Speaker 1: Let not your heart be troubled. You are listening to
Speaker 1: the Sean Hannity Radio Show podcast. You know attention to
Speaker 1: detail is critical when you own your own business, So
Speaker 1: use legal zoom dot com for the legal details. Now.
Speaker 1: Their network of independent attorneys licensed in forty eight states. Well,
Speaker 1: they know local laws and can provide answers to your
Speaker 1: legal questions. Legal zoom dot com is not a law firm,
Speaker 1: so you won't pay by the hour. Just use Hannity
Speaker 1: one when you check out and save even more legal
Speaker 1: zoom dot com. Wow, what a historic day this is.
Speaker 1: Yesterday was with what happened in Britain yesterday it was
Speaker 1: this is epic. This is how do I say this?
Speaker 1: This is a historically hinge moment. Now, this decision by
Speaker 1: the British people to leave the eight member European Union,
Speaker 1: I am telling you pay very close attention to this. Look.
Speaker 1: I know we tend to be a little American centric
Speaker 1: as a as a kun tree. That's normal. Every other
Speaker 1: country is as well. But of course we're not exceptional
Speaker 1: if you believe it. I assume the Brits think they're exceptional,
Speaker 1: and the the so and so think they're exceptional. We
Speaker 1: are exceptional, but Britain is the first nation now to
Speaker 1: do so. This is gonna have massive enormous consequences, not
Speaker 1: only for Britain, not only for Europe, but for the
Speaker 1: entire world and yes, the United States. Even the New
Speaker 1: York Times wrote a historic decision shorter reshape the nation's
Speaker 1: place in the world, rattle the continent and rock political
Speaker 1: establishments all throughout the West. By the way, Hillary, are
Speaker 1: you paying attention. We'll get to that in a minute now.
Speaker 1: What happened here? I know some of you I've talked
Speaker 1: about it yesterday, and um, I've been paying very close
Speaker 1: attention to it. I just didn't think there was as
Speaker 1: much interest in this until the vote was coming, so
Speaker 1: I didn't devote a lot of air time to it
Speaker 1: until yesterday. But British voters defied their leaders, they defied
Speaker 1: the international allies, they defied threats from Obama. You know,
Speaker 1: this was the most astounding thing in all of this,
Speaker 1: just like he tried to influence the Israeli elections. Listen
Speaker 1: to Obama's warning prior to this vote, Well, they're gonna
Speaker 1: be at the outside the queue here, They're gonna be
Speaker 1: at the back of the bus. Listen to this. I
Speaker 1: think it's fair to say that maybe some point down
Speaker 1: the line there might be a UK US trade agreement,
Speaker 1: but it's not gonna happen anytime soon, because our focus
Speaker 1: is in negotiating with a big block of the European
Speaker 1: Union to get a trade agreement done, and UK is
Speaker 1: gonna be in the back of the queue. Not because
Speaker 1: we don't have a special relationship, but because given the
Speaker 1: heavy lift on any trade agreement, US having access to
Speaker 1: a big market with a lot of countries rather than
Speaker 1: trying to do piecemeal trade agreements, UH, is hugely inefficient.
Speaker 1: No to the subject at hand, that's listen, so understand
Speaker 1: what was happening here. The same type of fearmongering was
Speaker 1: being used by British leaders, by the Prime Minister, by
Speaker 1: international allies. Threats from the President of the United States,
Speaker 1: You're gonna be in the back of the kill. We're
Speaker 1: not going to negotiate any trade deals with you any
Speaker 1: time zone, UH, scaring British voters. They tried to scare them.
Speaker 1: Some of it probably had some impact, but it did
Speaker 1: not have the impact that they wanted. UM. You know,
Speaker 1: international organizations, labor groups, so called experts, the media polsters
Speaker 1: go back. You know, just four or five weeks ago
Speaker 1: this this was headed in the other directions, which was
Speaker 1: to remain, not exit, so brexit, which is abbreviation for
Speaker 1: British exit from the European Union. It one remarkable victory
Speaker 1: for the country's anti EU forces, which not long ago
Speaker 1: were considered to have a little chance of prevailing. Now
Speaker 1: let me explain this that the effects are immediate here.
Speaker 1: I mean when when the Prime Minister came out late
Speaker 1: in the evening last night our time, David Cameron and said,
Speaker 1: you know, he led the stay with in the EU effort,
Speaker 1: saying he's gonna resign in October, and in a fairly gracious, eloquent,
Speaker 1: predictable speech for a British Prime minister, Cameron said that
Speaker 1: the nation deserved fresh leadership in the face of this
Speaker 1: referendum that set off an instant contest or replace him
Speaker 1: in with former London Mayor Boris Johnson, a leading campaigner
Speaker 1: in the anti EU campaign, considered now to be the
Speaker 1: odds on favorite. By the way, even looks a little
Speaker 1: bit like Donald Trump will talk about that. But the
Speaker 1: vote to leave could mark I think a massive turning point,
Speaker 1: not only a modern British history. But it could become
Speaker 1: the beginning of the end for the EU altogether. As
Speaker 1: one paper put it, quote, the loss of Britain is
Speaker 1: an enormous blow to the credibility of a block already
Speaker 1: under pressure from slow growth, high unemployment, the migrant crisis,
Speaker 1: Greece's debt woes, and the conflict in the Ukraine. In addition,
Speaker 1: the EU is gonna lose a major military and diplomatic
Speaker 1: power within its ranks. Not to be clear, nothing is
Speaker 1: going to change immediately, existing trade and immigration rules remaining
Speaker 1: in place. The withdrawal process is expected to be complex
Speaker 1: and somewhat contentious though the blocks governing treaty, you know,
Speaker 1: it's effectively limited to two years. So what happened here
Speaker 1: is you have a majority of the people. Now, I
Speaker 1: hate to say, Bernie Sanders is actually right on this.
Speaker 1: Donald Trump is right on this. Bernie Sanders said, the
Speaker 1: Brexit vote shows the global economy is not working. And
Speaker 1: this is what I went through in a lot of
Speaker 1: detail yesterday. Number One, you see a resurgence in British nationalism.
Speaker 1: You see I would argue that Great Britain is gonna
Speaker 1: be better and stronger in the long term, the immigration
Speaker 1: problem in Great Britain is quite real, and it's not
Speaker 1: just Great Britain, it's all over Europe. The Islamization of
Speaker 1: Europe played a very big part in all of this.
Speaker 1: You know, for example, all these migrants making their way
Speaker 1: into Europe. You know, let's say you're in Romania, you're
Speaker 1: a Romanian, you get to EU passport. That means you
Speaker 1: get to go to Britain. When you get there, well,
Speaker 1: you have access to everything. Their schools, their health care
Speaker 1: system which is already overwhelmed, the national the ni H
Speaker 1: health system, their unemployment and everything else. It's an enormous
Speaker 1: financial burden that was placed on Great Britain. They're one
Speaker 1: of the richer countries. It was pulling Great Britain down.
Speaker 1: The security relationship, that's not that's only a scare tactic,
Speaker 1: you know, trying to pretend that Britain leaving is going
Speaker 1: to jeopardize security relationships with France and Germany. This is
Speaker 1: never gonna hampen because we have great relationships with all
Speaker 1: those countries where and we're not even involved with the EU.
Speaker 1: But with this collapse collapse here, it is a loss
Speaker 1: of influence and it is also a a rebuke against
Speaker 1: the idea of globalization, which is, you know, we can
Speaker 1: outsource all our manufacturing and the United States is playing
Speaker 1: a big part in this. We could be one big
Speaker 1: world government Kumbaya, which is probably ultimately what a lot
Speaker 1: of these people had in mind. And the question is
Speaker 1: why should better run nations like Great Britain be burying
Speaker 1: the brunt of financial responsibility for all of these poorly
Speaker 1: run nations, and that means providing for the common defense.
Speaker 1: Why should the Brits and the Germans and the French,
Speaker 1: why they obligated to bail out Greece or why they
Speaker 1: obliged to bail out Spain when their government screw up
Speaker 1: so badly. And what's been happening is massive amounts of
Speaker 1: money have been taken out of Britain and fees and
Speaker 1: regulations to take care of all these weaker and poorly
Speaker 1: run nations, and it takes away the incentive from them
Speaker 1: to improve themselves weak countries with dragging down strong countries.
Speaker 1: So the EU now threatens was a threat to British sovereignty,
Speaker 1: and it was stopped. It was stopped right there. It's
Speaker 1: sort of like John Lennon's fantasy that's why Obama and
Speaker 1: Hillary were both supportive of it. Imagine there's no countries.
Speaker 1: It's not hard to do nothing to kill or die
Speaker 1: for no religion too. Imagine all the people living life
Speaker 1: in peace. Now it's utter nonsense because it's detached from
Speaker 1: a reality of how humans actually live their lives and
Speaker 1: developed their loyalties. We pledge allegiance to nations, not transnational entities.
Speaker 1: We pledge allegiance to the United States, not the United Nations.
Speaker 1: The British should pledge loyalty not to the EU, but
Speaker 1: to Great Britain, and so it's a big step for
Speaker 1: their sovereignty. Now, another thing you gotta pay attention to.
Speaker 1: The Daily Mail today raises a lot of pretty fascinating questions.
Speaker 1: You know, a sign of things to come in November
Speaker 1: for America, they ask Donald Trump congratulates the UK for
Speaker 1: their independence. He happened to be in Scotland today. Obama
Speaker 1: and Hillary begin their fearmongering immediately and and instantaneously you
Speaker 1: got London and his first Muslim mayor. They want London
Speaker 1: now to break away and Isis in the meantime, is
Speaker 1: threatening more attacks as Europe and their borders are so
Speaker 1: poorous That's another big part of it, and that's going
Speaker 1: to play a part here in our elections. So anyways,
Speaker 1: I um as I analyze this, you have the majority
Speaker 1: of voters decide to leave immigration, globe illization, loss of jobs,
Speaker 1: islama ization, all contributing factors to what happened here. You
Speaker 1: want to know the driving force of this revolt, that's
Speaker 1: it anxiety about immigration. You know, Britain's freedom from Brussels,
Speaker 1: that's a big part of it. Britain's ability to stop
Speaker 1: mass immigration. You know, anybody in Europe that gets that's
Speaker 1: part of the EU in these twenty eight countries has
Speaker 1: free access to to go to Great Britain and immediately
Speaker 1: take advantage of everything Britain has to offer. Is one
Speaker 1: of a a few of the more wealthy nations that
Speaker 1: are involved in this. Anyway, Cameron had no effective response
Speaker 1: on how to limit the influx of migration. So all
Speaker 1: of the things we're dealing with here were the issues
Speaker 1: at hand in Great Britain. You know, if the left
Speaker 1: side was warning that the remaining would produce uncontrolled immigration,
Speaker 1: that's exactly what's happening. For example, well, you've got hordes
Speaker 1: pouring into Britain from Turkey. Well, Turkey is a country
Speaker 1: that is seventy seven you know, that has seventy seven
Speaker 1: million Muslims that borders Syria and Iraq. They want to
Speaker 1: join the European Union. So the EU increasingly is being
Speaker 1: weighed down by all these failures to deal fully with
Speaker 1: this secession crisis, the financial collapse, you know, to a
Speaker 1: resurgent Russia, a huge influx of migrants, many from Muslim countries.
Speaker 1: And what happened is these values, like if you grow
Speaker 1: up into Sharia. How many times have I said, there's
Speaker 1: a a culture conflict, a conflict of civilizations. You grew
Speaker 1: up into Sharia. You want to come to America, But
Speaker 1: you grew up thinking you can tell women how to dress,
Speaker 1: and telling women whether they can go to school or work,
Speaker 1: telling women they can't drive, women are treated horribly, no
Speaker 1: religious freedom. Well, do people from these countries want to
Speaker 1: come here for freedom and liberty in a new way
Speaker 1: of life and assimilate or do they want to bring
Speaker 1: their life with them and that means indoctrinate us and
Speaker 1: create a theocracy here and proselytize here, and they bring
Speaker 1: their radicalism with them. They think, you know, gays and
Speaker 1: lesbians ought to be executed. Do they think women are
Speaker 1: third class citizens? And what happened with the EU, I mean,
Speaker 1: in no part is related to immigration and islama Ization.
Speaker 1: It's also become a bureaucratic monstrosity with enormous power, no accountability,
Speaker 1: no legitimacy. And the British people want Britain to remain
Speaker 1: Britain again. And now what will be now the decision
Speaker 1: here I will tell you it is a stunning rebuke
Speaker 1: and defeat for Obama and Hillary Clinton. They both wanted
Speaker 1: Britain to stay in the EU. But the the they
Speaker 1: threatened the British people what would happen if they left?
Speaker 1: Which was only fearmongering by the left. But anyway, and
Speaker 1: this whole state meant of Obama, well they're going to
Speaker 1: the back of the queue, me in the back of
Speaker 1: the line. From the perspective the US. Now, the British people,
Speaker 1: in their very polite way yesterday showed Obama their middle finger.
Speaker 1: And the great British historian Andrew Roberts actually and sensed
Speaker 1: by what Obama did, said, surely, surely this is an
Speaker 1: issue of which the British people and they alone have
Speaker 1: the right to decide without the interventional. President Obama, who
Speaker 1: adopted his haughtious professional manner when lecturing us to stay
Speaker 1: in the EU before making the naked threat that they
Speaker 1: would be sent to the back of the que Pretty
Speaker 1: funny in any future trade deals if we had the
Speaker 1: temerity to vote to leave. Well, was my country at
Speaker 1: the back of the line. When Winston Churchill promised the
Speaker 1: nineteen forty one that, in the event of a Japanese
Speaker 1: attack on the US, that a British declaration of war
Speaker 1: on Japan would be aid within the hour, that's how
Speaker 1: close we are. We're at the back of the line.
Speaker 1: On nine eleven, or did Great Britain step forward and
Speaker 1: instinctively at the very first, being the very first ally
Speaker 1: to contribute troops to join the expulsion of the Taliban
Speaker 1: al Qaeda's hose from power in Afghanistan. That's our relationship
Speaker 1: with Great Britain or Iraq. Two years later in two
Speaker 1: thousand and three, it wasn't the French, wasn't the Germans,
Speaker 1: It wasn't the Belgians who's stood and fought and bled
Speaker 1: beside American soldiers. It was the British. So it really
Speaker 1: was never right for the president to threaten to send
Speaker 1: them to the back of the queue. It's really wrong
Speaker 1: to threaten them, and it backfired. And by the way,
Speaker 1: it was a threat that he could never fulfill. Anyway,
Speaker 1: I thank god we're counting down the days till he leaves.
Speaker 1: You need to take control of your family and assets.
Speaker 1: Now it sounds like common sense, but too many people
Speaker 1: erastinate instead of getting in a state plan before it's
Speaker 1: too late. Now, with legal zoom dot Com, there's no
Speaker 1: reason to put it off any longer. Now you don't
Speaker 1: have to figure out on your own whether you need
Speaker 1: a will or a living trust and what's best for you. Instead,
Speaker 1: you work with an independent attorney now available in forty
Speaker 1: eight states. Now they'll walk you through your options and
Speaker 1: recommend an a state plan that offers the best solution
Speaker 1: to fit your needs. And since legal zoom is not
Speaker 1: a law firm, well you can count on efficiency and value.
Speaker 1: Everything is on your schedule, your terms, Plus you know
Speaker 1: what your state plan bundle costs upfront, instead of worrying
Speaker 1: about high hourly rates. Now that's how legal zoom has
Speaker 1: become the leader in helping families with their legal needs.
Speaker 1: You get the legal help and you walk away feeling
Speaker 1: great about it. So don't leave the most important decisions
Speaker 1: that you can make in the hands of other people.
Speaker 1: Take control of your family's future with an A state
Speaker 1: plan bundle at legal zoom dot com today just use
Speaker 1: Hannity one when you check out and save even more
Speaker 1: legal zoom dot com. You know. The Brexit leader this
Speaker 1: is great. I love this literally said earlier today that
Speaker 1: Obama's threat to retaliate against Britain, I'm gonna put you
Speaker 1: in the back of the queue left if it left
Speaker 1: the EU literally pushed the Leave supporters over the top.
Speaker 1: Nigel Farage has been on his program a number of times,
Speaker 1: leader of the UK Independence Party, one of the biggest
Speaker 1: pro Brexit leaders in the country, said during his victory
Speaker 1: lap this morning that Obama's intervention to stop Brexit actually
Speaker 1: helped it. A few weeks ago, while Obama was in England,
Speaker 1: he said during the press conference, I'm gonna put you
Speaker 1: in the back of the queue. Well, here's the most
Speaker 1: powerful man in the world coming from a country that
Speaker 1: we've always had a huge high regard for, and a
Speaker 1: lot of people in Britain said, how dare an American
Speaker 1: president come here and tell us what to do, and
Speaker 1: it backfired, and I think we got an Obama breaks
Speaker 1: it bounce because people don't want foreign leaders telling them
Speaker 1: how to think and how to vote. Same thing happened
Speaker 1: in Israel. I mean Obama literally at his own team
Speaker 1: on the ground trying to undermine bb Netan. Yahoo all
Speaker 1: did was motivate the Israelis to keep beb Netan. Yahoo
Speaker 1: worked out great um France and Italy, now this is interesting.
Speaker 1: Voters in France, Italy, the Netherlands are demanding their own
Speaker 1: votes on the European Union membership in the Euro as
Speaker 1: the continent faces now a contagion of referendums. UI leaders
Speaker 1: fear a string of copycat polls could tear down the organization,
Speaker 1: which I think would be a good thing. I really do.
Speaker 1: The Daily Mail for shadows trump victory in November. Now
Speaker 1: this is an interesting analysis. As Donald Trump flew to
Speaker 1: into Scotland today after the UK's size break with the
Speaker 1: European Union, parallels have been drawn with the anti immigration
Speaker 1: message that led to Brexit and his rise to presumptive
Speaker 1: Republican presidential candidate. Many have pointed out the similarities between
Speaker 1: Britain's decision to leave the EU and Trump's campaign, and
Speaker 1: they believe it's an indication of how Americans will vote
Speaker 1: on November eight, which could see Trump in the White House.
Speaker 1: I agree with this analysis because I'm gonna tell you something,
Speaker 1: Hillary Clinton wanting a five hundred and fifty increase, five
Speaker 1: increase and refugees even though our CIA director, FBI Director,
Speaker 1: assistant FBI director, National Director of Intelligence, House Homeland Security
Speaker 1: Committee chairman, let's see who else, our our former special
Speaker 1: omboy to defeat isis all say what happened in Brussels,
Speaker 1: what happened in Paris can happen here, and that they're
Speaker 1: warning that yes, ISIS will infiltrate the refugee population anyway. Today,
Speaker 1: uh promised to keep close ties between the US and
Speaker 1: the UK if he becomes president, and a Trump administration
Speaker 1: pledges to strengthen our ties with the free and independent Britain,
Speaker 1: deepening our bonds and culture, commerce and mutual defense. Let's
Speaker 1: play Trump when he was in Scotland earlier today. How
Speaker 1: would it Trump? How would a Trump administration approached the
Speaker 1: Brexit should be You'd be elected president and if Scotland
Speaker 1: voted to remain, should Scotland leave the UK as many
Speaker 1: people are talking and I think I see a big parallel.
Speaker 1: I think people really I think people really see a
Speaker 1: big parallel. A lot of people are talking about that,
Speaker 1: and not only the United States, but other countries. People
Speaker 1: want to take their country back and they want to
Speaker 1: have independence in a sense, and you see it with
Speaker 1: Europe all over Europe. You're gonna have more than just
Speaker 1: in my opinion, more than just what happened last night,
Speaker 1: You're gonna have I think many other cases where they
Speaker 1: want to take their borders back, they want to take
Speaker 1: their uh, their monetary back, they want to take a
Speaker 1: lot of things back. They want to be able to
Speaker 1: have a country again. So I think you're gonna have
Speaker 1: this happen more and more. I've really believed that, and
Speaker 1: I think it's happening in the United States. It's happening
Speaker 1: by the fact that I've done so well in the polls.
Speaker 1: I really do see a parallel between what's happening in
Speaker 1: the United States and what's happening here. People want to
Speaker 1: see borders. They don't necessarily want people pouring into their
Speaker 1: country that they don't know who they are and where
Speaker 1: they come from. They have no idea and I think
Speaker 1: you know it. Not only did it win, but it
Speaker 1: won by a much bigger margin than people thought it
Speaker 1: would happen. Wow, that's pretty that's pretty profound. Now, Donald
Speaker 1: Trump praised Cameron's likely success or. Some stays that Trump
Speaker 1: lookal like it actually because it's kind of got wild
Speaker 1: hair like Donald Trump does. But anyway, he praised the
Speaker 1: likely successor to British Prime Minister David Cameron, who will
Speaker 1: resign in November, and the man expected to replace Cameron
Speaker 1: as a guy by the name of Boris Johnson. Not
Speaker 1: only ari's Trump's approval of Brexit. He's a dead ringer
Speaker 1: a little bit for Trump himself. But anyway, The Telegraph
Speaker 1: reported that Trump has described the Brexit vote as beautiful
Speaker 1: and beautiful thing as praise Boris Johnson for reading the
Speaker 1: public mood better than David Cameron, who promised there would
Speaker 1: be zero impact on the special relationship if he becomes
Speaker 1: the president of the United States. That's huge. Now, where's
Speaker 1: Hillary and all of this? Hillary Clinton wakes up this
Speaker 1: morning and she finds herself, like Obama, on the wrong
Speaker 1: side of Brexit. She sides with elits who opposed Brexit,
Speaker 1: and they got just got tossed out on their ear,
Speaker 1: and Donald Trump celebrated the vote as a great thing,
Speaker 1: proof that the United Kingdom's voters have taken back their
Speaker 1: country by abandoning the shackles of the European Union. The
Speaker 1: reaction from Hillary Clinton's campaign is that this, by the way,
Speaker 1: we respect the choice of the people of the United
Speaker 1: Kingdom have made, she released. Our first task is has
Speaker 1: to be to make sure that the economic uncertainty created
Speaker 1: by these events does not hurt American working families. By
Speaker 1: the way, don't worry Hillary. Next to the economic uncertainty
Speaker 1: of the Obama economy, Brexit will be a piece of cake.
Speaker 1: And like most global leaders, Clinton expressed her support for
Speaker 1: the Remain camp throughout the referendum. But what are the
Speaker 1: issues here? The issues are what I have discussed in detail.
Speaker 1: They're all the same. There were surgeons in British nationalism. Well,
Speaker 1: I'm gonna tell you something. Americans, they're tired of being
Speaker 1: the world's policeman. Americans are tired of sending their sons
Speaker 1: and daughters to fight wars that Hillary Clinton votes for
Speaker 1: and then abandons the war effort once the political polls
Speaker 1: and winds shift. That's what Hillary Clinton did you know, Look,
Speaker 1: I think it was the right thing to go into
Speaker 1: Iraq and Afghanistan. I'm proud of what our military accomplished.
Speaker 1: They won the war. The surge worked, We took most
Speaker 1: of Ramadi, bagged Felucia to create, and the rest of
Speaker 1: the entire country was secure. That was two thousand and nine. Unfortunately,
Speaker 1: the world changed when Barack Obama became president and Hillary
Speaker 1: became the Secretary of State. Next thing that happened is
Speaker 1: they made dumb decisions. They gave a pullout date in Iraq.
Speaker 1: That created a vacuum that isis filled. They never held
Speaker 1: true to their promise on the red line in the
Speaker 1: sand in Syria, well, that spread death, destruction and terrorism.
Speaker 1: That created isis, that created the avenue to for isis
Speaker 1: same thing in Libya. You know, Libya was absolutely fine
Speaker 1: until Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama get into office. Libya
Speaker 1: was actually you know, had promised the Bush administration they
Speaker 1: would not pursue nuclear weapons. They were allowing inspections to
Speaker 1: make sure that they were upholding their promise. You know,
Speaker 1: so now were the same thing that they end up
Speaker 1: supporting the Arab Spring and the and the Muslim Brotherhood
Speaker 1: coming to power in Egypt. This is a guy that's
Speaker 1: part of a terrorist organization, and their response was to
Speaker 1: help undermine the previous president Mubarak and put in place
Speaker 1: Mohammed Morsey. Okay, he's former head of the Muslim Brotherhood
Speaker 1: of terrorist organization, referring to Jews as the sentence of
Speaker 1: apes and pigs. We gave him f sixteens, and we
Speaker 1: gave him tanks, and we gave him a billion dollars.
Speaker 1: Hillary started the negotiations with knock Medena jot at the time,
Speaker 1: even though they lied to us and denied it. She
Speaker 1: was a part of that stupidity. She's the one responsible
Speaker 1: for the Russian reset. Putin has nothing but contempt for
Speaker 1: Hillary and Obama and has pledged to work with a
Speaker 1: RAN and build missile defense so if we ever want
Speaker 1: to take out or need to take out their nuclear facilities,
Speaker 1: we won't be able to do so. So, you know,
Speaker 1: you look at every single area of the Middle East,
Speaker 1: and the world has been destabilized because they have no
Speaker 1: clue about the world. Just like here, they don't understand
Speaker 1: radical Islamic terrorism is the problem in Orlando and the
Speaker 1: problem in San Bernardino. They'd rather take away your Second
Speaker 1: Amendment rights to defend yourself if God forbid you ever
Speaker 1: find yourself in a situation like that. Their mentality is,
Speaker 1: let's not create a safe zone and zero Syria for
Speaker 1: victims of a civil war. No, we can't do that.
Speaker 1: By the way, how compassionate America would be willing? Trump
Speaker 1: is willing to create a safe zone that means a
Speaker 1: military safe zone with our allies protecting innocent men, women,
Speaker 1: and children. Will give them food and water, medicine, cots, supplies,
Speaker 1: baby formula, or anything else they need inside of Syria
Speaker 1: or inside of Jordan's or inside of any area we
Speaker 1: can find for them, and then they can go back
Speaker 1: to their home country when the civil war ends, go
Speaker 1: back to their homes. But no, they have to take
Speaker 1: them into the United States. Ignore the admonitions and warnings
Speaker 1: of our top intelligence officials and the intelligence community that
Speaker 1: isis will infiltrate. They'll gamble with your lives. It's really insane.
Speaker 1: Let's see Mike Huckaby way to on this, and he's
Speaker 1: applauded the Brexit vote, slamming Hillary. That's his words, not mine,
Speaker 1: and the he referred to Hillary as Hillary in a
Speaker 1: statement sharing Britain's vote to leave the EU, and he
Speaker 1: argued in a post on his website that the British
Speaker 1: exit Brexit that vote was a foreshadowing of what will
Speaker 1: likely happen in November, because it's the exact same thing.
Speaker 1: You know. It's it's Hillary wants to build bridges and
Speaker 1: and not a border wall. Well, that means that creates
Speaker 1: security issues because more and more Middle Eastern men are
Speaker 1: crossing the Mexican border. That also means that more and
Speaker 1: more Americans are competing with the illegal immigrants for jobs.
Speaker 1: When we have million Americans out of the labor force
Speaker 1: and fifty million in poverty and forty six million on
Speaker 1: food stamps, that means they'll compete for limited jobs because
Speaker 1: the economy hasn't turned around, and it drives down wages
Speaker 1: because the illegal immigrants will work for lower pay. It's
Speaker 1: going to impact so many Americans in so many different ways.
Speaker 1: And any Sanders of all people gets it. And he says,
Speaker 1: this vote shows a global economy is not working. Well,
Speaker 1: it's not working for workers in Pennsylvania. It's not working
Speaker 1: for the folks in New Jersey. It's not working for
Speaker 1: the people in Wisconsin. It's not working for the people
Speaker 1: of Michigan Detroit, which has single handedly been destroyed. How
Speaker 1: sad is that the Ford is going to build a
Speaker 1: Mexican plan and then literally bring their products to America.
Speaker 1: Those cars should be built in America. And if China
Speaker 1: has access to our markets and Japan has access to
Speaker 1: our markets, they ought to offer our products to their
Speaker 1: citizens because I think they would find American cars as
Speaker 1: a product they'd want to buy. And we can keep
Speaker 1: Americans working. Blue collar Americans have been screwed over royally
Speaker 1: by all of this. It's unbelievable seem to care. By
Speaker 1: the way. Another reason probably that Bernie Sanders. That's why
Speaker 1: what Bernie's supporters say they're not vote for Hillary. I
Speaker 1: think on this issue, blue collar workers they want jobs,
Speaker 1: they want the economy fixed. I think most Americans see
Speaker 1: the danger in robbing our future generations blind the way
Speaker 1: Democrats are doing it. It's time to stand up. It's
Speaker 1: time to build a border. And yes, you can't have
Speaker 1: a president ignore coequal branches of government and separation of
Speaker 1: powers and dictate laws the way this president has and
Speaker 1: the Supreme Court upheld the Fifth Circuit yesterday. I mean
Speaker 1: it's is illegal unconstitutional executive amnesty stops Hillary she wants
Speaker 1: increase and refugees. Well, when one American gets killed, that's
Speaker 1: blood on her hands, on Obama's hands. If one American
Speaker 1: is gonna die, that's not The price is too high
Speaker 1: for me. I think it's fair to say that maybe
Speaker 1: some point down the line there might be a UK
Speaker 1: S trade agreement, but it's not gonna happen anytime soon
Speaker 1: because our focus is in negotiating with a big block
Speaker 1: of the European Union to get a trade agreement done,
Speaker 1: and UK is going to be in the back of
Speaker 1: the queue, not because we don't have a special relationship,
Speaker 1: but because given the heavy lift on any trade agreement,
Speaker 1: US having access to a big market win a lot
Speaker 1: of countries rather than trying to do piecemeal trade agreements
Speaker 1: UH is hugely inefficient. Now to the subject at hand, obviously,
Speaker 1: the United States is in a different hemisphere, different circumstances,
Speaker 1: has different sets of relationships with its neighbors than the
Speaker 1: UK does. But I can tell you this if right
Speaker 1: now I've got access two a massive market where I
Speaker 1: sell forty four percent of my exports, and now I'm
Speaker 1: thinking about leaving the organization that gives me access to
Speaker 1: that market, and that is responsible for millions of jobs
Speaker 1: in my country and responsible for an enormous amount of
Speaker 1: commerce and upon which a lot of businesses depend. Um,
Speaker 1: that's not something i'd probably do. He didn't stop it
Speaker 1: at the water's edge because he made statements about, uh,
Speaker 1: this incredible part of the world and that this particular
Speaker 1: country and frankly a large group of countries should do.
Speaker 1: I mean, he's he's constantly dictating to the world what
Speaker 1: they should do. The world doesn't listen to him, obviously,
Speaker 1: you can see that by the vote. But he's constantly
Speaker 1: dictating to other countries. So you know, certainly it doesn't
Speaker 1: stop at the water's edge with him, and you know,
Speaker 1: very importantly got it totally wrong. And he's embarrassed. I mean,
Speaker 1: he's embarrassed by the Supreme Court decision yesterday, which was
Speaker 1: a real rebuke, and he's very embarrassed by he got involved.
Speaker 1: I don't know if that was through friendship with David Cameron.
Speaker 1: It could have been, and I understand friendship, and I
Speaker 1: can understand why he did it. I can't understand that,
Speaker 1: but I think it's something he shouldn't have done. It's
Speaker 1: not his country, it's not his part of the world.
Speaker 1: He shouldn't have done it, and I actually think that
Speaker 1: his recommendation perhaps caused it to fail. Wow. Powerful remarks
Speaker 1: today in Scotland by Donald Trump. Now go back to
Speaker 1: the original statement of Obama. Oh, you know, we're not
Speaker 1: going to be negotiating trade agreements with Great Britain Art
Speaker 1: Art Number one, Ally and supporter. We're not gonna do
Speaker 1: that anytime soon. They're gonna be in the back of
Speaker 1: the queue. In other words, they'll be in the back
Speaker 1: of the bus. We're not gonna rush to help or
Speaker 1: accommodate them. And Obama involves himself once again. Another epic
Speaker 1: fell for Obama and for Hillary. And also, just like
Speaker 1: he tried to influence the Israeli elections, what seems now
Speaker 1: to be happening and the impact that this breaks it
Speaker 1: leave by the people of Great Britain is going to
Speaker 1: have on people's mentality. There's a lot going on here,
Speaker 1: and what impact it's gonna have on our own elections
Speaker 1: in November is yet to be determined. But there's no
Speaker 1: doubt that the resurgence in British nationalism we're seeing something
Speaker 1: very similar unfold here. In the United States, and that
Speaker 1: is against globalism, against world trade, against you know, jobs
Speaker 1: being lost, all across the spectrum. Immigration issue has been
Speaker 1: in Great Britain quite real. They now have eight eight
Speaker 1: Sharia courts in Great Britain. Um. I think this in
Speaker 1: the end, this is gonna make things better and make
Speaker 1: Great Britain stronger in the long term. I think that
Speaker 1: all these scare tactics that Obama and others were using,
Speaker 1: that was that was done directly. I was sent a
Speaker 1: shot across the bow that we're not gonna help you,
Speaker 1: We're not gonna make extra agreements for you. I actually
Speaker 1: hope the U EU collapses. I hope for a lot
Speaker 1: of different reasons. Why should better run nations be financially
Speaker 1: responsible for poorly run nations sort of goes against the
Speaker 1: Obama's Kumbaya world government mentality that he has. And two
Speaker 1: weeks according to his need memory, talked about America waste
Speaker 1: more money in a day if we could feed in
Speaker 1: a cruise ship the you know population of Porta Prince.
Speaker 1: What was he talking about there? That's all redistribution And
Speaker 1: if you believe in redistribution in this country all night,
Speaker 1: why not redistribute the wealth. Why isn't it fair to
Speaker 1: redistribute it to every country? There's no belief in any
Speaker 1: sovereignty anyway. Joining us now, Raheim Kasam. He is the
Speaker 1: editor in chief of bright bart News in London. Their
Speaker 1: bureau Jessica Vaughan is the director of Policy Studies at
Speaker 1: the Center for Immigration Studies. And I think the UK
Speaker 1: made a powerful statement today saying they want control of
Speaker 1: their borders, uh and freedom from the EU many of
Speaker 1: the same issues we're debating here, uh, Raheim, why don't
Speaker 1: you tell us in the lead up to this a
Speaker 1: lot of scare tactics used by a lot of different people,
Speaker 1: and with Cameron actually getting out as the Prime minister,
Speaker 1: but tell us what the real issues were for the
Speaker 1: people of Britain. Yah Hi Sean, Well, of course we've
Speaker 1: had a monumental vote today and the run up to
Speaker 1: it was really marred by a lot of what we
Speaker 1: call project fear tactics over here and what really became
Speaker 1: project threat tactics. This was the this was the establishment,
Speaker 1: This was the big banks, this was the big government organizations,
Speaker 1: is the big longstanding politicians, the trades unions all coming
Speaker 1: together to say to Britain if you don't do as
Speaker 1: we say, if you don't do as we direct you,
Speaker 1: just like Mr Obama did also, and then your lives
Speaker 1: are going to be made a misery. You may find
Speaker 1: yourself in economic uncertainty, You may find yourself in the
Speaker 1: depths of recession. You may find yourself in the midst
Speaker 1: of World War three. We were even told at one point,
Speaker 1: and what to have happened is that they've over played
Speaker 1: their hand in such a massive way that the British
Speaker 1: public kicked back, and it kicked a prime minister out.
Speaker 1: The most extraordinary circumstances we're seeing here in Britain's day.
Speaker 1: It's amazing set of circumstances. I saw this coming, I
Speaker 1: said yesterday, I thought this was how the vote was
Speaker 1: going to turn out. Jessica, Look, you have done a
Speaker 1: lot of terrific work as the director of policy studies
Speaker 1: for the Center of Immigration Studies. Uh, there is no
Speaker 1: doubt the migrant population issue and the lack of borders
Speaker 1: in the EU contributed greatly to the people deciding to leave. Correct. Correct,
Speaker 1: there is no doubt that immigration was and and concern
Speaker 1: over immigration, high immigration numbers, and the fact that immigration
Speaker 1: has been out of control is what motivated so many
Speaker 1: people in UH in the UK to take this step,
Speaker 1: and that's what is motivating so many voters to support
Speaker 1: Donald Trump in in on the U s. Side. UH.
Speaker 1: You know, we've seen here the arrival of three million
Speaker 1: new immigrants in the United States in just the last
Speaker 1: two years, according to the Census Bureau. And Americans are
Speaker 1: feeling the impacts in their communities. UM. They're concerned about
Speaker 1: national security, they know that our economy is not creating
Speaker 1: enough jobs for the people who are here already. And
Speaker 1: they're concerned about the direction of a country and about
Speaker 1: especially the fact that they have had no say in
Speaker 1: this transformative level of immigration. And want a candidate who
Speaker 1: is signaling clearly that that they're going to turn this around. UH.
Speaker 1: And and so are a political elites really need to
Speaker 1: heed this warning and take a good look in the mirror.
Speaker 1: And UH and I'd like to see the Republican leadership
Speaker 1: in Congress, for example, put together a program of UM
Speaker 1: planned legislation that will reassure American voters that UM, in
Speaker 1: you know, conjunction with the President, that they're going to
Speaker 1: reverse direction on immigration in particular. And UH, do something different,
Speaker 1: do something that voters want to see happen, rather than
Speaker 1: I would argue, Yeah, look, I think Great Britain's problem
Speaker 1: with immigration is even worse than ours, and I think
Speaker 1: ours is pretty darn bad. And three million people new
Speaker 1: immigrants in two years, I'm not even sure if that
Speaker 1: number actually includes the number of illegals that continue to
Speaker 1: cross our border. But okay, but but the most important
Speaker 1: thing here is, for example, if you're a member of
Speaker 1: the European Union and you're a Great Britain, Okay, let's
Speaker 1: say you are Romanian, and let's say you became you
Speaker 1: came from the Middle East. Okay, you get an EU passport,
Speaker 1: you can go to Britain, and when you get there,
Speaker 1: you have access to the schools, the health care system,
Speaker 1: which is already overwhelmed, unemployment, and so much else. So
Speaker 1: the financial burden on them was even greater. But the
Speaker 1: same thing is happening here. You see it in border
Speaker 1: states like Arizona and Texas and California, where the impact
Speaker 1: the billions of dollars that have been spent on the
Speaker 1: illegal immigrants for a criminal justice system, our health care system,
Speaker 1: our educational system, it is so overwhelmed people that you know,
Speaker 1: taxpayers cannot afford to pay this anymore. That's right, and
Speaker 1: that's what motivated these twenty six states to file a
Speaker 1: lawsuit against the president's executive amnesties because they knew darn
Speaker 1: well that they were the ones and their taxpayers if
Speaker 1: we're going to be the ones that had to pick
Speaker 1: up the tab for this reckless decision because the people
Speaker 1: who were being legalized are are not self sufficient and
Speaker 1: going to be dependent on publicly funded wealth shaller's services,
Speaker 1: and it just gets too expensive, um and it diminishes
Speaker 1: services for Americans who are also needy. So it's unsustainable.
Speaker 1: And you can't find an economist in this country that
Speaker 1: thinks that we have a shortage of unskilled labor. And
Speaker 1: you know, so the job market impacts, the fiscal impacts,
Speaker 1: and the security problems created by mass immigration are just
Speaker 1: becoming too much. And voters have had enough. And Hillary
Speaker 1: wants of five and increase even over what Obama wants
Speaker 1: as it relates to the Syrian refugees and other refugees
Speaker 1: coming in the country in spite of every top national
Speaker 1: security intelligence officer warning that Isis will infiltrate that population.
Speaker 1: Let me go back to your Rahim because I think
Speaker 1: this is really important for people to understand. Was it
Speaker 1: about the money, Was it more about the immigration? Was
Speaker 1: it you know, how are the people? What was the
Speaker 1: thought process of the people that were for the Brexit. Well,
Speaker 1: they tried to make it about the money. The establishment
Speaker 1: tried to make it about the economy, about people's jobs
Speaker 1: threatening their livelihoods. They even commissioned a report from our
Speaker 1: own treasury to say that people would be three thousand
Speaker 1: pounds less well off a year if they voted to
Speaker 1: leave the European Union. But effectively it came down to
Speaker 1: the following things. The idea of nationhood, the idea of
Speaker 1: having a sovereign country, the idea of being able to
Speaker 1: control your own borders, and of course, as you mentioned earlier,
Speaker 1: one of the major parts of that constituent parts of
Speaker 1: that control of the borders is that people are unable
Speaker 1: to get appointments to see their doctors in this country.
Speaker 1: We have a massive shortage of primary school places in
Speaker 1: his country, and we have a net migration of three
Speaker 1: thousand people a year. When the government is telling us
Speaker 1: repeatedly election after election that we're going to bring this
Speaker 1: down for need a hundred thousand a year, so people
Speaker 1: exercise the fact that they were fed up of being
Speaker 1: told something five years ago, ten years ago, fifteen years
Speaker 1: ago and it never ever happening. And whether or not
Speaker 1: people want to blame the European Union for the facts
Speaker 1: that these things are happening, I perhaps would, for instance,
Speaker 1: but there are arguments against it. Whether or not that
Speaker 1: is the case, this is the main thrust behind the
Speaker 1: Leave campaign. They have seized on the European Union as
Speaker 1: this entity that encourages open borders, as this entity that
Speaker 1: takes twelve billion pounds out of the British taxpayer pocket
Speaker 1: every year and files it around Europe into these little
Speaker 1: projects that keep all these smaller satellite states tied into
Speaker 1: a broader union. Well, let me ask the bigger question,
Speaker 1: because at your election, you know, I had these big
Speaker 1: fights with Angum Chowdery, the radical Islamic imam that have
Speaker 1: really gone viral. But he said he supported remain and
Speaker 1: he said the EU courts are softer on his Islamic friends.
Speaker 1: Isn't that everything you need to know about Brexit? And
Speaker 1: is the issue of radical Well and let me ask,
Speaker 1: let me just at this point, isn't the issue of
Speaker 1: the Islamization of Europe, and in particular the impact of
Speaker 1: conflicting cultures also at the heart of this. So this
Speaker 1: is what the This is what the remain campaigns couldn't
Speaker 1: seem to get their heads around last night as the
Speaker 1: results were rolling. In places like Bradford and Birmingham and Luten,
Speaker 1: very heavily Muslim populated areas voted to leave. The reason
Speaker 1: for that is people are seeing their cultures and their
Speaker 1: communities diluted. People are seeing the Islamification of their communities
Speaker 1: and they are fighting back against that. They don't just
Speaker 1: hold the European Union accountable, but they hold the idea
Speaker 1: that we should be a member of the European Union accountable.
Speaker 1: That's tied in to this sort of one world globalist
Speaker 1: argument that you can dilute people get mad. I think
Speaker 1: that's a good point, and let me go back to
Speaker 1: Jessica because of the constraints of time. But Jessica, I mean,
Speaker 1: you know, you have people that if you grow up
Speaker 1: under Sharia, those values that you believe in are in
Speaker 1: direct conflict with our democratic republic and our constitutional values. Um,
Speaker 1: how do we know? I don't know. Well, I agree
Speaker 1: there's no reconciling, So how do you know if somebody
Speaker 1: comes here because they want the freedom that we have,
Speaker 1: or do they want to proselytize and create their own
Speaker 1: theocracy here, which by the way, is taught in Islam. Well,
Speaker 1: it's that's hard to predict. And that's why we need
Speaker 1: need to take another look at our immigration, our legal
Speaker 1: immigration policies as well, so that we can decide whether
Speaker 1: our immigration policy is able to keep us safe or not.
Speaker 1: And we certainly shouldn't be admitting the radical and moms
Speaker 1: who are going to set up shop in so many
Speaker 1: communities and have the ability to proselytize. But should we
Speaker 1: let anybody in from a country that supports Shariah if
Speaker 1: we can't possibly vet their motivation? We have we that
Speaker 1: the motivation. What we need to do is make it
Speaker 1: less likely that we're going to admit someone like that
Speaker 1: by reducing the numbers overall, but in particular with countries
Speaker 1: like Syria where we know we can't do any vetting whatsoever,
Speaker 1: and isis is promising to infiltrate that flow. We need
Speaker 1: to shut it down. Um until such time as we
Speaker 1: can have a better determination. I am skeptical that will
Speaker 1: ever hit that point. Um, you know, we need to
Speaker 1: find a way to help Syrians without our own communities
Speaker 1: at risk, and then that can be done. That can
Speaker 1: be done. You know, I gotta run, but I listen.
Speaker 1: You both have been terrific on this. I really really
Speaker 1: appreciate it. How do you respond to the President's response
Speaker 1: to the Supreme Court today? Well, first, Gretgen, as a reminder,
Speaker 1: I followed that lawsuit that the Supreme Court ruled upon today.
Speaker 1: It was my last act as Attorney in General before
Speaker 1: becoming governor. But I find what the President said to
Speaker 1: be insulting and and to be misrepresentative of what is
Speaker 1: really taking place because he talked about immigration and people
Speaker 1: who may not look like others. Here's the reality. America
Speaker 1: has always stood for legal immigration. What the President was
Speaker 1: doing was facilitating illegal immigration. The president's job is to
Speaker 1: enforce the law, not write the law. As the President
Speaker 1: himself admitted, he violated the Constitution. He said twenty times
Speaker 1: he did not have the authority to rewrite the law.
Speaker 1: But yet he acted as a king and rerutted himself
Speaker 1: because he could not get Congress to do what he
Speaker 1: wanted them to do. Yeah, I was just gonna say
Speaker 1: that he actually admitted to the fact that he wasn't
Speaker 1: able to do that legally, but he did it instead.
Speaker 1: But today he went back to what he has always said,
Speaker 1: which is that Congress left him with no choice, that
Speaker 1: he that he simply had to do it. And how
Speaker 1: do you respond to that. If that is his position,
Speaker 1: if that's the position of Hillary Clinton or anybody he
Speaker 1: runs for president, they are telling you they're willing to
Speaker 1: abdicate the Constitution. They're willing to violate the Constitution in
Speaker 1: order to fulfill their own political agenda. Gretchen, we have
Speaker 1: a constitution. The president has to follow, Congress has to
Speaker 1: follow you and I have to follow and it since
Speaker 1: a bad message to all Americans, especially those who want
Speaker 1: to come to this country. That is okay to not
Speaker 1: follow the law, to not follow the constitution. The president
Speaker 1: has to follow it. He does not have the authority
Speaker 1: to write the law. That is Congress's responsibility. All right,
Speaker 1: that's the governor of the great State of Texas. He
Speaker 1: was the attorney general. I want to just set the
Speaker 1: table here. I don't want to ignore the real significance
Speaker 1: of the Supreme Court decision yesterday, the four four tie,
Speaker 1: effectively blocking Obama's illegal, unconstitutional executive amnesty. UH. He sought
Speaker 1: to shield millions of people in this country from deportation. UH.
Speaker 1: The Texas led twenty six Republican dominated states and challenging
Speaker 1: the program, and Obama announced this in Republicans in Congress.
Speaker 1: They were weak and timid and wouldn't defund it, so
Speaker 1: it took the courts. But when they tried the courts, uh,
Speaker 1: and and abdicated the responsibility in Obamacare, that didn't work
Speaker 1: out as well as this did. Well, he's now the governor.
Speaker 1: He was the attorne a general at the time. Greg
Speaker 1: Abbott is with us. How are you, governor? How are you?
Speaker 1: Thank you so much for what it did here? Well,
Speaker 1: thank you, Sean gre to be back with you again.
Speaker 1: It's a huge, huge blow to Obama's illegal, unconstitutional action.
Speaker 1: You know what bothers me more than anything in this case, though,
Speaker 1: I've got a tape of the President times saying he
Speaker 1: did not have the authority to do this, and then
Speaker 1: he did it anyway, So he doesn't really care about
Speaker 1: the constitution. That's my that's my conclusion after listening to him.
Speaker 1: It demonstrates the crisis we're in in our country right
Speaker 1: Now remember this, this is not the only issue on
Speaker 1: which he's done this. He did the very same thing
Speaker 1: with regarded the Clean Power Plan, trying to use the
Speaker 1: e p A to cram down his global warming agenda
Speaker 1: in the United States. And it was a very weak
Speaker 1: that Justice Scalia passed away, that the Supreme Court put
Speaker 1: a hold on that particular issue. And so this is
Speaker 1: a recentibus behavior on the part of this president repeatedly
Speaker 1: saying if Congress will not act, if cong will not
Speaker 1: write a law the way that I want it written,
Speaker 1: and he is going to write it himself, that turns
Speaker 1: the Constitution on its head. It is necessary not just
Speaker 1: for attorneys general, it's necessary for Congress, it's necessary for
Speaker 1: all Americans. That we did not governorable to follow the laws.
Speaker 1: You did the right thing, you had the courage, your convictions.
Speaker 1: Republicans in Congress they said, oh, give us the Senate, Well,
Speaker 1: will defund executive amnesty. Well they got the Senate in
Speaker 1: that was their main promise, and they back down. That
Speaker 1: troubles me almost as much as Obama being so willing
Speaker 1: to to not follow the Constitution and the rule of law. Well,
Speaker 1: is we we will not always have the luxury of
Speaker 1: being able to have some backstops, such as attorneys general
Speaker 1: come forward and foul lawsuits, among other things. Sometimes the
Speaker 1: courts dismiss our lawsuits as though we don't have standing
Speaker 1: or the grounds to bring a lawsuit to begin with.
Speaker 1: And so we do have to have people in Washington,
Speaker 1: d c. With a backbone who are going to hold
Speaker 1: the executive branch of government accountable. And if you go
Speaker 1: back to Alexander Hamilton's he said, the most powerful tool
Speaker 1: any government has is the power of the purse, and
Speaker 1: Congress needs to start exercising his power of the purse
Speaker 1: to hold this president accountable. Well, I think you did
Speaker 1: a great job. I think you know the fact that
Speaker 1: you led this effort and was successful. But you're right.
Speaker 1: I mean, the courts oftentimes say there's no standing. You've
Speaker 1: got a liberal judge or justice. You get yourself in trouble.
Speaker 1: And it's frustrating that Republicans have been so timid. And
Speaker 1: give you one example. And then as Texas sued for
Speaker 1: recovery of all the money, more than billions of dollars
Speaker 1: that we have spent to secure the border, to educate
Speaker 1: people who are in this country illegally, to provide health
Speaker 1: care for them for those who are in the country illegally.
Speaker 1: This is coming out of Texas taxpayer dollars, and we
Speaker 1: wanted the federal government to cover the cost. And the
Speaker 1: court through the case out of court saying we didn't
Speaker 1: have the legal authority to assert such a claim. Yeah,
Speaker 1: well you really should, considering it's impacting your bottom line
Speaker 1: as a as a state. And look, I was down
Speaker 1: there with Governor Perry, your predecessor, and and six five
Speaker 1: thousand crimes committed against Texans in an eight year period
Speaker 1: of time. I sat through the briefing that Obama should
Speaker 1: have sat through, and it's frustrating. Let me ask you
Speaker 1: a very maybe off topic question. You saw Brexit in
Speaker 1: this big vote in Great Britain last night and yesterday
Speaker 1: here I keep reading every once in a while, I'm
Speaker 1: just doing my research that there is a succession effort
Speaker 1: in Texas. What are your thoughts on that. Do you
Speaker 1: think it ever gets to the point that the good
Speaker 1: people of Texas and their values of freedom separate themselves
Speaker 1: from the United States and and go on their own Kennedy,
Speaker 1: What I think is that what Texans believe in is
Speaker 1: that we need the United states to be more like Texas.
Speaker 1: In fact, I believe America longs to be the way
Speaker 1: that Texas is, and we need Texas brand Governor. I'm
Speaker 1: gonna tell you, I'm up in New York and I'd
Speaker 1: rather be a Texan. But I'm telling you right now,
Speaker 1: I don't think that's ever gonna happen. Well, there are
Speaker 1: Sean Hannity's across this country, and all we gotta do
Speaker 1: is have the backbone to stand up and steer this
Speaker 1: country back on the right. I could, I could talk
Speaker 1: till I'm blew in the face, I'll be dead. There's
Speaker 1: no way New York is ever going red. It's not
Speaker 1: gonna happen. And even even if New York doesn't go red, Sean,
Speaker 1: you know this, and that is there are at least thirty,
Speaker 1: maybe more than thirty Republican states are run by Republican
Speaker 1: conservative legislatures in this country. Right now, we have the people,
Speaker 1: we have the power. We just need to have the
Speaker 1: will of power to get this done. But we can
Speaker 1: do it. And we Texas will take the leadership role,
Speaker 1: just like we did in this case against Barack Obama,
Speaker 1: to ensure that we steer this country back on the
Speaker 1: right course. And you you you brought up Breggny. Listen,
Speaker 1: this is something that's going on. I'll just in the
Speaker 1: United States, and this is something that's going on across
Speaker 1: the entire globe. And there's a reason for it, and
Speaker 1: that is because sovereignty is a key component of a nation.
Speaker 1: And we've seen the United States, we've seen a great Britain.
Speaker 1: We've seen countries in Europe sacrifice the sovereignty and we've
Speaker 1: seen the way their citizens have suffered because of it.
Speaker 1: Asserting sovereignty of a state, of a nation is essential,
Speaker 1: and that is what America must do to put our
Speaker 1: country back on the right track. Governor. Governor, I want
Speaker 1: to thank you for leading this effort and the other
Speaker 1: twenty six Republican dominated states for challenging this and winning.
Speaker 1: You did us a great service. Thank you, sir, You're
Speaker 1: a great American than eight hundred nine four one Seawn
Speaker 1: Tolfrey telephone number you want to be a part of
Speaker 1: the program. Janice is in Tampa, Florida on nine seventy
Speaker 1: a m w f l A. What's up? How are you? Janice?
Speaker 1: So this CRETA initially called up to tell you a
Speaker 1: couple of days ago is at the um. The reason
Speaker 1: Donald Trump is not taking money from people, not asking
Speaker 1: for money from people is because, um, he doesn't money
Speaker 1: to be beholden to anybody. But then we're on the
Speaker 1: Brexfit thing now, and I just want to know that
Speaker 1: this gives me hope that the rest of the world
Speaker 1: is finally getting it. You know, Piers Morgan, I've actually
Speaker 1: met the Guy's a pretty nice guy, and I interviewed
Speaker 1: him once. I was once competing. It wasn't competition, but uh,
Speaker 1: you know. He actually put out a warning today to
Speaker 1: Hillary and he said that if she ignores this Brexit
Speaker 1: vote and what it means for America's presidential campaign, shall
Speaker 1: do so at her own peril. I agree with him,
Speaker 1: and if it can happen in Britain, it can definitely
Speaker 1: happen in America because the issues are the same and
Speaker 1: the cheerleaders for change or are not that dissimilar. Boris
Speaker 1: Johnson and Donald Trump have both focused with laser like
Speaker 1: ruthless precision on hot button issues that they know people
Speaker 1: are genuinely worried about immigration and terrorism. He's right, yeah, absolutely,
Speaker 1: and like our incredible, incredible liberal media, I mean, in
Speaker 1: Tampa not. We only have one newspaper. It is the
Speaker 1: most nauseating thing. I mean, it is the most nauseating
Speaker 1: Trump bashing paper I've ever seen ever in my life.
Speaker 1: So you know. But but there are people that I
Speaker 1: know in this city who are fed up and are ready,
Speaker 1: you know, to take back America. They really are. Yeah,
Speaker 1: well listen, I uh, I think this is a sign.
Speaker 1: I don't think I don't think the president, I don't
Speaker 1: think Hillary have any clue at the impact of their
Speaker 1: policies and how bad they have been on the world
Speaker 1: and on this country. And I think I honestly got
Speaker 1: to believe that we've suffered enough now not to continue
Speaker 1: down this road. And that's my hope and prayer. Anyway,
Speaker 1: thank you, Jannis, appreciate it. Nine for one, Shawn, you
Speaker 1: want to be a part of the program. Uh, Donna
Speaker 1: and Staten Island, our friend Donnald listening to the all
Speaker 1: New A M seven ten w O R. How are you?
Speaker 1: I'm good? How are you? What's going on? I'm good.
Speaker 1: I'm very happy that breakfit. I was so excited. I
Speaker 1: actually woke up in the middle of the night and
Speaker 1: put the TV on and saw that, and I was
Speaker 1: like emerging my husband going gues what th I was
Speaker 1: absolutely drilled. So you know what that you really know
Speaker 1: you're a news junkie because I kept waking up in
Speaker 1: the middle of the night and I'm watching Nicole pedal
Speaker 1: Eades on the Fox Business Network and Sky News and
Speaker 1: I'm going all over the place. You know, you see
Speaker 1: the Prime Minister Cameron resigned that I saw an interview
Speaker 1: with Tony Blair who was so flustered. He's a very
Speaker 1: articulate guy, but he was pretty flustered in this interview.
Speaker 1: And uh so you can't believe the polls, which was
Speaker 1: very um. I thought was very encouraging for those of
Speaker 1: us who support Trump because you just can't believe those polls.
Speaker 1: I I I tell everybody, when was the last time
Speaker 1: you participated in a poll? So alright, Donald, God bless you.
Speaker 1: Always love to hear your voice. Richard is in Twin Falls, Idaho,
Speaker 1: Richard High, How are you glad you cult sir brother Sean, Yes, yes,
Speaker 1: my Irish we better the five year old girl that
Speaker 1: got raped her into unfollowed by Muslim refugees that are
Speaker 1: living over here in the refugee relocation center. You know,
Speaker 1: I'm noticing that there's a media blackout on this. What
Speaker 1: you said about what the crime that they committed? They
Speaker 1: urinated on this girl. They videotaped this. She's only five
Speaker 1: years old. And the father, who is not five years old,
Speaker 1: high by this son. Were a great performance with his
Speaker 1: video and I guess the act itself. They have now
Speaker 1: been addicted all three families. They're out of that, are they?
Speaker 1: What do you mean there? They're out of the housing area.
Speaker 1: How about out of the country. Wow, that would be lovely.
Speaker 1: Like the two the two boys that were held in
Speaker 1: the juvenile lock up, they've been released yesterday to the Uh.
Speaker 1: Linda told me the care Remember they were the unindicted
Speaker 1: co conspirator group in the Holy Land Foundation case. That
Speaker 1: they're going to assume the legal costs for this? Um? What? Why?
Speaker 1: What are they defending here? And this now goes to
Speaker 1: the whole heart of the refugee population issue. And are
Speaker 1: I keep warning, I keep naming all the intelligence officials
Speaker 1: saying don't take refugees in, we can't vet them. Isis
Speaker 1: will infiltrate? And I keep saying, of one American dies, Uh,
Speaker 1: that blood is on Obama and Hillary's hands. Hillary wants
Speaker 1: a fifty increase and taking him refugees into the country. Look,
Speaker 1: I actually think watching breaks it. I think this is
Speaker 1: gonna have a profound impact, and people are gonna wake
Speaker 1: up come September, October, November, and they're gonna realize Hillary
Speaker 1: is so far out of touch with where this country
Speaker 1: is politically that it has the potential to be an
Speaker 1: overwhelm ming victory. And I hope and pray that that
Speaker 1: scenario unfolds. Listen, I want to say something I am.
Speaker 1: I'm I apologize to the people of Idaho. It is
Speaker 1: a disgrace that the media in this country has literally
Speaker 1: ignored the score, the story of this girl. We played,
Speaker 1: the eight nine year old woman that was an eyewitnessed
Speaker 1: to this, this horrible, horrible crime, and yet I don't
Speaker 1: see it anywhere in the media because it doesn't fit
Speaker 1: their narrative, doesn't fit the narrative of the candidate they support,
Speaker 1: and as a result, most people haven't even heard about
Speaker 1: this story. It's beyond frustrating. That's what I mean when
Speaker 1: I say we have an abusively biased news media in
Speaker 1: the country. On House Joint Resolution, the clerk will report
Speaker 1: the title of the joints of resolution resolution in the
Speaker 1: question is but how sound reconsideration passed the joint resolution
Speaker 1: the objectives of the President to the contrary, notwithstanding, the
Speaker 1: gentleman from Minnesota, Mr. Klein is recognized for one hour
Speaker 1: remember over ride the preside about the careers, the general
Speaker 1: from Missotia yields back the question into the gentleman has
Speaker 1: appraised the boat and a friend to debate, and given
Speaker 1: the weakness of his arguments in his position, his fear
Speaker 1: is well founded. I'm saying time for a real debate
Speaker 1: on these issues too. If you will fail and talking
Speaker 1: about friends, radical Islam leaves a bo loop fly loun
Speaker 1: no sin lo p hop high lou ho sig hold
Speaker 1: fiout to for getting a gun to make radical That's
Speaker 1: pretty much. Why do you want to let terrorist buy
Speaker 1: a gun? Oh my killer? Why do you want to
Speaker 1: protect terrorist from buying a gun? Why do you want alright?
Speaker 1: That of course, unfolding on the House floor earlier this week,
Speaker 1: the occupied DC Democrats petulant cry baby Democrats oddly strangely
Speaker 1: bizarrely blaming guns for what happened in Orlando. Not a
Speaker 1: radical Islamic ideology committed to killing every man, women, woman,
Speaker 1: and child that doesn't convert to their religion anyway, joining
Speaker 1: us now to discuss. And I think it's even tied
Speaker 1: into the Brexit vote that happened yesterday in Britain, and
Speaker 1: as much as immigration, the Islamization of Great Britain played
Speaker 1: heavily into the minds and voting hearts of people in
Speaker 1: Great Britain. Amy uh Dardashian is with us. She is
Speaker 1: a former CBS reporter turned on their legal analyst John Lott,
Speaker 1: the president of the Crime Prevention Research Center, author of
Speaker 1: the forthcoming book War on Guns. Of course, he's had
Speaker 1: many editions of more guns, less crime. Thank you both
Speaker 1: for being with us. Amy. Is this a gun issue
Speaker 1: or radical Islamic terrorist issue? I think they're interconnected. And
Speaker 1: I think what's so interesting about what's going on in
Speaker 1: the chambers right now for all to see is that
Speaker 1: many people, when seeing this sit in by the Democrats,
Speaker 1: may think that they're trying to advance liberal legislation, but
Speaker 1: in fact they're pushing for a vote on legislation that
Speaker 1: was drafted by a Republican which is actually pretty moderate.
Speaker 1: It's to ban Gunzell's sales to a hundred and nine
Speaker 1: thousand people on the no fly list. Only hundred of
Speaker 1: them are Americans. And there's even an outlet to appeal
Speaker 1: in court if you're put on the no fly list
Speaker 1: and you're prohibited from purchasing the no fly list. I
Speaker 1: actually think there are very strong constitutional arguments about whether
Speaker 1: or not if you are on that no fly list,
Speaker 1: there has to be some identification in some court presentation
Speaker 1: if you're going to prevent somebody from getting a gun. Now,
Speaker 1: with that said, if you're on the no fly list,
Speaker 1: I gotta believe it's probably for good reason. I don't
Speaker 1: want the person I have the right to get a gun,
Speaker 1: but certainly the person cannot be denied due process and
Speaker 1: the legislation builds and due process. And let's not forget
Speaker 1: that there was a broader terrorism watch list measure that failed.
Speaker 1: So this is a smaller subset. Now the problem with
Speaker 1: let me but Amy, let me ask the question this way.
Speaker 1: If I've carried a gun, I've had a carry permits
Speaker 1: in Rhode Island, California, Alabama, Georgia, and I carry a
Speaker 1: gun in New York every day of my life, all
Speaker 1: my adult life. The last thirty years of my life,
Speaker 1: I've carried a gun. My question to you is very simple.
Speaker 1: If God forbid, you ever found yourself in a situation
Speaker 1: like San Bernardino or Orlando, and we know in both
Speaker 1: these instances these guys reloaded their weapons, which means that
Speaker 1: takes a little time to reload a weapon. If I'm
Speaker 1: in the room, would you rather me be in that
Speaker 1: room with a weapon with the possibility of saving lives
Speaker 1: as a law abiding, responsible, well trained gun owner, would
Speaker 1: you want to you rather me be there in the
Speaker 1: room with you. I'm totally for that, And I will
Speaker 1: say that the Supreme Court in two tho they recognize
Speaker 1: that there's a Second Amendment constitutional rights for an individual
Speaker 1: to keep in bear arms. Even ween Lapierre and the
Speaker 1: n r A, they support only law abiding citizens carrying guns.
Speaker 1: So then what's the problem with background checks on felons
Speaker 1: and the men list? What's the problem with that? John Latta,
Speaker 1: I'll let you answer. Yeah, Well, we all want to
Speaker 1: try to stop bad people from being able to get guns.
Speaker 1: The Democrats could have voted for Cornyn's Senator Cornyn's bill,
Speaker 1: which would have done exactly what you are saying. There
Speaker 1: amy people on the no fly list if they try
Speaker 1: to buy a gun, the FBI would have been alerted,
Speaker 1: and then the people would have had seventy two hours
Speaker 1: to go and appeal uh if the FBI decided that
Speaker 1: they didn't want to go and get the gun verts.
Speaker 1: Except for one Democrat, all the other Democrats voted against
Speaker 1: that bill. But here's the problem. None of the proposals
Speaker 1: of the Democrats put up that were voted on in
Speaker 1: the Senate this week would have done anything to stop Orlando.
Speaker 1: And they wouldn't have stopped a single one of the
Speaker 1: mass public shootings during the Obama administration or years before.
Speaker 1: I would agree with you that may not have We
Speaker 1: want to do something here, let's do it. But the
Speaker 1: one thing we know consistently to pick up on Sean's
Speaker 1: point is that we had yet another shooting in a
Speaker 1: gun free zone where citizens weren't allowed to be able
Speaker 1: to go and defend themselves. Just a couple of months ago,
Speaker 1: we had a case in Detroit where a father was
Speaker 1: concerned about his son's involvement with ISIS had told the FBI.
Speaker 1: The FBI put a tap on his phone and they
Speaker 1: had this amazing conversation tape where he's explaining why he
Speaker 1: was going to attack or the largest churches in the
Speaker 1: Detroit area. One he had cased the place he had
Speaker 1: found that it had a large congregation that people went
Speaker 1: to regularly, and to the church was the only one
Speaker 1: of the large ones that had explicitly banned anybody from
Speaker 1: carrying permanent concealed handguns on church property, so he thought
Speaker 1: that they would be easy targets. Time after time after time,
Speaker 1: we find explicit statements from these killers picking targets where
Speaker 1: they know victims can't defend themselves, whether it be the
Speaker 1: Charleston church shooting last year where the person would originally
Speaker 1: going to go to Charleston College, but because of the
Speaker 1: armed security, they're decided not to do it. I could
Speaker 1: go through a long list, but the point why won't
Speaker 1: we go and deal with the one thing that actually
Speaker 1: is relevant to all these mass public shootings, name me
Speaker 1: one mass public shooting that Senator Feinstein's bill would have stopped. Okay,
Speaker 1: first of all, if you're talking about the ban on
Speaker 1: on assault ends and people like yourself are always citing
Speaker 1: a government study that when we had the band from
Speaker 1: ninety four to two thousand and four, that it had
Speaker 1: little to no effect because semi automatic weapons only counted
Speaker 1: for about two percent of all crimes. I did a
Speaker 1: study that nobody else has done. I isolated mass shootings,
Speaker 1: and obviously the majority of mass shootings involved semi automatic weapons.
Speaker 1: But what I found was really interesting because I found
Speaker 1: that from ninety four to two thousand and four, the
Speaker 1: number of mass shootings was almost identical in the forty
Speaker 1: range to the ones from two thousand and four to present.
Speaker 1: So we're having the same amount of mass shootings even
Speaker 1: when semi autos are banned. But what I found is
Speaker 1: that during the assault weapons ban, there were a third
Speaker 1: less casualties. So what I really attribute that too is
Speaker 1: banning on high capacity magazines. And there is no reason
Speaker 1: that if you need to defend yourself or go hunting,
Speaker 1: that you can't have your semi automatic weapon, have your
Speaker 1: ten round magazine and reload. You don't need thirty round magazine.
Speaker 1: You don't need a hundred and round magazines. And those
Speaker 1: few seconds and it might take somebody during a mass
Speaker 1: shooting to have to reload, those are second seconds save lives.
Speaker 1: Those are seconds law enforcement can keep that person down.
Speaker 1: It's simply wrong to say that you're the only one
Speaker 1: who's looked at that there's been lots of academics studies
Speaker 1: that have been done on that They have not found
Speaker 1: the type of claim that you're making there. But they
Speaker 1: counted every single casualty. It was a hundred and sixty
Speaker 1: casualties approximately during the band and more than four hundred
Speaker 1: let one at a time, people who are wounded. Hundreds
Speaker 1: of lives hang on you. Even studies paid for by
Speaker 1: the Clinton administration or later on when they were asked
Speaker 1: to do a follow up study, those same people couldn't
Speaker 1: find the types of benefits that you're talking about there.
Speaker 1: But look, if you want to go on band uh magazines,
Speaker 1: good luck, because they're like the simplest thing to make.
Speaker 1: It's a box with a spring in it. The notion
Speaker 1: that somehow you're going to be able to stop criminals
Speaker 1: from be able to go and get a box with
Speaker 1: a spring in it. You know, even with just a
Speaker 1: simple you gotta just take a simple set of tools
Speaker 1: and figure out how easy it is to go and
Speaker 1: make a magazine, and and with things like three D
Speaker 1: printers or whatever. I mean, you don't even need to
Speaker 1: have simple tools to do that type of thing anymore.
Speaker 1: You're not gonna be able to control that uh, magazines.
Speaker 1: The band guys are gonna get what you're gonna do
Speaker 1: by limiting magazine sizes is mainly affecting law binding citizens.
Speaker 1: Most people have concealed carry permits, will only carry the
Speaker 1: magazine that's in the gun that they have if you
Speaker 1: limit it like to ten or like they try to
Speaker 1: do in New York to seven. Uh, they're the ones
Speaker 1: who are going to be limited. You know when why
Speaker 1: do they need thirty rounds to fire up to a
Speaker 1: boat a second? Why do they need that? Why do
Speaker 1: they need what? Why do they need thirty round magazines
Speaker 1: or a hundred round magazines, which are what are used
Speaker 1: in mass shootings. When Adam Lanza went into Newtown, he
Speaker 1: brought too high capacity thirty round magazines more than five
Speaker 1: hund rounds of ammunition, and shout those elementary school children
Speaker 1: multiple times, why do you need that? If you're defending
Speaker 1: your home or if you're hunting, you can't reload your magazine.
Speaker 1: I'll hands to that, but I just want to point
Speaker 1: out that you Stom told us one single case where
Speaker 1: Feinstein's law would have stopped one mass public shooting. I'm
Speaker 1: telling you that the number of mass shootings were the
Speaker 1: same I'm not arguing that you can't prevent mass shootings. Listen,
Speaker 1: during the assault weapons ban, people didn't go out of
Speaker 1: their way to get illegal semi automatics. Even though there
Speaker 1: were millions in circulation. Those forty mass shootings, they were
Speaker 1: most of them were with handguns. So people, why why
Speaker 1: did they always choose? Why do they always choose gun
Speaker 1: free zones because the odds are that there's not going
Speaker 1: to be anybody there to fire back. True, I don't
Speaker 1: agree with that gun free zones. I think that there
Speaker 1: should be I mean, you don't agree with that. It's
Speaker 1: just a it's a fact. I mean, how many of
Speaker 1: these incidents, John, do these shooters pick gun free zones.
Speaker 1: It's nineteen fifty with just three exceptions. Every one of
Speaker 1: these mass public shootings has taken place where general citizens
Speaker 1: are not allowed to go and have guns for protection.
Speaker 1: And the problem is police are important, but you have
Speaker 1: a uniform police officer there. They have an extremely difficult
Speaker 1: job and dangerous job stopping these mass public shootings because
Speaker 1: they stand out like a sore thumb. You know, whether
Speaker 1: it be the Turley hebdo attack or other, the guard
Speaker 1: or the person in uniform. They're they're the first person
Speaker 1: taken out in these attacks, and the benefit of having
Speaker 1: permit concealed handguns is that they don't know who it
Speaker 1: is that. Let me ask you a question. Do you
Speaker 1: have a gun in your house? What are you gonna
Speaker 1: do if God forbid there's a robbery in your house
Speaker 1: or breaking in your house or home invasion? What are
Speaker 1: you gonna do? To be honest with you, I was
Speaker 1: recently talking to my husband about us going and purchasing
Speaker 1: a gun. But what I'm saying is that, listen, I'm
Speaker 1: not what if there are what if there are five guys?
Speaker 1: For example, I have a I have a glock forty
Speaker 1: or smith want nine that I carry. I have ten
Speaker 1: hollow point bullets in every clip. Okay, okay, where where
Speaker 1: do I keep them? When I carry children? Of course
Speaker 1: I have next to my bed. I have a fingerprint
Speaker 1: safe that I have it literally I it opens in
Speaker 1: a second. Right. So, what I'm saying is that they
Speaker 1: are rarely instances where you hear about somebody defending their home. Amy,
Speaker 1: that's not true. I would I could tell you right now.
Speaker 1: I mean, it takes me one second. I could send
Speaker 1: you to my house right now and you can spend
Speaker 1: four months here and you would never get access to
Speaker 1: my guns. And I'll even tell you where they are
Speaker 1: unless you bring dynamite with you, and even then I
Speaker 1: doubt you'll get them. So my question is still gunshots
Speaker 1: involving children nationwide. It's probably a hot less than most
Speaker 1: people think. If you look at the latest numbers for
Speaker 1: two thousand and fourteen, for kids under age fifteen, there
Speaker 1: are fifty two cases. Now it's fifty two cases for
Speaker 1: all the children nine states under age fifty two too many, yeah,
Speaker 1: it is, But the prom is that when you require,
Speaker 1: as some states do, that people have to lock their
Speaker 1: fifty two shootings in Chicago on any given weekend for
Speaker 1: crying out loud, Hey I gotta let you both go,
Speaker 1: But thank you both for an informative debate. We really
Speaker 1: appreciated so many people so wrong on you know, this
Speaker 1: Great Britain exit brexit from the European Union, huge loss
Speaker 1: for Obama, huge loss for Hillary and Donald Trump was right,
Speaker 1: and a lot of it has to do with globalization,
Speaker 1: loss of jobs, immigration, control of one's borders and one's destiny.
Speaker 1: And why should Great Britain be funding That's why all
Speaker 1: these other countries now want to get out as well.
Speaker 1: Why should Great Britain be funding countries that have been
Speaker 1: irresponsible and in terms of the money that they're promising
Speaker 1: their citizens, like Spain and other countries in Greece, and
Speaker 1: they're going bankrupt. Before we get to the phones joining
Speaker 1: us quickly, here is Claudia Tenney. Now. She is running
Speaker 1: for office out of New York. I had the opportunity
Speaker 1: I was up doing an event with Donald Trump up
Speaker 1: in I think it was Albany, Schenectady, and had a
Speaker 1: chance to meet her. She wants to go to Washington.
Speaker 1: She would be a great addition to the well rather
Speaker 1: weak minded Republicans that are there. And I was so
Speaker 1: impressed with you. I just wanted to introduce you to
Speaker 1: the audience today and and get your your feeling about
Speaker 1: the state of the race and your race. Thank you, Sean.
Speaker 1: I greatly appreciate your support. It's uh, it's it's going
Speaker 1: to be a close race. Uh. As you know, I
Speaker 1: ran against the incumbent in nearly knocked him off with
Speaker 1: a you know, fifteen one disadvantage and fundraising and now
Speaker 1: my my, the incumbent is backed out after I announced
Speaker 1: I was running and he's getting behind a guy who
Speaker 1: is actually a top donor to Governor Andrew Andrew Cuomo.
Speaker 1: You remember him. He's the guy that said that we
Speaker 1: conservatives have no place in New York. And they're running
Speaker 1: a multimillion dollar smear campaign against me, trying to call
Speaker 1: me some kind of liberal in a old and silver accolyte.
Speaker 1: You know, and everyone knows that I'm a strong advocate
Speaker 1: for conservative values. I'm endorsed by the Conservative Party. I'll
Speaker 1: be on the conservative line in November. I'm endorsed by
Speaker 1: ni A UH Citizen Union, SKA List, a strong pro
Speaker 1: life organization. And we're running hard. We need to we
Speaker 1: need to support You know, there were greatly outstand again,
Speaker 1: but it looks like we're slightly You know what the
Speaker 1: sad thing is. I looked at your website and you know,
Speaker 1: I see where you stand on economy and jobs. If
Speaker 1: New York would just follow Pennsylvania's lead on fracking, it
Speaker 1: would revitalize all of upstate New York. It would create
Speaker 1: that many jobs. You you certainly know the devastation of Obamacare.
Speaker 1: You but what impressed me is you kind of have
Speaker 1: taken a line from Trump, which I think is resonating,
Speaker 1: which is on illegal immigrants. We're gonna put Americans first.
Speaker 1: On taxes, We're gonna put families first. On government spending.
Speaker 1: You gotta rein in waste, fraud and abuse and stop
Speaker 1: spending money like a bunch of drunken sailors. And by
Speaker 1: the way, no offense two drunken sailors because they don't
Speaker 1: spend as much money as government. And UH, the Second
Speaker 1: Amendment and being pro life. It's tough in a state
Speaker 1: like New York, right, Yeah. Absolutely. I'm a small business owner.
Speaker 1: We have a manufacturing business that was started seven years
Speaker 1: ago by my grandfather, and we've been hurt by the
Speaker 1: bad trade deals. I wrote a piece that was published
Speaker 1: in Washington Times thanks to my good friend Monica Crowley,
Speaker 1: who was published us with another local manufacturer who actually
Speaker 1: runs the business founded by Paul Revere, one of our
Speaker 1: founding UH heroes in the old days, and that we're
Speaker 1: still in business, but it's just struggle and we've been
Speaker 1: hurt directly by bad trade deals in our community. We've
Speaker 1: lost businesses and jobs and and of course I'm sitting
Speaker 1: right in Binghamton, New York, one of the richest areas
Speaker 1: where the Marcella Shale is and we're not able to
Speaker 1: touch it. You crossed the wall into Pennsylvania and uh
Speaker 1: and they're doing safe, responsible gas drilling that we're not
Speaker 1: doing here in New York thanks to people. I don't
Speaker 1: mean this an offensive ways, Pennsylvania's smarter. Pennsylvania is actually
Speaker 1: literally stealing all of the resources from New York because
Speaker 1: the gas literally will will pass right over the border
Speaker 1: into their state. But good for them, they're smart enough
Speaker 1: to do it. Oh yeah, So I mean here we are,
Speaker 1: you know, the Governor Cuomo's world, I've got it. The
Speaker 1: guy that I'm against too, by the way, to Washington
Speaker 1: establishment is behind as well. Incredibly, you know again he's
Speaker 1: a huge donor to CLOM, always got millions in state
Speaker 1: contracts that he's getting in exchange for his uh, his donations.
Speaker 1: It looks like, you know, it looks like exactly what
Speaker 1: I've been fighting, the crony ism, the pay to place games,
Speaker 1: all the things that Donald Trump is talking about. And
Speaker 1: actually I thought the Brexit as it's called, the British
Speaker 1: exits from the EU was it was an amazing uh
Speaker 1: you know, not at Margaret Stasram looking back to growing
Speaker 1: our economy and then and it's for all freedom lovers
Speaker 1: to uh to celebrate today. Yeah, well said anyway, Claudia
Speaker 1: Tenney is running up in New York. Thank you, Claudia.
Speaker 1: I was very impressed meeting you again. I've had the
Speaker 1: opportunity now to meet you a couple of times, and
Speaker 1: I really hope you're able to take that seat. We
Speaker 1: wish you the best. Thank you, and thanks for signing
Speaker 1: my son my Marine Sons football. I appreciate it. I
Speaker 1: think that's more my honor. I hope I wrote semplify
Speaker 1: on it. You did write semplify played proudly in his room. Unfortunately,
Speaker 1: you know he's uh, he's serving our country right now.
Speaker 1: So Claudias for Congress dot com if if anyone's interested
Speaker 1: in finding out more about me, Claudia for Congress dot Com. Alright, Claudia,
Speaker 1: I'm hoping the people up state New York at a
Speaker 1: clue in the New York twenty two eight nine one
Speaker 1: sewn a toll free telephone number. UH. Tessa is in Lynchburg, Virginia,
Speaker 1: the home of Beauty Beautiful Liberty University. Tessa. Hi, how
Speaker 1: are you? We're glad you called? Hey? Sean. How are
Speaker 1: you doing. I'm good. How are you doing? I'm doing well.
Speaker 1: Hey listen, I'm a Liberal University graduate student. I've been
Speaker 1: here for a while, I've done my undergrad here, and
Speaker 1: I just wanted to say what I find really interesting
Speaker 1: is that a lot of the students here, while they're conservative,
Speaker 1: they aren't supporting Donald Trump. There. They're support is maybe
Speaker 1: man Paul Marco Rubio, and well, that's great. What blows
Speaker 1: my mind is that they're listening to the mainstream media.
Speaker 1: And you know, for a while, I was I was
Speaker 1: in a boat. I heard the mainstream media. I heard
Speaker 1: what they were saying about, you know, we shouldn't get
Speaker 1: him the nuclear codes. He's not fit to be president.
Speaker 1: And I have been listening to your show now for
Speaker 1: a while, and I've just been doing my own research,
Speaker 1: and it's incredible the things that the corruption that Hillary
Speaker 1: Clinton has gotten away with an Obama administration, and the
Speaker 1: things that you're uncovering, and it has completely converted me
Speaker 1: to becoming a Trump supporter. And you know, we just
Speaker 1: want to thank you for that, and you very You're
Speaker 1: very you know, I've gotten a lot of criticism for
Speaker 1: my interviews with Trump, but I've also got him on
Speaker 1: record committing to a lot of conservative things, justices, energy, independence, coal, fracking, drilling,
Speaker 1: nuclear and new technologies. I've got him committed to balancing
Speaker 1: a budget, even like the Penny Plan, which I've advocated
Speaker 1: for years. Uh, he's talks about education back to the states.
Speaker 1: He you know, on every single issue, I'm building the wall, etcetera, etcetera.
Speaker 1: I asked friends of mine, and I understand the nationalist
Speaker 1: populist the difference in some of these free trade deals
Speaker 1: that have not worked out for American workers and manufacturing.
Speaker 1: And you know, globalism has hurt Great Britain, but it's
Speaker 1: also hurt American workers in the UH in this country.
Speaker 1: You know, the idea that we ship all the manufacturing
Speaker 1: overseas has taken away a lot of jobs from a
Speaker 1: lot of Americans. And these massive trade deficits are having
Speaker 1: a huge impact on American lives, and it's destroying the
Speaker 1: middle class, which is the heart and soul of this country.
Speaker 1: And this message is resoning. That's why I think Trump
Speaker 1: can win a state like Pennsylvania, or he might take
Speaker 1: a state like Wisconsin or Michigan. Those states have all
Speaker 1: been devastated by these by these bad trade deals that
Speaker 1: have not protected American products American workers. Now Annity is
Speaker 1: sound like a protectionist. Now, I'm for free trade, but
Speaker 1: fair trade, and I'm also for better negotiating and and
Speaker 1: I think that's that's what Trump is saying. Absolutely. I
Speaker 1: think some I was people of my generation would actually
Speaker 1: listen to what he's saying. I actually believe it, and
Speaker 1: and listen to what the mainstre media is not reporting
Speaker 1: and what you're talking about and what the speech that
Speaker 1: he gave this past week was amazing, and it was
Speaker 1: the thing that we needed to hear that we hadn't
Speaker 1: been hearing for how many years. And it's I think
Speaker 1: it's ridiculous that the names. If you said it before,
Speaker 1: if this was a Republican presidential candidate doing these things,
Speaker 1: he would have been in jail on new cycles would
Speaker 1: have been on repeat NonStop. But no, they refused to
Speaker 1: report about anything that's going on with the Klings or
Speaker 1: with the Obama administration. And that's you know what anger
Speaker 1: If if they did their job, I'd be less popular.
Speaker 1: I'm feeling a massive void here. So we'll live with
Speaker 1: it that way, Tessa, thank you appreciate it. We'll go
Speaker 1: to Florida. Tina is next, Tai Tina. How are you?
Speaker 1: And welcome to the program. I'm good, happy friend. I
Speaker 1: think we need a Hill exit, and I think we
Speaker 1: need a Trump and Trump Brexit and a Hexit. I
Speaker 1: got it. Yeah, he'll exit in a Trump okay. Um.
Speaker 1: And what soured my stomach with Hillary Clinton, Um was
Speaker 1: the when JFK Jr. Was going to run for the
Speaker 1: Senate against he would he would have worked there. Okay,
Speaker 1: he was America's baby, sluting his dad at the coffin.
Speaker 1: He would have won by land slife. All of a
Speaker 1: sudden he ends up dead in an airplane crash. And
Speaker 1: how convenient for Hillary. Okay, you're not giving me a
Speaker 1: conspiracy that you think by all indications, JFK Jr. And
Speaker 1: that was a tragedy. I mean that he he didn't
Speaker 1: have the training, instrument training qualifications to take the ride
Speaker 1: that he took that night. And there's something known as
Speaker 1: spatial disorientation where you don't even know that you know,
Speaker 1: you think you're plane is horizontal and it ends up
Speaker 1: being vertical and you have no idea. You headed right
Speaker 1: down for a crash, and by all indications, sadly, that's
Speaker 1: what happened in that case. But I'm not I'm not accused,
Speaker 1: and I'm just saying it's all right. I'm just I'm
Speaker 1: making sure. I mean, but look, you know it was
Speaker 1: a tragedy as a young man in the prime of
Speaker 1: his life, and he had a very tragic family history.
Speaker 1: I mean, from all indications, I actually knew people that
Speaker 1: knew him, and I really liked him a lot that
Speaker 1: he was a really good guy. Alright, Tina, thank you
Speaker 1: crazy vil in the Liberal in Chicago. What's up, crazy Verlin?
Speaker 1: Why am I even talking to you on this Friday?
Speaker 1: Why would I let you aggravate me in the last
Speaker 1: half hour of the show. That's not smart on my part.
Speaker 1: But go ahead. You wouldn't know what to do without
Speaker 1: without me kissing you off at least a little bit.
Speaker 1: You can burn all some steam man shot. You are
Speaker 1: the hardest man to catch up with these days. I
Speaker 1: will call this number a thousand towns so I can
Speaker 1: get a piece of you. I think you're scared to
Speaker 1: step into octagon with me because you don't want some
Speaker 1: of the ground and pound. I goest for you today.
Speaker 1: I'll spect, I'll tell you what I actually been training.
Speaker 1: I got to I got to my brown belt recently,
Speaker 1: and I'm now working towards my black belt. I got
Speaker 1: about two years to go. And you really want, you
Speaker 1: really want to jump in the octagon with me. That's
Speaker 1: over over the phone, not in personal you know, I
Speaker 1: don't think all right, but listen, I don't think you
Speaker 1: want to be in the octagon with me because and
Speaker 1: and my m m A. Rules are no rules none
Speaker 1: the old school. That's old school. I'm old. But bare
Speaker 1: knuckles brawl. That's how my trained. I mean, you should
Speaker 1: see my fingers are all busted up in five different pieces,
Speaker 1: all of them. Anyway, what's going on. You've been all
Speaker 1: over Obama's back like a parasite for the last few years. Listen,
Speaker 1: Naming the enemy does nothing for beating the enemy. I mean,
Speaker 1: that's no battles. Battles the enemy does is you're trying
Speaker 1: to put Islam in a bad light, the Muslim religion
Speaker 1: in the bad light. It's like, it's like you want
Speaker 1: to go to war with that. Religion is better than that.
Speaker 1: That's a billion and a half people. You do not.
Speaker 1: Here's what I know. Here's what I know has happened
Speaker 1: under Obama's ring okay, and Hillary Clinton's time. He gave
Speaker 1: a hundred and fifty billion dollars to the number one
Speaker 1: state sponsor terror. He identified had a data pull out
Speaker 1: in Iraq, and that allowed the enemy isis to be
Speaker 1: created and grow and have the financial resources to grow.
Speaker 1: And simultaneously, he never he draw drew a red line
Speaker 1: in the sand, and he and Hillary didn't do anything
Speaker 1: after weapons of mass destruction were used against Syrian's people. Uh.
Speaker 1: He also gave Mohammed Morsey, former terrorist head of the
Speaker 1: Muslim Brotherhood, f sixteens tanks and a billion taxpayer dollars.
Speaker 1: He has now turned the Middle East into what it
Speaker 1: is today, nothing but an absolute chaotic mess. It was
Speaker 1: in far better condition when he got there. Russian reset
Speaker 1: didn't work China. He's done nothing for China and nothing
Speaker 1: for with North Korea. Now, if you look at the economy,
Speaker 1: we have twelve million more Americans in poverty on food stamps.
Speaker 1: We have all time high record of of those Americans
Speaker 1: out of the labor force. And he's doubled the debt,
Speaker 1: accumulating more debt than every other president before him combined.
Speaker 1: I'll tell you what I'm gonna do for you. I
Speaker 1: am going to give you a test. Are you ready
Speaker 1: for ilain? You think you're so smart. Let's get in
Speaker 1: the let's get in the octagon. You're ready, all right?
Speaker 1: Tell me three specific things that Obama has done that
Speaker 1: have worked out well for the American people. Go, well, Uh,
Speaker 1: if everybody was willing to put skin in the game,
Speaker 1: Obamacare will work. Like Okay, Obamacare is going bankrupt and
Speaker 1: everyone's premiums are this year back next okay, okay, financial way,
Speaker 1: it worked well for for everybody. Uh what financial reform? Yes,
Speaker 1: financial reform? What financial reform? He doubled the debt. We
Speaker 1: have more, We have millions more in poverty on food stamps.
Speaker 1: That's wrong answer number two. Go okay, let me see. Um, oh,
Speaker 1: the car company is back on track. You don't hear
Speaker 1: nothing bad about the car company? Kay? And you think
Speaker 1: the American people should be paying all that money to
Speaker 1: bail out private organizations. What about small business owners that
Speaker 1: were forced to pay? They don't get that break? Is
Speaker 1: that fair? Strike strike three? Strike three? By the way, Virlin,
Speaker 1: I gotta tell you something. I just knocked you out.
Speaker 1: I want a different test. Oh, you want a different
Speaker 1: test because you lost the first one all right, next
Speaker 1: time you're on Virlin. That was a cold knockout in
Speaker 1: thirty seconds. Thank you, my friend. Eight hundred nine four
Speaker 1: one shot. Oh now, I'll leave it on a happy note.
Speaker 1: Knocking out Virlin. That's pretty cool in the in the octagon.