WEBVTT - Rookie Runners

0:00:01.440 --> 0:00:05.160
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Fantasy Football Weekly, a production of I Heart Radio.

0:00:07.280 --> 0:00:10.640
<v Speaker 1>Time now for Fantasy Football Weekly from I Heart Radio,

0:00:10.880 --> 0:00:15.320
<v Speaker 1>your weekly source for the nation's best fantasy football advice, speculation,

0:00:15.440 --> 0:00:18.279
<v Speaker 1>and whatever stupid stuff they decided to drop into the show.

0:00:18.760 --> 0:00:25.880
<v Speaker 1>Now here's your host, Paul. Welcome to Fantasy Football Weekly.

0:00:25.920 --> 0:00:30.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm Paul Chargy in my co host as usual Brian Johnson.

0:00:30.720 --> 0:00:33.839
<v Speaker 1>Good day, George. Good to talk to you as well.

0:00:34.000 --> 0:00:39.280
<v Speaker 1>It's another edition centered around rookies as the draft gets

0:00:39.280 --> 0:00:41.479
<v Speaker 1>a little bit closer. Last week we did quarterbacks. We

0:00:41.560 --> 0:00:43.839
<v Speaker 1>encourage people to go back and listen to that one

0:00:43.840 --> 0:00:46.560
<v Speaker 1>if you missed it. As we break down players at

0:00:46.600 --> 0:00:49.519
<v Speaker 1>a at a position leading up to the draft, and

0:00:49.520 --> 0:00:52.680
<v Speaker 1>then a couple of three weeks from now, we'll we'll

0:00:52.720 --> 0:00:55.160
<v Speaker 1>be talking about the first round as a record on Fridays.

0:00:55.240 --> 0:00:58.880
<v Speaker 1>That'll be fun. Would you call this a shallow running

0:00:58.880 --> 0:01:05.520
<v Speaker 1>back class? Yeah, I don't know. We're gonna talk about

0:01:05.560 --> 0:01:08.520
<v Speaker 1>ten guys who I think all have a chance to

0:01:08.640 --> 0:01:10.880
<v Speaker 1>make an impact. I mean all ten of these I

0:01:10.959 --> 0:01:15.559
<v Speaker 1>think have pro level abilities to some degree. My temph

0:01:15.720 --> 0:01:18.680
<v Speaker 1>know the tenth guy, I've got guy number ten. Yeah, yeah,

0:01:18.840 --> 0:01:21.080
<v Speaker 1>that's crazy about him. But I think I think the

0:01:21.120 --> 0:01:23.840
<v Speaker 1>other nine I could could have an impact in the

0:01:23.959 --> 0:01:27.480
<v Speaker 1>right situations, taking a lot of hate overall, Yeah, I

0:01:27.520 --> 0:01:29.160
<v Speaker 1>think that. I think there's you know why, it's because

0:01:29.160 --> 0:01:34.120
<v Speaker 1>there isn't a There isn't a a or in Ezekiel

0:01:34.120 --> 0:01:36.960
<v Speaker 1>Elliott at the top of the first round to make

0:01:36.959 --> 0:01:40.640
<v Speaker 1>people who um. But there's still some really good running

0:01:40.640 --> 0:01:42.640
<v Speaker 1>backs in this class, and we're gonna break them down.

0:01:42.760 --> 0:01:45.479
<v Speaker 1>I want to start with this though. The I think

0:01:45.520 --> 0:01:50.040
<v Speaker 1>there's still four ideal landing spots where any of these

0:01:50.120 --> 0:01:54.120
<v Speaker 1>rookies could just walk in and become a workhorse back Miami.

0:01:54.560 --> 0:01:56.960
<v Speaker 1>You know, not like Miles Gaskin, but I think I

0:01:57.000 --> 0:02:01.320
<v Speaker 1>think if you know, the right guy falls there, you know,

0:02:01.160 --> 0:02:03.200
<v Speaker 1>I think he gets pushed to the background. I'm holding

0:02:03.280 --> 0:02:07.080
<v Speaker 1>my breath as a guy who's rostering Miles gascon in

0:02:07.160 --> 0:02:08.959
<v Speaker 1>hopes of leading me to the second year in a

0:02:09.000 --> 0:02:10.520
<v Speaker 1>row in our Empire League. So you can dig down

0:02:10.520 --> 0:02:14.440
<v Speaker 1>the whole pot. So I've survived free agency, right breath,

0:02:15.800 --> 0:02:17.919
<v Speaker 1>don't draft a running back Miami. But yes, that's a

0:02:17.960 --> 0:02:20.919
<v Speaker 1>great spot, like said the Jets, Well, Michael per Ryan

0:02:21.080 --> 0:02:23.160
<v Speaker 1>is not is not going to be a starter. I

0:02:23.160 --> 0:02:26.600
<v Speaker 1>don't believe somebody could walk in and take that job. Pittsburgh,

0:02:26.760 --> 0:02:29.799
<v Speaker 1>you know, Benny Snell is the only guy basically, and

0:02:29.880 --> 0:02:34.680
<v Speaker 1>Anthony McFarland roster, and unless they really show something different

0:02:34.720 --> 0:02:37.919
<v Speaker 1>than they had last year, that's a that's a spot.

0:02:37.960 --> 0:02:40.600
<v Speaker 1>And then you know, Atlanta did sign Mike Davis, but

0:02:40.639 --> 0:02:43.280
<v Speaker 1>I just think Mike Davis ideally is not the lead back.

0:02:43.480 --> 0:02:46.040
<v Speaker 1>Probably not. So those are the four that I feel

0:02:46.040 --> 0:02:47.720
<v Speaker 1>like somebody could just walk in and be a workhorse.

0:02:48.240 --> 0:02:50.679
<v Speaker 1>Then there's a bunch of spots where somebody could walk

0:02:50.720 --> 0:02:54.200
<v Speaker 1>in and be like a change of pace back, a

0:02:54.360 --> 0:02:58.720
<v Speaker 1>regularly used number two back. Cincinnati they cut Giovanni Bernard,

0:02:58.760 --> 0:03:00.840
<v Speaker 1>so I think that somebody could walk into that spot.

0:03:01.000 --> 0:03:05.640
<v Speaker 1>Jacksonville needs somebody behind James Robinson. Denver signed Mike Boone,

0:03:05.680 --> 0:03:07.720
<v Speaker 1>but they need somebody behind Melvin Gordon. I think Mike

0:03:07.720 --> 0:03:10.760
<v Speaker 1>Boon can be a number two back. Kansas City, I

0:03:10.800 --> 0:03:15.160
<v Speaker 1>think Darryl Williams is totally ordinary, so I think that's

0:03:15.160 --> 0:03:18.720
<v Speaker 1>a candidate. Uh. The Giants cut Wayne Gallman, so they

0:03:18.720 --> 0:03:25.000
<v Speaker 1>need to they need somebody behind. Yeah, Philadelphia behind Miles Sanders.

0:03:25.040 --> 0:03:26.840
<v Speaker 1>I don't think Boston Scott is big enough to carry

0:03:26.840 --> 0:03:29.120
<v Speaker 1>that even as like a change of paceload bringing back

0:03:29.160 --> 0:03:34.280
<v Speaker 1>Jordan Howard. You hear about that though, whatever Carolina behind

0:03:34.360 --> 0:03:38.160
<v Speaker 1>Christian McCaffrey, uh, in part because Mike Davis gone. And

0:03:38.200 --> 0:03:40.480
<v Speaker 1>then you know, Arizona has really just got Chase Edmonds

0:03:40.600 --> 0:03:42.320
<v Speaker 1>right now, so some needs to walk into that. And

0:03:42.320 --> 0:03:45.480
<v Speaker 1>then San Francisco with they're always rotate, it always rotation

0:03:45.520 --> 0:03:48.200
<v Speaker 1>of backs, and they always need somebody healthy. And I

0:03:48.240 --> 0:03:50.400
<v Speaker 1>think they they've got to be frustrated with all the

0:03:50.440 --> 0:03:53.520
<v Speaker 1>injuries to reheem most Art and you know Wilson and all.

0:03:53.720 --> 0:03:56.720
<v Speaker 1>You know, that's been a frustrating situation. So I think

0:03:56.720 --> 0:03:59.400
<v Speaker 1>those are all all all teams that are in play here,

0:03:59.600 --> 0:04:02.040
<v Speaker 1>all right, So let's let's start with this from a

0:04:02.600 --> 0:04:07.560
<v Speaker 1>purely fantasy perspective. The guy that is going first in

0:04:08.160 --> 0:04:12.240
<v Speaker 1>rookie drafts that are being held now is Naji Harris. Yeah,

0:04:12.360 --> 0:04:14.640
<v Speaker 1>tell us, tell us about him and what makes him

0:04:14.800 --> 0:04:18.800
<v Speaker 1>as a prime candidate for a strong fantasy season. Yeah,

0:04:18.800 --> 0:04:21.080
<v Speaker 1>most likely the first running back to go on the

0:04:21.279 --> 0:04:23.960
<v Speaker 1>NFL draft night to or maybe maybe Day two for

0:04:24.000 --> 0:04:27.680
<v Speaker 1>all we know. But Nagi Harris at Alabama right now

0:04:27.720 --> 0:04:30.760
<v Speaker 1>in best ball leagues, he's going around in the ninth round,

0:04:31.120 --> 0:04:35.839
<v Speaker 1>mid to late ninth round, which seems like no kidding,

0:04:35.960 --> 0:04:37.440
<v Speaker 1>we don't know where he's playing as it right now,

0:04:37.520 --> 0:04:41.880
<v Speaker 1>of course, but great size six to two thirty, absolute bruiser.

0:04:41.960 --> 0:04:45.360
<v Speaker 1>But that's not his only that's not the only ace

0:04:45.440 --> 0:04:47.040
<v Speaker 1>up his sleeve, only tricking up bag. He's had a

0:04:47.080 --> 0:04:50.240
<v Speaker 1>whole bag of tricks. Uh. He's not just in good hands, yeah,

0:04:50.279 --> 0:04:52.920
<v Speaker 1>great hands as a receiver. Did you hear how he

0:04:53.000 --> 0:04:56.600
<v Speaker 1>told Todd McShay recently to kiss his ass, not indirectly,

0:04:56.640 --> 0:04:59.960
<v Speaker 1>but he's getting interviewed and someone told him how Todd McShay,

0:05:00.000 --> 0:05:04.919
<v Speaker 1>He said he improved as a receiver, kiss my ass

0:05:05.680 --> 0:05:09.000
<v Speaker 1>like he's got but like mcshaven said he was. He said,

0:05:09.080 --> 0:05:11.800
<v Speaker 1>he's really good and he got even better. But he's

0:05:11.800 --> 0:05:13.800
<v Speaker 1>got a chip on his shoulder already, which I really like.

0:05:13.920 --> 0:05:17.160
<v Speaker 1>But um, the most rushing touchdowns in college football last

0:05:17.240 --> 0:05:21.200
<v Speaker 1>year twenty six rushing touchdowns in thirteen games and not.

0:05:21.360 --> 0:05:23.400
<v Speaker 1>Don't you think that's the thing that fantasy owners are

0:05:23.480 --> 0:05:28.240
<v Speaker 1>really highlighting with Harris is he is a goal line

0:05:28.320 --> 0:05:31.320
<v Speaker 1>back for sure, he is, but like you said, though

0:05:31.320 --> 0:05:33.359
<v Speaker 1>he can catch the ball. He was third in target

0:05:33.400 --> 0:05:37.080
<v Speaker 1>share among running backs in this year's draft class last year,

0:05:37.279 --> 0:05:40.040
<v Speaker 1>so he's got bell cow potential written all over him.

0:05:40.080 --> 0:05:44.599
<v Speaker 1>Now when it comes to dynasty, he sort of old

0:05:47.440 --> 0:05:50.760
<v Speaker 1>in March, but he's the most complete back in this class.

0:05:50.800 --> 0:05:52.600
<v Speaker 1>And uh yeah, right now, if I'm doing the best

0:05:52.640 --> 0:05:54.840
<v Speaker 1>ball draft or even a redraft league, I'm getting in

0:05:54.839 --> 0:05:56.640
<v Speaker 1>the ninth round. I don't care if he goes to

0:05:56.680 --> 0:05:59.400
<v Speaker 1>the Jets, which is probably the least ideal landing spot.

0:05:59.520 --> 0:06:03.440
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, nausea, Harris going to be the first running

0:06:03.440 --> 0:06:05.560
<v Speaker 1>back taken in most fantasy drafts and most likely in

0:06:05.680 --> 0:06:09.039
<v Speaker 1>uh in the reality draft, depending on where lands, which

0:06:09.080 --> 0:06:10.960
<v Speaker 1>is a huge X factor for all these guys. If

0:06:11.000 --> 0:06:12.880
<v Speaker 1>you go into the wrong spot and you're gonna be,

0:06:13.000 --> 0:06:15.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, in a workhorse situation like a J. Dillon

0:06:15.360 --> 0:06:17.360
<v Speaker 1>last week, that really would change the last year. That

0:06:17.360 --> 0:06:19.640
<v Speaker 1>would change things a lot. Now, the guy I think

0:06:20.080 --> 0:06:23.960
<v Speaker 1>can out potentially I'll perform. Harris from a fantasy standpoint.

0:06:24.320 --> 0:06:27.880
<v Speaker 1>Is one of the two University of North Carolina runners,

0:06:28.200 --> 0:06:30.640
<v Speaker 1>and the first is Javonte Williams, who set up much

0:06:30.640 --> 0:06:36.719
<v Speaker 1>more like Harris. Javonte Williams is a brutally hard running,

0:06:37.120 --> 0:06:43.159
<v Speaker 1>violent attacking back who welcomes contact and leaves defenders battered

0:06:43.600 --> 0:06:48.680
<v Speaker 1>for having insulted him by trying to tackle Javonte Williams.

0:06:49.120 --> 0:06:52.359
<v Speaker 1>He's got remarkable balance. So you have these big contact

0:06:52.440 --> 0:06:56.360
<v Speaker 1>moments where Williams lowers his shoulder, but he just powers through.

0:06:56.400 --> 0:06:58.719
<v Speaker 1>I mean, he's just the balance, is unfazed by the

0:06:58.800 --> 0:07:01.240
<v Speaker 1>hits that he takes and and doles out, and then

0:07:01.279 --> 0:07:05.760
<v Speaker 1>he just keeps going. He's got remarkable burst in acceleration

0:07:05.920 --> 0:07:08.680
<v Speaker 1>for a full bodied runner. And he is a he

0:07:08.800 --> 0:07:10.960
<v Speaker 1>is a bigger back. It's not gigantic. He's not a

0:07:10.960 --> 0:07:14.320
<v Speaker 1>bowling ball um. He led all of college football in

0:07:14.440 --> 0:07:18.640
<v Speaker 1>broken tackles last year per Pro Football Focus, seventy five

0:07:18.760 --> 0:07:22.320
<v Speaker 1>broken tackles last year. You know he only played seven games.

0:07:22.320 --> 0:07:25.440
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you know, he's breaking ten tackles a game.

0:07:25.840 --> 0:07:30.040
<v Speaker 1>It's crazy, and just ideal size for a power running back.

0:07:30.160 --> 0:07:32.800
<v Speaker 1>He isn't He's just he's well built and he's strong,

0:07:32.920 --> 0:07:35.400
<v Speaker 1>and he's but he's not overly huge, which is I

0:07:35.520 --> 0:07:38.680
<v Speaker 1>just think perfect. And there's so much to like about

0:07:38.720 --> 0:07:41.240
<v Speaker 1>Javonti Williams. Now. The only knacks on him he only

0:07:41.280 --> 0:07:46.720
<v Speaker 1>performed at this level last year. And he can catch,

0:07:47.040 --> 0:07:51.560
<v Speaker 1>but he's not a natural you know, ball catching back um,

0:07:51.600 --> 0:07:54.200
<v Speaker 1>and I think his top end speed is just okay.

0:07:54.240 --> 0:07:58.680
<v Speaker 1>He's better with the short the short burst and acceleration. UM.

0:07:58.760 --> 0:08:01.560
<v Speaker 1>When he gets into the open field, he's not necessarily

0:08:01.560 --> 0:08:04.240
<v Speaker 1>just going to run away from a cornerback or a

0:08:04.320 --> 0:08:09.080
<v Speaker 1>safety and still uh, Javonte Williams will get goal line

0:08:09.120 --> 0:08:13.320
<v Speaker 1>carries and Brian I think ideally suited for fantasy play

0:08:13.320 --> 0:08:15.440
<v Speaker 1>and if he falls into the right spot, he could

0:08:15.480 --> 0:08:19.360
<v Speaker 1>be the first overall running back taken in fantasy drafts. Yeah,

0:08:19.400 --> 0:08:21.800
<v Speaker 1>talk about a discount right now in bestball, he's uh

0:08:22.120 --> 0:08:26.440
<v Speaker 1>RB right now, we want a couple rounds after Nase Harris,

0:08:26.480 --> 0:08:28.760
<v Speaker 1>after Melvin Gordon right now, who would you rather have

0:08:28.840 --> 0:08:30.720
<v Speaker 1>right now? I know if you're a draft of Melvin

0:08:30.760 --> 0:08:35.640
<v Speaker 1>Gordon or vant William Williams all day, I agree with that.

0:08:35.920 --> 0:08:38.600
<v Speaker 1>Let's go to our Let's go to our next running back,

0:08:39.160 --> 0:08:43.280
<v Speaker 1>Travis E. T N And for Travis, it's he was

0:08:43.320 --> 0:08:47.560
<v Speaker 1>a highly publicized, well known commodity coming out of Clemson,

0:08:47.720 --> 0:08:55.320
<v Speaker 1>and boy the speed yeah remarkable. He's uh, probably not

0:08:55.520 --> 0:08:58.120
<v Speaker 1>the fastest running back when it comes to Peter speed

0:08:58.120 --> 0:08:59.600
<v Speaker 1>in the draft, but at four or four in the

0:08:59.640 --> 0:09:03.160
<v Speaker 1>forty he's very pretty close and he most people thought

0:09:03.200 --> 0:09:05.719
<v Speaker 1>he was going to turn pro last year, but he

0:09:05.720 --> 0:09:08.720
<v Speaker 1>he came back for his senior season at Clemson UM

0:09:09.400 --> 0:09:12.800
<v Speaker 1>where he set the it was over the course of

0:09:12.840 --> 0:09:14.679
<v Speaker 1>his career. But he's the n C double as all

0:09:14.720 --> 0:09:17.240
<v Speaker 1>time leader now in total games with a touchdown for

0:09:17.320 --> 0:09:21.920
<v Speaker 1>skilled players. And uh, he's got pretty good size to

0:09:22.160 --> 0:09:24.760
<v Speaker 1>five ten to fifteen. He's not a he's not a house,

0:09:24.840 --> 0:09:28.360
<v Speaker 1>but he's not undersized. And then like you said, great speed,

0:09:28.880 --> 0:09:32.920
<v Speaker 1>um career seven point two yards per carry, an excellent receiver,

0:09:33.360 --> 0:09:36.559
<v Speaker 1>pretty much the whole package. There are some concerns around

0:09:36.559 --> 0:09:39.640
<v Speaker 1>his past protection, but we hear that about plenty of

0:09:39.679 --> 0:09:43.880
<v Speaker 1>most even he's even seasoned vets. So uh E t

0:09:44.080 --> 0:09:47.400
<v Speaker 1>N with Nagy Harris and Javonte Williams, they're kind in

0:09:47.440 --> 0:09:51.120
<v Speaker 1>that top three, the top three tire and uh Javonte

0:09:51.160 --> 0:09:53.360
<v Speaker 1>Williams or you really could pick any one of these

0:09:53.360 --> 0:09:56.120
<v Speaker 1>guys first overall among rookies. E ten is actually going

0:09:56.120 --> 0:09:59.360
<v Speaker 1>a little earlier than Williams and right after Nagy Harris.

0:09:59.440 --> 0:10:02.920
<v Speaker 1>But like we said, they're they're lumped uh right there together,

0:10:03.040 --> 0:10:05.439
<v Speaker 1>and uh they can all immediately produce this here in

0:10:05.440 --> 0:10:07.640
<v Speaker 1>the right spot, and they're their future outlooking dynasty is

0:10:07.840 --> 0:10:10.320
<v Speaker 1>very very break e t N is just the the

0:10:10.360 --> 0:10:14.080
<v Speaker 1>acceleration and the burst. It's track star level stuff, Brian.

0:10:14.240 --> 0:10:18.199
<v Speaker 1>And you know you where I think where he's not

0:10:18.320 --> 0:10:22.440
<v Speaker 1>as great as moving laterally, is not as strong suit.

0:10:22.480 --> 0:10:26.520
<v Speaker 1>He's more of a track star, you know, straightforward runner,

0:10:26.600 --> 0:10:29.960
<v Speaker 1>north south runner. But he's gonna be good everywhere. And

0:10:30.240 --> 0:10:33.400
<v Speaker 1>just he's got some special traits that suggests he's going

0:10:33.400 --> 0:10:35.640
<v Speaker 1>to he's going to break a lot of big plays

0:10:35.640 --> 0:10:38.400
<v Speaker 1>in the NFL. Meant to throw in most yards after

0:10:38.520 --> 0:10:41.400
<v Speaker 1>contact over the last two seasons in college football. Et

0:10:41.559 --> 0:10:44.760
<v Speaker 1>N was second. That's amazing, and I won't mention who

0:10:44.800 --> 0:10:46.679
<v Speaker 1>was first. I'm gonna he's gonna be a bonus guy

0:10:46.720 --> 0:10:49.719
<v Speaker 1>at the very end you're not going to expect. I'm

0:10:49.800 --> 0:10:51.560
<v Speaker 1>very intrigued by this guy, by the way, but anyway,

0:10:51.559 --> 0:10:53.440
<v Speaker 1>we'll get to him later now. I just uh, I

0:10:53.520 --> 0:10:56.160
<v Speaker 1>was just earlier talking about Javonte Williams from University of

0:10:56.160 --> 0:11:00.120
<v Speaker 1>North Carolina. They have another running back who's fascinating in

0:11:00.760 --> 0:11:04.880
<v Speaker 1>this is not a case where North Carolina had like

0:11:05.200 --> 0:11:07.760
<v Speaker 1>the big, bruising back that Javonte Williams is. And then

0:11:07.800 --> 0:11:10.360
<v Speaker 1>the scat back though they had. They had two pretty

0:11:10.400 --> 0:11:14.680
<v Speaker 1>well put together, solidly built backs, Michael Carter being the

0:11:14.720 --> 0:11:17.040
<v Speaker 1>second of those. Now he's short, he's five ft eight,

0:11:17.080 --> 0:11:20.280
<v Speaker 1>he's two hundred pounds um. But at five two hundred

0:11:21.000 --> 0:11:23.439
<v Speaker 1>that two isn't spread across like a guy who's five

0:11:23.480 --> 0:11:27.079
<v Speaker 1>ft eleven, So he's still actually pretty well built despite

0:11:27.080 --> 0:11:30.640
<v Speaker 1>being on the shorter side. Michael Carter is um still

0:11:31.080 --> 0:11:34.760
<v Speaker 1>a tad lightweight for the position, but he is so

0:11:35.320 --> 0:11:39.280
<v Speaker 1>shifty and the amazing footwork that he's got. He's got

0:11:39.320 --> 0:11:43.480
<v Speaker 1>a hip swivel that unlocks just this crazy elusiveness and

0:11:43.520 --> 0:11:46.559
<v Speaker 1>he's very hard to get a clean shot on. Michael Carter.

0:11:46.880 --> 0:11:50.760
<v Speaker 1>He's got a compact running style with short strides and

0:11:50.960 --> 0:11:53.400
<v Speaker 1>a remarkable jump cut that I think gets released by

0:11:53.480 --> 0:11:57.440
<v Speaker 1>that compact running style. Great in traffic and when things

0:11:57.480 --> 0:12:01.440
<v Speaker 1>are really hairy, he's got this great He picks his spots,

0:12:01.480 --> 0:12:04.160
<v Speaker 1>he changes his direction, he makes his jump cut, and

0:12:04.160 --> 0:12:06.000
<v Speaker 1>he comes out of this pack of defenders. You know,

0:12:06.240 --> 0:12:09.360
<v Speaker 1>how did that even happen? Great top end speed, he

0:12:09.440 --> 0:12:13.600
<v Speaker 1>will run away from other players and he catches really well.

0:12:14.000 --> 0:12:17.040
<v Speaker 1>North Carolina would throw down field to Michael Carter and

0:12:17.080 --> 0:12:19.280
<v Speaker 1>I don't mean like five yards in the flat. I

0:12:19.360 --> 0:12:23.720
<v Speaker 1>mean twenty five yards down field they're throwing to Michael Carter.

0:12:24.480 --> 0:12:29.559
<v Speaker 1>And um, worst case, worst case to me about Michael

0:12:29.559 --> 0:12:33.720
<v Speaker 1>Carter's he is a Tarikohen And I think that's a

0:12:34.280 --> 0:12:38.760
<v Speaker 1>I think that's a fair NFL comparison. But his best

0:12:38.880 --> 0:12:40.960
<v Speaker 1>case is that he gets a lot more running work

0:12:40.960 --> 0:12:43.440
<v Speaker 1>than Cohen has ever gotten and ends up being a

0:12:43.640 --> 0:12:45.840
<v Speaker 1>better And I think he's just a better pure runner

0:12:45.840 --> 0:12:49.600
<v Speaker 1>than Cohen is. Yeah, Now, Carter's only really produced at

0:12:49.640 --> 0:12:52.520
<v Speaker 1>a high level one year last year, and same with

0:12:52.600 --> 0:12:55.679
<v Speaker 1>Javonte Williams from U n c UM. But and he's

0:12:55.720 --> 0:12:57.560
<v Speaker 1>a senior here, But I still think he's got some

0:12:57.600 --> 0:13:00.600
<v Speaker 1>really special traits and I love what he could do

0:13:00.720 --> 0:13:03.960
<v Speaker 1>for PPR leagues. And Michael Carter is a guy that's

0:13:03.960 --> 0:13:06.800
<v Speaker 1>going really late in drafts and I think as the

0:13:07.080 --> 0:13:12.840
<v Speaker 1>potential again to be a PPR stalwart. Nice Michael Carter.

0:13:13.200 --> 0:13:17.280
<v Speaker 1>Let's go to the poorly named Cuba Hubbard. Now he

0:13:17.320 --> 0:13:19.760
<v Speaker 1>should have been Chubba Hubbard. How do you not name

0:13:19.800 --> 0:13:21.200
<v Speaker 1>if you if you've got to the point where you've

0:13:21.200 --> 0:13:23.319
<v Speaker 1>got c h U b A, how do you not

0:13:23.480 --> 0:13:25.560
<v Speaker 1>go see it? You b B A and let him

0:13:25.600 --> 0:13:29.600
<v Speaker 1>be Chubba Hubbard. That'd be the coolest name ever. You

0:13:29.640 --> 0:13:32.680
<v Speaker 1>know why they fail because he's Canadian. They don't do

0:13:32.760 --> 0:13:35.800
<v Speaker 1>it exactly right when it comes to Noman cleature up

0:13:35.800 --> 0:13:40.800
<v Speaker 1>in Kanada. But Canadian born Cuba Hubbard out of Oklahoma

0:13:40.880 --> 0:13:44.520
<v Speaker 1>State six ft two pounds. Now, this is the track star,

0:13:44.760 --> 0:13:48.720
<v Speaker 1>literally a former track star. Ran a four three six

0:13:48.800 --> 0:13:52.079
<v Speaker 1>forty on his pro day. Uh, lightning fast. The fastest

0:13:52.400 --> 0:13:54.400
<v Speaker 1>time clocked by a running back, probably by any player,

0:13:54.400 --> 0:13:58.080
<v Speaker 1>I would imagine um most yards after contact of the

0:13:58.160 --> 0:14:01.280
<v Speaker 1>last two seasons I just mentioned, Travis et N was second,

0:14:01.720 --> 0:14:06.000
<v Speaker 1>Tuba Hubbard was third. Uh, so great player. There are

0:14:06.280 --> 0:14:08.800
<v Speaker 1>some concerns with him, not only in his past protection

0:14:08.880 --> 0:14:13.640
<v Speaker 1>but also his past catching abilities. He's not an elite receiver,

0:14:14.280 --> 0:14:19.240
<v Speaker 1>maybe average at best, so there's some concerns, uh with

0:14:19.280 --> 0:14:23.360
<v Speaker 1>his bell cow potential there. And right now in fantasy

0:14:23.360 --> 0:14:25.440
<v Speaker 1>he's going off the board around RB five and re

0:14:25.560 --> 0:14:29.320
<v Speaker 1>draft in the mid fifteenth round. But I don't like

0:14:29.360 --> 0:14:31.200
<v Speaker 1>to put a whole lot of stock into mock drafts

0:14:31.240 --> 0:14:34.760
<v Speaker 1>for the NFL. But I've been seeing him sliding recently

0:14:35.200 --> 0:14:37.640
<v Speaker 1>in favor of some other guys, so there are some concerns,

0:14:37.880 --> 0:14:39.840
<v Speaker 1>like I said, with the past protection the past catching

0:14:40.720 --> 0:14:43.880
<v Speaker 1>little undersized. Six ft is tall and the two ten

0:14:43.960 --> 0:14:46.520
<v Speaker 1>is a little light for running it is, which is

0:14:46.520 --> 0:14:50.000
<v Speaker 1>a little concerning. But he's blazing fast and uh he

0:14:50.000 --> 0:14:53.240
<v Speaker 1>he probably is not a guy who's gonna total ball

0:14:53.360 --> 0:14:54.960
<v Speaker 1>eight percent of the time for a team, but he

0:14:55.000 --> 0:14:57.160
<v Speaker 1>can be a factor in a one two punch and

0:14:57.320 --> 0:15:00.920
<v Speaker 1>if given significant touches, he he has the potential to

0:15:00.960 --> 0:15:04.160
<v Speaker 1>be a He's got breakaway he's got breakaway speed. What

0:15:04.320 --> 0:15:06.680
<v Speaker 1>I worries me about Chuba Hubbard is that he runs

0:15:07.440 --> 0:15:10.120
<v Speaker 1>upright like a track star, because he is a track star.

0:15:10.560 --> 0:15:13.360
<v Speaker 1>And when you're six foot and you're running upright, you're

0:15:13.440 --> 0:15:16.680
<v Speaker 1>giving defenders a lot of body to hit you with

0:15:17.240 --> 0:15:20.160
<v Speaker 1>and and two and I think, and he's not that

0:15:20.280 --> 0:15:22.880
<v Speaker 1>physical of a guy, so I think he's going to

0:15:24.120 --> 0:15:26.800
<v Speaker 1>I think he's going to absorb a lot of hits.

0:15:26.880 --> 0:15:28.680
<v Speaker 1>And I don't know that. I don't know that he's

0:15:28.720 --> 0:15:32.200
<v Speaker 1>a tackle breaking type of player. A comp I've heard

0:15:32.200 --> 0:15:34.280
<v Speaker 1>a lot and you're you're gonna hate this, but it'll

0:15:34.320 --> 0:15:36.480
<v Speaker 1>it'll be a blast. In the past is a tap

0:15:36.560 --> 0:15:41.560
<v Speaker 1>dancing Nancy Chris Johnson Chris Johnson had a pretty solid career.

0:15:41.680 --> 0:15:44.360
<v Speaker 1>He did, but he was a tap dancing Nancy. He

0:15:45.080 --> 0:15:47.440
<v Speaker 1>peeked and he certainly fell off a cliff pretty quick,

0:15:47.840 --> 0:15:50.120
<v Speaker 1>peaking at that two thousand yard rushing season. But uh,

0:15:50.240 --> 0:15:53.560
<v Speaker 1>that's one of my favorite ff W nicknames of all

0:15:53.600 --> 0:15:57.200
<v Speaker 1>time is the tap dancing Nancy Chris Johnson. We'll take

0:15:57.240 --> 0:15:59.760
<v Speaker 1>a break when we come back. The other five running

0:15:59.760 --> 0:16:03.400
<v Speaker 1>backs you need to know fantasy relevant running back, so

0:16:03.520 --> 0:16:05.760
<v Speaker 1>you need to know heading into the draft. It's Fantasy

0:16:05.760 --> 0:16:10.440
<v Speaker 1>Football Weekly, Welcome back, Paul Charge and Brian Johnson with

0:16:10.520 --> 0:16:14.440
<v Speaker 1>you talking through the rookie running backs fantasy owners need

0:16:14.520 --> 0:16:17.280
<v Speaker 1>to know, get familiar with. And the next one up

0:16:17.720 --> 0:16:21.840
<v Speaker 1>is a guy I'm fascinated by Kenneth gaine Well from Memphis.

0:16:21.920 --> 0:16:25.760
<v Speaker 1>He was an opt out from last year. Where he's

0:16:25.800 --> 0:16:28.200
<v Speaker 1>really interesting is that he's going to be a jack

0:16:28.240 --> 0:16:30.760
<v Speaker 1>of all trades type guy. And a lot of times

0:16:30.800 --> 0:16:33.400
<v Speaker 1>these guys don't end up handing out into anything. If

0:16:33.400 --> 0:16:36.280
<v Speaker 1>you don't have a position you're great at, sometimes you

0:16:36.320 --> 0:16:38.520
<v Speaker 1>just don't get on the field. Lynn Bowden from last

0:16:38.600 --> 0:16:41.320
<v Speaker 1>year right was a guy that was hey, is he

0:16:41.400 --> 0:16:43.960
<v Speaker 1>running back or is he receiver? Really don't know for sure,

0:16:44.400 --> 0:16:47.000
<v Speaker 1>and that's that worries me a little bit about Kenneth Gainwell,

0:16:47.040 --> 0:16:48.680
<v Speaker 1>that he could fall into that. But he's got some

0:16:48.720 --> 0:16:52.680
<v Speaker 1>really special traits and he's such a good receiver that

0:16:52.800 --> 0:16:56.520
<v Speaker 1>I think he gets on the field and can be

0:16:56.640 --> 0:17:00.440
<v Speaker 1>a PPR helper in the right spot. So he looks

0:17:00.440 --> 0:17:02.560
<v Speaker 1>and runs like a track star, but he doesn't quite

0:17:02.600 --> 0:17:05.640
<v Speaker 1>have track star top end speed. But he's another upright

0:17:05.800 --> 0:17:09.159
<v Speaker 1>runner like Chewba Hubbard. Uh. He's got the burst of

0:17:09.160 --> 0:17:12.240
<v Speaker 1>a track star, and he's got really good footwork and

0:17:12.280 --> 0:17:14.280
<v Speaker 1>lateral movement, which you don't always get out of tracks

0:17:14.320 --> 0:17:17.720
<v Speaker 1>star rutting runners who oftentimes are really very north south oriented.

0:17:18.240 --> 0:17:21.159
<v Speaker 1>Ganewell can go move laterally very well. He's got a

0:17:21.240 --> 0:17:24.199
<v Speaker 1>nice one cut move. But the big thing here is

0:17:24.240 --> 0:17:26.280
<v Speaker 1>that he catches so well. And they lined him up

0:17:26.280 --> 0:17:29.080
<v Speaker 1>at wide receiver in Memphis. He has tons of game

0:17:29.080 --> 0:17:33.080
<v Speaker 1>breaking plays against you know, suspect defenses that Memphis played.

0:17:33.119 --> 0:17:35.400
<v Speaker 1>But um, a lot of people think he's just gonna

0:17:35.400 --> 0:17:37.040
<v Speaker 1>play the slot. He might end up being a slot

0:17:37.080 --> 0:17:40.160
<v Speaker 1>receiver in the NFL. Well, that's where Antonio Gibson went.

0:17:40.400 --> 0:17:43.399
<v Speaker 1>If I'm not mistaken, to Memphis and there was the

0:17:43.520 --> 0:17:48.040
<v Speaker 1>same concerns with him just fine. Well, so far, so far,

0:17:48.119 --> 0:17:51.400
<v Speaker 1>so good for him. Um only three drops on sixty

0:17:51.440 --> 0:17:53.600
<v Speaker 1>targets last year, which is a pretty good rate for

0:17:53.600 --> 0:17:56.280
<v Speaker 1>a running back, and so he's got the hands to

0:17:56.320 --> 0:17:59.240
<v Speaker 1>be a requisite of it. Just not sure where he's

0:17:59.240 --> 0:18:01.040
<v Speaker 1>going to fit in that way again, I think he

0:18:01.080 --> 0:18:04.679
<v Speaker 1>needs the right spot and then he needs to get utilize.

0:18:04.720 --> 0:18:08.040
<v Speaker 1>So Kenneth Gainwells got upside in the right in the

0:18:08.119 --> 0:18:10.520
<v Speaker 1>right place, but he's got the downside of lin Bowden

0:18:10.560 --> 0:18:12.960
<v Speaker 1>from last year. Let's go to our next runner, which

0:18:13.000 --> 0:18:17.040
<v Speaker 1>is Jermar Jefferson and Jamar Jefferson out of Oregon State.

0:18:17.200 --> 0:18:20.359
<v Speaker 1>UH declared for the draft a year early, will forego

0:18:20.440 --> 0:18:22.399
<v Speaker 1>his senior season. One of the youngest running backs in

0:18:22.440 --> 0:18:25.080
<v Speaker 1>this class. Turns twenty one next week, so that's great

0:18:25.080 --> 0:18:28.720
<v Speaker 1>from a Dinosty perspective. Like most he only played in

0:18:28.760 --> 0:18:31.919
<v Speaker 1>six games last year, but started out hot four straight

0:18:31.960 --> 0:18:35.199
<v Speaker 1>games over one rushing yards. Finished with more rushing yards

0:18:35.480 --> 0:18:37.679
<v Speaker 1>than he had his entire sophomore season, which was a

0:18:37.680 --> 0:18:40.160
<v Speaker 1>full season. So he really produced last year in those

0:18:40.200 --> 0:18:43.600
<v Speaker 1>six games for really bad Oregon State team. By the way,

0:18:43.920 --> 0:18:49.040
<v Speaker 1>UM Jefferson's no gain slash loss run percentage. This is

0:18:49.080 --> 0:18:51.320
<v Speaker 1>a stat that depicts the percentage of runs that are

0:18:51.560 --> 0:18:56.000
<v Speaker 1>stopped at the loss was fourth best among draft elegial

0:18:56.080 --> 0:18:58.520
<v Speaker 1>running back So it's pretty good. He's great among the

0:18:58.560 --> 0:19:01.919
<v Speaker 1>leaders and positive runs on his UH attempts. Some worry

0:19:01.960 --> 0:19:06.720
<v Speaker 1>about his size five ten pounds a little like a

0:19:06.720 --> 0:19:09.840
<v Speaker 1>little put on like five more pounds hopefully, But he's

0:19:09.840 --> 0:19:12.960
<v Speaker 1>a pretty sound all around back. Good vision, good lateral speed,

0:19:13.000 --> 0:19:16.119
<v Speaker 1>can get to the edge quick, he has good bursts.

0:19:16.200 --> 0:19:19.480
<v Speaker 1>But some are concerned with his long speed in terms

0:19:19.520 --> 0:19:21.480
<v Speaker 1>of someone's gonna catch him from behind on a long run.

0:19:21.920 --> 0:19:24.560
<v Speaker 1>But he's a very able receiver as well. He does

0:19:24.600 --> 0:19:26.879
<v Speaker 1>have bell cow potential. I don't think he has the

0:19:26.920 --> 0:19:29.320
<v Speaker 1>talent to go in and like usurp a starting NFL

0:19:29.400 --> 0:19:32.480
<v Speaker 1>running back, but if given the opportunity, I think he

0:19:32.520 --> 0:19:36.040
<v Speaker 1>can be a fine producer. And uh again, you hear

0:19:36.080 --> 0:19:38.480
<v Speaker 1>this a lot. Some concerns about his past protection. Per

0:19:38.520 --> 0:19:43.040
<v Speaker 1>Pro Football Focus, Jefferson ranked seven in past protection efficiency

0:19:43.080 --> 0:19:46.120
<v Speaker 1>for running backs like in Oregon States a really bad team.

0:19:46.160 --> 0:19:48.320
<v Speaker 1>I don't care how good your past protection is a

0:19:48.400 --> 0:19:51.440
<v Speaker 1>running back. If you're the rest of the offensive line,

0:19:51.480 --> 0:19:54.199
<v Speaker 1>you know, but everyone everyone else get free run at

0:19:54.240 --> 0:19:58.480
<v Speaker 1>your quarterback. So Jefferson is a guy that little polarizing

0:19:58.480 --> 0:20:00.560
<v Speaker 1>in the sense he's way down on some people's list,

0:20:00.600 --> 0:20:02.880
<v Speaker 1>maybe like RB twelve, they're teend right now. He's going

0:20:02.920 --> 0:20:06.239
<v Speaker 1>off RB eight in Bestball League. So a guy I'm

0:20:06.320 --> 0:20:09.960
<v Speaker 1>keeping eye on eye on more than most Jumarin Jefferson. Okay,

0:20:10.600 --> 0:20:13.800
<v Speaker 1>My next running back is Kylin Hill from Mississippi State,

0:20:14.080 --> 0:20:17.439
<v Speaker 1>currently projected to go in probably uh, he'll be a

0:20:17.480 --> 0:20:19.560
<v Speaker 1>Day three guy, maybe the back end of day three.

0:20:20.040 --> 0:20:22.720
<v Speaker 1>But that doesn't mean that he can't that Kylan Hill

0:20:22.760 --> 0:20:24.879
<v Speaker 1>can't play a role in the NFL. Now. He's a

0:20:24.920 --> 0:20:29.760
<v Speaker 1>slimmer back, and he's a and and and for a

0:20:29.800 --> 0:20:34.680
<v Speaker 1>slimmer back, he's got remarkable tackle breaking and even physical playabilities,

0:20:35.280 --> 0:20:38.679
<v Speaker 1>and he has the explosiveness to be a factor in

0:20:38.680 --> 0:20:40.840
<v Speaker 1>the NFL. When I looked at his game, I'm like,

0:20:40.880 --> 0:20:43.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, you're looking for these guys that are gonna

0:20:43.160 --> 0:20:45.240
<v Speaker 1>go round six, round seven. I'm trying to find is

0:20:45.280 --> 0:20:47.600
<v Speaker 1>there any one thing in their game that can keep

0:20:47.640 --> 0:20:51.280
<v Speaker 1>them on the field. And it's the explosiveness for Kylin Hill,

0:20:51.359 --> 0:20:53.800
<v Speaker 1>because he's got he's got a lot of that. He's

0:20:53.840 --> 0:20:56.720
<v Speaker 1>super creative when he gets to the second level, and

0:20:56.720 --> 0:20:58.560
<v Speaker 1>you'll see these runs when you look when you look

0:20:58.560 --> 0:21:01.720
<v Speaker 1>through Kylan Hill's tape where when he gets past the

0:21:01.760 --> 0:21:04.680
<v Speaker 1>line of scrimmage and he's in that linebacker level, he's

0:21:04.720 --> 0:21:07.760
<v Speaker 1>so fast and he's making people miss and it's creating

0:21:07.760 --> 0:21:10.320
<v Speaker 1>all kinds of chaos and confusion. Is he's as he's

0:21:10.400 --> 0:21:13.280
<v Speaker 1>changing and cutting and players are running around just trying

0:21:13.320 --> 0:21:16.119
<v Speaker 1>to find him, and it's he was really good at

0:21:16.119 --> 0:21:19.720
<v Speaker 1>the next level. Now, he only played three games last

0:21:19.800 --> 0:21:23.040
<v Speaker 1>year with Mississippi State, but he caught twenty three passes

0:21:23.040 --> 0:21:25.880
<v Speaker 1>in the three games. You know, for it eight catches

0:21:25.920 --> 0:21:29.159
<v Speaker 1>a game. That's another special trait that tells me that

0:21:29.240 --> 0:21:31.720
<v Speaker 1>Kylan Hill can get on the field. He's got a

0:21:31.840 --> 0:21:35.760
<v Speaker 1>very good stiff arm move as well. Um, there are

0:21:35.840 --> 0:21:38.080
<v Speaker 1>parts of games that that are that are not great. Um,

0:21:38.119 --> 0:21:40.800
<v Speaker 1>he gets moved laterally, he runs high, he gives defenders

0:21:40.800 --> 0:21:42.280
<v Speaker 1>a big target. There things that I don't love about

0:21:42.320 --> 0:21:45.200
<v Speaker 1>his game. But he's got some trades. Kylan Hill has

0:21:45.240 --> 0:21:47.399
<v Speaker 1>trades that can get him on the field. And again

0:21:47.480 --> 0:21:50.720
<v Speaker 1>I think he's got some PPR upside to him as well.

0:21:52.440 --> 0:21:54.239
<v Speaker 1>Let's go to our next running back and that is

0:21:54.600 --> 0:21:58.480
<v Speaker 1>Khalil Herbert. Not to be confused with justin air bear.

0:21:59.400 --> 0:22:03.200
<v Speaker 1>This is no bears, a ground bear, not necessarily built

0:22:03.240 --> 0:22:05.639
<v Speaker 1>like a bear, not huge amount to ten, but he

0:22:05.720 --> 0:22:08.439
<v Speaker 1>is fast randy four or four six forty on his

0:22:08.480 --> 0:22:10.840
<v Speaker 1>pro day out of Virginia Tech. By the way, I

0:22:10.920 --> 0:22:14.280
<v Speaker 1>failed to mention that, uh Herbert, I was tempted to

0:22:14.280 --> 0:22:16.200
<v Speaker 1>say air bear. There. Herbert led the A C C

0:22:16.320 --> 0:22:20.240
<v Speaker 1>in combo yards last year and per Pro Football foot Focus, UM,

0:22:20.280 --> 0:22:23.680
<v Speaker 1>he was second only behind Nag Harris in yards after

0:22:23.800 --> 0:22:28.240
<v Speaker 1>contact on rushes among draft eligible running backs. So that's

0:22:28.359 --> 0:22:32.280
<v Speaker 1>very impressive. That's being said. Virginia Tech had a very

0:22:32.400 --> 0:22:36.359
<v Speaker 1>dominant offensive line, and uh there's some concern that contributed

0:22:36.400 --> 0:22:39.840
<v Speaker 1>to a good portion of Herbert's success. But he looks

0:22:39.840 --> 0:22:42.760
<v Speaker 1>really good on tape, great vision, great footwork. Only had

0:22:42.840 --> 0:22:45.800
<v Speaker 1>thirty four receptions in five years in college. I believe

0:22:45.800 --> 0:22:48.080
<v Speaker 1>he was at Kansas for four years and then he

0:22:48.200 --> 0:22:50.600
<v Speaker 1>was eligible to play Virginia Tech last year. Fifth year.

0:22:50.600 --> 0:22:52.840
<v Speaker 1>He was never the guide Kansas, so kind of a

0:22:52.920 --> 0:22:55.960
<v Speaker 1>late bloomer, which how I'd be worried. How old is

0:22:56.000 --> 0:23:01.600
<v Speaker 1>it is? Turning twenty four soon? So his his breakout

0:23:01.640 --> 0:23:03.320
<v Speaker 1>age is pretty late if you want to call it

0:23:03.359 --> 0:23:07.280
<v Speaker 1>a breakout running behind a very good offensive line. But um,

0:23:07.359 --> 0:23:11.000
<v Speaker 1>he again not under size, but he doesn't have the

0:23:11.040 --> 0:23:13.560
<v Speaker 1>size and durability to be a bell cow probably, but

0:23:13.840 --> 0:23:18.600
<v Speaker 1>if given the opportunity, touches a game in a good,

0:23:19.600 --> 0:23:22.600
<v Speaker 1>good scheme. He's a very good schematic runner basically great vision,

0:23:22.640 --> 0:23:25.280
<v Speaker 1>great footwork, so in a good spot he can thrive

0:23:25.320 --> 0:23:27.080
<v Speaker 1>like he did in Virginia Tech. Of course, the NFL

0:23:27.160 --> 0:23:29.679
<v Speaker 1>is a whole another level, but Khalil Herbert, keep your

0:23:29.760 --> 0:23:31.280
<v Speaker 1>ry on them, all right. For a final guy, I'm

0:23:31.280 --> 0:23:33.600
<v Speaker 1>actually gonna make it two guys, both in the Big

0:23:33.600 --> 0:23:36.160
<v Speaker 1>ten who I don't like that I don't think are

0:23:36.160 --> 0:23:38.720
<v Speaker 1>going to help that It will get drafted, but I

0:23:38.760 --> 0:23:42.200
<v Speaker 1>don't think are gonna help fantasy players. That is Ohio

0:23:42.280 --> 0:23:45.879
<v Speaker 1>State's Tray Sermon and then Michigan's Chris Evans. I don't

0:23:45.920 --> 0:23:48.560
<v Speaker 1>like either one of these at the NFL level, and

0:23:48.600 --> 0:23:51.439
<v Speaker 1>I'll tell you why. First. For Tray Sermon, um, I

0:23:51.440 --> 0:23:54.640
<v Speaker 1>don't think I did not see any special traits, particularly

0:23:54.680 --> 0:23:57.880
<v Speaker 1>special traits for him. He's not fast, he's a bit

0:23:57.920 --> 0:24:01.120
<v Speaker 1>tall for the running back position and gives the defenders

0:24:01.119 --> 0:24:03.240
<v Speaker 1>a big target to hit, and he ran behind you know,

0:24:03.400 --> 0:24:06.159
<v Speaker 1>these amazing offensive lines first at Oklahoma and then he

0:24:06.160 --> 0:24:09.200
<v Speaker 1>transferred to Ohio State, and these offensive lines opened up

0:24:09.240 --> 0:24:12.760
<v Speaker 1>big holes for him. I think his athleticism is just average.

0:24:12.920 --> 0:24:15.760
<v Speaker 1>He was rarely used in the passing game. I to me,

0:24:15.920 --> 0:24:19.159
<v Speaker 1>Tray Sermon feels like an NFL backup he is. To me,

0:24:19.200 --> 0:24:22.080
<v Speaker 1>he's a third or fourth back in the NFL, and

0:24:22.119 --> 0:24:25.080
<v Speaker 1>I just didn't see any special traits watching him that

0:24:25.119 --> 0:24:27.840
<v Speaker 1>makes me feel like he's going to contribute. And then

0:24:27.880 --> 0:24:29.800
<v Speaker 1>Michigan's Chris Evans, who a lot of people think it

0:24:29.840 --> 0:24:32.399
<v Speaker 1>could be drafted as early as like round four or five.

0:24:33.280 --> 0:24:36.040
<v Speaker 1>I didn't see a lot here that I loved either. Um,

0:24:36.080 --> 0:24:38.199
<v Speaker 1>he is a three down back with solid hands, and

0:24:38.200 --> 0:24:40.640
<v Speaker 1>I think that's why he'll get drafted and why he'll

0:24:40.720 --> 0:24:42.840
<v Speaker 1>end up being in the NFL. He's got a little

0:24:42.840 --> 0:24:46.040
<v Speaker 1>wiggle um, but just I just didn't see any remarkable

0:24:46.080 --> 0:24:49.680
<v Speaker 1>traits with him. Lackluster speed, ran behind a very good

0:24:49.680 --> 0:24:52.480
<v Speaker 1>offensive line. Again, a lot like Tray Sermon. He got

0:24:52.480 --> 0:24:55.760
<v Speaker 1>suspended due to academic reasons for the twenty nineteen season,

0:24:56.080 --> 0:24:59.200
<v Speaker 1>recorded only sixteen carries over the past two years. That's

0:24:59.200 --> 0:25:01.200
<v Speaker 1>also a big red like he's gonna be twenty four

0:25:01.280 --> 0:25:04.040
<v Speaker 1>years old as a rookie. And there's some there's some

0:25:04.119 --> 0:25:06.600
<v Speaker 1>running backs they're already on the downside of their career

0:25:06.760 --> 0:25:11.760
<v Speaker 1>twenty four and never really improved after his very good

0:25:11.800 --> 0:25:14.760
<v Speaker 1>rookie year. Chris Evans did, and you were, you know,

0:25:14.840 --> 0:25:16.720
<v Speaker 1>your your hope is a rookie. Your kid's gonna get

0:25:16.760 --> 0:25:19.639
<v Speaker 1>better sophomore junior. We really didn't see that. I just

0:25:19.720 --> 0:25:22.080
<v Speaker 1>to me, I I see what looks to me like

0:25:22.240 --> 0:25:24.439
<v Speaker 1>a backup who's in the NFL for a couple of

0:25:24.480 --> 0:25:27.120
<v Speaker 1>years from Chris Evans. Let me throw one more guy

0:25:27.160 --> 0:25:29.400
<v Speaker 1>out there really quick. You know there's a guy who

0:25:29.480 --> 0:25:31.240
<v Speaker 1>I don't know who you're gonna throw out right now.

0:25:31.640 --> 0:25:36.120
<v Speaker 1>I hope it is Ramandre Stevenson. No, it's not him,

0:25:36.320 --> 0:25:41.240
<v Speaker 1>and uh and him and Elijah Elijah Mitchell. Another guy,

0:25:41.480 --> 0:25:43.600
<v Speaker 1>a bubble guy, we can call him. We're not gonna

0:25:43.800 --> 0:25:47.560
<v Speaker 1>I want to talk about Jared Patterson now, I referencing

0:25:47.600 --> 0:25:50.800
<v Speaker 1>about Jared referenced the most yards after contact over the

0:25:50.840 --> 0:25:53.399
<v Speaker 1>last two seasons. Stat a couple of times where the

0:25:53.520 --> 0:25:58.520
<v Speaker 1>play Patterson out of Buffalo, Okay lead this category ahead

0:25:58.560 --> 0:26:02.000
<v Speaker 1>of Travis et en Chew Hud and Bruce Hall. Jared

0:26:02.040 --> 0:26:06.480
<v Speaker 1>Patterson though, is five ft seven hundred nine pounds. He's

0:26:06.520 --> 0:26:10.400
<v Speaker 1>like Darren Sprowlsey and but in just six games last

0:26:10.480 --> 0:26:13.600
<v Speaker 1>year he had over a thousand yards and nineteen touchdowns.

0:26:14.200 --> 0:26:16.920
<v Speaker 1>He had eight touchdowns and four hundred yards in one game.

0:26:18.600 --> 0:26:21.639
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. He's small, right, but he's an intriguing

0:26:21.880 --> 0:26:25.040
<v Speaker 1>name that I'm just keeping eye on Jared Patterson. People

0:26:25.040 --> 0:26:27.680
<v Speaker 1>are concerned about the size, but put on a little

0:26:27.680 --> 0:26:30.400
<v Speaker 1>more weight. At five seven, that's a a tough guy

0:26:30.400 --> 0:26:32.480
<v Speaker 1>to tackle at times if he's got moves and the

0:26:32.480 --> 0:26:34.920
<v Speaker 1>most yards after contact in college football of the last

0:26:34.920 --> 0:26:40.320
<v Speaker 1>two seasons. And I know he played at Buffalo was Toledo,

0:26:40.720 --> 0:26:44.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, So there's there's a lot of there are.

0:26:44.200 --> 0:26:45.800
<v Speaker 1>There are a lot of runners who have come out

0:26:45.800 --> 0:26:49.000
<v Speaker 1>of mid tier schools that end up end up being

0:26:49.520 --> 0:26:52.440
<v Speaker 1>pretty pretty darn good. Now, now our our own Matt

0:26:52.480 --> 0:26:54.520
<v Speaker 1>Harrison and for those who don't know, it's Matt with

0:26:54.560 --> 0:26:56.320
<v Speaker 1>one T. He should be a big fan of Jared

0:26:56.320 --> 0:27:00.520
<v Speaker 1>Patterson with one R and one T. J a r

0:27:00.640 --> 0:27:05.840
<v Speaker 1>et right to the point. So Remandi's Stevenson from Oklahoma.

0:27:06.000 --> 0:27:08.720
<v Speaker 1>Dude is just big built for goal line use and

0:27:08.800 --> 0:27:12.080
<v Speaker 1>absolute tank. He cuts hard, he breaks tackles, he's a

0:27:12.160 --> 0:27:13.879
<v Speaker 1>violent runner, and a lot of people think he's not

0:27:13.920 --> 0:27:16.200
<v Speaker 1>even gonna get drafted in the NFL. And I'm looking

0:27:16.200 --> 0:27:19.720
<v Speaker 1>at going that guy has he's got again, He's got

0:27:19.760 --> 0:27:21.600
<v Speaker 1>some of the special traits that I'm trying to look

0:27:21.600 --> 0:27:23.720
<v Speaker 1>for that guys that could translate to the NFL and

0:27:23.760 --> 0:27:26.760
<v Speaker 1>just the power running alone should put him on rosters.

0:27:27.000 --> 0:27:31.000
<v Speaker 1>And I'm I'm really intrigued by him. Um, he's a

0:27:31.080 --> 0:27:33.600
<v Speaker 1>name I've seen some guys pretty high on, you know,

0:27:33.720 --> 0:27:36.560
<v Speaker 1>around running back seven eight and others. He's running back.

0:27:38.320 --> 0:27:41.280
<v Speaker 1>He's a polarizing prospect for sure, but I'm I'm leaning

0:27:41.280 --> 0:27:45.240
<v Speaker 1>on your side, Remandre Stevenson. I'm I'm very interested to

0:27:45.280 --> 0:27:47.399
<v Speaker 1>see what where he lands and what role he could have.

0:27:48.040 --> 0:27:50.200
<v Speaker 1>All Right, thank you for listening to Fantasy Football Weekly.

0:27:50.480 --> 0:27:53.520
<v Speaker 1>Next week, Wide Receivers will break down receivers and the

0:27:53.560 --> 0:27:57.080
<v Speaker 1>rookie receivers in particular, and it's wow. I mean Chase

0:27:57.160 --> 0:28:00.240
<v Speaker 1>and Waddle and Smith and Rashod Bateman and rond More.

0:28:00.240 --> 0:28:02.879
<v Speaker 1>I mean it's a ton. There could be six receivers

0:28:02.880 --> 0:28:05.240
<v Speaker 1>taken in the first round. Again, you know, last year

0:28:05.320 --> 0:28:07.760
<v Speaker 1>was so deep at receiver, and here we are a

0:28:07.840 --> 0:28:11.240
<v Speaker 1>year later and it's almost as deep. Do you think

0:28:11.280 --> 0:28:15.720
<v Speaker 1>one will go before Kyle Pitts. No, No, I don't

0:28:15.840 --> 0:28:17.879
<v Speaker 1>and they shouldn't, and then Kyle Pitts will be in

0:28:17.920 --> 0:28:20.080
<v Speaker 1>two weeks. I'll talk about the tight end position. I'd

0:28:20.119 --> 0:28:21.520
<v Speaker 1>have to look it up, but this wouldn't be the

0:28:21.560 --> 0:28:24.600
<v Speaker 1>first time a tight end was selected before any wide receiver.

0:28:24.680 --> 0:28:28.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't think Vernon Davis went very early on when

0:28:28.040 --> 0:28:32.240
<v Speaker 1>he was very shocky went early. Yep um. Yeah, we'd

0:28:32.280 --> 0:28:35.520
<v Speaker 1>have to next week, probably not very often, but that

0:28:35.560 --> 0:28:37.320
<v Speaker 1>would be interesting, or at least two weeks from now

0:28:37.359 --> 0:28:39.520
<v Speaker 1>when we do the tight the rookie tight ends. Thanks

0:28:39.520 --> 0:28:43.480
<v Speaker 1>for listening, everybody, Bye bye. Fantasy Football Weekly is a

0:28:43.480 --> 0:28:46.160
<v Speaker 1>production of I Heart Radio. For more podcasts from my

0:28:46.240 --> 0:28:49.280
<v Speaker 1>heart Radio, visit the i heart Radio app, Apple podcast,

0:28:49.520 --> 0:28:51.520
<v Speaker 1>or wherever you listen to your favorite shows.