WEBVTT - The Hunt

0:00:03.960 --> 0:00:06.560
<v Speaker 1>The Moscow Police Department put out a renewed call for

0:00:06.600 --> 0:00:09.560
<v Speaker 1>social media content, pictures and videos.

0:00:09.200 --> 0:00:10.480
<v Speaker 2>From the community.

0:00:11.000 --> 0:00:14.280
<v Speaker 1>Investigators are still asking anyone with any information to contact

0:00:14.280 --> 0:00:17.880
<v Speaker 1>the Moscow tip Line. The investigation into who killed four

0:00:17.960 --> 0:00:22.400
<v Speaker 1>University of Idaho students has now received ten thousand tips.

0:00:28.800 --> 0:00:33.800
<v Speaker 3>This is the Idaho Massacre a production of KT Studios

0:00:33.920 --> 0:00:42.800
<v Speaker 3>and iHeartRadio, Episode six The Hunt Courtney Armstrong, a television

0:00:42.800 --> 0:00:46.960
<v Speaker 3>producer at KT Studios, with Stephanie Leidecker, Jeff Shane, and

0:00:47.040 --> 0:00:53.639
<v Speaker 3>Connor Powell. Weeks after four University of Idaho students were

0:00:53.720 --> 0:00:56.880
<v Speaker 3>murdered in their off campus home, investigators are on a

0:00:56.920 --> 0:01:02.320
<v Speaker 3>relentless search for the killer as the tips rolled in.

0:01:02.520 --> 0:01:06.319
<v Speaker 3>Multiple law enforcement agencies, including the Idaho's d Police and

0:01:06.360 --> 0:01:09.600
<v Speaker 3>the FBI, were working with the Moscow PD to crack

0:01:09.680 --> 0:01:15.120
<v Speaker 3>the case. They were methodically zeroing in on their main suspect,

0:01:15.400 --> 0:01:18.400
<v Speaker 3>following the evidence from the mysterious white Atlantra to the

0:01:18.480 --> 0:01:22.760
<v Speaker 3>DNA left at the scene. While observing Brian Coberger at

0:01:22.840 --> 0:01:25.600
<v Speaker 3>his family's home in Pennsylvania, the twenty eight year old

0:01:25.640 --> 0:01:28.720
<v Speaker 3>was seen wearing rubber latex gloves in public and putting

0:01:28.760 --> 0:01:33.240
<v Speaker 3>trash in neighbor's garbage cans. Coburger's family also noticed this

0:01:33.319 --> 0:01:37.479
<v Speaker 3>bizarre behavior. According to reports, one of his own sisters

0:01:37.520 --> 0:01:39.800
<v Speaker 3>began to wonder if her brother could have been involved

0:01:39.800 --> 0:01:43.000
<v Speaker 3>in the murders, at one point even saying loudly that

0:01:43.040 --> 0:01:45.399
<v Speaker 3>her brother lived near the victims and drove a white

0:01:45.520 --> 0:01:48.920
<v Speaker 3>Honda Atlantra. While some in the Coburger family may have

0:01:48.920 --> 0:01:52.320
<v Speaker 3>had their suspicions about him, unbeknownst to them, their own

0:01:52.400 --> 0:01:56.280
<v Speaker 3>family's genetic DNA would be key to linking Brian Koeberger

0:01:56.400 --> 0:01:57.080
<v Speaker 3>to the murders.

0:01:57.400 --> 0:02:01.120
<v Speaker 4>Big crack in this case came from das a specifically

0:02:01.320 --> 0:02:04.080
<v Speaker 4>genetic genealogy.

0:02:04.920 --> 0:02:08.079
<v Speaker 3>Within days of the gruesome murders, police suspected the white

0:02:08.160 --> 0:02:11.799
<v Speaker 3>Houndai Alantra seen repeatedly driving near the King Road crime

0:02:11.880 --> 0:02:17.000
<v Speaker 3>site was connected to the murders. Investigators immediately began compiling

0:02:17.040 --> 0:02:21.400
<v Speaker 3>a list of white Lantras registered in the region. Investigators

0:02:21.440 --> 0:02:24.880
<v Speaker 3>first sought cell records. They then most likely looked for

0:02:25.000 --> 0:02:27.960
<v Speaker 3>every person who panged the Moscow Tower and owned to

0:02:27.960 --> 0:02:32.360
<v Speaker 3>white Alantra, but the search of the long list of

0:02:32.400 --> 0:02:39.520
<v Speaker 3>white Alantra's didn't turn up anything conclusive for weeks. Here's

0:02:39.600 --> 0:02:41.040
<v Speaker 3>Jeff and Stephanie.

0:02:41.720 --> 0:02:44.160
<v Speaker 5>As November was coming to a close, the Moscow police

0:02:44.160 --> 0:02:46.120
<v Speaker 5>assured the public that there was no threat to the

0:02:46.120 --> 0:02:48.560
<v Speaker 5>community and that they were in fact making progress.

0:02:49.080 --> 0:02:52.519
<v Speaker 6>And at this point cops were really combing through thousands

0:02:52.639 --> 0:02:56.680
<v Speaker 6>of tips and pieces of information, most of which frankly

0:02:56.760 --> 0:02:57.360
<v Speaker 6>led nowhere.

0:02:57.800 --> 0:03:00.639
<v Speaker 5>Can you imagine the pressure. Not only are they concerned

0:03:00.639 --> 0:03:02.919
<v Speaker 5>about the safety of this college town, but they have

0:03:03.040 --> 0:03:04.440
<v Speaker 5>the whole world watching them.

0:03:05.080 --> 0:03:08.880
<v Speaker 6>I remember this time, the public really wanted information, and

0:03:09.200 --> 0:03:12.040
<v Speaker 6>every day that went by without an arrest, people were

0:03:12.080 --> 0:03:13.680
<v Speaker 6>getting angrier and angrier.

0:03:14.320 --> 0:03:17.680
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, it's a really unfair expectation, but at this point

0:03:17.720 --> 0:03:20.160
<v Speaker 5>there really was no credible suspect or murder weapon.

0:03:20.560 --> 0:03:24.760
<v Speaker 6>And then by early December, investigators had combed through the

0:03:24.880 --> 0:03:29.639
<v Speaker 6>victim's classmates, their friends, as well as any perhaps registered

0:03:29.639 --> 0:03:34.400
<v Speaker 6>sex offenders in the area, stalkers, any individuals known for

0:03:34.960 --> 0:03:39.680
<v Speaker 6>violently harassing people. They even looked into a local white supremacist,

0:03:40.000 --> 0:03:42.400
<v Speaker 6>but again, sadly, it all led to nothing.

0:03:42.840 --> 0:03:45.560
<v Speaker 5>The white Alantra was truly the best lead, but it's

0:03:45.560 --> 0:03:48.960
<v Speaker 5>an incredibly common car. In twenty twenty one, Hyundai sold

0:03:49.000 --> 0:03:51.960
<v Speaker 5>over one hundred and twenty four thousand Lantras, In fact,

0:03:52.080 --> 0:03:54.120
<v Speaker 5>the number of aluntras sold last year compared to the

0:03:54.200 --> 0:03:58.240
<v Speaker 5>year before increased forty seven percent, So it's basically like

0:03:58.280 --> 0:03:59.560
<v Speaker 5>finding a needle in a haystack.

0:04:01.440 --> 0:04:04.320
<v Speaker 3>For weeks, Brian Coberger was simply a name on an

0:04:04.320 --> 0:04:08.080
<v Speaker 3>ever growing list, one of the many white Atlanta owners,

0:04:08.680 --> 0:04:12.640
<v Speaker 3>and then he was the lone suspect and under arrest.

0:04:13.040 --> 0:04:16.520
<v Speaker 7>Suspect Brian Coburger is behind bars after investigators linked his

0:04:16.640 --> 0:04:19.760
<v Speaker 7>DNA at the crime scene two of a DNA taken

0:04:19.800 --> 0:04:21.520
<v Speaker 7>from the trash at his parents' home.

0:04:24.440 --> 0:04:27.359
<v Speaker 3>The official public story laid out in the Probable Cause

0:04:27.400 --> 0:04:32.200
<v Speaker 3>AFFI David is that investigator's positively identified Coburger by matching

0:04:32.279 --> 0:04:37.000
<v Speaker 3>DNA evidence from the knife sheath to Coburger's father's DNA.

0:04:39.160 --> 0:04:42.040
<v Speaker 3>But investigators in the Idaho Police Lab didn't have a

0:04:42.080 --> 0:04:45.120
<v Speaker 3>positive DNA match for the twenty eight year old criminology

0:04:45.160 --> 0:04:48.960
<v Speaker 3>student until at least December twenty seventh, when a surveillance

0:04:49.000 --> 0:04:52.240
<v Speaker 3>crew pulled his father's DNA from the trash. So how

0:04:52.240 --> 0:04:56.120
<v Speaker 3>did investigators know and with such confidence to start surveillance

0:04:56.160 --> 0:04:59.320
<v Speaker 3>on Coburger long before the conclusive DNA match.

0:05:00.000 --> 0:05:04.960
<v Speaker 6>Investigative genetic genealogy was used to point them in his direction.

0:05:07.240 --> 0:05:10.720
<v Speaker 3>The path to positively identify in the Washington State University

0:05:10.760 --> 0:05:14.239
<v Speaker 3>PhD student, employed and new, and at the same time

0:05:14.360 --> 0:05:19.680
<v Speaker 3>one of the most controversial modern crime solving techniques. It's

0:05:19.720 --> 0:05:22.760
<v Speaker 3>a DNA method that is only reluctantly talked about by

0:05:22.839 --> 0:05:27.720
<v Speaker 3>law enforcement. Before we can explain what genetic genealogy is

0:05:27.839 --> 0:05:30.599
<v Speaker 3>and why it's so rare and controversial, we need to

0:05:30.640 --> 0:05:34.039
<v Speaker 3>explain how DNA material is normally collected and used in

0:05:34.040 --> 0:05:35.280
<v Speaker 3>a criminal investigation.

0:05:36.200 --> 0:05:40.560
<v Speaker 4>So DNA is what makes us what we are, and

0:05:40.680 --> 0:05:44.880
<v Speaker 4>every single cell of our body, with a few exceptions,

0:05:44.920 --> 0:05:48.600
<v Speaker 4>has the same DNA. I like to describe it as

0:05:48.640 --> 0:05:50.680
<v Speaker 4>an enormous encyclopedia.

0:05:50.800 --> 0:05:54.440
<v Speaker 3>That's Daniel Padini, the head of the forensic Sciences department

0:05:54.480 --> 0:05:57.640
<v Speaker 3>at George Washington University speaking with Jeff.

0:05:58.400 --> 0:06:02.240
<v Speaker 4>And every cell of our body kind of harvests or

0:06:02.360 --> 0:06:05.719
<v Speaker 4>looks at parts of that encyclopedia that it needs to

0:06:05.800 --> 0:06:09.279
<v Speaker 4>become what it needs to develop in. So the liver

0:06:09.400 --> 0:06:12.760
<v Speaker 4>cell will look at the encyclopedia chapter on how to

0:06:12.800 --> 0:06:16.000
<v Speaker 4>become a liver cell. The retina cell will do the same,

0:06:16.080 --> 0:06:18.240
<v Speaker 4>but it's going to be a different chapter. But the

0:06:18.400 --> 0:06:22.600
<v Speaker 4>entire encyclopedia is present in every single cell, so we

0:06:22.680 --> 0:06:27.400
<v Speaker 4>can look at parts of this encyclopedia that are different

0:06:27.520 --> 0:06:32.040
<v Speaker 4>among individuals, and we can generate the DNA profile that

0:06:32.240 --> 0:06:37.440
<v Speaker 4>has a very very low frequency in the population to

0:06:37.480 --> 0:06:42.120
<v Speaker 4>the point that we can essentially identify a single individual.

0:06:42.880 --> 0:06:47.040
<v Speaker 5>How has that now kind of changed the way investigators

0:06:47.360 --> 0:06:48.520
<v Speaker 5>work on criminal cases.

0:06:48.920 --> 0:06:55.039
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, it really has dramatically changed the forensic investigations in

0:06:55.160 --> 0:06:59.719
<v Speaker 4>terms of being able to identify an individual that was

0:06:59.720 --> 0:07:03.880
<v Speaker 4>a crime scene. If a biological evidence is recovered at

0:07:03.880 --> 0:07:07.800
<v Speaker 4>a crime scene, a DNA profile can be generated and

0:07:07.839 --> 0:07:12.960
<v Speaker 4>then compared either to a database everybody's heard about the

0:07:13.040 --> 0:07:17.240
<v Speaker 4>CODIS Combined DNA Index System, which is a repository of

0:07:17.320 --> 0:07:22.080
<v Speaker 4>DNA profiles from convicted defenders or directly to the DNA

0:07:22.400 --> 0:07:28.120
<v Speaker 4>of suspect in order to identify the person that left

0:07:28.160 --> 0:07:29.560
<v Speaker 4>their DNA at the crime scene.

0:07:29.920 --> 0:07:33.160
<v Speaker 5>And as we know, there was touch DNA found on it.

0:07:33.280 --> 0:07:35.280
<v Speaker 5>Can you explain to us what touch DNA is.

0:07:35.840 --> 0:07:39.560
<v Speaker 4>Touch DNA is a very general term that refers to

0:07:39.960 --> 0:07:44.280
<v Speaker 4>the DNA that is deposited on a surface through touching it.

0:07:45.320 --> 0:07:49.200
<v Speaker 4>There's a lot of different types of cells that can

0:07:49.240 --> 0:07:52.760
<v Speaker 4>be deposited when touching a surface. For example, if I

0:07:52.800 --> 0:07:56.080
<v Speaker 4>scratch my nose or I cough in my hand, they're

0:07:56.120 --> 0:07:59.360
<v Speaker 4>being me some cells that come from the mucus or

0:07:59.400 --> 0:08:03.640
<v Speaker 4>from sali. There's also epithelial cells from my skin that

0:08:03.720 --> 0:08:06.840
<v Speaker 4>I'm gonna deposit. And also there's a lot of cell

0:08:06.960 --> 0:08:11.760
<v Speaker 4>free DNA that is secreted in sweat. So there's a

0:08:11.800 --> 0:08:16.440
<v Speaker 4>bunch of different types of sources of DNA that we deposit.

0:08:17.000 --> 0:08:22.160
<v Speaker 4>So exactly what touch DNA is we don't know, but

0:08:22.280 --> 0:08:25.920
<v Speaker 4>it's a combination of all of those and so, and

0:08:26.160 --> 0:08:28.560
<v Speaker 4>you can't really see it with a naked eye, so

0:08:29.120 --> 0:08:32.840
<v Speaker 4>you have to trust or you have to make some assumptions,

0:08:33.559 --> 0:08:36.080
<v Speaker 4>and generally you're going to try and collect that from

0:08:36.160 --> 0:08:39.680
<v Speaker 4>surfaces dead will have been touched.

0:08:40.200 --> 0:08:42.040
<v Speaker 5>Is it how we see in the movies where they

0:08:42.120 --> 0:08:44.880
<v Speaker 5>like dust it and there's like a perfect thumbprint on

0:08:45.040 --> 0:08:46.480
<v Speaker 5>the ground or wherever.

0:08:47.320 --> 0:08:50.400
<v Speaker 4>No, it's not quite like that. Sometimes if there's a

0:08:50.400 --> 0:08:53.920
<v Speaker 4>blood stain or a semen stain or a saliva stain,

0:08:54.559 --> 0:08:58.280
<v Speaker 4>then yes, it's it's pretty simple. You swab that area,

0:08:58.440 --> 0:09:02.559
<v Speaker 4>you transfer the biology stain onto a swab, and then

0:09:02.600 --> 0:09:06.120
<v Speaker 4>you extract the DNA directly from the swab. At times,

0:09:06.120 --> 0:09:08.959
<v Speaker 4>though you're not able to see the DNA, you can

0:09:09.000 --> 0:09:12.480
<v Speaker 4>assume that there is DNA in that area, and so

0:09:12.559 --> 0:09:17.400
<v Speaker 4>you swab that surface. In the case that we're talking about,

0:09:17.880 --> 0:09:23.040
<v Speaker 4>they found this knife sheet and they swabbed the area.

0:09:23.200 --> 0:09:26.120
<v Speaker 4>At least that's my understanding. They swabbed the area around

0:09:26.120 --> 0:09:30.480
<v Speaker 4>the button and they extracted the DNA from that, But

0:09:30.559 --> 0:09:34.120
<v Speaker 4>you don't necessarily see it, and you don't know it's

0:09:34.160 --> 0:09:38.480
<v Speaker 4>there until you've completed the extraction process and you went

0:09:38.559 --> 0:09:42.400
<v Speaker 4>through a second process that's called DNA quantification. The DNA

0:09:42.480 --> 0:09:46.360
<v Speaker 4>quantification process allows us to determine how much DNA there

0:09:46.559 --> 0:09:50.200
<v Speaker 4>is and also the quality of that DNA in terms

0:09:50.240 --> 0:09:53.640
<v Speaker 4>of it being degraded or potentially inhibited.

0:09:54.880 --> 0:09:57.959
<v Speaker 5>So if you're an investigator, you just kind of try

0:09:58.000 --> 0:10:00.559
<v Speaker 5>to get DNA off of anything without you're kind of

0:10:00.559 --> 0:10:02.679
<v Speaker 5>blindly doing it. You're thinking, Okay, there could be DNA here,

0:10:02.720 --> 0:10:04.080
<v Speaker 5>could be DA in here, and then it's not till

0:10:04.120 --> 0:10:06.280
<v Speaker 5>you test it that you actually are are aware of

0:10:06.640 --> 0:10:08.120
<v Speaker 5>if there is DNA, and then you have to figure

0:10:08.120 --> 0:10:09.000
<v Speaker 5>out how much DNA.

0:10:09.480 --> 0:10:13.880
<v Speaker 4>Obviously, you can't swab an entire apartment. That's just not practical,

0:10:14.520 --> 0:10:18.920
<v Speaker 4>and the DNA extraction process and analysis is expensive and

0:10:19.000 --> 0:10:22.480
<v Speaker 4>it takes time, so you need to be frugal and

0:10:22.800 --> 0:10:27.920
<v Speaker 4>keep in mind the resources that are available. So you

0:10:28.080 --> 0:10:32.000
<v Speaker 4>tend to do an evaluation of the crime scene and

0:10:32.679 --> 0:10:39.000
<v Speaker 4>based on the scenario, identify pieces of evidence that have

0:10:39.160 --> 0:10:42.520
<v Speaker 4>the greatest chance of providing useful information for the case.

0:10:45.760 --> 0:10:48.280
<v Speaker 3>Here again, Stephanie and Jeff.

0:10:48.800 --> 0:10:52.360
<v Speaker 6>Since its creation in nineteen eighty seven, DNA testing has

0:10:52.400 --> 0:10:55.840
<v Speaker 6>proven to be an incredible useful tool in identifying criminals.

0:10:56.240 --> 0:10:58.680
<v Speaker 6>It completely changed the criminal justice system.

0:10:58.920 --> 0:11:01.280
<v Speaker 5>How it applies to this case is really fascinating. We

0:11:01.360 --> 0:11:04.280
<v Speaker 5>know that investigators pulled a single source mail touch DNA

0:11:04.360 --> 0:11:06.440
<v Speaker 5>off the button of the knife sheet that was left

0:11:06.440 --> 0:11:09.199
<v Speaker 5>at the murdercy. Touch DNA is DNA transferred from a

0:11:09.240 --> 0:11:12.120
<v Speaker 5>person to an object via contact with the object itself.

0:11:12.320 --> 0:11:15.680
<v Speaker 5>It's called touch DNA because it only requires very small samples,

0:11:15.720 --> 0:11:18.840
<v Speaker 5>for example, from the skin cell left on something after

0:11:18.920 --> 0:11:24.840
<v Speaker 5>it's been touched or casually handled, or from footprints. So

0:11:24.960 --> 0:11:27.160
<v Speaker 5>cops have this piece of touch DNA and they tried

0:11:27.200 --> 0:11:29.800
<v Speaker 5>to link that to criminals already in the system. Because,

0:11:29.800 --> 0:11:31.960
<v Speaker 5>as you may or may not know, when someone is arrested,

0:11:31.960 --> 0:11:33.880
<v Speaker 5>they have to give a fingerprint, which then gets put

0:11:33.920 --> 0:11:37.560
<v Speaker 5>into law enforcement's database system. So let's say whoever did

0:11:37.600 --> 0:11:40.440
<v Speaker 5>commit this massacre also had robbed a bank years ago,

0:11:40.880 --> 0:11:43.880
<v Speaker 5>cops would get a match and have all the suspects information.

0:11:44.440 --> 0:11:47.680
<v Speaker 6>But that didn't happen here because by all accounts, Brian

0:11:47.760 --> 0:11:51.160
<v Speaker 6>did not have any kind of a criminal record. Maybe

0:11:51.160 --> 0:11:54.719
<v Speaker 6>he was busted for tailgating or something, but that was

0:11:54.760 --> 0:11:55.640
<v Speaker 6>the extent of it.

0:11:55.960 --> 0:11:57.959
<v Speaker 5>I would think that since he had wanted to work

0:11:57.960 --> 0:12:00.400
<v Speaker 5>in law enforcement and applied for that internship, that he

0:12:00.480 --> 0:12:02.480
<v Speaker 5>might have had to give his fingerprint at some point.

0:12:02.960 --> 0:12:05.880
<v Speaker 6>But there was no match in the system of DNA

0:12:05.960 --> 0:12:09.520
<v Speaker 6>at the crime scene. So unfortunately this was just a

0:12:09.559 --> 0:12:10.000
<v Speaker 6>dead end.

0:12:13.480 --> 0:12:15.520
<v Speaker 3>Let's stop here for a break. We'll be back in

0:12:15.520 --> 0:12:26.400
<v Speaker 3>a moment. With pressure mounting and leads coming up empty,

0:12:26.559 --> 0:12:30.520
<v Speaker 3>investigators turned to genetic genealogy as an alternative way of

0:12:30.559 --> 0:12:35.280
<v Speaker 3>identifying DNA on the knife sheath. Here's forensic expert Joseph

0:12:35.320 --> 0:12:36.079
<v Speaker 3>Scott Morgan.

0:12:39.360 --> 0:12:42.360
<v Speaker 2>The cool thing about genetic genealogy, and it's almost as

0:12:42.400 --> 0:12:46.160
<v Speaker 2>if you've got people that have discovered this thing just

0:12:46.240 --> 0:12:51.200
<v Speaker 2>in the last few years, where it's this fascinating methodology

0:12:51.240 --> 0:12:54.920
<v Speaker 2>of tracking down things or putting an identity to things

0:12:55.040 --> 0:12:58.920
<v Speaker 2>or people more specifically, that otherwise have remained kind of

0:12:59.000 --> 0:13:01.959
<v Speaker 2>cloaked in secrecy for many, many years.

0:13:05.080 --> 0:13:07.720
<v Speaker 5>How would you say it differs or doesn't differ from

0:13:07.760 --> 0:13:09.080
<v Speaker 5>regular DNA testing.

0:13:09.120 --> 0:13:13.040
<v Speaker 2>When it comes to testing for any kind of biological element,

0:13:13.080 --> 0:13:16.400
<v Speaker 2>as it's tied back to DNA. The FEDS maintain a

0:13:16.559 --> 0:13:22.880
<v Speaker 2>database that is actually referred to it's the FBI's database

0:13:22.920 --> 0:13:25.920
<v Speaker 2>that's actually referred to as CODIS, which is combined DNA

0:13:26.040 --> 0:13:30.280
<v Speaker 2>Index System. And people hear this term thrown around quite

0:13:30.280 --> 0:13:32.120
<v Speaker 2>a bit, and I'm sure that folks have heard about,

0:13:32.640 --> 0:13:35.480
<v Speaker 2>you know, where you have sex offenders where they are

0:13:35.520 --> 0:13:38.839
<v Speaker 2>mandated by court to give up a sample and once

0:13:38.880 --> 0:13:42.439
<v Speaker 2>that sample is rendered, unto the courts and unto the system,

0:13:42.600 --> 0:13:45.240
<v Speaker 2>it's banked at that point in time. So those are

0:13:45.360 --> 0:13:48.760
<v Speaker 2>known offenders, all right. On the other side of the house,

0:13:49.440 --> 0:13:52.720
<v Speaker 2>you have what's referred to as a forensic database. Those

0:13:52.760 --> 0:13:57.280
<v Speaker 2>are these horrible crimes, just like you know, the Golden

0:13:57.320 --> 0:14:00.600
<v Speaker 2>State killer that have gone undetected from many years. Those

0:14:00.640 --> 0:14:04.760
<v Speaker 2>are forensic cases where you have a sample which is

0:14:05.200 --> 0:14:08.199
<v Speaker 2>essentially the DNA code that's built into all of us,

0:14:08.720 --> 0:14:12.439
<v Speaker 2>but yet you don't have an identity that goes specifically

0:14:12.480 --> 0:14:15.400
<v Speaker 2>to that person, and so those are the unknowns. And

0:14:15.679 --> 0:14:19.040
<v Speaker 2>when you're looking at serialized crimes, for instance, if you

0:14:19.120 --> 0:14:22.400
<v Speaker 2>can get a DNA sample from multiple cases and it

0:14:22.480 --> 0:14:25.320
<v Speaker 2>kind of funneled back into the system, what they're looking

0:14:25.360 --> 0:14:27.720
<v Speaker 2>for in the forensic side of the house is to

0:14:27.720 --> 0:14:31.840
<v Speaker 2>see if you get multiple hits from a single individual,

0:14:31.960 --> 0:14:34.560
<v Speaker 2>and that gives you an idea of that you have

0:14:34.640 --> 0:14:37.680
<v Speaker 2>a serial perpetrator, for instance, on your hands. Now here's

0:14:37.720 --> 0:14:41.120
<v Speaker 2>the thing when it comes to genetic genealogy. This throws

0:14:41.240 --> 0:14:44.560
<v Speaker 2>kind of a wrinkle into everything because for years and

0:14:44.640 --> 0:14:49.800
<v Speaker 2>years it's been all about unknown assailants. When you have

0:14:50.240 --> 0:14:54.840
<v Speaker 2>an event where you have DNA deposition at a scene,

0:14:55.400 --> 0:14:59.000
<v Speaker 2>let's say, for instance, from any kind of body fluid,

0:14:59.200 --> 0:15:03.040
<v Speaker 2>blood seam, whatever the case, saliva at the scene, or

0:15:03.080 --> 0:15:06.880
<v Speaker 2>maybe even partial DNA that we get from touch DNA,

0:15:07.480 --> 0:15:11.920
<v Speaker 2>if you can capture that bit of biological sample, you

0:15:11.960 --> 0:15:15.240
<v Speaker 2>can kind of kick it into the next level with

0:15:15.680 --> 0:15:20.840
<v Speaker 2>genetic genealogy because there is this massive database that exists

0:15:20.880 --> 0:15:24.000
<v Speaker 2>out there of people that are seeking their ancestors, or

0:15:24.040 --> 0:15:27.680
<v Speaker 2>perhaps people that are looking to find out their parentage,

0:15:28.040 --> 0:15:30.640
<v Speaker 2>people that have been put up for adoption, Who are

0:15:30.640 --> 0:15:34.920
<v Speaker 2>they related to? And so many government agencies look at

0:15:34.920 --> 0:15:39.440
<v Speaker 2>this as this kind of broad ranging spectrum that they

0:15:39.480 --> 0:15:43.120
<v Speaker 2>can dig into and utilize that to kind of connect

0:15:43.160 --> 0:15:46.440
<v Speaker 2>the dots, if you would, as to who an unknown

0:15:46.440 --> 0:15:50.680
<v Speaker 2>perpetrator might be. And you know, here's the thing. Many

0:15:50.760 --> 0:15:56.240
<v Speaker 2>of these cases are solved by identifying cousins of all things,

0:15:56.280 --> 0:15:58.920
<v Speaker 2>and we all have cousins. Many of us are related

0:15:59.400 --> 0:16:02.800
<v Speaker 2>to one another, and we have no idea, and so

0:16:03.080 --> 0:16:05.880
<v Speaker 2>you look for this connectivity and then you kind of

0:16:05.960 --> 0:16:10.360
<v Speaker 2>begin to narrow this down with genetic genealogy.

0:16:14.840 --> 0:16:18.640
<v Speaker 3>Despite having their own in state forensic laboratory, the Idaho

0:16:18.760 --> 0:16:22.600
<v Speaker 3>State Police contacted a private third party company to conduct

0:16:22.640 --> 0:16:26.880
<v Speaker 3>the genealogy testing. Athroom is a Texas based company that

0:16:27.040 --> 0:16:32.160
<v Speaker 3>specializes in forensic genetic genealogy and has helped resolve unsolved

0:16:32.240 --> 0:16:36.280
<v Speaker 3>murders and identify unknown victims. With the help of the FBI,

0:16:36.440 --> 0:16:39.040
<v Speaker 3>the firm was able to create a more extensive DNA

0:16:39.160 --> 0:16:42.520
<v Speaker 3>profile of the suspected killer, and then it was uploaded

0:16:42.560 --> 0:16:44.920
<v Speaker 3>to commercial genetic testing databases.

0:16:48.280 --> 0:16:51.880
<v Speaker 5>Jeff and Stephanie, we don't know where the data profile

0:16:51.960 --> 0:16:55.440
<v Speaker 5>was uploaded. Most likely, though it was Jebmatch or family

0:16:55.480 --> 0:16:58.880
<v Speaker 5>Tree DNA, which are both familial DNA testing services. On

0:16:58.920 --> 0:17:01.120
<v Speaker 5>these sites you can find out what your heritage is

0:17:01.320 --> 0:17:03.480
<v Speaker 5>or if you have any long lost cousins across the world.

0:17:04.440 --> 0:17:07.440
<v Speaker 5>They are also both commercial websites that allow law enforcement searches.

0:17:07.480 --> 0:17:09.919
<v Speaker 5>They differ from twenty three in me or Ancestry DNA,

0:17:10.160 --> 0:17:12.560
<v Speaker 5>which do not allow investigators to search the records.

0:17:13.320 --> 0:17:17.480
<v Speaker 6>That does make perfect sense from a consumer's standpoint. I mean, look,

0:17:17.480 --> 0:17:19.800
<v Speaker 6>if you go to a website like twenty three in

0:17:19.880 --> 0:17:23.800
<v Speaker 6>me or Ancestry DNA, you may not want your personal

0:17:23.920 --> 0:17:27.520
<v Speaker 6>data getting out to law enforcement or personal data regarding

0:17:27.680 --> 0:17:31.040
<v Speaker 6>anybody in your family. I would imagine that these companies

0:17:31.200 --> 0:17:34.960
<v Speaker 6>are frankly afraid that law enforcement has access to everyone's

0:17:35.040 --> 0:17:38.880
<v Speaker 6>DNA and then people won't upload their info, thus hurting

0:17:38.960 --> 0:17:42.400
<v Speaker 6>their ultimate bottom line. Privacy is a pretty major concern

0:17:42.480 --> 0:17:44.600
<v Speaker 6>for this industry.

0:17:45.480 --> 0:17:50.360
<v Speaker 3>Here again Jeff speaking with forensic expert just so Scott Morgan, and.

0:17:50.320 --> 0:17:53.320
<v Speaker 5>Would you say that's why it's controversial, because every Tom,

0:17:53.359 --> 0:17:55.400
<v Speaker 5>Dick and Harry can kind of help the police catch

0:17:55.440 --> 0:17:56.399
<v Speaker 5>their cousin in a crime.

0:17:56.960 --> 0:17:59.560
<v Speaker 2>Most people in the population that are submitting their DNA,

0:17:59.640 --> 0:18:02.800
<v Speaker 2>they don't have a point of reference for what their

0:18:02.840 --> 0:18:07.240
<v Speaker 2>constitutional standing is as it applies to privacy and these

0:18:07.280 --> 0:18:10.000
<v Speaker 2>sorts of things. And you know, I think that for

0:18:10.119 --> 0:18:13.880
<v Speaker 2>many folks when they render this DNA sample, and it's

0:18:13.920 --> 0:18:18.000
<v Speaker 2>generally a cheek swab or a cheek scraping. When you

0:18:18.040 --> 0:18:20.560
<v Speaker 2>go in, you take the sample, you submit it to

0:18:20.640 --> 0:18:23.800
<v Speaker 2>one of these companies and they begin to run your profile.

0:18:24.240 --> 0:18:27.240
<v Speaker 2>You don't have this expectation that this is going to

0:18:27.280 --> 0:18:30.359
<v Speaker 2>be used to solve a crime. Now, many people might

0:18:30.480 --> 0:18:33.160
<v Speaker 2>not have a problem with that, but others do. They're

0:18:33.200 --> 0:18:36.240
<v Speaker 2>not entering into this agreement with a company so that

0:18:36.280 --> 0:18:39.240
<v Speaker 2>they're going to be crime solvers. They want to determine

0:18:39.600 --> 0:18:43.119
<v Speaker 2>the mystery that surrounds their heritage and to try to

0:18:43.200 --> 0:18:47.160
<v Speaker 2>determine who they came from. The Supreme Court has ruled

0:18:47.240 --> 0:18:50.359
<v Speaker 2>in the past that you do not have like a

0:18:50.440 --> 0:18:56.720
<v Speaker 2>baked in expectation of privacy if you freely surrender something, Okay,

0:18:56.840 --> 0:19:00.199
<v Speaker 2>particularly in this case we're talking about genetic material. They've

0:19:00.240 --> 0:19:02.800
<v Speaker 2>held that there is no expectation of privacy for a

0:19:02.840 --> 0:19:05.000
<v Speaker 2>third party. And so you've got these two that go

0:19:05.119 --> 0:19:08.200
<v Speaker 2>back and forth. What it comes down to, I think

0:19:08.280 --> 0:19:12.320
<v Speaker 2>probably for many of these companies people famously like ancestry

0:19:12.359 --> 0:19:14.960
<v Speaker 2>dot com. We've got twenty three and me that have

0:19:15.000 --> 0:19:19.280
<v Speaker 2>been out there for a while. They have vigorously stated

0:19:19.520 --> 0:19:23.119
<v Speaker 2>that they are not working with any government agency and

0:19:23.119 --> 0:19:26.480
<v Speaker 2>they're not going to surrender anything unless they're being presented

0:19:26.520 --> 0:19:29.320
<v Speaker 2>with a subpoena that they are in fact being compelled

0:19:29.520 --> 0:19:32.440
<v Speaker 2>to offer up these profiles that they have. And so

0:19:32.520 --> 0:19:35.520
<v Speaker 2>that in and of itself is kind of striking when

0:19:35.520 --> 0:19:39.399
<v Speaker 2>it comes to the utility of forensic genealogy.

0:19:39.359 --> 0:19:41.560
<v Speaker 5>And is that why you think to use it or

0:19:41.600 --> 0:19:42.640
<v Speaker 5>to talk about it when they do.

0:19:42.680 --> 0:19:47.320
<v Speaker 2>Use it, I think to a great degree, police are

0:19:47.680 --> 0:19:52.000
<v Speaker 2>reticent to reveal their sources when it comes to you generally,

0:19:52.080 --> 0:19:55.080
<v Speaker 2>don't find out the veil is not lifted. If you will,

0:19:55.440 --> 0:19:58.879
<v Speaker 2>you know from their source how they went about accomplishing

0:19:58.920 --> 0:20:02.399
<v Speaker 2>this these tasks. There are companies out there that do

0:20:02.520 --> 0:20:06.080
<v Speaker 2>in fact aid in the facilitation of this. Orthum comes

0:20:06.080 --> 0:20:09.080
<v Speaker 2>to mind in particular, they've been around for a few

0:20:09.119 --> 0:20:12.440
<v Speaker 2>years now and they've certainly made a name from themselves

0:20:12.480 --> 0:20:15.800
<v Speaker 2>and are highly regarded from a scientific perspective and the

0:20:15.840 --> 0:20:19.240
<v Speaker 2>methodologies that they employ, and they've had great success. The

0:20:19.280 --> 0:20:22.560
<v Speaker 2>average person on the street they're asked this question, how

0:20:22.640 --> 0:20:24.880
<v Speaker 2>much do you value your privacy if the whole thing

0:20:24.960 --> 0:20:28.960
<v Speaker 2>turns upon your DNA? Are you willing to surrender that

0:20:29.040 --> 0:20:32.720
<v Speaker 2>bit of privacy that you have in order to solve

0:20:32.760 --> 0:20:36.600
<v Speaker 2>a crime that might facilitate someone being taken off the

0:20:36.600 --> 0:20:39.040
<v Speaker 2>street and that sort of thing. And it's not necessarily

0:20:39.080 --> 0:20:43.840
<v Speaker 2>a very simple answer. It can be very very complicated.

0:20:48.800 --> 0:20:51.360
<v Speaker 5>This case, I think is different because we hear about

0:20:51.400 --> 0:20:53.000
<v Speaker 5>it so much for cold cases, but this is an

0:20:53.000 --> 0:20:56.199
<v Speaker 5>active investigation where genetic genealogy came into place, so obviously

0:20:56.200 --> 0:20:58.960
<v Speaker 5>the question for normally in cold cases, this is a

0:20:58.960 --> 0:20:59.960
<v Speaker 5>little bit of an outlier.

0:21:00.720 --> 0:21:03.439
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, because this is in fact not a cold case.

0:21:03.640 --> 0:21:06.560
<v Speaker 2>From the very first day that this happened, you could

0:21:06.560 --> 0:21:10.280
<v Speaker 2>hear the whisperings already, I'd say probably within the first

0:21:10.400 --> 0:21:13.119
<v Speaker 2>twelve hours of me being on the air and covering

0:21:13.160 --> 0:21:16.120
<v Speaker 2>the case. From a forensic standpoint, I had questions being

0:21:16.119 --> 0:21:21.080
<v Speaker 2>thrown at me repeatedly about DNA and DNA linkage to

0:21:21.160 --> 0:21:25.720
<v Speaker 2>a potential perpetrator. How is it possible that a subject

0:21:26.000 --> 0:21:29.240
<v Speaker 2>could go into an environment which we can, I think

0:21:29.400 --> 0:21:33.959
<v Speaker 2>pretty safely state is just a blood bath and not

0:21:34.119 --> 0:21:38.320
<v Speaker 2>leave some essence of themselves behind, and you have the

0:21:38.440 --> 0:21:43.320
<v Speaker 2>genetic connection at the scene in that home where this

0:21:43.840 --> 0:21:49.639
<v Speaker 2>massacre took place, and then apparently you have genetic connectivity

0:21:49.800 --> 0:21:53.120
<v Speaker 2>at Coberg's family's house. So now you're looking at two

0:21:53.280 --> 0:21:56.840
<v Speaker 2>things that are kind of coalescing here, they're coming together,

0:21:56.920 --> 0:22:01.160
<v Speaker 2>and you begin to create this picture. It's a damning

0:22:01.240 --> 0:22:04.520
<v Speaker 2>bit of evidence. I think now the courts, the attorneys

0:22:04.560 --> 0:22:06.560
<v Speaker 2>will get together and they'll begin to question things like

0:22:06.640 --> 0:22:11.000
<v Speaker 2>sourcing and procedurally, how was this done, how was the

0:22:11.080 --> 0:22:14.919
<v Speaker 2>assessment done, How can this actually be validated? How do

0:22:14.960 --> 0:22:17.040
<v Speaker 2>we know the sample may or may not have been

0:22:17.080 --> 0:22:20.560
<v Speaker 2>contaminated because it is so very fragile. Those questions will

0:22:20.560 --> 0:22:24.760
<v Speaker 2>come up. But the fact is you have this arguably

0:22:24.920 --> 0:22:29.560
<v Speaker 2>astronomical numerical mountain that the defense is going to have

0:22:29.600 --> 0:22:33.119
<v Speaker 2>to climb in this case. And I look, I don't

0:22:33.160 --> 0:22:36.960
<v Speaker 2>necessarily think that the DNA data that they gathered there

0:22:36.960 --> 0:22:39.520
<v Speaker 2>in Pennsylvania, and the DNA that we know about at

0:22:39.600 --> 0:22:43.159
<v Speaker 2>least thus far from what was collected at this quadruple

0:22:43.240 --> 0:22:46.200
<v Speaker 2>homicide is the end of the DNA. There very well

0:22:46.280 --> 0:22:48.119
<v Speaker 2>might be more, we just don't know what it is

0:22:48.160 --> 0:22:48.920
<v Speaker 2>at this point, though.

0:22:51.840 --> 0:22:54.760
<v Speaker 5>What's your opinion As an expert, do you think genetic

0:22:54.800 --> 0:22:57.880
<v Speaker 5>genealogy should be used for rest or narrowing down suspect less.

0:22:58.680 --> 0:23:02.199
<v Speaker 2>I think that there is utility for it, certainly. I

0:23:02.240 --> 0:23:05.760
<v Speaker 2>don't know that I have encountered a case where it

0:23:05.800 --> 0:23:09.000
<v Speaker 2>was turned around this quickly, you know, because look, it

0:23:09.040 --> 0:23:11.960
<v Speaker 2>seems as though we've been covering Idaho forever and ever

0:23:12.200 --> 0:23:14.960
<v Speaker 2>this point, but we haven't. It's really been a very

0:23:14.960 --> 0:23:18.080
<v Speaker 2>short period of time, and this profile was turned out

0:23:18.240 --> 0:23:22.639
<v Speaker 2>very quickly. So there is obviously provable utility relative to

0:23:22.680 --> 0:23:26.480
<v Speaker 2>the tool. I think that it can potentially be a

0:23:26.600 --> 0:23:30.800
<v Speaker 2>very slippery slope from a privacy standpoint. There are so

0:23:30.880 --> 0:23:34.000
<v Speaker 2>many cases out there that are cold, and you would

0:23:34.160 --> 0:23:38.680
<v Speaker 2>want nothing more than to have answers to these things

0:23:38.680 --> 0:23:40.960
<v Speaker 2>that have kind of lingered in our mind and actually

0:23:40.960 --> 0:23:45.119
<v Speaker 2>have become part and parcel of our history, And certainly

0:23:45.119 --> 0:23:48.199
<v Speaker 2>in the true crime community. Can you even imagine if

0:23:48.240 --> 0:23:51.040
<v Speaker 2>they were able to, say, for instance, come up with

0:23:51.119 --> 0:23:54.760
<v Speaker 2>a bit of unidentified DNA from say the Black Dalia

0:23:54.880 --> 0:23:58.920
<v Speaker 2>case or from Jack the Ripper, and they were able

0:23:58.960 --> 0:24:02.560
<v Speaker 2>to construct some kind of DNA profile based upon that.

0:24:02.600 --> 0:24:05.040
<v Speaker 2>I think a lot of us would really like to

0:24:05.080 --> 0:24:09.080
<v Speaker 2>know who those individuals might be that committed these crimes. However,

0:24:09.280 --> 0:24:12.720
<v Speaker 2>we have to keep in the forefront of our mind

0:24:13.000 --> 0:24:15.919
<v Speaker 2>what our expectations are as American citizens. Do we have

0:24:15.920 --> 0:24:19.919
<v Speaker 2>a right to privacy? And this is not just maybe

0:24:19.960 --> 0:24:23.480
<v Speaker 2>our records or our papers that you're talking about government

0:24:23.520 --> 0:24:27.720
<v Speaker 2>authorities having access to. We're talking about our base genetic code.

0:24:28.200 --> 0:24:30.320
<v Speaker 5>Do you think it's the future? Like, is there any

0:24:30.320 --> 0:24:32.320
<v Speaker 5>way to stop to you know, kind of put this

0:24:32.800 --> 0:24:35.199
<v Speaker 5>back in the box or is it like now police

0:24:35.240 --> 0:24:37.080
<v Speaker 5>have this in their tool, but they're going to use it.

0:24:37.560 --> 0:24:39.959
<v Speaker 2>No, you can't put the genie back in the bottle.

0:24:40.400 --> 0:24:43.280
<v Speaker 2>We're beyond that. Now we've crossed the rubicon. It will

0:24:43.280 --> 0:24:45.320
<v Speaker 2>be used and continue to be used. I just hope

0:24:45.359 --> 0:24:47.639
<v Speaker 2>that the people that wheel the tool have the best

0:24:47.680 --> 0:24:51.600
<v Speaker 2>interest of the citizenry at large, because no one in

0:24:51.640 --> 0:24:55.880
<v Speaker 2>our population is guilty until they are in fact proven guilty.

0:24:56.320 --> 0:24:59.399
<v Speaker 2>A quadruple homicide in a college town is stuff that

0:24:59.640 --> 0:25:04.160
<v Speaker 2>just doesn't happen every day, and it's one of these

0:25:04.160 --> 0:25:08.639
<v Speaker 2>moments in time that it has created extraordinary circumstances, and

0:25:08.680 --> 0:25:12.119
<v Speaker 2>to my way of thinking, the investigative authorities that are

0:25:12.160 --> 0:25:15.840
<v Speaker 2>involved in this case went to extraordinary measures in order

0:25:15.920 --> 0:25:19.080
<v Speaker 2>to facilitate the solving of this case, or at least

0:25:19.080 --> 0:25:22.320
<v Speaker 2>to give them an indication as to who may have

0:25:22.400 --> 0:25:24.560
<v Speaker 2>had a hand in this. And that's why they went

0:25:24.600 --> 0:25:28.240
<v Speaker 2>through these great links using genetic genealogy.

0:25:30.400 --> 0:25:43.080
<v Speaker 3>Let's stop here for another break. Once FBI investigators and

0:25:43.160 --> 0:25:46.679
<v Speaker 3>authroom genealogists had the DNA, they began to look for

0:25:46.760 --> 0:25:51.880
<v Speaker 3>full or partial matches to the suspected Idaho Killers DNA.

0:25:52.400 --> 0:25:56.639
<v Speaker 3>The first results were distant relatives. Slowly they created a

0:25:56.680 --> 0:25:59.920
<v Speaker 3>massive family tree that utilized the genetic information of the

0:26:00.119 --> 0:26:04.679
<v Speaker 3>Coburger's immediate family cousins and all of their distant relatives.

0:26:05.280 --> 0:26:07.840
<v Speaker 3>That tree would have provided a short list of potential

0:26:07.880 --> 0:26:15.600
<v Speaker 3>suspects within the Coburger family tree. Again, Stephanie and Jeff.

0:26:17.240 --> 0:26:20.399
<v Speaker 5>The most famous successful case of genetic genealogy mapping is

0:26:20.440 --> 0:26:23.359
<v Speaker 5>the Golden State Killer. In the nineteen seventies and eighties,

0:26:23.400 --> 0:26:27.239
<v Speaker 5>he terrorized California, murdering at least thirteen people. Likely he

0:26:27.359 --> 0:26:30.520
<v Speaker 5>killed and raped many more. But even with DNA evidence,

0:26:30.840 --> 0:26:33.199
<v Speaker 5>years went by with no solid leads and the cases

0:26:33.200 --> 0:26:37.480
<v Speaker 5>went cold. Why because the killer wasn't in any criminal database.

0:26:37.720 --> 0:26:40.560
<v Speaker 5>But in twenty eighteen, investigators had an idea. They used

0:26:40.600 --> 0:26:42.840
<v Speaker 5>public DNA information to see if they could locate and

0:26:42.880 --> 0:26:45.879
<v Speaker 5>identify family members of the Golden State killer using genetic

0:26:45.920 --> 0:26:49.840
<v Speaker 5>genealogy mapping. After painstakingly mapping out the killer's genetic links,

0:26:49.920 --> 0:26:53.639
<v Speaker 5>police were able to identify Joseph James DiAngelo, a retired

0:26:53.640 --> 0:26:56.240
<v Speaker 5>police officer living outside Sacramento, California.

0:26:56.880 --> 0:26:59.840
<v Speaker 6>To me, it's super interesting that he, just like co

0:27:00.080 --> 0:27:03.840
<v Speaker 6>Burger aspired to be, was also in law enforcement.

0:27:04.400 --> 0:27:05.000
<v Speaker 4>I agree.

0:27:05.080 --> 0:27:07.640
<v Speaker 5>So anyways, this technique is now being used to solve

0:27:07.720 --> 0:27:08.840
<v Speaker 5>hundreds of cold cases.

0:27:09.240 --> 0:27:11.760
<v Speaker 6>I'll say this though, it really does require a shift

0:27:11.760 --> 0:27:14.840
<v Speaker 6>in the process and the procedures that are currently in

0:27:14.880 --> 0:27:18.119
<v Speaker 6>place to catching a bad guy because labs really aren't

0:27:18.119 --> 0:27:21.160
<v Speaker 6>set up to do this type of genetic genealogy mapping.

0:27:21.400 --> 0:27:26.280
<v Speaker 6>They also don't regularly employ genealogists who map family trees.

0:27:26.520 --> 0:27:28.560
<v Speaker 5>But all that might change because of the success of

0:27:28.600 --> 0:27:29.639
<v Speaker 5>the Idaho investigation.

0:27:32.880 --> 0:27:36.960
<v Speaker 3>On the morning of December nineteenth, investigators positively identified their

0:27:37.000 --> 0:27:41.680
<v Speaker 3>loan suspect by mapping the genetic similarities of the killers' relatives.

0:27:41.880 --> 0:27:45.840
<v Speaker 3>Police were able to confirm through DNA genetic genealogy mapping

0:27:46.119 --> 0:27:49.520
<v Speaker 3>that twenty eight year old Brian Coberger was the likely killer.

0:27:54.920 --> 0:27:58.080
<v Speaker 6>Can you imagine that day for the hardworking investigators on

0:27:58.160 --> 0:27:58.720
<v Speaker 6>this case.

0:27:59.200 --> 0:28:02.159
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, was already one of their suspects. His name had

0:28:02.200 --> 0:28:05.359
<v Speaker 5>been forwarded to investigators. He drove a white Honda a Lantra,

0:28:05.600 --> 0:28:08.320
<v Speaker 5>he lived near the victims, had exhibited odd behavior, and

0:28:08.359 --> 0:28:10.440
<v Speaker 5>his cell phone had pinged in the area of the crowd.

0:28:10.520 --> 0:28:11.400
<v Speaker 5>He checked every.

0:28:11.240 --> 0:28:15.320
<v Speaker 6>Box, and yet without a murder weapon or some kind

0:28:15.359 --> 0:28:19.040
<v Speaker 6>of DNA evidence, police still don't really have any real

0:28:19.119 --> 0:28:21.640
<v Speaker 6>case against him. While it might seem like a lot

0:28:21.680 --> 0:28:25.159
<v Speaker 6>in hindsight, at the time, it was all really circumstantial

0:28:25.440 --> 0:28:28.480
<v Speaker 6>To make an arrest. Cops really needed something more.

0:28:28.800 --> 0:28:31.600
<v Speaker 5>And it's not really clear if Cooberger was quote unquote

0:28:31.720 --> 0:28:34.720
<v Speaker 5>the suspect before the genealogy ampol came back, or if

0:28:34.800 --> 0:28:36.840
<v Speaker 5>his name was just on a long list of persons

0:28:36.840 --> 0:28:37.400
<v Speaker 5>of interest.

0:28:39.960 --> 0:28:44.160
<v Speaker 3>With Coburger now identified as the prime suspect, investigators worked

0:28:44.160 --> 0:28:47.280
<v Speaker 3>to strengthen their case against him, applying for a search

0:28:47.360 --> 0:28:50.720
<v Speaker 3>warrant of Coburger's phone activity and the time period around

0:28:50.720 --> 0:28:53.840
<v Speaker 3>the murders. On the morning of the killings, the result

0:28:53.920 --> 0:28:57.480
<v Speaker 3>showed Coburger's phone hanging a tower near his home before

0:28:57.520 --> 0:29:00.440
<v Speaker 3>moving south at a rapid speed and then disco connecting

0:29:00.440 --> 0:29:05.080
<v Speaker 3>from the cellular phone system. Here's reporter Chris Spargo.

0:29:05.440 --> 0:29:09.000
<v Speaker 8>So at two forty two in the morning, Brian Coburger's

0:29:09.000 --> 0:29:11.680
<v Speaker 8>cell phone is recorded as sort of being on the

0:29:11.720 --> 0:29:14.720
<v Speaker 8>network in Pullman, Washington, where his dormitory is on Washingt

0:29:14.720 --> 0:29:17.400
<v Speaker 8>State University campus. Then a few minutes later goes off

0:29:17.400 --> 0:29:20.880
<v Speaker 8>the network and is disconnected. From that point on, there's

0:29:20.920 --> 0:29:22.920
<v Speaker 8>just counts of people seeing his white han Day lantro

0:29:23.160 --> 0:29:25.280
<v Speaker 8>so is white han Day Launt scene leaving Pullman shortly

0:29:25.280 --> 0:29:27.320
<v Speaker 8>after that, and then around three point thirty ittth seen

0:29:27.720 --> 0:29:30.760
<v Speaker 8>in Moscow. Now, the direct route from Pullman to Moscow

0:29:30.800 --> 0:29:33.120
<v Speaker 8>is about fifteen minutes tops, and this is late at night,

0:29:33.160 --> 0:29:35.200
<v Speaker 8>so it's not going to be any traffic, so it's

0:29:35.280 --> 0:29:37.240
<v Speaker 8>assumed he took some sort of way that would have

0:29:37.240 --> 0:29:39.240
<v Speaker 8>gone around that sort of main road.

0:29:41.320 --> 0:29:44.840
<v Speaker 3>During the exact moments of the murders, Coburger's cell phone

0:29:44.920 --> 0:29:49.000
<v Speaker 3>was offline and wouldn't return until four forty eight am,

0:29:49.200 --> 0:29:53.000
<v Speaker 3>at least twenty minutes after investigators say the murders took place.

0:29:53.680 --> 0:29:57.560
<v Speaker 3>When Coburger's phone does reconnect, it pings off several towers

0:29:57.600 --> 0:30:01.040
<v Speaker 3>south of Moscow and maps an odd early morning travel

0:30:01.080 --> 0:30:04.200
<v Speaker 3>pattern for the next forty five minutes. The data shows

0:30:04.240 --> 0:30:07.400
<v Speaker 3>Coburger driving on back roads and taking an off the

0:30:07.440 --> 0:30:10.240
<v Speaker 3>beaten track route to his home in Pullman, Washington.

0:30:12.960 --> 0:30:14.960
<v Speaker 8>It's a difficult alibi for him because he has to

0:30:15.120 --> 0:30:16.920
<v Speaker 8>explain that phone called ping off the tower in the

0:30:16.920 --> 0:30:19.320
<v Speaker 8>middle of nowhere at four forty five am on the

0:30:19.400 --> 0:30:20.560
<v Speaker 8>night of the murders.

0:30:23.320 --> 0:30:26.880
<v Speaker 3>Police also obtained cell phone data that showed that Coburger's

0:30:26.920 --> 0:30:29.200
<v Speaker 3>phone was in the area of the house on King

0:30:29.320 --> 0:30:31.920
<v Speaker 3>Road at least a dozen times in the weeks before

0:30:31.960 --> 0:30:35.160
<v Speaker 3>the attack. By December twenty third, police were closing in

0:30:35.200 --> 0:30:39.480
<v Speaker 3>on Coburger, but investigators still need a direct genetic comparison

0:30:39.560 --> 0:30:42.920
<v Speaker 3>between Coburger and the DNA on the knife sheath before

0:30:42.920 --> 0:30:47.280
<v Speaker 3>making an arrest. Four days later, Pennsylvania State Police are

0:30:47.360 --> 0:30:50.959
<v Speaker 3>tasked with watching Brian Coburger pull trash from his parents'

0:30:50.960 --> 0:30:54.479
<v Speaker 3>home on December twenty eighth. DNA results showed that the

0:30:54.520 --> 0:30:57.640
<v Speaker 3>mail DNA pulled from the trash can was a ninety

0:30:57.720 --> 0:31:00.680
<v Speaker 3>nine point nine nine nine eight percent likely to be

0:31:00.760 --> 0:31:04.200
<v Speaker 3>the biological father of the DNA pulled from the knife

0:31:04.240 --> 0:31:08.240
<v Speaker 3>sheath left on Madison Mogan's bed. This parental link was

0:31:08.280 --> 0:31:10.920
<v Speaker 3>the last piece of evidence needed for an arrest warrant.

0:31:11.280 --> 0:31:15.840
<v Speaker 3>Coburger was arrested shortly after. When Brian Coberger was arrested

0:31:15.880 --> 0:31:19.000
<v Speaker 3>in the early hours of December thirtieth, his family didn't

0:31:19.040 --> 0:31:21.520
<v Speaker 3>know the role their own DNA played in his capture,

0:31:21.880 --> 0:31:24.960
<v Speaker 3>but they did release a statement expressing sympathy for the

0:31:25.040 --> 0:31:29.440
<v Speaker 3>four Idaho families who lost their precious children. Coberger's family

0:31:29.560 --> 0:31:33.240
<v Speaker 3>also said they had fully cooperated with law enforcement agencies

0:31:33.520 --> 0:31:36.440
<v Speaker 3>in an attempt to seek the truth. They also asked

0:31:36.440 --> 0:31:41.160
<v Speaker 3>for privacy as the case move forward through the legal process. Later,

0:31:41.280 --> 0:31:44.720
<v Speaker 3>they found out their own family's DNA led investigators to

0:31:44.760 --> 0:31:49.959
<v Speaker 3>Brian Coburger, Stephanie, and Jeff.

0:31:51.360 --> 0:31:54.920
<v Speaker 5>DNA has become increasingly important for successful prosecutions thanks to

0:31:54.960 --> 0:31:58.360
<v Speaker 5>something called the CSI effect, which shows like CSI, Cold

0:31:58.400 --> 0:32:01.880
<v Speaker 5>Case Without a Trace, Criminal Linds basically every other CBS series.

0:32:02.240 --> 0:32:04.920
<v Speaker 5>Everyone thinks they're a criminal expert, so a large portion

0:32:04.960 --> 0:32:08.400
<v Speaker 5>of jurors expect that the prosecutors will present some type

0:32:08.400 --> 0:32:10.000
<v Speaker 5>of scientific data as part of their.

0:32:09.880 --> 0:32:13.000
<v Speaker 6>Case, which in some cases is a very fair assessment,

0:32:13.520 --> 0:32:17.680
<v Speaker 6>and look things like eyewitnesses and motives are still very important,

0:32:17.960 --> 0:32:22.640
<v Speaker 6>but without any kind of scientific DNA or firearm ballistics

0:32:23.080 --> 0:32:25.600
<v Speaker 6>or fingerprints, it's really hard to get a conviction.

0:32:26.400 --> 0:32:29.120
<v Speaker 5>The CSI effect is fascinating as it may also affect

0:32:29.120 --> 0:32:32.240
<v Speaker 5>how criminals themselves act. In the year two thousand, when

0:32:32.320 --> 0:32:35.200
<v Speaker 5>CSI premiered, forty six point nine percent of all rate

0:32:35.280 --> 0:32:38.080
<v Speaker 5>cases in the United States were resolved by police. By

0:32:38.120 --> 0:32:40.560
<v Speaker 5>two thousand and five, the rate had fallen to forty

0:32:40.600 --> 0:32:43.720
<v Speaker 5>one point three percent. Some investigators attributed this to client

0:32:43.800 --> 0:32:47.320
<v Speaker 5>to the CSI effect, as crime shows often inadvertently explain

0:32:47.480 --> 0:32:50.200
<v Speaker 5>in detail how criminals can conceal or destroy evidence.

0:32:50.840 --> 0:32:53.440
<v Speaker 6>But back to how this affects this case. Look, as

0:32:53.440 --> 0:32:56.840
<v Speaker 6>we know, our legal system demands proof beyond a reasonable

0:32:56.920 --> 0:33:00.480
<v Speaker 6>doubt before we can convict, and the jurors see these

0:33:00.520 --> 0:33:05.320
<v Speaker 6>types of scientific tests as frankly undeniable proof of guilt,

0:33:05.520 --> 0:33:10.440
<v Speaker 6>whereas eyewitnesses or potential motives those can be sometimes imperfect.

0:33:11.040 --> 0:33:13.200
<v Speaker 5>There have been multiple studies that say more than seventy

0:33:13.240 --> 0:33:16.680
<v Speaker 5>percent of jurors expect scientific evidence like DNA and murder

0:33:16.720 --> 0:33:18.560
<v Speaker 5>or rape prosecutions.

0:33:18.600 --> 0:33:21.320
<v Speaker 6>And really it has done extraordinary work in terms of

0:33:21.480 --> 0:33:26.080
<v Speaker 6>people being released from prison because the DNA testing obviously

0:33:26.160 --> 0:33:29.400
<v Speaker 6>proved their innocence despite the fact that they had been convicted,

0:33:30.120 --> 0:33:32.440
<v Speaker 6>So when you think about it, it's not surprising that

0:33:32.600 --> 0:33:35.720
<v Speaker 6>Idaho prosecutors have put a ton of weight into the

0:33:35.800 --> 0:33:37.440
<v Speaker 6>DNA elements of this case.

0:33:37.920 --> 0:33:40.160
<v Speaker 5>If this does go to trial, it's safe to assume

0:33:40.160 --> 0:33:42.680
<v Speaker 5>that prosecutors will have to show that Brian Coberger was

0:33:42.760 --> 0:33:45.240
<v Speaker 5>in the house and his DNA was all over the

0:33:45.240 --> 0:33:48.080
<v Speaker 5>crime scene where Kaylee Madison, Sanna and Ethan were killed.

0:33:48.360 --> 0:33:50.520
<v Speaker 5>The question is, though, is that going to be an

0:33:50.520 --> 0:33:51.440
<v Speaker 5>impossible task?

0:33:56.520 --> 0:34:00.840
<v Speaker 3>More on that next time. For worm on the case

0:34:00.880 --> 0:34:05.800
<v Speaker 3>and relevant photos, follow us on Instagram at KAT Underscore Studios.

0:34:06.680 --> 0:34:10.240
<v Speaker 3>The Idaho Masacre is produced by Stephanie Leidecker, Jeff Shane,

0:34:10.360 --> 0:34:15.520
<v Speaker 3>Connor Powell, Chris Bargo, Gabriel Castillo, and me Courtney Armstrong.

0:34:16.800 --> 0:34:21.040
<v Speaker 3>Editing and sound designed by Jeff Toi. Music by Jared Aston.

0:34:22.040 --> 0:34:24.480
<v Speaker 3>The Idaho Masacre is a production of iHeart Radio and

0:34:24.560 --> 0:34:29.520
<v Speaker 3>KAT Studios. For more podcasts like this, visit the iHeartRadio app,

0:34:29.640 --> 0:34:35.680
<v Speaker 3>Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to your favorite shows.

0:34:36.480 --> 0:34:39.279
<v Speaker 7>I'm Diana, You May Knows Body Movin, My Friend and

0:34:39.280 --> 0:34:42.520
<v Speaker 7>I John Green were featured in the Netflix documentary Don't

0:34:42.600 --> 0:34:45.400
<v Speaker 7>f with Cats. On our new podcast, True Crimes with

0:34:45.440 --> 0:34:48.560
<v Speaker 7>John and Deiana were turning our online investigative skills to

0:34:48.600 --> 0:34:52.560
<v Speaker 7>some of the most unexplained, unsolved, and most ignored cases.

0:34:54.320 --> 0:34:54.839
<v Speaker 2>Please say.

0:34:54.920 --> 0:34:57.200
<v Speaker 5>Thirty three year old bride Again was shot dead.

0:34:57.080 --> 0:34:59.320
<v Speaker 2>Gunned down in front of his two year old daughter.

0:35:00.000 --> 0:35:02.400
<v Speaker 8>Detectives confirmed that it was a targeted attack.

0:35:02.640 --> 0:35:05.480
<v Speaker 4>It appears to be an execution style of assassination.

0:35:05.760 --> 0:35:08.080
<v Speaker 7>This is very active, so we have to be careful.

0:35:08.360 --> 0:35:11.040
<v Speaker 6>I've heard that there's a house that has some bodies

0:35:11.080 --> 0:35:11.680
<v Speaker 6>in the basement.

0:35:11.880 --> 0:35:13.959
<v Speaker 4>I knew. I just knew something was wrong.

0:35:14.440 --> 0:35:17.479
<v Speaker 5>Maybe there's something more sinister at play than just one

0:35:17.600 --> 0:35:21.880
<v Speaker 5>young girl going missing. If you know something, heard something,

0:35:22.400 --> 0:35:24.920
<v Speaker 5>please it's never too late.

0:35:24.719 --> 0:35:25.520
<v Speaker 4>To do the right thing.

0:35:26.440 --> 0:35:29.200
<v Speaker 7>This is True Crimes with John and Deianna, the.

0:35:29.200 --> 0:35:32.440
<v Speaker 5>Production of KT Studios and iHeartRadio.

0:35:33.239 --> 0:35:36.880
<v Speaker 4>Justice is something that takes different shapes or formed