WEBVTT - NFL Week 2 Early Picks | Line Movement Predictions (Ep. 510)

0:00:01.120 --> 0:00:03.400
<v Speaker 1>Welcome in everybody to betting pros. It's time to place

0:00:03.440 --> 0:00:05.720
<v Speaker 1>your bets. It is me Joey Joe Pi's Apia and

0:00:05.800 --> 0:00:10.200
<v Speaker 1>this is BP ANDFL joining me the Undertaker Andrew Erickson

0:00:10.360 --> 0:00:14.200
<v Speaker 1>for week two, look ahead at some early value on

0:00:14.320 --> 0:00:16.800
<v Speaker 1>the early lines, and if you watched last week, I'm

0:00:16.800 --> 0:00:19.439
<v Speaker 1>pretty sure you did. You got a lot of help

0:00:19.480 --> 0:00:23.040
<v Speaker 1>here from us, including that Cowboys upset. Oh. I wish

0:00:23.079 --> 0:00:25.439
<v Speaker 1>we could have had the Raiders due they gave that

0:00:25.480 --> 0:00:28.680
<v Speaker 1>game away, but you can't get everything. Also, last week

0:00:28.720 --> 0:00:30.280
<v Speaker 1>we crushed some of the props. I hope you made

0:00:30.280 --> 0:00:32.640
<v Speaker 1>money on all those touchdowns that I gave you. And

0:00:32.800 --> 0:00:36.760
<v Speaker 1>of course that Daniel Jones over on the interceptions man

0:00:36.760 --> 0:00:38.960
<v Speaker 1>oh Man, Andrew Erickson, that's one that might be the

0:00:38.960 --> 0:00:41.000
<v Speaker 1>gift that keeps on giving all year. But look, our

0:00:41.080 --> 0:00:45.640
<v Speaker 1>Patriots came out as winners in week one, crushing everyone

0:00:45.760 --> 0:00:48.720
<v Speaker 1>survivor pools. There's a lot of joy that I have

0:00:48.840 --> 0:00:51.880
<v Speaker 1>in that too. That was kind of fun. Andrew, I

0:00:51.920 --> 0:00:53.640
<v Speaker 1>think we should just quit here as Pats fans. I

0:00:53.640 --> 0:00:54.960
<v Speaker 1>don't think it's gonna get any better than this.

0:00:55.040 --> 0:00:57.480
<v Speaker 2>Yes, I've already bet on the Seattle Seahawks to cover

0:00:57.520 --> 0:01:00.520
<v Speaker 2>the spread. That's the way I'm looking at us on again.

0:01:01.080 --> 0:01:04.520
<v Speaker 2>The Bengals are horrible in September. They're always horrible in September,

0:01:04.520 --> 0:01:06.040
<v Speaker 2>and it seemed like maybe this year, oh, Joe Burrow

0:01:06.120 --> 0:01:08.240
<v Speaker 2>is healthy, but then you look at him on the sideline,

0:01:08.240 --> 0:01:10.040
<v Speaker 2>he's like messing around with his wrists. We don't know

0:01:10.080 --> 0:01:11.880
<v Speaker 2>what's going on. Jamar Chase is playing f and our

0:01:11.920 --> 0:01:14.120
<v Speaker 2>practicing all year. Tie Higgins was out, so we're just

0:01:14.160 --> 0:01:16.760
<v Speaker 2>bad vibes overall from the Bengals. But the Bengals do

0:01:16.840 --> 0:01:19.720
<v Speaker 2>this every year. They just kind of sleep walk through

0:01:19.760 --> 0:01:21.759
<v Speaker 2>September and then they find a way to kind of rally,

0:01:21.959 --> 0:01:24.920
<v Speaker 2>get the troops going, get to the playoffs. So let's

0:01:24.959 --> 0:01:27.319
<v Speaker 2>not bury the Bengals quite yet, and let's not overrate

0:01:27.360 --> 0:01:28.720
<v Speaker 2>the Patriots quite yet.

0:01:28.880 --> 0:01:31.840
<v Speaker 1>No, let's definitely not do the ladder. Well, well, I

0:01:31.880 --> 0:01:34.639
<v Speaker 1>don't want to do the former either, but definitely don't

0:01:34.680 --> 0:01:37.080
<v Speaker 1>do the ladder. But we are going to look at

0:01:37.120 --> 0:01:39.280
<v Speaker 1>week two, give you our early takes on the games

0:01:39.280 --> 0:01:41.399
<v Speaker 1>and find some value if there is any on the lines.

0:01:41.440 --> 0:01:43.399
<v Speaker 1>And of course don't forget to sink your sports books

0:01:43.400 --> 0:01:45.440
<v Speaker 1>for free. Download the Betting pros app right now. Start

0:01:45.440 --> 0:01:48.600
<v Speaker 1>betting smarter, not harder, and of course talking about making

0:01:48.600 --> 0:01:52.040
<v Speaker 1>your money work for you, Draftings Sportsbook has an incredible

0:01:52.040 --> 0:01:53.880
<v Speaker 1>offer for new customers to get five bucks to get two

0:01:53.920 --> 0:01:56.640
<v Speaker 1>hundred dollars instantly in bonus bets, and you can enjoy

0:01:56.640 --> 0:02:00.560
<v Speaker 1>a one month NFL plus premium on the sign up

0:02:00.600 --> 0:02:04.560
<v Speaker 1>today at bettingpros dot com slash DraftKings, make your first deposit,

0:02:04.640 --> 0:02:07.600
<v Speaker 1>get five bucks in there, bet it and you get

0:02:07.640 --> 0:02:10.600
<v Speaker 1>two hundred dollars back in bonus bets and you can

0:02:10.639 --> 0:02:13.440
<v Speaker 1>stream more football today. More importantly, to keep making good

0:02:13.440 --> 0:02:16.440
<v Speaker 1>bets on using the Betting Pros app only at DraftKings Sportsbook.

0:02:16.600 --> 0:02:19.799
<v Speaker 1>The crown is yours, all right, let's kick things off

0:02:19.800 --> 0:02:23.079
<v Speaker 1>here Thursday night, another Barnburner two Thursdays in a row

0:02:23.200 --> 0:02:28.359
<v Speaker 1>erics and I love this Buffalo Miami. So the Bills handled,

0:02:28.400 --> 0:02:31.000
<v Speaker 1>they came back there. They were down to the Cardinals,

0:02:31.040 --> 0:02:34.280
<v Speaker 1>they came back. Miami also got dicey there for a while.

0:02:34.320 --> 0:02:36.120
<v Speaker 1>A weird start to this game too, with all the

0:02:36.200 --> 0:02:38.600
<v Speaker 1>drama ahead of time. Miami is one and a half

0:02:38.600 --> 0:02:40.440
<v Speaker 1>point favorites at home. This feels about right to me.

0:02:40.480 --> 0:02:42.920
<v Speaker 1>At minus one ten over on betting pros. The number

0:02:42.960 --> 0:02:45.280
<v Speaker 1>is fifty and a half. If you like Buffalo for

0:02:45.440 --> 0:02:48.560
<v Speaker 1>the win, here you get even money. So Josh Allen

0:02:48.880 --> 0:02:51.880
<v Speaker 1>had to take over and basically dominate in order to

0:02:51.960 --> 0:02:53.760
<v Speaker 1>get this team where they needed to be at home.

0:02:54.080 --> 0:02:56.680
<v Speaker 1>Now they're going to travel to Miami. Any early takes

0:02:56.720 --> 0:02:59.240
<v Speaker 1>or early value see on this line. I know it's

0:02:59.240 --> 0:03:00.639
<v Speaker 1>a high number with the fifty and a half, but

0:03:00.680 --> 0:03:01.959
<v Speaker 1>I feel like it's going to be an over. What

0:03:02.000 --> 0:03:02.480
<v Speaker 1>do you think?

0:03:02.639 --> 0:03:04.799
<v Speaker 2>I think these lines are pretty spot on. It's a

0:03:04.880 --> 0:03:07.280
<v Speaker 2>high total. Like you said, the spread is to Miami

0:03:07.320 --> 0:03:09.600
<v Speaker 2>because they're playing at home, But I would say the

0:03:09.600 --> 0:03:11.000
<v Speaker 2>best value is just builds money line.

0:03:11.080 --> 0:03:11.919
<v Speaker 3>I mean Josh Allen.

0:03:11.960 --> 0:03:14.359
<v Speaker 2>You saw they were down big at home and he

0:03:14.440 --> 0:03:16.960
<v Speaker 2>puts on the Superman cape and makes it happen. So

0:03:17.120 --> 0:03:19.519
<v Speaker 2>I don't see anything about Miami's defense that suggests that

0:03:19.520 --> 0:03:21.959
<v Speaker 2>they're gonna be able to stop Josh Allen in any capacity.

0:03:22.240 --> 0:03:24.320
<v Speaker 2>And as long as Tua starts hitting on more of

0:03:24.360 --> 0:03:26.320
<v Speaker 2>these throws, I don't think the Bill's defense is going

0:03:26.360 --> 0:03:26.679
<v Speaker 2>to stop.

0:03:26.720 --> 0:03:28.200
<v Speaker 3>So maybe the play is just on the over.

0:03:28.960 --> 0:03:32.200
<v Speaker 1>I don't think either defense is really stunting, to be

0:03:32.240 --> 0:03:34.440
<v Speaker 1>honest with you, and look that game could have gone

0:03:34.440 --> 0:03:36.320
<v Speaker 1>another way from Miami too. They got a huge break

0:03:36.320 --> 0:03:39.280
<v Speaker 1>in that game where it turned around. So to me,

0:03:39.360 --> 0:03:40.480
<v Speaker 1>I think the over is the way I'm going to

0:03:40.560 --> 0:03:42.640
<v Speaker 1>which is weird because it's a Thursday night game and sometimes,

0:03:42.720 --> 0:03:44.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, especially early on, those can kind of drag behind.

0:03:45.480 --> 0:03:47.400
<v Speaker 1>I don't believe in either of these defenses, so Erics

0:03:47.400 --> 0:03:49.160
<v Speaker 1>and I are in the same mind on this one.

0:03:49.240 --> 0:03:51.160
<v Speaker 1>Let's go to the next game on our list. The

0:03:51.160 --> 0:03:53.240
<v Speaker 1>Baltimore Ravens are zero to one, but that's okay. They

0:03:53.280 --> 0:03:55.080
<v Speaker 1>lost to the Chiefs. They are at home now. They

0:03:55.120 --> 0:03:56.880
<v Speaker 1>are eight and a half point favorites against the Las

0:03:56.960 --> 0:04:00.160
<v Speaker 1>Vegas Raiders. It's a lot of points, but again, the

0:04:00.240 --> 0:04:03.120
<v Speaker 1>Raiders certainly looked the man like I said they Gardner

0:04:03.120 --> 0:04:05.960
<v Speaker 1>Minshew in company just canded that game to the Chargers,

0:04:06.000 --> 0:04:07.920
<v Speaker 1>and you could tell I'm bitter about it because I

0:04:08.000 --> 0:04:10.000
<v Speaker 1>bet on them. Forty two and a half is the

0:04:10.080 --> 0:04:12.760
<v Speaker 1>number plus three twenty five for the upset for Vegas.

0:04:12.800 --> 0:04:14.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm staying away. This is one of the most heavily

0:04:14.840 --> 0:04:17.960
<v Speaker 1>favorite games of week two. Ericson, do you see any

0:04:18.000 --> 0:04:19.440
<v Speaker 1>early value here on the lines?

0:04:20.600 --> 0:04:22.279
<v Speaker 2>I think I like the under because this is a

0:04:22.279 --> 0:04:25.800
<v Speaker 2>classic spot where we look up and it's Baltimore thirty

0:04:25.839 --> 0:04:26.719
<v Speaker 2>and the Raider seven.

0:04:27.279 --> 0:04:28.800
<v Speaker 3>That's the way I kind of I see this game.

0:04:28.880 --> 0:04:29.440
<v Speaker 1>That's interesting.

0:04:29.480 --> 0:04:31.440
<v Speaker 2>So again, I just think that the Raiders is gonna

0:04:31.440 --> 0:04:34.360
<v Speaker 2>be overmatch. We've seen teams go to Baltimore and get

0:04:34.400 --> 0:04:37.599
<v Speaker 2>completely overwhelmed. Happens to the Lions last year, a Super

0:04:37.600 --> 0:04:40.840
<v Speaker 2>Bowl team. They went to Baltimore and they got whooped.

0:04:41.160 --> 0:04:43.000
<v Speaker 2>So the Raiders, again, we saw what they'd get into.

0:04:43.040 --> 0:04:45.520
<v Speaker 2>The Chargers not over impressive. We're not impressed with Gardner

0:04:45.560 --> 0:04:48.080
<v Speaker 2>Minshew and the Raiders. I mean, they do have a

0:04:48.080 --> 0:04:50.400
<v Speaker 2>good defense. They should have a good defense. So I

0:04:50.440 --> 0:04:51.960
<v Speaker 2>think it's gonna be a little scoring game. So I

0:04:52.000 --> 0:04:52.520
<v Speaker 2>take the under.

0:04:53.400 --> 0:04:56.240
<v Speaker 1>Well, considering that they gave up some huge plays there

0:04:56.240 --> 0:04:59.440
<v Speaker 1>to JK. Dobbins, they should be very worried about. Actually,

0:05:00.040 --> 0:05:01.880
<v Speaker 1>to be very worried, I would think about Dereck Henry

0:05:02.360 --> 0:05:05.480
<v Speaker 1>in this contest. So yeah, I'm with you. Eight and

0:05:05.520 --> 0:05:07.200
<v Speaker 1>a half is a big number. I think we're gonna

0:05:07.200 --> 0:05:09.320
<v Speaker 1>stay away from that. I think you're you might be

0:05:09.320 --> 0:05:11.440
<v Speaker 1>spot on there with the under. I think maybe like

0:05:11.480 --> 0:05:13.640
<v Speaker 1>a twenty seven to ten kind of a feel here

0:05:13.800 --> 0:05:15.640
<v Speaker 1>that would keep this one very much in check on

0:05:15.680 --> 0:05:18.760
<v Speaker 1>the under. Next one here the New Orleans Saints coming

0:05:18.800 --> 0:05:22.840
<v Speaker 1>out a huge win against Andrew Erickson's Carolina Panthers. The

0:05:22.960 --> 0:05:27.279
<v Speaker 1>Dallas Cowboys also undefeated after a week one butt kicking.

0:05:27.320 --> 0:05:30.320
<v Speaker 1>We told you the line was wrong, oil boy? Was it?

0:05:30.960 --> 0:05:33.559
<v Speaker 1>Dallas Cowboys at home? Six and a half point favorites

0:05:33.600 --> 0:05:35.920
<v Speaker 1>over New Orleans? That feels about right to me. I

0:05:35.960 --> 0:05:38.400
<v Speaker 1>think people are gonna overvalue maybe and see a lot

0:05:38.440 --> 0:05:41.520
<v Speaker 1>of value in New Orleans after that incredible win. But

0:05:41.520 --> 0:05:42.840
<v Speaker 1>I don't know how much we want to take out

0:05:42.880 --> 0:05:45.360
<v Speaker 1>of that. Forty five and a half is the total

0:05:45.360 --> 0:05:47.400
<v Speaker 1>plus two forty four New Orleans on the money line? Now,

0:05:47.440 --> 0:05:51.120
<v Speaker 1>I know sometimes you know, the Cowboys can let us

0:05:51.120 --> 0:05:54.400
<v Speaker 1>down and let down their fan base as well. But Andrew,

0:05:54.440 --> 0:05:56.599
<v Speaker 1>based off what you saw yesterday and both these teams

0:05:56.640 --> 0:05:59.600
<v Speaker 1>being victorious, what do you make of this contest here

0:05:59.600 --> 0:06:00.159
<v Speaker 1>in we two?

0:06:00.240 --> 0:06:02.680
<v Speaker 2>I think this is Dallas. They're playing at home. This

0:06:02.760 --> 0:06:05.840
<v Speaker 2>is where they cover games, even when they're heavy favorites.

0:06:06.200 --> 0:06:08.960
<v Speaker 2>They're going to take care of business again. But the

0:06:09.000 --> 0:06:11.320
<v Speaker 2>Saints look good because I think they're playing the Panthers.

0:06:11.800 --> 0:06:13.640
<v Speaker 2>I really think that has more to do with it.

0:06:13.720 --> 0:06:16.640
<v Speaker 2>I'm not still a believer in Dennis Allen long term.

0:06:17.040 --> 0:06:19.120
<v Speaker 2>So for me, this is I'm going to bet against

0:06:19.120 --> 0:06:20.880
<v Speaker 2>the Saints again two weeks in a row, but this

0:06:20.920 --> 0:06:23.599
<v Speaker 2>time I'm actually betting on a good team, not a

0:06:23.640 --> 0:06:25.440
<v Speaker 2>bad team like the Carolina Panthers. So I feel a

0:06:25.440 --> 0:06:28.119
<v Speaker 2>little bit more confident, especially with Dallas playing at home

0:06:28.360 --> 0:06:31.080
<v Speaker 2>and Jerry World, where they are usually very good covering

0:06:31.080 --> 0:06:32.640
<v Speaker 2>spreads even this large.

0:06:33.480 --> 0:06:35.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm comfortable with the six and a half. I would

0:06:35.520 --> 0:06:38.600
<v Speaker 1>bet the six and a half early. However, it would

0:06:38.600 --> 0:06:40.600
<v Speaker 1>not shock me if this went to six or in

0:06:40.640 --> 0:06:43.960
<v Speaker 1>five and a half. Based on people living in this

0:06:44.080 --> 0:06:46.640
<v Speaker 1>New Orleans win a little too much, and you know,

0:06:46.720 --> 0:06:49.400
<v Speaker 1>seeing Derek Carr throw all these touchdowns and oh, maybe

0:06:49.440 --> 0:06:52.200
<v Speaker 1>New Orleans is back, and maybe you know, I'm with you.

0:06:52.320 --> 0:06:53.720
<v Speaker 1>I think it was more of a case of opponent

0:06:53.760 --> 0:06:56.760
<v Speaker 1>than it was New Orleans being great Necessarily. This is

0:06:56.800 --> 0:06:58.960
<v Speaker 1>a much different to the circumstances in the Dallas pass

0:06:59.040 --> 0:07:01.640
<v Speaker 1>rush and Michael Arson's really got after it, and you know,

0:07:01.680 --> 0:07:03.240
<v Speaker 1>I think that's something they could do again in this

0:07:03.279 --> 0:07:06.400
<v Speaker 1>game very easily. Seedeelamb looked great. Any concerns about any

0:07:06.480 --> 0:07:09.960
<v Speaker 1>jet lag for him after not playing that was obviously

0:07:10.120 --> 0:07:12.520
<v Speaker 1>not a factor in this one at all yesterday. So

0:07:13.160 --> 0:07:14.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm good with the six and a half. But I

0:07:14.400 --> 0:07:16.760
<v Speaker 1>would watch this one and I would bet heavier on

0:07:16.800 --> 0:07:19.600
<v Speaker 1>it if it started to move a little bit more

0:07:19.720 --> 0:07:22.200
<v Speaker 1>towards the New Orleans side of things. So just keep

0:07:22.240 --> 0:07:23.760
<v Speaker 1>an eye on this one. I could see this one

0:07:23.800 --> 0:07:26.760
<v Speaker 1>getting a little bit of attention. The Los Angeles Chargers

0:07:26.840 --> 0:07:30.040
<v Speaker 1>came out with a w. The Carolina Panthers did not.

0:07:30.600 --> 0:07:33.480
<v Speaker 1>The Panthers at home four and a half point underdogs.

0:07:34.240 --> 0:07:37.320
<v Speaker 1>That feels like not enough to me based on what

0:07:37.400 --> 0:07:39.640
<v Speaker 1>I saw, or should I say, did not see in

0:07:39.720 --> 0:07:42.520
<v Speaker 1>Sunday's game. Thirty nine and a half is the number here.

0:07:42.600 --> 0:07:45.880
<v Speaker 1>If you like Carolina on the money line, it's plus

0:07:45.880 --> 0:07:49.360
<v Speaker 1>one ninety all right, ericson. So do the Chargers travel?

0:07:49.600 --> 0:07:50.960
<v Speaker 1>That's the question I'm gonna ask you.

0:07:51.120 --> 0:07:54.679
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's always like because like the Chargers, Chargers travel.

0:07:54.760 --> 0:07:57.920
<v Speaker 2>You're unsure because it's the Chargers are always going to charge.

0:07:57.960 --> 0:08:00.960
<v Speaker 2>But remember this is Harbaugh's Chargers, you know, and this

0:08:01.040 --> 0:08:03.440
<v Speaker 2>is a typical spot where the Chargers never cover the spread.

0:08:03.480 --> 0:08:07.480
<v Speaker 2>But Harbaugh being there makes a difference. Having an adults

0:08:07.520 --> 0:08:09.240
<v Speaker 2>in the room at head coach makes a big difference.

0:08:09.280 --> 0:08:11.920
<v Speaker 2>So I'm going to keep back in Harbaugh, especially when

0:08:11.960 --> 0:08:12.840
<v Speaker 2>it's against Carolina.

0:08:12.960 --> 0:08:14.239
<v Speaker 3>So yeah, I mean I'm off.

0:08:14.880 --> 0:08:17.440
<v Speaker 2>I hate to jump ship this this early, but and

0:08:17.480 --> 0:08:19.280
<v Speaker 2>I need to rewatch that Carolina game to get a

0:08:19.280 --> 0:08:21.680
<v Speaker 2>better sense of is this just over Is it just

0:08:21.720 --> 0:08:24.320
<v Speaker 2>this team is just so under man with Rice Sung?

0:08:24.440 --> 0:08:27.040
<v Speaker 2>Is he just so overwhelmed? This is never going to work.

0:08:27.120 --> 0:08:28.320
<v Speaker 2>So my lean is I.

0:08:28.320 --> 0:08:29.720
<v Speaker 1>Think the answer to all those questions.

0:08:29.840 --> 0:08:31.920
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean that's that's kind of how I'm leaning

0:08:31.920 --> 0:08:33.920
<v Speaker 2>towards as well. So I think it's still gonna be

0:08:33.920 --> 0:08:35.880
<v Speaker 2>the charges for me. And again I would also go

0:08:35.960 --> 0:08:38.280
<v Speaker 2>towards the under here because the Chargers want to run

0:08:38.280 --> 0:08:42.000
<v Speaker 2>the football and I don't think Parentis can score so under.

0:08:42.280 --> 0:08:44.160
<v Speaker 1>I just have this conversation with debro and Fits on

0:08:44.200 --> 0:08:47.200
<v Speaker 1>the Fantasy Growth podcast this morning. I said, look, I

0:08:47.240 --> 0:08:50.000
<v Speaker 1>think it's safe that we can call Rice Young the

0:08:50.040 --> 0:08:51.680
<v Speaker 1>bus now, Like I don't want to keep getting into

0:08:51.679 --> 0:08:53.640
<v Speaker 1>this and we could say, well, maybe they wanted to

0:08:53.640 --> 0:08:55.600
<v Speaker 1>give Dave ken Allie more time. I don't need to

0:08:55.640 --> 0:08:58.400
<v Speaker 1>see anything else. I really don't, and it's unfortunate. The

0:08:58.400 --> 0:09:00.920
<v Speaker 1>guy had a really good college career always was tough

0:09:00.920 --> 0:09:02.360
<v Speaker 1>on him. In college, I thought he was one of

0:09:02.400 --> 0:09:04.680
<v Speaker 1>these guys that really benefited a great deal from what

0:09:04.920 --> 0:09:07.840
<v Speaker 1>was around him. I thought he always struggled whenever he

0:09:07.920 --> 0:09:10.840
<v Speaker 1>was pressured in the pocket and some of those bigger

0:09:10.920 --> 0:09:13.320
<v Speaker 1>SEC matchups you would see that happen. I thought he

0:09:13.360 --> 0:09:15.480
<v Speaker 1>got better as his career went on in college, but

0:09:15.520 --> 0:09:17.439
<v Speaker 1>it was always something that really concerned me. And look,

0:09:17.480 --> 0:09:20.120
<v Speaker 1>this is where the big boys play, and at this point,

0:09:20.160 --> 0:09:23.560
<v Speaker 1>it is a tough road to see. At the end

0:09:23.559 --> 0:09:26.680
<v Speaker 1>there that Bryce Young comes out looking like, Yeah, I

0:09:26.720 --> 0:09:28.680
<v Speaker 1>deserve to be the number one overall pick. That's just

0:09:28.840 --> 0:09:31.520
<v Speaker 1>where it is. Before we continue with our next game.

0:09:31.600 --> 0:09:33.680
<v Speaker 1>Just a quick reminder to everybody too. When you have

0:09:33.720 --> 0:09:35.560
<v Speaker 1>the Betting Pros app make sure you check out all

0:09:35.559 --> 0:09:38.920
<v Speaker 1>the Betting Pros betting systems now. They're designed to help

0:09:38.960 --> 0:09:42.000
<v Speaker 1>you find winning trends and make smarter bets. You can

0:09:42.040 --> 0:09:46.040
<v Speaker 1>create and customize your own systems by sport, by bet type, timeframe,

0:09:46.080 --> 0:09:48.640
<v Speaker 1>all of that and our systems track your profitability for

0:09:48.720 --> 0:09:52.560
<v Speaker 1>bets across MLB, NFL, college football, NBA, you name it.

0:09:52.840 --> 0:09:55.240
<v Speaker 1>You can use a betting system for it basically tells

0:09:55.240 --> 0:09:56.880
<v Speaker 1>you how good you are at certain things and also

0:09:56.920 --> 0:09:59.480
<v Speaker 1>looking at other people systems too, to help you become

0:09:59.520 --> 0:10:02.280
<v Speaker 1>a better better. So download and use the Betting Pros

0:10:02.280 --> 0:10:05.280
<v Speaker 1>app today, find the most profitable betting systems that work

0:10:05.360 --> 0:10:09.319
<v Speaker 1>for you, and again, start betting smarter, not harder. That's

0:10:09.360 --> 0:10:11.040
<v Speaker 1>what we're here to do, folks. All right, let's go

0:10:11.120 --> 0:10:15.240
<v Speaker 1>to the next game. Here, the Detroit Lions taking on

0:10:15.280 --> 0:10:17.880
<v Speaker 1>the Tampa Bay Buccaneers. Baker Mayfield himself a good game.

0:10:17.920 --> 0:10:20.760
<v Speaker 1>They are six and a half point underdogs to the Lions. Here.

0:10:21.600 --> 0:10:23.360
<v Speaker 1>Forty eight and a half is the number plus two

0:10:23.400 --> 0:10:25.520
<v Speaker 1>to sixty five on the money line for Tampa Bay

0:10:25.520 --> 0:10:27.640
<v Speaker 1>to get a victory. I'm gonna say this Ericson. I

0:10:27.640 --> 0:10:29.920
<v Speaker 1>don't know if it's hot take, but I like the

0:10:29.960 --> 0:10:31.840
<v Speaker 1>Buck side of this one. With the points the six

0:10:31.880 --> 0:10:34.160
<v Speaker 1>and a half, I feel like the Bucks can go

0:10:34.240 --> 0:10:36.760
<v Speaker 1>in there. They know they're gonna be underdogs. I think

0:10:36.800 --> 0:10:39.960
<v Speaker 1>Baker Mayfield feeds on that mentality. I thought he had

0:10:40.000 --> 0:10:42.240
<v Speaker 1>a really good game. Yes, the Commander's defense, it's not

0:10:42.320 --> 0:10:46.040
<v Speaker 1>quite the Lions defense. I get that. However, they've got

0:10:46.160 --> 0:10:48.760
<v Speaker 1>enough weapons to compete offensively. I think they can keep

0:10:48.760 --> 0:10:50.600
<v Speaker 1>this within the six and a half. I like the

0:10:50.640 --> 0:10:52.280
<v Speaker 1>early value on this one. What say you?

0:10:52.440 --> 0:10:52.959
<v Speaker 3>I agree?

0:10:53.080 --> 0:10:55.200
<v Speaker 2>You know, last year Baker Mayfield was one of the

0:10:55.200 --> 0:10:59.120
<v Speaker 2>better bets as a road underdog. And look, we're talking

0:10:59.160 --> 0:11:01.760
<v Speaker 2>about former first aw picks Baker Mayfield.

0:11:01.800 --> 0:11:04.040
<v Speaker 3>He's got a swag back, man. I think that he does.

0:11:04.160 --> 0:11:07.160
<v Speaker 2>I think that he's feeling confident. You know how things

0:11:07.640 --> 0:11:10.800
<v Speaker 2>ended up with Cleveland and then Carolina, But now I

0:11:10.840 --> 0:11:13.120
<v Speaker 2>think he's finally found a home in Tampa Bay. They

0:11:13.160 --> 0:11:16.320
<v Speaker 2>signed him to the extension, and I think that maybe

0:11:16.360 --> 0:11:18.040
<v Speaker 2>it was overblown. Again, I talked about during the off

0:11:18.080 --> 0:11:21.000
<v Speaker 2>season how much I like Liam Cohen as the replacement

0:11:21.040 --> 0:11:22.640
<v Speaker 2>for Dave Canals. I know that was the thing that

0:11:22.679 --> 0:11:25.320
<v Speaker 2>we were concerned about. It's gonna lose Canals, what's gonna happen.

0:11:25.440 --> 0:11:28.600
<v Speaker 2>But I felt like bringing Cohen was the key to

0:11:28.600 --> 0:11:31.280
<v Speaker 2>this Buccaneers offense still being successful. At least through Week

0:11:31.320 --> 0:11:34.400
<v Speaker 2>one he was successful. So again, if this was playing

0:11:34.400 --> 0:11:36.680
<v Speaker 2>in Detroit, I obviously like the over. So I'm gonna

0:11:36.679 --> 0:11:39.000
<v Speaker 2>be obviously betting that, of course, but I do think, yes,

0:11:39.040 --> 0:11:40.800
<v Speaker 2>the Buccaneers within a touchdown.

0:11:40.960 --> 0:11:42.199
<v Speaker 3>I do like that value.

0:11:43.040 --> 0:11:45.120
<v Speaker 1>You know what else? I like this next one Indianapolis

0:11:45.160 --> 0:11:47.680
<v Speaker 1>going on the road to Green Bay and Indy is

0:11:47.880 --> 0:11:52.720
<v Speaker 1>favored by only three. I mean, what Malik Wilson's playing

0:11:52.800 --> 0:11:55.280
<v Speaker 1>quarterback as of right now? Like maybe they signed like

0:11:55.280 --> 0:11:58.240
<v Speaker 1>even if they signed Ryan Danehill, Like how many plays

0:11:58.240 --> 0:12:00.920
<v Speaker 1>can he learned and get indoctrinated to the system. Forty

0:12:00.920 --> 0:12:03.079
<v Speaker 1>one and a half is the number. I am tempted

0:12:03.080 --> 0:12:06.640
<v Speaker 1>for the under on this game, but I could also

0:12:06.679 --> 0:12:09.520
<v Speaker 1>see bad things happening in this game, really getting ugly

0:12:09.559 --> 0:12:12.440
<v Speaker 1>at one point, so I'm not running to it. It

0:12:12.559 --> 0:12:15.000
<v Speaker 1>is a low number of anything. Maybe I'm a little

0:12:15.000 --> 0:12:16.800
<v Speaker 1>on the over to tell you the truth, but plus

0:12:16.800 --> 0:12:20.319
<v Speaker 1>one thirty five for agreement Packers on the money line,

0:12:20.880 --> 0:12:23.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't think three is enough. I think this one

0:12:23.120 --> 0:12:25.320
<v Speaker 1>is going to grow. I think this is probably one

0:12:25.360 --> 0:12:28.440
<v Speaker 1>of the clearest early values on betting pros that you

0:12:28.440 --> 0:12:32.000
<v Speaker 1>could find. What say you, Andrew Erickson, Colts to the

0:12:32.040 --> 0:12:33.320
<v Speaker 1>loveless Packers.

0:12:33.360 --> 0:12:36.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, when I did my early projections for BP, this

0:12:37.000 --> 0:12:40.319
<v Speaker 2>was more Colts minus four and a half. So I'm

0:12:40.400 --> 0:12:42.920
<v Speaker 2>there with you on the Colts. Like Malik Willis, he

0:12:42.960 --> 0:12:45.040
<v Speaker 2>has been more of a running back than a quarterback

0:12:45.160 --> 0:12:47.160
<v Speaker 2>at the NFL level, Like he has an not shown

0:12:47.200 --> 0:12:49.880
<v Speaker 2>that he can pass away. He takes sacks like a madman,

0:12:50.000 --> 0:12:53.720
<v Speaker 2>like Will Levis and Richardson as explosive as he looked.

0:12:54.000 --> 0:12:56.480
<v Speaker 2>He was nine for nineteen for over two hundred passing

0:12:56.559 --> 0:12:58.880
<v Speaker 2>yards of the most Anthony richards stat line you could

0:12:58.920 --> 0:13:02.080
<v Speaker 2>ask for just throwing out a suit bombs to Aleck Pearce,

0:13:02.160 --> 0:13:05.280
<v Speaker 2>Ashton duell In, but then missing wide open throws.

0:13:05.320 --> 0:13:06.240
<v Speaker 3>So that up and down.

0:13:06.320 --> 0:13:08.640
<v Speaker 2>So again I'm concerned about the total because of the

0:13:08.640 --> 0:13:10.480
<v Speaker 2>matter of does he hit on those explosive plays or

0:13:10.559 --> 0:13:13.200
<v Speaker 2>he does not, And I'm just not confident with Milk Willster.

0:13:13.280 --> 0:13:14.880
<v Speaker 2>I mean I think that I think we talked about

0:13:14.880 --> 0:13:17.199
<v Speaker 2>this another show that Green Bay is gonna be. I

0:13:17.200 --> 0:13:19.480
<v Speaker 2>think they're gonna be shopping for a quarterback soon. I

0:13:19.480 --> 0:13:21.520
<v Speaker 2>think it was about in regards to Russ, right, we

0:13:21.520 --> 0:13:23.000
<v Speaker 2>were talking about Russ as a potential.

0:13:23.720 --> 0:13:25.800
<v Speaker 1>I think, look, it depends on how long. If it's

0:13:25.800 --> 0:13:27.760
<v Speaker 1>gonna be six weeks, then I think it's really important.

0:13:27.920 --> 0:13:31.200
<v Speaker 1>It's gonna be that two to four window. Maybe you

0:13:31.320 --> 0:13:33.200
<v Speaker 1>kind of just grinned, Barrett and try to grind it out.

0:13:33.280 --> 0:13:35.440
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. I mean a Tannehill would make more

0:13:35.480 --> 0:13:38.760
<v Speaker 1>sense then but it's I don't think. I don't think

0:13:38.760 --> 0:13:40.760
<v Speaker 1>the Stewarts is gonna readily throw up the flag here

0:13:40.880 --> 0:13:44.760
<v Speaker 1>and just send Russell Wilson that quickly. It wasn't like fields,

0:13:44.840 --> 0:13:46.760
<v Speaker 1>you know was world yesterday.

0:13:46.800 --> 0:13:49.040
<v Speaker 3>He didn't lose the game for that like that's.

0:13:49.000 --> 0:13:51.240
<v Speaker 1>He didn't like. He didn't lose the game for them.

0:13:51.360 --> 0:13:54.400
<v Speaker 1>And I continue to say that people made fun of me.

0:13:54.440 --> 0:13:56.480
<v Speaker 1>I saw you on the chat telling that the Atlanta

0:13:56.480 --> 0:13:58.480
<v Speaker 1>Falcons defense isn't any good. Well, I think they're better

0:13:58.480 --> 0:14:01.360
<v Speaker 1>than you think they are. Sorry, I think the first

0:14:01.360 --> 0:14:04.080
<v Speaker 1>look was good. By the way, since we've been talking

0:14:04.160 --> 0:14:06.000
<v Speaker 1>about this, it's moved to three and a half already.

0:14:06.400 --> 0:14:09.600
<v Speaker 2>Okay, so there you go, so get it. While again

0:14:09.679 --> 0:14:11.079
<v Speaker 2>is the other thing on because the last thing on

0:14:11.120 --> 0:14:11.880
<v Speaker 2>the Colts too.

0:14:11.720 --> 0:14:13.719
<v Speaker 1>I got it at three this morning and now it's three.

0:14:13.760 --> 0:14:17.360
<v Speaker 2>And the trend all last year was the Colts is

0:14:18.000 --> 0:14:20.320
<v Speaker 2>you never met them as underdog because they always lose,

0:14:20.480 --> 0:14:22.960
<v Speaker 2>but then when their favorites they always cover like they

0:14:22.960 --> 0:14:25.320
<v Speaker 2>were very very much whatever the public market thinks is

0:14:25.360 --> 0:14:26.840
<v Speaker 2>going to happen to them, that's what they would follow

0:14:26.840 --> 0:14:27.240
<v Speaker 2>through and do.

0:14:27.400 --> 0:14:29.480
<v Speaker 3>So. Yes, I like the col Tea even on the road.

0:14:29.640 --> 0:14:30.960
<v Speaker 1>Let me put it to this way too. I thought

0:14:30.960 --> 0:14:35.320
<v Speaker 1>the Colts defense was played inspired compared to maybe what

0:14:35.320 --> 0:14:38.360
<v Speaker 1>we thought the I mean, look, that Houston Texans offense

0:14:38.440 --> 0:14:39.920
<v Speaker 1>is for real. They've got a lot of weapons. I

0:14:39.920 --> 0:14:41.360
<v Speaker 1>know they give up a lot of rushing yards to

0:14:41.800 --> 0:14:45.560
<v Speaker 1>mix and I get that. But but outside of that,

0:14:45.800 --> 0:14:48.800
<v Speaker 1>like that game was close. That was a tight game

0:14:48.920 --> 0:14:51.360
<v Speaker 1>all the way to the end. So let's give them

0:14:51.360 --> 0:14:52.840
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of credit. Like right out of the

0:14:52.880 --> 0:14:55.600
<v Speaker 1>gate again, I love Indian this one. It's already moved

0:14:55.640 --> 0:14:56.840
<v Speaker 1>to three and a half. I'll still take it three

0:14:56.880 --> 0:14:58.480
<v Speaker 1>and a half. I would not be shocked by the

0:14:58.480 --> 0:15:02.000
<v Speaker 1>time we get to what the show with Terrell it.

0:15:01.960 --> 0:15:05.640
<v Speaker 2>Gets to have Alik Willis as the starter.

0:15:06.000 --> 0:15:09.480
<v Speaker 3>I think people are just gonna look, Malik was.

0:15:09.480 --> 0:15:12.000
<v Speaker 1>Is going to start no matter what happens. But we'll

0:15:12.000 --> 0:15:14.920
<v Speaker 1>see who finishes. The San Francisco forty nine ers are

0:15:14.960 --> 0:15:18.440
<v Speaker 1>gonna take all the Minnesota Vikings all. Sam Darnald in

0:15:18.520 --> 0:15:20.520
<v Speaker 1>that building that must have felt good for him. I'm

0:15:20.520 --> 0:15:22.720
<v Speaker 1>happy for Sam Donald in his giant head. That was

0:15:22.720 --> 0:15:25.000
<v Speaker 1>a nice moment for him that he was able to

0:15:25.080 --> 0:15:27.920
<v Speaker 1>go there and exercise those ghosts that he used to

0:15:28.000 --> 0:15:30.720
<v Speaker 1>see at Metlive Stadium. It was a great performance against

0:15:30.720 --> 0:15:32.560
<v Speaker 1>the Giants. At one point he was twelve for twelve

0:15:32.840 --> 0:15:35.160
<v Speaker 1>and now he gets to get home the conquering hero.

0:15:35.240 --> 0:15:37.400
<v Speaker 1>And what do you get the San Francisco forty nine Ers.

0:15:37.520 --> 0:15:39.480
<v Speaker 1>So they are underdogs plus five and a half in

0:15:39.480 --> 0:15:41.400
<v Speaker 1>their own building. Forty five and a half is the

0:15:41.480 --> 0:15:44.280
<v Speaker 1>number plus two hundred for Minnesota. I am going to

0:15:44.360 --> 0:15:46.440
<v Speaker 1>lay off this one early. I want to see again

0:15:46.840 --> 0:15:49.800
<v Speaker 1>the forty nine Ers tonight. We're recording this Monday morning,

0:15:50.160 --> 0:15:52.640
<v Speaker 1>so right now, I think this one looks right to me.

0:15:53.040 --> 0:15:54.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm not going to do anything because if there's a

0:15:54.480 --> 0:15:57.680
<v Speaker 1>macaffrey injury, this line's gonna change. If you know, the

0:15:57.760 --> 0:16:01.200
<v Speaker 1>forty nine Ers stomp amun hole in the Jets fingers crossed,

0:16:01.880 --> 0:16:04.280
<v Speaker 1>then all of a sudden again this line might change

0:16:04.280 --> 0:16:06.640
<v Speaker 1>a little bit more too, and it might be worth changing.

0:16:07.080 --> 0:16:09.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm staying away from this one. What do you see

0:16:09.800 --> 0:16:12.240
<v Speaker 1>when you see this forty nine Ers Vikings game in

0:16:12.280 --> 0:16:12.560
<v Speaker 1>Week two?

0:16:12.600 --> 0:16:15.240
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, the projections I did line up exactly with what

0:16:15.360 --> 0:16:17.720
<v Speaker 2>the lines are, so I'm not Yeah, this is kind

0:16:17.720 --> 0:16:19.720
<v Speaker 2>of a shyaway spot for me too, because I want

0:16:19.720 --> 0:16:21.320
<v Speaker 2>to see, Like you said, which forty nine ers team

0:16:21.360 --> 0:16:21.760
<v Speaker 2>we're getting.

0:16:21.760 --> 0:16:22.720
<v Speaker 3>Are we getting the death.

0:16:22.560 --> 0:16:24.760
<v Speaker 2>Star forty nine ers team this year or are we

0:16:24.800 --> 0:16:27.160
<v Speaker 2>getting the Super Bowl hangover forty nine Ers team?

0:16:27.280 --> 0:16:28.600
<v Speaker 3>So I'm gonna wait.

0:16:28.960 --> 0:16:30.600
<v Speaker 1>Now the one thing I'm not waiting for, which is

0:16:30.600 --> 0:16:32.640
<v Speaker 1>funny because the Jets are playing the forty nine ers.

0:16:32.640 --> 0:16:34.200
<v Speaker 1>And even though I think the Jets are gonna lose

0:16:34.240 --> 0:16:37.400
<v Speaker 1>to the forty nine ers, and if they do, Andrew

0:16:37.400 --> 0:16:40.560
<v Speaker 1>Erickson is gonna have to pay up on Thursday's show.

0:16:40.600 --> 0:16:42.520
<v Speaker 1>You're not gonna want to miss that one, folks, And

0:16:42.600 --> 0:16:44.840
<v Speaker 1>if I will, of course pay up if I am

0:16:44.840 --> 0:16:47.640
<v Speaker 1>the loser here to Andrew Erickson on Thursday. We are

0:16:47.720 --> 0:16:50.920
<v Speaker 1>men of honor, we are men of our word. We're

0:16:50.920 --> 0:16:54.080
<v Speaker 1>barely men sometimes, but here we go. That is gonna

0:16:54.080 --> 0:16:57.840
<v Speaker 1>be fun to watch. But regardless regardless Jets defense against

0:16:57.840 --> 0:17:00.240
<v Speaker 1>the Titans next week, I want to abut the one

0:17:00.280 --> 0:17:03.800
<v Speaker 1>early because the Titans are at home. They are four

0:17:03.800 --> 0:17:06.240
<v Speaker 1>point underdogs. I know it's gonna be tough for the

0:17:06.320 --> 0:17:08.040
<v Speaker 1>Jets to go on the road in the first two games.

0:17:08.160 --> 0:17:11.360
<v Speaker 1>But no matter what I see out of the Jets tonight,

0:17:11.760 --> 0:17:13.680
<v Speaker 1>I feel pretty good about them going into Tennessee and

0:17:13.720 --> 0:17:17.359
<v Speaker 1>handling them. Will Levis make stupid decisions, I mean, another

0:17:17.400 --> 0:17:20.880
<v Speaker 1>stupid decision in that game yesterday, and against the Jets defense,

0:17:21.240 --> 0:17:23.879
<v Speaker 1>they're gonna put pressure on you. They're gonna make you

0:17:23.920 --> 0:17:26.840
<v Speaker 1>pay for stupid decisions. And I could see a score

0:17:26.880 --> 0:17:29.040
<v Speaker 1>on defense easily in this game, and that would easily

0:17:29.080 --> 0:17:31.280
<v Speaker 1>take care of this cover. So I am on the

0:17:31.359 --> 0:17:34.080
<v Speaker 1>Jets side with the four in the early look ahead.

0:17:34.400 --> 0:17:36.000
<v Speaker 1>I've already bet it again. You can follow me at

0:17:36.000 --> 0:17:39.000
<v Speaker 1>betting pros dot com slash Joe, same thing with slash ericson.

0:17:39.160 --> 0:17:40.720
<v Speaker 1>Forty three and a half is the number that feels

0:17:40.760 --> 0:17:42.880
<v Speaker 1>right to me plus one sixty five for the Titans

0:17:42.920 --> 0:17:45.960
<v Speaker 1>to win outright, No, thanks, give me the Jets and

0:17:46.000 --> 0:17:47.760
<v Speaker 1>the four, Ericsson, What do you think?

0:17:47.880 --> 0:17:49.760
<v Speaker 3>I like the under again?

0:17:49.840 --> 0:17:52.440
<v Speaker 2>We saw what the Tennessee eight Titans offense was against

0:17:52.440 --> 0:17:53.680
<v Speaker 2>the Bears, and they're a game.

0:17:53.720 --> 0:17:54.520
<v Speaker 3>They're a team that want.

0:17:54.520 --> 0:17:56.919
<v Speaker 2>I mean, hadn't been for the special teams touchdown and

0:17:56.960 --> 0:17:59.280
<v Speaker 2>the pick six, that game would have been nowhere near

0:17:59.600 --> 0:17:59.920
<v Speaker 2>the toe.

0:18:00.520 --> 0:18:02.760
<v Speaker 3>So I think, yeah, I like the under.

0:18:02.800 --> 0:18:04.760
<v Speaker 2>Forty three and a half is especially with at forty

0:18:04.760 --> 0:18:06.760
<v Speaker 2>three and a half too, like that's it's not like

0:18:06.920 --> 0:18:09.240
<v Speaker 2>it's a I mean why I'm gonna be surprised if

0:18:09.240 --> 0:18:12.240
<v Speaker 2>this game was at forty or thirty nine and a half. Again,

0:18:12.280 --> 0:18:13.800
<v Speaker 2>it depends on what the Jets offense does and how

0:18:13.800 --> 0:18:15.560
<v Speaker 2>good they look. But I don't think the Jets need

0:18:15.600 --> 0:18:17.080
<v Speaker 2>to go into Tennessee thinking, oh, we need to put

0:18:17.119 --> 0:18:19.680
<v Speaker 2>up thirty points to beat Will Levis. I don't imagine

0:18:19.720 --> 0:18:20.879
<v Speaker 2>that's what the strategy is gonna be.

0:18:21.760 --> 0:18:25.840
<v Speaker 1>No, but I think they will beat Will Levis in Tennessee. Seattle,

0:18:25.920 --> 0:18:28.720
<v Speaker 1>New England. You tease this one earlier, your feelings Seattle

0:18:28.760 --> 0:18:31.919
<v Speaker 1>three point favorites on the road in New England. The

0:18:31.920 --> 0:18:33.600
<v Speaker 1>thirty nine and a half is the number plus one

0:18:33.680 --> 0:18:37.359
<v Speaker 1>forty for New England. I will say this, I saw

0:18:37.960 --> 0:18:40.119
<v Speaker 1>good things from the Seahawks, and I saw some not

0:18:40.200 --> 0:18:43.399
<v Speaker 1>so good things from the Seahawks. I wouldn't put it

0:18:43.440 --> 0:18:46.080
<v Speaker 1>past New England to cover here and keep this one close.

0:18:46.160 --> 0:18:48.560
<v Speaker 1>I just wouldn't. This game scares the crap out of me,

0:18:48.960 --> 0:18:51.960
<v Speaker 1>because even though I did believe that seven and a

0:18:51.960 --> 0:18:54.440
<v Speaker 1>half was too big, especially as we got later in

0:18:54.480 --> 0:18:56.480
<v Speaker 1>the week, I talked about that on Sports Grid on

0:18:56.480 --> 0:18:58.040
<v Speaker 1>Sunday morning. I was like, look, the seven and a half.

0:18:58.080 --> 0:18:59.679
<v Speaker 1>I think it's too big of a number here with

0:18:59.760 --> 0:19:03.679
<v Speaker 1>all these deficits that Cincinnati's working through. But Seattle had

0:19:03.720 --> 0:19:05.800
<v Speaker 1>its struggles at times in the in their Game two

0:19:05.800 --> 0:19:08.600
<v Speaker 1>against Denver, So I'm staying away from this one.

0:19:08.840 --> 0:19:11.280
<v Speaker 2>What do you think I'm taking Seattle. I think the

0:19:11.359 --> 0:19:14.359
<v Speaker 2>number is too small, even after the Patriots upset the

0:19:14.520 --> 0:19:17.080
<v Speaker 2>because it's solely driven by that. Right the Patriots, Oh

0:19:17.119 --> 0:19:19.240
<v Speaker 2>they're back. They're such a great team. They beat the Bengals,

0:19:19.240 --> 0:19:21.840
<v Speaker 2>and like I said, I just think, let's see it

0:19:21.880 --> 0:19:23.520
<v Speaker 2>for another week. And I get they're playing at home,

0:19:23.560 --> 0:19:27.439
<v Speaker 2>but the home field advantage of Jillette Stadium, it's I

0:19:27.440 --> 0:19:30.719
<v Speaker 2>don't really think it's significant. I would not overplay the

0:19:30.880 --> 0:19:33.200
<v Speaker 2>mystique of playing at Gillette, which is in the middle

0:19:33.200 --> 0:19:37.000
<v Speaker 2>of nowhere in Foxboro, Massachusetts, So I would the mistique.

0:19:36.600 --> 0:19:38.240
<v Speaker 1>Is Tom Brady, and Tom Brady doesn't.

0:19:38.000 --> 0:19:40.600
<v Speaker 3>Play, I would be back in Seattle here. I think

0:19:40.600 --> 0:19:41.520
<v Speaker 3>the numbers is too low.

0:19:41.560 --> 0:19:43.479
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I think Seattle they took care of business

0:19:43.480 --> 0:19:46.600
<v Speaker 2>against a rookie quarterback last week in the Patriots. Right,

0:19:46.760 --> 0:19:49.000
<v Speaker 2>the Patriots had the perfect game script. They were able

0:19:49.040 --> 0:19:51.159
<v Speaker 2>to establish the run because they had the lead and

0:19:51.200 --> 0:19:53.120
<v Speaker 2>the Bengals had to try to crawl their way back

0:19:53.119 --> 0:19:55.520
<v Speaker 2>into it. The Bengals had two They had a miss

0:19:55.600 --> 0:19:58.600
<v Speaker 2>or an overturned touchdown by Giseki who dropped the ball,

0:19:58.640 --> 0:20:00.439
<v Speaker 2>and then they had a play at the yard light

0:20:00.440 --> 0:20:02.879
<v Speaker 2>where Tanner Hudson fumbled the ball. They were going to

0:20:02.920 --> 0:20:05.160
<v Speaker 2>score on that play. So if the Bengals had come

0:20:05.200 --> 0:20:07.119
<v Speaker 2>back and won this game, we'd be looking up in

0:20:07.200 --> 0:20:09.560
<v Speaker 2>the Seattle minus four and a half. And I think

0:20:09.600 --> 0:20:11.840
<v Speaker 2>that's really more what the line should be. So again,

0:20:11.880 --> 0:20:13.560
<v Speaker 2>this isn't saying that the Patriots can't cover. I just

0:20:13.600 --> 0:20:16.240
<v Speaker 2>think that the value is on Seattle minstree.

0:20:17.119 --> 0:20:20.399
<v Speaker 1>I'm tempted for Patriots money line plus one forty. Instead,

0:20:20.400 --> 0:20:22.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna wait and watch it and see if it grows,

0:20:22.560 --> 0:20:24.800
<v Speaker 1>if it gets like one sixty five, one seventy five

0:20:24.840 --> 0:20:26.479
<v Speaker 1>or something like that, if people really are you know,

0:20:28.080 --> 0:20:29.840
<v Speaker 1>digging in a little deeper and go, okay, let's not

0:20:29.880 --> 0:20:31.720
<v Speaker 1>go crazy about the Patriots, and you see a little

0:20:31.760 --> 0:20:34.200
<v Speaker 1>bit more money go to Seattle. Maybe maybe, just maybe

0:20:34.200 --> 0:20:36.680
<v Speaker 1>New England. All right, here's an interesting one. The Cleveland

0:20:36.720 --> 0:20:41.160
<v Speaker 1>Browns traveling to Jacksonville. Jacksonville three point favorites at home,

0:20:41.359 --> 0:20:43.160
<v Speaker 1>forty two and a half is the number plus one

0:20:43.240 --> 0:20:47.240
<v Speaker 1>thirty five on the Cleveland side to win outright, So

0:20:47.359 --> 0:20:49.520
<v Speaker 1>Jacks IVI was hanging with the Dolphins. Then everything kind

0:20:49.520 --> 0:20:51.119
<v Speaker 1>of fell apart for them. Was a big swing in

0:20:51.160 --> 0:20:53.760
<v Speaker 1>that game. Next thing you know, they were done. They

0:20:53.760 --> 0:20:57.159
<v Speaker 1>went from being up by fourteen to being tied and

0:20:57.200 --> 0:20:59.440
<v Speaker 1>then the rest is history there. So let's talk about

0:20:59.560 --> 0:21:02.000
<v Speaker 1>you know this, Watson was miserable in this game and

0:21:02.119 --> 0:21:05.640
<v Speaker 1>Djoku was hurt. The defense could only do so much

0:21:05.680 --> 0:21:10.800
<v Speaker 1>to stop the Dallas Cowboys. So Jacksonville, Cleveland, any early

0:21:10.920 --> 0:21:11.960
<v Speaker 1>value on this one for you?

0:21:12.280 --> 0:21:15.359
<v Speaker 2>I like the Jags here. They're playing at home. The

0:21:15.359 --> 0:21:18.000
<v Speaker 2>Browns defense has traditionally been much worse on the road

0:21:18.119 --> 0:21:21.240
<v Speaker 2>than at home. And I mean three points. It's Trevor

0:21:21.320 --> 0:21:23.960
<v Speaker 2>Lawrence for who's the better quarterback at this point, it's

0:21:24.560 --> 0:21:28.920
<v Speaker 2>Trevor Lawrence. Like you said, the Jaguars, I mean, I

0:21:28.960 --> 0:21:30.639
<v Speaker 2>don't remember when the line closed that. I thought it

0:21:30.680 --> 0:21:32.439
<v Speaker 2>was at three and a half. So they actually may

0:21:32.480 --> 0:21:34.239
<v Speaker 2>have covered last week because they were I think they

0:21:34.240 --> 0:21:36.080
<v Speaker 2>were three and a half point dogs, so they should

0:21:36.119 --> 0:21:37.359
<v Speaker 2>have won that game out right. I mean they were

0:21:37.440 --> 0:21:39.280
<v Speaker 2>up big and they just fell apart in the second half,

0:21:39.320 --> 0:21:42.240
<v Speaker 2>so I'm not going to over evaluate the second half collapse.

0:21:42.400 --> 0:21:44.439
<v Speaker 2>Tell this last year with Jaguars too, they in the

0:21:44.440 --> 0:21:46.639
<v Speaker 2>second half of the season, they basically collapsed. So I

0:21:46.640 --> 0:21:49.000
<v Speaker 2>think they'll get things going. And Cleveland right now, I

0:21:49.000 --> 0:21:51.600
<v Speaker 2>mean they're reeling if we get another bad Deshaun Watts.

0:21:51.600 --> 0:21:53.919
<v Speaker 2>How many more games are he gonna be the starting quarterback.

0:21:54.880 --> 0:21:58.080
<v Speaker 1>If they lose again? None? I don't I think that.

0:21:58.160 --> 0:21:59.399
<v Speaker 1>You know, I'll gotta talk about this on Out of

0:21:59.400 --> 0:22:02.240
<v Speaker 1>Bound today w Bogman and Welsh. If you want to

0:22:02.240 --> 0:22:05.520
<v Speaker 1>hear that show, go to our Fantasy Pros podcast feed.

0:22:05.520 --> 0:22:07.959
<v Speaker 1>There's a lot of just audio only shows on there. There.

0:22:07.960 --> 0:22:09.640
<v Speaker 1>It's a much looser show. We kind of break down

0:22:09.680 --> 0:22:11.520
<v Speaker 1>the games from a fantasy perspective, but you know, we're

0:22:11.520 --> 0:22:13.280
<v Speaker 1>talking just kind of lose football stuff. And one of

0:22:13.320 --> 0:22:15.399
<v Speaker 1>the questions I'm gonna ask them today is you know

0:22:15.480 --> 0:22:17.440
<v Speaker 1>how much longer we do this? Because I don't think.

0:22:17.480 --> 0:22:19.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't think the leash is long. I think it's

0:22:19.040 --> 0:22:21.200
<v Speaker 1>September if any like that. At the most.

0:22:21.280 --> 0:22:24.080
<v Speaker 2>I mean, Mark Cooper had two catches on nine targets,

0:22:25.680 --> 0:22:28.080
<v Speaker 2>the most of Marik Cooper's stat line that he does

0:22:28.200 --> 0:22:29.560
<v Speaker 2>basically whatever quarterback it is.

0:22:29.600 --> 0:22:31.440
<v Speaker 3>But it just that's so who should.

0:22:31.240 --> 0:22:34.400
<v Speaker 1>They turn to in this gas? Baby jamis time?

0:22:34.560 --> 0:22:38.120
<v Speaker 2>I mean well, I mean they during the offseason they

0:22:38.400 --> 0:22:42.600
<v Speaker 2>talked about how the team loves James he's the backup quarterback,

0:22:42.640 --> 0:22:46.080
<v Speaker 2>and the team loves Hint like he's got If you're

0:22:46.080 --> 0:22:48.600
<v Speaker 2>playing super flex leagues, make sure Winston's unavailable, you got

0:22:48.640 --> 0:22:49.200
<v Speaker 2>to pick him up.

0:22:49.320 --> 0:22:52.840
<v Speaker 1>The best the Browns have looked. I mean, I mean,

0:22:52.880 --> 0:22:55.800
<v Speaker 1>it's Joe Flacco, Like, I'm kind of stunned that they

0:22:55.840 --> 0:22:56.640
<v Speaker 1>didn't just say.

0:22:56.560 --> 0:22:58.879
<v Speaker 3>Because they couldn't have him there because of the presence.

0:22:58.880 --> 0:23:01.040
<v Speaker 2>Because it's Watson's team, He's got to be the guy,

0:23:01.119 --> 0:23:03.040
<v Speaker 2>and so that's why they just you know what you.

0:23:03.040 --> 0:23:03.240
<v Speaker 4>Got to do.

0:23:03.280 --> 0:23:05.480
<v Speaker 1>You gotta make the playoff. They made the playoffs last year. Bro,

0:23:06.119 --> 0:23:08.520
<v Speaker 1>Joe Blackham made the playoffs with them. How do you

0:23:08.600 --> 0:23:12.440
<v Speaker 1>not look? I get it. I understand about making people uncomfortable,

0:23:12.440 --> 0:23:14.439
<v Speaker 1>but you know what, maybe some guys need to be

0:23:14.440 --> 0:23:19.960
<v Speaker 1>made to feel uncomfortable. Maybe that's exactly what Deshaun Watson needed. Anyway.

0:23:20.800 --> 0:23:23.400
<v Speaker 1>Washington Commanders two and a half point favorites at home

0:23:23.440 --> 0:23:26.199
<v Speaker 1>against the New York Football Giants. Ooha forty two and

0:23:26.200 --> 0:23:28.840
<v Speaker 1>a half plus one twenty for the Giants to win

0:23:28.880 --> 0:23:31.640
<v Speaker 1>this one out right, there were people leaving MetLife Stadium

0:23:31.640 --> 0:23:34.200
<v Speaker 1>in the fourth quarter in droves, and I don't blame them.

0:23:34.600 --> 0:23:38.400
<v Speaker 1>They took an ass kicking from the Minnesota Viking, so Andrew.

0:23:38.560 --> 0:23:40.600
<v Speaker 1>The real question here is, like you saw Jayan Daniels.

0:23:40.640 --> 0:23:42.680
<v Speaker 1>You saw some good moments. You saw some moments again,

0:23:42.720 --> 0:23:44.919
<v Speaker 1>didn't feel the pressure where he ends up, you know,

0:23:44.960 --> 0:23:46.919
<v Speaker 1>coughing off the football. But you saw the things we

0:23:47.000 --> 0:23:48.560
<v Speaker 1>like so much about Jaydon Daniels. We got to get

0:23:48.560 --> 0:23:54.040
<v Speaker 1>Tarry McLaurin worked in more. Giants offense was sad. Let's

0:23:54.160 --> 0:23:56.840
<v Speaker 1>just put it that way. Daniel Jones continues to be

0:23:56.880 --> 0:23:59.440
<v Speaker 1>a turnover machine, so I will again be betting any

0:23:59.480 --> 0:24:02.000
<v Speaker 1>sort of Daniel Jones turnover numbers. I'm sure the juice

0:24:02.040 --> 0:24:03.879
<v Speaker 1>won't be as friendly this week as it was to

0:24:03.920 --> 0:24:05.920
<v Speaker 1>me last week. But what do you take out of

0:24:05.920 --> 0:24:07.159
<v Speaker 1>this one too? Forty two and a half is the

0:24:07.200 --> 0:24:08.200
<v Speaker 1>number you want to go with the under?

0:24:08.520 --> 0:24:11.240
<v Speaker 2>I think I'd lean towards the under, especially because you

0:24:11.280 --> 0:24:14.000
<v Speaker 2>have two quarterbacks that are gonna be running around that

0:24:14.040 --> 0:24:17.080
<v Speaker 2>creates turnovers and so I think I do like the

0:24:17.160 --> 0:24:18.919
<v Speaker 2>under and I think I like the Commanders.

0:24:19.160 --> 0:24:20.200
<v Speaker 3>They're playing at home.

0:24:20.200 --> 0:24:23.200
<v Speaker 2>It's it's Jane Daniels's first home start, and I know

0:24:23.240 --> 0:24:26.200
<v Speaker 2>that they didn't cover against the Buccaneers, but they got

0:24:26.200 --> 0:24:28.720
<v Speaker 2>The fans are excited. They're going to be giddy about

0:24:28.720 --> 0:24:31.600
<v Speaker 2>their new quarterback, their rookie. As long as he completes

0:24:31.640 --> 0:24:33.399
<v Speaker 2>the game, right, that's the issues. Like, dude, like, you

0:24:33.520 --> 0:24:35.560
<v Speaker 2>need to take care of yourself because he's run around,

0:24:35.600 --> 0:24:38.640
<v Speaker 2>his helmet is flying off. That's concerning as a fantasy manager.

0:24:38.720 --> 0:24:40.680
<v Speaker 2>J dail is like, dude, like love the rushing, love

0:24:40.680 --> 0:24:43.760
<v Speaker 2>all the touchdowns, but man like, if he's gonna be compiling,

0:24:43.840 --> 0:24:45.359
<v Speaker 2>I mean, he took all those hits at LC when

0:24:45.359 --> 0:24:47.120
<v Speaker 2>he made it through, so maybe he just did.

0:24:47.200 --> 0:24:48.000
<v Speaker 3>He's just one of those.

0:24:47.840 --> 0:24:49.879
<v Speaker 2>Guys where he takes the thicket just gets back up.

0:24:49.920 --> 0:24:52.480
<v Speaker 2>But yeah, I'm gonna I don't like, I'm gonna back

0:24:52.480 --> 0:24:53.160
<v Speaker 2>the Commanders here.

0:24:54.640 --> 0:24:58.160
<v Speaker 1>It's Indivision games as early. The Giants got their buck kicked,

0:24:58.160 --> 0:24:59.800
<v Speaker 1>embarrassed at home. It's gonna be a rough week of

0:24:59.800 --> 0:25:02.919
<v Speaker 1>pride just for them. This game does give make me

0:25:02.960 --> 0:25:06.280
<v Speaker 1>a little antsy. I'm a little cautious. How I prefer

0:25:06.320 --> 0:25:10.520
<v Speaker 1>to approach this one. Washington team total. I'm confident that

0:25:10.640 --> 0:25:13.359
<v Speaker 1>Washington to put up a certain amount of points on

0:25:13.440 --> 0:25:15.280
<v Speaker 1>the New York Giants, so I'd go over whatever the

0:25:15.280 --> 0:25:19.920
<v Speaker 1>team total is they set for Washington. Individually, the Giants,

0:25:19.920 --> 0:25:22.159
<v Speaker 1>I feel like they might show up here. You know,

0:25:22.200 --> 0:25:23.960
<v Speaker 1>teams when they get embarrassed and they have an indivision

0:25:23.960 --> 0:25:25.800
<v Speaker 1>game the next week goes out of conference games get

0:25:25.800 --> 0:25:28.439
<v Speaker 1>wacky sometimes because they're not familiar with each other. They

0:25:28.440 --> 0:25:30.800
<v Speaker 1>don't prepare the same way these are. You know, even

0:25:30.800 --> 0:25:32.560
<v Speaker 1>though it's a new staff, it's a new situation here,

0:25:32.600 --> 0:25:34.919
<v Speaker 1>it's the commander. So I think this one might be

0:25:34.920 --> 0:25:37.560
<v Speaker 1>a little bit trickier to peg down. So I'm going

0:25:37.960 --> 0:25:40.880
<v Speaker 1>hyper focused Washington team total over. That's where I'm going

0:25:40.880 --> 0:25:43.760
<v Speaker 1>to this one. The Los Angeles Rams going to play

0:25:43.800 --> 0:25:47.760
<v Speaker 1>the Arizona Cardinals. Cardinals. It's numbers one and a half

0:25:47.800 --> 0:25:51.200
<v Speaker 1>in some spots, two in another again dogs at home,

0:25:51.760 --> 0:25:54.359
<v Speaker 1>fifty and a half? Is this number plus one fourteen? Now,

0:25:54.359 --> 0:25:57.040
<v Speaker 1>the Puka Nacua injury also something to We'll get you

0:25:57.080 --> 0:25:59.560
<v Speaker 1>updated here. But with all that being said, with the

0:25:59.560 --> 0:26:03.160
<v Speaker 1>way the Cardinals, you know, really competed in Buffalo, tough

0:26:03.160 --> 0:26:06.720
<v Speaker 1>place to play week one. In that crowd, you like

0:26:06.800 --> 0:26:08.760
<v Speaker 1>what you saw out of Kyler Murray in this offense.

0:26:08.800 --> 0:26:10.760
<v Speaker 1>I gotta get more of Marvin Harrison in this game.

0:26:10.800 --> 0:26:12.960
<v Speaker 1>I think you will. I'd be betting every over on

0:26:13.000 --> 0:26:15.560
<v Speaker 1>Marvin Harrison is a huge correction this week. I know

0:26:15.640 --> 0:26:17.959
<v Speaker 1>you might be scared of it, but it's gonna be okay.

0:26:18.119 --> 0:26:20.399
<v Speaker 1>Just trust me. What do you make out of this

0:26:20.480 --> 0:26:22.840
<v Speaker 1>one too? Rams Cardinals? It feels like a little bit

0:26:22.840 --> 0:26:26.199
<v Speaker 1>of you know, Cardinals money line value here, But I

0:26:26.240 --> 0:26:28.000
<v Speaker 1>don't think I'm ready to take that leap yet.

0:26:28.000 --> 0:26:30.000
<v Speaker 2>Look, there were two teams I liked a lot the NFC.

0:26:30.280 --> 0:26:32.360
<v Speaker 2>One was the Panthers that was wrong. The other one

0:26:32.440 --> 0:26:34.960
<v Speaker 2>was the Cardinals, which was right. So the cardinally wasn't.

0:26:34.960 --> 0:26:37.000
<v Speaker 2>They almost went outright. They still cover the spread even

0:26:37.000 --> 0:26:38.760
<v Speaker 2>though they didn't end up winning the game outright, so

0:26:38.800 --> 0:26:40.439
<v Speaker 2>it was plus six and a half last week. I

0:26:40.480 --> 0:26:42.639
<v Speaker 2>like the Cardinals here again. I'm just gonna keep backing

0:26:42.640 --> 0:26:46.159
<v Speaker 2>a team. Kyler Murray is continuously underrated. Right, they went

0:26:46.200 --> 0:26:48.160
<v Speaker 2>into Buffalo, they were up big, and yes, Josh Allen

0:26:48.240 --> 0:26:50.000
<v Speaker 2>is Josh Allen. He's gonna do those types of things.

0:26:50.000 --> 0:26:51.960
<v Speaker 3>But he just took over that game exactly.

0:26:52.000 --> 0:26:53.560
<v Speaker 2>I think that's what and that's gonna be tough to

0:26:53.560 --> 0:26:55.399
<v Speaker 2>be especially when he just takes over a game with

0:26:55.440 --> 0:26:57.000
<v Speaker 2>his legs in his arm and he's able to just

0:26:57.040 --> 0:26:59.399
<v Speaker 2>do like I mean, that's why he's viewed as the

0:26:59.440 --> 0:27:01.439
<v Speaker 2>best quarterback or one of the best top quarterbacks. So

0:27:01.720 --> 0:27:04.159
<v Speaker 2>for me, I think there's value with Arizona because this

0:27:04.320 --> 0:27:07.920
<v Speaker 2>Rams team's banged up again. Talked about Pooka offensive line injuries.

0:27:08.040 --> 0:27:12.840
<v Speaker 2>Two guys Noteboom Steve Avila both banged up. They're going

0:27:12.840 --> 0:27:15.240
<v Speaker 2>on the road, Yes, this game, expecting you to be

0:27:15.280 --> 0:27:18.080
<v Speaker 2>a shootout again Arizona. Last year that was a shootout Central,

0:27:18.480 --> 0:27:20.840
<v Speaker 2>But I don't know. I kind of like the undertheak.

0:27:20.880 --> 0:27:22.360
<v Speaker 2>The over under is really high, and I just think

0:27:22.400 --> 0:27:24.800
<v Speaker 2>that the Cardinals they're gonna be able to run the ball.

0:27:24.840 --> 0:27:26.960
<v Speaker 2>They're gonna be able to run the ball. James Connor.

0:27:27.040 --> 0:27:29.960
<v Speaker 2>They were feeding James Connor over and over and over again.

0:27:30.000 --> 0:27:32.119
<v Speaker 2>And what did the Lions do in overtime?

0:27:32.440 --> 0:27:34.920
<v Speaker 3>Gave the ball? Did Montgomery run it down their throats?

0:27:34.960 --> 0:27:37.720
<v Speaker 2>And the Rams had no, no answers to stop it

0:27:37.720 --> 0:27:39.280
<v Speaker 2>because they don't have Aaron Donald anymore.

0:27:39.560 --> 0:27:39.720
<v Speaker 1>So.

0:27:40.080 --> 0:27:41.879
<v Speaker 3>I love the Cardinals in this book.

0:27:42.800 --> 0:27:45.760
<v Speaker 1>All right, this should be a fun one theoretically, but

0:27:45.800 --> 0:27:48.760
<v Speaker 1>we'll see who shows up for Cincinnati this week. Cincinnati

0:27:48.800 --> 0:27:52.240
<v Speaker 1>and Kansas City for twenty five pm Eastern time. The

0:27:52.320 --> 0:27:55.240
<v Speaker 1>Chiefs are six point favorites. Forty seven is the number

0:27:55.240 --> 0:27:59.480
<v Speaker 1>plus two fifteen for the Cincinnati Bengals on the money line. Look,

0:27:59.560 --> 0:28:02.080
<v Speaker 1>six is a good size number. But I still like

0:28:02.119 --> 0:28:05.360
<v Speaker 1>the Chiefs in this one. I just do. I think

0:28:05.359 --> 0:28:08.639
<v Speaker 1>the Chiefs are going to be a handful of the

0:28:08.680 --> 0:28:12.399
<v Speaker 1>worthy wrinkle into this offense. How it frees up Brushy

0:28:12.520 --> 0:28:15.000
<v Speaker 1>Rice over the middle because you're taking those safeties and

0:28:15.080 --> 0:28:17.159
<v Speaker 1>you know everyone's trying to stop saf You're worthy from

0:28:17.160 --> 0:28:21.480
<v Speaker 1>being them downfield? The checko looks good. Every Mahomes looks

0:28:21.480 --> 0:28:25.480
<v Speaker 1>like he's confident. Again. I don't know the Bengals slow starters.

0:28:25.480 --> 0:28:26.880
<v Speaker 1>We talked about it at the top of the show.

0:28:26.880 --> 0:28:28.639
<v Speaker 1>It just feels like that's it. But is six too

0:28:28.640 --> 0:28:30.600
<v Speaker 1>big of a number in your opinion? Or are you

0:28:30.640 --> 0:28:31.560
<v Speaker 1>still comfortable with that?

0:28:31.800 --> 0:28:33.920
<v Speaker 3>It just depends on what I mean, what are we

0:28:33.920 --> 0:28:36.240
<v Speaker 3>gonna get from the bank. We're September bank.

0:28:36.320 --> 0:28:38.920
<v Speaker 1>Well, that being said, Okay, Well, let's let's let's project it.

0:28:39.040 --> 0:28:41.760
<v Speaker 1>Let's say, you know, it's a it's another week of

0:28:41.800 --> 0:28:44.680
<v Speaker 1>practice for Jamar Chase. We're going back to normal here. Uh,

0:28:44.880 --> 0:28:46.920
<v Speaker 1>let's say the T Higgins he had a hamstring, he

0:28:46.960 --> 0:28:50.000
<v Speaker 1>was out last week. Chance already doesn't play this week.

0:28:50.040 --> 0:28:51.800
<v Speaker 1>So let's approach this game is that we're gonna get

0:28:51.880 --> 0:28:55.440
<v Speaker 1>Jamar Chase and that's it. Is that enough there for

0:28:55.480 --> 0:28:57.040
<v Speaker 1>this six to be comfortable for you?

0:28:57.160 --> 0:28:59.960
<v Speaker 2>I just like the under just when when teams go

0:29:00.040 --> 0:29:01.960
<v Speaker 2>to Arrowhead, they just usually don't score them many points,

0:29:01.960 --> 0:29:03.440
<v Speaker 2>Like that's usually what happens in our Last week was

0:29:03.440 --> 0:29:05.480
<v Speaker 2>a little bit different with Lamar, but he rushed for

0:29:05.560 --> 0:29:08.479
<v Speaker 2>over one hundred yards in that game. It's it's different.

0:29:08.600 --> 0:29:11.200
<v Speaker 2>It's different here. So I like the over und Yeah,

0:29:11.240 --> 0:29:14.120
<v Speaker 2>forty seven, that's really high. Why should we be confident

0:29:14.160 --> 0:29:15.880
<v Speaker 2>the Bengals are going to come in and score a

0:29:15.880 --> 0:29:18.440
<v Speaker 2>ton of points. I don't think we should be confident

0:29:18.480 --> 0:29:20.040
<v Speaker 2>that they're going to do that, especially with the Burrow

0:29:20.080 --> 0:29:22.720
<v Speaker 2>thing man. They kept panting into him during that game

0:29:22.760 --> 0:29:24.840
<v Speaker 2>in the sideline, like doing weird things with his wrist,

0:29:25.280 --> 0:29:27.000
<v Speaker 2>like it was a weird injury last year and it

0:29:27.040 --> 0:29:29.880
<v Speaker 2>seemed like everything was okay. But again with the Chase thing,

0:29:29.920 --> 0:29:31.640
<v Speaker 2>does he need to get He's gonna get his contract now?

0:29:31.960 --> 0:29:34.760
<v Speaker 3>Like what's going on? So just I think I think

0:29:34.800 --> 0:29:36.320
<v Speaker 3>I just like the under the most.

0:29:36.880 --> 0:29:40.040
<v Speaker 1>Fair enough, Since you like a lot of the Bengals

0:29:40.040 --> 0:29:42.200
<v Speaker 1>in the preseason stuff we did, you know for Super

0:29:42.200 --> 0:29:44.520
<v Speaker 1>Bowl for you know, Joe Burrow MVP and all that stuff,

0:29:44.920 --> 0:29:46.840
<v Speaker 1>I think you might want to wait till after this

0:29:46.920 --> 0:29:48.680
<v Speaker 1>game and if they lose again, you might get some

0:29:48.720 --> 0:29:49.920
<v Speaker 1>really nice numbers on OHAU.

0:29:49.960 --> 0:29:51.920
<v Speaker 3>Remember it is only this is what they always do, though,

0:29:51.960 --> 0:29:52.920
<v Speaker 3>like this is they always do.

0:29:53.160 --> 0:29:56.920
<v Speaker 1>I wish I waited, you know, did you wait? Those

0:29:56.960 --> 0:29:58.840
<v Speaker 1>numbers are going to be real juicy in about the

0:29:59.080 --> 0:30:02.640
<v Speaker 1>right around my birthday. It's gonna be fun. Happy birthday

0:30:02.720 --> 0:30:06.800
<v Speaker 1>to me and Andrew Rickson, Pittsburgh and Denver. The Steelers

0:30:06.920 --> 0:30:09.040
<v Speaker 1>grind out and I mean grind out a victory and

0:30:09.040 --> 0:30:10.960
<v Speaker 1>we don't know who's gonna be quarterback next week. Russell

0:30:10.960 --> 0:30:13.440
<v Speaker 1>Wilson was inactive, but he was completely suited up to play.

0:30:13.720 --> 0:30:18.760
<v Speaker 1>I just classic Russell Wilson, classic Russ. You gotta love

0:30:18.760 --> 0:30:21.520
<v Speaker 1>that guy. Uh So they are two and a half

0:30:21.600 --> 0:30:24.680
<v Speaker 1>point favorites on the road in Denver, bow Nicks complete

0:30:24.720 --> 0:30:28.600
<v Speaker 1>turnover machine thirty seven and a half plus one twenty

0:30:28.640 --> 0:30:30.520
<v Speaker 1>eight for Denver on the money line. I'll say this

0:30:30.800 --> 0:30:34.120
<v Speaker 1>my favorite moment besides the Anthony Richards an amazing throw

0:30:34.480 --> 0:30:37.200
<v Speaker 1>was the bow Nicks throwing in a triple coverage where

0:30:37.200 --> 0:30:39.920
<v Speaker 1>the announcer said, as soon as he let go of

0:30:39.920 --> 0:30:46.200
<v Speaker 1>the ball, the color commentator went no. I just literally said,

0:30:46.720 --> 0:30:49.080
<v Speaker 1>oh no. And then the ball was like halfway to

0:30:49.200 --> 0:30:52.000
<v Speaker 1>where he was throwing it. And I watched it several

0:30:52.080 --> 0:30:57.600
<v Speaker 1>times and it kept getting funnier every time I saw it. TJ.

0:30:57.720 --> 0:31:00.200
<v Speaker 1>Watt is going to make this a long day. I

0:31:00.240 --> 0:31:02.000
<v Speaker 1>love this two and a half on Pittsburgh. I don't

0:31:02.000 --> 0:31:03.920
<v Speaker 1>think this is enough. I just don't. What do you think?

0:31:04.120 --> 0:31:06.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I'm just I guess I'm concerned if to try

0:31:06.520 --> 0:31:09.560
<v Speaker 2>to force us into playing because it's a wee bit.

0:31:09.640 --> 0:31:11.840
<v Speaker 1>Look, I don't think it matters. I don't think it matters.

0:31:11.960 --> 0:31:15.800
<v Speaker 1>I think bo Knicks is so limited and I think

0:31:16.160 --> 0:31:19.720
<v Speaker 1>he is so mistake prone. And Mike Tomlin's defense is

0:31:19.760 --> 0:31:22.400
<v Speaker 1>going to be ready to rock, and they're confident they will.

0:31:22.600 --> 0:31:25.320
<v Speaker 1>They were in Atlanta that were terrible towels everywhere. TJ.

0:31:25.440 --> 0:31:27.800
<v Speaker 1>Watt was wreaking havoc. I think it's gonna be a

0:31:27.840 --> 0:31:30.040
<v Speaker 1>long day at the office for bon Knicks. I love

0:31:30.160 --> 0:31:32.920
<v Speaker 1>defensive touchdown for the Pittsburgh Steelers in this game. I'd

0:31:32.960 --> 0:31:36.720
<v Speaker 1>be betting that wherever I can get it. But I'm

0:31:36.760 --> 0:31:38.560
<v Speaker 1>definitely on the steers on this one. And I've already

0:31:38.560 --> 0:31:40.200
<v Speaker 1>bet this one too on betting pros.

0:31:40.480 --> 0:31:42.080
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I can't argue with that.

0:31:43.120 --> 0:31:46.520
<v Speaker 2>I mean, we were not huge bow Knicks fans, and

0:31:46.560 --> 0:31:48.320
<v Speaker 2>people came after us because of how good look at

0:31:48.320 --> 0:31:49.840
<v Speaker 2>the preseason and we're like, well, let's wait till the

0:31:49.880 --> 0:31:52.680
<v Speaker 2>regular season starts, and what do you know, it's a

0:31:52.720 --> 0:31:53.360
<v Speaker 2>little bit different.

0:31:53.440 --> 0:31:55.160
<v Speaker 3>So okay, just a little.

0:31:55.280 --> 0:31:57.400
<v Speaker 1>It's a wee bit different. All right, let's go to

0:31:57.440 --> 0:32:00.480
<v Speaker 1>another rookie quarterback. This one's gonna be in primetime. Caleb

0:32:00.480 --> 0:32:02.680
<v Speaker 1>Williams and the Bears are six and a half point

0:32:02.760 --> 0:32:05.360
<v Speaker 1>underdogs going to Houston. That feels right to me. Forty

0:32:05.400 --> 0:32:08.560
<v Speaker 1>six is the number plus two forty for Chicago. So

0:32:08.960 --> 0:32:13.959
<v Speaker 1>this is a dangerous game because you know, primetime, Caleb

0:32:14.000 --> 0:32:17.440
<v Speaker 1>did not look great the Houston Texans. We're in a

0:32:17.440 --> 0:32:19.800
<v Speaker 1>bit of a dogfight there, with a division rival. Now

0:32:19.880 --> 0:32:23.680
<v Speaker 1>they're gonna go home. Theoretically, if you struggle against the

0:32:23.680 --> 0:32:25.840
<v Speaker 1>Titans and the things break your way and you win,

0:32:26.440 --> 0:32:29.600
<v Speaker 1>you should get crushed on the road by Houston. Theoretically,

0:32:30.640 --> 0:32:33.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm in on the Texans, and I'm gonna stick with

0:32:33.080 --> 0:32:36.200
<v Speaker 1>that logic and theory for now. It would not surprise

0:32:36.280 --> 0:32:38.680
<v Speaker 1>me if Chicago covered. They might be one of these

0:32:38.680 --> 0:32:40.760
<v Speaker 1>teams this year, all year that just finds these weird

0:32:40.760 --> 0:32:43.720
<v Speaker 1>ways to keep the games closed. But until further notice,

0:32:43.760 --> 0:32:46.080
<v Speaker 1>until I get a little bit more of that, I'm

0:32:46.080 --> 0:32:48.280
<v Speaker 1>gonna take what happened yesterday with a grand assault, and

0:32:48.280 --> 0:32:50.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna like Houston in this game, despite the fact

0:32:50.160 --> 0:32:52.120
<v Speaker 1>that six and a half forty six is the total

0:32:52.200 --> 0:32:54.080
<v Speaker 1>again plus two to forty on the money line for

0:32:54.080 --> 0:32:55.480
<v Speaker 1>the Bears. What do you what's your take on this?

0:32:55.800 --> 0:32:58.440
<v Speaker 2>Do you like the under a lot because you have

0:32:58.480 --> 0:33:01.800
<v Speaker 2>a rookie quarterback making his first start on the road, primetime,

0:33:02.280 --> 0:33:05.240
<v Speaker 2>hostile environment the Texans art, are they feel good right now?

0:33:05.280 --> 0:33:08.040
<v Speaker 2>And what did they show us like yesterday that they

0:33:08.040 --> 0:33:09.680
<v Speaker 2>want to run the football? They gave the ball to

0:33:09.760 --> 0:33:13.040
<v Speaker 2>Joe Mixon thirty times. That doesn't scream, Oh they're going

0:33:13.120 --> 0:33:15.040
<v Speaker 2>to put up thirty five points in this game against

0:33:15.040 --> 0:33:15.479
<v Speaker 2>the Bears.

0:33:15.760 --> 0:33:16.520
<v Speaker 3>I just don't see that.

0:33:16.600 --> 0:33:19.400
<v Speaker 2>So I think that Williams is going to again saw

0:33:19.440 --> 0:33:22.320
<v Speaker 2>the struggles early on and they weren't even close to

0:33:22.360 --> 0:33:25.080
<v Speaker 2>covering that game. If it weren't for two, you know,

0:33:25.160 --> 0:33:27.840
<v Speaker 2>a special team's touchdown and a defensive touchdown, they would

0:33:27.880 --> 0:33:29.080
<v Speaker 2>have been closed. So I think we're going to see

0:33:29.080 --> 0:33:29.600
<v Speaker 2>things regrets.

0:33:30.080 --> 0:33:31.720
<v Speaker 1>That was the other one too, But I was like,

0:33:31.800 --> 0:33:33.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm watching this game of like the Titans are going

0:33:33.640 --> 0:33:39.160
<v Speaker 1>to cover. I was look, but I agreed with him.

0:33:39.160 --> 0:33:42.840
<v Speaker 1>I will look, well, our wins are our wins, our

0:33:43.000 --> 0:33:45.040
<v Speaker 1>l's are our l's. This is how we roll here.

0:33:45.480 --> 0:33:49.080
<v Speaker 1>It's it's a process thing, right, and that we own it.

0:33:50.040 --> 0:33:53.080
<v Speaker 1>That was a bad being. Like when Will Levis threw

0:33:53.120 --> 0:33:55.440
<v Speaker 1>that ball as he was being sacked, I was just

0:33:56.000 --> 0:33:58.040
<v Speaker 1>I hung my head down and was just shaking my head.

0:33:58.080 --> 0:33:59.520
<v Speaker 1>I was like, and this is why Will Levis as

0:33:59.520 --> 0:34:01.760
<v Speaker 1>Will Levis like that kind of crap that you could

0:34:01.760 --> 0:34:03.800
<v Speaker 1>try to get away with when you're playing you know,

0:34:03.840 --> 0:34:06.120
<v Speaker 1>in Kentucky or whatever the hell, Like, you just can't

0:34:06.120 --> 0:34:08.399
<v Speaker 1>get away with that stuff here. You can't get away

0:34:08.440 --> 0:34:10.960
<v Speaker 1>with that stuff in the NFL. That stuff loses your games.

0:34:11.000 --> 0:34:13.680
<v Speaker 1>Just eat the sack, bro, What are you doing there?

0:34:13.840 --> 0:34:16.200
<v Speaker 1>Because if he eats the sack, guess what they probably

0:34:16.239 --> 0:34:18.640
<v Speaker 1>cover that game. They probably do like it's it's gonna

0:34:18.640 --> 0:34:22.320
<v Speaker 1>be fine, everything's gonna be fine. Week one, well it

0:34:22.400 --> 0:34:24.000
<v Speaker 1>was good bad. A lot of good in week one though,

0:34:24.040 --> 0:34:25.719
<v Speaker 1>a lot of good in week one, So don't want

0:34:25.719 --> 0:34:28.200
<v Speaker 1>to let those up. Other couple of things. But what's

0:34:28.200 --> 0:34:30.440
<v Speaker 1>more frustrating is when you see it and you know

0:34:30.520 --> 0:34:32.680
<v Speaker 1>it's going in that direction and then somebody like hands

0:34:32.680 --> 0:34:34.719
<v Speaker 1>it back like that's the front, like Gardner Minshew kicking

0:34:34.760 --> 0:34:37.840
<v Speaker 1>that ball? You know, like, what are you doing there? Like?

0:34:38.080 --> 0:34:39.560
<v Speaker 1>Was he trying to tucket? Was he trying to throw?

0:34:39.640 --> 0:34:40.759
<v Speaker 1>What the hell was going on there?

0:34:41.280 --> 0:34:42.000
<v Speaker 3>I was?

0:34:42.000 --> 0:34:42.120
<v Speaker 1>Was it?

0:34:42.200 --> 0:34:44.200
<v Speaker 3>Yeah? What was that to? Was that the two saves?

0:34:44.280 --> 0:34:47.439
<v Speaker 1>No, the Seattle game had the two safeties? Like that's

0:34:47.480 --> 0:34:52.160
<v Speaker 1>another way to score stuff. Who's coming out to close

0:34:52.200 --> 0:34:52.640
<v Speaker 1>this one?

0:34:52.880 --> 0:34:53.000
<v Speaker 4>All?

0:34:53.120 --> 0:34:56.280
<v Speaker 1>Right? Last one here? Monday night football, the Eagles Seguon

0:34:56.360 --> 0:34:58.440
<v Speaker 1>Barkley with a little bit of extra rest love that

0:34:58.480 --> 0:35:00.920
<v Speaker 1>he looked great. Uh, give the ball to Saquon and

0:35:00.920 --> 0:35:03.560
<v Speaker 1>get out of the way. Against Atlanta Falcons, the Eagle

0:35:03.600 --> 0:35:06.279
<v Speaker 1>is a six point favorites. It's a pretty hefty number there,

0:35:06.280 --> 0:35:09.040
<v Speaker 1>but I can't argue with it compared to like you

0:35:09.080 --> 0:35:10.920
<v Speaker 1>saw a lot of an aptitude with Atlanta. Maybe a

0:35:10.960 --> 0:35:13.719
<v Speaker 1>little bit more time in practice gets everybody together. I

0:35:13.719 --> 0:35:16.880
<v Speaker 1>think you saw. Unfortunately, this is what happens when you

0:35:16.960 --> 0:35:20.600
<v Speaker 1>don't get your preseason reps together and your quarterbacks coming

0:35:20.640 --> 0:35:23.080
<v Speaker 1>off an injury. It's gonna look crappy. It's just gonna

0:35:23.080 --> 0:35:26.440
<v Speaker 1>look bad. Hence, Wow, I'm concerned about the Jets tonight.

0:35:27.040 --> 0:35:28.440
<v Speaker 1>That being said, forty eight and a half is the

0:35:28.520 --> 0:35:31.320
<v Speaker 1>number plus two twenty four Atlanta. Your thoughts here, Andrew

0:35:31.360 --> 0:35:32.959
<v Speaker 1>Erickson on Monday Night, Week two.

0:35:33.120 --> 0:35:35.640
<v Speaker 3>Totals are way too high forty eight and a half.

0:35:36.280 --> 0:35:38.400
<v Speaker 2>Again, I don't think we're gonna see this Falcons offense

0:35:38.440 --> 0:35:40.800
<v Speaker 2>firing at least a couple of weeks into the season.

0:35:40.880 --> 0:35:42.439
<v Speaker 2>I don't think it's gonna be one week and they're

0:35:42.440 --> 0:35:45.400
<v Speaker 2>gonna help good to go like this will be fine.

0:35:45.680 --> 0:35:47.440
<v Speaker 2>I don't think that's gonna be the case. And you

0:35:47.480 --> 0:35:50.120
<v Speaker 2>were talking about how Talkin's defense, you don't think is

0:35:50.120 --> 0:35:51.000
<v Speaker 2>that is that bad?

0:35:51.320 --> 0:35:51.560
<v Speaker 3>Right?

0:35:51.640 --> 0:35:54.959
<v Speaker 2>They were able to contain a mobile quarterback in justin

0:35:55.000 --> 0:35:57.960
<v Speaker 2>field stealing Hurts is a mobile quarterback. You didn't really

0:35:58.000 --> 0:36:00.360
<v Speaker 2>see the Steelers again a team that they're going to

0:36:00.400 --> 0:36:02.040
<v Speaker 2>establish the run. They're gonna be a great running team.

0:36:02.080 --> 0:36:04.360
<v Speaker 2>You know, nause wasn't overly efficient anyway. I get like

0:36:04.360 --> 0:36:07.919
<v Speaker 2>Barkley's better than Nausey, but I just don't see forty

0:36:07.920 --> 0:36:09.279
<v Speaker 2>eight and a half. This is This would be the

0:36:09.320 --> 0:36:11.400
<v Speaker 2>line if the Falcons came out and we're firing on

0:36:11.480 --> 0:36:14.239
<v Speaker 2>all cylinders against the Steelers, right, this would be the line.

0:36:14.560 --> 0:36:17.680
<v Speaker 2>But they did it, so I don't understand where it's

0:36:17.680 --> 0:36:18.279
<v Speaker 2>too high for me.

0:36:19.280 --> 0:36:21.800
<v Speaker 1>There you have it, everybody. So that is the early

0:36:21.840 --> 0:36:24.880
<v Speaker 1>look at Week two in the NFL. Make sure you

0:36:24.920 --> 0:36:27.560
<v Speaker 1>are downloading your Betting Pros app sink all your sportsbooks

0:36:27.560 --> 0:36:29.560
<v Speaker 1>for free, use the tools, and of course you can

0:36:29.600 --> 0:36:31.760
<v Speaker 1>follow us at betting pros dot com, slash Joe, slash

0:36:31.880 --> 0:36:34.279
<v Speaker 1>ericson all of the gang here at Betting Pros, and

0:36:34.320 --> 0:36:37.080
<v Speaker 1>most importantly, make sure you subscribe to the Betting Pros

0:36:37.120 --> 0:36:40.440
<v Speaker 1>YouTube channel ring the Belta that goes ding for notifications

0:36:40.560 --> 0:36:42.439
<v Speaker 1>because we've got lots of giveaways. And don't forget about

0:36:42.440 --> 0:36:46.200
<v Speaker 1>that NFL contest too. Every week, every month again Betting

0:36:46.200 --> 0:36:48.959
<v Speaker 1>Pros dot Com slash NFL contest, join that bad boy,

0:36:49.280 --> 0:36:50.719
<v Speaker 1>and you even have to make bets. You just have

0:36:50.800 --> 0:36:53.000
<v Speaker 1>to make picks, have some fun with us, watch the

0:36:53.080 --> 0:36:55.360
<v Speaker 1>games with a little bit more mojo. That's what we

0:36:55.400 --> 0:36:57.399
<v Speaker 1>want to deal here at Betting Pros and shout out

0:36:57.440 --> 0:36:59.799
<v Speaker 1>to all of you who made week one such a

0:37:00.040 --> 0:37:02.520
<v Speaker 1>eccess over here on the channel. It's the first time

0:37:02.520 --> 0:37:05.759
<v Speaker 1>we've done five days a week of NFL programming, six

0:37:05.840 --> 0:37:08.680
<v Speaker 1>days if you count the live stream too. The college

0:37:08.719 --> 0:37:11.719
<v Speaker 1>shows were a great success. All the Betting NFL shows

0:37:11.719 --> 0:37:13.520
<v Speaker 1>were a great success because of all of you who

0:37:13.520 --> 0:37:15.480
<v Speaker 1>are out there watching and listening. So shout out to

0:37:15.520 --> 0:37:17.120
<v Speaker 1>all of you. Thanks for joining us. We know you

0:37:17.160 --> 0:37:19.440
<v Speaker 1>have a lot of options, and we're very pleased that

0:37:19.520 --> 0:37:22.680
<v Speaker 1>you choose us. Can you believe that, Andrew, they chose us.

0:37:22.880 --> 0:37:26.799
<v Speaker 1>I'm so moved, But again all honesty, thank you so

0:37:26.880 --> 0:37:28.680
<v Speaker 1>much everybody for being out there and be with us

0:37:28.719 --> 0:37:31.880
<v Speaker 1>all season long here on BP NFL. That'll do it

0:37:31.920 --> 0:37:33.560
<v Speaker 1>for us, But the story of the game goes on

0:37:33.600 --> 0:37:36.960
<v Speaker 1>for Andrew Erickson. I'm Joey p. We'll see you next time.

0:37:37.040 --> 0:37:37.400
<v Speaker 3>Kids.

0:37:38.680 --> 0:37:41.319
<v Speaker 4>Thanks for listening to the Betting Pros podcast. If you

0:37:41.360 --> 0:37:43.719
<v Speaker 4>love the show, the best freeway to support us is

0:37:43.719 --> 0:37:47.160
<v Speaker 4>by leaving a positive review on Apple Podcasts or Spotify.

0:37:47.440 --> 0:37:50.080
<v Speaker 4>Follow us on x and TikTok at Betting Pros and

0:37:50.160 --> 0:37:53.800
<v Speaker 4>Instagram at betting Pros NFL. Also subscribe to our YouTube

0:37:53.880 --> 0:38:05.520
<v Speaker 4>channel at YouTube dot com slash Betting Pros