v Speaker 1>do was build a case on Trump. You asked me,

0:24:21.600 --> 0:24:23.840
<v Speaker 1>why didn't they bring this case after all, if they

0:24:23.880 --> 0:24:25.960
<v Speaker 1>got Cohen to plead guilty to it wind up bringing

0:24:25.920 --> 0:24:28.720
<v Speaker 1>it against Trump. And the answer is because in the end,

0:24:28.760 --> 0:24:32.919
<v Speaker 1>they're not really inkind donations. And I think the Southern

0:24:32.960 --> 0:24:37.000
<v Speaker 1>District and the Justice Department understand understood that if somebody

0:24:37.040 --> 0:24:41.320
<v Speaker 1>actually challenged these in court, as you know, are they

0:24:41.480 --> 0:24:44.760
<v Speaker 1>as a matter of law in kind campaign donations, they

0:24:44.760 --> 0:24:47.200
<v Speaker 1>would have lost and it would have been humiliating. So

0:24:47.240 --> 0:24:49.080
<v Speaker 1>they decided if they were going to make a case

0:24:49.880 --> 0:24:51.720
<v Speaker 1>on a man who was then the President of the

0:24:51.800 --> 0:24:55.919
<v Speaker 1>United States. I think everybody should agree with this. If

0:24:55.960 --> 0:24:58.200
<v Speaker 1>you're going to bring a case like that, it should

0:24:58.200 --> 0:25:01.399
<v Speaker 1>be a very obvious, very serious, this crime that's backed

0:25:01.400 --> 0:25:03.960
<v Speaker 1>by very convincing evidence, and they knew they didn't have that,

0:25:04.080 --> 0:25:06.240
<v Speaker 1>so they didn't bring the case. And a lot of

0:25:06.240 --> 0:25:08.800
<v Speaker 1>people when I point that out, a lot of people say, well,

0:25:09.200 --> 0:25:12.800
<v Speaker 1>that was the Trump Justice Department. And what I would

0:25:12.840 --> 0:25:15.560
<v Speaker 1>say about that is, you know, number one, the Southern

0:25:15.560 --> 0:25:19.000
<v Speaker 1>District of New York is famously renegade when it comes

0:25:19.000 --> 0:25:23.160
<v Speaker 1>to political corruption cases. They've done a lot of them

0:25:23.760 --> 0:25:27.200
<v Speaker 1>in defiance of what the Justice Department wanted them to do.

0:25:27.640 --> 0:25:32.080
<v Speaker 1>But even if that weren't the case. I don't know

0:25:32.119 --> 0:25:34.439
<v Speaker 1>if this is late breaking news for people or not,

0:25:34.520 --> 0:25:40.320
<v Speaker 1>but as of January twentieth, twenty seventeen, twenty twenty one,

0:25:41.080 --> 0:25:43.720
<v Speaker 1>the Justice Department's been under new management. You know, the

0:25:43.760 --> 0:25:48.520
<v Speaker 1>Biden administration. You've noticed, so we noticed, Yeah, I know

0:25:48.640 --> 0:25:50.880
<v Speaker 1>it haven't we ever, but you know, I mean they've

0:25:50.880 --> 0:25:52.840
<v Speaker 1>had twenty seven months to bring a case if it

0:25:52.920 --> 0:25:55.760
<v Speaker 1>was there, and we also know, Lisa, Look, they're scorching

0:25:55.800 --> 0:25:57.280
<v Speaker 1>the earth. To me, it's not like they don't want

0:25:57.280 --> 0:25:59.400
<v Speaker 1>to make a case against Trump, right, They're going on them.

0:25:59.560 --> 0:26:02.400
<v Speaker 1>They're going after him on January sixth. They're going after

0:26:02.480 --> 0:26:04.879
<v Speaker 1>him and I think probably going to get him on

0:26:05.080 --> 0:26:09.280
<v Speaker 1>the documents case, which they've they're now sort of pitching

0:26:09.320 --> 0:26:13.640
<v Speaker 1>as a grand jury obstruction case rather than documents retention.

0:26:14.000 --> 0:26:16.040
<v Speaker 1>But we know they're trying very hard to make a

0:26:16.040 --> 0:26:19.320
<v Speaker 1>case against Trump. They didn't bring this one because legally

0:26:19.359 --> 0:26:22.479
<v Speaker 1>it just doesn't add up. Also, the documents, though, seems

0:26:22.600 --> 0:26:25.399
<v Speaker 1>rather unfair because you know, my understanding is a president

0:26:25.520 --> 0:26:28.280
<v Speaker 1>ultimately has the authority and so it's sort of gray

0:26:28.359 --> 0:26:31.919
<v Speaker 1>area in terms of, you know, if he declassified or not.

0:26:32.080 --> 0:26:34.359
<v Speaker 1>And then it seems like every president has some sort

0:26:34.359 --> 0:26:37.200
<v Speaker 1>of back and forth in terms of turning over records

0:26:37.320 --> 0:26:40.359
<v Speaker 1>or is probably you know, guilty of this. Whereas you know,

0:26:40.440 --> 0:26:43.400
<v Speaker 1>Joe Biden in the Senate to take stake documents out

0:26:43.400 --> 0:26:46.440
<v Speaker 1>of a skiff is like you're like malice, like actual

0:26:46.480 --> 0:26:48.720
<v Speaker 1>malice to you know, to have done that as opposed

0:26:48.760 --> 0:26:52.200
<v Speaker 1>to you know, just accidentally bringing stuff with you. I'm

0:26:52.200 --> 0:26:55.080
<v Speaker 1>not the most organized person, so probably best for me

0:26:55.119 --> 0:26:56.719
<v Speaker 1>not to be a president because I would totally do

0:26:56.760 --> 0:27:00.440
<v Speaker 1>that by accidents. So yeah, but I've never had classified auguments.

0:27:00.440 --> 0:27:02.240
<v Speaker 1>For the record, I also did not rob the bank.

0:27:02.280 --> 0:27:05.280
<v Speaker 1>So just to be clear in case anyone's listening, you know,

0:27:05.440 --> 0:27:10.280
<v Speaker 1>so covering committed any exactly, you just gotta laid out there,

0:27:10.320 --> 0:27:13.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, better be safe than than sorry here in

0:27:13.080 --> 0:27:15.879
<v Speaker 1>this environment, um, you know, and so obviously you know

0:27:15.880 --> 0:27:17.879
<v Speaker 1>they're laying out the thirty four accounts to try to

0:27:17.880 --> 0:27:19.800
<v Speaker 1>stack the deck in the event that it makes it

0:27:19.840 --> 0:27:21.880
<v Speaker 1>easier to try to lay on one. So his next

0:27:21.920 --> 0:27:27.640
<v Speaker 1>in person hearing is in December? What options does Donald

0:27:27.640 --> 0:27:30.840
<v Speaker 1>Trump have in front of him before that date, Kenn,

0:27:30.840 --> 0:27:32.520
<v Speaker 1>he try to get this thrown out? What you know,

0:27:32.560 --> 0:27:34.920
<v Speaker 1>what is the appeals process? Like, what's next for team

0:27:34.960 --> 0:27:37.119
<v Speaker 1>Trump in this? You think that's a great question. I

0:27:37.160 --> 0:27:42.440
<v Speaker 1>think that I wouldn't fault them for not immediately moving

0:27:42.480 --> 0:27:47.280
<v Speaker 1>to dismiss the indictment, because unlike the way it worked

0:27:47.280 --> 0:27:50.880
<v Speaker 1>when I was a federal prosecutor back in the Stone Age.

0:27:53.040 --> 0:27:55.920
<v Speaker 1>They didn't get the indictment the lawyers until they were

0:27:55.920 --> 0:28:00.280
<v Speaker 1>in court on was a Tuesday afternoon, so you know,

0:28:00.280 --> 0:28:03.080
<v Speaker 1>it wasn't until like two thirty Eastern time Tuesday afternoon

0:28:03.080 --> 0:28:04.720
<v Speaker 1>that they even saw this thing. So I don't think

0:28:04.720 --> 0:28:07.959
<v Speaker 1>that they should be faulted for not having done anything

0:28:08.000 --> 0:28:10.359
<v Speaker 1>there and then. But now that they've had a chance

0:28:10.400 --> 0:28:15.320
<v Speaker 1>to digest it, I would go into court. They have

0:28:15.400 --> 0:28:17.840
<v Speaker 1>a motion schedule, I think for the moment that you know,

0:28:18.320 --> 0:28:21.840
<v Speaker 1>that court is very congested in cases move very slowly,

0:28:21.920 --> 0:28:24.440
<v Speaker 1>So what the judge did the other day was set

0:28:24.440 --> 0:28:27.640
<v Speaker 1>a motion schedule. The government's supposed to start making discovery

0:28:27.760 --> 0:28:33.600
<v Speaker 1>right away. Trump has until August to make pre trial motions,

0:28:33.640 --> 0:28:37.760
<v Speaker 1>including motions to dismiss the indictment. The state has about

0:28:38.200 --> 0:28:40.320
<v Speaker 1>I think six or eight weeks to respond to that,

0:28:40.360 --> 0:28:42.040
<v Speaker 1>and then the next time they're all supposed to be

0:28:42.080 --> 0:28:44.800
<v Speaker 1>in court again is December, which just seems eight months

0:28:44.800 --> 0:28:47.440
<v Speaker 1>from now. It just seems ridiculous. But if I were

0:28:47.480 --> 0:28:51.000
<v Speaker 1>Trump's lawyers, I would try to get under the judge's toes. Now,

0:28:51.240 --> 0:28:52.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean I would, now that you've had a chance

0:28:52.960 --> 0:28:55.800
<v Speaker 1>to read this thing. I would go in and simply argue,

0:28:55.840 --> 0:28:58.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, look, the indictment fails to state a crime,

0:28:59.280 --> 0:29:01.680
<v Speaker 1>so we shouldn't even be here because they have to

0:29:01.680 --> 0:29:04.720
<v Speaker 1>state a crime before you can start a criminal proceeding.

0:29:05.440 --> 0:29:10.000
<v Speaker 1>And I would also be arguing that he seems to

0:29:10.040 --> 0:29:13.640
<v Speaker 1>be trying to say that he can enforce federal campaign

0:29:13.760 --> 0:29:17.520
<v Speaker 1>finance law, and my hook to try to get the

0:29:17.600 --> 0:29:20.160
<v Speaker 1>judge to move on this and go quickly would be

0:29:20.200 --> 0:29:26.960
<v Speaker 1>a twofold argument. One would be, this is a state proceeding,

0:29:27.040 --> 0:29:32.760
<v Speaker 1>but it's got enormous consequence for national electoral politics, and

0:29:32.880 --> 0:29:35.400
<v Speaker 1>it shouldn't be allowed to hang over the country if

0:29:35.440 --> 0:29:37.680
<v Speaker 1>there isn't a case here. You know, It's one thing

0:29:37.720 --> 0:29:40.120
<v Speaker 1>if Bragg stated a serious crime and it looked like

0:29:40.120 --> 0:29:42.600
<v Speaker 1>he could prove it, then you would just have to

0:29:43.120 --> 0:29:45.240
<v Speaker 1>go through with that. But here it doesn't look like

0:29:45.280 --> 0:29:47.760
<v Speaker 1>he has a crime at all, much less much evidence.

0:29:48.240 --> 0:29:51.480
<v Speaker 1>So I would try to push them on that end.

0:29:51.560 --> 0:29:53.440
<v Speaker 1>And then the other thing I'd say to them, Lisa,

0:29:53.600 --> 0:30:00.360
<v Speaker 1>is because he's purporting to be able to enforce federal

0:30:00.880 --> 0:30:04.120
<v Speaker 1>campaign finance law, although at least we think he is,

0:30:05.920 --> 0:30:09.040
<v Speaker 1>and the statutes of New York law do not allow

0:30:09.160 --> 0:30:12.760
<v Speaker 1>him to do that. I would signal to the judge

0:30:12.760 --> 0:30:16.239
<v Speaker 1>in New York that if they don't get satisfaction here,

0:30:16.240 --> 0:30:18.960
<v Speaker 1>they're going to go into federal court and say that

0:30:19.360 --> 0:30:23.240
<v Speaker 1>make an argument that the Manhattan District Attorney, who doesn't

0:30:23.240 --> 0:30:26.160
<v Speaker 1>have jurisdiction to enforce these criminal laws, is trying to

0:30:26.200 --> 0:30:28.880
<v Speaker 1>do that. And I think the reason you do that is,

0:30:30.040 --> 0:30:32.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, you try to nudge this judge into taking action.

0:30:33.040 --> 0:30:35.640
<v Speaker 1>You know this thing he's got right now, he's got

0:30:35.680 --> 0:30:38.000
<v Speaker 1>it on the slow train, and I think you want

0:30:38.080 --> 0:30:41.560
<v Speaker 1>him to move on it. And judges, what tends to

0:30:41.600 --> 0:30:45.320
<v Speaker 1>get judges attention and get them to move faster is

0:30:45.320 --> 0:30:48.320
<v Speaker 1>the prospect of their work being checked by a different court.

0:30:48.880 --> 0:30:50.960
<v Speaker 1>So that's what I do. We're going to take a

0:30:51.000 --> 0:30:53.920
<v Speaker 1>quick commercial break, and then Andy's going to continue breaking

0:30:53.960 --> 0:31:01.160
<v Speaker 1>down the indictment against Donald Trump. This a judge specifically

0:31:01.400 --> 0:31:07.400
<v Speaker 1>has donated two Democrats in twenty including that of Joe Biden.

0:31:07.400 --> 0:31:11.080
<v Speaker 1>Now they're not big donations, but their donations nonetheless, does

0:31:11.120 --> 0:31:14.480
<v Speaker 1>that increase his probability if this judge denies him the

0:31:14.480 --> 0:31:16.440
<v Speaker 1>ability to try to throw this out, to take it

0:31:16.520 --> 0:31:19.800
<v Speaker 1>beyond that and saying, not only have I faced you know,

0:31:20.160 --> 0:31:23.800
<v Speaker 1>a corruption from the Manhattan DA, but also a bias

0:31:24.000 --> 0:31:26.840
<v Speaker 1>judge who, you know, one could argue maybe should even

0:31:26.840 --> 0:31:30.240
<v Speaker 1>recuse himself in this instance. He's already demonstrated a bias

0:31:30.240 --> 0:31:33.360
<v Speaker 1>against Trump in the donations that he's made. Yeah, at Lisa,

0:31:33.400 --> 0:31:37.160
<v Speaker 1>I think that the one motion that Joe Takapina, who

0:31:37.240 --> 0:31:41.600
<v Speaker 1>is one of Trump's lawyers, has talked about publicly already

0:31:42.240 --> 0:31:45.760
<v Speaker 1>is selective prosecution. And I think that they are going

0:31:45.800 --> 0:31:49.680
<v Speaker 1>to take the background facts about the judge that you

0:31:49.800 --> 0:31:54.400
<v Speaker 1>just laid out in conjunction with the fact that Bragg

0:31:54.480 --> 0:31:57.440
<v Speaker 1>brings this case against Trump which he wouldn't bring against

0:31:57.480 --> 0:32:01.040
<v Speaker 1>anyone else. As I've been saying all along, I think

0:32:02.000 --> 0:32:05.520
<v Speaker 1>we call Bragg the district attorney because that's his title,

0:32:06.720 --> 0:32:08.600
<v Speaker 1>but we really shouldn't look at him as a law

0:32:08.680 --> 0:32:13.000
<v Speaker 1>enforcement official. We should look at him as a progressive

0:32:13.160 --> 0:32:17.520
<v Speaker 1>Democrat who's been elected to office on a campaign to

0:32:17.680 --> 0:32:22.000
<v Speaker 1>go after this one guy. I mean, basically, Bragg's pitch

0:32:22.120 --> 0:32:24.959
<v Speaker 1>to voters in New York was two things. One, if

0:32:25.440 --> 0:32:29.320
<v Speaker 1>you elect me, I won't enforce the law which his

0:32:29.440 --> 0:32:32.840
<v Speaker 1>progressive bases likes. And as a result, but he's more

0:32:32.840 --> 0:32:35.920
<v Speaker 1>famous for in New York is taking actual felonies and

0:32:37.040 --> 0:32:40.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, degrading them to misdemeanors or not prosecuting them

0:32:40.360 --> 0:32:43.360
<v Speaker 1>at all. So it's very rich that here he's taken

0:32:43.600 --> 0:32:48.240
<v Speaker 1>something that's a trivial misdemeanor, if it's even that, and

0:32:48.360 --> 0:32:52.719
<v Speaker 1>try to inflate it into a felony. But you know,

0:32:53.080 --> 0:32:58.920
<v Speaker 1>he campaigned on getting Trump, which is unseemly for a prosecutor,

0:32:59.360 --> 0:33:02.959
<v Speaker 1>and they and the voters of Manhattan elected him on

0:33:03.000 --> 0:33:05.920
<v Speaker 1>the promise to get Trump. So I think both those

0:33:05.960 --> 0:33:09.120
<v Speaker 1>things go into the mix when Trump brings his motion

0:33:09.480 --> 0:33:14.200
<v Speaker 1>that this is an unconstitutional selective prosecution. You have the judge,

0:33:14.720 --> 0:33:17.520
<v Speaker 1>you have the prosecutor, and you have the jury pool,

0:33:18.160 --> 0:33:19.920
<v Speaker 1>which you all seem to have it in for him.

0:33:20.840 --> 0:33:23.280
<v Speaker 1>You know, he'll have to make the case on the judge,

0:33:23.280 --> 0:33:27.840
<v Speaker 1>and you know, Trump is saying very aggressive things about

0:33:27.880 --> 0:33:31.600
<v Speaker 1>the judge who has handled other cases involving the Trump organization.

0:33:31.960 --> 0:33:34.360
<v Speaker 1>Trump's lawyer is, on the other hand, are saying very

0:33:34.400 --> 0:33:38.000
<v Speaker 1>different things about the judge and that, like, you know,

0:33:38.040 --> 0:33:40.600
<v Speaker 1>they don't think that there's a basis, at least at

0:33:40.600 --> 0:33:43.600
<v Speaker 1>this point to say that he's unfair. But we'll have

0:33:43.640 --> 0:33:46.280
<v Speaker 1>to see how he handles the case and how that unfolds.

0:33:46.560 --> 0:33:48.680
<v Speaker 1>But if I'm Trump, the argument I make is not

0:33:48.760 --> 0:33:51.440
<v Speaker 1>just based on the judge, or even just based on Bragg,

0:33:51.720 --> 0:33:54.520
<v Speaker 1>or even based on the jury pool. I would I

0:33:54.800 --> 0:33:56.800
<v Speaker 1>bring the whole thing together and just say, you know,

0:33:56.840 --> 0:33:59.080
<v Speaker 1>there's no way that this is a fair proceeding. Well,

0:33:59.160 --> 0:34:01.640
<v Speaker 1>and obviously they the concern at all of this is,

0:34:01.840 --> 0:34:04.239
<v Speaker 1>you know, we're talking about a liberal city and a

0:34:04.240 --> 0:34:06.959
<v Speaker 1>liberal state, with liberal judges, with a jury of your

0:34:06.960 --> 0:34:10.000
<v Speaker 1>peers or probably a bunch of liberals, and you know,

0:34:10.040 --> 0:34:12.120
<v Speaker 1>so a lot of people are concerned, you know, can

0:34:12.160 --> 0:34:16.040
<v Speaker 1>he get a fair shake in that environment? In your estimation,

0:34:16.200 --> 0:34:18.480
<v Speaker 1>with your experience of having been in the you know,

0:34:18.480 --> 0:34:20.560
<v Speaker 1>the Southern District of New York on the federal level,

0:34:20.600 --> 0:34:23.279
<v Speaker 1>but you know, kind of understanding the court system in

0:34:23.320 --> 0:34:26.879
<v Speaker 1>the state of New York, what happens with this? How

0:34:26.920 --> 0:34:29.640
<v Speaker 1>does this go down? Do you think I think it

0:34:29.680 --> 0:34:32.840
<v Speaker 1>gets thrown out prior to trial. I don't think this

0:34:32.920 --> 0:34:35.040
<v Speaker 1>case ever gets tride. Do you think he can get

0:34:35.080 --> 0:34:37.960
<v Speaker 1>a fair shake? Yeah, I think if the judge, you know,

0:34:38.040 --> 0:34:40.080
<v Speaker 1>I don't think we should jump to the conclusion that

0:34:40.120 --> 0:34:43.560
<v Speaker 1>the judge is unfair. You know, It's one thing to

0:34:43.640 --> 0:34:47.480
<v Speaker 1>say that, you know, he has political preferences. Everybody in

0:34:47.520 --> 0:34:51.759
<v Speaker 1>New York has political preferences. It's another thing to say

0:34:51.800 --> 0:34:53.879
<v Speaker 1>that he won't do his job right and that this

0:34:53.920 --> 0:34:59.399
<v Speaker 1>seems to be an egregious set of legal flaws with

0:34:59.480 --> 0:35:03.880
<v Speaker 1>respect to this particular indictment. And Lisa, let's remember, even

0:35:03.920 --> 0:35:07.520
<v Speaker 1>the left wing commentariat is out there saying, oh boy,

0:35:07.719 --> 0:35:11.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, Bragg really laid an egg here. So it's

0:35:11.000 --> 0:35:13.680
<v Speaker 1>not like the judge would be the first person on

0:35:13.719 --> 0:35:17.080
<v Speaker 1>the political left of center if you threw this case

0:35:17.120 --> 0:35:18.760
<v Speaker 1>out to say that there are a lot of problems

0:35:19.280 --> 0:35:22.080
<v Speaker 1>with this case. The other thing I would just point

0:35:22.080 --> 0:35:25.120
<v Speaker 1>out to people is that, you know, we're looking at

0:35:25.120 --> 0:35:27.680
<v Speaker 1>this case in a vacuum at the moment because it's

0:35:27.680 --> 0:35:29.840
<v Speaker 1>the only one in front of us. But by the

0:35:29.880 --> 0:35:31.799
<v Speaker 1>time we come back eight months from now, I think

0:35:31.800 --> 0:35:33.759
<v Speaker 1>even eight weeks from now, this could be a very

0:35:33.840 --> 0:35:37.439
<v Speaker 1>different situation. I mean, you know, I think by May

0:35:37.800 --> 0:35:42.520
<v Speaker 1>you may see charges from the prosecutor in Fulton County,

0:35:42.680 --> 0:35:46.520
<v Speaker 1>Fanny Willis, who's looking into the Georgia twenty twenty election stuff.

0:35:46.960 --> 0:35:49.680
<v Speaker 1>And it's obvious that this special council from the Justice

0:35:49.680 --> 0:35:54.480
<v Speaker 1>Department is steaming ahead. You know, this week probably the

0:35:54.520 --> 0:35:58.960
<v Speaker 1>biggest thing in terms of significance. I don't think that

0:35:59.040 --> 0:36:03.000
<v Speaker 1>the brag case is much but in terms of future

0:36:03.040 --> 0:36:05.960
<v Speaker 1>significance for Trump, maybe the most important thing that's happening

0:36:06.000 --> 0:36:10.200
<v Speaker 1>this week is is Jack Smith, the Special Counsel, is

0:36:10.239 --> 0:36:14.800
<v Speaker 1>putting Secret Service agents in the grand jury on Friday

0:36:16.040 --> 0:36:21.160
<v Speaker 1>to testify about what they observed in terms of Trump

0:36:21.440 --> 0:36:24.759
<v Speaker 1>looking at and reviewing documents. And it's obvious that the

0:36:24.760 --> 0:36:27.239
<v Speaker 1>reason they're doing that is to try to He's doing

0:36:27.280 --> 0:36:30.399
<v Speaker 1>that to try to help build his grand jury obstruction case.

0:36:30.400 --> 0:36:34.560
<v Speaker 1>What they want to show is that after Trump's lawyers

0:36:34.760 --> 0:36:38.120
<v Speaker 1>told the Justice Department in June of twenty twenty two

0:36:38.440 --> 0:36:40.760
<v Speaker 1>that they had done a thorough search of Mara Lago

0:36:40.960 --> 0:36:43.279
<v Speaker 1>and the thirty eight documents they gave them that day

0:36:43.280 --> 0:36:46.960
<v Speaker 1>were the only thirty eight documents with classification markings at

0:36:47.000 --> 0:36:50.640
<v Speaker 1>Mara Lago, what Smith is now trying to develop is

0:36:50.680 --> 0:36:53.960
<v Speaker 1>evidence that Trump not only knew that wasn't true, but

0:36:54.040 --> 0:36:57.560
<v Speaker 1>that he actually physically reviewed and moved documents around the

0:36:57.560 --> 0:37:01.439
<v Speaker 1>property after that. So that's clearly why he's putting the

0:37:02.160 --> 0:37:06.320
<v Speaker 1>Secret Service agents. And it's a very weighty thing. The

0:37:07.280 --> 0:37:13.000
<v Speaker 1>government hates the idea of Secret Service agents testifying against

0:37:13.000 --> 0:37:15.680
<v Speaker 1>their protectees. It makes it very difficult for the Secret

0:37:15.719 --> 0:37:20.080
<v Speaker 1>Service to do their job. That is not the kind

0:37:20.080 --> 0:37:22.680
<v Speaker 1>of thing that a prosecutor does unless he's dead serious

0:37:22.680 --> 0:37:25.279
<v Speaker 1>about making this case. And I think you can say

0:37:25.320 --> 0:37:28.880
<v Speaker 1>that for the way he's handled January six two, because

0:37:28.920 --> 0:37:32.000
<v Speaker 1>he's now you know, he's getting Mike Pence, who is

0:37:32.000 --> 0:37:36.360
<v Speaker 1>the highest ranking executive official other than Trump and the

0:37:36.360 --> 0:37:38.840
<v Speaker 1>Trump administration. He's going to have to testify in the

0:37:38.880 --> 0:37:43.879
<v Speaker 1>grand jury next week, and he's already also compelled testimony

0:37:44.520 --> 0:37:48.040
<v Speaker 1>from you know, the Chief of Staff Mark Meadows, and

0:37:48.160 --> 0:37:53.839
<v Speaker 1>other top officials in the Trump administration. The reason I

0:37:53.880 --> 0:37:57.560
<v Speaker 1>mentioned that is the Justice Department is usually in court

0:37:57.640 --> 0:38:01.000
<v Speaker 1>when these kind of things come up, arguing for a

0:38:01.120 --> 0:38:07.080
<v Speaker 1>very robust, extravagant interpretation of what the executive branch's privileges are. Here,

0:38:07.200 --> 0:38:10.520
<v Speaker 1>what's happening is they're eroding the privileges, which will be

0:38:10.560 --> 0:38:14.160
<v Speaker 1>to the detriment of Biden and all future presidents. Again,

0:38:14.400 --> 0:38:16.000
<v Speaker 1>I think it's the kind of thing they wouldn't do

0:38:16.080 --> 0:38:19.319
<v Speaker 1>unless they were dead serious about making a case. So

0:38:19.360 --> 0:38:22.280
<v Speaker 1>I think if we come back, you know, a couple

0:38:22.320 --> 0:38:25.400
<v Speaker 1>of months from now, this may not be the only case,

0:38:25.440 --> 0:38:27.960
<v Speaker 1>and we may look at this a lot differently. I

0:38:28.000 --> 0:38:30.040
<v Speaker 1>mean the left ones. I'm behind bars, you know, we

0:38:30.080 --> 0:38:33.760
<v Speaker 1>know this. And with all these criminal investigations, he's facing

0:38:33.800 --> 0:38:37.359
<v Speaker 1>the probability that has increased. What happens if he has

0:38:37.400 --> 0:38:41.560
<v Speaker 1>found guilty before the election, if that is what the

0:38:41.600 --> 0:38:44.560
<v Speaker 1>timeline would look like, or what happens if he was

0:38:44.640 --> 0:38:47.839
<v Speaker 1>to hypothetically win the election and then found guilty. Yeah,

0:38:47.880 --> 0:38:50.440
<v Speaker 1>I don't think he'll ever be found guilty before the election.

0:38:50.520 --> 0:38:52.480
<v Speaker 1>And my own view of it is for you for

0:38:52.560 --> 0:38:55.880
<v Speaker 1>what it's worth. I mean, you're not asking me to

0:38:55.880 --> 0:38:58.319
<v Speaker 1>put my political head on, but I'll put it on.

0:38:58.840 --> 0:39:01.160
<v Speaker 1>I think they want him to be the nominee, and

0:39:01.239 --> 0:39:05.239
<v Speaker 1>I think they realized that the more unfair and provocative

0:39:05.280 --> 0:39:07.840
<v Speaker 1>they are, and the more it looks like they're using

0:39:08.440 --> 0:39:11.879
<v Speaker 1>the criminal justice system as a political weapon against him,

0:39:12.760 --> 0:39:15.800
<v Speaker 1>the more it gins up the Trump base. We've already

0:39:15.840 --> 0:39:18.359
<v Speaker 1>seen this week he had his best week politically. It's

0:39:18.480 --> 0:39:20.959
<v Speaker 1>it's astonishing if you think about like all the things

0:39:20.960 --> 0:39:26.759
<v Speaker 1>that the Santis is accomplishing in Florida, you know, to

0:39:26.840 --> 0:39:30.360
<v Speaker 1>see Trump, you know, Spike ahead of him as he's done.

0:39:30.520 --> 0:39:32.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean, obviously this is just a snapshot and we'll

0:39:32.520 --> 0:39:35.719
<v Speaker 1>see how it all plays out. But you know, the

0:39:35.760 --> 0:39:39.320
<v Speaker 1>effect that this is having on the Republican electorate is

0:39:39.360 --> 0:39:43.080
<v Speaker 1>exactly what the Democrats want. So I've always thought that

0:39:43.120 --> 0:39:47.960
<v Speaker 1>they're not going to drop these indictments without thinking through timing.

0:39:48.800 --> 0:39:52.200
<v Speaker 1>And I don't see him ever going to trial or

0:39:52.239 --> 0:39:55.239
<v Speaker 1>being convicted, much less anyone trying to impose a jail

0:39:55.280 --> 0:40:01.120
<v Speaker 1>sentence before at least before he's tied up the Republican nomination.

0:40:02.120 --> 0:40:04.680
<v Speaker 1>That's what they want. They like, the Democrats, like the

0:40:04.719 --> 0:40:09.600
<v Speaker 1>havoc that this is wreaking in Republican politics. As for

0:40:09.680 --> 0:40:12.840
<v Speaker 1>what happens if he gets, you know, indicted or convicted,

0:40:13.680 --> 0:40:16.799
<v Speaker 1>you know, the Constitution says that the only qualifications for

0:40:16.880 --> 0:40:19.839
<v Speaker 1>president are that you be over the age of thirty five,

0:40:20.960 --> 0:40:24.160
<v Speaker 1>a natural board citizen, and resident in the United States

0:40:24.160 --> 0:40:27.719
<v Speaker 1>for fourteen years. That's it. There's nothing in the Constitution

0:40:27.760 --> 0:40:32.279
<v Speaker 1>that says that the American people can't elect not only

0:40:32.440 --> 0:40:35.080
<v Speaker 1>somebody who's accused of a crime, but somebody who's convicted

0:40:35.080 --> 0:40:40.080
<v Speaker 1>of a crime and in prison. Now, you obviously, if

0:40:40.080 --> 0:40:44.799
<v Speaker 1>a person couldn't perform the functions of the presidency for

0:40:44.840 --> 0:40:49.840
<v Speaker 1>whatever reason, it would be incumbent on Congress to impeach

0:40:49.840 --> 0:40:53.319
<v Speaker 1>and remove and disqualify the person. But you know, we're

0:40:53.360 --> 0:40:55.319
<v Speaker 1>a long way from that. There's nothing that says that

0:40:55.360 --> 0:41:02.440
<v Speaker 1>he can't be nominated, elected, and served while he's under investigation, indictment,

0:41:02.600 --> 0:41:05.359
<v Speaker 1>or even I think they would probably if he got

0:41:05.360 --> 0:41:08.400
<v Speaker 1>elected and he hadn't been tried yet. I think the

0:41:08.480 --> 0:41:11.480
<v Speaker 1>courts would probably suspend the trials until after his term

0:41:11.560 --> 0:41:14.400
<v Speaker 1>was over. But you know, anyone tells you, Lisa that

0:41:14.440 --> 0:41:16.600
<v Speaker 1>they know what's going to happen here is either lying

0:41:16.719 --> 0:41:19.400
<v Speaker 1>or delusional because we've never been here before and nobody

0:41:19.440 --> 0:41:22.239
<v Speaker 1>knows what's going to happen. What is the probability in

0:41:22.280 --> 0:41:25.319
<v Speaker 1>your mind of them landing a conviction on either the

0:41:25.480 --> 0:41:28.520
<v Speaker 1>federal charges he's facing, the charges out of New York

0:41:28.600 --> 0:41:32.640
<v Speaker 1>or or Fulton, Georgia. I think I don't like the

0:41:32.719 --> 0:41:35.800
<v Speaker 1>January sixth case, but I think Smith is pretty serious

0:41:35.840 --> 0:41:37.960
<v Speaker 1>about bringing it. I don't like it because it's you know,

0:41:38.000 --> 0:41:40.200
<v Speaker 1>he's probably going to charge him if he brings a

0:41:40.280 --> 0:41:46.720
<v Speaker 1>case with conspiring to obstruct Congress's ratification of Biden's election.

0:41:48.520 --> 0:41:50.319
<v Speaker 1>The only way I think he can do that is

0:41:50.320 --> 0:41:53.960
<v Speaker 1>by criminalizing a legal theory, which, even if it's a

0:41:54.000 --> 0:41:57.319
<v Speaker 1>bone headed legal theory, I think that's a road we

0:41:57.320 --> 0:41:59.120
<v Speaker 1>don't want to go down. When I was a prosecutor,

0:41:59.160 --> 0:42:01.560
<v Speaker 1>if a frivolous eagle theory is now going to be

0:42:01.600 --> 0:42:05.399
<v Speaker 1>a felony, I could have charged five of them a day.

0:42:05.440 --> 0:42:08.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean, defense lawyers are very creative with some of

0:42:08.160 --> 0:42:10.520
<v Speaker 1>the stuff they come up with. So I hope he

0:42:10.560 --> 0:42:13.640
<v Speaker 1>doesn't go there, but he may go there. The strongest case,

0:42:13.920 --> 0:42:18.479
<v Speaker 1>least it seems to me, is the documents case, which

0:42:18.520 --> 0:42:22.080
<v Speaker 1>would be presented as a documents case except for the

0:42:22.120 --> 0:42:25.319
<v Speaker 1>political inconvenience that it turns out that Biden also is

0:42:25.360 --> 0:42:32.080
<v Speaker 1>a serial hoarder of classified documents illegally. So now what

0:42:32.160 --> 0:42:36.120
<v Speaker 1>you have seen happen, and I think this was pretty predictable.

0:42:36.600 --> 0:42:40.800
<v Speaker 1>The minute that it became obvious that Biden also hoarded

0:42:40.840 --> 0:42:46.480
<v Speaker 1>classified documents, the prosecutor, the Justice Department, the Biden administration,

0:42:46.480 --> 0:42:52.040
<v Speaker 1>and the media Democrat complex has reframed that case from

0:42:52.080 --> 0:42:56.120
<v Speaker 1>a document retention case to a grand jury obstruction case.

0:42:56.440 --> 0:42:59.560
<v Speaker 1>And what they're going to argue is that the difference

0:42:59.600 --> 0:43:03.560
<v Speaker 1>in the two situations and what justifies prosecuting Trump but

0:43:03.640 --> 0:43:09.879
<v Speaker 1>not trust prosecuting Biden. Is that Biden cooperated with the authorities,

0:43:09.880 --> 0:43:12.759
<v Speaker 1>whereas Trump obstructed the grand jury. I don't know if

0:43:12.760 --> 0:43:15.080
<v Speaker 1>that's going to work as a public relations strategy, but

0:43:15.160 --> 0:43:17.839
<v Speaker 1>that's their story and they're sticking to it. And I

0:43:17.920 --> 0:43:20.279
<v Speaker 1>do think he's going to be indicted for obstructing the

0:43:20.320 --> 0:43:22.239
<v Speaker 1>grand jury. Well, so, I think you can make the

0:43:22.320 --> 0:43:25.719
<v Speaker 1>argument that he didn't because there was additional documents in

0:43:25.800 --> 0:43:27.920
<v Speaker 1>his home that he didn't make them aware of. But

0:43:28.120 --> 0:43:30.120
<v Speaker 1>I see your point in terms of legally what they

0:43:30.160 --> 0:43:32.640
<v Speaker 1>would they would try to argue. But Andy, this has

0:43:32.960 --> 0:43:36.239
<v Speaker 1>been truly fascinating. I have learned so much in this

0:43:36.280 --> 0:43:38.080
<v Speaker 1>period of time with you. I would absolutely love to

0:43:38.120 --> 0:43:39.600
<v Speaker 1>have you back on the show. You do such a

0:43:39.640 --> 0:43:42.759
<v Speaker 1>great job breaking this all down for people like me

0:43:42.800 --> 0:43:45.280
<v Speaker 1>who do not have a legal debate but doing show,

0:43:46.239 --> 0:43:49.120
<v Speaker 1>but doing so, you know, it's good for your mental

0:43:49.120 --> 0:43:53.520
<v Speaker 1>health that you didn't let them do law school to you, Lisa,

0:43:53.640 --> 0:43:56.520
<v Speaker 1>So that's good. And look at all these my dad's

0:43:56.560 --> 0:44:00.160
<v Speaker 1>look at all these crimes you haven't committed. So you know, well,

0:44:00.160 --> 0:44:02.720
<v Speaker 1>my dad's a lawyer, and I thought about it because

0:44:02.760 --> 0:44:06.280
<v Speaker 1>I you know, I kind of share his analytical nature,

0:44:06.480 --> 0:44:09.160
<v Speaker 1>but this was fascinating. You do such a great job.

0:44:09.200 --> 0:44:11.520
<v Speaker 1>I've learned so much from you, and I just truly

0:44:11.560 --> 0:44:14.120
<v Speaker 1>appreciate your time and your expertise in in this So

0:44:14.200 --> 0:44:16.360
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much. Thank you for having me appreciate it.

0:44:21.840 --> 0:44:24.680
<v Speaker 1>So is Andy McCarthy. I'm so glad he came on

0:44:24.719 --> 0:44:27.000
<v Speaker 1>the show because he does such a good job of

0:44:27.200 --> 0:44:30.360
<v Speaker 1>I think it's really hard for attorneys and particularly people

0:44:30.360 --> 0:44:34.080
<v Speaker 1>in the legal field to break things down in layman's terms,

0:44:34.360 --> 0:44:37.319
<v Speaker 1>and he's able to do that in such a take

0:44:37.360 --> 0:44:40.000
<v Speaker 1>these complex issues and make it easy for us to

0:44:40.080 --> 0:44:44.360
<v Speaker 1>understand even without having a legal degree or a legal background.

0:44:44.440 --> 0:44:46.480
<v Speaker 1>Rather so I appreciate him coming on the show. I

0:44:46.480 --> 0:44:49.680
<v Speaker 1>appreciate you guys at home for listening every Monday and Thursday,

0:44:49.680 --> 0:44:51.160
<v Speaker 1>but you can listen throughout the week. I want to

0:44:51.160 --> 0:44:53.680
<v Speaker 1>thank John Cassio, my producer, for putting the show together.

0:44:54.160 --> 0:44:54.959
<v Speaker 1>Until next time,