WEBVTT - Crafting a Citizen Story (Jon Alexander)

0:00:01.960 --> 0:00:05.000
<v Speaker 1>We just can't solve the challenges we face from within

0:00:05.480 --> 0:00:08.719
<v Speaker 1>the story that created them, right like we We can't

0:00:08.800 --> 0:00:13.360
<v Speaker 1>solve a crisis of loneliness and mental health from within

0:00:13.400 --> 0:00:16.799
<v Speaker 1>a story that says we're independent isolated individuals. Can't You

0:00:16.840 --> 0:00:19.720
<v Speaker 1>can't solve across of inequality from a story that says

0:00:19.760 --> 0:00:22.200
<v Speaker 1>that the society is a lot of you climb the

0:00:22.360 --> 0:00:25.200
<v Speaker 1>most important, like most viscerally to me. You can't solve

0:00:25.200 --> 0:00:28.040
<v Speaker 1>an ecological crisis from a story that says we're separate

0:00:28.080 --> 0:00:35.479
<v Speaker 1>from nature. Welcome to How does Citizen with Baritune Day,

0:00:35.520 --> 0:00:38.800
<v Speaker 1>a podcast that reimagine citizen as a verb, not a

0:00:38.880 --> 0:00:43.280
<v Speaker 1>legal status. This season is all about how we practice democracy,

0:00:43.479 --> 0:00:45.640
<v Speaker 1>what can we get rid of, what can we invent,

0:00:45.960 --> 0:00:48.440
<v Speaker 1>and how do we change the culture of democracy itself.

0:00:48.800 --> 0:00:51.600
<v Speaker 1>We're leaving the theoretical clouds and hitting the ground with

0:00:51.760 --> 0:00:55.600
<v Speaker 1>inspiring examples of people and institutions that are showing us

0:00:55.720 --> 0:01:06.080
<v Speaker 1>new ways to govern ourselves. If you're new to this podcast, Welcome,

0:01:06.720 --> 0:01:08.560
<v Speaker 1>make sure you check out the first episode of this

0:01:08.600 --> 0:01:12.440
<v Speaker 1>season with Adrian Marie Brown, the organizer, facilitator, and artist

0:01:12.480 --> 0:01:14.920
<v Speaker 1>who shared ways we can deepen our citizen practice and

0:01:14.959 --> 0:01:18.280
<v Speaker 1>bring it home In this episode, I'm joined by someone

0:01:18.319 --> 0:01:21.640
<v Speaker 1>who has spent a lot of time thinking about stories,

0:01:23.480 --> 0:01:26.440
<v Speaker 1>how they come into being, what they mean, and how

0:01:26.480 --> 0:01:30.399
<v Speaker 1>they informed the way we live with each other. The

0:01:30.440 --> 0:01:33.479
<v Speaker 1>first time I met John Alexander, we were both guested

0:01:33.480 --> 0:01:36.080
<v Speaker 1>on a podcast called From What If to What Next

0:01:36.280 --> 0:01:40.920
<v Speaker 1>with Rob Hopkins. Like me, John was also using citizen

0:01:41.200 --> 0:01:46.360
<v Speaker 1>in this inclusive, participatory sense, and we just clicked. He's

0:01:46.400 --> 0:01:49.720
<v Speaker 1>the author of citizens Why The Key to Fixing Everything

0:01:50.000 --> 0:01:52.360
<v Speaker 1>is all of Us? And he's also the founder of

0:01:52.400 --> 0:01:56.320
<v Speaker 1>the New Citizenship Project, a social innovation lab that works

0:01:56.360 --> 0:02:00.440
<v Speaker 1>with organizations to shift their culture and practice by helping

0:02:00.440 --> 0:02:04.760
<v Speaker 1>them think of people as citizens. First. It's one thing

0:02:04.840 --> 0:02:07.960
<v Speaker 1>to catalog projects. His book does that, and so do

0:02:08.040 --> 0:02:11.000
<v Speaker 1>we with this podcast, but it's a completely different thing

0:02:11.080 --> 0:02:15.320
<v Speaker 1>to have a staff, facilitators, workshops, and clients who are

0:02:15.360 --> 0:02:18.959
<v Speaker 1>really trying to implement things. I mean, there's no how

0:02:19.080 --> 0:02:24.120
<v Speaker 1>to citizen institute, not yet. I respect that. While John

0:02:24.200 --> 0:02:28.400
<v Speaker 1>is talking and writing about making citizenship a practice, he's

0:02:28.440 --> 0:02:32.400
<v Speaker 1>also practicing it himself, and it's a far cry from

0:02:32.400 --> 0:02:41.359
<v Speaker 1>the work he was doing before this. John Alexander is

0:02:41.400 --> 0:02:44.760
<v Speaker 1>a former admin. During his time in that world, he

0:02:44.800 --> 0:02:48.120
<v Speaker 1>won awards for telling the consumer story until it made

0:02:48.200 --> 0:02:53.880
<v Speaker 1>him sick, actually physically sick, and he couldn't continue selling

0:02:53.880 --> 0:02:56.840
<v Speaker 1>a narrative he didn't believe in, so he decided to

0:02:56.880 --> 0:02:59.960
<v Speaker 1>fight for a different story. John is helping us take

0:03:00.120 --> 0:03:04.040
<v Speaker 1>a narrative turn toward the citizens story, one where we're

0:03:04.040 --> 0:03:09.359
<v Speaker 1>not simply independent, but interdependent. We don't just compete, we collaborate,

0:03:09.880 --> 0:03:14.200
<v Speaker 1>and our leaders don't just serve, they facilitate our participation

0:03:14.360 --> 0:03:17.880
<v Speaker 1>in democracy. How would we show up? What would we

0:03:17.919 --> 0:03:22.040
<v Speaker 1>build together if we told ourselves we were citizens not consumers?

0:03:22.680 --> 0:03:25.080
<v Speaker 1>To find out, I met up with John in Los

0:03:25.080 --> 0:03:28.480
<v Speaker 1>Angeles along with our live studio audience. Be a zoom

0:03:28.520 --> 0:03:30.000
<v Speaker 1>who you are here from? At the end of the

0:03:30.000 --> 0:03:39.040
<v Speaker 1>episode After the break, John Alexander on why being a

0:03:39.080 --> 0:03:45.840
<v Speaker 1>conscious consumer is not the same as being a citizen y'all.

0:03:46.400 --> 0:03:49.680
<v Speaker 1>John Alexander is the author of Citizens Why the key

0:03:49.720 --> 0:03:52.880
<v Speaker 1>to fixing Everything is all of Us. He's the co

0:03:53.000 --> 0:03:55.560
<v Speaker 1>founder of the New Citizenship Project, a book and a

0:03:55.560 --> 0:03:58.120
<v Speaker 1>company that works to shift the dominant story of the

0:03:58.160 --> 0:04:02.080
<v Speaker 1>individual in society from consumer where two citizen. He began

0:04:02.120 --> 0:04:04.840
<v Speaker 1>his career with a decade in the advertising industry, so

0:04:04.880 --> 0:04:08.400
<v Speaker 1>he knows exactly what's wrong, and I'm so excited to

0:04:08.440 --> 0:04:11.320
<v Speaker 1>have him on how the Citizen. Welcome John, thank you

0:04:11.360 --> 0:04:15.040
<v Speaker 1>so much for having me. Let's start here. Your work

0:04:15.160 --> 0:04:18.800
<v Speaker 1>is about analyzing and reimagining the narratives that inform how

0:04:18.839 --> 0:04:21.600
<v Speaker 1>we live and relate to the world around us. And

0:04:21.760 --> 0:04:25.719
<v Speaker 1>you identified three stories. The story of the subject, the

0:04:25.760 --> 0:04:29.080
<v Speaker 1>story of the consumer, and the story of the citizen.

0:04:29.160 --> 0:04:31.000
<v Speaker 1>I want to start with a focus on the first two.

0:04:31.839 --> 0:04:34.280
<v Speaker 1>What is the subject story and where did it begin?

0:04:34.880 --> 0:04:37.359
<v Speaker 1>The subject story begins all the way back with the

0:04:37.360 --> 0:04:40.760
<v Speaker 1>first name king in Sunario in two thousand BC. And

0:04:40.839 --> 0:04:43.279
<v Speaker 1>with the first king came the first wolves came, the

0:04:43.279 --> 0:04:45.600
<v Speaker 1>first writing that was initially used to time to track

0:04:45.920 --> 0:04:48.720
<v Speaker 1>how much people owed tax and these kinds of things.

0:04:48.760 --> 0:04:51.960
<v Speaker 1>And that story started with this idea that the god

0:04:51.960 --> 0:04:55.440
<v Speaker 1>given few no best and if the rest of us

0:04:55.520 --> 0:04:57.479
<v Speaker 1>keep our heads down there's we're told, get what we're

0:04:57.480 --> 0:04:59.800
<v Speaker 1>given and do as the God given a few tell us,

0:04:59.800 --> 0:05:02.600
<v Speaker 1>then that is how the best society will result, the

0:05:02.640 --> 0:05:06.440
<v Speaker 1>best benevolent dictator idea. But we all know where that

0:05:06.560 --> 0:05:09.559
<v Speaker 1>usually ends up. Ultimately, this is the story that leads

0:05:09.560 --> 0:05:13.320
<v Speaker 1>you into colonialism and patriarchy and all those big things,

0:05:14.080 --> 0:05:15.560
<v Speaker 1>and it goes a long way back, and it was

0:05:15.600 --> 0:05:18.840
<v Speaker 1>dominant for an awful long time. And when we are

0:05:19.080 --> 0:05:23.320
<v Speaker 1>in times of uncertainty, in times of chaos, in times

0:05:23.360 --> 0:05:25.760
<v Speaker 1>when we don't know exactly what to do, then the

0:05:25.800 --> 0:05:29.680
<v Speaker 1>subject story has a powerful attraction, right because we want

0:05:29.680 --> 0:05:31.880
<v Speaker 1>to find some safety, we want to find some securities

0:05:31.920 --> 0:05:35.520
<v Speaker 1>and certainty. Well we might think we want someone to

0:05:35.520 --> 0:05:38.000
<v Speaker 1>tell us what to do. And in those moments like

0:05:38.200 --> 0:05:40.960
<v Speaker 1>the possibility, the promise of the kind of strongman leader

0:05:41.040 --> 0:05:43.960
<v Speaker 1>vibe is really strong, and I think that's a big

0:05:44.000 --> 0:05:45.800
<v Speaker 1>part of what we're seeing in this moment in time.

0:05:46.080 --> 0:05:48.960
<v Speaker 1>So the subject story lasted an awful long time, intensified

0:05:49.000 --> 0:05:51.880
<v Speaker 1>around the world. Really only became properly dominant in the

0:05:51.960 --> 0:05:55.160
<v Speaker 1>kind of sixteen hundreds with the age of Discovery, and

0:05:55.200 --> 0:05:57.920
<v Speaker 1>then after the Industrial Revolution, the rise of the middle class,

0:05:58.000 --> 0:06:00.120
<v Speaker 1>that the idea that there were a god given you

0:06:00.120 --> 0:06:01.680
<v Speaker 1>who knew best and they would tell us what to

0:06:01.720 --> 0:06:05.440
<v Speaker 1>do kind of fell in on itself, and in many

0:06:05.480 --> 0:06:07.760
<v Speaker 1>ways I believe that the two World wars resulted from

0:06:07.760 --> 0:06:10.400
<v Speaker 1>that breakdown of story, resulted from that kind of collapse

0:06:10.440 --> 0:06:13.200
<v Speaker 1>of the systems and structures by which we organized ourselves

0:06:13.560 --> 0:06:15.919
<v Speaker 1>and out of them we stepped into what was a

0:06:15.960 --> 0:06:19.239
<v Speaker 1>better story, right Like from the subject story, the consumer

0:06:19.279 --> 0:06:21.960
<v Speaker 1>story is a liberating shift. So the subject story and

0:06:22.040 --> 0:06:24.479
<v Speaker 1>effective goes to a made up sounding king and a

0:06:24.520 --> 0:06:28.160
<v Speaker 1>made up sounding place argon of Sarka had or something

0:06:28.200 --> 0:06:32.520
<v Speaker 1>like that. What is this consumer story then, and so

0:06:32.680 --> 0:06:35.279
<v Speaker 1>when does it emerge? The consumer story is the story

0:06:35.360 --> 0:06:37.839
<v Speaker 1>that's I think still dominant in our world today. The

0:06:37.880 --> 0:06:40.760
<v Speaker 1>consumer story is the story that says that, actually, the

0:06:40.839 --> 0:06:43.080
<v Speaker 1>right thing to do is to pursue self interest on

0:06:43.120 --> 0:06:46.039
<v Speaker 1>the basis that if everyone pursues self interest, if everyone

0:06:46.120 --> 0:06:48.120
<v Speaker 1>chooses the option that suits them best from those that

0:06:48.160 --> 0:06:50.800
<v Speaker 1>are offered, that will add up to the collective interest

0:06:50.920 --> 0:06:53.680
<v Speaker 1>that by pursuing self interest we will create the best

0:06:53.680 --> 0:06:57.000
<v Speaker 1>society that's possible as a whole. I mean the Milton

0:06:57.040 --> 0:07:00.200
<v Speaker 1>Friedman famous Milton Friedman is and the social responsibilit te

0:07:00.200 --> 0:07:03.400
<v Speaker 1>of businesses to maximize its profits is a perfect articulation

0:07:03.440 --> 0:07:07.320
<v Speaker 1>of of consumer morality. Actually, like it's saying the right

0:07:07.400 --> 0:07:09.760
<v Speaker 1>thing to do really explicitly, the right thing to do

0:07:09.880 --> 0:07:12.280
<v Speaker 1>is to pursue self interest on the behalf of the corporation,

0:07:12.760 --> 0:07:15.160
<v Speaker 1>on the behalf of the individual, because that is what

0:07:15.200 --> 0:07:17.680
<v Speaker 1>will add up to the best society. Yeah. So it's

0:07:17.720 --> 0:07:20.960
<v Speaker 1>not just an economic incentive. It's a patriotic incentive, right,

0:07:21.040 --> 0:07:24.679
<v Speaker 1>you serve best, you support your nation best by buying stuff.

0:07:24.760 --> 0:07:26.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you could even say it's a kind of

0:07:26.400 --> 0:07:29.200
<v Speaker 1>human incentive. The reason why I went into the advertising

0:07:29.240 --> 0:07:32.200
<v Speaker 1>industry in the first place. I was nineteen at university

0:07:32.520 --> 0:07:34.160
<v Speaker 1>trying to figure out what to do with my life

0:07:34.240 --> 0:07:37.320
<v Speaker 1>when the World Trade Center came down yea, and the

0:07:37.400 --> 0:07:40.360
<v Speaker 1>leaders of the free world came out and told us

0:07:40.400 --> 0:07:42.680
<v Speaker 1>to go shopping right, right, And at some level I

0:07:42.720 --> 0:07:46.720
<v Speaker 1>think I went into the advertising industry thinking unconsciously, conscious

0:07:47.080 --> 0:07:50.520
<v Speaker 1>that I was making a contribution. Wow. The kind of

0:07:50.640 --> 0:07:54.080
<v Speaker 1>key moment actually was my first boss described my job

0:07:54.120 --> 0:07:55.600
<v Speaker 1>to me by saying, what you've got to remember, as

0:07:55.640 --> 0:07:59.240
<v Speaker 1>the average consumer see something like three thousand commercial messages

0:07:59.280 --> 0:08:02.360
<v Speaker 1>a day. This was back in two thousand three, and

0:08:02.400 --> 0:08:04.280
<v Speaker 1>he said, your job is to cut through that. You've

0:08:04.280 --> 0:08:06.320
<v Speaker 1>got to make yours the best. And did you feel

0:08:06.360 --> 0:08:09.240
<v Speaker 1>motivated by that? Was it to do that? Yeah? And

0:08:09.280 --> 0:08:12.480
<v Speaker 1>it's hugely intellectually stimulating, right, You're like, oh, there's all

0:08:12.520 --> 0:08:14.880
<v Speaker 1>this stuff out there, there's so much noise and I'm

0:08:14.880 --> 0:08:16.840
<v Speaker 1>going to make mind the thing. I mean, I'm look,

0:08:16.920 --> 0:08:19.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm a six ft athletic white guy, Like that's what

0:08:19.680 --> 0:08:23.280
<v Speaker 1>I like to do, right, It's another conquest and attention

0:08:23.320 --> 0:08:27.880
<v Speaker 1>conquest a man. And then over time and probably it

0:08:27.880 --> 0:08:30.160
<v Speaker 1>took me longer than it should have. In retrospect, I've

0:08:30.160 --> 0:08:31.880
<v Speaker 1>started to ask what are we doing to ourselves when

0:08:31.880 --> 0:08:34.160
<v Speaker 1>we tell ourselves we're consumers? Three thousands of times a day?

0:08:35.480 --> 0:08:36.959
<v Speaker 1>What does that do to us? What does it do

0:08:37.080 --> 0:08:39.280
<v Speaker 1>to our relationships with one another? What does it do

0:08:39.440 --> 0:08:42.160
<v Speaker 1>to what we think is possible, what we think humans

0:08:42.160 --> 0:08:44.840
<v Speaker 1>are capable of? Yeah, what are the sort of products

0:08:44.840 --> 0:08:47.640
<v Speaker 1>and services you were advertising? All sorts of stuff, man,

0:08:47.640 --> 0:08:50.199
<v Speaker 1>I mean I worked on big brands in the UK,

0:08:50.360 --> 0:08:54.200
<v Speaker 1>particularly like Cadbury and Orange, like a big phone company.

0:08:55.240 --> 0:08:57.800
<v Speaker 1>Was at the agency where we we produced the Cadbury Gorilla,

0:08:57.920 --> 0:09:00.599
<v Speaker 1>which was like a big moment, a grilla playing the

0:09:00.679 --> 0:09:03.520
<v Speaker 1>drums to Phil Collins. That was we go. My friend,

0:09:05.000 --> 0:09:07.559
<v Speaker 1>I worked on Sony like we were Agency of the

0:09:07.640 --> 0:09:09.400
<v Speaker 1>year a couple of years that I was there, Like,

0:09:09.480 --> 0:09:11.440
<v Speaker 1>these were the big brands, This was the big stuff

0:09:11.760 --> 0:09:15.199
<v Speaker 1>in the Consumers story. You point out the four was

0:09:15.240 --> 0:09:18.480
<v Speaker 1>a key moment. What was it about? I mean? And

0:09:18.600 --> 0:09:21.599
<v Speaker 1>it starts with the launch of the Apple Macintosh with

0:09:21.720 --> 0:09:24.000
<v Speaker 1>the most famous ad in history, which is the takeoff

0:09:24.040 --> 0:09:27.320
<v Speaker 1>of All Worlds eighty four, like troops training down a

0:09:27.360 --> 0:09:30.160
<v Speaker 1>corridor and Big Brother's voice and then a woman in

0:09:30.200 --> 0:09:33.440
<v Speaker 1>glorious technicolor runs onto the screen, smashes the screen big

0:09:33.440 --> 0:09:35.920
<v Speaker 1>Brothers talking from and you get this voice over that

0:09:36.000 --> 0:09:38.160
<v Speaker 1>concludes and I'm going to do a horrendous American accent

0:09:38.280 --> 0:09:42.079
<v Speaker 1>in the US here it comes. On January, Apple will

0:09:42.080 --> 0:09:47.120
<v Speaker 1>release Macintosh and you'll see why four won't be four

0:09:47.480 --> 0:09:50.800
<v Speaker 1>this moment. But also that year you had two other

0:09:50.880 --> 0:09:53.880
<v Speaker 1>of the great super brands arrived. So Nike sold the

0:09:53.880 --> 0:09:57.800
<v Speaker 1>first pair of Air Jordan's Virgin Atlantic, so the virgin

0:09:57.880 --> 0:09:59.960
<v Speaker 1>brand arrived on the global stage. But then the pick

0:10:00.040 --> 0:10:02.520
<v Speaker 1>your thickens because you get body Shop floated on the

0:10:02.520 --> 0:10:04.640
<v Speaker 1>Stock Exchange, bringing the idea you can buy stuff to

0:10:04.679 --> 0:10:07.320
<v Speaker 1>save the planet. You get band Aid that year, the

0:10:07.360 --> 0:10:10.000
<v Speaker 1>idea you can buy stuff to solve global poverty. You

0:10:10.080 --> 0:10:12.880
<v Speaker 1>get the minor strike and the first privatization in the UK.

0:10:13.040 --> 0:10:16.880
<v Speaker 1>So politics shifting in this kind of consumer direction. And

0:10:17.200 --> 0:10:20.000
<v Speaker 1>my favorite actually of all of them, the l A Olympics,

0:10:21.440 --> 0:10:23.600
<v Speaker 1>which were the first Olympics ever to be funded by

0:10:23.720 --> 0:10:27.040
<v Speaker 1>commercial sponsorship. L A was the only city to apply

0:10:27.160 --> 0:10:29.520
<v Speaker 1>to host the eight four Olympics because other cities have

0:10:29.640 --> 0:10:32.360
<v Speaker 1>made such a financial loss, and they had the IOC

0:10:32.559 --> 0:10:36.360
<v Speaker 1>over a barrel and the rules changed and suddenly you

0:10:36.360 --> 0:10:38.720
<v Speaker 1>could buy stuff to fund global sporting culture. So that

0:10:38.800 --> 0:10:42.600
<v Speaker 1>consumer story is winding its way into so many different

0:10:42.640 --> 0:10:46.400
<v Speaker 1>areas of our lives. We're liberating so many of our

0:10:46.400 --> 0:10:49.559
<v Speaker 1>activities allegedly through this, and you're involved in it, right

0:10:49.640 --> 0:10:52.679
<v Speaker 1>and later in this timeline, you're involved in crafting these

0:10:52.720 --> 0:10:55.520
<v Speaker 1>stories and selling these products, and there's an adrenaline rush,

0:10:55.520 --> 0:10:59.040
<v Speaker 1>and there's excabining, there's true creativity, and it's exciting until

0:10:59.640 --> 0:11:03.640
<v Speaker 1>until it is it right? So when did your excitement

0:11:04.160 --> 0:11:06.959
<v Speaker 1>to get involved and serve in some way through advertising

0:11:07.240 --> 0:11:10.720
<v Speaker 1>start to crack? I remember being in a meeting talking

0:11:10.760 --> 0:11:15.640
<v Speaker 1>through hero products for a big retailer's Christmas advertising in May,

0:11:15.760 --> 0:11:19.000
<v Speaker 1>which was a bad start, and we got to the

0:11:19.000 --> 0:11:23.360
<v Speaker 1>one pound Christmas tree bary tune day here with a

0:11:23.559 --> 0:11:26.680
<v Speaker 1>very quick explainer. Tunday, we're talking about pounds as in

0:11:26.760 --> 0:11:31.199
<v Speaker 1>the British currency, not the way now back to John's

0:11:31.200 --> 0:11:34.440
<v Speaker 1>story and we got to the one pound Christmas tree

0:11:34.960 --> 0:11:37.319
<v Speaker 1>and someone at the table said, the one pound Christmas tree,

0:11:37.360 --> 0:11:42.120
<v Speaker 1>you can almost smell the exploitation, and everyone laughed and

0:11:42.160 --> 0:11:44.160
<v Speaker 1>it was and it was just this moment of like

0:11:44.320 --> 0:11:47.520
<v Speaker 1>feeling the flame inside you turned down. Like it was

0:11:47.559 --> 0:11:51.000
<v Speaker 1>really like a series of kind of investigations. I worked

0:11:51.040 --> 0:11:54.120
<v Speaker 1>on her on a report on ethics and advertising. Um,

0:11:54.640 --> 0:11:56.320
<v Speaker 1>I pretty much got sacked off the back of that,

0:11:57.240 --> 0:12:00.520
<v Speaker 1>but really interrogating this question ultimate of what are we

0:12:00.559 --> 0:12:03.400
<v Speaker 1>doing to ourselves when when we're surrounded with this story

0:12:03.960 --> 0:12:07.240
<v Speaker 1>and coming to the understanding that actually I was essentially

0:12:07.320 --> 0:12:09.520
<v Speaker 1>kind of preaching up what's the religion that I didn't

0:12:09.520 --> 0:12:12.800
<v Speaker 1>believe in? Not championing values that I did. And I

0:12:12.880 --> 0:12:15.320
<v Speaker 1>went through a like super dark period at this time,

0:12:15.320 --> 0:12:18.520
<v Speaker 1>and I wasn't the most constructive individual around this period.

0:12:18.840 --> 0:12:21.640
<v Speaker 1>Like I sometimes think if I started a company at

0:12:21.640 --> 0:12:23.760
<v Speaker 1>this point, it would have been called the Consumer Doom Project,

0:12:23.800 --> 0:12:26.079
<v Speaker 1>not the New Citizenship Project, right, Like I was staring

0:12:26.120 --> 0:12:28.120
<v Speaker 1>into the chasm, which I think so many of us

0:12:28.160 --> 0:12:30.839
<v Speaker 1>are trapped doing now in these darker period was this

0:12:31.120 --> 0:12:34.560
<v Speaker 1>physical you were you ill? Where was the behavior that

0:12:34.640 --> 0:12:38.000
<v Speaker 1>you weren't proud of like what did the manifest? But

0:12:38.080 --> 0:12:40.160
<v Speaker 1>there was a day, there was well there was a week,

0:12:40.200 --> 0:12:42.800
<v Speaker 1>actually week I ended up resigning where I stood on

0:12:42.840 --> 0:12:46.240
<v Speaker 1>the platform Oxford Circus tube station and in my office

0:12:46.960 --> 0:12:49.320
<v Speaker 1>and just watched tubes come and go and like felt

0:12:49.360 --> 0:12:53.000
<v Speaker 1>this like revulsion inside me. I honestly don't remember what

0:12:53.120 --> 0:12:55.240
<v Speaker 1>exactly I was. And then I was physically sick, like

0:12:55.360 --> 0:12:57.840
<v Speaker 1>I threw up on the platform and it was just

0:12:58.120 --> 0:13:01.960
<v Speaker 1>like this feeling of of just I mean, I guess

0:13:02.040 --> 0:13:04.320
<v Speaker 1>kind of self hatred actually, like a real kind of

0:13:04.320 --> 0:13:06.760
<v Speaker 1>rejection of the role I was playing and what I

0:13:06.840 --> 0:13:09.120
<v Speaker 1>was doing. And I kind of had to get out

0:13:09.120 --> 0:13:13.040
<v Speaker 1>at that point. It sounds like an overdose almost like

0:13:13.080 --> 0:13:15.679
<v Speaker 1>you over you oded on the consumer story. Maybe you

0:13:15.760 --> 0:13:18.480
<v Speaker 1>got high on your own supply, right, and some part

0:13:18.559 --> 0:13:21.120
<v Speaker 1>of your body maybe new this isn't for me anymore.

0:13:22.040 --> 0:13:23.680
<v Speaker 1>I can't, you know, I can't separate the kind of

0:13:23.679 --> 0:13:28.040
<v Speaker 1>intellectual journey from the from the physical rights. You're asking

0:13:28.040 --> 0:13:30.000
<v Speaker 1>deep enough questions and you've just got to a point

0:13:30.000 --> 0:13:32.920
<v Speaker 1>where I was overwhelming. But yeah, I was a difficult

0:13:32.960 --> 0:13:35.079
<v Speaker 1>guy to be around all that time. Can I talk

0:13:35.120 --> 0:13:39.040
<v Speaker 1>to those people? Yeah, Well, you know that some of

0:13:39.080 --> 0:13:41.319
<v Speaker 1>the best of them are are still closest friends now

0:13:41.360 --> 0:13:43.040
<v Speaker 1>and some of them are still working in the ad industry.

0:13:43.040 --> 0:13:46.320
<v Speaker 1>And look, I'm not trying to demonize all of those guys,

0:13:46.400 --> 0:13:49.480
<v Speaker 1>Like I think the the important thing to recognize when

0:13:49.520 --> 0:13:51.880
<v Speaker 1>you start to see these as stories, when you start

0:13:51.920 --> 0:13:54.120
<v Speaker 1>to see it in this way, is that you're not

0:13:54.200 --> 0:13:57.640
<v Speaker 1>just talking about like it's the problem is consumption, The

0:13:57.679 --> 0:14:01.240
<v Speaker 1>problem is advertising, Like, it's much more about the storytelling

0:14:01.240 --> 0:14:03.520
<v Speaker 1>of our society. It's the fact that what I would

0:14:03.520 --> 0:14:05.880
<v Speaker 1>describe what we live in today as a consumer democracy

0:14:05.880 --> 0:14:08.440
<v Speaker 1>where our only agencies to choose between a fix set

0:14:08.440 --> 0:14:10.800
<v Speaker 1>of options that are offered to us, where we're actually

0:14:10.840 --> 0:14:12.720
<v Speaker 1>encouraged to make that choice on the basis of our

0:14:12.720 --> 0:14:16.160
<v Speaker 1>own individual self interest. Like it's infused that that story

0:14:16.280 --> 0:14:21.880
<v Speaker 1>is pervaded everything. And I guess I focus on advertising

0:14:21.920 --> 0:14:24.560
<v Speaker 1>because it was the part I played, and your focus

0:14:24.560 --> 0:14:27.400
<v Speaker 1>on advertising it resonates with me because I spent a

0:14:27.440 --> 0:14:30.920
<v Speaker 1>lot of time in media and in advertising, which is inseparable.

0:14:31.320 --> 0:14:34.760
<v Speaker 1>And I remember realizing at a certain point that the

0:14:34.800 --> 0:14:38.400
<v Speaker 1>folks who were making the ads felt as legitimate as

0:14:38.440 --> 0:14:42.200
<v Speaker 1>storytellers as the content they were sitting next to. And

0:14:42.240 --> 0:14:44.680
<v Speaker 1>it's true. I mean they're selling and telling the story

0:14:44.680 --> 0:14:47.240
<v Speaker 1>of who we can be through our purchases, and there's

0:14:47.640 --> 0:14:51.000
<v Speaker 1>so much more money in that than just the art world.

0:14:51.360 --> 0:14:52.760
<v Speaker 1>So you are I think we're at the kind of

0:14:52.760 --> 0:14:55.920
<v Speaker 1>the eye of the storm for the story, because ads

0:14:55.960 --> 0:14:59.520
<v Speaker 1>are little stories that try to nudgest into thinking differently.

0:14:59.560 --> 0:15:02.160
<v Speaker 1>We're behaving differently, and all of them have that kind

0:15:02.160 --> 0:15:07.640
<v Speaker 1>of underlying or overarching kind of meta frame that you

0:15:07.680 --> 0:15:10.880
<v Speaker 1>are a consumer, you are an individual. Your agency has

0:15:10.960 --> 0:15:14.360
<v Speaker 1>to choose between things in these choices. And in one

0:15:14.400 --> 0:15:17.720
<v Speaker 1>meeting years ago, I remember stopping and saying, can we

0:15:17.760 --> 0:15:21.840
<v Speaker 1>just call them people? Just that the links on the

0:15:21.880 --> 0:15:24.080
<v Speaker 1>slides on the wall. It was just like consumers consumers

0:15:24.080 --> 0:15:26.400
<v Speaker 1>and the conductingsumer wants this and the consumer wants there.

0:15:26.960 --> 0:15:30.760
<v Speaker 1>And when I repeat that word, it consumes me. It

0:15:30.840 --> 0:15:33.880
<v Speaker 1>makes me think of consumption, not the active eating food,

0:15:34.200 --> 0:15:37.280
<v Speaker 1>but the disease and as we used to refer to it,

0:15:37.720 --> 0:15:41.960
<v Speaker 1>and so we will devour ourselves by referring to ourselves

0:15:41.960 --> 0:15:44.080
<v Speaker 1>in that way. And there's actually a heap of evidence

0:15:44.120 --> 0:15:48.400
<v Speaker 1>that even the word is damaging. Right. So there's a

0:15:48.400 --> 0:15:50.760
<v Speaker 1>couple of different studies, one one where you were involved

0:15:50.800 --> 0:15:54.200
<v Speaker 1>in replicating where like, So you give two thousand people

0:15:54.200 --> 0:15:56.480
<v Speaker 1>of resourced dilema scenario. You say you're one of four

0:15:56.520 --> 0:15:59.120
<v Speaker 1>households depending on a single wealthyr water supply and the

0:15:59.120 --> 0:16:00.760
<v Speaker 1>world is starting to run dry, so you need to

0:16:00.840 --> 0:16:03.560
<v Speaker 1>use less water. Okay, So you're asked two questions, to

0:16:03.600 --> 0:16:05.880
<v Speaker 1>what extent are you prepared to use less water? And

0:16:05.880 --> 0:16:07.840
<v Speaker 1>to what extent you trust the other three households to

0:16:07.920 --> 0:16:11.120
<v Speaker 1>use less water? Clever bit is, for half the sample,

0:16:11.240 --> 0:16:14.640
<v Speaker 1>the word household is replaced with the word consumer. And

0:16:14.680 --> 0:16:17.520
<v Speaker 1>for people for whom the word is consumer, to what

0:16:17.640 --> 0:16:20.000
<v Speaker 1>extent you prepared to compromise, to what extent you trust

0:16:20.040 --> 0:16:25.160
<v Speaker 1>the other three consumers? That's lower, significantly lower. So when

0:16:25.240 --> 0:16:27.560
<v Speaker 1>we use that language, even the word and it's not

0:16:27.640 --> 0:16:29.680
<v Speaker 1>again it's not just the word, it's the story. But

0:16:29.760 --> 0:16:33.320
<v Speaker 1>the word carries the story. Right, when we use that

0:16:33.360 --> 0:16:38.440
<v Speaker 1>word inside organizations were effectively I think of it like

0:16:38.480 --> 0:16:40.920
<v Speaker 1>as the scaffolding, right, like or the or the train

0:16:40.960 --> 0:16:43.600
<v Speaker 1>tracks or something like. There is no other possible we

0:16:44.800 --> 0:16:47.640
<v Speaker 1>are thinking, right, that's right. We limit our imaginations, right,

0:16:47.920 --> 0:16:51.040
<v Speaker 1>and we can only see a person as this subset

0:16:51.080 --> 0:16:53.680
<v Speaker 1>of themselves, this function and the only path we can

0:16:53.720 --> 0:16:59.160
<v Speaker 1>imagine to a better society is channeling people's self interest

0:16:59.240 --> 0:17:03.120
<v Speaker 1>in the service of because we assume people are only

0:17:03.160 --> 0:17:05.520
<v Speaker 1>capable of that. I've come to think of consumers and

0:17:05.640 --> 0:17:08.280
<v Speaker 1>essentially as a kind of species level self hatred complex.

0:17:08.320 --> 0:17:10.720
<v Speaker 1>It's like, it's like we're telling ourselves we're not good

0:17:10.800 --> 0:17:13.879
<v Speaker 1>enough to deal with this stuff. It's giving away some power.

0:17:14.200 --> 0:17:16.440
<v Speaker 1>It's like, all I have is this right, I'm gonna

0:17:16.440 --> 0:17:18.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna do. I'm gonna lean into this. I'm gonna

0:17:18.359 --> 0:17:20.760
<v Speaker 1>be the best version of this I can. But I'm

0:17:20.760 --> 0:17:22.040
<v Speaker 1>not going to think of it all the other things

0:17:22.040 --> 0:17:25.920
<v Speaker 1>that could be because I don't have the language for it. Language.

0:17:26.320 --> 0:17:31.399
<v Speaker 1>A third story. We've talked subject, we've talked consumer, the

0:17:31.520 --> 0:17:35.879
<v Speaker 1>citizens story. When does this as an alternate frame occur

0:17:35.960 --> 0:17:38.600
<v Speaker 1>to you? The citizens story occur to me personally? And

0:17:38.720 --> 0:17:40.639
<v Speaker 1>what does it? What does it mean? Give me a

0:17:40.640 --> 0:17:44.280
<v Speaker 1>brief overview, and then tell me when it enters your mind. So,

0:17:44.320 --> 0:17:47.119
<v Speaker 1>in the subject story, people are dependent, they have stuff

0:17:47.119 --> 0:17:50.080
<v Speaker 1>done to them. The role of organizations and leaders us

0:17:50.119 --> 0:17:52.240
<v Speaker 1>to come on them, and the role of subjects is

0:17:52.280 --> 0:17:56.040
<v Speaker 1>to obey and receive. And the consumer story, people are independent,

0:17:56.080 --> 0:17:58.560
<v Speaker 1>they have stuff done for them. They demand and choose,

0:17:58.560 --> 0:18:01.880
<v Speaker 1>and the role of organizations and does is to serve them.

0:18:01.880 --> 0:18:05.879
<v Speaker 1>In the citizens story, we're interdependent. We do stuff together

0:18:06.000 --> 0:18:10.119
<v Speaker 1>with and through organizations. The role of organizations and leaders

0:18:10.160 --> 0:18:11.959
<v Speaker 1>is to facilitate and hold the space for that. And

0:18:12.000 --> 0:18:14.120
<v Speaker 1>what we most deeply want to do and are capable

0:18:14.119 --> 0:18:18.320
<v Speaker 1>of doing is participate and create and that structure. When

0:18:18.359 --> 0:18:21.320
<v Speaker 1>you start to see that and think like that, I

0:18:21.359 --> 0:18:25.280
<v Speaker 1>think you start to see this story everywhere, like just

0:18:25.440 --> 0:18:30.320
<v Speaker 1>beneath the surface. But to your question before, like living

0:18:30.359 --> 0:18:32.560
<v Speaker 1>and working in the ad industry, I couldn't really see

0:18:32.600 --> 0:18:36.840
<v Speaker 1>it because I was so in so in frame, and

0:18:36.920 --> 0:18:39.159
<v Speaker 1>so when the first place I came across it was

0:18:39.359 --> 0:18:42.280
<v Speaker 1>weirdly like an ideal we came up with. I'm still

0:18:42.280 --> 0:18:43.760
<v Speaker 1>not sure quite how we did. And this is the

0:18:43.760 --> 0:18:46.000
<v Speaker 1>idea that one that creative idea of the year old,

0:18:46.400 --> 0:18:48.320
<v Speaker 1>which is an idea called my Farm, where we tried

0:18:48.320 --> 0:18:50.720
<v Speaker 1>to hand over decision making on a real working farm

0:18:50.760 --> 0:18:53.960
<v Speaker 1>to the public by online voting debate. This is back

0:18:53.960 --> 0:18:59.119
<v Speaker 1>in nearly killed me in several animals. Maybe what's interesting

0:18:59.119 --> 0:19:01.080
<v Speaker 1>about this is it is it did actually come out

0:19:01.160 --> 0:19:05.320
<v Speaker 1>of trying to think of ways to build an organization,

0:19:05.359 --> 0:19:07.919
<v Speaker 1>ways to sell an organization. Oddly, I was working on

0:19:08.119 --> 0:19:10.919
<v Speaker 1>the National Trust, which is a big conservation organization in

0:19:10.960 --> 0:19:14.359
<v Speaker 1>the UK. They own and run five odd places of

0:19:14.400 --> 0:19:17.240
<v Speaker 1>historic interest and natural beauty all over the country, and

0:19:17.280 --> 0:19:19.560
<v Speaker 1>we were going like, how do we how do we

0:19:19.560 --> 0:19:23.640
<v Speaker 1>get people to understand and value this organization and sort

0:19:23.680 --> 0:19:26.679
<v Speaker 1>of accidentally stumbled into this idea before I have this

0:19:26.760 --> 0:19:30.040
<v Speaker 1>language of consumer and citizen that was like, what if

0:19:30.040 --> 0:19:33.280
<v Speaker 1>we involve people in it rather than just do it

0:19:33.320 --> 0:19:36.359
<v Speaker 1>for them. Let's not just sell people sustainable food, Let's

0:19:36.359 --> 0:19:39.359
<v Speaker 1>involve them in sustainable food production. And the model and

0:19:39.400 --> 0:19:43.680
<v Speaker 1>the approach. I mean, we've had crowdfunding, crowdsourced ideas, we've

0:19:43.680 --> 0:19:47.240
<v Speaker 1>had participatory all kinds of things, but in that world

0:19:47.480 --> 0:19:51.000
<v Speaker 1>like inside the consumer story, that's a very radical approach

0:19:51.560 --> 0:19:54.439
<v Speaker 1>because you're seeing people as something other than purchasers. You're

0:19:54.440 --> 0:19:57.679
<v Speaker 1>seeing them as producers and contributors and creators and collaborators

0:19:57.720 --> 0:20:02.359
<v Speaker 1>and just competitors right in testing. Are there villains and

0:20:02.400 --> 0:20:09.679
<v Speaker 1>heroes in the citizens story? I think there are, but

0:20:09.800 --> 0:20:14.159
<v Speaker 1>I think they're more people who are an organizations who

0:20:14.240 --> 0:20:18.560
<v Speaker 1>are co opting the the modes of the citizens story

0:20:18.640 --> 0:20:22.280
<v Speaker 1>and service of something else example, what does that mean?

0:20:23.080 --> 0:20:28.000
<v Speaker 1>So one of the like craziest experiences of the research

0:20:28.080 --> 0:20:31.679
<v Speaker 1>for the book was I went not very deep, but

0:20:31.840 --> 0:20:34.240
<v Speaker 1>deep enough into the into the q and On world.

0:20:35.560 --> 0:20:40.280
<v Speaker 1>And the starting point of that journey is we need

0:20:40.359 --> 0:20:44.919
<v Speaker 1>you mm hmm, come help. Yeah, we need your energy,

0:20:45.000 --> 0:20:48.840
<v Speaker 1>we need your resources, we need your ideas. And I

0:20:48.840 --> 0:20:52.080
<v Speaker 1>mean that's coming from that's coming from subject story world.

0:20:52.160 --> 0:20:55.159
<v Speaker 1>It's coming from a desire to take charge and create

0:20:55.240 --> 0:20:58.600
<v Speaker 1>tribe and tell people what to do. But it's wearing

0:20:58.640 --> 0:21:01.879
<v Speaker 1>the clothes of participation. And I think that speaks a

0:21:01.920 --> 0:21:04.640
<v Speaker 1>lot to the moment in time we find ourselves in. Right,

0:21:04.720 --> 0:21:07.879
<v Speaker 1>Like the way I would describe it, I've already mentioned

0:21:07.880 --> 0:21:11.040
<v Speaker 1>this idea of like consumer democracy, like I think, I

0:21:11.080 --> 0:21:13.520
<v Speaker 1>think too many of those in the positions of parent

0:21:13.560 --> 0:21:16.640
<v Speaker 1>influence in our society today can only see two stories.

0:21:17.720 --> 0:21:21.280
<v Speaker 1>They can see the consumer story as the status quo,

0:21:22.119 --> 0:21:24.199
<v Speaker 1>and they can see the subject story rising and they

0:21:24.280 --> 0:21:28.760
<v Speaker 1>see the authoritarianism. But as a result, they see their

0:21:28.880 --> 0:21:33.679
<v Speaker 1>role as being to defend the consumer story. And the

0:21:33.840 --> 0:21:37.960
<v Speaker 1>danger of that is that we just can't solve the

0:21:38.040 --> 0:21:41.320
<v Speaker 1>challenges we face from within the story that created them.

0:21:41.440 --> 0:21:46.240
<v Speaker 1>Right like we we can't solve a crisis of loneliness

0:21:46.240 --> 0:21:48.880
<v Speaker 1>and mental health from within a story that says we're independent,

0:21:48.920 --> 0:21:53.040
<v Speaker 1>isolated individuals. You can't solve across of inequality from a

0:21:53.040 --> 0:21:55.520
<v Speaker 1>story that says that the society is a ladder you climb.

0:21:56.000 --> 0:21:58.800
<v Speaker 1>And most important, like most viscerally to me, you can't

0:21:58.800 --> 0:22:01.080
<v Speaker 1>solve an ecological christ. It's from a story that says

0:22:01.320 --> 0:22:04.360
<v Speaker 1>we're separate from nature right in. Our only way forward

0:22:04.440 --> 0:22:08.520
<v Speaker 1>is to destroy the thing we depend on most. And

0:22:08.600 --> 0:22:13.840
<v Speaker 1>so that story, the consumer story, is crumbling, like it's

0:22:13.840 --> 0:22:18.240
<v Speaker 1>falling apart, and you can't. Ultimately, we're going to have

0:22:18.320 --> 0:22:21.840
<v Speaker 1>to shift. And so the danger of this moment, I think,

0:22:22.280 --> 0:22:24.640
<v Speaker 1>is that these these tools and approaches of the citizen

0:22:24.680 --> 0:22:27.679
<v Speaker 1>world are kind of emerging, and they're so powerful and

0:22:27.720 --> 0:22:32.760
<v Speaker 1>so exciting and so creative, and if we don't adopt them,

0:22:32.920 --> 0:22:35.640
<v Speaker 1>then those who would actually create a subject world will

0:22:35.640 --> 0:22:39.480
<v Speaker 1>coop them, will steal those clothes. When you told the

0:22:39.520 --> 0:22:42.240
<v Speaker 1>story of Q and I, I think you started hinting

0:22:42.280 --> 0:22:45.360
<v Speaker 1>at what some of these tools of the citizens story are.

0:22:45.920 --> 0:22:47.840
<v Speaker 1>Can you be a bit more specific about it. If

0:22:47.880 --> 0:22:50.000
<v Speaker 1>we don't pick these up, someone else, well, what are

0:22:50.119 --> 0:22:51.600
<v Speaker 1>what are the things? What are the tools are the

0:22:51.640 --> 0:22:55.040
<v Speaker 1>citizens story? Well, I mean it's the stuff you talked

0:22:55.040 --> 0:22:57.120
<v Speaker 1>to her. It's like crowdsourcing, crowd funding, It's like it's

0:22:57.119 --> 0:23:00.920
<v Speaker 1>like inviting people in. I mean, you've talked to Audrey Tang,

0:23:00.960 --> 0:23:03.240
<v Speaker 1>I know, on this podcast and like what the Taiwanese

0:23:03.280 --> 0:23:06.520
<v Speaker 1>government did in their response to COVID that fast funfair.

0:23:07.280 --> 0:23:11.080
<v Speaker 1>Listen to that episode, my friends. But the tools begin

0:23:11.160 --> 0:23:14.119
<v Speaker 1>with asking people a question and saying like so in

0:23:14.160 --> 0:23:16.359
<v Speaker 1>the Taiwanese example, it was, we don't know how to

0:23:16.400 --> 0:23:19.040
<v Speaker 1>get through this challenge of the pandemic. What we do

0:23:19.119 --> 0:23:20.680
<v Speaker 1>know is that we'll get through it best if we

0:23:20.720 --> 0:23:23.160
<v Speaker 1>tap into the ideas and energy and resources of everyone,

0:23:23.200 --> 0:23:25.919
<v Speaker 1>Like we know we'll do it best together. That's the stop.

0:23:27.240 --> 0:23:30.879
<v Speaker 1>Then the challenges, how do you create the structures and

0:23:30.920 --> 0:23:33.199
<v Speaker 1>process of that enable people to contribute and make it

0:23:33.240 --> 0:23:35.720
<v Speaker 1>meaningful and joyful for people to get involved. In taime On,

0:23:35.800 --> 0:23:38.280
<v Speaker 1>they did some lovely stuff, like high tech stuff like

0:23:38.359 --> 0:23:41.080
<v Speaker 1>challenge prizes and these sorts of things, but they also

0:23:41.280 --> 0:23:44.600
<v Speaker 1>my favorite story, they created a phone line where any

0:23:44.760 --> 0:23:48.119
<v Speaker 1>citizen could ring in with ideas, right like I'm working

0:23:48.160 --> 0:23:50.920
<v Speaker 1>suggestion box, and then they actually listen to the messages

0:23:51.040 --> 0:23:54.359
<v Speaker 1>and adopted them. And it's so this stuff is not

0:23:54.480 --> 0:23:57.320
<v Speaker 1>rocket science, a lot of it, right, but but it's

0:23:57.480 --> 0:23:59.960
<v Speaker 1>most fundamentally that shift in mindset, and then the shifting

0:24:00.080 --> 0:24:02.600
<v Speaker 1>tools kind of follows from that. The other example I'm

0:24:02.600 --> 0:24:04.440
<v Speaker 1>thinking of when I when I think about the framework

0:24:04.480 --> 0:24:07.720
<v Speaker 1>that we've tried to hold too with our principles, which

0:24:07.800 --> 0:24:12.240
<v Speaker 1>overlap so much participation, investing in relationships, understanding power of

0:24:12.280 --> 0:24:15.439
<v Speaker 1>value in the collective. And I look at our school

0:24:15.480 --> 0:24:18.480
<v Speaker 1>board meetings in the US, which have become so violent

0:24:18.680 --> 0:24:21.919
<v Speaker 1>and the sight of intimidation physically, and I look at

0:24:21.920 --> 0:24:24.760
<v Speaker 1>who's showing up to political rallies and it's armed people.

0:24:25.440 --> 0:24:28.479
<v Speaker 1>I'm like, well, they're showing up and participating. They're invested

0:24:28.520 --> 0:24:31.200
<v Speaker 1>in relationships. People go to Trump rallies over and over

0:24:31.280 --> 0:24:35.240
<v Speaker 1>again and know each other and build friendships. They're understanding

0:24:35.240 --> 0:24:37.720
<v Speaker 1>their power. The attacks on education in our country in

0:24:37.800 --> 0:24:40.720
<v Speaker 1>terms of not teaching our real history is well funded

0:24:41.560 --> 0:24:44.359
<v Speaker 1>and distributed to the very edges of society. It doesn't

0:24:44.400 --> 0:24:46.760
<v Speaker 1>just live inside of our belt way. It's my friends

0:24:46.800 --> 0:24:48.719
<v Speaker 1>who live in the suburbs and somewhere in Texas are

0:24:48.720 --> 0:24:53.280
<v Speaker 1>getting mailings at home scaring them and then telling them

0:24:53.359 --> 0:24:57.479
<v Speaker 1>who to harass. So that's in a very effective model,

0:24:58.080 --> 0:25:01.160
<v Speaker 1>but in service in your words, of a subject model. Right,

0:25:01.520 --> 0:25:04.000
<v Speaker 1>So it's it's in cheap's clothing, right in the in

0:25:04.040 --> 0:25:07.480
<v Speaker 1>the sheep is the citizens story. This is where like

0:25:07.560 --> 0:25:10.600
<v Speaker 1>the process design of this stuff is so crucial, right,

0:25:10.680 --> 0:25:13.439
<v Speaker 1>and particularly to those who fear that in in the

0:25:13.520 --> 0:25:15.400
<v Speaker 1>U s maybe things are two polarized for this sort

0:25:15.400 --> 0:25:19.080
<v Speaker 1>of approach to work. My favorite example of of really

0:25:19.119 --> 0:25:23.000
<v Speaker 1>clear kind of process design and doing this really powerfully November,

0:25:24.440 --> 0:25:28.280
<v Speaker 1>just before the impeachment proceedings began, Like like the US

0:25:28.400 --> 0:25:33.320
<v Speaker 1>was super polarised the first impeachment. There you go, I'd like,

0:25:33.359 --> 0:25:37.720
<v Speaker 1>forget about it. You're back, You're back fifty years ago,

0:25:37.840 --> 0:25:40.160
<v Speaker 1>I know. But there was a there was a project

0:25:40.200 --> 0:25:43.080
<v Speaker 1>called America in a room, you know about this. So

0:25:43.320 --> 0:25:47.160
<v Speaker 1>they got five d and twenty six American citizens represented

0:25:47.200 --> 0:25:50.600
<v Speaker 1>in the national population on all key demographics including political affiliation,

0:25:51.440 --> 0:25:55.919
<v Speaker 1>thirty self identified as extremely liberal, thirty odds self identified

0:25:55.920 --> 0:25:59.040
<v Speaker 1>as extremely conservative. Came together in a conference suite in

0:25:59.080 --> 0:26:02.600
<v Speaker 1>Dallas for four days, split into small groups, deliberated on

0:26:02.640 --> 0:26:05.160
<v Speaker 1>all sorts of all the issues of the day. Basically

0:26:05.720 --> 0:26:10.480
<v Speaker 1>a whole load of like consensus emerged like lightly. There

0:26:10.480 --> 0:26:13.439
<v Speaker 1>were shifts away a little bit from a high federal

0:26:13.440 --> 0:26:16.800
<v Speaker 1>minimum wage because people are like engaging with the diversity

0:26:16.840 --> 0:26:20.720
<v Speaker 1>of the economic conditions across America. But the critical finding

0:26:21.040 --> 0:26:24.520
<v Speaker 1>the most powerful thing. So in the literature on polarization,

0:26:24.520 --> 0:26:27.359
<v Speaker 1>there are two different types of polarization, right there's issue

0:26:27.359 --> 0:26:31.520
<v Speaker 1>polarization where I disagree with you, barton and then there's

0:26:32.200 --> 0:26:37.520
<v Speaker 1>effective polarization, which is you're evil barton By. And what

0:26:37.560 --> 0:26:40.439
<v Speaker 1>they found in this process was that affective polarization went

0:26:40.480 --> 0:26:45.560
<v Speaker 1>through the floor. Okay, they rehumanized each other, even to

0:26:45.560 --> 0:26:47.320
<v Speaker 1>the extent where I was told that in some of

0:26:47.359 --> 0:26:50.840
<v Speaker 1>the communities that people were going back to these individual participants,

0:26:50.880 --> 0:26:54.080
<v Speaker 1>they saw affective polarization drop. There's a great New York

0:26:54.119 --> 0:26:56.240
<v Speaker 1>Times piece on it actually, m so if you want

0:26:56.240 --> 0:26:57.919
<v Speaker 1>to check it out there, And it was run by

0:26:57.920 --> 0:27:00.720
<v Speaker 1>a gang called the Hellna Projects stand for the University

0:27:01.240 --> 0:27:03.040
<v Speaker 1>James Fishkin was involved in it was it was in

0:27:03.080 --> 0:27:06.000
<v Speaker 1>the process that's called deliberative polling, was the kind of

0:27:06.000 --> 0:27:13.080
<v Speaker 1>methodology underpinning it. When I think about corporations, most governments,

0:27:14.280 --> 0:27:15.800
<v Speaker 1>it seems to me there'll be a lot of risk

0:27:16.280 --> 0:27:19.800
<v Speaker 1>to them in embracing a citizens story that tries to

0:27:19.840 --> 0:27:23.400
<v Speaker 1>facilitate and that dominate, that tries to encourage participation. Wrangle

0:27:24.119 --> 0:27:28.120
<v Speaker 1>so many different opinions heard cats. What reasons do they

0:27:28.200 --> 0:27:32.920
<v Speaker 1>have to make the shift into this different story and potentially,

0:27:33.640 --> 0:27:37.040
<v Speaker 1>at least in a short term view, give up some power. Well,

0:27:37.200 --> 0:27:38.880
<v Speaker 1>there's two things I would say that it's. The first

0:27:39.000 --> 0:27:42.560
<v Speaker 1>is just a kind of set the premise a little bit.

0:27:43.000 --> 0:27:45.520
<v Speaker 1>So I think we talk a lot about people trusting

0:27:45.560 --> 0:27:48.840
<v Speaker 1>government right and trying to get people to trust government

0:27:48.840 --> 0:27:51.360
<v Speaker 1>more and the sort of thing, And ultimately I think

0:27:51.400 --> 0:27:53.720
<v Speaker 1>that's a flawed premise. Like what we have to understand

0:27:53.760 --> 0:27:55.119
<v Speaker 1>is that what we're trapped in at the moment as

0:27:55.119 --> 0:27:57.600
<v Speaker 1>a vicious circle, Like we're trapped in a in a

0:27:57.720 --> 0:28:01.960
<v Speaker 1>state where people because our institutions are trapped within the

0:28:01.960 --> 0:28:04.040
<v Speaker 1>consumer story, they're trying to solve the problems of our

0:28:04.080 --> 0:28:07.400
<v Speaker 1>time from within that story, and you can't. People are

0:28:07.440 --> 0:28:11.040
<v Speaker 1>seeing that our institutions aren't up to the tasks and

0:28:11.119 --> 0:28:15.720
<v Speaker 1>that's why they're losing trust in them, and then they're

0:28:15.760 --> 0:28:22.320
<v Speaker 1>behaving a little angrily, and institutions again understandably see that

0:28:22.440 --> 0:28:28.000
<v Speaker 1>and respond by withdrawing, by bringing power in and then

0:28:28.040 --> 0:28:31.600
<v Speaker 1>people get angrier because right, and then you're in a loop.

0:28:32.280 --> 0:28:34.240
<v Speaker 1>And that is the way I think we need to

0:28:34.320 --> 0:28:36.879
<v Speaker 1>understand the moment in time we're in and so that

0:28:36.960 --> 0:28:41.560
<v Speaker 1>the task and the only place, Like Audrey says this again,

0:28:41.800 --> 0:28:45.640
<v Speaker 1>this this idea that actually it's not about people trusting

0:28:45.640 --> 0:28:48.920
<v Speaker 1>government so much. That is about government trusting people. It's

0:28:48.960 --> 0:28:53.840
<v Speaker 1>about institutions trusting people, which is difficult and that needs

0:28:53.840 --> 0:28:57.840
<v Speaker 1>to be met people, right, and some of them the worst.

0:28:58.880 --> 0:29:02.760
<v Speaker 1>But understanding that anger and frustration is comes from something.

0:29:02.760 --> 0:29:04.680
<v Speaker 1>And I really want to be clear, I am like,

0:29:04.720 --> 0:29:06.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm not. It's kind of easy for me to say, right,

0:29:06.880 --> 0:29:09.480
<v Speaker 1>like I'm I don't want to be that guy. But

0:29:09.560 --> 0:29:12.000
<v Speaker 1>there is a reason why that's happening, and we're certain

0:29:12.120 --> 0:29:14.960
<v Speaker 1>way down that cycle. So a part of the answer

0:29:14.960 --> 0:29:16.600
<v Speaker 1>to your question is I think we have to we

0:29:16.640 --> 0:29:19.320
<v Speaker 1>have to break the cycle somehow, and that I think

0:29:19.440 --> 0:29:23.160
<v Speaker 1>is the intervention point. The second part, and maybe the

0:29:23.240 --> 0:29:26.640
<v Speaker 1>more kind of hopeful and joyful part, is to say

0:29:27.480 --> 0:29:32.080
<v Speaker 1>it just works. If you're into things that work, try this,

0:29:32.840 --> 0:29:35.440
<v Speaker 1>like there's a reason why, Like the business world is

0:29:35.480 --> 0:29:40.000
<v Speaker 1>going in this direction actually, like we're seeing big corporations

0:29:40.040 --> 0:29:44.280
<v Speaker 1>like ge use crowdsourcing processes. We're seeing NASA use it.

0:29:44.320 --> 0:29:46.440
<v Speaker 1>We're seeing some of the fastest growing businesses in the

0:29:46.480 --> 0:29:48.160
<v Speaker 1>world like that. I talked in the book about a

0:29:48.160 --> 0:29:50.680
<v Speaker 1>company called brew Dog, which is started in Scotland with

0:29:50.720 --> 0:29:52.959
<v Speaker 1>two guys and a dog bringing their own beer and

0:29:53.200 --> 0:29:55.480
<v Speaker 1>is now it was the only company to be in

0:29:55.480 --> 0:29:58.040
<v Speaker 1>the Sunday Times a hundred fastest Growing Companies eight years

0:29:58.040 --> 0:30:00.200
<v Speaker 1>in a row, I think it was. And what they're

0:30:00.240 --> 0:30:03.280
<v Speaker 1>doing is crowd sourcing their recipes, Like they have a

0:30:03.320 --> 0:30:05.320
<v Speaker 1>thing called d i y Dog where they open source

0:30:05.360 --> 0:30:08.160
<v Speaker 1>those recipes once they crowd sourced them and then sell

0:30:08.200 --> 0:30:11.360
<v Speaker 1>brewing kits as well as beer and even train people

0:30:11.400 --> 0:30:14.240
<v Speaker 1>to be like a Samelio but for beer like that again,

0:30:14.360 --> 0:30:17.760
<v Speaker 1>like what that's doing is powering that organization because people

0:30:17.800 --> 0:30:19.840
<v Speaker 1>are buying into a cause in the in the world,

0:30:19.880 --> 0:30:23.440
<v Speaker 1>buying into something that can drive energy, build energy. And

0:30:23.480 --> 0:30:26.240
<v Speaker 1>then look at Taiwan. It's the most successful codd response

0:30:26.240 --> 0:30:29.320
<v Speaker 1>in the world. Right fast, funfair second lost death rate

0:30:29.400 --> 0:30:31.920
<v Speaker 1>never went into lockdown. Do you see examples of the

0:30:31.960 --> 0:30:38.800
<v Speaker 1>citizens story masquerading as a consumer story maybe for increased

0:30:39.000 --> 0:30:43.800
<v Speaker 1>palatability or comprehension. I think we can make the citizens story.

0:30:44.280 --> 0:30:47.120
<v Speaker 1>We can and should make the citizen story appealing and

0:30:47.200 --> 0:30:50.440
<v Speaker 1>joyful and creative, right, Like, that's not a bad thing

0:30:50.480 --> 0:30:53.360
<v Speaker 1>to do. I think there is a line where the

0:30:53.400 --> 0:30:56.000
<v Speaker 1>consumer story maybe can co opt the citizen story. Could it?

0:30:56.040 --> 0:30:58.560
<v Speaker 1>Could we end up with something like citizen washing happening,

0:30:58.760 --> 0:31:01.520
<v Speaker 1>like we could write. And I think brew Dog is

0:31:01.560 --> 0:31:04.160
<v Speaker 1>an interesting case in point because actually, like they've behaved

0:31:04.160 --> 0:31:07.360
<v Speaker 1>pretty badly in some ways recently. What they've found is

0:31:07.400 --> 0:31:11.000
<v Speaker 1>that the energy of this has grown the company so fast,

0:31:11.760 --> 0:31:13.840
<v Speaker 1>and then the founders started to kind of believe their

0:31:13.840 --> 0:31:16.440
<v Speaker 1>own hype. It's how I understand it, and they effectively

0:31:16.440 --> 0:31:19.320
<v Speaker 1>invented equity crowdfunding. Back in two thousand nine, they sold

0:31:19.320 --> 0:31:22.040
<v Speaker 1>a load of the company to their customers. They've now

0:31:22.040 --> 0:31:24.880
<v Speaker 1>got something like two hundred thousand equity punks, they call them,

0:31:25.520 --> 0:31:28.000
<v Speaker 1>so again, really creative, cool way of doing it. But

0:31:28.080 --> 0:31:30.280
<v Speaker 1>then they sold and they said they would never sell out,

0:31:30.280 --> 0:31:32.480
<v Speaker 1>and they sold a big portion of the company to

0:31:32.880 --> 0:31:36.400
<v Speaker 1>VC fund. And then there's there's been accusation from within

0:31:36.440 --> 0:31:39.640
<v Speaker 1>the company of them treating employees pretty badly. But what's

0:31:39.640 --> 0:31:43.120
<v Speaker 1>so interesting is the group of employees who are starting

0:31:43.160 --> 0:31:44.960
<v Speaker 1>to kind of fight back and hold them to account

0:31:44.960 --> 0:31:48.760
<v Speaker 1>and push them are calling themselves punks with purpose, So

0:31:48.800 --> 0:31:51.640
<v Speaker 1>they're sort of naming themselves from within the idea of

0:31:51.680 --> 0:31:55.239
<v Speaker 1>the organization and challenging the founders from that place. And

0:31:55.280 --> 0:31:58.200
<v Speaker 1>so the really interesting question in that organization is who's

0:31:58.240 --> 0:32:01.480
<v Speaker 1>co opting whom right like? And once you start to

0:32:01.720 --> 0:32:05.600
<v Speaker 1>authentically build a citizems story, you can't stop it right yeah,

0:32:05.760 --> 0:32:08.680
<v Speaker 1>and it'll it'll find a way, may be delayed, but

0:32:08.760 --> 0:32:12.080
<v Speaker 1>it may not be indefinitely deferred. One of the things

0:32:12.080 --> 0:32:15.239
<v Speaker 1>that I really admire about you is that you're not

0:32:15.280 --> 0:32:17.720
<v Speaker 1>just writing about these things. You're helping put them in

0:32:17.760 --> 0:32:21.120
<v Speaker 1>their practice. You've got the New Citizenship Project. You do reports,

0:32:21.240 --> 0:32:24.320
<v Speaker 1>but you also do like activations to take a word

0:32:24.320 --> 0:32:28.680
<v Speaker 1>from the brand and advertising world, workshops, tool kits. Have

0:32:28.720 --> 0:32:32.000
<v Speaker 1>you got boot camps? How do you go about helping

0:32:32.040 --> 0:32:35.920
<v Speaker 1>folks embrace and implement the citizens story? Can you walk

0:32:35.960 --> 0:32:40.280
<v Speaker 1>me through your design process to help folks take idea

0:32:40.360 --> 0:32:43.680
<v Speaker 1>into action and the new story. So it's basically one

0:32:43.720 --> 0:32:46.640
<v Speaker 1>of the tools, key tool really that we've created. The

0:32:46.720 --> 0:32:50.320
<v Speaker 1>three principles of participatory organizations. You can take the boy

0:32:50.320 --> 0:32:52.360
<v Speaker 1>out of advertising. You can't take the alliteration out of

0:32:52.360 --> 0:32:55.000
<v Speaker 1>the boy. Right. So, so the three principles of purpose,

0:32:55.040 --> 0:32:58.480
<v Speaker 1>platform and prototype. Okay, and actually just this is actually

0:32:58.480 --> 0:33:00.720
<v Speaker 1>a hack on one of the key kind of mental

0:33:00.760 --> 0:33:03.920
<v Speaker 1>models of the consumer story. So the first edition of

0:33:03.920 --> 0:33:06.400
<v Speaker 1>a marketing textbook was written that talked about the four

0:33:06.440 --> 0:33:10.080
<v Speaker 1>principles of the marketing mix, product, price, promotion, and place

0:33:10.560 --> 0:33:13.800
<v Speaker 1>here you go. And that is that the textbooks that

0:33:13.800 --> 0:33:16.280
<v Speaker 1>that's in is still taught in every embody course anywhere

0:33:16.280 --> 0:33:19.520
<v Speaker 1>in the world. And so the problem is even organizations

0:33:19.520 --> 0:33:23.320
<v Speaker 1>that are trying to think differently pulled back into that

0:33:23.440 --> 0:33:26.680
<v Speaker 1>story because the boxes. So the three principles, the three

0:33:26.720 --> 0:33:30.560
<v Speaker 1>piece purpose, platform, prototype is an attempt to sort of

0:33:30.560 --> 0:33:33.560
<v Speaker 1>offer a different front alternative. Yeah, so we help people

0:33:33.600 --> 0:33:36.880
<v Speaker 1>go Like the question for each purpose is, what are

0:33:36.920 --> 0:33:38.400
<v Speaker 1>you trying to do in the world that's so big

0:33:38.440 --> 0:33:40.280
<v Speaker 1>you actually need people to do it with you. You

0:33:40.360 --> 0:33:43.040
<v Speaker 1>can't do it for that's already. I just want to

0:33:43.080 --> 0:33:46.320
<v Speaker 1>parse you on that. What's an idea that's so big

0:33:46.360 --> 0:33:50.280
<v Speaker 1>that you need other people? What's something you can ask

0:33:50.320 --> 0:33:53.360
<v Speaker 1>of people. One of the things I feel is that

0:33:54.240 --> 0:33:58.360
<v Speaker 1>we haven't been asked to do very much. Maybe come

0:33:58.360 --> 0:34:00.560
<v Speaker 1>and vote every couple of years and at least spend

0:34:00.640 --> 0:34:03.840
<v Speaker 1>some money, take on debt, and otherwise kind of keep

0:34:03.840 --> 0:34:09.399
<v Speaker 1>your head down, protect yourself in your little homestead. And

0:34:09.480 --> 0:34:11.640
<v Speaker 1>that's that's all. That's all we got. Our list of

0:34:11.800 --> 0:34:14.879
<v Speaker 1>requests and demands and opportunities for your participation is very low.

0:34:15.200 --> 0:34:18.080
<v Speaker 1>So already starting with a big enough purpose that you

0:34:18.120 --> 0:34:21.399
<v Speaker 1>need other people. It's just a very dynamic shift from

0:34:21.400 --> 0:34:23.920
<v Speaker 1>what most of us experience. I think, keep going and

0:34:23.960 --> 0:34:26.040
<v Speaker 1>the power of a question in that space is really

0:34:26.239 --> 0:34:28.239
<v Speaker 1>huge as well, Right, how can we do this? We

0:34:28.239 --> 0:34:29.839
<v Speaker 1>we don't have the answers, we're not going to be

0:34:29.880 --> 0:34:31.919
<v Speaker 1>able to do it for you, but we can frame

0:34:31.960 --> 0:34:36.120
<v Speaker 1>the question that we can answer together purpose platform, What

0:34:36.239 --> 0:34:38.560
<v Speaker 1>are the structures and processes that you create to make

0:34:38.600 --> 0:34:40.880
<v Speaker 1>it meaningful and joyful for people to get involved in

0:34:40.880 --> 0:34:44.280
<v Speaker 1>that like not easy and convenient, not learningful and enjoy

0:34:44.520 --> 0:34:47.640
<v Speaker 1>meaningful and joyful. So again like the time one, stuff

0:34:47.680 --> 0:34:49.680
<v Speaker 1>that brew Dog, stuff like that, those are examples that

0:34:49.760 --> 0:34:51.960
<v Speaker 1>speak to that thing. And so we walk through with

0:34:52.120 --> 0:34:55.960
<v Speaker 1>organizations helping them develop their ideas to offer those opportunities.

0:34:56.239 --> 0:34:57.880
<v Speaker 1>And then the prototype one is really just how do

0:34:57.920 --> 0:34:59.680
<v Speaker 1>you build the energy for this? Because you can't flip

0:34:59.760 --> 0:35:02.480
<v Speaker 1>you to opien switch and become a completely different thing overnight.

0:35:02.880 --> 0:35:04.560
<v Speaker 1>So how do you build the energy? Is the third?

0:35:04.600 --> 0:35:10.560
<v Speaker 1>And are you generally working with young institutions, old institutions,

0:35:10.640 --> 0:35:14.200
<v Speaker 1>large or small? Like all of the above, it all

0:35:14.280 --> 0:35:17.360
<v Speaker 1>figures across every sector. Like the only thing you can't

0:35:17.360 --> 0:35:19.399
<v Speaker 1>do this stuff with is is something that doesn't really

0:35:19.400 --> 0:35:22.200
<v Speaker 1>have a purpose, right but without which nothing is something

0:35:22.239 --> 0:35:26.680
<v Speaker 1>that people want to participate in. Without which, Oh you

0:35:26.719 --> 0:35:30.640
<v Speaker 1>were using real English on me. I'm quite up to you.

0:35:30.680 --> 0:35:33.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm like people without it is the prower with target

0:35:33.360 --> 0:35:35.720
<v Speaker 1>to do a British game. Sorry, he uses the language

0:35:35.880 --> 0:35:41.600
<v Speaker 1>purposefully overly posh moments there it goes m I sometimes

0:35:41.680 --> 0:35:43.240
<v Speaker 1>like to think of myself as the kind of anti

0:35:43.280 --> 0:35:46.160
<v Speaker 1>Boris Johnson. His name is his name is actually Alexander Johnson.

0:35:46.200 --> 0:35:49.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm John Alexander with both the degrees in Ancient Greek

0:35:49.080 --> 0:35:52.879
<v Speaker 1>and Latin, like I can push it with the best

0:35:52.880 --> 0:35:55.520
<v Speaker 1>of them. So maybe what I'll say is because the

0:35:55.600 --> 0:35:57.600
<v Speaker 1>last four and a half weeks, like I'm in l A,

0:35:57.760 --> 0:36:00.280
<v Speaker 1>because I'm I'm going around the world right now, literally

0:36:00.320 --> 0:36:03.360
<v Speaker 1>around the world. I've been in Athens, Singapore, Melbourne, Sydney,

0:36:03.640 --> 0:36:06.560
<v Speaker 1>New Zealand. And there's a couple of things I'm learning

0:36:06.600 --> 0:36:08.760
<v Speaker 1>through that and thinking about as a result. The first

0:36:08.920 --> 0:36:13.400
<v Speaker 1>is this is not a new story, and spending time

0:36:13.440 --> 0:36:17.040
<v Speaker 1>with first nation's philosophers, particularly in Australian New Zealand, and

0:36:17.080 --> 0:36:20.239
<v Speaker 1>going like, actually, the citizens story is not like a

0:36:20.280 --> 0:36:24.000
<v Speaker 1>new creation. It's deep in us UM. Guy called Tyson

0:36:24.080 --> 0:36:26.239
<v Speaker 1>Young Corporter, who you need to get on this, you

0:36:26.239 --> 0:36:29.200
<v Speaker 1>would love. Tyson wrote a book called sand Talk, How

0:36:29.239 --> 0:36:32.600
<v Speaker 1>Indigenous Thinking Can Save the World, and he basically speaks

0:36:32.600 --> 0:36:35.400
<v Speaker 1>and sits in a sixty thousand year worldview just by default.

0:36:36.160 --> 0:36:38.640
<v Speaker 1>And the thing he said to me was like, don't

0:36:38.640 --> 0:36:41.920
<v Speaker 1>worry John. I was getting a little stressed because don't

0:36:41.960 --> 0:36:44.320
<v Speaker 1>worry John. Were you like it's going to take humans

0:36:44.320 --> 0:36:46.800
<v Speaker 1>a good bit longer to forget how to be human,

0:36:47.080 --> 0:36:49.239
<v Speaker 1>how to be the custodian species as the way he

0:36:49.280 --> 0:36:53.359
<v Speaker 1>called it. Thank you for that acknowledgment too, because I

0:36:53.400 --> 0:36:57.320
<v Speaker 1>think we're both pretty young, certainly relative to the human

0:36:57.440 --> 0:37:01.960
<v Speaker 1>experience where nets. But it can be very tempting to

0:37:02.000 --> 0:37:04.960
<v Speaker 1>think we need something new to get us out of

0:37:05.000 --> 0:37:08.080
<v Speaker 1>this new challenge. And the challenges really aren't that new.

0:37:08.280 --> 0:37:11.800
<v Speaker 1>They're repackaged, they're rebranded, and many of the solutions in

0:37:11.840 --> 0:37:17.000
<v Speaker 1>the pathways forward involve something we've lost or forgotten, but

0:37:17.280 --> 0:37:20.759
<v Speaker 1>not entirely new, is it. There's my yoda for you

0:37:23.440 --> 0:37:25.920
<v Speaker 1>after the break, more on making the shift to the

0:37:25.960 --> 0:37:34.040
<v Speaker 1>citizens story. For years, a lot of us have heard

0:37:34.080 --> 0:37:37.200
<v Speaker 1>this message that we should vote with our wallets become

0:37:37.200 --> 0:37:40.240
<v Speaker 1>a conscious consumer. Right, that's that's a better way forward.

0:37:40.560 --> 0:37:44.960
<v Speaker 1>What's the difference between conscious consumption and a full blown

0:37:44.960 --> 0:37:48.640
<v Speaker 1>citizens story? How close can they get to one another? Like,

0:37:48.760 --> 0:37:52.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean they all the calling the close. Um. The

0:37:52.080 --> 0:37:55.080
<v Speaker 1>way I would put it is that we all what

0:37:55.160 --> 0:37:57.840
<v Speaker 1>we are told to be. Um, you are what we

0:37:57.880 --> 0:38:01.360
<v Speaker 1>are told to be. And that is consumers who occasionally

0:38:01.440 --> 0:38:06.520
<v Speaker 1>vote and bring bring the identity construct and the mode

0:38:06.520 --> 0:38:08.800
<v Speaker 1>of the consumer to bear on the act of voting.

0:38:09.719 --> 0:38:14.640
<v Speaker 1>What we are becoming, I think, or rebecoming remembering into

0:38:14.640 --> 0:38:19.520
<v Speaker 1>the future is citizens who sometimes consume and might bring

0:38:19.760 --> 0:38:22.800
<v Speaker 1>the citizen orientation to bear on the act of consumption.

0:38:23.440 --> 0:38:26.640
<v Speaker 1>Like it's not like there's consumption is over right, Like

0:38:26.680 --> 0:38:29.120
<v Speaker 1>it's not. The problem is the story, not the act.

0:38:30.080 --> 0:38:35.080
<v Speaker 1>The problem is consumerism, not consumption. And so that's a

0:38:35.160 --> 0:38:38.200
<v Speaker 1>matter of degree, right, But then the other difference is

0:38:38.239 --> 0:38:42.759
<v Speaker 1>like it's just much more fun man like that trying

0:38:42.800 --> 0:38:46.040
<v Speaker 1>to be good within the consumer story is hard like

0:38:46.200 --> 0:38:49.440
<v Speaker 1>and guilt inducing, right, Like to be good within the

0:38:49.480 --> 0:38:53.560
<v Speaker 1>consumer story, like you have to never use a disposable cup,

0:38:53.600 --> 0:38:56.480
<v Speaker 1>never flood, never even and that stuff's important. Right, Don't

0:38:56.480 --> 0:38:59.040
<v Speaker 1>get me wrong. I'm not saying individual behavior change doesn't matter,

0:38:59.600 --> 0:39:02.600
<v Speaker 1>but atally, like our true agency is collective, right Like

0:39:02.640 --> 0:39:06.680
<v Speaker 1>if if individual behavior changes one plus one plus, it's collective.

0:39:06.760 --> 0:39:10.880
<v Speaker 1>Change is multiplies multipli and it's it's raised to something right, Right,

0:39:11.200 --> 0:39:13.719
<v Speaker 1>we're in the exponential realm now there you go. Yeah,

0:39:13.880 --> 0:39:16.239
<v Speaker 1>and it's just joyful, right, Like it's just good to

0:39:16.320 --> 0:39:19.480
<v Speaker 1>do stuff together. But maybe if I could, because I'd

0:39:19.520 --> 0:39:21.399
<v Speaker 1>love your view on this. Like one of the things

0:39:21.480 --> 0:39:25.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm thinking about as a result of this trip is

0:39:25.239 --> 0:39:29.920
<v Speaker 1>like I think increasingly I'm like, this is us, like

0:39:29.960 --> 0:39:32.920
<v Speaker 1>we are citizens by nature, Like people are doing it everywhere.

0:39:33.320 --> 0:39:36.440
<v Speaker 1>It's underneath the surface, but it's kind of happening. And

0:39:37.239 --> 0:39:39.440
<v Speaker 1>we saw it in COVID in particular. Right, you know

0:39:39.440 --> 0:39:43.680
<v Speaker 1>it's mutual A yeah, so what is it that that

0:39:43.800 --> 0:39:47.280
<v Speaker 1>flips the story? So there there is work of muscle building.

0:39:47.400 --> 0:39:49.520
<v Speaker 1>I love the frame, and I think, did you use

0:39:49.560 --> 0:39:52.480
<v Speaker 1>this citizenship as a muscle you build or is that yeah?

0:39:52.480 --> 0:39:54.719
<v Speaker 1>Maybe when we talked on the other show, I brought

0:39:54.760 --> 0:39:57.359
<v Speaker 1>it up because the gym metaphor was strong in me.

0:39:57.520 --> 0:40:00.480
<v Speaker 1>There you go, man, So the other up the work,

0:40:00.520 --> 0:40:02.680
<v Speaker 1>I think is is what I'm increasingly think about is

0:40:02.719 --> 0:40:05.200
<v Speaker 1>these like critical moments when the story can shift at

0:40:05.200 --> 0:40:08.560
<v Speaker 1>a societal level. What does it look like to two

0:40:08.600 --> 0:40:11.960
<v Speaker 1>more intentionally find or even create and kind of curate

0:40:12.000 --> 0:40:15.440
<v Speaker 1>those moments? Like how might we spot the opportunities for that?

0:40:15.920 --> 0:40:18.120
<v Speaker 1>So in Australia I ended up talking to loads of

0:40:18.120 --> 0:40:20.440
<v Speaker 1>people about the new government has committed to holding a

0:40:20.520 --> 0:40:25.239
<v Speaker 1>referendum on the Indigenous Voice to Parliament, the Indigenous Voice

0:40:25.239 --> 0:40:27.520
<v Speaker 1>to Parliament and when is that? So there was a

0:40:27.520 --> 0:40:30.280
<v Speaker 1>statement what's called the Statement from the Heart, a gathering

0:40:30.320 --> 0:40:33.360
<v Speaker 1>of First Nations leaders came together in Uluru in the

0:40:33.400 --> 0:40:36.799
<v Speaker 1>center of Australia and produced a set of recommendations for

0:40:36.880 --> 0:40:39.959
<v Speaker 1>how the voice of Indigenous people could be better heard

0:40:40.000 --> 0:40:44.000
<v Speaker 1>in Australian government. And they put that forward. The then

0:40:44.080 --> 0:40:48.040
<v Speaker 1>government rejected it out of hand. The new government has

0:40:48.120 --> 0:40:52.319
<v Speaker 1>said we want to do this. It's a constitutional shift,

0:40:52.360 --> 0:40:55.399
<v Speaker 1>so it requires referendum. So there will be some time

0:40:55.440 --> 0:40:57.160
<v Speaker 1>in the next few years there will be a referendum

0:40:57.200 --> 0:41:00.440
<v Speaker 1>on this at the moment. So that's a moment. So

0:41:00.480 --> 0:41:03.520
<v Speaker 1>how do you design for that? Because the referendum, trust me,

0:41:03.560 --> 0:41:06.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm British, can can take your country in a dark direction.

0:41:06.680 --> 0:41:10.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm a Californian. We have so many referenda out here.

0:41:11.160 --> 0:41:14.200
<v Speaker 1>Because the referendum in and of itself is a consumer moment, right,

0:41:14.239 --> 0:41:17.239
<v Speaker 1>Like it's just pick. But how you would lead up

0:41:17.239 --> 0:41:20.279
<v Speaker 1>to that, how you have conversations and deliberate there you

0:41:20.360 --> 0:41:23.319
<v Speaker 1>go over that moment could really shift the outcome and

0:41:23.360 --> 0:41:26.560
<v Speaker 1>the feeling you have about the outcome. Right, And then

0:41:26.680 --> 0:41:28.640
<v Speaker 1>I arrived in New Zealand and I look at like

0:41:28.880 --> 0:41:32.480
<v Speaker 1>the conversation about climate there is really ripening, and it's like,

0:41:32.520 --> 0:41:36.200
<v Speaker 1>how might we bring into that some of these ideas

0:41:36.719 --> 0:41:39.120
<v Speaker 1>but also like draw on the depth of the of

0:41:39.160 --> 0:41:42.040
<v Speaker 1>the Maori wisdoms and even the process that. One of

0:41:42.040 --> 0:41:44.080
<v Speaker 1>the lovely things I came across on this trip was

0:41:44.120 --> 0:41:46.799
<v Speaker 1>the Maori concept of pap and a hole, which is

0:41:46.840 --> 0:41:49.200
<v Speaker 1>the word for the joining space between the two holes

0:41:49.200 --> 0:41:51.560
<v Speaker 1>of an ocean going canoe and when when they had

0:41:51.600 --> 0:41:53.799
<v Speaker 1>a moment of uncertainty, they would gathering the space and

0:41:53.840 --> 0:41:56.479
<v Speaker 1>like and and draw on the wisdom of the people

0:41:56.520 --> 0:41:58.440
<v Speaker 1>who read the stars best and the people who read

0:41:58.440 --> 0:42:01.000
<v Speaker 1>the currents best, and figure out what to do together

0:42:01.680 --> 0:42:04.680
<v Speaker 1>in a process of storytelling and story sharing and wisdom sharing,

0:42:04.960 --> 0:42:08.040
<v Speaker 1>like how might we draw them back? And then here

0:42:08.040 --> 0:42:10.719
<v Speaker 1>in l A, I mean, this is the place of

0:42:10.800 --> 0:42:15.000
<v Speaker 1>story right, this is the global hub. And remember what

0:42:15.040 --> 0:42:17.960
<v Speaker 1>we said about the Olympics and four right, like yeah,

0:42:18.120 --> 0:42:20.239
<v Speaker 1>then twenty eight Like so we could we could have

0:42:20.280 --> 0:42:22.920
<v Speaker 1>a do over and do something different If if l

0:42:22.960 --> 0:42:25.719
<v Speaker 1>A helped accelerate the consumer story by bringing brands to

0:42:25.760 --> 0:42:28.040
<v Speaker 1>the Olympics, could it help accelerate the citizen story by

0:42:28.120 --> 0:42:29.839
<v Speaker 1>bringing people to it in a different way? And how

0:42:29.920 --> 0:42:33.600
<v Speaker 1>might we do that? And wouldn't it be great? Excited

0:42:33.640 --> 0:42:36.960
<v Speaker 1>to get local man? So, so what are some other ways?

0:42:37.560 --> 0:42:39.880
<v Speaker 1>Sadly our listeners do not all reside in l A

0:42:40.400 --> 0:42:43.840
<v Speaker 1>or New Zealand, which would be really really perfect ways

0:42:43.880 --> 0:42:46.799
<v Speaker 1>to help us make that mental shift into the citizens story.

0:42:46.880 --> 0:42:49.560
<v Speaker 1>Somebody is hearing this now and they're fired up, They're

0:42:49.600 --> 0:42:53.360
<v Speaker 1>ready to go. How do we help tell the story?

0:42:53.800 --> 0:42:56.279
<v Speaker 1>How do we help join in it? From where we're

0:42:56.320 --> 0:42:58.080
<v Speaker 1>at right now, what are some of the one ramps

0:42:58.080 --> 0:43:01.600
<v Speaker 1>you've seen? So? I mean I have a pretty simple

0:43:01.719 --> 0:43:04.640
<v Speaker 1>kind of three step thing which I've broadly stole from you.

0:43:04.719 --> 0:43:09.040
<v Speaker 1>I think a right here, we come from my way

0:43:09.080 --> 0:43:10.640
<v Speaker 1>of languages, so so you see what you make it

0:43:10.680 --> 0:43:14.600
<v Speaker 1>this one, But it's basically like step one, find home, like,

0:43:14.719 --> 0:43:18.720
<v Speaker 1>decide what the realm, whether it's your workplace, your local

0:43:18.840 --> 0:43:22.080
<v Speaker 1>place like, or something bigger or something we should we

0:43:22.239 --> 0:43:24.040
<v Speaker 1>You have to call it a realm though, It's just

0:43:24.080 --> 0:43:25.640
<v Speaker 1>it's more powerful when you refer to it as a

0:43:25.680 --> 0:43:28.840
<v Speaker 1>realm as opposed to a workplace or a neighborhood. Right, okay,

0:43:29.000 --> 0:43:32.640
<v Speaker 1>so find your home, find home, find home? Step to

0:43:32.800 --> 0:43:36.440
<v Speaker 1>find the others? M M, put up the bat signal,

0:43:36.560 --> 0:43:38.480
<v Speaker 1>right like? Who else is? Who else wants to make

0:43:38.520 --> 0:43:43.960
<v Speaker 1>this realm better? And then step three on only step

0:43:44.000 --> 0:43:47.640
<v Speaker 1>three like, decide what the first thing to do is together? Right?

0:43:48.719 --> 0:43:52.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean that that sequencing actually feels very important. It's

0:43:52.520 --> 0:43:57.319
<v Speaker 1>not I have an idea to fix X. I need

0:43:57.360 --> 0:44:00.560
<v Speaker 1>you to help me get it done, right. It's hi,

0:44:00.880 --> 0:44:04.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm here, you're here too. Where are we? Now? What

0:44:04.120 --> 0:44:07.160
<v Speaker 1>do we want to do? What's important to us, not

0:44:07.320 --> 0:44:11.040
<v Speaker 1>just to me, and just establishing that shared reality, that

0:44:11.040 --> 0:44:14.799
<v Speaker 1>shared narrative, that shared story, with the sequencing of that

0:44:14.880 --> 0:44:17.319
<v Speaker 1>just it actually feels really important because I know so

0:44:17.360 --> 0:44:20.880
<v Speaker 1>many people, including myself, who are like, that's wrong. I

0:44:20.920 --> 0:44:24.400
<v Speaker 1>got an idea. Let's go, here's my petition, here's my

0:44:24.400 --> 0:44:27.400
<v Speaker 1>sign up sheet to join me and my thing, and

0:44:27.440 --> 0:44:29.640
<v Speaker 1>hopefully you'll feel like it's you're a thing too. Whereas

0:44:29.640 --> 0:44:32.279
<v Speaker 1>if you develop it in community, then it has a

0:44:32.320 --> 0:44:35.759
<v Speaker 1>different potency, in a different sense of co investment. Okay,

0:44:36.480 --> 0:44:39.160
<v Speaker 1>when you think about because so much of the new

0:44:39.200 --> 0:44:43.959
<v Speaker 1>Citizenship project work that I've seen is institutional. So let's

0:44:43.960 --> 0:44:48.960
<v Speaker 1>say my realm is my neighborhood. And okay, so I've

0:44:49.000 --> 0:44:53.200
<v Speaker 1>I've chosen my home. Find others am I am? I

0:44:53.280 --> 0:44:56.799
<v Speaker 1>calling a meeting and I inviting people over for cupcakes?

0:44:58.160 --> 0:45:02.160
<v Speaker 1>How specific is my invit tation to these others before

0:45:02.239 --> 0:45:05.200
<v Speaker 1>we decide what it is we might want to affect

0:45:05.280 --> 0:45:08.399
<v Speaker 1>or change. I mean, it's it really varies. It's what

0:45:08.520 --> 0:45:11.239
<v Speaker 1>feels feels right to the group, I guess. I mean,

0:45:11.480 --> 0:45:15.879
<v Speaker 1>I think maybe a couple of examples from my sort

0:45:15.880 --> 0:45:18.680
<v Speaker 1>of story gathering that speak most powerfully to this. One

0:45:18.680 --> 0:45:20.399
<v Speaker 1>of my favorites is the story of a place called

0:45:20.440 --> 0:45:23.000
<v Speaker 1>Grimsby and on the northeast coast of England. That's like

0:45:23.120 --> 0:45:25.319
<v Speaker 1>the place that's been most screwed over over the last

0:45:25.320 --> 0:45:28.880
<v Speaker 1>fifty years or so. And what happened there was the

0:45:29.320 --> 0:45:33.800
<v Speaker 1>council called a meeting and there's a couple of guys,

0:45:33.800 --> 0:45:36.560
<v Speaker 1>this guy Billy, who wasn't going to go because he said, like,

0:45:36.719 --> 0:45:39.160
<v Speaker 1>it will just be people complaining and the council saying

0:45:39.160 --> 0:45:41.000
<v Speaker 1>they can't do anything. So what's the point of our

0:45:41.000 --> 0:45:43.440
<v Speaker 1>seen that meeting? We've all seen that meeting. And a

0:45:43.440 --> 0:45:45.719
<v Speaker 1>friend of his said, our moms would have gone, and

0:45:45.800 --> 0:45:48.840
<v Speaker 1>guilt tripped him into it, and he went to the

0:45:48.880 --> 0:45:51.440
<v Speaker 1>meeting and like got so frustrated that he stood up

0:45:51.440 --> 0:45:53.680
<v Speaker 1>in the meeting and said, look, I'm just going to

0:45:53.760 --> 0:45:57.520
<v Speaker 1>go clear one Street tomorrow. Anyone who wants to join me,

0:45:57.520 --> 0:45:59.640
<v Speaker 1>I'd love you to join me, and then we'll just

0:45:59.680 --> 0:46:01.839
<v Speaker 1>see what we do from there, because this is too

0:46:01.920 --> 0:46:05.160
<v Speaker 1>much like dwelling in the pain. I think it was

0:46:05.200 --> 0:46:06.920
<v Speaker 1>like I didn't get the numbers wrong, but let's say

0:46:06.920 --> 0:46:08.839
<v Speaker 1>it was like fifteen people turned up. Next day they

0:46:08.880 --> 0:46:11.280
<v Speaker 1>agreed to do it again two weeks later, on different streets.

0:46:11.320 --> 0:46:15.160
<v Speaker 1>Thirty came fast forward four years. These guys now have

0:46:15.239 --> 0:46:17.840
<v Speaker 1>a magazine called The Proud East Marshan. This is in

0:46:17.840 --> 0:46:20.400
<v Speaker 1>the East Marsh in Grimsby. They have a six monthly

0:46:20.520 --> 0:46:22.960
<v Speaker 1>arts festival called the Sun and Moon Arts Festival, and

0:46:23.000 --> 0:46:26.640
<v Speaker 1>they've just closed pretty recently a half million pounds community

0:46:26.680 --> 0:46:29.920
<v Speaker 1>share offer raising money, and that amount of money in

0:46:29.960 --> 0:46:34.040
<v Speaker 1>Grimsby will buy ten houses, refit them, using good local

0:46:34.160 --> 0:46:36.960
<v Speaker 1>jobs and let them out as a social landlord. Creating

0:46:36.960 --> 0:46:39.279
<v Speaker 1>a sustainable revenue stream for the rest of the organization.

0:46:39.760 --> 0:46:43.440
<v Speaker 1>Started with a litter pick and then another in a

0:46:43.480 --> 0:46:46.440
<v Speaker 1>totally different realm. There's a thing that I believe is

0:46:46.440 --> 0:46:49.920
<v Speaker 1>still live right now. Last time I checked to a

0:46:49.960 --> 0:46:53.799
<v Speaker 1>group of McKinsey consultants. Yeah, man, see this is the

0:46:53.880 --> 0:46:59.520
<v Speaker 1>Range East Marjians, the Mackensey. There we go a group

0:46:59.560 --> 0:47:01.560
<v Speaker 1>of I think it was eleven of them, originally an

0:47:01.600 --> 0:47:04.560
<v Speaker 1>open letter to the partners calling them to discuss the

0:47:04.719 --> 0:47:09.360
<v Speaker 1>fossil fuel relationships kind of ignored to start with. Last

0:47:09.400 --> 0:47:13.520
<v Speaker 1>time I heard McKinsey consultants had like signed up to

0:47:13.560 --> 0:47:19.399
<v Speaker 1>this letter. So to your thing, like those eleven might

0:47:19.440 --> 0:47:23.840
<v Speaker 1>be enough, fifteen might be enough. Like, it doesn't necessarily

0:47:23.880 --> 0:47:27.920
<v Speaker 1>mean like you have to find all of the others

0:47:27.920 --> 0:47:31.719
<v Speaker 1>some others. You're such a storyteller and the story gatherer,

0:47:31.920 --> 0:47:37.080
<v Speaker 1>as you just called yourself. Are there certain phrases, certain

0:47:37.160 --> 0:47:42.480
<v Speaker 1>narrative bullet points, certain language choices that you've seen people

0:47:42.640 --> 0:47:47.600
<v Speaker 1>using consistently across these examples when they make that invitation,

0:47:47.640 --> 0:47:49.279
<v Speaker 1>when they try to show up, when they try to

0:47:49.400 --> 0:47:52.879
<v Speaker 1>establish the WII, that tends to be successful more than

0:47:53.200 --> 0:47:56.520
<v Speaker 1>a different set of language choices. I'm literally thinking about

0:47:56.560 --> 0:48:01.759
<v Speaker 1>the sign on Facebook or master done that Twitter, or

0:48:01.880 --> 0:48:05.080
<v Speaker 1>on the posts you know, the power line that the

0:48:05.080 --> 0:48:08.040
<v Speaker 1>powerpoll in my neighborhood. It's a great question and when

0:48:08.080 --> 0:48:11.400
<v Speaker 1>I want to think about more, and but my immediate

0:48:11.440 --> 0:48:15.759
<v Speaker 1>reaction is that spirit of question and that language of

0:48:15.800 --> 0:48:20.279
<v Speaker 1>like of being needed briefly to kind of theory that's like,

0:48:20.320 --> 0:48:25.000
<v Speaker 1>there's a really powerful concept called safe uncertainty. And the

0:48:25.040 --> 0:48:27.239
<v Speaker 1>idea here so it comes from therapy, originally a guy

0:48:27.280 --> 0:48:29.320
<v Speaker 1>called Barry Mace And and the idea essentially is that

0:48:29.360 --> 0:48:31.440
<v Speaker 1>anyone who comes to therapy is in one of two places.

0:48:31.440 --> 0:48:34.279
<v Speaker 1>They're either unsafe uncertain I don't know what to do,

0:48:34.880 --> 0:48:38.200
<v Speaker 1>or unsafe certain I'm bad, and I know I am.

0:48:38.200 --> 0:48:41.160
<v Speaker 1>And what they think they want is safe certainty. Tell

0:48:41.200 --> 0:48:43.880
<v Speaker 1>me what to do to fix it. You can see

0:48:43.880 --> 0:48:46.320
<v Speaker 1>this right, This is the subject story, the consumer story.

0:48:46.360 --> 0:48:49.359
<v Speaker 1>Both play in that space. By this or do this.

0:48:50.800 --> 0:48:53.680
<v Speaker 1>And what this guy says as safe uncertainty is about

0:48:53.800 --> 0:48:56.640
<v Speaker 1>holding the space, standing the side rather than in front

0:48:56.680 --> 0:49:00.640
<v Speaker 1>of and saying we don't know exactly what's gonna happen,

0:49:00.640 --> 0:49:02.440
<v Speaker 1>and I'm not going to pretend to you that we do.

0:49:03.400 --> 0:49:05.920
<v Speaker 1>It's a billion Grimsby didn't stand up and say, if

0:49:05.920 --> 0:49:07.879
<v Speaker 1>we go and pick the litter off one street, will

0:49:07.880 --> 0:49:10.480
<v Speaker 1>have solved Grimsby in full years time. We'll have will

0:49:10.520 --> 0:49:12.160
<v Speaker 1>have bought some house this and will be a social

0:49:12.239 --> 0:49:15.320
<v Speaker 1>landlord and will be we'll be breaking it down. He said,

0:49:16.160 --> 0:49:19.120
<v Speaker 1>there are some things we can do. Oh man, Yeah,

0:49:19.239 --> 0:49:23.200
<v Speaker 1>you're blowing my mind a bit, just connecting to the

0:49:23.280 --> 0:49:27.880
<v Speaker 1>consumer stories, infiltration of philanthropy and the need for returns

0:49:27.960 --> 0:49:33.200
<v Speaker 1>and business plans and projections and scale and people with

0:49:33.280 --> 0:49:37.080
<v Speaker 1>significant resources only funding things that can prove all these

0:49:37.120 --> 0:49:42.319
<v Speaker 1>other downstream effects. Whereas they would have ignored the guy

0:49:42.360 --> 0:49:44.920
<v Speaker 1>in Grimsby, Right, you don't have a plan, right, what

0:49:44.960 --> 0:49:46.680
<v Speaker 1>are you gonna show me. You're gonna show me your metrics,

0:49:46.760 --> 0:49:49.400
<v Speaker 1>show me. I need to just see your deck and

0:49:49.400 --> 0:49:52.200
<v Speaker 1>and the intention of just gathering, which we have pre

0:49:52.280 --> 0:49:55.239
<v Speaker 1>a Parker in this season as well, And so there's

0:49:55.239 --> 0:49:57.800
<v Speaker 1>a there's a beautiful overlap with some of these thoughts

0:49:57.840 --> 0:50:00.560
<v Speaker 1>to kind of find their way into a person who

0:50:00.600 --> 0:50:02.120
<v Speaker 1>was like, all right, I think I know how I

0:50:02.239 --> 0:50:06.120
<v Speaker 1>might start this. What do you think the world would

0:50:06.160 --> 0:50:09.880
<v Speaker 1>look like if we made the transition to living in

0:50:09.880 --> 0:50:13.000
<v Speaker 1>the citizens story? What would be practically different? What would

0:50:13.000 --> 0:50:16.000
<v Speaker 1>our experience feel like? I find this question kind of

0:50:16.040 --> 0:50:22.279
<v Speaker 1>hard because it's like, no, but I'm at a level

0:50:22.280 --> 0:50:24.760
<v Speaker 1>where I'm like, some of it is that I don't

0:50:24.800 --> 0:50:28.319
<v Speaker 1>think we exactly know. Are you practicing safe uncertainty with

0:50:28.440 --> 0:50:31.600
<v Speaker 1>you right now? Working on you? But but it is

0:50:31.640 --> 0:50:34.000
<v Speaker 1>like I'm kind of serious, right, Like a big part

0:50:34.040 --> 0:50:36.439
<v Speaker 1>of the joy of this whole thing is the act

0:50:36.480 --> 0:50:39.640
<v Speaker 1>of creating it. Yeah, I hear you on on truly

0:50:39.640 --> 0:50:43.840
<v Speaker 1>on the safe uncertainty, and you're also kind of practicing

0:50:43.840 --> 0:50:46.120
<v Speaker 1>what you just described, which is you're not overpromising a

0:50:46.160 --> 0:50:48.759
<v Speaker 1>specific outcome when I ask you that question. I have

0:50:49.040 --> 0:50:50.759
<v Speaker 1>one last question for you, and then we'll go to

0:50:50.800 --> 0:50:55.719
<v Speaker 1>our live, not in studio audience. We embrace citizen as

0:50:55.719 --> 0:50:59.359
<v Speaker 1>a verb here at how to Citizen. So you missed

0:50:59.360 --> 0:51:03.040
<v Speaker 1>the storyteller words Smith. If you are interpreting citizen as

0:51:03.040 --> 0:51:05.480
<v Speaker 1>a verb, how do you define it? What does it

0:51:05.480 --> 0:51:08.960
<v Speaker 1>mean to citizen? I mean I listened to your first

0:51:09.080 --> 0:51:13.600
<v Speaker 1>episodes Salary Core Eric Loue. Yeah, when I was like

0:51:13.880 --> 0:51:18.120
<v Speaker 1>writing the book, and honestly, I've been like fan boying.

0:51:19.440 --> 0:51:23.080
<v Speaker 1>But where I got to the way I do it

0:51:23.160 --> 0:51:25.600
<v Speaker 1>is I talk about because nouns are important to me

0:51:25.680 --> 0:51:28.520
<v Speaker 1>as well, because nouns become identity constructs. That's why it's

0:51:28.520 --> 0:51:32.279
<v Speaker 1>important to understand the consumer, not just the act of consumption.

0:51:33.680 --> 0:51:35.640
<v Speaker 1>But the way I talk about it is is I

0:51:35.719 --> 0:51:40.920
<v Speaker 1>make the distinction between citizenship of status, which has become consumerized.

0:51:40.920 --> 0:51:44.080
<v Speaker 1>It's become a product. Can buy it, You can buy

0:51:44.080 --> 0:51:49.640
<v Speaker 1>it the Golden visa versus citizenship is practice. And that's

0:51:49.680 --> 0:51:54.120
<v Speaker 1>basically you this stuff is this part right, like the

0:51:54.160 --> 0:52:02.200
<v Speaker 1>citizenship has practices is citizen's verb. Yeah, John Alexander, It's

0:52:02.200 --> 0:52:04.840
<v Speaker 1>been so good to see you in person here in

0:52:04.880 --> 0:52:09.880
<v Speaker 1>the same room. Um, welcome belatedly to Los Angeles. And

0:52:09.960 --> 0:52:12.319
<v Speaker 1>at this point I want to turn it over to

0:52:12.360 --> 0:52:15.480
<v Speaker 1>our guests to see what's on their minds. Let's see

0:52:16.160 --> 0:52:20.520
<v Speaker 1>what magic we might have been missing. Jens Innoviation, come

0:52:20.520 --> 0:52:24.799
<v Speaker 1>on down. This is Jennine from Philadelphia. John. You were

0:52:24.840 --> 0:52:27.759
<v Speaker 1>talking about your origin story more or lesson. You said

0:52:27.840 --> 0:52:30.480
<v Speaker 1>something like about two thousand and three and you said

0:52:31.239 --> 0:52:33.680
<v Speaker 1>how much noise it is to have to go through,

0:52:33.800 --> 0:52:35.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, three thousand ads to get your ad out.

0:52:36.000 --> 0:52:37.640
<v Speaker 1>And I was like, wow, I remember when we thought

0:52:37.640 --> 0:52:41.120
<v Speaker 1>two thousand and three was noisy. Imagine what you know?

0:52:41.120 --> 0:52:43.000
<v Speaker 1>What I mean? That was really quaint, Like that was

0:52:43.040 --> 0:52:47.160
<v Speaker 1>before Facebook really took over. So my question is, what

0:52:47.239 --> 0:52:50.239
<v Speaker 1>do you think as a storyteller, like a professional storyteller,

0:52:50.560 --> 0:52:52.839
<v Speaker 1>what do you see as the impact social media has

0:52:52.880 --> 0:52:56.200
<v Speaker 1>had on the relationship between all of us civilians like

0:52:56.600 --> 0:53:03.319
<v Speaker 1>public and storytelling meaning making? And I guess story choosing right,

0:53:03.360 --> 0:53:06.600
<v Speaker 1>because you're talking about our ability to choose our stories

0:53:06.640 --> 0:53:10.200
<v Speaker 1>and make stories and opts in and out. And I

0:53:10.320 --> 0:53:12.759
<v Speaker 1>just want you to reflect on what these technologies are

0:53:12.800 --> 0:53:17.759
<v Speaker 1>doing to that. The first thing I would say is

0:53:18.600 --> 0:53:21.399
<v Speaker 1>to your kind of charting back through time, I think

0:53:21.560 --> 0:53:26.759
<v Speaker 1>we also need to remember and what we thought the

0:53:26.760 --> 0:53:28.799
<v Speaker 1>promise of these things were so a good friend of

0:53:28.800 --> 0:53:31.400
<v Speaker 1>mine as woman called Amozine Khalifa, who you again should

0:53:31.400 --> 0:53:34.040
<v Speaker 1>have on here, and she was one of the organizers

0:53:34.040 --> 0:53:39.400
<v Speaker 1>of the Tennisian Revolution and using social media in beautiful

0:53:39.440 --> 0:53:42.959
<v Speaker 1>ways when we all thought Facebook was the answer, right,

0:53:43.680 --> 0:53:46.120
<v Speaker 1>And I think I do believe that social media have

0:53:46.360 --> 0:53:49.880
<v Speaker 1>that potential, and like I do see everything through the

0:53:49.960 --> 0:53:52.239
<v Speaker 1>lens of these stories, like and the way I would

0:53:52.280 --> 0:53:55.760
<v Speaker 1>frame it is that we build our technologies from within stories.

0:53:56.719 --> 0:53:59.760
<v Speaker 1>So when we build them from within a consumer story,

0:53:59.800 --> 0:54:02.680
<v Speaker 1>they then speak back to us as consumers Facebook and

0:54:02.960 --> 0:54:05.640
<v Speaker 1>Twitter and sort of like they're designed for us as consumers.

0:54:05.800 --> 0:54:08.200
<v Speaker 1>I think the most powerful analogy really is actually more

0:54:08.320 --> 0:54:10.920
<v Speaker 1>like what was originally called the sharing economy, right, like

0:54:10.960 --> 0:54:12.839
<v Speaker 1>the airbnb s and Ubers of this world, where we

0:54:12.840 --> 0:54:15.640
<v Speaker 1>were like, I mean, these were these were out just

0:54:15.680 --> 0:54:18.640
<v Speaker 1>forming when I was starting to really develop this language,

0:54:19.000 --> 0:54:20.400
<v Speaker 1>and I was like, maybe I don't need to do

0:54:20.440 --> 0:54:22.319
<v Speaker 1>this because like we're just going to share everything, And

0:54:22.360 --> 0:54:24.839
<v Speaker 1>like the whole dream was that every transaction would become

0:54:24.840 --> 0:54:27.680
<v Speaker 1>a relationship. But because they were built from within the

0:54:27.719 --> 0:54:30.560
<v Speaker 1>consumer story, what's actually happened is that every relationship becomes

0:54:30.560 --> 0:54:33.919
<v Speaker 1>a transaction. We just become consumers of each other. It's

0:54:33.960 --> 0:54:36.160
<v Speaker 1>the story that I would look to and maybe to

0:54:36.200 --> 0:54:40.879
<v Speaker 1>this thing about critical intervention points like Twitter right now

0:54:41.080 --> 0:54:45.359
<v Speaker 1>is super fascinating, right, like, what what might happen in

0:54:45.400 --> 0:54:47.879
<v Speaker 1>that space? Well, what what might master don become? Or

0:54:48.120 --> 0:54:51.000
<v Speaker 1>like if in this moment we can seize on the

0:54:51.080 --> 0:54:55.000
<v Speaker 1>collapse in that space and build something from within the

0:54:55.040 --> 0:54:59.040
<v Speaker 1>citizens story, maybe we could have genuinely social media. Absolutely,

0:54:59.280 --> 0:55:03.040
<v Speaker 1>I love that. I have too many thoughts on that myself,

0:55:03.160 --> 0:55:06.720
<v Speaker 1>Janine as well. They align largely with what you shared John.

0:55:07.120 --> 0:55:09.279
<v Speaker 1>What social media has done to us is turned the

0:55:09.280 --> 0:55:13.960
<v Speaker 1>consumer story up to eleven thousand, all right, and atomize

0:55:14.040 --> 0:55:16.440
<v Speaker 1>us and chop us up and sell us off for parts.

0:55:17.080 --> 0:55:21.439
<v Speaker 1>And so it's much much more violent than what we've

0:55:21.480 --> 0:55:26.520
<v Speaker 1>experienced with traditional media and advertising, etcetera. So let's go

0:55:26.640 --> 0:55:30.360
<v Speaker 1>to the next question we've got. Ray. I'm Ray Kennedy.

0:55:30.400 --> 0:55:33.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm here in the Cotchella Valley in southern California. Had

0:55:33.480 --> 0:55:36.680
<v Speaker 1>the pleasure of driving into l A last night to

0:55:36.800 --> 0:55:40.399
<v Speaker 1>see John at the book tour event and just wanted

0:55:40.400 --> 0:55:43.320
<v Speaker 1>to ask one of the things that that I remember

0:55:43.360 --> 0:55:46.880
<v Speaker 1>reading years ago, I think two thousand five it was,

0:55:47.600 --> 0:55:51.120
<v Speaker 1>is the book on the wisdom of crowds, and I

0:55:51.200 --> 0:55:55.120
<v Speaker 1>was wondering if that was something that had played a

0:55:55.280 --> 0:56:00.800
<v Speaker 1>role in your thinking as it evolved. Thank you, Ray.

0:56:01.160 --> 0:56:02.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm trying to think of a way to make a

0:56:02.680 --> 0:56:06.279
<v Speaker 1>longer answer than yes, you don't have to give this time.

0:56:07.200 --> 0:56:09.000
<v Speaker 1>Maybe I'll just say that, I mean it was off

0:56:09.000 --> 0:56:10.560
<v Speaker 1>the back of the wisdom of crowds actually that the

0:56:10.560 --> 0:56:14.360
<v Speaker 1>original concept of my farm developed because we were like, actually,

0:56:15.560 --> 0:56:18.640
<v Speaker 1>we might get different intelligences into the space. Maybe one

0:56:18.680 --> 0:56:21.560
<v Speaker 1>thing I will say on this, Actually, I think this

0:56:21.680 --> 0:56:25.480
<v Speaker 1>is where the corruption of voting is a really good

0:56:25.520 --> 0:56:29.439
<v Speaker 1>way to understand the corruption of voting. So voting, if

0:56:29.480 --> 0:56:34.440
<v Speaker 1>it's an act of collective intelligence, can be a decent methodology, right,

0:56:34.480 --> 0:56:36.760
<v Speaker 1>But to do that, we all have to be asking

0:56:36.920 --> 0:56:39.520
<v Speaker 1>the same collective question. This is one of the points

0:56:39.520 --> 0:56:42.759
<v Speaker 1>that Siriaki may makes in Wisdom of Crowds. Everyone has

0:56:42.800 --> 0:56:45.319
<v Speaker 1>to be asking what's the option here that's in the

0:56:45.320 --> 0:56:48.480
<v Speaker 1>best interest, in the best collective interest. But one of

0:56:48.480 --> 0:56:51.960
<v Speaker 1>the things that's happened through the consumerization of our politics

0:56:52.400 --> 0:56:54.720
<v Speaker 1>is that we're no longer all asking what's in our

0:56:54.760 --> 0:56:59.640
<v Speaker 1>collective interest. Instead, we're individually asking what's in my interest? Yeah,

0:57:00.080 --> 0:57:03.040
<v Speaker 1>the way we asked the question what question we ask?

0:57:03.200 --> 0:57:06.120
<v Speaker 1>And and also are our bots answering the questions are

0:57:06.120 --> 0:57:10.000
<v Speaker 1>they real humans? There was there was a simplicity to like,

0:57:10.239 --> 0:57:12.240
<v Speaker 1>just put it up for a crowd vote and that'll

0:57:12.280 --> 0:57:15.319
<v Speaker 1>solve it. And there was the process design was weak

0:57:15.360 --> 0:57:19.640
<v Speaker 1>when it came to defending against actors, information warfare, artists

0:57:19.840 --> 0:57:22.120
<v Speaker 1>and all of this that could corrupt such a such

0:57:22.160 --> 0:57:24.320
<v Speaker 1>a process. Thank you so much. Ready for that question,

0:57:24.520 --> 0:57:28.480
<v Speaker 1>Let's see, I'm going to ask this on behalf listeners.

0:57:28.480 --> 0:57:32.439
<v Speaker 1>Submitted question from Jonathan asked what do you think about

0:57:32.480 --> 0:57:37.120
<v Speaker 1>using behavioral economic insights to encourage citizen like behavior over

0:57:37.160 --> 0:57:40.720
<v Speaker 1>consumer like behavior? Can you use the master's tools to

0:57:40.840 --> 0:57:42.960
<v Speaker 1>free the enslaves? Can you use the tools of the

0:57:43.000 --> 0:57:48.040
<v Speaker 1>consumer story in service of a citizens story? Look? I

0:57:48.080 --> 0:57:52.240
<v Speaker 1>think using good design, using creativity, framing things carefully like

0:57:52.480 --> 0:57:56.240
<v Speaker 1>is all part of this. I do worry about the

0:57:56.240 --> 0:58:00.880
<v Speaker 1>phenomenon of notch M because I think the the underlying

0:58:00.960 --> 0:58:04.240
<v Speaker 1>premise of that so often is do you define that briefly?

0:58:04.840 --> 0:58:08.720
<v Speaker 1>Nudging is this idea that you sort of unconsciously prompts

0:58:08.760 --> 0:58:11.200
<v Speaker 1>someone to behave in a certain way, so you like

0:58:11.320 --> 0:58:13.840
<v Speaker 1>you get people to keep their towels in our hotel room,

0:58:13.880 --> 0:58:18.400
<v Speaker 1>because you say most people do that rather than appealing

0:58:18.440 --> 0:58:21.360
<v Speaker 1>to the kind of the moral argument which motivates fewer people.

0:58:21.400 --> 0:58:25.880
<v Speaker 1>So you're like and like that there's nothing inherently wrong

0:58:25.920 --> 0:58:28.040
<v Speaker 1>with that. The My worry, though, is there's two things.

0:58:28.120 --> 0:58:31.800
<v Speaker 1>The first is that we underappreciate what's actually kind of

0:58:31.840 --> 0:58:34.880
<v Speaker 1>the biggest nudge in history, which is the fact that

0:58:34.920 --> 0:58:37.880
<v Speaker 1>we've got this story three thousand times a day plus

0:58:37.960 --> 0:58:41.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean, to Janine's question, the latest estimates or anything

0:58:41.200 --> 0:58:44.200
<v Speaker 1>up to ten thousand times a day for certain cohorts,

0:58:44.760 --> 0:58:48.680
<v Speaker 1>and so that's behavior economics right there, right. The other

0:58:48.720 --> 0:58:52.320
<v Speaker 1>thing is that I think what results from that, and

0:58:52.480 --> 0:58:56.240
<v Speaker 1>so often these approaches come from here, is you're actually, um,

0:58:57.080 --> 0:59:00.640
<v Speaker 1>some people call it sustainability by stealth, m right, okay,

0:59:00.680 --> 0:59:03.840
<v Speaker 1>And it's like tricking people into doing the greener thing, essentially,

0:59:03.840 --> 0:59:07.160
<v Speaker 1>because that's the only way we can possibly imagine trust them,

0:59:07.560 --> 0:59:10.760
<v Speaker 1>right to just do the better thing for our collective self.

0:59:11.240 --> 0:59:13.520
<v Speaker 1>And in a way it's like, because I think the

0:59:13.560 --> 0:59:16.400
<v Speaker 1>towels thing is kind of interesting, right, because when you

0:59:16.480 --> 0:59:19.920
<v Speaker 1>see that as a kind of grand victory, you're starting

0:59:19.960 --> 0:59:22.720
<v Speaker 1>so far down the down the futureain because you're not

0:59:22.760 --> 0:59:25.200
<v Speaker 1>sharing the big question that goes, how might we like,

0:59:25.640 --> 0:59:28.000
<v Speaker 1>how might we make our society is sustainable? How might

0:59:28.040 --> 0:59:31.480
<v Speaker 1>we make this city regenerative? Like if you hold that

0:59:31.600 --> 0:59:33.760
<v Speaker 1>question this question we were talking I was talking about

0:59:33.760 --> 0:59:36.600
<v Speaker 1>with Wellington City Council in New Zealand, how might Wellington

0:59:36.720 --> 0:59:40.640
<v Speaker 1>become the first regenerative city in the world. Oh, that's

0:59:40.640 --> 0:59:44.240
<v Speaker 1>a great question. Requires a lot of people, right, rather

0:59:44.320 --> 0:59:47.880
<v Speaker 1>than like, Okay, we need to decrease the water footprint

0:59:47.920 --> 0:59:51.200
<v Speaker 1>of Wellington's hotels, like let's this percentage point with this

0:59:51.280 --> 0:59:53.680
<v Speaker 1>little nuge. So I don't want to be too like

0:59:53.760 --> 0:59:56.880
<v Speaker 1>black and white about it, like I but there's there's

0:59:56.880 --> 0:59:59.120
<v Speaker 1>no answer to an I think it is. There's I

0:59:59.200 --> 1:00:02.720
<v Speaker 1>have a temptation often of you know, we're at war

1:00:03.720 --> 1:00:07.400
<v Speaker 1>and the other side is deploying all of these advanced weapons,

1:00:08.080 --> 1:00:11.760
<v Speaker 1>and are we gonna unilaterally disarmed? Right? So I'm already

1:00:11.800 --> 1:00:14.840
<v Speaker 1>choosing the language of combat and war. But it sometimes

1:00:14.880 --> 1:00:17.800
<v Speaker 1>feels like that truly, And so are we being naive

1:00:18.720 --> 1:00:21.000
<v Speaker 1>in saying, well, no, we'll just we'll just tell people

1:00:21.000 --> 1:00:23.360
<v Speaker 1>the truth and they'll figure it out. When they're being

1:00:23.480 --> 1:00:25.880
<v Speaker 1>lied to ten thousand times a day. Is that a

1:00:25.920 --> 1:00:28.960
<v Speaker 1>fair way to show up to a battle for a

1:00:29.040 --> 1:00:32.480
<v Speaker 1>home planet that we could all live on, or justice

1:00:32.600 --> 1:00:35.440
<v Speaker 1>and access to resources for many people who've never had

1:00:35.480 --> 1:00:37.800
<v Speaker 1>it before. I don't think there's a simple answer to it.

1:00:37.800 --> 1:00:39.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm pretty sure a war metaphor isn't gonna get us

1:00:40.120 --> 1:00:44.160
<v Speaker 1>to peace sustainably. But there's also a reality check on

1:00:45.280 --> 1:00:50.120
<v Speaker 1>what tools, what time, for what duration and being cleared

1:00:50.200 --> 1:00:52.880
<v Speaker 1>with here's I'm spending more time on us than I intended,

1:00:52.920 --> 1:00:56.040
<v Speaker 1>but I think it's just so fascinating. What rubs me

1:00:56.200 --> 1:00:59.160
<v Speaker 1>mostly the wrong way is the lack of transparency when

1:00:59.200 --> 1:01:02.400
<v Speaker 1>these techniques are used on and I find out later

1:01:02.960 --> 1:01:05.120
<v Speaker 1>and that we can trust even more, right, I'm like, oh,

1:01:05.120 --> 1:01:08.400
<v Speaker 1>so I'm a subject to your experiment and you couldn't

1:01:08.440 --> 1:01:12.760
<v Speaker 1>just tell me why and how and still give me incentives.

1:01:12.800 --> 1:01:17.880
<v Speaker 1>Incentives are fine, but the manipulation without consents or transparency,

1:01:18.120 --> 1:01:20.920
<v Speaker 1>that feels like a real problem. That's really interesting. And

1:01:21.040 --> 1:01:24.360
<v Speaker 1>it's like, and then what we're validating, right, and if

1:01:24.400 --> 1:01:28.160
<v Speaker 1>we're becoming, if we're becoming the thing, then we're just

1:01:29.000 --> 1:01:32.640
<v Speaker 1>now we're citizen washing right, all right? We have Martha

1:01:32.680 --> 1:01:35.439
<v Speaker 1>Toray with our last question, and if we have time left.

1:01:35.520 --> 1:01:40.040
<v Speaker 1>Some closing remarks. Hello Martha, Thank you very kindly, John Alexander,

1:01:40.160 --> 1:01:45.120
<v Speaker 1>this has been most thought provoking. I think we're in

1:01:45.160 --> 1:01:48.440
<v Speaker 1>a situation which is comparable to the end of the

1:01:48.480 --> 1:01:53.960
<v Speaker 1>Bronze Age. We are, in many ways really at mercy

1:01:54.000 --> 1:02:00.000
<v Speaker 1>of individuals, authorities, and etcetera, over which we have no power,

1:02:00.000 --> 1:02:04.640
<v Speaker 1>are and with whom we have no community. And it

1:02:04.760 --> 1:02:10.440
<v Speaker 1>strikes me as crucial that we developed community with the

1:02:10.520 --> 1:02:15.560
<v Speaker 1>people on whom we depend thoughts. Thank you so much,

1:02:15.600 --> 1:02:19.680
<v Speaker 1>Martha Joan. I think like I hear a lot of

1:02:19.720 --> 1:02:23.560
<v Speaker 1>what you're bringing to this in the sense that we're

1:02:23.600 --> 1:02:26.120
<v Speaker 1>in it now right, Like these challenges are not things

1:02:25.920 --> 1:02:30.400
<v Speaker 1>that scenarial planning exercise for a distant, possibly dystopic future.

1:02:30.440 --> 1:02:34.280
<v Speaker 1>There's thirty three million people displaced in Pakistan, there's bushfires

1:02:34.320 --> 1:02:39.040
<v Speaker 1>and wildfires, and like it's we're in it, and the

1:02:39.120 --> 1:02:44.280
<v Speaker 1>likelihood is that there are some collapses. That said, I

1:02:44.320 --> 1:02:49.920
<v Speaker 1>am also like there's a lovely Bioka Malafe, amazing Nigerian

1:02:49.920 --> 1:02:54.320
<v Speaker 1>philosopher says a couple of remarkable things, well, many remarkable things,

1:02:54.360 --> 1:02:55.960
<v Speaker 1>but one of them is times are urgent. We must

1:02:56.000 --> 1:02:59.960
<v Speaker 1>slow down. Some of this work is like, let us

1:03:00.080 --> 1:03:02.240
<v Speaker 1>take the opportunity to come together, because if we rush,

1:03:02.320 --> 1:03:05.360
<v Speaker 1>that is precisely what will force us into the into

1:03:05.400 --> 1:03:09.040
<v Speaker 1>the arms of the subject story again. And maybe in

1:03:09.080 --> 1:03:12.840
<v Speaker 1>that light, I'll put forward my my preferred historical analogy,

1:03:12.880 --> 1:03:15.960
<v Speaker 1>which is the aftermath of World War Two, which was

1:03:16.000 --> 1:03:20.680
<v Speaker 1>a moment of incredible institutional innovation. Like you think what

1:03:20.760 --> 1:03:23.360
<v Speaker 1>was created in those years, right, the u N and

1:03:23.400 --> 1:03:26.400
<v Speaker 1>the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the European colon steel

1:03:26.440 --> 1:03:28.600
<v Speaker 1>community that became the EU, the i m F and

1:03:28.640 --> 1:03:31.480
<v Speaker 1>the World Bank in the UK, the National Health Service

1:03:31.560 --> 1:03:34.320
<v Speaker 1>like and all of it really from within the consumer story,

1:03:34.360 --> 1:03:36.560
<v Speaker 1>all with the best intentions, but all with this frame

1:03:36.600 --> 1:03:39.280
<v Speaker 1>of service and with the idea that that trade brings peace.

1:03:39.360 --> 1:03:41.960
<v Speaker 1>And that's because we are consumers and so if we

1:03:42.400 --> 1:03:45.160
<v Speaker 1>fulfill our kind of material needs, then we won't fight.

1:03:47.280 --> 1:03:49.640
<v Speaker 1>In this moment in time that we need an institutional

1:03:49.680 --> 1:03:52.040
<v Speaker 1>innovation on the same scale. But what we need is

1:03:52.080 --> 1:03:55.960
<v Speaker 1>it to be the ideas and energy and resources of everyone, right,

1:03:55.960 --> 1:03:57.960
<v Speaker 1>like we we need to run those processes in a

1:03:57.960 --> 1:04:01.680
<v Speaker 1>way that genuinely taps into all the wids that um

1:04:01.680 --> 1:04:04.800
<v Speaker 1>and probably frankly, the people who looking sound like me

1:04:05.600 --> 1:04:08.360
<v Speaker 1>getting quite seriously out of the way of that and

1:04:08.400 --> 1:04:12.480
<v Speaker 1>if anything, helping hold the space rather than dominating that space.

1:04:13.200 --> 1:04:15.840
<v Speaker 1>And that I think is totally possible, and I think

1:04:15.880 --> 1:04:18.800
<v Speaker 1>it can still be in time. That we need a

1:04:18.840 --> 1:04:21.720
<v Speaker 1>new universal dectoration, we need new institutions of our scale,

1:04:21.760 --> 1:04:25.160
<v Speaker 1>but we need to do it really differently. The good news,

1:04:25.200 --> 1:04:27.880
<v Speaker 1>I think is that we can only do it really

1:04:27.880 --> 1:04:32.800
<v Speaker 1>differently now there's no going back. John. Thank you for

1:04:32.920 --> 1:04:37.200
<v Speaker 1>doing this podcast with me live in person with our

1:04:37.320 --> 1:04:40.760
<v Speaker 1>virtual audience, and so appreciate everything you're up to. Thank you,

1:04:40.800 --> 1:04:48.040
<v Speaker 1>my friend. It's been great to be here. There's so

1:04:48.120 --> 1:04:50.760
<v Speaker 1>much that we've built in our society that is about

1:04:50.800 --> 1:04:57.080
<v Speaker 1>empowering the individual to essentially live alone. We've got automated

1:04:57.160 --> 1:05:02.160
<v Speaker 1>voice assistance across every device, enough delivery and service apps

1:05:02.200 --> 1:05:06.160
<v Speaker 1>to never leave our homes, and so many TV shows

1:05:06.200 --> 1:05:10.800
<v Speaker 1>and podcast that we can just observe conversations instead of

1:05:10.880 --> 1:05:14.440
<v Speaker 1>having them. Now, for the record, this podcast is obviously

1:05:14.520 --> 1:05:17.200
<v Speaker 1>part of the solution, not the problem. But you get

1:05:17.280 --> 1:05:22.960
<v Speaker 1>my drift. We're supposed to be these rugged, individualistic armies

1:05:23.000 --> 1:05:28.200
<v Speaker 1>of one and for what who benefits from that? Who

1:05:28.240 --> 1:05:31.480
<v Speaker 1>benefits from us feeling alone and trying to satisfy that

1:05:31.600 --> 1:05:37.480
<v Speaker 1>loneliness with purchases. It's those who profit from the consumer story.

1:05:38.920 --> 1:05:43.200
<v Speaker 1>And listen, I don't see all advertising as evil. Some

1:05:43.240 --> 1:05:46.720
<v Speaker 1>of my best friends work in advertising. I'm just saying,

1:05:46.840 --> 1:05:50.240
<v Speaker 1>like I think, if we were hit with thousands of

1:05:50.320 --> 1:05:54.280
<v Speaker 1>messages a day telling us we are citizens, agents of

1:05:54.280 --> 1:05:57.160
<v Speaker 1>our own future, members of a collective who have the

1:05:57.200 --> 1:06:01.120
<v Speaker 1>power to shape our communities through collaboration, instead of messages

1:06:01.160 --> 1:06:04.200
<v Speaker 1>telling us to buy ship all the time, I just

1:06:04.240 --> 1:06:15.120
<v Speaker 1>think we'd live in a better world. And now it's

1:06:15.160 --> 1:06:19.920
<v Speaker 1>time for some actions. We've grouped these into three categories. First,

1:06:20.680 --> 1:06:23.880
<v Speaker 1>try this as an internal reflection. You can do this

1:06:24.240 --> 1:06:29.200
<v Speaker 1>all by yourself. Think about the three stories, subject, consumer,

1:06:29.440 --> 1:06:32.960
<v Speaker 1>and citizen. Where do those stories show up in your life?

1:06:33.480 --> 1:06:37.040
<v Speaker 1>Maybe you're a subject with your parents, or a consumer

1:06:37.240 --> 1:06:41.919
<v Speaker 1>in your neighborhood in what spaces, communities or realms all

1:06:42.000 --> 1:06:45.560
<v Speaker 1>of the word realms? In what spaces? Are you already

1:06:45.640 --> 1:06:49.000
<v Speaker 1>living the citizens story? Where else could you show up

1:06:49.040 --> 1:06:53.880
<v Speaker 1>that way? Second, become more informed by reading about John's

1:06:53.920 --> 1:06:57.560
<v Speaker 1>citizen work. Yes you should read his book, but a

1:06:57.560 --> 1:07:00.240
<v Speaker 1>shorter way in is the BBC Future Art of Cool

1:07:00.600 --> 1:07:03.800
<v Speaker 1>Citizen Future. Why we need a new Story of self

1:07:03.840 --> 1:07:08.600
<v Speaker 1>and society. Also, just visit the New Citizenship Project online.

1:07:09.000 --> 1:07:11.720
<v Speaker 1>They've got a number of resources to help you or

1:07:11.800 --> 1:07:15.640
<v Speaker 1>your organization shift into that citizens story. We've linked to

1:07:15.680 --> 1:07:20.000
<v Speaker 1>both in the show notes. Finally, here's something you can

1:07:20.040 --> 1:07:24.040
<v Speaker 1>do to publicly participate. I keep thinking about John's question,

1:07:24.840 --> 1:07:26.440
<v Speaker 1>what are you trying to do in the world that's

1:07:26.520 --> 1:07:30.040
<v Speaker 1>so big you actually need other people to do it

1:07:30.080 --> 1:07:33.280
<v Speaker 1>with you? So I want you to think of something

1:07:33.560 --> 1:07:37.160
<v Speaker 1>like that. It can actually be small. It just has

1:07:37.200 --> 1:07:39.840
<v Speaker 1>to be too big for you to do alone, because

1:07:39.880 --> 1:07:43.440
<v Speaker 1>we're done doing things alone. Maybe it's fixing defense around

1:07:43.480 --> 1:07:47.440
<v Speaker 1>your yard, organizing a fundraiser at your school, or envisioning

1:07:47.440 --> 1:07:50.360
<v Speaker 1>a future for your company. Ask someone to help you

1:07:50.400 --> 1:07:52.920
<v Speaker 1>do it now. I know some of us have a

1:07:53.040 --> 1:07:56.240
<v Speaker 1>harder time asking for help than others, so I also

1:07:56.320 --> 1:07:59.600
<v Speaker 1>want you to offer help to someone you're connected to.

1:08:00.160 --> 1:08:03.080
<v Speaker 1>Just ask them, is there something you're trying to do

1:08:03.400 --> 1:08:06.680
<v Speaker 1>that I can help you with. I promise you'll feel

1:08:06.680 --> 1:08:10.200
<v Speaker 1>better and you'll make your community better. If you take

1:08:10.360 --> 1:08:13.560
<v Speaker 1>any of these actions, please brag about it online and

1:08:13.680 --> 1:08:17.800
<v Speaker 1>use the hashtag how to citizen. Also tag our Instagram

1:08:17.840 --> 1:08:20.880
<v Speaker 1>how do citizen? I am always online and I really

1:08:20.880 --> 1:08:23.519
<v Speaker 1>do see your messages, so send them. You can also

1:08:23.600 --> 1:08:26.599
<v Speaker 1>visit our website How the Citizen dot Com, which has

1:08:26.680 --> 1:08:31.559
<v Speaker 1>all of our shows, full transcripts, actions and more. Finally,

1:08:31.840 --> 1:08:35.280
<v Speaker 1>see this episode show notes for resources, actions and more

1:08:35.320 --> 1:08:38.800
<v Speaker 1>ways to connect. How Do Citizen with barrettune Day is

1:08:38.800 --> 1:08:42.400
<v Speaker 1>a production of I Heart Radio Podcasts and row Home Productions.

1:08:42.880 --> 1:08:47.639
<v Speaker 1>Our executive producers are Me, barrettun Day, Thurston and Elizabeth Stewart.

1:08:48.120 --> 1:08:51.920
<v Speaker 1>Our leave producer is Ali Graham. Our associate producer is

1:08:52.000 --> 1:08:57.200
<v Speaker 1>Donia abdel Hamid. Alex Lewis is our managing producer, and

1:08:57.320 --> 1:09:01.320
<v Speaker 1>John Myers is our executive editor. Our mixed engineer is

1:09:01.400 --> 1:09:07.120
<v Speaker 1>Justin Burger. Our audience Engagement Fellow is Jasmine Lewis. Special

1:09:07.120 --> 1:09:09.760
<v Speaker 1>thanks to Joel Smith from My Heart Radio and lay

1:09:09.840 --> 1:09:19.680
<v Speaker 1>La Being John is pushing the bounds of how we

1:09:19.720 --> 1:09:23.080
<v Speaker 1>can practice democracy if we live in the citizens story.

1:09:23.720 --> 1:09:27.200
<v Speaker 1>But even within the existing boundaries and models, we can

1:09:27.240 --> 1:09:32.799
<v Speaker 1>do more. So we're going to talk about voting, Yeah, voting.

1:09:32.840 --> 1:09:37.360
<v Speaker 1>How do we take this often uninspired, tedious practice and

1:09:37.400 --> 1:09:41.360
<v Speaker 1>infuse it with a sense of community and culture. Fear

1:09:41.560 --> 1:09:45.240
<v Speaker 1>is a powerful motivator. Anger is a powerful motivator. The

1:09:45.280 --> 1:09:48.439
<v Speaker 1>problem is that it is not sustainable that people burn

1:09:48.520 --> 1:09:52.840
<v Speaker 1>out and tune out, and what I'm proposing is much

1:09:52.880 --> 1:09:56.679
<v Speaker 1>more sustainable. I say that joy is a renewable resource

1:09:56.720 --> 1:09:59.519
<v Speaker 1>that we can continue to tap back into. That people

1:09:59.600 --> 1:10:01.479
<v Speaker 1>want to come and hang out with us, they want

1:10:01.520 --> 1:10:03.720
<v Speaker 1>to come and volunteer with us, they want to come

1:10:03.720 --> 1:10:07.800
<v Speaker 1>and donate to our efforts because there's a nine ft

1:10:08.560 --> 1:10:13.479
<v Speaker 1>person walking around and like singing show tunes, keeping voters

1:10:13.680 --> 1:10:19.080
<v Speaker 1>entertained um and keeping people's spirits high. Next episode, we

1:10:19.160 --> 1:10:34.600
<v Speaker 1>do just that with in Sea Row Home Productions