WEBVTT - Elif Shafak's "Multiple Belongings" 

0:00:15.356 --> 0:00:22.716
<v Speaker 1>Pushkin from Pushkin Industries. This is Deep Background, the show

0:00:22.716 --> 0:00:25.876
<v Speaker 1>where we explore the stories behind the stories in the news.

0:00:26.316 --> 0:00:30.116
<v Speaker 1>I'm Noah Feldman. Today we speak to a globally best

0:00:30.156 --> 0:00:33.916
<v Speaker 1>selling novelist who has a special knack for angering the

0:00:33.956 --> 0:00:38.036
<v Speaker 1>Turkish government. Her name is Elif Shafak. In two thousand

0:00:38.036 --> 0:00:40.076
<v Speaker 1>and six, at the height of her fame, she was

0:00:40.196 --> 0:00:43.596
<v Speaker 1>charged with insulting Turkishness because one of the characters in

0:00:43.636 --> 0:00:46.796
<v Speaker 1>her novel The Bastard of Istanbul, referred to the murder

0:00:46.836 --> 0:00:50.356
<v Speaker 1>of Armenians during World War One as a genocide. That

0:00:50.436 --> 0:00:55.556
<v Speaker 1>case was eventually dismissed, but last year Turkish authorities began

0:00:55.636 --> 0:00:58.156
<v Speaker 1>a new investigation into her past work for what they

0:00:58.156 --> 0:01:02.196
<v Speaker 1>called quote crimes of obscenity. One thing that the Turkish

0:01:02.196 --> 0:01:04.636
<v Speaker 1>authorities have not been able to do, however, is to

0:01:04.716 --> 0:01:07.876
<v Speaker 1>keep Turkish readers and readers all over the world from

0:01:07.956 --> 0:01:11.716
<v Speaker 1>devouring Elif's books. The government also hasn't been able to

0:01:11.756 --> 0:01:14.476
<v Speaker 1>keep critics around the world from praising Eliaf's books either.

0:01:15.316 --> 0:01:18.356
<v Speaker 1>Her most recent novel, Ten Minutes thirty eight Seconds in

0:01:18.356 --> 0:01:22.396
<v Speaker 1>This Strange World was shortlisted for the twenty nineteen Booker Prize.

0:01:23.036 --> 0:01:26.036
<v Speaker 1>The novel is about a prostitute named to Quila Leila,

0:01:26.556 --> 0:01:29.596
<v Speaker 1>and it begins at the end of her story with

0:01:29.636 --> 0:01:33.116
<v Speaker 1>her body found in a dumpster. A Leif joined me

0:01:33.156 --> 0:01:35.916
<v Speaker 1>from London, where she now lives, to talk to me

0:01:35.996 --> 0:01:40.076
<v Speaker 1>about that new book and much more. Let me begin

0:01:40.116 --> 0:01:44.756
<v Speaker 1>by asking a little bit about your process of writing.

0:01:44.916 --> 0:01:48.116
<v Speaker 1>This is your eleventh novel, and you did something rather

0:01:48.196 --> 0:01:51.556
<v Speaker 1>extraordinary and among writers, which is that you wrote many

0:01:51.596 --> 0:01:55.196
<v Speaker 1>of your first novels in Turkish, your first language, and

0:01:55.276 --> 0:01:58.716
<v Speaker 1>then you switched to writing in English. And as I

0:01:58.756 --> 0:02:00.516
<v Speaker 1>was thinking about it, I thought, that's even harder than

0:02:00.556 --> 0:02:03.476
<v Speaker 1>what Joseph Conrad did, because he, of course spoke Polish

0:02:03.476 --> 0:02:04.796
<v Speaker 1>as his first language, and then he started but when

0:02:04.796 --> 0:02:07.076
<v Speaker 1>he started writing novels, he started writting them in English.

0:02:07.236 --> 0:02:10.716
<v Speaker 1>What you have done is more like what Nabokov did,

0:02:10.996 --> 0:02:14.276
<v Speaker 1>writing many of his novels first in Russian and then

0:02:14.356 --> 0:02:18.796
<v Speaker 1>turning to writing novels in English. What moved you to

0:02:18.836 --> 0:02:20.676
<v Speaker 1>make that transition? And then I'd love to hear about

0:02:20.676 --> 0:02:23.116
<v Speaker 1>some of the challenges and gifts that derive from that.

0:02:24.076 --> 0:02:27.396
<v Speaker 1>I appreciate it. It is a challenge, and the master

0:02:27.516 --> 0:02:29.956
<v Speaker 1>want to be honest, because I did not grow up

0:02:29.996 --> 0:02:34.276
<v Speaker 1>in a bilingual environment, and I started learning English at

0:02:34.316 --> 0:02:38.996
<v Speaker 1>the age of ten in Spain in Madrid, so at

0:02:38.996 --> 0:02:42.236
<v Speaker 1>the time Spanish was my second language and English became

0:02:42.316 --> 0:02:45.836
<v Speaker 1>my third. Turkish is my mother tongue, and of course,

0:02:45.956 --> 0:02:48.996
<v Speaker 1>to me, English is an acquired language, which means I'm

0:02:49.036 --> 0:02:53.276
<v Speaker 1>an outsider in this language, and I'm an immigrant, you know,

0:02:53.356 --> 0:02:57.156
<v Speaker 1>a latecomer. And I think, like all immigrants know, there's

0:02:57.196 --> 0:03:01.516
<v Speaker 1>always a gap between the mind and the tongue. When

0:03:01.516 --> 0:03:04.756
<v Speaker 1>you're an immigrant, you always try to say more, but

0:03:04.876 --> 0:03:07.036
<v Speaker 1>in a way you end up saying less. Maybe you

0:03:07.036 --> 0:03:09.876
<v Speaker 1>want to crack better jokes, but there's always is a gap.

0:03:10.396 --> 0:03:13.796
<v Speaker 1>And I think that gap can be quite intimidating. But

0:03:13.876 --> 0:03:16.476
<v Speaker 1>if we learn not to be intimidated by that, I

0:03:16.516 --> 0:03:20.036
<v Speaker 1>think it can also be very inspiring. In a nutshell,

0:03:20.076 --> 0:03:24.636
<v Speaker 1>I think I'm someone who loves languages plural. I love letters.

0:03:25.036 --> 0:03:27.796
<v Speaker 1>To me, it's almost magical, the very fact that with

0:03:27.836 --> 0:03:31.796
<v Speaker 1>a very limited number of letters we can create endless meanings.

0:03:32.236 --> 0:03:35.396
<v Speaker 1>I love that. I adore that I wrote my earlier

0:03:35.436 --> 0:03:38.636
<v Speaker 1>novels all in Turkish first, and then about fifteen years

0:03:38.636 --> 0:03:42.396
<v Speaker 1>ago now I switched to writing in English first, and

0:03:42.516 --> 0:03:45.836
<v Speaker 1>at the time in Turkey there was a big backlash.

0:03:46.236 --> 0:03:50.236
<v Speaker 1>People criticize me a lot, especially nationalists, saying she now

0:03:50.396 --> 0:03:54.076
<v Speaker 1>cannot be a Turkish author because you know, they accuse

0:03:54.156 --> 0:03:57.516
<v Speaker 1>me of practically abundaning my mother tongue. And I think

0:03:57.516 --> 0:04:00.916
<v Speaker 1>that's one of the many problems with nationalism. It's always

0:04:00.916 --> 0:04:04.196
<v Speaker 1>an either or thing for them, Whereas I believe you

0:04:04.276 --> 0:04:07.036
<v Speaker 1>can if you can dream in more than one language,

0:04:07.116 --> 0:04:10.156
<v Speaker 1>you can write fiction more than one language. So all

0:04:10.196 --> 0:04:12.956
<v Speaker 1>I can say over the years is that I found

0:04:13.716 --> 0:04:18.236
<v Speaker 1>the possibility of writing in another language freeing. To me.

0:04:18.276 --> 0:04:22.076
<v Speaker 1>It's freedom, and I needed that. Writing in Turkish can

0:04:22.116 --> 0:04:25.516
<v Speaker 1>be quite heavy, and I needed a bit of cognitive distance.

0:04:25.836 --> 0:04:29.116
<v Speaker 1>Writing in English gave me that sense of freedom overall.

0:04:29.396 --> 0:04:34.196
<v Speaker 1>If my writing has melancholy, sadness, longing, and sorrow, I

0:04:34.236 --> 0:04:37.156
<v Speaker 1>find these things much easier to express in Turkish. But

0:04:37.236 --> 0:04:40.716
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to humor and irony and maybe satire,

0:04:41.036 --> 0:04:44.756
<v Speaker 1>I find these things much easier in English. Well, this

0:04:44.876 --> 0:04:48.236
<v Speaker 1>new novel has both. It has melancholy and it has longing,

0:04:48.556 --> 0:04:51.916
<v Speaker 1>and it has humor and satire. And it strikes me

0:04:51.956 --> 0:04:54.436
<v Speaker 1>that it must have been particularly challenging to write a novel,

0:04:54.796 --> 0:04:57.556
<v Speaker 1>all of the action of which takes place in Turkey,

0:04:57.716 --> 0:05:02.036
<v Speaker 1>in Turkish, in the English language. In other words, there

0:05:02.116 --> 0:05:05.076
<v Speaker 1>must have been some degree of internal thought of translation

0:05:05.116 --> 0:05:07.756
<v Speaker 1>on your part as you imagined what your characters might

0:05:07.796 --> 0:05:10.916
<v Speaker 1>have said. Since you know the characters, presumably in your imagination,

0:05:10.956 --> 0:05:14.316
<v Speaker 1>we're saying these words originally in Turkish. All the things

0:05:14.396 --> 0:05:17.076
<v Speaker 1>I do not translate in my head, because for me,

0:05:17.236 --> 0:05:19.996
<v Speaker 1>language is a bit like a zone, you know, a

0:05:19.996 --> 0:05:23.796
<v Speaker 1>different zone space I enter in, and so when I

0:05:23.836 --> 0:05:26.596
<v Speaker 1>am in that space, I'm in that space. I do

0:05:26.716 --> 0:05:30.636
<v Speaker 1>not translate in my head, which doesn't mean I don't

0:05:30.676 --> 0:05:34.356
<v Speaker 1>make mistakes. I will always make mistakes or mispronounced words,

0:05:34.396 --> 0:05:37.156
<v Speaker 1>but I'm in that space, and to me, that's very

0:05:37.156 --> 0:05:41.476
<v Speaker 1>important to follow the flow, the rhythm of that language.

0:05:41.676 --> 0:05:44.516
<v Speaker 1>And in a way, maybe when I'm a little bit

0:05:44.556 --> 0:05:48.556
<v Speaker 1>distant from the Turkish language, maybe I can take a

0:05:48.596 --> 0:05:52.276
<v Speaker 1>closer look at my motherland. It's a bit like if

0:05:52.316 --> 0:05:54.756
<v Speaker 1>when you want to see a painting better, you don't

0:05:54.796 --> 0:05:57.316
<v Speaker 1>get nearer, you just sometimes need to take a step back.

0:05:57.756 --> 0:06:02.156
<v Speaker 1>And that space in between, that cognitive distance or linguistic distance,

0:06:02.196 --> 0:06:05.436
<v Speaker 1>if you will, I found it in a paradoxical way,

0:06:05.636 --> 0:06:09.556
<v Speaker 1>maybe it brings me closer to Turkey. In fact, I

0:06:09.556 --> 0:06:12.156
<v Speaker 1>want to ask you a little bit about national allegory.

0:06:12.756 --> 0:06:15.076
<v Speaker 1>There are moments reading the novel when I thought of,

0:06:15.756 --> 0:06:22.196
<v Speaker 1>you know, the protagonist's father's gradual move towards greater religious observance,

0:06:22.796 --> 0:06:26.916
<v Speaker 1>and the components of hypocrisy that the novel draws attention

0:06:26.916 --> 0:06:29.796
<v Speaker 1>to in that in that process where I wondered if

0:06:29.836 --> 0:06:33.716
<v Speaker 1>those could be read as engage with or in criticism

0:06:33.796 --> 0:06:36.836
<v Speaker 1>of changes and developments that have taken place in Turkey

0:06:36.836 --> 0:06:40.476
<v Speaker 1>in recent decades. I think that's correct, because what we've

0:06:40.516 --> 0:06:45.516
<v Speaker 1>seen in Turkey is a slide backwards, first a gradual one,

0:06:46.036 --> 0:06:50.036
<v Speaker 1>and then speeding up, I think, with a bewildering speed.

0:06:50.036 --> 0:06:53.796
<v Speaker 1>We've seen a decline. By that, I mean as we've

0:06:53.836 --> 0:07:01.316
<v Speaker 1>lost democracy, we've also seen a rise in nationalism, religiosity definitely,

0:07:01.436 --> 0:07:07.956
<v Speaker 1>fundamentalism of all kinds, authoritarianism certainly. But when these things happen,

0:07:08.076 --> 0:07:11.196
<v Speaker 1>I think women need to be more worried because alongside

0:07:11.196 --> 0:07:14.396
<v Speaker 1>we've seen an increase in patriarchy, we've seen an increase

0:07:14.516 --> 0:07:17.796
<v Speaker 1>in sexism, and also we've seen an increasing in homophobia

0:07:17.836 --> 0:07:20.796
<v Speaker 1>and transphobia. In my opinion, it's this is not a

0:07:20.836 --> 0:07:25.916
<v Speaker 1>coincidence because wherever we see an increasingbltranationalism. Any kind of

0:07:26.356 --> 0:07:29.756
<v Speaker 1>extremist narrative will always go hand in hand with some

0:07:29.836 --> 0:07:35.876
<v Speaker 1>kind of misogyny an intolerance towards particularly minorities. What happens

0:07:35.876 --> 0:07:40.716
<v Speaker 1>in countries where democracy is shattered to pieces is diversity

0:07:41.156 --> 0:07:45.076
<v Speaker 1>also is never appreciated. You know, I come from a

0:07:45.076 --> 0:07:49.156
<v Speaker 1>country or diversity. It has never been appreciated properly. But

0:07:49.196 --> 0:07:54.116
<v Speaker 1>we've completely lost our respect towards diversity. As a result,

0:07:54.516 --> 0:07:58.556
<v Speaker 1>the public space becomes more and more intolerant, and then

0:07:58.636 --> 0:08:02.356
<v Speaker 1>it becomes very difficult to be different. If you are

0:08:02.436 --> 0:08:05.596
<v Speaker 1>different for whatever reason. This could be the color of

0:08:05.596 --> 0:08:09.356
<v Speaker 1>your skin, how you look, it could be your sexual identity,

0:08:09.436 --> 0:08:12.476
<v Speaker 1>it could be your political views for whatever reason. If

0:08:12.516 --> 0:08:15.916
<v Speaker 1>you are deemed to be different in the eyes of

0:08:15.956 --> 0:08:18.956
<v Speaker 1>the society, than your life is going to be very difficult.

0:08:19.516 --> 0:08:23.196
<v Speaker 1>So I think it became more and more difficult to

0:08:23.236 --> 0:08:26.236
<v Speaker 1>be the other in a country like Turkey that has

0:08:26.276 --> 0:08:29.876
<v Speaker 1>been going backwards very fast. You talk a great deal

0:08:29.956 --> 0:08:32.036
<v Speaker 1>about education in the first part of the novel, because

0:08:32.036 --> 0:08:35.756
<v Speaker 1>the protagonist Tequila Leila, when she's a young girl, does

0:08:35.796 --> 0:08:38.996
<v Speaker 1>go to school, does learn to read, unlike her her

0:08:39.036 --> 0:08:43.356
<v Speaker 1>actual mother. Yet there is a moment where she rebels

0:08:43.356 --> 0:08:47.316
<v Speaker 1>against education and where she says, I don't care about it.

0:08:47.436 --> 0:08:49.356
<v Speaker 1>I'm paraphrasing, but it was something like I don't care

0:08:49.396 --> 0:08:52.036
<v Speaker 1>about all this crap and that the word jumps off

0:08:52.076 --> 0:08:55.676
<v Speaker 1>the page, and I was struck by it, and it

0:08:55.716 --> 0:08:57.996
<v Speaker 1>was a very powerful moment for me because it was

0:08:58.036 --> 0:09:00.916
<v Speaker 1>the moment when, you know, one could sense that education

0:09:00.996 --> 0:09:04.316
<v Speaker 1>would not be liberating for this character. Yes, I'm a

0:09:04.356 --> 0:09:09.436
<v Speaker 1>big believer in particularly girls education. At the same time,

0:09:09.756 --> 0:09:13.756
<v Speaker 1>I want to explore this what do we mean by education,

0:09:13.876 --> 0:09:17.796
<v Speaker 1>because sometimes education can be quite nationalistic, it can be

0:09:17.996 --> 0:09:22.156
<v Speaker 1>very religious, particularly the context that I'm describing in the novel.

0:09:22.436 --> 0:09:25.196
<v Speaker 1>She grows up in a polygamous family, so it's a

0:09:25.236 --> 0:09:28.716
<v Speaker 1>family with one father and two mothers without quite knowing

0:09:28.756 --> 0:09:32.276
<v Speaker 1>which one of these two women is her biological mother.

0:09:32.836 --> 0:09:36.196
<v Speaker 1>And the kind of education that her father is trying

0:09:36.236 --> 0:09:41.836
<v Speaker 1>to give her is extremely patriarchal and very religious. So

0:09:41.916 --> 0:09:44.276
<v Speaker 1>there's a part of her that reacts to all that

0:09:44.436 --> 0:09:48.076
<v Speaker 1>heritage and is longing for freedom. And that's not an

0:09:48.116 --> 0:09:52.196
<v Speaker 1>easy thing because it's a society that doesn't allow that

0:09:52.276 --> 0:09:56.036
<v Speaker 1>kind of behavior, particularly when you're a young girl. So

0:09:56.876 --> 0:10:00.276
<v Speaker 1>I also want to show those layers. At the end

0:10:00.276 --> 0:10:03.356
<v Speaker 1>of the day, I'm a big believer in books. Maybe

0:10:03.396 --> 0:10:08.356
<v Speaker 1>I make a distinction between information, knowledge, and wisdom, and

0:10:08.476 --> 0:10:11.476
<v Speaker 1>I think they're very different things, particularly the age we're

0:10:11.476 --> 0:10:15.716
<v Speaker 1>living in. I believe we have too much information, a

0:10:15.756 --> 0:10:19.716
<v Speaker 1>lot of information, let alone misinformation, and that's an obstacle

0:10:19.796 --> 0:10:23.876
<v Speaker 1>in front of knowledge because knowledge requires us to slow down,

0:10:24.436 --> 0:10:29.596
<v Speaker 1>and knowledge requires in depth analysis. It requires books, you know.

0:10:29.956 --> 0:10:32.396
<v Speaker 1>And then there's wisdom, which is something else wholl together,

0:10:32.676 --> 0:10:35.396
<v Speaker 1>and I believe that requires bringing the mind and the

0:10:35.476 --> 0:10:40.356
<v Speaker 1>heart together. It requires empathy, emotional intelligence, and therefore it

0:10:40.476 --> 0:10:43.516
<v Speaker 1>requires stories. So one of the questions that I ask

0:10:43.636 --> 0:10:47.156
<v Speaker 1>myself is how can we change the ratio? Because we

0:10:47.276 --> 0:10:50.196
<v Speaker 1>have too much information in this stage, less knowledge, and

0:10:50.276 --> 0:10:53.556
<v Speaker 1>even less wisdom. How can we change that and have

0:10:54.076 --> 0:10:58.156
<v Speaker 1>aim for less information, more knowledge, and much more wisdom.

0:10:58.716 --> 0:11:02.596
<v Speaker 1>And that's especially challenging because sometimes the flow of information

0:11:03.156 --> 0:11:06.396
<v Speaker 1>seems as though it will envelop us, and yet if

0:11:06.436 --> 0:11:10.676
<v Speaker 1>we don't follow it, there's the possibility of losing the

0:11:10.756 --> 0:11:13.796
<v Speaker 1>thread I mean, and therefore being unable to make the

0:11:13.876 --> 0:11:16.516
<v Speaker 1>kinds of judgments that would be would be required. I mean,

0:11:16.796 --> 0:11:20.036
<v Speaker 1>if one thinks of the Brexit debates or the debates

0:11:20.076 --> 0:11:24.716
<v Speaker 1>over the impeachment of Donald Trump. Without the basic information,

0:11:24.716 --> 0:11:26.676
<v Speaker 1>and of course the information, as you say, is contested

0:11:26.676 --> 0:11:29.596
<v Speaker 1>and is met with misinformation. But without the basic information,

0:11:29.756 --> 0:11:32.316
<v Speaker 1>it can become impossible to engage at all. I mean,

0:11:32.596 --> 0:11:35.316
<v Speaker 1>one would like to achieve knowledge on these topics, of course,

0:11:35.556 --> 0:11:37.756
<v Speaker 1>if such a thing is even possible. But they have

0:11:37.796 --> 0:11:40.276
<v Speaker 1>a kind of you know, flowing like a river or feeling.

0:11:40.316 --> 0:11:42.636
<v Speaker 1>And if you don't, if you don't keep drinking from

0:11:42.636 --> 0:11:44.556
<v Speaker 1>the river, the river will just wash over you. Or

0:11:44.596 --> 0:11:46.876
<v Speaker 1>maybe maybe the metaphors you have to just try to

0:11:46.916 --> 0:11:48.756
<v Speaker 1>keep your head above the water as the river washes

0:11:48.796 --> 0:11:50.996
<v Speaker 1>over you, or else you'll drown. Yeah, And I think

0:11:50.996 --> 0:11:55.076
<v Speaker 1>that's a wonderful metaphor and so true. Because we cannot

0:11:55.716 --> 0:12:00.276
<v Speaker 1>digest this much information, it doesn't stay with us. So

0:12:00.356 --> 0:12:03.796
<v Speaker 1>all we're trying to do is just somehow management to sink.

0:12:04.596 --> 0:12:09.716
<v Speaker 1>But that is not enough. So maybe this much information

0:12:09.876 --> 0:12:13.876
<v Speaker 1>is really giving us the illusion that we know something

0:12:13.916 --> 0:12:17.236
<v Speaker 1>about the subject. And maybe it's better if we don't

0:12:17.236 --> 0:12:19.036
<v Speaker 1>know it. Just it's better to say, you know, I

0:12:19.036 --> 0:12:22.276
<v Speaker 1>don't know. I'm still working on it. We forgot to

0:12:22.316 --> 0:12:24.716
<v Speaker 1>say I don't know. In the stage, because if you

0:12:24.796 --> 0:12:26.996
<v Speaker 1>ask me something and I don't know the answer, all

0:12:27.036 --> 0:12:28.996
<v Speaker 1>I have to do is google it, and in the

0:12:28.996 --> 0:12:32.316
<v Speaker 1>next five seconds or a couple of minutes, I have

0:12:32.396 --> 0:12:34.916
<v Speaker 1>the illusion that I can give you an answer about

0:12:34.956 --> 0:12:37.956
<v Speaker 1>that subject. But that's not knowledge. So I think we

0:12:38.036 --> 0:12:41.796
<v Speaker 1>need to differentiate these things and be honest that we

0:12:41.876 --> 0:12:46.196
<v Speaker 1>cannot process this much information. It doesn't stay with us.

0:12:46.756 --> 0:12:49.916
<v Speaker 1>And to me, it's incredibly important. Two things to slow

0:12:49.956 --> 0:12:54.156
<v Speaker 1>down because constantly we're in a hurry. And also loneliness,

0:12:54.236 --> 0:12:59.636
<v Speaker 1>some kind of maybe intellectual loneliness is important because constantly

0:12:59.676 --> 0:13:02.316
<v Speaker 1>we're in the company of each other. It affects us,

0:13:03.036 --> 0:13:06.716
<v Speaker 1>we think in collective identities. When we are reading a novel,

0:13:07.116 --> 0:13:09.716
<v Speaker 1>we are alone. Walter ban I mean he used to

0:13:09.716 --> 0:13:12.356
<v Speaker 1>call the novel the loneliest form of art, and I

0:13:12.396 --> 0:13:15.716
<v Speaker 1>love that description. You know, the writers alone when she

0:13:15.876 --> 0:13:18.636
<v Speaker 1>or he is writing, but also the readers alone when

0:13:18.836 --> 0:13:21.316
<v Speaker 1>she or he is reading, and we need to go

0:13:21.356 --> 0:13:26.196
<v Speaker 1>into that inner space. That solitude has a peaceful energy,

0:13:26.556 --> 0:13:30.116
<v Speaker 1>and I think that's incredibly important in this fast moving

0:13:30.196 --> 0:13:35.956
<v Speaker 1>age of constant information. Loneliness, the writer's loneliness, the reader's

0:13:35.956 --> 0:13:39.876
<v Speaker 1>loneliness are enhanced. I think by a sense of distance.

0:13:40.676 --> 0:13:43.116
<v Speaker 1>And I thought of that very much in reading your novel,

0:13:43.196 --> 0:13:46.676
<v Speaker 1>because the city of Istanbul is a character in the novel,

0:13:46.716 --> 0:13:50.076
<v Speaker 1>a very vibrant and rich character, and it's also a

0:13:50.156 --> 0:13:55.716
<v Speaker 1>city from which you are now at some real geographical distance.

0:13:55.756 --> 0:13:58.596
<v Speaker 1>And I wondered if perhaps there's an introduction to talking

0:13:58.596 --> 0:14:00.916
<v Speaker 1>about that a little bit. You'd be willing to read

0:14:00.916 --> 0:14:03.676
<v Speaker 1>out a passage from from your novel. It's the chapter

0:14:03.756 --> 0:14:09.996
<v Speaker 1>that's called this Manic Old City. Istanbul was an illusion,

0:14:10.476 --> 0:14:14.476
<v Speaker 1>a magician's trick gone wrong. Istambul was a dream that

0:14:14.596 --> 0:14:18.876
<v Speaker 1>existed solely in the minds of hushish eaters. In truth,

0:14:19.156 --> 0:14:25.116
<v Speaker 1>there was no Istambul. There were multiple istambules, struggling, competing, clashing,

0:14:25.556 --> 0:14:29.716
<v Speaker 1>each perceiving that in the end only one could survive.

0:14:30.596 --> 0:14:34.796
<v Speaker 1>There was, for instance, an ancient Estambul, designed to be

0:14:34.876 --> 0:14:39.516
<v Speaker 1>crossed on foot or by boat. The city of itinerant dervishes,

0:14:39.956 --> 0:14:46.996
<v Speaker 1>fortune tellers, matchmakers, seafarers, cotton fluffers, rug beaters, and porters

0:14:47.036 --> 0:14:51.276
<v Speaker 1>with wicker baskets on their backs. There was modern essemble,

0:14:51.756 --> 0:14:57.236
<v Speaker 1>an urban sprawl, overrun with cars and motorcycles whizzing back

0:14:57.276 --> 0:15:01.996
<v Speaker 1>and forth. Construction trucks laden with building materials for more

0:15:02.036 --> 0:15:09.276
<v Speaker 1>shopping centers, skyscrapers, industrial sites. Imperial istambul versus plea in

0:15:09.356 --> 0:15:17.836
<v Speaker 1>Istanbul global istambul versus parochial Istanbul, cosmopolitan istambul versus philistine

0:15:17.876 --> 0:15:25.396
<v Speaker 1>Istanbul heretical istambul versus pious istambul, matro istambul versus a

0:15:25.516 --> 0:15:30.996
<v Speaker 1>feminine istambul that adopted aphrodite, goddess of desire and also

0:15:31.036 --> 0:15:35.436
<v Speaker 1>of strife, as its symbol and protector. Then there was

0:15:35.436 --> 0:15:39.556
<v Speaker 1>the Istanbul of those who had left long ago, sailing

0:15:39.676 --> 0:15:43.476
<v Speaker 1>to far away ports. For them, the city would always

0:15:43.516 --> 0:15:49.316
<v Speaker 1>be a metropolis made of memories, myths, and messianic longings,

0:15:49.756 --> 0:15:54.396
<v Speaker 1>forever elusive, like a lover's face receding in the mist.

0:15:55.076 --> 0:16:00.196
<v Speaker 1>All these istambuls lived and breathe inside one another, like

0:16:00.276 --> 0:16:05.556
<v Speaker 1>Matroshka dolls that had come to life. Extraordinary. That image

0:16:05.836 --> 0:16:09.596
<v Speaker 1>of the city elusive like a lover's face receding the mist,

0:16:10.476 --> 0:16:15.316
<v Speaker 1>calls to my mind medieval Attoman and Persian poetry in

0:16:15.356 --> 0:16:18.356
<v Speaker 1>which the lover is always just about present and then

0:16:18.356 --> 0:16:23.956
<v Speaker 1>evanesces and disappears into the distance. Yeah, exactly, always illusive. Indeed, Istanbul,

0:16:23.996 --> 0:16:26.596
<v Speaker 1>which is a city with which you clearly have a

0:16:26.676 --> 0:16:30.476
<v Speaker 1>very deep relationship, but from which you are now at

0:16:30.516 --> 0:16:35.196
<v Speaker 1>a distance. As you were writing about the city, how

0:16:35.196 --> 0:16:39.556
<v Speaker 1>did you think of that that distance. I think it's emotionally,

0:16:40.476 --> 0:16:43.476
<v Speaker 1>to be honest, heart for me, because I love Istanbul

0:16:43.516 --> 0:16:46.516
<v Speaker 1>and I feel very attached to the city, the people,

0:16:46.636 --> 0:16:53.996
<v Speaker 1>it's culture, it's history, so that that connection is very personal. Nonetheless,

0:16:54.036 --> 0:16:56.996
<v Speaker 1>I think wherever I go, I feel like I carry

0:16:56.996 --> 0:17:00.716
<v Speaker 1>Istanbul with me. My relationship with the city is quite emotional,

0:17:00.756 --> 0:17:02.956
<v Speaker 1>of course, but at the same time, I'm someone who

0:17:02.996 --> 0:17:06.836
<v Speaker 1>believes in multiple belongings. Over the years, I've become a Londoner,

0:17:07.036 --> 0:17:10.156
<v Speaker 1>I've become a British citizen. And to what Teresa Made,

0:17:10.476 --> 0:17:13.556
<v Speaker 1>the previous Prime Minister, has been telling us, I would

0:17:13.556 --> 0:17:15.836
<v Speaker 1>like to think of myself as a citizen of the world,

0:17:16.396 --> 0:17:18.516
<v Speaker 1>because she said, if you're a citizen of the world,

0:17:18.596 --> 0:17:21.116
<v Speaker 1>it means you're a citizen of nowhere. I think she

0:17:21.276 --> 0:17:23.396
<v Speaker 1>was wrong. If you're a citizen of the world, it

0:17:23.436 --> 0:17:26.116
<v Speaker 1>doesn't mean that you have no sense of belonging, that

0:17:26.156 --> 0:17:29.516
<v Speaker 1>you're floating in the air aimlessly. I think a citizen

0:17:29.556 --> 0:17:34.876
<v Speaker 1>of humanity means you do care about multiple things, multiple identities,

0:17:34.956 --> 0:17:37.596
<v Speaker 1>multiple belongings at the same time, so you can be

0:17:37.676 --> 0:17:40.196
<v Speaker 1>very attached to a place, but at the same time

0:17:40.556 --> 0:17:44.116
<v Speaker 1>very much attached to or connected with your fellow human

0:17:44.156 --> 0:17:47.556
<v Speaker 1>beings all around the world. I want to defend that

0:17:47.636 --> 0:17:51.436
<v Speaker 1>kind of combination of local and universal at the same time.

0:17:51.996 --> 0:17:53.716
<v Speaker 1>When you were writing this novel, it was at a

0:17:53.716 --> 0:17:56.236
<v Speaker 1>time in your life where you can't visit Istanable, you

0:17:56.276 --> 0:17:59.316
<v Speaker 1>can't go back to Turkey. I'm wondering, for a person

0:17:59.356 --> 0:18:03.916
<v Speaker 1>who embraces multiple identities as you've just described, is it

0:18:03.956 --> 0:18:06.956
<v Speaker 1>possible for a citizen of the world to feel herself

0:18:06.996 --> 0:18:10.036
<v Speaker 1>to be an exiled right? I mean, one cannot be

0:18:10.076 --> 0:18:12.236
<v Speaker 1>truly exiled from the world, but one can be exiled

0:18:12.276 --> 0:18:15.156
<v Speaker 1>from from someplace. Is that a phrase that you hear

0:18:15.196 --> 0:18:17.636
<v Speaker 1>and think to yourself, that is that's not me. I'm

0:18:17.676 --> 0:18:20.476
<v Speaker 1>not an exiled writer because I'm at home in many places.

0:18:20.836 --> 0:18:22.756
<v Speaker 1>Where do you think to yourself, Yes, I am at

0:18:22.796 --> 0:18:24.596
<v Speaker 1>the stage of my life where that might be a

0:18:24.596 --> 0:18:27.796
<v Speaker 1>fair description of me. I think what you've expressed is

0:18:28.676 --> 0:18:31.516
<v Speaker 1>so true, because, on the one hand, I feel like

0:18:31.556 --> 0:18:34.516
<v Speaker 1>you can't be exiled from the world, or from humanity,

0:18:34.996 --> 0:18:39.236
<v Speaker 1>or from storyland. Storyland is my homeland is my motherland,

0:18:39.276 --> 0:18:41.876
<v Speaker 1>and I won't be exiled from there. But at the

0:18:41.916 --> 0:18:46.196
<v Speaker 1>same time, of course, there's an emotional pain, and I

0:18:46.236 --> 0:18:49.636
<v Speaker 1>have to be honest about that that accompanies me, because

0:18:49.676 --> 0:18:52.876
<v Speaker 1>I do know that I'm not able to go at

0:18:52.916 --> 0:18:56.676
<v Speaker 1>the moment. So, yes, exile is a word that I

0:18:56.756 --> 0:19:00.956
<v Speaker 1>take seriously, and I do think about a lot. To

0:19:00.996 --> 0:19:03.876
<v Speaker 1>be honest. This is a little bit oblique to the

0:19:03.956 --> 0:19:06.276
<v Speaker 1>question of exile, but it goes back to the point

0:19:06.276 --> 0:19:09.796
<v Speaker 1>that you made in describing the novel of your fascination

0:19:09.836 --> 0:19:12.956
<v Speaker 1>with the scientific studies that suggests that sometimes the brain

0:19:13.036 --> 0:19:15.436
<v Speaker 1>can continue to live on for some time after the

0:19:15.436 --> 0:19:18.996
<v Speaker 1>body dies, or after the heart dies at least. Yeah,

0:19:19.116 --> 0:19:21.276
<v Speaker 1>as I read the novel, I kept thinking to myself,

0:19:22.276 --> 0:19:25.276
<v Speaker 1>as a matter of genre, is this a novel of

0:19:25.316 --> 0:19:28.556
<v Speaker 1>magical realism or is it a novel of realist realism.

0:19:28.716 --> 0:19:31.756
<v Speaker 1>On the one hand, as you say, it's it's not

0:19:31.916 --> 0:19:34.516
<v Speaker 1>the case that there couldn't be anything in the mind

0:19:34.556 --> 0:19:36.996
<v Speaker 1>after the body dies. Of course, on the other hand,

0:19:37.076 --> 0:19:39.876
<v Speaker 1>one could hardly communicate the details of that of that story.

0:19:40.076 --> 0:19:43.196
<v Speaker 1>So there's something magical in that sense about it. And

0:19:43.196 --> 0:19:45.356
<v Speaker 1>although it's not the kind of magical realist novel in

0:19:45.396 --> 0:19:48.756
<v Speaker 1>which you know, trees begin to cry in the kind

0:19:48.796 --> 0:19:52.676
<v Speaker 1>of classic Marquez sort of mold. It is a novel

0:19:53.116 --> 0:19:55.956
<v Speaker 1>which shares, at least it seemed to this reader some

0:19:56.076 --> 0:20:03.876
<v Speaker 1>rhythms and some connections with the great tradition of magical realism. Yes,

0:20:03.956 --> 0:20:07.756
<v Speaker 1>I understand, and I think the reason why I hesitate

0:20:07.836 --> 0:20:12.876
<v Speaker 1>slightly is because in my mind, I don't make these distinctions.

0:20:13.436 --> 0:20:17.916
<v Speaker 1>You know, I don't believe in categories. I don't even

0:20:17.956 --> 0:20:21.196
<v Speaker 1>know how to categorize or explain my own work, and

0:20:21.356 --> 0:20:23.716
<v Speaker 1>I feel more free when I don't put it in

0:20:23.756 --> 0:20:26.836
<v Speaker 1>a certain genre. So maybe there's a part of me

0:20:26.916 --> 0:20:30.476
<v Speaker 1>that resists that. But that said, of course, I the

0:20:30.476 --> 0:20:33.476
<v Speaker 1>writer's privilege. For certain, it's the writer's privilege to reject

0:20:33.756 --> 0:20:36.956
<v Speaker 1>being boxed into any genre. Naturally, we try, you know.

0:20:37.596 --> 0:20:41.596
<v Speaker 1>But what you said made me remember maybe a moment

0:20:41.716 --> 0:20:45.276
<v Speaker 1>in time when I was in my grandmother's house in Ankara.

0:20:45.436 --> 0:20:48.876
<v Speaker 1>This was a very patriarchal, very conservative neighborhood, and I'm

0:20:48.916 --> 0:20:52.156
<v Speaker 1>talking about late nineteen seventies. This was a time of

0:20:52.236 --> 0:20:55.676
<v Speaker 1>extreme political violence in Turkey. And there is a moment

0:20:55.676 --> 0:20:58.636
<v Speaker 1>when I remember I was sitting by the window and

0:20:58.956 --> 0:21:02.596
<v Speaker 1>thinking about the world outside the window, which was full

0:21:02.596 --> 0:21:07.756
<v Speaker 1>of political clashes, bombs exploding, students were being gone down

0:21:08.316 --> 0:21:12.396
<v Speaker 1>every day, people would die on the streets and inside

0:21:12.396 --> 0:21:15.516
<v Speaker 1>the house. In my grandmother's house, it was somehow full

0:21:15.556 --> 0:21:18.636
<v Speaker 1>of you know, maybe you call it superstitions. It was

0:21:18.676 --> 0:21:23.036
<v Speaker 1>a very irrational world. And she would melt lead, she

0:21:23.116 --> 0:21:26.876
<v Speaker 1>had her own coffee cup reading, she would have her

0:21:27.076 --> 0:21:31.036
<v Speaker 1>magic charms towards of the evil spirits, and people would

0:21:31.036 --> 0:21:32.956
<v Speaker 1>come to her, and in a way, she was a

0:21:32.956 --> 0:21:36.036
<v Speaker 1>bit like an oral storyteller. Maybe there's a part of

0:21:36.076 --> 0:21:39.876
<v Speaker 1>me that remembers that moment, you know, that wants to

0:21:39.876 --> 0:21:43.436
<v Speaker 1>be able to write about what's happening outside the window

0:21:43.876 --> 0:21:48.556
<v Speaker 1>and therefore ask political questions about the world we're living

0:21:48.596 --> 0:21:52.396
<v Speaker 1>in and in its inequalities and injustices. But at the

0:21:52.436 --> 0:21:54.556
<v Speaker 1>same time, there's also a part of me that is

0:21:54.596 --> 0:21:58.476
<v Speaker 1>still tuned into that world that I found inside the house,

0:21:59.036 --> 0:22:02.876
<v Speaker 1>which is maybe magical or superstitious or spiritual, whatever we

0:22:02.916 --> 0:22:06.036
<v Speaker 1>call it, but definitely a very irrational world. I have

0:22:06.156 --> 0:22:11.036
<v Speaker 1>never looked down upon oral culture, women's culture. And the

0:22:11.076 --> 0:22:14.116
<v Speaker 1>reason why I'm saying this is because in Turkey usually

0:22:14.556 --> 0:22:19.716
<v Speaker 1>intellectuals do not respect that area much because it's regarded

0:22:19.756 --> 0:22:23.996
<v Speaker 1>as the domain of ignorant women. But either because of

0:22:24.076 --> 0:22:27.916
<v Speaker 1>my own upbringing or my personality, I've always been interested

0:22:27.916 --> 0:22:30.196
<v Speaker 1>in that world as much as I've been interested in

0:22:30.236 --> 0:22:34.476
<v Speaker 1>academia and knowledge and the intellect. So maybe there's a

0:22:34.516 --> 0:22:39.356
<v Speaker 1>part of me that wants to bridge written culture with

0:22:39.596 --> 0:22:45.956
<v Speaker 1>oral culture in some way. Your protagonist, Tequila Leila, could

0:22:45.996 --> 0:22:50.196
<v Speaker 1>not be more different from you. She's isolated, and she

0:22:50.356 --> 0:22:55.316
<v Speaker 1>is repressed, and she is she's impoverished, she's unable to

0:22:55.436 --> 0:22:59.516
<v Speaker 1>move and be global. She's stuck on many, many dimensions.

0:23:00.356 --> 0:23:05.396
<v Speaker 1>But in another way, she's also the victim of concerted

0:23:05.436 --> 0:23:09.476
<v Speaker 1>efforts really throughout her life to marginalize her and to

0:23:09.516 --> 0:23:13.836
<v Speaker 1>criticize her, and to deny her her capacity to genuinely

0:23:13.836 --> 0:23:17.596
<v Speaker 1>express herself. And I wondered writing this novel at a

0:23:17.636 --> 0:23:21.116
<v Speaker 1>time where, for what looked from the outside like essentially

0:23:21.156 --> 0:23:25.436
<v Speaker 1>political reasons, criticism from nationalists, you are unable to be

0:23:25.516 --> 0:23:30.876
<v Speaker 1>in Turkey, whether you have some identification with the protagonist

0:23:31.316 --> 0:23:35.156
<v Speaker 1>on that dimension, in the sense of being targeted and

0:23:35.716 --> 0:23:40.196
<v Speaker 1>unfairly on the false with the false idea that somehow

0:23:40.556 --> 0:23:43.316
<v Speaker 1>your truths are things that the public can't bear to

0:23:43.396 --> 0:23:48.516
<v Speaker 1>hear or can't tolerate hearing. I think this feeling of

0:23:48.876 --> 0:23:54.716
<v Speaker 1>being the other, if you will, that's something that I

0:23:55.076 --> 0:23:59.236
<v Speaker 1>unfamiliar with, and I've felt like the other myself for

0:23:59.356 --> 0:24:03.276
<v Speaker 1>different reasons throughout my life, and I think I always

0:24:03.356 --> 0:24:06.636
<v Speaker 1>feel closer to people who've been pushed to the periphery,

0:24:06.716 --> 0:24:10.476
<v Speaker 1>to the margins. It comes naturally to me, and maybe

0:24:10.476 --> 0:24:13.356
<v Speaker 1>it's visible in all my work. One of the things

0:24:13.396 --> 0:24:15.916
<v Speaker 1>that happened over the years is, you know, when I

0:24:15.956 --> 0:24:19.036
<v Speaker 1>wrote the story of an Armenian family, people said, oh,

0:24:19.076 --> 0:24:21.836
<v Speaker 1>she must be an Armenian herself. And then if there's

0:24:21.836 --> 0:24:25.916
<v Speaker 1>a Jewish character in my books, they said, oh, she's

0:24:25.956 --> 0:24:28.756
<v Speaker 1>a secret Jew, because in Turkey we have this. It's

0:24:28.796 --> 0:24:32.116
<v Speaker 1>a country of in many ways, conspiracy theories unfortunately, so

0:24:32.156 --> 0:24:34.716
<v Speaker 1>everything has to be secret, right, And then they said, oh,

0:24:34.716 --> 0:24:38.036
<v Speaker 1>she's a secret Kurd, She's a secret this. But the

0:24:38.236 --> 0:24:42.596
<v Speaker 1>underlying message is if it's not your story, why would

0:24:42.596 --> 0:24:45.316
<v Speaker 1>you write it? You know, if you're an Armenian yourself,

0:24:45.316 --> 0:24:49.556
<v Speaker 1>why would you care? Why would you write about Armenians?

0:24:49.596 --> 0:24:52.956
<v Speaker 1>And that's the mentality that I want to challenge. Of course,

0:24:52.996 --> 0:24:55.196
<v Speaker 1>at the end of the day, everything that we write

0:24:55.236 --> 0:25:00.316
<v Speaker 1>as novelists. They have autobiographical echoes, certainly, But the reason

0:25:00.356 --> 0:25:03.556
<v Speaker 1>why I love literature so much is because I can

0:25:03.676 --> 0:25:06.996
<v Speaker 1>be anyone. You can't be anyone. You know, there's freedom.

0:25:07.236 --> 0:25:09.676
<v Speaker 1>As long as you feel it in your heart and

0:25:09.876 --> 0:25:13.316
<v Speaker 1>follow the story and really put effort in it, we

0:25:13.396 --> 0:25:17.036
<v Speaker 1>can write anything and everything. I leave Shafak, thank you.

0:25:17.156 --> 0:25:19.556
<v Speaker 1>I will look forward to learning more from you in

0:25:19.596 --> 0:25:22.196
<v Speaker 1>the future, and I imagine that I'm joined by many

0:25:22.196 --> 0:25:24.356
<v Speaker 1>others in that respect. Thank you so much for the conversation.

0:25:24.716 --> 0:25:33.876
<v Speaker 1>I appreciate it so much. Thank you. The name of a.

0:25:33.956 --> 0:25:37.516
<v Speaker 1>Leif Shafak's latest novel is ten minutes, thirty eight seconds

0:25:37.556 --> 0:25:40.316
<v Speaker 1>In This Strange World. We'll be back with this week's

0:25:40.316 --> 0:25:45.796
<v Speaker 1>playback in just a moment. Now for our playback, John Dunning,

0:25:47.276 --> 0:25:55.756
<v Speaker 1>Miriam Haley, Jessica Man, Annabella Shora, Charole Wolf, Lauren Young,

0:25:56.996 --> 0:26:02.996
<v Speaker 1>Meghan Hast, Joan Bluzi Orbone. Eight women who have changed

0:26:03.036 --> 0:26:06.796
<v Speaker 1>the course of history in the fight against sexual violence.

0:26:07.836 --> 0:26:11.516
<v Speaker 1>That's Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus Vans Junior, whose office prosecuted

0:26:11.556 --> 0:26:14.596
<v Speaker 1>the case against tarwe Weinstein, speaking at a press conference

0:26:14.796 --> 0:26:18.636
<v Speaker 1>right after the verdict was announced. If you heard that verdict. Briefly,

0:26:18.956 --> 0:26:20.876
<v Speaker 1>you might have been a little bit confused because it

0:26:20.956 --> 0:26:24.476
<v Speaker 1>sounds like it was a split verdict. On the one hand,

0:26:24.636 --> 0:26:27.716
<v Speaker 1>Weinstein was convicted of two charges of rape, and those

0:26:27.716 --> 0:26:30.636
<v Speaker 1>were the primary charges against him. Yet it's also true

0:26:30.716 --> 0:26:34.516
<v Speaker 1>that Weinstein was acquitted on three other charges, including two

0:26:34.516 --> 0:26:36.996
<v Speaker 1>of the most serious charges against him, charges that he

0:26:37.036 --> 0:26:40.156
<v Speaker 1>was a sexual predator. After all, you might say to yourself,

0:26:40.236 --> 0:26:43.556
<v Speaker 1>Weinstein obviously was a sexual predator, So maybe this isn't

0:26:43.596 --> 0:26:46.156
<v Speaker 1>really that much of a win for the prosecutors or

0:26:46.196 --> 0:26:49.076
<v Speaker 1>for the me too movement. Well, the honest truth is,

0:26:49.076 --> 0:26:51.996
<v Speaker 1>if you go behind the scenes of this case and

0:26:52.076 --> 0:26:54.956
<v Speaker 1>look at the prosecutor strategy, you'll see that it was

0:26:55.116 --> 0:26:58.996
<v Speaker 1>a win for the prosecutors even though Weinstein was cleared

0:26:59.116 --> 0:27:02.836
<v Speaker 1>of two of the most serious charges. And here's why. Ordinarily,

0:27:02.836 --> 0:27:05.876
<v Speaker 1>in a criminal case, we do not allow evidence to

0:27:05.876 --> 0:27:09.916
<v Speaker 1>be introduced of any bad acts that the defendant committed

0:27:10.276 --> 0:27:14.396
<v Speaker 1>outside of the context of the specific charges brought against him.

0:27:14.796 --> 0:27:16.636
<v Speaker 1>And there's a reason for that. We don't want to

0:27:16.756 --> 0:27:19.556
<v Speaker 1>raise to convict people because they think they're just lousy,

0:27:19.876 --> 0:27:22.356
<v Speaker 1>or because we think they're bad on general principles, or

0:27:22.396 --> 0:27:24.636
<v Speaker 1>because they think that they're guilty of some other conduct

0:27:24.876 --> 0:27:27.916
<v Speaker 1>other than conduct with which they are literally being charged.

0:27:28.596 --> 0:27:32.196
<v Speaker 1>But there are exceptions. One is, if the prosecutors can

0:27:32.236 --> 0:27:35.396
<v Speaker 1>introduce a pattern of prior conduct, they can get other

0:27:35.516 --> 0:27:39.276
<v Speaker 1>bad acts admitted that happened actually in the Weinstein trial,

0:27:39.396 --> 0:27:42.196
<v Speaker 1>and it's one of the reasons that several other witnesses

0:27:42.276 --> 0:27:44.956
<v Speaker 1>three whose names have not been made public were introduced

0:27:45.076 --> 0:27:47.676
<v Speaker 1>in order to testify to other bad acts of Weinstein's.

0:27:48.356 --> 0:27:53.156
<v Speaker 1>But another way for prosecutors to introduce prior evidence of

0:27:53.236 --> 0:27:55.996
<v Speaker 1>bad action in a criminal trial in the New York

0:27:56.036 --> 0:27:59.956
<v Speaker 1>States system is to charge the defendant with being a

0:27:59.996 --> 0:28:04.836
<v Speaker 1>sexual predator, and that charge is what allowed the prosecution

0:28:05.116 --> 0:28:09.556
<v Speaker 1>to introduce the testimony of the actress Annabelle Ashura, who

0:28:09.596 --> 0:28:13.036
<v Speaker 1>testified that more than twenty five years ago, Harvey Weinstein

0:28:13.316 --> 0:28:16.796
<v Speaker 1>raped her. Now, on the surface, the fact that Weinstein

0:28:16.916 --> 0:28:19.356
<v Speaker 1>was not convicted of being a sexual predator might make

0:28:19.396 --> 0:28:22.676
<v Speaker 1>you think that the jury didn't believe Shura. That's not

0:28:22.836 --> 0:28:27.076
<v Speaker 1>necessarily the case. It's entirely possible that the jury believed

0:28:27.076 --> 0:28:30.356
<v Speaker 1>her but thought there wasn't beyond a reasonable doubt evidence

0:28:30.396 --> 0:28:33.756
<v Speaker 1>of that charge, and that as a consequence, it strengthened

0:28:33.756 --> 0:28:36.636
<v Speaker 1>their judgment that Weinstein was in fact guilty of the

0:28:36.716 --> 0:28:40.716
<v Speaker 1>basic rapes with which he was charged. That's especially probable

0:28:40.956 --> 0:28:44.956
<v Speaker 1>because those rapes involved situations in which it's often very

0:28:44.996 --> 0:28:49.396
<v Speaker 1>difficult for prosecutors to get convictions, namely, no physical evidence

0:28:49.636 --> 0:28:54.436
<v Speaker 1>and an ongoing professional, social, and even sexual relationship between

0:28:54.436 --> 0:28:58.196
<v Speaker 1>the perpetrator and the victims after the crimes alleged, at

0:28:58.236 --> 0:29:03.476
<v Speaker 1>least according to Weinstein's lawyers. Furthermore, to the extent the

0:29:03.556 --> 0:29:06.956
<v Speaker 1>jury may actually have been engaged in an internal compromise,

0:29:07.516 --> 0:29:10.076
<v Speaker 1>The fact that there were more serious charges that it

0:29:10.156 --> 0:29:13.076
<v Speaker 1>could choose not to find Weinstein guilty of may have

0:29:13.156 --> 0:29:17.156
<v Speaker 1>actually driven the jury in the direction of finding Weinstein

0:29:17.196 --> 0:29:22.036
<v Speaker 1>guilty on the underlying charges of rape. Of course, we

0:29:22.076 --> 0:29:24.716
<v Speaker 1>don't like to think the juries are horse training behind

0:29:24.716 --> 0:29:27.916
<v Speaker 1>the scenes, but we understand that in reality they sometimes are.

0:29:28.356 --> 0:29:31.076
<v Speaker 1>So that's another reason to think that the prosecutor's decision

0:29:31.356 --> 0:29:34.996
<v Speaker 1>to introduce the charge against Weinstein of being a sexual

0:29:34.996 --> 0:29:40.276
<v Speaker 1>predator actually contributed to his eventual conviction on the underlying

0:29:40.396 --> 0:29:45.036
<v Speaker 1>rape charges, notwithstanding his acquittal on the sexual predation charges.

0:29:46.036 --> 0:29:48.396
<v Speaker 1>The upshot here is at the legal system as like

0:29:48.436 --> 0:29:51.196
<v Speaker 1>a lot of other complicated systems in the world. Sometimes

0:29:51.236 --> 0:29:53.356
<v Speaker 1>to understand what's really going on, you've got to get

0:29:53.396 --> 0:29:57.196
<v Speaker 1>behind the scenes. Deep Background is brought to you by

0:29:57.236 --> 0:30:01.156
<v Speaker 1>Pushkin Industries. Our producer is Lydia gene Coott, with studio

0:30:01.236 --> 0:30:04.556
<v Speaker 1>recording by Joseph Fridman and mastering by Jason Gambrel and

0:30:04.676 --> 0:30:08.956
<v Speaker 1>Jason Roskowski. Our showrunner is Sophie mckibbn. Our theme music

0:30:09.236 --> 0:30:12.796
<v Speaker 1>composed by Luis Garat special thanks to the Pushkin Brass,

0:30:12.796 --> 0:30:16.956
<v Speaker 1>Malcolm Gladwell, Jacob Weissberg, and Mia Lobel. I'm Noah Feldman.

0:30:17.196 --> 0:30:20.236
<v Speaker 1>You can follow me on Twitter at Noah R. Feldman.

0:30:20.596 --> 0:30:22.116
<v Speaker 1>This is Deep Background