WEBVTT - Surveillance: Kass Says Investors Underpricing Risk

0:00:05.120 --> 0:00:09.200
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. I'm Tom Keene along

0:00:09.240 --> 0:00:13.080
<v Speaker 1>with Jonathan Ferrell and Lisa brown Witz Jailey. We bring

0:00:13.119 --> 0:00:17.159
<v Speaker 1>you insight from the best and economics, finance, investment, and

0:00:17.280 --> 0:00:23.280
<v Speaker 1>international relations. Find Bloomberg Surveillance, an Apple podcast, SoundCloud, Bloomberg

0:00:23.360 --> 0:00:28.360
<v Speaker 1>dot Com, and of course on the Bloomberg Terminal. Kyle

0:00:28.400 --> 0:00:31.280
<v Speaker 1>Wineberg with us now my frequency can almoys chief Economists

0:00:31.280 --> 0:00:34.560
<v Speaker 1>and Managing Director. Kyle. As the week progresses, will be

0:00:34.640 --> 0:00:36.760
<v Speaker 1>knee deep in CPI reachs, house sounds. I think this

0:00:36.840 --> 0:00:39.080
<v Speaker 1>morning's time has come to have a little bit more

0:00:39.080 --> 0:00:42.080
<v Speaker 1>of a deeper think about what's happening. You've compared crisis

0:00:42.080 --> 0:00:45.680
<v Speaker 1>to recession, from crisis to recession and rat us distinction

0:00:45.680 --> 0:00:48.720
<v Speaker 1>between the two. Can just walk me through that right now? Sure,

0:00:48.760 --> 0:00:50.960
<v Speaker 1>Good morning, John, and good morning Time, Good morning Lisa,

0:00:51.040 --> 0:00:54.040
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for having me on. A crisis is a downturn

0:00:54.200 --> 0:00:57.320
<v Speaker 1>or an adverse situation where you don't have a policy response.

0:00:57.640 --> 0:00:59.360
<v Speaker 1>And that's where we were a year ago. All right,

0:00:59.400 --> 0:01:02.280
<v Speaker 1>we had a pandemic. We had no solution for it

0:01:02.480 --> 0:01:05.000
<v Speaker 1>other than to shut everything down. That wasn't a good solution.

0:01:05.200 --> 0:01:07.800
<v Speaker 1>So with no good policy response, you have a crisis,

0:01:07.840 --> 0:01:10.880
<v Speaker 1>that's my definition. And but we're in right now. What

0:01:10.959 --> 0:01:13.520
<v Speaker 1>the crisis did was it created a recession, and in

0:01:13.600 --> 0:01:15.800
<v Speaker 1>a recession, we know what we have to do, alright.

0:01:15.840 --> 0:01:18.399
<v Speaker 1>The problem with this recession, which is different in so

0:01:18.440 --> 0:01:20.960
<v Speaker 1>many ways from all the recessions before it, is that

0:01:21.000 --> 0:01:24.520
<v Speaker 1>most of our policy tools already exhausted. So going into

0:01:24.760 --> 0:01:27.440
<v Speaker 1>a period where we normally would expect to see policy

0:01:28.160 --> 0:01:32.319
<v Speaker 1>supporting reemployment, re engagement of people in the workforce, growth

0:01:32.319 --> 0:01:34.880
<v Speaker 1>of the economy, and so forth, policy is pretty much

0:01:34.920 --> 0:01:38.520
<v Speaker 1>hamstrung and is already doing all that it can do. Carl,

0:01:38.560 --> 0:01:41.640
<v Speaker 1>you are a legendary across the time of Lehman Brothers

0:01:41.880 --> 0:01:46.440
<v Speaker 1>into World Crisis two and three, four decades ago, of

0:01:46.600 --> 0:01:50.800
<v Speaker 1>watching gloom turn into not optimism but a good workout.

0:01:50.960 --> 0:01:54.600
<v Speaker 1>Are we just impatient right now? Are we just impatient

0:01:54.680 --> 0:01:58.080
<v Speaker 1>worried about fixing things in three months that may take

0:01:58.200 --> 0:02:01.600
<v Speaker 1>three years to fix? Yeah, three years would be a

0:02:01.600 --> 0:02:04.600
<v Speaker 1>conservative estimate of history as any guide. You know, some

0:02:04.720 --> 0:02:06.880
<v Speaker 1>of the people in the market at least these days

0:02:07.040 --> 0:02:09.359
<v Speaker 1>were also in the market in two thousand and two

0:02:09.360 --> 0:02:12.440
<v Speaker 1>thousand and nine, And people forget that. Even though GDP

0:02:12.680 --> 0:02:16.600
<v Speaker 1>got back to where it was prior to the global

0:02:16.639 --> 0:02:20.519
<v Speaker 1>financial crisis in just two years. The unemployment rate didn't

0:02:20.520 --> 0:02:24.720
<v Speaker 1>regain two thousand and eight levels until a decade later.

0:02:25.080 --> 0:02:28.120
<v Speaker 1>And that kind of delay and employment is actually normal.

0:02:28.320 --> 0:02:32.040
<v Speaker 1>It's why we have recessions. Right, Recessions are a purge

0:02:32.440 --> 0:02:36.280
<v Speaker 1>of excesses, so firms hire too many workers, right, it's

0:02:36.320 --> 0:02:39.880
<v Speaker 1>easier there that uh, we we purge. We find we

0:02:39.919 --> 0:02:44.000
<v Speaker 1>can do just as much with fewer workers in a recession,

0:02:44.160 --> 0:02:46.440
<v Speaker 1>and then it's very, very slow to bring those workers

0:02:46.480 --> 0:02:49.120
<v Speaker 1>back on forward. Firms are reluctant to bring them back.

0:02:49.520 --> 0:02:53.120
<v Speaker 1>So I think that we are overly optimistic and expecting

0:02:53.360 --> 0:02:55.440
<v Speaker 1>that everything's going to get back to the way where

0:02:55.480 --> 0:02:58.359
<v Speaker 1>it was by the end of this year, and especially

0:02:58.360 --> 0:03:00.760
<v Speaker 1>in the labor market. And if the abor market is

0:03:00.800 --> 0:03:05.400
<v Speaker 1>now our criteria for changing monetary policy, than recovery or

0:03:05.520 --> 0:03:09.200
<v Speaker 1>changes or renormalization of monetary policy is going to be

0:03:09.280 --> 0:03:12.000
<v Speaker 1>further out than most people expect. Carl, are you saying

0:03:12.040 --> 0:03:14.560
<v Speaker 1>when you say policy is hamstrung, that the Federal Reserve

0:03:14.639 --> 0:03:18.440
<v Speaker 1>is out of tools to fight another recession. Well, I

0:03:18.480 --> 0:03:21.320
<v Speaker 1>think that they've extended about as much as they can

0:03:21.360 --> 0:03:24.760
<v Speaker 1>go in terms of q E. I mean technically they

0:03:24.760 --> 0:03:28.240
<v Speaker 1>could go further than that, but practically will they do that?

0:03:28.280 --> 0:03:30.680
<v Speaker 1>Will they take the heat if there were another downturn,

0:03:30.720 --> 0:03:32.640
<v Speaker 1>if there was another shock right now, what would the

0:03:32.680 --> 0:03:36.400
<v Speaker 1>FIT do? What could the FIT plausibly do without unsettling

0:03:36.440 --> 0:03:39.760
<v Speaker 1>financial markets? And on the fiscal side, it's clear that

0:03:39.800 --> 0:03:42.040
<v Speaker 1>there's not a lot of appetite anywhere in the world

0:03:42.080 --> 0:03:46.440
<v Speaker 1>for more deficit spending, yet that is what would be required. Remember,

0:03:46.560 --> 0:03:51.240
<v Speaker 1>with fiscal policy, it doesn't increase growth unless you get

0:03:51.280 --> 0:03:54.800
<v Speaker 1>more of it each year. So running bigger deficits than

0:03:54.840 --> 0:03:58.279
<v Speaker 1>we saw last year next year, I think as a nonstarter.

0:03:58.560 --> 0:04:01.760
<v Speaker 1>Even in the most dire circle stances, it's gonna catchhop

0:04:01.800 --> 0:04:03.320
<v Speaker 1>Has so wise to get your input on this show

0:04:03.640 --> 0:04:05.520
<v Speaker 1>ahead of a big week for this market. Gun, it's

0:04:05.520 --> 0:04:07.560
<v Speaker 1>the Fed next week, cal wand back that high frequency

0:04:07.560 --> 0:04:14.400
<v Speaker 1>can always chief economist and managing direct d Okay, we're

0:04:14.440 --> 0:04:16.400
<v Speaker 1>gonna stop the show. This is what we do. We

0:04:16.480 --> 0:04:19.960
<v Speaker 1>talked to smart smart people Imperial College in London, Johns Hopkins.

0:04:20.000 --> 0:04:21.800
<v Speaker 1>We've done a lot of at work with Thank you

0:04:21.880 --> 0:04:26.159
<v Speaker 1>Mr Bloomberg for that. I think of University Washington Microbiology.

0:04:26.240 --> 0:04:29.479
<v Speaker 1>Joshua Scharstein from Johns Hopkins with us today and we're

0:04:29.520 --> 0:04:33.000
<v Speaker 1>just gonna flat out stop, Joshua after I'm teen months

0:04:33.600 --> 0:04:36.720
<v Speaker 1>and brilliant people like you trying to extricate a seal

0:04:36.800 --> 0:04:40.240
<v Speaker 1>from this pandemic. To celebrate that one million kids will

0:04:40.279 --> 0:04:44.480
<v Speaker 1>go back to school in New York City today, I mean,

0:04:44.520 --> 0:04:47.320
<v Speaker 1>it's just a huge deal in New York City back

0:04:47.360 --> 0:04:50.440
<v Speaker 1>to school. Let's cut to the chase. Is it gonna

0:04:50.480 --> 0:04:52.760
<v Speaker 1>be safe? How do you go back to school and

0:04:52.800 --> 0:04:57.560
<v Speaker 1>be safe if you're not vaccinated under twelve years old? Well,

0:04:57.600 --> 0:05:00.840
<v Speaker 1>I think it's gonna be uh, pretty safe because New

0:05:00.920 --> 0:05:04.040
<v Speaker 1>York is taking as many precautions as it possibly can take.

0:05:04.320 --> 0:05:06.680
<v Speaker 1>It's really important for kids to be back in school.

0:05:06.720 --> 0:05:09.200
<v Speaker 1>So you're right, it is a really great thing that

0:05:09.240 --> 0:05:11.680
<v Speaker 1>they're doing it, but it's going to require, you know,

0:05:12.120 --> 0:05:17.200
<v Speaker 1>a vigilance and it's going to require these different mitigation steps, masking,

0:05:17.960 --> 0:05:22.120
<v Speaker 1>um testing, other kinds of things until we really get

0:05:22.120 --> 0:05:25.800
<v Speaker 1>a handle on what the delta virus does in schools,

0:05:25.839 --> 0:05:30.320
<v Speaker 1>particularly for younger kids. Link your knowledge of the unvaccinated,

0:05:30.440 --> 0:05:33.120
<v Speaker 1>including the runner up at the US Open I believe

0:05:33.760 --> 0:05:39.200
<v Speaker 1>is unvaccinated on the male side, Djokovic. Link the unvaccinated

0:05:39.240 --> 0:05:43.960
<v Speaker 1>across this nation with kids and teachers and staff going

0:05:44.040 --> 0:05:47.719
<v Speaker 1>back to school. Well, one thing that's been clear is

0:05:47.800 --> 0:05:52.280
<v Speaker 1>that UM states with more people who are unvaccinated are

0:05:52.320 --> 0:05:56.880
<v Speaker 1>also seeing many more sick kids, particularly young sick kids.

0:05:56.920 --> 0:06:01.039
<v Speaker 1>And that's probably because adults who are unvaccinated who gets

0:06:01.040 --> 0:06:05.039
<v Speaker 1>sick can really infect kids effectively, and adults who are

0:06:05.120 --> 0:06:08.239
<v Speaker 1>vaccinated are it's much harder for them to infect kids.

0:06:08.640 --> 0:06:11.080
<v Speaker 1>And so I think that one of the ways we

0:06:11.080 --> 0:06:14.440
<v Speaker 1>can protect kids is to have adults generally vaccinated. A

0:06:14.520 --> 0:06:18.160
<v Speaker 1>second way is to have adults in schools vaccinated. And

0:06:18.200 --> 0:06:22.039
<v Speaker 1>so I'm very supportive of policies that that that require

0:06:22.720 --> 0:06:25.680
<v Speaker 1>adults in schools to be vaccinated. It's absolutely for the

0:06:25.720 --> 0:06:28.160
<v Speaker 1>safety of the kids. Dr. Scharfsine almost every parent out

0:06:28.200 --> 0:06:30.600
<v Speaker 1>there is going to get a dreaded email one morning

0:06:30.600 --> 0:06:32.880
<v Speaker 1>and the next couple of weeks saying somebody and your

0:06:32.960 --> 0:06:36.920
<v Speaker 1>kids school was diagnosed with COVID. Don't worry or worry

0:06:37.240 --> 0:06:39.839
<v Speaker 1>you have to quarantine or not quarantine. What is the

0:06:39.839 --> 0:06:42.920
<v Speaker 1>correct protocol if someone is in contact or within six

0:06:42.920 --> 0:06:46.480
<v Speaker 1>feet for say, ten straight minutes, even if they are

0:06:46.560 --> 0:06:51.159
<v Speaker 1>masked in a school. So UM, what I would say

0:06:51.240 --> 0:06:53.440
<v Speaker 1>is it's really important for them to be good communication

0:06:53.480 --> 0:06:56.000
<v Speaker 1>about this and to explain to parents as much as

0:06:56.040 --> 0:06:58.719
<v Speaker 1>possible exactly how this will be handled, and then follow

0:06:58.760 --> 0:07:01.520
<v Speaker 1>through on that rather in surprise everyone the first time

0:07:01.560 --> 0:07:04.080
<v Speaker 1>there's a positive test, it is going to be expected

0:07:04.120 --> 0:07:06.000
<v Speaker 1>that that that may happen. Here's how we're going to

0:07:06.120 --> 0:07:10.240
<v Speaker 1>deal with it. UM, and I think that in general UM,

0:07:10.280 --> 0:07:14.120
<v Speaker 1>it is certainly for UM for kids who have vaccinated.

0:07:14.160 --> 0:07:17.680
<v Speaker 1>Older kids who are vaccinated, they do not necessarily, according

0:07:17.680 --> 0:07:21.160
<v Speaker 1>to the CDC, I think, need to be quarantined. Some

0:07:21.280 --> 0:07:23.440
<v Speaker 1>schools may want to do that out of an abundance

0:07:23.480 --> 0:07:26.239
<v Speaker 1>of caution. Others may want to try to use tests,

0:07:26.280 --> 0:07:28.640
<v Speaker 1>for example, to keep kids in school. They're going to

0:07:28.720 --> 0:07:31.600
<v Speaker 1>be a few different practices. I think the most important

0:07:31.600 --> 0:07:34.000
<v Speaker 1>thing is that they're explained clearly to parents and that

0:07:34.080 --> 0:07:37.440
<v Speaker 1>the school is monitoring whether their particular approach works and

0:07:37.480 --> 0:07:41.360
<v Speaker 1>it's flexible to changing UM if necessary based on what

0:07:41.400 --> 0:07:43.560
<v Speaker 1>they see. Early in the school year, Dr Scharfson, the

0:07:43.600 --> 0:07:46.080
<v Speaker 1>start of the New York City school year really highlights

0:07:46.080 --> 0:07:48.480
<v Speaker 1>how people are trying to get back to some semblance

0:07:48.480 --> 0:07:50.440
<v Speaker 1>of normal. People are saying, get back to the office.

0:07:50.440 --> 0:07:53.880
<v Speaker 1>City workers have to be back in person, and yet

0:07:53.880 --> 0:07:56.320
<v Speaker 1>it is pock marked by all these notices and by

0:07:56.360 --> 0:07:59.239
<v Speaker 1>the ongoing spread of the virus. When do we get

0:07:59.480 --> 0:08:01.560
<v Speaker 1>to some sort of equilibrium or we're heading into a

0:08:01.600 --> 0:08:04.200
<v Speaker 1>really perilous fall where people are trying to act like

0:08:04.240 --> 0:08:07.800
<v Speaker 1>everything is normal when it is anything. But I think

0:08:07.840 --> 0:08:10.440
<v Speaker 1>that we're headed right now into a bit of a

0:08:10.440 --> 0:08:12.960
<v Speaker 1>new normal. You know, we can go to work, but

0:08:13.080 --> 0:08:15.200
<v Speaker 1>we may need to wear a mask in the workplace

0:08:15.280 --> 0:08:18.559
<v Speaker 1>or make sure everybody is vaccinated. UM, and the people

0:08:18.720 --> 0:08:21.000
<v Speaker 1>need to be a little bit more vigilant. I think

0:08:21.000 --> 0:08:23.480
<v Speaker 1>we're going to be in that period for a while

0:08:23.520 --> 0:08:27.240
<v Speaker 1>at least until cases really go down. UM, and we

0:08:27.560 --> 0:08:29.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, get a little bit more of a distance

0:08:29.360 --> 0:08:31.880
<v Speaker 1>between us and the virus. That obviously depends on where

0:08:31.920 --> 0:08:34.600
<v Speaker 1>you are in the country in this situation. But for example,

0:08:34.640 --> 0:08:36.640
<v Speaker 1>at our school, you know, we're we have kids back

0:08:36.640 --> 0:08:39.040
<v Speaker 1>in class. Um, we have a little bit more distance

0:08:39.120 --> 0:08:42.760
<v Speaker 1>than usual, fewer people in the classroom, but they can

0:08:42.760 --> 0:08:45.800
<v Speaker 1>sit you know, three ft away with a mask on

0:08:46.640 --> 0:08:50.920
<v Speaker 1>and um, and everybody is vaccinated. So you know, we

0:08:51.000 --> 0:08:53.240
<v Speaker 1>have a new normal. But we're excited to be in

0:08:53.280 --> 0:08:55.280
<v Speaker 1>the classroom and teaching. And I've been doing some of that.

0:08:55.360 --> 0:08:57.680
<v Speaker 1>I think it's fantasy, like so you and many others

0:08:57.679 --> 0:09:00.679
<v Speaker 1>anticipating a bit of a problem this fold into WINSA Well.

0:09:00.679 --> 0:09:02.360
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I'll tell you my kids actually went back

0:09:02.480 --> 0:09:03.839
<v Speaker 1>back to school a little bit early because they go

0:09:03.880 --> 0:09:05.880
<v Speaker 1>to a charter school. And I will just tell you

0:09:05.960 --> 0:09:08.440
<v Speaker 1>that they actually have already had to stay home for

0:09:08.480 --> 0:09:11.200
<v Speaker 1>a week as a result, John, of this idea that

0:09:11.240 --> 0:09:13.880
<v Speaker 1>they have been quarantined and basically somebody was exposed to

0:09:13.920 --> 0:09:16.960
<v Speaker 1>scot started Lisa. I'm telling you it was the second week.

0:09:17.040 --> 0:09:19.320
<v Speaker 1>So I just wonder what kind of provisions do people

0:09:19.360 --> 0:09:21.920
<v Speaker 1>make to potentially have childcare when they have to go

0:09:21.960 --> 0:09:24.080
<v Speaker 1>back to the office. Your experience, Leasa, the experience of

0:09:24.120 --> 0:09:26.920
<v Speaker 1>so many right now, so keen across this country. Yeah,

0:09:26.960 --> 0:09:30.480
<v Speaker 1>it is. And you know, I think what's so important here, John,

0:09:30.600 --> 0:09:33.559
<v Speaker 1>is the idea of how it linkson Joe Biden stridency.

0:09:33.600 --> 0:09:36.360
<v Speaker 1>The President has made clear this is strident, but he

0:09:36.480 --> 0:09:39.840
<v Speaker 1>talked enough about the schools within that stridency. Joshua going

0:09:39.920 --> 0:09:41.960
<v Speaker 1>to leave it. They're gonna catch up. Joshua shafting there,

0:09:42.000 --> 0:09:50.640
<v Speaker 1>Johns Hopkins Blinbo School of Public Health, Weinstein, do we

0:09:50.679 --> 0:09:56.280
<v Speaker 1>get to Francisco the international standard out of London, Francisco

0:09:56.400 --> 0:09:59.959
<v Speaker 1>blage Bank America ahead of global commodatives and too rivets

0:10:00.000 --> 0:10:03.240
<v Speaker 1>of research got to catch up. Francisco. Let's just start

0:10:03.240 --> 0:10:06.360
<v Speaker 1>with what's going on with aluminum aluminium three K. What's

0:10:06.400 --> 0:10:11.400
<v Speaker 1>happening is this old supply scarcity. UH. In the Jonathan

0:10:11.400 --> 0:10:15.319
<v Speaker 1>there's a there's supply scarcity on a couple of different fronts.

0:10:15.360 --> 0:10:18.760
<v Speaker 1>We've had, of course, UH a coo of tieing Guinea,

0:10:18.880 --> 0:10:23.600
<v Speaker 1>which is created some anxiety around book side supplies. Book

0:10:23.679 --> 0:10:28.400
<v Speaker 1>Side is the ingredient into alumina, which in turn as

0:10:28.480 --> 0:10:34.480
<v Speaker 1>the key ingredients into aluminum or aluminium um so um so.

0:10:34.720 --> 0:10:37.040
<v Speaker 1>We we've had shortages there because of cool and but

0:10:37.040 --> 0:10:40.640
<v Speaker 1>then more importantly, China has been curving aluminum supplies now

0:10:40.720 --> 0:10:44.679
<v Speaker 1>for most of the most of the year because um

0:10:44.720 --> 0:10:48.439
<v Speaker 1>they're trying to rain in power generation become cleaner. And

0:10:48.559 --> 0:10:51.160
<v Speaker 1>remember it's been a low rainfall year in China. It's

0:10:51.160 --> 0:10:53.280
<v Speaker 1>one of the reasons they've been trying to crack down

0:10:53.320 --> 0:10:56.320
<v Speaker 1>on bitcoin too. So third generation is very strong, but

0:10:56.360 --> 0:10:59.880
<v Speaker 1>it's mostly again filling the gap for that lack of

0:11:00.080 --> 0:11:03.120
<v Speaker 1>hydro power. So so if you look at the liminum

0:11:03.120 --> 0:11:05.520
<v Speaker 1>production year to date in China's kind of flat as

0:11:05.520 --> 0:11:08.800
<v Speaker 1>a pancake. Demand's kept growing. We hold this liquar in

0:11:08.840 --> 0:11:13.280
<v Speaker 1>the system and and that's what's pushing prices higher. Francisco,

0:11:13.320 --> 0:11:16.520
<v Speaker 1>I saw the London Medals index of Bloomberg indexes as well,

0:11:16.559 --> 0:11:19.280
<v Speaker 1>show Medals as a group doing better. We know the

0:11:19.280 --> 0:11:23.160
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Commodity index has done better as well. Does it

0:11:23.320 --> 0:11:30.400
<v Speaker 1>signal the commodities breakout? Can you call a bullmarket in commodities? Um? Well,

0:11:30.400 --> 0:11:32.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean we you know, uh, Tom, we we've had

0:11:32.920 --> 0:11:34.520
<v Speaker 1>a bit of a bull market already for a while,

0:11:34.720 --> 0:11:36.880
<v Speaker 1>uh since since we hit the lowest back in April

0:11:37.000 --> 0:11:40.400
<v Speaker 1>last year. So um, we remained constructive here. We we

0:11:40.480 --> 0:11:43.320
<v Speaker 1>think prices of Marty's most commodities will keep going higher.

0:11:43.800 --> 0:11:45.959
<v Speaker 1>But again, independs on where you look at. I remember

0:11:46.440 --> 0:11:49.400
<v Speaker 1>iron ore has been coming down very hard since Valley

0:11:49.480 --> 0:11:54.240
<v Speaker 1>started exporting more volumes. But then oil, on the other hand,

0:11:54.280 --> 0:11:56.360
<v Speaker 1>it's kind of sitting. It's a bit of a boiling

0:11:56.360 --> 0:11:59.439
<v Speaker 1>frog waiting for the winter. And natural gas, of course

0:11:59.559 --> 0:12:03.200
<v Speaker 1>is ripped around the world and also dragging up us

0:12:03.280 --> 0:12:05.640
<v Speaker 1>mad gats with it. So it depends where you look at.

0:12:05.679 --> 0:12:08.880
<v Speaker 1>But in world terms, commorities are very strong because we

0:12:08.920 --> 0:12:11.160
<v Speaker 1>have a little liquid in the system. We are growing,

0:12:11.600 --> 0:12:14.480
<v Speaker 1>we have supply constraints, we have low inventories. It's kind

0:12:14.520 --> 0:12:16.880
<v Speaker 1>of a perfect cocktail for commorities to keep breaking higher.

0:12:16.920 --> 0:12:18.760
<v Speaker 1>And when you talk about oil and the cold winter,

0:12:18.960 --> 0:12:21.439
<v Speaker 1>there was a note that I believe your team put

0:12:21.480 --> 0:12:23.640
<v Speaker 1>out that you do see the potential for a hundred

0:12:23.640 --> 0:12:27.720
<v Speaker 1>dollar barrel oil in the United States and elsewhere based

0:12:27.840 --> 0:12:30.280
<v Speaker 1>on what supplies are doing. Just want to bring you

0:12:30.280 --> 0:12:33.480
<v Speaker 1>these headlines. OPEC see stronger demand for its crew this

0:12:33.559 --> 0:12:37.200
<v Speaker 1>year and next at the same time, non opeque output

0:12:37.520 --> 0:12:40.280
<v Speaker 1>is supposed to be down. And this really directly speaks

0:12:40.320 --> 0:12:43.280
<v Speaker 1>to the shale patch. What's the tipping point at which

0:12:43.280 --> 0:12:46.720
<v Speaker 1>point we start to see UH supplies go up to

0:12:46.800 --> 0:12:50.719
<v Speaker 1>meet the demand and regulate well. So so I think

0:12:50.720 --> 0:12:52.520
<v Speaker 1>I think right now we have a very short window

0:12:52.520 --> 0:12:55.320
<v Speaker 1>into the winter. We're all still UH wearing flip flow

0:12:55.360 --> 0:12:57.880
<v Speaker 1>ups and shorts in the northern hemisphere, but that's not

0:12:58.000 --> 0:13:00.559
<v Speaker 1>changed very quickly. Within a month or two, get cold,

0:13:00.679 --> 0:13:02.559
<v Speaker 1>you can get very cold. I think natural gas is

0:13:02.600 --> 0:13:06.160
<v Speaker 1>gonna be very strong and if if it breaks out,

0:13:06.320 --> 0:13:09.160
<v Speaker 1>and remember we're already trading over twenty dosp mb tu,

0:13:09.200 --> 0:13:12.040
<v Speaker 1>which is a hundred and twenty barrel foil equivalent in

0:13:12.120 --> 0:13:15.760
<v Speaker 1>oil um and we go another ten bucks higher on

0:13:15.800 --> 0:13:17.840
<v Speaker 1>then for mbtu, which would put US at a hundred

0:13:17.880 --> 0:13:22.079
<v Speaker 1>and eighty dollars per prepared barrel foil equivalent. I think

0:13:22.080 --> 0:13:24.439
<v Speaker 1>that would drug up the entire oil sector because people

0:13:24.440 --> 0:13:28.360
<v Speaker 1>will look for cheaper sources of of of of bt

0:13:28.520 --> 0:13:32.120
<v Speaker 1>us of calorific value for for heating and for power generation.

0:13:32.400 --> 0:13:35.600
<v Speaker 1>We see a very strong bunker fuel marketing Singapore already

0:13:35.640 --> 0:13:39.160
<v Speaker 1>because of that recent So I'm a little concerned that, um,

0:13:39.200 --> 0:13:41.960
<v Speaker 1>the winter gets cold, we're gonna see, uh, the entire

0:13:42.080 --> 0:13:44.880
<v Speaker 1>energy complex ripping higher. Francisco, what does the move in

0:13:44.920 --> 0:13:51.200
<v Speaker 1>these commodities say about the resurgence of the Pacific rim Um? Well,

0:13:51.240 --> 0:13:53.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think the Pacific rim is is definitely

0:13:53.240 --> 0:13:55.480
<v Speaker 1>coming back. Now. The one thing I would notice that

0:13:55.600 --> 0:13:58.400
<v Speaker 1>China is a little softer. And remember one thing we've

0:13:58.520 --> 0:14:01.000
<v Speaker 1>we've been tracking with with a lot of interest this

0:14:01.120 --> 0:14:02.960
<v Speaker 1>what's going on in the property sector in China with

0:14:03.040 --> 0:14:07.280
<v Speaker 1>ever grands bonds coming down very hard, Chinese new lawn

0:14:07.320 --> 0:14:11.400
<v Speaker 1>issues also slowing down materially over the last few months.

0:14:11.920 --> 0:14:14.080
<v Speaker 1>UM and that's one thing that you know, we we

0:14:14.200 --> 0:14:17.360
<v Speaker 1>keep a close eye on. But but generally the the

0:14:17.400 --> 0:14:20.960
<v Speaker 1>Asia Pacific ram, the back ram as reported, it's definitely

0:14:21.000 --> 0:14:23.920
<v Speaker 1>coming back with force. And remember over the next six

0:14:23.960 --> 0:14:27.360
<v Speaker 1>months we're gonna have a huge search in vaccinations which

0:14:27.360 --> 0:14:30.960
<v Speaker 1>will restart air travel. So we think a hundred oil

0:14:31.160 --> 0:14:33.680
<v Speaker 1>is more likely next summer when we all start flying

0:14:33.720 --> 0:14:37.280
<v Speaker 1>internationally much more um in in in a much much

0:14:37.280 --> 0:14:40.360
<v Speaker 1>greater way. Otherwise it may happen sooner if the winter

0:14:40.960 --> 0:14:43.200
<v Speaker 1>turn is very cold. But the pack rim is definitely

0:14:43.280 --> 0:14:45.640
<v Speaker 1>coming back. But it's a triple digit crew price the

0:14:45.640 --> 0:14:49.000
<v Speaker 1>base case for you, Francisco, it's not your base case. Now.

0:14:49.640 --> 0:14:52.400
<v Speaker 1>We we have are are we have a call for

0:14:52.520 --> 0:14:55.280
<v Speaker 1>a hundred oil for next summer. What we are saying

0:14:55.400 --> 0:14:57.720
<v Speaker 1>is if the winter is called, we would roll We

0:14:57.760 --> 0:14:59.760
<v Speaker 1>could roll that up six months and it may have

0:14:59.840 --> 0:15:03.480
<v Speaker 1>been this winter. Wow. But again, um, you know we're

0:15:03.480 --> 0:15:08.640
<v Speaker 1>gonna type market for for energy and oil is again

0:15:09.040 --> 0:15:12.920
<v Speaker 1>it's still benefiting from OPEC excess capacity. But we don't

0:15:12.920 --> 0:15:17.880
<v Speaker 1>have the the amount of shale available over a shore

0:15:17.920 --> 0:15:20.720
<v Speaker 1>window of time to to meet that call if if

0:15:20.760 --> 0:15:25.000
<v Speaker 1>the weather gets cold, Francisco, just an amazing cool, and

0:15:25.040 --> 0:15:26.920
<v Speaker 1>we want you to come back again soon so we

0:15:26.920 --> 0:15:29.160
<v Speaker 1>can talk about that the prospect that cool comes in

0:15:29.560 --> 0:15:37.920
<v Speaker 1>six months. Francisco Blige their bank for America. Let's get

0:15:37.960 --> 0:15:40.600
<v Speaker 1>straight to the quote of this morning. We've been jokingly

0:15:40.640 --> 0:15:43.160
<v Speaker 1>calling this rally the d Sharon or Dave Matthews rally.

0:15:43.240 --> 0:15:45.840
<v Speaker 1>Essentially it is a rally that nobody likes, and yet

0:15:45.840 --> 0:15:48.160
<v Speaker 1>it continues to go up. The author of that quote,

0:15:48.200 --> 0:15:49.640
<v Speaker 1>and please to say as with us now, I mean

0:15:49.640 --> 0:15:53.560
<v Speaker 1>with Silverman, RBC Capital Markets, Equity derivative strategist Amy, let's

0:15:53.560 --> 0:15:56.760
<v Speaker 1>start right there. Any reason for that to change anytime soon?

0:15:59.240 --> 0:16:02.360
<v Speaker 1>So guys, so far no, you know, I was watching

0:16:02.440 --> 0:16:04.840
<v Speaker 1>the draw down, you know, the past week with great

0:16:04.880 --> 0:16:08.720
<v Speaker 1>interest because the option sentiment has been so glum through

0:16:08.760 --> 0:16:11.320
<v Speaker 1>your end, and you know, once usually you get kind

0:16:11.360 --> 0:16:13.720
<v Speaker 1>of a breather, it kind of comes off, and the

0:16:13.760 --> 0:16:16.520
<v Speaker 1>reality is it hasn't. So you know, we remain glum.

0:16:17.080 --> 0:16:21.240
<v Speaker 1>We remain with demand for downside protection and even despite

0:16:21.240 --> 0:16:24.120
<v Speaker 1>the move down, you know, that has kind of stayed solid,

0:16:24.200 --> 0:16:27.160
<v Speaker 1>which just tells you that sentiment UH is still kind

0:16:27.160 --> 0:16:29.720
<v Speaker 1>of saying this is this is unloved and they're waiting

0:16:29.720 --> 0:16:33.520
<v Speaker 1>for even further of a move amy the week, the weekends,

0:16:33.600 --> 0:16:36.760
<v Speaker 1>the week begins, and we have to focus on acuity

0:16:36.840 --> 0:16:39.000
<v Speaker 1>here away from the lyrics of Ed shere And and

0:16:39.160 --> 0:16:42.720
<v Speaker 1>Dave Matthews. You've created a firestorm out in the street

0:16:43.000 --> 0:16:46.600
<v Speaker 1>with your vicious, mean spirited note. Give us the acuity

0:16:46.800 --> 0:16:52.400
<v Speaker 1>right now of why you can own equities. Yeah. Look,

0:16:52.480 --> 0:16:54.960
<v Speaker 1>I think part of it is because the market is

0:16:55.040 --> 0:16:58.240
<v Speaker 1>well hedged. We are very well positioned to the downside.

0:16:58.240 --> 0:17:00.280
<v Speaker 1>I'll give you guys one step that I think really

0:17:00.280 --> 0:17:02.680
<v Speaker 1>puts this in the context. You know, if you just

0:17:02.760 --> 0:17:04.959
<v Speaker 1>sold one of these temper cent how the money put

0:17:05.040 --> 0:17:08.120
<v Speaker 1>options on the SMP in October, Right now, you can

0:17:08.160 --> 0:17:11.960
<v Speaker 1>buy the equivalent sixty times the upside. Now, just to

0:17:12.040 --> 0:17:14.480
<v Speaker 1>provide some history on that metric, back in July that

0:17:14.560 --> 0:17:17.520
<v Speaker 1>was at fifteen times. So what that's telling you is

0:17:17.560 --> 0:17:20.920
<v Speaker 1>the market is ready for the market going down. Um,

0:17:21.000 --> 0:17:24.800
<v Speaker 1>and oftentimes when that happens that the reverse is not true. Right,

0:17:24.840 --> 0:17:27.200
<v Speaker 1>the market is not ready for the market going up.

0:17:27.520 --> 0:17:30.080
<v Speaker 1>And so you know that brings you to a potential

0:17:30.119 --> 0:17:34.160
<v Speaker 1>path if something good does happen of people climbing having

0:17:34.240 --> 0:17:36.439
<v Speaker 1>to scramble to get that leverage on the upside. Well,

0:17:36.440 --> 0:17:37.879
<v Speaker 1>I can say, Amy's I'm sure you've got a lot

0:17:37.880 --> 0:17:40.320
<v Speaker 1>of push back on the Dave Matthews point, especially based

0:17:40.320 --> 0:17:42.800
<v Speaker 1>on some of the people who read your notes. A

0:17:42.880 --> 0:17:44.919
<v Speaker 1>lot of people like Dave Matthews, and we can discuss

0:17:44.960 --> 0:17:47.840
<v Speaker 1>that in detail. They that's the hard way. Yeah, exactly,

0:17:47.840 --> 0:17:50.040
<v Speaker 1>not a lot of haymail Um. There is a question

0:17:50.160 --> 0:17:52.800
<v Speaker 1>about how people are looking at inflation, how people are

0:17:52.840 --> 0:17:55.280
<v Speaker 1>looking at margin pressures. And one thing that you said

0:17:55.320 --> 0:17:56.800
<v Speaker 1>in your note that I thought was fascinating is the

0:17:56.840 --> 0:18:00.040
<v Speaker 1>options market is not pricing in concern at all for

0:18:00.119 --> 0:18:02.520
<v Speaker 1>a six month period or twelve month period for inflation

0:18:02.520 --> 0:18:06.560
<v Speaker 1>in the consumer staples, however, not really the case in industrials.

0:18:06.560 --> 0:18:10.879
<v Speaker 1>Can you explain, Yeah, you know, I think it's important

0:18:10.920 --> 0:18:14.240
<v Speaker 1>because we kind of talk about inflation in this broad umbrella,

0:18:14.400 --> 0:18:17.639
<v Speaker 1>and the reality is obviously different sectors are going to

0:18:17.680 --> 0:18:20.600
<v Speaker 1>be impacted differently. You know, when you look at consumer

0:18:20.720 --> 0:18:23.240
<v Speaker 1>staples on a two month period, when you look at

0:18:23.280 --> 0:18:25.480
<v Speaker 1>the names in it, like a Kroger for example, where

0:18:25.520 --> 0:18:27.960
<v Speaker 1>you know it is down nine percent last week, you're

0:18:28.160 --> 0:18:31.520
<v Speaker 1>seeing it short term, and yet that disappears over a

0:18:31.520 --> 0:18:34.040
<v Speaker 1>six month period and a twelve month period when you

0:18:34.040 --> 0:18:38.920
<v Speaker 1>look at those relative implied volatilities completely the opposite truest industrials. Now,

0:18:39.119 --> 0:18:40.679
<v Speaker 1>you know, as I mentioned my notes, some of this

0:18:40.920 --> 0:18:43.760
<v Speaker 1>is tax related. But what this tells me is, look,

0:18:43.800 --> 0:18:47.080
<v Speaker 1>if you believe that the cost pressures do remain in

0:18:47.160 --> 0:18:50.520
<v Speaker 1>consumer staples over the longer term, that options market pricing

0:18:50.560 --> 0:18:52.439
<v Speaker 1>has not put that there yet, So that is an

0:18:52.440 --> 0:18:55.960
<v Speaker 1>opportunity to own those puts within that sector specifically. I

0:18:56.000 --> 0:18:59.120
<v Speaker 1>think that's how you have to play inflation concerns right now.

0:18:59.160 --> 0:19:01.200
<v Speaker 1>How much is this the way that people are looking

0:19:01.240 --> 0:19:03.919
<v Speaker 1>at the market rather than go along a particular sector,

0:19:03.960 --> 0:19:07.000
<v Speaker 1>They're looking at how margin pressures are being priced in

0:19:07.080 --> 0:19:12.120
<v Speaker 1>specific sectors and trying to get ahead of things that way. Yeah,

0:19:12.200 --> 0:19:14.760
<v Speaker 1>I think, Look, it's gonna go sector by sector, Lisa,

0:19:14.800 --> 0:19:17.000
<v Speaker 1>it's also going to go stock by stock, So you know,

0:19:17.040 --> 0:19:20.320
<v Speaker 1>we're really focused on where we see that change in

0:19:20.400 --> 0:19:23.560
<v Speaker 1>auction sentiment. And you know stop by stop program for example,

0:19:23.880 --> 0:19:26.800
<v Speaker 1>you know that the normalized skew in that name is

0:19:26.840 --> 0:19:29.080
<v Speaker 1>at a two year high, so essentially the demand for

0:19:29.119 --> 0:19:31.800
<v Speaker 1>downside protection. Again, this is even after it's gone down

0:19:31.880 --> 0:19:34.200
<v Speaker 1>nine percent. That's what I think is key for people

0:19:34.240 --> 0:19:36.680
<v Speaker 1>to remember it's you know, after you've had that moved down,

0:19:37.040 --> 0:19:40.560
<v Speaker 1>oftentimes hedges are removed. This is not what is happening

0:19:40.600 --> 0:19:43.240
<v Speaker 1>in names where you continue to see that inflation pressure,

0:19:43.280 --> 0:19:45.359
<v Speaker 1>so people think it will continue to go down. Okay,

0:19:45.440 --> 0:19:47.199
<v Speaker 1>So I mean after this, I'm in love with the

0:19:47.200 --> 0:19:49.959
<v Speaker 1>shape of this market. You know that's great. It's an

0:19:50.760 --> 0:19:53.520
<v Speaker 1>actually go out there, folks and read edge sheering lyrics.

0:19:53.600 --> 0:19:57.960
<v Speaker 1>It's um telling, you know, good jokes that needs to

0:19:57.960 --> 0:20:03.000
<v Speaker 1>be explained, tak. So we're in love with the shape

0:20:03.000 --> 0:20:05.800
<v Speaker 1>of this market. But the reason why the skew is

0:20:05.840 --> 0:20:07.879
<v Speaker 1>the way it is. You know that Shearing taught me

0:20:07.880 --> 0:20:10.920
<v Speaker 1>the Greek letters. The reason that the skews the way

0:20:10.960 --> 0:20:13.840
<v Speaker 1>it is is fear. How do you know when to

0:20:13.920 --> 0:20:19.320
<v Speaker 1>step into fear and go along? Yeah? You know, Look

0:20:19.520 --> 0:20:22.359
<v Speaker 1>you don't. I wish I did. It's always about timing, right,

0:20:22.440 --> 0:20:24.160
<v Speaker 1>you don't. You know. The way I kind of think

0:20:24.160 --> 0:20:27.439
<v Speaker 1>about it is what could possibly drive you know, this

0:20:27.520 --> 0:20:30.560
<v Speaker 1>market to the upside. What Lisa said earlier about just

0:20:30.640 --> 0:20:33.439
<v Speaker 1>the childcare point, I feel deeply personally because I have

0:20:33.480 --> 0:20:36.080
<v Speaker 1>two school aged children. But look, if you get a

0:20:36.160 --> 0:20:39.320
<v Speaker 1>vaccine earlier than expected for the under twelve crowd, right,

0:20:39.359 --> 0:20:43.240
<v Speaker 1>the crowd that actually needs childcare infrastructure. That's something that

0:20:43.280 --> 0:20:45.720
<v Speaker 1>could potentially bring this market up the same with you know,

0:20:45.840 --> 0:20:48.919
<v Speaker 1>better than expected NFP data point. Again, you know, the

0:20:48.960 --> 0:20:51.439
<v Speaker 1>timing is always difficult. The point is just that the

0:20:51.480 --> 0:20:54.000
<v Speaker 1>positioning is really not to be upside at all with it.

0:20:54.119 --> 0:20:56.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean, that's some important let's finish that. Do you

0:20:56.080 --> 0:21:00.000
<v Speaker 1>think that authorization for children could have a similar effect

0:21:00.080 --> 0:21:01.640
<v Speaker 1>on this market in the same way that we saw

0:21:01.680 --> 0:21:06.320
<v Speaker 1>things developed in early November last year? Yeah, you know, look,

0:21:06.680 --> 0:21:09.119
<v Speaker 1>I'm not a medical expert, but I think that that

0:21:09.240 --> 0:21:10.720
<v Speaker 1>this is one of those things where you just kind

0:21:10.720 --> 0:21:13.600
<v Speaker 1>of know personally if you're if you're living through it, right, Like,

0:21:13.640 --> 0:21:15.879
<v Speaker 1>if if this is something that you know that you

0:21:15.880 --> 0:21:18.520
<v Speaker 1>can safely send your children to school and so you're

0:21:18.520 --> 0:21:22.240
<v Speaker 1>not you know, calling a backubsider at the eleventh hour

0:21:22.320 --> 0:21:23.960
<v Speaker 1>because you still have to go to the office and

0:21:24.119 --> 0:21:26.120
<v Speaker 1>you know you can't leave a seven year at home,

0:21:26.560 --> 0:21:29.200
<v Speaker 1>then then sure, of course it helps that that makes

0:21:29.240 --> 0:21:32.320
<v Speaker 1>it so the stability of the return to work is

0:21:32.320 --> 0:21:34.800
<v Speaker 1>is something that can happen. I mean, thank you, thank

0:21:34.840 --> 0:21:36.480
<v Speaker 1>you for catching up with this morning, and we sail

0:21:36.560 --> 0:21:45.280
<v Speaker 1>them in that and obviously, capital markets Postmanian time keen

0:21:45.359 --> 0:21:48.040
<v Speaker 1>are the most important conversation of the day on the

0:21:48.160 --> 0:21:51.639
<v Speaker 1>here and now. Mr Cass is with us this morning.

0:21:51.640 --> 0:21:54.720
<v Speaker 1>Douglas Cass, he reads investment, and his people briefed us

0:21:54.760 --> 0:21:56.919
<v Speaker 1>this morning that we are not talking about the New

0:21:57.000 --> 0:22:02.280
<v Speaker 1>York Yankees, the Boston Red Sax or the Toronto Blue Juice.

0:22:03.440 --> 0:22:10.520
<v Speaker 1>Here nowhere, the Toronto's du Casse Good morning. Market breadth

0:22:10.920 --> 0:22:14.680
<v Speaker 1>represents the total number of stacks that are increasing as

0:22:14.680 --> 0:22:17.720
<v Speaker 1>opposed to the number of stacks that are undergoing a decline.

0:22:18.200 --> 0:22:22.119
<v Speaker 1>You are focused, I am focused. I'm fearful about the

0:22:22.160 --> 0:22:26.399
<v Speaker 1>equity market, and I'm basically of the view that investors

0:22:26.480 --> 0:22:32.760
<v Speaker 1>are underpricing risk UM. Investors today are really wildly bullish UM,

0:22:33.000 --> 0:22:38.560
<v Speaker 1>despite a long laundry list of uncertainties and despite um

0:22:38.600 --> 0:22:42.719
<v Speaker 1>a wide range of possible economic outcomes, there's virtually no

0:22:42.760 --> 0:22:45.600
<v Speaker 1>one looking for anything other than a garden variety correction

0:22:45.640 --> 0:22:48.760
<v Speaker 1>at most. And as a measure of that optimism, Bank

0:22:48.800 --> 0:22:52.120
<v Speaker 1>of America conducted a survey of their private wealth clients

0:22:52.119 --> 0:22:56.359
<v Speaker 1>represented over three trillion dollars in assets, and their investors

0:22:56.800 --> 0:23:00.800
<v Speaker 1>are at sixty in stocks and then all time high

0:23:01.400 --> 0:23:04.199
<v Speaker 1>and Today's and you've just been discussing this for the

0:23:04.240 --> 0:23:09.080
<v Speaker 1>past week. Today's strategists offer very precise and sometimes preposterous

0:23:09.119 --> 0:23:13.720
<v Speaker 1>price targets at that reflective optimism that economic growth will

0:23:13.760 --> 0:23:17.480
<v Speaker 1>not be threatened by inflation, by hierocaust, by continued supply

0:23:17.600 --> 0:23:21.600
<v Speaker 1>dis locations, by higher taxes, etcetera. The government's debtload and

0:23:21.640 --> 0:23:25.879
<v Speaker 1>even higher deficits. Um. Yeah, a few strategists have recently

0:23:25.920 --> 0:23:28.800
<v Speaker 1>voiced some short term concern pol Tom, but look at

0:23:28.840 --> 0:23:32.240
<v Speaker 1>the shallowness of their downside targets. There is a unanimity

0:23:32.359 --> 0:23:35.360
<v Speaker 1>that dips it A buy forgetting about draw downs over history,

0:23:35.600 --> 0:23:37.639
<v Speaker 1>and as I said to you last time, Grandma co

0:23:37.760 --> 0:23:39.679
<v Speaker 1>Fax taught me a more balanced way to look at

0:23:39.680 --> 0:23:42.639
<v Speaker 1>the markets. She taught me to always look over my

0:23:42.680 --> 0:23:46.000
<v Speaker 1>shoulder because the Cossacks may be attacking us. So you

0:23:46.040 --> 0:23:49.040
<v Speaker 1>could describe me now as the anti ethel merman who

0:23:49.119 --> 0:23:53.919
<v Speaker 1>I prefer over edge Shearon and Dave Matthews. Everything doesn't

0:23:54.000 --> 0:23:57.320
<v Speaker 1>always come up roses, and I would describe the market

0:23:57.400 --> 0:24:00.360
<v Speaker 1>a little differently. I prefer the lyrics of Jerry see

0:24:00.359 --> 0:24:04.080
<v Speaker 1>You to Dave Matthews from the Grateful Dead song Ripple.

0:24:04.520 --> 0:24:06.919
<v Speaker 1>There is a road but it's no simple highway between

0:24:06.960 --> 0:24:09.360
<v Speaker 1>the dawn and the dark. So I see things differently

0:24:09.400 --> 0:24:12.639
<v Speaker 1>than the bulls. And I would end by saying, among

0:24:12.680 --> 0:24:17.239
<v Speaker 1>other things, when when Pale tells us that inflation is transitory,

0:24:17.400 --> 0:24:20.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm reminded of that great scene and Princess Bride when

0:24:20.720 --> 0:24:23.679
<v Speaker 1>a Nigo Montoyo tells Vessini, I do not think the

0:24:23.720 --> 0:24:27.640
<v Speaker 1>word means what you think it means. Yeah. Yeah. Shoutout

0:24:27.680 --> 0:24:30.280
<v Speaker 1>to Lisianne Sanders, who, like Doug, cast channel the past

0:24:30.359 --> 0:24:35.280
<v Speaker 1>and excellence and mentioned the Stones in Philadelphia in Doug

0:24:35.320 --> 0:24:38.080
<v Speaker 1>Paul's got a bunch of adult questions. Just one quick

0:24:38.200 --> 0:24:44.359
<v Speaker 1>question for you. Is our pontification about equities now shattered

0:24:44.560 --> 0:24:50.480
<v Speaker 1>or changed because of all these media and social media. Well,

0:24:50.520 --> 0:24:52.680
<v Speaker 1>that's a question. That's a great question. I would look.

0:24:52.720 --> 0:24:55.879
<v Speaker 1>I would I have a different take on that. I

0:24:55.920 --> 0:25:01.720
<v Speaker 1>think it's shattered because we rarely discuss the dangers associated

0:25:01.760 --> 0:25:05.960
<v Speaker 1>with the evolution of market structure. Um. You know, in

0:25:06.000 --> 0:25:09.440
<v Speaker 1>the old days when we started talking to each other,

0:25:09.880 --> 0:25:12.680
<v Speaker 1>the dominant investor used to be active investors like mutual

0:25:12.720 --> 0:25:16.480
<v Speaker 1>funds and hedge funds, and today our markets are dominated

0:25:16.560 --> 0:25:21.639
<v Speaker 1>by these passive investors E. T. F and quant strategies UM.

0:25:21.680 --> 0:25:25.000
<v Speaker 1>I reminded of a quote that Warren Buffett said in

0:25:25.080 --> 0:25:28.200
<v Speaker 1>two thousand six when he was talking about derivetives being

0:25:28.240 --> 0:25:31.600
<v Speaker 1>financial weapons of mass destruction that led to the Great

0:25:31.840 --> 0:25:36.879
<v Speaker 1>Financial Crisis. He said, beware of geeks bearing formulas UM.

0:25:37.000 --> 0:25:40.439
<v Speaker 1>So today the geek's account for over sevent the trading

0:25:40.520 --> 0:25:43.520
<v Speaker 1>volume UH, and so Warrant's comments could apply to the

0:25:43.600 --> 0:25:46.240
<v Speaker 1>risk parity voice and the quants today. So I don't

0:25:46.240 --> 0:25:48.639
<v Speaker 1>think there's a I think there's a non trivial danger

0:25:48.680 --> 0:25:53.040
<v Speaker 1>in this transition. As passive investors know everything about price

0:25:53.119 --> 0:25:56.440
<v Speaker 1>but nothing about value. They act and are in herds.

0:25:56.480 --> 0:26:00.240
<v Speaker 1>They feast on price momentum, that's their prey. They don't

0:26:00.280 --> 0:26:03.200
<v Speaker 1>consider reward versus risk. They're not c f as they

0:26:03.240 --> 0:26:07.080
<v Speaker 1>know nothing about discount the dividend models. Um. They never

0:26:07.119 --> 0:26:08.760
<v Speaker 1>looked at a balance sheet or a P and L

0:26:08.880 --> 0:26:12.400
<v Speaker 1>statement and have no emotions because their algales and machines

0:26:12.760 --> 0:26:16.600
<v Speaker 1>to take their strategies. So any inflection point momentum can

0:26:16.680 --> 0:26:19.760
<v Speaker 1>lead to these abrupt and changes and even an avalanche

0:26:19.760 --> 0:26:23.240
<v Speaker 1>of selling. Look what happened on Friday. S and P

0:26:23.440 --> 0:26:25.639
<v Speaker 1>s were up twenty eight handles at nine thirty in

0:26:25.680 --> 0:26:28.520
<v Speaker 1>the morning. They closed sixty handles lower the end the

0:26:28.600 --> 0:26:31.119
<v Speaker 1>day minus thirty four. There was no new news. It

0:26:31.280 --> 0:26:33.919
<v Speaker 1>just happened. It's sort of like when the Yankees won

0:26:34.000 --> 0:26:36.919
<v Speaker 1>thirteen in a row and then went you know, they

0:26:36.960 --> 0:26:39.639
<v Speaker 1>went two for eight in the next ten ten games.

0:26:40.119 --> 0:26:42.959
<v Speaker 1>You know, I'm looking at the Yankee schedule here, and

0:26:43.000 --> 0:26:46.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean they end brutal three games with Toronto. You

0:26:46.880 --> 0:26:50.479
<v Speaker 1>promised me the three games with Tampa. The Yankees are

0:26:50.520 --> 0:26:53.640
<v Speaker 1>the toughest season clothes of any team, I mean Tampa Bay.

0:26:54.000 --> 0:26:56.720
<v Speaker 1>Since when do we fear Tampa today? You have to

0:26:56.880 --> 0:26:59.840
<v Speaker 1>you have to alight? Can I can? I just mentioned

0:27:00.000 --> 0:27:04.960
<v Speaker 1>one thing about stocks. Um You know. I usually come

0:27:04.960 --> 0:27:09.280
<v Speaker 1>on and I have these cautious remarks, um um, you know,

0:27:09.320 --> 0:27:11.720
<v Speaker 1>and I am concerned about the fragility of the economy,

0:27:11.760 --> 0:27:16.080
<v Speaker 1>our market structure, and other reasons like stagflation. But I

0:27:16.160 --> 0:27:20.359
<v Speaker 1>see some really extraordinary long opportunities today in deeper value

0:27:20.400 --> 0:27:23.600
<v Speaker 1>and hated market sectors. The market has been so bifurcated.

0:27:24.480 --> 0:27:26.960
<v Speaker 1>Um Can. I just mentioned very briefly one group that

0:27:27.040 --> 0:27:33.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm buying aggressively. It was a year ago in bank stocks.

0:27:33.760 --> 0:27:36.600
<v Speaker 1>I think that we're in a generational loaf of cannabis stocks.

0:27:36.680 --> 0:27:39.600
<v Speaker 1>And it's not dissimilar to when the SMP was at

0:27:39.640 --> 0:27:42.800
<v Speaker 1>six sixty six on that faithful day in March of

0:27:42.840 --> 0:27:45.000
<v Speaker 1>two thou nine, when I was on the Larry Cudlow

0:27:45.080 --> 0:27:48.520
<v Speaker 1>Show and talking about a generational low in stocks. I

0:27:48.560 --> 0:27:51.800
<v Speaker 1>think that cannabis represents a single best reward versus risk

0:27:51.840 --> 0:27:54.760
<v Speaker 1>on the longside of any sector that I have encountered.

0:27:54.760 --> 0:27:58.639
<v Speaker 1>In the last decade. UM. Most of the major industry

0:27:58.640 --> 0:28:02.920
<v Speaker 1>players are improved their franchises the footprints while the government

0:28:02.960 --> 0:28:06.520
<v Speaker 1>deals with the Safe Banking Act and legalization, both of

0:28:06.520 --> 0:28:09.960
<v Speaker 1>which I see happening during the next couple of months UM.

0:28:10.000 --> 0:28:14.840
<v Speaker 1>But they've been increasingly profitable while legislative debate. Today, most

0:28:14.920 --> 0:28:17.919
<v Speaker 1>institutionals can't even buy the stocks because they're on the

0:28:17.920 --> 0:28:21.440
<v Speaker 1>pitch sheets or trade in candidate. But these are artificial constraints,

0:28:21.680 --> 0:28:23.679
<v Speaker 1>and I'm buying M S O S, which is the

0:28:23.760 --> 0:28:26.959
<v Speaker 1>largest et the pink sheets. Is what the reason folks

0:28:27.000 --> 0:28:31.560
<v Speaker 1>done casses live in large in Florida. You and Tom

0:28:31.560 --> 0:28:35.159
<v Speaker 1>are grizzled veterans down putting it politely there, Um, you

0:28:35.240 --> 0:28:37.240
<v Speaker 1>don't fight the FED is something we all learned a

0:28:37.240 --> 0:28:39.640
<v Speaker 1>long time ago. If the FED is going to be

0:28:39.960 --> 0:28:46.720
<v Speaker 1>more or less our friend, doesn't that support stocks? You know? Um,

0:28:46.760 --> 0:28:50.040
<v Speaker 1>I would say the record high stock prices, the generational

0:28:50.080 --> 0:28:53.240
<v Speaker 1>low and interest rates and the extreme valuations that we

0:28:53.280 --> 0:28:57.160
<v Speaker 1>see today are fertile ground for bogus and new narratives

0:28:57.160 --> 0:28:59.960
<v Speaker 1>and paradigms. It's kind of the polar opposite of the

0:29:00.160 --> 0:29:05.040
<v Speaker 1>dire pessimism. Again in March nine, do you remember a

0:29:05.120 --> 0:29:10.480
<v Speaker 1>famous UH column published in wire by Peter Schwartz and

0:29:10.520 --> 0:29:14.000
<v Speaker 1>Peter Leyden during the dot com boom when they talked

0:29:14.000 --> 0:29:20.800
<v Speaker 1>about a long economic boon. Remember, all right, Well that

0:29:20.840 --> 0:29:27.320
<v Speaker 1>famous It pushed the dot com stocks to new highs.

0:29:27.360 --> 0:29:29.920
<v Speaker 1>And three years after that column there was an eight

0:29:30.400 --> 0:29:32.720
<v Speaker 1>collapse in the nastacs. Seven years later there was a

0:29:32.760 --> 0:29:37.200
<v Speaker 1>great financial crisis. Um. The mantra that sky high valuations

0:29:37.200 --> 0:29:40.280
<v Speaker 1>are now suddenly acceptable as interest rates well to almost

0:29:40.360 --> 0:29:44.640
<v Speaker 1>zero has provided today's rational and popular narrative. But low

0:29:44.720 --> 0:29:51.000
<v Speaker 1>rates provide the roots to historically high value valuations. And

0:29:51.160 --> 0:29:54.000
<v Speaker 1>I would counter the teno argument with the statement that

0:29:54.040 --> 0:29:57.520
<v Speaker 1>there's a fundamental problem with the low rates argument, that

0:29:57.560 --> 0:30:01.120
<v Speaker 1>we may be comparing, oh, one over valued asset class

0:30:01.200 --> 0:30:04.440
<v Speaker 1>to another. You know, you know, a year and a

0:30:04.440 --> 0:30:07.560
<v Speaker 1>half ago, when I like the dividing yield on the SMP,

0:30:07.960 --> 0:30:10.720
<v Speaker 1>sedd that of the tenure. Today the dividing yield on

0:30:10.760 --> 0:30:13.520
<v Speaker 1>the SMP is down to one point to eight. It's

0:30:13.520 --> 0:30:15.800
<v Speaker 1>the lowest in twenty years and not far from the

0:30:15.800 --> 0:30:18.240
<v Speaker 1>record low of one pen in two thousand. I get

0:30:18.280 --> 0:30:21.640
<v Speaker 1>fifteen seconds. Michael from the Pocono's ask should he buy Amazon?

0:30:23.440 --> 0:30:25.440
<v Speaker 1>Buy Amazon and put it away? Yet? There you go,

0:30:25.520 --> 0:30:27.760
<v Speaker 1>There you go, Doug Cass, Thank you so much, greatly

0:30:27.760 --> 0:30:31.920
<v Speaker 1>appreciate it. Next time, Doune Cass on Jay's Rays and Yankees.

0:30:32.640 --> 0:30:36.440
<v Speaker 1>This is the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. Thanks for listening. Join

0:30:36.520 --> 0:30:39.840
<v Speaker 1>us live weekdays from seven to ten am Eastern on

0:30:39.960 --> 0:30:44.240
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Radio and on Bloomberg Television each day from six

0:30:44.320 --> 0:30:49.200
<v Speaker 1>to nine am for insight from the best in economics, finance, investment,

0:30:49.320 --> 0:30:54.360
<v Speaker 1>and international relations. And subscribe to the Surveillance podcast on

0:30:54.440 --> 0:30:58.240
<v Speaker 1>Apple podcast, SoundCloud, Bloomberg dot com, and of course on

0:30:58.360 --> 0:31:02.400
<v Speaker 1>the terminal. I'm I'm keen in. This is Bloomer