WEBVTT - #498 Packers Unscripted: Wrap it up

0:00:00.880 --> 0:00:14.800
<v Speaker 1>Hi, everyone, Welcome to Packers Unscripted from Packers dot Com.

0:00:14.840 --> 0:00:17.480
<v Speaker 1>I am Mike Spofford, sitting next to the one and

0:00:17.560 --> 0:00:19.960
<v Speaker 1>only west Hodcowitz. Were coming to you here from our

0:00:20.000 --> 0:00:23.239
<v Speaker 1>studios at lambeau Field West, our final show of the week.

0:00:23.239 --> 0:00:25.960
<v Speaker 1>We're just a couple of days away from Packers Lions

0:00:26.040 --> 0:00:29.639
<v Speaker 1>Week seventeen at ford Field, and we all know what's

0:00:29.640 --> 0:00:31.800
<v Speaker 1>on the line for green Bay win and get a

0:00:31.840 --> 0:00:35.600
<v Speaker 1>first drawn by fly back from Detroit, settle in to

0:00:35.680 --> 0:00:38.360
<v Speaker 1>watch Seattle and San Francisco, see what happens in that

0:00:38.479 --> 0:00:42.920
<v Speaker 1>NFC West game and how that might impact the Packers seating. Um,

0:00:42.960 --> 0:00:45.600
<v Speaker 1>the number one seed would be at stake for green

0:00:45.640 --> 0:00:47.920
<v Speaker 1>Bay if they're coming back from Detroit with a win.

0:00:48.080 --> 0:00:51.680
<v Speaker 1>So with that in mind, what's it going to take

0:00:51.760 --> 0:00:54.640
<v Speaker 1>here for the Packers to get to thirteen and three?

0:00:54.680 --> 0:00:56.560
<v Speaker 1>I like the way you laid that out to begin

0:00:56.600 --> 0:00:58.760
<v Speaker 1>with two. It's like, oh, thank you, yes, I'll have that.

0:00:59.760 --> 0:01:03.160
<v Speaker 1>That's sounds about. That's the menu for someday. That sounds

0:01:03.200 --> 0:01:04.880
<v Speaker 1>about as pricks are perfect as how it could work

0:01:04.920 --> 0:01:06.399
<v Speaker 1>out for the Packers, but you have to earn it,

0:01:06.440 --> 0:01:08.240
<v Speaker 1>you have to work for it. In order to do that.

0:01:08.800 --> 0:01:11.120
<v Speaker 1>The two things that I really isolated as important in

0:01:11.120 --> 0:01:14.080
<v Speaker 1>this game. I go along with what Brian Balaga and

0:01:14.120 --> 0:01:17.560
<v Speaker 1>Matt Lafloord a lot of people said statistically, I don't

0:01:17.640 --> 0:01:20.480
<v Speaker 1>think the Lions defense is as bad as the numbers

0:01:20.560 --> 0:01:22.800
<v Speaker 1>might suggest. I still think they are dangerous, and I

0:01:22.800 --> 0:01:24.480
<v Speaker 1>still think it's something the Packers are gonna have to

0:01:24.520 --> 0:01:28.160
<v Speaker 1>take an account they can't take for granted. Offensively, though,

0:01:28.200 --> 0:01:29.920
<v Speaker 1>you can't get away from the fact that it is

0:01:29.959 --> 0:01:35.120
<v Speaker 1>an undrafted rookie quarterback that you're facing with an unestablished

0:01:35.200 --> 0:01:37.640
<v Speaker 1>run game. Now, Kenny Golladay is as good as they

0:01:37.640 --> 0:01:42.200
<v Speaker 1>get as receivers go in this league right now. But defensively,

0:01:42.360 --> 0:01:44.279
<v Speaker 1>I think you need to be able to really push

0:01:44.360 --> 0:01:47.400
<v Speaker 1>this thing, and I think it's up to Zadarius Smith,

0:01:47.400 --> 0:01:50.720
<v Speaker 1>press that Smith, Kenny Clark, to pressure David Blow, to

0:01:50.800 --> 0:01:53.520
<v Speaker 1>get after him, to make this day as uncomfortable as possible,

0:01:54.040 --> 0:01:57.560
<v Speaker 1>all while being able to maintain that solid run defense

0:01:57.560 --> 0:01:59.720
<v Speaker 1>that they've played over the last month. Yeah, and I

0:01:59.760 --> 0:02:03.360
<v Speaker 1>would say if there's one guy for the Lions offensively

0:02:03.600 --> 0:02:06.600
<v Speaker 1>that makes me a little bit nervous, it's Kenny Golladay.

0:02:06.600 --> 0:02:08.840
<v Speaker 1>We've seen him make big plays against the Packers. I

0:02:08.919 --> 0:02:11.800
<v Speaker 1>think this is a really up and coming young receiver

0:02:11.880 --> 0:02:14.720
<v Speaker 1>who has not reached the peak of his powers yet.

0:02:15.240 --> 0:02:18.680
<v Speaker 1>And also we saw yes Kyler Fackra was held. He

0:02:18.800 --> 0:02:20.919
<v Speaker 1>probably could have gotten a sack of Kirk Cousins, but

0:02:20.960 --> 0:02:23.640
<v Speaker 1>that was a pretty bad breakdown in the secondary that

0:02:23.720 --> 0:02:26.760
<v Speaker 1>allowed that long touchdown pass that was called back late

0:02:26.800 --> 0:02:28.799
<v Speaker 1>in the Vikings game. You can't have those kinds of

0:02:28.840 --> 0:02:31.800
<v Speaker 1>breakdowns against Kenny Golladay where he could end up having

0:02:31.800 --> 0:02:34.480
<v Speaker 1>a huge day. The other thing I see with this game,

0:02:34.560 --> 0:02:37.720
<v Speaker 1>quite simply for the Packers is don't turn the ball over.

0:02:37.840 --> 0:02:40.360
<v Speaker 1>You know, you know how I always am West when

0:02:40.400 --> 0:02:42.360
<v Speaker 1>we sit here and we talk about a game where

0:02:42.960 --> 0:02:45.120
<v Speaker 1>we really feel like the Packers are the better team

0:02:45.440 --> 0:02:48.400
<v Speaker 1>and that the Packers should win the game. So to me,

0:02:48.560 --> 0:02:51.560
<v Speaker 1>in those circumstances, I always say, hey, just don't turn

0:02:51.639 --> 0:02:55.560
<v Speaker 1>the ball over. Don't make those kinds of momentum changing

0:02:55.639 --> 0:02:58.560
<v Speaker 1>plays that can give a big underdog that spark and

0:02:58.600 --> 0:03:01.120
<v Speaker 1>that belief that they can not you off and that

0:03:01.200 --> 0:03:05.679
<v Speaker 1>they can make their season with a big upset victory.

0:03:05.720 --> 0:03:07.640
<v Speaker 1>And the Packers are coming off of a game in

0:03:07.760 --> 0:03:11.399
<v Speaker 1>Minneapolis three turnovers in the first half, very well could

0:03:11.440 --> 0:03:14.480
<v Speaker 1>have spelled disaster for Green Bay in their attempt to

0:03:14.520 --> 0:03:18.480
<v Speaker 1>clinch the NFC North. It didn't. They came back. But

0:03:18.560 --> 0:03:20.760
<v Speaker 1>three turnovers in the first half is not a recipe

0:03:20.800 --> 0:03:22.720
<v Speaker 1>for success. You gotta nip that in the butt and

0:03:22.760 --> 0:03:25.600
<v Speaker 1>not let that become a trend here as you're trying

0:03:25.600 --> 0:03:27.280
<v Speaker 1>to play your best football. Yeah, you gotta be able

0:03:27.280 --> 0:03:28.760
<v Speaker 1>to protect the football, and it's the reason why the

0:03:28.800 --> 0:03:31.040
<v Speaker 1>Packers are twelve and three. Simply put, They've been able

0:03:31.080 --> 0:03:32.680
<v Speaker 1>to take the ball away. They've played well in the

0:03:32.720 --> 0:03:34.560
<v Speaker 1>red zone on both sides of the ball, and they

0:03:34.639 --> 0:03:37.840
<v Speaker 1>protected the football offensively. Here's the interesting thing. You know,

0:03:38.240 --> 0:03:40.840
<v Speaker 1>Monday night in Minneapolis was only the second time this

0:03:40.920 --> 0:03:43.000
<v Speaker 1>year the Packers have had three turnovers in a game.

0:03:43.080 --> 0:03:47.800
<v Speaker 1>You know what. The other one was Philadelphia Detroit Detroit

0:03:47.920 --> 0:03:51.320
<v Speaker 1>really that Monday night game. Yeah, Aaron Rodgers through an interception,

0:03:51.600 --> 0:03:55.240
<v Speaker 1>Aaron Jones had a fumble, and Darius Shepherd fumbled the punt.

0:03:55.360 --> 0:03:57.280
<v Speaker 1>So maybe it doesn't matter if the Packers turn the

0:03:57.280 --> 0:04:01.520
<v Speaker 1>ball over. No, As as I say, not exactly a

0:04:01.560 --> 0:04:04.600
<v Speaker 1>recipe for success, But my point being that this Detroit

0:04:04.680 --> 0:04:08.120
<v Speaker 1>Lions defense did take the ball away from the Packers

0:04:08.120 --> 0:04:09.800
<v Speaker 1>a few times, and they were on the verge of

0:04:09.840 --> 0:04:12.880
<v Speaker 1>beating Green Bay at Lambeufield. Yes, Matthew Stafford is no

0:04:12.960 --> 0:04:15.760
<v Speaker 1>longer the quarterback, but still those are the kinds of

0:04:15.800 --> 0:04:18.840
<v Speaker 1>things that get your attention in a game where you're

0:04:18.880 --> 0:04:21.159
<v Speaker 1>where the Packers are going in obviously is a heavy

0:04:21.160 --> 0:04:23.279
<v Speaker 1>favorite and expected to win. I just think it's a

0:04:23.320 --> 0:04:25.560
<v Speaker 1>it's a week that you can't take for granted. You

0:04:25.640 --> 0:04:28.440
<v Speaker 1>just have to really be on top of everything and

0:04:28.440 --> 0:04:30.320
<v Speaker 1>and take care of business the way you're meant to

0:04:30.360 --> 0:04:33.400
<v Speaker 1>take care of business. I mean, this team to get

0:04:33.440 --> 0:04:35.880
<v Speaker 1>to this point. It was really interesting listen to Aaron

0:04:35.960 --> 0:04:38.440
<v Speaker 1>Rodgers discussed this at his locker on Thursday. I mean,

0:04:39.040 --> 0:04:41.360
<v Speaker 1>you know the way he even said that game against

0:04:41.360 --> 0:04:43.520
<v Speaker 1>Minnesota he can he count said among one of his

0:04:43.560 --> 0:04:46.839
<v Speaker 1>better games he's played this year. Not maybe statistically, not

0:04:46.920 --> 0:04:49.120
<v Speaker 1>because the numbers people can say, well, are you setting

0:04:49.120 --> 0:04:51.160
<v Speaker 1>the bar that low for yourself? No, he's not saying that.

0:04:51.600 --> 0:04:54.440
<v Speaker 1>It's that they were able to effectively manage the game

0:04:54.560 --> 0:04:56.640
<v Speaker 1>in a game in which you needed to do that. Now,

0:04:57.120 --> 0:05:00.400
<v Speaker 1>this is completely different from where the pack because we're

0:05:00.400 --> 0:05:02.400
<v Speaker 1>at in the past, like when you look at it

0:05:02.560 --> 0:05:05.120
<v Speaker 1>with going into Ford Field, and what it was gonna

0:05:05.240 --> 0:05:07.120
<v Speaker 1>take to be able to beat a team like that

0:05:07.640 --> 0:05:11.599
<v Speaker 1>in two thousand, what sixteen, the last two seasons when

0:05:11.760 --> 0:05:13.760
<v Speaker 1>you know they were on the wrong end of it.

0:05:14.240 --> 0:05:17.640
<v Speaker 1>I just think that there's so much fluidity with this

0:05:17.760 --> 0:05:20.159
<v Speaker 1>roster that if you do take care of the football

0:05:20.160 --> 0:05:23.840
<v Speaker 1>and you manage the appropriate situations offensively and defensively, you're

0:05:23.839 --> 0:05:25.960
<v Speaker 1>going to be able to be successful. It's just the

0:05:26.040 --> 0:05:28.600
<v Speaker 1>numbers bear it out. All year long. People wanted to

0:05:28.640 --> 0:05:31.960
<v Speaker 1>talk about identities, they wanted to talk about what separates

0:05:31.960 --> 0:05:34.560
<v Speaker 1>this team. I think that's what does it. It's that

0:05:34.640 --> 0:05:37.520
<v Speaker 1>they're just incredibly smart in those situations and when the

0:05:37.520 --> 0:05:40.479
<v Speaker 1>fourth quarter comes around, more often than not, the field

0:05:40.520 --> 0:05:43.120
<v Speaker 1>is tilted in their favor. Yeah. The other thing too,

0:05:43.160 --> 0:05:45.640
<v Speaker 1>I think from what I've heard in the locker room,

0:05:45.640 --> 0:05:47.640
<v Speaker 1>we haven't had a lot of locker room maxus this

0:05:47.680 --> 0:05:50.320
<v Speaker 1>week with the holiday in the short week and everything,

0:05:51.080 --> 0:05:55.360
<v Speaker 1>but I sense the players. The players are definitely dialed

0:05:55.400 --> 0:05:59.560
<v Speaker 1>into the fact that you cannot take anything for granted here.

0:05:59.640 --> 0:06:01.840
<v Speaker 1>They oh, what's at stake, they know what's on the line.

0:06:01.839 --> 0:06:06.080
<v Speaker 1>Preston Smith even mentioned yesterday when some reporters were at

0:06:06.080 --> 0:06:10.000
<v Speaker 1>his locker, Hey nobody thought the Arizona Cardinals with four wins,

0:06:10.200 --> 0:06:13.320
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna go to Century Linkfield in Seattle and knock

0:06:13.360 --> 0:06:17.080
<v Speaker 1>off the Seattle Seahawks, a loss that quite frankly, has

0:06:17.160 --> 0:06:20.200
<v Speaker 1>really damaged Seattle's chances to get the number one seed.

0:06:20.200 --> 0:06:22.520
<v Speaker 1>They they could still get it if you know, the

0:06:22.520 --> 0:06:24.960
<v Speaker 1>Packers losing the Saints Louis and all this other stuff

0:06:24.960 --> 0:06:28.520
<v Speaker 1>falls their way. But if the Seahawks hadn't lost that

0:06:28.600 --> 0:06:30.679
<v Speaker 1>game of the Cardinals, they'd be going into that Sunday

0:06:30.760 --> 0:06:32.760
<v Speaker 1>night game saying, hey, if we beat the forty Niners,

0:06:32.760 --> 0:06:35.200
<v Speaker 1>we are the top seed in the NFC. They lost

0:06:35.240 --> 0:06:38.080
<v Speaker 1>that opportunity to a team in their own division that

0:06:38.160 --> 0:06:40.479
<v Speaker 1>only had four wins on the year end coming into

0:06:40.480 --> 0:06:43.400
<v Speaker 1>their place. So it is all about not taking anything

0:06:43.400 --> 0:06:45.760
<v Speaker 1>for granted. I think the Packers are buying into it,

0:06:45.800 --> 0:06:47.680
<v Speaker 1>and I expect to see a pretty focused team on

0:06:47.720 --> 0:06:49.880
<v Speaker 1>Sunday in Detroit. Yeah, and and the other thing I

0:06:49.920 --> 0:06:52.560
<v Speaker 1>made this argument and insider inbox, this team for the

0:06:52.640 --> 0:06:55.880
<v Speaker 1>last eight months has played to be in this position.

0:06:56.120 --> 0:06:59.760
<v Speaker 1>Everything that they've done, every workout, every practice, every game

0:06:59.800 --> 0:07:04.039
<v Speaker 1>has set themselves up to go into Detroit, win this

0:07:04.120 --> 0:07:06.920
<v Speaker 1>game and get a first round by you don't want

0:07:06.920 --> 0:07:09.520
<v Speaker 1>to waste all of those efforts, all that hard work,

0:07:09.560 --> 0:07:12.280
<v Speaker 1>all of that momentum because you overlook a three win

0:07:12.360 --> 0:07:15.480
<v Speaker 1>opponent and every single guy, I think Corey Linsley mentioned

0:07:15.520 --> 0:07:18.120
<v Speaker 1>it too, that first game was by one point. There

0:07:18.160 --> 0:07:23.480
<v Speaker 1>was a one point difference, turnovers, whatever, uh, total yards production,

0:07:23.760 --> 0:07:25.440
<v Speaker 1>you can look at all of it. In the end,

0:07:25.480 --> 0:07:28.000
<v Speaker 1>it was one point that separated the Packers from victory

0:07:28.040 --> 0:07:31.760
<v Speaker 1>and defeat. And while the situation has changed and half

0:07:31.800 --> 0:07:33.880
<v Speaker 1>of this roster it seems like for the Lions is

0:07:33.880 --> 0:07:37.000
<v Speaker 1>now an injured reserve, that still is something that there

0:07:37.000 --> 0:07:39.720
<v Speaker 1>are guys that want to finish this thing out and

0:07:39.720 --> 0:07:42.520
<v Speaker 1>and play the string out and show that you know what,

0:07:42.840 --> 0:07:44.640
<v Speaker 1>if Matt Patricia is gonna be the head coach in

0:07:44.680 --> 0:07:47.040
<v Speaker 1>two thousand, twenty and beyond, and that's the plan, we

0:07:47.120 --> 0:07:48.720
<v Speaker 1>gotta play hard for him. We have to be ready

0:07:48.760 --> 0:07:50.880
<v Speaker 1>for him. And then even a guy like David Blah,

0:07:50.920 --> 0:07:52.440
<v Speaker 1>I mean, he's trying to prove that I can be

0:07:52.480 --> 0:07:55.160
<v Speaker 1>a backup in this league. I'm a quarterback that's worth developing.

0:07:55.200 --> 0:07:57.120
<v Speaker 1>I could be in this position again next year with

0:07:57.160 --> 0:08:00.800
<v Speaker 1>Matthew Stafford. All those things bundled together There's still is

0:08:00.800 --> 0:08:02.240
<v Speaker 1>a lot to play for it. But as I've said

0:08:02.280 --> 0:08:05.120
<v Speaker 1>all week long, Mike, for the Packers, they have to

0:08:05.120 --> 0:08:07.920
<v Speaker 1>go out, they have to control the momentum right off

0:08:07.960 --> 0:08:10.520
<v Speaker 1>the bat and make sure that while this game you

0:08:10.560 --> 0:08:13.679
<v Speaker 1>cannot take for granted, maybe the second half is where

0:08:14.080 --> 0:08:17.520
<v Speaker 1>you can actually start to you know, maybe pull back

0:08:17.600 --> 0:08:20.000
<v Speaker 1>some of the troops if you can get out there,

0:08:20.160 --> 0:08:22.600
<v Speaker 1>get a quick lead and make sure that that crowd

0:08:22.640 --> 0:08:25.120
<v Speaker 1>is in your favorite right. And that's exactly the fast

0:08:25.160 --> 0:08:27.680
<v Speaker 1>start idea is exactly what the Packers did not do

0:08:27.840 --> 0:08:30.480
<v Speaker 1>the first time against the Lions. They fell behind thirteen

0:08:30.520 --> 0:08:33.480
<v Speaker 1>to nothing. Fortunately for green Bay, that was a home game.

0:08:33.720 --> 0:08:35.760
<v Speaker 1>As soon as the rally started, you know, the crowd

0:08:35.840 --> 0:08:38.080
<v Speaker 1>kind of got behind the team and then it comes

0:08:38.120 --> 0:08:42.720
<v Speaker 1>down to Mason Crosby kicking a walk off field goal there. So, um,

0:08:42.840 --> 0:08:44.760
<v Speaker 1>I totally agree with you. I think I think a

0:08:44.840 --> 0:08:47.440
<v Speaker 1>fast start, as we talked about on yesterday's show, you know,

0:08:47.480 --> 0:08:49.720
<v Speaker 1>if if there are some green Bay fans in the stands,

0:08:49.760 --> 0:08:52.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, get them riled up early, keep the Detroit

0:08:52.240 --> 0:08:54.840
<v Speaker 1>fans quiet, don't let them think that some some big

0:08:54.960 --> 0:08:57.640
<v Speaker 1>upset for Matt Patricia to hang his hat on in

0:08:57.640 --> 0:09:00.120
<v Speaker 1>the off season is is what's going to result. And

0:09:00.240 --> 0:09:02.760
<v Speaker 1>keep in mind too, Aaron Jones. We've been discussing these

0:09:02.760 --> 0:09:05.480
<v Speaker 1>milestones all week long. Sixteen rushing yards away from his

0:09:05.520 --> 0:09:08.400
<v Speaker 1>first thousand yards season, one touchdown away from matching on

0:09:08.559 --> 0:09:11.320
<v Speaker 1>On Green single season record for touchdowns in a season.

0:09:12.440 --> 0:09:15.040
<v Speaker 1>Aaron Jones is a critical piece to this puzzle because

0:09:15.120 --> 0:09:17.360
<v Speaker 1>not only for all those reasons, but the fact that

0:09:17.880 --> 0:09:20.960
<v Speaker 1>Detroit is missing what three inside linebackers at this point

0:09:20.960 --> 0:09:24.040
<v Speaker 1>of the season. Their defense is really their defensive front

0:09:24.080 --> 0:09:26.760
<v Speaker 1>in particular. So if you're able to get that that

0:09:26.800 --> 0:09:30.040
<v Speaker 1>ball moving in the first quarter, um, then you know,

0:09:30.280 --> 0:09:33.160
<v Speaker 1>keep whatever happened, whatever that change was in that second

0:09:33.160 --> 0:09:35.640
<v Speaker 1>half against Minnesota, and carry that over to this game.

0:09:36.120 --> 0:09:38.280
<v Speaker 1>We could talk about Aaron Rodgers and Davante Adams and

0:09:38.320 --> 0:09:40.199
<v Speaker 1>all the other pieces that have to be in play

0:09:40.240 --> 0:09:42.680
<v Speaker 1>for the Packers here both on Sunday and moving into

0:09:42.679 --> 0:09:45.400
<v Speaker 1>the postseason. But I just think, especially with the question

0:09:45.440 --> 0:09:47.360
<v Speaker 1>marks right now with Jamal Williams and not sure what

0:09:47.520 --> 0:09:50.080
<v Speaker 1>his availability is going to be with the shoulder injury,

0:09:50.600 --> 0:09:52.800
<v Speaker 1>Aaron Jones, this game is set up for him perfectly

0:09:52.840 --> 0:09:54.520
<v Speaker 1>to have a breakout day. Yeah, well, I want to

0:09:54.520 --> 0:09:58.160
<v Speaker 1>continue to talk about that because there are several individual

0:09:58.960 --> 0:10:02.920
<v Speaker 1>milestones mile posts that various Packers could hit here in

0:10:02.960 --> 0:10:05.920
<v Speaker 1>the final regular season game. Obviously, getting the win, getting

0:10:05.960 --> 0:10:08.400
<v Speaker 1>the first round by is the priority, but you mentioned

0:10:08.800 --> 0:10:11.800
<v Speaker 1>Jones is sixteen yards away from his first thousand yard

0:10:11.880 --> 0:10:16.280
<v Speaker 1>rushing season. He currently leads the NFL with nineteen total touchdowns.

0:10:16.840 --> 0:10:19.959
<v Speaker 1>The last Packers player to actually lead the NFL and

0:10:20.040 --> 0:10:22.600
<v Speaker 1>touchdowns for a single season was Jim Taylor back in

0:10:22.679 --> 0:10:26.160
<v Speaker 1>nineteen sixty two. And I believe Aaron Jones goes into

0:10:26.160 --> 0:10:29.360
<v Speaker 1>this final game one touchdown ahead of Christian McCaffrey of

0:10:29.400 --> 0:10:32.280
<v Speaker 1>the Panthers. And then also he's one touchdown off of

0:10:32.320 --> 0:10:37.160
<v Speaker 1>the Packers single season franchise record of twenty touchdowns, which

0:10:37.600 --> 0:10:40.080
<v Speaker 1>was set by a Mon Green back in two thousand three.

0:10:40.160 --> 0:10:43.040
<v Speaker 1>So that, uh, that's one for him to get another one.

0:10:43.080 --> 0:10:47.679
<v Speaker 1>You mentioned Davante Adams, He's, uh, the exact number is escaping, right,

0:10:47.679 --> 0:10:51.240
<v Speaker 1>And I was at nineties ninety six receiving yards from

0:10:51.240 --> 0:10:53.679
<v Speaker 1>a thousand yards season, and it's really interesting for him.

0:10:53.720 --> 0:10:56.360
<v Speaker 1>Not only would it'd be pretty cool for him to

0:10:56.400 --> 0:10:58.360
<v Speaker 1>get a thousand yards season in a year that he

0:10:58.440 --> 0:11:00.880
<v Speaker 1>missed four games and he's only playing twelve in the

0:11:00.920 --> 0:11:03.240
<v Speaker 1>regular season. But this is a guy who had a

0:11:03.320 --> 0:11:07.079
<v Speaker 1>nine seven yards. He just missed a thousand another year

0:11:07.120 --> 0:11:09.880
<v Speaker 1>where he had eight hundred and eighty five but then

0:11:09.960 --> 0:11:13.160
<v Speaker 1>missed the last two games when a hundred and fifteen

0:11:13.240 --> 0:11:15.520
<v Speaker 1>yards and two games would have been pretty reasonable for

0:11:15.600 --> 0:11:18.199
<v Speaker 1>him to get a thousand. Davante Adams has only had

0:11:18.240 --> 0:11:21.800
<v Speaker 1>one thousand yards season technically in his career, and he's

0:11:21.800 --> 0:11:23.920
<v Speaker 1>going for number two in a year that he missed

0:11:23.920 --> 0:11:26.600
<v Speaker 1>an entire month, So that's kind of interesting as well.

0:11:26.679 --> 0:11:28.800
<v Speaker 1>And on the defensive side, here's a couple to keep

0:11:28.840 --> 0:11:31.440
<v Speaker 1>an eye on. West. I look this up and it

0:11:31.480 --> 0:11:36.320
<v Speaker 1>was interesting. Zadarius Smith, Preston Smith, Kenny Clark. That trio

0:11:36.480 --> 0:11:39.719
<v Speaker 1>has combined for thirty one and a half sacks so

0:11:39.800 --> 0:11:42.440
<v Speaker 1>far this season with one regular season game to go.

0:11:43.080 --> 0:11:48.040
<v Speaker 1>Since sacks became an official NFL statistic. In the top

0:11:48.160 --> 0:11:52.560
<v Speaker 1>trio in one season for the Packers was in Reggie

0:11:52.600 --> 0:11:55.720
<v Speaker 1>White with sixteen sacks and winning Defensive Player of the Year,

0:11:56.160 --> 0:11:58.960
<v Speaker 1>along with Vannie Holiday with eight sacks and Keith mackenzie

0:11:59.040 --> 0:12:02.719
<v Speaker 1>with eight sacks had two between the three of them,

0:12:02.800 --> 0:12:05.760
<v Speaker 1>So the Packers current top trio is thirty one and

0:12:05.800 --> 0:12:07.840
<v Speaker 1>a half. If they get one more sack, maybe the

0:12:07.880 --> 0:12:10.040
<v Speaker 1>two Smiths split one, they each get a half, and

0:12:10.080 --> 0:12:11.880
<v Speaker 1>that gets him to thirty two and a half, and

0:12:12.080 --> 0:12:13.959
<v Speaker 1>that would be one to chalk up and another one

0:12:13.960 --> 0:12:19.560
<v Speaker 1>on defense too. Uh. The Packers coaches go through the

0:12:19.600 --> 0:12:22.680
<v Speaker 1>film and they keep track of tackles, and the official

0:12:22.720 --> 0:12:26.439
<v Speaker 1>statistics that the Packers put out are the coaches tabulations

0:12:26.440 --> 0:12:30.520
<v Speaker 1>of tackles. Well, Blake Martinez solo and assisted tackles combined,

0:12:30.559 --> 0:12:33.000
<v Speaker 1>He's been credited with a hundred and ninety one tackles

0:12:33.000 --> 0:12:36.520
<v Speaker 1>so far this year and since Packers coaches started keeping

0:12:37.120 --> 0:12:43.200
<v Speaker 1>that statistic in five Since then, the single season record

0:12:43.320 --> 0:12:45.960
<v Speaker 1>for the Packers is a hundred and ninety four tackles

0:12:45.960 --> 0:12:49.800
<v Speaker 1>by Nick Barnett in two thousand and five. So Blake

0:12:49.880 --> 0:12:53.560
<v Speaker 1>Martinez is four tackles away from breaking Barnet's record, and

0:12:53.640 --> 0:12:57.000
<v Speaker 1>obviously nine tackles away from the first two hundred tackles

0:12:57.000 --> 0:13:00.960
<v Speaker 1>season since the Packers coaches have been keep being that statistics.

0:13:00.960 --> 0:13:02.560
<v Speaker 1>So and I've got a few other ones that are

0:13:02.600 --> 0:13:04.400
<v Speaker 1>going to be in my one Last Look column as well.

0:13:04.440 --> 0:13:06.680
<v Speaker 1>I had some fun looking up this, uh this stuff

0:13:06.760 --> 0:13:10.040
<v Speaker 1>yesterday as I was preparing my Saturday one last look

0:13:10.080 --> 0:13:12.880
<v Speaker 1>for Packers dot Com. But some interesting things here as

0:13:12.920 --> 0:13:15.480
<v Speaker 1>the regular season wraps up, because all of the team

0:13:15.559 --> 0:13:18.080
<v Speaker 1>records and all that are based on regular season games,

0:13:18.120 --> 0:13:20.960
<v Speaker 1>only postseason goes into another category. Well, and then there's

0:13:21.000 --> 0:13:23.520
<v Speaker 1>one other one that is not going to be as heralded.

0:13:23.720 --> 0:13:25.640
<v Speaker 1>I don't think many people will make much about, but

0:13:25.720 --> 0:13:29.640
<v Speaker 1>it's thirteen wins. Packers can actually get thirteen wins in

0:13:29.679 --> 0:13:31.960
<v Speaker 1>this season. That would be the most since two thousand

0:13:32.040 --> 0:13:35.120
<v Speaker 1>eleven during that fifteen win campaign, if I'm not mistaken. Yeah,

0:13:35.160 --> 0:13:37.720
<v Speaker 1>there there are only three. There are only three coaches

0:13:37.760 --> 0:13:41.000
<v Speaker 1>in Packer's history with thirteen wins in a regular season.

0:13:41.040 --> 0:13:44.080
<v Speaker 1>It's Vince Lombardi, Mike Holmgren, and Mike McCarthy. They're the

0:13:44.080 --> 0:13:45.920
<v Speaker 1>only ones who have done it. And Matt Lafleur, in

0:13:45.960 --> 0:13:48.600
<v Speaker 1>his first year, is trying to become the fourth coach

0:13:48.679 --> 0:13:50.760
<v Speaker 1>to hit that mark. And it goes back to something

0:13:50.800 --> 0:13:53.080
<v Speaker 1>that I think, you know, Mark Murphy has talked about

0:13:53.080 --> 0:13:55.120
<v Speaker 1>this season. I think a number of guys have talked about.

0:13:55.160 --> 0:13:57.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean, how many people on September one would have

0:13:58.000 --> 0:14:01.160
<v Speaker 1>put them in a position to be doing this right now, uh,

0:14:01.320 --> 0:14:03.800
<v Speaker 1>to to have a first round by I mean, Aaron

0:14:03.880 --> 0:14:06.920
<v Speaker 1>Rodgers has mentioned this at numerous different intervals throughout the

0:14:06.920 --> 0:14:08.559
<v Speaker 1>course of the year about how maybe this isn't the

0:14:08.559 --> 0:14:11.080
<v Speaker 1>most talented team. But I'll be honest with you, Mike,

0:14:11.120 --> 0:14:12.600
<v Speaker 1>and you've been doing this a little bit longer than

0:14:12.640 --> 0:14:14.360
<v Speaker 1>I have, but this is as tight knit of a

0:14:14.400 --> 0:14:16.920
<v Speaker 1>team as I've covered. And that's not to say that

0:14:16.960 --> 0:14:18.880
<v Speaker 1>the chemistry wasn't there with some of those other teams.

0:14:18.880 --> 0:14:22.440
<v Speaker 1>I think the two thousand team in particular had great chemistry,

0:14:22.480 --> 0:14:25.320
<v Speaker 1>but in terms of, especially on the defensive side of

0:14:25.320 --> 0:14:29.000
<v Speaker 1>the ball, how close they are from cornerbacks, the defensive

0:14:29.040 --> 0:14:32.200
<v Speaker 1>linemen to linebackers. It's not just the positional groups, and

0:14:32.200 --> 0:14:34.120
<v Speaker 1>it's not just you know, getting into the huddle and

0:14:34.120 --> 0:14:37.560
<v Speaker 1>and you know, channing Kumbaya together. I mean, these guys

0:14:37.640 --> 0:14:40.320
<v Speaker 1>legitimately really care about each other. And I know that

0:14:40.440 --> 0:14:42.400
<v Speaker 1>narrative and that cliche kind of gets thrown out there

0:14:42.400 --> 0:14:45.280
<v Speaker 1>when teams are having success. It's more difficult to get

0:14:45.320 --> 0:14:48.240
<v Speaker 1>that sort of reputation when you're six and ten. But

0:14:48.920 --> 0:14:50.960
<v Speaker 1>I think to some extent it's true because there is

0:14:50.960 --> 0:14:53.240
<v Speaker 1>an idea there that those guys are playing for each other.

0:14:53.480 --> 0:14:56.200
<v Speaker 1>So Darius and Preston Smith are on the verge of

0:14:56.240 --> 0:14:59.520
<v Speaker 1>becoming superstars in this league. You get fourteen sacks in

0:14:59.560 --> 0:15:01.760
<v Speaker 1>a season, in thirteen sacks in a year, you're gonna

0:15:01.800 --> 0:15:04.880
<v Speaker 1>get notoriety. Kenny Clark has been just the steady as

0:15:04.920 --> 0:15:07.640
<v Speaker 1>they go kind of players since day one with his mentality.

0:15:07.720 --> 0:15:10.280
<v Speaker 1>Even with some of the breakouts he's had the last

0:15:10.320 --> 0:15:12.600
<v Speaker 1>couple of seasons, you have your Dean Lowry's and your

0:15:12.680 --> 0:15:15.520
<v Speaker 1>gyr Alexanders and you look at a guy like Kevin

0:15:15.600 --> 0:15:18.800
<v Speaker 1>King and how he stepped up a week ago. They've

0:15:18.840 --> 0:15:21.160
<v Speaker 1>stayed healthy and they've been able to be on the

0:15:21.200 --> 0:15:23.240
<v Speaker 1>field together, and then when they're off the field, there's

0:15:23.240 --> 0:15:25.960
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the cambaraderie there as well. So it's

0:15:26.000 --> 0:15:28.080
<v Speaker 1>not a stat it's not a milestone, it's not anything

0:15:28.080 --> 0:15:30.320
<v Speaker 1>cool like that, but that definitely goes a long way.

0:15:30.320 --> 0:15:33.280
<v Speaker 1>When you talk about a team in its chemistry going

0:15:33.280 --> 0:15:35.440
<v Speaker 1>into the month of January, yeah, I mean every team

0:15:35.520 --> 0:15:38.720
<v Speaker 1>sort of develops its own version of chemistry. There are

0:15:38.720 --> 0:15:42.800
<v Speaker 1>all sorts of different formulas to continue the metaphor that

0:15:42.800 --> 0:15:47.360
<v Speaker 1>that work. I think with this particular team where the

0:15:47.680 --> 0:15:52.160
<v Speaker 1>chemistry has has uh, withstood some scrutiny and and withstood

0:15:52.160 --> 0:15:55.600
<v Speaker 1>some rough moments have been coming off of the losses

0:15:55.640 --> 0:15:57.760
<v Speaker 1>in the second half of the season, when the Packers

0:15:57.800 --> 0:15:59.560
<v Speaker 1>lost to the Chargers and they lost to the forty

0:15:59.600 --> 0:16:04.360
<v Speaker 1>nine Ers. These weren't just you know, knockdown, drag out

0:16:04.440 --> 0:16:06.320
<v Speaker 1>fights and you lose on a walk off field goal

0:16:06.400 --> 0:16:09.240
<v Speaker 1>kind of thing. These were just dud performances on both

0:16:09.240 --> 0:16:12.400
<v Speaker 1>sides of the ball, quite frankly by by the Packers

0:16:13.200 --> 0:16:15.440
<v Speaker 1>in road games, you know, long flights out to the

0:16:15.480 --> 0:16:19.320
<v Speaker 1>West Coast and all that. And I think the chemistry

0:16:19.320 --> 0:16:22.600
<v Speaker 1>of this team pulled them through and got them back

0:16:22.640 --> 0:16:26.680
<v Speaker 1>on the right track very quickly after both of those losses,

0:16:26.720 --> 0:16:29.960
<v Speaker 1>as as opposed to seeing you know, seeing one lost

0:16:30.000 --> 0:16:32.160
<v Speaker 1>beach twice, so to speak. And I think that's one

0:16:32.480 --> 0:16:34.560
<v Speaker 1>I think that's one way that the chemistry of this

0:16:34.600 --> 0:16:37.320
<v Speaker 1>team has been tested, and they have passed that test

0:16:37.360 --> 0:16:39.280
<v Speaker 1>to get to this point and being able to balance

0:16:39.280 --> 0:16:41.360
<v Speaker 1>back from losses where they didn't fall into you know,

0:16:41.400 --> 0:16:44.760
<v Speaker 1>mid season dulgrums. They didn't have consecutive losses all season.

0:16:44.920 --> 0:16:47.000
<v Speaker 1>And then keep in mind too, and this is kind

0:16:47.000 --> 0:16:49.160
<v Speaker 1>of the onus and and sort of mantra that I've

0:16:49.200 --> 0:16:51.480
<v Speaker 1>developed for this team. You have to beat them for

0:16:51.560 --> 0:16:54.080
<v Speaker 1>four quarters, because you've seen them get off to slow

0:16:54.120 --> 0:16:56.720
<v Speaker 1>starts and then work their way back into it. It

0:16:56.760 --> 0:16:59.720
<v Speaker 1>happened last week. Then you also have seen times where

0:17:00.040 --> 0:17:02.000
<v Speaker 1>maybe they get off to a fast start, they kind

0:17:02.000 --> 0:17:03.800
<v Speaker 1>of go into a little bit of a lull in

0:17:03.840 --> 0:17:07.239
<v Speaker 1>the second third quarters and they finish like gangbusters in

0:17:07.240 --> 0:17:10.480
<v Speaker 1>the fourth. I mean, this is a team that we

0:17:10.560 --> 0:17:12.159
<v Speaker 1>say it over and over again about how they can

0:17:12.160 --> 0:17:14.040
<v Speaker 1>win a variety of ways, but they truly can. And

0:17:14.119 --> 0:17:16.280
<v Speaker 1>last week I thought they you know, kind of pop

0:17:16.359 --> 0:17:20.239
<v Speaker 1>the cap on another way. So it's a fascinating way

0:17:20.280 --> 0:17:22.040
<v Speaker 1>to go into this thing. The Packers have to turn

0:17:22.080 --> 0:17:23.960
<v Speaker 1>back Detroit. They have to be able to win this

0:17:24.000 --> 0:17:28.200
<v Speaker 1>game and get that crown. But when they do, man,

0:17:28.840 --> 0:17:31.000
<v Speaker 1>you look at how this thing sets up right now.

0:17:31.040 --> 0:17:34.040
<v Speaker 1>If they're hosting a game or two in January in

0:17:34.119 --> 0:17:37.920
<v Speaker 1>Green Bay, Wisconsin against San Francisco and New Orleans and

0:17:38.400 --> 0:17:41.320
<v Speaker 1>some of these warm weather teams seattle to a certain extent,

0:17:42.040 --> 0:17:45.200
<v Speaker 1>the game changes. Yeah, absolutely well, looking at what else

0:17:45.280 --> 0:17:48.320
<v Speaker 1>is going on around the league in week seventeen. As

0:17:48.359 --> 0:17:50.919
<v Speaker 1>I mentioned at the top of the show, if the

0:17:50.960 --> 0:17:54.280
<v Speaker 1>Packers get the win at Detroit, they're flying back and

0:17:54.280 --> 0:17:57.159
<v Speaker 1>then settling in to watch the Seahawks and the forty

0:17:57.200 --> 0:18:00.080
<v Speaker 1>Niners battle for the NFC West crown. And if the

0:18:00.080 --> 0:18:03.160
<v Speaker 1>Packers get to thirteen and three, then a Seattle win

0:18:03.359 --> 0:18:06.440
<v Speaker 1>over San Francisco at Century Link would give the Packers

0:18:06.480 --> 0:18:09.879
<v Speaker 1>the number one overall seed. From the forty Niners perspective,

0:18:10.160 --> 0:18:13.800
<v Speaker 1>if they win against Seattle and win the NFC West,

0:18:13.880 --> 0:18:15.760
<v Speaker 1>they are the number one seed. And then if the

0:18:15.760 --> 0:18:18.000
<v Speaker 1>Packers have a win, they would get the buy and

0:18:18.040 --> 0:18:20.400
<v Speaker 1>the number two seeds, and either way it shuffles out.

0:18:20.440 --> 0:18:23.560
<v Speaker 1>It's a great story. Uh. If Green Bay would somehow

0:18:23.720 --> 0:18:26.439
<v Speaker 1>just work their way back up this thing and end

0:18:26.560 --> 0:18:29.720
<v Speaker 1>up claiming the number one seed, that's incredible. San Francisco's

0:18:29.760 --> 0:18:31.800
<v Speaker 1>point of view, you look at the setbacks they've had

0:18:31.840 --> 0:18:34.080
<v Speaker 1>and being able to claw their way back into that

0:18:34.119 --> 0:18:37.000
<v Speaker 1>game against the Rams and then potentially beat Seattle and

0:18:37.080 --> 0:18:39.280
<v Speaker 1>Century Link. I know Packer fans don't hear that, but

0:18:39.320 --> 0:18:41.200
<v Speaker 1>that's also a pretty good narrative two for a team

0:18:41.240 --> 0:18:43.120
<v Speaker 1>claiming the number one seed. Yeah. Well, when you look

0:18:43.119 --> 0:18:45.160
<v Speaker 1>at the forty Niners, I mean, this is a team,

0:18:45.200 --> 0:18:47.720
<v Speaker 1>this is a team that won on the road at

0:18:48.040 --> 0:18:50.960
<v Speaker 1>New Orleans, and I'm trying to remember they had another

0:18:51.000 --> 0:18:53.280
<v Speaker 1>really big road victory. I can look it up if

0:18:53.320 --> 0:18:55.199
<v Speaker 1>you can talk for a couple more seconds there. The

0:18:55.240 --> 0:18:57.000
<v Speaker 1>other thing, yeah, I will say, well you're looking that

0:18:57.119 --> 0:18:59.720
<v Speaker 1>up is for those wondering can the Packers get a

0:18:59.760 --> 0:19:02.119
<v Speaker 1>first drawn by if they were to happen to lose

0:19:02.160 --> 0:19:05.160
<v Speaker 1>at Detroit. The answer is yes, but that would require

0:19:05.240 --> 0:19:07.800
<v Speaker 1>the Carolina Panthers to beat the New Orleans set. So

0:19:07.840 --> 0:19:11.159
<v Speaker 1>if the Packers lose and the Saints lose, the Packers

0:19:11.240 --> 0:19:13.480
<v Speaker 1>would still get a first round by. But if the

0:19:13.520 --> 0:19:17.879
<v Speaker 1>Packers lose and the Saints win, then Green Bay is

0:19:17.920 --> 0:19:20.000
<v Speaker 1>the three seed, and then as the three seed, the

0:19:20.000 --> 0:19:22.600
<v Speaker 1>Packers would be hosting Minnesota in the wild card round

0:19:22.640 --> 0:19:24.960
<v Speaker 1>because Minnesota is locked in at the six and can't

0:19:25.040 --> 0:19:27.640
<v Speaker 1>change totally. You have to be thinking about the Rams game,

0:19:27.760 --> 0:19:30.080
<v Speaker 1>right because otherwise it didn't really play anybody on the road.

0:19:30.640 --> 0:19:33.879
<v Speaker 1>Maybe maybe I might be thinking of I might be

0:19:33.920 --> 0:19:36.240
<v Speaker 1>thinking of another team than that. That chalked up a

0:19:36.320 --> 0:19:38.920
<v Speaker 1>couple of big road wins. But you talk about the

0:19:38.920 --> 0:19:41.480
<v Speaker 1>Packers roads. People want to talk about the Packers. Look

0:19:41.480 --> 0:19:43.399
<v Speaker 1>at this road schedule. It did get ramp up at

0:19:43.400 --> 0:19:48.960
<v Speaker 1>the end of the year. But Tampa Bay, Cincinnati, l A, Rams, Washington, Arizona,

0:19:49.760 --> 0:19:51.560
<v Speaker 1>and then they had to face Baltimore, New Orleans and

0:19:51.560 --> 0:19:53.520
<v Speaker 1>back to back weeks. Maybe that's what I was. I

0:19:53.520 --> 0:19:55.280
<v Speaker 1>know they had the Baltimore game at home and then

0:19:55.320 --> 0:19:57.040
<v Speaker 1>that came down to a walk off field goal. So

0:19:57.080 --> 0:19:59.520
<v Speaker 1>maybe that was the game with the Niners that I

0:19:59.640 --> 0:20:03.600
<v Speaker 1>was that I was thinking of. But um regardless, So yes,

0:20:03.640 --> 0:20:05.280
<v Speaker 1>as a Packers fan, you're keeping an eye in the

0:20:05.320 --> 0:20:07.960
<v Speaker 1>Saints game and then on Sunday Night football if the

0:20:08.000 --> 0:20:11.000
<v Speaker 1>Packers do come back with a victory from Detroit, you're

0:20:11.080 --> 0:20:14.159
<v Speaker 1>keeping an eye on what happens there in the NFC West.

0:20:14.359 --> 0:20:16.800
<v Speaker 1>As far as the NFC East is concerned, it's between

0:20:16.840 --> 0:20:21.320
<v Speaker 1>Philadelphia and Dallas, Philadelphias and the driver's seat. With their

0:20:21.400 --> 0:20:24.760
<v Speaker 1>victory over the Dallas Cowboys last week. So I Philadelphia

0:20:24.800 --> 0:20:28.440
<v Speaker 1>beats the Giants, the Eagles are the four seed. If

0:20:28.440 --> 0:20:30.880
<v Speaker 1>the Eagles lose to the Giants and the Cowboys beat

0:20:30.920 --> 0:20:36.119
<v Speaker 1>the Redskins, the Cowboys are the four seed and the

0:20:36.640 --> 0:20:41.160
<v Speaker 1>that team then would be hosting the five which essentially

0:20:41.240 --> 0:20:43.440
<v Speaker 1>is going to be the loser of the Seattle San

0:20:43.480 --> 0:20:45.720
<v Speaker 1>Francisco game is going to be the five seed and

0:20:45.760 --> 0:20:49.200
<v Speaker 1>going on the road on wild card weekend. So um,

0:20:49.280 --> 0:20:51.359
<v Speaker 1>in the a f C, here's here's one thing I

0:20:51.440 --> 0:20:55.240
<v Speaker 1>want to ask you because it's interesting because the Pittsburgh

0:20:55.240 --> 0:20:57.439
<v Speaker 1>Steelers are still in the mix for a wild card

0:20:58.520 --> 0:21:01.320
<v Speaker 1>and and they have and they're they're on the road

0:21:01.359 --> 0:21:03.800
<v Speaker 1>at Baltimore. But the Ravens have locked up the number

0:21:03.880 --> 0:21:06.840
<v Speaker 1>one every a f C and they're sitting everybody. So

0:21:06.880 --> 0:21:10.359
<v Speaker 1>the Steelers could potentially get a win over you know,

0:21:10.720 --> 0:21:13.639
<v Speaker 1>the second string of the Baltimore Ravens so to speak,

0:21:13.760 --> 0:21:16.000
<v Speaker 1>and sneak their way into the a f C playoffs

0:21:16.040 --> 0:21:17.960
<v Speaker 1>as the six C. Now there's some other things too,

0:21:18.000 --> 0:21:21.760
<v Speaker 1>because the Tennessee Titans are still in the mix, and

0:21:22.320 --> 0:21:24.240
<v Speaker 1>there's somebody else I think who's still in the mix

0:21:24.280 --> 0:21:26.000
<v Speaker 1>in the a f C. Yeah, there's there's a couple

0:21:26.000 --> 0:21:28.399
<v Speaker 1>of teams. And how it works, Buffalo is Buffalo is

0:21:28.400 --> 0:21:30.720
<v Speaker 1>in the playoffs, and I believe they're the five seed

0:21:31.000 --> 0:21:32.919
<v Speaker 1>in the in the a f C. They've got one

0:21:32.960 --> 0:21:37.000
<v Speaker 1>of those wild card spots. So um, there the scenarios

0:21:37.040 --> 0:21:39.080
<v Speaker 1>in the a f C for that number six seat

0:21:39.160 --> 0:21:43.800
<v Speaker 1>or death. Oh it's Oakland Yeah, Oakland. If Oakland wins

0:21:43.840 --> 0:21:47.040
<v Speaker 1>and then has about four other games go exactly the

0:21:47.160 --> 0:21:51.159
<v Speaker 1>right way, Oakland can actually sneak in to the number

0:21:51.200 --> 0:21:52.800
<v Speaker 1>six seed in the a f C. So there's a

0:21:52.800 --> 0:21:55.520
<v Speaker 1>lot of other more complicated scenarios on that side of

0:21:55.560 --> 0:21:58.159
<v Speaker 1>the ball, But anything in particular from the a f

0:21:58.240 --> 0:22:00.639
<v Speaker 1>C that interests you heading into Week seven, I just

0:22:00.680 --> 0:22:02.919
<v Speaker 1>I gotta say Mike Tomlin and how he pulled that

0:22:02.960 --> 0:22:05.800
<v Speaker 1>team together this year, the job that they've done defensively

0:22:06.000 --> 0:22:08.680
<v Speaker 1>to to keep this team in this thing under a

0:22:08.720 --> 0:22:11.720
<v Speaker 1>lot of circumstances. You lose Ben Roethlisberger when they lost him,

0:22:11.720 --> 0:22:14.480
<v Speaker 1>and not having a guy really step up and grab

0:22:14.560 --> 0:22:17.760
<v Speaker 1>that opportunity behind him that that could have the season

0:22:17.800 --> 0:22:19.920
<v Speaker 1>could have went arrived very quickly. But here they are

0:22:19.960 --> 0:22:22.240
<v Speaker 1>taking on Baltimore. I actually think this is a really

0:22:22.240 --> 0:22:25.080
<v Speaker 1>good audition for r G three because it's a guy

0:22:25.080 --> 0:22:26.800
<v Speaker 1>that I think some people kind of left his career

0:22:26.840 --> 0:22:28.560
<v Speaker 1>for dead a little bit. Yeah, he'll be stepping in

0:22:28.600 --> 0:22:30.960
<v Speaker 1>for Lamar Jackson, and in an inter own basis, he's

0:22:30.960 --> 0:22:33.560
<v Speaker 1>played pretty well. I felt like throughout the course of

0:22:33.600 --> 0:22:35.040
<v Speaker 1>the year. Now he's gonna be playing one of the

0:22:35.040 --> 0:22:38.480
<v Speaker 1>best defenses in the NFL the Steelers, but that's that's

0:22:38.480 --> 0:22:40.560
<v Speaker 1>gonna be a good matchup to see how he reacts

0:22:40.560 --> 0:22:43.080
<v Speaker 1>to that. And then it always seems, one way or another,

0:22:43.119 --> 0:22:45.119
<v Speaker 1>the Titans are always right in this thing. At the

0:22:45.200 --> 0:22:48.359
<v Speaker 1>end of the season. They've probably played more significant Week

0:22:48.440 --> 0:22:51.200
<v Speaker 1>seventeen games maybe. I mean, it seems like every year

0:22:51.600 --> 0:22:54.360
<v Speaker 1>something's on the line for Tennessee in Week seventeen, they're

0:22:54.440 --> 0:22:56.359
<v Speaker 1>right in the mix somehow. It was like the Packers

0:22:56.640 --> 0:22:58.399
<v Speaker 1>for about five years, it was the Green Bay. It

0:22:58.480 --> 0:23:00.320
<v Speaker 1>was like that a lot, but Tennessee has been team

0:23:00.400 --> 0:23:02.600
<v Speaker 1>especially with some of the uncertainty and the that that

0:23:02.720 --> 0:23:06.520
<v Speaker 1>conference and that division in specific, so seeing if Ryan

0:23:06.520 --> 0:23:08.720
<v Speaker 1>Tannehill can sprinkle his magic a little bit more and

0:23:08.760 --> 0:23:11.680
<v Speaker 1>beat the division champions there to to claim a wild card.

0:23:12.000 --> 0:23:14.280
<v Speaker 1>Houston's already locked up that a f C South, but

0:23:14.400 --> 0:23:18.160
<v Speaker 1>Tennessee trying to sneak in as a wild card. It's

0:23:18.160 --> 0:23:21.680
<v Speaker 1>a fascinating week. Other than that, there really isn't much else.

0:23:21.760 --> 0:23:24.560
<v Speaker 1>It pretty much is all predicated on what those those

0:23:24.600 --> 0:23:27.480
<v Speaker 1>final wild card you know, positioning sort of works out

0:23:27.600 --> 0:23:31.240
<v Speaker 1>quickly before we go. The word out of Minnesota as

0:23:31.280 --> 0:23:33.520
<v Speaker 1>of this morning, anyway, is that it sounds like the

0:23:33.600 --> 0:23:36.000
<v Speaker 1>Vikings are going to rest up their guys and kind

0:23:36.000 --> 0:23:38.360
<v Speaker 1>of treat this as a bye week with Week seventeen

0:23:38.400 --> 0:23:41.000
<v Speaker 1>against Chicago, knowing that they're going on the road in

0:23:41.000 --> 0:23:42.880
<v Speaker 1>the wild Card, and you think that's the right move.

0:23:43.200 --> 0:23:46.640
<v Speaker 1>Probably originally earlier this week, I felt like you need

0:23:46.640 --> 0:23:49.320
<v Speaker 1>to give Kirk Cousins that tune up fight. But with

0:23:49.359 --> 0:23:52.960
<v Speaker 1>Adam Felan in the hamstring, Delvin Cook and Madison both

0:23:53.000 --> 0:23:56.040
<v Speaker 1>being injured, uh, and then you know Eric Kendricks Now,

0:23:56.080 --> 0:23:57.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean, there's so many different things that have kind

0:23:57.840 --> 0:24:00.879
<v Speaker 1>of popped up for the Vikings here at Okay, what

0:24:01.040 --> 0:24:03.040
<v Speaker 1>good does it do if you have Kirk Cousins out

0:24:03.040 --> 0:24:07.320
<v Speaker 1>there against a very good Chicago defense against you know,

0:24:07.359 --> 0:24:11.040
<v Speaker 1>with with secondary parts offensively. I don't like this scenario

0:24:11.119 --> 0:24:13.040
<v Speaker 1>for the Vikings. I still think this is a terrible

0:24:13.040 --> 0:24:15.520
<v Speaker 1>way to enter the playoffs. But all it takes is

0:24:15.560 --> 0:24:17.800
<v Speaker 1>one win to to get you back in it. Yeah,

0:24:17.840 --> 0:24:21.199
<v Speaker 1>for sure, and they'll be looking to obviously become the

0:24:21.320 --> 0:24:25.359
<v Speaker 1>road Warriors in the NFC as the number six seats.

0:24:25.440 --> 0:24:27.720
<v Speaker 1>So with that we will call it a wrap on

0:24:27.760 --> 0:24:30.400
<v Speaker 1>this edition of Packers Unscripted. Be sure to follow all

0:24:30.440 --> 0:24:32.640
<v Speaker 1>of our coverage of the team and of Sunday's game

0:24:32.720 --> 0:24:35.960
<v Speaker 1>from Detroit on Packers dot com. You can subscribe to us,

0:24:36.000 --> 0:24:39.880
<v Speaker 1>like us on iTunes and other podcast services, and check

0:24:39.920 --> 0:24:42.639
<v Speaker 1>out that Packers YouTube channel for all kinds of video

0:24:42.680 --> 0:24:45.720
<v Speaker 1>content for West. I'm Mike. Thanks for tuning in, everybody,

0:24:45.960 --> 0:24:46.720
<v Speaker 1>See you next time.