WEBVTT - Curing Social Distance Fatigue

0:00:07.560 --> 0:00:12.879
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Prognosis. I'm Laura Carlson. It's day seventy two

0:00:13.080 --> 0:00:17.360
<v Speaker 1>since coronavirus was declared a global pandemic our main story.

0:00:18.400 --> 0:00:21.720
<v Speaker 1>When lockdown measures went into effect in countries around the world,

0:00:22.239 --> 0:00:25.239
<v Speaker 1>many expected to be trapped at home for a few weeks,

0:00:26.280 --> 0:00:30.320
<v Speaker 1>but months into the pandemic, people are now looking for

0:00:30.360 --> 0:00:34.760
<v Speaker 1>a way to make social distancings sustainable while tentatively returning

0:00:34.800 --> 0:00:38.320
<v Speaker 1>to some of their old activities. State and local governments

0:00:38.360 --> 0:00:41.440
<v Speaker 1>are having a hard time helping people navigate those gray

0:00:41.520 --> 0:00:48.479
<v Speaker 1>areas because there are few clear answers. But first, here's

0:00:48.520 --> 0:00:59.800
<v Speaker 1>what happened today. Yet another study is showing the dangers

0:00:59.840 --> 0:01:03.800
<v Speaker 1>of antimillaria drugs touted by US President Donald Trump for

0:01:03.880 --> 0:01:08.880
<v Speaker 1>treating COVID nineteen. Hydroxy chloroquine and chloroquine were linked to

0:01:08.920 --> 0:01:12.800
<v Speaker 1>an increased risk of death and heart ailments. The drugs

0:01:12.840 --> 0:01:16.360
<v Speaker 1>don't benefit patients with the coronavirus, either alone or in

0:01:16.440 --> 0:01:20.000
<v Speaker 1>combination with other drugs, according to a study published today

0:01:20.240 --> 0:01:24.760
<v Speaker 1>by the Lancet Medical Journal. Trump's endorsement has led many

0:01:24.800 --> 0:01:28.800
<v Speaker 1>people to take the medications without scientific proof of their benefit.

0:01:29.640 --> 0:01:34.560
<v Speaker 1>An experimental vaccine developed by Chinese company Cancino Biologics is

0:01:34.600 --> 0:01:38.240
<v Speaker 1>showing promise. An early study shows that the vaccine was

0:01:38.360 --> 0:01:42.800
<v Speaker 1>safe and generated an immune response. That's according to another

0:01:42.840 --> 0:01:46.840
<v Speaker 1>report out today from The Lancet. The researchers from the

0:01:46.880 --> 0:01:52.000
<v Speaker 1>Beijing Institute of Biotechnology and other organizations said further study

0:01:52.080 --> 0:01:57.480
<v Speaker 1>is needed to show its effectiveness against the virus. And finally,

0:01:57.960 --> 0:02:02.200
<v Speaker 1>coronavirus is having another direct health effect, this one on

0:02:02.440 --> 0:02:06.600
<v Speaker 1>very small children. The pandemic has kept parents from taking

0:02:06.600 --> 0:02:10.959
<v Speaker 1>their children to routine doctor visits. That means, according to

0:02:11.000 --> 0:02:14.720
<v Speaker 1>the world's top health agencies, that more than eighty million

0:02:14.880 --> 0:02:17.680
<v Speaker 1>children under the age of one are at risk of

0:02:17.760 --> 0:02:24.280
<v Speaker 1>life threatening diseases like polio and measles. That's because routine

0:02:24.360 --> 0:02:28.280
<v Speaker 1>vaccinations of children have been substantially hindered in at least

0:02:28.560 --> 0:02:31.840
<v Speaker 1>sixty eight countries, according to data from the World Health

0:02:31.919 --> 0:02:38.239
<v Speaker 1>Organization UNICEF and other organizations. The agencies called on countries

0:02:38.320 --> 0:02:43.440
<v Speaker 1>to resume campaigns against vaccine preventable diseases and made recommendations

0:02:43.560 --> 0:02:54.800
<v Speaker 1>on how to safely deliver shots. Amid the pandemic and

0:02:54.919 --> 0:03:02.040
<v Speaker 1>now our main story, there's a growing public health argument

0:03:02.120 --> 0:03:05.160
<v Speaker 1>about how people should calculate risk when it comes to

0:03:05.200 --> 0:03:08.960
<v Speaker 1>social distancing. Many U S States are now lifting stay

0:03:08.960 --> 0:03:12.280
<v Speaker 1>at home restrictions. Summer is around the corner, and people

0:03:12.360 --> 0:03:14.800
<v Speaker 1>in the third month of what many hoped would be

0:03:14.840 --> 0:03:18.880
<v Speaker 1>a week's long disruption are desperate to visit friends and

0:03:18.919 --> 0:03:22.959
<v Speaker 1>get outside. That means we will be socializing a lot

0:03:23.040 --> 0:03:27.040
<v Speaker 1>more in many cases without clear guidelines as to what's

0:03:27.280 --> 0:03:31.600
<v Speaker 1>really risky. As we learn more about how the virus

0:03:31.639 --> 0:03:36.880
<v Speaker 1>spreads and what constitutes risky behavior, messaging from experts will

0:03:36.960 --> 0:03:40.400
<v Speaker 1>have to become a little more nuanced than just stay home,

0:03:40.720 --> 0:03:45.839
<v Speaker 1>stay safe, reports Kristin V. Brown. Here's Kristen with more

0:03:45.880 --> 0:03:48.600
<v Speaker 1>on how we can make social distancing work for the

0:03:48.720 --> 0:03:56.280
<v Speaker 1>long haul. A few weeks ago, I did something that

0:03:56.320 --> 0:04:01.960
<v Speaker 1>broke social distancing rules. I live in Oakland, California, and

0:04:02.000 --> 0:04:05.280
<v Speaker 1>on March seventeen, my county enacted a strict shelter and

0:04:05.320 --> 0:04:09.280
<v Speaker 1>place order That means no hanging out with friends or

0:04:09.320 --> 0:04:11.840
<v Speaker 1>family you don't live with, or spending time outside of

0:04:11.840 --> 0:04:16.480
<v Speaker 1>the house unless it's necessary at all. Like many people,

0:04:16.839 --> 0:04:19.640
<v Speaker 1>I coped by moving my social life to the screen.

0:04:20.680 --> 0:04:23.520
<v Speaker 1>I had lots of Zoom happy hours and Zoom game nights.

0:04:24.000 --> 0:04:26.120
<v Speaker 1>My best friend I would go for runs while chatting

0:04:26.120 --> 0:04:29.480
<v Speaker 1>on the phone. But a few weeks ago I hit

0:04:29.520 --> 0:04:32.279
<v Speaker 1>a wall. I just wanted to have a drink with

0:04:32.320 --> 0:04:36.000
<v Speaker 1>a friend in real life, so I suggested that my

0:04:36.040 --> 0:04:38.120
<v Speaker 1>best friend and I meet for a drink in her backyard.

0:04:39.080 --> 0:04:42.599
<v Speaker 1>We were careful, We stayed six ft apart, weight chips

0:04:42.600 --> 0:04:46.839
<v Speaker 1>from separate bowls. It seemed really low risk, but still

0:04:47.360 --> 0:04:52.600
<v Speaker 1>I felt guilty. Julia Marcus is an epidemiologist at Harvard University.

0:04:53.000 --> 0:04:57.640
<v Speaker 1>She calls what I've been experiencing quarantine fatigue, and she

0:04:57.720 --> 0:05:01.560
<v Speaker 1>says I am far from the only one feeling it today.

0:05:01.680 --> 0:05:05.000
<v Speaker 1>The public health health messaging right now has been um

0:05:05.080 --> 0:05:07.640
<v Speaker 1>stay at home, and of course that is the safest

0:05:07.640 --> 0:05:10.560
<v Speaker 1>option right now, staying at home, either on your own

0:05:10.720 --> 0:05:13.680
<v Speaker 1>or with your family, But it's not sustainable for the

0:05:13.720 --> 0:05:17.080
<v Speaker 1>long term. Julia is among a growing number of people

0:05:17.120 --> 0:05:19.680
<v Speaker 1>in the public health world to think the messaging around

0:05:19.760 --> 0:05:24.240
<v Speaker 1>COVID nineteen needs to change. At the beginning of the pandemic,

0:05:24.600 --> 0:05:26.839
<v Speaker 1>the idea was that we would all hunker down for

0:05:26.880 --> 0:05:29.880
<v Speaker 1>a few weeks or even a few months until the

0:05:29.960 --> 0:05:34.200
<v Speaker 1>virus was more under control. But now we're at an

0:05:34.200 --> 0:05:38.000
<v Speaker 1>inflection point at states reopen. On the one hand, we

0:05:38.040 --> 0:05:40.240
<v Speaker 1>still don't have a vaccine, and the threat of a

0:05:40.240 --> 0:05:43.680
<v Speaker 1>new outbreak of disease is very real. But on the

0:05:43.720 --> 0:05:47.719
<v Speaker 1>other hand, forcing people to continue to exclusively stay inside

0:05:48.240 --> 0:05:53.480
<v Speaker 1>it's unsustainable and taking a real psychological toll. Julius has

0:05:53.520 --> 0:05:55.240
<v Speaker 1>all of this means we need to make a plan

0:05:55.480 --> 0:05:59.039
<v Speaker 1>for the long haul, and now that that's become clear

0:05:59.560 --> 0:06:01.800
<v Speaker 1>that this is a long term proposition, we have to

0:06:01.920 --> 0:06:04.240
<v Speaker 1>rethink how we're going to do this so that we

0:06:04.240 --> 0:06:06.560
<v Speaker 1>can do it in a sustainable way and people can

0:06:06.600 --> 0:06:08.680
<v Speaker 1>live their lives such that they have things to look

0:06:08.720 --> 0:06:11.440
<v Speaker 1>forward to and they have joy, and they're not oppressed

0:06:11.480 --> 0:06:13.520
<v Speaker 1>and isolated. And it's not going to look the way

0:06:13.520 --> 0:06:16.040
<v Speaker 1>it did before. But you know, we have to adjust

0:06:16.040 --> 0:06:20.360
<v Speaker 1>to a new normal that balances people's need for human

0:06:20.480 --> 0:06:24.120
<v Speaker 1>contact with keeping the risk of transmission as low as possible.

0:06:24.760 --> 0:06:28.280
<v Speaker 1>Julia studies HIV and points to the AIDS epidemic as

0:06:28.279 --> 0:06:32.200
<v Speaker 1>an example of why our COVID nineteen playbook needs to change.

0:06:32.720 --> 0:06:36.920
<v Speaker 1>Asking people to not have sex doesn't work, but advising

0:06:36.960 --> 0:06:39.760
<v Speaker 1>people in ways they can have sex while reducing the

0:06:39.839 --> 0:06:43.800
<v Speaker 1>chances that they'll contract the virus does. She says, New

0:06:43.880 --> 0:06:47.640
<v Speaker 1>York City today is setting a good example, It just

0:06:47.680 --> 0:06:51.400
<v Speaker 1>put out guidelines on sexual health during COVID nineteen. The

0:06:51.440 --> 0:06:54.680
<v Speaker 1>best way to avoid risk, the guidelines say is to

0:06:54.760 --> 0:06:58.320
<v Speaker 1>not have sex, but it does recognize not everyone is

0:06:58.320 --> 0:07:01.040
<v Speaker 1>going to follow that advice and suggest some ways to

0:07:01.160 --> 0:07:05.000
<v Speaker 1>decrease the risk of other scenarios. To health is not

0:07:05.160 --> 0:07:09.200
<v Speaker 1>just prevention of disease transmission, and there are other aspects

0:07:09.360 --> 0:07:12.120
<v Speaker 1>to health that we're going to need to consider. We

0:07:12.160 --> 0:07:14.240
<v Speaker 1>don't want to see an increase in suicide, you know

0:07:14.280 --> 0:07:17.000
<v Speaker 1>what I mean, It's there. There's a lot to balance

0:07:17.080 --> 0:07:20.240
<v Speaker 1>here that I think needs the more holistic approach to

0:07:20.320 --> 0:07:22.840
<v Speaker 1>health if we're going to do this. The other thing

0:07:23.120 --> 0:07:25.680
<v Speaker 1>is that we know more about COVID nineteen than we

0:07:25.720 --> 0:07:28.520
<v Speaker 1>did two months ago. We have a better idea of

0:07:28.560 --> 0:07:32.120
<v Speaker 1>how it spreads and of who is most susceptible to

0:07:32.200 --> 0:07:36.160
<v Speaker 1>getting really sick from it. Marty Marqueri is a public

0:07:36.160 --> 0:07:39.960
<v Speaker 1>health expert at Johns Hopkins. He says he first supported

0:07:39.960 --> 0:07:44.360
<v Speaker 1>sheltering in place in order to reduce the burden on hospitals,

0:07:44.400 --> 0:07:49.680
<v Speaker 1>but things have changed now that we have flatten the

0:07:49.680 --> 0:07:54.080
<v Speaker 1>curve nationally, now that we have data coming in showing

0:07:54.640 --> 0:07:57.680
<v Speaker 1>that it is it has fallen short of some of

0:07:57.680 --> 0:08:03.400
<v Speaker 1>the more dire projections. We need to evolve our strategy,

0:08:04.080 --> 0:08:07.480
<v Speaker 1>and at the same time, the country simply cannot tolerate

0:08:08.120 --> 0:08:12.840
<v Speaker 1>anymore of a harsh shutdown. Marty says that we need

0:08:12.880 --> 0:08:16.360
<v Speaker 1>to customize public health recommendations to better fit what we

0:08:16.480 --> 0:08:20.360
<v Speaker 1>now know about the virus. For example, we now know

0:08:20.680 --> 0:08:23.720
<v Speaker 1>that the virus is much less likely to spread outdoors.

0:08:24.400 --> 0:08:27.040
<v Speaker 1>Most cases seem to come from people who have close

0:08:27.080 --> 0:08:31.160
<v Speaker 1>contact with each other, so have that socially distanced drink

0:08:31.200 --> 0:08:38.599
<v Speaker 1>in the backyard. Some of this thinking has actually already

0:08:38.720 --> 0:08:43.640
<v Speaker 1>made its way into policy. For example, in California, businesses

0:08:43.679 --> 0:08:47.319
<v Speaker 1>can now open up for curbside pickup that will reduce

0:08:47.400 --> 0:08:51.200
<v Speaker 1>contact opportunities, but will also allow life to inch back

0:08:51.280 --> 0:08:55.200
<v Speaker 1>towards normal. Marty says that businesses might even be able

0:08:55.240 --> 0:08:58.920
<v Speaker 1>to just shift to sidewalk shopping. He says, we need

0:08:58.920 --> 0:09:04.439
<v Speaker 1>to completely rethink many aspects of society. We can actually

0:09:04.520 --> 0:09:09.080
<v Speaker 1>fight this thing with a pretty good toolbox of many

0:09:09.120 --> 0:09:14.680
<v Speaker 1>different interventions and have a lot of success. Now does

0:09:14.720 --> 0:09:19.320
<v Speaker 1>that mean that people can resume summer camps and kids

0:09:19.360 --> 0:09:23.840
<v Speaker 1>can play soccer together? It depends on the local viral

0:09:23.920 --> 0:09:28.160
<v Speaker 1>burden in that community. So there's no one size fits

0:09:28.160 --> 0:09:32.040
<v Speaker 1>all strategy, and the strategy needs to evolve. But not

0:09:32.240 --> 0:09:35.360
<v Speaker 1>every region has taken into account what we've learned about

0:09:35.400 --> 0:09:40.280
<v Speaker 1>the virus in deciding how to roll back restrictions. In Alabama,

0:09:40.440 --> 0:09:43.679
<v Speaker 1>for example, restaurants and bars have been allowed to reopen

0:09:43.720 --> 0:09:46.920
<v Speaker 1>with limited seating, even though the state has yet to

0:09:46.920 --> 0:09:51.320
<v Speaker 1>meet White House reopening criteria. The percentage of positive tests

0:09:51.320 --> 0:09:55.120
<v Speaker 1>in the state has increased, causing concern that a second

0:09:55.120 --> 0:09:58.600
<v Speaker 1>wave of the virus may be on the way. Marty

0:09:58.640 --> 0:10:01.560
<v Speaker 1>says public health officials could create a virus threat level

0:10:01.600 --> 0:10:05.200
<v Speaker 1>for every community. This would change as a virus does

0:10:05.480 --> 0:10:08.880
<v Speaker 1>and help people better make their own risk assessments. In

0:10:08.880 --> 0:10:12.040
<v Speaker 1>the United States now with the pandemic, we have numbers

0:10:12.080 --> 0:10:17.160
<v Speaker 1>of cases, hospitalizations, new intubations, and we can create a

0:10:17.280 --> 0:10:23.280
<v Speaker 1>risk level for every locale, which will actually stratify the

0:10:23.400 --> 0:10:30.040
<v Speaker 1>degree of elective activities, be it um, social gathering, sporting events,

0:10:30.160 --> 0:10:34.280
<v Speaker 1>or essential services. And so we can do this. We

0:10:34.360 --> 0:10:38.560
<v Speaker 1>can figure out, hey, in this particular community, the disease

0:10:38.840 --> 0:10:42.880
<v Speaker 1>burden is so low that it's reasonable for young, healthy

0:10:42.920 --> 0:10:47.439
<v Speaker 1>people to essentially do whatever they want in that community.

0:10:47.920 --> 0:10:50.360
<v Speaker 1>In other areas, we can say, look there's still a risk.

0:10:50.679 --> 0:10:52.840
<v Speaker 1>It's not a severe risk, but it's a moderate risk.

0:10:53.360 --> 0:10:58.239
<v Speaker 1>We're going to ask people to limit themselves to activities

0:10:58.280 --> 0:11:03.200
<v Speaker 1>where they can conduct them selves with distancing hygiene masks

0:11:03.520 --> 0:11:07.040
<v Speaker 1>and redesigned business processes. That's very feasible and that's what

0:11:07.080 --> 0:11:10.679
<v Speaker 1>we should be doing. The big message here is that

0:11:10.720 --> 0:11:14.160
<v Speaker 1>now that the virus spread has slowed, public health policy

0:11:14.240 --> 0:11:18.360
<v Speaker 1>requires more of a balancing act. We need to consider

0:11:18.559 --> 0:11:21.839
<v Speaker 1>not just risk of exposure to the virus, but mental health,

0:11:22.000 --> 0:11:28.080
<v Speaker 1>economic well being, access to other kinds of healthcare, and happiness.

0:11:28.120 --> 0:11:49.480
<v Speaker 1>That said, don't count on shaking hands anytime soon. That

0:11:49.840 --> 0:11:53.120
<v Speaker 1>was Kristin V. Brown and that's our show today. For

0:11:53.240 --> 0:11:56.360
<v Speaker 1>coverage of the outbreak from one bureaus around the world,

0:11:56.640 --> 0:12:01.240
<v Speaker 1>visit Bloomberg dot com slash coronavirus and if you like

0:12:01.320 --> 0:12:04.360
<v Speaker 1>the show, please leave us a review and a rating

0:12:04.559 --> 0:12:08.280
<v Speaker 1>on Apple Podcasts or Spotify. It's the best way to

0:12:08.320 --> 0:12:13.040
<v Speaker 1>help more listeners find our global reporting. The Prognosis Daily

0:12:13.200 --> 0:12:17.760
<v Speaker 1>edition is produced by Topher Foreheads Jordan Gospore, Magnus Hendrickson

0:12:17.920 --> 0:12:22.200
<v Speaker 1>and me Laura Carlson. Today's main story was reported by

0:12:22.280 --> 0:12:27.800
<v Speaker 1>Kristin V. Brown. Original music by Leo Sidran. Our editors

0:12:27.800 --> 0:12:32.760
<v Speaker 1>are Francesca Levi and Rick Shine. Francesca Levie is Bloomberg's

0:12:32.800 --> 0:12:35.360
<v Speaker 1>head of podcasts. Thanks for listening.