WEBVTT - Elon Loses (Again) in Delaware, Might Gain New Tesla Customers

0:00:03.080 --> 0:00:08.200
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio news.

0:00:16.079 --> 0:00:18.960
<v Speaker 2>Well, Elon Musk is now the richest person on the planet.

0:00:19.320 --> 0:00:22.200
<v Speaker 3>More than half the satellites in space are owned and

0:00:22.280 --> 0:00:24.200
<v Speaker 3>controlled by one man.

0:00:24.560 --> 0:00:27.320
<v Speaker 4>Starting his own artificial intelligence company.

0:00:27.520 --> 0:00:31.240
<v Speaker 3>Well, he's a legitimate, super genius, legitimate, he says. He's

0:00:31.280 --> 0:00:34.160
<v Speaker 3>always voted for Democrats, but this year it will be different.

0:00:34.200 --> 0:00:35.160
<v Speaker 1>He'll vote Republican.

0:00:35.400 --> 0:00:37.919
<v Speaker 4>There is a reason the US government is so reliant

0:00:37.920 --> 0:00:38.320
<v Speaker 4>on him.

0:00:38.520 --> 0:00:41.199
<v Speaker 1>Elon Musk is a scam artist and he's done nothing.

0:00:42.720 --> 0:00:45.479
<v Speaker 2>Anything he does, he's fascinating people.

0:00:53.240 --> 0:00:57.480
<v Speaker 3>Welcome to Elanank, Bloomberg's weekly podcast about Elon Musket's Tuesday,

0:00:57.520 --> 0:01:02.320
<v Speaker 3>December third. I'm your host, David Papatapolis. Now, Elon Musk

0:01:02.480 --> 0:01:06.120
<v Speaker 3>loves himself a good lawsuit. He's always suing someone or

0:01:06.160 --> 0:01:10.120
<v Speaker 3>getting sued by someone, and these cases are constantly percolating

0:01:10.160 --> 0:01:13.000
<v Speaker 3>in the background, but this week they take center stage.

0:01:13.120 --> 0:01:16.759
<v Speaker 3>Late yesterday, News broke to the Delaware court yet again

0:01:16.920 --> 0:01:21.520
<v Speaker 3>has struck down his ginormous Tesla pay package. Meanwhile, JP

0:01:21.640 --> 0:01:24.279
<v Speaker 3>Morgan decided the best to walk away from a separate

0:01:24.319 --> 0:01:27.440
<v Speaker 3>suit it had brought against Musk, who in turn decided

0:01:27.480 --> 0:01:29.440
<v Speaker 3>it was time to re up an old suit he

0:01:29.440 --> 0:01:32.960
<v Speaker 3>had filed against rival Sam Altman and his company Open Ai.

0:01:33.480 --> 0:01:36.199
<v Speaker 5>All is fair in love and war and law, fair,

0:01:36.480 --> 0:01:37.840
<v Speaker 5>as Elon likes to call it.

0:01:38.480 --> 0:01:40.560
<v Speaker 3>After that, we're going to get into the way politics

0:01:40.640 --> 0:01:44.080
<v Speaker 3>is reshaping the Musk customer base something of a fascination

0:01:44.240 --> 0:01:47.080
<v Speaker 3>of ours here at Elon Inc. To talk about all this.

0:01:47.440 --> 0:01:51.400
<v Speaker 3>I am joined in the studio by our old pal

0:01:51.480 --> 0:01:54.320
<v Speaker 3>Sarah Friar. Hey, Sarah, Hey, you picked a hell of

0:01:54.360 --> 0:01:56.880
<v Speaker 3>a week to come to New York. It is cold here, Sarah,

0:01:57.040 --> 0:01:58.400
<v Speaker 3>love it okay.

0:01:58.200 --> 0:01:58.600
<v Speaker 5>Very good.

0:01:58.760 --> 0:02:04.240
<v Speaker 3>We also have our regulars Max Chafkin and Dana Hall. Hey, Max, Hey, David,

0:02:04.600 --> 0:02:08.160
<v Speaker 3>Dana Hello, Hello, Hello. And on the bat phone, we

0:02:08.240 --> 0:02:11.680
<v Speaker 3>have a special update coming from Bloomberg's man in Delaware,

0:02:11.720 --> 0:02:14.240
<v Speaker 3>our courts reporter Jeff Feely.

0:02:14.840 --> 0:02:18.919
<v Speaker 5>Jeff, Hello, sir, Good morning. All So, Jeff, we're gonna.

0:02:18.720 --> 0:02:22.600
<v Speaker 3>Start with you and this ruling that came last night

0:02:22.840 --> 0:02:26.440
<v Speaker 3>on the Musk pay package. Tell us what exactly did

0:02:26.480 --> 0:02:30.680
<v Speaker 3>the judge there, Chancellor Kathlyn McCormick rule last night.

0:02:31.680 --> 0:02:35.240
<v Speaker 2>She's judge Kate. He just judged Kate down here. She

0:02:35.440 --> 0:02:40.440
<v Speaker 2>ruled for the second time that must pay was the

0:02:40.480 --> 0:02:44.920
<v Speaker 2>result of a tainted process and that it should not

0:02:45.040 --> 0:02:48.720
<v Speaker 2>be reinstated, even though there was a second shareholder vote

0:02:49.200 --> 0:02:54.800
<v Speaker 2>overwhelmingly ratifying the idea that he deserved the largest compensation

0:02:55.000 --> 0:03:00.320
<v Speaker 2>award in US corporate history. And she also awarded the

0:03:01.040 --> 0:03:04.240
<v Speaker 2>legal fees of three hundred and forty five million dollars

0:03:04.760 --> 0:03:08.720
<v Speaker 2>to the lawyers who represented the loan Tesla shareholder who

0:03:08.760 --> 0:03:12.600
<v Speaker 2>took issue with this. With this pay package, they had

0:03:12.639 --> 0:03:17.720
<v Speaker 2>been asking for stock in the neighborhood of five billion dollars.

0:03:17.880 --> 0:03:23.359
<v Speaker 2>They pointed to the fifty five billion dollar pay package

0:03:23.400 --> 0:03:27.400
<v Speaker 2>as the load star that they were comparing themselves to

0:03:27.600 --> 0:03:32.359
<v Speaker 2>and hoping to be awarded upon. But the judge, following

0:03:33.040 --> 0:03:36.400
<v Speaker 2>the guidance of the Delaware Supreme Court, found that that

0:03:36.600 --> 0:03:42.160
<v Speaker 2>would be an unfair windfall and cut back their feet

0:03:42.480 --> 0:03:45.440
<v Speaker 2>only to three hundred and forty five million dollars.

0:03:45.480 --> 0:03:46.920
<v Speaker 5>Woo, Who poor them.

0:03:47.080 --> 0:03:50.320
<v Speaker 2>I doubt Greg Vala, who's the lead lawyer, was crying

0:03:50.320 --> 0:03:51.600
<v Speaker 2>in his beer last night.

0:03:52.080 --> 0:03:54.840
<v Speaker 3>I would think that the number on that pay package

0:03:54.880 --> 0:03:58.480
<v Speaker 3>bounces all around. As we last understood it, what was

0:03:58.520 --> 0:04:00.000
<v Speaker 3>the approximate number two?

0:04:00.600 --> 0:04:02.520
<v Speaker 2>What did we I think we in the story said

0:04:02.520 --> 0:04:06.560
<v Speaker 2>that it had definitely bounced beyond fifty five you know,

0:04:06.600 --> 0:04:11.800
<v Speaker 2>again because Tesla's stock, you know, it's so volatile, it

0:04:11.960 --> 0:04:13.280
<v Speaker 2>just goes all over the place.

0:04:13.480 --> 0:04:16.080
<v Speaker 3>I thought it had gotten max to like around one

0:04:16.160 --> 0:04:19.360
<v Speaker 3>hundred billion or so, giving some work, Well.

0:04:19.440 --> 0:04:22.279
<v Speaker 2>The numbers we used in the story were that when

0:04:22.279 --> 0:04:25.360
<v Speaker 2>the stock option grant was made, they were worth two

0:04:25.440 --> 0:04:29.000
<v Speaker 2>point six billion, and by the time the trial went

0:04:29.080 --> 0:04:31.160
<v Speaker 2>on they were up to fifty six billion.

0:04:31.720 --> 0:04:36.080
<v Speaker 4>So as of Monday one hunt, according to the Bloomberg story,

0:04:36.080 --> 0:04:38.159
<v Speaker 4>one hundred and one point five billion. Oh yeah, which

0:04:38.200 --> 0:04:40.560
<v Speaker 4>is obviously that the stock price of Tesla has gone

0:04:40.600 --> 0:04:42.240
<v Speaker 4>way up over the last month or so.

0:04:42.560 --> 0:04:44.760
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, there we are, now, Jeff, hadn't there been a

0:04:44.880 --> 0:04:50.720
<v Speaker 3>sense that the new shareholder vote, done with greater transparency

0:04:50.920 --> 0:04:54.560
<v Speaker 3>and so on and so forth, had addressed fully or

0:04:54.600 --> 0:04:59.719
<v Speaker 3>at least some of Judge Katie's concerns. Apparently not, But

0:04:59.760 --> 0:05:01.400
<v Speaker 3>I but I thought there was that sense out there

0:05:01.400 --> 0:05:02.760
<v Speaker 3>that had been the case.

0:05:03.680 --> 0:05:07.040
<v Speaker 2>Well, I mean, look, the reality is this was a

0:05:08.160 --> 0:05:12.520
<v Speaker 2>novel question of law in terms of could you basically

0:05:12.800 --> 0:05:18.160
<v Speaker 2>use a second shareholder vote to and affect correct problems

0:05:18.760 --> 0:05:24.120
<v Speaker 2>with the pay process and the problems that Judge Katie

0:05:24.160 --> 0:05:28.520
<v Speaker 2>had identified the first time around, just rampant conflicts of

0:05:28.560 --> 0:05:32.400
<v Speaker 2>interest had not really been addressed. I mean, you know,

0:05:32.440 --> 0:05:37.800
<v Speaker 2>there were some cosmetic changes, but the process itself was tainted.

0:05:38.200 --> 0:05:40.960
<v Speaker 3>And Jeff on that the rampant conflicts of interest. Basically,

0:05:41.040 --> 0:05:43.760
<v Speaker 3>this board is just too much in bed with Elon Musk.

0:05:43.839 --> 0:05:46.200
<v Speaker 2>That's the idea, and that is exactly right.

0:05:46.400 --> 0:05:47.240
<v Speaker 1>I'd just like to know.

0:05:47.400 --> 0:05:50.880
<v Speaker 6>I mean, Tesla's own proxy made it very clear to

0:05:50.960 --> 0:05:55.680
<v Speaker 6>shareholders that there was no certainty that this revote was

0:05:55.720 --> 0:05:57.480
<v Speaker 6>going to change the outcome of the case. I mean

0:05:57.520 --> 0:06:00.800
<v Speaker 6>they said it plain as day. A special noted that

0:06:00.920 --> 0:06:04.279
<v Speaker 6>even a favorable ratification vote by stockholders may not fully

0:06:04.320 --> 0:06:07.280
<v Speaker 6>resolve this matter. We cannot predict with certainty how a

0:06:07.360 --> 0:06:10.240
<v Speaker 6>revote will where I will vote to ratify the performance

0:06:10.279 --> 0:06:14.000
<v Speaker 6>award would be treated under Delaware law under these novel circumstances.

0:06:14.360 --> 0:06:16.799
<v Speaker 6>So these risk factors were all laid out in the proxy.

0:06:16.880 --> 0:06:19.680
<v Speaker 6>I think what happened was that Musk kind of did

0:06:19.720 --> 0:06:22.680
<v Speaker 6>this like marketing campaign to all of the retail shareholders

0:06:22.680 --> 0:06:24.760
<v Speaker 6>and got them whipped up into this frenzy so that

0:06:24.839 --> 0:06:27.080
<v Speaker 6>they think that this is like a direct democracy that

0:06:27.120 --> 0:06:30.159
<v Speaker 6>they voted to ratify it again. And therefore it would

0:06:30.200 --> 0:06:33.960
<v Speaker 6>sail through. And they're completely ignoring the precedent of Delaware

0:06:34.040 --> 0:06:37.280
<v Speaker 6>law and the process in Delaware. And that's why you're

0:06:37.320 --> 0:06:40.760
<v Speaker 6>seeing so many people upset today. And you know, like

0:06:40.960 --> 0:06:44.360
<v Speaker 6>Tesla's obviously going to appeal, but Tesla's ow proxy made

0:06:44.360 --> 0:06:46.400
<v Speaker 6>it very clear that they were taking a novel approach

0:06:46.440 --> 0:06:47.240
<v Speaker 6>to trying to resolve.

0:06:47.440 --> 0:06:51.920
<v Speaker 3>So, Jeff, when Tesla appeals, how does that appeal process work?

0:06:52.880 --> 0:06:55.240
<v Speaker 2>They've already filed their notice of appeal.

0:06:55.040 --> 0:06:57.520
<v Speaker 3>They did, and so they filed that to whom and

0:06:57.600 --> 0:07:00.000
<v Speaker 3>how exactly does that work? And what would the timeline

0:07:00.200 --> 0:07:00.719
<v Speaker 3>that look like?

0:07:01.360 --> 0:07:04.000
<v Speaker 2>All right, So, the Delaware Supreme Court is where this

0:07:04.120 --> 0:07:07.480
<v Speaker 2>case goes, and unlike the US Supreme Court, they don't

0:07:07.560 --> 0:07:11.040
<v Speaker 2>choose their cases any lower court ruling. They have to

0:07:11.240 --> 0:07:14.119
<v Speaker 2>hear the appeal of So it's headed to the five

0:07:14.280 --> 0:07:17.920
<v Speaker 2>members of that court, and it's going to take the

0:07:17.960 --> 0:07:20.280
<v Speaker 2>better part of a year for all the processing to

0:07:20.320 --> 0:07:20.920
<v Speaker 2>get done.

0:07:21.120 --> 0:07:23.880
<v Speaker 4>Hey, Jeff, can I ask a dumb question. Isn't Tesla

0:07:23.880 --> 0:07:24.679
<v Speaker 4>based in Texas?

0:07:24.720 --> 0:07:24.960
<v Speaker 5>Now?

0:07:25.160 --> 0:07:25.520
<v Speaker 2>It is?

0:07:26.160 --> 0:07:27.800
<v Speaker 5>So, at what point.

0:07:27.560 --> 0:07:31.520
<v Speaker 4>Does that have an effect on what the company tries

0:07:31.560 --> 0:07:34.000
<v Speaker 4>to do with Elon Musk's pay Okay?

0:07:34.040 --> 0:07:38.320
<v Speaker 2>Well, so, because they were a Delaware company when this

0:07:38.520 --> 0:07:42.760
<v Speaker 2>package in two eighteen was negotiated, they're still covered by

0:07:42.800 --> 0:07:47.280
<v Speaker 2>Delaware law for this case. If they decide, you know,

0:07:47.400 --> 0:07:50.600
<v Speaker 2>if they lose on appeal, the likelihood is they're going

0:07:50.680 --> 0:07:53.880
<v Speaker 2>to run to the new Business Court in Texas and

0:07:54.920 --> 0:07:59.920
<v Speaker 2>you know, basically create a whole new package in Texas,

0:08:00.080 --> 0:08:02.120
<v Speaker 2>and it's probably going to be the same package that

0:08:02.120 --> 0:08:05.680
<v Speaker 2>they proposed here at Delaware, and the likelihood is it'll

0:08:05.720 --> 0:08:12.760
<v Speaker 2>sail through like you know, bacon or in Greece decision.

0:08:13.760 --> 0:08:16.720
<v Speaker 5>I don't know that bacon and grease sales. But anyway, Sara,

0:08:16.840 --> 0:08:18.640
<v Speaker 5>you were.

0:08:18.480 --> 0:08:22.040
<v Speaker 7>Does that mean that Musk's plan to just move all

0:08:22.120 --> 0:08:26.680
<v Speaker 7>of his lawsuits to Texas, like anything that we ever

0:08:26.720 --> 0:08:29.520
<v Speaker 7>do to challenge Musk in the court of law will

0:08:29.560 --> 0:08:30.240
<v Speaker 7>be heard there.

0:08:30.480 --> 0:08:31.200
<v Speaker 1>That's going to work.

0:08:31.840 --> 0:08:35.200
<v Speaker 2>Well, there is a provision in the law where corporations

0:08:35.320 --> 0:08:40.120
<v Speaker 2>can decide where their litigation is going to be. They're

0:08:40.120 --> 0:08:45.040
<v Speaker 2>called you know, basically forum clauses, and yes, those are

0:08:45.080 --> 0:08:49.360
<v Speaker 2>considered legal. If Elon and the Tesla board decide that

0:08:49.520 --> 0:08:53.600
<v Speaker 2>all litigation against Tesla will be heard in Texas, there's

0:08:53.640 --> 0:08:55.959
<v Speaker 2>really not much that shareholders can do about it.

0:08:56.760 --> 0:09:00.679
<v Speaker 3>So then why take the step of appealing to the

0:09:01.000 --> 0:09:03.240
<v Speaker 3>to the top court in Delaware if in the end

0:09:03.320 --> 0:09:05.079
<v Speaker 3>you just know you're going to go to Texas.

0:09:05.559 --> 0:09:08.240
<v Speaker 2>Well, I can tell you it's pretty easy. I mean,

0:09:08.320 --> 0:09:10.679
<v Speaker 2>we just mentioned that the guy is worth more than

0:09:10.720 --> 0:09:14.400
<v Speaker 2>one hundred billion dollars, so picking up the tab for

0:09:14.520 --> 0:09:18.079
<v Speaker 2>another appeal in Delaware it'n't exactly going to leave him

0:09:18.120 --> 0:09:22.679
<v Speaker 2>eating dog food out of cans. So I think he's appealing,

0:09:23.640 --> 0:09:26.280
<v Speaker 2>you know, basically because he can.

0:09:27.120 --> 0:09:30.600
<v Speaker 4>I mean, it's an interesting test of the like Elon

0:09:30.720 --> 0:09:34.400
<v Speaker 4>Musk ability to just sort of force things make, you know,

0:09:34.480 --> 0:09:37.360
<v Speaker 4>try to try to essentially avoid the law or ignore

0:09:37.400 --> 0:09:40.040
<v Speaker 4>the law, you know, go on Twitter and say this

0:09:40.080 --> 0:09:41.760
<v Speaker 4>is this is bs, I'm not going to do it,

0:09:42.040 --> 0:09:45.480
<v Speaker 4>and then the ability of like courts to assert their authority.

0:09:45.520 --> 0:09:48.760
<v Speaker 4>I mean, over the last month, we've seen all of

0:09:48.800 --> 0:09:53.280
<v Speaker 4>these kind of very optimistic projections by like Tesla shareholders

0:09:53.280 --> 0:09:57.280
<v Speaker 4>that somehow Trump is going to drastically shift, you know,

0:09:57.360 --> 0:10:00.320
<v Speaker 4>basically the dollars and cents of this company. And I

0:10:00.320 --> 0:10:02.559
<v Speaker 4>feel like this this case, although it's not going to

0:10:02.720 --> 0:10:06.400
<v Speaker 4>change that much, it just shows that like you cannot

0:10:06.760 --> 0:10:09.720
<v Speaker 4>you know, reality and the reality of the justice system

0:10:09.720 --> 0:10:10.720
<v Speaker 4>will assert itself.

0:10:11.040 --> 0:10:13.320
<v Speaker 7>Well, I mean, remember this is the judge that forced

0:10:13.440 --> 0:10:17.319
<v Speaker 7>Musk to buy Twitter. That history has sort of been

0:10:17.360 --> 0:10:20.680
<v Speaker 7>revised now into something Musk always wanted to do, to say,

0:10:20.720 --> 0:10:23.520
<v Speaker 7>free speech. But as we remember while on this podcast,

0:10:24.480 --> 0:10:25.960
<v Speaker 7>it was really Judge Katie.

0:10:26.040 --> 0:10:28.040
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, for a guy who's been winning and winning and

0:10:28.080 --> 0:10:30.560
<v Speaker 3>winning of late. And you know he, as we've said

0:10:30.559 --> 0:10:33.640
<v Speaker 3>perhaps in the past, when he tangles with Judge Katie,

0:10:33.679 --> 0:10:34.400
<v Speaker 3>he loses.

0:10:34.760 --> 0:10:39.560
<v Speaker 2>As my friend Dana Hall has very evocatively said, you know,

0:10:40.000 --> 0:10:44.360
<v Speaker 2>he's he was teflon Elon. Nothing stuck to him. He

0:10:44.559 --> 0:10:46.240
<v Speaker 2>slid like bacon on greef.

0:10:49.520 --> 0:10:51.319
<v Speaker 5>You're making me hungry here, Pheely.

0:10:51.280 --> 0:10:54.640
<v Speaker 2>I know, I know. Anyway, he's got some dents in

0:10:54.720 --> 0:10:58.720
<v Speaker 2>his armor here, and she's pretty much the only one

0:10:59.200 --> 0:11:01.440
<v Speaker 2>who was held his feet to the legal fire.

0:11:01.559 --> 0:11:05.040
<v Speaker 5>You got to give her some credit, absolutely, mister Peeley.

0:11:05.120 --> 0:11:06.400
<v Speaker 5>We will let you go, sir.

0:11:07.000 --> 0:11:09.240
<v Speaker 3>We'll have you back on soon when there's a new

0:11:09.280 --> 0:11:10.559
<v Speaker 3>twist and turn in the case.

0:11:10.840 --> 0:11:18.400
<v Speaker 2>Listen, everybody have a wonderful day, Dana.

0:11:18.600 --> 0:11:20.560
<v Speaker 3>So let's zoom the lens back out for a second.

0:11:20.679 --> 0:11:24.840
<v Speaker 3>In general, on lawfair as a whole, Elon loves to

0:11:24.880 --> 0:11:29.520
<v Speaker 3>talk about the term. What exactly is the definition of

0:11:29.600 --> 0:11:31.920
<v Speaker 3>lawfair as we understand it, what's kind of.

0:11:31.920 --> 0:11:35.280
<v Speaker 6>This combination of law and warfare? And I think the

0:11:35.320 --> 0:11:38.800
<v Speaker 6>coinage comes from two thousand and one, after the September

0:11:38.840 --> 0:11:41.160
<v Speaker 6>eleventh attacks, when the idea is that you could sort

0:11:41.200 --> 0:11:43.959
<v Speaker 6>of weaponize the law to go after your adversaries.

0:11:44.200 --> 0:11:46.760
<v Speaker 1>And Musk loves this term.

0:11:47.040 --> 0:11:49.720
<v Speaker 6>He has often said that Donald Trump is a victim

0:11:49.760 --> 0:11:52.800
<v Speaker 6>of lawfair, that he himself is a victim of law fair.

0:11:52.960 --> 0:11:55.320
<v Speaker 6>If you do a search of his posts on X,

0:11:55.400 --> 0:11:58.920
<v Speaker 6>it's like lawfair, lawfair, law fair. When when he hosted

0:11:59.360 --> 0:12:02.160
<v Speaker 6>Trump on in August, he kept kind of trying to

0:12:02.160 --> 0:12:05.320
<v Speaker 6>steer the conversation to like, hey, like, we're both victims

0:12:05.360 --> 0:12:08.400
<v Speaker 6>of lawfair. So it's just something that he is constantly

0:12:08.440 --> 0:12:12.160
<v Speaker 6>harping on. But the big irony is that he himself

0:12:12.240 --> 0:12:14.960
<v Speaker 6>is so litigious. I mean, he is right now trying

0:12:14.960 --> 0:12:17.959
<v Speaker 6>to sue Sam Altman into oblivion, and he is often

0:12:18.120 --> 0:12:21.480
<v Speaker 6>the plaintiff in a lot of cases. And so I

0:12:21.520 --> 0:12:24.199
<v Speaker 6>just think it's fascinating to look at how Musk himself

0:12:24.200 --> 0:12:27.040
<v Speaker 6>has kind of weaponized the law. He has so much money,

0:12:27.080 --> 0:12:29.600
<v Speaker 6>he can hire the best law firms, he can go

0:12:29.679 --> 0:12:32.560
<v Speaker 6>for broke and oftentimes that's how law works, right, Like,

0:12:32.600 --> 0:12:37.839
<v Speaker 6>the richest people have the resources to litigate beyond their adversaries.

0:12:37.920 --> 0:12:40.160
<v Speaker 6>And you're seeing that play out over and over and

0:12:40.160 --> 0:12:43.000
<v Speaker 6>over again, and so I just think there's sort of

0:12:43.040 --> 0:12:45.520
<v Speaker 6>a wider frame here, Like right now Musk is saying

0:12:45.559 --> 0:12:48.839
<v Speaker 6>that he is a victim of the lawfair against him

0:12:48.840 --> 0:12:51.920
<v Speaker 6>in Delaware Chancery Corps, and he's clearly whipping all of

0:12:51.960 --> 0:12:55.600
<v Speaker 6>his fans and retail shareholders into agreeing with him. At

0:12:55.600 --> 0:12:58.280
<v Speaker 6>the same time, look at what he's doing, suing not

0:12:58.320 --> 0:13:01.640
<v Speaker 6>just open ai, but now Microsoft to over open aies

0:13:01.720 --> 0:13:05.240
<v Speaker 6>you know, nonprofit versus for profit status plans, and and

0:13:05.360 --> 0:13:07.960
<v Speaker 6>how how many times Musk has been in lawsuits.

0:13:08.040 --> 0:13:10.360
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, so Max tell us a little bit about that

0:13:10.640 --> 0:13:13.560
<v Speaker 3>freshly opened Musk suit against open Ai.

0:13:13.760 --> 0:13:15.880
<v Speaker 4>Well, he filed the suit, then he dropped it, then

0:13:15.880 --> 0:13:19.679
<v Speaker 4>he refiled. And the latest twist is an injunction asking

0:13:19.720 --> 0:13:24.439
<v Speaker 4>the court to stop open AI's plan to change its

0:13:24.440 --> 0:13:27.400
<v Speaker 4>status from a non for profit or this very complicated

0:13:27.840 --> 0:13:30.440
<v Speaker 4>legal status that had had where there was a non

0:13:30.440 --> 0:13:33.200
<v Speaker 4>for profit that owned the for profit to a more

0:13:33.360 --> 0:13:36.040
<v Speaker 4>conventional for profit, which it's trying to do because it's

0:13:36.040 --> 0:13:39.560
<v Speaker 4>trying to raise, you know, buckets of money, and Elon

0:13:39.679 --> 0:13:43.160
<v Speaker 4>Musk's suit is basically asked in the court to stop that,

0:13:43.640 --> 0:13:46.280
<v Speaker 4>and it's and the arguments it's megan, they're kind of interesting.

0:13:46.720 --> 0:13:49.040
<v Speaker 4>There's a few different ones, but couple of which are

0:13:49.040 --> 0:13:53.319
<v Speaker 4>basically anti trust claims. I trust, yeah, yeah, based on

0:13:53.760 --> 0:13:57.120
<v Speaker 4>a couple of factors. One is interlocking directors. To me,

0:13:57.200 --> 0:14:00.440
<v Speaker 4>the most interesting one is this idea of the interlocking directors,

0:14:00.440 --> 0:14:03.440
<v Speaker 4>which would be a violation of federal antitrust law.

0:14:03.720 --> 0:14:05.760
<v Speaker 5>You have Sam help me out there for.

0:14:07.760 --> 0:14:08.200
<v Speaker 2>AI.

0:14:08.480 --> 0:14:10.240
<v Speaker 4>So this is this is a thing that has come

0:14:10.320 --> 0:14:13.640
<v Speaker 4>up in discussions around Microsoft and anti trust and open

0:14:13.679 --> 0:14:15.920
<v Speaker 4>Ai and anti trust and various FTC things.

0:14:15.920 --> 0:14:17.480
<v Speaker 5>But basically, like there are.

0:14:17.400 --> 0:14:20.560
<v Speaker 4>Legal issues with a director serving on the board of

0:14:21.000 --> 0:14:23.560
<v Speaker 4>companies that are doing business together, which is a case

0:14:23.720 --> 0:14:27.720
<v Speaker 4>for open ai where you had Reid Hoffmann simultaneously serving

0:14:27.720 --> 0:14:31.280
<v Speaker 4>on the board of open Ai and Microsoft. He's now anyway,

0:14:31.440 --> 0:14:33.440
<v Speaker 4>and so a bunch of issues like that. And then

0:14:33.680 --> 0:14:38.200
<v Speaker 4>there's also a complaint about open Ai suggesting to venture

0:14:38.200 --> 0:14:42.360
<v Speaker 4>capitalists that they not invest in Elon Musk's company, which

0:14:42.520 --> 0:14:45.640
<v Speaker 4>my understanding is something that is not all that unusual.

0:14:45.680 --> 0:14:47.840
<v Speaker 4>Sarah may have a better sense of this is not

0:14:47.880 --> 0:14:50.760
<v Speaker 4>something that's entirely unusual in the world of venture capital,

0:14:51.080 --> 0:14:54.480
<v Speaker 4>although you know, perhaps it does raise some raise some

0:14:54.600 --> 0:14:58.720
<v Speaker 4>legal issues. Basically Elon Musk doing everything you can to

0:14:58.840 --> 0:15:01.960
<v Speaker 4>mess with you know, a competitor and and really the

0:15:02.000 --> 0:15:04.840
<v Speaker 4>strongest competitor in the in the world of AI.

0:15:05.040 --> 0:15:07.080
<v Speaker 7>What's so interesting about this case to me is like,

0:15:07.840 --> 0:15:10.320
<v Speaker 7>usually when there's a lawsuit, you can get a sense

0:15:10.360 --> 0:15:13.200
<v Speaker 7>of who is who's the big doug and who's like

0:15:13.280 --> 0:15:15.920
<v Speaker 7>fighting for their life right. Usually it's like a David

0:15:15.960 --> 0:15:19.360
<v Speaker 7>versus Goliath kind of situation. In this situation, you know

0:15:19.400 --> 0:15:22.000
<v Speaker 7>that you've got the richest man in the world who

0:15:22.120 --> 0:15:27.520
<v Speaker 7>has his own AI company suing his I guess co

0:15:27.600 --> 0:15:29.840
<v Speaker 7>founder is one way to put it. Of Open Ai,

0:15:30.440 --> 0:15:35.800
<v Speaker 7>who has also created this extremely powerful, influential AI company

0:15:35.840 --> 0:15:37.239
<v Speaker 7>that's that wants.

0:15:37.000 --> 0:15:39.440
<v Speaker 5>To conjunction with Microsoft.

0:15:38.840 --> 0:15:43.520
<v Speaker 7>In conjunction with an extremely powerful big tech company which

0:15:43.560 --> 0:15:48.400
<v Speaker 7>wants to completely reconfigure like the data center infrastructure in

0:15:48.400 --> 0:15:50.360
<v Speaker 7>the United States. It's going to cost them billions upon

0:15:50.440 --> 0:15:52.120
<v Speaker 7>billions of dollars, are going to need a lot of

0:15:52.120 --> 0:15:55.840
<v Speaker 7>government support, and so this lawsuit is interesting, but it's

0:15:55.880 --> 0:15:58.480
<v Speaker 7>also interesting in the sort of wider lens of like

0:15:59.240 --> 0:16:01.960
<v Speaker 7>Musk is now sitting at the right hand of the president,

0:16:02.440 --> 0:16:06.280
<v Speaker 7>Altman needs the government to be behind him one hundred

0:16:06.280 --> 0:16:09.400
<v Speaker 7>percent on his data center build out to fulfill open

0:16:09.440 --> 0:16:13.040
<v Speaker 7>AI's ambitions. So this not for profit debate is kind

0:16:13.080 --> 0:16:18.400
<v Speaker 7>of like a hiccup in the grand scheme of things,

0:16:18.040 --> 0:16:23.600
<v Speaker 7>in both of these men having like these intense ambitions

0:16:23.640 --> 0:16:25.360
<v Speaker 7>for AI taking over.

0:16:26.000 --> 0:16:29.120
<v Speaker 4>I do think Elon Musk's position has gotten a lot stronger,

0:16:29.200 --> 0:16:32.480
<v Speaker 4>and not only because he's revived this lawsuit, but because,

0:16:32.480 --> 0:16:36.240
<v Speaker 4>as Sarah says, he's in a position to have a

0:16:36.400 --> 0:16:40.360
<v Speaker 4>huge impact on AI policy and open ai and not

0:16:40.400 --> 0:16:43.520
<v Speaker 4>just AI policy, but anti trust policy, lots of policies

0:16:43.760 --> 0:16:46.520
<v Speaker 4>that potentially impact you know, not just open AI, but

0:16:46.640 --> 0:16:49.120
<v Speaker 4>like any company that he competes with. And so you

0:16:49.160 --> 0:16:50.960
<v Speaker 4>have this suit on one side, and then on the

0:16:51.000 --> 0:16:53.400
<v Speaker 4>other side, you know half a dozen things that the

0:16:53.400 --> 0:16:57.200
<v Speaker 4>Trump administration could or couldn't do that would have an

0:16:57.200 --> 0:17:00.880
<v Speaker 4>effect on this market and potentially could benefit and must We.

0:17:00.840 --> 0:17:04.800
<v Speaker 3>Should note that his AI company, Xai, all the while

0:17:05.040 --> 0:17:06.520
<v Speaker 3>is growing quite a bit, is it not.

0:17:06.800 --> 0:17:09.560
<v Speaker 6>They've built out this massive data center in Memphis, Tennessee

0:17:10.000 --> 0:17:14.000
<v Speaker 6>that they call Colossus. They have all these Nvidia GPUs.

0:17:14.160 --> 0:17:16.639
<v Speaker 6>They've hired a bunch of people. I don't know what

0:17:16.640 --> 0:17:19.320
<v Speaker 6>the current valuation is, but they yeah, no, it's I

0:17:19.359 --> 0:17:21.960
<v Speaker 6>mean it's a real company. It's small, but it is

0:17:22.080 --> 0:17:24.920
<v Speaker 6>not something to be taken lightly. Like Elon moves very.

0:17:24.720 --> 0:17:28.760
<v Speaker 7>Fast and in the market of AI, like what matters

0:17:28.880 --> 0:17:31.639
<v Speaker 7>is the capital, Like you just need money, Like the

0:17:31.800 --> 0:17:34.520
<v Speaker 7>tech is kind of open source at this point, you

0:17:34.600 --> 0:17:39.760
<v Speaker 7>just need buying and sometimes like appearing it's super capital

0:17:39.800 --> 0:17:44.480
<v Speaker 7>intensive industry, super capital intensive, Like it's getting more efficient, right,

0:17:44.680 --> 0:17:50.239
<v Speaker 7>but the amount of of compute power necessary to do

0:17:50.359 --> 0:17:54.440
<v Speaker 7>an energy and energy to do the kind of analysis

0:17:54.520 --> 0:17:58.840
<v Speaker 7>that AI needs to do, it's only getting getting exponentially

0:17:59.280 --> 0:18:02.639
<v Speaker 7>heavier as AI develops, and it's going to continue in

0:18:02.680 --> 0:18:07.000
<v Speaker 7>that direction. As AI gets more efficient, they're just going

0:18:07.080 --> 0:18:08.919
<v Speaker 7>to try to make it do more things, which is

0:18:08.920 --> 0:18:11.520
<v Speaker 7>going to cost more and require more. Like even if

0:18:11.560 --> 0:18:15.680
<v Speaker 7>like every energy plant in the entire United States ran

0:18:15.760 --> 0:18:18.800
<v Speaker 7>it full capacity, like it wouldn't fulfill the need of

0:18:18.800 --> 0:18:21.600
<v Speaker 7>this industry. But then there's also just like the idea

0:18:21.640 --> 0:18:23.879
<v Speaker 7>that if you are a competitor of Musk, which is,

0:18:24.720 --> 0:18:31.280
<v Speaker 7>to be clear, a lot of the entire business America. Yeah,

0:18:31.280 --> 0:18:33.960
<v Speaker 7>if you're if you're in if you're in EVS, if

0:18:33.960 --> 0:18:36.919
<v Speaker 7>you're Jeff Bezos, if you're you know, a rival in

0:18:36.960 --> 0:18:40.719
<v Speaker 7>social media, if you're you have to be scared of

0:18:40.760 --> 0:18:44.560
<v Speaker 7>this open Ai lawsuit and also must proximity to Trump,

0:18:44.640 --> 0:18:48.320
<v Speaker 7>And like what that might mean for who Trump decides

0:18:48.440 --> 0:18:49.760
<v Speaker 7>to have a grudge against the other.

0:18:49.800 --> 0:18:52.320
<v Speaker 4>Thing is like this lawsuit doesn't have to succeed in

0:18:52.320 --> 0:18:55.080
<v Speaker 4>a conventional sense for it to hurt open Ai. Like

0:18:55.840 --> 0:18:59.199
<v Speaker 4>just slowing down open Ai is potentially a win for

0:18:59.240 --> 0:19:02.399
<v Speaker 4>Elon must because open Ai, yes, it's very successful. But

0:19:02.480 --> 0:19:05.119
<v Speaker 4>Sarah kind of hinted at this, none of these companies

0:19:05.160 --> 0:19:08.840
<v Speaker 4>are making money. Open Ai is losing huge amounts of money,

0:19:08.840 --> 0:19:12.119
<v Speaker 4>burning billions of dollars, and that's part of the reason

0:19:12.200 --> 0:19:15.439
<v Speaker 4>they're trying to go for profit, because they're trying to

0:19:15.440 --> 0:19:18.240
<v Speaker 4>create additional things they can offer investors to keep the

0:19:18.280 --> 0:19:21.879
<v Speaker 4>capital spigot flowing. So, you know, anything Musk can do

0:19:22.520 --> 0:19:26.240
<v Speaker 4>to slow open Ai down is going to help his company,

0:19:26.240 --> 0:19:29.000
<v Speaker 4>which is at effectively an earlier stage. But you know,

0:19:29.080 --> 0:19:31.720
<v Speaker 4>really all these companies are at an early stage, So

0:19:31.720 --> 0:19:33.679
<v Speaker 4>so despite the fact that open as a lead, you know,

0:19:33.720 --> 0:19:36.200
<v Speaker 4>he can kind of like start to try to bring

0:19:36.240 --> 0:19:37.720
<v Speaker 4>his company up to parody.

0:19:37.960 --> 0:19:39.400
<v Speaker 5>Got it okay? Now? Dan?

0:19:39.680 --> 0:19:44.840
<v Speaker 3>Meanwhile, JP Morgan decided, I believe sometime in the last

0:19:44.840 --> 0:19:47.680
<v Speaker 3>few days, to drop a lawsuit it had brought against

0:19:47.800 --> 0:19:48.560
<v Speaker 3>Musk tell us.

0:19:48.600 --> 0:19:50.879
<v Speaker 6>What happened there, Yeah, I mean this was sort of

0:19:50.960 --> 0:19:55.360
<v Speaker 6>a suit from twenty twenty one where JP Morgan was

0:19:56.080 --> 0:19:58.520
<v Speaker 6>claiming that Tesla owed them one hundred and sixty two

0:19:58.560 --> 0:20:02.639
<v Speaker 6>million dollars tied to like stock warrant transaction and it

0:20:02.680 --> 0:20:04.520
<v Speaker 6>was over a strike price. It was such a small

0:20:04.520 --> 0:20:07.280
<v Speaker 6>amount of money, which is crazy because like I always

0:20:07.280 --> 0:20:10.000
<v Speaker 6>think of Elon in terms of billions, not millions, and

0:20:10.040 --> 0:20:11.919
<v Speaker 6>this one seemed relatively small.

0:20:12.080 --> 0:20:14.719
<v Speaker 5>If it ain't fifty billion, what is It's nothing?

0:20:15.000 --> 0:20:17.320
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, Anyway, they agreed to drop the lawsuit.

0:20:17.440 --> 0:20:18.840
<v Speaker 6>And I think you have to think about like the

0:20:18.920 --> 0:20:22.359
<v Speaker 6>judiciary as a whole, like which courthouses are all these

0:20:22.440 --> 0:20:26.440
<v Speaker 6>suits heard in, and like why Tesla has moved to Texas.

0:20:26.520 --> 0:20:29.240
<v Speaker 6>And I think that anytime there's a change in administration,

0:20:29.359 --> 0:20:31.600
<v Speaker 6>you just start to see a lot of litigation wrap

0:20:31.720 --> 0:20:35.159
<v Speaker 6>up because people think about the cost benefit analysis of

0:20:35.200 --> 0:20:38.800
<v Speaker 6>continuing to litigate under a new administration when there could

0:20:38.840 --> 0:20:41.760
<v Speaker 6>be new judges appointed in different courtrooms and.

0:20:41.840 --> 0:20:44.200
<v Speaker 3>Max, you know, it's also just the calculus, as Danager said,

0:20:44.200 --> 0:20:46.000
<v Speaker 3>it just a few million dollars or I don't know

0:20:46.000 --> 0:20:49.040
<v Speaker 3>how many millions, But yeah, is it worth pursuing that

0:20:49.160 --> 0:20:51.840
<v Speaker 3>when against the next president's first budy?

0:20:51.920 --> 0:20:53.480
<v Speaker 5>But it's not, and it's not I don't even think

0:20:53.480 --> 0:20:53.760
<v Speaker 5>it's that.

0:20:53.880 --> 0:20:56.520
<v Speaker 4>I think it's that, you know, JP Morgan wants those

0:20:56.560 --> 0:20:58.679
<v Speaker 4>one hundred and sixty two million dollars, but it very

0:20:58.760 --> 0:21:01.760
<v Speaker 4>much also wants future fees that Elon Musk could pay

0:21:01.920 --> 0:21:02.760
<v Speaker 4>and you know, in the.

0:21:02.920 --> 0:21:05.879
<v Speaker 3>In the's, but it also presumably one of those future

0:21:05.920 --> 0:21:07.400
<v Speaker 3>fees at the time it suited him.

0:21:07.440 --> 0:21:10.040
<v Speaker 4>No, no, But my point is like I'm not saying

0:21:10.040 --> 0:21:14.040
<v Speaker 4>you shouldn't pay your professional services providers, but businesses choose

0:21:14.080 --> 0:21:17.000
<v Speaker 4>to not pay their professional service to providers all the time.

0:21:17.280 --> 0:21:19.600
<v Speaker 4>And there are lawsuits just like this that are effectively

0:21:19.600 --> 0:21:22.600
<v Speaker 4>like negotiations over how much money are going to be paid?

0:21:23.000 --> 0:21:24.600
<v Speaker 4>Is he going to pay more in the future. And

0:21:24.680 --> 0:21:27.640
<v Speaker 4>in the reports about this settlement, part of the reason

0:21:28.040 --> 0:21:30.159
<v Speaker 4>that they're the rational for dropping is that there are

0:21:30.200 --> 0:21:32.280
<v Speaker 4>future commercial arrange.

0:21:32.640 --> 0:21:35.439
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, there's some kind of settlement agreement. Yeah, there's like

0:21:35.480 --> 0:21:37.160
<v Speaker 6>an undisclosed settlement agreement.

0:21:37.400 --> 0:21:37.720
<v Speaker 5>Okay, so.

0:21:40.560 --> 0:21:43.439
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, yeah, they're saying that it's I forget the exact wording,

0:21:43.440 --> 0:21:46.800
<v Speaker 4>but it's essentially with an eye to future commercial stuff.

0:21:51.400 --> 0:21:54.080
<v Speaker 3>All right, Listen, we're gonna drop the lawsuits for now.

0:21:54.720 --> 0:21:58.040
<v Speaker 3>They will keep coming up up again and again and again, so.

0:21:58.119 --> 0:21:58.879
<v Speaker 5>Do not fret.

0:21:59.040 --> 0:22:01.359
<v Speaker 3>And I want to talk a little bit about further

0:22:01.480 --> 0:22:07.760
<v Speaker 3>signs of the shifting customer base for Elon's companies. You know, Sarah,

0:22:07.840 --> 0:22:10.719
<v Speaker 3>yesterday Bloomberg we had a good story some of our

0:22:10.760 --> 0:22:14.560
<v Speaker 3>colleagues did on how we're starting to see signs that

0:22:14.640 --> 0:22:19.360
<v Speaker 3>conservatives are driving Model Wise and other vehicles. I suppose

0:22:19.440 --> 0:22:22.520
<v Speaker 3>this is proof that at some level, at least anecdotal

0:22:22.560 --> 0:22:24.719
<v Speaker 3>proof that this shift has begun.

0:22:25.840 --> 0:22:27.560
<v Speaker 7>I mean, this is something we've been talking about for

0:22:27.960 --> 0:22:32.840
<v Speaker 7>a while, ever since Elon started to move rightward his products.

0:22:32.880 --> 0:22:37.720
<v Speaker 7>His companies are getting politically coodd too. And I guess

0:22:37.720 --> 0:22:41.000
<v Speaker 7>they always were because Tesla's were at one point considered

0:22:41.440 --> 0:22:45.080
<v Speaker 7>this environmental statement, right, like, you cared about climate change,

0:22:45.119 --> 0:22:47.959
<v Speaker 7>you got a Tesla because you wanted to drive an

0:22:47.960 --> 0:22:48.560
<v Speaker 7>electric car.

0:22:48.600 --> 0:22:49.600
<v Speaker 1>You didn't want to use.

0:22:49.520 --> 0:22:52.840
<v Speaker 7>Fossil fuels, and so liberals bought a lot of Tesla's,

0:22:53.240 --> 0:22:55.320
<v Speaker 7>and now those same people are saying, oh my god,

0:22:55.600 --> 0:22:59.879
<v Speaker 7>I bought the car that is backed by Elon Musk

0:23:00.040 --> 0:23:03.000
<v Speaker 7>and I feel I feel like connected to Trump when

0:23:03.040 --> 0:23:05.000
<v Speaker 7>I drive it around, even though I didn't vote for him.

0:23:05.520 --> 0:23:07.920
<v Speaker 7>So on the one hand, you've got a lot of

0:23:07.960 --> 0:23:10.479
<v Speaker 7>liberals trying to get rid of their Teslas, and then

0:23:10.520 --> 0:23:12.760
<v Speaker 7>you also got a lot of conservatives saying, hey, maybe

0:23:12.760 --> 0:23:14.280
<v Speaker 7>this is cool, right.

0:23:14.160 --> 0:23:16.960
<v Speaker 3>It's cool, and they're buying them. And to Sarah's point,

0:23:17.000 --> 0:23:21.680
<v Speaker 3>there Max, there has been a proliferation of these bumper

0:23:21.720 --> 0:23:26.000
<v Speaker 3>stickers that some of these liberals on the coast who

0:23:26.000 --> 0:23:28.600
<v Speaker 3>had bought their Teslas and are suddenly mortified by the

0:23:28.640 --> 0:23:31.360
<v Speaker 3>fact that they own Tesla's, but they're not yet quite

0:23:31.440 --> 0:23:33.800
<v Speaker 3>ready to get rid of their Tesla. So all these

0:23:33.840 --> 0:23:36.400
<v Speaker 3>bumper stickers are out now. Some are tame and subdued.

0:23:36.440 --> 0:23:38.880
<v Speaker 3>There's like as simple as love the car, not Elon,

0:23:38.960 --> 0:23:42.199
<v Speaker 3>and there's the anti Elon Tesla club. Some are a

0:23:42.200 --> 0:23:45.480
<v Speaker 3>little creative Elon ate my cat. And there are some

0:23:45.520 --> 0:23:50.920
<v Speaker 3>that are just like blunt and aggressive Elon sucks, shut up. Elon,

0:23:51.760 --> 0:23:54.919
<v Speaker 3>And then there are also some pro Elon stickers. If

0:23:54.920 --> 0:23:56.719
<v Speaker 3>one is so inclined to by those, you have Elon

0:23:56.840 --> 0:24:01.240
<v Speaker 3>Musk Free Speech Hero, Elon Musk making speech free again,

0:24:01.359 --> 0:24:04.080
<v Speaker 3>and in Musk we trust, by the way, max up

0:24:04.080 --> 0:24:06.560
<v Speaker 3>point one other thing out. There's not one that I

0:24:06.600 --> 0:24:10.440
<v Speaker 3>could find. Zero bumper stickers on Elon Inc. Neither four

0:24:10.600 --> 0:24:12.439
<v Speaker 3>or against that is.

0:24:12.560 --> 0:24:14.720
<v Speaker 4>I think that's a failing of marketing.

0:24:14.840 --> 0:24:16.000
<v Speaker 5>Don't we have.

0:24:16.440 --> 0:24:18.399
<v Speaker 3>Don't we have an Don't we have an email address

0:24:18.400 --> 0:24:19.800
<v Speaker 3>where people can send us ideas?

0:24:19.800 --> 0:24:21.320
<v Speaker 5>So we need Elon Inc.

0:24:21.520 --> 0:24:24.520
<v Speaker 4>At Bloomberg dot net. Tell us your ideas for bumper stickers.

0:24:24.760 --> 0:24:26.760
<v Speaker 3>Ready, you love the show or hate the show, just

0:24:26.960 --> 0:24:28.240
<v Speaker 3>send them in test us.

0:24:28.119 --> 0:24:31.320
<v Speaker 7>To just have those bumper stickers at the at the dealership.

0:24:31.480 --> 0:24:34.560
<v Speaker 4>Like my favorite stickers and the ones I've actually seen

0:24:34.840 --> 0:24:37.800
<v Speaker 4>the most of are ones that say, effectively, I bought

0:24:37.800 --> 0:24:40.679
<v Speaker 4>this before he went crazy classes, and I feel like

0:24:40.760 --> 0:24:44.720
<v Speaker 4>that is sort of telling about the not only the

0:24:45.080 --> 0:24:47.560
<v Speaker 4>sort of cultural signifiers around the brand, but also like

0:24:47.600 --> 0:24:50.200
<v Speaker 4>the used car market. I mean, one reason we're seeing

0:24:50.640 --> 0:24:53.680
<v Speaker 4>these bumper stickers is it's like not particularly easy to

0:24:53.840 --> 0:24:57.000
<v Speaker 4>unload your used Tesla because of these discounts.

0:24:57.320 --> 0:24:58.359
<v Speaker 5>They have these stickers on them.

0:24:58.480 --> 0:25:00.920
<v Speaker 4>No, because over the lie last year and a half

0:25:01.000 --> 0:25:04.040
<v Speaker 4>or so, as Tesla's sales have faltered to some extent,

0:25:04.320 --> 0:25:09.760
<v Speaker 4>Tesla like rapidly dropped its prices, so huge price cuts.

0:25:09.760 --> 0:25:13.480
<v Speaker 4>So people are looking at taking a huge haircut if

0:25:13.480 --> 0:25:16.639
<v Speaker 4>they sell their Model three like it. This really like

0:25:16.720 --> 0:25:19.600
<v Speaker 4>devastated the price for the used Tesla market. So oh

0:25:19.680 --> 0:25:22.120
<v Speaker 4>and oh, by the way, there aren't that many comparably

0:25:22.480 --> 0:25:25.640
<v Speaker 4>priced Evy alternatives. So you're in this situation where, gee,

0:25:25.680 --> 0:25:28.280
<v Speaker 4>you'd really like to sell your Tesla, but you but

0:25:28.359 --> 0:25:30.840
<v Speaker 4>there's no good alternative. You can't get a good return,

0:25:30.920 --> 0:25:35.280
<v Speaker 4>There's not there's not a comparably priced ev with with

0:25:35.440 --> 0:25:38.760
<v Speaker 4>comparable things. So if you're a liberal who's like a

0:25:38.800 --> 0:25:41.680
<v Speaker 4>little bit upset about the electric resolution is you can't

0:25:41.680 --> 0:25:44.359
<v Speaker 4>sell your Tesla. You just have you get a bumper sticker.

0:25:45.680 --> 0:25:47.480
<v Speaker 6>So you just have to buy a bumper sticker and

0:25:47.520 --> 0:25:51.080
<v Speaker 6>like virtue signal that like you like bought the car

0:25:51.200 --> 0:25:52.320
<v Speaker 6>before Elon.

0:25:52.160 --> 0:25:53.640
<v Speaker 1>Went crazy again.

0:25:53.800 --> 0:25:55.840
<v Speaker 6>It's just yeah, I think it's very funny. I mean,

0:25:55.840 --> 0:25:57.800
<v Speaker 6>here in the Bay Area, I see the bumper stickers

0:25:57.840 --> 0:26:00.560
<v Speaker 6>all the time. But musk shift to the right has

0:26:00.600 --> 0:26:04.720
<v Speaker 6>been underway for years. He moved to Texas in twenty twenty.

0:26:05.119 --> 0:26:08.160
<v Speaker 6>He has been crapping on California ever since. Like Tesla's

0:26:08.200 --> 0:26:11.879
<v Speaker 6>early adopters, like the consumers who basically like helped build

0:26:11.920 --> 0:26:16.480
<v Speaker 6>the brand, are largely like Hollywood people and tech people

0:26:16.480 --> 0:26:19.000
<v Speaker 6>in Silicon Valley. Some of them are environmentalists, a lot

0:26:19.000 --> 0:26:21.680
<v Speaker 6>of them are frankly just tech people who really like

0:26:21.800 --> 0:26:24.399
<v Speaker 6>the car. And then you have like libertarians who wanted

0:26:24.400 --> 0:26:26.760
<v Speaker 6>the US to be independent from oil. But but yeah, no,

0:26:26.800 --> 0:26:28.280
<v Speaker 6>I mean this has been underway for a while. You

0:26:28.320 --> 0:26:30.320
<v Speaker 6>can buy the stickers. You can buy the bumper stickers

0:26:30.320 --> 0:26:31.920
<v Speaker 6>on Amazon. Now it's like a thing.

0:26:32.280 --> 0:26:33.440
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, they're all over the place.

0:26:33.480 --> 0:26:35.800
<v Speaker 3>I mean, I think somebody should maybe they're out there,

0:26:35.880 --> 0:26:39.320
<v Speaker 3>somebody like specially to sell to the cyber truck buyers,

0:26:39.400 --> 0:26:42.840
<v Speaker 3>should have a sticker that says I bought this, you know,

0:26:42.880 --> 0:26:46.760
<v Speaker 3>cyber truck after I realized you know who elons.

0:26:46.960 --> 0:26:49.159
<v Speaker 6>I mean, I think how that impacts sales overall in

0:26:49.160 --> 0:26:51.240
<v Speaker 6>the US going forward is going to be super interesting.

0:26:51.280 --> 0:26:54.640
<v Speaker 6>I mean, Tesla is headed towards its first year over

0:26:54.720 --> 0:26:58.320
<v Speaker 6>year decline because of declining sales in the United States.

0:26:58.880 --> 0:27:01.280
<v Speaker 3>The data I thought that the delivery data out of

0:27:01.359 --> 0:27:06.040
<v Speaker 3>China that came out overnight for November wasn't great either, right, I.

0:27:05.920 --> 0:27:08.440
<v Speaker 6>Mean, it's okay, but like it's not going to offset

0:27:08.480 --> 0:27:10.720
<v Speaker 6>what is predicted to be a decline in the US

0:27:10.720 --> 0:27:13.680
<v Speaker 6>and in Europe. But it's really hard to tease out,

0:27:13.720 --> 0:27:16.560
<v Speaker 6>like is the decline because of Elon's politics or is

0:27:16.600 --> 0:27:19.480
<v Speaker 6>it because they frankly have like a very stale lineup

0:27:19.680 --> 0:27:21.760
<v Speaker 6>and like the cyber truck is still not in like

0:27:21.840 --> 0:27:25.080
<v Speaker 6>super high volume. And so I think what's what's weirder

0:27:25.160 --> 0:27:29.600
<v Speaker 6>is just that all of Elon's products are so polarizing.

0:27:29.640 --> 0:27:31.720
<v Speaker 6>Like we've talked about Tesla, but I mean, Sarah, look

0:27:31.720 --> 0:27:35.360
<v Speaker 6>at X, Like now if you're on X, it's like, oh,

0:27:35.400 --> 0:27:37.199
<v Speaker 6>does that mean you support Trump? Or does that mean

0:27:37.240 --> 0:27:39.359
<v Speaker 6>that you support the administration. We've seen this like huge

0:27:39.400 --> 0:27:43.919
<v Speaker 6>surge to Blue Sky after the election, and it's remarkable

0:27:43.960 --> 0:27:48.160
<v Speaker 6>that someone has so polarized the brands of his own company.

0:27:48.960 --> 0:27:50.679
<v Speaker 7>And what's funny is the X is very It's a

0:27:50.760 --> 0:27:54.679
<v Speaker 7>very similar situation to Tesla, where where people are polarized

0:27:54.680 --> 0:27:56.919
<v Speaker 7>about the product but they can't quite decide what to

0:27:57.000 --> 0:27:59.960
<v Speaker 7>do about it. You know, people are hesitant to leave

0:28:00.040 --> 0:28:03.200
<v Speaker 7>all their followers on X. You're seeing these these open

0:28:03.200 --> 0:28:06.919
<v Speaker 7>debates about like, well, you know, maybe I should stay

0:28:06.920 --> 0:28:10.719
<v Speaker 7>on X because somebody needs to talk to these these

0:28:10.880 --> 0:28:14.159
<v Speaker 7>people and help them understand where they're going wrong. And

0:28:14.480 --> 0:28:19.120
<v Speaker 7>somebody needs to witness the dissent into fascism of America. Right.

0:28:19.240 --> 0:28:22.320
<v Speaker 7>There's just a lot of justification and a lot of

0:28:23.160 --> 0:28:25.480
<v Speaker 7>thinking about you know, is it better to delete my

0:28:25.480 --> 0:28:27.359
<v Speaker 7>account and go to Blue Sky? Is it better to

0:28:27.840 --> 0:28:30.719
<v Speaker 7>stay on X and and fight? But that means I'm

0:28:30.720 --> 0:28:32.600
<v Speaker 7>giving elon my attention to my money.

0:28:32.800 --> 0:28:34.920
<v Speaker 3>Are there any conservatives by the way, I'm Blue Sky

0:28:35.440 --> 0:28:36.160
<v Speaker 3>or in any kind of.

0:28:36.119 --> 0:28:40.800
<v Speaker 7>Mutual anywhere that people can fight with people they disagree

0:28:40.840 --> 0:28:44.040
<v Speaker 7>with Online, You're gonna have all kinds of people, right.

0:28:44.360 --> 0:28:47.760
<v Speaker 7>That was always one of the one of the draws

0:28:47.840 --> 0:28:51.880
<v Speaker 7>of X. It's more fun than true social because there

0:28:51.880 --> 0:28:55.640
<v Speaker 7>are people who disagree and you can go in their

0:28:55.680 --> 0:28:59.280
<v Speaker 7>applies and explain why you think what you think.

0:28:59.520 --> 0:29:02.000
<v Speaker 3>Okay, just to bring it back to Tesla again for

0:29:02.040 --> 0:29:04.680
<v Speaker 3>a second and a theory, I have that for you

0:29:04.720 --> 0:29:07.400
<v Speaker 3>guys to opine on and blow up and Max with

0:29:07.520 --> 0:29:09.960
<v Speaker 3>some of his comments earlier. Max already has begun the

0:29:10.000 --> 0:29:12.320
<v Speaker 3>process of blowing up this theory. But the theory goes

0:29:12.320 --> 0:29:15.640
<v Speaker 3>like this, that what if Elon's turn to the right

0:29:15.960 --> 0:29:20.960
<v Speaker 3>actually winds up rapidly accelerating EV adoption in America, that.

0:29:20.960 --> 0:29:24.200
<v Speaker 5>The liberal elites or the liberal.

0:29:23.840 --> 0:29:26.600
<v Speaker 3>Buyers let's say, who are getting rid of their Tesla

0:29:26.640 --> 0:29:29.960
<v Speaker 3>as they own or are refusing to buy a new Tesla,

0:29:30.120 --> 0:29:32.360
<v Speaker 3>well they were just going to buy some other evy.

0:29:32.520 --> 0:29:34.760
<v Speaker 5>Those people are going to buy an ev regardless.

0:29:35.480 --> 0:29:39.040
<v Speaker 3>And by shifting to the right as Elon has, he

0:29:39.200 --> 0:29:42.360
<v Speaker 3>is bringing in a whole new buyer base in red

0:29:42.480 --> 0:29:46.400
<v Speaker 3>states who otherwise never would have looked at EV's at all.

0:29:47.040 --> 0:29:51.680
<v Speaker 4>Max's Smith, I think this is like fan fiction basically,

0:29:51.800 --> 0:29:56.120
<v Speaker 4>Like you know, we've we've talked about versions of this theory,

0:29:56.640 --> 0:29:59.400
<v Speaker 4>I think going back over a year, and you can

0:29:59.440 --> 0:30:02.080
<v Speaker 4>sort of see because like Elon Musk, he sold a

0:30:02.120 --> 0:30:04.320
<v Speaker 4>lot of cars to liberals, he's kind of tapped that

0:30:04.360 --> 0:30:07.160
<v Speaker 4>market out. Meanwhile, you have a bunch of red states

0:30:07.160 --> 0:30:09.680
<v Speaker 4>where there isn't a lot of EV adoptions. Therefore, this

0:30:09.760 --> 0:30:12.600
<v Speaker 4>all makes perfect sense now that would I guess like

0:30:12.640 --> 0:30:14.640
<v Speaker 4>you could kind of get behind that theory if not

0:30:14.720 --> 0:30:17.880
<v Speaker 4>for the fact that Elon Musk just became a campaign

0:30:18.000 --> 0:30:20.520
<v Speaker 4>surrogate for a candidate who ran in part on the

0:30:20.560 --> 0:30:23.360
<v Speaker 4>idea that EV's are bad, Like Trump went on the

0:30:23.400 --> 0:30:26.800
<v Speaker 4>stump over and over again and said that EV's were

0:30:26.840 --> 0:30:29.240
<v Speaker 4>no good and that we need to drill baby dress.

0:30:29.280 --> 0:30:32.080
<v Speaker 4>That's not only that, it's not just Trump, it's Elon

0:30:32.160 --> 0:30:35.160
<v Speaker 4>Musk himself who's saying this, who's saying we are pivoting

0:30:35.240 --> 0:30:37.360
<v Speaker 4>away from electric cars. If you think of us as

0:30:37.360 --> 0:30:39.480
<v Speaker 4>a car company, you got it twisted. We are an

0:30:39.520 --> 0:30:42.520
<v Speaker 4>AI company now, so it does make some sense. And

0:30:42.560 --> 0:30:45.560
<v Speaker 4>I just one other thing, Like, it's not like Tesla

0:30:45.680 --> 0:30:49.200
<v Speaker 4>never had conservatives driving them. I've read some of these

0:30:49.320 --> 0:30:52.360
<v Speaker 4>articles about conservative car buyers and who are like really

0:30:52.480 --> 0:30:55.960
<v Speaker 4>enthusiastic about Tesla, and I'm like, it's like they're like

0:30:56.000 --> 0:30:59.120
<v Speaker 4>a lot of professionals, wealthy people who happen to vote

0:30:59.160 --> 0:31:01.280
<v Speaker 4>for Trump and also Arab Tesla. And I have to

0:31:01.280 --> 0:31:04.040
<v Speaker 4>ask number one, yeah, would they really have a lot

0:31:04.040 --> 0:31:07.440
<v Speaker 4>of test And second, anyone who's followed this company for

0:31:07.480 --> 0:31:10.760
<v Speaker 4>a long time knows that there have always been kind

0:31:10.840 --> 0:31:14.000
<v Speaker 4>of off the grid type, you know, militia types who've

0:31:14.160 --> 0:31:17.080
<v Speaker 4>liked this right, They like the idea of of like

0:31:17.560 --> 0:31:21.640
<v Speaker 4>not relying on yeah, energy dependency, d like libert There's

0:31:21.640 --> 0:31:24.360
<v Speaker 4>always been a libertarian flair to this company. I think

0:31:24.400 --> 0:31:28.200
<v Speaker 4>what's happened and this is you know, unfortunate for the

0:31:28.240 --> 0:31:31.000
<v Speaker 4>company and for the mission, which is that Tesla went

0:31:31.040 --> 0:31:34.000
<v Speaker 4>from being like a cool brand to bringing kind of

0:31:34.040 --> 0:31:37.920
<v Speaker 4>a cringe brand, being a brand that is associated very

0:31:37.920 --> 0:31:41.600
<v Speaker 4>closely with one political candidate, when whereas before it kind

0:31:41.640 --> 0:31:46.400
<v Speaker 4>of transcended those bounds. And and yeah, that might lead

0:31:46.440 --> 0:31:48.640
<v Speaker 4>to kind of a bump now, but is it going

0:31:48.680 --> 0:31:49.920
<v Speaker 4>to be good in the long term. I don't know.

0:31:50.080 --> 0:31:53.680
<v Speaker 3>We need the data though, ultimately, Dana and the data

0:31:53.760 --> 0:31:56.720
<v Speaker 3>I guess just will come our way over time.

0:31:57.080 --> 0:31:57.280
<v Speaker 5>Well.

0:31:57.440 --> 0:31:59.600
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, and just to be clear, the data is just

0:31:59.720 --> 0:32:03.080
<v Speaker 6>sales data. Doesn't say why someone bought a Tesla. Doesn't

0:32:03.080 --> 0:32:05.600
<v Speaker 6>say I bought a Tesla because Elon Musk is like.

0:32:05.640 --> 0:32:07.840
<v Speaker 3>But it should give us we can get if we

0:32:07.880 --> 0:32:11.280
<v Speaker 3>work hard enough at it, we can get geographical breakdown.

0:32:10.760 --> 0:32:11.200
<v Speaker 5>Can we not.

0:32:11.760 --> 0:32:15.240
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, you can get geographical breakdown eventually. But I'm just

0:32:15.280 --> 0:32:18.560
<v Speaker 6>saying that, like, there's no like, all of these stories

0:32:18.600 --> 0:32:23.080
<v Speaker 6>are just anecdotal, and ultimately what matters to Wall Street

0:32:23.320 --> 0:32:24.720
<v Speaker 6>is how many frickin' cars.

0:32:24.760 --> 0:32:26.600
<v Speaker 1>Did they sell in twenty twenty four?

0:32:27.200 --> 0:32:29.000
<v Speaker 5>Not many, is the answer, actually?

0:32:29.320 --> 0:32:32.000
<v Speaker 6>And is it more or less than last year? And

0:32:32.080 --> 0:32:35.080
<v Speaker 6>if it's less, that's a problem. But at the same time,

0:32:35.160 --> 0:32:38.080
<v Speaker 6>to Max's point, like Elon doesn't care anymore, like Elon

0:32:38.200 --> 0:32:40.560
<v Speaker 6>is bored of making cars. He wants Tesla to be

0:32:40.560 --> 0:32:42.440
<v Speaker 6>an AI company and a robotics company.

0:32:42.600 --> 0:32:48.120
<v Speaker 7>Do you think that Elon's environmental mission is true to

0:32:48.240 --> 0:32:51.239
<v Speaker 7>him or true to the business, Like was that a

0:32:51.360 --> 0:32:54.520
<v Speaker 7>means of selling Tesla's early on or was that something

0:32:54.560 --> 0:32:57.120
<v Speaker 7>he actually cares about? And if so, is he going

0:32:57.200 --> 0:32:59.920
<v Speaker 7>to change Trump's mind on Drill, Baby Drill.

0:33:00.640 --> 0:33:02.880
<v Speaker 3>We are at a time we're going to wrap it there,

0:33:03.320 --> 0:33:05.760
<v Speaker 3>But I do want to remind our listeners again that

0:33:05.880 --> 0:33:09.560
<v Speaker 3>we need your Elon Inc. Bumper sticker ideas. They go

0:33:09.800 --> 0:33:13.720
<v Speaker 3>Max to, Yeah, it's Elon Inc. At Bloomberg dot net.

0:33:13.920 --> 0:33:17.480
<v Speaker 4>And you know we are looking for not just bumper

0:33:17.480 --> 0:33:22.000
<v Speaker 4>sticker ideas, although definitely keen on those, but also slogans,

0:33:22.360 --> 0:33:25.720
<v Speaker 4>product extensions, merge and really anything else about the show.

0:33:25.760 --> 0:33:28.720
<v Speaker 4>We've already had a few emails come in, and I think,

0:33:28.840 --> 0:33:30.200
<v Speaker 4>like next week maybe we'll.

0:33:30.000 --> 0:33:31.960
<v Speaker 5>Do it quick Singers Yeah, we'll We'll.

0:33:31.760 --> 0:33:33.480
<v Speaker 4>Go through some of them and respond to some of

0:33:33.480 --> 0:33:36.000
<v Speaker 4>your ideas and maybe some of your criticisms. We will

0:33:36.000 --> 0:33:39.000
<v Speaker 4>take any slogans I would even put If someone sends

0:33:39.040 --> 0:33:40.800
<v Speaker 4>a slogan, I might even put.

0:33:40.720 --> 0:33:44.080
<v Speaker 5>It on the back of my Honda. Odysty Absolutely, let's

0:33:44.120 --> 0:33:44.440
<v Speaker 5>do it.

0:33:44.520 --> 0:33:46.920
<v Speaker 4>I started listening to this podcast before they.

0:33:46.800 --> 0:33:52.560
<v Speaker 3>Went crazy, exactly, Max, Sarah Danna, thanks.

0:33:52.280 --> 0:33:54.520
<v Speaker 1>For joining, Thanks for having me. Always a pleasure, great

0:33:54.560 --> 0:33:55.000
<v Speaker 1>to be here.

0:34:02.320 --> 0:34:05.400
<v Speaker 3>This episode was produced by Stacy Wang. Anna Maserrakus is

0:34:05.400 --> 0:34:08.520
<v Speaker 3>our editor, and Rayhan Harmanci is our senior editor. The

0:34:08.640 --> 0:34:12.600
<v Speaker 3>idea for this very show also came from Rayhan. Blake

0:34:12.640 --> 0:34:16.839
<v Speaker 3>Maples handles engineering, and Emma Sanchez fact checks. Our supervising

0:34:16.880 --> 0:34:20.600
<v Speaker 3>producer is Magnus Henrikson. The elon Ink theme is written

0:34:20.640 --> 0:34:25.200
<v Speaker 3>and performed by Taka Yasuzawa and Alex Sugiura. Brendan Francis

0:34:25.280 --> 0:34:27.759
<v Speaker 3>Newnham is our executive producer, and Sage Bauman is the

0:34:27.760 --> 0:34:31.279
<v Speaker 3>head of Bloomberg Podcasts. A big thanks to our supporters

0:34:31.400 --> 0:34:35.279
<v Speaker 3>Joel Weber and Brad Stone. I'm David Papadopoulos. If you

0:34:35.360 --> 0:34:38.200
<v Speaker 3>have a minute, rate and review our show, it'll help

0:34:38.239 --> 0:34:40.640
<v Speaker 3>other listeners find us see you next week.