WEBVTT - Countdown To Halloween!  Sci-Fi Horror Pick #1 “It’s What’s Inside”

0:00:02.270 --> 0:00:05.510
<v Speaker 1>Hey there folks it is saturday october 24th yes just

0:00:05.590 --> 0:00:08.810
<v Speaker 1>one week until halloween and we have got a horror

0:00:08.869 --> 0:00:15.090
<v Speaker 1>movie recommendation for you from the sci-fi horror genre we

0:00:15.250 --> 0:00:19.509
<v Speaker 1>absolutely love this movie and it's a little on the

0:00:19.570 --> 0:00:22.550
<v Speaker 1>freaky side and with that welcome to this episode of

0:00:22.640 --> 0:00:25.000
<v Speaker 1>amy and tj i should probably explain this when i

0:00:25.060 --> 0:00:27.760
<v Speaker 1>say freaky it's It'll freak you out a little bit,

0:00:27.800 --> 0:00:29.750
<v Speaker 1>some of the scenarios that play out in this movie.

0:00:29.800 --> 0:00:32.229
<v Speaker 1>It is so unexpected. It is so fun. It's so

0:00:32.270 --> 0:00:36.530
<v Speaker 1>well acted. And Robes, this deserves to be number one

0:00:36.570 --> 0:00:37.150
<v Speaker 1>on our recommendation.

0:00:37.229 --> 0:00:40.330
<v Speaker 2>It does. Because also, I would say I don't think

0:00:40.390 --> 0:00:43.270
<v Speaker 2>a lot of people have this movie on their radar,

0:00:43.330 --> 0:00:46.949
<v Speaker 2>which makes it all the more special. It's called It's

0:00:47.170 --> 0:00:51.700
<v Speaker 2>What's Inside. And yes, it's our number one sci-fi horror pick.

0:00:51.870 --> 0:00:53.230
<v Speaker 3>Even the title is a mystery.

0:00:53.300 --> 0:00:54.600
<v Speaker 2>It's What's Inside.

0:00:54.660 --> 0:00:54.930
<v Speaker 3>Yes.

0:00:55.830 --> 0:01:01.770
<v Speaker 2>This was actually released straight to Netflix on October 4th, 2024.

0:01:01.770 --> 0:01:04.150
<v Speaker 2>So it's only two years old. But I hadn't heard

0:01:04.170 --> 0:01:07.209
<v Speaker 2>of this. We just recently found it. And it is

0:01:07.330 --> 0:01:09.309
<v Speaker 2>such a gem because, as you pointed out, there are

0:01:09.350 --> 0:01:13.280
<v Speaker 2>some actors there. They might not be household names. but

0:01:13.380 --> 0:01:15.890
<v Speaker 2>they are faces that you will recognize. And as soon

0:01:15.920 --> 0:01:18.310
<v Speaker 2>as you see them, you're like, okay, we're in good

0:01:18.330 --> 0:01:22.230
<v Speaker 2>hands here. Very much so. But the concept is cool

0:01:22.290 --> 0:01:26.170
<v Speaker 2>because in this one, very much I think like some

0:01:26.190 --> 0:01:29.110
<v Speaker 2>of the other sci-fi movies we've highlighted, Significant Other, it

0:01:29.170 --> 0:01:32.300
<v Speaker 2>starts out in one genre where you think It's going

0:01:32.340 --> 0:01:34.580
<v Speaker 2>to be, okay, we've got a bunch of kids, a

0:01:34.640 --> 0:01:40.590
<v Speaker 2>reunion in a house set in a rural area, in

0:01:40.670 --> 0:01:43.730
<v Speaker 2>an isolated area. What could possibly go wrong?

0:01:43.750 --> 0:01:48.530
<v Speaker 3>Party for the weekend, drinking and drugs. Yes. Reunion, some tension. Yes.

0:01:48.590 --> 0:01:52.360
<v Speaker 2>It's actually a pre-wedding reunion. And so, yes, there's some

0:01:52.720 --> 0:01:56.140
<v Speaker 2>backstories that you have to unravel why there are certain

0:01:56.480 --> 0:01:59.930
<v Speaker 2>tensions between different people. Right. It starts out like this,

0:01:59.970 --> 0:02:02.510
<v Speaker 2>but then it takes a complete left turn, and it

0:02:02.550 --> 0:02:06.190
<v Speaker 2>goes on a wild roller coaster of a ride. Would

0:02:06.230 --> 0:02:07.210
<v Speaker 2>you describe it like that?

0:02:07.230 --> 0:02:11.810
<v Speaker 3>You said it, Robe.

0:02:11.830 --> 0:02:15.670
<v Speaker 1>There's one moment that happens in the movie that they

0:02:16.570 --> 0:02:19.580
<v Speaker 1>and you are all confused about what to.

0:02:20.120 --> 0:02:20.720
<v Speaker 3>Oh, wait a minute.

0:02:21.460 --> 0:02:26.060
<v Speaker 1>It's a mind-blowing scenario that takes place, and that's the twist,

0:02:26.540 --> 0:02:27.919
<v Speaker 1>and it is such a good time.

0:02:28.100 --> 0:02:30.470
<v Speaker 2>Yes, because you end up having to try and figure

0:02:30.530 --> 0:02:33.070
<v Speaker 2>things out for the rest of the movie. You're constantly

0:02:33.090 --> 0:02:35.769
<v Speaker 2>trying to figure out what's going on. So here's the

0:02:35.850 --> 0:02:42.950
<v Speaker 2>official synopsis of It's What's Inside. A pre-wedding reunion descends

0:02:43.110 --> 0:02:46.890
<v Speaker 2>into a psychological nightmare for a group of college friends

0:02:47.290 --> 0:02:52.650
<v Speaker 2>when a surprise guest arrives with a mysterious suitcase. It

0:02:52.730 --> 0:02:53.310
<v Speaker 2>is funny, though.

0:02:53.330 --> 0:02:55.030
<v Speaker 3>That's all they tell you? That's all it says.

0:02:55.270 --> 0:02:58.680
<v Speaker 2>And the fun thing is, you know the... the movies,

0:02:58.720 --> 0:03:01.100
<v Speaker 2>the genre, the sub-genre of horror movies where you've got

0:03:01.120 --> 0:03:03.980
<v Speaker 2>a group of friends in a house. Then you've got

0:03:04.120 --> 0:03:07.840
<v Speaker 2>another genre of horror movies where there's a box and

0:03:07.870 --> 0:03:09.929
<v Speaker 2>you open the box or there's a game, there's a

0:03:09.950 --> 0:03:14.310
<v Speaker 2>Ouija board, there's something. This has both of those elements

0:03:14.910 --> 0:03:17.670
<v Speaker 2>in it and then you add the sci-fi part of

0:03:17.750 --> 0:03:20.110
<v Speaker 2>it and it just is a unique experience.

0:03:20.169 --> 0:03:22.859
<v Speaker 3>I didn't really put it together.

0:03:22.880 --> 0:03:25.839
<v Speaker 1>I think that's a pretty good comparison when you Ouija

0:03:25.980 --> 0:03:28.400
<v Speaker 1>is the one you think of, but how many scenarios?

0:03:28.860 --> 0:03:31.120
<v Speaker 1>We're going to try some. Let's do a seance. Let's

0:03:31.580 --> 0:03:34.019
<v Speaker 1>play some game or let's try to summon a spirit

0:03:34.060 --> 0:03:39.060
<v Speaker 1>or whatever. Yes, it's that thing where everybody's trying something

0:03:39.080 --> 0:03:40.840
<v Speaker 1>and shit goes awry.

0:03:41.380 --> 0:03:44.540
<v Speaker 2>Exactly. So the cast, again, I don't think you'll know

0:03:44.580 --> 0:03:47.590
<v Speaker 2>her name. Maybe you will. Brittany O'Grady is... But if

0:03:47.630 --> 0:03:51.010
<v Speaker 2>you want to immediately say, I know her. She was

0:03:51.050 --> 0:03:54.170
<v Speaker 2>in White Lotus and she played opposite Sidney Sweeney. She

0:03:54.190 --> 0:03:57.610
<v Speaker 2>was Sidney Sweeney's best friend in White Lotus. And as

0:03:57.670 --> 0:03:59.410
<v Speaker 2>soon as you see her face, you'll be like, oh,

0:03:59.570 --> 0:04:03.340
<v Speaker 2>of course, her. I love her. She's also in Jumanji,

0:04:03.900 --> 0:04:06.600
<v Speaker 2>Open World. She was in Jumanji. 2026, the new one.

0:04:06.640 --> 0:04:10.300
<v Speaker 2>She was in House of Dynamite, which is also a

0:04:10.340 --> 0:04:14.030
<v Speaker 2>great one. And Black Christmas, which we love as well.

0:04:14.060 --> 0:04:18.729
<v Speaker 2>So she is Yes, she is. I think in the

0:04:18.770 --> 0:04:20.470
<v Speaker 2>last couple of years, you've seen a lot of her

0:04:20.710 --> 0:04:23.240
<v Speaker 2>House of Dynamite. You remember that that was with Catherine Bigelow.

0:04:23.810 --> 0:04:28.979
<v Speaker 2>It was a big Netflix movie where you had kind

0:04:29.000 --> 0:04:30.539
<v Speaker 2>of the end of days and you saw it from

0:04:30.680 --> 0:04:33.060
<v Speaker 2>all those different points of view about what was happening

0:04:33.080 --> 0:04:33.520
<v Speaker 2>at the end.

0:04:34.000 --> 0:04:36.020
<v Speaker 3>Was this the one Idris Elba was in? Yes. He

0:04:36.040 --> 0:04:37.539
<v Speaker 3>played the president or something, right?

0:04:37.620 --> 0:04:39.300
<v Speaker 2>Idris Elba was in it. Yes, exactly.

0:04:39.360 --> 0:04:39.680
<v Speaker 3>That one.

0:04:39.700 --> 0:04:43.029
<v Speaker 2>So she was in that. Anyway, guaranteed, I feel like

0:04:43.190 --> 0:04:46.430
<v Speaker 2>everyone knows her face. Oh, yeah. And then there was

0:04:46.450 --> 0:04:49.310
<v Speaker 2>another guy, James Morosini, who was a familiar face. There's

0:04:49.330 --> 0:04:52.130
<v Speaker 2>a bunch of characters here. All of them, I think,

0:04:52.230 --> 0:04:54.970
<v Speaker 2>very well acted. None of them necessarily household names, but

0:04:55.150 --> 0:04:57.950
<v Speaker 2>all of them deliver a fantastic performance.

0:04:58.010 --> 0:05:01.589
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, top to bottom. There's... You got some annoying ones.

0:05:01.610 --> 0:05:05.610
<v Speaker 1>You got the annoying influencer in there. She's familiar, too,

0:05:05.650 --> 0:05:07.050
<v Speaker 1>from something. I can't remember her.

0:05:07.089 --> 0:05:08.970
<v Speaker 2>They all have credits.

0:05:08.990 --> 0:05:09.730
<v Speaker 3>They have good credits.

0:05:09.930 --> 0:05:12.350
<v Speaker 2>Of course I know who that is. The director, I

0:05:12.370 --> 0:05:15.469
<v Speaker 2>thought this was so interesting in researching this movie. His

0:05:15.510 --> 0:05:18.870
<v Speaker 2>name is Greg Jarden, and this is his directorial debut.

0:05:19.029 --> 0:05:24.600
<v Speaker 2>I was so impressed. So, yes, they call it a

0:05:24.620 --> 0:05:29.250
<v Speaker 2>sci-fi comedy horror thriller. That's the genre they give it.

0:05:30.130 --> 0:05:32.890
<v Speaker 2>But they say it premiered at Sundance and then launched

0:05:32.950 --> 0:05:37.560
<v Speaker 2>globally on Netflix. So it was a fun film. I

0:05:37.600 --> 0:05:40.360
<v Speaker 2>was surprised it actually runs longer than I thought it did,

0:05:40.440 --> 0:05:43.880
<v Speaker 2>an hour 44. That's a little longer than we usually

0:05:44.000 --> 0:05:45.320
<v Speaker 2>have in our horror movies.

0:05:45.460 --> 0:05:47.020
<v Speaker 3>There's a lot to keep up with, a lot to

0:05:47.050 --> 0:05:48.390
<v Speaker 3>keep straight in this movie, actually.

0:05:48.710 --> 0:05:52.610
<v Speaker 2>Definitely. And look, Rotten Tomatoes, everybody liked it. The critics

0:05:52.650 --> 0:05:57.650
<v Speaker 2>gave it 80%. What? Yep. and the audience gave it 70%,

0:05:57.650 --> 0:06:00.310
<v Speaker 2>which I thought was pretty good because, yes, this is

0:06:00.330 --> 0:06:02.610
<v Speaker 2>a movie you have to pay close attention to. If

0:06:02.650 --> 0:06:05.270
<v Speaker 2>you think you're gonna be drifting off or you're a

0:06:05.290 --> 0:06:08.410
<v Speaker 2>little tired, probably shouldn't put this one on. It isn't

0:06:08.470 --> 0:06:13.380
<v Speaker 2>this formulaic slasher film. This is actually a thought-provoking, and

0:06:13.420 --> 0:06:16.380
<v Speaker 2>you really do have to go, wait, what's happening in

0:06:16.420 --> 0:06:19.200
<v Speaker 2>this scene And I can't say what I really want

0:06:19.220 --> 0:06:21.280
<v Speaker 2>to say because it would give away the twist, but

0:06:21.320 --> 0:06:23.820
<v Speaker 2>there is a big, big, big plot twist, and it

0:06:23.880 --> 0:06:27.000
<v Speaker 2>requires you to pay very close attention to what's going

0:06:27.060 --> 0:06:27.640
<v Speaker 2>on in the screen.

0:06:36.690 --> 0:06:37.890
<v Speaker 3>You know, I give them credit.

0:06:38.310 --> 0:06:40.839
<v Speaker 1>They do a good job of helping you keep up,

0:06:41.000 --> 0:06:44.540
<v Speaker 1>and it's necessary. So there's a bunch of moving, there's

0:06:44.560 --> 0:06:46.880
<v Speaker 1>a lot of moving parts in this movie and they do,

0:06:47.360 --> 0:06:49.020
<v Speaker 1>I'd give them credit because it is hard to keep

0:06:49.080 --> 0:06:51.290
<v Speaker 1>up with and the way they chose to do it,

0:06:51.320 --> 0:06:53.690
<v Speaker 1>how they, it's, this is a good flick.

0:06:54.260 --> 0:06:57.250
<v Speaker 2>It's very good. The critic consensus, and again, it landed

0:06:57.290 --> 0:07:01.990
<v Speaker 2>at 80% on Rotten Tomatoes, cleverly constructed and leaping off

0:07:02.050 --> 0:07:06.469
<v Speaker 2>the screen with stylistic verve. It's what's inside centers around

0:07:06.510 --> 0:07:09.670
<v Speaker 2>a party from hell and that audiences can enjoy from

0:07:09.730 --> 0:07:12.310
<v Speaker 2>a safe remove. I thought that was funny because, yes,

0:07:12.390 --> 0:07:15.600
<v Speaker 2>it's almost like the way they shoot this, and it's

0:07:15.700 --> 0:07:18.940
<v Speaker 2>dizzying sometimes. Remember some of the camera work is really

0:07:19.000 --> 0:07:22.300
<v Speaker 2>crazy and creative, but you actually feel like you're in

0:07:22.340 --> 0:07:25.720
<v Speaker 2>the room with them, and yet you know, thank God,

0:07:25.780 --> 0:07:28.880
<v Speaker 2>you don't actually have to participate in what they're actually

0:07:29.260 --> 0:07:33.580
<v Speaker 2>doing because it does create some thought-provoking questions.

0:07:33.620 --> 0:07:35.130
<v Speaker 3>I think this is a fun movie to watch at

0:07:35.150 --> 0:07:35.370
<v Speaker 3>a party.

0:07:38.970 --> 0:07:42.230
<v Speaker 1>Oh, I'm telling you could do 10, 15 plus watching

0:07:42.270 --> 0:07:42.790
<v Speaker 1>this movie.

0:07:42.850 --> 0:07:45.770
<v Speaker 3>Yes, certainly. You need six probably. This is a good one.

0:07:45.910 --> 0:07:48.670
<v Speaker 2>Because there were so many what if scenarios and you

0:07:48.710 --> 0:07:52.150
<v Speaker 2>want to ask yourself, what would I do and what

0:07:52.170 --> 0:07:55.960
<v Speaker 2>would it mean in this group if we also participated

0:07:56.060 --> 0:08:01.520
<v Speaker 2>in this same thing? Yes, this is a very thought-provoking,

0:08:01.780 --> 0:08:05.360
<v Speaker 2>conversation-starting movie that's fun in a group, I think.

0:08:05.380 --> 0:08:07.170
<v Speaker 3>Possibly fight-inducing.

0:08:08.170 --> 0:08:08.930
<v Speaker 2>Possibly.

0:08:09.050 --> 0:08:12.650
<v Speaker 3>Because it is. It explores every friend group.

0:08:12.690 --> 0:08:15.170
<v Speaker 1>If you've got six, seven, eight people who've been together

0:08:15.190 --> 0:08:18.330
<v Speaker 1>since college, there are some weird dynamics. Somebody used to

0:08:18.390 --> 0:08:21.310
<v Speaker 1>date somebody. Somebody was sweet on somebody. Somebody was jealous

0:08:21.350 --> 0:08:23.410
<v Speaker 1>of somebody. All that stuff plays out.

0:08:23.550 --> 0:08:26.490
<v Speaker 2>It all comes out. Ding, ding, ding, ding, ding. I

0:08:26.690 --> 0:08:29.390
<v Speaker 2>plucked a couple of the critics' reviews that I thought

0:08:29.430 --> 0:08:33.270
<v Speaker 2>were really perfect. So one of them reads, It's what's

0:08:33.309 --> 0:08:36.460
<v Speaker 2>inside is a fun and twisty ride that always has

0:08:36.520 --> 0:08:39.819
<v Speaker 2>a few cards hidden up its sleeves. I'm serious when

0:08:39.860 --> 0:08:42.199
<v Speaker 2>I say this is one of the best things I

0:08:42.220 --> 0:08:45.559
<v Speaker 2>have found on Netflix in months. That was a recent

0:08:46.080 --> 0:08:49.179
<v Speaker 2>critical review. And then another one, Perfect for a Friday

0:08:49.280 --> 0:08:54.140
<v Speaker 2>or Saturday night viewing with friends. This face-off meets Bodies, Bodies,

0:08:54.220 --> 0:09:00.079
<v Speaker 2>Bodies by way of Brandon Cronenberg's Possessor offers thought-provoking, discussion-inducing

0:09:00.160 --> 0:09:04.350
<v Speaker 2>entertainment that also doesn't stint on thrills. So yeah, you

0:09:04.370 --> 0:09:07.830
<v Speaker 2>still get the thrills. You still get a little shock

0:09:07.890 --> 0:09:11.510
<v Speaker 2>and jump scares. And you're also just like trying to

0:09:11.570 --> 0:09:16.270
<v Speaker 2>follow this mind-bending, constantly shifting, changing narrative.

0:09:16.290 --> 0:09:19.490
<v Speaker 3>It's so... Good. The scenario they come up with. The

0:09:19.550 --> 0:09:23.490
<v Speaker 3>twist is twisted. Yes.

0:09:23.790 --> 0:09:27.180
<v Speaker 2>And I don't think, like, you're constantly trying to predict...

0:09:27.300 --> 0:09:30.540
<v Speaker 2>How is this going to end? How are they going

0:09:30.600 --> 0:09:35.140
<v Speaker 2>to wrap this up? It is fun to see how

0:09:35.220 --> 0:09:37.800
<v Speaker 2>the tale evolves. So when we come back, we're going

0:09:37.830 --> 0:09:41.030
<v Speaker 2>to tell you what the audience had to say. We're

0:09:41.050 --> 0:09:43.270
<v Speaker 2>going to tell you where you can watch it and, yes,

0:09:43.429 --> 0:09:47.390
<v Speaker 2>why this is, in our opinions, a guaranteed, the number

0:09:47.550 --> 0:10:00.760
<v Speaker 2>one guaranteed Halloween horror sci-fi hit. Welcome back. everyone, to

0:10:00.880 --> 0:10:04.590
<v Speaker 2>Amy and TJ. We are at our number one recommendation

0:10:04.650 --> 0:10:09.600
<v Speaker 2>for sci-fi horror on this Saturday before Halloween, the last

0:10:09.800 --> 0:10:15.460
<v Speaker 2>Saturday before Halloween. It's What's Inside. It is a fabulous, fun,

0:10:16.220 --> 0:10:20.760
<v Speaker 2>mind-bending flick that will keep you engaged and entertained the

0:10:20.860 --> 0:10:25.520
<v Speaker 2>entire time. It is on Netflix, so pretty much who

0:10:25.570 --> 0:10:28.050
<v Speaker 2>doesn't have Netflix these days? This is going to be

0:10:28.150 --> 0:10:30.510
<v Speaker 2>an easy one to find, and it will be free

0:10:30.550 --> 0:10:33.130
<v Speaker 2>as long as you've got that service. I loved some

0:10:33.170 --> 0:10:35.449
<v Speaker 2>of these audience reviews I found. It got 70% in

0:10:35.570 --> 0:10:41.310
<v Speaker 2>Rotten Tomatoes. Krista S. said this, Honestly, this movie was

0:10:41.350 --> 0:10:43.850
<v Speaker 2>so confusing, but I love me a good confusing movie.

0:10:43.890 --> 0:10:46.850
<v Speaker 2>The ending, bro, I was so disappointed because I was like,

0:10:46.910 --> 0:10:50.150
<v Speaker 2>what you mean the end? I wanted more. I thought

0:10:50.170 --> 0:10:51.819
<v Speaker 2>that was good. You didn't want it to end.

0:10:53.100 --> 0:10:57.140
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and I'm thinking back to the, yeah, I'm trying

0:10:57.160 --> 0:11:00.000
<v Speaker 1>to remember how I felt. If I felt completely satiated

0:11:00.040 --> 0:11:01.040
<v Speaker 1>by the ending of this movie.

0:11:02.179 --> 0:11:04.590
<v Speaker 2>Well, look, I think people were hoping that this could

0:11:04.640 --> 0:11:09.700
<v Speaker 2>continue because you weren't really sure. Yes, well. There are

0:11:09.760 --> 0:11:15.620
<v Speaker 2>concepts of justice and what's right, what's wrong. What would

0:11:15.700 --> 0:11:19.360
<v Speaker 2>you do in this scenario? There is a First, there's

0:11:19.390 --> 0:11:22.280
<v Speaker 2>the initial twist. Then there's a twist within the twist.

0:11:22.620 --> 0:11:24.980
<v Speaker 2>And then there's a final twist. It's so good. But

0:11:25.020 --> 0:11:27.240
<v Speaker 2>Krista S. did give it five stars. Logan D. gave

0:11:27.280 --> 0:11:30.350
<v Speaker 2>it four stars and said, This is a hidden gem

0:11:30.380 --> 0:11:45.900
<v Speaker 2>featuring rapid-fire pacing. and an impressive ensemble cast of mostly unknowns.

0:11:46.280 --> 0:11:49.700
<v Speaker 2>The premise is clever, and the neon-soaked images will either

0:11:49.780 --> 0:11:52.679
<v Speaker 2>appeal or not. It does lack the depth I would

0:11:52.700 --> 0:11:54.500
<v Speaker 2>have liked in a film such as this, but still

0:11:54.540 --> 0:11:57.059
<v Speaker 2>was a worthy view. I was like, he gave it

0:11:57.100 --> 0:11:59.420
<v Speaker 2>four stars because it didn't have depth. I thought it

0:11:59.470 --> 0:12:03.209
<v Speaker 2>had depth. Great depth. I was totally enthralled in the

0:12:03.250 --> 0:12:05.650
<v Speaker 2>storylines and I didn't think it was some vapid. Yes,

0:12:05.670 --> 0:12:09.160
<v Speaker 2>there were some funny comedic moments while they had some

0:12:09.260 --> 0:12:12.339
<v Speaker 2>stereotypical characters that were a part of the ensemble cast.

0:12:12.360 --> 0:12:15.260
<v Speaker 2>But yeah, that's what a good horror movie typically has. Right.

0:12:15.590 --> 0:12:19.770
<v Speaker 2>We need some generalism. like generalized characters that we expect

0:12:20.210 --> 0:12:22.309
<v Speaker 2>to show up in horror movies.

0:12:22.570 --> 0:12:25.730
<v Speaker 1>At 70%, what did you see as a general consensus

0:12:25.770 --> 0:12:27.579
<v Speaker 1>of what issue people took with it?

0:12:27.780 --> 0:12:30.100
<v Speaker 2>I think most people just thought it was confusing. They

0:12:30.760 --> 0:12:33.640
<v Speaker 2>said that it was hard to pay attention to, and

0:12:33.660 --> 0:12:36.319
<v Speaker 2>I just didn't find it to be that case at all.

0:12:36.380 --> 0:12:38.189
<v Speaker 2>But that was like, if there was a complaint, it

0:12:38.210 --> 0:12:41.190
<v Speaker 2>was just that it was almost too confusing.

0:12:41.690 --> 0:12:43.729
<v Speaker 3>That was the brilliance. That was the whole point. That's

0:12:43.770 --> 0:12:46.530
<v Speaker 3>the centerpiece of the movie. Exactly.

0:12:46.650 --> 0:12:49.850
<v Speaker 2>I think some people, it's funny, I do find what

0:12:49.890 --> 0:12:53.240
<v Speaker 2>they complain about sometimes was the whole point of the movie,

0:12:53.510 --> 0:12:57.239
<v Speaker 2>which I think sometimes just speaks once again to expectations.

0:12:57.300 --> 0:12:59.780
<v Speaker 2>But this is why we've had so much fun this

0:12:59.860 --> 0:13:03.820
<v Speaker 2>month going through all of these sub-genres of horror movies

0:13:03.860 --> 0:13:08.560
<v Speaker 2>because there is no, like, yes, we've got a stereotypical...

0:13:09.429 --> 0:13:11.559
<v Speaker 2>plot that you expect a horror movie to go through,

0:13:11.600 --> 0:13:14.360
<v Speaker 2>just like a rom-com. Yes, you've got the false ending,

0:13:14.400 --> 0:13:17.559
<v Speaker 2>you've got the final girl, all of that, typically. But

0:13:17.840 --> 0:13:21.200
<v Speaker 2>so many sub-genres have popped up that are fun. And

0:13:21.220 --> 0:13:23.650
<v Speaker 2>the sci-fi one, I think, is really the one that

0:13:24.470 --> 0:13:27.069
<v Speaker 2>I like it a lot because those are the types

0:13:27.110 --> 0:13:30.870
<v Speaker 2>of movies where you get... something you weren't expecting. There's

0:13:30.929 --> 0:13:34.750
<v Speaker 2>some left turn that just comes out of nowhere. And

0:13:34.910 --> 0:13:38.270
<v Speaker 2>with sci-fi, you can explain it in that way. Like, ooh,

0:13:38.360 --> 0:13:41.440
<v Speaker 2>you didn't know because who would have thunk it? Because

0:13:41.480 --> 0:13:44.920
<v Speaker 2>it is something that is original. And that's what makes

0:13:44.960 --> 0:13:45.500
<v Speaker 2>this so cool.

0:13:45.620 --> 0:13:48.540
<v Speaker 1>And in sci-fi, oftentimes we do think of aliens or

0:13:48.580 --> 0:13:49.859
<v Speaker 1>space or something like that.

0:13:50.020 --> 0:13:56.010
<v Speaker 3>Science fiction. This is science. It is fiction. But it's

0:13:56.250 --> 0:13:57.969
<v Speaker 3>of this earth. if you will.

0:13:57.990 --> 0:13:59.390
<v Speaker 1>Is that fair to say? I'm not giving away too

0:13:59.410 --> 0:14:02.750
<v Speaker 1>much there. It's not some far-fetched alien type movie.

0:14:02.890 --> 0:14:06.790
<v Speaker 2>I actually think anyone who's kind of into where we

0:14:06.910 --> 0:14:10.630
<v Speaker 2>are now in society with our advancements in technology, even like, yes,

0:14:10.670 --> 0:14:13.960
<v Speaker 2>let's think artificial intelligence or that kind of a thing

0:14:14.000 --> 0:14:17.680
<v Speaker 2>where you're able to do things you wouldn't have thought

0:14:17.740 --> 0:14:22.380
<v Speaker 2>possible before, but it is... That's what's cool about this movie. The...

0:14:22.960 --> 0:14:25.640
<v Speaker 2>Science fiction, part of it, the technology that is brought

0:14:25.840 --> 0:14:31.520
<v Speaker 2>into this plot is something that, yes, is far-fetched today,

0:14:31.920 --> 0:14:35.330
<v Speaker 2>but could it be possible 10 years from now, 20

0:14:35.330 --> 0:14:36.770
<v Speaker 2>years from now, 30 years from now?

0:14:36.930 --> 0:14:38.930
<v Speaker 3>In that context, this movie is terrifying.

0:14:39.610 --> 0:14:42.630
<v Speaker 1>Because all the AI stuff now, really, babe, this doesn't

0:14:42.770 --> 0:14:45.460
<v Speaker 1>seem as far-fetched as it once did.

0:14:46.130 --> 0:14:48.330
<v Speaker 2>That's a good point. And so maybe that's why, yes,

0:14:48.490 --> 0:14:51.450
<v Speaker 2>it is a horror movie. But we loved it. We

0:14:51.490 --> 0:14:55.890
<v Speaker 2>really think this is a guaranteed hit. Get a group together,

0:14:55.910 --> 0:14:58.310
<v Speaker 2>a pre-Halloween party, even if you had it on during

0:14:58.350 --> 0:15:00.470
<v Speaker 2>Halloween in the days leading up to it. This is

0:15:00.590 --> 0:15:03.530
<v Speaker 2>totally fun. We'll get you in the spirit. It kept

0:15:03.590 --> 0:15:08.290
<v Speaker 2>us guessing. A extremely unique movie. With so many fun

0:15:08.600 --> 0:15:10.700
<v Speaker 2>twists and turns, and yes, at the end of the day,

0:15:11.240 --> 0:15:14.979
<v Speaker 2>it is fun. And we love when you get to

0:15:15.020 --> 0:15:18.260
<v Speaker 2>start asking yourself, what would I do? If that were me,

0:15:18.730 --> 0:15:22.410
<v Speaker 2>how would I handle it? And that is exactly what

0:15:22.450 --> 0:15:25.510
<v Speaker 2>this movie is. So please, everyone, enjoy our number one

0:15:25.550 --> 0:15:31.060
<v Speaker 2>pick for our Saturday sci-fi horror movie, It's What's Inside.

0:15:31.100 --> 0:15:33.420
<v Speaker 2>And with that, everyone, we always appreciate you listening to us.

0:15:33.840 --> 0:15:35.560
<v Speaker 2>Check out our feed tomorrow. We're going to have a

0:15:35.600 --> 0:15:39.370
<v Speaker 2>whole other sub-genre of horror movies for you. I'm Amy Robach,

0:15:39.450 --> 0:15:41.390
<v Speaker 2>alongside TJ Holmes. We'll talk soon.