WEBVTT - Lots More on China's Moves to Create a Dollar Alternative

0:00:00.160 --> 0:00:03.240
<v Speaker 1>If we never ever have had guests bringing treats for us,

0:00:03.279 --> 0:00:06.160
<v Speaker 1>and now this is two days in a row. This

0:00:06.240 --> 0:00:09.639
<v Speaker 1>is incredible, happened? This is no two days in a

0:00:09.720 --> 0:00:13.480
<v Speaker 1>row guests bringing in sweets for us, which which makes

0:00:13.560 --> 0:00:13.960
<v Speaker 1>us very.

0:00:13.880 --> 0:00:15.960
<v Speaker 2>Popular in our row because then we'll share them with

0:00:16.000 --> 0:00:18.560
<v Speaker 2>a thank you so much.

0:00:19.800 --> 0:00:23.200
<v Speaker 3>I can't definitely does this bring you guys back to

0:00:23.239 --> 0:00:23.680
<v Speaker 3>Hong Kong?

0:00:23.720 --> 0:00:23.919
<v Speaker 1>You know?

0:00:24.239 --> 0:00:24.479
<v Speaker 3>Yes?

0:00:25.040 --> 0:00:27.920
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I remember every year. I actually kind of miss it,

0:00:28.040 --> 0:00:31.560
<v Speaker 4>like all the zodiac theme things every year, like you

0:00:31.560 --> 0:00:33.239
<v Speaker 4>would walk around the streets and they'd be all the

0:00:33.280 --> 0:00:37.520
<v Speaker 4>pastries and things, but also the little gold statues in

0:00:37.640 --> 0:00:40.199
<v Speaker 4>like the shape of a dog or a bear, not

0:00:40.200 --> 0:00:42.680
<v Speaker 4>a bear of a pig, or like a dragon and stuff.

0:00:42.760 --> 0:00:46.639
<v Speaker 4>I missed that. We don't get that so much more. Joe,

0:00:46.680 --> 0:00:51.520
<v Speaker 4>do you know what your zodiac animal is in China?

0:00:52.360 --> 0:00:59.080
<v Speaker 4>I used to monkey, monkey, monkey, and I'm a bore.

0:00:59.560 --> 0:01:02.760
<v Speaker 2>I'm very hello, yes, what are you?

0:01:02.880 --> 0:01:06.080
<v Speaker 3>I'm read it? So this last year was my year?

0:01:06.880 --> 0:01:07.720
<v Speaker 4>Did you have a good year?

0:01:08.120 --> 0:01:14.920
<v Speaker 3>I think so I got, But.

0:01:14.840 --> 0:01:17.840
<v Speaker 4>I'm here to carman? What Chinese zodiac animal? Are you?

0:01:18.040 --> 0:01:18.520
<v Speaker 3>The horse?

0:01:19.760 --> 0:01:20.400
<v Speaker 4>A good one too?

0:01:23.120 --> 0:01:30.479
<v Speaker 2>I did a deadlift one? Okay, so many Uh, this

0:01:30.520 --> 0:01:32.440
<v Speaker 2>isn't after school Special, except.

0:01:32.080 --> 0:01:34.640
<v Speaker 4>I've decided I'm going to base my entire personality going

0:01:34.680 --> 0:01:37.880
<v Speaker 4>forward on campaigning for a strategic pork reserve in the US.

0:01:38.000 --> 0:01:39.720
<v Speaker 2>Where's the best with imposta?

0:01:39.880 --> 0:01:42.479
<v Speaker 4>These are the important question? Is it robots taking over

0:01:42.520 --> 0:01:43.080
<v Speaker 4>the world? No.

0:01:43.160 --> 0:01:46.039
<v Speaker 1>I think that like in a couple of years, the

0:01:46.120 --> 0:01:48.320
<v Speaker 1>AI will do a really good job of making the

0:01:48.320 --> 0:01:51.800
<v Speaker 1>odd launch podcast. And people say, I don't really need

0:01:51.840 --> 0:01:53.480
<v Speaker 1>to listen to Joe and Tracy anymore.

0:01:53.680 --> 0:01:59.360
<v Speaker 2>We do have the perfect welcome to lots more. Will

0:01:59.400 --> 0:02:02.280
<v Speaker 2>we catch up with friends about what's going on right now.

0:02:02.400 --> 0:02:05.639
<v Speaker 4>Because even when ad thoughts is over, there's always lots

0:02:05.680 --> 0:02:06.880
<v Speaker 4>more and we.

0:02:06.920 --> 0:02:09.360
<v Speaker 2>Really do have the perfect guest.

0:02:11.639 --> 0:02:14.239
<v Speaker 1>I'm always sort of skeptical of like, like when people

0:02:14.320 --> 0:02:16.080
<v Speaker 1>talk about the end of the dollar, it sort of

0:02:16.080 --> 0:02:17.520
<v Speaker 1>seems like crank stuff to me.

0:02:18.000 --> 0:02:20.720
<v Speaker 4>We have had this conversation so many times. And yes,

0:02:20.800 --> 0:02:24.040
<v Speaker 4>a lot of the people who like having conversations about

0:02:24.120 --> 0:02:27.240
<v Speaker 4>the end of dollar dominance, they are crank adjacent many

0:02:27.240 --> 0:02:30.120
<v Speaker 4>of them. Many of them are firmly in crank territory.

0:02:30.280 --> 0:02:33.560
<v Speaker 4>But I do think it is true if you look

0:02:33.960 --> 0:02:36.960
<v Speaker 4>at what's happening in certain parts of the financial system, like,

0:02:37.080 --> 0:02:41.959
<v Speaker 4>there are attempts being made, even if they're not officially

0:02:42.120 --> 0:02:44.960
<v Speaker 4>called we are trying to move away from the dollar.

0:02:45.080 --> 0:02:47.119
<v Speaker 4>They are called things like, well, we want a more

0:02:47.160 --> 0:02:51.079
<v Speaker 4>resilient financial system, or we want one where we are

0:02:51.120 --> 0:02:54.520
<v Speaker 4>not as tied or as reliant on what's happening to

0:02:54.560 --> 0:02:58.560
<v Speaker 4>the dollar exposed exactly right. So the efforts are there,

0:02:58.720 --> 0:03:01.639
<v Speaker 4>they are underway. Does it mean that things are going

0:03:01.680 --> 0:03:05.560
<v Speaker 4>to change in the next like year, Absolutely not. I

0:03:05.560 --> 0:03:07.680
<v Speaker 4>don't think so. But I don't think they can be

0:03:07.760 --> 0:03:09.400
<v Speaker 4>disregarded in total.

0:03:09.760 --> 0:03:12.600
<v Speaker 1>Well, in the studio with us, we have someone who

0:03:12.960 --> 0:03:16.600
<v Speaker 1>is definitely not a crank or crank and Jason. Former

0:03:16.680 --> 0:03:20.640
<v Speaker 1>guest Zoe Lu You've a great piece China wants to

0:03:20.720 --> 0:03:24.919
<v Speaker 1>ditch the dollar in Noema magazine, and you know this

0:03:24.960 --> 0:03:27.480
<v Speaker 1>is of course we've done episodes on China and the dollar.

0:03:27.800 --> 0:03:30.720
<v Speaker 1>They want to dedollarize, et cetera. I actually find it

0:03:30.760 --> 0:03:32.760
<v Speaker 1>kind of compelling. Maybe there's something going on here.

0:03:33.360 --> 0:03:36.200
<v Speaker 3>Wow. First of all, I do not get to choose

0:03:36.240 --> 0:03:41.240
<v Speaker 3>the title, and I've spoken like a true journalist.

0:03:41.520 --> 0:03:45.560
<v Speaker 1>All journalists have had this. Although I've generally been pretty

0:03:45.560 --> 0:03:46.040
<v Speaker 1>involved in.

0:03:46.000 --> 0:03:48.480
<v Speaker 4>Titles, it's much less of a thing than it used

0:03:48.520 --> 0:03:50.800
<v Speaker 4>to be. If you were working on a newspaper for many,

0:03:50.840 --> 0:03:53.800
<v Speaker 4>many years, it was the sub editors who would choose

0:03:53.840 --> 0:03:56.440
<v Speaker 4>the headline. I'm sorry, Zoe, we've totally interrupted you and

0:03:56.520 --> 0:03:58.680
<v Speaker 4>hijack the conversation talk about journalists.

0:03:58.680 --> 0:04:00.800
<v Speaker 3>No, no, no, no. I actually, do you appreciate your

0:04:00.880 --> 0:04:04.400
<v Speaker 3>explaining of this, because sometimes I get people emailing me

0:04:04.480 --> 0:04:06.800
<v Speaker 3>saying that, well, the title of your article, you're saying

0:04:06.840 --> 0:04:09.680
<v Speaker 3>that China is trying to ditch the dollar. But in reality,

0:04:09.760 --> 0:04:11.960
<v Speaker 3>when we finish reading our article, it turned out that

0:04:12.040 --> 0:04:13.920
<v Speaker 3>you are not saying that China is going to ditch

0:04:13.960 --> 0:04:17.440
<v Speaker 3>the dollar. The bottom line of my argument is that

0:04:17.800 --> 0:04:22.279
<v Speaker 3>for their art, economic and geopolitical reasons for countries like

0:04:22.360 --> 0:04:27.279
<v Speaker 3>China to try to reduce its exposure to the dollar

0:04:27.279 --> 0:04:30.839
<v Speaker 3>based system. And the reason I'm saying this is because

0:04:30.960 --> 0:04:33.560
<v Speaker 3>just think about it. You can imagine China as the

0:04:34.560 --> 0:04:36.840
<v Speaker 3>factory of the world, and you are buying a lot

0:04:36.839 --> 0:04:39.440
<v Speaker 3>of commodities using one currency, and you are trying to

0:04:39.480 --> 0:04:43.200
<v Speaker 3>sell your commodities are in the same currency. This is

0:04:43.240 --> 0:04:46.400
<v Speaker 3>the story of China's rice. This is how China accumulated

0:04:46.720 --> 0:04:51.719
<v Speaker 3>at one point for trillion for exchange reserves denominated in dollar,

0:04:52.279 --> 0:04:56.039
<v Speaker 3>but every time when Chinese exporters importers doing a transaction,

0:04:56.200 --> 0:04:58.640
<v Speaker 3>it has to go through the entire banking system, which

0:04:58.720 --> 0:05:03.440
<v Speaker 3>is not denominated in the Chinese currency. This is why

0:05:03.480 --> 0:05:07.360
<v Speaker 3>the Chinese financiers are grumpy about grumpy about right. They

0:05:07.360 --> 0:05:09.520
<v Speaker 3>are saying that, well, you know, we're the largest trading

0:05:09.560 --> 0:05:11.800
<v Speaker 3>punder with more than one hundred and twenty country them

0:05:11.839 --> 0:05:15.080
<v Speaker 3>the world, and yet our currency is a very minimum.

0:05:15.640 --> 0:05:20.520
<v Speaker 4>How much of the urge to maybe diversify a little

0:05:20.560 --> 0:05:25.160
<v Speaker 4>bit comes from waning economic growth? And I'm very conscious

0:05:25.160 --> 0:05:27.560
<v Speaker 4>that we are recording this in a week. You know,

0:05:27.600 --> 0:05:30.039
<v Speaker 4>we are here on January twenty fifth. It has been

0:05:30.160 --> 0:05:33.760
<v Speaker 4>a terrible week for both the Chinese economy and its

0:05:33.880 --> 0:05:38.279
<v Speaker 4>financial assets. There's been a lot of ink spilt about

0:05:38.400 --> 0:05:40.960
<v Speaker 4>the crash in Chinese stocks. I think the CSI three

0:05:41.040 --> 0:05:44.719
<v Speaker 4>hundred index is down something like forty percent over the

0:05:44.760 --> 0:05:48.599
<v Speaker 4>past three years. There's a lot of conversation about structural

0:05:48.640 --> 0:05:51.960
<v Speaker 4>weakness in China's economy at the moment. How much of

0:05:52.000 --> 0:05:55.919
<v Speaker 4>this urge to maybe dedollarize is too strong a word,

0:05:56.040 --> 0:06:01.120
<v Speaker 4>but sort of diversify currency options is part of this

0:06:01.320 --> 0:06:05.360
<v Speaker 4>economic evolution that makes a lot of sense tracy.

0:06:05.360 --> 0:06:08.880
<v Speaker 3>In fact, if we go back all the way to

0:06:08.920 --> 0:06:12.080
<v Speaker 3>the early two thousands, that was actually the very first

0:06:12.080 --> 0:06:15.599
<v Speaker 3>time when the Chinese officials was talking about seriously talking

0:06:15.640 --> 0:06:19.039
<v Speaker 3>about diversifying their foreign exchange reserve holdings. So from that

0:06:19.200 --> 0:06:23.640
<v Speaker 3>time on, with the growing of the Chinese foreign exchange

0:06:23.640 --> 0:06:27.520
<v Speaker 3>reserve accumulation, the conversation has been focused has been focused

0:06:27.520 --> 0:06:31.920
<v Speaker 3>on how to reduce the opportunity cost of investing all

0:06:32.320 --> 0:06:37.040
<v Speaker 3>the foreign exchange asset in US treasuries. But things started

0:06:37.080 --> 0:06:41.359
<v Speaker 3>to change around two thousand, after twenty fourteen, part of

0:06:41.360 --> 0:06:46.359
<v Speaker 3>the reason was because of the West's threatening of kicking

0:06:46.440 --> 0:06:50.240
<v Speaker 3>Russia off the Swift system. Now at that time the

0:06:50.279 --> 0:06:53.680
<v Speaker 3>West did not go with the nuclear option with Russia,

0:06:53.760 --> 0:06:56.720
<v Speaker 3>but it did sort of provided it did provide a

0:06:56.760 --> 0:07:00.000
<v Speaker 3>wake up call for present putting as well as the Chinese.

0:07:00.560 --> 0:07:04.160
<v Speaker 3>And one year later, it was around twenty fifteen that

0:07:04.400 --> 0:07:09.320
<v Speaker 3>was a launch of CIPS, China's cross border interbank payment system.

0:07:09.680 --> 0:07:13.600
<v Speaker 3>And at that time, again the idea was to facilitate

0:07:13.840 --> 0:07:16.640
<v Speaker 3>broader use of the Internet of the reman be in

0:07:16.680 --> 0:07:21.040
<v Speaker 3>the international system. But then systematically people started to realize, well,

0:07:21.120 --> 0:07:26.000
<v Speaker 3>this can be a hatch or a insurance policy. Then

0:07:26.320 --> 0:07:30.520
<v Speaker 3>things really started to get worse from Chinese perspective around

0:07:30.600 --> 0:07:34.600
<v Speaker 3>two southern eighteen with the escalation of US China trade

0:07:34.640 --> 0:07:39.760
<v Speaker 3>war during the Trump administration, and you have Chinese financial regulators,

0:07:40.200 --> 0:07:44.280
<v Speaker 3>even the people the vice chairman of China's Securities Regulatory Commission,

0:07:44.320 --> 0:07:46.600
<v Speaker 3>funcing how he came out and saying that, well, we

0:07:46.600 --> 0:07:50.920
<v Speaker 3>should be prepared for the so called forced decoupling, meaning

0:07:51.000 --> 0:07:53.600
<v Speaker 3>China was being kicked out of the US led global

0:07:53.600 --> 0:07:58.320
<v Speaker 3>financial system. And obviously with Russia's invasion of Ukraine and

0:07:58.480 --> 0:08:01.960
<v Speaker 3>present puddings more against uk in and the freeze of

0:08:02.040 --> 0:08:05.040
<v Speaker 3>Russian reserves and kicking out of kicking Russia out of

0:08:05.080 --> 0:08:08.640
<v Speaker 3>the swift system, this is really the moment where China realized,

0:08:09.160 --> 0:08:11.560
<v Speaker 3>you know, we could be the next Russia. And by

0:08:11.560 --> 0:08:13.160
<v Speaker 3>the way, China is not the only country in the

0:08:13.200 --> 0:08:16.600
<v Speaker 3>world of facing that kind of insecurity. You have countries

0:08:16.720 --> 0:08:20.440
<v Speaker 3>like Saudi Arabia started to worry, and at one point

0:08:20.480 --> 0:08:22.800
<v Speaker 3>there was even floating the idea that Saudi Arabia was

0:08:22.840 --> 0:08:27.520
<v Speaker 3>considering moving. The trading of shifting is part of the

0:08:27.560 --> 0:08:31.000
<v Speaker 3>transactions of oil or denominating the oil price pricing in

0:08:31.040 --> 0:08:33.120
<v Speaker 3>the Remanbi so this is where I think a lot

0:08:33.160 --> 0:08:35.640
<v Speaker 3>of things have been underestimated.

0:08:36.280 --> 0:08:38.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm glad who brought up oil. Actually I should mention

0:08:39.800 --> 0:08:43.000
<v Speaker 1>we talked to Zoe last year. I think it was

0:08:43.160 --> 0:08:46.920
<v Speaker 1>maybe last August. She's the author of Sovereign Funds, How

0:08:46.920 --> 0:08:50.960
<v Speaker 1>the CPC finances its global ambitions. She's the Maurice R.

0:08:51.000 --> 0:08:55.280
<v Speaker 1>Greenberg Fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations. Perfect guests literally,

0:08:55.520 --> 0:08:57.360
<v Speaker 1>But actually I'm glad you brought up oil because I

0:08:57.360 --> 0:09:00.560
<v Speaker 1>thought one of the most fascinating aspects of your piece

0:09:00.760 --> 0:09:03.480
<v Speaker 1>on China and the dollar, and I had never seen

0:09:03.559 --> 0:09:06.800
<v Speaker 1>anyone put this together, which is that if China is

0:09:06.840 --> 0:09:09.920
<v Speaker 1>going to be I don't know, if it's a dominant

0:09:10.000 --> 0:09:12.760
<v Speaker 1>provider of rare earth metals, and we talk about this

0:09:12.800 --> 0:09:15.040
<v Speaker 1>all the time in the context of like batteries and

0:09:15.120 --> 0:09:18.240
<v Speaker 1>clean tech and certain needs for high tech, et cetera.

0:09:18.520 --> 0:09:20.680
<v Speaker 1>And there's you know, this talk a dependence on China

0:09:20.720 --> 0:09:22.360
<v Speaker 1>for all these things. If China is going to be

0:09:22.360 --> 0:09:24.560
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, maybe the Saudi Arabia of some of

0:09:24.600 --> 0:09:28.360
<v Speaker 1>these commodities, then this is an opportunity to create brand

0:09:28.400 --> 0:09:31.520
<v Speaker 1>new markets that aren't not from day one. You know,

0:09:31.559 --> 0:09:33.280
<v Speaker 1>It's like saudis like a bulkhead.

0:09:33.480 --> 0:09:33.680
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:09:33.720 --> 0:09:36.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, Like Saudi Arabia is like okay, maybe if they're

0:09:36.000 --> 0:09:38.480
<v Speaker 1>all these years, maybe it'll trade a little bit more

0:09:38.480 --> 0:09:41.800
<v Speaker 1>oil and some other currency. But China could create a

0:09:41.840 --> 0:09:44.360
<v Speaker 1>new market for these and not and have it be

0:09:44.760 --> 0:09:46.079
<v Speaker 1>undollarized from day one.

0:09:46.679 --> 0:09:51.720
<v Speaker 3>I think that is an excellent point to summarize my argument,

0:09:52.200 --> 0:09:56.360
<v Speaker 3>and I wish you were my editor right at the

0:09:56.400 --> 0:10:01.079
<v Speaker 3>top of very much. So this is how I think

0:10:01.120 --> 0:10:05.240
<v Speaker 3>about the relationship between energy and finance. Right right now,

0:10:05.480 --> 0:10:08.160
<v Speaker 3>we are living through a moment of the so called

0:10:08.240 --> 0:10:10.640
<v Speaker 3>energy transition, but this is actually not the very first

0:10:10.640 --> 0:10:14.160
<v Speaker 3>time we leave. The human society lived through this from

0:10:14.240 --> 0:10:19.400
<v Speaker 3>fire to coal to oil, and the next thing could

0:10:19.520 --> 0:10:22.960
<v Speaker 3>be renewable or clean energy. Could it be a variety

0:10:23.000 --> 0:10:26.200
<v Speaker 3>of renewable resources or clean energy sources. And the danger

0:10:26.240 --> 0:10:30.160
<v Speaker 3>of this is that when we move from an oil

0:10:30.240 --> 0:10:33.640
<v Speaker 3>denominated global economy, which is about eighty percent of the

0:10:33.679 --> 0:10:37.679
<v Speaker 3>global economy now is a fueld by oil. Right so,

0:10:38.120 --> 0:10:43.800
<v Speaker 3>oil is one commodity that has one single market. It

0:10:43.840 --> 0:10:45.719
<v Speaker 3>does not matter where you are trading it, whether you're

0:10:45.760 --> 0:10:48.480
<v Speaker 3>in Texas, you are in Dubai, or in Singapore or

0:10:48.480 --> 0:10:51.920
<v Speaker 3>Shanghai or London. At least for most of the time,

0:10:52.600 --> 0:10:56.520
<v Speaker 3>there is only one global oil market price change here

0:10:56.559 --> 0:11:01.120
<v Speaker 3>it moves over there. But renewables is totally different because

0:11:01.400 --> 0:11:06.560
<v Speaker 3>it's a very much decentralized and distributed system. And even

0:11:06.559 --> 0:11:08.960
<v Speaker 3>for natural gas is the same thing. Right, there is

0:11:09.080 --> 0:11:13.559
<v Speaker 3>no single global market for natural gas. So from this perspective,

0:11:13.600 --> 0:11:19.559
<v Speaker 3>this decentralized and fragmented market provide opportunity for the emergence

0:11:19.640 --> 0:11:23.120
<v Speaker 3>of a different trading hub, different trading system, and different

0:11:23.200 --> 0:11:27.920
<v Speaker 3>pricing mechanism. And this is where China see energy transition

0:11:28.080 --> 0:11:33.320
<v Speaker 3>as an opportunity to reduce their dependence on the dollar system.

0:11:34.040 --> 0:11:38.280
<v Speaker 3>And China actually has the market power in this regards

0:11:38.440 --> 0:11:41.480
<v Speaker 3>because it is already one of It is the world's

0:11:41.559 --> 0:11:45.520
<v Speaker 3>largest import of a lot of commodities, and it also

0:11:45.520 --> 0:11:49.959
<v Speaker 3>dominates a lot of the processing capacity for critical minerals.

0:11:50.120 --> 0:11:53.320
<v Speaker 3>So from that perspective, you see China has access to

0:11:53.760 --> 0:11:57.160
<v Speaker 3>the resources, has the processing capacity. They also have the

0:11:57.200 --> 0:11:59.880
<v Speaker 3>manufacturing capacity in the transition through.

0:12:00.760 --> 0:12:03.839
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I didn't realize this. So I knew China had

0:12:04.280 --> 0:12:08.440
<v Speaker 4>rare earth capacity, I didn't realize it also has the

0:12:08.520 --> 0:12:13.800
<v Speaker 4>tungsten capital of the world in in Ganjo. Am I

0:12:13.840 --> 0:12:17.040
<v Speaker 4>pronouncing that right, very right in Ganjo. And it's funny

0:12:17.040 --> 0:12:19.520
<v Speaker 4>because I've been to Ganjo on my way to Guylan,

0:12:19.600 --> 0:12:22.400
<v Speaker 4>but the sitting, Yeah, but this was like I mean,

0:12:22.440 --> 0:12:25.240
<v Speaker 4>it must have been like two thousand and four or

0:12:25.280 --> 0:12:28.840
<v Speaker 4>something when my mother was working in Beijing, and you know,

0:12:28.960 --> 0:12:31.440
<v Speaker 4>I was at university at the time, and rare earth

0:12:31.440 --> 0:12:35.080
<v Speaker 4>metals were not on my mind, So the importance of

0:12:35.120 --> 0:12:38.320
<v Speaker 4>that particular city of flew over my head at that time.

0:12:38.400 --> 0:12:42.120
<v Speaker 4>But Tungsten capital of the world, as you point out.

0:12:41.800 --> 0:12:44.320
<v Speaker 3>The example that you pointed out is very important to

0:12:44.360 --> 0:12:49.320
<v Speaker 3>Tracy because Ganjo is the it is the location where

0:12:49.480 --> 0:12:52.199
<v Speaker 3>you I cannot believe you actually have been there because

0:12:52.360 --> 0:12:55.679
<v Speaker 3>I have never been there. Many tourists would not even no.

0:12:56.200 --> 0:12:58.200
<v Speaker 4>It was a way stop on the way to Guilan.

0:12:58.360 --> 0:13:01.240
<v Speaker 4>And I remember I've had a lot of of adventures

0:13:01.280 --> 0:13:04.120
<v Speaker 4>in getting lost in foreign places, but this was one

0:13:04.160 --> 0:13:06.880
<v Speaker 4>of the places where we genuinely got lost because we

0:13:06.880 --> 0:13:09.440
<v Speaker 4>were only there for a night and we really struggled

0:13:09.440 --> 0:13:11.880
<v Speaker 4>to find a restaurant to eat in and no one

0:13:12.120 --> 0:13:14.880
<v Speaker 4>back then spoke English, and you know, we didn't have

0:13:14.960 --> 0:13:17.440
<v Speaker 4>translator apps and things like that, so I remember we

0:13:17.480 --> 0:13:19.400
<v Speaker 4>went to a restaurant and we ordered something and I

0:13:19.440 --> 0:13:22.160
<v Speaker 4>think we got back. I think we thought we were

0:13:22.280 --> 0:13:24.679
<v Speaker 4>ordering like chicken or beef, and we got I'm pretty

0:13:24.679 --> 0:13:27.280
<v Speaker 4>sure it was pan fried scorpions. In the end, this

0:13:27.400 --> 0:13:32.560
<v Speaker 4>was one of my like only like no, no, but

0:13:32.600 --> 0:13:35.760
<v Speaker 4>anyway it was. It was not a tourist destination, as

0:13:35.800 --> 0:13:37.840
<v Speaker 4>you point out. It was really a way stop on

0:13:37.880 --> 0:13:40.840
<v Speaker 4>the way to Gwaelan, which is definitely a tourist destination

0:13:40.920 --> 0:13:42.120
<v Speaker 4>and is beautiful.

0:13:42.280 --> 0:13:45.360
<v Speaker 3>Very much so. But Gun Joe is important in the

0:13:45.440 --> 0:13:53.920
<v Speaker 3>sense that it has China's a second rare metals exchange mechanism,

0:13:54.120 --> 0:13:57.160
<v Speaker 3>and the whole idea behind setting up this is rare

0:13:57.240 --> 0:14:03.720
<v Speaker 3>mineral exchange mechanism has been to increase the pricing power

0:14:03.920 --> 0:14:06.760
<v Speaker 3>of the reman be in a lot of these critical

0:14:06.760 --> 0:14:10.439
<v Speaker 3>minerals very much relevant for the energy transition, and China

0:14:10.480 --> 0:14:13.040
<v Speaker 3>not only have one. China not only has one, but

0:14:13.200 --> 0:14:18.440
<v Speaker 3>has another one in ne Mango Can Oh sorry no,

0:14:18.840 --> 0:14:20.920
<v Speaker 3>I was just pointing out the name of the city.

0:14:20.960 --> 0:14:23.560
<v Speaker 3>I believe it's abouttle rare earth mineral and just a

0:14:23.560 --> 0:14:26.560
<v Speaker 3>small segue about rare earth. This is another aspect of

0:14:26.560 --> 0:14:30.280
<v Speaker 3>why Chinese finance seers have been grumpy. They're saying that, Well,

0:14:30.320 --> 0:14:34.840
<v Speaker 3>you know, China, it is the largest rare mineral exporting

0:14:34.840 --> 0:14:36.480
<v Speaker 3>country in the world for a lamp period the time,

0:14:36.600 --> 0:14:40.600
<v Speaker 3>but they have been exporting rare earth at an extremely

0:14:40.680 --> 0:14:43.920
<v Speaker 3>cheap price. The idea is, you sell rare earth is

0:14:43.960 --> 0:14:46.960
<v Speaker 3>a very important mineral, but you sell it dirt cheap.

0:14:47.360 --> 0:14:49.920
<v Speaker 3>In Chinese word, rare earth is called a heat tool.

0:14:50.040 --> 0:14:52.920
<v Speaker 3>It's like a rare earth means the two too. It's like,

0:14:53.120 --> 0:14:56.240
<v Speaker 3>literally it means dirt. So you are selling something precious

0:14:56.480 --> 0:14:58.960
<v Speaker 3>at the price of a dirt. So this is why

0:14:59.000 --> 0:15:02.440
<v Speaker 3>we are really interesting in sort of increasing the pricing

0:15:02.480 --> 0:15:03.640
<v Speaker 3>power of their meanbi.

0:15:03.520 --> 0:15:06.520
<v Speaker 4>Wait, but is that just to try to get market share?

0:15:06.560 --> 0:15:10.760
<v Speaker 4>Because I think about rare earth's and I think finite resources,

0:15:11.040 --> 0:15:13.960
<v Speaker 4>a lot of people are struggling to get them or

0:15:14.400 --> 0:15:18.080
<v Speaker 4>reliable access to them. Why would you sell it cheap?

0:15:19.040 --> 0:15:22.600
<v Speaker 3>That is an excellent question. For a long period of time,

0:15:22.760 --> 0:15:25.880
<v Speaker 3>rare earth as a metal, it didn't have a lot

0:15:25.960 --> 0:15:29.800
<v Speaker 3>of applications. In the transition to renewables. Like if we

0:15:29.800 --> 0:15:32.680
<v Speaker 3>were having this conversation back in let's say two thousand

0:15:32.680 --> 0:15:37.000
<v Speaker 3>and seven, the market is definitely very different from what

0:15:37.040 --> 0:15:40.480
<v Speaker 3>we are saying today. So from that perspective, yes, having

0:15:40.520 --> 0:15:44.720
<v Speaker 3>market share is important, but the problem is the demand

0:15:44.880 --> 0:15:47.800
<v Speaker 3>is not necessarily as high as it is today.

0:15:47.920 --> 0:15:50.080
<v Speaker 4>Oh I see, Okay, So a lot of the discussion

0:15:50.120 --> 0:15:54.320
<v Speaker 4>around the shortage of rare earth metals is still very hypothetical,

0:15:54.560 --> 0:15:55.000
<v Speaker 4>very much so.

0:16:08.800 --> 0:16:11.880
<v Speaker 1>Something that has come up on a couple of episodes

0:16:11.920 --> 0:16:13.840
<v Speaker 1>we've done, but I don't think we've talked about it

0:16:13.920 --> 0:16:18.880
<v Speaker 1>with you is the Belton Road initiative and the degree

0:16:18.880 --> 0:16:23.280
<v Speaker 1>to which that has or hasn't actually been particularly effective

0:16:23.480 --> 0:16:28.000
<v Speaker 1>at creating a renmend B network that rival or a

0:16:28.040 --> 0:16:30.320
<v Speaker 1>renmen be system. And I think what was it, like

0:16:30.720 --> 0:16:34.760
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the lending is still dollarized, right Terseay? Yeah,

0:16:34.840 --> 0:16:37.160
<v Speaker 1>what is going on with that? And how did how

0:16:37.200 --> 0:16:40.000
<v Speaker 1>do you see like you know, obviously the geopolitics ort

0:16:40.000 --> 0:16:42.520
<v Speaker 1>of building relationships. Of course we've seen the emergence and

0:16:42.640 --> 0:16:45.880
<v Speaker 1>growing of the formal like bricks group of countries. How

0:16:45.880 --> 0:16:48.480
<v Speaker 1>does that How do some of these endeavors play into

0:16:49.040 --> 0:16:50.800
<v Speaker 1>China's currency strategy in your view?

0:16:51.400 --> 0:16:56.120
<v Speaker 3>So, the Belt on the Road initiative initially started as

0:16:56.280 --> 0:17:01.320
<v Speaker 3>a way for Chinese leaders in particular Season to address

0:17:01.400 --> 0:17:05.640
<v Speaker 3>China's domestic overcapacity problem, right is after the financial during

0:17:05.640 --> 0:17:08.120
<v Speaker 3>the financial crisis, China, due to the fort tralling, remenbe

0:17:08.119 --> 0:17:12.280
<v Speaker 3>stimulate and then it creates a lot of domestic overcapacity. Therefore,

0:17:12.520 --> 0:17:15.760
<v Speaker 3>using President czimping his own word, he said, you know,

0:17:15.880 --> 0:17:18.639
<v Speaker 3>China's overcapacity problem is a problem for us, but it

0:17:18.720 --> 0:17:21.720
<v Speaker 3>could be beneficial for other countries. So that was the contact,

0:17:21.720 --> 0:17:24.240
<v Speaker 3>that was the background. But it's in reality, it's not

0:17:24.280 --> 0:17:27.760
<v Speaker 3>necessarily how it was imagined. Right, You're right. A lot

0:17:27.760 --> 0:17:33.520
<v Speaker 3>of the lending have been denominated in dollars. However, Chinese financiers,

0:17:33.560 --> 0:17:38.080
<v Speaker 3>including Presidence MP himself as the leader, have been evasioning

0:17:38.520 --> 0:17:42.399
<v Speaker 3>having bri Beldroom Road Initiative as a vehicle or a

0:17:42.440 --> 0:17:46.800
<v Speaker 3>mechanism to broaden the use of remenbe along Beldom Road

0:17:46.880 --> 0:17:51.520
<v Speaker 3>initiative countries. And they even created a sovereign funds to

0:17:51.680 --> 0:17:54.800
<v Speaker 3>help broadening the use of remenb and that sovereign funds

0:17:54.840 --> 0:17:58.280
<v Speaker 3>is called the Silk Road Fund, and it was launched

0:17:58.280 --> 0:18:01.840
<v Speaker 3>around to south end it if I remember it correctly,

0:18:01.920 --> 0:18:05.320
<v Speaker 3>it should be around two thousand fourteen, two thousand fifteen

0:18:05.560 --> 0:18:08.760
<v Speaker 3>ish if I remember it correctly, And at one of

0:18:08.800 --> 0:18:12.560
<v Speaker 3>those Bolt and Road initiative International Corporation Forum, President City

0:18:12.680 --> 0:18:14.600
<v Speaker 3>things that I'm going to give it, you know, another

0:18:14.680 --> 0:18:17.680
<v Speaker 3>capital injection, and this time the capital injection is going

0:18:17.720 --> 0:18:20.720
<v Speaker 3>to be denominated like the capital injection is going to

0:18:20.720 --> 0:18:23.679
<v Speaker 3>be in I mean B. The whole purpose is to

0:18:23.720 --> 0:18:27.439
<v Speaker 3>broaden the use of REMENB through this initiative. And what

0:18:27.560 --> 0:18:31.159
<v Speaker 3>is fascinating is once President made the announcement, the Chinese

0:18:31.240 --> 0:18:33.720
<v Speaker 3>Central Banker at that time came out and saying that

0:18:33.880 --> 0:18:36.399
<v Speaker 3>this is a great idea and we are going to

0:18:36.520 --> 0:18:40.800
<v Speaker 3>use the socro defund as a mechanism to facilitate the

0:18:41.040 --> 0:18:45.040
<v Speaker 3>reminbi internationalization initiative. But the important part here is to

0:18:45.119 --> 0:18:50.159
<v Speaker 3>remember is the is not really internationalization. It's not that

0:18:50.280 --> 0:18:52.960
<v Speaker 3>they are removing capital controls or anything like that. They

0:18:52.960 --> 0:18:57.720
<v Speaker 3>are doing this through creating a relatively regional space for

0:18:58.600 --> 0:19:02.840
<v Speaker 3>Chinese importers acts orders to make transactions right. And in

0:19:02.880 --> 0:19:06.720
<v Speaker 3>this particular context is also very important because Seal Croade Fund,

0:19:06.840 --> 0:19:10.000
<v Speaker 3>the creation of the Seal Code of Fund was using

0:19:10.320 --> 0:19:15.399
<v Speaker 3>China's foreign exchange reserves managed by State Administration of a

0:19:15.440 --> 0:19:19.119
<v Speaker 3>Foreign exchange or safe which was which is the foreign

0:19:19.160 --> 0:19:23.800
<v Speaker 3>exchange reserve management arm of the People's Bank of China,

0:19:24.160 --> 0:19:26.679
<v Speaker 3>and in order to create the Seal Crode Fund, the

0:19:26.720 --> 0:19:32.440
<v Speaker 3>PBOC created a special entity called Buttomwood and although capitalizing

0:19:32.520 --> 0:19:37.040
<v Speaker 3>the Sellcrode Fund was bottom with initial mission, it then

0:19:37.200 --> 0:19:41.000
<v Speaker 3>later went on to create additional investment funds played a

0:19:41.119 --> 0:19:43.879
<v Speaker 3>very important role in stabilizing China's stock market.

0:19:44.119 --> 0:19:46.920
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I remember this. I think it came up in

0:19:47.119 --> 0:19:50.440
<v Speaker 4>another one of our episodes, although I cannot remember which one.

0:19:50.520 --> 0:19:54.359
<v Speaker 4>Since you brought up she listening to you lay out

0:19:54.680 --> 0:19:59.359
<v Speaker 4>why China wants this type of diversification, it makes a

0:19:59.359 --> 0:20:01.960
<v Speaker 4>lot of sense. And I think this is in many

0:20:02.000 --> 0:20:06.920
<v Speaker 4>ways an underappreciated aspect of Shishin Ping and the CCPs,

0:20:07.000 --> 0:20:12.879
<v Speaker 4>that like, they are good at identifying problems and vulnerabilities,

0:20:13.440 --> 0:20:17.960
<v Speaker 4>it's just that sometimes they're bad at maybe identifying solutions.

0:20:18.480 --> 0:20:21.520
<v Speaker 4>And sometimes I think Dan Wang, another one of our guests,

0:20:21.520 --> 0:20:24.120
<v Speaker 4>pointed this out in his annual letter. And I'm probably

0:20:24.280 --> 0:20:28.000
<v Speaker 4>paraphrasing here, but like, sometimes the solution is more painful

0:20:28.200 --> 0:20:30.600
<v Speaker 4>than the problem itself. And you could make that argument

0:20:30.640 --> 0:20:33.439
<v Speaker 4>for things like housing, what happened in the for profit

0:20:33.600 --> 0:20:38.080
<v Speaker 4>education space, the tech crackdown, all of those things. What

0:20:38.240 --> 0:20:42.280
<v Speaker 4>is the mechanism or the scenario in which China's attempt

0:20:42.359 --> 0:20:46.719
<v Speaker 4>to diversify away from the dollar ends up harming it

0:20:47.200 --> 0:20:49.560
<v Speaker 4>in some way. Like essentially, what are the risks here?

0:20:49.600 --> 0:20:51.360
<v Speaker 4>I feel like they need to be discussed.

0:20:52.080 --> 0:20:55.560
<v Speaker 3>So let me take a step back by explaining what

0:20:55.640 --> 0:21:00.400
<v Speaker 3>are the risk What are the motivations for China totempt

0:21:00.760 --> 0:21:05.840
<v Speaker 3>to reduce exposure? Right? In addition to economic reasons, there

0:21:05.880 --> 0:21:10.600
<v Speaker 3>are what I consider as very important geopolitical vulnerabilities that

0:21:10.840 --> 0:21:14.680
<v Speaker 3>has direct financial security implication, and I describe it as

0:21:14.680 --> 0:21:17.160
<v Speaker 3>the three eyes. I know that last time we talked

0:21:17.160 --> 0:21:18.080
<v Speaker 3>about the four d s.

0:21:19.920 --> 0:21:23.720
<v Speaker 1>Any great comment or has to have their thing or

0:21:23.800 --> 0:21:27.439
<v Speaker 1>guest recently Jason Cummins from Resident REVN. Howard the three ends.

0:21:28.040 --> 0:21:29.520
<v Speaker 1>So we like they say, all right, what are the

0:21:29.560 --> 0:21:30.080
<v Speaker 1>three eyes?

0:21:30.320 --> 0:21:36.040
<v Speaker 3>So the three eyes is under rising geopolitical tension, exposed

0:21:36.119 --> 0:21:42.160
<v Speaker 3>countries like China to ill liquidity challenge. It's exposed countries

0:21:42.240 --> 0:21:46.680
<v Speaker 3>like China to insecure challenge, and they find the other

0:21:46.720 --> 0:21:52.320
<v Speaker 3>part would because of insecurity, because of ill liquidity. China

0:21:52.560 --> 0:21:57.320
<v Speaker 3>is building an alternative to to ensure against a lot

0:21:57.359 --> 0:22:00.880
<v Speaker 3>of these vulnerabilities. Right, So those are the three and

0:22:01.280 --> 0:22:04.840
<v Speaker 3>the mechanism for China to achieve. This is to create

0:22:04.880 --> 0:22:08.000
<v Speaker 3>an alternative system. It can be summarized as the split.

0:22:08.280 --> 0:22:11.000
<v Speaker 3>You have settlement and payment, that's the S and a P.

0:22:11.680 --> 0:22:16.680
<v Speaker 3>You have liquidity, which is l and liquidity. The whole

0:22:16.720 --> 0:22:20.440
<v Speaker 3>idea of liquidity is to create international demand for the

0:22:20.560 --> 0:22:24.200
<v Speaker 3>reminbi and the remanbi asset. Right, and then I would

0:22:24.280 --> 0:22:28.159
<v Speaker 3>be creating a sort of this international international system to

0:22:28.280 --> 0:22:32.560
<v Speaker 3>increase the insurance. And then the key part would be

0:22:32.840 --> 0:22:36.520
<v Speaker 3>the trading. The whole idea of China being not just

0:22:36.560 --> 0:22:39.560
<v Speaker 3>the world factory but also a very important player in

0:22:39.640 --> 0:22:44.520
<v Speaker 3>global commodities market. Now the backfire scenario would be at

0:22:44.640 --> 0:22:47.520
<v Speaker 3>the T scenario. Now you have all this plumbing system.

0:22:47.640 --> 0:22:49.960
<v Speaker 3>You know, the settlement, the payment, A lot of these

0:22:49.960 --> 0:22:51.920
<v Speaker 3>are the plumbing. Yes, you can make it the argument

0:22:52.040 --> 0:22:54.720
<v Speaker 3>to say that the transaction volume on the swift on

0:22:54.800 --> 0:22:58.080
<v Speaker 3>the Chinese CIPS system is still very low. But the

0:22:58.119 --> 0:23:02.560
<v Speaker 3>point is it's approved of concept. The idea is you

0:23:02.640 --> 0:23:04.840
<v Speaker 3>buy insurance, you hope that you don't need it, but

0:23:04.960 --> 0:23:08.280
<v Speaker 3>in case you need it, you have it ready to go. Right,

0:23:08.720 --> 0:23:12.239
<v Speaker 3>and if the worst case scenario for China would be

0:23:12.880 --> 0:23:18.359
<v Speaker 3>with the continued supply chain diversification, you started to say, okay,

0:23:18.400 --> 0:23:22.159
<v Speaker 3>so what the implication for global currency system would be

0:23:22.440 --> 0:23:26.280
<v Speaker 3>China started to build its own trading system, whereas a

0:23:26.400 --> 0:23:29.159
<v Speaker 3>denominating year may be whereas the rest of the world

0:23:29.240 --> 0:23:32.920
<v Speaker 3>is trading an entirely different currency. Now, if in that

0:23:33.000 --> 0:23:37.600
<v Speaker 3>scenario you have a currency war, and for central bankers,

0:23:37.640 --> 0:23:41.159
<v Speaker 3>experience would be foreign exchange reserves are one day in

0:23:41.160 --> 0:23:43.840
<v Speaker 3>the central bank, but the next day could be gone.

0:23:44.000 --> 0:23:47.760
<v Speaker 3>China lived through this around two sixteen twenty seventeen. Within

0:23:47.840 --> 0:23:51.360
<v Speaker 3>one year, foreign exchange reserves decreased from four tillion dollars

0:23:51.440 --> 0:23:55.440
<v Speaker 3>to three trillion dollars. Right, so this experience is sort

0:23:55.480 --> 0:24:02.120
<v Speaker 3>of very insecure from Chinese financier's perspective. Therefore, if the

0:24:02.280 --> 0:24:07.399
<v Speaker 3>entire global trading system is split into two parts, to

0:24:07.520 --> 0:24:11.000
<v Speaker 3>whom is China going to export in order to accumulate

0:24:11.240 --> 0:24:16.000
<v Speaker 3>all the foreign exchange reserves? That back China's remy be

0:24:16.119 --> 0:24:17.960
<v Speaker 3>internationalization operation.

0:24:19.359 --> 0:24:22.679
<v Speaker 1>I just have one more question about the current state

0:24:22.840 --> 0:24:25.800
<v Speaker 1>of things in China. We got to slew data recently.

0:24:26.080 --> 0:24:29.399
<v Speaker 1>Not great, still slump, but a second year in a

0:24:29.480 --> 0:24:33.640
<v Speaker 1>row of declining population. I believe more deaths than birds

0:24:34.040 --> 0:24:37.479
<v Speaker 1>and a little bit worse than expected. This is another

0:24:37.640 --> 0:24:40.680
<v Speaker 1>top demographics or another topic kind of like the dollar

0:24:40.720 --> 0:24:42.280
<v Speaker 1>ridge with a lot of people have a lot of

0:24:42.320 --> 0:24:45.280
<v Speaker 1>opinions and things to say, and I never really know

0:24:45.320 --> 0:24:48.159
<v Speaker 1>how serious is What do you think of as the

0:24:48.440 --> 0:24:54.240
<v Speaker 1>economic implications or any implications of a shrinking population?

0:24:55.640 --> 0:24:58.600
<v Speaker 3>First of all, I would say that currently perhaps we

0:24:58.640 --> 0:25:02.320
<v Speaker 3>are living through a mood swing of the Chinese economy

0:25:02.400 --> 0:25:06.159
<v Speaker 3>because you know, during the around twenty twenty two, before

0:25:06.240 --> 0:25:09.919
<v Speaker 3>China officially exited the zero COVID policies, you know, a

0:25:09.920 --> 0:25:13.600
<v Speaker 3>lot of people in the West were anticipating in China's

0:25:13.720 --> 0:25:17.880
<v Speaker 3>a rapid snap back. But obviously the economy, the recovery

0:25:17.880 --> 0:25:21.200
<v Speaker 3>of the economy has been disappointing. Therefore, we are now

0:25:21.560 --> 0:25:26.520
<v Speaker 3>becoming having this very much doom Seer's mood and demographics

0:25:26.600 --> 0:25:29.040
<v Speaker 3>is one of the fourties that we talked about, and

0:25:29.560 --> 0:25:32.919
<v Speaker 3>I think in the short run, perhaps the challenge is

0:25:32.960 --> 0:25:35.800
<v Speaker 3>even even bigger than the long term implication. Now, the

0:25:35.840 --> 0:25:38.560
<v Speaker 3>long term implication is that, well, you know, the labor

0:25:38.640 --> 0:25:42.880
<v Speaker 3>premium that is China benefited from has shrinked. Obviously, that's

0:25:42.960 --> 0:25:45.520
<v Speaker 3>one argument that you can say. But you know, China

0:25:45.600 --> 0:25:48.399
<v Speaker 3>is also spending a lot of money and investing in

0:25:48.520 --> 0:25:51.520
<v Speaker 3>artificial intelligence, robotics and all that. And I guess what

0:25:51.840 --> 0:25:54.840
<v Speaker 3>Japan is a good example. Instead of labor, instead of

0:25:54.880 --> 0:26:00.960
<v Speaker 3>relaxing the immigration policy, they use robotics, right, So I

0:26:01.000 --> 0:26:04.800
<v Speaker 3>do think the short run implication is more severe because

0:26:05.240 --> 0:26:10.200
<v Speaker 3>shrinking population the reason why birth rate goes lower. Part

0:26:10.200 --> 0:26:12.719
<v Speaker 3>of the reason is because well, perhaps people are no

0:26:12.800 --> 0:26:17.880
<v Speaker 3>longer getting married as often as the family formation rate.

0:26:18.000 --> 0:26:21.800
<v Speaker 3>The marriage ratio declined, and it has a severe implication

0:26:21.840 --> 0:26:25.600
<v Speaker 3>for the housing market because the demount for housing decrease

0:26:25.800 --> 0:26:30.119
<v Speaker 3>and housing remen constitute about thirty percent of China's GDP,

0:26:30.680 --> 0:26:34.320
<v Speaker 3>and without housing market recovery, it is very difficult for

0:26:34.400 --> 0:26:37.040
<v Speaker 3>the Chinese economy to recover in the short run.

0:26:38.280 --> 0:26:40.720
<v Speaker 4>I have just one more question, and it's not that important,

0:26:40.760 --> 0:26:43.400
<v Speaker 4>but I'm going to ask it. Last time you were

0:26:43.440 --> 0:26:46.600
<v Speaker 4>on the show, you gave us one of the greatest

0:26:46.640 --> 0:26:50.000
<v Speaker 4>gifts in all LOTS history, which is knowledge of the

0:26:50.040 --> 0:26:54.320
<v Speaker 4>existence of idiot sunflower seeds, which has become one of

0:26:54.320 --> 0:26:57.400
<v Speaker 4>my all time favorite companies, like both for the business itself,

0:26:57.480 --> 0:27:00.959
<v Speaker 4>but also for what it says about the development of

0:27:01.000 --> 0:27:05.080
<v Speaker 4>the Chinese economy and what's happening now under Sheshan Ping.

0:27:06.000 --> 0:27:10.200
<v Speaker 4>Give me a new uh wormhole to go down in

0:27:10.240 --> 0:27:14.200
<v Speaker 4>the Chinese currency market, or the economy, or rare earth metals,

0:27:14.240 --> 0:27:15.879
<v Speaker 4>any of those. I'm up for it.

0:27:16.119 --> 0:27:17.320
<v Speaker 2>I think we can get obsessed with.

0:27:19.160 --> 0:27:21.760
<v Speaker 3>This is a good question. I was trying to look

0:27:21.880 --> 0:27:25.880
<v Speaker 3>through the Chinese economy. I'm trying to find like company

0:27:26.200 --> 0:27:29.200
<v Speaker 3>icons that can correspond to a different era. I have

0:27:30.040 --> 0:27:33.520
<v Speaker 3>the idea the watermelon seed that is won stunflower seed,

0:27:34.080 --> 0:27:37.280
<v Speaker 3>but I have been struggling to find another one. And

0:27:37.640 --> 0:27:41.679
<v Speaker 3>since we were talking about energy transition and potential Chinese

0:27:41.720 --> 0:27:45.120
<v Speaker 3>potential challenge to the dollar based the system, I'm going

0:27:45.119 --> 0:27:47.960
<v Speaker 3>to see Bui D. It's a good choice.

0:27:48.000 --> 0:27:48.159
<v Speaker 1>You know.

0:27:48.200 --> 0:27:52.520
<v Speaker 3>It just stands for bewed your dream right. And if

0:27:52.560 --> 0:27:55.800
<v Speaker 3>you look at how buid the rise of Bui D

0:27:55.920 --> 0:27:59.919
<v Speaker 3>and to what extent it challenges a lot of foreign

0:28:00.040 --> 0:28:05.399
<v Speaker 3>ev makers, it shows that perhaps the Chinese market is

0:28:05.520 --> 0:28:08.760
<v Speaker 3>extremely competitive and there are still reasons to be hopeful

0:28:08.760 --> 0:28:12.640
<v Speaker 3>for the Chinese economy, especially for the high tech sector. However,

0:28:12.840 --> 0:28:16.560
<v Speaker 3>I would offer another cautious piece here, which is if

0:28:16.600 --> 0:28:19.879
<v Speaker 3>you look at bid and who's the largest shareholders of

0:28:20.880 --> 0:28:24.680
<v Speaker 3>his publicly listed shares, you will find Central Roisin owns

0:28:24.680 --> 0:28:27.359
<v Speaker 3>more than ten percent of his publicly listed shares.

0:28:27.560 --> 0:28:29.280
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, it's funny you bring it up, because Joe and

0:28:29.280 --> 0:28:31.680
<v Speaker 4>I were actually talking about this earlier in the week.

0:28:31.880 --> 0:28:35.320
<v Speaker 4>Bid shares have also fallen a lot. And it's this

0:28:35.560 --> 0:28:42.600
<v Speaker 4>incredibly promising company that I think has overtaken Tesla to become, yeah,

0:28:42.680 --> 0:28:47.760
<v Speaker 4>to become the biggest maker of electric vehicles. But investors

0:28:47.760 --> 0:28:51.000
<v Speaker 4>are really down on its outlooks. I think in part because,

0:28:51.040 --> 0:28:53.400
<v Speaker 4>like the government has basically said, this is a really

0:28:53.440 --> 0:28:55.400
<v Speaker 4>important part of our economy and we want to be

0:28:55.480 --> 0:28:58.200
<v Speaker 4>leaders in the EV market, and so there's a lot

0:28:58.240 --> 0:29:01.800
<v Speaker 4>of pressure on them to invest, especially if one of

0:29:01.800 --> 0:29:05.120
<v Speaker 4>their dominant shareholders is actually a public entity. You know,

0:29:05.160 --> 0:29:07.880
<v Speaker 4>they're all sort of working together for the future development

0:29:07.920 --> 0:29:12.120
<v Speaker 4>of the Chinese economy. So that means reinvestment capex, it

0:29:12.160 --> 0:29:15.680
<v Speaker 4>doesn't necessarily mean dividends and share buybacks.

0:29:15.960 --> 0:29:21.000
<v Speaker 1>Also, maybe the dollar system is under some sort of threat,

0:29:21.440 --> 0:29:24.640
<v Speaker 1>but the English system. If the leader of your domestic

0:29:24.720 --> 0:29:28.360
<v Speaker 1>manufacturing is build your dreams, then I think the network

0:29:28.360 --> 0:29:32.000
<v Speaker 1>effects of the English language are still extremely very much so.

0:29:36.800 --> 0:29:39.880
<v Speaker 4>Lots More is produced by Carmen Rodriguez and Dashel Bennett,

0:29:39.880 --> 0:29:42.240
<v Speaker 4>with help from Moses Ondom and Kale Brooks.

0:29:42.600 --> 0:29:44.680
<v Speaker 2>Our sound engineer is Blake Maples.

0:29:44.720 --> 0:29:47.040
<v Speaker 1>Sage Bauman is the head of Bloomberg Podcasts.

0:29:47.280 --> 0:29:50.400
<v Speaker 4>Please rate, review, and subscribe to Odd, Lots and Lots

0:29:50.400 --> 0:29:53.440
<v Speaker 4>More on your favorite podcast platforms.

0:29:53.240 --> 0:29:55.840
<v Speaker 1>And remember that Bloomberg subscribers can listen to all of

0:29:55.880 --> 0:29:59.680
<v Speaker 1>our podcasts and free by connecting through Apple Podcasts. Thanks

0:29:59.680 --> 0:30:00.360
<v Speaker 1>for the let snake