1 00:00:04,400 --> 00:00:06,120 Speaker 1: There Are No Girls on the Internet. As a production 2 00:00:06,160 --> 00:00:13,680 Speaker 1: of iHeartRadio and Unbossed Creative. I'm Bridget Tad and this 3 00:00:13,760 --> 00:00:18,320 Speaker 1: is there are No Girls on the Internet. I'm here 4 00:00:18,360 --> 00:00:19,480 Speaker 1: with my producer, Mike Hey. 5 00:00:19,520 --> 00:00:21,120 Speaker 2: Mike Hey, Bridget. 6 00:00:21,720 --> 00:00:23,120 Speaker 1: How about this smoke? Right? 7 00:00:24,160 --> 00:00:27,600 Speaker 2: It's really something here in duc. It's like the only 8 00:00:27,640 --> 00:00:30,160 Speaker 2: thing anybody's been able to talk about for days. 9 00:00:30,400 --> 00:00:32,680 Speaker 1: I have not left my house in forty eight hours. 10 00:00:32,920 --> 00:00:34,640 Speaker 1: And here's what you might have missed this week on 11 00:00:34,680 --> 00:00:38,720 Speaker 1: the internet. You know that song that goes I always 12 00:00:38,800 --> 00:00:42,879 Speaker 1: feel like somebody's watching me. Well, if you have a 13 00:00:43,000 --> 00:00:46,760 Speaker 1: ring camera, that somebody watching might be an Amazon employee. 14 00:00:46,840 --> 00:00:50,400 Speaker 1: And that's because before twenty seventeen, Amazon employees could just 15 00:00:50,479 --> 00:00:54,640 Speaker 1: access whoever's ring camera they wanted, and some of them did. 16 00:00:55,200 --> 00:00:57,200 Speaker 1: This is according to a court filing from the Federal 17 00:00:57,200 --> 00:01:00,320 Speaker 1: Trade Commission when in announced a five point eight million 18 00:01:00,400 --> 00:01:04,479 Speaker 1: dollar settlement with Amazon over privacy violations. So this whole 19 00:01:04,560 --> 00:01:06,880 Speaker 1: thing is about as creepy as you would expect. It 20 00:01:06,959 --> 00:01:09,880 Speaker 1: sounds like there was just over broad access given to 21 00:01:09,959 --> 00:01:13,800 Speaker 1: employees and also contractors to customers ring footage, and that 22 00:01:13,840 --> 00:01:16,880 Speaker 1: there might have been just a generally lax attitude around 23 00:01:16,959 --> 00:01:20,400 Speaker 1: accessing that footage at Amazon. According to the filing, Ring 24 00:01:20,520 --> 00:01:24,160 Speaker 1: gave every employee full access to every customer video before 25 00:01:24,200 --> 00:01:27,280 Speaker 1: twenty seventeen and failed to patch bugs in the system 26 00:01:27,360 --> 00:01:30,480 Speaker 1: that allowed hackers to access cameras and scare consumers. Now, 27 00:01:30,480 --> 00:01:32,800 Speaker 1: I gotta say this was not just like a one 28 00:01:32,880 --> 00:01:36,720 Speaker 1: time thing. It sounds like a pervasive issue. Ring employees 29 00:01:36,760 --> 00:01:39,840 Speaker 1: were spying on women. In twenty seventeen, an employee of 30 00:01:39,920 --> 00:01:42,720 Speaker 1: Ring viewed videos made by at least eighty one female 31 00:01:42,800 --> 00:01:47,320 Speaker 1: consumers and Ring employees using Ring products undetected by Ring. 32 00:01:47,400 --> 00:01:51,840 Speaker 1: The employee continued spuying for months. He was looking specifically 33 00:01:51,960 --> 00:01:55,080 Speaker 1: for cameras with labels that suggested they were in people's 34 00:01:55,120 --> 00:01:58,559 Speaker 1: intimate spaces. So they had labels like master, bedroom camera 35 00:01:58,720 --> 00:02:03,720 Speaker 1: or bathroom camera, so it's pretty clear what was going on. 36 00:02:03,920 --> 00:02:07,200 Speaker 1: In this instance, this employee was only caught after a 37 00:02:07,240 --> 00:02:11,399 Speaker 1: supervisor noticed that the male employee was only viewing videos 38 00:02:11,480 --> 00:02:17,240 Speaker 1: of quote pretty girls, which even that supervisor's explanation, I 39 00:02:17,240 --> 00:02:20,360 Speaker 1: feel like, is pretty gross. In another incident, an employee 40 00:02:20,400 --> 00:02:23,560 Speaker 1: gave someone's ex husband access to their Ring footage without 41 00:02:23,600 --> 00:02:26,160 Speaker 1: their consent. So you can kind of get a sense 42 00:02:26,200 --> 00:02:29,520 Speaker 1: of how dangerous and serious. That could be like if 43 00:02:29,520 --> 00:02:33,240 Speaker 1: you're going through a contentious divorce or you have an 44 00:02:33,280 --> 00:02:37,560 Speaker 1: abusive X. The fact that Ring was just handing over 45 00:02:37,800 --> 00:02:40,720 Speaker 1: your ring footage to your ex without your consent or 46 00:02:40,760 --> 00:02:44,360 Speaker 1: knowledge is pretty problematic. So it was not just random 47 00:02:44,360 --> 00:02:47,560 Speaker 1: women that these Ring employees didn't know. Ring employees were 48 00:02:47,600 --> 00:02:51,040 Speaker 1: also spying on each other. Another incident allegedly occurred in 49 00:02:51,080 --> 00:02:54,680 Speaker 1: twenty eighteen when a male employee allegedly accessed a fellow 50 00:02:54,720 --> 00:02:58,720 Speaker 1: female employees camera and watched her stored video recordings without 51 00:02:58,720 --> 00:03:03,160 Speaker 1: her permission. And can you imagine, Like you go to work, 52 00:03:03,639 --> 00:03:10,240 Speaker 1: there's Greg at the water cooler, cut to Greg watching 53 00:03:10,320 --> 00:03:13,800 Speaker 1: you in your home. Like that is so fucked. So 54 00:03:14,080 --> 00:03:17,399 Speaker 1: Ring employees were also gifting people with cameras and then 55 00:03:17,600 --> 00:03:20,519 Speaker 1: using those cameras to spy on them. An employee was 56 00:03:20,560 --> 00:03:22,680 Speaker 1: found to have given Ring devices to people and then 57 00:03:22,720 --> 00:03:26,520 Speaker 1: watched their videos without their knowledge, Like some gift. Oh 58 00:03:26,520 --> 00:03:29,480 Speaker 1: here's the present, it's a Ring camera, I'll see you later. 59 00:03:30,360 --> 00:03:36,280 Speaker 1: Totally fucked. Give the gift of Greg watching, lurking spying, 60 00:03:36,840 --> 00:03:40,680 Speaker 1: terrible gift. So separately, Amazon also had to pay twenty 61 00:03:40,680 --> 00:03:44,200 Speaker 1: five million to settle allegations that it violated children's privacy 62 00:03:44,280 --> 00:03:47,000 Speaker 1: rights when it failed to delete Alecxa recordings at the 63 00:03:47,000 --> 00:03:50,280 Speaker 1: request of parents and kept them for longer than necessary. 64 00:03:50,600 --> 00:03:56,120 Speaker 2: Wow. Wow, So parents requested did Amazon delete them and 65 00:03:56,160 --> 00:04:00,000 Speaker 2: then they just didn't. That's an additional level. 66 00:04:01,240 --> 00:04:04,720 Speaker 1: Yeah, My understanding is that they said that they would 67 00:04:04,760 --> 00:04:07,200 Speaker 1: delete those recordings and then did not. So it kind 68 00:04:07,200 --> 00:04:09,960 Speaker 1: of goes back to this idea of you know, I 69 00:04:10,000 --> 00:04:11,960 Speaker 1: don't think that companies can just say one thing and 70 00:04:12,000 --> 00:04:14,560 Speaker 1: do another. And it sounds like the FTC agrees. 71 00:04:16,160 --> 00:04:18,480 Speaker 2: We talked about this last week with Google where they 72 00:04:18,480 --> 00:04:20,960 Speaker 2: said they were going to delete users abortion data and 73 00:04:21,000 --> 00:04:22,160 Speaker 2: then they just didn't. 74 00:04:22,320 --> 00:04:25,960 Speaker 1: Exactly like it definitely paints a larger portrait of negligence. 75 00:04:26,040 --> 00:04:27,800 Speaker 1: You know, this is all part of a push by 76 00:04:27,839 --> 00:04:31,080 Speaker 1: the FTC to regulate big tech and hold companies accountable 77 00:04:31,240 --> 00:04:34,960 Speaker 1: to putting profit above privacy. Now, I have said this 78 00:04:35,279 --> 00:04:38,200 Speaker 1: probably a hundred times on this show. I get why 79 00:04:38,240 --> 00:04:40,920 Speaker 1: someone would want a ring camera for their safety or 80 00:04:41,000 --> 00:04:43,640 Speaker 1: to feel secure in their homes, but I would never 81 00:04:43,800 --> 00:04:46,320 Speaker 1: allow one of these devices in my home. You know, 82 00:04:46,600 --> 00:04:50,039 Speaker 1: not that I would ever break any laws myself, but 83 00:04:50,760 --> 00:04:54,200 Speaker 1: people should be aware that police can and have accessed 84 00:04:54,200 --> 00:04:57,120 Speaker 1: your RING footage without your consent and without a warrant 85 00:04:57,160 --> 00:05:00,760 Speaker 1: because Ring partners with police departments. It sounds like even 86 00:05:00,800 --> 00:05:03,360 Speaker 1: after having to pay out millions of dollars for these 87 00:05:03,440 --> 00:05:07,560 Speaker 1: violations around spying and privacy, Amazon is still not admitting wrongdoing, 88 00:05:07,640 --> 00:05:10,120 Speaker 1: saying in a statement that they disagree with how these 89 00:05:10,120 --> 00:05:13,520 Speaker 1: instances were framed by the FTC, but they did, you know, 90 00:05:13,640 --> 00:05:16,400 Speaker 1: pay these fines. And so it just goes to show 91 00:05:16,400 --> 00:05:19,880 Speaker 1: like these companies don't care. They don't care about your security, 92 00:05:19,880 --> 00:05:22,719 Speaker 1: they don't care about your privacy, and they're callously praying 93 00:05:22,760 --> 00:05:26,719 Speaker 1: on and fostering a climate of fear, fear around crime, 94 00:05:26,920 --> 00:05:29,719 Speaker 1: fear around your neighbors, and tricking us into thinking that 95 00:05:29,760 --> 00:05:32,360 Speaker 1: it is a safe choice to have their devices in 96 00:05:32,440 --> 00:05:35,279 Speaker 1: your home, while all the while they are out here 97 00:05:35,279 --> 00:05:38,680 Speaker 1: putting us in danger. You know, I completely get a 98 00:05:38,680 --> 00:05:42,040 Speaker 1: lot of us feel vulnerable right now, feel scared right now. 99 00:05:42,120 --> 00:05:44,400 Speaker 1: I totally get it. But I believe that Amazon is 100 00:05:44,480 --> 00:05:48,359 Speaker 1: inflaming and exploiting and taking advantage of this vulnerability that 101 00:05:48,400 --> 00:05:51,840 Speaker 1: we might feel to sell us technology that ultimately harms us. 102 00:05:52,279 --> 00:05:55,120 Speaker 2: Yeah, and like you mentioned, this story happens to be 103 00:05:55,240 --> 00:05:57,640 Speaker 2: about Amazon, but it could just as well be a 104 00:05:57,640 --> 00:06:00,839 Speaker 2: story about Google we talked about last week, or or Tesla, 105 00:06:00,920 --> 00:06:03,400 Speaker 2: who a few months ago was in the news because 106 00:06:03,880 --> 00:06:08,360 Speaker 2: their engineers similarly had unfettered access to the cameras inside 107 00:06:08,360 --> 00:06:12,000 Speaker 2: people's cars, and they were using that to share videos 108 00:06:12,040 --> 00:06:14,160 Speaker 2: of each other of like, hey, look at this guy 109 00:06:14,279 --> 00:06:17,760 Speaker 2: picking his nose in his car hahaha Lol. But you know, 110 00:06:17,800 --> 00:06:20,520 Speaker 2: it could be Facebook, could be any of these big companies, 111 00:06:20,560 --> 00:06:23,240 Speaker 2: because this is just the sort of thing that we 112 00:06:23,360 --> 00:06:28,039 Speaker 2: get in surveillance capitalism, when we bring these devices into 113 00:06:28,040 --> 00:06:32,640 Speaker 2: our homes, where privacy is just an afterthought and the 114 00:06:32,640 --> 00:06:35,800 Speaker 2: commodification of our personal data is a gold rush for 115 00:06:35,839 --> 00:06:38,760 Speaker 2: these companies, so much so that you know, a few 116 00:06:38,880 --> 00:06:42,320 Speaker 2: million dollars in fines here and there is well worth 117 00:06:42,360 --> 00:06:45,240 Speaker 2: it to them. And so in this case, you know, 118 00:06:45,279 --> 00:06:47,919 Speaker 2: it's not like the Amazon executives were getting in on 119 00:06:47,960 --> 00:06:51,719 Speaker 2: the creeping. I assume it was just Greg and maybe 120 00:06:51,800 --> 00:06:52,719 Speaker 2: some of these buddies. 121 00:06:53,600 --> 00:06:55,960 Speaker 1: But I feel like I'm using Greg as a stand 122 00:06:56,040 --> 00:06:59,479 Speaker 1: in for the creepy employee because I've have been binge 123 00:06:59,520 --> 00:07:03,000 Speaker 1: washing session, so I'm like, oh, someone was doing something creepy, 124 00:07:03,520 --> 00:07:05,919 Speaker 1: has to be Greg, just like the name on the 125 00:07:05,960 --> 00:07:10,160 Speaker 1: top of my mind that I'm associating with like leccherous creeps. 126 00:07:10,560 --> 00:07:12,760 Speaker 1: No offense to any Greg's out there listening. You're not 127 00:07:12,800 --> 00:07:14,360 Speaker 1: all bad, No, just. 128 00:07:14,440 --> 00:07:19,520 Speaker 2: The one who's a member of the disgusting Brothers. But yeah, they, 129 00:07:19,640 --> 00:07:23,720 Speaker 2: I mean, yeah they, you know, Greg's the one creeping. 130 00:07:23,840 --> 00:07:25,920 Speaker 2: But it's the executives at the top that allowed it 131 00:07:25,960 --> 00:07:29,160 Speaker 2: to happen with these lack of security controls when they 132 00:07:29,480 --> 00:07:33,520 Speaker 2: I would are you had a responsibility to limit access 133 00:07:33,520 --> 00:07:37,280 Speaker 2: in a way that would protect people's privacy, but they didn't, 134 00:07:37,320 --> 00:07:42,520 Speaker 2: because why would they willingly put road bumps in the 135 00:07:42,520 --> 00:07:46,960 Speaker 2: way of unfettered access to all of the data just 136 00:07:47,040 --> 00:07:51,240 Speaker 2: to feed back into their profits and helping them make 137 00:07:51,280 --> 00:07:54,920 Speaker 2: more sales, and without regulation, that's just going to keep happening. 138 00:07:55,240 --> 00:07:58,320 Speaker 1: And I just don't think that what like thirty million 139 00:07:58,400 --> 00:08:00,840 Speaker 1: dollars is an amount that a come any like Amazon 140 00:08:00,920 --> 00:08:03,240 Speaker 1: is really going to feel. To me this I mean, 141 00:08:03,320 --> 00:08:06,400 Speaker 1: I am happy that they're having to have some kind 142 00:08:06,400 --> 00:08:08,360 Speaker 1: of a show of accountability to how they have wronged 143 00:08:08,480 --> 00:08:11,160 Speaker 1: the public, But I don't think this is amount of 144 00:08:11,200 --> 00:08:13,160 Speaker 1: money that they are going to feel. And just the 145 00:08:13,160 --> 00:08:18,560 Speaker 1: fact that before twenty seventeen anybody a ring employee and 146 00:08:18,120 --> 00:08:22,160 Speaker 1: their vast network of contractors could just look at anybody 147 00:08:22,760 --> 00:08:26,880 Speaker 1: from their ring cameras they wanted. Is just the scale 148 00:08:26,920 --> 00:08:30,560 Speaker 1: of harm is so much bigger than the amount that 149 00:08:30,600 --> 00:08:33,680 Speaker 1: they have to pay in punishment that I cannot imagine 150 00:08:33,679 --> 00:08:36,800 Speaker 1: this is going to be something that gives them pause 151 00:08:36,920 --> 00:08:38,920 Speaker 1: in terms of how they're harming people in the future. 152 00:08:39,320 --> 00:08:41,160 Speaker 1: And you know you, I didn't even know about the 153 00:08:41,160 --> 00:08:45,400 Speaker 1: fact that Tesla was using people's cameras to like share 154 00:08:45,679 --> 00:08:49,560 Speaker 1: jokes with each other. Think about the grossest, longest car 155 00:08:49,720 --> 00:08:53,480 Speaker 1: trip that you've ever taken, where there's just Wendy's bags 156 00:08:53,520 --> 00:08:57,000 Speaker 1: and used Kleenex on the ground and you're driving barefoot 157 00:08:57,040 --> 00:09:02,960 Speaker 1: and you're disgusting. Imagine that video being used in Greg's 158 00:09:03,000 --> 00:09:05,320 Speaker 1: slack channel just to have a laugh. 159 00:09:06,679 --> 00:09:08,240 Speaker 2: Yeah, thanks a lot, Greg. 160 00:09:08,960 --> 00:09:11,520 Speaker 1: We're really we're really beating up on the Gregs here. 161 00:09:11,760 --> 00:09:13,720 Speaker 1: Let's let's let's switch gears. Let's beat up on the 162 00:09:13,840 --> 00:09:17,080 Speaker 1: Ron's for a minute. Because Ron DeSantis's campaign just recently 163 00:09:17,160 --> 00:09:21,440 Speaker 1: used AI generated images of Trump hugging and kissing Fauci 164 00:09:21,600 --> 00:09:24,760 Speaker 1: in their campaign material. So we've said many times on 165 00:09:24,800 --> 00:09:26,640 Speaker 1: the show about the spread of deep fakes, and on 166 00:09:26,679 --> 00:09:30,160 Speaker 1: the Internet, and as AI image generation software gets better 167 00:09:30,200 --> 00:09:33,000 Speaker 1: and more available, it is so easy for bad actors 168 00:09:33,080 --> 00:09:35,839 Speaker 1: to create fake images of celebrities and politicians. And I 169 00:09:35,880 --> 00:09:39,880 Speaker 1: think especially when those images are weaponized in political campaigns 170 00:09:40,200 --> 00:09:43,960 Speaker 1: during climates that are like politically fraught or sensitive or inflammatory. 171 00:09:44,320 --> 00:09:48,319 Speaker 1: It's concerning because these fake images can often appear real. 172 00:09:48,559 --> 00:09:50,320 Speaker 1: I am not too proud to admit that I got 173 00:09:50,440 --> 00:09:53,160 Speaker 1: I got got by that image of the Pope in 174 00:09:53,200 --> 00:09:57,199 Speaker 1: the Balenciaga puffer. It was early morning, I had had 175 00:09:57,240 --> 00:09:59,880 Speaker 1: my coffee. I was just scrolling Twitter on my iPad. 176 00:10:00,720 --> 00:10:03,400 Speaker 1: I just saw it and I thought, Okay, the Pope's 177 00:10:03,440 --> 00:10:07,520 Speaker 1: wearing a Balenciaga puffer. Checks out. It didn't. I didn't 178 00:10:07,679 --> 00:10:10,800 Speaker 1: have My brain was not primed. Even though I'm somebody 179 00:10:10,800 --> 00:10:13,720 Speaker 1: who studies disinformation and like talks about it for a living, 180 00:10:14,040 --> 00:10:16,600 Speaker 1: my brain was not yet primed to have that seer 181 00:10:16,679 --> 00:10:19,760 Speaker 1: of skepticism. So these fake images can get the best 182 00:10:19,760 --> 00:10:22,600 Speaker 1: of us. Right, you shouldn't have to necessarily be so 183 00:10:22,880 --> 00:10:25,679 Speaker 1: primed and poised and ready to tell the zoom in 184 00:10:25,760 --> 00:10:27,920 Speaker 1: on the fingers and be like, oh, that's fake, to 185 00:10:28,040 --> 00:10:29,599 Speaker 1: tell if an image is real or not. So that 186 00:10:29,720 --> 00:10:31,520 Speaker 1: I definitely am. I've gotten got before. 187 00:10:31,960 --> 00:10:34,959 Speaker 2: Yeah, it's a good point you make that we shouldn't 188 00:10:35,040 --> 00:10:38,520 Speaker 2: have to be constantly hyper vigilant. You know, if you 189 00:10:39,000 --> 00:10:40,720 Speaker 2: if I think about the times that I'm looking at 190 00:10:40,760 --> 00:10:44,959 Speaker 2: social media, it's when I'm waiting for the metro or 191 00:10:46,120 --> 00:10:50,920 Speaker 2: bored or you know, waiting on this or that, or 192 00:10:51,679 --> 00:10:55,240 Speaker 2: I don't know, I'm not like sitting down to critically 193 00:10:55,520 --> 00:10:59,280 Speaker 2: engage in like deep and critical thought about what I'm 194 00:10:59,320 --> 00:11:02,000 Speaker 2: looking at right, Like, I just want to see some cats. 195 00:11:02,040 --> 00:11:03,880 Speaker 2: I want to see some jokes. I want to see 196 00:11:03,920 --> 00:11:08,160 Speaker 2: some stupid stuff that makes me laugh. And yeah, you 197 00:11:08,200 --> 00:11:11,840 Speaker 2: see the pope in a puffer jacket. I don't know, 198 00:11:12,440 --> 00:11:13,959 Speaker 2: I probably would have got got too. 199 00:11:14,440 --> 00:11:17,760 Speaker 1: So this week, Ronda Santis's campaign joined in on the 200 00:11:17,800 --> 00:11:20,880 Speaker 1: AI generated deep fake fun and shared a set of 201 00:11:20,920 --> 00:11:24,559 Speaker 1: fake images of Donald Trump hugging and kissing Anthony Fauci. 202 00:11:24,880 --> 00:11:27,320 Speaker 1: They were kind of clever about it, mixing in the 203 00:11:27,360 --> 00:11:29,880 Speaker 1: fake images with some real ones, but they weren't that 204 00:11:30,040 --> 00:11:32,840 Speaker 1: clever about it because with a little scrutiny, the images 205 00:11:32,840 --> 00:11:35,280 Speaker 1: appear to be obviously fake, Like in one of them, 206 00:11:35,520 --> 00:11:39,480 Speaker 1: Trump's arm kind of wraps all the way around Fauci's 207 00:11:39,520 --> 00:11:42,200 Speaker 1: body in a very unnatural way, like a long snake, 208 00:11:42,280 --> 00:11:44,719 Speaker 1: like he's like got double the arm around him kind 209 00:11:44,760 --> 00:11:47,400 Speaker 1: of in another one the letters in the phrase white 210 00:11:47,440 --> 00:11:49,520 Speaker 1: house or garble, so you kind of know it's AI 211 00:11:49,679 --> 00:11:52,080 Speaker 1: or that something is going on there. Other details are 212 00:11:52,080 --> 00:11:54,839 Speaker 1: also off, like the stars in the American flag, or 213 00:11:55,000 --> 00:11:58,760 Speaker 1: unnatural details in Trump's hair, which somehow kind of manages 214 00:11:58,800 --> 00:12:02,720 Speaker 1: to look more unnatural than his actual, honest to god 215 00:12:02,800 --> 00:12:06,000 Speaker 1: human hair. I don't know how that's possible. So the 216 00:12:06,040 --> 00:12:09,280 Speaker 1: French media entity AFP first reported on the fake photos, 217 00:12:09,400 --> 00:12:11,640 Speaker 1: which were included in a video released by the official 218 00:12:11,679 --> 00:12:12,680 Speaker 1: Dasantis campaign. 219 00:12:13,640 --> 00:12:16,040 Speaker 2: You know, I really thought, in hope that we had 220 00:12:16,080 --> 00:12:21,240 Speaker 2: more time before US presidential candidates were using deep fakes 221 00:12:21,280 --> 00:12:24,280 Speaker 2: as part of their official campaigns. I don't know why 222 00:12:24,320 --> 00:12:27,480 Speaker 2: I thought that. I guess maybe just wishful thinking. But 223 00:12:28,160 --> 00:12:33,120 Speaker 2: you know, politicians like DeSantis and also Trump, like it 224 00:12:33,240 --> 00:12:36,480 Speaker 2: happens to be that like DeSantis did this against Trump, 225 00:12:36,559 --> 00:12:39,240 Speaker 2: but I could just as easily see it going the 226 00:12:39,280 --> 00:12:43,080 Speaker 2: other way. They have no qualms about speaking lies and 227 00:12:43,120 --> 00:12:47,560 Speaker 2: spreading lies, so why wouldn't they take advantage of AI 228 00:12:47,720 --> 00:12:50,040 Speaker 2: images to spread visual lies? 229 00:12:50,360 --> 00:12:53,520 Speaker 1: And I think there's really something about visual lies that 230 00:12:54,360 --> 00:12:56,839 Speaker 1: works on a different level than when you read something 231 00:12:56,880 --> 00:12:58,680 Speaker 1: that's not true. The same way that I was just like, 232 00:12:59,160 --> 00:13:02,120 Speaker 1: didn't have my class, hadn't had my coffee, scrolling ands 233 00:13:02,120 --> 00:13:03,920 Speaker 1: all picture of the Pope and said, oh that's fine. 234 00:13:04,400 --> 00:13:07,240 Speaker 1: Visual images can hit us so much differently. They can 235 00:13:07,320 --> 00:13:10,320 Speaker 1: hit us quickly, more quickly than the written word, and 236 00:13:10,360 --> 00:13:14,439 Speaker 1: they can sort of stoke a more emotionally resonant space 237 00:13:14,600 --> 00:13:16,480 Speaker 1: in us. I think, like in the interview that we 238 00:13:16,520 --> 00:13:19,200 Speaker 1: did with the Foma Uzoma who was formally at pinterest, 239 00:13:19,240 --> 00:13:21,559 Speaker 1: who was kind of in charge of getting medical misinformation 240 00:13:21,679 --> 00:13:24,720 Speaker 1: and other you know, bad stuff, I'll have Pinterest, she 241 00:13:24,800 --> 00:13:26,760 Speaker 1: said that one of the reasons why it was so 242 00:13:26,920 --> 00:13:30,880 Speaker 1: prevalent on Pinterest is because it's a visual, a visual platform, 243 00:13:30,920 --> 00:13:35,679 Speaker 1: and so there would be these highly visually visceral images, 244 00:13:35,800 --> 00:13:38,160 Speaker 1: like when it came to abortion disinformation, it was these 245 00:13:38,200 --> 00:13:41,440 Speaker 1: like very visually charged images and they of course would 246 00:13:41,520 --> 00:13:44,800 Speaker 1: stoke an emotional response on people very quickly. So definitely 247 00:13:45,200 --> 00:13:49,960 Speaker 1: the threat of image based AI manipulated deep fake images 248 00:13:50,200 --> 00:13:52,000 Speaker 1: is a real concern. 249 00:13:52,480 --> 00:13:55,440 Speaker 2: Yeah, that's I think you really hit on something there 250 00:13:55,480 --> 00:13:59,240 Speaker 2: that the like she said, the images evoke this visual 251 00:13:59,480 --> 00:14:05,920 Speaker 2: emotion reaction. And also it's just new I think in 252 00:14:06,880 --> 00:14:09,800 Speaker 2: certainly in my lifetime, and I think possibly all of 253 00:14:10,200 --> 00:14:13,840 Speaker 2: human experience that we have to be so questioning of 254 00:14:13,880 --> 00:14:16,760 Speaker 2: what we visually see in front of us. 255 00:14:16,840 --> 00:14:16,960 Speaker 1: Right. 256 00:14:17,000 --> 00:14:20,040 Speaker 2: We have all these phrases like he said, she said, 257 00:14:20,440 --> 00:14:23,960 Speaker 2: you can't believe everything you read, and so we're used 258 00:14:23,960 --> 00:14:26,480 Speaker 2: to having to like sort through what's true and what 259 00:14:26,600 --> 00:14:30,640 Speaker 2: isn't in these like verbal domains. But we also have 260 00:14:30,680 --> 00:14:33,400 Speaker 2: the phrase like you don't believe what's in front of 261 00:14:33,400 --> 00:14:37,600 Speaker 2: your own eyes, right, which is usually a pejorative thing 262 00:14:37,680 --> 00:14:40,680 Speaker 2: because typically in human experience, we can believe what we 263 00:14:41,000 --> 00:14:45,440 Speaker 2: see for ourselves. When we directly see something, it's generally 264 00:14:45,480 --> 00:14:48,200 Speaker 2: assumed to be true. But even that is no longer true. 265 00:14:48,520 --> 00:14:51,840 Speaker 2: And so, you know, of all the scary stuff that 266 00:14:51,920 --> 00:14:54,560 Speaker 2: you've talked about on this show with our guests, I 267 00:14:54,560 --> 00:14:57,720 Speaker 2: feel like deep fakes are one of the scariest because 268 00:14:57,840 --> 00:15:00,680 Speaker 2: if people aren't able to tell what's real and what isn't, 269 00:15:01,360 --> 00:15:05,960 Speaker 2: it does not bode well for solving the big problems 270 00:15:05,960 --> 00:15:08,960 Speaker 2: that are coming our way. Right Like outside the windows 271 00:15:09,000 --> 00:15:13,640 Speaker 2: right now, the city is blanketed in smoke from the 272 00:15:13,680 --> 00:15:17,520 Speaker 2: worst wildfires on the East Coast that I can remember 273 00:15:17,520 --> 00:15:22,560 Speaker 2: in my lifetime, made worse by climate change. We're gonna 274 00:15:22,600 --> 00:15:25,040 Speaker 2: have like serious problems that a society we need to 275 00:15:25,040 --> 00:15:29,240 Speaker 2: come together to solve. And Yeah, if we can't have 276 00:15:29,280 --> 00:15:31,840 Speaker 2: a shared understanding of what is real and what isn't, 277 00:15:32,320 --> 00:15:33,720 Speaker 2: that's gonna be hard. 278 00:15:38,400 --> 00:15:51,000 Speaker 3: Let's take a quick break at our back. 279 00:15:52,640 --> 00:15:55,800 Speaker 1: Let's talk about YouTube. YouTube, which is owned by Google, 280 00:15:56,120 --> 00:15:59,000 Speaker 1: will no longer remove videos falsely claiming that the twenty 281 00:15:59,080 --> 00:16:02,400 Speaker 1: twenty presidential in the United States was stolen, reversing a 282 00:16:02,440 --> 00:16:05,120 Speaker 1: policy put in place after the twenty twenty vote. In 283 00:16:05,160 --> 00:16:07,600 Speaker 1: a blog post, the company says, quote, it will stop 284 00:16:07,640 --> 00:16:11,520 Speaker 1: removing content that advances false claims that widespread fraud, errors, 285 00:16:11,720 --> 00:16:13,840 Speaker 1: or a glitches accord in twenty twenty in other past 286 00:16:13,960 --> 00:16:18,440 Speaker 1: US presidential elections because things have changed. Well what's changed? 287 00:16:18,480 --> 00:16:23,000 Speaker 1: Why are they doing this? According to YouTube, because free speech, 288 00:16:24,040 --> 00:16:26,400 Speaker 1: they said, in the current environment, we find that while 289 00:16:26,400 --> 00:16:29,920 Speaker 1: removing this content does curb some misinformation, it could also 290 00:16:30,040 --> 00:16:33,760 Speaker 1: have the unintended effect of curtailing political speech without meaningfully 291 00:16:33,800 --> 00:16:36,480 Speaker 1: reducing the risk of violence and other real world to harm. 292 00:16:37,040 --> 00:16:38,760 Speaker 2: I just want to jump in there real quick to 293 00:16:38,840 --> 00:16:41,120 Speaker 2: break down that quote that you just read, because it's 294 00:16:41,120 --> 00:16:44,120 Speaker 2: so telling. They say, we find that while removing this 295 00:16:44,280 --> 00:16:50,200 Speaker 2: content does curb some misinformation, it could have the unintended 296 00:16:50,200 --> 00:16:53,160 Speaker 2: effect of curtailing political speech. Right. So they're on the 297 00:16:53,160 --> 00:16:57,960 Speaker 2: one hand, they're acknowledging that it does curb misinformation, it 298 00:16:58,400 --> 00:17:03,360 Speaker 2: is actively today preventing harm from being done, and yet 299 00:17:03,560 --> 00:17:08,440 Speaker 2: they are going to remove those protections out of potential 300 00:17:08,760 --> 00:17:14,440 Speaker 2: maybe fear about something that could potentially occur in the future. 301 00:17:14,520 --> 00:17:18,240 Speaker 2: And it's so backwards and silly and infuriating. 302 00:17:18,480 --> 00:17:21,840 Speaker 1: Yeah, it's like the Gettysburg Address of cow towing tech 303 00:17:21,960 --> 00:17:27,200 Speaker 1: pr bullshit speak where they say, we are we acknowledge 304 00:17:27,240 --> 00:17:30,840 Speaker 1: that what we are doing will has prevented harm, but 305 00:17:31,720 --> 00:17:34,720 Speaker 1: what if it could increase for speech? Question mark, let's 306 00:17:34,720 --> 00:17:37,040 Speaker 1: find out, right. And I gotta say, like, I feel 307 00:17:37,040 --> 00:17:41,080 Speaker 1: a little bit personally invested in this because getting Google 308 00:17:41,200 --> 00:17:44,480 Speaker 1: to agree to take down this kind of misinformation is 309 00:17:44,520 --> 00:17:47,320 Speaker 1: something that I personally worked on in my platform accountability work. 310 00:17:47,440 --> 00:17:50,280 Speaker 1: This has definitely been I've tried, I mean, I've tried 311 00:17:50,320 --> 00:17:52,960 Speaker 1: not to dwell on it too much because what does 312 00:17:53,000 --> 00:17:55,400 Speaker 1: that get you? But this has definitely been the year 313 00:17:55,560 --> 00:18:00,800 Speaker 1: of a lot of policies that did verifiable, verifyable good 314 00:18:01,000 --> 00:18:05,639 Speaker 1: and verifiably made platforms safer in like clear ways. This 315 00:18:05,680 --> 00:18:08,200 Speaker 1: has been the year of seeing those policies be walked back, 316 00:18:08,480 --> 00:18:13,359 Speaker 1: be changed. So it's a little personally distressing to me, 317 00:18:13,480 --> 00:18:17,000 Speaker 1: but that's either here nor there. They do say that 318 00:18:17,040 --> 00:18:20,320 Speaker 1: they will continue to take down content that misleads voters 319 00:18:20,320 --> 00:18:22,840 Speaker 1: about when, where, and how to vote, and claims that 320 00:18:22,880 --> 00:18:26,359 Speaker 1: discourage voting, and content that encourages others to interfere with 321 00:18:26,400 --> 00:18:29,600 Speaker 1: the democratic process. But knowing a little bit about this, 322 00:18:29,800 --> 00:18:32,919 Speaker 1: like that's just not how it works, right. Donald Trump 323 00:18:33,040 --> 00:18:36,119 Speaker 1: didn't go on television and say I think people should 324 00:18:36,160 --> 00:18:40,360 Speaker 1: go to polls and harass pole workers. I don't think 325 00:18:40,359 --> 00:18:43,480 Speaker 1: he explicitly said that, but that was how that message 326 00:18:43,560 --> 00:18:46,280 Speaker 1: was interpreted and filtered down right, And so this is 327 00:18:46,680 --> 00:18:49,760 Speaker 1: really flies in the face with like what we know 328 00:18:51,240 --> 00:18:56,240 Speaker 1: about how election disinformation and misinformation works. People don't go 329 00:18:56,320 --> 00:18:59,240 Speaker 1: on TV and say do x y z in an 330 00:18:59,280 --> 00:19:03,919 Speaker 1: explicit way. It's very roundabout. It's very the implication. And 331 00:19:04,000 --> 00:19:07,240 Speaker 1: so saying like, oh, well, can we definitely understand that 332 00:19:07,520 --> 00:19:11,520 Speaker 1: misleading people about how to vote, content that encourages people 333 00:19:11,520 --> 00:19:14,439 Speaker 1: to interfere with the democratic process. Saying that that is 334 00:19:14,840 --> 00:19:17,000 Speaker 1: content that you will take down because you recognize that 335 00:19:17,040 --> 00:19:20,000 Speaker 1: as harmful and dangerous. It kind of it doesn't make 336 00:19:20,040 --> 00:19:22,399 Speaker 1: sense that you would think that that is dangerous. But 337 00:19:22,600 --> 00:19:25,200 Speaker 1: that is not how it really works, Right, Like, bad 338 00:19:25,240 --> 00:19:28,679 Speaker 1: actors are really good at staying just on the right 339 00:19:28,720 --> 00:19:31,440 Speaker 1: side of not needing to be have their content remove. 340 00:19:31,520 --> 00:19:33,199 Speaker 1: That is like something that they are very good at. 341 00:19:33,200 --> 00:19:35,280 Speaker 1: It is their bread and butter. And so saying that 342 00:19:35,320 --> 00:19:38,440 Speaker 1: someone will have to meet this very specific threshold to 343 00:19:38,520 --> 00:19:42,600 Speaker 1: have their content removed by YouTube is just inviting people 344 00:19:42,640 --> 00:19:46,000 Speaker 1: to make content that stays just a hair on that 345 00:19:46,080 --> 00:19:50,840 Speaker 1: side of plausible deniability that essentially encourages just that you. 346 00:19:50,800 --> 00:19:57,760 Speaker 2: Know, yeah, that's right, and it's a moving, shifting target, 347 00:19:58,240 --> 00:20:02,480 Speaker 2: and to really meaningfully address it or moderate that content, 348 00:20:02,520 --> 00:20:06,080 Speaker 2: to remove that sort of content that is sneakily just 349 00:20:06,320 --> 00:20:10,800 Speaker 2: on the just the hair shy of being over the line. 350 00:20:10,960 --> 00:20:13,880 Speaker 2: You know, it's a tough problem, and I can understand 351 00:20:14,000 --> 00:20:18,840 Speaker 2: why platforms like Google really just want to punt on it, 352 00:20:18,960 --> 00:20:25,199 Speaker 2: but it's also super important for our democracy and the 353 00:20:25,280 --> 00:20:27,480 Speaker 2: cohesion of society. 354 00:20:27,880 --> 00:20:31,000 Speaker 1: And also, let's just talk about this bs oh, it 355 00:20:31,040 --> 00:20:34,840 Speaker 1: could threaten free speech literally. This morning, I saw a 356 00:20:34,920 --> 00:20:38,280 Speaker 1: post from Trump on truth Social that said that the 357 00:20:38,440 --> 00:20:41,360 Speaker 1: twenty twenty election was stolen. It's not as if there 358 00:20:41,400 --> 00:20:44,480 Speaker 1: are no places in society or on the Internet that 359 00:20:44,560 --> 00:20:47,800 Speaker 1: one could say those lies if they wanted to. Trump 360 00:20:47,840 --> 00:20:50,960 Speaker 1: does it literally every day and has been for the 361 00:20:51,040 --> 00:20:54,280 Speaker 1: last few years, right, And so what I am saying 362 00:20:54,320 --> 00:20:56,159 Speaker 1: is that there is no reason for a company like 363 00:20:56,240 --> 00:20:59,920 Speaker 1: YouTube to allow that on their platform. Not being able 364 00:20:59,920 --> 00:21:02,160 Speaker 1: to say it on YouTube doesn't mean that people aren't 365 00:21:02,160 --> 00:21:03,880 Speaker 1: able to say it. People say it all the time, right. 366 00:21:03,880 --> 00:21:07,920 Speaker 1: It's just like it's such an abdication of responsibility and leadership. 367 00:21:07,920 --> 00:21:10,199 Speaker 1: And I should say that this is actually one of 368 00:21:10,240 --> 00:21:15,400 Speaker 1: the last planks of like post insurrection digital infrastructure that 369 00:21:15,560 --> 00:21:18,240 Speaker 1: was put in place after the violent insurrection. YouTube was 370 00:21:18,240 --> 00:21:20,359 Speaker 1: actually the last one of the last platforms to have 371 00:21:20,400 --> 00:21:24,760 Speaker 1: a policy against twenty twenty election denial. Twitter started adding 372 00:21:25,000 --> 00:21:28,080 Speaker 1: false labeling of false claims about the twenty twenty election 373 00:21:28,119 --> 00:21:30,879 Speaker 1: early last year, but then they walked it back, saying 374 00:21:30,920 --> 00:21:33,320 Speaker 1: that it had been more than a year since you know, 375 00:21:33,400 --> 00:21:36,000 Speaker 1: Biden took office and there was an eventually an exchange 376 00:21:36,000 --> 00:21:39,120 Speaker 1: of power. Facebook also walked back their labeling of false 377 00:21:39,200 --> 00:21:39,639 Speaker 1: claims to. 378 00:21:40,160 --> 00:21:43,080 Speaker 2: The decisions of these platforms about what sort of content 379 00:21:43,119 --> 00:21:48,480 Speaker 2: they're going to allow and what sort of lying, disingenuous, 380 00:21:48,600 --> 00:21:53,160 Speaker 2: dangerous content they might prohibit. That's not a free speech issue, 381 00:21:53,280 --> 00:21:56,640 Speaker 2: right like that is what these That is a business 382 00:21:56,680 --> 00:22:00,760 Speaker 2: decision by these companies of how they they want to 383 00:22:00,840 --> 00:22:04,480 Speaker 2: operate and what role they want to play in a 384 00:22:04,520 --> 00:22:05,800 Speaker 2: pluralistic society. 385 00:22:06,119 --> 00:22:08,919 Speaker 1: And I think it really shows it's just like another 386 00:22:09,000 --> 00:22:11,720 Speaker 1: plank and how these platforms are I guess I'll use 387 00:22:11,760 --> 00:22:13,880 Speaker 1: the word preparing, but really it's the opposite of preparing 388 00:22:14,080 --> 00:22:17,160 Speaker 1: for the upcoming election. Like YouTube restored Trump's account back 389 00:22:17,160 --> 00:22:20,440 Speaker 1: in March so that users could quote hear equally from 390 00:22:20,480 --> 00:22:23,320 Speaker 1: major national candidates. You know. I think it really shows 391 00:22:23,320 --> 00:22:26,920 Speaker 1: that platforms and also media outlets like CNN, who platform 392 00:22:27,000 --> 00:22:31,639 Speaker 1: Trump to just like lie and smear and slander people 393 00:22:31,840 --> 00:22:35,040 Speaker 1: for an hour. I think that these platforms have really 394 00:22:35,480 --> 00:22:39,280 Speaker 1: learned nothing from the last few years. You know, verifiable 395 00:22:39,440 --> 00:22:43,000 Speaker 1: lies about our democratic process and our elections. It's not discourse. 396 00:22:43,320 --> 00:22:46,119 Speaker 1: It's not a difference of opinion. It's not an issue 397 00:22:46,119 --> 00:22:48,160 Speaker 1: that you need to show both sides to or give 398 00:22:48,200 --> 00:22:51,720 Speaker 1: credence to. It is a lie. It is a verifiable lie. 399 00:22:51,840 --> 00:22:54,520 Speaker 1: By now, platforms should have a game plan about how 400 00:22:54,560 --> 00:22:58,200 Speaker 1: they're going to deal with verifiable lies about our democratic 401 00:22:58,200 --> 00:23:00,879 Speaker 1: process in a way that is ethical and responsible, or 402 00:23:00,880 --> 00:23:02,960 Speaker 1: at least more ethical and more responsible than just like 403 00:23:03,560 --> 00:23:06,520 Speaker 1: let anybody lie, because that's what free speech is. 404 00:23:07,320 --> 00:23:10,919 Speaker 2: Yeah, I mean, they just want that sweet, sweet engagement. 405 00:23:11,040 --> 00:23:14,800 Speaker 2: They know that trumpy outrage drives clicks and eyeballs, and 406 00:23:14,800 --> 00:23:17,240 Speaker 2: they want a piece of the action. You know, Google's 407 00:23:17,359 --> 00:23:23,600 Speaker 2: business is selling ads, and integrity and responsibility really have 408 00:23:23,920 --> 00:23:27,800 Speaker 2: nothing to do with it. And it's tragic and dangerous 409 00:23:27,880 --> 00:23:30,520 Speaker 2: because YouTube is so powerful and it has such a 410 00:23:30,600 --> 00:23:35,800 Speaker 2: large impact on our discourse, on our democracy that they 411 00:23:35,840 --> 00:23:39,159 Speaker 2: should feel a sense of responsibility for the content that 412 00:23:39,200 --> 00:23:43,040 Speaker 2: they amplify and promote. But they've just demonstrated time and 413 00:23:43,040 --> 00:23:45,960 Speaker 2: again that they don't, and that they're going to choose 414 00:23:46,160 --> 00:23:51,960 Speaker 2: outraged engagement and selling ads every time. Platforms. Huh. 415 00:23:52,040 --> 00:23:55,119 Speaker 1: Yeah, Let's talk about another platform that is generating a 416 00:23:55,119 --> 00:23:58,480 Speaker 1: bit of outrage, and that is Reddit. So popular platform 417 00:23:58,520 --> 00:24:02,680 Speaker 1: Reddit announce some changes this week and users are not happy, 418 00:24:02,720 --> 00:24:04,280 Speaker 1: to say the least. So if you don't know what 419 00:24:04,320 --> 00:24:08,120 Speaker 1: Reddit is, I love Reddit. It's kind of known as 420 00:24:08,160 --> 00:24:10,679 Speaker 1: the front page of the Internet, to a point where, like, 421 00:24:10,760 --> 00:24:12,360 Speaker 1: if you need to answer a question or you need 422 00:24:12,359 --> 00:24:16,080 Speaker 1: some like real, like human vetted reliable information, it is 423 00:24:16,119 --> 00:24:18,960 Speaker 1: a common practice to search whatever you need plus Reddit 424 00:24:19,040 --> 00:24:21,159 Speaker 1: to quickly get to an actual answer. I want to 425 00:24:21,200 --> 00:24:23,879 Speaker 1: heart somebody say that, like, if they were in a fire, 426 00:24:24,680 --> 00:24:26,840 Speaker 1: the last thing googled on their phone would be like 427 00:24:26,920 --> 00:24:30,640 Speaker 1: how to fight fires plus Reddit, Like I died trying 428 00:24:30,680 --> 00:24:31,639 Speaker 1: to get the answer from Reddit. 429 00:24:32,000 --> 00:24:35,439 Speaker 2: So and Bridget, didn't you used to be like a 430 00:24:35,560 --> 00:24:39,200 Speaker 2: power moderator on Reddit, like years ago, I was a. 431 00:24:39,080 --> 00:24:42,040 Speaker 1: Former Reddit moderator. I was. I mean, it was a 432 00:24:42,080 --> 00:24:45,760 Speaker 1: site that I spent a lot of my free labor 433 00:24:46,119 --> 00:24:49,520 Speaker 1: moderating and caring about and thinking about. So if folks 434 00:24:49,720 --> 00:24:51,840 Speaker 1: use Reddit, and they probably already know that, when you 435 00:24:51,960 --> 00:24:55,359 Speaker 1: log onto Reddit from a computer, generally like it's fine, 436 00:24:55,400 --> 00:24:57,520 Speaker 1: the user experience is fine. But if you log on 437 00:24:57,600 --> 00:25:01,280 Speaker 1: on your phone the app, the Reddit app is very janky, 438 00:25:01,400 --> 00:25:03,439 Speaker 1: and it's also full of ads, to the point that 439 00:25:03,720 --> 00:25:06,480 Speaker 1: I would say that it's like, I won't say unusable, 440 00:25:06,680 --> 00:25:10,320 Speaker 1: but it's not a pleasant user experience. It's like almost unusable. 441 00:25:10,359 --> 00:25:13,119 Speaker 1: The amount of ads that pop up when you're trying 442 00:25:13,119 --> 00:25:14,920 Speaker 1: to use it. So to get around that, a lot 443 00:25:14,960 --> 00:25:17,520 Speaker 1: of folks who use Reddit on a mobile use third 444 00:25:17,520 --> 00:25:20,880 Speaker 1: party apps like Apollo, and these apps only work because 445 00:25:20,880 --> 00:25:23,679 Speaker 1: Reddit allowed those third party apps to have access to 446 00:25:23,720 --> 00:25:26,680 Speaker 1: their API, basically have access to their back ends. And 447 00:25:26,840 --> 00:25:29,520 Speaker 1: all of that is changing because now Reddit announce that 448 00:25:29,520 --> 00:25:32,520 Speaker 1: they're going to start charging those third party apps a 449 00:25:32,760 --> 00:25:36,160 Speaker 1: pretty high price for the access that they've always had. 450 00:25:36,359 --> 00:25:39,000 Speaker 1: You might remember that Twitter did something pretty recently too, 451 00:25:39,320 --> 00:25:42,640 Speaker 1: so pretty much every third party app that relies on 452 00:25:42,760 --> 00:25:45,560 Speaker 1: Twitter's API has announced that they will not be able 453 00:25:45,560 --> 00:25:49,200 Speaker 1: to operate if Reddit continues with this plan to charge 454 00:25:49,240 --> 00:25:52,280 Speaker 1: them the amount that they're asking to be charged to 455 00:25:52,359 --> 00:25:54,000 Speaker 1: continue to have access to the back end. 456 00:25:55,000 --> 00:25:59,840 Speaker 2: Wow, this is like such a surprising trend for platforms 457 00:26:00,080 --> 00:26:03,240 Speaker 2: to make because I think I was reading like a 458 00:26:03,320 --> 00:26:09,239 Speaker 2: Tom Friedman book a while ago. Tom Friedman, Yeah, it 459 00:26:09,280 --> 00:26:12,560 Speaker 2: was a I don't remember why. I think it was 460 00:26:12,560 --> 00:26:14,360 Speaker 2: like in an airport and it felt like the right 461 00:26:14,400 --> 00:26:17,400 Speaker 2: thing to do or something. But he was talking about 462 00:26:17,440 --> 00:26:20,920 Speaker 2: like after the nineties and the dot com boom, how 463 00:26:20,960 --> 00:26:24,840 Speaker 2: like APIs were the big thing that enabled the Internet 464 00:26:24,920 --> 00:26:27,040 Speaker 2: to like take off and flourish because you had all 465 00:26:27,040 --> 00:26:30,800 Speaker 2: this interoperability, and I think it was right about that. 466 00:26:31,040 --> 00:26:34,920 Speaker 2: It was wrong about a lot of other stuff. But 467 00:26:34,920 --> 00:26:40,199 Speaker 2: but yeah, like APIs were a great invention, right and 468 00:26:40,480 --> 00:26:45,359 Speaker 2: allowed platform arguably. You know, these all the third party 469 00:26:45,560 --> 00:26:51,479 Speaker 2: apps that allow people to interact with Reddit in ways 470 00:26:51,520 --> 00:26:57,800 Speaker 2: that are better than Reddit's native app makes available, help 471 00:26:57,880 --> 00:27:01,400 Speaker 2: people use it, help grow their user base, and it's 472 00:27:01,480 --> 00:27:07,000 Speaker 2: so surprising to see platforms like Reddit and Twitter clamping 473 00:27:07,119 --> 00:27:11,880 Speaker 2: down on the very thing that helped them grow. 474 00:27:12,640 --> 00:27:15,960 Speaker 1: Well. So, one of my favorite third party apps for 475 00:27:16,000 --> 00:27:19,800 Speaker 1: Twitter block Party, which is a great tool to mass 476 00:27:19,800 --> 00:27:24,240 Speaker 1: block people who are like harassers or bad actors on Twitter. 477 00:27:24,640 --> 00:27:27,600 Speaker 1: They announce that they're taking an indefinite hiatus because of 478 00:27:27,640 --> 00:27:30,680 Speaker 1: this change where they're now charging for Twitter access to 479 00:27:30,720 --> 00:27:34,040 Speaker 1: Twitter's API. Now, Reddit did walk this back a little bit, 480 00:27:34,119 --> 00:27:36,120 Speaker 1: kind of along the lines of exactly what you were saying, 481 00:27:36,440 --> 00:27:39,760 Speaker 1: saying that these new API terms would carve out an 482 00:27:39,760 --> 00:27:43,240 Speaker 1: exception for accessibility apps which allow users who are blind 483 00:27:43,359 --> 00:27:46,280 Speaker 1: or visually impaired to browse Reddit, because I guess Reddit 484 00:27:46,600 --> 00:27:48,439 Speaker 1: does not have a way for people who are visually 485 00:27:48,440 --> 00:27:50,560 Speaker 1: impaired to browse it. So exactly what you were saying 486 00:27:50,560 --> 00:27:55,639 Speaker 1: that these third party apps via API access are able 487 00:27:55,680 --> 00:27:59,439 Speaker 1: to create a more inclusive experience to to include more users, 488 00:27:59,480 --> 00:28:02,040 Speaker 1: which Reddit have not done. So really, like, I'm the 489 00:28:02,080 --> 00:28:03,760 Speaker 1: expert on this, but in my book, it's like Reddit 490 00:28:03,760 --> 00:28:06,440 Speaker 1: should really be paying the people who It's like, oh, well, 491 00:28:06,480 --> 00:28:11,000 Speaker 1: you just completely shut out blind users. Luckily we have 492 00:28:11,119 --> 00:28:13,480 Speaker 1: found a workaround to include them. 493 00:28:13,880 --> 00:28:17,680 Speaker 2: You're welcome. Yeah, And that's a that is an interesting 494 00:28:17,720 --> 00:28:22,360 Speaker 2: note here, right like, Reddit is pretty different than Twitter 495 00:28:22,560 --> 00:28:26,200 Speaker 2: in a lot of ways. Right Like, Reddit, to my understanding, 496 00:28:26,280 --> 00:28:31,240 Speaker 2: really survives and thrives on the active participation of its 497 00:28:31,400 --> 00:28:34,560 Speaker 2: users U and I would imagine that some of them, 498 00:28:34,880 --> 00:28:39,480 Speaker 2: particularly like you just mentioned, those who are blind who 499 00:28:39,520 --> 00:28:42,960 Speaker 2: rely on these third party apps to use it, I 500 00:28:42,960 --> 00:28:47,840 Speaker 2: would imagine some of those users might not love this change. 501 00:28:48,200 --> 00:28:50,720 Speaker 1: While they certainly do not, and in fact, the Reddit 502 00:28:50,760 --> 00:28:53,360 Speaker 1: community is very vocal and they do not take stuff 503 00:28:53,400 --> 00:28:56,280 Speaker 1: like this without a fight, so they are organizing to 504 00:28:56,280 --> 00:28:59,959 Speaker 1: fight back. The platform relies on an army of unpaid moderators. 505 00:29:00,080 --> 00:29:02,000 Speaker 1: I used to be one of them, and honestly, like 506 00:29:02,240 --> 00:29:06,880 Speaker 1: Reddit would not function without these moderators giving a lot 507 00:29:06,920 --> 00:29:10,320 Speaker 1: of their free time and labor to keep Reddit subreddits, 508 00:29:10,360 --> 00:29:13,240 Speaker 1: which are like they're like, you know, the different communities 509 00:29:13,240 --> 00:29:16,440 Speaker 1: on Reddit going. They all signed an open letter to 510 00:29:16,440 --> 00:29:20,720 Speaker 1: Reddit saying that oftentimes third party tools offer better moderation 511 00:29:20,840 --> 00:29:23,240 Speaker 1: tools than the ones that Reddit does. They say, many 512 00:29:23,320 --> 00:29:25,640 Speaker 1: of us rely on third party apps to manage our 513 00:29:25,640 --> 00:29:28,640 Speaker 1: communities effectively. The potential loss of these services due to 514 00:29:28,640 --> 00:29:32,560 Speaker 1: the pricing change would significantly impact our ability to moderate efficiently, 515 00:29:32,640 --> 00:29:36,520 Speaker 1: thus negatively affecting the experience for users in our communities 516 00:29:36,560 --> 00:29:39,920 Speaker 1: and for us as mods and users ourselves. It honestly 517 00:29:39,960 --> 00:29:42,440 Speaker 1: sounds like these moderators are just generally fed up with 518 00:29:42,520 --> 00:29:45,000 Speaker 1: what they feel as a lack of communication and transparency 519 00:29:45,200 --> 00:29:48,680 Speaker 1: from Redder higher ups to Reddit moderators, who, again basically 520 00:29:49,240 --> 00:29:51,920 Speaker 1: their unpaid labor is the reason why this site is 521 00:29:51,960 --> 00:29:55,080 Speaker 1: able to function. On June twelfth, much of the site's 522 00:29:55,120 --> 00:29:58,240 Speaker 1: subreddits are planning a blackout, which means that individual subreddits 523 00:29:58,280 --> 00:30:00,600 Speaker 1: will lock into private mode, meaning that and anybody who 524 00:30:00,680 --> 00:30:02,960 Speaker 1: is not already a follower of these subredits will not 525 00:30:03,000 --> 00:30:05,040 Speaker 1: be able to access them during that time or see 526 00:30:05,040 --> 00:30:08,240 Speaker 1: that content. So, if you don't use Reddit and you're thinking, 527 00:30:08,640 --> 00:30:11,560 Speaker 1: who cares, what's the big deal, We're talking about millions 528 00:30:11,600 --> 00:30:13,960 Speaker 1: of people, right Some of these big subreddits that are 529 00:30:13,960 --> 00:30:16,920 Speaker 1: going dark in protests have upwards of like three or 530 00:30:16,960 --> 00:30:19,840 Speaker 1: four million people on them, and I think it does 531 00:30:19,960 --> 00:30:21,800 Speaker 1: kind of come back to what you were saying, Mike 532 00:30:21,840 --> 00:30:24,880 Speaker 1: about how I mean. I don't want to give Thomas 533 00:30:24,880 --> 00:30:27,520 Speaker 1: Freeman too much credit, but this idea of APIs and 534 00:30:27,640 --> 00:30:30,640 Speaker 1: opening things up and having it be a more inclusive experience. 535 00:30:31,120 --> 00:30:33,800 Speaker 1: I really see this reddit thing and the reason that 536 00:30:33,840 --> 00:30:36,200 Speaker 1: I wanted to talk about it here, I really say 537 00:30:36,240 --> 00:30:38,600 Speaker 1: it as a part of a larger fight about the 538 00:30:38,640 --> 00:30:41,280 Speaker 1: Internet and who the Internet is for and what it 539 00:30:41,320 --> 00:30:43,960 Speaker 1: is for. Right There is this great piece in Wired 540 00:30:44,000 --> 00:30:47,920 Speaker 1: about the inthitification of the Internet which kind of posits 541 00:30:47,960 --> 00:30:50,920 Speaker 1: that this is how platforms die. First they are good 542 00:30:50,920 --> 00:30:53,719 Speaker 1: to their users, then they abuse their users to make 543 00:30:53,760 --> 00:30:57,480 Speaker 1: things better for their business customers. Finally they abuse those 544 00:30:57,520 --> 00:31:00,520 Speaker 1: business customers to claw back all the value for them themselves, 545 00:31:00,680 --> 00:31:05,040 Speaker 1: and then they die. I totally agree with this, and 546 00:31:05,200 --> 00:31:08,760 Speaker 1: I feel it everywhere, like Ie, not even just on 547 00:31:08,800 --> 00:31:12,840 Speaker 1: social media platforms, just everywhere. I feel like everything online 548 00:31:13,200 --> 00:31:18,400 Speaker 1: eventually has to whatever little joy or life or love 549 00:31:18,800 --> 00:31:22,240 Speaker 1: it has to just bleed it to make a little 550 00:31:22,280 --> 00:31:25,160 Speaker 1: bit more money for people who are already rich. You 551 00:31:25,160 --> 00:31:29,760 Speaker 1: know Instagram. Ten years ago, Instagram felt fun and cool, 552 00:31:29,800 --> 00:31:33,040 Speaker 1: Like I remember when Instagram first was a thing I didn't. 553 00:31:33,240 --> 00:31:35,240 Speaker 1: I wasn't on Instagram because I didn't feel cool enough. 554 00:31:35,240 --> 00:31:36,600 Speaker 1: I was like, oh, there's nothing cool in my life 555 00:31:36,640 --> 00:31:41,280 Speaker 1: to show. Everybody is like putting Sepia filters on their pictures, 556 00:31:41,320 --> 00:31:43,960 Speaker 1: and it was like, it felt cool. It felt like 557 00:31:43,960 --> 00:31:46,600 Speaker 1: a community where you wanted to be, And now it 558 00:31:46,680 --> 00:31:49,440 Speaker 1: just feels like a virtual dead mall. You know, it's 559 00:31:49,480 --> 00:31:53,320 Speaker 1: not enough that HBO, Max or Netflix cancels your favorite 560 00:31:53,360 --> 00:31:56,959 Speaker 1: series only after one season. Now they have to remove 561 00:31:57,080 --> 00:32:00,479 Speaker 1: the entire back catalog so you cannot so it's not canceled, 562 00:32:00,680 --> 00:32:04,480 Speaker 1: you can never watch the existing episodes again, just to 563 00:32:04,520 --> 00:32:06,560 Speaker 1: save a little bit of money on residuals and like 564 00:32:06,640 --> 00:32:09,280 Speaker 1: having to pay the writers and the actors more. You know. 565 00:32:09,600 --> 00:32:13,200 Speaker 1: On this new version of Twitter verification, people with something 566 00:32:13,240 --> 00:32:16,360 Speaker 1: to sell can buy influence via paying eight dollars a 567 00:32:16,360 --> 00:32:18,920 Speaker 1: month for a blue check mark to give them more 568 00:32:18,960 --> 00:32:22,080 Speaker 1: influence to sell whatever it is that they sell more effectively. 569 00:32:22,320 --> 00:32:25,360 Speaker 1: But where is the internet infrastructure that exists to prop 570 00:32:25,480 --> 00:32:30,040 Speaker 1: things up other than building and squeezing capital from people? 571 00:32:30,120 --> 00:32:34,120 Speaker 2: You know, Ooh, that is dark and heavy, but you're 572 00:32:34,160 --> 00:32:40,360 Speaker 2: absolutely right. I do like this phrase and shitification. First 573 00:32:40,480 --> 00:32:45,480 Speaker 2: them bigan, then they shitify. But yeah, it's a good question, 574 00:32:45,520 --> 00:32:50,560 Speaker 2: like where is that internet infrastructure that exists? Yeah, well it's. 575 00:32:50,720 --> 00:32:54,320 Speaker 1: A perfectly cromulent question. Luke Plummet, a tech writer, captured 576 00:32:54,360 --> 00:32:57,680 Speaker 1: this feeling so well on Twitter. He writes, a huge 577 00:32:57,680 --> 00:33:00,520 Speaker 1: part of the bad vibes you feel everywhere these days 578 00:33:00,800 --> 00:33:03,240 Speaker 1: is because every single aspect of our lives is being 579 00:33:03,280 --> 00:33:06,040 Speaker 1: squeezed by companies shaking us down, and we're reaching a 580 00:33:06,080 --> 00:33:10,200 Speaker 1: breaking point. Every platform, every service, every product, every form 581 00:33:10,240 --> 00:33:14,160 Speaker 1: of entertainment just keeps tightening the grip. Each quarterly growth 582 00:33:14,160 --> 00:33:17,120 Speaker 1: report looks good in isolation, but we're reaching the point 583 00:33:17,120 --> 00:33:22,480 Speaker 1: of collective societal exhaustion. And boy, I really felt that, 584 00:33:22,680 --> 00:33:25,240 Speaker 1: I really identified with that. I think I'm there where 585 00:33:25,400 --> 00:33:28,960 Speaker 1: it feels like every little bit of joy is being 586 00:33:29,120 --> 00:33:33,080 Speaker 1: squeezed and mined for whatever little capital can be taken 587 00:33:33,120 --> 00:33:35,520 Speaker 1: from it to make some rich guy who's already rich 588 00:33:35,560 --> 00:33:37,640 Speaker 1: a little bit more rich. And I think I'm really 589 00:33:37,760 --> 00:33:40,680 Speaker 1: yearning for online spaces that felt like they felt when 590 00:33:40,680 --> 00:33:42,200 Speaker 1: I was a bit younger, you know, that felt like 591 00:33:42,280 --> 00:33:45,560 Speaker 1: connection and community building and joy and it feels like 592 00:33:45,600 --> 00:33:48,680 Speaker 1: we are seating more and more of the Internet solely 593 00:33:48,680 --> 00:33:50,480 Speaker 1: to people who want to make money, right, whether it's 594 00:33:50,520 --> 00:33:53,960 Speaker 1: capital for wealthy investors or people who want to sell 595 00:33:54,000 --> 00:33:56,000 Speaker 1: you something or outright scams. 596 00:33:56,440 --> 00:33:59,960 Speaker 2: Yeah, we got to bring the weird, joyful internet. 597 00:34:00,880 --> 00:34:03,800 Speaker 1: Yeah, I want to see Like I don't want to 598 00:34:03,880 --> 00:34:08,200 Speaker 1: date myself, but I want to see more weird Internet 599 00:34:08,200 --> 00:34:12,200 Speaker 1: spaces that are just like, here's my weird cartoon website. 600 00:34:12,239 --> 00:34:16,960 Speaker 1: Here's my big spoon or my salad fingers or my 601 00:34:17,120 --> 00:34:21,080 Speaker 1: teen girls squad. All those are real things. Look them up, kids, 602 00:34:21,200 --> 00:34:22,320 Speaker 1: They're very funny. 603 00:34:23,320 --> 00:34:25,920 Speaker 2: Yeah, there was like funny stuff. There is joyful stuff. 604 00:34:26,080 --> 00:34:28,680 Speaker 2: I feel like it's out there too, right, like they're 605 00:34:28,719 --> 00:34:32,920 Speaker 2: instill the infrastructure to create those things. Maybe the problem 606 00:34:32,920 --> 00:34:35,680 Speaker 2: is that we're all spending our time on the big 607 00:34:35,719 --> 00:34:38,960 Speaker 2: platforms because everybody else is there. Maybe we gotta get off. 608 00:34:39,000 --> 00:34:41,239 Speaker 2: I don't know. I'm just like speculating and losing the 609 00:34:41,320 --> 00:34:41,799 Speaker 2: thread here. 610 00:34:42,560 --> 00:34:45,359 Speaker 1: So that's I mean, it's pretty messed up in dark 611 00:34:45,400 --> 00:34:47,000 Speaker 1: and I have to we have to talk about this, 612 00:34:47,200 --> 00:34:50,120 Speaker 1: like speaking of dark, messed up stuff online. 613 00:34:50,600 --> 00:34:51,759 Speaker 2: I want to talk about this. 614 00:34:52,040 --> 00:34:53,719 Speaker 1: I know I don't want to spend too much time 615 00:34:53,760 --> 00:34:56,200 Speaker 1: on it because it like genuinely nauseates me. But we 616 00:34:56,280 --> 00:34:58,360 Speaker 1: have to talk about this new Wall Street Journal report 617 00:34:58,360 --> 00:35:04,240 Speaker 1: about Instagram. A trigger warning here about abuse of children. 618 00:35:04,480 --> 00:35:07,560 Speaker 1: It is horrific. The Wall Street Journal just published an 619 00:35:07,600 --> 00:35:11,640 Speaker 1: expose showing that Instagram has been algorithmically promoting a vast 620 00:35:11,719 --> 00:35:15,480 Speaker 1: trade of child sexual exploitation material. The journal said that 621 00:35:15,520 --> 00:35:19,080 Speaker 1: it conducted an investigation into child sexual exploitation material on 622 00:35:19,160 --> 00:35:22,280 Speaker 1: Instagram in collaboration with researchers at Stanford and the University 623 00:35:22,320 --> 00:35:26,120 Speaker 1: of Massachusetts Amherst. They found that pedophiles have long used 624 00:35:26,160 --> 00:35:29,400 Speaker 1: the Internet, but unlike forums and file transfer services that 625 00:35:29,480 --> 00:35:32,759 Speaker 1: cater to people who have interest and illicit content, Instagram 626 00:35:32,880 --> 00:35:37,399 Speaker 1: does not merely host these activities. Its algorithms promote them. 627 00:35:37,800 --> 00:35:41,120 Speaker 1: Instagram connects pedophiles and guides them to content sellers via 628 00:35:41,200 --> 00:35:45,440 Speaker 1: recommendation systems that excel at linking those who share niche interests. 629 00:35:45,600 --> 00:35:48,240 Speaker 1: Here's how it all works. The researchers found that Instagram 630 00:35:48,320 --> 00:35:51,719 Speaker 1: enabled people to search explicit hashtags and then connected them 631 00:35:51,840 --> 00:35:55,240 Speaker 1: to accounts that use those same terms to advertise child 632 00:35:55,280 --> 00:35:58,440 Speaker 1: sex material for sale. According to the journal, test accounts 633 00:35:58,440 --> 00:36:01,200 Speaker 1: were set up by researchers that viewed a single such account, 634 00:36:01,239 --> 00:36:04,560 Speaker 1: and then we're immediately hit with suggested for you recommendations 635 00:36:04,840 --> 00:36:08,040 Speaker 1: of purported child sex content sellers and buyers, as well 636 00:36:08,040 --> 00:36:11,640 Speaker 1: as accounts that we're linking to off platform content trading sites. 637 00:36:11,880 --> 00:36:15,360 Speaker 1: Following just a handful of these recommendations was enough to 638 00:36:15,480 --> 00:36:20,080 Speaker 1: flood their test account with content that sexualizes children. In 639 00:36:20,080 --> 00:36:24,720 Speaker 1: addition to that, it's horrifying. In addition to that, certain 640 00:36:24,760 --> 00:36:28,839 Speaker 1: Instagram accounts invite buyers to commission specific acts, with men 641 00:36:28,960 --> 00:36:32,160 Speaker 1: us listing prices for videos of children harming themselves or 642 00:36:32,200 --> 00:36:35,759 Speaker 1: imagery of minor children performing sex acts with animals. This 643 00:36:35,800 --> 00:36:38,080 Speaker 1: is all, according to the Wall Street Journals report, citing 644 00:36:38,160 --> 00:36:42,000 Speaker 1: the findings of the Stanford Internet Observatory researchers. At the 645 00:36:42,080 --> 00:36:45,000 Speaker 1: right price children are available for in person meetups. The 646 00:36:45,040 --> 00:36:50,600 Speaker 1: journal reported, h Yeah, it's stomach churning, it's horrifying. It's terrifying. 647 00:36:50,800 --> 00:36:54,120 Speaker 1: But I have to say it is not terribly surprising 648 00:36:54,160 --> 00:36:57,520 Speaker 1: to me, especially right now when we're having so many 649 00:36:57,560 --> 00:37:02,160 Speaker 1: conversations about protecting kids online, and if lawmakers were serious 650 00:37:02,200 --> 00:37:06,279 Speaker 1: about that, they would be regulating Facebook and companies that 651 00:37:06,360 --> 00:37:09,920 Speaker 1: Facebook runs like Instagram, because according to the data, Facebook 652 00:37:10,040 --> 00:37:13,480 Speaker 1: is by far the biggest defender when it comes to 653 00:37:13,640 --> 00:37:16,359 Speaker 1: child sexual abuse content online. This is not just when 654 00:37:16,360 --> 00:37:18,759 Speaker 1: you compare it to other social media platforms, but when 655 00:37:18,760 --> 00:37:21,680 Speaker 1: you compare it to pornography sites as well. According to 656 00:37:21,680 --> 00:37:24,360 Speaker 1: an independent study released by the National Center for missigan 657 00:37:24,440 --> 00:37:29,080 Speaker 1: Exploited Children, mind Geek, which is the parent company of Pornhub, RedTube, Uporn, 658 00:37:29,400 --> 00:37:33,280 Speaker 1: and several other adult tube sites, accounted for thirteen thousand, 659 00:37:33,360 --> 00:37:36,440 Speaker 1: two hundred and twenty nine instances of what they deemed 660 00:37:36,560 --> 00:37:39,960 Speaker 1: child sexual abuse material, while Snapchat had one hundred and 661 00:37:40,000 --> 00:37:44,120 Speaker 1: forty four thousand, ninety five instances. Google had five hundred 662 00:37:44,120 --> 00:37:47,640 Speaker 1: and forty six seven hundred and four instances. Facebook topped 663 00:37:47,800 --> 00:37:53,279 Speaker 1: everybody with twenty point three million instances of this child 664 00:37:53,440 --> 00:37:57,880 Speaker 1: exploitation material. So if we're actually serious about protecting kids online, 665 00:37:58,239 --> 00:38:00,840 Speaker 1: it needs to start with looking at the biggest defender, 666 00:38:01,080 --> 00:38:03,799 Speaker 1: looking at the worst bad actor, and that is undoubtedly, 667 00:38:03,920 --> 00:38:06,839 Speaker 1: by a by have a vast majority Facebook. 668 00:38:07,600 --> 00:38:10,879 Speaker 2: Jesus, I thought we started out dark, but this is 669 00:38:11,040 --> 00:38:17,200 Speaker 2: like next level stuff and like it's I got to 670 00:38:17,320 --> 00:38:22,000 Speaker 2: hand it to Facebook. You know, we've talked about Amazon 671 00:38:22,480 --> 00:38:26,640 Speaker 2: in this episode. We've talked about Google doing bad stuff, 672 00:38:27,160 --> 00:38:32,360 Speaker 2: but once again, Facebook just blows away the competition at 673 00:38:32,400 --> 00:38:41,120 Speaker 2: being unbelievably bad. Actor. Oh, this is disgusting, and I 674 00:38:41,120 --> 00:38:44,160 Speaker 2: mean in printing in the this, this was in the 675 00:38:44,160 --> 00:38:48,479 Speaker 2: Wall Street Journal, so like, hopefully something will come from this. 676 00:38:49,360 --> 00:38:51,680 Speaker 1: Well, the Wall Street Journal is also where Francis Hogan 677 00:38:51,760 --> 00:38:57,320 Speaker 1: published her information about harms that Facebook knowingly did against children. 678 00:38:57,400 --> 00:38:59,960 Speaker 1: So I don't know, I don't know, they're goals with no, 679 00:39:00,440 --> 00:39:01,440 Speaker 1: I don't know what to tell you. 680 00:39:01,760 --> 00:39:06,200 Speaker 2: I let's move on it like a well traveled Wall 681 00:39:06,239 --> 00:39:08,799 Speaker 2: Street Journal to nothing pipeline, got it? 682 00:39:09,120 --> 00:39:12,160 Speaker 1: Uh? Yeah, I mean I wouldn't say nothing. After Francis 683 00:39:12,200 --> 00:39:15,680 Speaker 1: Hogan published that information in the Wall Street Journal, Facebook 684 00:39:15,680 --> 00:39:18,080 Speaker 1: did change their name to Meta So we got that 685 00:39:18,120 --> 00:39:19,040 Speaker 1: out of it, all. 686 00:39:19,000 --> 00:39:21,600 Speaker 2: Right, that's true. Yeah, still working on the legs. 687 00:39:22,120 --> 00:39:27,120 Speaker 1: Yeah, they're not doing there. They're not doing the metaverse anymore. 688 00:39:27,200 --> 00:39:29,360 Speaker 1: You're never gonna get those legs. Might keep dreaming. 689 00:39:30,280 --> 00:39:33,040 Speaker 2: Okay, thank god, Okay, back to jokes please. 690 00:39:33,800 --> 00:39:36,040 Speaker 1: Okay, So let's let's move on. I know I can't. 691 00:39:36,080 --> 00:39:37,920 Speaker 2: I we have to move on. 692 00:39:38,040 --> 00:39:40,040 Speaker 1: I can't. I can't even sum make it. So let's 693 00:39:40,080 --> 00:39:42,680 Speaker 1: move back to Twitter. So last month, Elon must announced 694 00:39:42,680 --> 00:39:44,680 Speaker 1: that he was stepping down as a CEO of Twitter 695 00:39:44,719 --> 00:39:48,480 Speaker 1: and named a former NBC Universal executive, Linda Yakarino, as 696 00:39:48,520 --> 00:39:51,480 Speaker 1: the new CEO. Musk initially said that she would take 697 00:39:51,480 --> 00:39:54,320 Speaker 1: over in about six weeks, but on Monday, after about 698 00:39:54,360 --> 00:39:56,960 Speaker 1: three weeks, she tweeted that she had officially started, saying 699 00:39:57,160 --> 00:39:59,880 Speaker 1: it happened first day in the books. So who is 700 00:40:00,040 --> 00:40:03,560 Speaker 1: Linda Yakarino. Well, she spent twelve years at NBC Universal, 701 00:40:03,600 --> 00:40:06,600 Speaker 1: where she was most recently the chairperson of Global Advertising 702 00:40:06,640 --> 00:40:09,440 Speaker 1: and Partnerships. She was a big part of launching NBC's 703 00:40:09,440 --> 00:40:12,480 Speaker 1: streaming service Peacock in twenty twenty, which I gotta say 704 00:40:12,520 --> 00:40:14,800 Speaker 1: shout out to Peacock because I watch a lot of Peacock. 705 00:40:15,239 --> 00:40:18,960 Speaker 1: She seems pretty buddy buddy with Elon Musk. At a conference, 706 00:40:19,000 --> 00:40:21,319 Speaker 1: she interviewed him and said, many of you in this 707 00:40:21,440 --> 00:40:23,600 Speaker 1: room know me and know that I pride myself on 708 00:40:23,640 --> 00:40:26,720 Speaker 1: my work ethic, But buddy, I have met my match. 709 00:40:26,880 --> 00:40:29,359 Speaker 1: She said that to Elon Musk when everybody was kind 710 00:40:29,360 --> 00:40:31,560 Speaker 1: of criticizing Elon Musk in the early days of him 711 00:40:31,560 --> 00:40:34,359 Speaker 1: at the helm of Twitter. She urged people to give 712 00:40:34,400 --> 00:40:36,360 Speaker 1: him a minute, let's see what he's gonna do. She 713 00:40:36,480 --> 00:40:39,520 Speaker 1: has some ties to Trump. In twenty eighteen, Yakarino was 714 00:40:39,600 --> 00:40:42,080 Speaker 1: named by Trump to the President's counsel on Sports and 715 00:40:42,120 --> 00:40:46,200 Speaker 1: Fitness and Nutrition. The queer focused news outlet them reported 716 00:40:46,280 --> 00:40:49,760 Speaker 1: that she follows some troubling accounts on Twitter, like libs 717 00:40:49,760 --> 00:40:53,040 Speaker 1: of TikTok, which we know is known for attacking LGBTQ 718 00:40:53,200 --> 00:40:56,720 Speaker 1: people and their allies for just like minding their business. 719 00:40:57,000 --> 00:41:00,560 Speaker 1: Deb notes that she also follows some like stand one 720 00:41:00,560 --> 00:41:04,200 Speaker 1: of the mill Twitter accounts, like mainstream journalists. I actually 721 00:41:04,200 --> 00:41:06,480 Speaker 1: could kind of see her being the kind of person 722 00:41:06,680 --> 00:41:10,239 Speaker 1: who thinks that if you follow mainstream journalists, that means 723 00:41:10,239 --> 00:41:12,719 Speaker 1: that you also have to follow accounts like libs of 724 00:41:12,760 --> 00:41:16,640 Speaker 1: TikTok to sort of represent both sides and have balance. 725 00:41:16,680 --> 00:41:19,359 Speaker 1: Like I was like, I probably I could easily see 726 00:41:19,400 --> 00:41:22,279 Speaker 1: her being the kind of person that feels this way. Now, 727 00:41:22,400 --> 00:41:25,760 Speaker 1: her coming on as CEO does not necessarily signal big 728 00:41:25,880 --> 00:41:28,520 Speaker 1: changes at Twitter. Musk is staying on as the owner, 729 00:41:28,800 --> 00:41:30,880 Speaker 1: and he says that he wants to focus more on 730 00:41:30,920 --> 00:41:34,560 Speaker 1: like tech issues. Media Matters reported that Twitter's lawyers told 731 00:41:34,560 --> 00:41:37,520 Speaker 1: a court that hiring Koris the new CEO will not 732 00:41:37,680 --> 00:41:41,200 Speaker 1: result in different content moderation strategies. So if you had, 733 00:41:41,280 --> 00:41:45,560 Speaker 1: you know, high hopes for new content moderation strategies that 734 00:41:45,640 --> 00:41:48,319 Speaker 1: maybe don't allow for things like hate speech, attacks on 735 00:41:48,400 --> 00:41:52,879 Speaker 1: trans folks, crypto scams, and pornbots, you might be disappointed. 736 00:41:53,160 --> 00:41:54,719 Speaker 1: What's also kind of funny to me is that when 737 00:41:54,760 --> 00:41:57,400 Speaker 1: she was first announced as CEO, a bunch of right 738 00:41:57,480 --> 00:42:02,280 Speaker 1: wing and extremist influencers criticized her because she had talked 739 00:42:02,280 --> 00:42:04,680 Speaker 1: about wanting to hire more women and people of color 740 00:42:04,680 --> 00:42:07,360 Speaker 1: when she was at NBC and they had a video 741 00:42:07,400 --> 00:42:11,080 Speaker 1: of her in twenty twenty talking about the importance of masks, 742 00:42:11,160 --> 00:42:13,759 Speaker 1: like that was their big find. Just goes to show 743 00:42:13,760 --> 00:42:18,080 Speaker 1: that these people are literally never satisfied. Like anybody that 744 00:42:18,200 --> 00:42:20,040 Speaker 1: Musk was going to pick, they would still find a 745 00:42:20,080 --> 00:42:22,359 Speaker 1: way to make that a grievance, to make that an 746 00:42:22,400 --> 00:42:23,600 Speaker 1: attack on them. 747 00:42:23,800 --> 00:42:29,879 Speaker 2: Yeah, anyone to the left of Mussolini is like unacceptable 748 00:42:29,920 --> 00:42:30,520 Speaker 2: to these people. 749 00:42:30,920 --> 00:42:34,360 Speaker 1: So she's coming in as CEO at a self inflicted 750 00:42:34,400 --> 00:42:37,399 Speaker 1: difficult time for Twitter. The platform is not doing well. 751 00:42:37,400 --> 00:42:40,520 Speaker 1: It's not doing well with this regular users or with advertisers. 752 00:42:40,719 --> 00:42:42,799 Speaker 1: A recent poll by Pugh found that six and ten 753 00:42:42,840 --> 00:42:45,880 Speaker 1: adults in the US, which is Twitter's largest user base, 754 00:42:46,120 --> 00:42:48,200 Speaker 1: were taking a break, and a quarter of them said 755 00:42:48,200 --> 00:42:50,480 Speaker 1: that they did not expect to be using Twitter in 756 00:42:50,520 --> 00:42:53,279 Speaker 1: a year. When it comes to advertisers, of Twitter's top 757 00:42:53,320 --> 00:42:56,439 Speaker 1: one thousand advertisers from last September before Musk took over, 758 00:42:56,840 --> 00:42:59,960 Speaker 1: only forty three percent of them were still using Twitter 759 00:43:00,040 --> 00:43:03,080 Speaker 1: as of April. Now, Musk had been kind of cagey 760 00:43:03,160 --> 00:43:05,600 Speaker 1: about this, like he has not liked to talk about 761 00:43:05,640 --> 00:43:08,719 Speaker 1: the dire financial straits that the company was in, But 762 00:43:09,040 --> 00:43:11,800 Speaker 1: this week he finally did acknowledge that in a Twitter 763 00:43:11,840 --> 00:43:16,040 Speaker 1: spaces with presidential candidate and COVID conspiracy theorist Robert Kennedy Junior, 764 00:43:16,160 --> 00:43:18,440 Speaker 1: where he did admit that the revenue at Twitter had 765 00:43:18,480 --> 00:43:21,960 Speaker 1: been cut by about fifty percent. You know, advertisers buying 766 00:43:22,000 --> 00:43:25,520 Speaker 1: ads on Twitter is how the platform makes money, and 767 00:43:25,560 --> 00:43:29,799 Speaker 1: basically right now they're not doing that because what advertiser 768 00:43:29,880 --> 00:43:33,320 Speaker 1: wants to see their branding next to a tweet calling 769 00:43:33,360 --> 00:43:36,279 Speaker 1: somebody a racial slur or like a porn bot or 770 00:43:36,320 --> 00:43:38,960 Speaker 1: a scam or something. Right. I saw a pretty interesting 771 00:43:39,000 --> 00:43:43,120 Speaker 1: piece in BBC about how with Yakanaro's background working with 772 00:43:43,200 --> 00:43:47,120 Speaker 1: advertisers Musk was basically trying to purchase trust to woo 773 00:43:47,239 --> 00:43:48,400 Speaker 1: advertisers back. 774 00:43:49,040 --> 00:43:56,160 Speaker 2: Maybe she'll be less like chaotic than Musk. Maybe. 775 00:43:56,360 --> 00:43:58,600 Speaker 1: So if you're thinking that she sounds like she might 776 00:43:58,680 --> 00:44:00,840 Speaker 1: be a grown up in the room, might be somebody 777 00:44:00,840 --> 00:44:03,799 Speaker 1: who can sort of steer the ship in a better 778 00:44:04,239 --> 00:44:09,120 Speaker 1: direction than Musk has. That is a well worn phenomena 779 00:44:09,239 --> 00:44:11,560 Speaker 1: in business. There is this theory in business called the 780 00:44:11,600 --> 00:44:15,200 Speaker 1: glass cliff, where women are basically brought in to clean 781 00:44:15,280 --> 00:44:18,879 Speaker 1: up the messes made by terrible men in power. I'm 782 00:44:18,880 --> 00:44:20,880 Speaker 1: a good example of the glass cliff was after the 783 00:44:20,920 --> 00:44:26,080 Speaker 1: gaming company Blizzard had a massive gender discrimination and harassment lawsuit, 784 00:44:26,200 --> 00:44:28,719 Speaker 1: they hired in twenty twenty one Jen O'Neil, who was 785 00:44:28,880 --> 00:44:31,000 Speaker 1: the first female lead of the company, right, who was 786 00:44:31,000 --> 00:44:34,359 Speaker 1: sort of like brought in seeming lead to kind of 787 00:44:34,400 --> 00:44:37,920 Speaker 1: clean up this mess. Now, I absolutely do think that 788 00:44:37,920 --> 00:44:39,880 Speaker 1: that is what some of what's going on here, that 789 00:44:39,920 --> 00:44:41,640 Speaker 1: a woman is being brought in to clean up this 790 00:44:41,760 --> 00:44:44,520 Speaker 1: mess made by a man, and this sort of signal 791 00:44:44,680 --> 00:44:47,120 Speaker 1: that a grown up is in charge and that it's 792 00:44:47,120 --> 00:44:50,319 Speaker 1: no longer like a frat boy in charge. But I 793 00:44:50,440 --> 00:44:53,600 Speaker 1: also think that she is kind of being set up 794 00:44:53,680 --> 00:44:56,640 Speaker 1: to fail in a lot of ways. You know, it's 795 00:44:56,800 --> 00:45:00,920 Speaker 1: tough to be a such a high profile higher one 796 00:45:01,760 --> 00:45:05,440 Speaker 1: have to appease a demagogue, which we know Elon Musk 797 00:45:05,640 --> 00:45:10,719 Speaker 1: is too, and then have to handle that, navigate that 798 00:45:10,840 --> 00:45:15,080 Speaker 1: while also signaling to advertisers that big changes are coming 799 00:45:15,160 --> 00:45:19,920 Speaker 1: to woo them back. You know, it's this very difficult dance. 800 00:45:19,960 --> 00:45:22,640 Speaker 1: I would say it's an impossible dance to have to dance. 801 00:45:22,880 --> 00:45:26,000 Speaker 1: The way that people are talking about her background really 802 00:45:26,040 --> 00:45:27,960 Speaker 1: signals to me that she is being set up to 803 00:45:28,000 --> 00:45:31,280 Speaker 1: have to accomplish something that seems at least very difficult, 804 00:45:31,360 --> 00:45:35,200 Speaker 1: if not impossible. People have described her as someone who 805 00:45:35,280 --> 00:45:38,280 Speaker 1: really likes to be a superwoman and someone who can 806 00:45:38,840 --> 00:45:42,440 Speaker 1: who would see a mess of a company and voluntarily 807 00:45:42,680 --> 00:45:45,120 Speaker 1: want to go in and feel like they can fix things. 808 00:45:45,320 --> 00:45:48,160 Speaker 1: By the way, I hate this framing. I can't even 809 00:45:48,200 --> 00:45:51,680 Speaker 1: really get, like verbalize why I hate this. There's just 810 00:45:51,680 --> 00:45:55,560 Speaker 1: something about it that feels very much like women have 811 00:45:55,640 --> 00:45:59,719 Speaker 1: to be super women to be in the room that 812 00:45:59,760 --> 00:46:02,359 Speaker 1: they have to be. They can't just be included from 813 00:46:02,400 --> 00:46:06,160 Speaker 1: the jump. They have to be super women who are 814 00:46:06,200 --> 00:46:09,560 Speaker 1: not just able, but excited to clean up a mess 815 00:46:09,600 --> 00:46:13,000 Speaker 1: that was just clearly made by a man who had 816 00:46:13,040 --> 00:46:15,120 Speaker 1: too much power and didn't know how to handle it, 817 00:46:15,200 --> 00:46:15,400 Speaker 1: you know. 818 00:46:15,800 --> 00:46:18,600 Speaker 2: Yeah, And if you think about the mess that is Twitter, 819 00:46:19,680 --> 00:46:25,200 Speaker 2: it really all started when Elon took over, right, Like, 820 00:46:25,719 --> 00:46:30,560 Speaker 2: I guess, it had financial problems before then, but it 821 00:46:30,719 --> 00:46:37,520 Speaker 2: wasn't the chaotic, toxic place that it is now. Where 822 00:46:38,520 --> 00:46:41,759 Speaker 2: I mean, among my friends, I don't know too many 823 00:46:41,800 --> 00:46:45,160 Speaker 2: people that really spend much time there at all anymore. 824 00:46:45,239 --> 00:46:49,279 Speaker 2: He's really I don't know, Tank, the brand, whoever you 825 00:46:49,320 --> 00:46:50,600 Speaker 2: want to say it. 826 00:46:50,600 --> 00:46:53,759 Speaker 1: It'll be interesting to see how bringing on this new 827 00:46:53,840 --> 00:46:56,960 Speaker 1: CEO will be for Twitter. There was a very interesting 828 00:46:57,000 --> 00:47:00,160 Speaker 1: piece about the glass Cliff phenomena and wired twitch Yaknaro 829 00:47:00,280 --> 00:47:03,680 Speaker 1: responded on Twitter quote as someone used to wearing foreign cheels. 830 00:47:03,800 --> 00:47:06,960 Speaker 1: Let's be crystal clear. I don't teeter which, Okay, I'll 831 00:47:07,000 --> 00:47:08,480 Speaker 1: give it to her. Kind of a good line. I'm 832 00:47:08,520 --> 00:47:11,440 Speaker 1: not gonna lie, but it's clear, like we need to 833 00:47:11,440 --> 00:47:13,880 Speaker 1: be clear, Musk is staying on at Twitter. So even 834 00:47:13,880 --> 00:47:16,319 Speaker 1: with a new CEO, this is still his company. He's 835 00:47:16,360 --> 00:47:19,880 Speaker 1: not going away. And Musk does not have a great 836 00:47:19,960 --> 00:47:23,000 Speaker 1: track record when it comes to working alongside women. I 837 00:47:23,040 --> 00:47:25,960 Speaker 1: believe that Mosque is a misogynist. You don't even have 838 00:47:26,000 --> 00:47:27,879 Speaker 1: to look very far to see the ways in which 839 00:47:27,920 --> 00:47:30,440 Speaker 1: he is a misogynist either. There are like a hundred 840 00:47:30,600 --> 00:47:32,359 Speaker 1: different examples, and I could give you off the top 841 00:47:32,400 --> 00:47:34,360 Speaker 1: of my head, but immediately come to mind if we 842 00:47:34,440 --> 00:47:36,920 Speaker 1: listed all of the ways that Trump or Trump Oh 843 00:47:37,000 --> 00:47:42,440 Speaker 1: my god, he's also a massageist. No, keep that shit in. 844 00:47:42,520 --> 00:47:44,920 Speaker 1: They're both misogynists. They actually reminded me of each other. 845 00:47:44,920 --> 00:47:47,480 Speaker 1: A sound surprising to me that I confuse one for 846 00:47:47,600 --> 00:47:50,120 Speaker 1: the other. So you know, if we listed all the 847 00:47:50,280 --> 00:47:51,839 Speaker 1: different examples that come to the top of my head, 848 00:47:51,880 --> 00:47:54,799 Speaker 1: we'd be here all night. He tweeted a crass joke 849 00:47:54,920 --> 00:47:58,440 Speaker 1: about wanting to start a university called the Texas Institute 850 00:47:58,480 --> 00:48:03,440 Speaker 1: of Technology and Science TITS as the acronym. Side note, 851 00:48:03,760 --> 00:48:08,520 Speaker 1: it's never even a good sexist joke, right, Like, I 852 00:48:08,600 --> 00:48:12,319 Speaker 1: hate misogyny and sexism, but I love humor, and if 853 00:48:12,320 --> 00:48:16,520 Speaker 1: a sexist joke was legitimately funny, I would acknowledge it. 854 00:48:16,719 --> 00:48:19,680 Speaker 1: This isn't even a good joke. It's not even good misogyny. 855 00:48:19,760 --> 00:48:22,600 Speaker 1: Like if you're gonna tell, if you're gonna be a CEO, 856 00:48:23,040 --> 00:48:26,719 Speaker 1: that is this powerful and tell misogynistic jokes. Don't give 857 00:48:26,800 --> 00:48:28,840 Speaker 1: the joke that a million of us have heard in 858 00:48:28,880 --> 00:48:30,920 Speaker 1: the frat a thousand different times. 859 00:48:30,960 --> 00:48:33,520 Speaker 2: You know it's a bad joke, Like it's it's like 860 00:48:33,560 --> 00:48:37,239 Speaker 2: a Beavis and butt Head level joke, but like not 861 00:48:37,360 --> 00:48:39,719 Speaker 2: even good enough to actually be on Beavis and butt Head, 862 00:48:40,360 --> 00:48:43,920 Speaker 2: which is an excellent show, including the reboot. 863 00:48:44,200 --> 00:48:48,120 Speaker 1: Like I am someone who deeply appreciates stupid jokes and 864 00:48:48,160 --> 00:48:51,000 Speaker 1: stupid humor, and this is not even like I can't 865 00:48:51,040 --> 00:48:53,319 Speaker 1: even appreciate it. So the day after he tweeted this, 866 00:48:53,800 --> 00:48:57,640 Speaker 1: Tesla became the subject of a gender discrimination lawsuit from 867 00:48:57,680 --> 00:49:01,479 Speaker 1: multiple women, and I remember engineer and tech organizer Share 868 00:49:01,520 --> 00:49:03,920 Speaker 1: Scarlett tweeted in response to all this, I heard that 869 00:49:04,040 --> 00:49:07,239 Speaker 1: sexualizing women is a top down, systemic issue in tech. 870 00:49:07,640 --> 00:49:10,440 Speaker 1: Might be wrong, thou lighty k And to be honest, 871 00:49:11,080 --> 00:49:14,120 Speaker 1: that's how you do a funny joke about gender and tech. Elon, 872 00:49:14,480 --> 00:49:15,400 Speaker 1: take a note. 873 00:49:15,600 --> 00:49:17,600 Speaker 2: Yes, acronyms are not the way. 874 00:49:17,840 --> 00:49:20,719 Speaker 1: Yeah an acronym that spells out tits, which is a 875 00:49:21,120 --> 00:49:25,160 Speaker 1: body part that is sometimes found on female anatomy. Oh 876 00:49:25,200 --> 00:49:27,759 Speaker 1: my god, Like, get this, get this guy a Mark 877 00:49:27,800 --> 00:49:31,760 Speaker 1: Twain Award, somebody. So, according to a report from Business insider, 878 00:49:31,880 --> 00:49:36,000 Speaker 1: Musk secretly fathered twins with Chavon Zill's, a female executive 879 00:49:36,040 --> 00:49:38,840 Speaker 1: at his company, Neuralik. So we don't know much about 880 00:49:38,880 --> 00:49:41,360 Speaker 1: their relationship. But if you're the head of a company 881 00:49:41,400 --> 00:49:44,520 Speaker 1: and you're having sex with your underlings and your staff, 882 00:49:44,920 --> 00:49:47,480 Speaker 1: I feel comfortable saying that, Like, at the very least, 883 00:49:47,480 --> 00:49:50,200 Speaker 1: it's not a great look. All of this information is public, right, 884 00:49:50,239 --> 00:49:53,080 Speaker 1: So by all the accounts, Jacanaro, this new Twitter CEO 885 00:49:53,600 --> 00:49:56,719 Speaker 1: seems like a smart, competent person who would have looked 886 00:49:56,719 --> 00:49:59,239 Speaker 1: at this information and decided that Twitter and Elon Musk 887 00:49:59,280 --> 00:50:01,080 Speaker 1: were who and what what she wanted to be mixed 888 00:50:01,120 --> 00:50:04,800 Speaker 1: up with. And if that's what you decided, as a confident, 889 00:50:04,880 --> 00:50:08,000 Speaker 1: smart adult, that's what you wanted. If it doesn't work out, 890 00:50:08,040 --> 00:50:10,759 Speaker 1: like you kind of in my book, like get what 891 00:50:10,840 --> 00:50:13,319 Speaker 1: you get, Like this is all public information is if 892 00:50:13,320 --> 00:50:15,840 Speaker 1: this is the company that you decided that you wanted 893 00:50:16,040 --> 00:50:18,799 Speaker 1: to stake your reputation on, girl do you but you 894 00:50:18,840 --> 00:50:20,719 Speaker 1: get what you get, you know, And I want to 895 00:50:20,719 --> 00:50:24,279 Speaker 1: be clear, I want Yakanero to do well the same 896 00:50:24,320 --> 00:50:26,920 Speaker 1: way that I want like all women to do well. 897 00:50:27,120 --> 00:50:29,880 Speaker 1: You know, I'm not like rooting for her to fail. 898 00:50:30,239 --> 00:50:34,000 Speaker 1: But to me, doing well is not just bringing back 899 00:50:34,040 --> 00:50:38,440 Speaker 1: advertisers or appeasing Elon Musk or helping Twitter make money. 900 00:50:38,719 --> 00:50:41,640 Speaker 1: Doing well would be making Twitter a platform that does 901 00:50:41,680 --> 00:50:46,239 Speaker 1: not elevate and amplify toxicity, lives, abuse, scams, and harassment. 902 00:50:46,239 --> 00:50:49,759 Speaker 1: And so I wish her well and hope that she's 903 00:50:49,800 --> 00:50:54,280 Speaker 1: able to achieve that. But I think that her vision 904 00:50:54,440 --> 00:50:57,480 Speaker 1: for doing well and what I have just articulated might 905 00:50:57,520 --> 00:50:58,799 Speaker 1: be two different things. 906 00:50:59,360 --> 00:51:04,759 Speaker 2: Yeah, to be interesting to watch it develop. Uh you know, 907 00:51:04,840 --> 00:51:11,359 Speaker 2: maybe I've bought into the glass cliff mythology, but uh, yeah, 908 00:51:11,520 --> 00:51:16,080 Speaker 2: it seems like having having a smart, competent woman in 909 00:51:16,080 --> 00:51:20,240 Speaker 2: the room probably couldn't hurt and hopefully it'll be good. 910 00:51:20,360 --> 00:51:24,120 Speaker 2: But I guess we'll just have to wait and see 911 00:51:24,400 --> 00:51:29,279 Speaker 2: as this Twitter, this latest Twitter drama unfolds. 912 00:51:30,040 --> 00:51:33,080 Speaker 1: Now, I don't trust any institution or company that doesn't 913 00:51:33,080 --> 00:51:37,759 Speaker 1: have some women at the at the highest levels, the priesthood, 914 00:51:38,360 --> 00:51:42,440 Speaker 1: the NFL. Uh yeah, if you don't have the military, 915 00:51:42,600 --> 00:51:45,799 Speaker 1: if there's not women all up through that, I have 916 00:51:45,920 --> 00:51:50,040 Speaker 1: questions that I'm a little skeptical just in general. That's 917 00:51:50,040 --> 00:51:51,920 Speaker 1: a blanket statement. If I don't see, if I don't 918 00:51:51,920 --> 00:51:55,480 Speaker 1: see a woman making decisions something. 919 00:51:56,360 --> 00:51:58,360 Speaker 2: Yeah, it's it's a set of somebody. 920 00:51:58,480 --> 00:52:00,680 Speaker 1: Somebody's tweeting the word tits. So all, let's put it 921 00:52:00,760 --> 00:52:02,280 Speaker 1: at the very least. 922 00:52:04,480 --> 00:52:07,000 Speaker 2: You know, I've never thought of those three institutions as 923 00:52:07,000 --> 00:52:14,960 Speaker 2: a set together before, so thank you for that. More. 924 00:52:14,960 --> 00:52:28,000 Speaker 3: After a quick break, let's get right back into it. 925 00:52:32,600 --> 00:52:34,600 Speaker 1: So. I know that this has been a little dark, 926 00:52:34,640 --> 00:52:36,200 Speaker 1: but I do have a little bit of a good news. 927 00:52:36,400 --> 00:52:37,279 Speaker 1: Would you like to hear it? 928 00:52:38,000 --> 00:52:39,560 Speaker 2: Yes? Please, So it's. 929 00:52:39,440 --> 00:52:41,360 Speaker 1: Going to start with some bad news, but trust me, 930 00:52:41,400 --> 00:52:44,279 Speaker 1: it'll get good. Stick with me. I probably don't need 931 00:52:44,320 --> 00:52:46,720 Speaker 1: to tell y'all that book bands are on the rise 932 00:52:46,760 --> 00:52:50,719 Speaker 1: in the US, with books that center LGBTQ voices accounting 933 00:52:50,719 --> 00:52:53,279 Speaker 1: for about forty one percent of challenged books. This is 934 00:52:53,320 --> 00:52:56,080 Speaker 1: according to Pan America. Attempted book bands at school and 935 00:52:56,120 --> 00:52:58,920 Speaker 1: public library set a record high in twenty twenty two. 936 00:52:59,320 --> 00:53:03,200 Speaker 1: This is according to information from the American Library Association. Obviously, 937 00:53:03,440 --> 00:53:05,960 Speaker 1: that is terrible, but here's the good news. At a 938 00:53:06,000 --> 00:53:09,480 Speaker 1: White House Pride event yesterday, Biden announced a slate of 939 00:53:09,520 --> 00:53:13,799 Speaker 1: actions aimed at curbing discrimination against LGBTQ communities, including the 940 00:53:13,840 --> 00:53:16,120 Speaker 1: appointment of a new point person who will serve as 941 00:53:16,120 --> 00:53:19,480 Speaker 1: a coordinator at the Education Department to address the increase 942 00:53:19,560 --> 00:53:22,560 Speaker 1: in book bands. That's good, I like to see that. 943 00:53:22,880 --> 00:53:25,839 Speaker 1: But here's a little bit more positive news. Despite all 944 00:53:25,880 --> 00:53:28,400 Speaker 1: of those bands and all of those restrictions and all 945 00:53:28,440 --> 00:53:32,359 Speaker 1: of those attempted attacks by extremists to challenge and ban 946 00:53:32,480 --> 00:53:37,640 Speaker 1: books about LGBTQ people, people still really really want to 947 00:53:37,640 --> 00:53:39,560 Speaker 1: read about queer folks and are going out of their 948 00:53:39,560 --> 00:53:43,640 Speaker 1: way to do so. Sales of LGBTQ plus books soared 949 00:53:43,680 --> 00:53:45,920 Speaker 1: to record highs in twenty twenty two, even as a 950 00:53:45,920 --> 00:53:48,520 Speaker 1: small but vocal army of extremists try to ban queer 951 00:53:48,560 --> 00:53:51,960 Speaker 1: theme titles and attack inclusive education across the country, US 952 00:53:52,040 --> 00:53:56,240 Speaker 1: readers bought six point one million LGBTQ plus fiction titles 953 00:53:56,520 --> 00:53:58,600 Speaker 1: over the past year ending in May twenty twenty three. 954 00:53:58,680 --> 00:54:00,600 Speaker 1: This is according to a new report put out on 955 00:54:00,680 --> 00:54:04,520 Speaker 1: Tuesday by consumer analyst group CIRCANNA that marks an eleven 956 00:54:04,600 --> 00:54:08,040 Speaker 1: percent jump in growth since last year, when around five 957 00:54:08,120 --> 00:54:10,880 Speaker 1: million total units were sold, and a massive one hundred 958 00:54:10,880 --> 00:54:14,480 Speaker 1: and seventy three percent explosions in twenty nineteen before the 959 00:54:14,480 --> 00:54:17,520 Speaker 1: COVID nineteen pandemic. This is a really important context. The 960 00:54:17,600 --> 00:54:21,640 Speaker 1: growth in LGBTQ fiction has outpaced the overall market for 961 00:54:21,719 --> 00:54:25,640 Speaker 1: fiction sales, including adult, kids and young adult fiction combined, 962 00:54:25,880 --> 00:54:29,200 Speaker 1: which remained relatively flat. This is from Kristen MacLean, a 963 00:54:29,239 --> 00:54:32,120 Speaker 1: book industry analyst. So it just goes to show you 964 00:54:32,200 --> 00:54:35,879 Speaker 1: can try to ban queerness and transness and gainness out 965 00:54:35,960 --> 00:54:39,360 Speaker 1: of existence, people still want to see it represented. People 966 00:54:39,360 --> 00:54:41,880 Speaker 1: will go out of their way to get that inclusion 967 00:54:41,960 --> 00:54:45,160 Speaker 1: because that is what people want. The extremists who are 968 00:54:45,200 --> 00:54:48,960 Speaker 1: trying to ban and legislate that out of existence are 969 00:54:49,080 --> 00:54:51,960 Speaker 1: out of step with the desires of the majority of 970 00:54:51,960 --> 00:54:55,320 Speaker 1: the country. I believe they are a small but vocal 971 00:54:55,480 --> 00:54:58,040 Speaker 1: group of extremists, and there are more of us than 972 00:54:58,040 --> 00:55:00,479 Speaker 1: there are of them, and I think that is news. 973 00:55:01,080 --> 00:55:03,960 Speaker 2: That is good news. Thank you for sharing that. It's 974 00:55:04,040 --> 00:55:08,919 Speaker 2: good to be reminded that the right wing bigots are 975 00:55:08,960 --> 00:55:13,839 Speaker 2: a minority and they are freaking out because they know it, 976 00:55:14,000 --> 00:55:17,040 Speaker 2: and they know that they are going to go extinct. 977 00:55:17,440 --> 00:55:21,000 Speaker 1: So I've got a little bit of bonus good news. 978 00:55:20,719 --> 00:55:25,200 Speaker 2: For you, two different good news stories in one episode. 979 00:55:26,560 --> 00:55:29,880 Speaker 1: It's not really good news exactly, but the good news 980 00:55:30,040 --> 00:55:32,280 Speaker 1: is that one of my favorite things in the world 981 00:55:32,600 --> 00:55:36,040 Speaker 1: is low stakes online internet drama where there are no 982 00:55:36,280 --> 00:55:39,080 Speaker 1: clear like good guys to root for, and the entire 983 00:55:39,120 --> 00:55:41,120 Speaker 1: internet is like weighing in on what they think. And 984 00:55:41,160 --> 00:55:43,160 Speaker 1: some of that happened, and so it's good news for 985 00:55:43,280 --> 00:55:48,479 Speaker 1: me personally, Bridget. So here's what we've been down. There's 986 00:55:48,520 --> 00:55:51,799 Speaker 1: two moms, let's call one park Mom and the other 987 00:55:52,040 --> 00:55:55,799 Speaker 1: birthday cake Mom. So park Mom gets on TikTok and 988 00:55:55,880 --> 00:55:58,160 Speaker 1: explains the situation. She says that she took her kid 989 00:55:58,280 --> 00:56:00,320 Speaker 1: to a public park and there was another f family 990 00:56:00,360 --> 00:56:02,479 Speaker 1: there who is having a birthday party for their kid. 991 00:56:02,880 --> 00:56:06,760 Speaker 1: Her kid basically starts playing with this other family having 992 00:56:06,760 --> 00:56:10,200 Speaker 1: this party. It's time to sing Happy Birthday and due cake. 993 00:56:10,600 --> 00:56:13,719 Speaker 1: So park Mom is watching her kid. It sounds like 994 00:56:13,719 --> 00:56:16,000 Speaker 1: from the other side of the playground. Park Mom says 995 00:56:16,040 --> 00:56:19,560 Speaker 1: that she watches her kid get a plate, sing happy 996 00:56:19,600 --> 00:56:22,880 Speaker 1: Birthday and clearly have the intention that they're going to 997 00:56:22,960 --> 00:56:27,360 Speaker 1: have birthday cake. That is when birthday cake Mom takes 998 00:56:27,360 --> 00:56:31,000 Speaker 1: the plate away from her the kid and says, you're 999 00:56:31,040 --> 00:56:33,200 Speaker 1: not going to have a piece of cake. These are 1000 00:56:33,200 --> 00:56:36,520 Speaker 1: not your friends, this is not your party. Where is 1001 00:56:36,560 --> 00:56:37,000 Speaker 1: your mother? 1002 00:56:37,360 --> 00:56:40,279 Speaker 2: Devastating So park. 1003 00:56:40,120 --> 00:56:44,280 Speaker 1: Mom, in her TikTok says basically, am I the asshole? 1004 00:56:44,760 --> 00:56:49,279 Speaker 1: Park Mom is horrified. She cannot believe that birthday cake 1005 00:56:49,360 --> 00:56:51,720 Speaker 1: mom would speak to a kid this way. She cannot 1006 00:56:51,760 --> 00:56:55,280 Speaker 1: believe that birthday cake mom, who had what she describes 1007 00:56:55,360 --> 00:56:57,680 Speaker 1: as a big sheet cake with lots of lots of 1008 00:56:57,680 --> 00:56:59,680 Speaker 1: cake to go around, plenty of cake for her kid, 1009 00:56:59,719 --> 00:57:04,600 Speaker 1: would deny her kid a slice of cake. She asks 1010 00:57:04,640 --> 00:57:07,160 Speaker 1: the Internet on TikTok is she wrong? 1011 00:57:07,480 --> 00:57:07,560 Speaker 2: So? 1012 00:57:07,960 --> 00:57:11,520 Speaker 1: This is why I love this drama so much. It's 1013 00:57:11,520 --> 00:57:15,279 Speaker 1: one of those things where there is no clear right 1014 00:57:15,360 --> 00:57:20,520 Speaker 1: answer and everybody is weighing in, and like what people 1015 00:57:20,560 --> 00:57:23,480 Speaker 1: weigh in with actually says more about them than it 1016 00:57:23,520 --> 00:57:26,000 Speaker 1: does about the situation, because the situation, we actually don't 1017 00:57:26,040 --> 00:57:28,920 Speaker 1: have a lot of information, like how old are these kids? 1018 00:57:29,000 --> 00:57:31,680 Speaker 1: You know. Some people were like, oh, well, I wouldn't 1019 00:57:31,680 --> 00:57:34,560 Speaker 1: give food to someone else's kid that I didn't know, 1020 00:57:34,600 --> 00:57:36,840 Speaker 1: Like what if they have an allergy? Other people were like, well, 1021 00:57:36,880 --> 00:57:39,040 Speaker 1: who's allergic to birthday cake? That seems like a weird 1022 00:57:39,040 --> 00:57:41,480 Speaker 1: thing that to just suggest that maybe they're allergyp to 1023 00:57:41,520 --> 00:57:44,920 Speaker 1: birthday cake? Read every comment, Love every minute of it, 1024 00:57:45,120 --> 00:57:49,280 Speaker 1: you know, I it sounds to me like, if I'm 1025 00:57:49,320 --> 00:57:52,960 Speaker 1: being honest, it sounds to me like Park mom just 1026 00:57:53,040 --> 00:57:56,960 Speaker 1: kind of let her kid join this other family and 1027 00:57:57,080 --> 00:57:59,680 Speaker 1: never went over and introduced herself or said like, hey, 1028 00:58:00,080 --> 00:58:02,600 Speaker 1: I'm whoever. Is it cool if my kid hangs out, like, 1029 00:58:02,680 --> 00:58:04,920 Speaker 1: let me know if they get annoying, just assume that 1030 00:58:04,960 --> 00:58:09,320 Speaker 1: it was fine. Kind of a point against Park Mom. Also, 1031 00:58:09,400 --> 00:58:11,400 Speaker 1: I feel like snatching a plate from a kid and 1032 00:58:11,440 --> 00:58:14,160 Speaker 1: saying these are not your friends a little bit harsh. 1033 00:58:14,280 --> 00:58:18,200 Speaker 1: I probably wouldn't do that, but I'm like, I don't 1034 00:58:18,240 --> 00:58:20,640 Speaker 1: know who is in the right here. I just love 1035 00:58:20,720 --> 00:58:24,640 Speaker 1: that it's low stakes. There's no clear correct answer. Everyone 1036 00:58:24,680 --> 00:58:27,280 Speaker 1: on the internet is weighing in, and their way in 1037 00:58:28,000 --> 00:58:31,200 Speaker 1: says more about who they are and what their values are, 1038 00:58:31,800 --> 00:58:33,400 Speaker 1: and you know who they are as people in the 1039 00:58:33,440 --> 00:58:37,160 Speaker 1: world that it does about the actual situation. Tad out 1040 00:58:37,160 --> 00:58:40,760 Speaker 1: of ten love this kind of low stakes internet drama. 1041 00:58:40,880 --> 00:58:44,760 Speaker 2: Yes, please, It is nice that it's so low stakes, 1042 00:58:45,240 --> 00:58:47,280 Speaker 2: you know. No, Like I feel for the kid who 1043 00:58:47,360 --> 00:58:50,480 Speaker 2: didn't get the cake. It sounds like park Mom was 1044 00:58:50,560 --> 00:58:52,760 Speaker 2: also pretty upset. 1045 00:58:54,000 --> 00:58:56,400 Speaker 1: Yes, I'm sat are entitled Mike? 1046 00:58:57,080 --> 00:59:01,520 Speaker 2: Yeah, well, you know, I'm trying to refrain from sharing 1047 00:59:01,560 --> 00:59:02,680 Speaker 2: my thoughts here. 1048 00:59:02,800 --> 00:59:05,080 Speaker 1: No, what do you you have? You have a take, 1049 00:59:05,280 --> 00:59:07,760 Speaker 1: like what's like, who do you think is in the wrong? 1050 00:59:08,080 --> 00:59:11,240 Speaker 2: Well, I mean, just give the kids some damn cake, 1051 00:59:11,360 --> 00:59:15,120 Speaker 2: Like what the hell? Like, one person's an adult, the 1052 00:59:15,200 --> 00:59:18,959 Speaker 2: other person is a kid who wanted who like came 1053 00:59:19,040 --> 00:59:21,240 Speaker 2: to sing the birthday song and like play with some 1054 00:59:21,280 --> 00:59:24,600 Speaker 2: other kids and like have some cake. Like regardless of 1055 00:59:24,680 --> 00:59:29,680 Speaker 2: who's like truly morally in the right or like violating 1056 00:59:29,720 --> 00:59:33,120 Speaker 2: someone else's personal property or whatever. Like one of them 1057 00:59:33,200 --> 00:59:35,760 Speaker 2: is a kid who sang the birthday song and wanted 1058 00:59:35,800 --> 00:59:38,040 Speaker 2: a piece of cake. The other one's an adult. 1059 00:59:38,080 --> 00:59:39,960 Speaker 1: Well, I saw a lot of people on the internet 1060 00:59:40,000 --> 00:59:44,120 Speaker 1: being like this kid the birthday cake. Mom probably was 1061 00:59:44,160 --> 00:59:46,560 Speaker 1: annoyed by this kid the whole time and was probably like, 1062 00:59:46,600 --> 00:59:48,720 Speaker 1: where's your mom to come get you? And was like 1063 00:59:49,440 --> 00:59:52,320 Speaker 1: just in this it not not to like excuse her behavior, 1064 00:59:52,360 --> 00:59:54,520 Speaker 1: but was like in one of those situations where you're 1065 00:59:54,520 --> 00:59:56,640 Speaker 1: getting more and more and more annoyed and then you're 1066 00:59:56,680 --> 00:59:59,440 Speaker 1: just like, now it's coming out of an outburst that 1067 00:59:59,480 --> 01:00:01,200 Speaker 1: doesn't really makes sense, and it's kind of that the 1068 01:00:01,200 --> 01:00:05,720 Speaker 1: wrong person, which I know very well in my personal life. 1069 01:00:05,920 --> 01:00:08,800 Speaker 1: But yeah, I kind of see all sides. I think 1070 01:00:08,800 --> 01:00:11,320 Speaker 1: that I have been park mom I probably would have. 1071 01:00:12,120 --> 01:00:15,840 Speaker 1: I find it frankly unfathomable that at this that someone 1072 01:00:15,880 --> 01:00:18,000 Speaker 1: could watch their kid playing with another family, but it 1073 01:00:18,040 --> 01:00:19,800 Speaker 1: wouldn't occur to them at some point to go up 1074 01:00:19,800 --> 01:00:23,000 Speaker 1: town and be like, hey, like I'm Sally, this is 1075 01:00:23,040 --> 01:00:25,440 Speaker 1: my kid, Like this is fine, You're you're cool with this. 1076 01:00:26,000 --> 01:00:27,960 Speaker 1: I think it's a It is surprising to me that 1077 01:00:28,360 --> 01:00:32,000 Speaker 1: that a mom wouldn't, you know, do that. I think 1078 01:00:32,040 --> 01:00:34,880 Speaker 1: that's probably what I would do. Uh probably honestly would 1079 01:00:34,920 --> 01:00:37,120 Speaker 1: have like solved this whole thing. It also was surprising 1080 01:00:37,160 --> 01:00:39,000 Speaker 1: to me that a grown woman would be like snatching 1081 01:00:39,000 --> 01:00:41,560 Speaker 1: a plate from a child. That's that's why it's so good, 1082 01:00:41,600 --> 01:00:45,720 Speaker 1: Because everybody but this kid has done something that I 1083 01:00:45,760 --> 01:00:49,240 Speaker 1: would not suggest adults do. Everybody's behavior is a little 1084 01:00:49,280 --> 01:00:49,680 Speaker 1: bit off. 1085 01:00:50,000 --> 01:00:52,160 Speaker 2: Maybe that's part of what makes this so satisfying. It's 1086 01:00:52,160 --> 01:00:55,440 Speaker 2: almost like reality TV, where like like am I the asshole? Like, 1087 01:00:55,520 --> 01:00:59,840 Speaker 2: actually everyone's the asshole? You know, park mom probably should 1088 01:00:59,840 --> 01:01:02,200 Speaker 2: have been keeping it better around her kid. Birthday Mom 1089 01:01:02,520 --> 01:01:04,840 Speaker 2: probably could have given the kids some cake. I guess 1090 01:01:04,880 --> 01:01:07,760 Speaker 2: I do want to give birthday mom a little bit 1091 01:01:07,880 --> 01:01:12,320 Speaker 2: of grace here, because like I've thrown a party in 1092 01:01:12,360 --> 01:01:16,640 Speaker 2: my life, you know, a couple of times, and it's stressful, 1093 01:01:16,760 --> 01:01:18,120 Speaker 2: and it kind of makes me a bit of a 1094 01:01:18,160 --> 01:01:20,920 Speaker 2: head case. I like to think that I would still 1095 01:01:21,040 --> 01:01:25,280 Speaker 2: be like kind to a child, but you know, it's 1096 01:01:25,320 --> 01:01:29,600 Speaker 2: a high pressure thing. Maybe she had trouble tracking down 1097 01:01:29,640 --> 01:01:32,000 Speaker 2: the sheet cake, and like the kids keep running around 1098 01:01:32,040 --> 01:01:34,320 Speaker 2: and yelling and like where's birthday? 1099 01:01:34,400 --> 01:01:34,680 Speaker 1: Dad? 1100 01:01:34,800 --> 01:01:36,760 Speaker 2: Is he helping? I don't hear anything about him in 1101 01:01:36,800 --> 01:01:37,320 Speaker 2: this story. 1102 01:01:39,240 --> 01:01:42,440 Speaker 1: It makes it better that it's two moms. I feel, yeah, 1103 01:01:42,480 --> 01:01:44,080 Speaker 1: it actually I think I think I was telling you 1104 01:01:44,160 --> 01:01:46,520 Speaker 1: about this that it reminds me so you and I 1105 01:01:46,560 --> 01:01:48,120 Speaker 1: had very I know that you and I had very 1106 01:01:48,160 --> 01:01:51,560 Speaker 1: different upbringing sess children. I grew up in the suburbs. 1107 01:01:51,640 --> 01:01:53,480 Speaker 1: You grew up on a farm and like in a 1108 01:01:53,600 --> 01:01:56,120 Speaker 1: very rural community, so this was not something that you 1109 01:01:56,160 --> 01:01:58,920 Speaker 1: really knew about. But when I was a kid, I 1110 01:01:59,000 --> 01:02:02,880 Speaker 1: remember I have several memories of in the summertime going 1111 01:02:02,920 --> 01:02:06,160 Speaker 1: out to play on our street with other kids. One 1112 01:02:06,160 --> 01:02:07,960 Speaker 1: of the other kids would be like, hey, you want 1113 01:02:07,960 --> 01:02:10,000 Speaker 1: to come back to my house. I would say sure. 1114 01:02:10,480 --> 01:02:12,760 Speaker 1: I would go back to this kid's house, like a 1115 01:02:12,760 --> 01:02:15,360 Speaker 1: couple of blocks away. I would get there, their mom 1116 01:02:15,440 --> 01:02:18,880 Speaker 1: would be there, so they'll be like, oh, you are 1117 01:02:18,920 --> 01:02:21,240 Speaker 1: now expected to like keep an eye on this like 1118 01:02:21,440 --> 01:02:24,320 Speaker 1: stranger kid from down the street, and half the time 1119 01:02:24,360 --> 01:02:27,560 Speaker 1: I think we would expect food. So it's like, oh, hi, Mom, 1120 01:02:27,920 --> 01:02:30,840 Speaker 1: it's not just me the kid that you had that 1121 01:02:30,880 --> 01:02:34,840 Speaker 1: you you know, aren't caring for. It's a stranger's kid 1122 01:02:34,880 --> 01:02:38,840 Speaker 1: that you don't even know, and she expects lunch. Like 1123 01:02:39,680 --> 01:02:42,680 Speaker 1: I think there is something kind of entitled about sending 1124 01:02:42,720 --> 01:02:46,880 Speaker 1: your kids with strangers and expecting them to be fed. 1125 01:02:47,360 --> 01:02:50,040 Speaker 1: But I absolutely that was my I mean, like maybe 1126 01:02:50,080 --> 01:02:52,400 Speaker 1: I misremembering, but I feel like that's how it was 1127 01:02:52,440 --> 01:02:53,400 Speaker 1: when I was growing up. 1128 01:02:53,720 --> 01:02:56,560 Speaker 2: Yeah, that was different from my upbringing. You know, there 1129 01:02:56,560 --> 01:03:00,200 Speaker 2: were like four other kids within a mile radius of 1130 01:03:00,280 --> 01:03:03,640 Speaker 2: our house, right Like I knew them all and also 1131 01:03:03,720 --> 01:03:06,720 Speaker 2: needed a ride from my parents if I wanted to 1132 01:03:06,720 --> 01:03:09,800 Speaker 2: go see them, So that, just like straight was not happening. 1133 01:03:10,200 --> 01:03:13,440 Speaker 1: So I want to know where you stand on this drama. Again, 1134 01:03:13,520 --> 01:03:16,520 Speaker 1: it's low stakes, so no judgment. If you would have 1135 01:03:17,120 --> 01:03:20,320 Speaker 1: snatched that paper plate from that kid so fast it 1136 01:03:20,320 --> 01:03:21,960 Speaker 1: makes your head spend, I want to know about it. 1137 01:03:22,000 --> 01:03:24,960 Speaker 1: If you would have gotten Mom's Venmo information to Venmo 1138 01:03:25,040 --> 01:03:26,760 Speaker 1: her for her share of the cake. I want to 1139 01:03:26,800 --> 01:03:29,600 Speaker 1: know that too. I'm obsessed. Let me know. Hit me 1140 01:03:29,680 --> 01:03:31,960 Speaker 1: up on email at Hello at tango dot com. You 1141 01:03:32,000 --> 01:03:35,120 Speaker 1: can find me on social or you can subscribe to 1142 01:03:35,160 --> 01:03:39,360 Speaker 1: our Patreon. We are having interesting conversations over there. Thank 1143 01:03:39,360 --> 01:03:41,400 Speaker 1: you so much to the folks who have subscribed. I've 1144 01:03:41,440 --> 01:03:45,800 Speaker 1: got some really exciting stuff coming up on Patreon soon. 1145 01:03:46,960 --> 01:03:49,720 Speaker 1: I'll give you a little teaser. It involves Elon Musk 1146 01:03:49,760 --> 01:03:54,880 Speaker 1: and Azalea Banks, my problematic fave. So please subscribe. We 1147 01:03:54,880 --> 01:03:57,800 Speaker 1: would love to have you there, and thanks so much 1148 01:03:57,840 --> 01:03:59,040 Speaker 1: for listening. We'll see you next time. 1149 01:03:59,440 --> 01:04:01,120 Speaker 2: Yeah, so listening, and thanks for having me. 1150 01:04:01,120 --> 01:04:06,120 Speaker 1: Bridget always Mike. If you're looking for ways to support 1151 01:04:06,120 --> 01:04:08,600 Speaker 1: the show, check out our merch store at tangody dot 1152 01:04:08,600 --> 01:04:12,240 Speaker 1: com slash store. Got a story about an interesting thing 1153 01:04:12,240 --> 01:04:14,240 Speaker 1: in tech, or just want to say hi, You can 1154 01:04:14,320 --> 01:04:16,560 Speaker 1: reach us at Hello at tangody dot com. You can 1155 01:04:16,560 --> 01:04:19,520 Speaker 1: also find transcripts for today's episode at TENG Goody dot com. 1156 01:04:19,640 --> 01:04:21,320 Speaker 1: There Are No Girls on the Internet was created by 1157 01:04:21,320 --> 01:04:24,680 Speaker 1: me Bridget tod It's a production of iHeartRadio and Unbossed Creative, 1158 01:04:25,200 --> 01:04:28,800 Speaker 1: edited by Joey pat Jonathan Strickland as our executive producer. 1159 01:04:29,120 --> 01:04:32,360 Speaker 1: Tari Harrison is our producer and sound engineer. Michael Amado 1160 01:04:32,440 --> 01:04:35,440 Speaker 1: is our contributing producer. I'm your host, Bridget Todd. If 1161 01:04:35,440 --> 01:04:37,160 Speaker 1: you want to help us grow, rate and review. 1162 01:04:37,080 --> 01:04:38,120 Speaker 3: Us on Apple Podcasts. 1163 01:04:38,880 --> 01:04:41,720 Speaker 1: For more podcasts from iHeartRadio, check out the iHeartRadio app, 1164 01:04:41,720 --> 01:04:48,040 Speaker 1: Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.