WEBVTT - Will the D-backs Still Buy at the Trade Deadline After Recent Slump?

0:00:09.360 --> 0:00:12.799
<v Speaker 1>Hello and welcome to another episode of Snake's Territory, part

0:00:12.840 --> 0:00:15.760
<v Speaker 1>of the Fouls Territory Network. Be sure to like this video,

0:00:15.800 --> 0:00:18.400
<v Speaker 1>subscribe it to our YouTube channel, maybe leave us a

0:00:18.440 --> 0:00:21.560
<v Speaker 1>five star review wherever you get your podcasts. I am

0:00:21.640 --> 0:00:27.400
<v Speaker 1>Jesse Friedman alongside Jack Summers and Jack Diamondbacks did not

0:00:27.560 --> 0:00:31.200
<v Speaker 1>have a great weekend out in Tampa. They get swept

0:00:31.240 --> 0:00:34.920
<v Speaker 1>by the Tampa Bay Rays. They get outscored fifteen to four.

0:00:35.400 --> 0:00:39.280
<v Speaker 1>It was a lifeless showing and they are now under

0:00:39.400 --> 0:00:44.040
<v Speaker 1>five hundred for the first time since May seventeenth.

0:00:44.280 --> 0:00:47.519
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that place has just been a house of horrors

0:00:47.520 --> 0:00:49.680
<v Speaker 2>for the Diamondbacks. They was swept there in twenty three,

0:00:50.640 --> 0:00:52.760
<v Speaker 2>they swept this year. They lost two or three to

0:00:52.800 --> 0:00:55.440
<v Speaker 2>the Rays last year at Chase Field. As we heard

0:00:55.480 --> 0:00:58.880
<v Speaker 2>at nauseum. You know, the Dbacs are zero for six

0:00:59.360 --> 0:01:03.440
<v Speaker 2>in Florida and I think they scored ten runs in

0:01:03.480 --> 0:01:05.440
<v Speaker 2>the six games between.

0:01:05.080 --> 0:01:06.480
<v Speaker 3>Tampa and Miami.

0:01:07.000 --> 0:01:10.119
<v Speaker 2>So yeah, good news for the d Backs that they

0:01:10.120 --> 0:01:11.720
<v Speaker 2>do not need to go back to the state of

0:01:11.720 --> 0:01:14.280
<v Speaker 2>Florida again for the rest of the season, unless it's

0:01:14.280 --> 0:01:16.680
<v Speaker 2>supposed season. Well.

0:01:16.760 --> 0:01:19.840
<v Speaker 1>Unfortunately, there really was no good news for Merrill Kelly

0:01:20.040 --> 0:01:24.000
<v Speaker 1>after another rough outing for him on Sunday in the

0:01:24.000 --> 0:01:27.199
<v Speaker 1>finale of the series. Six innings, eight hits, five runs,

0:01:27.240 --> 0:01:30.840
<v Speaker 1>two walks, three strikeouts. He allowed three home runs in

0:01:30.920 --> 0:01:35.400
<v Speaker 1>the game, Jack, he generated four whiffs. I guess if

0:01:35.440 --> 0:01:38.080
<v Speaker 1>you want to combine Zach Gallon and Meryl Kelly in

0:01:38.120 --> 0:01:40.560
<v Speaker 1>the course of that series, those two guys combined to

0:01:40.640 --> 0:01:44.760
<v Speaker 1>get five swing and misses and allowed five home runs,

0:01:45.120 --> 0:01:47.920
<v Speaker 1>and that is you do not want those two numbers

0:01:47.960 --> 0:01:51.720
<v Speaker 1>to be the same. So Meryl Kelly another rough one,

0:01:52.160 --> 0:01:55.240
<v Speaker 1>and at the end of this game, I'll just throw

0:01:55.280 --> 0:01:58.320
<v Speaker 1>these quotes up here. Now, Merrill was sort of at

0:01:58.320 --> 0:02:02.520
<v Speaker 1>a loss for words. Merrill started, I guess the first

0:02:02.600 --> 0:02:07.280
<v Speaker 1>quote that we saw from Jose Romero in his story

0:02:07.320 --> 0:02:11.880
<v Speaker 1>over at the Arizona Republic was Meryll saying that he

0:02:11.960 --> 0:02:15.440
<v Speaker 1>doesn't really have any more ways to describe what's happened

0:02:15.520 --> 0:02:18.400
<v Speaker 1>this season. He said, I'm starting to run out of

0:02:18.440 --> 0:02:21.680
<v Speaker 1>words for how bad I've been this year. And then

0:02:21.800 --> 0:02:23.880
<v Speaker 1>you see here he said, just more of the same,

0:02:23.960 --> 0:02:28.000
<v Speaker 1>missing pitches, bad counts. And then Merrill went on to say,

0:02:28.040 --> 0:02:30.320
<v Speaker 1>we still have half a season left, but as a

0:02:30.320 --> 0:02:33.360
<v Speaker 1>whole on the year, definitely the poorest results the porse,

0:02:33.480 --> 0:02:34.560
<v Speaker 1>I've felt the least.

0:02:34.600 --> 0:02:36.400
<v Speaker 4>I feel like I'm doing my job.

0:02:36.800 --> 0:02:39.800
<v Speaker 1>That part sucks probably the worst, not doing what the

0:02:39.840 --> 0:02:41.920
<v Speaker 1>team needs me to do, what the team counts on

0:02:41.960 --> 0:02:44.720
<v Speaker 1>me to do every fifth day. I've mixed some good

0:02:44.760 --> 0:02:46.840
<v Speaker 1>ones in there, but as a whole, I think that's

0:02:46.880 --> 0:02:50.560
<v Speaker 1>the part that hurts the most. And I guess if

0:02:50.560 --> 0:02:53.919
<v Speaker 1>you're a Diamondbacks fan the very least can maybe respect

0:02:53.919 --> 0:02:57.760
<v Speaker 1>that Merril Kelly is really feeling it right now and

0:02:57.919 --> 0:03:00.959
<v Speaker 1>is trying to do everything he can to get back

0:03:01.000 --> 0:03:01.440
<v Speaker 1>on track.

0:03:02.520 --> 0:03:05.399
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, for sure, Meryl cares. I mean, I know it's

0:03:05.400 --> 0:03:09.600
<v Speaker 2>frustrating for all of us, but not as much as

0:03:09.639 --> 0:03:12.320
<v Speaker 2>for us as it is for him. I mean, yes,

0:03:12.360 --> 0:03:15.799
<v Speaker 2>he's well paid. He's well paid professional athlete. He makes

0:03:15.800 --> 0:03:18.200
<v Speaker 2>a lot of money. But don't for a minute think

0:03:18.240 --> 0:03:22.080
<v Speaker 2>that Merril Kelly doesn't care immensely about how well he

0:03:22.120 --> 0:03:25.080
<v Speaker 2>performs doing his job and trying to help his teammates.

0:03:25.919 --> 0:03:27.280
<v Speaker 2>You know, at the end of the day, we don't

0:03:27.320 --> 0:03:30.720
<v Speaker 2>have to feel bad for him as a person. I mean,

0:03:30.760 --> 0:03:35.080
<v Speaker 2>he's going to be absolutely fine. But don't kid yourself, guys,

0:03:35.120 --> 0:03:38.080
<v Speaker 2>these they care. I know when we're watching on TV,

0:03:39.040 --> 0:03:41.880
<v Speaker 2>whether guys are not hitting or you know, having bad

0:03:41.880 --> 0:03:44.720
<v Speaker 2>at bats, or you know, serving up meatballs. It just

0:03:44.720 --> 0:03:47.680
<v Speaker 2>feels like they don't care, and it's listless and lifeless

0:03:47.680 --> 0:03:50.040
<v Speaker 2>and all of that. And it can feel that way

0:03:50.080 --> 0:03:53.640
<v Speaker 2>in their dugout as well. But they care. They work hard,

0:03:53.720 --> 0:03:57.960
<v Speaker 2>they try, they care. It doesn't excuse poor performance, but

0:03:58.000 --> 0:03:58.400
<v Speaker 2>they care.

0:04:00.480 --> 0:04:04.640
<v Speaker 1>Zach Gallon has the worst ERA in baseball among qualified

0:04:04.680 --> 0:04:07.760
<v Speaker 1>starters at six point one point five. Mary Kelly is

0:04:07.800 --> 0:04:11.720
<v Speaker 1>still not a qualified starter, so he technically is not

0:04:11.840 --> 0:04:14.560
<v Speaker 1>on that list, But if you were a qualified starter,

0:04:14.680 --> 0:04:18.000
<v Speaker 1>his five point eight four ERA theoretically would rank second

0:04:18.000 --> 0:04:22.080
<v Speaker 1>worst in baseball, just behind his teammates Zach Gallon. So

0:04:22.480 --> 0:04:25.240
<v Speaker 1>certainly not what the Diamondbacks we're hoping to get from

0:04:25.279 --> 0:04:28.120
<v Speaker 1>those two guys this season. We talked a little bit

0:04:28.200 --> 0:04:31.520
<v Speaker 1>more about Gallon after his start on Friday. In terms

0:04:31.520 --> 0:04:34.600
<v Speaker 1>of Meryl Jack, I know you've done some work looking

0:04:34.800 --> 0:04:38.400
<v Speaker 1>at some of the underlying numbers for Merrill this season

0:04:38.720 --> 0:04:42.920
<v Speaker 1>and in comparison with twenty twenty five, and I guess

0:04:43.000 --> 0:04:45.080
<v Speaker 1>there was a narrative early in the year that he

0:04:45.200 --> 0:04:47.680
<v Speaker 1>just had a few really bad starts and he didn't

0:04:47.720 --> 0:04:50.760
<v Speaker 1>have a full spring training. You could maybe excuse those

0:04:50.800 --> 0:04:54.320
<v Speaker 1>clunkers in the beginning, but I think your chart here

0:04:54.400 --> 0:04:58.440
<v Speaker 1>shows pretty clearly that Mary Kelly, even if you exclude

0:04:58.520 --> 0:05:00.599
<v Speaker 1>those really bad starts at the beginn any of the year,

0:05:01.000 --> 0:05:02.440
<v Speaker 1>he has not been the same guy.

0:05:03.520 --> 0:05:07.359
<v Speaker 2>That's correct. And the other point for me was, even

0:05:07.400 --> 0:05:09.760
<v Speaker 2>when he was having some good starts, a lot of

0:05:09.800 --> 0:05:12.120
<v Speaker 2>the underlying stuff just didn't look right. And there are

0:05:12.120 --> 0:05:15.240
<v Speaker 2>a lot of really big red flags and warning signs

0:05:15.279 --> 0:05:18.120
<v Speaker 2>that even those few good starts that he did have

0:05:19.360 --> 0:05:22.839
<v Speaker 2>were just not sustainable. So what this chart is, and

0:05:22.880 --> 0:05:24.240
<v Speaker 2>it's a little eyecharty, but.

0:05:24.200 --> 0:05:24.760
<v Speaker 3>Hang with me.

0:05:25.360 --> 0:05:30.279
<v Speaker 2>So this is Merril Kelly's ex wOBA by pitch type splits,

0:05:30.839 --> 0:05:34.360
<v Speaker 2>and it's being compared against the MLB average right hand

0:05:34.440 --> 0:05:36.760
<v Speaker 2>starting pitcher. So I want to be very specific. I

0:05:36.800 --> 0:05:40.080
<v Speaker 2>want to compare Merrill to his class of player right

0:05:40.120 --> 0:05:44.440
<v Speaker 2>hand starters, and so on the screen it shows twenty

0:05:44.480 --> 0:05:48.520
<v Speaker 2>twenty six year to date. And just for those that

0:05:48.640 --> 0:05:53.880
<v Speaker 2>may not know, x wOBA is basically the same as XCRA.

0:05:54.520 --> 0:05:58.680
<v Speaker 2>XCRA is ex wOBA converted to an ERA number, So

0:05:58.720 --> 0:06:02.480
<v Speaker 2>it's just easier to pull the x wOBA and Merrill's

0:06:02.520 --> 0:06:06.640
<v Speaker 2>ex wOBA for the year is coming into today's start

0:06:06.960 --> 0:06:10.240
<v Speaker 2>was four oh two, and the average right hand starting

0:06:10.279 --> 0:06:13.239
<v Speaker 2>pitcher was point three two three. But if I throw

0:06:13.279 --> 0:06:17.159
<v Speaker 2>out the first four starts, just don't include him, just

0:06:17.200 --> 0:06:21.840
<v Speaker 2>toss him out. His ex wOBA from May ninth forward

0:06:22.520 --> 0:06:26.279
<v Speaker 2>was still point three six eight three sixty eight x

0:06:26.320 --> 0:06:29.960
<v Speaker 2>wOBA against a three to nineteen average for the average

0:06:30.040 --> 0:06:34.240
<v Speaker 2>right hand starting pitcher. Compared to twenty twenty five, he

0:06:34.320 --> 0:06:38.320
<v Speaker 2>had a three sixteen x WHOBA versus a three twenty

0:06:38.360 --> 0:06:41.839
<v Speaker 2>two average x WHOBA for the right hand.

0:06:41.720 --> 0:06:42.880
<v Speaker 3>Starting pitchers in the league.

0:06:43.440 --> 0:06:47.520
<v Speaker 2>So we can see a fifty point gap in the

0:06:47.560 --> 0:06:52.200
<v Speaker 2>expected stats on wOBA for Merrill Kelly, even if you

0:06:52.240 --> 0:06:55.640
<v Speaker 2>throw out the bad first fourth starts. The other part

0:06:55.680 --> 0:06:57.960
<v Speaker 2>of this chart that I just want to highlight is

0:06:58.120 --> 0:07:01.440
<v Speaker 2>I did break it out by pitch type, and on

0:07:01.480 --> 0:07:03.440
<v Speaker 2>the far left hand side of the column you can

0:07:03.480 --> 0:07:06.360
<v Speaker 2>see what the wOBA is for the average starting pitcher.

0:07:06.400 --> 0:07:08.599
<v Speaker 2>For example, because if you hit the ball, if you

0:07:08.600 --> 0:07:12.120
<v Speaker 2>put it in play, I mean the average hitters like fastballs, right,

0:07:12.160 --> 0:07:15.440
<v Speaker 2>So the average wOBA on a fastball is zero point

0:07:15.440 --> 0:07:18.720
<v Speaker 2>three four nine. Merrill's this year is five oh two,

0:07:19.480 --> 0:07:23.360
<v Speaker 2>and even since May ninth, it's four fifty. The changeup,

0:07:23.400 --> 0:07:26.280
<v Speaker 2>which is his bread and butter. I mean, the changeup

0:07:26.360 --> 0:07:29.400
<v Speaker 2>was his best pitch in twenty twenty five or with

0:07:29.480 --> 0:07:33.560
<v Speaker 2>a two seventy x wOBA against This year it's three

0:07:33.760 --> 0:07:36.800
<v Speaker 2>ninety and even since May ninth, three point fifty five.

0:07:37.640 --> 0:07:41.280
<v Speaker 2>The cutter's bad, the slider's pretty good, but he doesn't

0:07:41.320 --> 0:07:44.160
<v Speaker 2>throw out that much. The curve is the pitch that

0:07:44.280 --> 0:07:47.800
<v Speaker 2>he's getting the most success on, but again is probably

0:07:47.800 --> 0:07:50.680
<v Speaker 2>hard to sequence in more frequently than he has. I

0:07:50.720 --> 0:07:53.640
<v Speaker 2>showed the total number of pitches as well. He's only

0:07:53.640 --> 0:07:56.440
<v Speaker 2>got a two oh nine x wOBA on the curve

0:07:56.440 --> 0:07:59.040
<v Speaker 2>ball since May ninth. So there are you know, I mean,

0:07:59.120 --> 0:08:02.040
<v Speaker 2>basically it's ever think about the curveball and maybe some

0:08:02.120 --> 0:08:05.960
<v Speaker 2>of the sliders getting hammered, forcing change up, cutter, sinker,

0:08:06.240 --> 0:08:10.560
<v Speaker 2>they're all getting absolutely drilled, and you know, so it's

0:08:10.600 --> 0:08:13.480
<v Speaker 2>really hard for me to see where to be optimistic

0:08:13.560 --> 0:08:16.840
<v Speaker 2>with Merrill going forward, Like what's the way forward for

0:08:16.960 --> 0:08:19.960
<v Speaker 2>him to reverse this collapse?

0:08:20.200 --> 0:08:21.440
<v Speaker 3>And that's what this is, folks.

0:08:21.720 --> 0:08:24.720
<v Speaker 2>This is a complete and total collapse through you know,

0:08:24.760 --> 0:08:28.960
<v Speaker 2>however many starts he's got fourteen or whatever for a

0:08:29.000 --> 0:08:30.119
<v Speaker 2>thirty seven year old pitcher.

0:08:31.640 --> 0:08:34.760
<v Speaker 1>I think We've always understood with Merrill that the stuff

0:08:34.920 --> 0:08:38.640
<v Speaker 1>wasn't all that great, and as it continued to diminish

0:08:39.080 --> 0:08:41.200
<v Speaker 1>as he got older, like there was a risk there,

0:08:41.280 --> 0:08:44.320
<v Speaker 1>certainly that he would just sort of drop off the table.

0:08:44.800 --> 0:08:49.199
<v Speaker 1>What's odd about his twenty twenty six season is the

0:08:49.600 --> 0:08:52.319
<v Speaker 1>numbers haven't really dropped off the table. I mean, it's

0:08:52.320 --> 0:08:55.480
<v Speaker 1>forcing fastball this year is averaged ninety two point zero

0:08:55.960 --> 0:08:59.120
<v Speaker 1>last year at average ninety one point nine. You look

0:08:59.160 --> 0:09:02.280
<v Speaker 1>at the movement on some of his pitches, I know,

0:09:02.400 --> 0:09:06.400
<v Speaker 1>the cutter movement profile is pretty different this year. I'm

0:09:06.400 --> 0:09:08.760
<v Speaker 1>not sure it's clearly worse than it was last year,

0:09:08.800 --> 0:09:11.920
<v Speaker 1>but it is different. The change up his signature pitch

0:09:11.960 --> 0:09:16.160
<v Speaker 1>that you mentioned almost exactly identical in terms of velocity

0:09:16.320 --> 0:09:18.360
<v Speaker 1>and movement. I think he's lost a third of an

0:09:18.360 --> 0:09:21.280
<v Speaker 1>inch of drop, but that is such a small number

0:09:21.280 --> 0:09:24.439
<v Speaker 1>it's hard to believe that that is solely responsible for

0:09:24.800 --> 0:09:28.520
<v Speaker 1>the difference there. And it sets up a situation with

0:09:28.600 --> 0:09:33.040
<v Speaker 1>Meryl Jack where I'm just like, I just can't really

0:09:33.080 --> 0:09:36.760
<v Speaker 1>put my finger on what's gone on with him this season.

0:09:37.280 --> 0:09:40.679
<v Speaker 1>The narrative that he's kind of pushed in his postgame interviews,

0:09:40.720 --> 0:09:44.480
<v Speaker 1>and he talked about it again today, was just throwing

0:09:44.520 --> 0:09:47.440
<v Speaker 1>too many pitches in the heart of the zone. And

0:09:47.480 --> 0:09:50.080
<v Speaker 1>I know this is maybe a bit of an oversimplification,

0:09:50.200 --> 0:09:52.960
<v Speaker 1>but if you just look at the percentage of pitches

0:09:53.000 --> 0:09:55.800
<v Speaker 1>in the heart of the zone from Merril Kelly, he

0:09:56.000 --> 0:09:59.240
<v Speaker 1>actually has thrown fewer of them in twenty twenty six

0:09:59.320 --> 0:10:02.360
<v Speaker 1>than he did season ago. This season he's a twenty

0:10:02.360 --> 0:10:05.080
<v Speaker 1>two point three percent of his pitches in the heart

0:10:05.080 --> 0:10:07.600
<v Speaker 1>of the zone. Last year was twenty four point three percent,

0:10:08.160 --> 0:10:11.400
<v Speaker 1>so actually down two percent in that regard. The one

0:10:11.400 --> 0:10:14.960
<v Speaker 1>thing I could find Jack was his zone rate is

0:10:15.040 --> 0:10:19.000
<v Speaker 1>down pretty significantly. He has thrown forty three point five

0:10:19.080 --> 0:10:23.320
<v Speaker 1>percent of his pitches in the zone entering today. Last

0:10:23.360 --> 0:10:26.600
<v Speaker 1>year was forty seven point eight percent, and I think

0:10:26.640 --> 0:10:28.800
<v Speaker 1>compared to the rest of his career, I believe that's

0:10:28.840 --> 0:10:32.319
<v Speaker 1>the lowest zone rate of his career. So in terms

0:10:32.320 --> 0:10:35.200
<v Speaker 1>of just literally throwing the pitch in the strike zone,

0:10:35.360 --> 0:10:39.000
<v Speaker 1>Merrill Kelly has regressed in that regard, and I guess

0:10:39.040 --> 0:10:42.880
<v Speaker 1>that that results in fewer counts in his favor and

0:10:43.400 --> 0:10:47.640
<v Speaker 1>hitters maybe just being more comfortable against his wide arsenal

0:10:47.679 --> 0:10:48.160
<v Speaker 1>of pitches.

0:10:49.520 --> 0:10:53.640
<v Speaker 2>Meryl also talked about his mechanics and saying that, you know,

0:10:53.679 --> 0:10:56.120
<v Speaker 2>he felt like there was some issues there with his mechanics,

0:10:56.120 --> 0:10:59.520
<v Speaker 2>and there were definitely some problems there. I go back

0:10:59.559 --> 0:11:02.160
<v Speaker 2>to discussion I have with Brent Strom during the Madison

0:11:02.200 --> 0:11:07.679
<v Speaker 2>Bumgarner trials, and you know, when we look with looking

0:11:07.720 --> 0:11:10.079
<v Speaker 2>at Bumgarner, I mean, his velocity was the same, his

0:11:10.160 --> 0:11:13.120
<v Speaker 2>spin rates were the same, the movement profile on his

0:11:13.200 --> 0:11:17.040
<v Speaker 2>pitches was essentially the same. We couldn't figure out why

0:11:17.600 --> 0:11:20.800
<v Speaker 2>hitters were crushing him, but he was having a lot

0:11:20.800 --> 0:11:23.760
<v Speaker 2>of location mistakes. It wasn't so much that he was

0:11:23.800 --> 0:11:26.240
<v Speaker 2>walking guys, but he did get scared out of strike.

0:11:26.080 --> 0:11:26.719
<v Speaker 3>Zone a little bit.

0:11:27.000 --> 0:11:31.199
<v Speaker 2>And I asked Strom, I said, do pictures sometimes maybe

0:11:31.280 --> 0:11:33.560
<v Speaker 2>have to go a little harder or closer to max

0:11:33.600 --> 0:11:35.640
<v Speaker 2>effort when they get older And it doesn't show up

0:11:35.679 --> 0:11:38.120
<v Speaker 2>in the velocity and the spin rates, but it does

0:11:38.160 --> 0:11:43.079
<v Speaker 2>show up in inconsistency and mechanics and inability to locate.

0:11:44.360 --> 0:11:47.040
<v Speaker 2>And he said absolutely. He said, you know, the location

0:11:47.240 --> 0:11:50.680
<v Speaker 2>oftentimes goes first, especially when you're looking at guys that

0:11:50.720 --> 0:11:53.200
<v Speaker 2>don't throw ninety eight miles an hour. It was like,

0:11:53.240 --> 0:11:55.560
<v Speaker 2>all of a sudden, why is this? You know, command

0:11:55.640 --> 0:11:58.679
<v Speaker 2>and control expert having a hard time dotting the ball

0:11:58.720 --> 0:12:00.280
<v Speaker 2>like he used to do and keeping it in the

0:12:00.280 --> 0:12:04.280
<v Speaker 2>strike zone. And so you know that's an age factor.

0:12:04.320 --> 0:12:06.439
<v Speaker 2>I mean, look, we all get older. Father time is

0:12:06.480 --> 0:12:10.120
<v Speaker 2>undefeated and being able to repeat your mechanics whistle clean

0:12:10.559 --> 0:12:12.480
<v Speaker 2>every single time so that you can put the ball

0:12:12.520 --> 0:12:16.240
<v Speaker 2>exactly where you want it. That's part of the formula two.

0:12:16.640 --> 0:12:20.079
<v Speaker 2>And there's probably some ways to measure that, but it's

0:12:20.160 --> 0:12:23.320
<v Speaker 2>much more subtle and difficult to do so, and so

0:12:23.559 --> 0:12:27.240
<v Speaker 2>those things will show up first before you see the

0:12:27.280 --> 0:12:31.040
<v Speaker 2>rest of the underlying metrics kind of following behind.

0:12:33.600 --> 0:12:35.520
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I think that. I think that makes a lot

0:12:35.559 --> 0:12:35.959
<v Speaker 4>of sense.

0:12:36.559 --> 0:12:38.880
<v Speaker 1>Certainly, that could be at the heart of what's going

0:12:38.920 --> 0:12:41.760
<v Speaker 1>on with Merrill Kelly five point eight to four er

0:12:42.400 --> 0:12:45.360
<v Speaker 1>at this point still just such an enormous difference from

0:12:45.559 --> 0:12:47.679
<v Speaker 1>where he was a season ago, a three point five

0:12:47.800 --> 0:12:50.480
<v Speaker 1>to two ERA in one hundred and eighty four innings.

0:12:50.480 --> 0:12:53.160
<v Speaker 1>He's one of the best pitchers in baseball and this

0:12:53.200 --> 0:12:56.679
<v Speaker 1>season far far from it. So Diamondbacks get swept by

0:12:56.720 --> 0:13:00.800
<v Speaker 1>the Rays Junior Camonaro, Holy cow, they are going to

0:13:00.840 --> 0:13:05.560
<v Speaker 1>be happy to not have to pitch to him anymore.

0:13:05.679 --> 0:13:08.160
<v Speaker 1>He went five for ten in the series with three

0:13:08.160 --> 0:13:12.280
<v Speaker 1>home runs. That was pretty brutal. And the Diamondbacks have

0:13:12.360 --> 0:13:15.240
<v Speaker 1>now lost six of their last eight. They are ten

0:13:15.280 --> 0:13:19.240
<v Speaker 1>and eighteen since reaching a season high seven games over

0:13:19.320 --> 0:13:22.320
<v Speaker 1>five hundred back on May twenty seventh, And I guess

0:13:22.360 --> 0:13:25.400
<v Speaker 1>we should maybe touch on the offense here as well.

0:13:25.440 --> 0:13:29.160
<v Speaker 1>The Diamondbacks was scoring just the one run in the

0:13:29.160 --> 0:13:32.600
<v Speaker 1>finale of the series. They have now scored two runs

0:13:32.720 --> 0:13:37.080
<v Speaker 1>or fewer in fourteen games since May thirtieth, That is

0:13:37.120 --> 0:13:40.120
<v Speaker 1>the span of less than a month, and the Diamondbacks

0:13:40.120 --> 0:13:43.760
<v Speaker 1>have scored two runs or less in fourteen strake or

0:13:43.760 --> 0:13:48.000
<v Speaker 1>in fourteen games in that span. This offense jack continues

0:13:48.080 --> 0:13:53.000
<v Speaker 1>to be lifeless with runners in scoring position and really

0:13:53.040 --> 0:13:55.440
<v Speaker 1>more lately just kind of lifeless in general.

0:13:56.440 --> 0:13:58.120
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean, we're going to dig into some of

0:13:58.160 --> 0:14:01.920
<v Speaker 2>the underlying stuff but later in the show on the offense,

0:14:02.000 --> 0:14:04.720
<v Speaker 2>But you know, we're getting close to the time where

0:14:05.120 --> 0:14:09.000
<v Speaker 2>some really big moves probably will be happening soon. I mean,

0:14:09.040 --> 0:14:11.319
<v Speaker 2>I don't know much how much further they can go

0:14:11.559 --> 0:14:16.480
<v Speaker 2>this way with the offense struggling this badly, whether that's

0:14:16.679 --> 0:14:19.840
<v Speaker 2>you know, change of player personnel or change of coaching personnel.

0:14:20.120 --> 0:14:23.360
<v Speaker 3>Something's going to give just as simple as that.

0:14:23.640 --> 0:14:26.160
<v Speaker 2>What moves they'll choose to make and when and how

0:14:26.200 --> 0:14:28.440
<v Speaker 2>they'll make them, we don't know for sure. We can

0:14:28.480 --> 0:14:32.680
<v Speaker 2>make suggestions, We have ideas, just like everybody else. You know,

0:14:32.800 --> 0:14:36.080
<v Speaker 2>we'll put some of those forth today, but very very

0:14:36.120 --> 0:14:36.880
<v Speaker 2>difficult to watch.

0:14:36.920 --> 0:14:38.240
<v Speaker 3>They're just a tough watch right now.

0:14:39.480 --> 0:14:42.880
<v Speaker 1>Before we get to our first break, just circling back

0:14:42.880 --> 0:14:45.080
<v Speaker 1>to Maryland, Zach real quick. You and I had a

0:14:45.120 --> 0:14:50.560
<v Speaker 1>conversation earlier today offline about how the Diamondbacks could maybe

0:14:50.760 --> 0:14:53.560
<v Speaker 1>maximize the value on these two guys as they are

0:14:53.600 --> 0:14:56.640
<v Speaker 1>continuing to struggle. I know there's a contingent of people

0:14:56.640 --> 0:14:59.040
<v Speaker 1>that would love to see the d Bacs just remove

0:14:59.160 --> 0:15:02.520
<v Speaker 1>Merrill and Zach from their rotation and you know, maybe

0:15:02.560 --> 0:15:06.480
<v Speaker 1>throw Mitch Bratt and Cold Drake or something like that

0:15:06.560 --> 0:15:09.640
<v Speaker 1>in there. I don't think that's a realistic outcome for

0:15:09.760 --> 0:15:12.360
<v Speaker 1>this team right now. But Jack, I know you had

0:15:12.840 --> 0:15:15.520
<v Speaker 1>a thought about how the Diamondbacks could maybe get some

0:15:15.560 --> 0:15:16.360
<v Speaker 1>more value here.

0:15:17.120 --> 0:15:18.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and this is an original thought. I mean, you know,

0:15:19.000 --> 0:15:21.840
<v Speaker 2>other people have discussed this before, but I'm embracing the

0:15:21.960 --> 0:15:26.320
<v Speaker 2>thought the more I've thought about it, which is, at

0:15:26.320 --> 0:15:29.760
<v Speaker 2>this point in time, as for zach and or for Merril,

0:15:30.560 --> 0:15:33.440
<v Speaker 2>they have to consider using an opener in front of them.

0:15:34.360 --> 0:15:36.760
<v Speaker 2>And it doesn't really matter so much of the righty

0:15:36.880 --> 0:15:41.040
<v Speaker 2>lefty aspect of it. It's more about protecting them from

0:15:41.080 --> 0:15:43.760
<v Speaker 2>the top three on the other team's batting order, because

0:15:43.760 --> 0:15:47.720
<v Speaker 2>almost every team puts their best three hitters one, two, three.

0:15:48.160 --> 0:15:51.240
<v Speaker 2>Protect those two guys right now. Let them get their

0:15:51.280 --> 0:15:54.440
<v Speaker 2>feet under them by facing the lower down portion of

0:15:54.480 --> 0:15:58.400
<v Speaker 2>the order when they come out, and then by the

0:15:58.480 --> 0:16:00.800
<v Speaker 2>time they get back around to the top of the order,

0:16:01.160 --> 0:16:03.920
<v Speaker 2>they will have at least, you know, faced anywhere from

0:16:03.920 --> 0:16:07.640
<v Speaker 2>three to six batters, figure out what's working today, maybe

0:16:07.680 --> 0:16:09.800
<v Speaker 2>being a little bit more solid footing, maybe have a

0:16:09.800 --> 0:16:13.280
<v Speaker 2>little bit more confidence. And you know, oh, by the way,

0:16:13.360 --> 0:16:16.040
<v Speaker 2>that's one less time that they have to face the

0:16:16.040 --> 0:16:19.120
<v Speaker 2>top of the order. They're still starting pictures, they can

0:16:19.200 --> 0:16:22.320
<v Speaker 2>still give you length. You need the bulk. You know,

0:16:22.360 --> 0:16:24.040
<v Speaker 2>you can't just say, well, I'll send them to the bullpen,

0:16:24.080 --> 0:16:26.520
<v Speaker 2>which I did, but you know, the reality is somebody's

0:16:26.520 --> 0:16:30.960
<v Speaker 2>got to start. So the other thing is is, you know, okay,

0:16:30.960 --> 0:16:34.040
<v Speaker 2>with pedigree and history and relationships and all of that,

0:16:34.680 --> 0:16:36.760
<v Speaker 2>I can see where that would be a difficult conversation

0:16:36.840 --> 0:16:39.200
<v Speaker 2>to have, but I don't see how either one of

0:16:39.240 --> 0:16:41.840
<v Speaker 2>them has a leg to stand on to push back

0:16:41.880 --> 0:16:45.680
<v Speaker 2>on this idea. If dbac's management went to them and said, yeah,

0:16:45.760 --> 0:16:47.640
<v Speaker 2>we're going to we're going to go with an opener today,

0:16:48.080 --> 0:16:50.280
<v Speaker 2>you know, or the next two or three times out,

0:16:50.440 --> 0:16:53.440
<v Speaker 2>we're going to try an opener for you guys, I

0:16:53.520 --> 0:16:55.040
<v Speaker 2>think that they could get some value that way.

0:16:55.040 --> 0:16:56.120
<v Speaker 3>If you think it through.

0:16:57.440 --> 0:17:00.920
<v Speaker 2>That way, they never really need to face the top

0:17:00.960 --> 0:17:04.320
<v Speaker 2>three of any batting order more than once twice. If

0:17:04.320 --> 0:17:07.720
<v Speaker 2>they're going really well, right, if they're pitching really well,

0:17:08.280 --> 0:17:10.760
<v Speaker 2>then you can say, okay, let them try and get

0:17:10.800 --> 0:17:13.600
<v Speaker 2>through that top three in the order. And if, you know,

0:17:13.800 --> 0:17:16.000
<v Speaker 2>if it happens too quickly, then it means it's not

0:17:16.080 --> 0:17:18.760
<v Speaker 2>pitching well in the first place. But I think at

0:17:18.800 --> 0:17:21.080
<v Speaker 2>least this way you can get some bulk innings out

0:17:21.119 --> 0:17:23.440
<v Speaker 2>of them. You know, you might be able to get

0:17:23.480 --> 0:17:27.680
<v Speaker 2>five innings, you know, fifteen outs or whatever from them

0:17:27.720 --> 0:17:31.679
<v Speaker 2>that way, so without giving up quite so many runs.

0:17:31.840 --> 0:17:34.520
<v Speaker 2>So this is something I would try just to try

0:17:34.520 --> 0:17:37.399
<v Speaker 2>to salvage them. And that's what I'm talking about here, folks.

0:17:37.560 --> 0:17:40.240
<v Speaker 2>Salvage I do not believe that either one of them

0:17:40.280 --> 0:17:42.800
<v Speaker 2>is just going to magically turn it around and even

0:17:42.840 --> 0:17:44.919
<v Speaker 2>be a four or four point five Vra Pitcher.

0:17:45.160 --> 0:17:47.040
<v Speaker 3>I think we're past a point of no return.

0:17:49.080 --> 0:17:51.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's hard to argue with that. As both of

0:17:51.560 --> 0:17:55.080
<v Speaker 1>these guys continue to struggle. It is frankly hard for

0:17:55.119 --> 0:17:58.040
<v Speaker 1>me to imagine the Diamondbacks actually doing that. I think

0:17:58.160 --> 0:18:01.760
<v Speaker 1>the factors that you mentioned earlier, of just the pedigree

0:18:01.760 --> 0:18:06.199
<v Speaker 1>that they have in this organization, it's hard for me

0:18:06.280 --> 0:18:10.879
<v Speaker 1>to see it happening, especially with maybe with Zach because

0:18:10.920 --> 0:18:13.320
<v Speaker 1>it's a one year contract. I think with Merrill, the

0:18:13.320 --> 0:18:17.080
<v Speaker 1>fact that he's coming back next year, like the optics there,

0:18:17.680 --> 0:18:20.320
<v Speaker 1>I just have a hard time imagining them going down

0:18:20.320 --> 0:18:23.439
<v Speaker 1>that road. But certainly it makes some sense. All this

0:18:23.560 --> 0:18:25.640
<v Speaker 1>to say, the Diamondbacks are not in a great position

0:18:26.280 --> 0:18:29.560
<v Speaker 1>after the weekend. The vibes have soured quite a bit

0:18:29.640 --> 0:18:32.600
<v Speaker 1>here over the past few weeks, and as we think

0:18:32.640 --> 0:18:35.680
<v Speaker 1>ahead to the trade deadline, which is thirty six days

0:18:35.720 --> 0:18:40.840
<v Speaker 1>away as we record here on Sunday evening, June twenty eighth,

0:18:40.960 --> 0:18:43.960
<v Speaker 1>the Diamondbacks have quite a few questions to answer. So

0:18:44.400 --> 0:18:46.639
<v Speaker 1>when we come back after this break, we're going to

0:18:46.720 --> 0:18:48.800
<v Speaker 1>dive into the trade deadline, how we think the d

0:18:48.960 --> 0:18:53.600
<v Speaker 1>Bacs should approach it. Are they maybe more leaning towards

0:18:53.640 --> 0:18:56.159
<v Speaker 1>cell mode at this point. We'll get into all of

0:18:56.160 --> 0:19:00.400
<v Speaker 1>that on the other side of this break. We are

0:19:00.440 --> 0:19:03.359
<v Speaker 1>back here on Snake's territory. Shout out to all of

0:19:03.400 --> 0:19:07.000
<v Speaker 1>you who are here with us, watching on YouTube, listening

0:19:07.040 --> 0:19:10.160
<v Speaker 1>on your favorite podcast app. We really appreciate you. As

0:19:10.160 --> 0:19:12.159
<v Speaker 1>I mentioned earlier, it really helps us out. If you

0:19:12.160 --> 0:19:15.240
<v Speaker 1>would drop a like on this video, subscribe to our channel,

0:19:15.320 --> 0:19:18.639
<v Speaker 1>hit the bell icon for notifications, leave us a comment.

0:19:18.680 --> 0:19:21.439
<v Speaker 1>We always enjoy hearing from you. So thank you to

0:19:21.520 --> 0:19:23.840
<v Speaker 1>all of you for doing all those things. We really

0:19:23.880 --> 0:19:27.000
<v Speaker 1>really appreciate it. Well, Jack I mentioned it before the break.

0:19:27.040 --> 0:19:30.000
<v Speaker 1>We are thirty six days out from the August third

0:19:30.200 --> 0:19:34.040
<v Speaker 1>trade deadline. Some big decisions on the horizon. Of course,

0:19:34.080 --> 0:19:37.359
<v Speaker 1>the only public comments that Mike Hasen has made on

0:19:37.400 --> 0:19:40.159
<v Speaker 1>this subject or that he is planning to buy, so

0:19:40.840 --> 0:19:43.679
<v Speaker 1>I guess in that sense, you know you still have

0:19:43.760 --> 0:19:46.680
<v Speaker 1>to put some stock in those words. But Mike also

0:19:46.800 --> 0:19:50.600
<v Speaker 1>said those words long enough ago that you'll wonder if

0:19:50.680 --> 0:19:53.359
<v Speaker 1>things have maybe changed. The Diamondbacks are forty one and

0:19:53.440 --> 0:19:58.679
<v Speaker 1>forty two after their series loss or series sweep, I

0:19:58.680 --> 0:20:00.920
<v Speaker 1>should say at the hands of the Tampa Bay Rays.

0:20:01.320 --> 0:20:03.840
<v Speaker 1>This is where they are in the standings. They are

0:20:03.920 --> 0:20:07.560
<v Speaker 1>three games behind the Saint Louis Cardinals for that third

0:20:07.600 --> 0:20:11.679
<v Speaker 1>wild card spot. And maybe even more daunting than that

0:20:11.800 --> 0:20:15.119
<v Speaker 1>number is the fact that they have five teams that

0:20:15.160 --> 0:20:17.560
<v Speaker 1>they would need to jump over to get into that

0:20:17.600 --> 0:20:18.760
<v Speaker 1>third wild card spot.

0:20:20.480 --> 0:20:24.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, their playoff odds are not great right now. As

0:20:24.680 --> 0:20:30.479
<v Speaker 2>of today, Fangraphs is already down to eighteen point five percent,

0:20:30.560 --> 0:20:34.760
<v Speaker 2>I believe, and I'm sure that when we look at

0:20:35.400 --> 0:20:38.280
<v Speaker 2>Baseball Reference, they're probably going to be down to about

0:20:38.320 --> 0:20:41.800
<v Speaker 2>six percent. Baseball Perspectus is going to be down to

0:20:41.840 --> 0:20:45.560
<v Speaker 2>about twenty three percent, So they're composite. Even if you,

0:20:45.560 --> 0:20:50.080
<v Speaker 2>you know, just use three different methodologies, it's going to

0:20:50.119 --> 0:20:53.359
<v Speaker 2>be about sixteen percent. When we compare where they were

0:20:54.040 --> 0:20:58.200
<v Speaker 2>through eighty three games last year, they were Fangrafts had

0:20:58.200 --> 0:21:01.000
<v Speaker 2>them in eighteen point two percent and Reference had them

0:21:01.000 --> 0:21:02.440
<v Speaker 2>in eleven point two percent.

0:21:02.880 --> 0:21:05.879
<v Speaker 1>So they had the exact same record, right, forty one

0:21:05.920 --> 0:21:08.480
<v Speaker 1>and forty two through eighty three games, the exact same

0:21:08.520 --> 0:21:10.440
<v Speaker 1>record at this point last season.

0:21:10.720 --> 0:21:13.439
<v Speaker 2>Right, and they were in similar spot and standings, So

0:21:13.760 --> 0:21:16.080
<v Speaker 2>you know, not looking great.

0:21:16.160 --> 0:21:17.000
<v Speaker 3>It's pretty bleak.

0:21:17.560 --> 0:21:21.800
<v Speaker 2>And you know, Mike is a responsible general manager, so

0:21:21.920 --> 0:21:23.679
<v Speaker 2>he's not going to, you know, all of a sudden

0:21:23.720 --> 0:21:26.199
<v Speaker 2>start stripping the farm, bear to go bring in a

0:21:26.200 --> 0:21:26.960
<v Speaker 2>bunch of rentals.

0:21:26.960 --> 0:21:27.960
<v Speaker 3>That's not going to happen.

0:21:29.040 --> 0:21:31.960
<v Speaker 2>You know, what he is going to do will still

0:21:32.040 --> 0:21:35.240
<v Speaker 2>largely be determined about by what happens over the next

0:21:35.400 --> 0:21:39.480
<v Speaker 2>you know, twenty five days. I mean, he's got fifteen

0:21:39.520 --> 0:21:43.840
<v Speaker 2>twenty games to decide ultimately what he is what he's

0:21:43.880 --> 0:21:46.880
<v Speaker 2>going to do. We, on the other hand, have opinions

0:21:46.920 --> 0:21:49.800
<v Speaker 2>about what he should do or where he's likely to

0:21:49.880 --> 0:21:52.359
<v Speaker 2>land on this based on what we're seeing.

0:21:54.680 --> 0:21:56.760
<v Speaker 4>I guess this is uh, this is where we throw

0:21:56.800 --> 0:22:02.320
<v Speaker 4>this on the screen. This is a that's the time, Yeah,

0:22:02.400 --> 0:22:02.720
<v Speaker 4>I guess.

0:22:03.000 --> 0:22:05.120
<v Speaker 1>I guess we'll stick with this for the next month

0:22:05.240 --> 0:22:09.080
<v Speaker 1>or so and kind of use it to as a

0:22:09.119 --> 0:22:11.840
<v Speaker 1>gauge for what the Diamondbacks are most likely to do

0:22:11.880 --> 0:22:13.960
<v Speaker 1>with the deadline. For those of you listening have no

0:22:14.000 --> 0:22:16.919
<v Speaker 1>idea what I'm talking about, we have a little gauge

0:22:16.920 --> 0:22:19.520
<v Speaker 1>that kind of looks like a speedometer, where on the

0:22:19.560 --> 0:22:23.480
<v Speaker 1>far left side you have sell, in the middle you

0:22:23.520 --> 0:22:25.840
<v Speaker 1>have hold, and then on the right side of the gauge,

0:22:25.880 --> 0:22:29.159
<v Speaker 1>you have the Diamondbacks buying, and right now we have

0:22:29.600 --> 0:22:34.280
<v Speaker 1>we're basically towing the line between sell and hold where

0:22:34.320 --> 0:22:38.160
<v Speaker 1>we think the Diamondbacks are certainly not in a buy

0:22:38.280 --> 0:22:42.160
<v Speaker 1>mode if the trade deadline was tomorrow, but they're also

0:22:42.400 --> 0:22:46.080
<v Speaker 1>close enough, Like if the standings looked something like this

0:22:46.600 --> 0:22:49.760
<v Speaker 1>right at the trade deadline, they are within shouting distance.

0:22:49.800 --> 0:22:52.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean, three games is not insurmountable. We know Mike

0:22:52.600 --> 0:22:55.520
<v Speaker 1>Kyson likes to be aggressive, so I think if it

0:22:55.640 --> 0:22:58.600
<v Speaker 1>looked something, if the standings looked something like this on

0:22:58.960 --> 0:23:02.160
<v Speaker 1>August first, or whatever date you want to look at,

0:23:02.960 --> 0:23:05.399
<v Speaker 1>it's hard to imagine the d Bacs going full on

0:23:05.560 --> 0:23:09.280
<v Speaker 1>fire sale in that situation as well.

0:23:09.400 --> 0:23:12.720
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's it may be hard, but it may also

0:23:12.800 --> 0:23:16.479
<v Speaker 2>be the right thing to do. The problem is is

0:23:16.560 --> 0:23:20.040
<v Speaker 2>full on fire sale. They don't have the assets like

0:23:20.080 --> 0:23:22.879
<v Speaker 2>they had last year. I mean last year you had Naylor,

0:23:22.920 --> 0:23:25.440
<v Speaker 2>you had Geno, you have Merrow. They thought they had

0:23:25.440 --> 0:23:27.720
<v Speaker 2>an asset in Zach, but it's turned out that the

0:23:27.720 --> 0:23:30.919
<v Speaker 2>rest of the league saw what we're seeing now. You know,

0:23:31.000 --> 0:23:35.760
<v Speaker 2>they did also sell Randall Gritchick and they ended up

0:23:35.800 --> 0:23:39.840
<v Speaker 2>selling Shelby Miller and packaging him with Jordan Montgomery saved

0:23:39.840 --> 0:23:43.240
<v Speaker 2>some money. So you know, now this year they're free

0:23:43.240 --> 0:23:47.040
<v Speaker 2>agents are mostly relievers, right, I mean Lords is a

0:23:47.080 --> 0:23:50.399
<v Speaker 2>free agent. You know, James mccannon is a free agent.

0:23:51.320 --> 0:23:55.000
<v Speaker 2>But you know it's Kevin Kinkle, it's Paul Sewall, it's

0:23:55.040 --> 0:23:58.080
<v Speaker 2>Jonathan Issica, it's Taylor Clark. I mean, these are the

0:23:58.080 --> 0:24:01.960
<v Speaker 2>guys that they have to market. And you know, it's

0:24:02.000 --> 0:24:04.679
<v Speaker 2>it's a totally different thing because two months of a

0:24:04.720 --> 0:24:08.199
<v Speaker 2>reliever that's a free agent the next year is going

0:24:08.240 --> 0:24:10.760
<v Speaker 2>to get you a lot less than two months of

0:24:10.760 --> 0:24:14.360
<v Speaker 2>a Merril Kelly or even a Gino Suarez or Joshnaylor.

0:24:14.880 --> 0:24:18.640
<v Speaker 2>So you know, the cell option isn't as attractive because

0:24:18.680 --> 0:24:23.200
<v Speaker 2>of less marketable assets. But I think the other thing

0:24:23.240 --> 0:24:24.879
<v Speaker 2>we need to look at is, you know, how do

0:24:24.960 --> 0:24:29.240
<v Speaker 2>we project this team going forward and what's the true

0:24:29.359 --> 0:24:32.080
<v Speaker 2>underlying nature of this team. I mean, beyond the fact

0:24:32.119 --> 0:24:34.720
<v Speaker 2>that they're just slumping horribly on offense and Zach and

0:24:34.800 --> 0:24:38.160
<v Speaker 2>Merrill are struggling, we can kind of take a look

0:24:38.200 --> 0:24:42.639
<v Speaker 2>back even when the record was doing somewhat better. You know,

0:24:42.720 --> 0:24:45.119
<v Speaker 2>what I have here on the screen is a chart

0:24:45.280 --> 0:24:51.119
<v Speaker 2>of wOBA and X wOBA through May sixteenth, and the

0:24:51.200 --> 0:24:54.640
<v Speaker 2>batter Is on May sixteenth had a three oh nine

0:24:54.960 --> 0:24:58.239
<v Speaker 2>wOBA which ranked twenty fourth in the league, and at

0:24:58.240 --> 0:25:01.159
<v Speaker 2>three oh nine x WHOBA would ranked twenty fourth in

0:25:01.160 --> 0:25:05.359
<v Speaker 2>the league. The pitchers had a three nineteen wOBA against,

0:25:05.720 --> 0:25:09.280
<v Speaker 2>which was seventeenth, the x wOBA was three thirty six,

0:25:09.359 --> 0:25:12.760
<v Speaker 2>which was twenty fourth. And then I show the era

0:25:13.040 --> 0:25:17.159
<v Speaker 2>versus XCRA, FIP, x FIP and Sierra, and all of

0:25:17.200 --> 0:25:20.640
<v Speaker 2>those are you know, in were more or less in line. Well,

0:25:20.680 --> 0:25:24.879
<v Speaker 2>now we fast forward to June twenty seventh, and the

0:25:24.920 --> 0:25:28.400
<v Speaker 2>team's wolba's three oh seven, it's twenty seventh.

0:25:28.080 --> 0:25:28.520
<v Speaker 3>In the league.

0:25:28.960 --> 0:25:31.960
<v Speaker 2>The x roobs three thirteen, it's twenty second in the league. So,

0:25:32.560 --> 0:25:34.919
<v Speaker 2>you know, the offense has been the offense really for

0:25:34.960 --> 0:25:38.240
<v Speaker 2>a long time. This isn't something new that just the

0:25:38.320 --> 0:25:41.920
<v Speaker 2>situational hitting has been so bad, so the runs aren't coming,

0:25:41.960 --> 0:25:47.120
<v Speaker 2>but the underlying inputs that determine, you know, what kind

0:25:47.119 --> 0:25:50.000
<v Speaker 2>of talent you have has been the same all year.

0:25:50.920 --> 0:25:55.080
<v Speaker 2>Pitchers they have a three to twenty three wOBA against

0:25:55.119 --> 0:25:58.399
<v Speaker 2>as of June's twenty seventh that ranks twenty first in

0:25:58.440 --> 0:26:03.600
<v Speaker 2>the league. The x wol three thirty eight ranks twenty six. Now,

0:26:03.680 --> 0:26:06.960
<v Speaker 2>that gap maybe can be explained by the defense, because

0:26:06.960 --> 0:26:11.720
<v Speaker 2>the Dbacs are in the top two or three fielding

0:26:11.800 --> 0:26:14.919
<v Speaker 2>run value, so their defense has been very good, and

0:26:14.960 --> 0:26:17.879
<v Speaker 2>so if there's a gap between their wOBA and x wOBA,

0:26:18.160 --> 0:26:21.800
<v Speaker 2>the fielding is probably a major factor there in helping

0:26:21.800 --> 0:26:22.280
<v Speaker 2>that along.

0:26:23.880 --> 0:26:26.199
<v Speaker 1>I guess all this to say that you could make

0:26:26.240 --> 0:26:29.879
<v Speaker 1>a very strong case that the Diamondbacks true talent level

0:26:29.960 --> 0:26:33.080
<v Speaker 1>offensively is bottom ten in the league, and that their

0:26:33.160 --> 0:26:36.399
<v Speaker 1>true talent level pitching wise is bottom ten in the league,

0:26:36.119 --> 0:26:37.400
<v Speaker 1>maybe worse than that.

0:26:37.480 --> 0:26:40.520
<v Speaker 4>On both of those fronts, you could argue, And.

0:26:40.520 --> 0:26:43.919
<v Speaker 1>So projecting moving forward, it's hard to it's hard to

0:26:43.960 --> 0:26:46.400
<v Speaker 1>look at this team that's only a game under five

0:26:46.480 --> 0:26:49.280
<v Speaker 1>hundred and three games out of the playoffs right now

0:26:49.640 --> 0:26:52.159
<v Speaker 1>and think that realistically they're going to be able to

0:26:52.200 --> 0:26:52.959
<v Speaker 1>turn this around.

0:26:54.160 --> 0:26:55.000
<v Speaker 3>That's my sense.

0:26:55.359 --> 0:26:59.320
<v Speaker 2>I mean, look, I have to admit that when I

0:26:59.359 --> 0:27:03.720
<v Speaker 2>predicted in our preseason predictions as the Dbacks would be

0:27:03.720 --> 0:27:06.520
<v Speaker 2>a seventy five win team, I was thinking it was

0:27:06.520 --> 0:27:08.800
<v Speaker 2>because I thought the bullpen was going to be terrible

0:27:08.840 --> 0:27:10.920
<v Speaker 2>and the pitching was going to be bottom five to ten.

0:27:11.440 --> 0:27:13.200
<v Speaker 2>I'm not far off there, but I thought they would

0:27:13.240 --> 0:27:16.879
<v Speaker 2>have a league average offense, and they still project on

0:27:17.040 --> 0:27:22.040
<v Speaker 2>paper as a league average offense. So I'm finding more

0:27:22.160 --> 0:27:26.159
<v Speaker 2>close to it, like probably around eighteenth or nineteenth, you know,

0:27:26.320 --> 0:27:29.480
<v Speaker 2>better than twentieth, somewhere between fifteen and twenty. If you

0:27:29.480 --> 0:27:33.000
<v Speaker 2>go to the Fangrass depth charts rest of season projections,

0:27:33.680 --> 0:27:38.040
<v Speaker 2>most of the players have better projections than their actual

0:27:38.119 --> 0:27:43.320
<v Speaker 2>numbers for this year. Corbyn's got better, you know, numbers

0:27:43.320 --> 0:27:46.840
<v Speaker 2>than his projections, but Katell and so does Gabby. But

0:27:46.920 --> 0:27:52.399
<v Speaker 2>Katel and Prodomo are significantly worse. And of course Lordis

0:27:52.440 --> 0:27:55.960
<v Speaker 2>and peven Smith the bottom has fallen out on their production,

0:27:56.440 --> 0:27:59.400
<v Speaker 2>albeit in small sample size because of injury. But that's

0:27:59.440 --> 0:28:02.160
<v Speaker 2>what you're dealing with, veteran players that have been having hurt,

0:28:02.680 --> 0:28:05.760
<v Speaker 2>that have been hurt, that are having terrible years. And

0:28:05.800 --> 0:28:08.199
<v Speaker 2>then you have a lot of really young players. And

0:28:08.240 --> 0:28:10.440
<v Speaker 2>if you look at the aggregate of all the young players,

0:28:10.920 --> 0:28:13.720
<v Speaker 2>the batting averages are kind of okay, but there's very

0:28:13.720 --> 0:28:17.280
<v Speaker 2>little pop there. I mean, Tommy Troy is your your

0:28:17.400 --> 0:28:22.160
<v Speaker 2>rookie slugger with three homers. You know, it's just unfortunately,

0:28:22.800 --> 0:28:25.080
<v Speaker 2>if you you know, we want to see these young

0:28:25.080 --> 0:28:27.880
<v Speaker 2>players come up and play and develop every day. And

0:28:28.000 --> 0:28:30.119
<v Speaker 2>I think the overriding sense as well, if you're going

0:28:30.160 --> 0:28:32.920
<v Speaker 2>to lose any way, at least let's see the young

0:28:33.000 --> 0:28:37.120
<v Speaker 2>kids try and develop and enjoy that. And that can happen.

0:28:37.160 --> 0:28:39.520
<v Speaker 2>That can be very enjoyable at times, that can also

0:28:40.280 --> 0:28:43.960
<v Speaker 2>kind of be tough to watch, especially for the casual fan.

0:28:44.040 --> 0:28:47.760
<v Speaker 2>Everyone has to remember we're the diehards, right. If you're

0:28:47.800 --> 0:28:51.520
<v Speaker 2>watching this show, you're a diehard Jesse and I.

0:28:51.520 --> 0:28:55.520
<v Speaker 1>If you're crazy enough to watch our show, then clearly

0:28:55.520 --> 0:28:56.720
<v Speaker 1>this team is important to you.

0:28:57.480 --> 0:29:00.520
<v Speaker 2>But you know they're running a business, right And you know,

0:29:00.680 --> 0:29:04.080
<v Speaker 2>the casual fan, if they see a bunch of rookies

0:29:04.080 --> 0:29:08.240
<v Speaker 2>that they don't know anything about, you know, they're probably

0:29:08.280 --> 0:29:09.960
<v Speaker 2>not going to show up at the ballpark to come

0:29:09.960 --> 0:29:11.960
<v Speaker 2>out and see them. Now, they're not coming out to

0:29:12.000 --> 0:29:14.560
<v Speaker 2>the ballpark to see Lord Is to hobble around and Pevin

0:29:14.600 --> 0:29:18.960
<v Speaker 2>Smith ground out or strikeout either. So you know, a

0:29:19.080 --> 0:29:21.360
<v Speaker 2>case can be made either way. But I'm just trying

0:29:21.400 --> 0:29:23.880
<v Speaker 2>to say, like from an owner's perspective, you know, the

0:29:23.960 --> 0:29:26.840
<v Speaker 2>decision to strip off all your veterans and DFA all

0:29:26.880 --> 0:29:29.600
<v Speaker 2>your veterans and goes strictly youth. That's a tough one

0:29:29.640 --> 0:29:31.480
<v Speaker 2>to make, but I think they're going to get there

0:29:31.720 --> 0:29:33.240
<v Speaker 2>because they should and they're going to have to.

0:29:35.520 --> 0:29:38.680
<v Speaker 1>In terms of what it would look like for the

0:29:38.680 --> 0:29:42.400
<v Speaker 1>Diamondbacks to actually sell, you mentioned some of the names.

0:29:42.440 --> 0:29:47.120
<v Speaker 1>The Diamondbacks do have a lot of impending free agents currently,

0:29:47.560 --> 0:29:50.200
<v Speaker 1>but yeah, a lot of them are are relievers or

0:29:50.240 --> 0:29:53.400
<v Speaker 1>position players like Lordis Gurriyell and James McCann that you

0:29:53.560 --> 0:29:55.800
<v Speaker 1>just don't figure are going to bring back a whole

0:29:55.800 --> 0:29:58.960
<v Speaker 1>lot of value. I guess on the reliever front, the

0:29:59.080 --> 0:30:02.120
<v Speaker 1>name that stands out most to me as someone that

0:30:02.120 --> 0:30:05.760
<v Speaker 1>would be attractive for teams is Kevin Ginkle. Ginkle We've

0:30:05.840 --> 0:30:08.240
<v Speaker 1>talked about it a lot. His underlying numbers have been

0:30:08.320 --> 0:30:12.320
<v Speaker 1>strong consistently throughout the season. I know they've slipped a

0:30:12.360 --> 0:30:14.760
<v Speaker 1>little bit here in recent days. There's been a little

0:30:14.760 --> 0:30:18.280
<v Speaker 1>bit more hard contact lately, but he still has a

0:30:18.320 --> 0:30:20.959
<v Speaker 1>sub three er and has a strikeout ray close to

0:30:21.000 --> 0:30:24.360
<v Speaker 1>thirty percent. He's the kind of reliever that if you're

0:30:24.360 --> 0:30:27.280
<v Speaker 1>a contending team, you'd probably be happy to plug Kevin

0:30:27.320 --> 0:30:30.240
<v Speaker 1>Ginkle in not as your closer, but maybe as like

0:30:30.280 --> 0:30:33.320
<v Speaker 1>your seventh inning guy. I think that would be attractive

0:30:33.560 --> 0:30:37.240
<v Speaker 1>for teams out there. The other relievers that the Dbacks

0:30:37.520 --> 0:30:40.680
<v Speaker 1>have available, it's a little bit hard to say how

0:30:40.880 --> 0:30:43.840
<v Speaker 1>attractive they would be for teams. I mean, Ryan Thompson

0:30:43.840 --> 0:30:46.600
<v Speaker 1>has put up pretty good numbers, but you look at

0:30:46.600 --> 0:30:49.480
<v Speaker 1>the underlying stats, he's not really striking anybody out. And

0:30:49.840 --> 0:30:52.800
<v Speaker 1>we know how important that is for teams, especially when

0:30:52.840 --> 0:30:56.200
<v Speaker 1>they think about the postseason. They're looking for swing and miss.

0:30:56.280 --> 0:30:59.880
<v Speaker 1>That's really the skill set they're targeting more than anything else,

0:31:00.080 --> 0:31:02.680
<v Speaker 1>and it's really a skill set that Ryan Thompson doesn't have.

0:31:02.760 --> 0:31:06.520
<v Speaker 1>He's well below average in that regard. A similar story

0:31:06.560 --> 0:31:09.440
<v Speaker 1>with Jonathan Lewisica who has a good ra but his

0:31:09.480 --> 0:31:13.720
<v Speaker 1>strikeout rate is well below the league average. Taylor Clark

0:31:13.920 --> 0:31:17.720
<v Speaker 1>similar story, strikeout rate well below league average. And so

0:31:18.080 --> 0:31:22.320
<v Speaker 1>you'll wonder, even if the Diamondbacks were in a pretty

0:31:22.680 --> 0:31:26.920
<v Speaker 1>pretty confident cell mode at the trade deadline, I wonder

0:31:27.000 --> 0:31:29.200
<v Speaker 1>if the juice is worth the squeeze with those guys.

0:31:29.240 --> 0:31:32.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean, are you actually getting back anything meaningful for

0:31:32.200 --> 0:31:34.880
<v Speaker 1>any of them? Maybe you'd rather hold on to him

0:31:35.000 --> 0:31:37.680
<v Speaker 1>on the off chance that we see something like we

0:31:37.760 --> 0:31:39.600
<v Speaker 1>did last year, where do they kind of make it

0:31:39.640 --> 0:31:42.280
<v Speaker 1>interesting toward the end of the season, and maybe you'd

0:31:42.320 --> 0:31:44.120
<v Speaker 1>be happy to have those guys on the roster.

0:31:45.400 --> 0:31:47.560
<v Speaker 2>The other thing, and I mentioned this the other day,

0:31:47.600 --> 0:31:49.480
<v Speaker 2>if you think this team is a tough watch, now,

0:31:50.840 --> 0:31:54.280
<v Speaker 2>you know, dive into your next tier of relief pitchers,

0:31:55.480 --> 0:31:58.440
<v Speaker 2>you know, the wamberg Osh and if he manages to

0:31:58.480 --> 0:32:02.880
<v Speaker 2>get back healthy, Andrew Hoffman or Kate Stroud, you know,

0:32:02.920 --> 0:32:05.520
<v Speaker 2>guys like that. I mean, like, you know, you look

0:32:05.560 --> 0:32:09.760
<v Speaker 2>at who's come up from the miners and how they performed,

0:32:09.800 --> 0:32:12.320
<v Speaker 2>and it's been brutal, of course, you know.

0:32:12.520 --> 0:32:15.160
<v Speaker 3>So brutal that Joe Bardiaz got himself DFAD.

0:32:16.160 --> 0:32:19.680
<v Speaker 2>So you know, it's it's kind of dicey to say, okay,

0:32:19.680 --> 0:32:22.200
<v Speaker 2>well yeah, just strip a clean, sell it off, bring

0:32:22.240 --> 0:32:24.200
<v Speaker 2>out you know, well, wait a minute, you only have

0:32:24.440 --> 0:32:28.600
<v Speaker 2>among the position players I mean that you would possibly trade,

0:32:28.800 --> 0:32:31.320
<v Speaker 2>might have any trade value or lord is, if a

0:32:31.320 --> 0:32:33.000
<v Speaker 2>team needs a right hand to bat, we'll come to

0:32:33.040 --> 0:32:35.680
<v Speaker 2>that minute, or you know, and they think that he

0:32:35.760 --> 0:32:39.560
<v Speaker 2>might be able to hit, or you know, strip your relievers.

0:32:39.600 --> 0:32:43.120
<v Speaker 2>So that's another dicey piece of this whole puzzle too.

0:32:44.440 --> 0:32:49.320
<v Speaker 2>You know, if Mike makes a trade, I think he's

0:32:49.440 --> 0:32:52.880
<v Speaker 2>just most likely at this point to trade for somebody

0:32:52.880 --> 0:32:55.480
<v Speaker 2>that's got control, he's going to want a major league

0:32:55.480 --> 0:32:58.440
<v Speaker 2>player that has control. You know, some of that's at

0:32:58.520 --> 0:33:00.800
<v Speaker 2>least got his beak wet in a major not somebody

0:33:00.800 --> 0:33:04.400
<v Speaker 2>that's never played, hopefully, somebody that's got at least a

0:33:04.440 --> 0:33:06.400
<v Speaker 2>year or two under their belt. He's going to want

0:33:06.400 --> 0:33:09.800
<v Speaker 2>a controlled player. And so if the players even halfway

0:33:09.840 --> 0:33:14.080
<v Speaker 2>decent and you're trading for a player that's under team control,

0:33:14.240 --> 0:33:16.240
<v Speaker 2>then it's going to cost you on your prospect list.

0:33:17.120 --> 0:33:20.560
<v Speaker 2>So be ready for that too. I think about AJ

0:33:20.680 --> 0:33:24.040
<v Speaker 2>Puck all right now, Davis and Della Sentos was an

0:33:24.040 --> 0:33:27.280
<v Speaker 2>overrated prospect by my view at the time, because we

0:33:27.320 --> 0:33:29.400
<v Speaker 2>saw that strikeout rate, and we saw the swing and

0:33:29.480 --> 0:33:32.400
<v Speaker 2>miss and just a lack of plate discipline and lack

0:33:32.440 --> 0:33:37.560
<v Speaker 2>of defensive mobility, and we you know, just outweighed his

0:33:37.760 --> 0:33:38.680
<v Speaker 2>prodigious power.

0:33:39.400 --> 0:33:42.120
<v Speaker 3>Yes, guy had light tower power, but we could see that.

0:33:42.240 --> 0:33:45.120
<v Speaker 2>I don't know why the Marlins gave up AJ Puck,

0:33:45.200 --> 0:33:48.240
<v Speaker 2>but then again, you look at his injury history, and

0:33:48.360 --> 0:33:51.800
<v Speaker 2>the number one ability is availability, and they probably just

0:33:51.840 --> 0:33:53.920
<v Speaker 2>felt like, you know what, I'll take a role here

0:33:53.920 --> 0:33:56.400
<v Speaker 2>because Aj is probably just going to get hurt. Again,

0:33:56.480 --> 0:33:59.040
<v Speaker 2>and that's exactly what happened for the Diamondbacks while they're

0:33:59.040 --> 0:34:01.600
<v Speaker 2>paying some pretty exhorba in arbitration wages.

0:34:01.680 --> 0:34:04.200
<v Speaker 3>So you know, we'll see what happens.

0:34:04.200 --> 0:34:07.520
<v Speaker 2>But I think that, you know, we've got to be

0:34:07.560 --> 0:34:09.560
<v Speaker 2>careful what we ask for because if they do sell,

0:34:10.719 --> 0:34:12.960
<v Speaker 2>the only assets they have our relievers, and the next

0:34:13.040 --> 0:34:14.479
<v Speaker 2>line of relievers is pretty weak.

0:34:16.000 --> 0:34:18.399
<v Speaker 1>We've got more to get to in this this buy

0:34:18.800 --> 0:34:22.480
<v Speaker 1>sell conversation, so we'll jump back into it. We'll also

0:34:22.560 --> 0:34:25.759
<v Speaker 1>talk about the Giant Series coming up, as well as

0:34:25.840 --> 0:34:29.720
<v Speaker 1>the schedule the Diamondbacks have going into the All Star Break.

0:34:30.040 --> 0:34:32.800
<v Speaker 1>But first it is time for our Daily Dinger segment

0:34:32.960 --> 0:34:40.719
<v Speaker 1>here on Snake's Territory. Well, Snake's Territory is brought to

0:34:40.760 --> 0:34:43.840
<v Speaker 1>you by fan Duel Baseball Fans. The MLB season is

0:34:43.880 --> 0:34:46.000
<v Speaker 1>in full swing and fan Duel is giving you a

0:34:46.080 --> 0:34:48.880
<v Speaker 1>chance to call your shot with daily dingers. Joining the

0:34:48.920 --> 0:34:52.000
<v Speaker 1>action is easy. Just make your free pick on who's

0:34:52.080 --> 0:34:54.799
<v Speaker 1>hitting a home run in their game, and if you're right,

0:34:54.800 --> 0:34:57.399
<v Speaker 1>you'll get a profit boost to use on your next

0:34:57.440 --> 0:34:59.280
<v Speaker 1>bet for a chance at extra winnings.

0:34:59.520 --> 0:35:02.480
<v Speaker 4>It's just another reason why fan Duel is the home

0:35:02.680 --> 0:35:04.720
<v Speaker 4>of home runs Jack.

0:35:04.800 --> 0:35:07.719
<v Speaker 1>It feels like Hotel Marte is really the only Diamondback

0:35:07.760 --> 0:35:11.320
<v Speaker 1>who's hitting home runs, and unfortunately he's not really hitting

0:35:11.320 --> 0:35:13.080
<v Speaker 1>them at important times.

0:35:13.480 --> 0:35:15.040
<v Speaker 4>But I don't know.

0:35:15.080 --> 0:35:18.520
<v Speaker 1>At least I'm tempting to take Ketel Marte again. What

0:35:18.560 --> 0:35:19.239
<v Speaker 1>do you got here?

0:35:20.239 --> 0:35:22.960
<v Speaker 2>Hilliott Romos is coming back for the Giants. I'm going

0:35:23.040 --> 0:35:26.440
<v Speaker 2>to take him. I think he comes back and knocks

0:35:26.440 --> 0:35:26.759
<v Speaker 2>a homer.

0:35:28.680 --> 0:35:29.440
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, that's fair.

0:35:29.640 --> 0:35:34.160
<v Speaker 1>I guess picking members of the opposing team is maybe

0:35:34.200 --> 0:35:37.799
<v Speaker 1>the safer bet at this point. I think about Matt

0:35:37.880 --> 0:35:40.520
<v Speaker 1>Chapman of the Giants, who's heating.

0:35:40.320 --> 0:35:41.000
<v Speaker 4>Up a little bit.

0:35:41.719 --> 0:35:45.160
<v Speaker 1>Raphael Devers is another name who's he's started to hit

0:35:45.239 --> 0:35:48.279
<v Speaker 1>better here in recent days. We've seen him showcase his

0:35:48.360 --> 0:35:52.319
<v Speaker 1>power against the Diamondbacks in the past. So yeah, maybe

0:35:52.360 --> 0:35:55.080
<v Speaker 1>you want to lead Giants with the way that things

0:35:55.120 --> 0:35:57.839
<v Speaker 1>have gone for this pitching staff and this offense here

0:35:57.920 --> 0:36:00.399
<v Speaker 1>in recent days. Head over to fan duel dot com

0:36:00.400 --> 0:36:03.840
<v Speaker 1>slash podcast to get started. That's FanDuel dot com slash

0:36:03.920 --> 0:36:06.520
<v Speaker 1>podcast to opt in for daily dingers and make your

0:36:06.520 --> 0:36:09.400
<v Speaker 1>free pick on who's hitting a homer, playball and swing

0:36:09.440 --> 0:36:13.120
<v Speaker 1>for the fences on FanDuel, an official partner of Major

0:36:13.160 --> 0:36:13.880
<v Speaker 1>League Baseball.

0:36:14.800 --> 0:36:18.040
<v Speaker 5>No purchase necessary, opt in required, bonus issue does non

0:36:18.080 --> 0:36:22.080
<v Speaker 5>withdrawable profit boost tokens. Restrictions apply, including any token expiration

0:36:22.160 --> 0:36:25.600
<v Speaker 5>and max wager amount. See terms at sportsbook dot FanDuel

0:36:25.600 --> 0:36:29.200
<v Speaker 5>dot com. Gambling problem caller tex one eight hundred gambler.

0:36:31.520 --> 0:36:31.960
<v Speaker 4>Well Jack.

0:36:32.000 --> 0:36:34.880
<v Speaker 1>As we jump back into our trade deadline discussion, I

0:36:34.920 --> 0:36:38.319
<v Speaker 1>guess we should mention that the possibility of buying at

0:36:38.320 --> 0:36:42.000
<v Speaker 1>the deadline is not is not completely out of the question,

0:36:42.120 --> 0:36:45.600
<v Speaker 1>where we're still over a month away again the last

0:36:45.719 --> 0:36:48.000
<v Speaker 1>the only comments that Mike Hasen has made on the

0:36:48.040 --> 0:36:51.080
<v Speaker 1>record about this is that he's planning to buy, and

0:36:51.520 --> 0:36:54.319
<v Speaker 1>we know that that he likes to be aggressive, and

0:36:54.680 --> 0:36:57.560
<v Speaker 1>it wouldn't shock me if he did that. Looking at

0:36:57.600 --> 0:37:01.560
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty three and twenty twenty four as examples, Mike

0:37:01.600 --> 0:37:05.200
<v Speaker 1>Hasen bought both of those years when the Diamondbacks were

0:37:05.320 --> 0:37:09.560
<v Speaker 1>actually not comfortably in a playoff spot, depending on exactly

0:37:09.600 --> 0:37:12.200
<v Speaker 1>which day you look on the calendar, both of those

0:37:12.280 --> 0:37:15.799
<v Speaker 1>years they were right on the doorstep. They were, you know,

0:37:15.920 --> 0:37:18.160
<v Speaker 1>maybe had to climb over one or two teams. They

0:37:18.160 --> 0:37:20.239
<v Speaker 1>were about a game or so out of the third

0:37:20.239 --> 0:37:23.759
<v Speaker 1>wild card spot, but they weren't they weren't in the playoffs.

0:37:24.120 --> 0:37:26.799
<v Speaker 1>In twenty three, Mike talked about how the team got

0:37:26.800 --> 0:37:29.399
<v Speaker 1>off to this great start and we believe in that

0:37:29.480 --> 0:37:31.879
<v Speaker 1>and we want to support what they were able to do.

0:37:32.320 --> 0:37:35.600
<v Speaker 1>And then in twenty twenty four it felt like maybe

0:37:35.640 --> 0:37:39.479
<v Speaker 1>a little bit more of a clear cut decision, even though, yeah,

0:37:39.480 --> 0:37:42.400
<v Speaker 1>the d Backs at that time they were not in

0:37:42.440 --> 0:37:46.000
<v Speaker 1>a playoff spot. So I don't think the threshold here

0:37:46.040 --> 0:37:48.440
<v Speaker 1>is the d Backs have to be, you know, at

0:37:48.480 --> 0:37:51.120
<v Speaker 1>the top wild card spot or the second wild card spot.

0:37:51.200 --> 0:37:53.760
<v Speaker 1>Even I think there's maybe a world where Mike hasen

0:37:53.880 --> 0:37:57.719
<v Speaker 1>buys and they're outside of the playoff picture. It just

0:37:57.880 --> 0:38:00.439
<v Speaker 1>probably needs to look a little better than it does

0:38:00.520 --> 0:38:00.959
<v Speaker 1>right now.

0:38:01.719 --> 0:38:04.200
<v Speaker 2>Well, you know, you have to, as we did, took

0:38:04.239 --> 0:38:06.200
<v Speaker 2>a lookout before. They have to get in a better

0:38:06.200 --> 0:38:07.880
<v Speaker 2>position on these head to heads. I mean all the

0:38:07.920 --> 0:38:10.120
<v Speaker 2>teams in front of them, the five teams in front

0:38:10.120 --> 0:38:12.200
<v Speaker 2>of them, they've got a lot of games left against them,

0:38:12.680 --> 0:38:14.880
<v Speaker 2>and even against them, you want to include the Phillies

0:38:14.880 --> 0:38:17.280
<v Speaker 2>and the Cubs. I mean, they've got three against the Phillies,

0:38:17.280 --> 0:38:20.640
<v Speaker 2>three against the Cubs, they've got four against the Cardinals,

0:38:20.680 --> 0:38:23.240
<v Speaker 2>they've got three against the Pirates, three against the Nationals,

0:38:23.320 --> 0:38:27.799
<v Speaker 2>three against the Marlins, you know, and so they have

0:38:27.840 --> 0:38:29.960
<v Speaker 2>an opportunity to make a move. Now they're not all

0:38:29.960 --> 0:38:32.919
<v Speaker 2>coming up right away, and the schedule's pretty tough. I mean, yes,

0:38:32.960 --> 0:38:35.720
<v Speaker 2>they have three against the Giants, but then they've faced

0:38:35.719 --> 0:38:37.799
<v Speaker 2>the Brewers for three. Then they go on the road

0:38:37.800 --> 0:38:40.680
<v Speaker 2>to California for four games against the Padres and three

0:38:40.719 --> 0:38:41.600
<v Speaker 2>against the Dodgers.

0:38:42.120 --> 0:38:43.520
<v Speaker 3>And yes, the Padres.

0:38:43.120 --> 0:38:45.520
<v Speaker 2>Don't hit, but they're a tough team to beat in

0:38:45.680 --> 0:38:49.759
<v Speaker 2>San Diego and they pitch well. So you know, they

0:38:49.800 --> 0:38:52.520
<v Speaker 2>could the Dvacs could easily head into the All Star

0:38:52.560 --> 0:38:55.480
<v Speaker 2>Break quite a few games under five hundred. But if

0:38:55.480 --> 0:38:58.279
<v Speaker 2>they managed to turn it around, if you know, over

0:38:58.320 --> 0:39:02.600
<v Speaker 2>these next six for ten thirteen games, you know, they

0:39:02.600 --> 0:39:05.520
<v Speaker 2>go like eight and five in the next thirteen games,

0:39:05.520 --> 0:39:07.400
<v Speaker 2>and they get to a couple of games over five hundred,

0:39:07.800 --> 0:39:10.920
<v Speaker 2>they're probably going to be, you know, right on the

0:39:10.920 --> 0:39:13.840
<v Speaker 2>doorstep again coming out of the All Star Break. And

0:39:13.840 --> 0:39:16.080
<v Speaker 2>then it just depends what they do. You know, that

0:39:16.200 --> 0:39:19.400
<v Speaker 2>last week before Mike has to make his decisions. I

0:39:19.400 --> 0:39:22.319
<v Speaker 2>mean most of his decisions are made probably you know,

0:39:22.440 --> 0:39:26.080
<v Speaker 2>a week before the trade deadline itself. Of like Okay,

0:39:26.280 --> 0:39:30.080
<v Speaker 2>this is our direction. He can, you know, make adjustments

0:39:30.080 --> 0:39:33.799
<v Speaker 2>as he goes depending on what's happening within that and

0:39:33.840 --> 0:39:37.319
<v Speaker 2>certainly injuries both to his team and other teams can

0:39:37.320 --> 0:39:38.720
<v Speaker 2>come into effect there as well.

0:39:39.200 --> 0:39:40.240
<v Speaker 3>So yes, there's.

0:39:40.120 --> 0:39:42.640
<v Speaker 2>Plenty of time for Mike to still become a buyer.

0:39:43.600 --> 0:39:48.440
<v Speaker 2>But when you look at the underlying weaknesses of this team,

0:39:49.200 --> 0:39:51.959
<v Speaker 2>they need to improve in those areas, I think because

0:39:52.120 --> 0:39:54.399
<v Speaker 2>the team's got to be looking at what I'm looking

0:39:54.440 --> 0:39:56.319
<v Speaker 2>at and a lot more. They can't not see it.

0:39:57.600 --> 0:40:00.640
<v Speaker 2>They know it. But they're just more paid than we

0:40:00.680 --> 0:40:03.680
<v Speaker 2>are when it comes to their belief in players. That

0:40:04.040 --> 0:40:07.960
<v Speaker 2>I mean, when they invest in a player, whether it's

0:40:08.040 --> 0:40:11.759
<v Speaker 2>via draft or trade or signing and all the time

0:40:11.800 --> 0:40:15.920
<v Speaker 2>of development and all of that, you know they're not

0:40:16.040 --> 0:40:18.920
<v Speaker 2>just going to give up on that right away because

0:40:18.920 --> 0:40:21.280
<v Speaker 2>the guy has a bad month. You know, they're not fans,

0:40:21.320 --> 0:40:26.680
<v Speaker 2>they're professionals. So at the same time, they see what

0:40:26.719 --> 0:40:29.960
<v Speaker 2>we see and ten times more, and so they know

0:40:30.000 --> 0:40:32.560
<v Speaker 2>which guys are truly trending in the wrong direction and

0:40:32.560 --> 0:40:34.239
<v Speaker 2>they're going to make their decisions based on that.

0:40:35.719 --> 0:40:37.960
<v Speaker 1>Another name we should mention on the cell side is

0:40:38.000 --> 0:40:43.400
<v Speaker 1>Michael Soroka, who has theoretically an opportunity to be healthy

0:40:43.480 --> 0:40:47.000
<v Speaker 1>before the trade deadline, and he's on a one year contract,

0:40:47.080 --> 0:40:50.000
<v Speaker 1>and certainly if he came back healthy and looked good,

0:40:50.400 --> 0:40:53.000
<v Speaker 1>then I'm sure there would be teams that would show

0:40:53.000 --> 0:40:57.000
<v Speaker 1>interest in him. Three point zero seventy ERA and fifteen starts,

0:40:57.160 --> 0:40:59.680
<v Speaker 1>the Dbax are in cell mode. They get a lot

0:40:59.719 --> 0:41:02.920
<v Speaker 1>of Michael Soroka if he was healthy, So I think

0:41:02.960 --> 0:41:06.680
<v Speaker 1>Soroka would be far and away their most coveted asset

0:41:06.840 --> 0:41:09.360
<v Speaker 1>if they were sellers and if he was healthy. The

0:41:09.440 --> 0:41:12.279
<v Speaker 1>other name that's fascinating to me on the cell side

0:41:12.360 --> 0:41:17.520
<v Speaker 1>is Paul Seawald, who is eighteen for nineteen and saves right.

0:41:17.719 --> 0:41:19.759
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's hard, it's hard to argue with that,

0:41:20.320 --> 0:41:24.080
<v Speaker 1>but we know that the types of relievers that teams

0:41:24.200 --> 0:41:27.080
<v Speaker 1>usually acquire at the deadline. You know, if you trade

0:41:27.080 --> 0:41:30.359
<v Speaker 1>for a team's closer, chances are you want them to be,

0:41:30.760 --> 0:41:33.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, their seventh inning guy. They want them to

0:41:33.400 --> 0:41:35.480
<v Speaker 1>be their seventh thinning guy or eighth inning guy or

0:41:35.520 --> 0:41:38.160
<v Speaker 1>something like that. And I'm not sure a team would

0:41:38.200 --> 0:41:40.880
<v Speaker 1>do that with Paul Seawald. It kind of feels like

0:41:41.200 --> 0:41:44.320
<v Speaker 1>he has value in the closing role, but it would

0:41:44.320 --> 0:41:46.759
<v Speaker 1>be maybe a bit of a wild card in any

0:41:46.800 --> 0:41:51.400
<v Speaker 1>other setting. So he's another name where maybe there'd be interest,

0:41:51.520 --> 0:41:53.719
<v Speaker 1>but the d Bacs just might not be able to

0:41:53.719 --> 0:41:57.480
<v Speaker 1>get enough to actually warrant trading him off to another team.

0:41:58.000 --> 0:42:02.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's exactly right, you know, not that he would

0:42:02.080 --> 0:42:04.560
<v Speaker 2>have zero values, only making one and a half million,

0:42:04.640 --> 0:42:07.320
<v Speaker 2>so you know, for five hundred thousand dollars, there's plenty

0:42:07.320 --> 0:42:09.839
<v Speaker 2>of teams that would take a chance on him, but

0:42:10.239 --> 0:42:13.040
<v Speaker 2>you know, it just you wouldn't get much back. I think,

0:42:13.120 --> 0:42:16.160
<v Speaker 2>you know, important part of this too is the salary

0:42:16.239 --> 0:42:19.400
<v Speaker 2>relief because the Dbacks have been brushing up against the

0:42:19.719 --> 0:42:22.759
<v Speaker 2>competitive balance tax and we don't know if that's all

0:42:22.760 --> 0:42:25.120
<v Speaker 2>going to go away next year, if there's even going

0:42:25.200 --> 0:42:28.840
<v Speaker 2>to be a season next year, but you know, for

0:42:28.960 --> 0:42:31.880
<v Speaker 2>right now, the Dbacks definitely don't want to be paying penalties,

0:42:33.120 --> 0:42:36.719
<v Speaker 2>so you know, saving half a million here, a millionaire,

0:42:36.920 --> 0:42:40.439
<v Speaker 2>two millionaire, you know, that all kind of helps them

0:42:40.800 --> 0:42:43.320
<v Speaker 2>back away from that luxury tax threshold.

0:42:44.560 --> 0:42:47.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean it seems like this year if they're sellers,

0:42:47.320 --> 0:42:49.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean it's not there's no way that they're going

0:42:49.200 --> 0:42:50.280
<v Speaker 1>to get to the threshold.

0:42:50.320 --> 0:42:52.920
<v Speaker 4>If they're sellers, right.

0:42:52.760 --> 0:42:56.840
<v Speaker 2>Well, onles. They do the old sell buy two step right,

0:42:57.239 --> 0:42:59.439
<v Speaker 2>a couple of guys off to make room to bring

0:42:59.480 --> 0:43:02.279
<v Speaker 2>in somebody else. You never well go get a hitter, well,

0:43:02.760 --> 0:43:05.520
<v Speaker 2>any hitter worth his sauce. I mean, you know that

0:43:05.719 --> 0:43:07.520
<v Speaker 2>is going to cost you some money. It's going to

0:43:07.560 --> 0:43:10.080
<v Speaker 2>be some guy that's second or third year, are at

0:43:10.160 --> 0:43:12.719
<v Speaker 2>least or maybe has a couple of years left on

0:43:12.800 --> 0:43:16.560
<v Speaker 2>the contract, and you're absorbing salary. So you know, you

0:43:16.680 --> 0:43:19.160
<v Speaker 2>got to make you got to clear some follar space there.

0:43:20.080 --> 0:43:25.680
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and regardless of the luxury tax situation, Ken Kendrick

0:43:25.800 --> 0:43:28.560
<v Speaker 1>might just decide that he wants to cut back on payroll,

0:43:28.960 --> 0:43:31.439
<v Speaker 1>even if that's not an issue. If the d Backs

0:43:31.440 --> 0:43:34.120
<v Speaker 1>are sellers, he might say, like, yes, let's you know,

0:43:34.200 --> 0:43:37.879
<v Speaker 1>let's trade Jonathan Lewisega. Even though we're not getting much back,

0:43:37.920 --> 0:43:41.000
<v Speaker 1>we're saving what it would be like five hundred k

0:43:41.320 --> 0:43:43.680
<v Speaker 1>or something out out of his one point five million.

0:43:44.360 --> 0:43:48.120
<v Speaker 1>You know, maybe those savings would actually be worthwhile for

0:43:48.120 --> 0:43:51.640
<v Speaker 1>for Ken Kendrick trying to lower the payroll a little

0:43:51.640 --> 0:43:54.400
<v Speaker 1>bit down the stretch. So a lot of decisions for

0:43:54.480 --> 0:43:57.239
<v Speaker 1>the Diamondbacks to to make here in the next the

0:43:57.239 --> 0:43:58.000
<v Speaker 1>next few weeks.

0:43:58.719 --> 0:44:00.160
<v Speaker 2>Are we at the point in the show where we

0:44:00.200 --> 0:44:02.799
<v Speaker 2>can talk about the Mariners pretty please please please.

0:44:04.560 --> 0:44:07.840
<v Speaker 1>Sir Jack, what Mariners Diamondbacks trade? Are we going to

0:44:07.920 --> 0:44:09.239
<v Speaker 1>get this July?

0:44:09.440 --> 0:44:09.880
<v Speaker 3>Go ahead?

0:44:09.920 --> 0:44:12.520
<v Speaker 2>Tell us well, reports have come out that the Mariners

0:44:12.560 --> 0:44:14.880
<v Speaker 2>are looking for a reliever in a right handed bat.

0:44:16.600 --> 0:44:21.000
<v Speaker 2>So I had like a very strange thought which probably

0:44:21.080 --> 0:44:23.440
<v Speaker 2>can't or won't happen. But you know, it's not the

0:44:23.480 --> 0:44:27.160
<v Speaker 2>worst idea I've ever had, which is, you know, go

0:44:27.239 --> 0:44:30.799
<v Speaker 2>to Jerry Depoto and say, here, we'll pick up all

0:44:30.840 --> 0:44:33.960
<v Speaker 2>but say a million of Lordis's salary, you know, to

0:44:34.120 --> 0:44:36.400
<v Speaker 2>pick up a million of Lordus Curio's salary. But you

0:44:36.440 --> 0:44:39.799
<v Speaker 2>got to do it. Now, go ahead and bring Ryan

0:44:39.840 --> 0:44:43.799
<v Speaker 2>Walshman back up. You move Lordis over the Seattle. Now

0:44:43.800 --> 0:44:46.880
<v Speaker 2>what's in that for Seattle? I mean they get a

0:44:46.880 --> 0:44:50.439
<v Speaker 2>guy early that if he somehow did get on a heater,

0:44:51.800 --> 0:44:54.080
<v Speaker 2>you know that that's a million dollar risk or a

0:44:54.080 --> 0:44:56.640
<v Speaker 2>two million dollar risk, but it's not going to cost

0:44:56.680 --> 0:44:59.160
<v Speaker 2>him anything in player capital. In other words, you're just

0:44:59.200 --> 0:45:01.720
<v Speaker 2>getting the Mariners to take as much of the salary

0:45:02.080 --> 0:45:05.520
<v Speaker 2>remaining salary as you can without really getting any player

0:45:05.560 --> 0:45:09.239
<v Speaker 2>capital in return. Right, And so for the Mariners, they

0:45:09.239 --> 0:45:12.000
<v Speaker 2>get him early enough where if it works out and

0:45:12.040 --> 0:45:14.799
<v Speaker 2>he starts to hit, you got your right handed hitter.

0:45:15.239 --> 0:45:18.320
<v Speaker 2>And if it doesn't work out, they can say goodbye

0:45:18.360 --> 0:45:20.839
<v Speaker 2>to him before the trade downline and go try somebody else.

0:45:21.040 --> 0:45:23.279
<v Speaker 2>And all it's cost him is a couple million dollars.

0:45:24.000 --> 0:45:26.680
<v Speaker 2>So I don't know what their salary situation is and

0:45:26.719 --> 0:45:31.080
<v Speaker 2>how tight it is, but that's something that I would

0:45:31.360 --> 0:45:33.480
<v Speaker 2>be on the phone talking to them about if I

0:45:33.600 --> 0:45:36.520
<v Speaker 2>was my Kazum, you know, I would see, hey, could

0:45:36.520 --> 0:45:39.040
<v Speaker 2>you take lorders off my hands? How much of the

0:45:39.120 --> 0:45:40.160
<v Speaker 2>salary are.

0:45:40.080 --> 0:45:41.000
<v Speaker 3>You willing to absorb?

0:45:41.640 --> 0:45:44.160
<v Speaker 2>And I would try to make it early move there.

0:45:44.840 --> 0:45:48.680
<v Speaker 2>And then for Mike, he's simply replacing Lords with Ryan.

0:45:50.000 --> 0:45:50.399
<v Speaker 3>That's it.

0:45:51.840 --> 0:45:55.680
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I'm skeptical, but I'm also like, well, this is

0:45:55.680 --> 0:45:58.280
<v Speaker 1>a Mariner's Diamondbacks trade, so of course it could happen

0:45:58.320 --> 0:45:59.520
<v Speaker 1>and probably will happen.

0:46:01.000 --> 0:46:03.120
<v Speaker 4>Looking at the Mariners roster a little.

0:46:03.000 --> 0:46:06.680
<v Speaker 1>More closely, the guy that they got in the off

0:46:06.800 --> 0:46:11.480
<v Speaker 1>season to be their right handed hitting outfielder was Rob Refsnyder,

0:46:11.920 --> 0:46:14.799
<v Speaker 1>and he has had just a miserable season. He's hitting

0:46:14.840 --> 0:46:17.960
<v Speaker 1>one thirty three with a two oh three on base

0:46:18.000 --> 0:46:21.200
<v Speaker 1>percentage of two nineteen slug negative one point one war

0:46:21.800 --> 0:46:25.960
<v Speaker 1>entering today. So I guess the threshold that the Mariners

0:46:25.960 --> 0:46:29.480
<v Speaker 1>are looking for is maybe not that high. So so

0:46:29.600 --> 0:46:33.280
<v Speaker 1>maybe that does open the door to take a chance

0:46:33.360 --> 0:46:36.520
<v Speaker 1>on someone like Lordis Guriel Junior. I still am skeptical

0:46:36.600 --> 0:46:39.239
<v Speaker 1>because I think that lordis. Yes, he has been better

0:46:39.280 --> 0:46:42.080
<v Speaker 1>than ref Snyder this year, but not by that much.

0:46:42.440 --> 0:46:45.359
<v Speaker 1>To me, he just looks like a player that you know,

0:46:45.400 --> 0:46:48.640
<v Speaker 1>if I'm a contender, I don't really see a need

0:46:48.680 --> 0:46:51.360
<v Speaker 1>to go down that road. I would be shooting higher

0:46:51.400 --> 0:46:54.240
<v Speaker 1>for sure. But but yeah, we know how Jerry Depoto

0:46:54.480 --> 0:46:56.640
<v Speaker 1>and Mike Hazen r So never say never.

0:46:57.280 --> 0:47:00.200
<v Speaker 2>Well again, the concept that I have there is that only.

0:47:00.120 --> 0:47:01.000
<v Speaker 3>Works if it's early.

0:47:01.600 --> 0:47:03.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean, that's not a move that the Mariners

0:47:03.520 --> 0:47:06.800
<v Speaker 2>would do five days before the trade deadline. There certainly

0:47:06.800 --> 0:47:09.160
<v Speaker 2>would be shooting higher. The point is that if they

0:47:09.200 --> 0:47:12.240
<v Speaker 2>pulled this off in the next week, you know, before

0:47:12.280 --> 0:47:15.120
<v Speaker 2>the All Star break, then you can you got fifteen

0:47:15.160 --> 0:47:18.440
<v Speaker 2>games to see if Lords can do anything, and if

0:47:18.480 --> 0:47:20.400
<v Speaker 2>he doesn't, you cut bait on a million bucks and

0:47:21.280 --> 0:47:22.879
<v Speaker 2>move on go get somebody else.

0:47:23.760 --> 0:47:28.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, huh, it it does make some sense. And if

0:47:28.600 --> 0:47:31.040
<v Speaker 1>it's not this trade. It's going to be something. We

0:47:31.120 --> 0:47:33.360
<v Speaker 1>know that Mike Casan and Jerry Depota they're going to

0:47:33.440 --> 0:47:36.080
<v Speaker 1>make some sort of trade over the next month or

0:47:36.080 --> 0:47:38.520
<v Speaker 1>so regardless, So we just all get to wait and

0:47:38.560 --> 0:47:41.320
<v Speaker 1>see what that is. In terms of what's next for

0:47:41.400 --> 0:47:44.760
<v Speaker 1>the Diamondbacks, they as you mentioned earlier, they are heading

0:47:44.800 --> 0:47:48.400
<v Speaker 1>back home to face the San Francisco Giants, a team

0:47:48.480 --> 0:47:51.360
<v Speaker 1>that they have had quite a bit of success against

0:47:51.360 --> 0:47:55.279
<v Speaker 1>this season. We have the pitching probables here. It is

0:47:55.360 --> 0:47:58.960
<v Speaker 1>going to be Eduardo Rodriguez and Tyler Mallley on Monday night.

0:47:59.320 --> 0:48:03.400
<v Speaker 1>Brandon Fought is expected to make the start on Tuesday,

0:48:03.800 --> 0:48:06.080
<v Speaker 1>going against landed group of the Giants, and then it's

0:48:06.160 --> 0:48:10.640
<v Speaker 1>Zach Gallen and Trevor McDonald in the finale on Wednesday. So,

0:48:11.080 --> 0:48:15.600
<v Speaker 1>as you mentioned, Jack, the schedule is pretty tough outside

0:48:15.640 --> 0:48:18.160
<v Speaker 1>of this series with the Brewers and the Padres and

0:48:18.200 --> 0:48:20.960
<v Speaker 1>the Dodgers coming up heading into the All Star break,

0:48:21.040 --> 0:48:24.680
<v Speaker 1>so really important that the Diamondbacks capitalize on a team

0:48:24.719 --> 0:48:27.880
<v Speaker 1>that they have dominated to this point in the season.

0:48:28.640 --> 0:48:31.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, a couple of quick health updates, by the way,

0:48:31.600 --> 0:48:35.920
<v Speaker 2>Speaking of Michael Soroka, he is actually expected to begin

0:48:36.120 --> 0:48:39.760
<v Speaker 2>throwing some bullpens by the end of this upcoming week,

0:48:40.360 --> 0:48:46.720
<v Speaker 2>and also the James McCann had his ACL rehab games

0:48:46.800 --> 0:48:50.960
<v Speaker 2>pushed to the end of this upcoming week. So to me,

0:48:51.160 --> 0:48:52.960
<v Speaker 2>it kind of looks like James McCann is not going

0:48:53.000 --> 0:48:55.440
<v Speaker 2>to be back before the All Star break. He could be,

0:48:55.760 --> 0:48:59.719
<v Speaker 2>but maybe not. But the good names on Soroka is

0:48:59.800 --> 0:49:02.680
<v Speaker 2>that and they mentioned this before that they felt like

0:49:02.719 --> 0:49:06.120
<v Speaker 2>he would be able to start throwing enough to shorten

0:49:06.239 --> 0:49:06.640
<v Speaker 2>up his.

0:49:06.800 --> 0:49:07.479
<v Speaker 3>Ramp up time.

0:49:07.719 --> 0:49:11.000
<v Speaker 2>If you remember we talked about the amount of weeks

0:49:11.080 --> 0:49:13.919
<v Speaker 2>down from throwing is the amount of weeks you need

0:49:13.960 --> 0:49:16.319
<v Speaker 2>to ramp back up. So I think he went on

0:49:16.360 --> 0:49:21.160
<v Speaker 2>the injured list but in eighteen nineteen somewhere in there,

0:49:21.920 --> 0:49:25.239
<v Speaker 2>forget the exact date. So if he's only down two

0:49:25.239 --> 0:49:26.759
<v Speaker 2>weeks and it might only take him a couple of

0:49:26.760 --> 0:49:29.719
<v Speaker 2>weeks to ramp up, so we could very well see

0:49:29.760 --> 0:49:31.399
<v Speaker 2>Michael Siroka immediately after the All.

0:49:31.400 --> 0:49:34.360
<v Speaker 4>Star break, and yeah, that would be huge.

0:49:35.040 --> 0:49:36.600
<v Speaker 2>There will given plenty of time to at least get

0:49:36.600 --> 0:49:38.760
<v Speaker 2>in a couple of starts approved to the world he's healthy,

0:49:39.400 --> 0:49:42.480
<v Speaker 2>and then turn into the dbak's best sell chip if

0:49:42.520 --> 0:49:43.400
<v Speaker 2>that's what they need to do.

0:49:44.800 --> 0:49:48.560
<v Speaker 1>I else did started on June twentieth, so yeah, we're

0:49:48.640 --> 0:49:51.720
<v Speaker 1>just a little over a week out from that. Pretty

0:49:52.040 --> 0:49:55.200
<v Speaker 1>good news there that he's already expected to throw a

0:49:55.239 --> 0:49:58.279
<v Speaker 1>bullpen pretty soon, so we'll do our best to keep

0:49:58.320 --> 0:50:01.839
<v Speaker 1>you all updated on that. And thank you to all

0:50:01.920 --> 0:50:04.040
<v Speaker 1>of you for being with us on this episode. We

0:50:04.120 --> 0:50:07.279
<v Speaker 1>really appreciate it. As I mentioned earlier, drop alke on

0:50:07.320 --> 0:50:10.160
<v Speaker 1>the video, subscribe to our channel, hit the bell icon

0:50:10.200 --> 0:50:13.880
<v Speaker 1>from notifications so that you never miss an episode of

0:50:13.920 --> 0:50:16.600
<v Speaker 1>the show. We always enjoy hearing from you, so leave

0:50:16.640 --> 0:50:19.360
<v Speaker 1>us a comment. You can also find us on social media.

0:50:19.640 --> 0:50:21.719
<v Speaker 1>I am at jesse En Friedman on Twitter. Jack is

0:50:21.719 --> 0:50:24.520
<v Speaker 1>at sho Wizard fifty nine, and our show is at

0:50:24.560 --> 0:50:28.279
<v Speaker 1>Snake's Territory. You can find Jack's written work over at

0:50:28.360 --> 0:50:33.080
<v Speaker 1>Arizona Diamondbacks on si Jack any final thoughts here As

0:50:33.120 --> 0:50:34.440
<v Speaker 1>we say goodbye.

0:50:34.520 --> 0:50:37.799
<v Speaker 2>I'll see everyone Tuesday night after this episode. We our

0:50:37.800 --> 0:50:41.080
<v Speaker 2>next show should be a live show on Tuesday following

0:50:41.360 --> 0:50:42.640
<v Speaker 2>the DBS Giants game.

0:50:43.480 --> 0:50:44.000
<v Speaker 4>Here you go.

0:50:44.080 --> 0:50:48.040
<v Speaker 1>We hope to see you all right back here on YouTube. Then,

0:50:48.719 --> 0:50:51.160
<v Speaker 1>thank you again to all of you for being with us.

0:50:51.239 --> 0:50:53.879
<v Speaker 1>We really appreciate your time, and we'll be back once

0:50:53.920 --> 0:50:57.480
<v Speaker 1>again on Tuesday night with another edition of Snake's Territory

0:51:00.120 --> 0:51:00.239
<v Speaker 2>Pe