WEBVTT - Surveillance: Equities are Overpriced, Normand Says

0:00:09.880 --> 0:00:13.800
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. I'm Tom Keene Jay Ley.

0:00:13.960 --> 0:00:17.560
<v Speaker 1>We bring you insight from the best in economics, finance, investment,

0:00:18.000 --> 0:00:23.520
<v Speaker 1>and international relations. Find Bloomberg Surveillance on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud,

0:00:23.600 --> 0:00:27.319
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg dot Com, and of course, on the Bloomberg. We

0:00:27.440 --> 0:00:29.840
<v Speaker 1>begin this morning with the President of the United States

0:00:29.880 --> 0:00:33.280
<v Speaker 1>saying the following. Will some people be affected, yes, will

0:00:33.320 --> 0:00:36.199
<v Speaker 1>some people be affected badly? Yes, But we have to

0:00:36.240 --> 0:00:38.599
<v Speaker 1>get our country open, and we have to get it

0:00:38.680 --> 0:00:42.000
<v Speaker 1>open soon. Let's turn out to David Balen, a city

0:00:42.000 --> 0:00:45.480
<v Speaker 1>private bank, the chief investment officer. David, help me out

0:00:45.479 --> 0:00:48.400
<v Speaker 1>with this one. As we reopen, is there a reopening

0:00:48.520 --> 0:00:53.800
<v Speaker 1>rotation in this market? If so, what does it look like? Well,

0:00:53.880 --> 0:00:56.760
<v Speaker 1>in terms of what we're what we're expecting to see, is,

0:00:57.000 --> 0:00:59.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, a reopening that is very much focused on

0:00:59.680 --> 0:01:03.160
<v Speaker 1>two big trends. One is to refill the supply lines

0:01:03.280 --> 0:01:06.200
<v Speaker 1>and you know of the for all industrial products and

0:01:06.240 --> 0:01:10.479
<v Speaker 1>capital expenditures in the second one associated with the consumer um.

0:01:10.520 --> 0:01:13.120
<v Speaker 1>We expected that reopening is right. This quarter is all

0:01:13.160 --> 0:01:16.479
<v Speaker 1>about refilling that pipeline and then obviously the rebound will

0:01:16.480 --> 0:01:19.119
<v Speaker 1>take place in the numbers in Q three and as

0:01:19.120 --> 0:01:21.720
<v Speaker 1>you've been talking about on the show today, we're going

0:01:21.800 --> 0:01:24.560
<v Speaker 1>to continue to see these incredibly bad numbers. And what

0:01:24.640 --> 0:01:26.520
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna need to see on the opposite side of

0:01:26.520 --> 0:01:29.360
<v Speaker 1>this is an enormous amount of re employment. Of the

0:01:29.400 --> 0:01:31.640
<v Speaker 1>thirty odd million people, let's say in the United States

0:01:31.680 --> 0:01:34.039
<v Speaker 1>who are unemployed, we would want to see half of

0:01:34.080 --> 0:01:37.360
<v Speaker 1>those people are more reemployed as we entered Q three.

0:01:37.720 --> 0:01:39.840
<v Speaker 1>And if that's the case, then you can really have

0:01:39.920 --> 0:01:42.959
<v Speaker 1>your meeting the market expectations here. So to me, that's

0:01:43.000 --> 0:01:44.920
<v Speaker 1>what we're gonna be looking for, because that is what's

0:01:44.920 --> 0:01:48.840
<v Speaker 1>going to drive, in my mind, the the the economic power,

0:01:48.920 --> 0:01:52.040
<v Speaker 1>the recovery that will give people confidence that the numbers

0:01:52.040 --> 0:01:54.320
<v Speaker 1>in the markets today are real. How far is the

0:01:54.400 --> 0:01:57.360
<v Speaker 1>stock market looking out right now? The textbook tells me

0:01:57.440 --> 0:02:01.000
<v Speaker 1>six months. We understand that's a guestimate, David. How far

0:02:01.080 --> 0:02:04.600
<v Speaker 1>do you think the stock market is guessing out? Yeah?

0:02:04.640 --> 0:02:06.760
<v Speaker 1>I think that the stock market Tom has to be

0:02:06.800 --> 0:02:09.720
<v Speaker 1>guessing out now about a year. And here's why. First

0:02:09.720 --> 0:02:11.359
<v Speaker 1>of all, you see that nobody is willing to make

0:02:11.360 --> 0:02:13.600
<v Speaker 1>really good predictions about what's actually going to happen quarter

0:02:13.680 --> 0:02:16.280
<v Speaker 1>to quarter for all good reasons. These numbers are unlike

0:02:16.320 --> 0:02:19.400
<v Speaker 1>anything that we've ever seen, including in the Great Financial Crisis.

0:02:19.800 --> 0:02:21.960
<v Speaker 1>So what we need to see as a recovery right

0:02:21.960 --> 0:02:24.919
<v Speaker 1>where we get through this trough and then we actually

0:02:25.000 --> 0:02:28.400
<v Speaker 1>experience the type of earnings that you fore and we

0:02:28.440 --> 0:02:31.519
<v Speaker 1>get some clarity on that, and we're expecting a fifty

0:02:31.560 --> 0:02:35.400
<v Speaker 1>so a very sharp decline you know about decline in

0:02:35.480 --> 0:02:38.160
<v Speaker 1>EPs for the SMP and half of that would be

0:02:38.200 --> 0:02:42.799
<v Speaker 1>captured back in. So once we get into Q three

0:02:42.919 --> 0:02:45.320
<v Speaker 1>and we see the recovery, people will need to believe

0:02:45.360 --> 0:02:49.280
<v Speaker 1>that what they see in Q three will be possible

0:02:49.600 --> 0:02:51.600
<v Speaker 1>and that will be the key determinant as to whether

0:02:51.639 --> 0:02:54.480
<v Speaker 1>or not this market can maintain the types of valuations

0:02:54.520 --> 0:02:58.040
<v Speaker 1>that are being projected when within the elasticities on any

0:02:58.080 --> 0:03:03.359
<v Speaker 1>given big companies UH income statement. What does furlow mean?

0:03:03.400 --> 0:03:05.800
<v Speaker 1>Do you? I mean, John? I mean you, you're up

0:03:05.840 --> 0:03:08.600
<v Speaker 1>to speed on these headlines better than me. British Airways

0:03:08.680 --> 0:03:11.840
<v Speaker 1>is furlowing? You know, general mode as a CFO is

0:03:11.880 --> 0:03:13.639
<v Speaker 1>going to be on with Bloomberg later. I'll bet you

0:03:13.720 --> 0:03:19.440
<v Speaker 1>theugh furlow. What's furlough mean? Well, in terms of what

0:03:19.520 --> 0:03:23.840
<v Speaker 1>we're looking at, furlough means obviously temporary unemployment people who's

0:03:23.919 --> 0:03:27.040
<v Speaker 1>where the company's intention is to re employ them, and

0:03:27.120 --> 0:03:30.040
<v Speaker 1>furlough also means, at least in the US, that those

0:03:30.080 --> 0:03:35.040
<v Speaker 1>furloughed employees will get benefits associated with either company loans

0:03:35.080 --> 0:03:38.880
<v Speaker 1>that are forgiven or because of unemployment benefits that are

0:03:38.880 --> 0:03:41.720
<v Speaker 1>made available. Uh. And then when that furlow period is over,

0:03:41.760 --> 0:03:44.720
<v Speaker 1>there presumably reemployed, and then we'll ultimately be paid by

0:03:44.720 --> 0:03:48.480
<v Speaker 1>the company. David. This sort of goes to the idea

0:03:48.640 --> 0:03:51.280
<v Speaker 1>of what the economy will look like. On the other side,

0:03:51.320 --> 0:03:54.600
<v Speaker 1>the idea of furlowing employees rather than laying them off

0:03:54.680 --> 0:03:58.720
<v Speaker 1>outright because people are expecting the economy to recover. I'm

0:03:58.720 --> 0:04:01.360
<v Speaker 1>struck by the borrowings of some junk raded companies. They

0:04:01.360 --> 0:04:03.880
<v Speaker 1>are paying more than ten percent yields to borrow money

0:04:03.920 --> 0:04:07.720
<v Speaker 1>for four years, and I'm wondering whether the cure is

0:04:07.760 --> 0:04:10.040
<v Speaker 1>worth the worse than the ailment. In other words, how

0:04:10.080 --> 0:04:13.080
<v Speaker 1>many of these companies that are piling on debt and

0:04:13.160 --> 0:04:17.200
<v Speaker 1>keeping employees online are not going to survive after the

0:04:17.240 --> 0:04:21.640
<v Speaker 1>pandemic because they've just simply become overleveraged given economic growth.

0:04:23.000 --> 0:04:25.520
<v Speaker 1>It's it's one of the major issues that you know,

0:04:25.760 --> 0:04:29.440
<v Speaker 1>an unintended and unintended consequences of the FED stepping into

0:04:29.440 --> 0:04:32.520
<v Speaker 1>the market. What you're talking about is the fact that

0:04:32.560 --> 0:04:34.440
<v Speaker 1>the companies that might not have been able to borrow

0:04:34.440 --> 0:04:36.279
<v Speaker 1>are now able to go to the junk market, able

0:04:36.320 --> 0:04:39.359
<v Speaker 1>to obtain, as you said, capital at very expensive rates

0:04:39.680 --> 0:04:43.080
<v Speaker 1>to continue their operations, even though they were probably marginal

0:04:43.200 --> 0:04:47.080
<v Speaker 1>prior to that recapitalization. So the issue there is what

0:04:47.200 --> 0:04:48.800
<v Speaker 1>is the strength of the recovery. And one of the

0:04:48.800 --> 0:04:50.880
<v Speaker 1>reasons why we're very concerned about aspects of the high

0:04:50.920 --> 0:04:54.279
<v Speaker 1>yield bond market is precisely because there is really no

0:04:54.360 --> 0:04:57.000
<v Speaker 1>trajectory for those companies, you know, given the slowness of

0:04:57.000 --> 0:04:59.000
<v Speaker 1>what we expect this recovery will be over the next

0:04:59.040 --> 0:05:02.960
<v Speaker 1>two years, to really give them any acceleration in their businesses.

0:05:03.279 --> 0:05:05.719
<v Speaker 1>So to your point, a lot of companies have seen

0:05:05.800 --> 0:05:09.479
<v Speaker 1>the postponement of what ultimately will be, you know, either

0:05:09.560 --> 0:05:11.320
<v Speaker 1>the failure of the company, the merger of the company,

0:05:11.360 --> 0:05:13.760
<v Speaker 1>or the restructuring of the company, and that's really one

0:05:13.800 --> 0:05:17.120
<v Speaker 1>of the unintended consequences. We're very carefully looking at credits

0:05:17.120 --> 0:05:19.040
<v Speaker 1>at City Private Bank to make sure we do not

0:05:19.120 --> 0:05:21.960
<v Speaker 1>put client capital into those companies because even though the

0:05:22.000 --> 0:05:24.800
<v Speaker 1>yields look very attractive, they are much more risky than

0:05:24.839 --> 0:05:27.520
<v Speaker 1>they appear. So, David, can you square the idea that

0:05:27.600 --> 0:05:30.320
<v Speaker 1>sort of bearish feel with respect to the high old

0:05:30.360 --> 0:05:34.240
<v Speaker 1>bond market with your bullish call on small cap stocks

0:05:34.320 --> 0:05:37.160
<v Speaker 1>which often track the high old bond market in terms

0:05:37.160 --> 0:05:40.719
<v Speaker 1>of performance. That is a great question also, and I

0:05:40.720 --> 0:05:42.520
<v Speaker 1>think you have to look at the balance sheets of

0:05:42.520 --> 0:05:45.200
<v Speaker 1>those companies. So what we've done is we've divided the

0:05:45.279 --> 0:05:47.360
<v Speaker 1>high old market itself. Will We've taken out all of

0:05:47.360 --> 0:05:49.400
<v Speaker 1>the energy securities and taking a look at the remainder

0:05:49.400 --> 0:05:51.159
<v Speaker 1>of the high old mark market bond market and the

0:05:51.200 --> 0:05:53.919
<v Speaker 1>companies that are borrowing those, and then we've further divided

0:05:53.920 --> 0:05:57.360
<v Speaker 1>those companies into those that have resilient business models i e.

0:05:57.720 --> 0:06:00.240
<v Speaker 1>Which have not been as impacted by this more ket

0:06:00.240 --> 0:06:04.320
<v Speaker 1>conditions and specifically associated with healthcare, consumer durables, and things

0:06:04.360 --> 0:06:07.799
<v Speaker 1>like that. Companies that supply parts and services two industries

0:06:07.800 --> 0:06:10.440
<v Speaker 1>that are going to recover. An example would be airline

0:06:10.520 --> 0:06:14.839
<v Speaker 1>services rather than airlines. And by identifying all of those subsegments,

0:06:14.920 --> 0:06:17.560
<v Speaker 1>you're able to build a portfolio companies that are very

0:06:17.640 --> 0:06:20.400
<v Speaker 1>highly likely to rebound and to thrive, and to your

0:06:20.480 --> 0:06:22.800
<v Speaker 1>other point, to the extent that you identify companies that

0:06:22.839 --> 0:06:25.600
<v Speaker 1>are either over leveled or whether business models themselves are

0:06:25.640 --> 0:06:28.440
<v Speaker 1>not in essential categories, we are going to avoid them.

0:06:28.680 --> 0:06:31.000
<v Speaker 1>But it's this level of discrimination. And by the way,

0:06:31.000 --> 0:06:33.520
<v Speaker 1>the market has been fairly discriminating in this regard when

0:06:33.600 --> 0:06:36.239
<v Speaker 1>when you take a little bit small and MidCap equity prices,

0:06:36.240 --> 0:06:37.760
<v Speaker 1>this is the kind of work that you have to

0:06:37.839 --> 0:06:41.039
<v Speaker 1>do in terms of portfolio construction now that just six

0:06:41.080 --> 0:06:43.640
<v Speaker 1>months ago you really didn't need to do because things

0:06:43.640 --> 0:06:47.200
<v Speaker 1>were relatively sanguine. Would have thrive under what conditions, you know,

0:06:47.240 --> 0:06:49.400
<v Speaker 1>let's get back to the main story. We re outake

0:06:49.440 --> 0:06:51.400
<v Speaker 1>care and there's clearly a massive tower risk of a

0:06:51.480 --> 0:06:53.840
<v Speaker 1>second wife. Now for some people, that's not a tower risk,

0:06:53.880 --> 0:06:56.280
<v Speaker 1>that's a base case. Isn't that likely to linger for

0:06:56.320 --> 0:06:59.760
<v Speaker 1>the next several months, So it is a base case.

0:06:59.800 --> 0:07:02.200
<v Speaker 1>And I think that this whole debate in the market

0:07:02.279 --> 0:07:04.039
<v Speaker 1>is to whether or not there is a second wave.

0:07:04.160 --> 0:07:07.039
<v Speaker 1>We are going to see a material increase in the

0:07:07.160 --> 0:07:10.040
<v Speaker 1>number of coronavirus cases, whether that be in Europe or

0:07:10.040 --> 0:07:12.240
<v Speaker 1>in the United States. And in the US you're actually

0:07:12.360 --> 0:07:14.920
<v Speaker 1>going to see potentially even more bad dudes in that

0:07:15.000 --> 0:07:17.640
<v Speaker 1>regard because of the nature of the rolling way that

0:07:17.680 --> 0:07:21.119
<v Speaker 1>they handled the lockdowns and are now handling the the

0:07:21.320 --> 0:07:26.040
<v Speaker 1>reopening of the economy. So the question is do these

0:07:26.400 --> 0:07:30.760
<v Speaker 1>increases in virus cases ultimately once again impact the healthcare system.

0:07:31.040 --> 0:07:33.160
<v Speaker 1>You have to go back to the first premise. The

0:07:33.240 --> 0:07:35.800
<v Speaker 1>reason why we took the step of lockdown was because

0:07:35.840 --> 0:07:39.120
<v Speaker 1>we thought we would overwhelm healthcare systems and completely have

0:07:39.240 --> 0:07:42.160
<v Speaker 1>people literally dying at their homes, dying in the streets,

0:07:42.200 --> 0:07:44.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, and things like that. Unwilling to do that

0:07:44.680 --> 0:07:47.800
<v Speaker 1>as a society, we then stepped into to stop that.

0:07:48.000 --> 0:07:49.960
<v Speaker 1>And now we're going to reopen. And the question is

0:07:50.080 --> 0:07:52.040
<v Speaker 1>how do we make sure that does not happen again.

0:07:52.080 --> 0:07:53.520
<v Speaker 1>And there's only two ways for that to be true.

0:07:53.560 --> 0:07:55.640
<v Speaker 1>One is that the amount of disease goes down, and

0:07:55.680 --> 0:07:58.160
<v Speaker 1>that's this concept of a trough between the waves. And

0:07:58.200 --> 0:07:59.720
<v Speaker 1>then the second is that we know that there will

0:07:59.720 --> 0:08:01.480
<v Speaker 1>be as second wave of barring your treatment or a

0:08:01.560 --> 0:08:03.960
<v Speaker 1>vaccine um and that that the question is how big

0:08:04.000 --> 0:08:05.600
<v Speaker 1>that wave is, and it right now in the United

0:08:05.640 --> 0:08:08.200
<v Speaker 1>States look looks like it could accelerate because of the

0:08:08.240 --> 0:08:12.240
<v Speaker 1>fact that we didn't tamp down the disease sufficiently. David

0:08:12.280 --> 0:08:15.200
<v Speaker 1>gred Skate thow us on a shot. Real appreciate David

0:08:15.200 --> 0:08:17.560
<v Speaker 1>Betton sending up best to the same one City Private

0:08:17.560 --> 0:08:23.440
<v Speaker 1>Banks chief Investment officer. This has been one of the

0:08:23.440 --> 0:08:27.880
<v Speaker 1>pleasant surprises of this tragedy. A weekly conversation even more

0:08:27.880 --> 0:08:30.760
<v Speaker 1>than that with the Lieutenant Governor of the Empire State,

0:08:30.840 --> 0:08:33.520
<v Speaker 1>Kathey Hokel joins us right now, Kathy, I want to

0:08:33.520 --> 0:08:38.160
<v Speaker 1>ask a dumb question. Government can affect policy that makes

0:08:38.240 --> 0:08:41.520
<v Speaker 1>things easy. Why can't the State of New York say

0:08:41.640 --> 0:08:44.160
<v Speaker 1>you can't walk on the streets of New York, New

0:08:44.240 --> 0:08:47.880
<v Speaker 1>York State without a mask on and those plastic gloves on,

0:08:47.880 --> 0:08:54.120
<v Speaker 1>those latex gloves on. Wouldn't that immediately build confidence? We

0:08:54.280 --> 0:08:57.319
<v Speaker 1>build confidence by having the people who listened to us

0:08:57.360 --> 0:09:00.520
<v Speaker 1>every single day as we give very transparent press officers

0:09:00.520 --> 0:09:02.840
<v Speaker 1>and tell like this. We tell them the truth. We

0:09:02.960 --> 0:09:05.280
<v Speaker 1>tell them that if they wear the mask, they couldnt

0:09:05.400 --> 0:09:08.000
<v Speaker 1>just save themselves but also their families and they have

0:09:08.040 --> 0:09:11.040
<v Speaker 1>a responsibility. But we don't have the resources nor the

0:09:11.160 --> 0:09:13.280
<v Speaker 1>desire to have a police state where we go through

0:09:13.280 --> 0:09:17.120
<v Speaker 1>and have to try to convince ninety million people to it. Here.

0:09:17.280 --> 0:09:19.040
<v Speaker 1>We'd love to, but we're not going to that's not

0:09:19.120 --> 0:09:21.240
<v Speaker 1>who we are, it's not our character, but we want

0:09:21.320 --> 0:09:24.280
<v Speaker 1>that same results, and we're appealing to people and their

0:09:24.360 --> 0:09:28.160
<v Speaker 1>desire to protect themselves and their families and friends and neighbors,

0:09:28.200 --> 0:09:30.840
<v Speaker 1>and thus far, I have to say, we are starting

0:09:30.880 --> 0:09:33.360
<v Speaker 1>to see some cracks in this, but people have really

0:09:33.480 --> 0:09:36.080
<v Speaker 1>uniformly throughout the States been adhering to this, and that's

0:09:36.080 --> 0:09:39.120
<v Speaker 1>really actually quite astounding that they are the ones, the

0:09:39.120 --> 0:09:42.560
<v Speaker 1>New Yorkers are the ones who really changed the trend.

0:09:42.720 --> 0:09:45.040
<v Speaker 1>If they hadn't been doing the social disting and now

0:09:45.080 --> 0:09:47.360
<v Speaker 1>the mask, we'd be in a far worse place. So

0:09:47.400 --> 0:09:49.480
<v Speaker 1>you'll see outliers and we hope we can bring them

0:09:49.480 --> 0:09:51.640
<v Speaker 1>back into the fold. But right now I think we're

0:09:51.640 --> 0:09:54.640
<v Speaker 1>doing very well. Governor. When we talk about a May

0:09:54.640 --> 0:09:58.080
<v Speaker 1>fifteenth three opening in New York, we are talking about upstate.

0:09:58.160 --> 0:10:00.600
<v Speaker 1>We are not talking about New York City. How much

0:10:00.760 --> 0:10:03.360
<v Speaker 1>longer do you think it will take for the major

0:10:03.440 --> 0:10:07.960
<v Speaker 1>metropolitan areas in the region to reopen. We have put

0:10:08.000 --> 0:10:10.760
<v Speaker 1>in place the number of metrics better really come from

0:10:10.760 --> 0:10:13.200
<v Speaker 1>the CBC that we're using up state first of all,

0:10:13.240 --> 0:10:15.439
<v Speaker 1>and that is to look at the hospitalization rate, the

0:10:15.520 --> 0:10:18.040
<v Speaker 1>number of vice the you bed being used, the rate

0:10:18.040 --> 0:10:21.280
<v Speaker 1>of infection, how it's spreading. Also the ability to have

0:10:21.360 --> 0:10:25.600
<v Speaker 1>more diagnostic testing available as well as contact tracers. So

0:10:25.840 --> 0:10:27.719
<v Speaker 1>the benefit for New York City is that we will

0:10:27.760 --> 0:10:31.319
<v Speaker 1>be able to trial run this upstate. I'm managing parts

0:10:31.320 --> 0:10:34.720
<v Speaker 1>of upstate Western New York area and looking at these metrics.

0:10:34.720 --> 0:10:37.120
<v Speaker 1>Do we hit them by May fifteenth? If so, we'll

0:10:37.160 --> 0:10:41.640
<v Speaker 1>slowly open manufacturing, some retail we could pick up on

0:10:41.679 --> 0:10:44.680
<v Speaker 1>the curve and construction. This is the same model that

0:10:44.720 --> 0:10:46.840
<v Speaker 1>we would use downstate. But then we're going to take

0:10:46.880 --> 0:10:49.920
<v Speaker 1>two weeks and testency whether or not the numbers have

0:10:50.040 --> 0:10:53.319
<v Speaker 1>gone upwards downwards day the same. And so it's this

0:10:53.480 --> 0:10:55.800
<v Speaker 1>data that's going to help us drive the reopening of

0:10:55.800 --> 0:10:58.240
<v Speaker 1>New York City, which we have to get right. We

0:10:58.280 --> 0:11:00.480
<v Speaker 1>cannot do it a day to really, but not a

0:11:00.559 --> 0:11:02.560
<v Speaker 1>day longer than necessary. That we don't want to have

0:11:02.600 --> 0:11:05.920
<v Speaker 1>the economy held back any longer than is necessary. But

0:11:05.960 --> 0:11:08.280
<v Speaker 1>also the safety is going to continue to be our

0:11:08.360 --> 0:11:11.040
<v Speaker 1>our guide guiding stars. So I think it's good for

0:11:11.040 --> 0:11:13.720
<v Speaker 1>New York City. I don't think there's a single person

0:11:13.760 --> 0:11:16.079
<v Speaker 1>New York City who thinks they're ready. They know that

0:11:16.120 --> 0:11:18.760
<v Speaker 1>they're still seeing the numbers but upstate, we can do

0:11:18.840 --> 0:11:21.520
<v Speaker 1>a trial one of this and then implement that in

0:11:21.559 --> 0:11:23.040
<v Speaker 1>New York City in a few weeks. So we don't

0:11:23.040 --> 0:11:26.439
<v Speaker 1>have a timeline for New York City just yet. Kathy.

0:11:26.480 --> 0:11:28.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to ask you, Delica a question, and I

0:11:28.160 --> 0:11:30.360
<v Speaker 1>asked it with the deepest amount of understanding of sympathy

0:11:30.360 --> 0:11:33.240
<v Speaker 1>for the position you're in. When Governor Cuomo says the

0:11:33.280 --> 0:11:36.120
<v Speaker 1>fast that we reopen, the lower the economic costs, but

0:11:36.200 --> 0:11:40.520
<v Speaker 1>the more lives are lost, you guys are in a

0:11:40.640 --> 0:11:43.959
<v Speaker 1>really tough position now where you have to balance reopen

0:11:44.000 --> 0:11:47.840
<v Speaker 1>the economy with loss of life. And when that's communicated

0:11:47.840 --> 0:11:52.320
<v Speaker 1>from Governor Cuomo, it comes across really sincerely, very authentically,

0:11:52.600 --> 0:11:54.319
<v Speaker 1>and I think it resonates with a lot of people

0:11:54.440 --> 0:11:57.719
<v Speaker 1>listening to these news conferences. But behind closed doors, when

0:11:57.760 --> 0:11:59.880
<v Speaker 1>you have to make that calculation, can you give us

0:11:59.880 --> 0:12:05.320
<v Speaker 1>a deeper understanding of how you make those decisions? We've

0:12:05.400 --> 0:12:08.400
<v Speaker 1>heart wrenching. No one in public life ever expects they're

0:12:08.400 --> 0:12:10.800
<v Speaker 1>going to have to make these types of decisions. We

0:12:10.880 --> 0:12:13.480
<v Speaker 1>go into public life to make people's lives better, give

0:12:13.480 --> 0:12:17.280
<v Speaker 1>them education, health care, opportunity for good jobs. You never

0:12:17.400 --> 0:12:18.640
<v Speaker 1>think that you're going to have to be in the

0:12:18.720 --> 0:12:22.640
<v Speaker 1>position to determine between life and death. But it's very

0:12:22.640 --> 0:12:25.520
<v Speaker 1>clear to us we will choose life over death. That

0:12:25.520 --> 0:12:28.640
<v Speaker 1>that has been what has guided us. It's not a

0:12:28.679 --> 0:12:31.520
<v Speaker 1>gray area, it's black and white. And we also know

0:12:31.720 --> 0:12:34.520
<v Speaker 1>that you can have a livelihood without a life. So

0:12:34.679 --> 0:12:36.520
<v Speaker 1>people talk about what we have to bring back to

0:12:36.559 --> 0:12:39.160
<v Speaker 1>economic guests. We do, but we have to bring it

0:12:39.200 --> 0:12:42.600
<v Speaker 1>back in a thoughtful way that will protect people's lives

0:12:42.640 --> 0:12:46.679
<v Speaker 1>and also give employees and customers the assurance that when

0:12:46.720 --> 0:12:50.080
<v Speaker 1>they come to your establishment they will be safe. That's

0:12:50.080 --> 0:12:52.240
<v Speaker 1>why we have to get this right. We could flip

0:12:52.240 --> 0:12:54.040
<v Speaker 1>a switch and open it tomorrow, but there's not a

0:12:54.080 --> 0:12:56.880
<v Speaker 1>single New Yorker, very few who think that it's safe

0:12:56.960 --> 0:12:58.520
<v Speaker 1>enough to go out there now, and they're still seeing

0:12:58.520 --> 0:13:00.920
<v Speaker 1>the numbers that we are. We will get to that point,

0:13:01.400 --> 0:13:03.320
<v Speaker 1>and I'm going to tell you right now, we're already

0:13:03.320 --> 0:13:07.080
<v Speaker 1>planning for a post pandemic future that's even better. Not

0:13:07.200 --> 0:13:11.920
<v Speaker 1>just reopening our economy, but reimagining areas like the workplace,

0:13:12.000 --> 0:13:15.240
<v Speaker 1>how we can make it more flexible for people, Reimagining

0:13:15.360 --> 0:13:18.559
<v Speaker 1>education and making sure it's more accessible truth technology, and

0:13:18.600 --> 0:13:20.920
<v Speaker 1>all the experience that our teachers have had to go

0:13:21.000 --> 0:13:24.040
<v Speaker 1>through teaching children at home in our colleges, and how

0:13:24.080 --> 0:13:26.360
<v Speaker 1>they've had to a debt. We have an opportunity here

0:13:26.760 --> 0:13:29.760
<v Speaker 1>to make this state even stronger than before, and that's

0:13:29.760 --> 0:13:31.320
<v Speaker 1>what we're doing. But we're going to get it right.

0:13:32.040 --> 0:13:34.880
<v Speaker 1>Lieutenant Governor, you said that there really isn't gray area.

0:13:35.480 --> 0:13:37.760
<v Speaker 1>I am guessing that President Trump may agree. He was

0:13:37.800 --> 0:13:40.880
<v Speaker 1>talking about how there are losses on either side. You're

0:13:40.880 --> 0:13:45.079
<v Speaker 1>seeing mental illness rise, uh, you're seeing the the the

0:13:45.120 --> 0:13:49.120
<v Speaker 1>concern about substance abuse, domestic violence. Even Governor Cuomo has

0:13:49.120 --> 0:13:53.920
<v Speaker 1>talked about this. It's not necessarily all all things being equal.

0:13:53.960 --> 0:13:56.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm just wondering how you weigh things on that side.

0:13:57.080 --> 0:13:59.840
<v Speaker 1>As a jobless rate soars to levels not seen in

0:14:00.000 --> 0:14:05.040
<v Speaker 1>our history. Yeah, this is unprecedent. You know, we're not

0:14:05.080 --> 0:14:08.400
<v Speaker 1>trying to increase the job We're trying to save people's lives.

0:14:08.440 --> 0:14:10.760
<v Speaker 1>But we're very thoughtful in this. That's why we've put

0:14:10.800 --> 0:14:14.320
<v Speaker 1>in place different opportunities for people to get assistance. We

0:14:14.400 --> 0:14:17.080
<v Speaker 1>have a hotline and emotional health hotline for not just

0:14:17.240 --> 0:14:20.640
<v Speaker 1>first responders, who I'm sure are going to have lifelong

0:14:20.800 --> 0:14:23.280
<v Speaker 1>impacts on their mental health because of what they've had

0:14:23.320 --> 0:14:26.280
<v Speaker 1>to see and endure during this crisis. But people who

0:14:26.280 --> 0:14:28.720
<v Speaker 1>have been isolated and people who are lonely, and those

0:14:28.760 --> 0:14:32.320
<v Speaker 1>are dealing with the the the havoc in their lives

0:14:32.360 --> 0:14:34.440
<v Speaker 1>from having lost a job when they never dreamed they'd

0:14:34.440 --> 0:14:36.320
<v Speaker 1>be having to spend hours on the phone trying to

0:14:36.320 --> 0:14:39.800
<v Speaker 1>get an unemployment application. And so we know there's a

0:14:40.440 --> 0:14:43.600
<v Speaker 1>severe human toll, and we have assistance for them. We

0:14:43.640 --> 0:14:47.040
<v Speaker 1>have over nineties thousand people answering phone calls to help them.

0:14:47.280 --> 0:14:50.400
<v Speaker 1>But at the end of the day, New Yorkers are resilient.

0:14:50.520 --> 0:14:52.920
<v Speaker 1>We are a tough bunch. We will come out of

0:14:52.960 --> 0:14:55.840
<v Speaker 1>this stronger as long as we continue to protect each

0:14:55.880 --> 0:14:58.240
<v Speaker 1>other with the social distancing and the mass and it's

0:14:58.280 --> 0:15:00.320
<v Speaker 1>not an easy equation, but we're going to get Yeah,

0:15:00.680 --> 0:15:03.680
<v Speaker 1>Lieutenant Governor, thank you so much. This is a joyful

0:15:03.760 --> 0:15:10.640
<v Speaker 1>thank you, Lieutenant Governor. Every week. Joining us right now

0:15:10.880 --> 0:15:13.440
<v Speaker 1>from JP Morgan is John Norman. He has been a

0:15:13.480 --> 0:15:17.080
<v Speaker 1>wonderful supporter of all that we do with surveillance because

0:15:17.120 --> 0:15:23.440
<v Speaker 1>of a wonderful synthesis in his research note across equities, bonds, currencies, commodities. John,

0:15:23.880 --> 0:15:28.000
<v Speaker 1>just exceptional historic import coming up in three days. What

0:15:28.080 --> 0:15:31.680
<v Speaker 1>do you hear from Bruce Casman and your economists that

0:15:31.800 --> 0:15:37.200
<v Speaker 1>you fold into market choice. To me, the most important

0:15:37.240 --> 0:15:40.080
<v Speaker 1>takeaway from the work of our economists is that it's

0:15:40.120 --> 0:15:43.320
<v Speaker 1>going to be an extremely abnormal recovery, meaning it's going

0:15:43.360 --> 0:15:46.720
<v Speaker 1>to take years to recruit the lost output and the

0:15:46.800 --> 0:15:50.760
<v Speaker 1>lost jobs, and that usually equates to a multi year

0:15:50.800 --> 0:15:53.280
<v Speaker 1>process of recouping the lost profits. That that's got to

0:15:53.280 --> 0:15:55.440
<v Speaker 1>be a constraint on how much markets can we trace,

0:15:55.640 --> 0:15:57.480
<v Speaker 1>even if they go up, So that that shape of

0:15:57.520 --> 0:16:00.200
<v Speaker 1>the recovery, to me, is a lot of what is

0:16:00.200 --> 0:16:02.920
<v Speaker 1>the views on the asset markets going forward. The views

0:16:02.960 --> 0:16:04.960
<v Speaker 1>on the asset markets don't seem that dire. If you

0:16:04.960 --> 0:16:07.760
<v Speaker 1>take a look at stock prices, particularly within the tech sector,

0:16:07.840 --> 0:16:10.560
<v Speaker 1>do you think that they're accurately pricing in and I'm

0:16:10.600 --> 0:16:13.080
<v Speaker 1>not just talking about big tech, just broadly, do you

0:16:13.080 --> 0:16:15.400
<v Speaker 1>think that equities are pricing in what you're talking about,

0:16:15.400 --> 0:16:18.680
<v Speaker 1>which is a prolonged period of time with these destroyed

0:16:18.760 --> 0:16:23.280
<v Speaker 1>jobs not coming back anytime soon. No, I think the

0:16:23.400 --> 0:16:27.320
<v Speaker 1>price the over optimistically, meaning they seem to be pricing

0:16:27.360 --> 0:16:31.120
<v Speaker 1>and extremely smooth transition from the lockdown to the restart

0:16:31.160 --> 0:16:34.200
<v Speaker 1>of the economies. So even though the levels that we're

0:16:34.200 --> 0:16:38.880
<v Speaker 1>seeing right now in markets. UM may may may be

0:16:39.120 --> 0:16:43.640
<v Speaker 1>levels that that UH should be seen in six months time.

0:16:44.120 --> 0:16:46.240
<v Speaker 1>It's it's a bit premature to be seeing these now.

0:16:46.640 --> 0:16:49.680
<v Speaker 1>It essentially assumes that the restart is going to be

0:16:49.800 --> 0:16:52.160
<v Speaker 1>all free, and I think it's going to be a

0:16:52.200 --> 0:16:54.800
<v Speaker 1>little more hazard prone than that. So let's talk about it, John,

0:16:54.840 --> 0:16:56.880
<v Speaker 1>How you a capital with all of that in mind?

0:16:59.160 --> 0:17:01.320
<v Speaker 1>So for me, you want to be allocating to markets

0:17:01.360 --> 0:17:04.719
<v Speaker 1>that are still very cheap and have a very direct

0:17:04.840 --> 0:17:07.000
<v Speaker 1>central bank back stop. And to me, this is why

0:17:07.040 --> 0:17:10.800
<v Speaker 1>the credit markets are better risk reward than the equity

0:17:10.840 --> 0:17:13.679
<v Speaker 1>markets over the over this transition period and to restart

0:17:13.680 --> 0:17:15.840
<v Speaker 1>the economies, even though I think equity markets will be

0:17:16.000 --> 0:17:18.199
<v Speaker 1>you know, still higher by by year end, it's just

0:17:18.200 --> 0:17:20.200
<v Speaker 1>sort of recognizing that as we go through this very

0:17:20.200 --> 0:17:24.000
<v Speaker 1>awkward restarting process, UM, there are going to be some

0:17:24.080 --> 0:17:27.640
<v Speaker 1>uncertainties around out the corporate profits outlook, and and it's

0:17:27.680 --> 0:17:30.240
<v Speaker 1>better to have exposure to a market where at least

0:17:30.280 --> 0:17:32.560
<v Speaker 1>someone else is buying regardless of the news flowers and

0:17:32.840 --> 0:17:34.639
<v Speaker 1>that's someone of course is the FED in terms of

0:17:34.680 --> 0:17:37.080
<v Speaker 1>what it's doing in the high grade and high young market.

0:17:37.119 --> 0:17:39.360
<v Speaker 1>So I feel like that's the best risk reward for now,

0:17:39.880 --> 0:17:41.960
<v Speaker 1>even though I still think stocks you're gonna keep up

0:17:41.960 --> 0:17:44.719
<v Speaker 1>performing bonds, let's say over the over the next three quarters.

0:17:45.080 --> 0:17:47.040
<v Speaker 1>This is something you call it. Bob Michael talked about

0:17:47.040 --> 0:17:49.240
<v Speaker 1>as well, co investing with the Federal Reserve, And I

0:17:49.280 --> 0:17:51.240
<v Speaker 1>just wanted to Johmp from your perspective, whether that takes

0:17:51.280 --> 0:17:53.359
<v Speaker 1>you to the United States of the Europe, the United

0:17:53.400 --> 0:17:56.040
<v Speaker 1>States over the rest of the world, just geographically speaking,

0:17:56.040 --> 0:18:00.400
<v Speaker 1>the regional bias, It definitely does. Because there's there's two

0:18:00.440 --> 0:18:02.600
<v Speaker 1>dimensions to this. One is that the FED is just

0:18:02.840 --> 0:18:06.720
<v Speaker 1>a much greater participant in in so many sectors of

0:18:06.920 --> 0:18:09.520
<v Speaker 1>US financial markets compared to the ECP. The ECB actually

0:18:09.560 --> 0:18:11.440
<v Speaker 1>has more latitude the ft the e C. We could

0:18:11.440 --> 0:18:14.320
<v Speaker 1>buy stocks to days we wanted to, but it doesn't.

0:18:14.440 --> 0:18:16.600
<v Speaker 1>And it has latitudes to buy high yield but it doesn't.

0:18:16.680 --> 0:18:19.840
<v Speaker 1>So the FAT is the one that's the the broadest

0:18:19.880 --> 0:18:23.040
<v Speaker 1>investor uh and playing. But there's another dimension to it

0:18:23.119 --> 0:18:25.320
<v Speaker 1>as well, which is when you think about what sectors

0:18:25.320 --> 0:18:28.200
<v Speaker 1>are the end game winners in a post COVID environment,

0:18:28.280 --> 0:18:31.800
<v Speaker 1>it's it's tag communications, and it's and its healthcare, And

0:18:31.840 --> 0:18:34.120
<v Speaker 1>these are ones that probably comprise, you know, a good

0:18:34.119 --> 0:18:37.199
<v Speaker 1>fortent of the US equity market. So if you just

0:18:37.240 --> 0:18:40.520
<v Speaker 1>kind of recognize that there's a structural set of winners here,

0:18:40.800 --> 0:18:44.240
<v Speaker 1>that those winners are much more evident and dominant in

0:18:44.280 --> 0:18:47.080
<v Speaker 1>the US equity market and other equity markets, it's uh,

0:18:47.280 --> 0:18:50.120
<v Speaker 1>it's a hands down view that the US stock market

0:18:50.160 --> 0:18:52.920
<v Speaker 1>is going to continue on performing. John implicit in your

0:18:52.960 --> 0:18:56.159
<v Speaker 1>comments is this feeling like there it will be no

0:18:56.320 --> 0:19:01.160
<v Speaker 1>international consequence to the US is printing trillions of dollars

0:19:01.160 --> 0:19:03.320
<v Speaker 1>of debt, with the Federal reserves balance sheet poise to

0:19:03.359 --> 0:19:05.680
<v Speaker 1>exceed ten trillion dollars by the end of the year.

0:19:05.960 --> 0:19:07.679
<v Speaker 1>A lot of times in the past this would have

0:19:07.680 --> 0:19:10.760
<v Speaker 1>been expressed in a weaker dollar versus other currencies, but

0:19:10.800 --> 0:19:13.680
<v Speaker 1>weaker versus what especially given some of the existential acts

0:19:13.800 --> 0:19:17.720
<v Speaker 1>right now over in the euroregion, Is that true that

0:19:17.760 --> 0:19:22.080
<v Speaker 1>basically there is no consequence to the US monetizing its

0:19:22.119 --> 0:19:27.560
<v Speaker 1>debt and increasing its deficit dramatically. There will be a

0:19:27.640 --> 0:19:30.919
<v Speaker 1>consequence to this, It's more question of time horizon and

0:19:31.000 --> 0:19:36.040
<v Speaker 1>as you suggest, against what asset specifically, so um over

0:19:36.080 --> 0:19:38.760
<v Speaker 1>the long term, there's a concern this could be inflationary

0:19:38.840 --> 0:19:41.080
<v Speaker 1>that that is not a concern right now or for

0:19:41.119 --> 0:19:45.439
<v Speaker 1>this year next year, because you could have particuarly unemployment

0:19:45.600 --> 0:19:47.919
<v Speaker 1>in the in the US um But there is a

0:19:47.920 --> 0:19:50.440
<v Speaker 1>consequence in terms of real interest rates, they're they're extremely

0:19:50.440 --> 0:19:52.040
<v Speaker 1>low in the US and that makes it difficult to

0:19:52.040 --> 0:19:54.080
<v Speaker 1>the US to attract financing. And I think that's one

0:19:54.119 --> 0:19:57.440
<v Speaker 1>of them why you do see the dollars slipping lower

0:19:57.560 --> 0:19:59.960
<v Speaker 1>versus the end and it slips lower versus the goal

0:20:00.080 --> 0:20:02.919
<v Speaker 1>price even though stock and credit markets are very healthy

0:20:03.040 --> 0:20:05.879
<v Speaker 1>right now. So there's there's some I think residual anxiety

0:20:05.960 --> 0:20:09.880
<v Speaker 1>around the dollar, a currency which is feeding through into

0:20:10.000 --> 0:20:12.400
<v Speaker 1>some things like the n gold even though it's it's

0:20:12.400 --> 0:20:14.840
<v Speaker 1>certainly not a you know, a fire sale. Where it

0:20:14.880 --> 0:20:16.920
<v Speaker 1>gets more interesting is if you're in a in a

0:20:17.040 --> 0:20:19.280
<v Speaker 1>much better state of the world in six months time,

0:20:19.400 --> 0:20:23.960
<v Speaker 1>what's the demand for US assets when qwie is bearing

0:20:23.960 --> 0:20:27.239
<v Speaker 1>down on real interest rates and other parts of picking up.

0:20:27.520 --> 0:20:29.639
<v Speaker 1>That's when I think you could see something much bigger

0:20:29.680 --> 0:20:32.399
<v Speaker 1>in terms of payback against the dollar versus and own

0:20:32.400 --> 0:20:34.960
<v Speaker 1>a range of currencies. But that's something for six months

0:20:35.000 --> 0:20:38.320
<v Speaker 1>from now. John, We're six minutes away from the beginning

0:20:38.359 --> 0:20:43.000
<v Speaker 1>of three days of history in America within this economic

0:20:43.040 --> 0:20:46.800
<v Speaker 1>contraction and the sum of it distilled on long term

0:20:46.840 --> 0:20:50.800
<v Speaker 1>planning for our global Wall Street is what's the new

0:20:50.920 --> 0:20:56.199
<v Speaker 1>actual rearial assumption? Do you change your actuarial assumption of

0:20:56.359 --> 0:20:59.760
<v Speaker 1>long term investible assets? Do you have to lower it

0:21:00.000 --> 0:21:03.320
<v Speaker 1>of disinflation or dare say, do you have to actually

0:21:03.440 --> 0:21:07.359
<v Speaker 1>raise it because you see it an inflationary impulse out

0:21:07.400 --> 0:21:11.160
<v Speaker 1>there somewhere. No. I think what you have to do

0:21:11.280 --> 0:21:14.399
<v Speaker 1>is rather than be macro about it, you actually have

0:21:14.400 --> 0:21:15.760
<v Speaker 1>to be more micro and you have to sort of

0:21:15.800 --> 0:21:19.600
<v Speaker 1>recognize that some sectors are either not going to exist

0:21:19.720 --> 0:21:21.919
<v Speaker 1>or the you're not going to exist with nearly the

0:21:21.960 --> 0:21:24.720
<v Speaker 1>same profitability as as they used to, and so you're

0:21:25.080 --> 0:21:28.520
<v Speaker 1>you really have to reset your assumptions around profits, growth

0:21:28.640 --> 0:21:31.760
<v Speaker 1>and margins on a sector bisector basis. And I think

0:21:31.760 --> 0:21:34.840
<v Speaker 1>that's the kind of arithmetic that people just haven't really

0:21:34.880 --> 0:21:36.960
<v Speaker 1>gotten around to doing yet to kind of grappling with

0:21:37.000 --> 0:21:39.560
<v Speaker 1>the first order issue, which is the recession. But there's

0:21:39.560 --> 0:21:43.080
<v Speaker 1>a whole lot more thinking that around what's bible as

0:21:43.119 --> 0:21:45.160
<v Speaker 1>a as a sector and you kind of aggregate those

0:21:45.200 --> 0:21:48.080
<v Speaker 1>into what it might be for profit market as a whole.

0:21:48.560 --> 0:21:51.960
<v Speaker 1>One final question, John Norman we saw Apple or a

0:21:52.000 --> 0:21:55.560
<v Speaker 1>glorious bond effort. I think it was two days ago.

0:21:56.200 --> 0:21:58.600
<v Speaker 1>Everybody can issue bonds right now, can't they? What is

0:21:58.640 --> 0:22:02.840
<v Speaker 1>that signal to our listeners. I don't think everyone can

0:22:02.840 --> 0:22:05.879
<v Speaker 1>issue bonds. I think if you're a or the borrow

0:22:05.880 --> 0:22:08.280
<v Speaker 1>where you can, and that that's a very important distinction.

0:22:08.320 --> 0:22:11.880
<v Speaker 1>You know, when you think about UM, what what booming

0:22:11.920 --> 0:22:14.560
<v Speaker 1>issuance is telling us? It is telling us clearly does

0:22:14.600 --> 0:22:16.879
<v Speaker 1>a demand for fixing compaigner clearly does a lot of

0:22:16.880 --> 0:22:21.080
<v Speaker 1>faith that certain UM higher rated borrowers are are still

0:22:21.080 --> 0:22:24.200
<v Speaker 1>going to be around after after COVID. But it's it's

0:22:24.200 --> 0:22:26.920
<v Speaker 1>a lower quality part that one really has to worry about.

0:22:26.920 --> 0:22:29.560
<v Speaker 1>And obviously the lower quality segments are the ones that

0:22:29.600 --> 0:22:31.760
<v Speaker 1>have really grown over the past several years of of

0:22:31.800 --> 0:22:35.479
<v Speaker 1>easy money. So I wouldn't misread that booming issuance as

0:22:35.520 --> 0:22:42.520
<v Speaker 1>a as a like a health check information across the board. Hi, John,

0:22:42.640 --> 0:22:44.680
<v Speaker 1>great to catch up with the appreciate it's on this morning.

0:22:44.640 --> 0:22:46.800
<v Speaker 1>Sam My best of it saying John Norman that JP

0:22:46.920 --> 0:22:56.399
<v Speaker 1>Morgan had a cross asset fundamental strategy place decide that

0:22:56.400 --> 0:22:58.280
<v Speaker 1>how it Davis? So how it Davis joins us? Now

0:22:58.680 --> 0:23:01.359
<v Speaker 1>the obvious cham and how fantastic to have you with

0:23:01.400 --> 0:23:03.320
<v Speaker 1>us on the program. Can we just spend a moment

0:23:03.359 --> 0:23:06.160
<v Speaker 1>reflecting on these devastating jobs figures that are coming through

0:23:06.200 --> 0:23:08.840
<v Speaker 1>here in America and adaptly likely to be the same

0:23:08.880 --> 0:23:11.520
<v Speaker 1>in the United Kingdom as well, albeit on a different scale.

0:23:11.720 --> 0:23:13.800
<v Speaker 1>How how are you thinking about the recovery and how

0:23:13.920 --> 0:23:17.639
<v Speaker 1>quickly this labor market heals well? The first thing I

0:23:17.720 --> 0:23:21.080
<v Speaker 1>have to think about is the personal tragedies that must

0:23:21.160 --> 0:23:23.560
<v Speaker 1>lie behind these numbers, because there must be a lot

0:23:23.560 --> 0:23:28.320
<v Speaker 1>of very worried people out there. I think that we

0:23:28.480 --> 0:23:32.600
<v Speaker 1>desperately need now some sense of direction on the recovery.

0:23:32.760 --> 0:23:36.520
<v Speaker 1>In some European countries, notably in Germany. Also at some

0:23:36.600 --> 0:23:38.480
<v Speaker 1>extent now in France we are seeing a bit of

0:23:38.520 --> 0:23:40.760
<v Speaker 1>direction and a bit of loosening up, which gives people

0:23:40.800 --> 0:23:46.040
<v Speaker 1>some optimism and might mean that these job losses were temporary.

0:23:46.080 --> 0:23:49.520
<v Speaker 1>But at the moment here I'm afraid we don't have that.

0:23:49.560 --> 0:23:51.399
<v Speaker 1>But we've been told is that we may be told

0:23:51.440 --> 0:23:54.200
<v Speaker 1>something on Sunday about the way in which the recovery

0:23:54.320 --> 0:23:58.280
<v Speaker 1>will emerge. And I think that's increasingly important because the

0:23:58.359 --> 0:24:02.000
<v Speaker 1>assumption behind a lot of government schemes and a lot

0:24:02.000 --> 0:24:04.000
<v Speaker 1>of bank lending has been that we face a V

0:24:04.080 --> 0:24:07.199
<v Speaker 1>shaped recovery, that people will come very quickly up the

0:24:07.200 --> 0:24:10.080
<v Speaker 1>other side of this canyon. But the longer it goes on,

0:24:10.359 --> 0:24:13.959
<v Speaker 1>the much less certain that recovery is. Howard, when you

0:24:14.000 --> 0:24:16.639
<v Speaker 1>look at the Royal Bank of Scotland's workforce and you

0:24:16.720 --> 0:24:19.480
<v Speaker 1>look at the fact that so many people are working

0:24:19.520 --> 0:24:23.639
<v Speaker 1>remotely and getting it done, are you expecting a smaller

0:24:23.640 --> 0:24:27.280
<v Speaker 1>workforce and one that is less centralized in a big

0:24:27.280 --> 0:24:31.840
<v Speaker 1>city going forward? For your bank, we are very busy

0:24:31.920 --> 0:24:35.760
<v Speaker 1>at the moment. We've managed to keep our branches open

0:24:36.280 --> 0:24:39.000
<v Speaker 1>and our I T people, particularly those people dealing with

0:24:39.040 --> 0:24:42.600
<v Speaker 1>small businesses or dealing with people getting mortgage interest holidays,

0:24:43.000 --> 0:24:46.960
<v Speaker 1>are very busy. So we have said we're not laying

0:24:47.000 --> 0:24:49.919
<v Speaker 1>people off at this point. We're not asking for support

0:24:49.960 --> 0:24:53.240
<v Speaker 1>from the government now. In the longer run, if you

0:24:53.320 --> 0:24:55.879
<v Speaker 1>look and say, what are we learning in this crisis

0:24:55.960 --> 0:24:58.280
<v Speaker 1>about the way in which we can operate, you know

0:24:58.359 --> 0:25:00.520
<v Speaker 1>you have to have you will have to ask yourself

0:25:00.600 --> 0:25:04.600
<v Speaker 1>some questions about location of people and numbers of people,

0:25:04.640 --> 0:25:08.200
<v Speaker 1>et cetera. But for the moment, you know, the job

0:25:08.359 --> 0:25:10.520
<v Speaker 1>unemployment numbers are not coming from us because we are

0:25:10.560 --> 0:25:14.240
<v Speaker 1>pretty we are pretty frantic. Actually, your charm, Howard Davies,

0:25:14.520 --> 0:25:17.040
<v Speaker 1>is as a young lad at Oxford, you had the

0:25:17.119 --> 0:25:21.359
<v Speaker 1>courage to study modern history and not something fancy like

0:25:21.480 --> 0:25:24.160
<v Speaker 1>medieval history or the classics and all the rest of it.

0:25:24.720 --> 0:25:29.879
<v Speaker 1>Tell us about our modern history forward, about government in

0:25:29.960 --> 0:25:33.479
<v Speaker 1>our society, and particularly your take on the United States

0:25:33.480 --> 0:25:37.560
<v Speaker 1>of America. Are we actually going to be more government centric?

0:25:37.600 --> 0:25:41.480
<v Speaker 1>Are we gonna push back against the ethos of Ronald Reagan?

0:25:42.960 --> 0:25:47.280
<v Speaker 1>I think you probably. Ah. I'm less expert obviously on

0:25:47.320 --> 0:25:49.960
<v Speaker 1>the United States than I am on the UK, but

0:25:50.040 --> 0:25:54.000
<v Speaker 1>I would have thought that the knee jack rhetoric that says,

0:25:54.600 --> 0:25:57.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, we need as little government as we can.

0:25:57.680 --> 0:26:00.280
<v Speaker 1>The jokes about saying you know, I'm from the government,

0:26:00.280 --> 0:26:03.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm here to help you. That doesn't sound like a joke. Now,

0:26:03.400 --> 0:26:08.520
<v Speaker 1>that sounds as if that's actually serious. Um. And I

0:26:08.560 --> 0:26:12.320
<v Speaker 1>think that will create a sense among the population. Not

0:26:12.400 --> 0:26:15.040
<v Speaker 1>those people who had their minds up as several centuries ago.

0:26:15.080 --> 0:26:16.639
<v Speaker 1>They weren't change, but there will be a lot of

0:26:16.680 --> 0:26:18.159
<v Speaker 1>people in the middle who say, well, do you know

0:26:18.200 --> 0:26:20.920
<v Speaker 1>what this government? You know? Do we want to ridicule

0:26:21.000 --> 0:26:24.040
<v Speaker 1>all these pointyheads within the belt Way or are they

0:26:24.119 --> 0:26:27.320
<v Speaker 1>sometimes useful when the economy really falls into trouble. So

0:26:27.440 --> 0:26:29.719
<v Speaker 1>I do think there will be a change in in rhetoric,

0:26:29.760 --> 0:26:32.199
<v Speaker 1>but of course it will depend on how effectively the

0:26:32.240 --> 0:26:35.480
<v Speaker 1>government is seen to have responded, and that looks rather

0:26:35.560 --> 0:26:37.840
<v Speaker 1>different from place to place. I think there will be

0:26:37.840 --> 0:26:39.600
<v Speaker 1>a change in business and how we do business, and

0:26:39.640 --> 0:26:42.440
<v Speaker 1>that's for sure, Howard, I love your insight on how

0:26:42.640 --> 0:26:45.120
<v Speaker 1>the United Kingdom will change in the years to come,

0:26:45.160 --> 0:26:47.320
<v Speaker 1>particularly with banking now. For many people listening to this

0:26:47.320 --> 0:26:50.560
<v Speaker 1>program in the United States, retail banking in the UK

0:26:50.720 --> 0:26:53.320
<v Speaker 1>has changed radically in the last couple of decades. You

0:26:53.320 --> 0:26:55.640
<v Speaker 1>walk into a bank branch now and you'll see very

0:26:55.680 --> 0:26:58.399
<v Speaker 1>few people, a lot of machines, very few people, and

0:26:58.440 --> 0:27:00.600
<v Speaker 1>the machines are now doing the day to day transactions

0:27:00.600 --> 0:27:02.000
<v Speaker 1>that I think a lot of people are still depending

0:27:02.040 --> 0:27:05.240
<v Speaker 1>on people for in America. How does that just accelerate

0:27:05.240 --> 0:27:08.200
<v Speaker 1>that trend in the UK and beyond. Is there something new,

0:27:08.240 --> 0:27:10.000
<v Speaker 1>a new world of banking that we need to consider

0:27:10.040 --> 0:27:12.000
<v Speaker 1>just in terms of your day to day operations and

0:27:12.040 --> 0:27:16.760
<v Speaker 1>how do you use people? Yes, that's the short answer

0:27:16.840 --> 0:27:20.600
<v Speaker 1>that question is. Yet the crisis has meant that a

0:27:20.640 --> 0:27:25.200
<v Speaker 1>lot of people have switched to digital banking who did

0:27:25.240 --> 0:27:28.439
<v Speaker 1>not wish to do so before. Now the millennials have

0:27:28.520 --> 0:27:30.840
<v Speaker 1>already done that, that's not used to them. But we

0:27:30.960 --> 0:27:33.280
<v Speaker 1>had quite a lot of older customers who found this

0:27:33.400 --> 0:27:37.560
<v Speaker 1>rather frightening and intimidating, and they are now switching because

0:27:37.600 --> 0:27:41.320
<v Speaker 1>they've had to, and they are switching quite quickly. So

0:27:41.800 --> 0:27:44.040
<v Speaker 1>we are going to see an acceleration of the trend

0:27:44.200 --> 0:27:48.879
<v Speaker 1>towards remote banking, and in due course that will undoubtedly

0:27:49.320 --> 0:27:53.960
<v Speaker 1>alter things quite a bit. But I guess also the

0:27:54.119 --> 0:27:57.800
<v Speaker 1>interesting thing about the competitive dynamic is that we have

0:27:57.920 --> 0:28:02.639
<v Speaker 1>got quite a lot of new ventures, new fintech companies,

0:28:02.960 --> 0:28:06.880
<v Speaker 1>new digital only banks, etcetera. Some of them are well

0:28:06.960 --> 0:28:10.080
<v Speaker 1>funded and will survive this crisis and come out stronger,

0:28:10.480 --> 0:28:12.880
<v Speaker 1>and some will fall by the wayside. So I think

0:28:12.880 --> 0:28:16.399
<v Speaker 1>we will see an altered competitive environment in two ways.

0:28:16.440 --> 0:28:18.919
<v Speaker 1>One it will be more digital, but to some of

0:28:18.960 --> 0:28:22.520
<v Speaker 1>the marginal players I suspect we'll find it difficult to survive.

0:28:23.160 --> 0:28:25.480
<v Speaker 1>How it fantastic to get your thoughts this morning. Really

0:28:25.480 --> 0:28:27.520
<v Speaker 1>appreciate it. Thanks for jointing us to Howard Davis there

0:28:27.960 --> 0:28:30.720
<v Speaker 1>RBS chairman, joining us on the latest with the job

0:28:30.760 --> 0:28:33.000
<v Speaker 1>situation and the future of banking as well. In the

0:28:33.080 --> 0:28:40.320
<v Speaker 1>UK and beyond, it's National Nurses Week and that is

0:28:40.360 --> 0:28:43.720
<v Speaker 1>a big deal across this nation. This year. We talked

0:28:43.760 --> 0:28:48.200
<v Speaker 1>to Laurence Sour of the Johns Hopkins University. Everyone is

0:28:48.200 --> 0:28:52.520
<v Speaker 1>working incredibly hard to keep up with the patient load,

0:28:52.680 --> 0:28:55.200
<v Speaker 1>keep up with the demands of using the PPE, keep

0:28:55.280 --> 0:28:57.959
<v Speaker 1>up with the demands of working over time, to make

0:28:58.000 --> 0:29:01.000
<v Speaker 1>sure units get turned into COVID in its UM and

0:29:01.880 --> 0:29:07.000
<v Speaker 1>patients are safely cared for. UM. We're incredibly grateful for

0:29:07.040 --> 0:29:09.680
<v Speaker 1>the work of our nurses. It's really just been unbelievable.

0:29:10.240 --> 0:29:13.520
<v Speaker 1>Laurence Sor what I notice about emergency medicine as you

0:29:13.600 --> 0:29:16.800
<v Speaker 1>try to learn every step of the way. What do

0:29:16.880 --> 0:29:21.960
<v Speaker 1>you know now about the therapeutics of this virus versus

0:29:22.000 --> 0:29:25.080
<v Speaker 1>where you were six weeks ago. Well, we just conducted

0:29:25.120 --> 0:29:29.520
<v Speaker 1>the first phase of UM, the ACT trial UM, which

0:29:29.560 --> 0:29:31.600
<v Speaker 1>is the NIH adaptive trial. In the first arm was

0:29:31.680 --> 0:29:34.560
<v Speaker 1>rem desivare. So we are starting to see some positive data,

0:29:34.880 --> 0:29:38.080
<v Speaker 1>which is really exciting. UM. We're we're learning a lot

0:29:38.120 --> 0:29:40.720
<v Speaker 1>about some of the other drugs that have been tried

0:29:40.920 --> 0:29:44.960
<v Speaker 1>hydroxy chloroquine chloroquine UM. We're learning a lot about proning

0:29:44.960 --> 0:29:49.040
<v Speaker 1>of patients. So there's a lot of studies underway, um

0:29:49.240 --> 0:29:52.040
<v Speaker 1>all throughout the hospital. Laurence Sward talk to me a

0:29:52.080 --> 0:29:55.520
<v Speaker 1>little bit about how first responders are are feeling about,

0:29:55.960 --> 0:29:59.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, the president and the administration saying that they

0:29:59.280 --> 0:30:03.200
<v Speaker 1>want to reopen in the economy, even if it means more,

0:30:03.240 --> 0:30:07.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, rise in debts and infections. How many percentage

0:30:07.440 --> 0:30:10.400
<v Speaker 1>of the population we think have had COVID. You know,

0:30:10.560 --> 0:30:12.800
<v Speaker 1>do we need much more testing to try and understand

0:30:13.240 --> 0:30:18.400
<v Speaker 1>where the viruses and in what phase we are exactly? Yeah, absolutely. UM.

0:30:18.640 --> 0:30:21.520
<v Speaker 1>So I think the first word that comes to mind

0:30:21.560 --> 0:30:24.080
<v Speaker 1>is scared. Um. When you're in the hospital every day

0:30:24.240 --> 0:30:28.240
<v Speaker 1>and you're seeing these patients come in quite sick, and

0:30:28.280 --> 0:30:31.160
<v Speaker 1>knowing that there's so many of the so many of

0:30:31.160 --> 0:30:35.240
<v Speaker 1>the population who are not infected UM yet and who

0:30:35.280 --> 0:30:39.640
<v Speaker 1>maybe as states, as states and locations start to reopen,

0:30:40.240 --> 0:30:43.160
<v Speaker 1>we get really nervous. Um. We're finally starting to see

0:30:43.160 --> 0:30:45.360
<v Speaker 1>a bit of an easing in the number of cases

0:30:46.200 --> 0:30:50.320
<v Speaker 1>in Maryland, and we um, we approach that easing with

0:30:50.440 --> 0:30:54.160
<v Speaker 1>cautious optimism because you know, as you know, as you

0:30:54.200 --> 0:30:56.760
<v Speaker 1>start to reopen, you'll see a spike in cases and

0:30:56.560 --> 0:30:58.920
<v Speaker 1>and in several of the states that are already starting

0:30:58.960 --> 0:31:02.080
<v Speaker 1>to ease restrictions, their cases are still on rapid increase.

0:31:02.160 --> 0:31:05.720
<v Speaker 1>So um, you know in states like Florida, Nebraska, other

0:31:05.760 --> 0:31:10.200
<v Speaker 1>places where they're starting to ease the restrictions there, their

0:31:10.280 --> 0:31:13.440
<v Speaker 1>their case counts are actually on the rise. So I

0:31:13.480 --> 0:31:16.240
<v Speaker 1>think we are all in the health care setting nervous

0:31:16.280 --> 0:31:20.120
<v Speaker 1>that uh, these restrictions will be eased too quickly and

0:31:20.120 --> 0:31:22.680
<v Speaker 1>we'll see a massive spike in the number of cases.

0:31:23.320 --> 0:31:25.760
<v Speaker 1>Do we have more drugs now? And how close are

0:31:25.800 --> 0:31:28.360
<v Speaker 1>we to a vaccine to try and fight this COVID nineteen.

0:31:28.720 --> 0:31:31.080
<v Speaker 1>I think we're still a ways away from a vaccine.

0:31:31.080 --> 0:31:34.240
<v Speaker 1>I mean everyone is app is working over time on

0:31:35.040 --> 0:31:38.360
<v Speaker 1>on the development of a vaccine UM and in fact,

0:31:38.440 --> 0:31:42.360
<v Speaker 1>there was a summit uh late last or sorry earlier

0:31:42.440 --> 0:31:46.560
<v Speaker 1>last week specifically on focused on racing to get a

0:31:46.600 --> 0:31:50.280
<v Speaker 1>vaccine up and up and running. It's a true toward

0:31:50.320 --> 0:31:54.440
<v Speaker 1>a force of global efforts to develop a coronavirus vaccine.

0:31:54.880 --> 0:31:59.840
<v Speaker 1>On the on the therapeutic side, we have remed does

0:31:59.840 --> 0:32:02.600
<v Speaker 1>of year. We saw the positive data come out from

0:32:02.720 --> 0:32:05.560
<v Speaker 1>the first phase of that clinical trial and several other

0:32:05.600 --> 0:32:09.280
<v Speaker 1>clinical trials around reim does a hear um so it's

0:32:09.280 --> 0:32:13.080
<v Speaker 1>it is definitely looking promising. The data are looking promising,

0:32:13.120 --> 0:32:15.880
<v Speaker 1>but you know that is an IVY infusion drug, so

0:32:16.000 --> 0:32:19.040
<v Speaker 1>people have to be given in the hospital. So I

0:32:19.080 --> 0:32:22.000
<v Speaker 1>think there's a lot of people working on drugs that

0:32:22.040 --> 0:32:24.920
<v Speaker 1>can be given orally drugs that can be given administered

0:32:24.920 --> 0:32:27.640
<v Speaker 1>at Homer in the outpatient setting. UM, So we have

0:32:27.680 --> 0:32:31.240
<v Speaker 1>a long ways to go. Laurence So our expert in

0:32:31.400 --> 0:32:34.760
<v Speaker 1>emergency room medicine at the Johns Hopkins University and of

0:32:34.800 --> 0:32:37.720
<v Speaker 1>course part of the Bloomberg School of Public Health. And

0:32:37.720 --> 0:32:42.320
<v Speaker 1>we thank Michael Bloomberg for his support of this company,

0:32:42.400 --> 0:32:45.600
<v Speaker 1>the terminal company, Bloomberg LP, and also this radio television

0:32:45.640 --> 0:32:51.000
<v Speaker 1>station in his philanthropy to his Johns Hopkins University. Thanks

0:32:51.000 --> 0:32:55.240
<v Speaker 1>for listening to the Bloomberg Surveillance podcast. Subscribe and listen

0:32:55.480 --> 0:33:00.280
<v Speaker 1>to interviews on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, or whichever pod cast

0:33:00.320 --> 0:33:04.520
<v Speaker 1>platform you prefer. I'm on Twitter at Tom Keane before

0:33:04.560 --> 0:33:08.400
<v Speaker 1>the podcast. You can always catch us worldwide. I'm Bloomberg

0:33:08.480 --> 0:33:08.760
<v Speaker 1>Radio