Speaker 1: Hello, and welcome to another episode of The Mark Moss Show,
Speaker 1: where we talk about the decentralized Revolution, talking about the
Speaker 1: way the world is breaking apart, and it is. It's
Speaker 1: breaking apart. Now, A lot of people don't really understand this.
Speaker 1: The decentralized revolution is where we're going from a world
Speaker 1: that's moving towards centralization and we're going back to decentralization.
Speaker 1: And of course we look at through the lens of politics, finance,
Speaker 1: and technology, so we can put things into context. And
Speaker 1: the technology is bitcoin, which is the decentralized technology that's
Speaker 1: going to help decentralize with the world. Now, there's other
Speaker 1: technologies that are going to decentralized the world. I've been
Speaker 1: talking about that. We're going to talk about that more.
Speaker 1: A lot of people don't understand, They say, but Mark,
Speaker 1: what do you mean things are breaking apart? I just
Speaker 1: see more centralization, more World Economic Forum. The United States
Speaker 1: is trying to lay down as sovereignty to the World
Speaker 1: Health Organization all these things, and that is true, but
Speaker 1: you can also see the pushback. You can see the
Speaker 1: system cracking apart. And that's what we're going to talk
Speaker 1: about today. Big, big, big, big topics dominated news headlines.
Speaker 1: I've talked about it extensively. I've been called on numerous
Speaker 1: podcasts and Twitter spaces to talk about this, and I
Speaker 1: am talking about the banking collapse now. In the decentralized revolution,
Speaker 1: we talk about three revolutionary cycles that are all converging.
Speaker 1: Of course, there's the two hundred and fifty year political
Speaker 1: revolution cycle. There's an eighty year financial revolution cycle on
Speaker 1: a fifty year tech but the eighty year financial cycle
Speaker 1: is where we're at. We're seeing the entire financial system
Speaker 1: being reset. The banking system is being reset, the sovereign
Speaker 1: wealth system, the entire global financial system is being reset
Speaker 1: right before our very eyes. About eighty years ago, we
Speaker 1: went into the Bretton Woods Agreement where the entire world,
Speaker 1: most of the entire world, agreed to go into a
Speaker 1: new monitor hary system. It would be a gold back system,
Speaker 1: that it would be gold, the dollar would be pegged
Speaker 1: to gold, and everyone would use the dollar. And now
Speaker 1: that system is being reset and we're watching it now.
Speaker 1: It is not near as neat and clean and easy
Speaker 1: as it was before because as the cracks start happening,
Speaker 1: it gets very messy. It's very dangerous. You don't want
Speaker 1: to get caught up in this danger. You want to
Speaker 1: be able to navigate it correctly, and if you navigate
Speaker 1: it correctly, it could be massively profitable for you. So
Speaker 1: we're gonna talk about that. We're gonna talk about the
Speaker 1: banking system collapsing. Like I said, it's all over the news.
Speaker 1: Silicon Valley Bank SVB was bailed out. We're gonna talk
Speaker 1: about that. We're gonna talk about, like I said, how
Speaker 1: this goes into the banking system overall, not just for
Speaker 1: the United States, but for the world, what that means.
Speaker 1: We'll talk about steps that you can do to protect yourself.
Speaker 1: So we have a lot to cover. Like I said,
Speaker 1: I've talked about this extensively, and so I'm going to
Speaker 1: give you some different perspectives that I was thinking about
Speaker 1: last night, thinking about this morning, because as I think
Speaker 1: about this, as I talk, as I discuss it, I
Speaker 1: keep kind of having these new insights and revelations. And
Speaker 1: so we're gonna talk about a couple of different angles
Speaker 1: that I haven't really thought of. So let's dig in,
Speaker 1: all right. So, first of all, the banks are collapsing.
Speaker 1: You've heard it, like I said, Unless you've been living
Speaker 1: under a rock, you already know this. You've heard about it.
Speaker 1: Silicon Valley Bank crashed. Of course it wasn't the first one.
Speaker 1: Didn't happen a vacuum. First we saw it was Silvergate
Speaker 1: Bank first of all, and then it was you know, SBB.
Speaker 1: Now we're seeing other banks, Signature Bank was taken over, etc.
Speaker 1: So why are they failing now? If you want a
Speaker 1: super deep analysis into the data, including looking at the
Speaker 1: charts and the graphs and the data, go to my
Speaker 1: main YouTube channel. Just search Mark Moss on YouTube and
Speaker 1: you'll see a very detailed video. I don't know how
Speaker 1: long that was. It was, it was long, it was,
Speaker 1: I don't know. I haven't looked. Probably twenty thirty minutes,
Speaker 1: I'm guessing. But I have all the charts of all
Speaker 1: the graphs if you want to see the data of
Speaker 1: exactly how this went down. So I'm not going to
Speaker 1: go super deep into that, because like I said, you
Speaker 1: can go watch that if you want. I'm gonna give
Speaker 1: you the super high level because I want to get
Speaker 1: to what I think is more important, which is why
Speaker 1: is the system failing? What is the government doing to
Speaker 1: prevent a new system from being built to save this system?
Speaker 1: Why it's inevitable. It's going to happen, like I said,
Speaker 1: and what we're gonna do about it? Okay, So why
Speaker 1: first of all, let's talk about that. So well, we'll
Speaker 1: just say it's the FED. The irony here is that
Speaker 1: the Federal Reserve was created in nineteen thirteen, and it
Speaker 1: was created to stop the boom and bust cycles. Specifically,
Speaker 1: it was created to backstop banks because previous to the
Speaker 1: Federal Reserve creation in the late eighteen hundreds, we had
Speaker 1: an era known as free banking. And what that means
Speaker 1: is that we had something called capitalism where we had
Speaker 1: businesses that would compete against each other, and so you
Speaker 1: had all these different banks and they would try out
Speaker 1: different models. That's how it works in capitalism. One bank
Speaker 1: would try one system, another bank would try another system,
Speaker 1: and we were starting to figure out what was working
Speaker 1: and what wasn't working, and unfortunately, some banks went bust,
Speaker 1: and when the banks went bust, people would lose their
Speaker 1: money in there. Now, I believe, and this is a
Speaker 1: pretty radical viewpoint today, So I apologize if this ends you.
Speaker 1: Not really, I don't apologize for that, but my very
Speaker 1: radical viewpoint is that I believe that we should be
Speaker 1: responsible for ourselves. At the end of the day, anything
Speaker 1: that happens in my life is my responsibility, just like
Speaker 1: anything that happens in my business is my responsibility. Even
Speaker 1: if it was someone below me, someone who was supposed
Speaker 1: to do that. At the end of the day, I
Speaker 1: got to take responsibility. It's my business, it's my life,
Speaker 1: it's my money. I need to take responsibility for where
Speaker 1: I put that money. So in the free banking are
Speaker 1: in the eighteen hundreds, it was it was up to
Speaker 1: the people to be responsible for that money. Just like
Speaker 1: a Silicon Valley bank, it was their responsibility to make
Speaker 1: sure where they put their money was safe. And we'll
Speaker 1: talk about that, but first let me continue frame this up.
Speaker 1: So with this araa free banking and these banks were
Speaker 1: trying out different models capitalism at its finest, we were
Speaker 1: starting to figure out what worked. Part of what caused
Speaker 1: that banking system to collapse the free banking era was
Speaker 1: the government. The government came in to put all kinds
Speaker 1: of crazy restrictions on this free banking, such as they
Speaker 1: couldn't have more than one branch open in different jurisdictions.
Speaker 1: And so if you got money, iou claims because back
Speaker 1: then gold was money. Gold went into the bank. They
Speaker 1: gave us an IOU, a paper gold certificate that was
Speaker 1: redeemable for gold. But if I got an IOU from
Speaker 1: a bank in New York, I necessarily couldn't redeem that
Speaker 1: IOU in a bank in Texas or California. The banks
Speaker 1: were not allowed because of government regulations. They weren't allowed
Speaker 1: to open up separate banks. So what happened is if
Speaker 1: I wanted to redeem a paper goalstificate from New York
Speaker 1: in Texas, they would make me. They'd give me a discount.
Speaker 1: They'd say, we're not going to redeem it a one
Speaker 1: hundred percent, will give you seventy eighty percent or whatever
Speaker 1: it is that really restricted it. Now, it's no different.
Speaker 1: I spend a lot of time in Mexico. As a
Speaker 1: matter of fact, I'm heading down to Mexico tonight, and
Speaker 1: in the very remote places of Mexico, they don't want dollars.
Speaker 1: They use pasos. So if you're in the tourist areas,
Speaker 1: they typically will take dollars, but your exchange rate isn't
Speaker 1: always going to be that good. Now, if you go
Speaker 1: to the more remote places, they may not take those
Speaker 1: dollars at all, or they're going to give you a
Speaker 1: very discounted exchange rate, because it's what are they going
Speaker 1: to do now? They got to go drive hours or
Speaker 1: whatever to the bank to go exchanges, so they're going
Speaker 1: to charge you for that. And that's basically what happened
Speaker 1: in the free banking are That was number one, but
Speaker 1: the number two this is a very interesting parallel protocol here,
Speaker 1: or parallel way to look at it, is that the
Speaker 1: governments forced these free banks to buy government bonds. And
Speaker 1: what happened is that that's government debt treasuries, which are
Speaker 1: supposed to be the risk free asset because the government's
Speaker 1: never going to default. But the problem is is that
Speaker 1: the bonds crashed and these free banks we're sitting on
Speaker 1: a bunch of government bonds that lost value and the
Speaker 1: bank's crashed. Now interesting parallel because that's exactly what just
Speaker 1: happened in this banking collapse. They bought risky assets that
Speaker 1: were government bonds that lost money and they collapsed as well.
Speaker 1: Same thing that happened in the free banking area. It
Speaker 1: wasn't really free. It was mandated by the government. Can't
Speaker 1: have more than one branch. You have to buy government
Speaker 1: bonds and they lost money. Then the Federal Reserve was
Speaker 1: started nineteen thirteen. We're gonna backstop the banks. We're gonna
Speaker 1: make sure that it doesn't happen. We're gonna make sure
Speaker 1: that we regulate them and they're gonna be safe, and
Speaker 1: we're going to make sure that if they fail, we're
Speaker 1: going to back up the deposits. And so ever since
Speaker 1: nineteen thirteen, when the Federal Reserve was created to do
Speaker 1: just that, booms and bus have only gotten bigger and
Speaker 1: bigger and bigger. We've had something like over five hundred
Speaker 1: banks have failed in the last you know, thirty forty years,
Speaker 1: and we're having banks failing today. If you're just tune
Speaker 1: in you are listening to the Mark Moas Show. We're
Speaker 1: talking about the banking collapse that happening, but we're gonna
Speaker 1: bring it into bigger context, show you how the entire
Speaker 1: financial system of the United States and the world is collapsing.
Speaker 1: How do we protect ourselves, what's coming next? All of
Speaker 1: that good stuff like we always talk about all the time.
Speaker 1: Again listening to the markmas Show. If you if you
Speaker 1: miss any of this, you can catch it on the podcast.
Speaker 1: Just search the Mark Moa show and your favorite podcast player,
Speaker 1: or you can watch me on YouTube as well. Just
Speaker 1: search Market Disruptors and you can find it over there
Speaker 1: as well. But I gotta take a quick break. I'm
Speaker 1: gonna take a second. I'm gonna come back. We're gonna
Speaker 1: talk about this more. Don't go away, I'll be right back,
Speaker 1: all right, welcome back. If you just tune in, you
Speaker 1: are listening to the Mark Moas Show. We're talking about
Speaker 1: the blood bath in the banking sector. We're talking about
Speaker 1: the meltdown in the banking sector. And so I was
Speaker 1: kind of framing up how that worked. It's failing. So
Speaker 1: the banking system is failing because the banks don't have
Speaker 1: any money. So what happens is you put your money
Speaker 1: in the bank and you hope that you get your
Speaker 1: money back out of the bank. What a lot of
Speaker 1: you maybe don't know is that when you give that
Speaker 1: money to the bank, it is no longer your money.
Speaker 1: Most people don't understand this. When you open up bankcount,
Speaker 1: you fill out a whole packet of information. In that
Speaker 1: packet of information, you basically give away your money. It's
Speaker 1: no longer years. You now become what's called an unsecured
Speaker 1: creditor of the bank. So what does that mean? Unsecured?
Speaker 1: That means they owe it to you, but it's not
Speaker 1: against any security. Like if the bank, you know, gives
Speaker 1: you a loan against your house, but it's secured against house.
Speaker 1: If you don't pay the house loan, they take your house,
Speaker 1: it's secured against that asset. But when you give your
Speaker 1: money to the bank, it's unsecured. So we're doing that
Speaker 1: and they don't have the money. Now in the case
Speaker 1: of this, just to kind of frame it up real quick,
Speaker 1: go watch my YouTube video to get the full details.
Speaker 1: But basically, the FED created all this money, so we
Speaker 1: had the pandemic twenty twenty came between the FED and
Speaker 1: the government. They printed about eleven trillion dollars and sent
Speaker 1: that out into the ecosystem. Where does that money go, Well,
Speaker 1: of course, it goes to businesses and people and things
Speaker 1: like that, and they put it into the bank. The
Speaker 1: bank balance is swelled to massive amounts had and seen
Speaker 1: as a matter of fact, in twenty twenty one, banks
Speaker 1: were telling people not to give them any more cash.
Speaker 1: We don't want your cash, we don't have to do
Speaker 1: with it, go spend it, give it to another Bank.
Speaker 1: I mean it was crazy, and so they balance is swelled.
Speaker 1: For SVB, Silicon Valley Bank, the balance is swelled from
Speaker 1: sixty billion to almost two hundred from sixty to two
Speaker 1: hundred in about a year and a half. Now what
Speaker 1: do they do with all that cash, Well, they invest it.
Speaker 1: It's your money, they invest it, and they make money.
Speaker 1: Of course, they give you zero percent. We're going to
Speaker 1: come back to that, and that's an interesting piece. They
Speaker 1: give you zero they're making money. But the problem is
Speaker 1: with Silicon Valley they and other banks, Silvergate as well,
Speaker 1: they bought government bonds when government bonds very cheap. Then
Speaker 1: the Fed goes on this crazy hiking path, raises rates
Speaker 1: really high, drives the value of those bonds down, and
Speaker 1: the bank's lost a lot of money, similar to the
Speaker 1: free banking era. Then when people went to go get
Speaker 1: their money out of the bank, Silvergate Bank had over
Speaker 1: forty billion dollars worth of redemptions or withdraws in a day,
Speaker 1: and they didn't have the money. It was gone. They
Speaker 1: risked it into treasuries, they risked it into mortgage backed securities,
Speaker 1: and they lost money, and they didn't have the money
Speaker 1: to give to the people. When they started selling the
Speaker 1: treasuries to get the money. They lost almost two billion dollars.
Speaker 1: They try to go raise two billion dollars to pay
Speaker 1: these people. No one want to give it to them, surprise, surprise,
Speaker 1: and they went out. Now it's a it's a much deeper,
Speaker 1: more involved story. Like I said, go to my main
Speaker 1: YouTube channel, Mark Moss to watch that whole thing. All right,
Speaker 1: But the problem, the thing is that I want to
Speaker 1: highlight is that this isn't just silver Gate or Silicon
Speaker 1: Valley Bank or Signature Bank. This is all the banks.
Speaker 1: This is the entire banking system that's breaking apart. Like this,
Speaker 1: it's doomed. They don't have your money now. In order
Speaker 1: to try to save this system, the FED pulled out
Speaker 1: some more magic tricks and they basically said, hey, all
Speaker 1: these government bonds that you have you lost money on,
Speaker 1: We'll just make you whole, okay. And the FED also
Speaker 1: said we're gonna we're gonna guarantee all deposits. So you
Speaker 1: have money in the bank that's FDIC insured up to
Speaker 1: two hundred fifty thousand dollars. But now the FED said, hey,
Speaker 1: we're just going to guarantee all of it. Now, why
Speaker 1: Silicon Valley Bank is a bank in Silicon Valley. Silicon
Speaker 1: Valley is a big, big, big political donors, specifically to
Speaker 1: the Democrat Party. California Governor Gavin Newsom rallied really really,
Speaker 1: really hard to get a bell out for Silicon Valley Bank.
Speaker 1: Turns out all his businesses use that bank. Surprise surprise,
Speaker 1: turns out about ninety eight percent of all the deposits
Speaker 1: of Silicon Valley Bank were not insured because they were
Speaker 1: over the two hundred fifty thousand dollars limit. So we
Speaker 1: basically had was a small, very small community bank for
Speaker 1: the very very very rich. That's what we had, the
Speaker 1: very very rich and very very connected, we'll say, right.
Speaker 1: So that's basically what happened. And so they got the
Speaker 1: government to guy and Knewsom got the government's ear they
Speaker 1: built out the bank, and they made all those depositors hold.
Speaker 1: Now it wasn't necessary to do this, there was they
Speaker 1: had losses. They wouldn't been able to pay everybody back
Speaker 1: one hundred percent, but they could have paid back everybody
Speaker 1: mostly ninety percent. Maybe some of these depositors would have
Speaker 1: taken a ten percent haircut. These are the billionaires I
Speaker 1: think they could afford a ten percent haircut, but more importantly,
Speaker 1: would protect the system, because that ten percent haircut would
Speaker 1: be like that slap on the wrist when you touch
Speaker 1: a hot stove and you don't and you know, you
Speaker 1: don't touch it again, And it would teach those people
Speaker 1: that they should take personal responsibility and not put all
Speaker 1: their money into the system that's not protected. It would
Speaker 1: also teach the bank that they should use proper risk management.
Speaker 1: So SVB Bank didn't do that. They didn't use any
Speaker 1: proper risk management. They were way too risky. As a
Speaker 1: matter of fact, they had about seventy percent of their
Speaker 1: investments into mortgage backed securities for comparison stake that normal
Speaker 1: banks are about third. They're way too risky, and they
Speaker 1: didn't employ even the most basic of risk management strategies,
Speaker 1: such as hedges, to protect themselves against bond yields moving
Speaker 1: against them. And so again no lesson has learned. Capitalism
Speaker 1: is shurecutted, and so the government saves the day. But
Speaker 1: one thing that's important here is that in the fog
Speaker 1: of war there are casualties sometimes that you might be
Speaker 1: called friendly fire or something like that. And in this case,
Speaker 1: it looks like what the government is trying to do,
Speaker 1: or actually say, the banking system is. They're trying to
Speaker 1: take out the exits. They don't want you to get
Speaker 1: out of the system because if you get out of
Speaker 1: the system, the system collapses. They need your money in
Speaker 1: the bank. As we found out Silicon Valley Bank, people
Speaker 1: tried to pull their money out the bank. The banking
Speaker 1: system collapsed. If people go pull their money out of
Speaker 1: the bank, the banking system will collapse. As a matter
Speaker 1: of fact, if just a few percentage of the people
Speaker 1: were to pull their money out of the banks, the
Speaker 1: banking system collapse. So they need your money in the bank.
Speaker 1: They don't want it coming out. The whole system of collapses.
Speaker 1: And we can see this. So I recently had on
Speaker 1: Caitlyn Long on my main YouTube channel, Amazing interviews also
Speaker 1: on the podcast so Mark Moss Show Caitlyn Long. You
Speaker 1: can find that interview hundreds of thousands of views on
Speaker 1: this video and the podcast downloads. Go check that out.
Speaker 1: And she was trying to form a bank called Custodia
Speaker 1: Bank in Wyoming, and Custodia Bank was going to be
Speaker 1: a custodian which meant they were going to hold onto
Speaker 1: your cash for you. They were going to be a
Speaker 1: one hundred percent full reserve, meaning you give them money,
Speaker 1: they keep it. None of the other banks do that.
Speaker 1: When you give your money to the banks, they lend
Speaker 1: it out. They don't have your money. But her bank
Speaker 1: wanted to have a novel idea such as, we're going
Speaker 1: to keep all your cash in the bank and we're
Speaker 1: going to charge you just to service your cash. And
Speaker 1: I think a lot of people would do that, and
Speaker 1: apparently the FED thinks a lot of people would want
Speaker 1: that as well. So the FED denied their banking charter.
Speaker 1: They said, Nope, you can't have that. Why why would
Speaker 1: the FED do that? Well, it turns out it wasn't
Speaker 1: the only one. There was another bank called Narrow Bank,
Speaker 1: same thing. So the FED has to approve any bank
Speaker 1: charter and Narrow Bank Custodia bank. They got denied for
Speaker 1: trying to be safe, for trying to hold onto your cash,
Speaker 1: which is what they're supposed to do, and the FED
Speaker 1: deny them. Why would the FED deny them? Will the
Speaker 1: FED deny them because they know that that's what people
Speaker 1: would want, and so everyone would take all their money
Speaker 1: out of these risky banks. They don't hold your money,
Speaker 1: and they would move it to these other banks and
Speaker 1: it would completely wipe out the banking systems. So the
Speaker 1: FED said, no, no, you don't have the right to
Speaker 1: keep yourself safe. That's how fragile this system is. But
Speaker 1: it gets worse. There's so much more now you won't
Speaker 1: even believe what they're trying to blame this on and
Speaker 1: what they're trying to do next. It's probably one of
Speaker 1: the biggest battlegrounds that we have in our life right
Speaker 1: now and over the next couple years, we're gonna talk
Speaker 1: about that. I gotta take a quick break. If you're
Speaker 1: just tune in right now, you're listening to the Mark
Speaker 1: Moas Show, talking about the banking collapse, the blood bath,
Speaker 1: explain to you. But we are going to go deep.
Speaker 1: We have a lot more to cover, so do not
Speaker 1: go away. I'm just gonna take a quick break. I'll
Speaker 1: come right back, all right, Welcome back. If you just
Speaker 1: tune in, you are listening to the Mark Moss Show,
Speaker 1: we're talking about the banking collapse. Of course, this builds
Speaker 1: into our thesis of the decentralized revolution that we talk
Speaker 1: about each end every week. And I was talking about
Speaker 1: how the government or the Fudderal Reserve. The Fuddal Reserve
Speaker 1: approves banks, and they've denied two different banks because they
Speaker 1: want to hold your money in the bank. It's the
Speaker 1: novel concept and they don't want that because they know
Speaker 1: that if there was a bank that offered safety and security,
Speaker 1: everybody would go to that bank. It would collapse the
Speaker 1: entire system. So what they want is they want to
Speaker 1: take out the exits. It looks like what they've also
Speaker 1: done is they've taken out the exits. There's another bank
Speaker 1: called Signature Bank that got taken over by the FDIC
Speaker 1: and according to one of the authors of the Dodd
Speaker 1: Frank Act that was written after the bank collapse of
Speaker 1: two thousand and eight, that was written specifically to not
Speaker 1: have this problem happen again. According to one of the
Speaker 1: authors of that bill, he said that Signature Bank was
Speaker 1: taken over by the FDIC, and they don't know why.
Speaker 1: It wasn't risky, it wasn't facing insolvency. There was absolutely
Speaker 1: no reason for it to be taken over by the FDIC.
Speaker 1: So he doesn't know why, except for Signature Bank is
Speaker 1: one of the main banks that cryptocurrency and bitcoin companies use.
Speaker 1: So we had Silvergate Bank go down. That was one
Speaker 1: of the main banks, and so people when silver Gate
Speaker 1: went down, they left and they went to Signature Bank.
Speaker 1: Signature Bank was one of the other very very very
Speaker 1: crypto bitcoin friendly banks, and that just got taken over
Speaker 1: for no reason, apparently, no reason. They weren't risky except
Speaker 1: for is this another case of them trying to take
Speaker 1: out the exits. They don't want you to be safe.
Speaker 1: They don't want you to find the exit, to find
Speaker 1: the lifeboat. They want you on the boat as the
Speaker 1: boat goes down, because I guess it makes the boat
Speaker 1: go down less slowly obviously, right if everybody rushed for
Speaker 1: the exits, the boat would just sink. Now, they're doing
Speaker 1: this from a lot of ways. And as I said
Speaker 1: kind of before the break, I was saying, this is all.
Speaker 1: They're also doing this in what is maybe the biggest
Speaker 1: fight we have of our time right now, and that
Speaker 1: is a censorship of our speech. So the SEC head
Speaker 1: Gary Gensler, came out and says warning, any misconduct amid
Speaker 1: a banking collapse will be prosecuted, will be prosecuted. What
Speaker 1: kind of misconduct is he talking about, Well, they're saying
Speaker 1: that people on Twitter talking about a banking collapse, are
Speaker 1: causing a banking collapse, and if you put out a
Speaker 1: tweet that causes the banks to collapse, you could be prosecuted.
Speaker 1: They're saying that it could be potentially Peter Thiel's fault
Speaker 1: because he said that he's pulling his money out of
Speaker 1: SVB Bank, and he's telling all his companies that he
Speaker 1: advises to pull their money out of SPB Bank. He
Speaker 1: put that out publicly, which caused a mad rush for
Speaker 1: the exit. So it's his fault. Never Mind SVB made
Speaker 1: all types of risky investments. Never Mind that SVP made
Speaker 1: zero attempt for any type of risk management. Never Mind
Speaker 1: the fact that they didn't have the money, Like the
Speaker 1: bank's supposed to have your money, so if people want
Speaker 1: to get their money, they should get their money. How
Speaker 1: is it Peter Deal's fault that SVP didn't have the
Speaker 1: people's money. I mean, it's just insanity. But apparently if
Speaker 1: we don't talk about it, then it's not real. As
Speaker 1: a matter of fact, I put on Twitter last night.
Speaker 1: If you're not following on Twitter, you should. It's just
Speaker 1: at one Mark Moss, the number one Mark Moss, and
Speaker 1: I put this video clip of Jerome Powell, the fed
Speaker 1: share of Jerome Power, and some lawmaker from Nevada was saying, Hey,
Speaker 1: Jerome Power, it explained to me, and it was a
Speaker 1: very clear question. Tell me how two percent inflation helps
Speaker 1: Nevada families. There was a very simple questions. Of course
Speaker 1: it doesn't. So he couldn't really answer it. So he
Speaker 1: danced around, danced around, dance around, didn't even try to
Speaker 1: attempt it. But what he said was, well, it just
Speaker 1: gives us a target because if people think that we're
Speaker 1: going to have two percent inflation, then we will. So
Speaker 1: whatever we collectively think just happens, which he's calling the
Speaker 1: self fulfill in prophecy. If we go into the mirror
Speaker 1: and we screamed beetle juice three times, I guess beetle
Speaker 1: juice appears. I don't know. That's what he's saying. So
Speaker 1: if we just all collectively hold hands and seeing kumbaya
Speaker 1: and hope for two percent inflation, we'll get it, I guess.
Speaker 1: But I guess that's what they're thinking about banking laps.
Speaker 1: If we don't, if we don't talk about banking collaps,
Speaker 1: then we won't have banking collaps. Never mind that they
Speaker 1: don't have your money. That's the problem, a man. That's
Speaker 1: the problem with all this censorship of speech. We shouldn't
Speaker 1: be afraid of the truth. Truth is freedom, truth is
Speaker 1: found an open, honest dialogue. We shouldn't be afraid of that.
Speaker 1: They're afraid of it because they live in a crooked, evil, corrupt,
Speaker 1: failing system that if there's any light shine on what
Speaker 1: they're doing, the whole thing will be found out. As
Speaker 1: a matter of fact, Henry Ford says, if the American
Speaker 1: people knew how the banking system worked, there would be
Speaker 1: a revolution before the morning. Not there'd be a revolution
Speaker 1: not tomorrow, before the morning. If the American people knew
Speaker 1: how it worked, well, they're finding out how it works
Speaker 1: because we're in a new era. We're in a new paradigm.
Speaker 1: And that new paradigm, that new era is the information
Speaker 1: age or the digital age. Information moves at the speed
Speaker 1: of light instantly, and it broadcasts to everybody. Now. I
Speaker 1: often say I like to look at politics, finance, and technology.
Speaker 1: It's always technology that changes the world more than anything.
Speaker 1: And I have been talking about how it's changing the
Speaker 1: world now, and it is. And so let's go back
Speaker 1: a little bit in history to kind of see a
Speaker 1: little perspective jump back forward, but on a two hundred
Speaker 1: fifty year time frame, we have a political revolution cycle.
Speaker 1: Two hundred fifty years ago was the American and the
Speaker 1: French Revolution rejecting the centralization of the monarchy of the king.
Speaker 1: Two hundred fifty years before that was fifteen hundred. It
Speaker 1: was the Protestant Reformation, where the people rejected the centralization
Speaker 1: of the church and state and they sought their own
Speaker 1: decentralized path to God. Now what led to that It
Speaker 1: was a piece of technology, a piece of technology that
Speaker 1: was invented seventy years earlier, and it was a new
Speaker 1: piece of technology called the printing press. And the printing
Speaker 1: press allowed for mass distribution of books, specifically the Bible.
Speaker 1: And when people were got a Bible were able to
Speaker 1: actually read it for themselves, they said, wait a minute,
Speaker 1: everything you've been telling us is a lie. You're lying
Speaker 1: to us. Now we know the truth. Now. They didn't
Speaker 1: like that, of course, they tried to hang onto that
Speaker 1: power as best as they could, so they would lay
Speaker 1: anybody who would speak out against the labeled them a
Speaker 1: heretic heresy. My friend Joe Brown shout out to Joe Brown.
Speaker 1: He's got a podcast on the iHeart network as well.
Speaker 1: His is called heresy Financial. Anyway, they would call them
Speaker 1: a heretic, and it was punishable by death by death.
Speaker 1: But no matter how many people they killed, no matter
Speaker 1: how many people they threatened with death, they couldn't stop
Speaker 1: the inevitable, which was the free flowing of information, and
Speaker 1: eventually their whole system collapse because people have the information.
Speaker 1: Now fast forward to today, we also have a new
Speaker 1: invention that started about thirty years ago called the Internet,
Speaker 1: and the Internet allows for free flowing of information, sort
Speaker 1: of like the printing press. And no matter how much
Speaker 1: they try to censor us, no matter how much Gary
Speaker 1: Gensler warns us that they're going to prosecute us if
Speaker 1: we talk about it, the information is out there. And
Speaker 1: to Henry Ford's quote, if the people knew how the
Speaker 1: banking system worked, well, that's my job. That's my goal.
Speaker 1: I shouldn't say it's a lot of people's jobs. As
Speaker 1: I say on my YouTube videos, I'm here to change
Speaker 1: the way you think about money because everything you've learned
Speaker 1: is wrong. Purposely because Henry Ford said there'd be a revolution.
Speaker 1: They don't want that, so they have to either not
Speaker 1: teach you about it, or they have to teach you wrong.
Speaker 1: They have to lie to you about it. But just
Speaker 1: like the printing press, the Internet has now exposed this.
Speaker 1: We now see how it's working and we're in that
Speaker 1: age stay so they can't control it, and it moves fast.
Speaker 1: So just like Henry Ford said, a revolution before morning,
Speaker 1: Peter Field put that out and within forty eight hours
Speaker 1: the bank had collapsed within forty eight hours. So there's
Speaker 1: two things. One, information moves really really fast. We can
Speaker 1: share the information no matter how much they try to
Speaker 1: censor and control. You got the Joe Rogans, you got
Speaker 1: the Russell Brands. You got little old Me doing my
Speaker 1: part as well, trying to expose this. So you know
Speaker 1: what's going on and they can't stop that. But there's
Speaker 1: something else that's also leading to this, something called the
Speaker 1: digital age. I'm going to talk about that. I gotta
Speaker 1: take a quick break. If you're just tune in, you're
Speaker 1: listening to the Mark Moss Show, we're talking about the
Speaker 1: banking system collapse. I'm gonna do. I'm gonna cover exactly
Speaker 1: like I said, the second ingredient to why we're in
Speaker 1: a new paradigm and why they aren't unable to control this,
Speaker 1: and then we're gonna talk about how to protect yourself
Speaker 1: from all of this. So I'm gonna be back with
Speaker 1: all of that, talk about some of the ramifications. Like
Speaker 1: I said, how to protect yourself, and so much more.
Speaker 1: If you've missed any of this before, go check it
Speaker 1: out on the podcast The Mark Moss Show on your
Speaker 1: favorite podcast player or the Market Disruptors YouTube channel. You
Speaker 1: can listen and watch me at the same time. I'm
Speaker 1: gonna take one quick break. I'm gonna be right back
Speaker 1: with the rest. Don't go away, all right, Welcome back.
Speaker 1: If you're just tune in, you're listening to the Mark
Speaker 1: Moss Show. Of course we're talking about the banking system collapse,
Speaker 1: the blood bath that's happening in the banking market, banking system,
Speaker 1: and of course this leads into our thesis of the
Speaker 1: decentralized revolution. It's one of the three revolutionary cycles that
Speaker 1: are resetting. The financial system is resetting. Now. I'm not
Speaker 1: going to recap everything I've talked about, but it was important.
Speaker 1: Go check it out on the podcast player. Just search
Speaker 1: Market Maas Show if you want to check that out.
Speaker 1: So the new paradigm. Now information moves at the speed
Speaker 1: of light. The Internet has changed that exposes it. But
Speaker 1: even more importantly, we're in the digital age of money,
Speaker 1: and so in previous banking collapses in the seventies and
Speaker 1: the thirties, the twenties, the eighteen hundreds, information moved very
Speaker 1: very slow. Maybe you know, out on my farm we
Speaker 1: had on the prairie. Eventually months later, like a little
Speaker 1: rumor comes to me and I don't know if it's
Speaker 1: true or not. Right, So information moved really slow, whereas
Speaker 1: today boom, one Twitter post can reach millions of people,
Speaker 1: or tens or twenty or fifty million people. But more importantly,
Speaker 1: if I'm that rancher out on the farm that maybe
Speaker 1: don't get that news for a couple of months now,
Speaker 1: then I would have to get get on my horse
Speaker 1: and I would have to ride, however many days to
Speaker 1: get to the town and stand the line at a
Speaker 1: bank to get some cash out. Now I can see
Speaker 1: the post online on my favorite news site or social
Speaker 1: media app, and I can literally open my banking app
Speaker 1: and just click a button and move my money out
Speaker 1: of the bank. So not only in the digital as
Speaker 1: this information move to speed delight. So does money. And
Speaker 1: I can move it from one bank to another, which
Speaker 1: you know hurts that bank I pulled it from it's
Speaker 1: still in the banking system overall. Or with a click
Speaker 1: of a button, I can just go buy a bitcoin,
Speaker 1: which happened a lot. We saw bitcoin price bounce from
Speaker 1: twenty to twenty five thousand as massive amounts of people
Speaker 1: were moving into bitcoin. Also gold gold caught a massive bid,
Speaker 1: did amazing. But a couple of things I think that
Speaker 1: are interested about this. The banks don't understand capitalism, so
Speaker 1: they don't understand capitalism because the government always bails them out. Right,
Speaker 1: if there was a little bit of risk and reward here,
Speaker 1: if banks actually lost money instead of what they we
Speaker 1: say privatizing gains, the banks privatize the gains. They get
Speaker 1: to keep the profits. But if they lose, we socialize
Speaker 1: the losses. That means you and I, as tax I
Speaker 1: have to pay that. If they didn't do if the
Speaker 1: government didn't bail them out, if that didn't happen, they
Speaker 1: would learn that, shoot, I shouldn't touch that hot stove again.
Speaker 1: Capitalism would kick in. They'd have personal responsibility. But they don't.
Speaker 1: A couple things that are just stupid for the banks
Speaker 1: that have again because they've never had risk It's like
Speaker 1: it's like it's like a it's like a kid who's
Speaker 1: been or or an adult who's grown up with, you know,
Speaker 1: overbearing parents who's treated them like a kid, and they've
Speaker 1: just never learned to manage themselves. And so the banks
Speaker 1: didn't practice any proper risk management. That's their fault. They
Speaker 1: made massive bad investments into e SG that have complete
Speaker 1: felt so they lost. They had no risk management. They
Speaker 1: made massive amounts of bad investments. But that's SVB. But
Speaker 1: the banks overall don't get it either. So for example,
Speaker 1: as I said, you give your money to the bank,
Speaker 1: you're a non secured creditor, okay, and how much does
Speaker 1: the bank give you. Well, when you give the money
Speaker 1: to the bank, they loan, they use that money to
Speaker 1: invest and make money. How much of that do they
Speaker 1: give back to you. See, used to be when I
Speaker 1: give my money to the bank, the bank would invest
Speaker 1: it and then they would pay me interest, which was
Speaker 1: a return on my money, which was part of the
Speaker 1: money they were making with my money. But today we
Speaker 1: put our money in the bank. They make money with
Speaker 1: our money, but they give us zero As a matter
Speaker 1: of fact, most banks pay like zero point eight today.
Speaker 1: But the FED, the government, the FED will pay me
Speaker 1: five percent. And that's the FED. So I don't have
Speaker 1: to worry about the riskiness of the bank. I have
Speaker 1: to worry about being unsecured creditor. I don't have to
Speaker 1: worry about them, you know, making bad deals or whatever, fraud.
Speaker 1: I don't have to worry about any of that. I
Speaker 1: just give it directly to the FED, and they guarantee
Speaker 1: my money and they pay me five percent. So would
Speaker 1: you rather take all the risk, all the problems, all
Speaker 1: the headaches, all the pitfalls for zero percent or give
Speaker 1: it to the Fed for five? Of course, the answer
Speaker 1: is give it to the Fed five. So what are
Speaker 1: doing well? They're pulling money out. Banks have never had
Speaker 1: to deal with competition. They don't understand capitalisms, so they
Speaker 1: don't get this. So if the banks want us to
Speaker 1: keep our money in the banks, they should probably pay
Speaker 1: us better than what the FED will pay us. They
Speaker 1: should pay us Fed five percent plus whatever they're making
Speaker 1: on our loan portfolio. They're giving out credit cards, are
Speaker 1: given out home loans. They're making about a seventeen percent
Speaker 1: return on average seventeen percent. So could they give us
Speaker 1: what the FED is paying five plus two? Could they
Speaker 1: give us seven percent? We'll keep my money in the
Speaker 1: bank for seven percent. At five percent, let's going to
Speaker 1: the FED. That's it. Banks lose. Now maybe I'll keep
Speaker 1: enough to pay my house payment next month, but the
Speaker 1: rest goes to the Fed. So how do we protect ourselves.
Speaker 1: Let's move into that part. Well, one, get your money
Speaker 1: out of the banks, move it to the FED. Certainly,
Speaker 1: keep your money under two hundred fifty thousand dollars amounts. Certainly.
Speaker 1: Of course, now the Fed's going to backstop all though,
Speaker 1: so maybe that doesn't even matter anymore. But why would
Speaker 1: you put your money in the bank and mern zero? Now,
Speaker 1: like I said, you know, we have our checking account.
Speaker 1: I'm talking about checking account. There's money that I need
Speaker 1: short term paying my bills this month, and then you
Speaker 1: should have hopefully you have a savings account, and that's
Speaker 1: long term money, right, and so that savings account, put
Speaker 1: that at the FED. Go make five percent. You can
Speaker 1: do it. And now not long term treasuries. That's how
Speaker 1: everyone lost money. Short term treasuries less than two years,
Speaker 1: one year, six months, and it's tax free. In most cases,
Speaker 1: talk to your tax professional in that most cases that
Speaker 1: income is tax free for you, so it's even better
Speaker 1: than that. You can't earn that in stocks, which is
Speaker 1: why stocks are going downhill. So that's how you protect yourself.
Speaker 1: That's one way. Another way, obviously, bitcoin Bitcoin was made
Speaker 1: for this moment. As I said, it pumped from twenty
Speaker 1: twenty five thousand. People realize that the banks can't be trusted,
Speaker 1: there's moral hazard, and so there's bitcoin. Now, I'm gonna
Speaker 1: do a live event next week where I'm gonna go
Speaker 1: live for about an hour and really going to break
Speaker 1: this system down and more importantly talk about how we
Speaker 1: can protect ourselves, how we can invest, how we can
Speaker 1: make money through this situation because oh, a lot of
Speaker 1: wealth is being created right now. Um, if you want
Speaker 1: to find out about that, you want to join me
Speaker 1: next week where we're gonna go live and you can
Speaker 1: actually interact with me. It's done like over zoom. Just
Speaker 1: go to go dot one, Markmoss dot com, Go dot one,
Speaker 1: Markmas dot com, slash crash, Go dot one, Markmoss dot com,
Speaker 1: slash crash. We'll go live, like I said, in a
Speaker 1: zoom environment, we can talk. We can share messages and
Speaker 1: we'll really talk about this, but I'm gonna lay out
Speaker 1: my plan of how we're making a killing in this market. Um,
Speaker 1: when there's when there's volatility, that's when the time is
Speaker 1: to make money. It's sort of like, um, when there's
Speaker 1: big waves in the ocean, that's the time to go surf.
Speaker 1: When there's big waves in the financial market, that's time
Speaker 1: to make money. So we want to talk about that.
Speaker 1: But UM, you know, like I said, uh, get your
Speaker 1: money out of the bank. Why if you if you
Speaker 1: have more than you need for this month or two,
Speaker 1: go put into treasuries short dated less than two years
Speaker 1: tax free. In most cases, gold is doing amazing well.
Speaker 1: I expect that to continue. Bitcoin is doing amazingly well.
Speaker 1: And part of this isn't just the system collapsing on
Speaker 1: its own because they've made all these bad decisions, which
Speaker 1: is certainly the case. It's also happening because other nations
Speaker 1: around the world see the same problem. As a matter
Speaker 1: of fact, central banks have bought more gold than any
Speaker 1: time in history. Central banks are going to shoot. We
Speaker 1: don't want fiat currency. I don't want any fiat currency.
Speaker 1: I don't want the Turkish lira, I don't want I
Speaker 1: don't want any I don't want any currency. I don't
Speaker 1: even want to use a dollar. I'd rather just have
Speaker 1: the gold they're saying, I would rather have the commodities.
Speaker 1: So Russia announced are going to produce less oil. They'd
Speaker 1: rather keep the oil in the ground than pump it
Speaker 1: all out and hold onto Fiat currencies. Saudi Arabia the
Speaker 1: same thing. GM just announce they're going to spend six
Speaker 1: hundred and fifty million, over half a billion dollars to
Speaker 1: buy a lithium mine. They'd rather own lithium in the
Speaker 1: ground than they would rather have the dollars or the treasuries.
Speaker 1: So that's what's happening here. And so you know, we
Speaker 1: have the rise of the bricks nations. Over sixty percent
Speaker 1: of the people in the world are now part of
Speaker 1: the bricks nations. That's Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa,
Speaker 1: but of course lots of other nations are joining in Iran,
Speaker 1: Saudi Arabia, and now even Mexico is talking about it,
Speaker 1: which would be catastrophic. And so everybody sees what's happening.
Speaker 1: Everybody's running too. The exits. The banking system is trying
Speaker 1: to close off those exits as fast as they can,
Speaker 1: and you need to get out of the exit while
Speaker 1: you still can. But like I said, those walls are
Speaker 1: closing in. If you want to join me next week
Speaker 1: we're gonna go live talk about this, do live Q
Speaker 1: and A join me. Just go dot one Mark Moss
Speaker 1: dot com slash crash again, that's go dot one Mark
Speaker 1: Moss dot com slash crash. But whatever you do, be careful.
Speaker 1: It's the age of personal responsibility is snapping back. You
Speaker 1: are responsible for your retirement, you are responsible for your health,
Speaker 1: you are responsible for your money in the bank, You're
Speaker 1: responsible for your business. You're responsible for yourself. No one
Speaker 1: is coming to save you, so better learn how to
Speaker 1: do it yourself. Anyway, you're listening to the Mark Mos
Speaker 1: Show talking about the decentralized Revolution, talking about the banking collapse.
Speaker 1: If you missed any of it, check it out on
Speaker 1: the podcast The Mark ma Show. And that's what I got.
Speaker 1: Thanks for listening.