WEBVTT - On The Heels Of The Kerfuffle

0:00:02.000 --> 0:00:06.320
<v Speaker 1>Broadcasting live from the Abraham Lincoln Radio Studio, the George

0:00:06.360 --> 0:00:10.880
<v Speaker 1>Washington Broadcast Center, Jack Armstrong and Joe Getty arm Strong

0:00:10.960 --> 0:00:17.599
<v Speaker 1>and Dat enough He Armstrong and Eddy.

0:00:27.040 --> 0:00:28.080
<v Speaker 2>Marcus is just sleep.

0:00:28.480 --> 0:00:31.240
<v Speaker 3>Biden may be keeping a strong face. The headline from

0:00:31.280 --> 0:00:35.000
<v Speaker 3>Axios Harris stiff arms Biden in the final stretch. Days

0:00:35.000 --> 0:00:37.440
<v Speaker 3>he's kept open to hit the trail have come and gone,

0:00:37.560 --> 0:00:40.000
<v Speaker 3>the campaign reportedly saying we'll get back to you.

0:00:40.240 --> 0:00:42.360
<v Speaker 1>I've done a lot of sorts. If we talk all

0:00:42.400 --> 0:00:45.199
<v Speaker 1>the time, I'm they're asking me where they think I

0:00:45.200 --> 0:00:46.360
<v Speaker 1>should be to help them.

0:00:46.440 --> 0:00:49.800
<v Speaker 3>Most Evidently those calls aren't coming from Harris. The New

0:00:49.880 --> 0:00:52.519
<v Speaker 3>York Times reports she is gingerly peppered people who are

0:00:52.520 --> 0:00:55.000
<v Speaker 3>close to mister Biden. How do you think he's doing?

0:00:55.120 --> 0:00:55.760
<v Speaker 1>She will ask.

0:00:56.080 --> 0:00:59.680
<v Speaker 3>Biden's allies say he's concerned the campaign is underestimating his

0:00:59.680 --> 0:01:02.600
<v Speaker 3>appeace among working class voters in the rust Bell.

0:01:02.920 --> 0:01:05.360
<v Speaker 1>That's a non story in my opinion. It's just, you know,

0:01:05.400 --> 0:01:07.560
<v Speaker 1>it's an old man whose feelings might be hurt. That

0:01:07.959 --> 0:01:15.560
<v Speaker 1>he no longer is relevant to the question. But George W.

0:01:15.720 --> 0:01:22.560
<v Speaker 1>Bush didn't campaign with McCain back in two thousand and

0:01:22.600 --> 0:01:25.160
<v Speaker 1>eight because he wasn't popular at the time, and he said, yeah,

0:01:25.200 --> 0:01:26.800
<v Speaker 1>that's fine. I realized I'd be more of a drag

0:01:26.840 --> 0:01:29.679
<v Speaker 1>than a help. Maybe Biden's hurt by this, I don't know,

0:01:29.760 --> 0:01:31.520
<v Speaker 1>but Biden would be a drag.

0:01:31.640 --> 0:01:35.360
<v Speaker 4>Characterized it quite accurately as a sad old man who

0:01:35.400 --> 0:01:38.960
<v Speaker 4>can't accept that he's now worse than irrelevant.

0:01:39.160 --> 0:01:41.360
<v Speaker 1>Which has got to be tough when you've been relevant

0:01:41.400 --> 0:01:46.360
<v Speaker 1>for fifty some years. But you know it happens to

0:01:46.400 --> 0:01:50.320
<v Speaker 1>all of us. Trump is over an hour into a

0:01:50.360 --> 0:01:53.600
<v Speaker 1>press conference. Over an hour. Can you imagine Kamala Harris

0:01:53.640 --> 0:01:56.320
<v Speaker 1>standing there with major press taking questions for over an hour? No,

0:01:56.440 --> 0:01:58.760
<v Speaker 1>neither can I. It'd be the end of her campaign

0:01:58.840 --> 0:02:04.520
<v Speaker 1>probably if she right. Yeah, so, uh. Trump doesn't get

0:02:04.600 --> 0:02:10.919
<v Speaker 1>enough credit for that. He takes on adversarial press more

0:02:10.960 --> 0:02:16.840
<v Speaker 1>than anybody I can remember in modern presidential history, and

0:02:17.000 --> 0:02:18.160
<v Speaker 1>has the whole time.

0:02:19.080 --> 0:02:21.360
<v Speaker 4>Part of the reason is because virtually all of the

0:02:21.400 --> 0:02:24.040
<v Speaker 4>press is adversarial. I saw it actually claimed the other

0:02:24.080 --> 0:02:25.880
<v Speaker 4>day by CNN or somebody. The Trump has done a

0:02:25.960 --> 0:02:30.160
<v Speaker 4>number of interviews almost entirely with friendly outlets, which is

0:02:30.320 --> 0:02:33.960
<v Speaker 4>just given the context of Kamala that is just shame

0:02:34.480 --> 0:02:35.639
<v Speaker 4>shamelessness is kind.

0:02:35.520 --> 0:02:37.960
<v Speaker 1>Of their their way of doing business. So here's an

0:02:37.960 --> 0:02:40.560
<v Speaker 1>interesting thing I saw develop yesterday. And Katie, you can

0:02:40.600 --> 0:02:43.240
<v Speaker 1>weigh on this as the only woman or I'm sorry,

0:02:43.320 --> 0:02:46.560
<v Speaker 1>a chest feeding person, vagina owning person. I don't know

0:02:46.560 --> 0:02:48.040
<v Speaker 1>what I'm supposed to call you. I don't want to

0:02:48.160 --> 0:02:49.760
<v Speaker 1>get on the wrong side of history.

0:02:51.480 --> 0:02:56.720
<v Speaker 4>That wasmit worthy. Bonus hole, that's right. I forgot that

0:02:56.840 --> 0:02:58.480
<v Speaker 4>was the actual term.

0:02:59.120 --> 0:03:05.000
<v Speaker 1>Ei the woke, that's right. Oh, I forgot for a

0:03:05.040 --> 0:03:09.280
<v Speaker 1>cup of coffee. They seriously were saying that this emerged yesterday.

0:03:09.440 --> 0:03:17.320
<v Speaker 1>I heard it a bunch of times, the hesitant Harris

0:03:17.440 --> 0:03:21.520
<v Speaker 1>voter around abortion. So there's the hesidant Trump voter, which

0:03:21.560 --> 0:03:25.919
<v Speaker 1>seems to be true several cycles in a roll where

0:03:26.040 --> 0:03:29.320
<v Speaker 1>Trump does better than the polling, with the idea being

0:03:29.800 --> 0:03:33.079
<v Speaker 1>their Trump voters are afraid to say it to pollsters

0:03:33.320 --> 0:03:36.480
<v Speaker 1>or something. I don't know. I've never quite understood. It

0:03:36.560 --> 0:03:39.600
<v Speaker 1>doesn't make sense to me that why you'd be afraid

0:03:39.600 --> 0:03:42.080
<v Speaker 1>to say anything to a polster. But anyway, he has

0:03:42.160 --> 0:03:45.800
<v Speaker 1>performed better than the polls. There's belief that there's a

0:03:45.920 --> 0:03:52.040
<v Speaker 1>hesitant Harris voter. Women in specific. They now have ads

0:03:52.640 --> 0:03:57.000
<v Speaker 1>mentioning this. It's getting mentioned in all kinds of surrogate speeches. Women,

0:03:57.880 --> 0:04:00.480
<v Speaker 1>Michelle Obama. We should have the clip of this Obama

0:04:00.560 --> 0:04:04.160
<v Speaker 1>saying this the other night. Women, we know your husbands

0:04:04.560 --> 0:04:07.760
<v Speaker 1>might get really angry if you go and vote for Harris,

0:04:08.000 --> 0:04:10.160
<v Speaker 1>but remember you need to stand up for your you know,

0:04:10.320 --> 0:04:13.600
<v Speaker 1>protecting your body and women's rights and your daughter's rights

0:04:13.600 --> 0:04:16.839
<v Speaker 1>and all this different sort of crap. It's basically saying,

0:04:16.880 --> 0:04:18.600
<v Speaker 1>there are a whole bunch of women who are so

0:04:18.760 --> 0:04:23.000
<v Speaker 1>afraid of their husbands that they're claiming they'll vote for Trump,

0:04:23.279 --> 0:04:25.680
<v Speaker 1>but in secret they're Harris voters. But I guess they

0:04:25.680 --> 0:04:27.360
<v Speaker 1>feel like their husband's gonna beat them.

0:04:27.320 --> 0:04:28.000
<v Speaker 4>Up or something.

0:04:28.400 --> 0:04:29.760
<v Speaker 1>I don't even need to stand it.

0:04:30.320 --> 0:04:32.160
<v Speaker 4>We need to get the Michelle Obama clip. But what

0:04:32.200 --> 0:04:34.479
<v Speaker 4>she said was, your husband isn't going to be in

0:04:34.520 --> 0:04:36.880
<v Speaker 4>the booths with you, right, boyfriend won't be in the

0:04:36.880 --> 0:04:39.760
<v Speaker 4>booth with you. You can tell them you voted for Trump,

0:04:40.000 --> 0:04:42.880
<v Speaker 4>but you should vote for Harris to protect yourself.

0:04:43.040 --> 0:04:43.160
<v Speaker 2>Right.

0:04:43.200 --> 0:04:44.880
<v Speaker 1>She said this Friday night. And now I've seen a

0:04:44.920 --> 0:04:48.520
<v Speaker 1>whole bunch of different Sarah Goods and Kamala herself and

0:04:48.600 --> 0:04:50.680
<v Speaker 1>all kinds of pundits saying Yeah, there are a bunch

0:04:50.680 --> 0:04:53.720
<v Speaker 1>of women out there who, you know, if they were

0:04:53.760 --> 0:04:55.880
<v Speaker 1>allowed to, they would have vote for Harris, but they're

0:04:55.880 --> 0:04:58.239
<v Speaker 1>not allowed to in their household. What are you trying

0:04:58.240 --> 0:05:02.800
<v Speaker 1>to say that there are thousands, tens of thousands, hundreds

0:05:02.800 --> 0:05:06.440
<v Speaker 1>of thousands, of millions of Harris voters who live in

0:05:06.520 --> 0:05:10.279
<v Speaker 1>households that are so oppressive. I mean, I have never

0:05:10.320 --> 0:05:13.520
<v Speaker 1>had a relationship like that. I don't know if you have,

0:05:14.240 --> 0:05:17.320
<v Speaker 1>where you would be scared to say your opinion out

0:05:17.360 --> 0:05:19.400
<v Speaker 1>loud or how your vote. I don't even get it.

0:05:19.440 --> 0:05:23.760
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think it's a specific poke at the Trump voter,

0:05:24.160 --> 0:05:26.960
<v Speaker 2>not just their their relationships, but that you know, these

0:05:27.000 --> 0:05:31.080
<v Speaker 2>women are married to these Trumpers, and you know, I

0:05:31.080 --> 0:05:33.080
<v Speaker 2>don't know, they've been trying to paint men that are

0:05:33.120 --> 0:05:34.880
<v Speaker 2>for Trump like monsters this whole time.

0:05:35.040 --> 0:05:37.480
<v Speaker 1>True, That's very, very true. It might be a they

0:05:37.520 --> 0:05:41.000
<v Speaker 1>might actually have this view because they have such a distorted,

0:05:41.400 --> 0:05:44.040
<v Speaker 1>hateful view of anybody who would vote for Donald Trump,

0:05:44.200 --> 0:05:47.400
<v Speaker 1>which has more to do with inflation and the variety

0:05:47.400 --> 0:05:50.160
<v Speaker 1>of other immigration than it does any of the stuff

0:05:50.200 --> 0:05:54.560
<v Speaker 1>you think racism and misogyny. But so their evil view

0:05:54.600 --> 0:05:56.760
<v Speaker 1>of Trump voters as yeah, women just go along with

0:05:56.800 --> 0:05:59.040
<v Speaker 1>it because they they live in a Trump household, where

0:05:59.080 --> 0:06:00.919
<v Speaker 1>you have to do with the been once. Have you

0:06:00.960 --> 0:06:04.160
<v Speaker 1>ever know anybody within one hundred miles of that portrayal?

0:06:04.480 --> 0:06:06.280
<v Speaker 2>Have you guys seen one of these ads that they're

0:06:06.320 --> 0:06:07.240
<v Speaker 2>talking about.

0:06:08.000 --> 0:06:08.320
<v Speaker 1>I don't know.

0:06:08.360 --> 0:06:08.760
<v Speaker 4>I don't know.

0:06:11.160 --> 0:06:15.000
<v Speaker 2>As Yeah, I just I just saw one on YouTube

0:06:15.000 --> 0:06:17.040
<v Speaker 2>a second ago, actually before you guys started talking about it.

0:06:17.520 --> 0:06:20.279
<v Speaker 1>We'll play it at this hour. It's it's really visual.

0:06:20.880 --> 0:06:24.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I'll get the last clip, but it's it's it's

0:06:24.440 --> 0:06:27.400
<v Speaker 2>definitely showing like the woman would be in some deep

0:06:27.720 --> 0:06:29.400
<v Speaker 2>s if she didn't vote for Trump.

0:06:29.680 --> 0:06:33.039
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I agree with you that it's a fairly repugnant idea,

0:06:33.120 --> 0:06:34.960
<v Speaker 4>but I don't I'm not sure I can go as

0:06:35.080 --> 0:06:39.279
<v Speaker 4>far as you and saying there's nothing there. I think,

0:06:39.440 --> 0:06:42.880
<v Speaker 4>given the closeness of the Swing States, if you could

0:06:42.960 --> 0:06:46.760
<v Speaker 4>reach a few suburban women and convince them, hey, say

0:06:46.760 --> 0:06:50.560
<v Speaker 4>you voted for Trump, just vote for hers. It's it's

0:06:50.600 --> 0:06:53.719
<v Speaker 4>it's perverse and sick, but I don't think it's totally crazy.

0:06:54.080 --> 0:06:58.320
<v Speaker 1>But out of fear, like they're physically afraid of their husbands,

0:06:58.960 --> 0:06:59.400
<v Speaker 1>or they.

0:06:59.279 --> 0:07:01.120
<v Speaker 4>Just don't want to get to hear the guff they

0:07:01.120 --> 0:07:07.400
<v Speaker 4>don't want to hear it. Strategically speaking, it's not insane.

0:07:08.120 --> 0:07:10.560
<v Speaker 1>I think they believe it. I think they think that

0:07:10.680 --> 0:07:15.280
<v Speaker 1>Trump households are like that Handsmaid's tailed, all that crap

0:07:15.320 --> 0:07:17.760
<v Speaker 1>that they've been talking about for a decade now.

0:07:18.200 --> 0:07:23.560
<v Speaker 4>Mm hmm, craziness. You're just looking for a dozen votes

0:07:23.600 --> 0:07:25.640
<v Speaker 4>wherever you can get them. At this point, it's scaring

0:07:25.680 --> 0:07:28.880
<v Speaker 4>people into voting, and you know, well, I think powering

0:07:28.920 --> 0:07:30.720
<v Speaker 4>them to defy their oppressive husbands.

0:07:30.720 --> 0:07:33.680
<v Speaker 1>I guess I would say. I think it's another example

0:07:33.720 --> 0:07:36.560
<v Speaker 1>of you're doing more harm than good. You're making me

0:07:36.800 --> 0:07:40.840
<v Speaker 1>think and a lot of people who could I would

0:07:40.840 --> 0:07:44.280
<v Speaker 1>never vote for Kamala Harris, but people that can't quite

0:07:44.320 --> 0:07:47.520
<v Speaker 1>handle Trump, who would think? A few people and know

0:07:47.800 --> 0:07:50.160
<v Speaker 1>that's what I'm like as a Trump voter. My wife

0:07:50.240 --> 0:07:53.960
<v Speaker 1>doesn't have the right juice what she wants to screw you? Yes,

0:07:54.560 --> 0:07:58.400
<v Speaker 1>a pattern of never ending condescension, Yes, never ending condescension.

0:07:58.440 --> 0:08:01.320
<v Speaker 1>The Armstrong and Getty show. It used to be one

0:08:01.320 --> 0:08:04.320
<v Speaker 1>of our liners. No, never worked for us. No, people

0:08:04.360 --> 0:08:04.920
<v Speaker 1>didn't like it.

0:08:06.120 --> 0:08:06.400
<v Speaker 4>Eh.

0:08:06.840 --> 0:08:10.920
<v Speaker 1>So ah, what a heck of a croosing argument. You

0:08:10.960 --> 0:08:13.080
<v Speaker 1>women who are so scared of your husband's vote. This way.

0:08:13.960 --> 0:08:17.560
<v Speaker 4>The drumbeat of that idiot comedian's idiot joke is the

0:08:17.600 --> 0:08:19.640
<v Speaker 4>most important issue in America.

0:08:19.280 --> 0:08:23.560
<v Speaker 1>Continues five five stories in The New York Times Today

0:08:23.560 --> 0:08:29.360
<v Speaker 1>about it. Five that seems like plenty Byron york Is

0:08:29.400 --> 0:08:32.520
<v Speaker 1>taking a look at Playbook DC from Politico, which is

0:08:32.600 --> 0:08:34.720
<v Speaker 1>kind of their inside the belt Way every morning. You

0:08:34.720 --> 0:08:37.800
<v Speaker 1>got to check it if you're a Politico thing, And

0:08:38.600 --> 0:08:41.880
<v Speaker 1>virtually the entire thing is about that stupid joke or

0:08:41.920 --> 0:08:44.880
<v Speaker 1>too by that ill advised comedian who took the stage

0:08:44.880 --> 0:08:50.400
<v Speaker 1>an hour and a quarter before Trump. That's that's crazy

0:08:50.880 --> 0:08:55.080
<v Speaker 1>ore exit polls. Do people believe in exit polls? I

0:08:55.080 --> 0:08:58.840
<v Speaker 1>don't remember eh much lately.

0:08:59.120 --> 0:08:59.840
<v Speaker 4>No.

0:09:00.160 --> 0:09:02.480
<v Speaker 1>I would love to know if it goes Trump way,

0:09:02.480 --> 0:09:04.880
<v Speaker 1>either direction it goes, I would like to know what

0:09:05.040 --> 0:09:08.600
<v Speaker 1>actually what stuff actually mattered and what didn't. I find

0:09:08.640 --> 0:09:12.360
<v Speaker 1>it very hard to believe that this comedian from Sunday

0:09:12.400 --> 0:09:16.400
<v Speaker 1>Night is going to be a deciding factor for anyone. Yeah,

0:09:16.400 --> 0:09:16.839
<v Speaker 1>I got this.

0:09:16.840 --> 0:09:20.480
<v Speaker 4>Note from Bob that I thought was pretty good. You

0:09:20.520 --> 0:09:22.480
<v Speaker 4>act as though the comment about Puerto Rico was the

0:09:22.520 --> 0:09:25.760
<v Speaker 4>catalyst of something in an outrage that wouldn't have happened

0:09:25.800 --> 0:09:29.400
<v Speaker 4>if they weren't set his point is the left was

0:09:29.559 --> 0:09:32.280
<v Speaker 4>going to be outraged about something and this is just

0:09:32.320 --> 0:09:35.840
<v Speaker 4>what they chose. But it's unquestionable, Bob, that we're just

0:09:35.960 --> 0:09:38.880
<v Speaker 4>reporting on what the lefties are trying to get going.

0:09:38.960 --> 0:09:41.120
<v Speaker 4>But he does point out that, you know, if you

0:09:41.200 --> 0:09:46.040
<v Speaker 4>combine the two worst jokes three, there's maybe forty seconds

0:09:46.080 --> 0:09:48.040
<v Speaker 4>of a six and a half hour event.

0:09:48.360 --> 0:09:50.960
<v Speaker 1>It was long before Trump took the stage. It was

0:09:51.000 --> 0:09:54.000
<v Speaker 1>six and a half hours long. Were you expected to

0:09:54.000 --> 0:09:56.760
<v Speaker 1>be there the whole time? I don't know. Wow.

0:09:56.960 --> 0:09:59.240
<v Speaker 4>Uh, the media is all in for Harris. They'll spend

0:09:59.280 --> 0:10:01.480
<v Speaker 4>things no matter what media creation. The worst part is

0:10:01.480 --> 0:10:03.440
<v Speaker 4>that the people from Puerto Rico agree they have a

0:10:03.480 --> 0:10:05.920
<v Speaker 4>massive garbage problem, as I was describing the other day.

0:10:09.679 --> 0:10:11.640
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. I guess Trump was asked about the

0:10:11.760 --> 0:10:15.199
<v Speaker 1>rally during his press conference today. If he said anything interesting,

0:10:15.920 --> 0:10:19.920
<v Speaker 1>we will we'll pass that along to you. So Joe

0:10:20.040 --> 0:10:26.600
<v Speaker 1>Rogan apparently on his podcast today talked about why Kamala Harris,

0:10:26.640 --> 0:10:28.640
<v Speaker 1>why that interview fell apart. He was going to interview

0:10:28.679 --> 0:10:32.360
<v Speaker 1>both candidates. Remember there was like a week there where

0:10:32.360 --> 0:10:34.160
<v Speaker 1>the talk was she was going to do Joe Rogan.

0:10:35.120 --> 0:10:38.240
<v Speaker 1>Trump ended up doing Joe Rogan for two hours. The

0:10:38.280 --> 0:10:40.200
<v Speaker 1>only headline I've seen out of this is he said

0:10:40.240 --> 0:10:42.319
<v Speaker 1>she wanted to limit to an hour, and he said.

0:10:42.040 --> 0:10:47.560
<v Speaker 4>No, and that he had to come to her well,

0:10:47.600 --> 0:10:49.240
<v Speaker 4>and she would laime an hour, but then she'd show

0:10:49.320 --> 0:10:50.199
<v Speaker 4>up twenty minutes.

0:10:50.000 --> 0:10:52.720
<v Speaker 1>Late, right like she did with Barbara. Ask Brett Berringer,

0:10:52.880 --> 0:10:56.080
<v Speaker 1>she wouldn't travel to Austin to be on the show. Nope,

0:10:56.600 --> 0:10:57.240
<v Speaker 1>what is that?

0:10:57.320 --> 0:10:59.520
<v Speaker 4>Well, then she wanted it to not happen, and right,

0:10:59.640 --> 0:11:01.400
<v Speaker 4>that's what. Get an hour and you got to bring

0:11:01.440 --> 0:11:05.000
<v Speaker 4>your crew with you? Yeah, no's that's a poison pill.

0:11:05.040 --> 0:11:08.200
<v Speaker 4>I think that the hour thing, I think could have

0:11:08.320 --> 0:11:10.360
<v Speaker 4>just been a we can't have her out there for more.

0:11:10.679 --> 0:11:13.440
<v Speaker 4>For that long, we're doomed, but you have to come

0:11:13.440 --> 0:11:15.440
<v Speaker 4>to us. Sounds like a poison pill, Like he won't

0:11:15.440 --> 0:11:16.960
<v Speaker 4>agree to that, so then we won't have to do it.

0:11:17.559 --> 0:11:18.120
<v Speaker 1>I would agree.

0:11:18.160 --> 0:11:20.679
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, to do Rogan as Rogan does all his guests

0:11:20.720 --> 0:11:23.120
<v Speaker 4>would have been a disastrous idea. They were smart to

0:11:23.440 --> 0:11:24.800
<v Speaker 4>find an excuse not to do it.

0:11:25.040 --> 0:11:27.920
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely, that would have been a terrible idea with a

0:11:28.120 --> 0:11:30.640
<v Speaker 1>with a ten days left at the time, No, that

0:11:30.679 --> 0:11:32.920
<v Speaker 1>would have been yeah, and they didn't let her. Smart

0:11:33.280 --> 0:11:37.080
<v Speaker 1>strategy by David Bloof or whoever pulls the strings.

0:11:37.440 --> 0:11:39.040
<v Speaker 4>And as Trump is doing an hour and a half

0:11:39.040 --> 0:11:42.800
<v Speaker 4>press conference in front of the hostile media as we speak,

0:11:43.080 --> 0:11:45.600
<v Speaker 4>there will be no backlash to her chickening out on

0:11:45.720 --> 0:11:46.800
<v Speaker 4>Joe Rogan, not a bit.

0:11:46.880 --> 0:11:50.080
<v Speaker 1>No, absolutely not so. Jeff Bezos, second richest man in

0:11:50.080 --> 0:11:54.640
<v Speaker 1>the world, owns the Washington Post. Kids, Jeff, that's the

0:11:54.720 --> 0:12:00.280
<v Speaker 1>fellow was born in nineteen sixty four. He gives me hope,

0:12:00.960 --> 0:12:03.480
<v Speaker 1>gives me hope that we might get some dominant, dominant

0:12:03.480 --> 0:12:07.719
<v Speaker 1>media that tries to restore our faith in journalism. And

0:12:07.800 --> 0:12:09.719
<v Speaker 1>a piece he wrote in his own paper today, we'll

0:12:09.720 --> 0:12:12.439
<v Speaker 1>share that with you this hour.

0:12:14.880 --> 0:12:15.120
<v Speaker 3>Now.

0:12:15.160 --> 0:12:18.920
<v Speaker 4>One of the few advantages of age is a little

0:12:18.960 --> 0:12:21.640
<v Speaker 4>bit of wisdom, you'd like to think, including recognizing, Hey,

0:12:21.760 --> 0:12:22.800
<v Speaker 4>I'm an outlier on this.

0:12:23.000 --> 0:12:24.280
<v Speaker 1>Okay, I can live with that.

0:12:24.559 --> 0:12:27.160
<v Speaker 4>But that's why, you know, the world doesn't go quite

0:12:27.160 --> 0:12:29.559
<v Speaker 4>the way I think it should. For instance, the Wall

0:12:29.600 --> 0:12:33.360
<v Speaker 4>Street Journal with a very good piece about where all

0:12:33.400 --> 0:12:36.280
<v Speaker 4>the places where childcare is on the ballot in America,

0:12:36.679 --> 0:12:40.199
<v Speaker 4>subsidies for childcare, taxpayer funded childcare, that sort of thing.

0:12:41.120 --> 0:12:43.400
<v Speaker 4>And it's just interesting because it is, as usual with

0:12:43.440 --> 0:12:45.400
<v Speaker 4>the journal, very well written and researched in a bunch

0:12:45.400 --> 0:12:48.600
<v Speaker 4>of quotes from a bunch of different people, but they

0:12:48.720 --> 0:12:53.640
<v Speaker 4>never ever mention that. I think every single woman who

0:12:53.720 --> 0:12:59.240
<v Speaker 4>is quoted in this piece as unable to afford daycare

0:12:59.320 --> 0:13:03.559
<v Speaker 4>for their children is a single mom. Is raising their

0:13:03.640 --> 0:13:05.520
<v Speaker 4>kid without a partner, without a man, or a one

0:13:05.640 --> 0:13:07.360
<v Speaker 4>or I don't know, a talking dog or whatever. It

0:13:07.400 --> 0:13:15.880
<v Speaker 4>doesn't matter. And the fundamental question which is unspoken, And

0:13:15.880 --> 0:13:18.080
<v Speaker 4>this is not a value judgment on my part, This

0:13:18.120 --> 0:13:20.960
<v Speaker 4>is me looking at it almost from a political scientists

0:13:20.960 --> 0:13:22.840
<v Speaker 4>point of view, and this is one of the failings

0:13:22.840 --> 0:13:25.400
<v Speaker 4>of democracy. You can't hurt people's feelings and like give

0:13:25.440 --> 0:13:27.960
<v Speaker 4>them the facts. But we've gone from a society that

0:13:28.160 --> 0:13:33.800
<v Speaker 4>was vastly, vastly two parents raising a child with all

0:13:33.840 --> 0:13:37.920
<v Speaker 4>the benefits thereof, to a society that sends the message

0:13:38.000 --> 0:13:40.959
<v Speaker 4>quite consistently. It's perfectly fine if you, as a single

0:13:41.080 --> 0:13:44.560
<v Speaker 4>mom or single dad, want to have a child, and

0:13:44.600 --> 0:13:47.160
<v Speaker 4>I'm not talking about a situation of divorce or being widowed.

0:13:47.440 --> 0:13:51.920
<v Speaker 4>You never intended to have a partner that puts you

0:13:51.960 --> 0:13:55.080
<v Speaker 4>in the situation where you cannot afford care for your

0:13:55.160 --> 0:13:58.200
<v Speaker 4>child and work in many cases because you don't make

0:13:58.280 --> 0:14:02.760
<v Speaker 4>enough money. Therefore tax payers should pay for that child's care.

0:14:04.600 --> 0:14:07.880
<v Speaker 4>It's an interesting way to describe how society should work.

0:14:08.400 --> 0:14:11.239
<v Speaker 4>Maybe it's a good idea, maybe it's not a good idea.

0:14:11.400 --> 0:14:13.760
<v Speaker 4>The interesting part to me is that the questions never asked.

0:14:14.880 --> 0:14:17.040
<v Speaker 4>We pretend that that's not the question that we're trying

0:14:17.040 --> 0:14:17.640
<v Speaker 4>to answer.

0:14:18.040 --> 0:14:20.880
<v Speaker 1>Well, how many of the journalists who would ever write

0:14:20.880 --> 0:14:25.720
<v Speaker 1>a story are in the camp of not having two

0:14:25.880 --> 0:14:29.760
<v Speaker 1>partners raising a kid? A lot right, right?

0:14:29.840 --> 0:14:32.960
<v Speaker 4>And it reminds me of that big study that was

0:14:33.040 --> 0:14:38.240
<v Speaker 4>done to ascertain whether the hormone blockers and puberty blockers

0:14:38.280 --> 0:14:40.800
<v Speaker 4>helped kids, and the answer was a resounding no. So

0:14:40.840 --> 0:14:43.760
<v Speaker 4>they didn't publish the study because they didn't want their

0:14:44.160 --> 0:14:48.120
<v Speaker 4>enemies to quote unquote weaponize it. And I think the

0:14:48.200 --> 0:14:50.000
<v Speaker 4>journalists would say, well, I don't want to see you

0:14:50.080 --> 0:14:54.520
<v Speaker 4>weaponize that against single parents. I'm not weaponizing anything. I

0:14:54.600 --> 0:14:57.840
<v Speaker 4>just think when a democracy isn't even asking the questions,

0:14:58.920 --> 0:15:01.520
<v Speaker 4>that the policy is addressed much less answering. Though, Well,

0:15:01.560 --> 0:15:04.200
<v Speaker 4>all right, you're gonna get bad policy anyway. Moving along

0:15:04.880 --> 0:15:09.160
<v Speaker 4>unless you have more on that topic. Hunger crisis, food

0:15:09.160 --> 0:15:12.440
<v Speaker 4>banks and key swing states reporting increase in demand all

0:15:12.560 --> 0:15:17.560
<v Speaker 4>over the country. They're featuring swing states in particular Pennsylvania, Michigan,

0:15:17.560 --> 0:15:20.400
<v Speaker 4>Wisconsin reporting an increase in demand from people waiting in

0:15:20.440 --> 0:15:24.800
<v Speaker 4>lines for food and also being forced out of their

0:15:24.840 --> 0:15:28.160
<v Speaker 4>homes because they can't afford them anymore. It's all inflation related.

0:15:30.400 --> 0:15:32.240
<v Speaker 1>Because I got anything to do with the credit card

0:15:32.360 --> 0:15:35.560
<v Speaker 1>limit thingy. People have maxed out their credit cards because

0:15:35.560 --> 0:15:39.680
<v Speaker 1>those numbers are astounding. There's got to be some birds

0:15:39.680 --> 0:15:42.800
<v Speaker 1>that come home to roost on that one. I would think, sure, yeah,

0:15:42.840 --> 0:15:46.120
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't mention that, but that makes sense. Yeah.

0:15:46.120 --> 0:15:48.640
<v Speaker 4>Oh, and then just a semi related topic to that,

0:15:48.880 --> 0:15:51.440
<v Speaker 4>I was reading and I couldn't find it for some reason,

0:15:51.560 --> 0:15:56.640
<v Speaker 4>it escaped me. In the Reno area, where the Armstrong

0:15:56.640 --> 0:15:58.840
<v Speaker 4>e Getty Show has enjoyed a great deal of support

0:15:58.840 --> 0:16:00.480
<v Speaker 4>for years and years, and we're more and pleased to

0:16:00.480 --> 0:16:06.480
<v Speaker 4>be on Reno sparks, they mentioned that it's now very purple.

0:16:06.560 --> 0:16:10.760
<v Speaker 4>It's a fifty to fifty metro area politically speaking, and

0:16:10.800 --> 0:16:13.480
<v Speaker 4>the primary reason for that, which amuses the hell out

0:16:13.480 --> 0:16:18.040
<v Speaker 4>of me, is that so many Californians have moved to Reno. Wow,

0:16:18.640 --> 0:16:23.680
<v Speaker 4>now let's go through this. You left California for a

0:16:23.760 --> 0:16:29.480
<v Speaker 4>reason right. It was part of it affordability. Now you're

0:16:29.480 --> 0:16:34.160
<v Speaker 4>in Reno, prices are skyrocketing there, but you're voting for

0:16:34.200 --> 0:16:37.400
<v Speaker 4>the same people you did in California, which you left.

0:16:37.480 --> 0:16:40.200
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I don't get it. Happens over and over and

0:16:40.200 --> 0:16:43.200
<v Speaker 1>over again. Speaking of things, you just have to accept.

0:16:43.480 --> 0:16:49.880
<v Speaker 1>People don't understand that elections bring policies, and policies bring results.

0:16:50.480 --> 0:16:53.960
<v Speaker 1>Is mainstream media about to make a comeback, possibly.

0:16:53.760 --> 0:16:54.840
<v Speaker 4>Armstrong and Getty.

0:16:56.360 --> 0:16:58.840
<v Speaker 1>So the Nazi rally the other night Madison Square Garden,

0:17:00.600 --> 0:17:03.840
<v Speaker 1>two thirds of Israelis in the latest poll are in

0:17:03.880 --> 0:17:07.080
<v Speaker 1>favor of Trump winning. It's not a very good Nazi

0:17:07.160 --> 0:17:12.200
<v Speaker 1>rally if two thirds of Israelis are for Trump over.

0:17:12.119 --> 0:17:17.000
<v Speaker 4>Hairis in which side has been rife with anti semitism

0:17:17.119 --> 0:17:18.720
<v Speaker 4>line Okay.

0:17:18.840 --> 0:17:21.960
<v Speaker 1>Also speaking of the Nazi rally, I was in the

0:17:22.000 --> 0:17:27.520
<v Speaker 1>arena in Milwaukee when Hulk Hogan gave his speech and

0:17:27.640 --> 0:17:31.399
<v Speaker 1>ripped his shirt off to show his Trump T shirt

0:17:31.440 --> 0:17:33.800
<v Speaker 1>tanked up and the crowd went wild. It was a

0:17:33.800 --> 0:17:37.720
<v Speaker 1>funny moment to be you know. Therefore, But anyway, he

0:17:37.840 --> 0:17:41.760
<v Speaker 1>struggled somewhat that day. Well, I didn't see him Friday

0:17:41.840 --> 0:17:44.359
<v Speaker 1>night at Madison Square Garden. But he did the same thing.

0:17:44.640 --> 0:17:47.000
<v Speaker 1>When he went to rip off his shirt, he like,

0:17:47.040 --> 0:17:50.600
<v Speaker 1>couldn't rip it. Dude, you're seventy one. I think you

0:17:50.720 --> 0:17:53.360
<v Speaker 1>got to give up the whole ripping the shirt apart thing,

0:17:53.440 --> 0:17:55.240
<v Speaker 1>unless they're gonna make it a crepe paper or something.

0:17:55.280 --> 0:17:57.840
<v Speaker 1>Because he can't stand up. There's an old man trying

0:17:57.840 --> 0:18:00.440
<v Speaker 1>to tear apart your little shirt. Look, you got to

0:18:00.440 --> 0:18:02.840
<v Speaker 1>get a new tear away t shirt company. Yeah, that's

0:18:03.359 --> 0:18:05.640
<v Speaker 1>not a good look. It's just too long to struggle

0:18:05.680 --> 0:18:10.520
<v Speaker 1>to rip your shirt open. Uh. You probably know if

0:18:10.520 --> 0:18:13.159
<v Speaker 1>you're into talk radio and all that sort of stuff.

0:18:13.200 --> 0:18:16.800
<v Speaker 1>That the La Times decided not to endorse Kamala Harris.

0:18:16.800 --> 0:18:19.680
<v Speaker 1>They didn't endorse Trump, they just failed to endorse anyone.

0:18:20.520 --> 0:18:23.960
<v Speaker 1>The daughter of the owner says it's because of Harris's

0:18:24.080 --> 0:18:28.399
<v Speaker 1>stance on Israel. Maybe that's true, maybe it's not. I

0:18:28.400 --> 0:18:31.880
<v Speaker 1>don't know now. Then later that day, the Washington Post

0:18:31.920 --> 0:18:36.600
<v Speaker 1>announced that they were not going to endorse Kamala Harris

0:18:36.720 --> 0:18:42.120
<v Speaker 1>or anyone, and that caused a huge backlash among readers

0:18:42.160 --> 0:18:44.800
<v Speaker 1>and people that work for the Washington Post. A bunch

0:18:44.800 --> 0:18:48.240
<v Speaker 1>of people in like the uh in the editorial room

0:18:48.359 --> 0:18:54.560
<v Speaker 1>quit and according to NPR today, two hundred thousand people

0:18:54.960 --> 0:18:58.359
<v Speaker 1>have canceled their subscriptions of the Washington Post. That's eight

0:18:58.480 --> 0:19:02.680
<v Speaker 1>percent of their subscribers have canceled over.

0:19:02.480 --> 0:19:06.399
<v Speaker 4>That for just saying we don't endorse candidates anymore. We

0:19:06.480 --> 0:19:08.359
<v Speaker 4>didn't used to. We did for a while, We're not

0:19:08.520 --> 0:19:11.960
<v Speaker 4>going to anymore. So that's one of the reasons that

0:19:13.920 --> 0:19:16.560
<v Speaker 4>there's an op ed in his own newspaper today from

0:19:16.560 --> 0:19:19.919
<v Speaker 4>the owner Jeff Bezos, the world's second richest man. It

0:19:20.040 --> 0:19:23.200
<v Speaker 4>says the hard truth, Americans don't trust the news media.

0:19:23.440 --> 0:19:26.040
<v Speaker 4>A note from our owner, and it says underneath Jeff

0:19:26.040 --> 0:19:27.800
<v Speaker 4>Bezos is the owner of the Washington Post.

0:19:28.320 --> 0:19:33.480
<v Speaker 1>So this comes out on the heels of the Kerfluffel

0:19:33.800 --> 0:19:36.560
<v Speaker 1>on Friday, but it sure sounds like he's been thinking

0:19:36.560 --> 0:19:40.000
<v Speaker 1>about this for a while. Jeff Bezos writes in the

0:19:40.040 --> 0:19:43.119
<v Speaker 1>annual public surveys about trust and reputation, journalists in the

0:19:43.119 --> 0:19:46.760
<v Speaker 1>media have regularly fallen near the bottom, often just above Congress.

0:19:46.880 --> 0:19:49.119
<v Speaker 1>But in this year's Gallup poll, we have managed to

0:19:49.160 --> 0:19:52.199
<v Speaker 1>fall below Congress. Our profession is now the least trusted

0:19:52.240 --> 0:19:55.280
<v Speaker 1>of all. Something we are doing is clearly not working. Man.

0:19:55.320 --> 0:19:59.120
<v Speaker 1>When you're below Congress in terms of trust, you are

0:19:59.200 --> 0:20:03.600
<v Speaker 1>at the bottom. Let me give under how I wonder.

0:20:03.400 --> 0:20:08.639
<v Speaker 4>How the newsroom would react to that simple assertion, that

0:20:08.800 --> 0:20:12.439
<v Speaker 4>simple indisputable assertion. Well, that's because Americans are stupid and

0:20:12.600 --> 0:20:13.360
<v Speaker 4>they're Nazis.

0:20:13.480 --> 0:20:17.200
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, we need to we need to be leaders. Maybe

0:20:17.200 --> 0:20:19.280
<v Speaker 1>we're not on popped, maybe we're not popular now, but

0:20:19.320 --> 0:20:23.240
<v Speaker 1>we'll be leaders and convince people or something. That's a

0:20:23.280 --> 0:20:27.000
<v Speaker 1>principled stand. Anyway, back to Jeff Bezos, he right impressed.

0:20:27.560 --> 0:20:31.040
<v Speaker 1>Let me give an analogy. Voting machines must meet two requirements.

0:20:31.160 --> 0:20:34.200
<v Speaker 1>They must count the vote accurately, and people must believe

0:20:34.280 --> 0:20:37.919
<v Speaker 1>they count the vote accurately. The second requirement is distinct

0:20:37.920 --> 0:20:41.800
<v Speaker 1>from and just as important as the first. Likewise, with newspapers,

0:20:41.840 --> 0:20:44.560
<v Speaker 1>we must be accurate and we must be believed to

0:20:44.600 --> 0:20:47.439
<v Speaker 1>be accurate. It's a bitter pill to swallow, but we

0:20:47.480 --> 0:20:50.600
<v Speaker 1>are failing on the second requirement. Most people believe the

0:20:50.640 --> 0:20:53.240
<v Speaker 1>media is biased. Anyone who doesn't see this as paying

0:20:53.280 --> 0:20:57.840
<v Speaker 1>scant attention to reality and those who fight reality lose reality,

0:20:57.960 --> 0:21:01.560
<v Speaker 1>is an undefeated champion. Love that line. It would be

0:21:01.560 --> 0:21:04.080
<v Speaker 1>easy to blame others for our long and continued fall

0:21:04.119 --> 0:21:08.000
<v Speaker 1>and credibility and therefore decline and impact. But a victim

0:21:08.040 --> 0:21:10.760
<v Speaker 1>mentality will not help. Complaining is not a strategy. We

0:21:10.840 --> 0:21:13.000
<v Speaker 1>must work harder to control what we can control to

0:21:13.040 --> 0:21:15.720
<v Speaker 1>increase our credibility. By the way, he doesn't mention it

0:21:15.760 --> 0:21:18.600
<v Speaker 1>in this piece, but The New York Times reports that

0:21:18.640 --> 0:21:23.400
<v Speaker 1>Bezos is saying they're going to hire more Republican conservative

0:21:24.000 --> 0:21:28.160
<v Speaker 1>reporters and opinion writers, which obviously has to happen.

0:21:29.040 --> 0:21:32.800
<v Speaker 4>Hey, I'm interested in becoming a Wall Post subscriber already

0:21:32.840 --> 0:21:35.200
<v Speaker 4>am for professional reasons, but that sounds great.

0:21:35.200 --> 0:21:38.359
<v Speaker 1>To the specific about the non endorsement, here, writes, presidential

0:21:38.440 --> 0:21:40.800
<v Speaker 1>endorsements do nothing to tip the scales of an election.

0:21:41.200 --> 0:21:43.640
<v Speaker 1>No undecided voters in Pennsylvania are going to say, I'm

0:21:43.640 --> 0:21:48.320
<v Speaker 1>going with newspaper a's endorsement. None. What presidential endorsements actually

0:21:48.320 --> 0:21:50.919
<v Speaker 1>do is create a perception of bias, a perception of

0:21:51.000 --> 0:21:55.000
<v Speaker 1>non independents. Ending them is a principal decision, and it's

0:21:55.040 --> 0:21:58.200
<v Speaker 1>the right one. Eugene Meyer, publisher of The Wappo from

0:21:58.359 --> 0:22:01.200
<v Speaker 1>thirty three to forty six, the same, and he was

0:22:01.320 --> 0:22:05.320
<v Speaker 1>right by itself. Declining to endorse presidential candidates is not

0:22:05.480 --> 0:22:08.000
<v Speaker 1>enough to move us very far up the trust scale,

0:22:08.240 --> 0:22:10.280
<v Speaker 1>but it's a meaningful step in the right direction. I

0:22:10.359 --> 0:22:12.679
<v Speaker 1>wish we had made the change earlier than we did,

0:22:13.240 --> 0:22:15.520
<v Speaker 1>in a moment of further and and in a moment

0:22:15.560 --> 0:22:18.119
<v Speaker 1>further from the election and the emotions around it. That

0:22:18.320 --> 0:22:24.280
<v Speaker 1>was inadequate planning and not some intentional strategy. So him

0:22:24.320 --> 0:22:27.600
<v Speaker 1>saying this is our new philosophy, I wish we had

0:22:27.600 --> 0:22:35.399
<v Speaker 1>done it earlier is important, gets into a kerf fluffle.

0:22:35.400 --> 0:22:37.720
<v Speaker 1>I didn't even know happened. Must have been an internal thing.

0:22:39.280 --> 0:22:42.480
<v Speaker 1>And then I'll get to this. While I do not

0:22:42.640 --> 0:22:45.280
<v Speaker 1>and will not push my personal interests, I will also

0:22:45.359 --> 0:22:47.920
<v Speaker 1>not allow this paper to stay on autopilot and fade

0:22:47.960 --> 0:22:53.200
<v Speaker 1>into irrelevance, overtaken by unresearched podcasts and social media barbs.

0:22:53.440 --> 0:22:55.560
<v Speaker 1>Not without a fight. It's too important. The stakes are

0:22:55.600 --> 0:22:59.000
<v Speaker 1>too high now more than ever. The world needs a credible, trusted,

0:22:59.040 --> 0:23:02.120
<v Speaker 1>independent voice. And where better for the voice to originate

0:23:02.119 --> 0:23:05.320
<v Speaker 1>than the capital city the most important country in the world. Oh,

0:23:05.359 --> 0:23:07.280
<v Speaker 1>and I like this part. To win this fight, we'll

0:23:07.280 --> 0:23:10.439
<v Speaker 1>have to exercise new muscles. Some changes will be a

0:23:10.440 --> 0:23:13.040
<v Speaker 1>return to the past, and some will be new inventions.

0:23:13.680 --> 0:23:20.200
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, well, I'm looking at the long list of wahpoh

0:23:20.280 --> 0:23:24.240
<v Speaker 4>scribblers and editors who are screeching in indignation and have

0:23:24.440 --> 0:23:29.320
<v Speaker 4>resigned or whatever. And it's just it's, you know, the

0:23:29.359 --> 0:23:34.720
<v Speaker 4>bubbled left media elite utterly convinced that, well, there are

0:23:34.760 --> 0:23:37.520
<v Speaker 4>folks who actually use the term my truth with a

0:23:37.560 --> 0:23:41.199
<v Speaker 4>straight face because they have attempted, to, at least in

0:23:41.200 --> 0:23:44.159
<v Speaker 4>their own minds, erase the line between opinion and truth,

0:23:44.600 --> 0:23:47.399
<v Speaker 4>and so if it's their strong opinion, that's the truth

0:23:47.480 --> 0:23:52.760
<v Speaker 4>to them. And they are saying they're deeply disappointed. What

0:23:53.000 --> 0:23:56.919
<v Speaker 4>steems me is oh there it is, will not be

0:23:57.040 --> 0:24:01.480
<v Speaker 4>making any endorsement. Dot dot dot were furious. I mean,

0:24:01.480 --> 0:24:05.440
<v Speaker 4>if you don't have the ballstone a newspaper, don't, one

0:24:05.520 --> 0:24:13.359
<v Speaker 4>Post Opinion employee told this writer. Another said an endorsement.

0:24:14.040 --> 0:24:17.600
<v Speaker 4>The non endorsement was an outrageous abdication of responsibility and

0:24:17.880 --> 0:24:22.040
<v Speaker 4>a form of craset consent to a fascist whims that's

0:24:22.040 --> 0:24:25.600
<v Speaker 4>so crazy, I'm sure, well right, yeah, I'm sure Jeff

0:24:25.640 --> 0:24:30.600
<v Speaker 4>Bezos would say, y'all and that Opinion have been in charge.

0:24:31.160 --> 0:24:36.600
<v Speaker 4>You lost seventy seven million dollars last year, seventy seven

0:24:36.640 --> 0:24:40.199
<v Speaker 4>million dollars. So tell me again why I ought to

0:24:40.280 --> 0:24:41.840
<v Speaker 4>defer to your opinions.

0:24:42.119 --> 0:24:46.120
<v Speaker 1>Why well right, and his thing about I don't want

0:24:46.119 --> 0:24:50.960
<v Speaker 1>to be you know, overtaken and become irrelevant to podcasts

0:24:51.000 --> 0:24:56.119
<v Speaker 1>and other social media barbs. Yeah, that's exactly the case.

0:24:56.200 --> 0:24:59.920
<v Speaker 1>If nobody cares what your paper thinks, you're not actu

0:25:00.359 --> 0:25:04.800
<v Speaker 1>doing anything, you weird woke reporters. So what you What

0:25:04.960 --> 0:25:09.200
<v Speaker 1>apparently they'd be happy with is having a very small

0:25:09.320 --> 0:25:13.919
<v Speaker 1>number of people who agree with everything they say, and

0:25:13.960 --> 0:25:15.920
<v Speaker 1>then they go to cocktail parties and out to eat

0:25:15.960 --> 0:25:19.520
<v Speaker 1>and congratulate themselves. They'd be perfectly happy with that. Yeah,

0:25:19.560 --> 0:25:22.639
<v Speaker 1>absolutely true. Let's see, I gotta scroll down. Who's this

0:25:22.920 --> 0:25:23.680
<v Speaker 1>darcy person.

0:25:23.720 --> 0:25:26.760
<v Speaker 4>There's a bunch of you know, media insider heavyweight to

0:25:26.760 --> 0:25:30.600
<v Speaker 4>do his name. I don't know, but I love this.

0:25:30.600 --> 0:25:34.520
<v Speaker 4>This is the defense, and the prosecution will rest after

0:25:34.560 --> 0:25:36.960
<v Speaker 4>the defense, which is doing a better job than I could,

0:25:37.840 --> 0:25:41.720
<v Speaker 4>she said. On one side is an Adolph Hitler praising

0:25:41.840 --> 0:25:45.359
<v Speaker 4>autocratic wannabee who is vowed to seek retribution against his

0:25:45.480 --> 0:25:48.320
<v Speaker 4>perceived enemies should he find himself in the back in

0:25:48.359 --> 0:25:51.399
<v Speaker 4>the oval office. On the other side is a relatively

0:25:51.480 --> 0:25:54.880
<v Speaker 4>run of the mill democratic politician who respects the rule

0:25:54.920 --> 0:25:59.000
<v Speaker 4>of law in American Democratic order, right, that is their

0:25:59.359 --> 0:26:00.840
<v Speaker 4>neutraless of the race.

0:26:01.760 --> 0:26:06.520
<v Speaker 1>I reach my case, your nuts if you actually believe that. Yeah, well,

0:26:06.600 --> 0:26:09.920
<v Speaker 1>it's it's a problem the first year you don't endorse,

0:26:10.200 --> 0:26:12.760
<v Speaker 1>because it's pretty easy. I don't. I don't think this

0:26:12.880 --> 0:26:16.120
<v Speaker 1>is what he's doing at all. But it's pretty easy

0:26:16.200 --> 0:26:19.800
<v Speaker 1>to the first year the newspapers don't endorse, to think, Okay,

0:26:19.840 --> 0:26:21.320
<v Speaker 1>you're for the other side. You just don't want to

0:26:21.359 --> 0:26:24.200
<v Speaker 1>say it out loud. But after a couple of years

0:26:24.240 --> 0:26:26.480
<v Speaker 1>it'll become more clear. No, our policy is just we

0:26:26.560 --> 0:26:30.040
<v Speaker 1>don't endorse, because that would be dumb. Our job is

0:26:30.040 --> 0:26:33.240
<v Speaker 1>to report the news. If we endorse, by definition, we

0:26:33.320 --> 0:26:35.760
<v Speaker 1>are more interested in one side the other than the other.

0:26:35.840 --> 0:26:38.520
<v Speaker 1>How obvious is that. Yeah.

0:26:38.880 --> 0:26:42.959
<v Speaker 4>Bezos himself for expressed regret that they didn't do it sooner,

0:26:43.240 --> 0:26:45.120
<v Speaker 4>not only because it's a good idea, but this close

0:26:45.160 --> 0:26:47.440
<v Speaker 4>to the election it feels different.

0:26:47.520 --> 0:26:50.119
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Well, when I when I heard the La Times

0:26:50.160 --> 0:26:53.639
<v Speaker 1>didn't endorse Harris, my first thought was, Wow, they actually

0:26:53.680 --> 0:27:00.040
<v Speaker 1>prefer Trump, fairly or unfairly. I think it's important that

0:27:00.200 --> 0:27:04.120
<v Speaker 1>the two richest people in the world. More importantly, they're

0:27:04.160 --> 0:27:07.120
<v Speaker 1>both Americans. The two richest people in the United States,

0:27:07.680 --> 0:27:10.080
<v Speaker 1>Elon Musk and Jeff Bezos seem to be hell bent

0:27:10.640 --> 0:27:13.600
<v Speaker 1>on more free speech and trying to play it down

0:27:13.600 --> 0:27:17.080
<v Speaker 1>the middle. And the people on the left think Elon's

0:27:17.119 --> 0:27:18.439
<v Speaker 1>full of crap, and the people on the right are

0:27:18.480 --> 0:27:20.159
<v Speaker 1>going to think Bezos is full of crap. But I

0:27:20.160 --> 0:27:24.399
<v Speaker 1>think they're both closer to that than not of what

0:27:24.440 --> 0:27:25.960
<v Speaker 1>they want to accomplish.

0:27:26.240 --> 0:27:28.239
<v Speaker 4>People were putting out that both were men of the

0:27:28.280 --> 0:27:30.640
<v Speaker 4>center left, only you know, two years ago.

0:27:30.960 --> 0:27:33.720
<v Speaker 1>Right, they both recognize that the country's doomed. If we

0:27:33.800 --> 0:27:38.280
<v Speaker 1>don't have some shared news sources, if we all just

0:27:38.320 --> 0:27:42.359
<v Speaker 1>go to our own podcasts, radio shows, you know, social

0:27:42.400 --> 0:27:46.600
<v Speaker 1>media followings and stuff like that, we're doomed. I run

0:27:46.680 --> 0:27:50.600
<v Speaker 1>into people every single day left or right, who say, hey,

0:27:50.640 --> 0:27:53.800
<v Speaker 1>did you hear about the whatever? And I haven't because

0:27:53.800 --> 0:27:58.800
<v Speaker 1>they're following some crazy website reporting something that's not true

0:27:59.400 --> 0:28:02.160
<v Speaker 1>that I haven't even heard of in the many hours

0:28:02.200 --> 0:28:03.720
<v Speaker 1>of media that I take in every day.

0:28:04.680 --> 0:28:07.280
<v Speaker 4>Meanwhile, back at the wah Poe, let us know that

0:28:07.320 --> 0:28:13.159
<v Speaker 4>democracy dies in darkness. Karen Attiya, who's a Post columnist, said, quote,

0:28:13.640 --> 0:28:17.400
<v Speaker 4>keeping in mind that the WAPO endorsed the Democrat every

0:28:17.440 --> 0:28:20.320
<v Speaker 4>single time. Of course, it is since they started endorsing

0:28:20.359 --> 0:28:23.920
<v Speaker 4>presidential candidates in nineteen seventy six, every single damn time.

0:28:23.960 --> 0:28:28.399
<v Speaker 4>As Bezos pointed out, nobody cares anyway. She said, today

0:28:28.440 --> 0:28:30.960
<v Speaker 4>has been an absolute stab in the back. What an

0:28:31.000 --> 0:28:33.600
<v Speaker 4>insult to those of us who have literally put our

0:28:33.640 --> 0:28:36.520
<v Speaker 4>careers and lives on the line to call out threats

0:28:36.520 --> 0:28:38.120
<v Speaker 4>to human rights and democracy.

0:28:38.360 --> 0:28:42.800
<v Speaker 1>You put your life on the line by writing what

0:28:43.040 --> 0:28:46.120
<v Speaker 1>everybody in your newsroom and everybody who reads your paper

0:28:46.160 --> 0:28:48.160
<v Speaker 1>agrees with. Yes, I'm you're.

0:28:48.120 --> 0:28:51.000
<v Speaker 4>Taking the courageous stand of agreeing with everybody around you.

0:28:51.160 --> 0:28:54.360
<v Speaker 1>Yes. Wow. And then you go places I'm sure where

0:28:54.360 --> 0:28:56.400
<v Speaker 1>everybody pat you on the back and agrees with you. Also,

0:28:56.440 --> 0:28:57.120
<v Speaker 1>how brave of you?

0:28:57.800 --> 0:29:00.160
<v Speaker 4>And if you don't have the ballstone and newspaper, or

0:29:00.320 --> 0:29:04.600
<v Speaker 4>don't Apparently having the balls to own a newspaper includes

0:29:04.680 --> 0:29:08.360
<v Speaker 4>putting up with the suicidal policies of your employees to

0:29:08.440 --> 0:29:11.480
<v Speaker 4>the tune of nearly eighty million dollars in red ink

0:29:11.640 --> 0:29:17.280
<v Speaker 4>per year. I don't quite see your point, you whining communists.

0:29:18.280 --> 0:29:20.600
<v Speaker 1>So what is the story? So Bezos owns the paper?

0:29:20.720 --> 0:29:24.760
<v Speaker 1>So who are the guys he hired from Britain that

0:29:24.800 --> 0:29:29.840
<v Speaker 1>came in. They're the Rubbisher, the publisher. Anyway, it's a

0:29:30.000 --> 0:29:33.400
<v Speaker 1>ceo anyway. I remember when the CEOs came in and

0:29:33.480 --> 0:29:36.720
<v Speaker 1>said that. In the newsroom was complaining and they said, look,

0:29:37.160 --> 0:29:40.360
<v Speaker 1>nobody's reading your stuff. To me. That was the boo

0:29:40.480 --> 0:29:44.120
<v Speaker 1>yah kill shot boom goes to dynamite. I mean, there's

0:29:44.120 --> 0:29:47.800
<v Speaker 1>nothing to say beyond that. If you keep going the

0:29:47.840 --> 0:29:51.720
<v Speaker 1>direction you're going, you're completely irrelevant. What's the point.

0:29:52.000 --> 0:29:55.400
<v Speaker 4>And that's what's so interesting about the newspaper business. If

0:29:55.480 --> 0:29:59.160
<v Speaker 4>this was a record company, there's no way that the

0:29:59.720 --> 0:30:03.280
<v Speaker 4>owner would allow the producers or whatever to continue putting

0:30:03.280 --> 0:30:04.960
<v Speaker 4>out records nobody wants to listen to.

0:30:05.120 --> 0:30:08.160
<v Speaker 1>Or we think polka rap is the most important music.

0:30:08.480 --> 0:30:11.160
<v Speaker 1>Nobody's buying it, nobody's listening to it.

0:30:11.800 --> 0:30:14.760
<v Speaker 4>If it John Deere, all the shop foremen were insisting

0:30:14.840 --> 0:30:18.840
<v Speaker 4>on building like bicycle tractors that you have to pedal,

0:30:19.160 --> 0:30:22.440
<v Speaker 4>and the firm that keeps falling off of them, and

0:30:22.520 --> 0:30:26.680
<v Speaker 4>nobody freaking wants them, and huge majorities of Americans say

0:30:26.720 --> 0:30:29.480
<v Speaker 4>that's crap, that's worse than Congress.

0:30:29.720 --> 0:30:32.680
<v Speaker 1>But John Deere's owners would say, well, what can we do?

0:30:33.040 --> 0:30:37.360
<v Speaker 4>Our shop foremen will want to build the bicycle tractors.

0:30:36.800 --> 0:30:39.840
<v Speaker 1>That one example where this could possibly exist because the

0:30:39.880 --> 0:30:42.240
<v Speaker 1>employees are saying, you don't have the balls to run

0:30:42.280 --> 0:30:45.160
<v Speaker 1>a tractor company. You shouldn't be doing it. Dude. You

0:30:45.160 --> 0:30:46.880
<v Speaker 1>didn't get people something they don't want.

0:30:47.560 --> 0:30:51.040
<v Speaker 4>This is my truth here at ja Lied. We believe

0:30:51.080 --> 0:30:53.920
<v Speaker 4>in making razors that don't cut whiskers. All of us

0:30:53.920 --> 0:30:58.040
<v Speaker 4>on the shop floor agree, and the owners have to say, well, okay,

0:30:58.080 --> 0:30:58.800
<v Speaker 4>I guess we'll.

0:30:58.760 --> 0:31:00.280
<v Speaker 1>Keep bleeding money.

0:31:01.880 --> 0:31:05.040
<v Speaker 4>Seriously, sometimes I slapped my forehead. I think what colors

0:31:05.080 --> 0:31:07.160
<v Speaker 4>does this kai in your world? What does reality look

0:31:07.240 --> 0:31:08.640
<v Speaker 4>like in your world? So it could end up being

0:31:08.640 --> 0:31:10.320
<v Speaker 4>a big deal in a turning point. I hope it

0:31:10.400 --> 0:31:13.280
<v Speaker 4>is that in a matter of what two years, Elon

0:31:13.400 --> 0:31:17.160
<v Speaker 4>bought Twitter and Bezos decided that at the Wappo they

0:31:17.200 --> 0:31:18.400
<v Speaker 4>need to fix everything.

0:31:18.560 --> 0:31:24.400
<v Speaker 1>I hope. I hope it matters. We will finish strong next.

0:31:25.680 --> 0:31:29.680
<v Speaker 1>So I made steak and corn last night for me

0:31:29.720 --> 0:31:33.400
<v Speaker 1>and Henry, kind of a you know, go to sad

0:31:33.640 --> 0:31:36.720
<v Speaker 1>single dad sort of meal. Steaks on the grill, corn

0:31:36.760 --> 0:31:38.520
<v Speaker 1>on the cob on the grill, and some bread. That's

0:31:38.560 --> 0:31:42.680
<v Speaker 1>so fantastic. Yeah, it is fantastic, except if you can

0:31:42.760 --> 0:31:45.479
<v Speaker 1>only make three things. It gets a little repetitious. But

0:31:46.600 --> 0:31:49.360
<v Speaker 1>so we bought. We didn't have the corn holders, so

0:31:49.840 --> 0:31:53.240
<v Speaker 1>we bought the cow. That's right, it's cone. We bought

0:31:53.240 --> 0:31:55.000
<v Speaker 1>the corn holders. You know, the little things that are

0:31:55.000 --> 0:31:57.400
<v Speaker 1>shaped like a corn. Huh, how clever is that? And

0:31:57.440 --> 0:31:59.800
<v Speaker 1>they have the little metal poky things in there and

0:31:59.840 --> 0:32:01.600
<v Speaker 1>you jam them in the edge of the corn.

0:32:01.920 --> 0:32:02.120
<v Speaker 3>Well.

0:32:02.200 --> 0:32:04.480
<v Speaker 1>I was having trouble getting it in the narrow end

0:32:04.480 --> 0:32:06.800
<v Speaker 1>of the corn, and I was pushed on it and

0:32:06.880 --> 0:32:10.360
<v Speaker 1>it slipped and I jabbed it into my other hand,

0:32:10.400 --> 0:32:13.680
<v Speaker 1>into my finger, deep into my finger. I still have

0:32:13.760 --> 0:32:16.360
<v Speaker 1>the wood. I have blood squirting out of the two holes,

0:32:16.880 --> 0:32:19.520
<v Speaker 1>and it's swollen up. Today. I got some sort of

0:32:19.600 --> 0:32:22.080
<v Speaker 1>corn tetanus going on. I think corn juice tetanus. I

0:32:22.120 --> 0:32:24.480
<v Speaker 1>don't know if that's a thing. Oh, it can't be

0:32:24.520 --> 0:32:27.400
<v Speaker 1>good for you. It hurt shockingly much. And as Henry

0:32:27.400 --> 0:32:29.720
<v Speaker 1>pointed out, you have salt in your wound. I did.

0:32:29.960 --> 0:32:32.360
<v Speaker 1>I'd salted the corn already, and so I got salted

0:32:32.440 --> 0:32:35.400
<v Speaker 1>there good. It was just uite, the quite the off

0:32:35.440 --> 0:32:37.760
<v Speaker 1>putting thing to have happened right at the dinner table.

0:32:38.320 --> 0:32:40.840
<v Speaker 1>Are you up to date on your Titanus shots. I

0:32:40.880 --> 0:32:43.960
<v Speaker 1>was wondering about that. How long do they last? Oh,

0:32:44.000 --> 0:32:47.880
<v Speaker 1>it's been, like I know at least how long it's

0:32:47.920 --> 0:32:49.680
<v Speaker 1>been because the last time I got a tetanus shot,

0:32:49.680 --> 0:32:53.680
<v Speaker 1>I was drunk and tripped climbing over a rusty barbed

0:32:53.680 --> 0:32:56.240
<v Speaker 1>wire fence, so I had to go get my tennis shot.

0:32:56.240 --> 0:32:57.680
<v Speaker 1>But I haven't had a drink in eighteen years, so

0:32:57.720 --> 0:33:00.880
<v Speaker 1>it's been at least eighty. Yeah, keep an eye on that.

0:33:02.200 --> 0:33:04.640
<v Speaker 1>If my Josh Arsenal lock up and I talk like this,

0:33:05.840 --> 0:33:09.000
<v Speaker 1>let me know. I don't think there's any curing you.

0:33:09.040 --> 0:33:15.760
<v Speaker 1>At that point, you'll be dead. Look for the barcessities,

0:33:16.120 --> 0:33:21.760
<v Speaker 1>the simple fair necessities, like final thoughts to end in

0:33:21.880 --> 0:33:32.240
<v Speaker 1>the other show in the Mancessity Mother Nature's recipes, like

0:33:32.560 --> 0:33:36.120
<v Speaker 1>final thoughts from our host Jack and Joe.

0:33:36.200 --> 0:33:36.640
<v Speaker 2>Thank you.

0:33:38.600 --> 0:33:42.200
<v Speaker 1>That's a ukulele. Here's your host for final thoughts, Joe Getty.

0:33:42.520 --> 0:33:44.280
<v Speaker 4>Let's get a final thought from everybody and the crew

0:33:44.320 --> 0:33:46.400
<v Speaker 4>to wrap up the show. There is our technical director,

0:33:46.440 --> 0:33:48.400
<v Speaker 4>Michael lead us Off. Jack.

0:33:48.480 --> 0:33:50.360
<v Speaker 1>Is it true I saw a tweet that you ate

0:33:50.440 --> 0:33:53.280
<v Speaker 1>a tower of donuts? Yeah, we got the donut tower

0:33:53.360 --> 0:33:57.800
<v Speaker 1>at Red Robin the other day. That thing was freaking good.

0:33:58.800 --> 0:34:01.000
<v Speaker 1>We were all shocked at how those donuts where they're

0:34:01.040 --> 0:34:03.760
<v Speaker 1>hot and fresh right off the griddle.

0:34:04.440 --> 0:34:08.480
<v Speaker 4>The donut tower and architectural marvel Katie Green are esteemed

0:34:08.600 --> 0:34:10.480
<v Speaker 4>newswoman is final thought, Katie All.

0:34:10.560 --> 0:34:13.640
<v Speaker 2>I responded to that tweet and I said, dot dot dot,

0:34:13.760 --> 0:34:16.040
<v Speaker 2>but a bag of chips is a step too far.

0:34:17.239 --> 0:34:21.080
<v Speaker 1>Right, Yeah, speaking of the donut tower at Red Robin,

0:34:21.640 --> 0:34:25.239
<v Speaker 1>usually we get the ort, the onion ring tower, which

0:34:25.280 --> 0:34:26.719
<v Speaker 1>we call the ORT, and it is caught on at

0:34:26.760 --> 0:34:29.319
<v Speaker 1>the restaurant. Now the other waitresses called the ort. But

0:34:29.520 --> 0:34:33.120
<v Speaker 1>the donut tower comes with hot caramel to dip it

0:34:33.120 --> 0:34:36.239
<v Speaker 1>in or hot chocolate to dip it in. Fudge. Oh man,

0:34:36.280 --> 0:34:36.959
<v Speaker 1>that's some good eating.

0:34:37.480 --> 0:34:40.760
<v Speaker 4>Later today, I'm looking forward to eating a cake condominium.

0:34:40.920 --> 0:34:41.839
<v Speaker 1>Wait, no, I'm not.

0:34:43.760 --> 0:34:46.279
<v Speaker 4>My final thought is reading the comments on that Jeff

0:34:46.320 --> 0:34:49.640
<v Speaker 4>Bezos opinion piece is so revealing. Every single one and

0:34:49.680 --> 0:34:52.560
<v Speaker 4>I'm like, fifteen comments in every single one is an

0:34:52.600 --> 0:34:56.160
<v Speaker 4>ad hominem attack, an attack on Bezos is a bad

0:34:56.239 --> 0:34:57.520
<v Speaker 4>person or a billionaire.

0:34:57.800 --> 0:35:02.319
<v Speaker 1>Not a single damn one addresses his arguments. What would

0:35:02.320 --> 0:35:08.360
<v Speaker 1>that's revealing? What would your argument be? Armstrong person? Armstrong

0:35:08.400 --> 0:35:11.000
<v Speaker 1>in getty rabbing him another grueling four hour workday.

0:35:11.400 --> 0:35:13.040
<v Speaker 4>So many people who think so little time go to

0:35:13.120 --> 0:35:14.239
<v Speaker 4>armstrong e giddy dot com.

0:35:14.239 --> 0:35:15.400
<v Speaker 1>What a great hot lengths for you?

0:35:15.440 --> 0:35:18.160
<v Speaker 4>Pick up a hot Dogs Are Dogs t shirt and

0:35:18.160 --> 0:35:21.680
<v Speaker 4>wear it to the Zan Jose State Women's volleyball games

0:35:21.719 --> 0:35:22.880
<v Speaker 4>where they have a dude playing.

0:35:23.400 --> 0:35:26.600
<v Speaker 1>I can't keep my weight down. Must be my metabolism

0:35:26.680 --> 0:35:31.680
<v Speaker 1>or something we'll see tomorrow. God bless America. I'm man

0:35:31.800 --> 0:35:33.760
<v Speaker 1>enough to enjoy it. I'm strong and getty.

0:35:33.960 --> 0:35:36.439
<v Speaker 3>I've been thinking that we really all need a trim

0:35:36.480 --> 0:35:37.360
<v Speaker 3>and hug.

0:35:38.520 --> 0:35:42.000
<v Speaker 1>About I'm gonna stop you, so let's go with a

0:35:42.040 --> 0:35:46.279
<v Speaker 1>buy it. It's like a did he freak off. It's

0:35:46.280 --> 0:35:47.279
<v Speaker 1>they're all.

0:35:46.960 --> 0:35:52.720
<v Speaker 4>Oiled up in their own unctious lesty morality slash ideology,

0:35:53.040 --> 0:35:56.720
<v Speaker 4>and they're all having like intellectual orgy sex with each.

0:35:56.560 --> 0:35:59.640
<v Speaker 1>Other that I know. Thanks you all very much, Armstrong

0:35:59.719 --> 0:36:00.279
<v Speaker 1>and Yetti