1 00:00:00,760 --> 00:00:03,680 Speaker 1: Hey, guys, ready or not, twenty twenty four is here 2 00:00:03,840 --> 00:00:06,320 Speaker 1: and we here at breaking points, are already thinking of 3 00:00:06,360 --> 00:00:08,600 Speaker 1: ways we can up our game for this critical election. 4 00:00:08,800 --> 00:00:11,719 Speaker 2: We rely on our premium subs to expand coverage, upgrade 5 00:00:11,720 --> 00:00:15,720 Speaker 2: the studio ad staff give you, guys, the best independent. 6 00:00:15,120 --> 00:00:16,239 Speaker 3: Coverage that is possible. 7 00:00:16,280 --> 00:00:18,279 Speaker 2: If you like what we're all about, it just means 8 00:00:18,320 --> 00:00:20,080 Speaker 2: the absolute world to have your support. 9 00:00:20,160 --> 00:00:21,840 Speaker 3: But enough with that, let's get to the show. 10 00:00:28,360 --> 00:00:31,320 Speaker 2: Good morning, everybody, Happy Thursday. We have an amazing show 11 00:00:31,360 --> 00:00:32,040 Speaker 2: for everybody today. 12 00:00:32,040 --> 00:00:34,159 Speaker 1: What do we have Crystal, Indeed, we do lots of 13 00:00:34,240 --> 00:00:37,800 Speaker 1: breaking news to cover This morning. South Africa presented their 14 00:00:37,840 --> 00:00:40,560 Speaker 1: case at the ICJ at the Hegue, so we break 15 00:00:40,600 --> 00:00:42,720 Speaker 1: that down for you. This comes as the hoofies have 16 00:00:42,800 --> 00:00:46,520 Speaker 1: stepped up their attacks, leading to a very dangerous situation 17 00:00:46,640 --> 00:00:49,639 Speaker 1: in the Middle East. We had a debate last night 18 00:00:49,800 --> 00:00:51,960 Speaker 1: between Rond de Santis and Nikki Haley. 19 00:00:52,120 --> 00:00:54,680 Speaker 4: We also had a Trump town hall. We have all 20 00:00:54,720 --> 00:00:55,000 Speaker 4: of the. 21 00:00:55,600 --> 00:00:59,600 Speaker 1: Highlight, oh highlight light out of those interactions. 22 00:00:59,640 --> 00:01:00,279 Speaker 4: What is it mean? 23 00:01:00,360 --> 00:01:03,319 Speaker 1: And of course Saga covered this yesterday. Chris Christy has 24 00:01:03,320 --> 00:01:06,360 Speaker 1: now dropped out of the race that could actually have 25 00:01:06,440 --> 00:01:08,679 Speaker 1: some significant impacts in New Hampshire, so we'll talk about 26 00:01:08,720 --> 00:01:12,119 Speaker 1: that as well. There are some significant developments in numerous 27 00:01:12,240 --> 00:01:15,240 Speaker 1: Trump legal cases, some cutting in his direction, some cutting 28 00:01:15,240 --> 00:01:17,440 Speaker 1: against him. We will break those down for you. Hunter 29 00:01:17,480 --> 00:01:21,640 Speaker 1: Biden made a big surprise visit to Capitol Hill and 30 00:01:21,720 --> 00:01:25,200 Speaker 1: it led to some very interesting fireworks. We'll tell you 31 00:01:25,200 --> 00:01:27,319 Speaker 1: about that. Sager is taking a look at how Ron 32 00:01:27,319 --> 00:01:30,400 Speaker 1: DeSantis invented affirmative action for Jewish people. 33 00:01:30,480 --> 00:01:31,800 Speaker 3: Yeah, oh wow. Interesting. 34 00:01:31,840 --> 00:01:32,720 Speaker 4: A lot to us there. 35 00:01:32,760 --> 00:01:35,600 Speaker 1: And I'm taking a look at some new reports revealing 36 00:01:35,880 --> 00:01:40,000 Speaker 1: just stunning bias in media coverage of Israel and Palestine. 37 00:01:40,040 --> 00:01:41,080 Speaker 4: So a lot to get to you this morning. 38 00:01:41,160 --> 00:01:43,280 Speaker 2: Yeah, I'm really excited for all of that, especially at 39 00:01:43,280 --> 00:01:44,440 Speaker 2: two monologues back in the show. 40 00:01:44,480 --> 00:01:45,199 Speaker 3: So that's very fun. 41 00:01:45,280 --> 00:01:47,000 Speaker 2: That's a reminder, by the way, a while you can 42 00:01:47,040 --> 00:01:49,360 Speaker 2: sign up Breakingpoints dot com to become a premium member. 43 00:01:49,360 --> 00:01:52,400 Speaker 2: We're currently soliciting premium member questions for our RFAJU and 44 00:01:52,440 --> 00:01:55,200 Speaker 2: your focus group. It will be taking place tomorrow on 45 00:01:55,280 --> 00:01:58,160 Speaker 2: the ground in Detroit. Our entire team will be there, 46 00:01:58,200 --> 00:02:00,200 Speaker 2: so we've got a great number of people that we'll 47 00:02:00,200 --> 00:02:02,120 Speaker 2: be voting for RFK Junior. We want to hear from 48 00:02:02,120 --> 00:02:04,320 Speaker 2: them what do you guys want, like, what are you 49 00:02:04,440 --> 00:02:07,440 Speaker 2: looking for? Why do you support RFK? How strong is 50 00:02:07,480 --> 00:02:10,840 Speaker 2: your support? To our knowledge, the first focus group really 51 00:02:10,840 --> 00:02:14,400 Speaker 2: of its kind by a media organization, to be fair. 52 00:02:14,520 --> 00:02:16,680 Speaker 2: So if you can help us out support work like 53 00:02:16,720 --> 00:02:18,280 Speaker 2: that and a lot of other big plans we have 54 00:02:18,320 --> 00:02:20,520 Speaker 2: for the election season, you can sign up right now 55 00:02:20,560 --> 00:02:21,880 Speaker 2: Breakingpoints dot com. 56 00:02:21,919 --> 00:02:24,200 Speaker 1: So, whether you know it or not, CNN hosted a 57 00:02:24,240 --> 00:02:28,239 Speaker 1: debate last night between Republican presidential contenders Nicki Haley and 58 00:02:28,400 --> 00:02:31,600 Speaker 1: Ron DeSantis. Came right after Chris Christy had actually dropped 59 00:02:31,600 --> 00:02:33,280 Speaker 1: out of the race, which is very interesting. He didn't 60 00:02:33,240 --> 00:02:35,280 Speaker 1: make the debate stage anyway, so it's not like he 61 00:02:35,280 --> 00:02:37,960 Speaker 1: would have been there, but has obviously changed the dynamics 62 00:02:38,000 --> 00:02:40,480 Speaker 1: of the race. I took a look at some of 63 00:02:40,520 --> 00:02:44,840 Speaker 1: the quote unquote highlights from the night. You know, the 64 00:02:45,280 --> 00:02:47,320 Speaker 1: big story here is, of course Trump is not on 65 00:02:47,360 --> 00:02:53,200 Speaker 1: the stage. He is overwhelmingly leading the Republican presidential nomination contest, 66 00:02:53,639 --> 00:02:56,799 Speaker 1: and so at the beginning of the debate, both Ron 67 00:02:56,919 --> 00:03:00,320 Speaker 1: and Nicki made some nod towards the fact that Trump 68 00:03:00,440 --> 00:03:03,600 Speaker 1: was not there and attempted to attack him, but most 69 00:03:03,639 --> 00:03:06,440 Speaker 1: of the time they just spent going after each other 70 00:03:06,480 --> 00:03:09,240 Speaker 1: in an aggressive manner. So let's take a listen to 71 00:03:09,360 --> 00:03:11,120 Speaker 1: a little bit of their attacks on Trump and then 72 00:03:11,160 --> 00:03:12,639 Speaker 1: how they were going at one another. 73 00:03:12,919 --> 00:03:15,240 Speaker 5: I wish Donald Trump was up here on this stage. 74 00:03:15,280 --> 00:03:17,320 Speaker 5: He's the one that I'm running against. He's the one 75 00:03:17,320 --> 00:03:19,480 Speaker 5: that I wish would be here. He needs to be 76 00:03:19,520 --> 00:03:22,840 Speaker 5: defending his record right now. He's not defending the fact 77 00:03:23,160 --> 00:03:26,000 Speaker 5: that he allowed us to have eight trillion dollars in 78 00:03:26,080 --> 00:03:28,440 Speaker 5: debt over four years, that our kids are never going 79 00:03:28,520 --> 00:03:30,960 Speaker 5: to forgive us. For the fact that he didn't deal 80 00:03:31,000 --> 00:03:33,640 Speaker 5: with China when it came to stealing intellectual property, the 81 00:03:33,680 --> 00:03:36,520 Speaker 5: fact that they gave us COVID, the fact that they've 82 00:03:36,520 --> 00:03:39,400 Speaker 5: gone and continue to put up Chinese police stations and 83 00:03:39,440 --> 00:03:42,440 Speaker 5: continue to threaten our military. He didn't do enough to 84 00:03:42,480 --> 00:03:44,520 Speaker 5: make sure that we were really standing with our. 85 00:03:44,400 --> 00:03:45,080 Speaker 4: Friends and doing that. 86 00:03:45,200 --> 00:03:46,440 Speaker 6: He said he was going to build a wall and 87 00:03:46,440 --> 00:03:48,600 Speaker 6: have Mexico pay for it. He did not deliver that. 88 00:03:48,720 --> 00:03:50,640 Speaker 6: He said he was going to drain the swamp. He 89 00:03:50,640 --> 00:03:52,040 Speaker 6: did not deliver that. He said he was going to 90 00:03:52,080 --> 00:03:54,720 Speaker 6: hold Hillary accountable, and he let her off the hook. 91 00:03:54,720 --> 00:03:56,760 Speaker 6: He said he was going to eliminate the debt, and 92 00:03:56,800 --> 00:03:59,160 Speaker 6: he added seven point eight trillion dollars to the debt. 93 00:03:59,400 --> 00:04:01,480 Speaker 6: So we need to deliver and get this stuff done. 94 00:04:01,520 --> 00:04:03,480 Speaker 6: And I think the difference and we need to go. 95 00:04:03,560 --> 00:04:07,440 Speaker 5: Back to the basics and education, so we get back problem. 96 00:04:07,040 --> 00:04:10,680 Speaker 6: Though that word salad is the problem. She's always supported 97 00:04:10,720 --> 00:04:14,200 Speaker 6: school choice and she failed to deliver. She blames other people. 98 00:04:14,480 --> 00:04:19,120 Speaker 6: Leadership is about getting things done, stop making it. 99 00:04:21,320 --> 00:04:23,880 Speaker 5: If leadership is about getting things done, how did you 100 00:04:23,920 --> 00:04:26,360 Speaker 5: blow through one hundred and fifty million dollars in your 101 00:04:26,440 --> 00:04:28,080 Speaker 5: campaign and you were down in the polls. 102 00:04:28,200 --> 00:04:28,919 Speaker 3: So here here's. 103 00:04:30,360 --> 00:04:30,520 Speaker 7: Now. 104 00:04:30,520 --> 00:04:32,680 Speaker 6: I'm going to say, it's very instructive about what. 105 00:04:34,760 --> 00:04:37,000 Speaker 3: I think I have the political. 106 00:04:38,080 --> 00:04:40,280 Speaker 6: That's important. 107 00:04:40,720 --> 00:04:44,919 Speaker 3: Education what is more important? Here she's saying something go 108 00:04:46,360 --> 00:04:47,960 Speaker 3: it's Governor Hale, is time go ahead. 109 00:04:48,120 --> 00:04:50,200 Speaker 4: I think I hit a nerve. So I mean that 110 00:04:50,320 --> 00:04:52,000 Speaker 4: was basically the dynamic all night. 111 00:04:52,080 --> 00:04:54,599 Speaker 1: It was a lot of like they get into it 112 00:04:54,640 --> 00:04:57,479 Speaker 1: with each other on these little like parts of their 113 00:04:57,520 --> 00:05:00,440 Speaker 1: record that people aren't even particularly familiar with, and you're 114 00:05:00,480 --> 00:05:03,000 Speaker 1: just asking yourself the whole time, like what are we have. 115 00:05:03,000 --> 00:05:03,720 Speaker 4: Him doing here? 116 00:05:04,080 --> 00:05:07,080 Speaker 1: You're going mercilessly at each other for the honor of 117 00:05:07,120 --> 00:05:09,720 Speaker 1: being in second place, Like what is going on and 118 00:05:09,880 --> 00:05:11,320 Speaker 1: will I mean, I will say, in terms of the 119 00:05:11,320 --> 00:05:15,160 Speaker 1: blows that were landed, I think Nicky's attack on Ron 120 00:05:15,200 --> 00:05:17,799 Speaker 1: of basically like you're a loser. You spent one hundred 121 00:05:17,800 --> 00:05:20,120 Speaker 1: and fifty million dollars and you've done nothing but tank 122 00:05:20,200 --> 00:05:23,400 Speaker 1: in the polls is probably the most effective attack at 123 00:05:23,440 --> 00:05:23,760 Speaker 1: this point. 124 00:05:23,760 --> 00:05:25,760 Speaker 3: And the only reason is because it's not about you. 125 00:05:26,000 --> 00:05:30,240 Speaker 2: When twenty ten spent twelve dollars at a Chinese restaurant, 126 00:05:30,279 --> 00:05:31,680 Speaker 2: it's like, it's there was. 127 00:05:31,720 --> 00:05:34,200 Speaker 1: A lengthy discussion of a like two thousand and nine 128 00:05:34,279 --> 00:05:35,000 Speaker 1: bathroom bill. 129 00:05:35,120 --> 00:05:35,960 Speaker 3: I don't know, I'll stop. 130 00:05:36,000 --> 00:05:36,400 Speaker 8: Yeah, all right. 131 00:05:36,520 --> 00:05:39,360 Speaker 2: So what this is about is he's tainted and he 132 00:05:39,440 --> 00:05:41,560 Speaker 2: seems like a loser. People don't want to be part 133 00:05:41,600 --> 00:05:44,039 Speaker 2: of a losing campaign. That's it, period. A lot of 134 00:05:44,040 --> 00:05:46,560 Speaker 2: this is about vibes. The problem, though, is that at 135 00:05:46,640 --> 00:05:49,200 Speaker 2: the very same time Crystal that the debate was happening, 136 00:05:49,400 --> 00:05:53,360 Speaker 2: Donald Trump was on Fox News giving The Trump Show, 137 00:05:53,440 --> 00:05:55,400 Speaker 2: and guess what, sorry to say it, The Trump Show 138 00:05:55,440 --> 00:05:57,840 Speaker 2: is way more compelling, it's more fun to watch because 139 00:05:57,839 --> 00:06:01,400 Speaker 2: he understands that at a very base level. And so 140 00:06:01,800 --> 00:06:05,120 Speaker 2: we have some of the highlights there from Trump's town 141 00:06:05,200 --> 00:06:08,440 Speaker 2: hall and frankly, just given his political position, these are 142 00:06:08,640 --> 00:06:12,839 Speaker 2: going to matter way more in the actual eventual general election. 143 00:06:13,080 --> 00:06:14,080 Speaker 3: Here's what he had to say. 144 00:06:14,400 --> 00:06:18,680 Speaker 9: Can you say tonight that political violence is never acceptable? Well, 145 00:06:18,720 --> 00:06:21,320 Speaker 9: of course that's right, and of course I'm the one 146 00:06:21,320 --> 00:06:23,800 Speaker 9: that had very little of it. Take a look at 147 00:06:23,800 --> 00:06:27,120 Speaker 9: Wars again, I didn't start. I wasn't involved in Wars. 148 00:06:27,160 --> 00:06:29,280 Speaker 9: We beat the hell out of Isis. We won one 149 00:06:29,360 --> 00:06:33,200 Speaker 9: hundred percent. We brought our troops back home. Look at 150 00:06:33,200 --> 00:06:35,240 Speaker 9: the violence that we've had, look at the violence we 151 00:06:35,320 --> 00:06:38,760 Speaker 9: have recently. But when you say bedlam, what do you 152 00:06:38,839 --> 00:06:40,520 Speaker 9: mean I think said bedlam? I think you look at 153 00:06:40,600 --> 00:06:43,440 Speaker 9: Joe Biden's bedlam. You have a man who can't lead. 154 00:06:43,720 --> 00:06:45,440 Speaker 9: You have a man who can't find his way off 155 00:06:45,440 --> 00:06:47,640 Speaker 9: a stage after he makes a speech that lasts for 156 00:06:47,640 --> 00:06:50,440 Speaker 9: about two minutes. Now, I think Bedlam is Joe Biden. 157 00:06:50,520 --> 00:06:53,680 Speaker 9: I think that he's using this. This is just a 158 00:06:53,720 --> 00:06:56,760 Speaker 9: political ploy. Trump is a dictator. He wants to be 159 00:06:56,800 --> 00:06:59,360 Speaker 9: a dictator. You know, it's interesting. I did a show 160 00:06:59,440 --> 00:07:01,320 Speaker 9: Sean Hannah. Did you ever hear of him? He's a 161 00:07:01,400 --> 00:07:04,680 Speaker 9: very nice man, and he said, essentially, you're not going 162 00:07:04,720 --> 00:07:05,400 Speaker 9: to be a dictator. 163 00:07:05,440 --> 00:07:06,159 Speaker 3: Are you tell me. 164 00:07:06,279 --> 00:07:07,640 Speaker 9: I think he was trying to give me a nicer 165 00:07:07,720 --> 00:07:10,280 Speaker 9: question that maybe you guys, but he meant it very well. 166 00:07:10,320 --> 00:07:14,160 Speaker 9: I said, I'm going to be a dictator for one day. 167 00:07:14,520 --> 00:07:17,720 Speaker 9: We're going to do two things. The border, we're going 168 00:07:17,800 --> 00:07:20,640 Speaker 9: to make it so tight you can't get in unless 169 00:07:20,680 --> 00:07:23,680 Speaker 9: you come in legally. And the other is energy. We're 170 00:07:23,680 --> 00:07:24,720 Speaker 9: going to drill, baby, drill. 171 00:07:25,600 --> 00:07:28,440 Speaker 10: Some of my friends that supported you in twenty twenty 172 00:07:29,280 --> 00:07:33,920 Speaker 10: are not this time because they believe a Trump presidency 173 00:07:34,440 --> 00:07:38,520 Speaker 10: will bring four years of chaos due to your haters. 174 00:07:39,880 --> 00:07:41,320 Speaker 10: What is your response to them? 175 00:07:41,680 --> 00:07:43,560 Speaker 9: Well, I think, first of all, I'm glad you're asking 176 00:07:43,600 --> 00:07:46,120 Speaker 9: the question, and I'm very glad that you started off 177 00:07:46,160 --> 00:07:48,480 Speaker 9: by saying you're with me, because I want you on 178 00:07:48,560 --> 00:07:50,800 Speaker 9: my side. I figured maybe Fox would have written that 179 00:07:50,920 --> 00:07:53,000 Speaker 9: question if it was just the second part of the question. 180 00:07:53,600 --> 00:07:56,520 Speaker 9: But just so you understand, we don't write any of 181 00:07:56,520 --> 00:07:57,120 Speaker 9: the questions. 182 00:07:57,160 --> 00:07:58,840 Speaker 4: You all wrote the questions, just Claire. 183 00:07:59,160 --> 00:08:00,640 Speaker 9: We'll figure that one pretty soon. 184 00:08:01,200 --> 00:08:04,920 Speaker 1: Oh javit, Fox is there suggesting that they scripted the. 185 00:08:04,680 --> 00:08:07,679 Speaker 3: Come on, he asked it in the nicest way possible 186 00:08:07,760 --> 00:08:10,280 Speaker 3: and say like, I'm with you. Yeah, He's like, look, sir, 187 00:08:10,600 --> 00:08:11,360 Speaker 3: I'm with you. 188 00:08:12,120 --> 00:08:14,920 Speaker 4: Yeah, he is so thin skinned. He is unbelievable. 189 00:08:14,920 --> 00:08:16,720 Speaker 3: But listening, you have to give it to him. He's trying. 190 00:08:16,760 --> 00:08:17,760 Speaker 3: It's funny any what he does. 191 00:08:17,880 --> 00:08:21,800 Speaker 1: Listen the content aside, because honestly, I think his content 192 00:08:21,840 --> 00:08:24,240 Speaker 1: and Ron and Nicky's content to be horrifying, but we'll 193 00:08:24,240 --> 00:08:26,720 Speaker 1: put that aside of him. I mean, he's an another 194 00:08:26,800 --> 00:08:30,160 Speaker 1: league in terms of the showmanship. Absolutely in terms of 195 00:08:30,160 --> 00:08:34,959 Speaker 1: the charism, it's just not even comparable. On the dictator question, 196 00:08:35,120 --> 00:08:37,400 Speaker 1: it's interesting that he brought that up on his own. 197 00:08:37,520 --> 00:08:39,120 Speaker 3: I think he thinks it's very amusing. 198 00:08:39,240 --> 00:08:41,240 Speaker 1: I think he thinks it's amusing, and I think he's 199 00:08:41,400 --> 00:08:44,560 Speaker 1: right that there's an appetite in the Republican base of like, 200 00:08:45,000 --> 00:08:48,240 Speaker 1: screw the roles and we want the strong man who's 201 00:08:48,240 --> 00:08:50,240 Speaker 1: just going to do what we want him to do, 202 00:08:50,280 --> 00:08:52,680 Speaker 1: who's going to be that bulwark against the Libs who 203 00:08:52,679 --> 00:08:55,800 Speaker 1: we see is this like existential threat and pulling bears 204 00:08:55,800 --> 00:08:58,360 Speaker 1: that out that there are these you know, tendencies throughout 205 00:08:58,360 --> 00:09:01,640 Speaker 1: the American public, but disproport on the Republican side that's like, 206 00:09:01,720 --> 00:09:04,000 Speaker 1: you know, actually, we're willing to bend the rules of 207 00:09:04,000 --> 00:09:07,400 Speaker 1: democracy to have that strong man leader, do what we 208 00:09:07,440 --> 00:09:10,240 Speaker 1: want him to do. I think Trump intuit's that and 209 00:09:10,360 --> 00:09:14,120 Speaker 1: so far from it being this like negative, at least 210 00:09:14,120 --> 00:09:16,880 Speaker 1: in terms of a Republican primary contest. Maybe it's different 211 00:09:16,880 --> 00:09:19,680 Speaker 1: in a general election. I'm not really sure, but he 212 00:09:19,840 --> 00:09:23,000 Speaker 1: intuits that. No, actually people want to hear that I'm going. 213 00:09:23,000 --> 00:09:23,560 Speaker 4: To be that guy. 214 00:09:23,840 --> 00:09:25,400 Speaker 3: I think he both. There's two things. 215 00:09:25,400 --> 00:09:28,000 Speaker 2: So A there definitely is a desire, but be what 216 00:09:28,040 --> 00:09:30,360 Speaker 2: I as far as I understand, what he knows is 217 00:09:30,400 --> 00:09:31,720 Speaker 2: how to drive the media crazy. 218 00:09:31,840 --> 00:09:32,880 Speaker 3: He knows how to get the. 219 00:09:32,840 --> 00:09:35,280 Speaker 2: Headlines that he wants that both work to his political 220 00:09:35,320 --> 00:09:39,200 Speaker 2: benefit and absolutely drive insane Washington Post columnists. 221 00:09:39,240 --> 00:09:41,240 Speaker 3: This is the perfect, you know, way to do it. 222 00:09:41,280 --> 00:09:43,840 Speaker 2: And so bringing that up the problem and you know, 223 00:09:43,880 --> 00:09:45,920 Speaker 2: this is what really gets to it is that Trump 224 00:09:46,040 --> 00:09:49,240 Speaker 2: also does not seem to yet have a sense that 225 00:09:49,360 --> 00:09:51,840 Speaker 2: stopped the steal was a massive problem for him. 226 00:09:51,880 --> 00:09:54,240 Speaker 3: Yeah, he did not intuit. 227 00:09:53,840 --> 00:09:56,880 Speaker 2: In that chaos question that while it is not true 228 00:09:56,960 --> 00:10:00,560 Speaker 2: in a Republican primary, it is absolutely true for the 229 00:10:00,640 --> 00:10:02,960 Speaker 2: overall general electorate. And this is not I have to 230 00:10:02,960 --> 00:10:05,640 Speaker 2: be I totally underestimated this in twenty twenty two. I 231 00:10:05,679 --> 00:10:07,640 Speaker 2: didn't think people would care. I was like, yeah, you know, 232 00:10:07,679 --> 00:10:10,360 Speaker 2: it's a long time ago, we're talking about a new election. No, 233 00:10:10,640 --> 00:10:14,080 Speaker 2: it's a huge problem for a lot of normal voters. 234 00:10:14,120 --> 00:10:16,520 Speaker 2: And I think now that I've just come to understand it, 235 00:10:16,520 --> 00:10:19,480 Speaker 2: it's just like people felt like, you know, tight in 236 00:10:19,520 --> 00:10:22,320 Speaker 2: the chest at the idea of political problems. They also 237 00:10:22,360 --> 00:10:25,040 Speaker 2: don't they really hate Joe Biden, but a lot of 238 00:10:25,040 --> 00:10:27,280 Speaker 2: people are willing to do lesser of two evils. I 239 00:10:27,280 --> 00:10:29,480 Speaker 2: think he needs a lot better answer actually on that 240 00:10:29,600 --> 00:10:32,439 Speaker 2: second question than he did. I don't think the dictator 241 00:10:32,520 --> 00:10:34,440 Speaker 2: the thing is a problem. I think it really is. 242 00:10:34,880 --> 00:10:37,240 Speaker 3: It gets down to just give us some calm, and 243 00:10:37,240 --> 00:10:39,559 Speaker 3: that's just not what he's calibrated to do. 244 00:10:39,920 --> 00:10:41,959 Speaker 2: So that was his big problem, on top of rovers 245 00:10:42,000 --> 00:10:43,280 Speaker 2: his weight, which are about to get Yeah. 246 00:10:43,480 --> 00:10:48,240 Speaker 1: Yeah, Trump is a master like creating suspending reality and. 247 00:10:48,160 --> 00:10:50,080 Speaker 4: Creating his own reality totally. 248 00:10:50,120 --> 00:10:52,320 Speaker 1: You know, this is something that he has excelled at 249 00:10:52,559 --> 00:10:56,599 Speaker 1: is a politician. He excelled at as a businessman as well. 250 00:10:56,640 --> 00:10:59,320 Speaker 1: But I think to deny that there was political violence 251 00:10:59,400 --> 00:11:02,720 Speaker 1: during the Trump term, that's a difficult one for people 252 00:11:02,760 --> 00:11:04,680 Speaker 1: to swallow because obviously they. 253 00:11:04,559 --> 00:11:06,559 Speaker 4: Think immediately of January six, But. 254 00:11:06,559 --> 00:11:09,360 Speaker 1: Also I mean the violence associated with the Black Lives 255 00:11:09,440 --> 00:11:10,000 Speaker 1: Matter movement. 256 00:11:10,080 --> 00:11:12,560 Speaker 4: Wow, that happened under his term as well. 257 00:11:12,880 --> 00:11:13,800 Speaker 3: I would go all the way back. 258 00:11:13,840 --> 00:11:16,400 Speaker 2: I mean, I remember what twenty seventeen, that was a 259 00:11:16,400 --> 00:11:18,520 Speaker 2: whole Antifa thing, and then there was Proud. 260 00:11:18,400 --> 00:11:20,120 Speaker 4: Charlottesville also happened. 261 00:11:20,320 --> 00:11:21,360 Speaker 3: That was all one year. 262 00:11:21,440 --> 00:11:25,280 Speaker 2: Yeah, that was, if anything, I remember, more political violence 263 00:11:25,320 --> 00:11:28,160 Speaker 2: really than modern memory. I wouldn't even necessarily say it's 264 00:11:28,240 --> 00:11:30,600 Speaker 2: like his fault, but it did exist, right, And that's 265 00:11:30,600 --> 00:11:33,719 Speaker 2: something you've got to you know, you have to acknowledge that, right. 266 00:11:33,880 --> 00:11:35,840 Speaker 1: I think a lot of it is his fault, just 267 00:11:35,880 --> 00:11:38,800 Speaker 1: because of the incredibly polarizing force that he is. But 268 00:11:38,920 --> 00:11:41,880 Speaker 1: even if you don't think that, like to just deny 269 00:11:41,960 --> 00:11:44,560 Speaker 1: the reality of what we all experience for those four 270 00:11:44,679 --> 00:11:45,720 Speaker 1: years is a lot. 271 00:11:45,800 --> 00:11:46,560 Speaker 4: It's a lot to swell. 272 00:11:46,640 --> 00:11:48,439 Speaker 1: And like I said, of course, instantly what people think 273 00:11:48,440 --> 00:11:50,280 Speaker 1: about is like what about January six? 274 00:11:50,360 --> 00:11:51,320 Speaker 4: Dude? 275 00:11:51,520 --> 00:11:54,719 Speaker 1: So, as you mentioned, Sager, he got asked about Roe 276 00:11:54,800 --> 00:11:59,000 Speaker 1: versus Wade. He had had to try to tow an 277 00:11:59,040 --> 00:12:03,720 Speaker 1: interesting line on this because he knows that the abortion 278 00:12:03,800 --> 00:12:07,280 Speaker 1: politics for Republicans at this point are a disaster. Like 279 00:12:07,280 --> 00:12:10,440 Speaker 1: he knew that immediately when the Supreme court decision came down. 280 00:12:10,840 --> 00:12:13,520 Speaker 1: On the other hand, it continues to be very animating 281 00:12:13,559 --> 00:12:16,200 Speaker 1: issue for the base. So let's take a listen to 282 00:12:16,800 --> 00:12:20,240 Speaker 1: part of how he responded to a question about abortion rights. 283 00:12:20,520 --> 00:12:23,520 Speaker 9: For fifty four years, they were trying to get Roe v. 284 00:12:23,640 --> 00:12:26,320 Speaker 9: Wade terminated, and I did it, and I'm proud to 285 00:12:26,360 --> 00:12:28,800 Speaker 9: have done it. They wanted to get it back right, 286 00:12:29,040 --> 00:12:31,120 Speaker 9: You wouldn't be have that. There would be no question 287 00:12:31,200 --> 00:12:32,760 Speaker 9: nobody else was going to get that done with me, 288 00:12:33,440 --> 00:12:34,760 Speaker 9: and we did it. 289 00:12:35,800 --> 00:12:37,960 Speaker 3: And that was immediately meet it out by the Biden. 290 00:12:37,760 --> 00:12:40,840 Speaker 4: That is a Biden campaign ad. Just right there. 291 00:12:40,960 --> 00:12:43,000 Speaker 1: You will, I guarantee you will hear those words again 292 00:12:43,040 --> 00:12:44,400 Speaker 1: packaged into a campaign ad. 293 00:12:44,440 --> 00:12:46,720 Speaker 2: This is the difficulty of this race is that Biden 294 00:12:46,800 --> 00:12:51,040 Speaker 2: is tremendously unpopular and he's so old. I genuinely don't 295 00:12:51,040 --> 00:12:53,400 Speaker 2: think he should not be qualified to run for president. 296 00:12:53,440 --> 00:12:56,040 Speaker 2: And I still think that he's got a decent chance 297 00:12:56,080 --> 00:12:58,160 Speaker 2: of winning. Now I don't think he has like a 298 00:12:58,240 --> 00:13:00,440 Speaker 2: great chance of winning, but he's got The fact that 299 00:13:00,480 --> 00:13:02,000 Speaker 2: they has a chance in the first place, to me 300 00:13:02,120 --> 00:13:05,959 Speaker 2: is nuts. And the problem with that is abortion politics. 301 00:13:06,000 --> 00:13:09,320 Speaker 2: We saw over and over and over again that there 302 00:13:09,360 --> 00:13:12,400 Speaker 2: is an entire animated new political base that is willing 303 00:13:12,440 --> 00:13:14,640 Speaker 2: to come out and willing to vote on this. It's 304 00:13:14,640 --> 00:13:17,679 Speaker 2: deeply personal, and it's one that is willing to override 305 00:13:18,000 --> 00:13:20,600 Speaker 2: the rarest of things. To me, Crystal is a social 306 00:13:20,640 --> 00:13:24,080 Speaker 2: issue which can a one hundred percent override economic issue. 307 00:13:24,120 --> 00:13:27,560 Speaker 2: It's almost never happened in modern American history except for 308 00:13:27,720 --> 00:13:31,120 Speaker 2: this time in twenty and twenty two. Now, there are 309 00:13:31,120 --> 00:13:33,360 Speaker 2: a couple of reasons to be optimistic on the Trump side. 310 00:13:33,440 --> 00:13:37,200 Speaker 2: The economic situation continues to fester, The global position is bad. 311 00:13:37,400 --> 00:13:40,600 Speaker 2: The Israel position for Joe Biden within the Democratic Party 312 00:13:40,920 --> 00:13:44,080 Speaker 2: is a problem. We're getting farther and farther away to 313 00:13:44,160 --> 00:13:47,280 Speaker 2: a post row Ish consensus. You know, the states that 314 00:13:47,360 --> 00:13:51,160 Speaker 2: don't want it have generally carved out or done different things. 315 00:13:51,160 --> 00:13:54,000 Speaker 2: So there's reason to believe also that you have these 316 00:13:54,080 --> 00:13:57,080 Speaker 2: non frequent voters that don't aren't as animated by Roe, 317 00:13:57,080 --> 00:13:58,800 Speaker 2: that would come out and would vote for him. 318 00:13:58,800 --> 00:14:00,720 Speaker 3: So I'm not coming him out. I genuinely think it's 319 00:14:00,720 --> 00:14:02,280 Speaker 3: fifty to fifty right now, yeah, point, but I think 320 00:14:02,280 --> 00:14:03,280 Speaker 3: it should be seventy five. 321 00:14:03,120 --> 00:14:04,679 Speaker 2: To twenty five. I don't even think it should be 322 00:14:04,720 --> 00:14:06,240 Speaker 2: a concern. That's a problem. 323 00:14:06,440 --> 00:14:06,840 Speaker 8: I don't know. 324 00:14:06,920 --> 00:14:09,960 Speaker 1: I mean, they're both like, both Biden and Trump are 325 00:14:10,040 --> 00:14:13,520 Speaker 1: so disliked by the American public, so many people just 326 00:14:13,559 --> 00:14:15,440 Speaker 1: want to move on from both of these dudes that 327 00:14:15,520 --> 00:14:17,839 Speaker 1: to say, like who should be winning in this Senate, 328 00:14:17,880 --> 00:14:20,640 Speaker 1: I don't know. They both are so extraordinarily weak that 329 00:14:20,760 --> 00:14:24,280 Speaker 1: it is pretty pathetic, you know, I want to make 330 00:14:24,280 --> 00:14:28,280 Speaker 1: the case. So going back to the Republican primary, there 331 00:14:28,360 --> 00:14:31,440 Speaker 1: has been some you know, there have been some interesting developments. 332 00:14:31,520 --> 00:14:34,720 Speaker 1: We covered Nikki Haley surging in the polls in New Hampshire, 333 00:14:34,720 --> 00:14:37,960 Speaker 1: like genuinely multiple polls have her now within single digits 334 00:14:38,000 --> 00:14:40,680 Speaker 1: of Donald Trump in New Hampshire, which I'm really surprised by. 335 00:14:41,360 --> 00:14:44,840 Speaker 1: We also have her now in the Real Clear Politics average, 336 00:14:45,160 --> 00:14:48,600 Speaker 1: in the national average, and in Iowa she has overtaken 337 00:14:49,040 --> 00:14:52,200 Speaker 1: Ron DeSantis in the second place position, so she has 338 00:14:52,360 --> 00:14:57,160 Speaker 1: really claimed that second place Trump alternative spot. At the 339 00:14:57,200 --> 00:15:00,080 Speaker 1: same point, you have to assume that even though Chris 340 00:15:00,440 --> 00:15:03,400 Speaker 1: didn't endorse her and also got caught on a hot 341 00:15:03,440 --> 00:15:07,720 Speaker 1: mic completely trashing her hilarious, that his exit from the 342 00:15:07,840 --> 00:15:10,920 Speaker 1: race is going to benefit Nikki Haley in particular in 343 00:15:11,040 --> 00:15:13,240 Speaker 1: New Hampshire. And I think it's very likely that many, 344 00:15:13,320 --> 00:15:16,680 Speaker 1: if not most, of his voters go to her campaign, 345 00:15:16,920 --> 00:15:19,800 Speaker 1: and since she was already only facing a single dig 346 00:15:19,840 --> 00:15:22,440 Speaker 1: at least according the polls, single digit deficit wit Trump, 347 00:15:22,640 --> 00:15:26,040 Speaker 1: is it possible she wins New Hampshire? Then, you know, 348 00:15:26,520 --> 00:15:30,240 Speaker 1: we've seen primaries in the past where somebody gets a 349 00:15:30,280 --> 00:15:33,360 Speaker 1: surprise win and it completely flips the polls and shifts 350 00:15:33,400 --> 00:15:34,600 Speaker 1: the dynamics overnight. 351 00:15:35,120 --> 00:15:36,320 Speaker 4: Do I think that's likely? 352 00:15:36,720 --> 00:15:36,800 Speaker 9: No? 353 00:15:37,360 --> 00:15:39,000 Speaker 4: Is it possible? It's possible. 354 00:15:39,360 --> 00:15:42,960 Speaker 1: There's a theoretic, theoretical case out there. So on the 355 00:15:43,000 --> 00:15:46,080 Speaker 1: one hand, let me give the anti Nikki case. And 356 00:15:46,120 --> 00:15:49,840 Speaker 1: this was laid out pretty compellingly in Politico magazine by 357 00:15:50,720 --> 00:15:52,960 Speaker 1: Jonathan Allen. Let's put this up on the screen and 358 00:15:53,040 --> 00:15:55,920 Speaker 1: basically what he argues here, he says why Haley won't 359 00:15:55,920 --> 00:15:58,160 Speaker 1: break through. The today's up has split along class lines 360 00:15:58,160 --> 00:16:01,800 Speaker 1: in her college educated support are not the majority. He 361 00:16:01,880 --> 00:16:04,760 Speaker 1: just argues, like the wine track beer track case. Yep, 362 00:16:05,200 --> 00:16:08,120 Speaker 1: the beer track folks who make a majority at this 363 00:16:08,160 --> 00:16:10,760 Speaker 1: point of the Republican base are with Trump. The wine 364 00:16:10,760 --> 00:16:13,160 Speaker 1: track folks are increasingly with Niki. But even if they 365 00:16:13,200 --> 00:16:15,840 Speaker 1: all consolidate and behind Nikki, it's still not enough. And 366 00:16:15,840 --> 00:16:18,080 Speaker 1: that that's sort of like the fundamental issue that she's 367 00:16:18,120 --> 00:16:20,560 Speaker 1: facing in this campaign is she is yet to demonstrate 368 00:16:20,680 --> 00:16:23,720 Speaker 1: any ability to reach into Trump's working class base. 369 00:16:23,800 --> 00:16:26,800 Speaker 2: It just remains so patently obvious to me. I even 370 00:16:26,840 --> 00:16:29,440 Speaker 2: in a one to one race. So Trump's internals, he 371 00:16:29,520 --> 00:16:31,720 Speaker 2: released them yesterday. They weren't great for Trump, but it 372 00:16:31,760 --> 00:16:34,600 Speaker 2: did show him beating one on one NICKI Haley. I 373 00:16:34,600 --> 00:16:36,400 Speaker 2: think it was like fifty eight to four, or it 374 00:16:36,440 --> 00:16:37,880 Speaker 2: was like fifty two to forty. 375 00:16:37,600 --> 00:16:38,000 Speaker 3: Something like that. 376 00:16:38,080 --> 00:16:39,240 Speaker 4: I have those, I'll show those. 377 00:16:39,800 --> 00:16:42,600 Speaker 2: Yeah, the point being that there was an internal Trump 378 00:16:42,640 --> 00:16:45,920 Speaker 2: pull that show him still beating her. And the reason 379 00:16:45,920 --> 00:16:48,000 Speaker 2: why is that the vast majority of people who will 380 00:16:48,040 --> 00:16:52,040 Speaker 2: vote in a GOP primary are non college educated white people, 381 00:16:52,080 --> 00:16:55,680 Speaker 2: and those people are dramatically pro Trump. Now there is 382 00:16:55,720 --> 00:16:59,000 Speaker 2: a small portion which are college educated, the remnants of 383 00:16:59,040 --> 00:17:02,280 Speaker 2: the Mitt Romney, John McCain, George W. Bush type voter 384 00:17:02,640 --> 00:17:05,280 Speaker 2: by and large, though most of those people who are 385 00:17:05,359 --> 00:17:08,880 Speaker 2: very political are Democrats now they voted for Joe Biden. 386 00:17:09,160 --> 00:17:12,919 Speaker 2: There are very much like the CIA Democrats here in 387 00:17:12,960 --> 00:17:16,880 Speaker 2: Northern Virginia, and that is the probably the great political 388 00:17:16,880 --> 00:17:19,439 Speaker 2: realignment of our time. So if you're just winning college 389 00:17:19,560 --> 00:17:21,879 Speaker 2: educated you know, so called wine track voters. 390 00:17:22,000 --> 00:17:23,000 Speaker 3: It's just not going to work. 391 00:17:23,160 --> 00:17:25,600 Speaker 2: This was the reason why the only two candidates and 392 00:17:25,640 --> 00:17:28,359 Speaker 2: the Democratic primary of twenty twenty who had any shot, 393 00:17:28,440 --> 00:17:31,159 Speaker 2: we're Bernie Sanders and we're Joe Biden. Yeah, they're the 394 00:17:31,200 --> 00:17:34,880 Speaker 2: only two who had any chance with working class voters. Warren, 395 00:17:35,040 --> 00:17:39,280 Speaker 2: you know, Kamala Corey, all these other people, they're MSNBC nobodies. 396 00:17:39,320 --> 00:17:41,159 Speaker 2: It's like you got to be able to have a 397 00:17:41,200 --> 00:17:44,400 Speaker 2: bartender or union worker, any these other people. Because while yes, 398 00:17:44,480 --> 00:17:47,480 Speaker 2: a huge portion of the Democratic base is college educated, 399 00:17:47,800 --> 00:17:49,679 Speaker 2: still the majority of people who vote Democrat in this 400 00:17:49,720 --> 00:17:52,680 Speaker 2: country are not college educated. So but they're totally erased, 401 00:17:52,720 --> 00:17:54,400 Speaker 2: you know, from media, from everything. 402 00:17:54,600 --> 00:17:57,919 Speaker 1: Yeah, so I agree with you on that. I do 403 00:17:58,000 --> 00:18:02,280 Speaker 1: want to present the case for Niki right, the most hopeful, 404 00:18:02,320 --> 00:18:05,159 Speaker 1: optimistic case of how she could find a path to 405 00:18:05,480 --> 00:18:07,720 Speaker 1: winning the Republican primary outright. 406 00:18:08,040 --> 00:18:09,680 Speaker 4: So you referenced this was. 407 00:18:09,680 --> 00:18:12,200 Speaker 1: Really interesting and I think this was a real own 408 00:18:12,280 --> 00:18:15,440 Speaker 1: goal from the Trump campaign. They released after Chris Christy 409 00:18:15,560 --> 00:18:18,280 Speaker 1: dropped down, they released this internal poll that they had 410 00:18:18,320 --> 00:18:21,720 Speaker 1: taken that showed what would head to head between Trump 411 00:18:21,760 --> 00:18:24,000 Speaker 1: and Nikki Haley look like in the states of Iowa 412 00:18:24,080 --> 00:18:24,560 Speaker 1: and New. 413 00:18:24,400 --> 00:18:26,800 Speaker 4: Hampshire, and they still had Trump winning. 414 00:18:27,119 --> 00:18:29,760 Speaker 1: But again, this is your own internal poll, so it's 415 00:18:29,800 --> 00:18:33,400 Speaker 1: going to very likely be more favorable towards you than 416 00:18:33,560 --> 00:18:37,720 Speaker 1: reality actually is. And they had him beating Nikki fifty 417 00:18:37,760 --> 00:18:41,240 Speaker 1: six forty in Iowa and only fifty two forty four 418 00:18:41,480 --> 00:18:42,400 Speaker 1: in New Hampshire. 419 00:18:43,040 --> 00:18:44,600 Speaker 4: Those are not overwhelming numbers. 420 00:18:44,760 --> 00:18:48,560 Speaker 1: That's a race, right for the overwhelming majority of the 421 00:18:48,600 --> 00:18:52,400 Speaker 1: Republican primary process, save for right after the midterms, there 422 00:18:52,440 --> 00:18:56,080 Speaker 1: has not been a race. These numbers here in single digits. 423 00:18:56,119 --> 00:18:59,560 Speaker 1: You know, you're within ten fifteen points. That's actually a 424 00:18:59,600 --> 00:19:02,280 Speaker 1: real race. Those are the sort of numbers where you 425 00:19:02,280 --> 00:19:04,720 Speaker 1: can imagine if Nicki is surging right now in the 426 00:19:04,800 --> 00:19:07,160 Speaker 1: right moment, which she appears to be, that she could 427 00:19:07,240 --> 00:19:08,680 Speaker 1: theoretically close the gap. 428 00:19:09,119 --> 00:19:10,840 Speaker 4: The way that this could. 429 00:19:10,560 --> 00:19:14,720 Speaker 1: Happen is just to play the sound so Iowa caucuses. 430 00:19:14,920 --> 00:19:18,960 Speaker 1: Ron has invested so much money in Iowa and it's 431 00:19:18,960 --> 00:19:21,280 Speaker 1: not looking good. You know, his polls have continued to 432 00:19:21,320 --> 00:19:25,760 Speaker 1: trail off. If he underperforms in Iowa gets third, Trump 433 00:19:25,840 --> 00:19:28,280 Speaker 1: sort of get you know, wins but has a less 434 00:19:28,680 --> 00:19:32,240 Speaker 1: more lackluster performance than expected, so he you know, does 435 00:19:32,320 --> 00:19:36,160 Speaker 1: not meet or exceed expectations. Ron drops out, and then 436 00:19:36,200 --> 00:19:40,000 Speaker 1: you are effectively facing this Nicki Haley versus Donald Trump 437 00:19:40,320 --> 00:19:42,400 Speaker 1: race in New Hampshire, and if the Vek is still 438 00:19:42,440 --> 00:19:44,639 Speaker 1: hanging in there, he's probably taking more from Trump than 439 00:19:44,640 --> 00:19:45,400 Speaker 1: he is from Nicki. 440 00:19:45,480 --> 00:19:47,280 Speaker 4: He's actually helping Nicki at that point. 441 00:19:47,480 --> 00:19:50,680 Speaker 1: If he hangs in there, and then if Nicky's able 442 00:19:50,680 --> 00:19:53,160 Speaker 1: to pull off the upset victory, which polls shows she's 443 00:19:53,160 --> 00:19:56,280 Speaker 1: got a shot of at this point, then you could 444 00:19:56,320 --> 00:19:59,359 Speaker 1: create a permission structure for people who have felt like 445 00:19:59,600 --> 00:20:01,359 Speaker 1: I need to stay with Trump, or I need to 446 00:20:01,400 --> 00:20:03,639 Speaker 1: say I'm staying with Trump, even though I'm kind of 447 00:20:03,680 --> 00:20:05,879 Speaker 1: sick of him. I kind of do feel like he's old, 448 00:20:06,000 --> 00:20:08,840 Speaker 1: Like I'm this chaos. I'm not really down for it, 449 00:20:09,119 --> 00:20:10,800 Speaker 1: but I have felt like I need to stay in line, 450 00:20:10,840 --> 00:20:12,600 Speaker 1: and I felt like he's the guy, and there isn't 451 00:20:12,600 --> 00:20:16,000 Speaker 1: really room for an alternative. She creates a permission structure 452 00:20:16,000 --> 00:20:17,919 Speaker 1: for this theoretical group of people that I don't know 453 00:20:17,920 --> 00:20:21,280 Speaker 1: whether they exist or not, to then switch loyalties and 454 00:20:21,320 --> 00:20:24,000 Speaker 1: for the polls to flip in a dramatic way in 455 00:20:24,040 --> 00:20:26,480 Speaker 1: the way that they did for Joe Biden last time around. 456 00:20:26,480 --> 00:20:28,840 Speaker 1: In the way that they did for Barack Obama back 457 00:20:28,840 --> 00:20:31,240 Speaker 1: in two thousand and eight against Hillary Clinton. I think 458 00:20:31,280 --> 00:20:33,640 Speaker 1: it's theoretically possible. Again, do I think it's the most 459 00:20:33,680 --> 00:20:35,600 Speaker 1: likely outcome. No, I think the most likely outcome is 460 00:20:35,640 --> 00:20:38,359 Speaker 1: Trump romps. He wins basically every state, and this is 461 00:20:38,359 --> 00:20:40,919 Speaker 1: over in a couple of weeks. But this is the 462 00:20:40,960 --> 00:20:44,440 Speaker 1: first time where I can even really visualize a path 463 00:20:44,520 --> 00:20:46,480 Speaker 1: for anyone else to actually win out. 464 00:20:46,440 --> 00:20:47,240 Speaker 3: Right now, I totally agree. 465 00:20:47,280 --> 00:20:48,920 Speaker 2: I would say that the odds of it are less 466 00:20:48,960 --> 00:20:51,560 Speaker 2: than twenty percent. Honestly, that might even be generous. But 467 00:20:51,960 --> 00:20:53,359 Speaker 2: let's give it to her just for the sake of 468 00:20:53,400 --> 00:20:56,480 Speaker 2: it being fun. It just makes New Hampshire. They'll all 469 00:20:56,560 --> 00:20:59,200 Speaker 2: make or break. It's like she has to win. Yes, 470 00:20:59,200 --> 00:21:03,240 Speaker 2: primary Luckily we'll be having a great show during New Hampshire, 471 00:21:03,240 --> 00:21:05,320 Speaker 2: so we will all digest it. We would do so 472 00:21:05,600 --> 00:21:07,760 Speaker 2: here together. But I'm excited to see it. Oh, I 473 00:21:07,800 --> 00:21:09,679 Speaker 2: forgot to mention this. Have to put this up on 474 00:21:09,720 --> 00:21:12,119 Speaker 2: the screen. Trump is now pulling out the greatest hits 475 00:21:12,160 --> 00:21:15,720 Speaker 2: against Nicki Haley. He is now says in Nikki Haley, this. 476 00:21:15,720 --> 00:21:17,399 Speaker 3: Is from Gateway on It in one of the original 477 00:21:17,440 --> 00:21:18,240 Speaker 3: birth places. 478 00:21:18,359 --> 00:21:21,240 Speaker 2: He says in Nicki Haley situation, reports indicate that her 479 00:21:21,280 --> 00:21:23,320 Speaker 2: parents were not US citizens at the time of her 480 00:21:23,359 --> 00:21:26,600 Speaker 2: birth in nineteen seventy two. Based on the Constitution as 481 00:21:26,640 --> 00:21:31,640 Speaker 2: interpreted by one of their in house analysts, Chris disqualifies 482 00:21:31,680 --> 00:21:36,160 Speaker 2: Haley from presidential or vice presidential candidacy under the Twelfth Amendment. 483 00:21:36,359 --> 00:21:37,200 Speaker 4: The birth certificate. 484 00:21:37,240 --> 00:21:39,480 Speaker 2: Nikki, Well, no, this is different because this is she 485 00:21:39,680 --> 00:21:41,639 Speaker 2: was born here, but her parents weren't citizens whenever she 486 00:21:41,800 --> 00:21:45,200 Speaker 2: was born. Unfortunately for Trump, that's pretty well trodden territory 487 00:21:45,600 --> 00:21:47,360 Speaker 2: in terms of US citizenship law. 488 00:21:47,480 --> 00:21:49,400 Speaker 3: So anyway, though, you know, you got to throw whatever 489 00:21:49,440 --> 00:21:51,600 Speaker 3: you can. I actually don't think it'll be impactful at all. 490 00:21:51,640 --> 00:21:55,679 Speaker 2: It's more so that it demonstrates he sees her relatively serious, right, 491 00:21:55,960 --> 00:21:56,640 Speaker 2: and so. 492 00:21:56,720 --> 00:21:58,280 Speaker 3: He's got it. He needs a big win in Iowa. 493 00:21:58,320 --> 00:22:00,600 Speaker 2: I mean, I think big win in Iowa twenty sox 494 00:22:00,720 --> 00:22:03,399 Speaker 2: or some points, blowout win that softens her up a 495 00:22:03,440 --> 00:22:04,959 Speaker 2: little bit going in New Hampshire. 496 00:22:05,000 --> 00:22:06,640 Speaker 3: But let's say she gets them within ten. She could 497 00:22:06,680 --> 00:22:08,400 Speaker 3: spin that and maybe she could win. Maybe that would 498 00:22:08,400 --> 00:22:09,680 Speaker 3: be extraordinary. 499 00:22:09,080 --> 00:22:13,040 Speaker 1: Because so much of politics is number one about expectations. Yeah, 500 00:22:13,080 --> 00:22:15,560 Speaker 1: and the expectation for Trump is that it's a blowout 501 00:22:15,600 --> 00:22:18,719 Speaker 1: in Iowa. And if so, if he doesn't meet those expectations. 502 00:22:18,760 --> 00:22:22,560 Speaker 1: And you also know, the media loves Nicky Haley. They 503 00:22:22,680 --> 00:22:26,440 Speaker 1: love her, and the billionaire class on the Republican side 504 00:22:26,480 --> 00:22:28,919 Speaker 1: they have lined up behind her like she is their 505 00:22:29,000 --> 00:22:29,840 Speaker 1: chosen Canadate. 506 00:22:29,880 --> 00:22:31,320 Speaker 4: Fox News loves her. 507 00:22:31,400 --> 00:22:34,720 Speaker 1: Yes, so you know they will do everything they can 508 00:22:35,080 --> 00:22:38,280 Speaker 1: to spin the Iowa results in her favor even if 509 00:22:38,280 --> 00:22:40,879 Speaker 1: she doesn't win. I think it's very unlikely she wins 510 00:22:40,920 --> 00:22:44,000 Speaker 1: the Iowa caucus. I mean, listen, anything can happen, especially 511 00:22:44,000 --> 00:22:46,760 Speaker 1: it's supposed to be like minus freaking thirty in Iowa 512 00:22:46,840 --> 00:22:51,760 Speaker 1: that day. And so maybe she's really super organized, maybe 513 00:22:51,760 --> 00:22:54,720 Speaker 1: her people are really dedicated and die hard. Trump's aren't aren't. 514 00:22:54,760 --> 00:22:56,199 Speaker 1: If anything, I would think it would cut in the 515 00:22:56,200 --> 00:22:58,720 Speaker 1: other direction. But who the heck knows. But if he 516 00:22:58,800 --> 00:23:02,119 Speaker 1: fails to meet the very high expectations, the media is 517 00:23:02,119 --> 00:23:03,680 Speaker 1: going to spend it in her favor. She goes into 518 00:23:03,720 --> 00:23:05,600 Speaker 1: New Hampshire with the head of steam. Who knows what 519 00:23:05,640 --> 00:23:06,119 Speaker 1: could happen? 520 00:23:06,160 --> 00:23:11,280 Speaker 2: We will certainly see. Okay, let's move on to Trump 521 00:23:11,359 --> 00:23:13,840 Speaker 2: and his legal problems. This's probably more This probably is 522 00:23:13,880 --> 00:23:17,240 Speaker 2: the more important conversation for the overall election. There's a 523 00:23:17,320 --> 00:23:20,639 Speaker 2: couple of different instances that have happened. There was recently, 524 00:23:21,000 --> 00:23:23,399 Speaker 2: there have been a lot of hearings with respect to 525 00:23:23,680 --> 00:23:26,439 Speaker 2: Trump and in much of his challenges, specifically to the 526 00:23:26,560 --> 00:23:30,040 Speaker 2: January sixth prosecution that has been mounted against him by 527 00:23:30,119 --> 00:23:33,600 Speaker 2: Jack Smith. That all centers around presidential immunity and the 528 00:23:33,600 --> 00:23:36,919 Speaker 2: theory of how and when a president can be charged, 529 00:23:37,160 --> 00:23:41,000 Speaker 2: even a former president, and be held liable legally for 530 00:23:41,119 --> 00:23:44,919 Speaker 2: whether that person was currently occupying the executive office of 531 00:23:44,960 --> 00:23:47,520 Speaker 2: the president. So one of the judges who is hearing 532 00:23:47,560 --> 00:23:52,199 Speaker 2: this presidential immunity argument leveled a very interesting hypothetical. They 533 00:23:52,200 --> 00:23:54,600 Speaker 2: got an even more interesting answer. Here's what they had 534 00:23:54,600 --> 00:23:54,880 Speaker 2: to say. 535 00:23:54,960 --> 00:23:57,720 Speaker 11: Did a president order sealed Team six to assassinate a 536 00:23:57,760 --> 00:24:02,400 Speaker 11: political rival an official act in order to seal Team sits. 537 00:24:02,680 --> 00:24:05,280 Speaker 7: He would have to be and would speedily be, you know, 538 00:24:05,560 --> 00:24:08,159 Speaker 7: uh uh impeached and convicted before the criminals. 539 00:24:08,920 --> 00:24:11,240 Speaker 11: But if you weren't, there would be no criminal prosecution, 540 00:24:11,440 --> 00:24:12,960 Speaker 11: no criminal liability for that. 541 00:24:14,119 --> 00:24:17,879 Speaker 7: Chief Justices opinion in murder against Macison and h h 542 00:24:18,400 --> 00:24:21,080 Speaker 7: and the ar concut tradition and the plain language of 543 00:24:21,119 --> 00:24:24,320 Speaker 7: the apeachment judgment clause all clearly presupposed that what the 544 00:24:24,359 --> 00:24:25,800 Speaker 7: founders were concerned about was not. 545 00:24:25,920 --> 00:24:28,359 Speaker 11: I asked you a yes, no, yes, or no question. 546 00:24:29,280 --> 00:24:32,520 Speaker 11: Could a president who ordered seal team sits to assassinate 547 00:24:32,560 --> 00:24:36,359 Speaker 11: a political rival who was not impeached would he be 548 00:24:36,359 --> 00:24:38,200 Speaker 11: subject to criminal prosecution. 549 00:24:38,600 --> 00:24:40,480 Speaker 7: If he were impeached and convicted first? 550 00:24:40,680 --> 00:24:43,840 Speaker 11: And so your answer is. 551 00:24:42,800 --> 00:24:44,440 Speaker 8: Is my answer is qualified? 552 00:24:44,520 --> 00:24:44,720 Speaker 11: Yes? 553 00:24:44,880 --> 00:24:46,880 Speaker 3: Answer? Is it qualified? Yes? Interesting? 554 00:24:47,160 --> 00:24:49,639 Speaker 2: You know, I actually thought about it, and it doesn't 555 00:24:49,640 --> 00:24:52,720 Speaker 2: seem as nuts as it sounds, because if we think 556 00:24:52,800 --> 00:24:57,280 Speaker 2: back to the only similar analogous case Barack Obama. Uh, 557 00:24:57,320 --> 00:25:00,520 Speaker 2: do you remember whenever you assassinated anwar al ALWICKI? Yeah, 558 00:25:00,560 --> 00:25:02,200 Speaker 2: so this was twenty eleven. I mean, this is actually 559 00:25:02,240 --> 00:25:05,600 Speaker 2: a crazy legal president. Yeah, Barack Obama, the president of 560 00:25:05,640 --> 00:25:10,159 Speaker 2: the United States Executive Office, held a due process style 561 00:25:10,240 --> 00:25:14,480 Speaker 2: hearing inside the executive branch and assassinated an American citizen 562 00:25:14,720 --> 00:25:17,639 Speaker 2: on foreign soil using the United States military. 563 00:25:17,680 --> 00:25:20,800 Speaker 3: Now, obviously it's substantively. 564 00:25:20,119 --> 00:25:22,520 Speaker 2: Different in that we're talking about a political rival here, 565 00:25:22,680 --> 00:25:27,000 Speaker 2: but technically, because all citizens are the same under the Constitution, 566 00:25:27,359 --> 00:25:29,639 Speaker 2: it's one of those where we somewhat kind of had 567 00:25:29,640 --> 00:25:31,800 Speaker 2: a test to this and nothing happened to him. 568 00:25:31,920 --> 00:25:33,879 Speaker 3: Now, I do not believe that that was the right 569 00:25:33,920 --> 00:25:34,360 Speaker 3: thing to do. 570 00:25:34,480 --> 00:25:36,200 Speaker 2: I don't think it was right that that was even 571 00:25:36,240 --> 00:25:38,520 Speaker 2: allowed to happen, and that there was some sort of crazy. 572 00:25:39,240 --> 00:25:41,920 Speaker 2: But the problem is is that because that did happen, 573 00:25:42,280 --> 00:25:44,640 Speaker 2: what I have seen is that could be cited as 574 00:25:44,680 --> 00:25:46,480 Speaker 2: an instance for which this has been held. 575 00:25:46,640 --> 00:25:48,160 Speaker 4: Right that I did. 576 00:25:48,200 --> 00:25:51,880 Speaker 1: Anyone try to bring charge is dismissed on the presidential immunity. 577 00:25:51,960 --> 00:25:56,240 Speaker 2: So his family brought charges or tried to bring them 578 00:25:56,359 --> 00:25:58,680 Speaker 2: in a US Corps, they were dismissed. It wasn't necessarily 579 00:25:58,680 --> 00:26:00,880 Speaker 2: on the grounds of immunity. I believe it was under 580 00:26:00,880 --> 00:26:02,640 Speaker 2: counter I'd have to go back and read. It has 581 00:26:02,400 --> 00:26:05,560 Speaker 2: been a while, but it was around counter terrorism grounds. 582 00:26:05,720 --> 00:26:07,480 Speaker 3: But I mean, if you do think about it substantively, 583 00:26:07,720 --> 00:26:09,480 Speaker 3: that was an insane. 584 00:26:09,040 --> 00:26:11,400 Speaker 1: But like, of course it's an insane situation. But that 585 00:26:11,800 --> 00:26:14,920 Speaker 1: couldn't be cited as precedent since there wasn't a ruling 586 00:26:15,080 --> 00:26:16,840 Speaker 1: that this was barred because present unity. 587 00:26:17,720 --> 00:26:19,600 Speaker 4: Yeah, but your point is taken. That's interesting. 588 00:26:19,680 --> 00:26:21,680 Speaker 1: That's what I hadn't thought of. But I mean, what 589 00:26:21,880 --> 00:26:23,720 Speaker 1: he's arguing for here is really wild. 590 00:26:24,040 --> 00:26:24,960 Speaker 3: I agree, because if you. 591 00:26:24,880 --> 00:26:27,720 Speaker 1: Think about just to lay on a separate scenario under 592 00:26:27,760 --> 00:26:32,359 Speaker 1: his legal theory here, Joe Biden could have Trump assassinated 593 00:26:33,359 --> 00:26:37,960 Speaker 1: resign Yes, before there are impeachment hearings, good to go, 594 00:26:38,280 --> 00:26:41,960 Speaker 1: can't prosecute me presidential immunity, this was an official act. 595 00:26:42,080 --> 00:26:44,320 Speaker 4: I wasn't impeached. Sorry, you can't get me. 596 00:26:44,760 --> 00:26:47,440 Speaker 1: So, I mean, it really is like an insane thing 597 00:26:47,480 --> 00:26:50,280 Speaker 1: to argue that there is literally as long as they're 598 00:26:50,320 --> 00:26:53,520 Speaker 1: not impeached, they can do absolutely whatever they want. And 599 00:26:53,560 --> 00:26:56,320 Speaker 1: I believe it was perhaps our friend Bradley Moss on 600 00:26:56,359 --> 00:26:59,200 Speaker 1: Twitter who was pointing out like there also may be 601 00:26:59,359 --> 00:27:01,920 Speaker 1: a lot of politicians who are pretty reluctant to impeach 602 00:27:01,960 --> 00:27:04,119 Speaker 1: in the Senate when they know this person is so 603 00:27:04,240 --> 00:27:07,080 Speaker 1: crazy that they will just have you assassinated, you know, 604 00:27:07,200 --> 00:27:07,800 Speaker 1: willy nilly. 605 00:27:07,920 --> 00:27:09,720 Speaker 4: So it is, it is a wild thing dark. 606 00:27:09,840 --> 00:27:13,720 Speaker 2: This all traces back to the imperial presidency theory under 607 00:27:13,800 --> 00:27:17,679 Speaker 2: Richard Nixon and then really popularized by Dick Cheney and 608 00:27:17,720 --> 00:27:21,679 Speaker 2: the White House phill a lot of these people who 609 00:27:22,040 --> 00:27:24,520 Speaker 2: this is a very very actually recent interpretation of the 610 00:27:24,600 --> 00:27:27,879 Speaker 2: US presidency, but it combined at a time, unfortunately, when 611 00:27:27,920 --> 00:27:30,800 Speaker 2: the executive office became more powerful than ever before. This 612 00:27:30,880 --> 00:27:33,720 Speaker 2: is the most logical conclusion of that. I absolutely heart that. 613 00:27:34,080 --> 00:27:36,800 Speaker 2: I absolutely would hope that a court would strike somethingness 614 00:27:36,840 --> 00:27:39,120 Speaker 2: down because this is as king like as it gets. 615 00:27:39,200 --> 00:27:40,280 Speaker 3: Absolutely yeah. 616 00:27:40,280 --> 00:27:42,639 Speaker 2: I mean, this is literally how they treated monarchs and 617 00:27:43,240 --> 00:27:47,119 Speaker 2: so called monarch monarchical constitutional systems. 618 00:27:47,160 --> 00:27:49,199 Speaker 3: They're like, yeah, the Constitution applies to everybody except for the. 619 00:27:49,240 --> 00:27:49,880 Speaker 4: King, except the king. 620 00:27:50,760 --> 00:27:54,800 Speaker 1: It seems like these judges were very skeptical of the 621 00:27:54,840 --> 00:27:56,479 Speaker 1: Trump lawyer case that was being made here. 622 00:27:56,520 --> 00:27:57,119 Speaker 4: This was in the d C. 623 00:27:57,240 --> 00:27:59,800 Speaker 1: Circuit Court of Appeals. This applies to some of the 624 00:28:00,400 --> 00:28:03,840 Speaker 1: crimes that Trump has been charged with. But even though 625 00:28:03,880 --> 00:28:07,199 Speaker 1: it appears they're going to side against Trump on this 626 00:28:07,240 --> 00:28:10,719 Speaker 1: pretty wide reaching claim he's making for immunity here, that 627 00:28:10,760 --> 00:28:13,480 Speaker 1: doesn't mean that this was necessarily a loss for Trump, 628 00:28:13,640 --> 00:28:18,120 Speaker 1: in that his whole goal is to delay the longer 629 00:28:18,280 --> 00:28:21,679 Speaker 1: that he files these appeals and challenges, and they have 630 00:28:21,760 --> 00:28:23,840 Speaker 1: to be heard, and it takes a while to decide. 631 00:28:24,000 --> 00:28:27,199 Speaker 1: The clock is ticking, and really his hope at this 632 00:28:27,320 --> 00:28:29,920 Speaker 1: point is that he gets elected president and he's able 633 00:28:29,960 --> 00:28:32,640 Speaker 1: to part himself and get out of all of this 634 00:28:32,840 --> 00:28:36,880 Speaker 1: legal jeopardy. So even though again I think it seems 635 00:28:36,960 --> 00:28:38,760 Speaker 1: like the court is going to side against him on 636 00:28:38,800 --> 00:28:44,120 Speaker 1: this specific claim. There's still an important effect here in 637 00:28:44,160 --> 00:28:44,880 Speaker 1: favor of Trump. 638 00:28:45,040 --> 00:28:46,640 Speaker 4: Was just just to delay the proceedings. 639 00:28:46,720 --> 00:28:48,840 Speaker 2: Absolutely, So let's combine there, because there's a lot of 640 00:28:48,840 --> 00:28:51,040 Speaker 2: other developments. So that one was probably I would say, 641 00:28:51,080 --> 00:28:53,080 Speaker 2: net bad for Trump. Well, this one is definitely a 642 00:28:53,080 --> 00:28:54,960 Speaker 2: net good for Trump. Let's go ahead and put this 643 00:28:55,040 --> 00:28:59,160 Speaker 2: up there on the screen. Some absolutely wild allegations that 644 00:28:59,200 --> 00:29:02,800 Speaker 2: are coming out showing Fanny Willis, who's the district attorney 645 00:29:02,840 --> 00:29:06,880 Speaker 2: in Fulton County, Georgia, Well, her name is now being 646 00:29:06,920 --> 00:29:10,960 Speaker 2: brought up in divorce proceedings by a guy named Nathan Wade, 647 00:29:11,080 --> 00:29:15,360 Speaker 2: who Fanny Willis had been tapped as the prosecutor against 648 00:29:15,400 --> 00:29:18,000 Speaker 2: Trump in the grand jury investigation. 649 00:29:18,080 --> 00:29:20,760 Speaker 3: In the subsequent case, well, it seems now. 650 00:29:20,680 --> 00:29:23,880 Speaker 2: Quote as they put it here, the relationship between missus 651 00:29:23,920 --> 00:29:26,480 Speaker 2: Willis and mister Wade has not taken center stage in 652 00:29:26,560 --> 00:29:30,080 Speaker 2: the case against Trump, because on Monday, a lawyer for 653 00:29:30,200 --> 00:29:32,600 Speaker 2: one of the co defendants charged in a court filing 654 00:29:32,880 --> 00:29:36,600 Speaker 2: that miss Willis and mister Wade have been romantic partners 655 00:29:36,800 --> 00:29:40,720 Speaker 2: who are now quote profiting significantly from the prosecution at 656 00:29:40,720 --> 00:29:44,719 Speaker 2: the expense of the taxpayer. So in divorce proceedings, effectively 657 00:29:44,760 --> 00:29:47,800 Speaker 2: against mister Wade, the allegation is made that mister Wade 658 00:29:47,800 --> 00:29:52,600 Speaker 2: and miss Willis were in a romantic relationship, and that 659 00:29:52,640 --> 00:29:57,160 Speaker 2: mister Wade, while being unqualified as the prosecutor, has now 660 00:29:57,280 --> 00:30:00,520 Speaker 2: billed the Special Prosecutor Office for there are a total 661 00:30:00,520 --> 00:30:03,640 Speaker 2: of six hundred and fifty three thousand, eight hundred and 662 00:30:03,760 --> 00:30:06,800 Speaker 2: eighty one dollars. Now currently none of this has been 663 00:30:06,800 --> 00:30:09,440 Speaker 2: confirmed Crystal, but much of it traces back to the 664 00:30:09,480 --> 00:30:13,120 Speaker 2: ongoing divorce proceedings. I think we would probably trace it 665 00:30:13,160 --> 00:30:16,400 Speaker 2: back to his wife, missus Joscelyn Wade, who is trying 666 00:30:16,400 --> 00:30:19,880 Speaker 2: to burn everything but honestly good firm. Yeah, I hope 667 00:30:19,920 --> 00:30:23,400 Speaker 2: she gets the bag. But the issue that comes through 668 00:30:23,440 --> 00:30:26,960 Speaker 2: this is that it would obviously taint the investigation for 669 00:30:27,240 --> 00:30:29,600 Speaker 2: the Georgia Fulton counter case, and in a lot of cases. 670 00:30:29,800 --> 00:30:32,520 Speaker 2: I actually thought this is the single strongest one against 671 00:30:32,560 --> 00:30:33,960 Speaker 2: Trump because. 672 00:30:33,600 --> 00:30:34,720 Speaker 3: It's about state law. 673 00:30:35,080 --> 00:30:38,400 Speaker 2: State law is the most iron clawed place where we 674 00:30:38,560 --> 00:30:42,560 Speaker 2: know election law is completely you know, the jurisdiction and 675 00:30:42,640 --> 00:30:45,640 Speaker 2: all that applies here. We had Trump on the phone, 676 00:30:45,720 --> 00:30:48,480 Speaker 2: we had the Grand Jurian investigation that was against him, 677 00:30:48,680 --> 00:30:52,680 Speaker 2: they have total authority. There's no actual major constitutional questions 678 00:30:52,960 --> 00:30:55,720 Speaker 2: about whether Georgia a state, you know, Georgia state court. 679 00:30:56,000 --> 00:30:58,200 Speaker 2: And that's part of the reason too, Crystal, why so 680 00:30:58,400 --> 00:31:00,880 Speaker 2: many of the people that they were charged co conspirators 681 00:31:00,960 --> 00:31:03,920 Speaker 2: have all flipped against him, including Sidney Powell and others. 682 00:31:04,080 --> 00:31:07,440 Speaker 2: They don't have the same level of constitutional defense. But 683 00:31:07,840 --> 00:31:09,760 Speaker 2: I mean, this is the thing about Trump. I don't 684 00:31:09,760 --> 00:31:12,080 Speaker 2: know what he has been blessed by or whatever? 685 00:31:12,840 --> 00:31:14,760 Speaker 3: Does how does how is it that. 686 00:31:14,760 --> 00:31:18,200 Speaker 2: His opponents always seem to hand him something, because this 687 00:31:18,400 --> 00:31:21,960 Speaker 2: would be genuine grounds for at least trying for dismissal 688 00:31:22,000 --> 00:31:25,120 Speaker 2: in others, if you can argue a personal charge by 689 00:31:25,120 --> 00:31:27,520 Speaker 2: the person who's investigating you, it's just crazy. 690 00:31:27,640 --> 00:31:30,680 Speaker 1: It is wild if this is true of their allegations 691 00:31:30,680 --> 00:31:32,560 Speaker 1: at this point. But she has been brought up in 692 00:31:32,560 --> 00:31:35,400 Speaker 1: these Colors filings that part I think we have been confirmed. 693 00:31:35,400 --> 00:31:38,400 Speaker 4: But if it is true, it's the level of slaughter. 694 00:31:38,520 --> 00:31:39,520 Speaker 3: What are you doing here? 695 00:31:39,680 --> 00:31:40,640 Speaker 4: It's wild. 696 00:31:40,800 --> 00:31:44,640 Speaker 1: Yeah, this person who you know is allegedly in the 697 00:31:44,680 --> 00:31:48,240 Speaker 1: relationship with Fanny well Willis and who was appointed as 698 00:31:48,360 --> 00:31:51,200 Speaker 1: by her as the prosecutor. Apparently it's just some basically 699 00:31:51,280 --> 00:31:54,800 Speaker 1: like kind of random suburban lawyer with no real relevant 700 00:31:55,160 --> 00:31:58,560 Speaker 1: like in the Georgia legal community. When he got picked, 701 00:31:58,760 --> 00:32:00,760 Speaker 1: there was a lot of head scratching of like, really, 702 00:32:00,880 --> 00:32:04,000 Speaker 1: this guy, he doesn't really like the experience, Okay, whatever, 703 00:32:04,120 --> 00:32:07,280 Speaker 1: I guess. And she was made to defend his choice 704 00:32:07,320 --> 00:32:09,640 Speaker 1: a number of times. She said, this is someone she 705 00:32:09,760 --> 00:32:12,200 Speaker 1: trusts that you know, she whatever he is, he has 706 00:32:12,320 --> 00:32:14,360 Speaker 1: experienced that she knows that she can go at him 707 00:32:14,360 --> 00:32:16,240 Speaker 1: and he'll come right back at her. She had to 708 00:32:16,280 --> 00:32:18,320 Speaker 1: defend it a number of times. So that's part of 709 00:32:18,360 --> 00:32:21,680 Speaker 1: why it looks a little bit fishier. I will say 710 00:32:21,800 --> 00:32:24,280 Speaker 1: the legal analysts that they quoted in the New York Times, 711 00:32:24,280 --> 00:32:26,760 Speaker 1: for whatever it's worth, seemed to think that it probably 712 00:32:26,760 --> 00:32:30,680 Speaker 1: wouldn't be grounds to completely like dismiss the case. But 713 00:32:31,880 --> 00:32:34,479 Speaker 1: for Trump, as we were just saying, so much of 714 00:32:34,480 --> 00:32:38,720 Speaker 1: this is not about the legal arguments. It's about the politics. 715 00:32:38,840 --> 00:32:43,440 Speaker 1: And this is a very potent political argument to make that, 716 00:32:43,680 --> 00:32:46,120 Speaker 1: you know, if it's true that this is her lover, 717 00:32:46,560 --> 00:32:49,959 Speaker 1: that she picked him and she's been, you know, funneling 718 00:32:50,080 --> 00:32:52,280 Speaker 1: hundreds of thousands of dollars to him as part of 719 00:32:52,280 --> 00:32:55,200 Speaker 1: this prosecution. There's also allegations that were going on vacations 720 00:32:55,200 --> 00:32:57,600 Speaker 1: together using some of the money that came from this. 721 00:32:57,960 --> 00:32:59,920 Speaker 4: You know that he's benefiting from from the prosecution. 722 00:33:00,080 --> 00:33:03,800 Speaker 1: Again, this is allegations, but you can see how this 723 00:33:03,840 --> 00:33:06,600 Speaker 1: will be very politically salient for Trump. 724 00:33:06,680 --> 00:33:08,840 Speaker 4: And I just cannot imagine if. 725 00:33:08,680 --> 00:33:10,960 Speaker 1: Your fanning will is and know the level of scrutiney 726 00:33:10,960 --> 00:33:12,960 Speaker 1: you're going to get, you know what's coming at you, 727 00:33:13,600 --> 00:33:16,000 Speaker 1: that you would be this sloppy. 728 00:33:16,160 --> 00:33:17,480 Speaker 4: So we'll see how this one plays. 729 00:33:17,600 --> 00:33:21,840 Speaker 2: I will certainly see who That is the best news 730 00:33:21,840 --> 00:33:23,800 Speaker 2: for Trump that I've seen in a long time. 731 00:33:24,080 --> 00:33:25,120 Speaker 3: Let's go to the next one. 732 00:33:25,200 --> 00:33:27,520 Speaker 2: Please, this just gets to a little bit we can't 733 00:33:27,520 --> 00:33:30,320 Speaker 2: forget because there's so many freaking legal proceedings around Trump, 734 00:33:30,480 --> 00:33:32,960 Speaker 2: So don't forget that he's also currently involved in a 735 00:33:33,000 --> 00:33:35,680 Speaker 2: civil fraud trial. He was supposed to be able to 736 00:33:35,720 --> 00:33:38,160 Speaker 2: give his own closing argument, where he was basically going 737 00:33:38,200 --> 00:33:40,800 Speaker 2: to say that this entire thing is a crazy witch hunt, 738 00:33:40,960 --> 00:33:43,680 Speaker 2: but the judge has now ruled that he is not 739 00:33:43,800 --> 00:33:46,640 Speaker 2: going to be allowed to give a closing argument and 740 00:33:46,720 --> 00:33:49,640 Speaker 2: instead that his attorneys will be required to do so. 741 00:33:49,680 --> 00:33:53,400 Speaker 2: He said, quote mean and nasty of the decision so far. 742 00:33:53,760 --> 00:33:57,640 Speaker 2: The issue here is that if this trial finds him guilty, 743 00:33:57,720 --> 00:34:00,680 Speaker 2: he will be liable for quote, hundreds of millions of 744 00:34:00,720 --> 00:34:03,520 Speaker 2: dollars in penalties, strips him of his business license in 745 00:34:03,520 --> 00:34:06,120 Speaker 2: the state of New York. Currently he is fighting the 746 00:34:06,160 --> 00:34:08,040 Speaker 2: allegation that he inflated his net worth. 747 00:34:08,160 --> 00:34:10,759 Speaker 3: About you know, you've done a lot of work on this. 748 00:34:10,840 --> 00:34:13,600 Speaker 2: People go and read in the past around whether he's 749 00:34:13,640 --> 00:34:16,800 Speaker 2: guilty or not. Honestly, at this point, given the situation 750 00:34:16,920 --> 00:34:19,520 Speaker 2: and all that, and also some of the prejudgments that 751 00:34:19,520 --> 00:34:21,399 Speaker 2: were made before they even went to trial, it's almost 752 00:34:21,400 --> 00:34:23,560 Speaker 2: certain that he's going to be convicted. So on a 753 00:34:23,560 --> 00:34:25,520 Speaker 2: personal level, this actually is a huge threat to his 754 00:34:25,600 --> 00:34:26,839 Speaker 2: overall quality of life. 755 00:34:26,840 --> 00:34:29,960 Speaker 1: So they've already found that he inflated the networth. 756 00:34:30,040 --> 00:34:31,719 Speaker 4: The question now is what is the penalties. 757 00:34:31,920 --> 00:34:34,200 Speaker 1: And again this is a civil case, so he's not 758 00:34:34,200 --> 00:34:36,600 Speaker 1: going to end up in prison. It's just a matter 759 00:34:36,719 --> 00:34:38,560 Speaker 1: of how much is he going to have to pay, 760 00:34:39,000 --> 00:34:43,239 Speaker 1: what is the impact to his businesses? And basically the 761 00:34:43,640 --> 00:34:46,360 Speaker 1: rub here and why they didn't end up letting Trump 762 00:34:46,400 --> 00:34:49,000 Speaker 1: give his own closing statement, is because the judge was like, 763 00:34:49,080 --> 00:34:51,160 Speaker 1: you have to just stick to the merits of the case. 764 00:34:51,200 --> 00:34:53,280 Speaker 1: You can't just go out and give some campaign speech 765 00:34:53,440 --> 00:34:55,640 Speaker 1: and Trump was like, no, basically, I want to give 766 00:34:55,680 --> 00:34:57,520 Speaker 1: a campaign speech, and they were like, you can't do that. 767 00:34:57,640 --> 00:34:59,960 Speaker 4: So that is why that fell apart. 768 00:35:00,080 --> 00:35:02,359 Speaker 1: But you know, it's a reminder that all of these 769 00:35:02,400 --> 00:35:07,439 Speaker 1: things are unpredictable, chaotic. The timelines are incredibly unsettled. The 770 00:35:07,480 --> 00:35:11,440 Speaker 1: revelations that continue to emerge are you know, interesting and 771 00:35:11,680 --> 00:35:16,120 Speaker 1: potentially relevant in a political situation. And it also underscores 772 00:35:16,560 --> 00:35:19,760 Speaker 1: Trump is politically he is in the fight of his life, 773 00:35:20,040 --> 00:35:22,920 Speaker 1: Like if he does not end up in the White House, 774 00:35:23,000 --> 00:35:25,479 Speaker 1: it is very likely he's going to prison. You said 775 00:35:25,520 --> 00:35:27,239 Speaker 1: you thought the Georgia case was the strongest. I do 776 00:35:27,280 --> 00:35:29,160 Speaker 1: think the Georgia case is strong I think the Documents 777 00:35:29,200 --> 00:35:30,840 Speaker 1: case is probably stronger. 778 00:35:30,960 --> 00:35:33,759 Speaker 3: Even though I honestly forgot about your right. 779 00:35:34,280 --> 00:35:37,200 Speaker 1: In terms of the cases centering around January sixth and 780 00:35:37,239 --> 00:35:39,480 Speaker 1: stolen electors and whatever, I think the Georgia case is 781 00:35:39,480 --> 00:35:42,400 Speaker 1: the strongest. I think overall, the Documents case is strongest. 782 00:35:42,440 --> 00:35:45,320 Speaker 1: And yes, they have some constitutional questions that they're gonna, 783 00:35:45,480 --> 00:35:49,160 Speaker 1: you know, assert, but it seems pretty open and shut 784 00:35:49,280 --> 00:35:51,600 Speaker 1: that one, just in terms of the facts, in terms 785 00:35:51,640 --> 00:35:53,279 Speaker 1: of the cover up, in terms of the level of 786 00:35:53,320 --> 00:35:57,040 Speaker 1: classification of the documents, et cetera. So if he's not 787 00:35:57,120 --> 00:35:59,840 Speaker 1: in the White House, it again very likely. 788 00:35:59,800 --> 00:36:00,880 Speaker 4: He is headed to prison. 789 00:36:01,239 --> 00:36:04,000 Speaker 1: So he's going to do whatever it takes to try 790 00:36:04,040 --> 00:36:06,440 Speaker 1: to avoid getting nailed on these charges to try to 791 00:36:06,520 --> 00:36:08,080 Speaker 1: make sure that he does end up back in the 792 00:36:08,080 --> 00:36:10,719 Speaker 1: White House. And the stakes for him personally could not 793 00:36:10,800 --> 00:36:11,720 Speaker 1: possibly be higher. 794 00:36:11,719 --> 00:36:13,839 Speaker 2: Absolutely well said, let's go to the next part here 795 00:36:13,880 --> 00:36:17,000 Speaker 2: about trials stakes, how they could not be higher. So 796 00:36:17,200 --> 00:36:22,319 Speaker 2: Hunter Biden made a shocking and unannounced visit yesterday to 797 00:36:22,400 --> 00:36:25,239 Speaker 2: Capitol Hill, despite actually not even being invited. So we 798 00:36:25,320 --> 00:36:28,160 Speaker 2: have to remember he showed up to the opening of 799 00:36:28,200 --> 00:36:31,640 Speaker 2: the House Oversight Committee. The reason why is that currently 800 00:36:31,680 --> 00:36:34,920 Speaker 2: the House Overside Committee and Republicans have subpoenat Hunter Biden, 801 00:36:34,960 --> 00:36:37,760 Speaker 2: of which he's been refusing to cooperate with. He says, 802 00:36:37,840 --> 00:36:41,319 Speaker 2: I will not testify behind closed doors and in a 803 00:36:41,440 --> 00:36:45,120 Speaker 2: longer form setting. I will, however, testify in public. So 804 00:36:45,239 --> 00:36:49,400 Speaker 2: yesterday mounted a publicity stunt showed up to the opening 805 00:36:49,440 --> 00:36:52,240 Speaker 2: of that oversight hearing. He was not recognized actually to speak, 806 00:36:52,440 --> 00:36:57,320 Speaker 2: but it didn't stop stuff from absolutely going crazy. Nancy Mace, 807 00:36:57,480 --> 00:37:01,880 Speaker 2: Marjorie Taylor Green blasting him to his face, saying with 808 00:37:02,000 --> 00:37:04,040 Speaker 2: some choice words, let's take a lesson. 809 00:37:04,360 --> 00:37:06,799 Speaker 11: First of all, my first question is who bribed Hunter 810 00:37:06,880 --> 00:37:11,400 Speaker 11: Biden to be here today? That's my first question. Second question, 811 00:37:11,840 --> 00:37:14,880 Speaker 11: You are the epitome of white privilege, coming into the 812 00:37:14,920 --> 00:37:19,120 Speaker 11: Oversight Committee, spitting in our face, ignoring a congressional subpoena 813 00:37:19,160 --> 00:37:20,080 Speaker 11: to be deposed. 814 00:37:20,440 --> 00:37:21,480 Speaker 4: What are you afraid of? 815 00:37:21,560 --> 00:37:25,040 Speaker 3: You have no balls to come up here, mister chairman, 816 00:37:25,080 --> 00:37:25,720 Speaker 3: point of inquiry. 817 00:37:26,040 --> 00:37:31,000 Speaker 2: Mister chairman, if the general, if the general lady wants 818 00:37:31,000 --> 00:37:32,640 Speaker 2: to hear from Hunter Biden, we can hear from him 819 00:37:32,680 --> 00:37:33,560 Speaker 2: right now, Miss chairman. 820 00:37:33,640 --> 00:37:35,719 Speaker 3: Let's take a vote and hear from unter Biden. What 821 00:37:35,760 --> 00:37:38,239 Speaker 3: are you afraid? 822 00:37:38,600 --> 00:37:38,759 Speaker 11: Order? 823 00:37:39,000 --> 00:37:39,160 Speaker 12: Order? 824 00:37:41,120 --> 00:37:41,400 Speaker 11: Speak? 825 00:37:42,120 --> 00:37:43,279 Speaker 3: Are women allowed to speak? 826 00:37:43,840 --> 00:37:46,800 Speaker 1: To keep interrupting me, I'll interrupt. 827 00:37:46,600 --> 00:37:47,560 Speaker 3: I know that he's a lady. 828 00:37:49,200 --> 00:37:52,040 Speaker 5: I think that, uh that Hunter Biden should be arrested 829 00:37:52,120 --> 00:37:53,920 Speaker 5: right here, right now and goes straight to jail. 830 00:37:54,040 --> 00:37:56,680 Speaker 4: Our nation is founded on the rules. 831 00:37:56,760 --> 00:37:59,680 Speaker 13: Come on, come on the premise that the law applies 832 00:38:00,040 --> 00:38:01,960 Speaker 13: equally to everyone, no matter. 833 00:38:01,719 --> 00:38:04,879 Speaker 3: What you're last point to order, mister chairman, point of matter. 834 00:38:04,920 --> 00:38:08,920 Speaker 6: Who you are, chairman, big zob here? 835 00:38:08,560 --> 00:38:09,279 Speaker 3: So all right? 836 00:38:09,360 --> 00:38:13,560 Speaker 4: So no balls? Wow, that privileged white privilege, just white privilege. 837 00:38:13,600 --> 00:38:18,680 Speaker 2: I can't stand Nancy May. She's like as MacCarthy. McCarthy 838 00:38:18,800 --> 00:38:21,400 Speaker 2: was like, she's a whole other story. I could not 839 00:38:21,960 --> 00:38:25,960 Speaker 2: agree with that. The way she conducts herself, opens her 840 00:38:25,960 --> 00:38:28,200 Speaker 2: mouth everything she's said in the past. 841 00:38:28,480 --> 00:38:28,719 Speaker 13: Uh. 842 00:38:28,840 --> 00:38:31,719 Speaker 2: I Also, though, we have to show Marjorie Taylor Green 843 00:38:31,840 --> 00:38:34,319 Speaker 2: shouting out Hunter Biden as he stormed out of the 844 00:38:34,320 --> 00:38:37,360 Speaker 2: committee meeting hearing after he was not called actually to 845 00:38:37,400 --> 00:38:38,280 Speaker 2: testify publicly. 846 00:38:38,440 --> 00:38:39,719 Speaker 3: Here, let's see what happened. 847 00:38:39,520 --> 00:38:42,560 Speaker 9: Gentlemen, Tom's expired Cherwick and as missus Green from Georgia for. 848 00:38:44,440 --> 00:38:45,520 Speaker 4: Thank you, mister chairman. 849 00:38:46,400 --> 00:38:49,839 Speaker 13: Excuse me Hunter, Apparently you're afraid of my words and 850 00:38:50,360 --> 00:39:00,480 Speaker 13: why you Ah, I like to reclaim my time, mister chairman. 851 00:39:01,920 --> 00:39:03,280 Speaker 7: Wow, that's too bad. 852 00:39:04,080 --> 00:39:06,920 Speaker 2: So he stormed out there of the committee room hearing. 853 00:39:06,960 --> 00:39:09,280 Speaker 2: You know, we were saying, I have to give Hunter this. 854 00:39:09,280 --> 00:39:12,400 Speaker 2: This was a Trumpian move, like he showed up and 855 00:39:12,440 --> 00:39:14,200 Speaker 2: he's like, all right, call on me, call on me, 856 00:39:14,800 --> 00:39:16,759 Speaker 2: even though you know he knew it wasn't going to happen. 857 00:39:16,800 --> 00:39:18,880 Speaker 2: And it showed he both is able to defy a 858 00:39:18,920 --> 00:39:21,000 Speaker 2: subpoena and then draw attention to the fact that he 859 00:39:21,080 --> 00:39:24,920 Speaker 2: is literally defying a congressional subpoena. So look, that's the 860 00:39:24,960 --> 00:39:28,160 Speaker 2: overall like quote unquote investigation update and all of that. 861 00:39:28,440 --> 00:39:30,879 Speaker 2: I do wonder though, how the White House feels, because 862 00:39:30,880 --> 00:39:33,279 Speaker 2: there's been a lot of talk that Joe Biden and 863 00:39:33,320 --> 00:39:35,960 Speaker 2: the White House would really prefer that Hunter hiding a 864 00:39:36,040 --> 00:39:38,600 Speaker 2: rock in Malibu and live off of his millions with 865 00:39:38,640 --> 00:39:41,000 Speaker 2: his latest wife and just you know, just not be 866 00:39:41,200 --> 00:39:43,480 Speaker 2: in the headlines. But it seems here that he has 867 00:39:43,560 --> 00:39:46,520 Speaker 2: hired his own counsel and he's determined to fight back, 868 00:39:46,600 --> 00:39:48,640 Speaker 2: which politically, I mean, I'm not gonna say it. 869 00:39:48,680 --> 00:39:49,560 Speaker 3: Matters all that much. 870 00:39:49,640 --> 00:39:52,240 Speaker 4: Yeah, I can't imagine that he's not doing this without Dad's. 871 00:39:52,320 --> 00:39:53,719 Speaker 3: Maybe you're right, I can't imagine that. 872 00:39:53,800 --> 00:39:55,200 Speaker 4: Yeah. 873 00:39:55,200 --> 00:39:57,640 Speaker 1: So just to give people the backs, right, so they 874 00:39:57,640 --> 00:40:00,640 Speaker 1: subpoenaed him, he said, I'll testify and public, but I'm 875 00:40:00,680 --> 00:40:02,720 Speaker 1: not doing it in private, partly because of what happened 876 00:40:02,760 --> 00:40:05,839 Speaker 1: with Devin Archer, where he helped testified in private and 877 00:40:05,840 --> 00:40:08,279 Speaker 1: then they like cherry picked and sort of misrepresented some 878 00:40:08,320 --> 00:40:10,439 Speaker 1: of the things that he said. So Hunter's like, listen, 879 00:40:10,480 --> 00:40:12,480 Speaker 1: I'll answer questions, but I'm going to do it in public. 880 00:40:12,520 --> 00:40:15,480 Speaker 1: So that's the context in which this stunt plays out. 881 00:40:15,800 --> 00:40:18,120 Speaker 1: So he comes in and it's like, listen, I'm here, 882 00:40:18,360 --> 00:40:21,719 Speaker 1: you got questions for me, I'll answer your questions. I 883 00:40:21,719 --> 00:40:24,760 Speaker 1: do think it was kind of a clever, like Trumpian stunt, 884 00:40:24,920 --> 00:40:28,160 Speaker 1: but then I don't think that necessarily storming out is 885 00:40:28,160 --> 00:40:30,080 Speaker 1: the right way to stay there, and you look like 886 00:40:30,160 --> 00:40:33,040 Speaker 1: you're the adult in the room, as they like accuse 887 00:40:33,120 --> 00:40:35,600 Speaker 1: you of having no balls in right proplas. There was 888 00:40:35,640 --> 00:40:38,080 Speaker 1: also a bunch of like conservative girl boss moments of 889 00:40:38,160 --> 00:40:40,560 Speaker 1: like he just doesn't want to hear a strong conservative 890 00:40:40,560 --> 00:40:43,400 Speaker 1: woman and are women even allowed to speak in this hearing? 891 00:40:43,480 --> 00:40:44,320 Speaker 4: Blah blah blah. 892 00:40:44,360 --> 00:40:46,319 Speaker 1: So I don't know, the wokeness on the Republican side 893 00:40:46,320 --> 00:40:48,160 Speaker 1: has really gotten out of control lately, which I know 894 00:40:48,200 --> 00:40:50,759 Speaker 1: you're covering in your mind life, which I'm very excited. 895 00:40:50,400 --> 00:40:52,480 Speaker 3: About as well, but does genuinely make me want to 896 00:40:52,560 --> 00:40:52,839 Speaker 3: kill more. 897 00:40:52,960 --> 00:40:54,400 Speaker 1: I just I don't know what to say about this 898 00:40:54,480 --> 00:40:57,279 Speaker 1: Hunter thing. Everything's so fake in American politics. Like the 899 00:40:57,360 --> 00:41:00,319 Speaker 1: investigation is fake, the concern is fake, the stunt is fake, 900 00:41:00,400 --> 00:41:00,960 Speaker 1: the like. 901 00:41:01,120 --> 00:41:02,080 Speaker 3: The defense is fake. 902 00:41:02,840 --> 00:41:07,719 Speaker 1: It's all just theater. It's all just theater, and it's 903 00:41:07,719 --> 00:41:08,640 Speaker 1: sort of disgusting to. 904 00:41:08,560 --> 00:41:11,040 Speaker 2: Watch it unfold, certainly, and you know to to that point, 905 00:41:11,080 --> 00:41:14,760 Speaker 2: I mean, like Hunter's corruption is just so blatant and obvious. 906 00:41:14,800 --> 00:41:17,200 Speaker 2: Now listen, you can say whether it should be you know, 907 00:41:17,320 --> 00:41:19,960 Speaker 2: voted on or not. But just the latest example of this, 908 00:41:20,120 --> 00:41:22,120 Speaker 2: the braziness of this man. Let's put this up there 909 00:41:22,360 --> 00:41:24,480 Speaker 2: on the screen. I just I love this. So new 910 00:41:24,520 --> 00:41:27,359 Speaker 2: revelations show us if you guys will remember about Hunter 911 00:41:27,440 --> 00:41:30,120 Speaker 2: Biden and his art. So it turns out from what 912 00:41:30,160 --> 00:41:33,040 Speaker 2: we can see here is it quote Hunter Biden actually 913 00:41:33,120 --> 00:41:36,440 Speaker 2: knew most of his art buyers, despite the quote unquote 914 00:41:36,560 --> 00:41:39,439 Speaker 2: ethics plan contradicting the White House. If you guys will 915 00:41:39,440 --> 00:41:43,200 Speaker 2: recall when Hunter, out of nowhere just decided to start 916 00:41:43,280 --> 00:41:46,720 Speaker 2: selling art and doing it for a very high dollar. Well, Crystal, 917 00:41:46,880 --> 00:41:50,799 Speaker 2: it turns out that the major buyer of Hunter's art 918 00:41:51,160 --> 00:41:55,279 Speaker 2: is the very same person who paid off his irs 919 00:41:55,440 --> 00:41:58,520 Speaker 2: two million dollar tax bill, which is the end as 920 00:41:58,560 --> 00:42:01,279 Speaker 2: a major Democratic donor and is the only reason. 921 00:42:01,040 --> 00:42:04,960 Speaker 3: He was never criminally prosecuted. Like, this is the most 922 00:42:05,120 --> 00:42:09,040 Speaker 3: obvious form of money laundering I have ever seen, Crystal. 923 00:42:09,160 --> 00:42:12,640 Speaker 2: He bought eight hundred and seventy five thousand dollars worth 924 00:42:12,680 --> 00:42:15,000 Speaker 2: of this man's art. Yeah, and he previously had paid 925 00:42:15,000 --> 00:42:17,600 Speaker 2: off his tax bill and is a huge Democratic donor. 926 00:42:17,640 --> 00:42:19,239 Speaker 2: Now list today this is the most important story in 927 00:42:19,239 --> 00:42:21,400 Speaker 2: the world. No, but it's just like, come on, this 928 00:42:21,520 --> 00:42:24,200 Speaker 2: is just it's almost an accounting gimmick at this point 929 00:42:24,320 --> 00:42:28,080 Speaker 2: as to who's being propped up who's not. Recall also 930 00:42:28,120 --> 00:42:29,600 Speaker 2: that the White House said that they had a whole 931 00:42:29,640 --> 00:42:32,000 Speaker 2: ethics plan in place for Hunter's art. 932 00:42:32,040 --> 00:42:33,840 Speaker 3: Since he's not going to know who bought it and 933 00:42:33,840 --> 00:42:36,200 Speaker 3: all this, it's complete bist. It's like, what, he's not 934 00:42:36,239 --> 00:42:36,480 Speaker 3: going to. 935 00:42:36,480 --> 00:42:38,560 Speaker 2: Go to his friend's house and see his art on 936 00:42:38,600 --> 00:42:40,920 Speaker 2: the wall and know that he received almost a million 937 00:42:41,000 --> 00:42:44,919 Speaker 2: bucks even though he'd never painted anything in the past. Look, 938 00:42:44,960 --> 00:42:48,040 Speaker 2: I know it's clownish. Whether Biden himself got any of 939 00:42:48,040 --> 00:42:51,040 Speaker 2: the dollars, I don't know. I think he's certainly benefited 940 00:42:51,040 --> 00:42:53,319 Speaker 2: from it in the past. You know, we'll see. But 941 00:42:53,520 --> 00:42:56,000 Speaker 2: the art thing is just like whole Biden is the president, 942 00:42:56,239 --> 00:42:58,200 Speaker 2: You've got the donor who's getting paid off. 943 00:42:58,200 --> 00:42:59,279 Speaker 3: It's just as blatant as when. 944 00:42:59,160 --> 00:43:01,560 Speaker 2: Trump was president and all those foreign dignitaries which just 945 00:43:01,600 --> 00:43:02,520 Speaker 2: go stay at his hotels. 946 00:43:02,760 --> 00:43:03,239 Speaker 3: It's like you. 947 00:43:03,239 --> 00:43:05,920 Speaker 2: Cannot deny that you're getting paid that him and his 948 00:43:05,960 --> 00:43:07,200 Speaker 2: family are not benefiting well. 949 00:43:07,520 --> 00:43:09,759 Speaker 1: And this is this is why Republicans have no leg 950 00:43:09,800 --> 00:43:13,240 Speaker 1: to stand on when they're in you know, Foe concerned 951 00:43:13,280 --> 00:43:17,160 Speaker 1: suddenly about corruption because yeah, we just got this report 952 00:43:17,200 --> 00:43:19,400 Speaker 1: about the many millions of dollars that were spent by 953 00:43:19,440 --> 00:43:22,440 Speaker 1: foreign governments like China and Saudi Arabia at his properties, 954 00:43:22,880 --> 00:43:24,200 Speaker 1: and he got asked about it, by the way, at 955 00:43:24,200 --> 00:43:26,759 Speaker 1: the Fox Newstown. They basically bribed about it. I mean 956 00:43:26,920 --> 00:43:29,600 Speaker 1: did he totally admitted to it. So you know, when 957 00:43:29,600 --> 00:43:32,160 Speaker 1: you're looking at his foreign policy actions, you're like, Okay, well, 958 00:43:32,200 --> 00:43:33,799 Speaker 1: is this on behalf of the country or is this 959 00:43:33,840 --> 00:43:36,600 Speaker 1: because you got millions into your personal bank account through 960 00:43:36,760 --> 00:43:40,200 Speaker 1: via your businesses from China, from Saudi Arabia, et cetera. 961 00:43:40,680 --> 00:43:45,000 Speaker 1: So yeah, I mean this is why there's no accountability. 962 00:43:45,120 --> 00:43:47,680 Speaker 1: This is why these things are not prosecuted. This is 963 00:43:47,680 --> 00:43:50,520 Speaker 1: why the Supreme Court has made it basically impossible to 964 00:43:50,600 --> 00:43:54,719 Speaker 1: prove corruption because they're all so complicit and they're so 965 00:43:54,760 --> 00:43:59,000 Speaker 1: selective in which types of corruption they're going to care about, 966 00:43:59,080 --> 00:44:01,360 Speaker 1: depending on whether it's a D or whether it's an R. 967 00:44:01,560 --> 00:44:01,840 Speaker 3: Yeah. 968 00:44:01,880 --> 00:44:04,040 Speaker 2: Absolutely, it shows you why, you know, It's like you said, 969 00:44:04,120 --> 00:44:05,640 Speaker 2: a lot of it is just theater, and most of 970 00:44:05,680 --> 00:44:08,040 Speaker 2: it is almost entirely fake. But at least we did 971 00:44:08,080 --> 00:44:10,960 Speaker 2: get a hilarious clip of Nancymas out of it, So 972 00:44:11,040 --> 00:44:12,520 Speaker 2: thank you Hunter, at least. 973 00:44:12,320 --> 00:44:12,880 Speaker 12: Thank you for that. 974 00:44:13,120 --> 00:44:17,200 Speaker 4: Yes, all right, Sacher, were we looking at. 975 00:44:17,080 --> 00:44:18,799 Speaker 3: It's become cliche and it's tried. 976 00:44:18,880 --> 00:44:21,640 Speaker 2: But in discussions about free speech or any other principle, 977 00:44:21,719 --> 00:44:24,360 Speaker 2: the maximum is this. Unless you support free speech, or 978 00:44:24,400 --> 00:44:26,960 Speaker 2: you apply your principles for those who you hate most 979 00:44:27,000 --> 00:44:29,839 Speaker 2: in society, those even who you find the most reprehensible, 980 00:44:30,040 --> 00:44:32,440 Speaker 2: then you don't really believe in it at all. For 981 00:44:32,480 --> 00:44:35,279 Speaker 2: a while there many Republican politicians were singing a tune 982 00:44:35,280 --> 00:44:37,400 Speaker 2: that I could get on board with pro free speech, 983 00:44:37,480 --> 00:44:40,680 Speaker 2: anti affirmative action in essence an embrace of equality of 984 00:44:40,719 --> 00:44:44,120 Speaker 2: outcome and equal application of law. That is, a heterogeneous 985 00:44:44,120 --> 00:44:46,880 Speaker 2: society of three hundred and thirty million should be governed 986 00:44:46,960 --> 00:44:49,920 Speaker 2: under this equal application. By and large, this is mostly 987 00:44:49,920 --> 00:44:52,080 Speaker 2: the case in the last seven years since the mainstream 988 00:44:52,160 --> 00:44:55,879 Speaker 2: establishment decidedly became liberal with the capital L. But much 989 00:44:55,920 --> 00:44:58,720 Speaker 2: of it was then thrown out of seemingly overnight after 990 00:44:58,800 --> 00:45:01,920 Speaker 2: October seven. Sames is what we'll discuss with Glenn Greenwald 991 00:45:02,000 --> 00:45:04,439 Speaker 2: later this week that much of the American right now 992 00:45:04,520 --> 00:45:07,680 Speaker 2: has a pro Israel exception, and there is perhaps no 993 00:45:07,840 --> 00:45:11,160 Speaker 2: better example of this than Governor Ron DeSantis's Israel turn. 994 00:45:11,440 --> 00:45:13,400 Speaker 3: One of the ways that Ron de Santa's built. 995 00:45:13,160 --> 00:45:16,320 Speaker 2: A national name for himself was specifically signing into legislation 996 00:45:16,480 --> 00:45:19,520 Speaker 2: anti critical race theory measures, a key tenant of which 997 00:45:19,800 --> 00:45:23,160 Speaker 2: is attacking the foundation of affirmative action, the notion that 998 00:45:23,200 --> 00:45:27,000 Speaker 2: specific groups in American society deserve special treatment and separate 999 00:45:27,000 --> 00:45:31,320 Speaker 2: admissions categories because they have been so called oppressed throughout history. 1000 00:45:31,560 --> 00:45:34,200 Speaker 2: The day after that ruling actually came out on affirmative 1001 00:45:34,200 --> 00:45:37,000 Speaker 2: action from the Supreme Court, Desantas said that his state 1002 00:45:37,040 --> 00:45:39,960 Speaker 2: would go even further. They would not only abolish affirmative 1003 00:45:39,960 --> 00:45:45,120 Speaker 2: action in Florida, but also eliminate diversity, diversity, equity, and inclusion, 1004 00:45:45,800 --> 00:45:48,919 Speaker 2: otherwise known as DEI. As those who watch no, I'm 1005 00:45:49,000 --> 00:45:51,200 Speaker 2: very anti DEI. I think it is on American and 1006 00:45:51,239 --> 00:45:54,640 Speaker 2: has imported the affirmative action rules into the workplace, elevating 1007 00:45:54,640 --> 00:45:56,520 Speaker 2: people based on the color of their skin or their 1008 00:45:56,560 --> 00:45:59,399 Speaker 2: sexual orientation instead of whether they're good at their jobs 1009 00:45:59,480 --> 00:46:01,759 Speaker 2: or not. In fact, the day after the ruling, af 1010 00:46:01,800 --> 00:46:05,080 Speaker 2: new Florida law went into place, specifically prohibiting colleges or 1011 00:46:05,200 --> 00:46:08,880 Speaker 2: universities from spending state or federal money quote to promote, 1012 00:46:08,920 --> 00:46:14,120 Speaker 2: support or maintain programs campus activities that advocate for diversity, equity, 1013 00:46:14,160 --> 00:46:17,160 Speaker 2: and inclusion. Again, that is law and policy that I 1014 00:46:17,200 --> 00:46:20,239 Speaker 2: have one hundred percent support, which is why it was 1015 00:46:20,320 --> 00:46:23,320 Speaker 2: so shocking to see someone who has said this, acted 1016 00:46:23,400 --> 00:46:26,239 Speaker 2: on it, and touted it flip on a dime. In 1017 00:46:26,320 --> 00:46:29,120 Speaker 2: the last three months of moral panic about so called 1018 00:46:29,160 --> 00:46:33,080 Speaker 2: anti semitism on college campuses, Republicans have turned themselves into 1019 00:46:33,080 --> 00:46:36,440 Speaker 2: the same snowflakes that they castigated for the last eight years. Now, 1020 00:46:36,480 --> 00:46:38,759 Speaker 2: all of a sudden, a student crying on campus or 1021 00:46:38,840 --> 00:46:42,360 Speaker 2: quote not feeling safe because of words is caused for action, 1022 00:46:42,719 --> 00:46:45,240 Speaker 2: so much cost for action that in the state of Florida, 1023 00:46:45,280 --> 00:46:49,040 Speaker 2: DeSantis is now funneling state resources specifically. 1024 00:46:48,600 --> 00:46:50,760 Speaker 3: For Jewish students, he announced. 1025 00:46:50,400 --> 00:46:54,520 Speaker 2: Yesterday quote Today, I am directing Florida's colleges and universities 1026 00:46:54,560 --> 00:46:56,920 Speaker 2: to make it easier for Jewish students to transfer to 1027 00:46:57,000 --> 00:47:00,480 Speaker 2: a Florida higher education institution. While leaders of if elite 1028 00:47:00,560 --> 00:47:04,319 Speaker 2: universities enable anti semitism we will protect Jewish students and 1029 00:47:04,360 --> 00:47:07,800 Speaker 2: welcome them to Florida. So, in other words, DeSantis invented 1030 00:47:07,840 --> 00:47:11,880 Speaker 2: affirmative action for Jews. It is beyond parody because affirmative 1031 00:47:11,920 --> 00:47:14,400 Speaker 2: action itself has roots that go back to the early 1032 00:47:14,560 --> 00:47:18,800 Speaker 2: twentieth century, specifically to keep Jews out of universities. Without 1033 00:47:18,840 --> 00:47:22,000 Speaker 2: explicitly saying so, the new DeSantis policy will allow the 1034 00:47:22,000 --> 00:47:26,000 Speaker 2: state University system of Florida to waive credit hour requirements 1035 00:47:26,040 --> 00:47:29,120 Speaker 2: and application date windows for Jewish students who are quote 1036 00:47:29,120 --> 00:47:32,680 Speaker 2: facing anti semitism on their campuses to transfer into a 1037 00:47:32,680 --> 00:47:36,080 Speaker 2: Florida based university. The policy will also grant in state 1038 00:47:36,120 --> 00:47:40,040 Speaker 2: tuition on a case by case basis, so quite literally 1039 00:47:40,320 --> 00:47:44,919 Speaker 2: directing state resources for special treatment of American Jews. Even 1040 00:47:44,960 --> 00:47:47,160 Speaker 2: more clownish is the defense that I have seen from 1041 00:47:47,160 --> 00:47:50,600 Speaker 2: the pro DeSantis crowd. They say soccer k read in 1042 00:47:50,640 --> 00:47:53,400 Speaker 2: the executive order, it says it applies to any religious 1043 00:47:53,400 --> 00:47:56,720 Speaker 2: group who is facing discrimination. It doesn't technically say anything 1044 00:47:56,760 --> 00:47:59,920 Speaker 2: about Jews as usual. They should read the words of 1045 00:48:00,120 --> 00:48:02,920 Speaker 2: the governor, who on Twitter and in his official release 1046 00:48:03,080 --> 00:48:06,440 Speaker 2: from his state office, said that the policy is specifically 1047 00:48:06,520 --> 00:48:12,360 Speaker 2: intended for Jewish students. Imagine a counterfactual, Governor Gavin Newsom. 1048 00:48:12,480 --> 00:48:15,600 Speaker 2: He said, I'm going to direct state resources for black kids, 1049 00:48:15,800 --> 00:48:18,640 Speaker 2: but that technically the policy will apply to all races. 1050 00:48:18,760 --> 00:48:20,879 Speaker 2: Would we say yeah, I mean he said it would 1051 00:48:20,920 --> 00:48:23,799 Speaker 2: direct to all races, right, Or would we believe him 1052 00:48:23,800 --> 00:48:26,719 Speaker 2: when he said he's going to preference blacks over everyone else? 1053 00:48:27,040 --> 00:48:30,719 Speaker 2: The same defense is so patently absurd and pathetic here 1054 00:48:30,920 --> 00:48:33,239 Speaker 2: they would have been better off just staying silent and 1055 00:48:33,440 --> 00:48:36,000 Speaker 2: hope that their blatant hypocrisy is unnoticed. 1056 00:48:36,320 --> 00:48:38,239 Speaker 3: The Dessantis policy already has. 1057 00:48:38,160 --> 00:48:41,040 Speaker 2: Come after he banned the Students for Justice for Palestine 1058 00:48:41,120 --> 00:48:44,680 Speaker 2: organization on Florida campuses in executive order that the free 1059 00:48:44,680 --> 00:48:48,920 Speaker 2: speech organization fire said quote believes higher education can only 1060 00:48:48,960 --> 00:48:52,280 Speaker 2: fulfill its important mission when students can speak their minds. 1061 00:48:52,320 --> 00:48:54,680 Speaker 2: We will defend the rights of all Florida students and 1062 00:48:54,760 --> 00:48:56,040 Speaker 2: all Americans. 1063 00:48:55,480 --> 00:48:57,720 Speaker 3: To speak freely. That's exactly correct. 1064 00:48:57,920 --> 00:49:01,160 Speaker 2: Being for free speech, being against racial or religious quotas 1065 00:49:01,360 --> 00:49:03,680 Speaker 2: is only a principle when you hold it both against 1066 00:49:03,719 --> 00:49:06,000 Speaker 2: people who you don't like, and you don't make special 1067 00:49:06,040 --> 00:49:08,400 Speaker 2: exceptions for those that may be politically convenient for you 1068 00:49:08,640 --> 00:49:11,600 Speaker 2: in the moment. Otherwise you're a hypocritical hack. That's what 1069 00:49:11,640 --> 00:49:13,560 Speaker 2: Desanta say is now and that's what it seems that 1070 00:49:13,600 --> 00:49:16,839 Speaker 2: a lot of the American right is too so Honestly, and. 1071 00:49:16,840 --> 00:49:19,520 Speaker 1: If you want to hear my reaction to Sagres's monologue, 1072 00:49:19,560 --> 00:49:25,920 Speaker 1: become a premium subscriber today at breakingpoints dot com. Crystal, 1073 00:49:25,960 --> 00:49:27,960 Speaker 1: what are you taking a look at a violent incident 1074 00:49:28,120 --> 00:49:30,680 Speaker 1: unfolded recently in the occupied West Bank, which has seen 1075 00:49:30,719 --> 00:49:33,680 Speaker 1: an onslaught of violence and land grabs by extremist settlers 1076 00:49:33,760 --> 00:49:37,040 Speaker 1: enabled by the IDF as well as IDF raids. Two 1077 00:49:37,080 --> 00:49:41,200 Speaker 1: Palestinians rammed into Israeli border police. Those police then fired 1078 00:49:41,239 --> 00:49:44,120 Speaker 1: on the assailants and in the chaos, astray bullet fired 1079 00:49:44,120 --> 00:49:48,080 Speaker 1: by the Israelis killed a three year old Bedouin Palestinian child. 1080 00:49:48,400 --> 00:49:51,760 Speaker 1: Take a listen though to how Sky News described these events. 1081 00:49:52,000 --> 00:49:53,360 Speaker 8: This happened to the border checkpoint. 1082 00:49:53,600 --> 00:49:55,440 Speaker 14: You can see a car going through and ramming some 1083 00:49:55,520 --> 00:49:59,040 Speaker 14: of the police that we're actually manning that checkpoint. The 1084 00:49:59,680 --> 00:50:03,480 Speaker 14: video going to free shortly, but the two people as 1085 00:50:03,480 --> 00:50:04,640 Speaker 14: a man and a woman in the car. 1086 00:50:05,239 --> 00:50:07,440 Speaker 8: In the subsequently they were killed by the police. 1087 00:50:07,440 --> 00:50:09,759 Speaker 14: But it looks like accidentally a stray bullet found its 1088 00:50:09,800 --> 00:50:12,759 Speaker 14: way into the van ahead, and that killed a three 1089 00:50:12,840 --> 00:50:14,120 Speaker 14: or four year old young lady. 1090 00:50:14,160 --> 00:50:16,040 Speaker 8: So tragic events in the West Bank. 1091 00:50:16,120 --> 00:50:18,560 Speaker 1: That's right, a three year old was described as a 1092 00:50:18,640 --> 00:50:22,360 Speaker 1: quote young lady. The bullet, of course, just magically found 1093 00:50:22,360 --> 00:50:25,920 Speaker 1: its way into the vehicle. Now contrast this language to 1094 00:50:26,080 --> 00:50:28,760 Speaker 1: a recent report in The Daily Mail decrying the continued 1095 00:50:28,800 --> 00:50:32,400 Speaker 1: captivity of four Israeli women still being held by Hamas. 1096 00:50:32,920 --> 00:50:36,439 Speaker 1: Their headline reads the faces of the girls still being 1097 00:50:36,440 --> 00:50:38,879 Speaker 1: held by Hamas as their families make a desperate plea 1098 00:50:38,920 --> 00:50:40,839 Speaker 1: for their release three months. 1099 00:50:40,520 --> 00:50:41,640 Speaker 4: After they were captured. 1100 00:50:42,000 --> 00:50:45,160 Speaker 1: The article features deeply emotional interviews with the families of 1101 00:50:45,200 --> 00:50:48,520 Speaker 1: these women, who I am sure are absolutely tormented. But 1102 00:50:48,560 --> 00:50:51,799 Speaker 1: these are not, in fact girls. They are adult women, 1103 00:50:52,080 --> 00:50:54,959 Speaker 1: old enough to serve in the IDF, which all four 1104 00:50:55,000 --> 00:50:58,439 Speaker 1: of them do, a fact that was conveniently left out 1105 00:50:58,600 --> 00:51:01,440 Speaker 1: of that entire Daily Mail Peace. So you're left with 1106 00:51:01,520 --> 00:51:05,320 Speaker 1: the specter of a literal toddler being called a young lady, 1107 00:51:05,719 --> 00:51:09,960 Speaker 1: while adult women soldiers are called girls. And while these soldiers, 1108 00:51:10,040 --> 00:51:12,799 Speaker 1: combatants in an ongoing war, are portrayed in the fullness 1109 00:51:12,800 --> 00:51:15,480 Speaker 1: of their humanity, with their hopes, their wishes, the terror 1110 00:51:15,520 --> 00:51:18,720 Speaker 1: of their families all showcased. We will never know anything 1111 00:51:18,840 --> 00:51:21,480 Speaker 1: more than the most basic of details about the three 1112 00:51:21,520 --> 00:51:24,279 Speaker 1: year old. What was her favorite toy? Does she have 1113 00:51:24,360 --> 00:51:27,279 Speaker 1: a big brother who misses her? Will her parents ever 1114 00:51:27,400 --> 00:51:30,000 Speaker 1: be able to get over the loss of their darling girl. 1115 00:51:30,480 --> 00:51:32,600 Speaker 1: Now you might think I'm cherry picking here one off 1116 00:51:32,600 --> 00:51:35,720 Speaker 1: incidents of shoddy and one sided journalism, but a growing 1117 00:51:35,760 --> 00:51:39,200 Speaker 1: mountain of evidence shows that the dehumanization of Palestinians and 1118 00:51:39,520 --> 00:51:43,640 Speaker 1: gregiously lopsided coverage is systematic, and it is widespread. In fact, 1119 00:51:43,800 --> 00:51:46,960 Speaker 1: according to a new analysis, the unprecedented toll that Israel's 1120 00:51:46,960 --> 00:51:49,440 Speaker 1: assault on Gaza has taken on children has been rendered 1121 00:51:49,520 --> 00:51:54,040 Speaker 1: nearly invisible, featured in just two headlines out of eleven 1122 00:51:54,120 --> 00:51:56,560 Speaker 1: hundred that were examined by the Intercept. 1123 00:51:56,680 --> 00:51:58,319 Speaker 4: But that is far from all. 1124 00:51:58,880 --> 00:52:01,600 Speaker 1: Wild imbalances are happening at CNN, where we now know 1125 00:52:01,680 --> 00:52:04,879 Speaker 1: they willingly operate under the IDF censorship regime, but also 1126 00:52:04,880 --> 00:52:08,000 Speaker 1: at prestige papers like The Washington Post, which positions itself 1127 00:52:08,040 --> 00:52:11,560 Speaker 1: as a beacon of journalistic courage and integrity, At right 1128 00:52:11,560 --> 00:52:15,080 Speaker 1: wing outlets like Fox News, and also at liberal ones 1129 00:52:15,200 --> 00:52:19,360 Speaker 1: like MSNBC. Right here in the US, that imbalance is manifest, 1130 00:52:19,400 --> 00:52:22,920 Speaker 1: but also in Britain at the BBC. Even for someone 1131 00:52:23,120 --> 00:52:26,440 Speaker 1: as Jaden's skeptical of mainstream coverage, as I certainly am, 1132 00:52:26,719 --> 00:52:29,600 Speaker 1: the insanely imbalanced nature of these numbers is still shocking. 1133 00:52:29,880 --> 00:52:31,200 Speaker 4: So let's start with the new report. 1134 00:52:31,200 --> 00:52:33,720 Speaker 1: This was published in The Intercept, compiled by Adam Johnson 1135 00:52:33,840 --> 00:52:36,399 Speaker 1: and Athmanali. They took a look at coverage in three 1136 00:52:36,440 --> 00:52:40,160 Speaker 1: ostensibly liberal outlets, The Times, The Washington Post, and The 1137 00:52:40,280 --> 00:52:43,000 Speaker 1: La Times over a six week period from October seventh 1138 00:52:43,040 --> 00:52:45,680 Speaker 1: through November twenty fourth, and they compiled a number of 1139 00:52:45,760 --> 00:52:48,959 Speaker 1: metrics seeking to show the consistent way that Israeli lives 1140 00:52:49,000 --> 00:52:52,800 Speaker 1: are valued to a dramatically greater degree than Palestinian lives. 1141 00:52:52,840 --> 00:52:54,160 Speaker 4: Just take a look at this chart. 1142 00:52:54,719 --> 00:52:58,160 Speaker 1: So they calculated that the words slaughter was used to 1143 00:52:58,200 --> 00:53:01,520 Speaker 1: describe the killing of Israelis on October seventh sixty times, 1144 00:53:01,880 --> 00:53:04,680 Speaker 1: Yet when it came to Palestinians, many thousands more of 1145 00:53:04,680 --> 00:53:07,919 Speaker 1: them have been killed, only a single time was their 1146 00:53:07,960 --> 00:53:10,480 Speaker 1: mass killing described as it should be, as a slaughter. 1147 00:53:10,920 --> 00:53:14,360 Speaker 1: It's a similar story with the word horrific. Hamasa's actions 1148 00:53:14,360 --> 00:53:17,960 Speaker 1: were described as horrific thirty eight times. That's appropriate Israeli 1149 00:53:18,040 --> 00:53:21,479 Speaker 1: assaults on innocent civilians were only described as horrific four 1150 00:53:21,520 --> 00:53:25,320 Speaker 1: times in six weeks. October seventh was labeled a massacre 1151 00:53:25,520 --> 00:53:28,320 Speaker 1: a full one hundred and twenty times during the relevant period, 1152 00:53:28,320 --> 00:53:31,000 Speaker 1: but as Palestinians were being killed by the tens of thousands, 1153 00:53:31,280 --> 00:53:35,000 Speaker 1: these deaths were only described as a massacre four times. Now, 1154 00:53:35,120 --> 00:53:38,040 Speaker 1: keep in mind, according to EUROMED Monitor twenty eight thousand, 1155 00:53:38,080 --> 00:53:40,880 Speaker 1: two hundred and one Palestinian civilians have been killed by 1156 00:53:40,960 --> 00:53:44,120 Speaker 1: Israel since October seventh, and estimated six hundred and ninety 1157 00:53:44,120 --> 00:53:47,080 Speaker 1: five civilians were killed and the Hamas attack on October seventh. 1158 00:53:47,400 --> 00:53:50,280 Speaker 1: In other words, forty times more Palestinians have been killed 1159 00:53:50,320 --> 00:53:52,600 Speaker 1: than Israelis. But if you were to judge the relative 1160 00:53:52,640 --> 00:53:55,680 Speaker 1: loss of life by the number of mentions in media outlets, 1161 00:53:55,840 --> 00:53:58,960 Speaker 1: you would have to presume far more dead Israelis than 1162 00:53:58,960 --> 00:54:03,359 Speaker 1: Palestinians by long stretch. According to Adam and Ali's analysis, 1163 00:54:03,400 --> 00:54:07,360 Speaker 1: for every two Palestinian deaths, Palestinians are mentioned once. For 1164 00:54:07,440 --> 00:54:10,759 Speaker 1: every Israeli death, Israelis are mentioned eight times, or a 1165 00:54:10,840 --> 00:54:13,960 Speaker 1: rate sixteen times more per death than that of Palestinians. 1166 00:54:14,280 --> 00:54:16,759 Speaker 1: And you can see this from this chart. As more 1167 00:54:16,800 --> 00:54:20,920 Speaker 1: Palestinians were killed, they were actually mentioned less and less. 1168 00:54:21,280 --> 00:54:24,080 Speaker 1: We witness this in real time. How invented university anti 1169 00:54:24,080 --> 00:54:26,360 Speaker 1: semitism scandals and whatever the hell is going on with 1170 00:54:26,400 --> 00:54:29,120 Speaker 1: Bill Ackman, how that took the place of coverage of 1171 00:54:29,160 --> 00:54:33,040 Speaker 1: the increasingly undeniable horrors that Palestinians are being subjected to. 1172 00:54:33,520 --> 00:54:36,960 Speaker 1: This chart tracks how has the horror increased the coverage 1173 00:54:37,080 --> 00:54:41,200 Speaker 1: actually decreased. Also revealed in this report, real and invented 1174 00:54:41,239 --> 00:54:45,040 Speaker 1: anti semitism was covered far more vigorously than Islamophobia. This 1175 00:54:45,080 --> 00:54:47,439 Speaker 1: in spite of the fact that multiple violent incidents during 1176 00:54:47,440 --> 00:54:50,399 Speaker 1: this time appeared spurred by anti Muslim or anti Arab hat. 1177 00:54:50,800 --> 00:54:54,480 Speaker 1: Eighty seven percent of mentions of discrimination concerned anti Semitism, 1178 00:54:54,560 --> 00:54:59,600 Speaker 1: only thirteen percent concerned Islamophobia. The cable news landscape is 1179 00:54:59,680 --> 00:55:03,120 Speaker 1: unso prizingly at least equally as grimm This chart from 1180 00:55:03,120 --> 00:55:06,480 Speaker 1: Adam Substack. The column tracks how many times Israelis were 1181 00:55:06,480 --> 00:55:10,200 Speaker 1: described as having been massacred versus Palestinians over the first 1182 00:55:10,200 --> 00:55:13,120 Speaker 1: month of the conflict. Out of seventeen hundred and thirty 1183 00:55:13,120 --> 00:55:16,719 Speaker 1: three massacre mentions, one thy six hundred and fifty five 1184 00:55:16,760 --> 00:55:20,120 Speaker 1: came of them. When describing Israelis killed on October seventh, 1185 00:55:20,560 --> 00:55:24,760 Speaker 1: This evocative language was only applied to Palestinian deaths seventy 1186 00:55:24,880 --> 00:55:28,360 Speaker 1: eight times. They further document in this piece that usually 1187 00:55:28,560 --> 00:55:31,480 Speaker 1: when massacre was actually used with regard to Palestinians, it 1188 00:55:31,520 --> 00:55:34,480 Speaker 1: didn't come directly from network anchors or commentators, but as 1189 00:55:34,560 --> 00:55:38,080 Speaker 1: comments attributed to Palestinians. So, for example, Richard Angel of 1190 00:55:38,160 --> 00:55:41,600 Speaker 1: NBC News he said that quote Palestinians call it a 1191 00:55:41,680 --> 00:55:46,280 Speaker 1: massacre passive language that is debatable rather than unequivocal. Ali 1192 00:55:46,360 --> 00:55:48,760 Speaker 1: and Adam also reveal in this report that although children 1193 00:55:48,760 --> 00:55:51,480 Speaker 1: in journalists, sympathetic and protected groups have been slaughtered at 1194 00:55:51,560 --> 00:55:55,239 Speaker 1: rates far higher than any other modern conflict, they have 1195 00:55:55,360 --> 00:55:59,839 Speaker 1: received scant media coverage. This contrasts dramatically with the cover 1196 00:55:59,920 --> 00:56:02,520 Speaker 1: of the Ukraine War, where the impact on children and 1197 00:56:02,560 --> 00:56:05,680 Speaker 1: on the press was a frequent subject of commentary and 1198 00:56:05,800 --> 00:56:08,600 Speaker 1: of reporting. Now, to be clear, six journalists were killed 1199 00:56:08,600 --> 00:56:10,279 Speaker 1: in the early days of the Ukraine War, and that 1200 00:56:10,400 --> 00:56:13,560 Speaker 1: is a terrible tool. Forty eight were killed in the 1201 00:56:13,600 --> 00:56:16,400 Speaker 1: first weeks of Israel's assault on Gaza. That number has 1202 00:56:16,440 --> 00:56:19,920 Speaker 1: now skyrocketed to over one hundred and ten. These people 1203 00:56:20,040 --> 00:56:23,000 Speaker 1: have the nerve to posture as defenders of the free press. 1204 00:56:23,200 --> 00:56:27,080 Speaker 1: What utter and complete garbage. Finally, to show you, I 1205 00:56:27,080 --> 00:56:30,720 Speaker 1: guess we're not alone in insufferable and completely dishonest coverage. 1206 00:56:30,760 --> 00:56:34,840 Speaker 1: British commentator Owen Jones recently featured analysis on BBC coverage 1207 00:56:34,920 --> 00:56:38,760 Speaker 1: conducted by Mona Chalabi with a lot of very similar results. 1208 00:56:38,880 --> 00:56:41,040 Speaker 1: Just take a listen to a portion of Owen's report. 1209 00:56:41,320 --> 00:56:45,000 Speaker 12: As for a motive, words murder or murdered is used 1210 00:56:45,040 --> 00:56:47,840 Speaker 12: one hundred and one times in reference to his reignees 1211 00:56:48,000 --> 00:56:51,600 Speaker 12: compared to one time in reference to Palestinians. So he 1212 00:56:51,680 --> 00:56:54,160 Speaker 12: might go, well, look, come on, an airstrike killing lots 1213 00:56:54,160 --> 00:56:56,560 Speaker 12: of people is extremely horrific, but it's different to someone 1214 00:56:56,760 --> 00:56:59,960 Speaker 12: just going up to someone and shooting them. Well, look, 1215 00:57:00,080 --> 00:57:01,840 Speaker 12: if you take that place, we'll have to beg to differ. 1216 00:57:01,880 --> 00:57:06,239 Speaker 12: There's ample evidence that Israel is deliberately killing civilians. I 1217 00:57:06,280 --> 00:57:09,799 Speaker 12: make no apology for saying that the so called diahead doctrine, 1218 00:57:10,120 --> 00:57:12,120 Speaker 12: first developed in the two thousand and six Lebanon War, 1219 00:57:12,200 --> 00:57:15,960 Speaker 12: to deliberately kill civilians to put pressure on civilian populations 1220 00:57:16,000 --> 00:57:20,120 Speaker 12: to achieve political goals, is clearly in action in Gaza 1221 00:57:20,480 --> 00:57:24,040 Speaker 12: and indeed, nine to seventy two magazine using leaked information 1222 00:57:24,240 --> 00:57:29,160 Speaker 12: from Israeli military intelligence sources, makes it abundantly clear that 1223 00:57:29,240 --> 00:57:33,320 Speaker 12: Palastine civilians are clearly being deliberately killed. In any case, 1224 00:57:33,400 --> 00:57:35,960 Speaker 12: what are the fact that several Palatins have been objectively 1225 00:57:36,040 --> 00:57:38,320 Speaker 12: murdered in the West Bank alone in this time period, 1226 00:57:38,360 --> 00:57:41,000 Speaker 12: and where it's extremely comparable actually to the way that 1227 00:57:41,040 --> 00:57:43,400 Speaker 12: many Israeli civilians were killed on the seventh of October. 1228 00:57:44,000 --> 00:57:46,520 Speaker 12: The West Bank, as you will know, is of course 1229 00:57:46,560 --> 00:57:49,480 Speaker 12: not run by Hamas. Now as for other emotive words, well, 1230 00:57:49,800 --> 00:57:53,160 Speaker 12: massacre or massacred is used twenty three times in reference 1231 00:57:53,160 --> 00:57:56,400 Speaker 12: to Israelis, it's used just once in relation to Gaza. 1232 00:57:56,880 --> 00:57:58,520 Speaker 12: That for me actually just sums up the whole problem 1233 00:57:59,000 --> 00:58:02,240 Speaker 12: western media coverage, because if it actually reflected reality, we 1234 00:58:02,280 --> 00:58:04,160 Speaker 12: would be referring to what's happening to Gas as one 1235 00:58:04,200 --> 00:58:06,560 Speaker 12: of the great masakers of our time. But in any case, 1236 00:58:06,560 --> 00:58:09,840 Speaker 12: clearly the BBC does not believe that, for example, wiping 1237 00:58:09,840 --> 00:58:13,360 Speaker 12: out entire blood lines of Palestinians constitutes of massacre. As 1238 00:58:13,400 --> 00:58:16,800 Speaker 12: for slaughter or slaughtered, those words that's used twenty times, 1239 00:58:17,000 --> 00:58:21,320 Speaker 12: twenty times in reference was Raeli's in reference to Palestinians zerotypes, 1240 00:58:21,440 --> 00:58:21,800 Speaker 12: not once. 1241 00:58:22,080 --> 00:58:24,720 Speaker 1: So here is a visualization of what Owen was just 1242 00:58:24,760 --> 00:58:26,920 Speaker 1: discussing there that you can take a look at. And 1243 00:58:27,080 --> 00:58:30,680 Speaker 1: the bottom line is this, So Raelis are murdered, Palestinians 1244 00:58:30,720 --> 00:58:34,520 Speaker 1: simply inexplicably die, something that I've grappled with over these 1245 00:58:34,560 --> 00:58:38,560 Speaker 1: past several months that has really shaken me. How How 1246 00:58:38,640 --> 00:58:42,240 Speaker 1: is the unrelenting assault allowed to persist? How is there 1247 00:58:42,280 --> 00:58:46,680 Speaker 1: not uniform condemnation of the killing of civilians, of their starvation, 1248 00:58:46,800 --> 00:58:50,680 Speaker 1: of their permanent destruction of their homes, schools, mosques, neighborhoods, 1249 00:58:50,680 --> 00:58:55,760 Speaker 1: and so much more, the massacre of children, journalists, aid workers, doctors. 1250 00:58:56,400 --> 00:58:59,160 Speaker 1: As fellow at the Institute for Global Affairs, Assaul Rale 1251 00:58:59,200 --> 00:59:02,120 Speaker 1: put it stupid for thinking that we believed as a 1252 00:59:02,120 --> 00:59:06,080 Speaker 1: society that killing thousands of children, bearing them under rubble 1253 00:59:06,360 --> 00:59:10,600 Speaker 1: and amputating their limbs without anesthesia is wrong. No matter 1254 00:59:10,680 --> 00:59:14,000 Speaker 1: what I naively thought, that was one thing we could 1255 00:59:14,040 --> 00:59:17,440 Speaker 1: all agree on. And when the history is written, how 1256 00:59:17,440 --> 00:59:20,200 Speaker 1: the West looked on with approval and rushed to supply 1257 00:59:20,280 --> 00:59:23,480 Speaker 1: the bombs that were dropped on the babies of Palestine. 1258 00:59:23,720 --> 00:59:26,920 Speaker 1: When that history is written, these charts will need to 1259 00:59:26,960 --> 00:59:30,000 Speaker 1: be shown. They must be shown because a vital part 1260 00:59:30,040 --> 00:59:32,880 Speaker 1: of that story is how the Western press their absolute 1261 00:59:33,040 --> 00:59:36,480 Speaker 1: damnedest to hide from citizens the horse that their own 1262 00:59:36,520 --> 00:59:40,040 Speaker 1: taxpayer dollars are paying for. For the real story, you 1263 00:59:40,080 --> 00:59:42,120 Speaker 1: will do a hell of a lot better joining the 1264 00:59:42,200 --> 00:59:45,600 Speaker 1: zoomers over on TikTok and soger and if you. 1265 00:59:45,520 --> 00:59:48,280 Speaker 2: Want to hear my reaction to Crystal's monologue, become a 1266 00:59:48,280 --> 00:59:54,760 Speaker 2: premium subscriber today at breakingpoints dot com. Okay, we had 1267 00:59:54,800 --> 00:59:57,120 Speaker 2: a great show for you guys, really appreciate you. You 1268 00:59:57,120 --> 00:59:59,640 Speaker 2: can sign up breakingpoints dot com otherwise we will see 1269 00:59:59,680 --> 01:00:09,919 Speaker 2: you all on Monday.