WEBVTT - The Forbidden Void: Cases Against Space

0:00:03.080 --> 0:00:06.120
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Stuff to Blow your Mind. From housetop Work

0:00:06.160 --> 0:00:15.640
<v Speaker 1>Dot Cargo. Hey, you welcome to Stuff to Blow your Mind.

0:00:15.640 --> 0:00:18.000
<v Speaker 1>My name is Robert lamp and I am Christian Sagar.

0:00:18.120 --> 0:00:19.880
<v Speaker 1>We're going to kick off here with a quote from

0:00:19.920 --> 0:00:23.200
<v Speaker 1>the late great Carl Sagan sort of set the tone

0:00:23.280 --> 0:00:28.280
<v Speaker 1>for this episode. We were wanderers from the beginning, from

0:00:28.360 --> 0:00:32.519
<v Speaker 1>nine percent of the tenure of humans on Earth, we

0:00:32.520 --> 0:00:37.080
<v Speaker 1>were hunters and foragers, wandering on the savannahs and the steps.

0:00:37.720 --> 0:00:40.800
<v Speaker 1>Even after four hundred generations in villages and cities, we

0:00:40.880 --> 0:00:44.760
<v Speaker 1>still remember. The open road still calls like an almost

0:00:44.760 --> 0:00:49.040
<v Speaker 1>forgotten song of childhood. We invest far off places with

0:00:49.120 --> 0:00:52.880
<v Speaker 1>a certain romance. The appeal I suspect has been meticulously

0:00:52.880 --> 0:00:56.840
<v Speaker 1>crafted by natural selection as an essential element in our

0:00:56.960 --> 0:01:01.080
<v Speaker 1>long term survival. That was a a lark, Carl Sagan.

0:01:01.760 --> 0:01:03.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm all right, like I said, I think uh, I

0:01:03.760 --> 0:01:06.960
<v Speaker 1>think Chuck has the best one in the house. Toufforts. Yeah,

0:01:07.640 --> 0:01:10.039
<v Speaker 1>I like that. I was. I was sitting here giggling

0:01:10.080 --> 0:01:12.160
<v Speaker 1>the whole time, tracking not to laugh into the microphone.

0:01:12.840 --> 0:01:15.640
<v Speaker 1>So that's an appropriate quote for us to start this

0:01:15.680 --> 0:01:19.800
<v Speaker 1>episode with, because we are going to be talking today

0:01:19.840 --> 0:01:25.880
<v Speaker 1>about all well, not all, but various anti space exploration movements,

0:01:26.240 --> 0:01:31.280
<v Speaker 1>whether they be religious, political, economic, Uh, there's there's a

0:01:31.360 --> 0:01:35.119
<v Speaker 1>largic Yeah, yeah, it turns out there's quite a bit

0:01:35.120 --> 0:01:37.320
<v Speaker 1>of them. And uh, you know, I don't think we'd

0:01:37.319 --> 0:01:40.160
<v Speaker 1>classify Carl Sagan as being among them, obviously, no, but

0:01:40.200 --> 0:01:42.520
<v Speaker 1>he kind of sets the stage I think by like that.

0:01:42.680 --> 0:01:45.480
<v Speaker 1>That's a quote from him that kind of captures the

0:01:45.560 --> 0:01:49.680
<v Speaker 1>overall optimism for space and enthusiasm for space that you know,

0:01:49.720 --> 0:01:51.440
<v Speaker 1>I want to definitely get out there for my own part,

0:01:51.440 --> 0:01:54.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm I am definitely a space optimist of space enthusiast.

0:01:55.200 --> 0:01:59.040
<v Speaker 1>I think there are several key arguments for space exploration

0:01:59.080 --> 0:02:02.640
<v Speaker 1>and our investment in space exploration. I mean, namely, uh,

0:02:02.720 --> 0:02:05.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, pushing the technology, ensuring the long term survival

0:02:05.920 --> 0:02:08.440
<v Speaker 1>of the human race, and giving us the ability to

0:02:08.480 --> 0:02:11.080
<v Speaker 1>even protect the planet like in the in movies. As

0:02:11.080 --> 0:02:14.280
<v Speaker 1>I've said before, saving the world is an everyday occurrence

0:02:14.280 --> 0:02:18.760
<v Speaker 1>for hero but to actually save the world, our ability

0:02:18.840 --> 0:02:25.119
<v Speaker 1>to protect the planet from near Earth objects, from meteorites, comments, etcetera,

0:02:25.320 --> 0:02:28.440
<v Speaker 1>like that is as close as we can realistically get

0:02:28.639 --> 0:02:32.960
<v Speaker 1>to saving the planet in a short term, tangible way

0:02:33.280 --> 0:02:35.960
<v Speaker 1>against mass extinction. I think if you had asked me

0:02:36.080 --> 0:02:38.440
<v Speaker 1>before we did all the research for this episode, I

0:02:38.480 --> 0:02:44.800
<v Speaker 1>would have said something similar. And now I'm on the fence. Uh. And,

0:02:44.960 --> 0:02:47.920
<v Speaker 1>which is sad to me because in personal anecdote, like

0:02:48.160 --> 0:02:50.360
<v Speaker 1>I grew up as a little kid, I wanted to

0:02:50.360 --> 0:02:52.440
<v Speaker 1>be an astronaut. That was like my thing as a

0:02:52.480 --> 0:02:54.600
<v Speaker 1>long kid, and my parents bought me all those books

0:02:54.639 --> 0:02:58.360
<v Speaker 1>of like you know, those like giant like uh um

0:02:58.560 --> 0:03:01.440
<v Speaker 1>fold up books of like the interior of the Space

0:03:01.440 --> 0:03:04.040
<v Speaker 1>Shuttle looks like, or like how to become an astronaut,

0:03:04.160 --> 0:03:09.200
<v Speaker 1>stuff like that. Uh. And I remember very specifically being

0:03:09.320 --> 0:03:14.040
<v Speaker 1>a kindergartener in the classroom. I was in New Hampshire

0:03:14.040 --> 0:03:18.000
<v Speaker 1>at the time when the Challenger exploded, and Christie mcculloff

0:03:18.440 --> 0:03:21.880
<v Speaker 1>was a New Hampshire teacher that was aboard the Challenger,

0:03:21.960 --> 0:03:24.680
<v Speaker 1>and so at the time it was you know, a

0:03:24.880 --> 0:03:27.840
<v Speaker 1>really big deal is super upsetting, and but I was

0:03:27.840 --> 0:03:31.520
<v Speaker 1>still like so into the whole astronaut thing. Uh. And

0:03:31.600 --> 0:03:34.800
<v Speaker 1>now look at me now, I you know, I talked

0:03:34.800 --> 0:03:38.360
<v Speaker 1>about science on podcasts and write horror stories about demons.

0:03:38.440 --> 0:03:40.400
<v Speaker 1>I I don't know if I ever achieved my dreams.

0:03:40.440 --> 0:03:43.160
<v Speaker 1>You're rarely go into space at all. No, No, it's

0:03:43.200 --> 0:03:45.400
<v Speaker 1>it's few and far between. I got to talk to

0:03:45.600 --> 0:03:49.880
<v Speaker 1>uh Elon Musk and Richard Branson about that, but yeah,

0:03:49.960 --> 0:03:52.400
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, Like reading all of this information, I

0:03:52.400 --> 0:03:56.440
<v Speaker 1>got to say, there are some compelling arguments against it too,

0:03:56.720 --> 0:03:59.280
<v Speaker 1>I would agree. And you know, I think the important

0:03:59.280 --> 0:04:01.200
<v Speaker 1>thing about this because some of you might be listening

0:04:01.200 --> 0:04:03.160
<v Speaker 1>and you're you're thinking, you're like me, You're like, oh,

0:04:03.200 --> 0:04:06.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm I'm already one board space question and I'm not

0:04:06.080 --> 0:04:08.960
<v Speaker 1>really interested in the counter arguments. But I think it's

0:04:08.960 --> 0:04:12.240
<v Speaker 1>it's healthy to explore the arguments against the things that

0:04:12.280 --> 0:04:15.120
<v Speaker 1>we value, because hey, that gives you a chance to,

0:04:15.680 --> 0:04:18.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, hold on a little tighter, do the things

0:04:18.320 --> 0:04:20.960
<v Speaker 1>you do believe in, question the things you believe in,

0:04:21.240 --> 0:04:23.560
<v Speaker 1>and you know, maybe end up with a more balanced perspective.

0:04:23.839 --> 0:04:26.640
<v Speaker 1>I agree, And after you know, going through this and

0:04:26.680 --> 0:04:28.400
<v Speaker 1>what we're going to present to you today, I can

0:04:28.440 --> 0:04:33.479
<v Speaker 1>tell you that they're there are definitely like like weak

0:04:33.520 --> 0:04:36.039
<v Speaker 1>points in the armor of both of the arguments that

0:04:36.120 --> 0:04:38.080
<v Speaker 1>sort of make you go, okay, like maybe we could

0:04:38.160 --> 0:04:42.440
<v Speaker 1>refine this here. They're like, let's let's really nail down

0:04:42.520 --> 0:04:45.800
<v Speaker 1>why we're going into space and then like for some

0:04:45.839 --> 0:04:48.120
<v Speaker 1>of the arguments against it too, like they need to

0:04:48.120 --> 0:04:50.400
<v Speaker 1>be refined as well. You know, it's a little a

0:04:50.400 --> 0:04:55.000
<v Speaker 1>little loose sometimes, especially like so the one that really

0:04:55.120 --> 0:04:57.240
<v Speaker 1>got us got the ball rolling for us on this

0:04:57.440 --> 0:05:00.359
<v Speaker 1>was an article that we're going to talk about at

0:05:00.360 --> 0:05:03.480
<v Speaker 1>the end of the podcast that is called the Manifesto

0:05:03.520 --> 0:05:08.520
<v Speaker 1>from the Committee to Abolish Outer Space. And it reads

0:05:08.560 --> 0:05:13.840
<v Speaker 1>like a total like farcical, dadist sort of I don't know,

0:05:14.480 --> 0:05:20.840
<v Speaker 1>anti capitalist manifesto sort of joke from the nineteen seventies, right, Um,

0:05:20.880 --> 0:05:23.200
<v Speaker 1>but there is some like if you read real deeply

0:05:23.320 --> 0:05:26.920
<v Speaker 1>on it, there is some logic between the lines. But yeah,

0:05:27.120 --> 0:05:29.719
<v Speaker 1>you know, I thought it was worth reading through to

0:05:29.839 --> 0:05:32.480
<v Speaker 1>promote discussion. Yeah, yeah, totally. And that's why this is

0:05:32.560 --> 0:05:35.600
<v Speaker 1>ultimately all about. We're we're gonna provide you with some arguments.

0:05:36.200 --> 0:05:38.080
<v Speaker 1>You take those, combine them with what you already know,

0:05:38.120 --> 0:05:40.359
<v Speaker 1>which already believe, and then you can give us feedback

0:05:40.400 --> 0:05:43.719
<v Speaker 1>on how that may have changed your viewpoint, how that

0:05:43.839 --> 0:05:47.000
<v Speaker 1>caused you to double down any viewpoint, etcetera. So, before

0:05:47.040 --> 0:05:50.080
<v Speaker 1>we dive into the various sort of categories of anti

0:05:50.120 --> 0:05:53.080
<v Speaker 1>space arguments, there was one article that I read that

0:05:53.120 --> 0:05:54.839
<v Speaker 1>i'd like to use as like a cap off for

0:05:54.920 --> 0:05:58.040
<v Speaker 1>us to start with. And this was written in by

0:05:58.080 --> 0:06:00.960
<v Speaker 1>a guy named Gary Westfall, and it's called The Case

0:06:01.080 --> 0:06:04.560
<v Speaker 1>against Space uh. And it's in it's it's actually in

0:06:04.600 --> 0:06:08.839
<v Speaker 1>a science fiction journal called Science Fiction Studies. Uh. It

0:06:08.920 --> 0:06:10.640
<v Speaker 1>was issued seventy two. If you want to go look

0:06:10.640 --> 0:06:14.520
<v Speaker 1>it up. Um. And he basically says, look like, I'm

0:06:14.720 --> 0:06:17.039
<v Speaker 1>part of the sci fi community. I love science fiction.

0:06:17.040 --> 0:06:20.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm a science fiction writer. I teach science fiction. Uh.

0:06:20.400 --> 0:06:22.320
<v Speaker 1>And I have been in love with the idea of

0:06:22.360 --> 0:06:26.680
<v Speaker 1>going to space for decades now, but lately, like my

0:06:26.920 --> 0:06:31.120
<v Speaker 1>enthusiasm for it has waned. Uh. And he says there

0:06:31.120 --> 0:06:34.680
<v Speaker 1>have been different supportive arguments for space travel in recent

0:06:34.800 --> 0:06:37.719
<v Speaker 1>error eras right, So you can sort of break it

0:06:37.760 --> 0:06:40.520
<v Speaker 1>down from the fifties and sixties to the seventies and

0:06:40.600 --> 0:06:43.039
<v Speaker 1>eighties and then up to his point in the nineties.

0:06:43.320 --> 0:06:45.280
<v Speaker 1>And I think as we go on today, we'll see

0:06:45.320 --> 0:06:47.800
<v Speaker 1>some more in the the ats and the teens that

0:06:47.839 --> 0:06:51.160
<v Speaker 1>we're existing in now. But uh, he said, the fifties

0:06:51.160 --> 0:06:53.960
<v Speaker 1>and the sixties, they were all philosophical arguments, right, humanity

0:06:54.040 --> 0:06:56.960
<v Speaker 1>must venture into an occupy outer space so that we

0:06:57.000 --> 0:07:01.800
<v Speaker 1>can fulfill our inherent drive for exploration and inhabit unknown realms.

0:07:02.000 --> 0:07:06.719
<v Speaker 1>Not because it is easy, that it is hard. Oh yeah,

0:07:06.760 --> 0:07:10.320
<v Speaker 1>Well Kennedy didn't have a Boston accent. He had a

0:07:10.680 --> 0:07:13.920
<v Speaker 1>he had a Kennedy accent. Yeah, but I can try.

0:07:14.480 --> 0:07:18.520
<v Speaker 1>Uh you know what. No, I'm not gonna I could

0:07:18.520 --> 0:07:24.440
<v Speaker 1>do his brother. I had a bad ice cube anyways. Okay,

0:07:25.040 --> 0:07:27.160
<v Speaker 1>But to continue on, this is basically like the Star

0:07:27.240 --> 0:07:32.760
<v Speaker 1>Trek argument, right, like like a new life, new civilizations, YadA, YadA.

0:07:32.800 --> 0:07:35.920
<v Speaker 1>It's kind of a manifest destiny kind of yeah. Yeah,

0:07:35.960 --> 0:07:39.160
<v Speaker 1>which is a good way to put it. Um. In short,

0:07:39.440 --> 0:07:42.360
<v Speaker 1>he says, this is an exact quote. In short, the

0:07:42.440 --> 0:07:45.960
<v Speaker 1>history of our species powerfully suggests that progress will come

0:07:46.360 --> 0:07:49.560
<v Speaker 1>from continued stable life on Earth and that a vast

0:07:49.680 --> 0:07:52.880
<v Speaker 1>new program of travel into space will lead to a

0:07:52.880 --> 0:07:56.160
<v Speaker 1>new period of human stagnation. And interestingly enough, he then

0:07:56.400 --> 0:07:59.600
<v Speaker 1>quotes the exact quote that you put above from Carl Sagan.

0:08:00.320 --> 0:08:03.239
<v Speaker 1>Then he says, Okay, then in the seventies and eighties

0:08:03.440 --> 0:08:06.440
<v Speaker 1>was shifted right because the whole philosophical thing wasn't really

0:08:06.440 --> 0:08:10.120
<v Speaker 1>working out anymore, and it became a practical economic argument,

0:08:10.400 --> 0:08:13.000
<v Speaker 1>and it was something like this that outer space will

0:08:13.040 --> 0:08:16.600
<v Speaker 1>solve our many problems, uh, the ones that are confronting

0:08:16.680 --> 0:08:19.360
<v Speaker 1>us here on Earth, and that people will step forward

0:08:19.400 --> 0:08:22.200
<v Speaker 1>to solve these problems and we're gonna make a lot

0:08:22.240 --> 0:08:26.240
<v Speaker 1>of money doing it. It's kind of an industrial uh

0:08:26.520 --> 0:08:29.880
<v Speaker 1>trickle down economics kind of you, which sort of velcrow

0:08:30.120 --> 0:08:32.760
<v Speaker 1>as the star. Right, look at this. We have velcro

0:08:32.920 --> 0:08:35.480
<v Speaker 1>because of space, And isn't your life better because of velcro?

0:08:36.040 --> 0:08:40.760
<v Speaker 1>Velcro is perfect? Yeah, I forgot all about that. Uh,

0:08:40.960 --> 0:08:43.559
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna like it's just gonna be us thinking about

0:08:43.600 --> 0:08:47.360
<v Speaker 1>like all the like space stuff from our childhood, like velcrow,

0:08:47.679 --> 0:08:54.080
<v Speaker 1>tang and like freeze dried ice cream suppose. Yeah. Um,

0:08:54.120 --> 0:08:56.280
<v Speaker 1>But here's his quote about that one. He says, thus,

0:08:56.320 --> 0:08:59.240
<v Speaker 1>when people were unmoved by calls to fulfill the basic

0:08:59.280 --> 0:09:02.720
<v Speaker 1>destiny of manity, which is the exploration one, it was

0:09:02.760 --> 0:09:05.600
<v Speaker 1>hoped that the magnetic allure of the dollar sign would

0:09:05.640 --> 0:09:08.040
<v Speaker 1>draw them into the space camp. And they were talking

0:09:08.080 --> 0:09:10.839
<v Speaker 1>about everything from gathering free energy from the Sun to

0:09:10.960 --> 0:09:14.319
<v Speaker 1>mining key metals on the moon, building space factories that

0:09:14.360 --> 0:09:17.640
<v Speaker 1>would make big money, developing and selling life saving medicine

0:09:17.640 --> 0:09:20.560
<v Speaker 1>and devices. And that is something that's going to come

0:09:20.640 --> 0:09:22.959
<v Speaker 1>up later in this podcast as well. Then in the

0:09:23.040 --> 0:09:25.960
<v Speaker 1>nineties we switched again, right, And this is what I

0:09:26.040 --> 0:09:29.440
<v Speaker 1>like to call the Armageddon argument, which is basically the

0:09:29.480 --> 0:09:33.280
<v Speaker 1>movie Armageddon. We need to go into space for defensive

0:09:33.280 --> 0:09:35.760
<v Speaker 1>reasons and for prevention. We need to make sure a

0:09:35.800 --> 0:09:39.120
<v Speaker 1>massive asteroid doesn't strike Earth and kill all of us,

0:09:40.200 --> 0:09:43.480
<v Speaker 1>or even better, we move into space. The asteroid can

0:09:43.559 --> 0:09:45.920
<v Speaker 1>hit Earth and destroy if it doesn't matter because we've

0:09:45.960 --> 0:09:49.559
<v Speaker 1>colonized other planets, right And I that's one that I

0:09:49.679 --> 0:09:53.520
<v Speaker 1>especially think it's still a very compelling argumentation. It's a

0:09:53.559 --> 0:09:57.360
<v Speaker 1>big picture argument. And that's one of the things about

0:09:57.559 --> 0:09:59.280
<v Speaker 1>any of this because when you're trying when you're looking

0:09:59.280 --> 0:10:02.040
<v Speaker 1>at space, you're talk thinking about you're talking about space exportation,

0:10:02.080 --> 0:10:06.400
<v Speaker 1>you're talking about a massive megaproject, and you get they

0:10:06.440 --> 0:10:08.480
<v Speaker 1>have all these different ideas of what it means, what

0:10:08.600 --> 0:10:10.480
<v Speaker 1>the benefits are, what are the short term versus a

0:10:10.520 --> 0:10:14.480
<v Speaker 1>long term and what does it mean to see this

0:10:14.520 --> 0:10:18.760
<v Speaker 1>as an extension of culture? Yeah, yeah, I agree, And

0:10:18.840 --> 0:10:20.880
<v Speaker 1>so like I said, like I guess what I'm looking

0:10:20.920 --> 0:10:22.640
<v Speaker 1>for is by the end of this podcast that I'll

0:10:22.640 --> 0:10:25.080
<v Speaker 1>be able to be convinced back to my five year

0:10:25.120 --> 0:10:27.200
<v Speaker 1>old self who was enamored with the idea of being

0:10:27.200 --> 0:10:32.240
<v Speaker 1>an astronaut. But uh, Westfall basically uses the rest of

0:10:32.320 --> 0:10:35.680
<v Speaker 1>this this article to make arguments against those three cases,

0:10:35.960 --> 0:10:39.000
<v Speaker 1>um and he He basically finds that there's no compelling,

0:10:39.120 --> 0:10:43.680
<v Speaker 1>immediate reason why we should accelerate our space programs. He says, yeah,

0:10:43.679 --> 0:10:45.480
<v Speaker 1>sure would be fine for us to go into outage space,

0:10:45.480 --> 0:10:47.719
<v Speaker 1>but we've got much more pressing issues to deal with

0:10:47.760 --> 0:10:51.600
<v Speaker 1>here on Earth, all right, So let's segue from that

0:10:52.080 --> 0:10:55.200
<v Speaker 1>into and this was brand new to me. You educated

0:10:55.240 --> 0:10:58.080
<v Speaker 1>me on this for for this episode, that there are

0:10:58.200 --> 0:11:02.360
<v Speaker 1>religious reasons to go to space. Yeah, there or at

0:11:02.400 --> 0:11:05.720
<v Speaker 1>least the case has been made um and granted you

0:11:05.720 --> 0:11:07.800
<v Speaker 1>you don't see as much of this anymore, at least

0:11:07.840 --> 0:11:12.400
<v Speaker 1>in mainstream arguments. But but it's still pretty interesting. I've

0:11:12.440 --> 0:11:16.480
<v Speaker 1>been long fascinated by by space religion and the idea

0:11:16.559 --> 0:11:19.600
<v Speaker 1>like what happens to our beliefs when we actually take

0:11:19.679 --> 0:11:22.240
<v Speaker 1>them into space, or just what do we do? What

0:11:22.240 --> 0:11:26.640
<v Speaker 1>happens when we take old beliefs essentially old cosmologies, I

0:11:26.679 --> 0:11:30.880
<v Speaker 1>mean maybe even like Babylonian cosmologies, and we try to

0:11:30.920 --> 0:11:34.800
<v Speaker 1>hold onto those sometimes without without daring to tinker with them.

0:11:35.080 --> 0:11:39.720
<v Speaker 1>In an age of modern cosmological understanding. Very Jodorowski like

0:11:39.800 --> 0:11:42.079
<v Speaker 1>that that that's like a big theme of his and uh,

0:11:42.160 --> 0:11:45.160
<v Speaker 1>what is it meta barons and that that university sort

0:11:45.200 --> 0:11:49.920
<v Speaker 1>of created around that was a wild universe. Um. Yeah.

0:11:49.960 --> 0:11:52.800
<v Speaker 1>So so there are various examples of this. Um. You know,

0:11:53.040 --> 0:11:56.240
<v Speaker 1>there's some religions of Hinduism instantly comes to mind. They

0:11:56.240 --> 0:11:59.959
<v Speaker 1>have displayed an amazing ability to adapt supernatural cosmologies to

0:12:00.080 --> 0:12:04.160
<v Speaker 1>agree with new information on the nature of the universe. Um.

0:12:04.200 --> 0:12:07.960
<v Speaker 1>But other examples stand out to exemplify religions uh, sometimes

0:12:08.040 --> 0:12:13.200
<v Speaker 1>unflinching refusal to change in the face of scientific advancement. Geocentricism.

0:12:13.200 --> 0:12:15.320
<v Speaker 1>You know, there's no way anything but the earth can

0:12:15.360 --> 0:12:20.040
<v Speaker 1>be the center of creation. Uh. And speaking of creation creationism,

0:12:20.559 --> 0:12:23.040
<v Speaker 1>there's no there's no way that this uh, that any

0:12:23.040 --> 0:12:26.480
<v Speaker 1>of this scientific data and these these scientific theories about

0:12:26.960 --> 0:12:29.679
<v Speaker 1>the origin of species can be any different from this

0:12:29.760 --> 0:12:32.840
<v Speaker 1>ancient text that I still hope, right, Why I bother

0:12:32.960 --> 0:12:38.280
<v Speaker 1>to go looking? We know we have the gnosticism here already. Yeah. So,

0:12:38.360 --> 0:12:40.840
<v Speaker 1>of course, so it's not that all that surprising that

0:12:41.120 --> 0:12:45.560
<v Speaker 1>certain religious groups or certain religious individuals have spoken out

0:12:45.600 --> 0:12:50.040
<v Speaker 1>to varying degrees against space exploration and space travel or

0:12:50.160 --> 0:12:54.480
<v Speaker 1>or raise some very particular religious questions about it. UM.

0:12:54.640 --> 0:12:58.800
<v Speaker 1>One that I found very thought provoking occurred in two

0:12:58.800 --> 0:13:02.199
<v Speaker 1>thousand twelve, and this this came from the General Authority

0:13:02.240 --> 0:13:07.000
<v Speaker 1>of Islamic Affairs and Endowment SPATWA Committee UH. And and

0:13:07.040 --> 0:13:10.000
<v Speaker 1>I do want to to UH to clarify that this

0:13:10.120 --> 0:13:15.800
<v Speaker 1>is UH. This is just one single United Arab Emirates committee. UM.

0:13:16.040 --> 0:13:19.640
<v Speaker 1>They were not They're not speaking speaking all of Islam. UM.

0:13:19.679 --> 0:13:22.319
<v Speaker 1>This is just one committee speaking out here. But they

0:13:22.320 --> 0:13:26.120
<v Speaker 1>were mainly interested with what a one way mission to

0:13:26.200 --> 0:13:31.000
<v Speaker 1>Mars would mean UH from an Islamic perspective. So this

0:13:31.040 --> 0:13:32.600
<v Speaker 1>is of course the whole idea of the first settlers

0:13:32.600 --> 0:13:35.640
<v Speaker 1>to Mars are essentially on a suicide mission. Well, just

0:13:35.760 --> 0:13:39.600
<v Speaker 1>that constitutes suicide? And if so, UH does the Koran

0:13:39.720 --> 0:13:41.800
<v Speaker 1>speak out against it when it says do not kill

0:13:41.840 --> 0:13:46.080
<v Speaker 1>yourselves or one another. Indeed, Allah is to you've ever merciful.

0:13:46.920 --> 0:13:49.440
<v Speaker 1>And they were argumenting that, yeah, Muslims should not go

0:13:49.640 --> 0:13:52.760
<v Speaker 1>on this journey. But the but there even more remarkable

0:13:53.080 --> 0:13:55.800
<v Speaker 1>part of this was and this was brought up is

0:13:55.840 --> 0:13:59.200
<v Speaker 1>the notion that some Muslims might take the trip to

0:13:59.280 --> 0:14:03.120
<v Speaker 1>Mars in order or to quote escape punishment or standing

0:14:03.160 --> 0:14:07.800
<v Speaker 1>before Almighty Allah for judgment that I don't quite understand,

0:14:07.880 --> 0:14:10.320
<v Speaker 1>but I guess like I'm also not like an Islamic scholar,

0:14:10.440 --> 0:14:13.240
<v Speaker 1>but I would assume that even if they died on

0:14:13.280 --> 0:14:17.319
<v Speaker 1>the mission to Mars, they would still face judgment from

0:14:17.320 --> 0:14:20.240
<v Speaker 1>Allah well after life. That that's where it gets crazy, right,

0:14:20.280 --> 0:14:24.000
<v Speaker 1>because if you if you leave Earth, does that mean

0:14:24.040 --> 0:14:26.760
<v Speaker 1>you were leaving God's domain? Is each God is God

0:14:26.840 --> 0:14:30.600
<v Speaker 1>only lord over a single planet? Um? I think the

0:14:30.600 --> 0:14:34.160
<v Speaker 1>most would argue that that a that a modern depiction

0:14:34.200 --> 0:14:37.360
<v Speaker 1>of God is a God of all creations, and therefore

0:14:37.400 --> 0:14:39.160
<v Speaker 1>if you if you take him off on one world,

0:14:39.360 --> 0:14:42.560
<v Speaker 1>you can't just go to the next and claim immunity. Um.

0:14:42.640 --> 0:14:44.680
<v Speaker 1>And I think that was the the idea that that

0:14:44.840 --> 0:14:47.920
<v Speaker 1>one out here, But it's so much science fiction spins

0:14:48.000 --> 0:14:50.960
<v Speaker 1>off of this very simple idea that we're getting into

0:14:51.000 --> 0:14:54.040
<v Speaker 1>today of should we or shouldn't we go into space?

0:14:54.160 --> 0:14:56.440
<v Speaker 1>You know, like immediately thinking of you and I were

0:14:56.480 --> 0:14:58.760
<v Speaker 1>just talking about this book the other day, Uh, Mary

0:14:58.840 --> 0:15:02.520
<v Speaker 1>Doria Russell's book The Sparrow. Yeah, I have not read it,

0:15:02.520 --> 0:15:04.400
<v Speaker 1>but it's been on my to read list for a

0:15:04.400 --> 0:15:08.120
<v Speaker 1>while really fascinating sci fi book about you know, the

0:15:08.160 --> 0:15:14.040
<v Speaker 1>idea of the future sending Catholic Jesuit priests along with

0:15:14.080 --> 0:15:16.960
<v Speaker 1>a team to a new planet where they found alien

0:15:17.040 --> 0:15:19.760
<v Speaker 1>life so that they can be missionaries basically and teach

0:15:19.840 --> 0:15:23.000
<v Speaker 1>them about the Catholic faith. Uh. And of course everything

0:15:23.000 --> 0:15:26.960
<v Speaker 1>goes horribly awry, but it's it's fascinating, yeah, but it's

0:15:26.960 --> 0:15:29.480
<v Speaker 1>also sort of an argument or it ends up sort

0:15:29.520 --> 0:15:33.600
<v Speaker 1>of being an argument for not doing such a thing. Well, um,

0:15:33.640 --> 0:15:35.800
<v Speaker 1>we'll get the Catholics in a minute. But by my

0:15:36.040 --> 0:15:38.720
<v Speaker 1>next example comes from the Church of Jesus Christ of

0:15:38.800 --> 0:15:41.080
<v Speaker 1>Latter day Saints, which, you know, a lot of people

0:15:41.240 --> 0:15:43.960
<v Speaker 1>might not think that Mormons are going to really come

0:15:44.040 --> 0:15:47.160
<v Speaker 1>up when we talk about space ready religions, but as

0:15:47.200 --> 0:15:51.000
<v Speaker 1>a relative newcomer to the religious world marketplace, Uh, they

0:15:51.680 --> 0:15:54.520
<v Speaker 1>were really preloaded for the space age from the beginning.

0:15:55.240 --> 0:16:00.200
<v Speaker 1>As pointed out by Roger D. Lonnia's curator of the

0:16:00.200 --> 0:16:04.920
<v Speaker 1>Smithsonian's planetary Exploration programs in his paper A Western Mormon

0:16:05.000 --> 0:16:08.080
<v Speaker 1>in Washington, d c. You have a couple of key

0:16:08.160 --> 0:16:12.760
<v Speaker 1>attributes to the Mormon faith that that make it perfect

0:16:12.800 --> 0:16:16.360
<v Speaker 1>for space. It's grounded in frontier religion kind of giving

0:16:16.400 --> 0:16:19.120
<v Speaker 1>back to that spirit that that that that that quote

0:16:19.120 --> 0:16:24.680
<v Speaker 1>from Sagan capture uh and uh. And so you see,

0:16:24.880 --> 0:16:27.600
<v Speaker 1>you see this idea, you know, you're gonna push the frontier. Uh,

0:16:27.720 --> 0:16:29.560
<v Speaker 1>not not only the frontiers on Earth, but you're gonna

0:16:29.640 --> 0:16:32.800
<v Speaker 1>push the frontiers in space as well. Yeah. And that

0:16:32.880 --> 0:16:36.760
<v Speaker 1>was primarily through a guy named Dr James C. Fletcher,

0:16:36.880 --> 0:16:40.840
<v Speaker 1>who I believe was Mormon. Uh. He was also NASA's

0:16:40.840 --> 0:16:43.760
<v Speaker 1>administrator from nineteen seventy one and nineteen seventy seven and

0:16:43.760 --> 0:16:48.320
<v Speaker 1>then again from six to nineteen eighty nine, very influential

0:16:48.360 --> 0:16:52.600
<v Speaker 1>on the Space Shuttle program and other space exploration research. Yeah,

0:16:52.600 --> 0:16:55.080
<v Speaker 1>he was big into set as well. He considered all

0:16:55.080 --> 0:16:57.880
<v Speaker 1>of this, uh, you know, part of his Mormon faith

0:16:57.880 --> 0:17:01.000
<v Speaker 1>that he should push these ideas because Mormon cosmology also

0:17:01.160 --> 0:17:05.080
<v Speaker 1>involves a universe full of worlds without number that are

0:17:05.119 --> 0:17:09.040
<v Speaker 1>inhabited by intelligent beings. So, in other words, earthlings are

0:17:09.080 --> 0:17:13.679
<v Speaker 1>not the only creatures in Mormon cosmology. It comes pre

0:17:14.080 --> 0:17:16.359
<v Speaker 1>loaded with the idea that yes, there are other worlds

0:17:16.920 --> 0:17:20.920
<v Speaker 1>under God's domain that are also liberated by the same savior,

0:17:21.080 --> 0:17:24.160
<v Speaker 1>and they have they have people on them or something

0:17:24.200 --> 0:17:27.280
<v Speaker 1>like people you know, Um, so you don't have to

0:17:27.280 --> 0:17:30.239
<v Speaker 1>worry about discovering alien life and having as much of

0:17:30.280 --> 0:17:34.359
<v Speaker 1>a uh, you know, a religious um you know, apocalypse

0:17:34.359 --> 0:17:37.720
<v Speaker 1>in the mind. So the opposite version of this in

0:17:37.880 --> 0:17:41.480
<v Speaker 1>like sci fi fantasy type of stuff. I have to

0:17:41.920 --> 0:17:43.840
<v Speaker 1>I don't know why, but this is just immediately popping

0:17:43.840 --> 0:17:46.560
<v Speaker 1>into my head. There's this recent storyline in the Thor

0:17:46.720 --> 0:17:51.680
<v Speaker 1>comic books where um Thor realizes that like every planet

0:17:51.680 --> 0:17:55.600
<v Speaker 1>with sentient life has its own pantheon of gods, right,

0:17:55.680 --> 0:17:58.879
<v Speaker 1>and so like he's part of the Norris pantheon of gods.

0:17:58.920 --> 0:18:01.199
<v Speaker 1>But he flies into space and he goes to another planet,

0:18:01.280 --> 0:18:04.399
<v Speaker 1>and it turns out like this planet had its own pantheon,

0:18:04.520 --> 0:18:08.399
<v Speaker 1>but somebody had been murdering all of their deities. So

0:18:08.600 --> 0:18:12.480
<v Speaker 1>Thor takes it upon himself to also become their new deity.

0:18:12.560 --> 0:18:16.159
<v Speaker 1>You know. Uh, it's just interesting, Like this is just

0:18:16.200 --> 0:18:21.360
<v Speaker 1>like amazing springboard for fertile, imaginative ideas for science fiction. Yeah,

0:18:21.359 --> 0:18:23.400
<v Speaker 1>and heed it is. Now it's interesting with with Thor

0:18:23.480 --> 0:18:25.639
<v Speaker 1>of course, because he's a part of a pantheon of

0:18:25.680 --> 0:18:30.639
<v Speaker 1>god's apposed to a monotheistic model, Yeah, which is mainly

0:18:30.640 --> 0:18:35.160
<v Speaker 1>what we're talking about here. Both the Islamic and Mormon examples.

0:18:35.640 --> 0:18:39.520
<v Speaker 1>Now to return to the Church of Latter day Saints.

0:18:39.640 --> 0:18:42.359
<v Speaker 1>Uh not. Everyone in the history of the Church has

0:18:42.400 --> 0:18:46.920
<v Speaker 1>been super on board with space exploration. In nineteen fifty seven,

0:18:46.920 --> 0:18:49.439
<v Speaker 1>just a few short years before the first human ventured

0:18:49.480 --> 0:18:54.000
<v Speaker 1>into space, prominent Mormon Joseph Fielding Smith remarked that quote,

0:18:54.400 --> 0:18:57.159
<v Speaker 1>it is doubtful that man will ever be permitted to

0:18:57.240 --> 0:18:59.879
<v Speaker 1>make any instrument or ship to travel through space and

0:19:00.080 --> 0:19:03.800
<v Speaker 1>visit the Moon or any distinct planet. And in nineteen

0:19:03.880 --> 0:19:07.960
<v Speaker 1>sixty one, the same year, the Cosmonautori Gargan made history,

0:19:08.080 --> 0:19:11.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean the first man in space. Uh. Smith further stated,

0:19:11.400 --> 0:19:13.280
<v Speaker 1>we will never get a man into space. This is

0:19:13.320 --> 0:19:16.680
<v Speaker 1>of course before before he went up. Um, we will

0:19:16.800 --> 0:19:18.560
<v Speaker 1>never get a man into his face. The Earth is

0:19:18.640 --> 0:19:21.560
<v Speaker 1>man's fear, and it was never intended that he should

0:19:21.600 --> 0:19:23.800
<v Speaker 1>get away from it. The Moon is a superior planet

0:19:23.840 --> 0:19:26.720
<v Speaker 1>to the Earth, and it was never intended that men

0:19:26.880 --> 0:19:29.040
<v Speaker 1>should go there. You can write it down in your

0:19:29.080 --> 0:19:32.800
<v Speaker 1>books that this will never happen. Well, boy, was he wrong,

0:19:33.400 --> 0:19:35.640
<v Speaker 1>or or maybe it's all been a lie. Right, It's

0:19:35.680 --> 0:19:38.679
<v Speaker 1>like the shin I'm surprised nothing came up about the

0:19:38.680 --> 0:19:42.240
<v Speaker 1>Shining conspiracy, the idea that we faked the moon landing.

0:19:42.280 --> 0:19:44.280
<v Speaker 1>I think that that plays into some of the attitudes

0:19:44.320 --> 0:19:47.359
<v Speaker 1>will get out, you know, the the nineteen some of

0:19:47.359 --> 0:19:50.200
<v Speaker 1>the early skepticisms that we could do it, and then

0:19:50.240 --> 0:19:53.399
<v Speaker 1>when we did do it, Uh, you had to double

0:19:53.440 --> 0:19:55.439
<v Speaker 1>down on your beliefs and say, well, no, way that

0:19:55.480 --> 0:19:57.800
<v Speaker 1>we actually did. I should probably explain what I mean.

0:19:57.840 --> 0:19:59.840
<v Speaker 1>I just threw that out there, like that's common knowledge

0:19:59.920 --> 0:20:02.160
<v Speaker 1>or whatever. This is more along the lines of our

0:20:02.240 --> 0:20:04.679
<v Speaker 1>our colleagues over at stuff they don't want you to know.

0:20:04.800 --> 0:20:07.359
<v Speaker 1>But so the idea that the idea goes like this,

0:20:07.600 --> 0:20:09.600
<v Speaker 1>well it should be noted, this is a this is

0:20:09.600 --> 0:20:13.080
<v Speaker 1>a fake conspiracy theory because they created conspiracy theory that

0:20:13.800 --> 0:20:17.520
<v Speaker 1>nearly but people fascinating the people got really into it.

0:20:17.560 --> 0:20:21.639
<v Speaker 1>You've seen about it. Yeah, So, like the the idea

0:20:21.720 --> 0:20:24.879
<v Speaker 1>goes that the moon landing and all of our space

0:20:24.920 --> 0:20:28.119
<v Speaker 1>exploration has been faked, and that in particular the moon

0:20:28.240 --> 0:20:33.320
<v Speaker 1>landing was shot and faked by Stanley Kubrick, and subsequently

0:20:33.400 --> 0:20:39.520
<v Speaker 1>the shining is a metaphorical thematic apology to his wife.

0:20:39.800 --> 0:20:43.720
<v Speaker 1>I think for committing the act of lying to the

0:20:44.080 --> 0:20:47.760
<v Speaker 1>public about what happened on the Moon. Yeah, it's it's

0:20:47.880 --> 0:20:52.600
<v Speaker 1>it's elaborate, and it's such a neatly constructed, elaborate conspiracy

0:20:52.640 --> 0:20:57.800
<v Speaker 1>theory that you can't help but find it, find it fascinating. Um.

0:20:57.920 --> 0:21:00.800
<v Speaker 1>But doubting the moon landing, that, of course, is a

0:21:00.880 --> 0:21:03.720
<v Speaker 1>very real thing. And and I do think that that

0:21:03.720 --> 0:21:05.439
<v Speaker 1>that spirit is echoed and some of the stuff we're

0:21:05.440 --> 0:21:07.440
<v Speaker 1>gonna discuss here in a bit now. I do want

0:21:07.440 --> 0:21:09.639
<v Speaker 1>to mention one more thing about Joseph Fielding Smith, and

0:21:09.720 --> 0:21:13.879
<v Speaker 1>that is that later on his um his grandson, writing

0:21:13.920 --> 0:21:17.120
<v Speaker 1>about about all of this, uh he uh, he made

0:21:17.160 --> 0:21:20.560
<v Speaker 1>a case that that one of the points that Smith

0:21:20.640 --> 0:21:23.800
<v Speaker 1>was making was that if you went to another world,

0:21:24.040 --> 0:21:26.320
<v Speaker 1>you've discovered that they had the same Savior, they had

0:21:26.359 --> 0:21:28.959
<v Speaker 1>the same God, and therefore you wouldn't have to have

0:21:29.000 --> 0:21:31.960
<v Speaker 1>faith anymore. That that that by visiting another planet, you

0:21:32.000 --> 0:21:35.800
<v Speaker 1>could confirm the existence of God and therefore remove the

0:21:35.840 --> 0:21:41.040
<v Speaker 1>importance for faith and the human experience. UM okay, I

0:21:41.080 --> 0:21:43.719
<v Speaker 1>don't like just taking that from like a sort of

0:21:43.760 --> 0:21:47.800
<v Speaker 1>like debate logical perspective. I don't know that I necessarily

0:21:49.080 --> 0:21:55.240
<v Speaker 1>agree just because another species evolved to have a monotheistic

0:21:56.000 --> 0:22:01.560
<v Speaker 1>religion that that confirms the existence of a God. I

0:22:01.600 --> 0:22:04.840
<v Speaker 1>don't know. I'd have to hear more. It's an it's

0:22:04.840 --> 0:22:07.320
<v Speaker 1>an interesting idea. I imagine it would require a deeper

0:22:07.320 --> 0:22:11.080
<v Speaker 1>discussion of Mormon theology. I guess, as our colleague Holly

0:22:11.160 --> 0:22:15.240
<v Speaker 1>Fry often says, I require more data. Yeah, but but

0:22:15.280 --> 0:22:18.280
<v Speaker 1>I do. I do find the Mormon faith very interesting

0:22:18.280 --> 0:22:22.000
<v Speaker 1>and it's in its space ready nature. Though as we've

0:22:22.000 --> 0:22:24.359
<v Speaker 1>explored here that it still doesn't mean you're gonna not

0:22:24.560 --> 0:22:28.320
<v Speaker 1>encounter some some problems when you bring your faith into

0:22:28.359 --> 0:22:32.800
<v Speaker 1>an everly, ever increasingly space age. Oh yeah, yeah, certainly.

0:22:33.000 --> 0:22:37.280
<v Speaker 1>Now some other examples here. Scientist David Rittenhouse insisted back

0:22:37.320 --> 0:22:40.199
<v Speaker 1>in seventeen seventy five that quote, the doctrine of a

0:22:40.240 --> 0:22:43.520
<v Speaker 1>plurality of worlds is inseparable from the principles of astronomy.

0:22:43.600 --> 0:22:46.400
<v Speaker 1>But this doctrine is still thought by some pious persons

0:22:46.800 --> 0:22:50.280
<v Speaker 1>to militate against the truths asserted by the Christian religion.

0:22:51.040 --> 0:22:54.080
<v Speaker 1>A two thousand fourteen University of dat And study found

0:22:54.080 --> 0:22:58.439
<v Speaker 1>that Evangelical Protestants are much sure Jesus will return in

0:22:58.440 --> 0:23:01.399
<v Speaker 1>the next forty years than the humans will make significant

0:23:01.440 --> 0:23:04.879
<v Speaker 1>strides and space exploration. Huh. That seems to me to

0:23:04.920 --> 0:23:07.560
<v Speaker 1>be one of those things that's cyclical, is that like

0:23:07.880 --> 0:23:10.760
<v Speaker 1>every generation feels like they're just on the cusp of

0:23:11.119 --> 0:23:13.760
<v Speaker 1>revelations or or whatever kind of end of the world

0:23:14.280 --> 0:23:18.080
<v Speaker 1>apocryphal story occurring. Yeah, And I mean that's just I

0:23:18.080 --> 0:23:20.359
<v Speaker 1>think the nature of any kind of you know, very

0:23:20.440 --> 0:23:23.639
<v Speaker 1>evangelic or very fundamentalist movement is that you're going to

0:23:23.680 --> 0:23:27.040
<v Speaker 1>be more more focused on on the short term and

0:23:27.080 --> 0:23:30.120
<v Speaker 1>the religious version of the world given, not the next life.

0:23:30.200 --> 0:23:32.680
<v Speaker 1>I don't necessarily have any problem with that so long

0:23:32.720 --> 0:23:35.119
<v Speaker 1>as like, like you said, like they're focusing on like

0:23:35.200 --> 0:23:38.000
<v Speaker 1>earthly problems, you know, taking care of earthly problems. Yeah,

0:23:38.040 --> 0:23:40.640
<v Speaker 1>they're investing in space X. And certainly that ties into

0:23:40.680 --> 0:23:44.240
<v Speaker 1>some of the secular arguments we're gonna explore this um.

0:23:44.280 --> 0:23:47.199
<v Speaker 1>This particular study was carried out by University of day

0:23:47.240 --> 0:23:52.560
<v Speaker 1>and Political Science Assistant Professor Joshua Ambrose Ambrosius, who used

0:23:52.640 --> 0:23:55.760
<v Speaker 1>data from the General Social Survey and three Puce surveys

0:23:55.800 --> 0:23:59.960
<v Speaker 1>to compare knowledge interest in support for space exploration among Catholics, Evangelical,

0:24:00.480 --> 0:24:05.040
<v Speaker 1>mainline Protestants, Jews, Eastern religions, and agnostics, and the key

0:24:05.080 --> 0:24:08.520
<v Speaker 1>findings were that that were as follows, Evangelicals, who account

0:24:08.520 --> 0:24:12.800
<v Speaker 1>for one quarter of US population, are the least knowledgeable, interested,

0:24:12.840 --> 0:24:17.040
<v Speaker 1>in supportive of space exploration. Interesting, Jews and members of

0:24:17.119 --> 0:24:21.920
<v Speaker 1>Eastern traditions are more attentive and supportive. Uh. Also, no

0:24:21.960 --> 0:24:26.680
<v Speaker 1>matter where you're talking about, clergical support is important. So Evangelicals,

0:24:26.720 --> 0:24:29.560
<v Speaker 1>for instance, were twice as likely to recognize the benefits

0:24:29.600 --> 0:24:33.240
<v Speaker 1>of space exploration if their pastors speak positively about science

0:24:34.280 --> 0:24:38.360
<v Speaker 1>and UM. And of all the Christian faiths, Catholics, Uh,

0:24:38.840 --> 0:24:41.840
<v Speaker 1>they seem to have the most the most openness and

0:24:41.880 --> 0:24:45.199
<v Speaker 1>so they've all read the sparrow. Yeah. Well, I mean

0:24:45.240 --> 0:24:48.760
<v Speaker 1>that Vatican has um. They have an astronomer, they have

0:24:48.920 --> 0:24:51.520
<v Speaker 1>they have an interest in space. They occasionally have meetings

0:24:51.560 --> 0:24:53.480
<v Speaker 1>where they discuss, Hey, what happens when we speak to

0:24:53.640 --> 0:24:57.480
<v Speaker 1>speak with aliens? So exactly. Well, I would assume that

0:24:58.520 --> 0:25:02.040
<v Speaker 1>you would be like adapt the same kind of methodologies

0:25:02.040 --> 0:25:06.399
<v Speaker 1>that you use for missionary work in other countries in

0:25:06.440 --> 0:25:11.000
<v Speaker 1>the same way as you would for first contact. Right. Yeah,

0:25:11.040 --> 0:25:13.159
<v Speaker 1>And and if someone wanted to get kind of critical,

0:25:13.200 --> 0:25:16.480
<v Speaker 1>and certainly this is a critical episode, you might say

0:25:16.520 --> 0:25:22.880
<v Speaker 1>that the Catholic Church historically, UH is interested in large megaprojects,

0:25:22.960 --> 0:25:29.160
<v Speaker 1>we would dubious price tags and questionable benefits for the massage. Right, Well,

0:25:29.200 --> 0:25:32.160
<v Speaker 1>they've certainly got the pocketbook capable of doing it. But yeah,

0:25:32.200 --> 0:25:34.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean I think that that was sort of the

0:25:34.359 --> 0:25:37.000
<v Speaker 1>argument of the Sparrow was that like in the future,

0:25:37.119 --> 0:25:40.560
<v Speaker 1>governments were wouldn't be able to fund such a thing,

0:25:40.640 --> 0:25:43.239
<v Speaker 1>so they had to turn to the Catholic Church in

0:25:43.359 --> 0:25:47.600
<v Speaker 1>order for the funding, subsequently leading to Jesuit missionaries being

0:25:47.600 --> 0:25:50.679
<v Speaker 1>included on every mission. Yeah. So I guess basically you

0:25:50.680 --> 0:25:52.960
<v Speaker 1>can you can boil all of this down by saying

0:25:53.000 --> 0:25:56.119
<v Speaker 1>that when you have a supernatural worldview, even if you

0:25:56.160 --> 0:26:00.920
<v Speaker 1>have just like a basic mythological background to your world view, um,

0:26:00.960 --> 0:26:03.600
<v Speaker 1>there's a there's a potential risk to it in taking

0:26:03.720 --> 0:26:08.080
<v Speaker 1>your culture into space, taking your mindset into a space age,

0:26:08.119 --> 0:26:09.760
<v Speaker 1>and so therefore there's going to be a certain amount

0:26:09.760 --> 0:26:12.280
<v Speaker 1>of resistance. All Right, we're gonna take a quick break,

0:26:12.280 --> 0:26:15.000
<v Speaker 1>and when we come back, we're gonna get into some economics.

0:26:21.080 --> 0:26:24.399
<v Speaker 1>All Right, we're back. We're going to discuss some economic

0:26:24.480 --> 0:26:28.679
<v Speaker 1>anti space arguments. Alright, So, as we've talked about on

0:26:28.680 --> 0:26:31.639
<v Speaker 1>the show many times before, pretty much any time we

0:26:31.680 --> 0:26:34.639
<v Speaker 1>talked about space, but I'm thinking of like our rods

0:26:34.680 --> 0:26:37.760
<v Speaker 1>from God episodes space mirrors, Like any time we talk

0:26:37.800 --> 0:26:41.560
<v Speaker 1>about launching something into space, it is super expensive, right,

0:26:41.640 --> 0:26:45.000
<v Speaker 1>that's right. I mean some of the figures here are

0:26:45.040 --> 0:26:49.040
<v Speaker 1>just are truly astronomical. Um, I'm gonna lay out unintended. Yeah,

0:26:49.200 --> 0:26:50.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna lay out a few here. And these came

0:26:50.840 --> 0:26:55.480
<v Speaker 1>from an article UM from the Space Review. First of all,

0:26:55.520 --> 0:26:58.280
<v Speaker 1>Apollo program, this was of course one of the big

0:26:58.280 --> 0:27:02.600
<v Speaker 1>ones UM, and went for fifteen years ninety nineteen seventy three.

0:27:03.000 --> 0:27:06.760
<v Speaker 1>It cost twenty point four billion, and if we simply

0:27:06.800 --> 0:27:10.640
<v Speaker 1>added yearly spending all up, we were we're took looking

0:27:10.680 --> 0:27:14.920
<v Speaker 1>at a round a hundred and nine billion in modern currency. UH.

0:27:15.040 --> 0:27:17.560
<v Speaker 1>That brings that breaks down to nine point nine billion

0:27:17.600 --> 0:27:22.120
<v Speaker 1>per flight with each lunar land and costing eighteen billion dollars. UH.

0:27:22.240 --> 0:27:26.440
<v Speaker 1>Sky Lab, the Skylab space station program, that cost UH

0:27:26.600 --> 0:27:29.359
<v Speaker 1>two point two billion in the money of the time,

0:27:29.520 --> 0:27:32.280
<v Speaker 1>that would be a ten billion in two thousand ten dollars.

0:27:32.560 --> 0:27:35.920
<v Speaker 1>And and that was across its nine year existence nineteen

0:27:35.960 --> 0:27:39.320
<v Speaker 1>sixty six through nineteen seventy four. Meanwhile, the Space Shuttle

0:27:39.359 --> 0:27:43.760
<v Speaker 1>program cost roughly one hundred ninety eight point six billion

0:27:43.800 --> 0:27:46.520
<v Speaker 1>in two thousand ten dollars um. A lot of the

0:27:46.560 --> 0:27:47.959
<v Speaker 1>sources I was looking at this came from a two

0:27:47.960 --> 0:27:49.720
<v Speaker 1>thousand ten articles, so you can, you know, you can

0:27:49.760 --> 0:27:51.680
<v Speaker 1>boost that those prices a little bit in your head.

0:27:51.880 --> 0:27:54.000
<v Speaker 1>I noticed that as well though, doing the research that

0:27:54.320 --> 0:27:56.040
<v Speaker 1>a lot of this I think it takes time to

0:27:56.119 --> 0:27:59.040
<v Speaker 1>gather these this information, so we don't have a lot

0:27:59.080 --> 0:28:03.639
<v Speaker 1>of data that's like right up to like you know, June. Now,

0:28:03.920 --> 0:28:07.520
<v Speaker 1>the I S S is an entirely different scenario to

0:28:07.680 --> 0:28:10.760
<v Speaker 1>to look at. NASA may have spent the equivalent of

0:28:10.920 --> 0:28:13.399
<v Speaker 1>seventy two point four billion on the I S S

0:28:13.440 --> 0:28:16.440
<v Speaker 1>as of two thousand ten. So I've also read other accounts,

0:28:16.440 --> 0:28:19.040
<v Speaker 1>including some more recent ones. They'd argue that the station's

0:28:19.040 --> 0:28:22.040
<v Speaker 1>true cost is somewhere between a hundred and a hundred

0:28:22.040 --> 0:28:25.560
<v Speaker 1>and fifty billion dollars or I've also read accounts that

0:28:25.640 --> 0:28:28.960
<v Speaker 1>make an argument that it's just kind of difficult to calculate.

0:28:29.000 --> 0:28:31.800
<v Speaker 1>It might be incalculable. Wow, Yeah, I think I have

0:28:31.920 --> 0:28:35.040
<v Speaker 1>notes in here later on about the I S costs.

0:28:35.040 --> 0:28:36.960
<v Speaker 1>But so we'll at the when we get to those,

0:28:37.000 --> 0:28:40.440
<v Speaker 1>we can compare and contrast but that sounds right to me.

0:28:40.480 --> 0:28:44.720
<v Speaker 1>I mean it was again no pun intended, astronomically expensive.

0:28:45.600 --> 0:28:48.120
<v Speaker 1>So Westfall, the guy I brought up at the beginning,

0:28:48.720 --> 0:28:52.560
<v Speaker 1>he uh comes to the economic argument. Now. Remember this

0:28:52.640 --> 0:28:55.480
<v Speaker 1>is the argument that he said was primarily made in

0:28:55.520 --> 0:28:59.040
<v Speaker 1>the seventies and eighties. Right, it's worth the investment because

0:28:59.120 --> 0:29:01.480
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna make all this money, man, like all these

0:29:01.480 --> 0:29:04.600
<v Speaker 1>technologies that we create that will bring back to Earth.

0:29:04.680 --> 0:29:08.640
<v Speaker 1>It's going to be totally worth it. Uh. And he says, yeah,

0:29:08.720 --> 0:29:11.680
<v Speaker 1>but we observe a cycle in this literature, right that

0:29:11.720 --> 0:29:15.600
<v Speaker 1>they first they announced that someone has developed the quote

0:29:15.760 --> 0:29:19.040
<v Speaker 1>perfect plan for space exploration. Right, maybe it's a new

0:29:19.120 --> 0:29:23.760
<v Speaker 1>rocket chip or something that's cheaply ineffective. Or then other

0:29:23.800 --> 0:29:26.520
<v Speaker 1>people start to examine this perfect plan and they find

0:29:26.520 --> 0:29:28.360
<v Speaker 1>a few little problems. They go, well, wait a minute,

0:29:28.360 --> 0:29:30.960
<v Speaker 1>that rocket chip actually cost fifty times what you you

0:29:31.000 --> 0:29:35.200
<v Speaker 1>announced originally, right. Uh. And then they find oh, there's

0:29:35.200 --> 0:29:41.120
<v Speaker 1>a rate of failure. Uh, maybe we shouldn't do this yet,

0:29:41.680 --> 0:29:44.800
<v Speaker 1>or maybe this thing is gonna crash and scatter radioactive

0:29:44.880 --> 0:29:48.280
<v Speaker 1>dust all over Australia or something like that, right, um.

0:29:48.360 --> 0:29:51.040
<v Speaker 1>And so as these objections start to mount, the people

0:29:51.040 --> 0:29:53.840
<v Speaker 1>who proposed it in the first place stopped talking about it,

0:29:53.880 --> 0:29:58.040
<v Speaker 1>and then they immediately shift to another new perfect plan

0:29:58.160 --> 0:30:00.440
<v Speaker 1>that they talk about. So this is the cycle of

0:30:00.840 --> 0:30:05.280
<v Speaker 1>that he accounts for and argues against that you see

0:30:05.320 --> 0:30:09.320
<v Speaker 1>in these economic arguments that you know that like I'm

0:30:09.360 --> 0:30:12.640
<v Speaker 1>thinking right now of like Elon Musk and SpaceX right,

0:30:12.680 --> 0:30:14.800
<v Speaker 1>like that's probably the current one that we're seeing where

0:30:14.800 --> 0:30:16.400
<v Speaker 1>it's like, how we can totally do this, We're gonna

0:30:16.480 --> 0:30:19.280
<v Speaker 1>land this. What's the most recent thing, like they landed

0:30:20.440 --> 0:30:22.480
<v Speaker 1>a space rocket on a platform in the middle of

0:30:22.520 --> 0:30:24.760
<v Speaker 1>the ocean, like what like a month or two ago. Yeah,

0:30:24.800 --> 0:30:27.000
<v Speaker 1>there was a talking about the whole Dragon programmer. I

0:30:27.000 --> 0:30:29.080
<v Speaker 1>think it's Dragon too at this point. I wrote something

0:30:29.120 --> 0:30:31.920
<v Speaker 1>about it for how stuff works now, uh, and it's

0:30:31.920 --> 0:30:35.440
<v Speaker 1>pretty impressive technology. But yeah, this is the latest where

0:30:35.440 --> 0:30:38.080
<v Speaker 1>where the you know, the the proponents of this were saying,

0:30:38.120 --> 0:30:40.640
<v Speaker 1>this is this is how we're getting to Mars. This

0:30:40.760 --> 0:30:43.320
<v Speaker 1>is the this is the vehicle, and it just takes

0:30:43.320 --> 0:30:45.240
<v Speaker 1>further development to get it where we needed. So it's

0:30:45.240 --> 0:30:48.280
<v Speaker 1>the new perfect plan that we're working on. Yeah, essentially

0:30:48.280 --> 0:30:51.000
<v Speaker 1>here semi perfect. Yeah, yeah, it is. It is the

0:30:51.040 --> 0:30:54.880
<v Speaker 1>new perfect plan. Now some additional anti space arguments were

0:30:54.880 --> 0:30:57.760
<v Speaker 1>presented in Engineering and Technology magazine back in two thousand

0:30:57.840 --> 0:31:02.520
<v Speaker 1>eleven by Cornish explore U been Handbury tennyson um. And

0:31:02.560 --> 0:31:05.480
<v Speaker 1>he was taking the anti space argument in a pro

0:31:05.640 --> 0:31:08.280
<v Speaker 1>con article that was that was pretty interesting. It was

0:31:08.320 --> 0:31:10.160
<v Speaker 1>kind of cool. They like laid him out like right

0:31:10.240 --> 0:31:12.560
<v Speaker 1>next to each other, the pro and the con argument

0:31:12.640 --> 0:31:14.440
<v Speaker 1>at the bottom. It was sort of like, so where

0:31:14.480 --> 0:31:16.720
<v Speaker 1>how have you been convinced? Yeah? Which one? Which one

0:31:16.760 --> 0:31:20.640
<v Speaker 1>do you side with? So here a couple of quotes

0:31:20.720 --> 0:31:22.760
<v Speaker 1>here that I have to read. He says, the amount

0:31:22.800 --> 0:31:25.520
<v Speaker 1>of money being spent on space researches in the billions,

0:31:25.520 --> 0:31:28.840
<v Speaker 1>and it has achieved extraordinarily little except for a bit

0:31:28.880 --> 0:31:33.240
<v Speaker 1>of improved technology, which would probably have come about anyway

0:31:33.240 --> 0:31:35.880
<v Speaker 1>by other means. I guess he means that we could

0:31:35.880 --> 0:31:38.000
<v Speaker 1>have had velcro without going into space, right, Yeah, we

0:31:38.040 --> 0:31:42.480
<v Speaker 1>probably could have built velcro without also going into space. Yeah. Meanwhile,

0:31:42.520 --> 0:31:44.960
<v Speaker 1>he says, we we have no shortage of crisises here

0:31:44.960 --> 0:31:49.160
<v Speaker 1>on Earth. Economic environmental, we've got deforestation, we've got global

0:31:49.200 --> 0:31:52.040
<v Speaker 1>clim climate change going on. Uh. He says we should

0:31:52.080 --> 0:31:55.320
<v Speaker 1>be spending these colossal sums of money on sustainability and

0:31:55.360 --> 0:31:58.280
<v Speaker 1>management of the human population. He said, quote, if you

0:31:58.320 --> 0:32:00.960
<v Speaker 1>put the money that is wasted in in space into

0:32:01.040 --> 0:32:04.760
<v Speaker 1>the hands of climatologists, you could have lasting benefits for mankind.

0:32:04.840 --> 0:32:07.840
<v Speaker 1>I don't think space science is bad science. I just

0:32:07.880 --> 0:32:11.240
<v Speaker 1>think it's a waste of time. Yeah, And Henbury Tennyson's

0:32:11.440 --> 0:32:15.640
<v Speaker 1>argument is really him considering space research a gross waste

0:32:15.680 --> 0:32:19.040
<v Speaker 1>of time, money, and effort that could be used to

0:32:19.080 --> 0:32:21.520
<v Speaker 1>do other things like manage our own planet, which you know,

0:32:21.680 --> 0:32:24.520
<v Speaker 1>that's something that we we already saw in the religious arguments.

0:32:24.560 --> 0:32:27.080
<v Speaker 1>Now it's popping up again and the the economic ones.

0:32:27.480 --> 0:32:29.880
<v Speaker 1>He says, this is interesting because I had not heard

0:32:29.880 --> 0:32:32.720
<v Speaker 1>this before, and it's it sounds a little pseudo e

0:32:32.840 --> 0:32:35.160
<v Speaker 1>to me. But but we'll see what you and the

0:32:35.200 --> 0:32:38.880
<v Speaker 1>listeners think. He says that all civilizations collapse after five

0:32:38.960 --> 0:32:42.040
<v Speaker 1>hundred years, and that this is usually because of their

0:32:42.160 --> 0:32:46.080
<v Speaker 1>greed to development and leads to the extinction of their culture.

0:32:47.040 --> 0:32:51.760
<v Speaker 1>Uh so, I don't know. I mean, okay, sure, let's

0:32:51.840 --> 0:32:55.360
<v Speaker 1>for the sake of this argument say that that's true, um,

0:32:55.400 --> 0:32:58.840
<v Speaker 1>and that our ambitions towards space are a sign of

0:32:58.880 --> 0:33:02.080
<v Speaker 1>our own event will collapse, that we're we're closing in

0:33:02.160 --> 0:33:04.600
<v Speaker 1>on the end of our our time. Yeah, I mean,

0:33:04.600 --> 0:33:09.080
<v Speaker 1>I've certainly read some material about the collapse of civilizations,

0:33:09.160 --> 0:33:12.960
<v Speaker 1>and yeah, I don't think that the five year estimate

0:33:13.040 --> 0:33:16.760
<v Speaker 1>is that far off. And that being said, a collapsing

0:33:17.040 --> 0:33:20.480
<v Speaker 1>civilization doesn't mean now what it used to me, and like,

0:33:20.480 --> 0:33:23.240
<v Speaker 1>like used to it meant some another army is going

0:33:23.280 --> 0:33:26.520
<v Speaker 1>to rise up and defeat you, and they might solve

0:33:26.560 --> 0:33:29.960
<v Speaker 1>the early just leave an empty city behind. Yeah, yeah, yeah, exactly,

0:33:30.000 --> 0:33:34.600
<v Speaker 1>whereas now we sort of just have like uh, fallen empires,

0:33:34.720 --> 0:33:38.760
<v Speaker 1>right right. But then but then space itself is I mean, granted,

0:33:38.800 --> 0:33:42.360
<v Speaker 1>there are a very few major players in the game,

0:33:42.680 --> 0:33:45.960
<v Speaker 1>but it is an international game, with newer players making

0:33:46.000 --> 0:33:47.960
<v Speaker 1>strides more and more every day, and that's part of

0:33:47.960 --> 0:33:51.080
<v Speaker 1>the problem, as some people argue to but both actually

0:33:51.120 --> 0:33:53.440
<v Speaker 1>they argue that it's part of the problem and what

0:33:53.600 --> 0:33:56.680
<v Speaker 1>makes it good, and we'll get into that later as well.

0:33:57.160 --> 0:33:59.720
<v Speaker 1>The last thing that he says here is because in

0:33:59.760 --> 0:34:01.760
<v Speaker 1>this is another thing that comes up in both sides

0:34:01.760 --> 0:34:05.320
<v Speaker 1>of the argument, because of population issues. Basically, because like

0:34:05.360 --> 0:34:08.879
<v Speaker 1>there's too many people on Earth, we should instead concentrate

0:34:09.520 --> 0:34:12.280
<v Speaker 1>all these funds that we're throwing into space exploration into

0:34:12.320 --> 0:34:16.120
<v Speaker 1>food production and rainmaking technology. I wonder what he would

0:34:16.160 --> 0:34:19.759
<v Speaker 1>have thought of Willem Reich in his Cloudbusters. But but yeah,

0:34:19.880 --> 0:34:22.560
<v Speaker 1>so the other the other side to that argument, as

0:34:22.560 --> 0:34:25.399
<v Speaker 1>we'll see, is basically, we should go into space because

0:34:25.440 --> 0:34:27.520
<v Speaker 1>there's a population problem, so we can get all of

0:34:27.560 --> 0:34:31.000
<v Speaker 1>these people off of Earth and colonize other planets and

0:34:31.040 --> 0:34:34.200
<v Speaker 1>take the resources from those planets. Yeah, it's like it

0:34:34.280 --> 0:34:37.840
<v Speaker 1>depends on how optimistic your view of humanities future in

0:34:37.880 --> 0:34:41.399
<v Speaker 1>space happens to be. If you think we can create um,

0:34:41.440 --> 0:34:44.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, arcs to send off to other planets, or

0:34:44.440 --> 0:34:47.160
<v Speaker 1>if you think that it's just so far off that

0:34:47.280 --> 0:34:50.200
<v Speaker 1>it's it's not even remotely an answer to even our

0:34:50.320 --> 0:34:54.040
<v Speaker 1>even our longer term problems. So good old stuff to

0:34:54.040 --> 0:34:56.840
<v Speaker 1>blow your mind. Regular Richard Feynman shows up in this

0:34:56.960 --> 0:35:00.880
<v Speaker 1>literature to who we have infamously talked about before in

0:35:00.960 --> 0:35:05.200
<v Speaker 1>his Bathtub Adventures or his sorry hot Tub Adventures criticizing

0:35:05.440 --> 0:35:09.960
<v Speaker 1>um reflexology. What episode was that on, I'm trying to

0:35:10.000 --> 0:35:13.160
<v Speaker 1>remember now. Was it on Cargo cult Science? Yes, it was,

0:35:13.320 --> 0:35:17.400
<v Speaker 1>because he coined the term cargo cultures. Yeah. His his

0:35:17.520 --> 0:35:21.200
<v Speaker 1>major thing is that human space travel and particular in

0:35:21.280 --> 0:35:25.080
<v Speaker 1>particular has never achieved any major scientific break THEWS or

0:35:25.120 --> 0:35:27.359
<v Speaker 1>had not of course during his lifetime. Yeah, that sounds

0:35:27.400 --> 0:35:29.440
<v Speaker 1>about right for Fineman though, and his like kind of

0:35:29.560 --> 0:35:33.520
<v Speaker 1>angle of criticism of how science is approached. But you know,

0:35:33.840 --> 0:35:36.080
<v Speaker 1>I was with him on the cargo cult science thing. Well,

0:35:36.120 --> 0:35:38.480
<v Speaker 1>you know this, this is one of those arguments that

0:35:38.520 --> 0:35:40.759
<v Speaker 1>I often find pretty compelling, and I've heard others make

0:35:40.800 --> 0:35:44.840
<v Speaker 1>it as well, And especially as the technology has advances,

0:35:44.920 --> 0:35:48.319
<v Speaker 1>we've gotten to a point where the near future technology

0:35:48.480 --> 0:35:51.640
<v Speaker 1>is uh, you know, perhaps even even further along than

0:35:51.920 --> 0:35:54.759
<v Speaker 1>than Fineman could have possibly imagined. You know, when we're

0:35:54.760 --> 0:35:58.520
<v Speaker 1>talking about our ability to engage with VR increased communication

0:35:58.680 --> 0:36:02.080
<v Speaker 1>between when robots, I mean, Joe and I did a

0:36:02.080 --> 0:36:04.600
<v Speaker 1>recent episode talking about some of the plans for exploring

0:36:04.719 --> 0:36:08.279
<v Speaker 1>the Jovian moons, and so many of those are predicated

0:36:08.400 --> 0:36:11.359
<v Speaker 1>on the use of probes that are been controlled by

0:36:11.400 --> 0:36:15.719
<v Speaker 1>this particular communication hub that's sending information back to us.

0:36:16.040 --> 0:36:19.120
<v Speaker 1>And it does make you raise the question do we

0:36:19.239 --> 0:36:22.960
<v Speaker 1>need to engage in the costly, dangerous endeavor of sending

0:36:22.960 --> 0:36:26.360
<v Speaker 1>a human out there for largely symbolic reasons like a

0:36:26.440 --> 0:36:29.719
<v Speaker 1>human concett in a steel container here on Earth and

0:36:29.760 --> 0:36:32.279
<v Speaker 1>watch this on a screen, or we can take him

0:36:32.360 --> 0:36:34.720
<v Speaker 1>or her and put them in an enclosed steel box

0:36:34.920 --> 0:36:37.960
<v Speaker 1>to watch it on a screen. Um, you know, kind

0:36:38.000 --> 0:36:40.240
<v Speaker 1>of like, why do I need to go to China?

0:36:40.280 --> 0:36:43.080
<v Speaker 1>I can walk to watch a documentary about it? Well,

0:36:43.360 --> 0:36:47.200
<v Speaker 1>except you can go to China, right and um but no,

0:36:47.320 --> 0:36:49.399
<v Speaker 1>but no, that's a that's a good counter argument as well.

0:36:49.440 --> 0:36:51.360
<v Speaker 1>It's like and it gets back to some people to

0:36:51.440 --> 0:36:53.480
<v Speaker 1>make that argument when you say why I haven't like

0:36:53.560 --> 0:36:56.800
<v Speaker 1>for some Americans, I like, I I've certainly met people

0:36:56.800 --> 0:36:59.440
<v Speaker 1>before who go why do you travel so much? I'm like, oh,

0:36:59.560 --> 0:37:01.279
<v Speaker 1>you know, you get to see new sites and learn

0:37:01.320 --> 0:37:04.320
<v Speaker 1>about new people, and it expands your ideas about the world.

0:37:04.320 --> 0:37:06.400
<v Speaker 1>And they're like, hey, I can get all that stuff

0:37:06.440 --> 0:37:08.680
<v Speaker 1>watching the travel channel. Yeah, but you can't catch a

0:37:08.719 --> 0:37:12.360
<v Speaker 1>weird flu watching and that's part of my travel experience.

0:37:12.440 --> 0:37:14.400
<v Speaker 1>But I don't come back with some sort of weird bug.

0:37:14.520 --> 0:37:19.480
<v Speaker 1>Then I know I didn't actually explore so A really grounded,

0:37:19.719 --> 0:37:24.480
<v Speaker 1>sort of very like logical look at the economic argument

0:37:24.520 --> 0:37:30.640
<v Speaker 1>was conducted actually in by the US Congressional Budget Office, UH,

0:37:30.680 --> 0:37:35.160
<v Speaker 1>and they performed what they say is a nonpartisan analysis

0:37:35.440 --> 0:37:39.160
<v Speaker 1>for Congress to review the economic benefits of what we

0:37:39.200 --> 0:37:42.160
<v Speaker 1>would get out of eliminating the space program, and this

0:37:42.160 --> 0:37:47.719
<v Speaker 1>would be from the years. The proposal is specifically to

0:37:47.920 --> 0:37:51.560
<v Speaker 1>terminate human space exploration. So it's important to say that because,

0:37:51.560 --> 0:37:53.880
<v Speaker 1>like as Robert was just saying, we can send up

0:37:54.160 --> 0:37:56.680
<v Speaker 1>unmanned probes and stuff like that right Like we're using

0:37:56.760 --> 0:38:00.239
<v Speaker 1>radio waves right now to map Jupiter in particular, so

0:38:00.280 --> 0:38:03.040
<v Speaker 1>we can see sort of what the geography of the

0:38:03.080 --> 0:38:05.840
<v Speaker 1>planet is like underneath all those spots. Yeah, I mean

0:38:05.920 --> 0:38:08.400
<v Speaker 1>that's the other I mean, even getting me on probes

0:38:09.000 --> 0:38:12.520
<v Speaker 1>and robots, I mean just pure sensors, pure telescope technology,

0:38:12.760 --> 0:38:15.840
<v Speaker 1>Like the human eye is not gonna is not going

0:38:15.920 --> 0:38:17.960
<v Speaker 1>to be able to glimpse these things. We need the

0:38:18.280 --> 0:38:21.160
<v Speaker 1>We need the eye of technology to glimpse and understand

0:38:21.160 --> 0:38:25.279
<v Speaker 1>these things. That's the that's the lens. That's important. So

0:38:25.280 --> 0:38:29.040
<v Speaker 1>the Congressional Budget Office says, look, this proposal would allow

0:38:29.480 --> 0:38:33.480
<v Speaker 1>NASA to continue its aeronautics and its robotics missions. That

0:38:33.600 --> 0:38:36.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, we're not cutting that out, just the human stuff. Now.

0:38:36.680 --> 0:38:39.480
<v Speaker 1>They found by crunching the numbers that this would save

0:38:39.880 --> 0:38:45.720
<v Speaker 1>seventy three billion dollars in that time span from three

0:38:46.160 --> 0:38:50.160
<v Speaker 1>They argue that because most space missions use electronics and

0:38:50.200 --> 0:38:53.359
<v Speaker 1>information technology, that there's no need to send humans into

0:38:53.400 --> 0:38:56.680
<v Speaker 1>space because the instruments don't need the people there to

0:38:56.760 --> 0:39:00.440
<v Speaker 1>operate them. And by using quote robots, I think robots

0:39:00.480 --> 0:39:03.040
<v Speaker 1>is a bit of a strong term here, but that

0:39:03.080 --> 0:39:06.400
<v Speaker 1>won't put human life in danger either, right Uh. And

0:39:06.440 --> 0:39:08.759
<v Speaker 1>it would actually decrease the cost. Because we make the

0:39:08.760 --> 0:39:11.360
<v Speaker 1>missions one way, we don't have to figure out a

0:39:11.400 --> 0:39:13.920
<v Speaker 1>way to bring them back and bring them back safely,

0:39:14.160 --> 0:39:16.600
<v Speaker 1>and that's a huge cost. Yeah, a one way mission

0:39:16.600 --> 0:39:20.799
<v Speaker 1>to Mars, uh isn't nearly as scarier thing when it's

0:39:20.800 --> 0:39:26.080
<v Speaker 1>just a robot. Robot Matt Damon. So yeah, robot Matt.

0:39:27.840 --> 0:39:31.960
<v Speaker 1>He's going to science the beep out of this. I

0:39:31.960 --> 0:39:33.960
<v Speaker 1>mean that's actually a pretty you know, when you think

0:39:33.960 --> 0:39:36.680
<v Speaker 1>about that movie, which was great, like most, I mean,

0:39:36.719 --> 0:39:39.160
<v Speaker 1>the whole thing that all the problems depend on the

0:39:39.200 --> 0:39:41.800
<v Speaker 1>fact that you sent a human there, and then there's

0:39:42.000 --> 0:39:45.600
<v Speaker 1>all of this you know, symbolic power and sending him

0:39:45.640 --> 0:39:48.880
<v Speaker 1>there and all this additional cost and keeping him alive

0:39:48.960 --> 0:39:52.000
<v Speaker 1>there and then and getting him back. Whereas it's just

0:39:52.040 --> 0:39:54.600
<v Speaker 1>a robot, you just write it off like any other robot.

0:39:54.640 --> 0:39:57.799
<v Speaker 1>We've sent out into his face. Yeah. Yeah, which some

0:39:57.840 --> 0:40:00.560
<v Speaker 1>people argue that's a problem too, especially lay along the

0:40:00.760 --> 0:40:05.520
<v Speaker 1>sort of pollution slash anti capitalist lines. But anyways, to

0:40:05.560 --> 0:40:11.040
<v Speaker 1>finish it off the this congressional article, they specifically added, look,

0:40:11.080 --> 0:40:14.040
<v Speaker 1>there's also arguments against this too, and here's what they are.

0:40:14.320 --> 0:40:18.120
<v Speaker 1>That eliminating human space flight would end the progress that's

0:40:18.160 --> 0:40:21.200
<v Speaker 1>necessary to send humans to Mars, leading right into that

0:40:21.280 --> 0:40:25.719
<v Speaker 1>Martian uh analogy. And also that there is possibly a

0:40:25.760 --> 0:40:30.200
<v Speaker 1>scientific advantage to having human beings on the I S

0:40:30.200 --> 0:40:33.839
<v Speaker 1>S to conduct experiments in micro gravity. That's true, that's

0:40:33.840 --> 0:40:36.000
<v Speaker 1>a good one. We kind of it's easy to forget

0:40:36.080 --> 0:40:38.120
<v Speaker 1>I S S and and all the work that goes

0:40:38.120 --> 0:40:41.239
<v Speaker 1>on there when we start thinking about these more futuristic

0:40:41.320 --> 0:40:44.120
<v Speaker 1>visions of sending humans to other planets. Now. On the

0:40:44.160 --> 0:40:49.200
<v Speaker 1>other hand, in two thousand eight, Freakonomics hosted a basically

0:40:49.200 --> 0:40:52.840
<v Speaker 1>like a round table of a bunch of space exploration

0:40:53.320 --> 0:40:57.520
<v Speaker 1>experts with the theme is space exploration worth the cost?

0:40:57.920 --> 0:40:59.400
<v Speaker 1>And I'm not going to break it down by like

0:40:59.440 --> 0:41:01.160
<v Speaker 1>each one. You can go look at it yourself. It's

0:41:01.200 --> 0:41:04.920
<v Speaker 1>pretty interesting, but they pretty much came down totally in

0:41:04.960 --> 0:41:07.640
<v Speaker 1>favor of space exploration and there are reasons where that

0:41:07.680 --> 0:41:12.040
<v Speaker 1>space exploration stimulates children to enter into stem fields. The

0:41:12.160 --> 0:41:16.440
<v Speaker 1>returns on investments generate royalties from patents and licenses. But

0:41:16.719 --> 0:41:19.239
<v Speaker 1>what's interesting is that all that money goes back into

0:41:19.280 --> 0:41:22.440
<v Speaker 1>the US Treasury instead of into NASA. So some of

0:41:22.480 --> 0:41:24.880
<v Speaker 1>them were arguing, Hey, you know, if you made it

0:41:25.000 --> 0:41:28.520
<v Speaker 1>so that the money that's generated from the technology that's

0:41:28.560 --> 0:41:31.920
<v Speaker 1>invented by NASA goes back into NASA, NASA will be

0:41:31.960 --> 0:41:36.800
<v Speaker 1>self funding. Then uh. And also this was a weird argument.

0:41:36.840 --> 0:41:39.640
<v Speaker 1>I thought. Uh. One guy said, well, we spend a

0:41:39.719 --> 0:41:41.680
<v Speaker 1>hundred and fifty four billion dollars a year in the

0:41:41.760 --> 0:41:44.400
<v Speaker 1>United States on alcohol, so why shouldn't we spend that

0:41:44.440 --> 0:41:47.200
<v Speaker 1>kind of money on going into space? See, and this

0:41:47.280 --> 0:41:49.600
<v Speaker 1>is this is where we get into an argument. We

0:41:49.640 --> 0:41:52.600
<v Speaker 1>see with science a lot that sounds to me like

0:41:52.640 --> 0:41:54.840
<v Speaker 1>the kind of thing that I would see in Facebook comments.

0:41:54.920 --> 0:41:56.719
<v Speaker 1>And then people will say, oh, but where is this

0:41:56.880 --> 0:41:58.919
<v Speaker 1>lost flight? How come we can do this? We can't

0:41:58.960 --> 0:42:02.799
<v Speaker 1>find that? Uh, you know the whole Really, we can

0:42:02.800 --> 0:42:05.160
<v Speaker 1>put a man on the moon. Why can't we achieve

0:42:05.320 --> 0:42:09.400
<v Speaker 1>this thing in our culture, in our life, either scientifically

0:42:09.560 --> 0:42:12.640
<v Speaker 1>or or or non science? Whatever is like a specific

0:42:12.719 --> 0:42:17.200
<v Speaker 1>current event type crisis. Curing cancer, it's another big one.

0:42:17.200 --> 0:42:19.600
<v Speaker 1>How Come how the argument is always like, oh, why

0:42:19.640 --> 0:42:21.719
<v Speaker 1>why aren't they curing cancer? I think, well, they can't

0:42:21.719 --> 0:42:26.439
<v Speaker 1>cure cancers. They're stopping wildfires. This is fluid dynamics. Yes,

0:42:26.880 --> 0:42:30.280
<v Speaker 1>this is a different realm. And just because just because

0:42:30.360 --> 0:42:34.040
<v Speaker 1>cancer research is hugely important and lives are are on

0:42:34.080 --> 0:42:36.360
<v Speaker 1>the line, it doesn't mean that these other areas of

0:42:36.400 --> 0:42:40.800
<v Speaker 1>scientific inquiry or not important, right right. Uh, they made

0:42:41.320 --> 0:42:44.640
<v Speaker 1>many more arguments in favor of space. So I'm gonna

0:42:44.640 --> 0:42:46.920
<v Speaker 1>throw some of these down here and then we'll keep

0:42:46.960 --> 0:42:49.360
<v Speaker 1>those in mind as we continue on with the arguments

0:42:49.440 --> 0:42:53.240
<v Speaker 1>against going into space. Uh. One is that it would,

0:42:53.239 --> 0:42:56.720
<v Speaker 1>of course allow us to establish human civilization on another world.

0:42:57.080 --> 0:43:00.520
<v Speaker 1>We talked already about the new technologies, but in particular

0:43:00.600 --> 0:43:03.399
<v Speaker 1>they gave us some examples saying we've developed a better

0:43:03.480 --> 0:43:06.920
<v Speaker 1>understanding of osteoporosis and balance disorder as a result of

0:43:06.960 --> 0:43:10.280
<v Speaker 1>sending people into outer space, and we've built new medical

0:43:10.320 --> 0:43:16.520
<v Speaker 1>devices such as digital mammography that generate wealth. Now now again,

0:43:16.600 --> 0:43:18.520
<v Speaker 1>like it's debatable is that going to the treasury, is

0:43:18.560 --> 0:43:21.760
<v Speaker 1>it going to NASA, or is it going into private hands? Also,

0:43:22.360 --> 0:43:26.920
<v Speaker 1>miniaturization of electronics devices for space flight led to our

0:43:26.960 --> 0:43:31.520
<v Speaker 1>present day computers and phones. So these are some tangible

0:43:31.520 --> 0:43:34.920
<v Speaker 1>examples of that kind of trickled down and technology that

0:43:35.040 --> 0:43:38.360
<v Speaker 1>we were discussing earlier. The other argument economically that I

0:43:38.360 --> 0:43:42.080
<v Speaker 1>thought was interesting was they said NASA's development in the South,

0:43:42.239 --> 0:43:46.600
<v Speaker 1>meaning the South of the United States, by establishing centers

0:43:46.760 --> 0:43:52.279
<v Speaker 1>or space flight operations, uh, that those brought economic economic

0:43:52.360 --> 0:43:56.560
<v Speaker 1>development into areas that previously didn't have them, basically providing jobs,

0:43:56.920 --> 0:44:01.200
<v Speaker 1>specifically thinking of Cape canaveral and Garda and Huntsville, Alabama.

0:44:01.320 --> 0:44:03.439
<v Speaker 1>It's also the reason you have like five or six

0:44:03.440 --> 0:44:06.360
<v Speaker 1>German restaurants in Huntsville, Alabama. It's like the mecca of

0:44:06.440 --> 0:44:10.200
<v Speaker 1>German restaurants in the entire region. All except for what's

0:44:10.200 --> 0:44:14.120
<v Speaker 1>the what's the fake German town here in Georgia Helen? Helen?

0:44:14.160 --> 0:44:16.520
<v Speaker 1>I think Helen only that is Helen is not a

0:44:16.520 --> 0:44:21.000
<v Speaker 1>destination for Yeah, if you if you're from the South,

0:44:21.040 --> 0:44:22.560
<v Speaker 1>have you ever been to Helen, Georgia, You know what

0:44:22.560 --> 0:44:25.920
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about. But it's like this little like touristy,

0:44:25.920 --> 0:44:28.759
<v Speaker 1>fake German village. It's kind of bizarre. Yeah, they do

0:44:28.840 --> 0:44:31.719
<v Speaker 1>have a good Thai restaurant data. By the way, in

0:44:31.760 --> 0:44:34.920
<v Speaker 1>the fake German town, there's a great rest there, just

0:44:35.200 --> 0:44:39.919
<v Speaker 1>f y I to local listeners. Other other reasons why

0:44:39.960 --> 0:44:44.000
<v Speaker 1>we where we should go is this is an interesting terminology.

0:44:44.480 --> 0:44:49.960
<v Speaker 1>It allows us to address global challenges with quote space solutions,

0:44:50.000 --> 0:44:53.920
<v Speaker 1>and one of those is the international context. So it

0:44:54.000 --> 0:44:58.600
<v Speaker 1>offers a venue for peaceful cooperation between nations. Uh. And

0:44:58.680 --> 0:45:02.480
<v Speaker 1>that results in a foreign policy boost and prestige to

0:45:02.560 --> 0:45:06.200
<v Speaker 1>those nations, right. Uh. And so the person who made

0:45:06.200 --> 0:45:10.320
<v Speaker 1>this argument says that it justifies the Cold War basically,

0:45:11.000 --> 0:45:13.319
<v Speaker 1>which again, like like I said at the top, some

0:45:13.360 --> 0:45:16.640
<v Speaker 1>of these arguments I find a little bit loose like that.

0:45:16.640 --> 0:45:19.000
<v Speaker 1>That one's kind of strange to me. You end up

0:45:19.040 --> 0:45:22.240
<v Speaker 1>kind of taking uh, it's you end up taking approaches

0:45:22.239 --> 0:45:25.080
<v Speaker 1>if you're playing a game of civilization right where you're

0:45:25.200 --> 0:45:29.080
<v Speaker 1>you're thinking, oh, well, this brought up my technology technology score,

0:45:29.160 --> 0:45:31.680
<v Speaker 1>but then also it lowered the risk level. And it's

0:45:31.719 --> 0:45:35.400
<v Speaker 1>just it gets it's helpful to take these these broad views,

0:45:35.560 --> 0:45:40.080
<v Speaker 1>but it's also it also creates its own problems with perspective. Yeah,

0:45:40.120 --> 0:45:43.640
<v Speaker 1>I think so as well. Another one is some again

0:45:43.800 --> 0:45:46.520
<v Speaker 1>sort of loose, right, but uh, well, you know, of

0:45:46.560 --> 0:45:48.560
<v Speaker 1>course we should keep doing this and spending these billions

0:45:48.560 --> 0:45:51.160
<v Speaker 1>of dollars because it will answer the are we alone? Question?

0:45:51.239 --> 0:45:54.080
<v Speaker 1>Which sure it will, and that that would be fascinating,

0:45:54.200 --> 0:45:57.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, that would be great headlines. Right. But do

0:45:57.239 --> 0:46:00.120
<v Speaker 1>we need to know are we alone? More than we

0:46:00.200 --> 0:46:03.960
<v Speaker 1>need to I don't know, feed the hungry? Yeah, stuff

0:46:04.000 --> 0:46:07.600
<v Speaker 1>like that is sort of where the economic argument gets tricky.

0:46:07.760 --> 0:46:10.520
<v Speaker 1>It's also one of those things. Um. Not to be

0:46:10.640 --> 0:46:12.799
<v Speaker 1>too much of a downer, but sometimes I think about

0:46:12.840 --> 0:46:15.080
<v Speaker 1>that and I think, well, it would be great to know,

0:46:15.520 --> 0:46:18.600
<v Speaker 1>but the answer can only mess us up, you know,

0:46:18.880 --> 0:46:21.080
<v Speaker 1>like the answers no, then oh I feel so alone.

0:46:21.080 --> 0:46:23.719
<v Speaker 1>If the answer is yes, well then it's whoa, what

0:46:23.760 --> 0:46:25.799
<v Speaker 1>does that mean for my sense of identity? What does

0:46:25.840 --> 0:46:28.680
<v Speaker 1>that mean for my faith? And then are they scary

0:46:28.800 --> 0:46:32.960
<v Speaker 1>or not? Should I now just be petrified of the

0:46:32.960 --> 0:46:36.680
<v Speaker 1>the Independence day version? Um? And then there's this, you know,

0:46:36.800 --> 0:46:39.520
<v Speaker 1>continual argument that we keep coming back to that ex

0:46:39.960 --> 0:46:43.000
<v Speaker 1>exploration is intrinsic to human nature, so of course we

0:46:43.040 --> 0:46:47.080
<v Speaker 1>have to fulfill our human nature right um. And whenever

0:46:47.160 --> 0:46:49.799
<v Speaker 1>I hear that, I can't help but think of the

0:46:49.840 --> 0:46:54.040
<v Speaker 1>Franklin Expedition into uh the Arctic because I did a

0:46:54.040 --> 0:46:56.960
<v Speaker 1>lot of research into that for another project, and that

0:46:57.040 --> 0:47:00.279
<v Speaker 1>was basically, you know, this pre space age that that

0:47:00.360 --> 0:47:03.719
<v Speaker 1>was their outer space, like being able to traverse the

0:47:03.760 --> 0:47:07.399
<v Speaker 1>Northwest passage. Uh. And they lost tons alive and spent

0:47:07.520 --> 0:47:10.120
<v Speaker 1>many a lot of money. They still don't know what happened. Well,

0:47:10.160 --> 0:47:12.440
<v Speaker 1>they sort of know what happened to the Franklin expedition.

0:47:12.520 --> 0:47:15.640
<v Speaker 1>But you know, there's there's many a horror story written

0:47:15.680 --> 0:47:19.919
<v Speaker 1>about the cannibalization that possibly went on on the icy

0:47:19.960 --> 0:47:23.439
<v Speaker 1>wastes of the North uh, purely so that we could

0:47:23.440 --> 0:47:29.560
<v Speaker 1>fulfill this need of human exploration. So there's that. Uh. Now,

0:47:29.600 --> 0:47:33.480
<v Speaker 1>one guy in particular, he says, quote asking if space

0:47:33.520 --> 0:47:37.319
<v Speaker 1>exploration with humans or robots are both is worth the

0:47:37.400 --> 0:47:41.360
<v Speaker 1>effort is like questioning the value of Columbus's voyage to

0:47:41.400 --> 0:47:45.080
<v Speaker 1>the New World in the fourteen nineties. Now, it's interesting

0:47:45.120 --> 0:47:48.480
<v Speaker 1>about that is one of the people that we're going

0:47:48.520 --> 0:47:52.640
<v Speaker 1>to talk about next actually makes that argument and says, yeah,

0:47:52.680 --> 0:47:54.719
<v Speaker 1>that was a bad thing too. Yeah, there are a

0:47:54.719 --> 0:47:57.120
<v Speaker 1>lot of compelling arguments that that was. That was a

0:47:57.160 --> 0:48:00.239
<v Speaker 1>bad thing. And it's kind of weird to say you

0:48:00.320 --> 0:48:03.160
<v Speaker 1>can't doubt this because doubting that is like second guessing

0:48:03.239 --> 0:48:06.160
<v Speaker 1>something that happened in the past. I can't really, I

0:48:06.200 --> 0:48:09.560
<v Speaker 1>can't change what happened with Columbus. You know, a lot

0:48:09.640 --> 0:48:12.600
<v Speaker 1>of aspects of that scenario sucked. But um, you know

0:48:12.960 --> 0:48:15.600
<v Speaker 1>I am in that flow of time. I'm not going

0:48:15.640 --> 0:48:17.719
<v Speaker 1>to go back and kill him. Yeah. I gotta say,

0:48:17.719 --> 0:48:20.160
<v Speaker 1>like a lot of these people in this Freakonomics roundtable,

0:48:20.560 --> 0:48:24.239
<v Speaker 1>you know, it was a couple of years ago now,

0:48:24.320 --> 0:48:27.520
<v Speaker 1>so maybe their their arguments would be different. But I

0:48:27.560 --> 0:48:31.279
<v Speaker 1>admire their enthusiasm for space travel, but some of their

0:48:31.400 --> 0:48:34.879
<v Speaker 1>arguments weren't very well thought out. And I think part

0:48:34.880 --> 0:48:36.880
<v Speaker 1>of it comes from, again just going from the broad

0:48:36.960 --> 0:48:40.040
<v Speaker 1>view to the smaller view and it ultimately being kind

0:48:40.040 --> 0:48:44.400
<v Speaker 1>of its own wicked problem. Right. Yeah, absolutely. Now, another

0:48:44.440 --> 0:48:46.080
<v Speaker 1>thing I want to point out here before we take

0:48:46.120 --> 0:48:49.880
<v Speaker 1>another break is that, you know, looking back, it's easy

0:48:50.000 --> 0:48:53.080
<v Speaker 1>to look back at the footage of of of the

0:48:53.080 --> 0:48:56.160
<v Speaker 1>the original space race and thinking, well, everybody was behind it.

0:48:56.680 --> 0:49:00.640
<v Speaker 1>There's just so much like political and public will that

0:49:00.719 --> 0:49:02.759
<v Speaker 1>was devoted for it. Of course, you were able to

0:49:02.760 --> 0:49:05.520
<v Speaker 1>pull off such a megaproject, and of course, to a

0:49:05.560 --> 0:49:07.960
<v Speaker 1>certain extent that's true. We were we were able to

0:49:08.000 --> 0:49:10.719
<v Speaker 1>do that kind of things that those pep we were

0:49:10.760 --> 0:49:15.200
<v Speaker 1>able to pull off landing humans on the Moon because

0:49:15.680 --> 0:49:20.120
<v Speaker 1>that political capital was there. However, Uh, I've found a

0:49:20.120 --> 0:49:23.359
<v Speaker 1>couple of sources that really drive home the fact that

0:49:24.239 --> 0:49:28.360
<v Speaker 1>public opinion polls conducted during the Apollo missions, um the

0:49:28.440 --> 0:49:30.520
<v Speaker 1>voices of critics that we can look back on, it

0:49:30.840 --> 0:49:34.120
<v Speaker 1>shows that not everyone was really as on board as

0:49:34.160 --> 0:49:37.120
<v Speaker 1>we sometimes like to think. Yeah, like I'm imagining like

0:49:37.160 --> 0:49:40.360
<v Speaker 1>the Archie Bunkers of the world probably didn't like get

0:49:40.400 --> 0:49:45.160
<v Speaker 1>as excited about the mission to the Moon as like

0:49:45.280 --> 0:49:47.640
<v Speaker 1>maybe the rest of us. Yeah. And in fact, if

0:49:47.640 --> 0:49:51.200
<v Speaker 1>some of this comes from space historian Roger Lanaias of

0:49:51.200 --> 0:49:53.360
<v Speaker 1>the National Inner Space Museum, who we mentioned earlier in

0:49:53.360 --> 0:49:57.360
<v Speaker 1>that piece about Dr James C. Fletcher, Yeah, he said, quote.

0:49:57.560 --> 0:50:00.640
<v Speaker 1>Polls do not support a contention that American embraced the

0:50:00.719 --> 0:50:04.360
<v Speaker 1>lunar landing mission. Consistently through the nineteen sixties, the majority

0:50:04.360 --> 0:50:07.000
<v Speaker 1>of Americans did not believe Apollo was worth the cost.

0:50:07.560 --> 0:50:10.239
<v Speaker 1>With the one exception to this poll to this a

0:50:10.320 --> 0:50:13.040
<v Speaker 1>poll taken at the time of Apollo eleven lunar landing

0:50:13.040 --> 0:50:17.320
<v Speaker 1>in July ninety nine, and uh, consistently throughout the decade,

0:50:17.560 --> 0:50:20.239
<v Speaker 1>forty five to sixty percent of Americans belief that the

0:50:20.280 --> 0:50:24.040
<v Speaker 1>government was spending too much money on space, indicative of

0:50:24.080 --> 0:50:27.640
<v Speaker 1>a lack of commitment to the spaceflight agenda. Yeah, so

0:50:27.680 --> 0:50:32.200
<v Speaker 1>that's sort of like our revisionist history, right, especially through

0:50:32.239 --> 0:50:35.160
<v Speaker 1>pop culture, like like, yeah, now we've got movies with

0:50:35.200 --> 0:50:38.200
<v Speaker 1>Tom Hanks where we sit around and celebrate how amazing

0:50:38.480 --> 0:50:42.719
<v Speaker 1>our ingenuity was for sending Apollo up there. But at

0:50:42.719 --> 0:50:47.600
<v Speaker 1>the time, Yeah, yeah, indeed, and uh has pointed out

0:50:47.640 --> 0:50:52.120
<v Speaker 1>in an excellent Atlantic article by Alexa c Magical. Could

0:50:52.360 --> 0:50:54.839
<v Speaker 1>that I recommend anyone check out. I'll include a link

0:50:54.840 --> 0:50:56.600
<v Speaker 1>to it on the landing page. For this episode, I

0:50:56.640 --> 0:51:00.200
<v Speaker 1>was titled the Moondoggle, The Forgotten Opposition to the Apollo Program.

0:51:00.320 --> 0:51:02.160
<v Speaker 1>Um He says, there was a fair amount of civil

0:51:02.239 --> 0:51:06.320
<v Speaker 1>rights criticism of the space program. So you had, for instance,

0:51:06.600 --> 0:51:09.480
<v Speaker 1>in the in the musical scene, you had the the

0:51:09.560 --> 0:51:12.960
<v Speaker 1>late great Gil Scott Heron who died in two thousand eleven.

0:51:13.560 --> 0:51:16.080
<v Speaker 1>You may know him for the Revolution will not be

0:51:16.120 --> 0:51:19.040
<v Speaker 1>telefol televised. Home is Where the Hatred Is. A number

0:51:19.080 --> 0:51:22.319
<v Speaker 1>of songs are this highly talented artists. Uh. He wrote

0:51:22.360 --> 0:51:24.280
<v Speaker 1>a couple of songs that were critical of the program,

0:51:24.320 --> 0:51:28.160
<v Speaker 1>most notably nineteen seventies Whitey on the Moon um, which

0:51:28.200 --> 0:51:32.319
<v Speaker 1>is probably the most notable example. But the it kind

0:51:32.320 --> 0:51:33.560
<v Speaker 1>of goes like this. I'm not gonna sing it, but

0:51:33.560 --> 0:51:35.719
<v Speaker 1>I'm just gonna quote it. He says, with all that

0:51:35.800 --> 0:51:38.200
<v Speaker 1>money I made last year for Whitey on the Moon,

0:51:38.440 --> 0:51:40.880
<v Speaker 1>how come there ain't no money here? White He's on

0:51:40.920 --> 0:51:43.279
<v Speaker 1>the moon. You know, I just about had my fill

0:51:43.400 --> 0:51:46.360
<v Speaker 1>of Whitey on the Moon. I think I'll I'll send

0:51:46.400 --> 0:51:50.200
<v Speaker 1>these dollar these doctor bills airmail special to Whitey on

0:51:50.239 --> 0:51:52.440
<v Speaker 1>the Moon. And of course what he's saying here is

0:51:52.480 --> 0:51:55.600
<v Speaker 1>that we're spending all of this money on well, on

0:51:55.719 --> 0:51:58.880
<v Speaker 1>sending white people to the moon on this space program.

0:51:58.960 --> 0:52:02.520
<v Speaker 1>That is not benefiting people who are suffering. It's not

0:52:02.560 --> 0:52:05.960
<v Speaker 1>and it's not benefiting UH, individuals who are still fighting

0:52:06.040 --> 0:52:08.719
<v Speaker 1>for their own civil rights, while all of this money

0:52:08.840 --> 0:52:14.920
<v Speaker 1>is is fighting to do really with with hardly tangible benefits,

0:52:14.920 --> 0:52:18.360
<v Speaker 1>certainly not to the common man. Ray Bradberry has a story,

0:52:18.840 --> 0:52:20.480
<v Speaker 1>I can't remember the title of it, that's in The

0:52:20.520 --> 0:52:25.040
<v Speaker 1>Illustrated Man that's along the lines of this too, Yeah,

0:52:25.080 --> 0:52:29.440
<v Speaker 1>where the premises that African Americans have basically moved to

0:52:29.640 --> 0:52:34.120
<v Speaker 1>Mars because civil rights issues on Earth were so horrific,

0:52:34.600 --> 0:52:38.400
<v Speaker 1>and then white people on Earth had mind all the

0:52:38.520 --> 0:52:43.640
<v Speaker 1>resources and we're starving and they needed help. So they Uh,

0:52:43.719 --> 0:52:46.040
<v Speaker 1>it's about like a rocket man coming to Mars. He

0:52:46.160 --> 0:52:48.960
<v Speaker 1>lands on Mars, and some of the people on Mars

0:52:48.960 --> 0:52:51.600
<v Speaker 1>are like, why should we accept these people? Why should

0:52:51.640 --> 0:52:54.359
<v Speaker 1>we help them? Ultimately, the community comes together and says,

0:52:54.360 --> 0:52:56.239
<v Speaker 1>of course we're gonna We're gonna take care of So

0:52:56.360 --> 0:53:00.960
<v Speaker 1>essentially Bradberry wrote an afro futurist pete. That's interesting. Yeah,

0:53:01.120 --> 0:53:03.480
<v Speaker 1>it's an incredible story. Off to go, I'll go look

0:53:03.480 --> 0:53:06.520
<v Speaker 1>that up because I I found I find afro futurism

0:53:06.520 --> 0:53:10.799
<v Speaker 1>a very interesting area. Yeah, you have this convergence of

0:53:10.800 --> 0:53:13.600
<v Speaker 1>of enthusiasm for space and science fiction but also the

0:53:13.640 --> 0:53:16.640
<v Speaker 1>civil rights movement. Yeah, there was stuff like that even

0:53:16.640 --> 0:53:19.160
<v Speaker 1>in like the old EAC comics in the late fifties.

0:53:19.719 --> 0:53:22.040
<v Speaker 1>In fact, like one of the reasons this is an

0:53:22.080 --> 0:53:26.040
<v Speaker 1>interesting little side note, one of the reasons why horror

0:53:26.040 --> 0:53:31.120
<v Speaker 1>comics were banned in the fifties and why the Comics

0:53:31.120 --> 0:53:34.920
<v Speaker 1>Code was created was because EAC comics had a story

0:53:35.200 --> 0:53:37.440
<v Speaker 1>that was a sci fi story where at the end

0:53:37.440 --> 0:53:40.200
<v Speaker 1>of the story, the an astronaut takes off his helmet

0:53:40.360 --> 0:53:43.279
<v Speaker 1>and it's a black man and it's you know, the

0:53:43.800 --> 0:53:46.240
<v Speaker 1>people writing it were meant to be a civil rights

0:53:46.560 --> 0:53:52.960
<v Speaker 1>promotional story, but the black man was sweating. There was

0:53:53.080 --> 0:53:56.440
<v Speaker 1>a bead of sweat dripping down his face in the panel.

0:53:56.640 --> 0:53:59.560
<v Speaker 1>And the people who were against the story at the

0:53:59.600 --> 0:54:03.000
<v Speaker 1>times said that that was like too primal or something

0:54:03.080 --> 0:54:05.919
<v Speaker 1>like that, and that you know that the comic book

0:54:05.960 --> 0:54:09.239
<v Speaker 1>was pushing boundaries too far by showing the sensuality of

0:54:09.280 --> 0:54:13.080
<v Speaker 1>the humanity of this astronaut. Huh, yeah, that is fascinating.

0:54:13.600 --> 0:54:17.320
<v Speaker 1>So hey, Gil Scott Heron wasn't alone. Yeah, indeed, um,

0:54:17.400 --> 0:54:20.319
<v Speaker 1>and certainly they were. Yeah, it went beyond just just

0:54:20.600 --> 0:54:24.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, the work of your artists. Um. In Black

0:54:24.480 --> 0:54:27.239
<v Speaker 1>protesters marched on Cape Canaveral to protest the launch of

0:54:27.280 --> 0:54:31.759
<v Speaker 1>a Paula fourteen. Uh. Then civil rights leader Jose Williams, who,

0:54:31.760 --> 0:54:35.560
<v Speaker 1>of course we have Jose Williams here in Atlanta. Yeah,

0:54:35.600 --> 0:54:38.600
<v Speaker 1>he framed this as a protest against quote, our nation's

0:54:38.640 --> 0:54:42.520
<v Speaker 1>inability to choose humane priorities, which gets down to the

0:54:42.760 --> 0:54:46.160
<v Speaker 1>economic argument again, right, Like it's just truly a priority

0:54:46.239 --> 0:54:49.160
<v Speaker 1>and what's more important to us. Yeah, clearly, if you

0:54:49.160 --> 0:54:51.279
<v Speaker 1>look at the way that the budget breaks down, the

0:54:51.280 --> 0:54:55.760
<v Speaker 1>war is tremendously more. Yeah, and that is war. Robert

0:54:55.840 --> 0:55:00.560
<v Speaker 1>defense that's often used as an argument for space exploration is, Look,

0:55:01.160 --> 0:55:03.960
<v Speaker 1>if you spent just a fraction more of what you

0:55:04.000 --> 0:55:07.759
<v Speaker 1>spend on the war in the Middle East on space exploration,

0:55:08.480 --> 0:55:11.360
<v Speaker 1>then we would we'd experience all of these tangible benefits

0:55:11.440 --> 0:55:13.799
<v Speaker 1>as as opposed to just the merre tangible benefits of

0:55:13.800 --> 0:55:15.960
<v Speaker 1>military research. Yeah. I think about the Star Wars and

0:55:16.040 --> 0:55:18.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm not talking about the movie, the Star Wars program

0:55:18.560 --> 0:55:21.680
<v Speaker 1>research done in the eighties. That's combining both worlds. It's

0:55:21.719 --> 0:55:26.080
<v Speaker 1>the space exploration world combined with militarization, which we talked

0:55:26.120 --> 0:55:29.600
<v Speaker 1>about with the Weapons in Space episode. Yeah. Now that

0:55:29.600 --> 0:55:33.120
<v Speaker 1>that Alexacy Madrigal article that mentioned he he spends a

0:55:33.120 --> 0:55:35.400
<v Speaker 1>lot of time talking about the work of his Israeli

0:55:35.480 --> 0:55:41.240
<v Speaker 1>American sociologist uh Amatali at Ziani uh and his fifty

0:55:41.280 --> 0:55:45.279
<v Speaker 1>four book The Moondoggle, Domestic and International Implications of the

0:55:45.280 --> 0:55:48.959
<v Speaker 1>Space Race, And in this book at the only laid

0:55:48.960 --> 0:55:52.840
<v Speaker 1>out scientific opposition to the space race as a cash

0:55:52.920 --> 0:55:56.440
<v Speaker 1>and crash approach to science, and he argued that, based

0:55:56.440 --> 0:55:58.520
<v Speaker 1>on the opinions of various scientists that he spoke to,

0:55:58.920 --> 0:56:02.400
<v Speaker 1>space should only be pursued in balance with other scientific

0:56:02.440 --> 0:56:05.000
<v Speaker 1>and technological pursuits, and shouldn't be pursued in a manner

0:56:05.040 --> 0:56:09.239
<v Speaker 1>that weakens other scientific endeavors. One of the facts that

0:56:09.560 --> 0:56:12.279
<v Speaker 1>cited here um in the book, and then cited by

0:56:12.320 --> 0:56:15.360
<v Speaker 1>Magical is that of every three dollars spent on research

0:56:15.360 --> 0:56:18.160
<v Speaker 1>and development in the United United States in nineteen three,

0:56:18.560 --> 0:56:21.760
<v Speaker 1>one went for defense, one for space, and the remaining

0:56:21.880 --> 0:56:25.799
<v Speaker 1>one for all other research purposes, including private industry and

0:56:25.880 --> 0:56:30.200
<v Speaker 1>medical research. He also argued that the space program at

0:56:30.200 --> 0:56:32.480
<v Speaker 1>the time function as something of a brain range. He

0:56:32.600 --> 0:56:35.120
<v Speaker 1>had the best in the brightest and where they drawn,

0:56:35.120 --> 0:56:37.000
<v Speaker 1>they're drawn where the energy is, they're drawn where the

0:56:37.040 --> 0:56:43.840
<v Speaker 1>money is. And that was the exactly Yeah and um.

0:56:43.880 --> 0:56:46.200
<v Speaker 1>And it's also argued that while one of the Space

0:56:46.200 --> 0:56:49.080
<v Speaker 1>program did create jobs, it did stimulate the economy, it

0:56:49.160 --> 0:56:52.640
<v Speaker 1>mainly did so with a focus on highly skilled positions.

0:56:52.719 --> 0:56:55.680
<v Speaker 1>Yeah sure, right, Yeah, they're not. There's not that many

0:56:55.760 --> 0:56:59.920
<v Speaker 1>jobs for janitors at NASA necessarily as there are for

0:57:00.120 --> 0:57:04.400
<v Speaker 1>engineers with PhDs. So how are we going to abolish

0:57:04.400 --> 0:57:08.600
<v Speaker 1>outer Space. Okay, So Sam Chris, I was unfamiliar with him,

0:57:08.640 --> 0:57:11.279
<v Speaker 1>I learned. Actually, it turned out I was familiar with him.

0:57:11.280 --> 0:57:13.200
<v Speaker 1>I had read articles by him before, but I didn't

0:57:13.239 --> 0:57:16.520
<v Speaker 1>realize who he was. Uh. He just in February of

0:57:16.600 --> 0:57:19.360
<v Speaker 1>this year wrote a piece at the New Inquiry that

0:57:19.560 --> 0:57:21.920
<v Speaker 1>I've already said as the manifesto of the Committee to

0:57:21.960 --> 0:57:26.440
<v Speaker 1>Abolish outer Space. I learned about it from uh my

0:57:26.560 --> 0:57:29.960
<v Speaker 1>patron saint for Stuff to Blow your Mind, warren Ellis's newsletter.

0:57:30.000 --> 0:57:33.640
<v Speaker 1>He included it in his newsletter, um Warren Ellis being

0:57:33.680 --> 0:57:39.120
<v Speaker 1>a political science fiction writer, mainly of comics but also

0:57:39.120 --> 0:57:42.680
<v Speaker 1>of pros. Uh. So, Chris, from what I can gather,

0:57:42.920 --> 0:57:46.520
<v Speaker 1>seems to be a writer who alternates between I guess

0:57:46.560 --> 0:57:51.040
<v Speaker 1>what I would call florid prose satire and nonfiction essays.

0:57:51.360 --> 0:57:54.000
<v Speaker 1>And his big thing seems to be challenging what we

0:57:54.080 --> 0:57:57.520
<v Speaker 1>assumed to be authority figures in modern thought, like Neil

0:57:57.560 --> 0:58:02.160
<v Speaker 1>de Grass, Tyson Slaboy, Jack, Richard Dawkins, Nate Silver, people

0:58:02.200 --> 0:58:05.720
<v Speaker 1>like that. Uh He's written for Wired, Slate, invice. This

0:58:05.760 --> 0:58:08.600
<v Speaker 1>isn't just some like crazy guy off on his own blog,

0:58:08.640 --> 0:58:11.120
<v Speaker 1>although he does have his own blog and trying to read,

0:58:11.160 --> 0:58:15.800
<v Speaker 1>it is fairly impenetrable. Um. And I also recommend take

0:58:15.800 --> 0:58:17.800
<v Speaker 1>a look at this guy's Twitter feed two because it's

0:58:17.800 --> 0:58:21.360
<v Speaker 1>it's also like pretty out there. Um. But this piece,

0:58:21.400 --> 0:58:25.280
<v Speaker 1>in particular, he argues that the promise of the beautiful

0:58:25.360 --> 0:58:28.600
<v Speaker 1>journey to space is actually a political lie. It's an

0:58:28.640 --> 0:58:32.720
<v Speaker 1>ant and so he's making an anti capitalist argument. Uh.

0:58:32.720 --> 0:58:36.080
<v Speaker 1>And he says that this political lie is perpetuated by

0:58:36.120 --> 0:58:40.440
<v Speaker 1>science communicators who pretend to love science. And what I

0:58:40.480 --> 0:58:43.360
<v Speaker 1>wonder is if we would be included in there now

0:58:43.400 --> 0:58:46.520
<v Speaker 1>he does include some of our peers in there. Uh.

0:58:46.560 --> 0:58:49.600
<v Speaker 1>In a separate piece, he expands on it in a

0:58:49.640 --> 0:58:53.600
<v Speaker 1>Wired article against Neil de grass Tyson and I f

0:58:53.720 --> 0:58:58.080
<v Speaker 1>L Science. He accuses them of quote making the universe boring,

0:58:58.280 --> 0:59:02.160
<v Speaker 1>telling people things that they already know, and dispelling misconceptions

0:59:02.200 --> 0:59:05.880
<v Speaker 1>that nobody actually holds. So I'd like to think that

0:59:05.960 --> 0:59:09.280
<v Speaker 1>we were not guilty of those things. But hey, listeners,

0:59:09.360 --> 0:59:12.640
<v Speaker 1>let us know. Yeah, I feel like this is an

0:59:12.640 --> 0:59:16.320
<v Speaker 1>area we could we could really discuss at length another time.

0:59:16.440 --> 0:59:20.840
<v Speaker 1>But there is this whole push and pull between science

0:59:21.000 --> 0:59:23.800
<v Speaker 1>and public science science and you could I guess I've

0:59:23.800 --> 0:59:26.680
<v Speaker 1>heard it called vulgar science. Uh, and we've talked. We

0:59:26.760 --> 0:59:29.200
<v Speaker 1>talked about it in the Cargo Cults episode and sort

0:59:29.240 --> 0:59:32.120
<v Speaker 1>of in the Wicked Problems episode two, that there is

0:59:32.160 --> 0:59:36.640
<v Speaker 1>a somewhat like deification of quote unquote science in today's

0:59:36.720 --> 0:59:40.360
<v Speaker 1>pop culture news cycle, and space is kind of a

0:59:40.360 --> 0:59:44.840
<v Speaker 1>shining gym. It is, you don't quite, It's like, it's

0:59:44.880 --> 0:59:52.160
<v Speaker 1>essentially haven't it's essentially the afterlife for the vulgar science y. Yeah.

0:59:52.840 --> 0:59:55.840
<v Speaker 1>Another quote he has here is he says science here

0:59:56.400 --> 1:00:00.400
<v Speaker 1>meaning in these situations of writing, has very little to

1:00:00.440 --> 1:00:05.440
<v Speaker 1>do with the scientific method itself. It means ontological physicalism,

1:00:05.480 --> 1:00:09.400
<v Speaker 1>not believing in quote our Lord Jesus Christ, hating the

1:00:09.520 --> 1:00:13.280
<v Speaker 1>spectral lee, stupid and more than anything, pretty pictures of

1:00:13.320 --> 1:00:17.800
<v Speaker 1>nebula and tree frogs. So, okay, I sort of get

1:00:17.800 --> 1:00:20.320
<v Speaker 1>where he's coming from here. But you know, I'm often

1:00:20.360 --> 1:00:22.680
<v Speaker 1>accused of being a curmudge, and this guy really seems

1:00:22.720 --> 1:00:26.040
<v Speaker 1>to be planting a flag there. He's been a bit

1:00:26.040 --> 1:00:29.120
<v Speaker 1>of a hardcore. Yeah, But his manifesto, he says, look,

1:00:29.440 --> 1:00:34.120
<v Speaker 1>space itself in the existence of life is actually vanishingly short,

1:00:34.600 --> 1:00:37.640
<v Speaker 1>and we are all headed toward death because the universe

1:00:37.760 --> 1:00:41.040
<v Speaker 1>is already unmaking itself. But in the meantime, here we

1:00:41.080 --> 1:00:44.000
<v Speaker 1>are polluting space with all of our electronic debris and

1:00:44.120 --> 1:00:48.320
<v Speaker 1>probes and what we refer to as space junk, right uh.

1:00:48.360 --> 1:00:52.000
<v Speaker 1>And he says, if our exploration of space goes like

1:00:52.080 --> 1:00:56.400
<v Speaker 1>our exploration of Earth has, then Mars will end up

1:00:56.480 --> 1:01:00.920
<v Speaker 1>exploiting We'll just end up exploiting Mars for resources, right uh.

1:01:00.920 --> 1:01:04.040
<v Speaker 1>And there's a there's an infamous book by Robert Zubrin,

1:01:04.240 --> 1:01:07.400
<v Speaker 1>the Case for Mars, that is often cited as being like, yeah,

1:01:07.440 --> 1:01:09.440
<v Speaker 1>this is this is the go to book of like

1:01:09.760 --> 1:01:11.840
<v Speaker 1>why we should, why we should get up there? Why

1:01:12.160 --> 1:01:15.840
<v Speaker 1>zuber is a great advocate four Mars. Yeah, I interviewed

1:01:15.920 --> 1:01:19.280
<v Speaker 1>him several years back. Yeah, and it's he is. Yeah,

1:01:19.280 --> 1:01:21.000
<v Speaker 1>he's gung ho. He's like, he's very much of the

1:01:21.040 --> 1:01:23.360
<v Speaker 1>mindset not only should we go to Mars, we should

1:01:23.400 --> 1:01:27.160
<v Speaker 1>be there today. He makes an impassioned argument, Well, Sam,

1:01:27.280 --> 1:01:32.520
<v Speaker 1>Chris hates that guy. Uh. He says that this brings

1:01:32.560 --> 1:01:34.880
<v Speaker 1>us back to what we mentioned earlier. He says that

1:01:35.000 --> 1:01:38.880
<v Speaker 1>Zubrin's case for Mars is basically an analog for Columbus

1:01:39.200 --> 1:01:42.880
<v Speaker 1>pillaging the America's uh, and that you know, going to

1:01:42.920 --> 1:01:45.600
<v Speaker 1>Mars will lead to quote the spread of a rationalism,

1:01:45.920 --> 1:01:49.920
<v Speaker 1>the banalization of popular culture, the loss of willingness by

1:01:49.920 --> 1:01:53.160
<v Speaker 1>individuals to take risks, to fend for themselves and to

1:01:53.280 --> 1:01:57.520
<v Speaker 1>think for themselves. So, okay, I don't know if I

1:01:57.560 --> 1:01:59.840
<v Speaker 1>agree with it. Yeah, I don't know if I do either.

1:02:00.040 --> 1:02:04.320
<v Speaker 1>I also think, like um, like many kind of quasi

1:02:04.480 --> 1:02:08.439
<v Speaker 1>Marxist critics, this argument ends up getting lost a lot,

1:02:08.480 --> 1:02:11.760
<v Speaker 1>and it's sort of flowery poetic prose and trying to

1:02:11.800 --> 1:02:14.080
<v Speaker 1>show how great of a writer this guy actually is,

1:02:14.280 --> 1:02:19.000
<v Speaker 1>rather than focusing on his argumentation. Uh, like this segment

1:02:19.080 --> 1:02:21.440
<v Speaker 1>here where I'm telling you about what is in this

1:02:21.520 --> 1:02:23.240
<v Speaker 1>It took me, like I would say, a good hour

1:02:23.640 --> 1:02:27.560
<v Speaker 1>to pull this out of the morass of his language.

1:02:27.560 --> 1:02:29.600
<v Speaker 1>But also I would imagine he would say, well, this's

1:02:29.880 --> 1:02:33.360
<v Speaker 1>this is postmodern argumentation, man like, it's a manifest doing

1:02:33.360 --> 1:02:36.560
<v Speaker 1>the same way to the cyborg manifest. Totally. Donna Harroway

1:02:36.680 --> 1:02:40.200
<v Speaker 1>is exactly in the same camp. Yeah yeah, so uh

1:02:40.400 --> 1:02:42.960
<v Speaker 1>he says the journey to any frontier is going to

1:02:43.560 --> 1:02:47.680
<v Speaker 1>result in the depths of millions. But we convince ourselves

1:02:47.720 --> 1:02:51.280
<v Speaker 1>that Mars is okay, right, because Mars is lifeless. Nobody

1:02:51.280 --> 1:02:56.280
<v Speaker 1>can die on Mars. Right. Uh, And he brings us

1:02:56.320 --> 1:02:59.120
<v Speaker 1>back around again to the Columbus thing, and he says, well,

1:02:59.200 --> 1:03:03.080
<v Speaker 1>feudalism is dying in Europe. The conquering of the America's

1:03:03.160 --> 1:03:07.160
<v Speaker 1>kept the ruling class in power by shipping vast quantities

1:03:07.200 --> 1:03:11.240
<v Speaker 1>of precious metals back to them. So this is basically

1:03:11.240 --> 1:03:14.840
<v Speaker 1>an anti capitalist argument against going into space because Earth

1:03:14.880 --> 1:03:18.120
<v Speaker 1>is running out of both physical space for human beings

1:03:18.400 --> 1:03:21.400
<v Speaker 1>and the minerals of value for us to exploit. He

1:03:21.480 --> 1:03:23.200
<v Speaker 1>even goes so far as to say that if we

1:03:23.320 --> 1:03:27.960
<v Speaker 1>end up going to Mars, it could lead to slavery again. Yeah,

1:03:28.080 --> 1:03:33.640
<v Speaker 1>so he comes down hard on this. Now there's a

1:03:34.680 --> 1:03:40.120
<v Speaker 1>similar argument, but I would say less strident argument made

1:03:40.160 --> 1:03:44.280
<v Speaker 1>by Paul Dickens in a article that he wrote for

1:03:44.760 --> 1:03:48.920
<v Speaker 1>Monthly Review, which is an independent socialist magazine. And Dickens

1:03:48.960 --> 1:03:53.440
<v Speaker 1>basically says, look, the humanization of the cosmos is primarily

1:03:53.520 --> 1:03:59.600
<v Speaker 1>about benefiting the powerful, namely economic and military institutions, and

1:03:59.640 --> 1:04:03.160
<v Speaker 1>it will keep happening as we continue to colonize the cosmos.

1:04:03.160 --> 1:04:04.880
<v Speaker 1>So he says, we need to come up with some

1:04:04.920 --> 1:04:06.920
<v Speaker 1>kind of alternative forms of this. So he's not like

1:04:06.960 --> 1:04:10.560
<v Speaker 1>necessarily against going into space. What he's against is doing

1:04:10.600 --> 1:04:15.120
<v Speaker 1>it for the gain of the upper class essentially. Uh,

1:04:15.160 --> 1:04:18.600
<v Speaker 1>And he says, yeah, we look at going into outer

1:04:18.640 --> 1:04:22.120
<v Speaker 1>space as being a symbol of modernization. It's progress. It

1:04:22.200 --> 1:04:25.120
<v Speaker 1>brings social unity, right. Like he actually points out he

1:04:25.160 --> 1:04:28.800
<v Speaker 1>says one of the most lauded benefits of space exploration

1:04:29.040 --> 1:04:33.680
<v Speaker 1>is teleworking. That we wouldn't have teleworking technology. Uh. If

1:04:33.720 --> 1:04:36.600
<v Speaker 1>it wasn't for the space race, well then I guess

1:04:36.640 --> 1:04:38.600
<v Speaker 1>it was all worth it. But I don't know, man,

1:04:38.680 --> 1:04:42.520
<v Speaker 1>tell we both telework, but man alive is it seems

1:04:42.560 --> 1:04:48.919
<v Speaker 1>like we haven't gotten that technology nailed down yet. The technology. Um, yeah,

1:04:48.960 --> 1:04:51.560
<v Speaker 1>and to say nothing of the weirdness of trying to

1:04:51.600 --> 1:04:54.440
<v Speaker 1>work from home around at all the rights. So then

1:04:54.440 --> 1:04:57.520
<v Speaker 1>he also mentions, hey, look at this big boom in

1:04:57.600 --> 1:05:00.240
<v Speaker 1>space tourism. Now keep in mind this is in two thousand, hen,

1:05:00.320 --> 1:05:02.560
<v Speaker 1>this is six years ago. So he's already talking about

1:05:02.640 --> 1:05:06.120
<v Speaker 1>Richard Branson getting a you know, trying to create like

1:05:06.200 --> 1:05:09.800
<v Speaker 1>the space tourism industry, charging people exorbitant prices so that

1:05:09.840 --> 1:05:13.800
<v Speaker 1>can fly lower, be at lower orbit. Uh. He also

1:05:13.840 --> 1:05:15.880
<v Speaker 1>mentioned something that I had never heard of before, called

1:05:15.920 --> 1:05:19.600
<v Speaker 1>the Space Renaissance Initiative, which is apparently an international group

1:05:19.640 --> 1:05:24.280
<v Speaker 1>of over seventy private organizations that promote space exploration, and

1:05:24.320 --> 1:05:27.040
<v Speaker 1>they have their own manifesto, and this manifesto is to

1:05:27.120 --> 1:05:29.959
<v Speaker 1>help the economy because there's too many people on Earth

1:05:30.000 --> 1:05:33.120
<v Speaker 1>that are making too many demands on Earth's resources. So

1:05:33.160 --> 1:05:35.240
<v Speaker 1>they sort of see themselves the same way as like

1:05:35.280 --> 1:05:38.840
<v Speaker 1>the wealthy philanthropists who funded exploration to the New World, right,

1:05:38.840 --> 1:05:42.240
<v Speaker 1>the people who helped Columbus out. Okay, they're not saying

1:05:42.360 --> 1:05:45.320
<v Speaker 1>there are too many people, let's throw some people into

1:05:45.320 --> 1:05:49.160
<v Speaker 1>outer space. Yeah yeah, not not that far, not yet.

1:05:49.160 --> 1:05:52.000
<v Speaker 1>We're not gonna put him out the airlock. Uh. But

1:05:52.040 --> 1:05:55.280
<v Speaker 1>he says, look, that's a weird argument, right, because instead

1:05:55.280 --> 1:05:57.960
<v Speaker 1>of finding a solution to our problems, you're just basically

1:05:58.080 --> 1:06:01.439
<v Speaker 1>jettising them away, right, We'll just push push them off.

1:06:01.640 --> 1:06:04.440
<v Speaker 1>So another argument by philanthropists like this is something like

1:06:05.200 --> 1:06:09.320
<v Speaker 1>will find cheap supplies for labor or raw materials up there, right,

1:06:09.360 --> 1:06:12.920
<v Speaker 1>So that's going to benefit the economy as well. His

1:06:13.000 --> 1:06:17.240
<v Speaker 1>evidence that he showed in for the quote global space

1:06:17.280 --> 1:06:21.560
<v Speaker 1>economy was that it had increased between two thousand four

1:06:21.600 --> 1:06:24.560
<v Speaker 1>and two thousand nine. Uh. Now you hear people often

1:06:24.600 --> 1:06:27.160
<v Speaker 1>to crying like that. NASA is not getting enough funding.

1:06:27.200 --> 1:06:32.120
<v Speaker 1>But he's talking about everything from commercial satellites to military hardware,

1:06:32.280 --> 1:06:36.640
<v Speaker 1>space tourism, and launch services, and that government budgets actually

1:06:36.800 --> 1:06:39.400
<v Speaker 1>rose in two thousand nine up to two hundred and

1:06:39.440 --> 1:06:44.400
<v Speaker 1>sixty one billion dollars to promote space exploration. And at

1:06:44.440 --> 1:06:48.760
<v Speaker 1>the end he mentions the growth of SpaceX under Elon Musk,

1:06:48.800 --> 1:06:50.480
<v Speaker 1>which we kind of talked about at the beginning, right

1:06:50.480 --> 1:06:53.720
<v Speaker 1>as that's that's currently are are kind of like quote

1:06:53.800 --> 1:06:57.560
<v Speaker 1>perfect plan for going to space, as we're enamored with

1:06:58.880 --> 1:07:01.760
<v Speaker 1>launching and landing these rockets that SpaceX is working on.

1:07:02.240 --> 1:07:04.640
<v Speaker 1>So all of this raises a question that I would

1:07:04.680 --> 1:07:08.040
<v Speaker 1>I would pitch to you the audience, who owns outer space?

1:07:09.240 --> 1:07:13.280
<v Speaker 1>And what about the collisions between all that stuff that

1:07:13.320 --> 1:07:16.040
<v Speaker 1>we have an outer space? Who's responsible for that? With

1:07:16.080 --> 1:07:18.200
<v Speaker 1>all the space junk that's floating around up there, Like

1:07:18.200 --> 1:07:20.960
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of like who who takes responsibility when

1:07:21.000 --> 1:07:24.400
<v Speaker 1>those crash into each other? He even argues, you know,

1:07:25.200 --> 1:07:28.600
<v Speaker 1>what could we do with the money there that we're

1:07:28.640 --> 1:07:32.320
<v Speaker 1>spending up in space here on Earth? Could we end

1:07:32.440 --> 1:07:35.400
<v Speaker 1>poverty with all of those billions of dollars that we're

1:07:35.400 --> 1:07:41.040
<v Speaker 1>spending on going to space, I might got answers No, Yeah,

1:07:41.080 --> 1:07:43.240
<v Speaker 1>I I would say no as well. I imagine that

1:07:43.280 --> 1:07:47.920
<v Speaker 1>it's a much more pervasive, wicked problem than Yeah. There

1:07:47.960 --> 1:07:49.600
<v Speaker 1>is a tendency to sort of, when you're talking about

1:07:49.640 --> 1:07:51.960
<v Speaker 1>these vast sums of money, to sort of throw them

1:07:51.960 --> 1:07:54.640
<v Speaker 1>down hallways and say, how throw this money down the

1:07:54.680 --> 1:07:57.480
<v Speaker 1>hallway of poverty. You got it, you got it. That's alve,

1:07:57.600 --> 1:08:01.560
<v Speaker 1>throw this money down the hallway of of overpopulation. You've

1:08:01.600 --> 1:08:03.800
<v Speaker 1>got it solved. And it just it never works out

1:08:03.840 --> 1:08:08.160
<v Speaker 1>that way, alright. So there you have it. A lot

1:08:08.240 --> 1:08:11.720
<v Speaker 1>of the anti space arguments, some arguments for that we've

1:08:11.760 --> 1:08:13.960
<v Speaker 1>mentioned in place, everything in balance, but for the most part,

1:08:13.960 --> 1:08:18.200
<v Speaker 1>focusing on uh, on the voices that are saying this

1:08:18.280 --> 1:08:21.679
<v Speaker 1>is maybe not worth the amount of money we're spending.

1:08:21.920 --> 1:08:25.320
<v Speaker 1>Maybe the benefits here aren't really worth chasing after, certainly

1:08:25.360 --> 1:08:29.080
<v Speaker 1>with not not with this level of money. Um, but

1:08:29.200 --> 1:08:34.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, economic arguments, religious arguments, political arguments. So there's

1:08:34.200 --> 1:08:36.920
<v Speaker 1>something to it there. I just don't know where I

1:08:37.000 --> 1:08:39.799
<v Speaker 1>fall anymore, Robert, I don't know. I mean, I want

1:08:39.920 --> 1:08:42.320
<v Speaker 1>us to go to space. I love I love those

1:08:42.360 --> 1:08:45.400
<v Speaker 1>ideas as like as as everybody does, right, Like like

1:08:45.439 --> 1:08:47.200
<v Speaker 1>I said, like I was a little kid sitting there

1:08:47.200 --> 1:08:49.400
<v Speaker 1>watching Krista mcculliff go up, and I was supposed to

1:08:49.439 --> 1:08:53.000
<v Speaker 1>be proud of one of my uh uh local New

1:08:53.000 --> 1:08:57.599
<v Speaker 1>Hampshire right's flying into space uh and have this tragic ending.

1:08:58.200 --> 1:09:01.759
<v Speaker 1>But um, I don't know. I mean, when you present

1:09:01.800 --> 1:09:03.599
<v Speaker 1>all these other arguments of what we could do with

1:09:03.640 --> 1:09:07.880
<v Speaker 1>that money, who it's benefiting, I don't know where I

1:09:07.920 --> 1:09:11.519
<v Speaker 1>fall anymore. Yeah, I find the arguments, the arguments about

1:09:11.640 --> 1:09:15.840
<v Speaker 1>ways we could use the money to better benefit people

1:09:15.880 --> 1:09:19.120
<v Speaker 1>here on Earth and better address sustainability problems here. I

1:09:19.160 --> 1:09:21.960
<v Speaker 1>find those to be pretty compelling at the same time.

1:09:22.479 --> 1:09:25.080
<v Speaker 1>And this may this may actually spill more into almost

1:09:25.080 --> 1:09:28.679
<v Speaker 1>a kind of religious or you know, just just fear

1:09:28.720 --> 1:09:32.320
<v Speaker 1>based decision making process. But there are plenty of times

1:09:32.320 --> 1:09:35.639
<v Speaker 1>where I'll be I'll be outside, like playing with my son,

1:09:36.160 --> 1:09:38.880
<v Speaker 1>and I'll this happens way too often. I'll look up

1:09:38.880 --> 1:09:42.760
<v Speaker 1>in the sky and I'll imagine, uh, something burning through

1:09:42.800 --> 1:09:46.280
<v Speaker 1>it coming down, And it's kind of like a scenario

1:09:46.400 --> 1:09:50.040
<v Speaker 1>where a family waits to the last minute to pack

1:09:50.080 --> 1:09:52.200
<v Speaker 1>and move out of the apartment that they're having to

1:09:52.280 --> 1:09:55.280
<v Speaker 1>make kate and it's like, why didn't you pack up

1:09:55.280 --> 1:09:57.320
<v Speaker 1>ahead of time. Why didn't you prepare? You knew this

1:09:57.439 --> 1:10:01.400
<v Speaker 1>was coming, and you didn't prepare, And now it's coming down.

1:10:01.680 --> 1:10:06.519
<v Speaker 1>So I keep coming back to our planet's ability to

1:10:06.520 --> 1:10:11.080
<v Speaker 1>to shield itself from near Earth objects, to shield our

1:10:11.520 --> 1:10:14.840
<v Speaker 1>culture and our people in our species from a mass extinction,

1:10:15.320 --> 1:10:17.040
<v Speaker 1>And I just I always come back to that and

1:10:17.080 --> 1:10:19.920
<v Speaker 1>think that that is worth the effort, Like that should

1:10:19.960 --> 1:10:23.600
<v Speaker 1>be a major line item on on every UH, on

1:10:23.680 --> 1:10:29.360
<v Speaker 1>every politician's desk. But so so maybe maybe here's the compromise.

1:10:29.479 --> 1:10:32.760
<v Speaker 1>We we put all that money rather into space exploration.

1:10:32.760 --> 1:10:35.920
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna build uh like a giant force field that

1:10:36.040 --> 1:10:39.000
<v Speaker 1>envelops the entire planet Earth. Sure, if we can figure

1:10:39.000 --> 1:10:42.840
<v Speaker 1>out of plant. Um, but that's the thing. How are

1:10:42.880 --> 1:10:46.600
<v Speaker 1>you gonna you're gonna? I mean, I'm being phasical, no, no no,

1:10:46.720 --> 1:10:48.880
<v Speaker 1>But but I like the play does come back to

1:10:48.920 --> 1:10:52.840
<v Speaker 1>the idea that even even my view here, my sort

1:10:52.840 --> 1:10:55.920
<v Speaker 1>of go to argument for space exploration is still more

1:10:55.960 --> 1:10:58.640
<v Speaker 1>about Earth. It's still more about safeguarding what we have

1:10:58.840 --> 1:11:01.720
<v Speaker 1>here rather than and exploring all of these you know,

1:11:01.760 --> 1:11:06.880
<v Speaker 1>fascinating things about say the Jovian moons, right, yeah, yeah, absolutely, Yeah.

1:11:06.960 --> 1:11:09.519
<v Speaker 1>There's a lot of good arguments on both sides. And

1:11:09.720 --> 1:11:12.400
<v Speaker 1>you know what, listeners, we would love to hear from you.

1:11:12.479 --> 1:11:14.840
<v Speaker 1>I imagine at this point there's a lot of you

1:11:14.920 --> 1:11:17.599
<v Speaker 1>out there that are probably already halfway through writing as

1:11:17.600 --> 1:11:20.240
<v Speaker 1>a message, whether it's on Facebook or Twitter or Tumbler

1:11:20.880 --> 1:11:23.640
<v Speaker 1>or through email. Uh. You can find us on all

1:11:23.680 --> 1:11:27.920
<v Speaker 1>of our social platforms, including Instagram now at blow the Mind.

1:11:28.600 --> 1:11:31.720
<v Speaker 1>That's our handle there, and don't forget, hey, we're on

1:11:31.920 --> 1:11:34.000
<v Speaker 1>stuff to Blow your Mind dot com too. That's where

1:11:34.040 --> 1:11:36.960
<v Speaker 1>we've got everything from podcasts to videos to articles, all

1:11:37.000 --> 1:11:39.840
<v Speaker 1>the stuff that Robert, Joe and I are generating every week.

1:11:39.960 --> 1:11:41.439
<v Speaker 1>And if you want to send us an email, we

1:11:41.520 --> 1:11:44.280
<v Speaker 1>address as always is blow the Mind at how stuff

1:11:44.360 --> 1:11:57.639
<v Speaker 1>Works well more on most compassasive other topics. How stuff

1:11:57.680 --> 1:12:14.720
<v Speaker 1>Works dot Com the biggest part