WEBVTT - Bloomberg's Barnes: Obama's Clean Power Plan Could Stay (Audio)

0:00:02.240 --> 0:00:06.160
<v Speaker 1>Global business news twenty four hours a day's Bloomberg dot Com,

0:00:06.360 --> 0:00:09.280
<v Speaker 1>the Radio plus mobile ass and on your radio. This

0:00:09.600 --> 0:00:13.480
<v Speaker 1>is a Bloomberg Business Flash from Bloomberg World Headquarters. I'm

0:00:13.600 --> 0:00:16.799
<v Speaker 1>Charlie Plot the dial the SMP nezdank Hall advancing in.

0:00:16.800 --> 0:00:20.480
<v Speaker 1>This update is brought to you by Hartford Funds. Hartford

0:00:20.560 --> 0:00:24.840
<v Speaker 1>Funds their benchmark is the investor. Now let's head right

0:00:24.880 --> 0:00:27.320
<v Speaker 1>over to the first word, breaking news best for today's

0:00:27.320 --> 0:00:32.120
<v Speaker 1>afternoon call, and here's Bill Maloney. Good afternoon, Charlie. Manus

0:00:32.159 --> 0:00:35.400
<v Speaker 1>averages have been strong after a quiet start, with the

0:00:35.479 --> 0:00:37.680
<v Speaker 1>DAL currently hired by a hundred and twenty three points,

0:00:37.680 --> 0:00:40.760
<v Speaker 1>says that he's gains thirteen and NAZAC rises forty four.

0:00:41.240 --> 0:00:43.680
<v Speaker 1>The down traded back above the hundred day moving average,

0:00:43.920 --> 0:00:46.040
<v Speaker 1>the small cap six hundreds up a point, and the

0:00:46.120 --> 0:00:48.479
<v Speaker 1>U S ten yield at one point five six percent.

0:00:48.960 --> 0:00:51.760
<v Speaker 1>Eight out of eleven sp sectors are higher, led by games,

0:00:51.760 --> 0:00:56.200
<v Speaker 1>in technology, consumed, discretionary, and the financials, while utilities, energy

0:00:56.280 --> 0:01:00.480
<v Speaker 1>and real estate fell down, Transports rise seventy one, hilities

0:01:00.520 --> 0:01:03.920
<v Speaker 1>fall seven, Nazi Botech jump twenty one, and the VIX

0:01:04.120 --> 0:01:07.039
<v Speaker 1>is lower by ten percent. Leaders to the upside of

0:01:07.040 --> 0:01:11.399
<v Speaker 1>the down including Microsoft, Nike, and IBM. Only Disney fell.

0:01:11.959 --> 0:01:14.679
<v Speaker 1>Nike reports after the bell estimates are for fifty six

0:01:14.720 --> 0:01:18.000
<v Speaker 1>cents on revenues of eight point eight seven billion live

0:01:18.040 --> 0:01:20.400
<v Speaker 1>in the first Bacon News asked on Bill Maloney. Alrighty,

0:01:20.400 --> 0:01:22.200
<v Speaker 1>thank you very much. Bill Maloney will be all over

0:01:22.280 --> 0:01:24.880
<v Speaker 1>Nike as we get those numbers again. The Dow the

0:01:25.040 --> 0:01:28.680
<v Speaker 1>Smpton has stack all advancing and to hear live breaking

0:01:28.720 --> 0:01:31.840
<v Speaker 1>news over your Bloomberg Times squawk s q U A

0:01:32.120 --> 0:01:35.679
<v Speaker 1>w K on your terminal. I'm Charlie Pellock. That's a

0:01:35.680 --> 0:01:40.360
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg business flash. You're listening to taking stock with Kathleen

0:01:40.440 --> 0:01:44.280
<v Speaker 1>Hays and Pim Box on Bloomberg Radio. The Clean Power

0:01:44.440 --> 0:01:49.880
<v Speaker 1>Plan it's facing its first legal test. This is President

0:01:49.960 --> 0:01:54.120
<v Speaker 1>Obama's climate legacy. It's the cornerstone of the carbon cutting

0:01:54.160 --> 0:01:56.600
<v Speaker 1>promise the United States made to the world in Paris

0:01:56.760 --> 0:02:00.520
<v Speaker 1>last December as part of a pack among more than

0:02:00.560 --> 0:02:04.080
<v Speaker 1>one hundred eighty nations, and meeting those targets without the

0:02:04.120 --> 0:02:08.800
<v Speaker 1>initiative will be difficult, though impossible bringing in now. Brandon

0:02:08.880 --> 0:02:14.040
<v Speaker 1>Barnes are senior litigation analysts for Energy Bloomberg Intelligence, based

0:02:14.080 --> 0:02:18.480
<v Speaker 1>in Washington, d C to talk about the Clean Power

0:02:18.600 --> 0:02:23.040
<v Speaker 1>Plan arguments from both sides of this debate before the

0:02:23.160 --> 0:02:29.280
<v Speaker 1>d C Circuit. Brandon, welcome, Thanks, So what is on

0:02:29.400 --> 0:02:33.440
<v Speaker 1>the dock at what is being argued today? So today

0:02:33.560 --> 0:02:36.480
<v Speaker 1>was unprecedented in terms of the scope of the argument.

0:02:37.160 --> 0:02:40.799
<v Speaker 1>You had two d eighteen minutes of scheduled argument, which

0:02:40.840 --> 0:02:43.160
<v Speaker 1>is a far far greater amount than normal for the

0:02:43.240 --> 0:02:47.480
<v Speaker 1>d C Circuit. This was sixteen different attorneys arguing in

0:02:47.520 --> 0:02:51.360
<v Speaker 1>front of ten judges. Uh. And they broke the argument

0:02:51.400 --> 0:02:56.240
<v Speaker 1>down into five different categories. First being generally statutory issues,

0:02:56.280 --> 0:02:58.880
<v Speaker 1>which is typically how you would approach a challenge to

0:02:59.000 --> 0:03:01.600
<v Speaker 1>n e p A rule than a very specific statutory

0:03:01.600 --> 0:03:05.800
<v Speaker 1>issue related to Cleaner Act Section one twelve Constitutional shoes

0:03:06.160 --> 0:03:10.919
<v Speaker 1>um segment. And then two other more procedural issues. Can

0:03:10.960 --> 0:03:13.640
<v Speaker 1>you outline who is and what is going on? Because

0:03:13.639 --> 0:03:15.920
<v Speaker 1>I thought that the CPP ended a place in the

0:03:16.040 --> 0:03:21.560
<v Speaker 1>Environmental Protection Agency, the e p A in one corner,

0:03:21.760 --> 0:03:25.480
<v Speaker 1>and then there are what like you know, twenty seven

0:03:25.680 --> 0:03:31.679
<v Speaker 1>states plus industry groups plus utilities, coal miners, labor unions,

0:03:31.760 --> 0:03:34.920
<v Speaker 1>and they were all in another corner and the judges

0:03:34.960 --> 0:03:38.320
<v Speaker 1>are somehow in the middle. Well, I think that's how

0:03:38.480 --> 0:03:40.520
<v Speaker 1>that's certainly how the judges probably felt today with that

0:03:40.640 --> 0:03:44.279
<v Speaker 1>much argument and that many attorneys in the room. Um,

0:03:44.360 --> 0:03:46.200
<v Speaker 1>So you've got EPA on one side, but they've got

0:03:46.240 --> 0:03:48.600
<v Speaker 1>their own kind of cadre of support behind them. They've

0:03:48.640 --> 0:03:54.240
<v Speaker 1>got eighteen states supporting them, filing briefs, They've got counties, cities, mayors. UM.

0:03:54.360 --> 0:03:58.160
<v Speaker 1>Companies like Apple for example, is exactly companies tell us

0:03:58.200 --> 0:04:00.040
<v Speaker 1>a little bit in detail, like who's on each on

0:04:00.240 --> 0:04:04.320
<v Speaker 1>what are they fighting over? Sure? So I think if

0:04:04.320 --> 0:04:06.800
<v Speaker 1>you look at it from a company perspective, on the

0:04:06.840 --> 0:04:08.800
<v Speaker 1>side of the Clean Power Plan and the side of

0:04:08.800 --> 0:04:10.880
<v Speaker 1>the e p A are going to be your wind

0:04:11.040 --> 0:04:14.800
<v Speaker 1>and solar groups, the ones who would benefit most from this. Um.

0:04:14.880 --> 0:04:17.599
<v Speaker 1>That's typically how these lawsuits work, right. And so on

0:04:17.640 --> 0:04:20.400
<v Speaker 1>the other side, you've got utilities, especially the ones who

0:04:20.440 --> 0:04:24.360
<v Speaker 1>are coal fired, because they're really going to be put

0:04:24.400 --> 0:04:26.960
<v Speaker 1>out of existence not only because of this, but I

0:04:27.040 --> 0:04:29.800
<v Speaker 1>mean the market has driven them so far down. So

0:04:29.960 --> 0:04:33.960
<v Speaker 1>between this and other regulations, UM, coal firepower just isn't

0:04:33.960 --> 0:04:35.600
<v Speaker 1>gonna have the same kind of place in the US

0:04:35.680 --> 0:04:37.920
<v Speaker 1>power mix that I had before. So everyone who would

0:04:37.920 --> 0:04:40.920
<v Speaker 1>support coal, the producers, those who work in the industry,

0:04:40.960 --> 0:04:44.160
<v Speaker 1>including the unions are definitely backing would be back in

0:04:44.200 --> 0:04:47.840
<v Speaker 1>the opponents. It just I just with this, this is

0:04:47.880 --> 0:04:50.880
<v Speaker 1>even this is is this is intense or more intense

0:04:50.880 --> 0:04:53.400
<v Speaker 1>than the Supreme Court kind of setting when you talk

0:04:53.440 --> 0:04:56.960
<v Speaker 1>about but how many lawyers intend just it's it's a big,

0:04:57.400 --> 0:05:02.520
<v Speaker 1>big undertaking. It's it's unpressed, as I said, unprecedented, And

0:05:02.800 --> 0:05:05.520
<v Speaker 1>I'll tell you for a couple of reasons, but one

0:05:05.560 --> 0:05:08.000
<v Speaker 1>really important one is Supreme Court has already sort of

0:05:08.080 --> 0:05:11.520
<v Speaker 1>seen a little bit of this picture. They've they've decided

0:05:11.560 --> 0:05:14.359
<v Speaker 1>something related to the Clean Power Plan already, and that

0:05:14.480 --> 0:05:18.120
<v Speaker 1>was back when Justice Scalia was still alive. So the

0:05:18.160 --> 0:05:21.560
<v Speaker 1>Clean Power Plan was stayed by the Supreme Court five

0:05:21.640 --> 0:05:25.880
<v Speaker 1>to four. If we assume Scalia's being that five that

0:05:25.960 --> 0:05:28.520
<v Speaker 1>fitth deciding vote for the conservative side of the of

0:05:28.560 --> 0:05:32.080
<v Speaker 1>the Court then were at four four, which means that

0:05:32.320 --> 0:05:35.400
<v Speaker 1>if if there's a split, the d C Circuit's opinion

0:05:35.839 --> 0:05:39.880
<v Speaker 1>will stay as is and and remain sort of the

0:05:39.880 --> 0:05:42.640
<v Speaker 1>the controlling opinion. So that puts a lot of emphasis

0:05:42.640 --> 0:05:44.920
<v Speaker 1>on what happens in the d C Circuit. And for

0:05:44.960 --> 0:05:47.320
<v Speaker 1>that reason, the d C Circuit said, well, look, we're

0:05:47.320 --> 0:05:49.160
<v Speaker 1>not going to just decide this on our normal three

0:05:49.200 --> 0:05:52.160
<v Speaker 1>judge panel. We're gonna take the entire panel of all

0:05:52.200 --> 0:05:54.600
<v Speaker 1>the judges that are on the court, uh less Merrick

0:05:54.640 --> 0:05:57.560
<v Speaker 1>Garland who recused himself, and and they're going to hear

0:05:57.600 --> 0:06:00.000
<v Speaker 1>the entire case. And they did it on their own

0:06:00.000 --> 0:06:02.520
<v Speaker 1>on which they've only done two other times. So you

0:06:02.560 --> 0:06:08.200
<v Speaker 1>say two hundred and eighteen minutes today? Right? Yes, sir? Uh?

0:06:09.080 --> 0:06:11.359
<v Speaker 1>What happens next? Give us the timeline? What can we

0:06:11.400 --> 0:06:14.039
<v Speaker 1>expect and how do we keep following this important case?

0:06:14.960 --> 0:06:18.680
<v Speaker 1>So hard to say exactly on the timeline because of

0:06:18.839 --> 0:06:22.560
<v Speaker 1>how the DC Circuit has done this by skipping one

0:06:22.560 --> 0:06:24.680
<v Speaker 1>of the segments that they normally do. But if we

0:06:24.720 --> 0:06:27.320
<v Speaker 1>assume that this is a regular case, the d C

0:06:27.440 --> 0:06:30.160
<v Speaker 1>Circuit typically does this in thirteen months or so. This

0:06:30.200 --> 0:06:33.000
<v Speaker 1>case was filed back in October of last year, so

0:06:33.040 --> 0:06:36.040
<v Speaker 1>we could see some sort of opinion coming out from

0:06:36.440 --> 0:06:41.080
<v Speaker 1>UM the court in mid December. Uh go from there,

0:06:41.160 --> 0:06:43.480
<v Speaker 1>there's the obvious appeal up to the Supreme Court that's

0:06:43.480 --> 0:06:46.640
<v Speaker 1>almost guaranteed at this point. UM. That would take you

0:06:46.680 --> 0:06:52.000
<v Speaker 1>through that process into potentially early until we have a

0:06:52.000 --> 0:06:54.960
<v Speaker 1>final decision. If you had to bet, how would you

0:06:55.000 --> 0:06:59.520
<v Speaker 1>bet this comes out? Well, I think right now, based

0:06:59.520 --> 0:07:01.480
<v Speaker 1>on what we saw in the argument today and how

0:07:01.520 --> 0:07:05.119
<v Speaker 1>the judges sort of split on ideological lines, the clean

0:07:05.120 --> 0:07:08.920
<v Speaker 1>power plant is looking pretty good. So if we assume

0:07:09.080 --> 0:07:10.960
<v Speaker 1>that that holds and then we go to a four

0:07:11.040 --> 0:07:13.160
<v Speaker 1>force split in the Screme Court, looks like the clean

0:07:13.160 --> 0:07:16.720
<v Speaker 1>power Plant could could stay relevant and stay in effect

0:07:16.840 --> 0:07:22.600
<v Speaker 1>moving forward. I want to thank you very much. Brandon Barnes,

0:07:22.760 --> 0:07:28.200
<v Speaker 1>Senior Litigation analyst for Energy for Bloomberg Intelligence, joining us

0:07:28.240 --> 0:07:33.440
<v Speaker 1>from Washington, d C. Home to Bloomberg one and one

0:07:33.440 --> 0:07:36.400
<v Speaker 1>oh five point seven h D two. You're listening to

0:07:36.480 --> 0:07:39.480
<v Speaker 1>taking Stock. I'm Pim Fox, my co host Captain Hayes.

0:07:40.000 --> 0:07:47.120
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg, Yeah, Bloomberg. Taking Stock is brought to

0:07:47.160 --> 0:07:49.280
<v Speaker 1>you by a Bank of American Mary Lynches Global Cash

0:07:49.320 --> 0:07:52.200
<v Speaker 1>management solutions, helping you manage, protect, and invest your global

0:07:52.240 --> 0:07:54.480
<v Speaker 1>cash wherever the road or growth leads. That's the power

0:07:54.480 --> 0:07:57.880
<v Speaker 1>of global connections. The Bank of America North America member

0:07:57.960 --> 0:07:58.520
<v Speaker 1>f D I C