WEBVTT - Saxo’s 'Outrageous' Forecast Sees Trump Blowing Up the Dollar

0:00:03.080 --> 0:00:19.119
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, Radio News. Welcome to Marin Talks Money,

0:00:19.120 --> 0:00:21.480
<v Speaker 1>the podcast so much people who know the markets explain

0:00:21.560 --> 0:00:24.160
<v Speaker 1>the markets. I'm Maren Sums at Web. This week, I'm

0:00:24.160 --> 0:00:27.400
<v Speaker 1>speaking with John Hardy, chief macro strategist at Saxo Bank.

0:00:28.000 --> 0:00:30.280
<v Speaker 1>Every year for at least the last two decades, Saxo

0:00:30.360 --> 0:00:34.280
<v Speaker 1>Bank is released their annual Outrageous Predictions list, and today's guest,

0:00:34.320 --> 0:00:36.879
<v Speaker 1>John Hardy, has been involved in those predictions since the

0:00:36.960 --> 0:00:38.200
<v Speaker 1>list began? Is that right, John?

0:00:38.600 --> 0:00:40.800
<v Speaker 2>Since the last began the year after the list began.

0:00:40.840 --> 0:00:43.520
<v Speaker 1>I believe he began. Okay, cool enough, You've got big

0:00:43.520 --> 0:00:46.839
<v Speaker 1>shoes to fill here, because we normally talk Justine Jacobson

0:00:46.880 --> 0:00:49.560
<v Speaker 1>about this and he has now retired. I believe, yes,

0:00:49.840 --> 0:00:51.320
<v Speaker 1>we'll trying to get seen on another time for it

0:00:51.400 --> 0:00:54.360
<v Speaker 1>for a retirement debrief. Right for now, you're the guy

0:00:54.400 --> 0:00:56.120
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna have to fill his shoes. Thanks so much

0:00:56.160 --> 0:00:56.920
<v Speaker 1>for joining us today.

0:00:56.960 --> 0:00:58.840
<v Speaker 2>I'll do my best. Thank you. I'm glad to be here.

0:00:58.920 --> 0:01:00.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm feeling going to do pretty well. I have a

0:01:00.600 --> 0:01:03.040
<v Speaker 1>list of these outrageous predictions in front of me, and

0:01:03.080 --> 0:01:04.600
<v Speaker 1>we're not going to talk about all of them. Because

0:01:04.880 --> 0:01:06.720
<v Speaker 1>listeners can go to your website right and have a

0:01:06.720 --> 0:01:09.679
<v Speaker 1>look at them, the ones we don't talk about today. Sure, yeah,

0:01:10.840 --> 0:01:13.000
<v Speaker 1>if you want to hear more about this, listeners, go

0:01:13.080 --> 0:01:14.840
<v Speaker 1>look at the website and you can see the ones

0:01:14.880 --> 0:01:16.360
<v Speaker 1>we don't talk about today. But we're going to get

0:01:16.360 --> 0:01:19.840
<v Speaker 1>through quite a lot of them because they are relatively outrageous.

0:01:20.040 --> 0:01:22.240
<v Speaker 1>So the first one, and I'm not going to do

0:01:22.280 --> 0:01:24.880
<v Speaker 1>them in chronological order, but the first one is Trump

0:01:24.959 --> 0:01:28.880
<v Speaker 1>two point zero blows up the US dollar. What's going

0:01:28.920 --> 0:01:29.319
<v Speaker 1>to happen?

0:01:29.680 --> 0:01:33.240
<v Speaker 2>Well, again, these are outrageous predictions. They're not our forecasts

0:01:33.280 --> 0:01:35.960
<v Speaker 2>for the future. This is not our sort of baseline

0:01:36.240 --> 0:01:37.920
<v Speaker 2>outlook for what's happen for are.

0:01:37.840 --> 0:01:40.440
<v Speaker 1>You taking any further? If any of these things happen,

0:01:40.920 --> 0:01:43.720
<v Speaker 1>you're going to call them forecast, not outrageous predictions, aren't you?

0:01:43.760 --> 0:01:46.039
<v Speaker 1>If this actually happens next time we talk about it,

0:01:46.080 --> 0:01:47.840
<v Speaker 1>you're going to say as a forecast.

0:01:48.280 --> 0:01:50.520
<v Speaker 2>Well, no, I don't think so, because they've rarely come true,

0:01:50.520 --> 0:01:53.040
<v Speaker 2>but occasionally they do. And that's the idea here, is

0:01:53.040 --> 0:01:55.760
<v Speaker 2>to take some very serious issues that we see in

0:01:55.800 --> 0:01:58.720
<v Speaker 2>the background, whether it's too political or financial markets otherwise,

0:01:58.800 --> 0:02:00.840
<v Speaker 2>and say there's a pressing things going on. Maybe there's

0:02:00.840 --> 0:02:02.640
<v Speaker 2>a lot of consensus in this case that Trump two

0:02:02.640 --> 0:02:05.320
<v Speaker 2>point zero actually should mean a strong dollar. And what

0:02:05.360 --> 0:02:07.720
<v Speaker 2>we're saying is maybe we have this wrong. There are

0:02:07.760 --> 0:02:10.280
<v Speaker 2>ways that we could actually see this resulting in a

0:02:10.400 --> 0:02:13.280
<v Speaker 2>much weaker dollar, I mean blows up, meaning of course

0:02:13.360 --> 0:02:15.360
<v Speaker 2>it goes down, not that it goes up or in

0:02:15.360 --> 0:02:17.680
<v Speaker 2>flights that it goes down the US dollar.

0:02:17.760 --> 0:02:19.000
<v Speaker 1>Okay, so what's the mechanism.

0:02:19.320 --> 0:02:22.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, well, the mechanism could be from just about any direction.

0:02:22.760 --> 0:02:25.960
<v Speaker 2>But one of those is the sort of post Plaza

0:02:26.000 --> 0:02:29.440
<v Speaker 2>Accord reality that we have economies now needing to act

0:02:29.440 --> 0:02:32.480
<v Speaker 2>more in their self interest, a multipolar world. No longer

0:02:32.600 --> 0:02:36.560
<v Speaker 2>the sort of global landscape of the US hegemony rules

0:02:36.600 --> 0:02:39.560
<v Speaker 2>all into one global reserve currency to rule them all.

0:02:39.880 --> 0:02:44.120
<v Speaker 2>But we have multiple currencies and multiple regions acting more

0:02:44.120 --> 0:02:46.119
<v Speaker 2>in their self interest. And this has really been brought

0:02:46.120 --> 0:02:50.000
<v Speaker 2>about from the US side because the global reserve dollars,

0:02:50.040 --> 0:02:52.519
<v Speaker 2>the global reserve currency, is just not working for the

0:02:52.600 --> 0:02:55.000
<v Speaker 2>US economy anymore, and so we have a much more

0:02:55.400 --> 0:02:58.480
<v Speaker 2>self interested US and nationalist economics if you want to

0:02:58.480 --> 0:03:02.200
<v Speaker 2>call it. The threat of terror US et cetera, and

0:03:02.360 --> 0:03:05.440
<v Speaker 2>almost a weaponization and really it is a weaponization of

0:03:05.480 --> 0:03:08.160
<v Speaker 2>the US dollar for those that don't want to play ball.

0:03:08.680 --> 0:03:11.720
<v Speaker 2>And therefore, major trading partners, major powers in the world

0:03:11.800 --> 0:03:14.600
<v Speaker 2>outside of the US will be seeking alternatives, and there

0:03:14.760 --> 0:03:17.480
<v Speaker 2>they already are to a degree, but this will be

0:03:17.520 --> 0:03:19.800
<v Speaker 2>something that could really pick up pace in twenty twenty five.

0:03:20.080 --> 0:03:22.200
<v Speaker 1>And this has been discussed for so long that there's

0:03:22.240 --> 0:03:23.919
<v Speaker 1>going to be an alternative to the US dollars that

0:03:23.960 --> 0:03:26.200
<v Speaker 1>everyone's had it with always having to trade in dollars,

0:03:26.200 --> 0:03:29.040
<v Speaker 1>and they're going to start trading in various different currencies.

0:03:29.040 --> 0:03:31.720
<v Speaker 1>The bricks are going to create their own joint trading

0:03:31.760 --> 0:03:34.560
<v Speaker 1>block exactly. These things have been this conversation has been

0:03:34.600 --> 0:03:37.240
<v Speaker 1>around for ages. But there is the idea here there's

0:03:37.240 --> 0:03:40.240
<v Speaker 1>a possibility that it is Trump's tariffs that could actually

0:03:40.240 --> 0:03:40.880
<v Speaker 1>make it happen.

0:03:41.080 --> 0:03:44.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and it's kind of interesting. You see almost some

0:03:44.520 --> 0:03:48.240
<v Speaker 2>foreshadowing of this when you have Trump saying, well, if

0:03:48.240 --> 0:03:50.280
<v Speaker 2>the bricks current, if the bricks countries are going to

0:03:50.280 --> 0:03:52.800
<v Speaker 2>seek to, you know, trade outside of the US dollar,

0:03:52.840 --> 0:03:54.440
<v Speaker 2>We're going to slap one hundred percent tariffs on all

0:03:54.480 --> 0:03:57.320
<v Speaker 2>of them. Well, it almost becomes a self fulfilling conclusion.

0:03:57.800 --> 0:04:00.560
<v Speaker 2>If that is going to be the future of trade relationlationships.

0:04:00.760 --> 0:04:03.720
<v Speaker 2>This kind of tit for tat a measure, So it's

0:04:03.760 --> 0:04:07.280
<v Speaker 2>not a trivial thing to do to create a new currency.

0:04:07.720 --> 0:04:10.480
<v Speaker 2>And of course the dollars days are not done, but

0:04:10.520 --> 0:04:12.960
<v Speaker 2>it's a matter of degrees and a matter of perhaps

0:04:13.040 --> 0:04:15.600
<v Speaker 2>rolling over and something new starting, rather than that this

0:04:15.640 --> 0:04:17.360
<v Speaker 2>is something that's going to happen overnight. So I don't

0:04:17.360 --> 0:04:19.559
<v Speaker 2>want to give the impression, even as an outrageous prediction,

0:04:19.640 --> 0:04:22.680
<v Speaker 2>that we're talking about some kind of sudden end to

0:04:22.720 --> 0:04:26.400
<v Speaker 2>the US dollar. It's about new potential currencies and ways

0:04:26.440 --> 0:04:27.680
<v Speaker 2>to trade coming about.

0:04:27.880 --> 0:04:30.240
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. But then there's a fascinating little bit in the

0:04:30.240 --> 0:04:33.279
<v Speaker 1>middle of the summary of this where it says, while

0:04:33.360 --> 0:04:36.120
<v Speaker 1>slashing deficits with the help of an Elon Musk run

0:04:36.120 --> 0:04:40.160
<v Speaker 1>Department of Government Efficiency Efficiency or DOGE, and that implication

0:04:40.200 --> 0:04:41.120
<v Speaker 1>that really is possible.

0:04:41.760 --> 0:04:44.520
<v Speaker 2>Well, it's possible, certainly possible in theory. There's plenty of

0:04:44.600 --> 0:04:47.080
<v Speaker 2>government bloat that could be attacked. But of course there

0:04:47.120 --> 0:04:49.360
<v Speaker 2>are also political constituents that would not be happy to

0:04:49.360 --> 0:04:51.560
<v Speaker 2>see their funding pulled. And I don't think we even

0:04:51.600 --> 0:04:54.480
<v Speaker 2>necessarily need to see that to get a weeker dollar.

0:04:54.520 --> 0:04:57.400
<v Speaker 2>But we have to remember that fiscal a weak fiscal

0:04:57.440 --> 0:05:00.200
<v Speaker 2>impulse is also very negative for a US dollar, even

0:05:00.200 --> 0:05:02.600
<v Speaker 2>if we don't go the route of the dollar weakening,

0:05:02.680 --> 0:05:06.839
<v Speaker 2>because they inflate further deficits and the FED has to

0:05:06.839 --> 0:05:09.360
<v Speaker 2>do some sort of new QE or something to keep

0:05:09.400 --> 0:05:13.560
<v Speaker 2>the US treasury market from seizing up. If we have

0:05:13.760 --> 0:05:15.560
<v Speaker 2>the dose suddenly coming in in a big way and

0:05:15.560 --> 0:05:18.080
<v Speaker 2>cutting spending, that's also quite negative for the US dollar,

0:05:18.120 --> 0:05:19.280
<v Speaker 2>also a negative for US growth.

0:05:19.400 --> 0:05:21.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I'm partly to do with this falling supply of

0:05:21.240 --> 0:05:24.400
<v Speaker 1>US dollars. Yes, yes, Okay, Now let's go onto the

0:05:24.400 --> 0:05:27.200
<v Speaker 1>potential market impact. Actually, I'm going to say it sounds

0:05:27.200 --> 0:05:30.279
<v Speaker 1>pretty good. The crypto market quadruples to more than ten

0:05:30.320 --> 0:05:32.680
<v Speaker 1>trillion dollars, and I think probably by crypto we're really

0:05:32.680 --> 0:05:34.880
<v Speaker 1>talking about bitcoin, or are we talking about all types

0:05:34.920 --> 0:05:35.400
<v Speaker 1>of crypto.

0:05:36.200 --> 0:05:37.960
<v Speaker 2>It was just the crypto market in general. We don't

0:05:38.040 --> 0:05:40.240
<v Speaker 2>like to talk specifics and we talk crypto. It's just

0:05:40.279 --> 0:05:43.080
<v Speaker 2>not an area we like to make a big profile,

0:05:43.480 --> 0:05:45.039
<v Speaker 2>cut a big profile in the market. So it's just

0:05:45.040 --> 0:05:47.360
<v Speaker 2>a general idea that one of these alternatives could be

0:05:47.360 --> 0:05:49.960
<v Speaker 2>the crypto space. And read that as you will.

0:05:50.040 --> 0:05:52.440
<v Speaker 1>Interesting, you'll definitely get hate mail because almost everybody else

0:05:52.440 --> 0:05:55.320
<v Speaker 1>who comes on this podcast likes to divide crypto into bitcoin,

0:05:55.760 --> 0:05:58.200
<v Speaker 1>which is real, and crypto, which they considered to be

0:05:58.440 --> 0:06:01.760
<v Speaker 1>less real. I'll set up for your hate mail director.

0:06:02.640 --> 0:06:05.560
<v Speaker 1>So manages the USO oft falls twenty percent again major currencies,

0:06:05.560 --> 0:06:10.159
<v Speaker 1>and thirty percent versus gold. The US economy continues to reflate,

0:06:10.240 --> 0:06:13.599
<v Speaker 1>but wages keep up with goods inflation as production resources

0:06:13.720 --> 0:06:17.320
<v Speaker 1>reshore to the US US exporters advantage. I mean it

0:06:17.360 --> 0:06:19.960
<v Speaker 1>sounds great. Yeah, it sounds great for the US.

0:06:20.200 --> 0:06:21.960
<v Speaker 2>It does sound good for the US, except there will

0:06:21.960 --> 0:06:25.000
<v Speaker 2>be inflation. I think the key for this to be

0:06:25.080 --> 0:06:27.880
<v Speaker 2>something that the US can can pull off, and there's

0:06:27.920 --> 0:06:30.880
<v Speaker 2>so many ifs involved here would be potentially sort of

0:06:30.960 --> 0:06:33.480
<v Speaker 2>selective inflation. I mean, the US is very well supplied

0:06:33.520 --> 0:06:36.120
<v Speaker 2>in terms of energy from its own resources, from food.

0:06:36.560 --> 0:06:38.600
<v Speaker 2>So if they're able to keep those key categories down,

0:06:38.680 --> 0:06:42.600
<v Speaker 2>cost of living categories down in reasonable inflation levels relative

0:06:42.640 --> 0:06:44.640
<v Speaker 2>to wages in particular, and people don't feel like they're

0:06:44.640 --> 0:06:48.039
<v Speaker 2>getting poor from paycheck to paycheck, I think the US

0:06:48.160 --> 0:06:53.159
<v Speaker 2>public could potentially not be too upset if some consumer goods,

0:06:53.440 --> 0:06:56.720
<v Speaker 2>namely those produced in China and elsewhere are suddenly seeing

0:06:56.760 --> 0:06:58.960
<v Speaker 2>much higher rates of inflation than those other costs of

0:06:59.040 --> 0:07:00.960
<v Speaker 2>living related goods.

0:07:01.080 --> 0:07:03.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, well, people don't mind inflation as long as their

0:07:03.000 --> 0:07:05.000
<v Speaker 1>real income remains the same arises, right.

0:07:05.080 --> 0:07:07.120
<v Speaker 2>Oh, real income in what category? Is the sort of

0:07:07.120 --> 0:07:08.560
<v Speaker 2>the nuance I'm trying to introduce there?

0:07:08.560 --> 0:07:11.680
<v Speaker 1>But yes, in general, yes, okay, Well we touched on energy,

0:07:12.360 --> 0:07:15.360
<v Speaker 1>so let's go straight on to another outrage of prediction.

0:07:15.720 --> 0:07:20.200
<v Speaker 1>Electrification boom ends Opek. Now it's about electrical vehicles. As

0:07:20.240 --> 0:07:23.440
<v Speaker 1>electrical vehicles become more affordable, could oil rich Opek become

0:07:23.480 --> 0:07:25.920
<v Speaker 1>irrelevant in twenty twenty five and find itself on the

0:07:25.960 --> 0:07:28.880
<v Speaker 1>ash heap of history. Now this comes at a time

0:07:29.120 --> 0:07:31.400
<v Speaker 1>when all of our newspapers are full of stories about

0:07:31.440 --> 0:07:34.800
<v Speaker 1>how nobody wants to in EV and the manufacturers can't

0:07:34.840 --> 0:07:37.400
<v Speaker 1>sell enough evs, and they'll all just worry about whether

0:07:37.440 --> 0:07:40.680
<v Speaker 1>we can really phase out petrol and diesel cars, and

0:07:40.680 --> 0:07:43.120
<v Speaker 1>whether it's really possible for the government to continue to

0:07:43.400 --> 0:07:46.880
<v Speaker 1>find manufacturers for not selling enough evs, etc. So the

0:07:46.920 --> 0:07:49.680
<v Speaker 1>general mood at the moment suddenly in the UK is

0:07:49.840 --> 0:07:52.120
<v Speaker 1>really really anti EV.

0:07:52.640 --> 0:07:54.880
<v Speaker 2>In the UK. Yes, and the UK you also have

0:07:54.960 --> 0:07:59.360
<v Speaker 2>a terrible infrastructure for charging evs, and that is the

0:07:59.440 --> 0:08:02.520
<v Speaker 2>key challenge. I think the evs themselves have gotten to

0:08:02.760 --> 0:08:05.960
<v Speaker 2>incredible levels of range, and the efficiency of an EV

0:08:06.080 --> 0:08:09.400
<v Speaker 2>is quite remarkable because it's so much better an energy

0:08:09.560 --> 0:08:13.120
<v Speaker 2>source to use electricity rather than fossil fuels, because you're

0:08:13.120 --> 0:08:15.400
<v Speaker 2>getting so much waste heat with fossil fuels relative to

0:08:15.440 --> 0:08:19.200
<v Speaker 2>the efficiency to the kinetic needs to turn wheels with

0:08:19.480 --> 0:08:22.600
<v Speaker 2>an electric motor. So for those countries where they build

0:08:22.600 --> 0:08:24.960
<v Speaker 2>out the infrastructure, the transition can be quicker if you

0:08:25.040 --> 0:08:27.560
<v Speaker 2>look at a Norway, et cetera. But I think the

0:08:27.640 --> 0:08:30.160
<v Speaker 2>key point here is one of rate of change, and

0:08:30.240 --> 0:08:32.440
<v Speaker 2>one of the biggest markets is China, where already they

0:08:32.480 --> 0:08:35.880
<v Speaker 2>are going beyond fifty percent evs. Now, in terms of

0:08:35.880 --> 0:08:39.640
<v Speaker 2>the new passenger vehicle mix, at some point the Tesla,

0:08:39.720 --> 0:08:44.480
<v Speaker 2>Semi or other companies would be making for hauling for

0:08:44.559 --> 0:08:47.840
<v Speaker 2>hauling goods, so transport vehicles as well as passenger vehicles.

0:08:48.400 --> 0:08:50.960
<v Speaker 2>And we're just talking about at some point, possibly within

0:08:51.000 --> 0:08:53.640
<v Speaker 2>a year, possibly two or three. We're at peak oil

0:08:53.760 --> 0:08:55.360
<v Speaker 2>in terms of the demand side, Now that there's some

0:08:55.440 --> 0:08:58.160
<v Speaker 2>kind of absolute geological limit that we've reached, but we're

0:08:58.200 --> 0:09:01.480
<v Speaker 2>at a demand peak, and what does the exponential decline

0:09:01.520 --> 0:09:04.640
<v Speaker 2>curve look like? And if your country is reliant on

0:09:04.679 --> 0:09:08.400
<v Speaker 2>oil exports, do you break ranks, produce more now rather

0:09:08.480 --> 0:09:11.400
<v Speaker 2>than later, perhaps make a long term supply deal with

0:09:11.440 --> 0:09:14.800
<v Speaker 2>somebody else. It's not so much about OPEK really, which

0:09:14.880 --> 0:09:16.880
<v Speaker 2>is in the text to me, This is more about

0:09:17.200 --> 0:09:22.760
<v Speaker 2>the thought process around peak oil demand and electrification and

0:09:22.840 --> 0:09:23.520
<v Speaker 2>what does it mean.

0:09:23.760 --> 0:09:25.880
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I find this one really interesting because it's one

0:09:25.880 --> 0:09:28.160
<v Speaker 1>of those ones that I think would it would genuinely

0:09:28.200 --> 0:09:32.439
<v Speaker 1>be one of those things that is very very unexpected,

0:09:32.440 --> 0:09:33.680
<v Speaker 1>in that I think a lot of people who don't

0:09:33.679 --> 0:09:35.520
<v Speaker 1>look very carefully at the energy market might think, well,

0:09:35.520 --> 0:09:37.800
<v Speaker 1>that sounds that sounds entirely reasonable. That could easily happen.

0:09:37.840 --> 0:09:40.560
<v Speaker 1>That's what I expect to happen. But in fact, of course,

0:09:40.720 --> 0:09:43.320
<v Speaker 1>we know that even as demand for electricity rises at

0:09:43.320 --> 0:09:46.280
<v Speaker 1>the moment, so does the demand for fossil fuels. So

0:09:46.320 --> 0:09:48.800
<v Speaker 1>we're still thinking rising demand for fossil fuels globally, and

0:09:48.840 --> 0:09:52.080
<v Speaker 1>eighty percent of energy use globally remains fossil fueled. And

0:09:52.120 --> 0:09:54.520
<v Speaker 1>even in Scandinavian countries, where I think it is is

0:09:54.559 --> 0:09:56.960
<v Speaker 1>in Norway, where the majority of new cars sold are

0:09:57.040 --> 0:09:59.520
<v Speaker 1>now evs but nonetheless more than eighty percent of the

0:09:59.600 --> 0:10:02.880
<v Speaker 1>cars on the road remain combustion engine cause.

0:10:02.800 --> 0:10:06.360
<v Speaker 2>About seventy five percent. But although ninety percent now are

0:10:06.400 --> 0:10:09.240
<v Speaker 2>are evs of new cars, and it's a very small

0:10:09.280 --> 0:10:11.120
<v Speaker 2>it's a very small country, but you're right, and you

0:10:11.160 --> 0:10:13.200
<v Speaker 2>do have to get into not just passenger vehicles but

0:10:13.240 --> 0:10:15.640
<v Speaker 2>other vehicles. And it does take many years for the

0:10:15.679 --> 0:10:18.600
<v Speaker 2>replacement to fully happen. But once those evs become more

0:10:18.640 --> 0:10:20.800
<v Speaker 2>attractive to own and they're easy to charge, perhaps the

0:10:22.040 --> 0:10:26.640
<v Speaker 2>replacement accelerates. This of course is this is outrageous, right,

0:10:26.679 --> 0:10:29.480
<v Speaker 2>but we are need to consider what does this look

0:10:29.559 --> 0:10:32.200
<v Speaker 2>like in terms of a handful of years when there's

0:10:32.200 --> 0:10:35.400
<v Speaker 2>a process change and a mentality change for those that

0:10:35.440 --> 0:10:38.240
<v Speaker 2>are exporting oil, especially when you have a US that

0:10:38.320 --> 0:10:42.240
<v Speaker 2>has created essentially two Saudi Arabias of oil production, and

0:10:42.360 --> 0:10:44.120
<v Speaker 2>the first in the shale gas patch and then in

0:10:44.120 --> 0:10:45.800
<v Speaker 2>the shale oil patch. And it really is important to

0:10:45.800 --> 0:10:49.400
<v Speaker 2>differentiate here on talking oil. We know that gas is

0:10:49.440 --> 0:10:51.520
<v Speaker 2>still growing and this applies will probably grow for at

0:10:51.559 --> 0:10:53.920
<v Speaker 2>least another decade or if not more. So, it really

0:10:53.960 --> 0:10:56.080
<v Speaker 2>is the oil side of things that we're talking about.

0:10:56.120 --> 0:10:59.560
<v Speaker 2>Oil and specifically used for transports that it's biggest current use.

0:11:00.120 --> 0:11:02.120
<v Speaker 1>It's interesting, and you could have had another outrage of

0:11:02.160 --> 0:11:05.000
<v Speaker 1>prediction on a similar vein suggesting that the price of

0:11:05.040 --> 0:11:07.200
<v Speaker 1>oil is going to collapse because the supply of oil

0:11:07.240 --> 0:11:10.080
<v Speaker 1>coming out form of the US under Trump two point

0:11:10.160 --> 0:11:11.600
<v Speaker 1>zero would be so high.

0:11:12.040 --> 0:11:14.360
<v Speaker 2>I think that's less likely because a lot of the

0:11:14.520 --> 0:11:17.120
<v Speaker 2>new production that's been brought online in the US shale,

0:11:17.120 --> 0:11:20.120
<v Speaker 2>and it's much easier by the nature of US shale

0:11:20.240 --> 0:11:24.760
<v Speaker 2>many many small fields, many many small sources to turn

0:11:24.840 --> 0:11:28.480
<v Speaker 2>up and turn down production, versus the large field model

0:11:28.480 --> 0:11:31.840
<v Speaker 2>where that's not really feasible to so quickly and dynamically

0:11:31.880 --> 0:11:35.760
<v Speaker 2>change the production rates. So, you know, without being oil

0:11:35.760 --> 0:11:37.840
<v Speaker 2>industry expert, I think we do have a very different

0:11:38.200 --> 0:11:41.199
<v Speaker 2>structure to how the supply and demand, how supply can

0:11:41.240 --> 0:11:44.280
<v Speaker 2>respond to demand and price relatives to previous regime.

0:11:44.720 --> 0:11:47.280
<v Speaker 1>Okay, well lit again, if you get down to read

0:11:47.280 --> 0:11:50.080
<v Speaker 1>your wit at the bottom. One potential market impact sounds great,

0:11:50.600 --> 0:11:53.679
<v Speaker 1>absolutely great. Crude ol slums and price, it's a boom

0:11:53.720 --> 0:11:57.120
<v Speaker 1>for airlines, We'll get to travel more. Luxury travel booms. Right,

0:11:57.320 --> 0:12:00.440
<v Speaker 1>chemical paint and time manufacture is free to logistics companies,

0:12:00.440 --> 0:12:03.679
<v Speaker 1>they'll boom too. This sounds amazing. The market balance is

0:12:03.720 --> 0:12:06.680
<v Speaker 1>out quickly, oil prices cyber to stabilize again. You know

0:12:06.760 --> 0:12:09.880
<v Speaker 1>that's good. Higher cost suppliers, particularly North America's shut down

0:12:09.880 --> 0:12:13.040
<v Speaker 1>expensive shale oil production. People won't complain about that too much,

0:12:13.040 --> 0:12:15.199
<v Speaker 1>will they? And the only people who end up in

0:12:15.200 --> 0:12:17.959
<v Speaker 1>a bad way are the Japanese car manufacturers who find

0:12:18.000 --> 0:12:20.280
<v Speaker 1>themselves in a desperate race to catch up with some

0:12:20.400 --> 0:12:23.920
<v Speaker 1>other ev plants. Will anybody else suffer badly from this?

0:12:23.920 --> 0:12:25.440
<v Speaker 1>This is almost entirely good news.

0:12:25.600 --> 0:12:27.440
<v Speaker 2>Well, some of the open countries themselves.

0:12:27.559 --> 0:12:29.840
<v Speaker 1>The countries of course slightly forgotten about.

0:12:29.600 --> 0:12:34.480
<v Speaker 2>That too, reliant on their oil revenues for for their

0:12:34.559 --> 0:12:36.199
<v Speaker 2>for the national income.

0:12:35.840 --> 0:12:38.280
<v Speaker 1>And they're all aware of that, right, All those countries

0:12:38.679 --> 0:12:41.000
<v Speaker 1>all have been trying to diversify, move into different areas,

0:12:41.040 --> 0:12:42.880
<v Speaker 1>and we see that across the Middle East for example.

0:12:43.200 --> 0:12:45.880
<v Speaker 2>We're just talking about bringing awareness forward to this is

0:12:45.920 --> 0:12:48.120
<v Speaker 2>happening sort of now, in the few years. It's not

0:12:48.200 --> 0:12:51.120
<v Speaker 2>just about a thirty year generation forward effort. This is

0:12:51.200 --> 0:12:53.720
<v Speaker 2>a process that starts more or less now.

0:12:54.120 --> 0:12:58.400
<v Speaker 1>Well maybe okay, it's not you know, you're not expecting

0:13:00.240 --> 0:13:02.319
<v Speaker 1>a chance it might happen. Okay, So we're going to

0:13:02.360 --> 0:13:06.800
<v Speaker 1>stick with energy. So we've just discussed one outrageous prediction

0:13:06.920 --> 0:13:09.760
<v Speaker 1>being that oil becomes very cheap, and so one type

0:13:09.760 --> 0:13:12.360
<v Speaker 1>of energy becomes extremely cheap. And we move along to

0:13:12.400 --> 0:13:16.079
<v Speaker 1>the next outrageous prediction, and it's the US imposes AI

0:13:16.320 --> 0:13:20.160
<v Speaker 1>data center tax as power prices run wild. Now, I

0:13:20.240 --> 0:13:24.120
<v Speaker 1>thought this one was really interesting because I noted it. Gosh,

0:13:24.120 --> 0:13:26.080
<v Speaker 1>but eight nine months ago, maybe a bit longer, the

0:13:26.120 --> 0:13:31.120
<v Speaker 1>EU started discussing taxing AI in order to prevent it

0:13:31.200 --> 0:13:33.280
<v Speaker 1>using so much energy. Do you remember that?

0:13:33.880 --> 0:13:36.000
<v Speaker 2>I do remember that. And you also saw a microcosm

0:13:36.080 --> 0:13:38.880
<v Speaker 2>here and there with the bitcoin mining the type of

0:13:39.000 --> 0:13:43.280
<v Speaker 2>energy resources or electricity resources, Yeah, that that requires. So

0:13:43.800 --> 0:13:45.920
<v Speaker 2>this could be an issue when we're talking about the

0:13:46.240 --> 0:13:49.559
<v Speaker 2>acceleration and build out of these AI data centers. Now,

0:13:49.559 --> 0:13:51.360
<v Speaker 2>of course, if you're particularly large, you're going to need

0:13:51.400 --> 0:13:53.360
<v Speaker 2>to find the agreement to hook up to the grid

0:13:53.400 --> 0:13:56.520
<v Speaker 2>somewhere anyway before you can even get started. But at

0:13:56.520 --> 0:14:00.680
<v Speaker 2>the same time, the AI linked demand is is growing,

0:14:01.440 --> 0:14:03.800
<v Speaker 2>and you're seeing the likes of a Microsoft wanting to

0:14:03.840 --> 0:14:06.640
<v Speaker 2>restart an old nuclear reactor in the US three Mile

0:14:06.720 --> 0:14:10.120
<v Speaker 2>Island to get resources for a data center. There you

0:14:10.160 --> 0:14:13.680
<v Speaker 2>see the Amazon's Googles Oracles of the World talking nuclear

0:14:13.880 --> 0:14:20.560
<v Speaker 2>small nuclear, small module reactors with very nuclear power. Super interesting.

0:14:20.600 --> 0:14:23.160
<v Speaker 2>But what about between now and you're five six when

0:14:23.160 --> 0:14:25.520
<v Speaker 2>that thing is done right, you have that five to

0:14:25.560 --> 0:14:26.440
<v Speaker 2>six years of growth.

0:14:26.440 --> 0:14:28.880
<v Speaker 1>And some are saying, well, content Koreans build them very quickly.

0:14:31.440 --> 0:14:33.800
<v Speaker 2>I think still think we're talking a few years before

0:14:34.040 --> 0:14:38.040
<v Speaker 2>something is available in in size to to power these things.

0:14:38.080 --> 0:14:41.280
<v Speaker 2>And if if the calculation requirements there's one estimate, is

0:14:41.480 --> 0:14:43.640
<v Speaker 2>it doubles every hundred days, that's a lot of doublings

0:14:44.280 --> 0:14:46.720
<v Speaker 2>per hont you know, times x num one hundred days.

0:14:47.360 --> 0:14:48.960
<v Speaker 2>Where's the energy going to come from? I just find

0:14:49.000 --> 0:14:51.000
<v Speaker 2>I think it's interesting to think if this demand does

0:14:51.040 --> 0:14:53.920
<v Speaker 2>grow at that pace, it's going to start that baselet

0:14:53.960 --> 0:14:57.000
<v Speaker 2>requirement is going to start interacting with peak requirements for

0:14:57.120 --> 0:15:00.000
<v Speaker 2>households and basic industries, and there will be a compon

0:15:00.000 --> 0:15:02.720
<v Speaker 2>inflict there and it could mean that we actually and

0:15:02.720 --> 0:15:05.160
<v Speaker 2>it's to remind people in general, we still live in

0:15:05.160 --> 0:15:07.280
<v Speaker 2>a world with physical limits. Maybe we in the days

0:15:07.320 --> 0:15:10.000
<v Speaker 2>of starship and space we think we don't, but there

0:15:10.040 --> 0:15:12.640
<v Speaker 2>are some some physical limits that could get a bit

0:15:12.640 --> 0:15:15.120
<v Speaker 2>more pressing with ent to AI.

0:15:15.120 --> 0:15:18.680
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and you're right here this inspires popular outrageous household

0:15:18.680 --> 0:15:21.640
<v Speaker 1>see the utility bill skyrocket, aggravated by the huge banks

0:15:21.680 --> 0:15:24.080
<v Speaker 1>and power prices for electricity consumed at home during peak

0:15:24.080 --> 0:15:26.440
<v Speaker 1>load periods in the evening. So this is in the

0:15:26.520 --> 0:15:29.280
<v Speaker 1>US right where we expect they'll get absolutely furious if

0:15:29.280 --> 0:15:31.120
<v Speaker 1>their utility bills go up. And here we are in

0:15:31.160 --> 0:15:33.000
<v Speaker 1>the UK, we just sit here watching them go up

0:15:33.040 --> 0:15:34.520
<v Speaker 1>and up and up and up. We're not out on

0:15:34.560 --> 0:15:35.640
<v Speaker 1>the streets. What's wrong with us?

0:15:37.120 --> 0:15:40.360
<v Speaker 2>There's some specific challenges that were from twenty twenty two

0:15:40.440 --> 0:15:44.960
<v Speaker 2>that happened in the UK, and plus of the transfer

0:15:45.120 --> 0:15:48.400
<v Speaker 2>of the energy system here partially reliable and renewable energy

0:15:48.440 --> 0:15:52.720
<v Speaker 2>and that and that's where's the baseload? These are these

0:15:52.720 --> 0:15:56.240
<v Speaker 2>issues are plaguing at times when the wind doesn't blow

0:15:56.520 --> 0:15:58.280
<v Speaker 2>or the sun doesn't shine enough. You don't have the

0:15:58.520 --> 0:16:01.920
<v Speaker 2>storage out there to power when those when those energy

0:16:01.960 --> 0:16:04.920
<v Speaker 2>resources are are down or not producing it the capacity

0:16:04.960 --> 0:16:05.240
<v Speaker 2>you need.

0:16:05.360 --> 0:16:08.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, okay, so again this could this could be good news. Right,

0:16:09.080 --> 0:16:11.560
<v Speaker 1>so you write again down to your potential market impact,

0:16:11.640 --> 0:16:14.840
<v Speaker 1>and here this looks like unmitigated good news. You're such,

0:16:15.000 --> 0:16:16.920
<v Speaker 1>you're such an optimist.

0:16:16.760 --> 0:16:18.360
<v Speaker 2>Not for those that are investing in AI if they're

0:16:18.360 --> 0:16:19.080
<v Speaker 2>held back from.

0:16:18.960 --> 0:16:22.640
<v Speaker 1>The for long. A massive boom in US investment in

0:16:22.920 --> 0:16:26.160
<v Speaker 1>power infrastructure companies like Floor is that I said, I

0:16:26.160 --> 0:16:30.000
<v Speaker 1>don't know. Yeah, yeah right, I'm signing massive new construction deals.

0:16:30.200 --> 0:16:34.280
<v Speaker 1>Tesla is accelerating, MEGAPAC gets increasing attention. Long term US

0:16:34.360 --> 0:16:37.240
<v Speaker 1>natural gas price is more than double, then we get

0:16:37.240 --> 0:16:37.920
<v Speaker 1>a bit of inflation.

0:16:38.240 --> 0:16:41.320
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. If you look at US natural gas prices specifically,

0:16:41.440 --> 0:16:43.840
<v Speaker 2>they've been so absurdly cheap for so long because the

0:16:43.880 --> 0:16:47.840
<v Speaker 2>shale patch in the US has delivered at incredible rates

0:16:48.280 --> 0:16:51.040
<v Speaker 2>and they've capped the ability to export it. So just

0:16:51.120 --> 0:16:54.000
<v Speaker 2>a realistic market price for natural gas that's still cheap

0:16:54.080 --> 0:16:56.960
<v Speaker 2>is double what it is now in the it starts

0:16:57.000 --> 0:16:59.360
<v Speaker 2>to point out the natural gas pricing around the world

0:16:59.440 --> 0:17:02.040
<v Speaker 2>is not flat. It's very, very, very differentiated depending on

0:17:02.080 --> 0:17:05.040
<v Speaker 2>where you live, because it's a difficult product to ship.

0:17:05.160 --> 0:17:07.680
<v Speaker 2>Has to be liquefied and that's very energy and cost

0:17:07.720 --> 0:17:09.880
<v Speaker 2>intensive to do so, and then shipped around the world

0:17:09.880 --> 0:17:12.400
<v Speaker 2>in these incredibly expensive, very high tech ships.

0:17:12.560 --> 0:17:15.399
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Well, the one very good thing that could come

0:17:15.440 --> 0:17:17.639
<v Speaker 1>out of this, because we know that the people running

0:17:17.680 --> 0:17:20.160
<v Speaker 1>AI data centers or setting them up. Except all these

0:17:20.160 --> 0:17:23.080
<v Speaker 1>companies have big tech companies. They want huge amounts of money,

0:17:23.200 --> 0:17:26.080
<v Speaker 1>and if they really want cheap energy fast, they may

0:17:26.160 --> 0:17:28.119
<v Speaker 1>well push forward what we were just talking about the

0:17:28.119 --> 0:17:29.960
<v Speaker 1>development of SMRs that can be put up in a

0:17:30.040 --> 0:17:33.200
<v Speaker 1>hurry and use very I mean, they could really accelerate

0:17:33.320 --> 0:17:36.320
<v Speaker 1>these and that would be amazing, for example, for the UK,

0:17:36.960 --> 0:17:39.320
<v Speaker 1>because we could start with all the ridiculous offshore wind

0:17:39.320 --> 0:17:41.320
<v Speaker 1>and all that expensive stuff and the solo that hardly

0:17:41.320 --> 0:17:43.680
<v Speaker 1>ever works, and we can just take up SMRs around

0:17:43.680 --> 0:17:45.720
<v Speaker 1>cities all around the country. Problem solved.

0:17:46.240 --> 0:17:48.680
<v Speaker 2>Yes, let's do it. But let's see how easy and

0:17:48.760 --> 0:17:50.840
<v Speaker 2>cheap that is. It sounds so easy, but it takes

0:17:50.840 --> 0:17:53.280
<v Speaker 2>many years and then the designs are still in design phase.

0:17:53.480 --> 0:17:56.000
<v Speaker 2>There are some designs that are complete, but these things

0:17:56.040 --> 0:17:59.000
<v Speaker 2>are not available in large quality. Yeah numbers yet.

0:17:59.080 --> 0:18:01.320
<v Speaker 1>I get that. But as we often say on this podcast,

0:18:01.320 --> 0:18:03.240
<v Speaker 1>if anyone can do it, the tech bros can, So

0:18:03.359 --> 0:18:05.880
<v Speaker 1>if they're under pressure, may happen faster than it might

0:18:05.920 --> 0:18:09.520
<v Speaker 1>have otherwise. Okay, that's a good one. Before I choose more,

0:18:09.560 --> 0:18:10.560
<v Speaker 1>you must have a favorite.

0:18:10.640 --> 0:18:12.280
<v Speaker 2>Well, we already covered my favorite, which was a Trump

0:18:12.320 --> 0:18:14.000
<v Speaker 2>two point o blows up the US dollar and the

0:18:14.000 --> 0:18:16.480
<v Speaker 2>consensus is one way, and you want to be outrageous

0:18:16.480 --> 0:18:18.639
<v Speaker 2>by saying, well, what about this or what about so

0:18:18.720 --> 0:18:21.400
<v Speaker 2>if this doesn't turn out the way expect and expecting

0:18:21.400 --> 0:18:23.320
<v Speaker 2>a strong dollars, having your cake and eating it too,

0:18:23.840 --> 0:18:25.480
<v Speaker 2>and the other consequences we talked about.

0:18:25.560 --> 0:18:27.920
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, all right, okay, let's move on to a video.

0:18:28.000 --> 0:18:31.399
<v Speaker 1>Then in video, blis to twice the value of Apple.

0:18:31.640 --> 0:18:34.400
<v Speaker 1>Now here's the thing. It's kind of outrageous to people

0:18:34.440 --> 0:18:36.879
<v Speaker 1>who look at some market history to think that any

0:18:36.880 --> 0:18:39.400
<v Speaker 1>stock could keep growing like that and could become so big, etc.

0:18:39.840 --> 0:18:41.760
<v Speaker 1>But if you look at for example, in the UK,

0:18:41.840 --> 0:18:43.960
<v Speaker 1>at the top by lists of retail investors, any of

0:18:44.000 --> 0:18:46.120
<v Speaker 1>the platforms, video is always up there at the top.

0:18:46.440 --> 0:18:48.639
<v Speaker 1>There's a lot of people out there who are expecting this.

0:18:48.760 --> 0:18:51.480
<v Speaker 1>You don't think this is outrageous at all, who think

0:18:51.520 --> 0:18:55.119
<v Speaker 1>this is exactly what should happen. It's been going up

0:18:55.160 --> 0:18:57.800
<v Speaker 1>for rages, It's going to go up more. That's just life.

0:18:58.080 --> 0:19:01.240
<v Speaker 2>I agree and I disagree. So, of course, one stock

0:19:01.320 --> 0:19:04.880
<v Speaker 2>market performs or stock performance on a twelve month basis

0:19:04.920 --> 0:19:07.000
<v Speaker 2>is a very strong performance, indeed, but it did a

0:19:07.000 --> 0:19:08.600
<v Speaker 2>lot more than that last year, right, So what's so

0:19:08.640 --> 0:19:11.600
<v Speaker 2>big about one hundred percent, Well, it's talking about sheer magnitude.

0:19:11.600 --> 0:19:13.520
<v Speaker 2>We're talking about a three and a half trillion dollar

0:19:14.040 --> 0:19:16.399
<v Speaker 2>it's going to double in size, three to three and

0:19:16.440 --> 0:19:19.800
<v Speaker 2>a half trillion dollar of market cap created. That's, you know,

0:19:19.840 --> 0:19:24.080
<v Speaker 2>for perspective, maybe slightly less than the entire UK stock

0:19:24.400 --> 0:19:27.240
<v Speaker 2>market is worth almost twice that the DAX forty is worth.

0:19:27.280 --> 0:19:29.960
<v Speaker 2>So it's we're talking big numbers here in short, and

0:19:30.000 --> 0:19:32.200
<v Speaker 2>you're talking about a company, as you pointed to, growing

0:19:32.240 --> 0:19:36.440
<v Speaker 2>at incredible rates, could become the most profitable company within

0:19:36.680 --> 0:19:40.560
<v Speaker 2>twelve months at least, to within fifteen months or eighteen

0:19:40.600 --> 0:19:44.160
<v Speaker 2>months doing that at incredible growth rates. Whereas you've taken

0:19:44.200 --> 0:19:47.959
<v Speaker 2>Apple's currently the most profitable company ever, it's grown ten

0:19:48.000 --> 0:19:50.680
<v Speaker 2>twelve percent over the last three years. And that means

0:19:50.680 --> 0:19:55.120
<v Speaker 2>not yearly, that means in total top line. So it's

0:19:55.200 --> 0:19:57.679
<v Speaker 2>just for perspective, yes it's a richly valid company, and

0:19:57.760 --> 0:19:59.760
<v Speaker 2>yes it requires that growth. What are the implications the

0:19:59.840 --> 0:20:01.840
<v Speaker 2>other side of it? And this is a small point

0:20:01.840 --> 0:20:03.600
<v Speaker 2>to this, and I think an important one though, is

0:20:03.640 --> 0:20:05.600
<v Speaker 2>that if in Vidia, and these are simply based on

0:20:05.640 --> 0:20:08.760
<v Speaker 2>projected earnings for the company going forward, if it is

0:20:08.800 --> 0:20:11.200
<v Speaker 2>to earn that much money and you get that much revenue.

0:20:11.280 --> 0:20:13.800
<v Speaker 2>Who is providing that revenue? This is the other mag

0:20:13.880 --> 0:20:16.960
<v Speaker 2>seven stocks largely, who are building these gigantic data centers.

0:20:17.240 --> 0:20:20.360
<v Speaker 2>So that becomes a headwind to their profitability because they're

0:20:20.359 --> 0:20:23.200
<v Speaker 2>having to make these huge investments that aren't yet paying

0:20:23.240 --> 0:20:25.439
<v Speaker 2>off in terms of the end uses of AI. So

0:20:25.440 --> 0:20:28.040
<v Speaker 2>we have this AI arms race to get these data

0:20:28.040 --> 0:20:31.440
<v Speaker 2>centers built to find these applications, but those applications aren't

0:20:31.520 --> 0:20:34.480
<v Speaker 2>aren't yet paying the dividends and therefore just a higher

0:20:34.480 --> 0:20:37.240
<v Speaker 2>cost structure for these are these you know, formerly and

0:20:37.280 --> 0:20:40.320
<v Speaker 2>still really very very very profitable companies.

0:20:40.680 --> 0:20:44.280
<v Speaker 1>Okay, so then back to the end game for this,

0:20:44.359 --> 0:20:47.280
<v Speaker 1>The potential market impact and video share is trade well

0:20:47.320 --> 0:20:50.320
<v Speaker 1>north of two hundred and fifty dollars, And then there

0:20:50.359 --> 0:20:53.159
<v Speaker 1>is a suggestion that later on the market and the

0:20:53.200 --> 0:20:55.240
<v Speaker 1>regulatory authority start to look at that and go, WHOA,

0:20:55.280 --> 0:20:57.080
<v Speaker 1>hang on, that's got to be quite some monopoly, and

0:20:57.119 --> 0:21:00.080
<v Speaker 1>then you get the scrutiny that might bring it to an.

0:21:00.359 --> 0:21:03.480
<v Speaker 2>As well as I think implicitly that these growth rates

0:21:03.520 --> 0:21:06.399
<v Speaker 2>can only be achieved for so long because the the

0:21:06.480 --> 0:21:08.720
<v Speaker 2>size becomes so enormous you're talking about sucking up the

0:21:08.720 --> 0:21:12.240
<v Speaker 2>profits of the entire economy at some point, right when

0:21:12.240 --> 0:21:14.320
<v Speaker 2>a company has gotten to this magnitude.

0:21:14.400 --> 0:21:16.720
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, but then you might get a wonderful moment, because

0:21:16.720 --> 0:21:19.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm assuming that pretty much all Americans by now in

0:21:19.160 --> 0:21:21.400
<v Speaker 1>a couple of video shares, you might get a moment

0:21:21.440 --> 0:21:24.720
<v Speaker 1>when you have an amazing wealth effect from these these

0:21:24.920 --> 0:21:28.160
<v Speaker 1>share price going quite that high. Great for American consumption,

0:21:28.480 --> 0:21:31.440
<v Speaker 1>Okay they are with their budget being slashed, their cheap energy,

0:21:31.800 --> 0:21:33.720
<v Speaker 1>there are are hundreds of thousands of dollars to eat

0:21:33.760 --> 0:21:34.800
<v Speaker 1>from their stake in video.

0:21:35.520 --> 0:21:37.600
<v Speaker 2>Oh they're cheaper dollar as well, so buys less than

0:21:37.600 --> 0:21:40.760
<v Speaker 2>the world stage. But to put a mention in the

0:21:40.840 --> 0:21:43.920
<v Speaker 2>document if I can, but yes, there is a wealth

0:21:43.920 --> 0:21:47.919
<v Speaker 2>of effect. But the wealth effect is less in inequities

0:21:47.960 --> 0:21:51.800
<v Speaker 2>and something like income paid out from bonds, for example,

0:21:51.840 --> 0:21:53.880
<v Speaker 2>le go straight into spending when you get your when

0:21:53.880 --> 0:21:56.040
<v Speaker 2>you get your coupons, whereas the wealth effect is much

0:21:56.040 --> 0:21:58.800
<v Speaker 2>more muted from your share portfolio going out.

0:21:58.800 --> 0:22:01.040
<v Speaker 1>But yes, there is a possible well, okay, and on

0:22:01.080 --> 0:22:03.320
<v Speaker 1>the other side, what would crash in the video. I mean,

0:22:03.520 --> 0:22:06.439
<v Speaker 1>to many people, it would be just as outrageous to

0:22:06.440 --> 0:22:08.320
<v Speaker 1>say in video is going to a bug.

0:22:08.560 --> 0:22:10.320
<v Speaker 2>I'm not so sure it's outrageous to say the video

0:22:10.359 --> 0:22:11.560
<v Speaker 2>is going to fall. It seems like there's a lot

0:22:11.560 --> 0:22:14.840
<v Speaker 2>of folks that recognize that the incredible ascent of this company,

0:22:14.880 --> 0:22:17.600
<v Speaker 2>and there are plenty of naysayers, Not so much that

0:22:17.680 --> 0:22:19.399
<v Speaker 2>it's not a good company here, doesn't have an amazing

0:22:19.440 --> 0:22:23.000
<v Speaker 2>AI platform, that the Blackwell chip is there's anything amiss

0:22:23.119 --> 0:22:25.439
<v Speaker 2>with it, but just that these growth rates are just

0:22:25.480 --> 0:22:28.719
<v Speaker 2>not possible extended too far out into time, and somebody

0:22:28.760 --> 0:22:31.840
<v Speaker 2>is right or they are right at some point. The

0:22:31.920 --> 0:22:34.880
<v Speaker 2>question is always one in investing, in especially trading, of

0:22:35.240 --> 0:22:37.399
<v Speaker 2>when when are you right? When does the growth curve

0:22:37.680 --> 0:22:41.399
<v Speaker 2>stop going exponential? When when do they have a bad miss,

0:22:41.440 --> 0:22:44.600
<v Speaker 2>for example, and suddenly you have to look forward to

0:22:44.640 --> 0:22:47.760
<v Speaker 2>a no growth next year in chips, or even a

0:22:47.760 --> 0:22:49.920
<v Speaker 2>ten percent fall versus what you've been used to two

0:22:49.960 --> 0:22:54.200
<v Speaker 2>hundred percent originally now one hundred percent growth in these sales.

0:22:54.840 --> 0:22:56.640
<v Speaker 2>You know you're on your basis, etcetera.

0:22:56.920 --> 0:22:58.879
<v Speaker 1>Realistically, that's more likely, isn't it?

0:22:59.000 --> 0:23:01.199
<v Speaker 2>Eventually? But again, time tim and.

0:23:01.240 --> 0:23:04.600
<v Speaker 1>Tim and timing. Okay, all right, China, China. No one's

0:23:04.640 --> 0:23:07.360
<v Speaker 1>been investing in China for ragies looks a little uninvestable.

0:23:07.880 --> 0:23:13.399
<v Speaker 1>Your summary here, having created, having created China's most epic

0:23:13.520 --> 0:23:16.720
<v Speaker 1>debt bubble, China boldly prints and prints and prints and

0:23:16.760 --> 0:23:18.439
<v Speaker 1>prints and prints to try and make it all. Okay,

0:23:18.640 --> 0:23:19.399
<v Speaker 1>I'm summarizing.

0:23:20.840 --> 0:23:24.399
<v Speaker 2>That's kind of a fair assessment of the of the

0:23:24.440 --> 0:23:26.880
<v Speaker 2>outrageous prediction. But I think our point here is one

0:23:27.760 --> 0:23:29.879
<v Speaker 2>it's not so much about the magnitude. Yes, if they

0:23:29.960 --> 0:23:34.160
<v Speaker 2>printed fifty trillion un in a reflationary move, this would

0:23:34.200 --> 0:23:36.960
<v Speaker 2>be larger than anything they've done before. That's about seven

0:23:37.119 --> 0:23:40.719
<v Speaker 2>trillion US dollars. By the way, for perspective, it's more

0:23:40.760 --> 0:23:44.080
<v Speaker 2>about China needs to move away from its from its

0:23:44.119 --> 0:23:47.520
<v Speaker 2>economic model that was based purely on fixed asset investment

0:23:47.960 --> 0:23:52.080
<v Speaker 2>and especially the real estate bubble and debacle and dealing

0:23:52.080 --> 0:23:53.760
<v Speaker 2>with all the debt that is linked to that, so

0:23:53.760 --> 0:23:56.840
<v Speaker 2>that they need to power through this balance sheet recession

0:23:56.840 --> 0:24:00.399
<v Speaker 2>which has echoes of in Japan's experience starting in the

0:24:00.480 --> 0:24:03.520
<v Speaker 2>late eighties. And it's about fiscal It's about getting money

0:24:03.560 --> 0:24:06.680
<v Speaker 2>into consumer's hand and rebalancing the economy more towards consumption.

0:24:07.160 --> 0:24:10.439
<v Speaker 2>Could they start to look at producing or creating a

0:24:10.440 --> 0:24:13.760
<v Speaker 2>better social safety net. They have a long term demographic

0:24:13.800 --> 0:24:16.239
<v Speaker 2>crisis that needs to be addressed. A social safety net

0:24:16.359 --> 0:24:18.680
<v Speaker 2>might go a long way to having more people feel

0:24:18.760 --> 0:24:21.600
<v Speaker 2>comfortable about starting families. It's getting married, et cetera. These

0:24:21.600 --> 0:24:24.080
<v Speaker 2>are long term social issues that China may look at.

0:24:24.240 --> 0:24:26.720
<v Speaker 2>It's kind of linking to a change of behavior and

0:24:27.080 --> 0:24:30.040
<v Speaker 2>something a new China relative to just the size true

0:24:30.119 --> 0:24:31.040
<v Speaker 2>size of the stimulus.

0:24:31.080 --> 0:24:33.840
<v Speaker 1>And again this is something that's been discussed for ye yeah,

0:24:33.920 --> 0:24:36.199
<v Speaker 1>very long. How can China do this? How can they

0:24:36.240 --> 0:24:39.120
<v Speaker 1>move towards a more consumption orientated economy, how can they

0:24:39.359 --> 0:24:42.320
<v Speaker 1>make people spend them? There's one rather lovely idea in this,

0:24:42.600 --> 0:24:45.639
<v Speaker 1>a proper kind of people's people's q E, whereby you

0:24:45.720 --> 0:24:48.560
<v Speaker 1>use a digital currency to put money directly into people' accounts.

0:24:48.640 --> 0:24:50.320
<v Speaker 2>And they have the technology to do that, and they've

0:24:50.359 --> 0:24:53.400
<v Speaker 2>experimented with it, but they're most likely being held back

0:24:53.480 --> 0:24:56.960
<v Speaker 2>by my concerns about inflation, and so there has to

0:24:57.040 --> 0:25:00.040
<v Speaker 2>be of course some balance and the size of the and

0:25:00.119 --> 0:25:03.040
<v Speaker 2>most relative to the type of inflation it would cause

0:25:03.040 --> 0:25:03.880
<v Speaker 2>and risks from them.

0:25:03.960 --> 0:25:05.760
<v Speaker 1>And if you have the technology to do that, to

0:25:05.760 --> 0:25:09.040
<v Speaker 1>put money directly into people's pockets via or digital currency,

0:25:09.040 --> 0:25:10.679
<v Speaker 1>presumably you also have the pad to take it right

0:25:10.720 --> 0:25:13.840
<v Speaker 1>out again under for example, a social credit system or

0:25:13.840 --> 0:25:14.440
<v Speaker 1>anything like that.

0:25:14.640 --> 0:25:16.680
<v Speaker 2>Or yeah, or to turn it off. You started and

0:25:16.720 --> 0:25:18.919
<v Speaker 2>then you turn it off if if it's uh, you know,

0:25:19.160 --> 0:25:22.040
<v Speaker 2>causing problems. And we saw this, I mean the curate.

0:25:22.359 --> 0:25:25.159
<v Speaker 2>The clever thing about the digital approach is you know

0:25:25.240 --> 0:25:28.439
<v Speaker 2>exactly who's who's going to. Was in the case of

0:25:28.520 --> 0:25:33.119
<v Speaker 2>the pandemic response, it was just showering endless amounts everywhere

0:25:33.200 --> 0:25:36.280
<v Speaker 2>because you didn't know exactly how what the transmission or

0:25:36.280 --> 0:25:37.720
<v Speaker 2>how good the transmission would be, and there was a

0:25:37.720 --> 0:25:39.840
<v Speaker 2>lot of fraud involved in the US case and the

0:25:40.440 --> 0:25:43.040
<v Speaker 2>trail of course, a big brother et cetera. Your concerns

0:25:43.040 --> 0:25:46.600
<v Speaker 2>about that, But at least you know more precisely who

0:25:46.640 --> 0:25:49.120
<v Speaker 2>it is going to and then the transmission mechanism.

0:25:49.280 --> 0:25:52.280
<v Speaker 1>Okay, and the market impact here that would be good.

0:25:52.200 --> 0:25:53.960
<v Speaker 2>Right, well, it should be good. It should be good

0:25:53.960 --> 0:25:56.640
<v Speaker 2>for global growth, for global nominal growth. It should also

0:25:56.720 --> 0:26:02.040
<v Speaker 2>mean higher global inflation. China would be competing for goods

0:26:02.080 --> 0:26:04.680
<v Speaker 2>relative to the rest of the world. Yeah, there's a

0:26:04.880 --> 0:26:07.919
<v Speaker 2>but more just a transformation of China's economic model has

0:26:08.160 --> 0:26:11.360
<v Speaker 2>huge consequences and becomes a big end market for consumption

0:26:12.400 --> 0:26:15.320
<v Speaker 2>which we saw at times for key companies, the German

0:26:15.359 --> 0:26:19.360
<v Speaker 2>auto manufacturers for example, other companies as well, they were

0:26:19.359 --> 0:26:21.640
<v Speaker 2>selling into China. Some of those are now pulling out.

0:26:21.920 --> 0:26:24.240
<v Speaker 2>But can this process be stopped and turned around? I

0:26:24.280 --> 0:26:26.960
<v Speaker 2>don't know, but somebody would need to satisfy that demand

0:26:26.960 --> 0:26:28.480
<v Speaker 2>obviously if if it was created.

0:26:28.600 --> 0:26:31.240
<v Speaker 1>So now we have this sort of rather marvelous situation

0:26:31.359 --> 0:26:35.800
<v Speaker 1>whereby manufacturing is reshored to America, the Americans make up

0:26:35.840 --> 0:26:37.920
<v Speaker 1>out of stuff'll sell it back to the Chinese.

0:26:37.960 --> 0:26:41.040
<v Speaker 2>There you go, Let's see if you can. Let's see

0:26:41.040 --> 0:26:41.480
<v Speaker 2>if it can.

0:26:41.400 --> 0:26:45.520
<v Speaker 1>Happen exactly exactly what President Trump wants.

0:26:45.760 --> 0:26:47.399
<v Speaker 2>Exactly what he wants. But will he get it or

0:26:47.480 --> 0:26:50.800
<v Speaker 2>are we headed for towards more some kind of disentangable

0:26:50.840 --> 0:26:54.600
<v Speaker 2>disengagement divorce of of chi America as some call it.

0:26:54.600 --> 0:26:57.520
<v Speaker 2>It's a huge existential question for how how the global

0:26:57.560 --> 0:27:00.399
<v Speaker 2>economy works in coming years, and we try to kind

0:27:00.440 --> 0:27:02.160
<v Speaker 2>of touch on that in this publication with a couple

0:27:02.160 --> 0:27:02.920
<v Speaker 2>of these predictions.

0:27:03.080 --> 0:27:05.480
<v Speaker 1>Okay, I want to cover one last one, which is

0:27:05.520 --> 0:27:08.639
<v Speaker 1>my favorite, about your favorite? This is my favorite. I

0:27:08.760 --> 0:27:14.000
<v Speaker 1>hovered here between the artificial heart and and and the pound,

0:27:14.080 --> 0:27:15.240
<v Speaker 1>but I've settled on the pound.

0:27:15.320 --> 0:27:15.919
<v Speaker 2>Okay, okay.

0:27:16.320 --> 0:27:20.320
<v Speaker 1>As Europe's economy struggles, fresh fiscal policy winds are blowing

0:27:20.320 --> 0:27:24.000
<v Speaker 1>in the UK, driving sterling dactor levels versus the Euro

0:27:24.160 --> 0:27:28.280
<v Speaker 1>not seen since before Brexit. The UK outlook is as

0:27:28.320 --> 0:27:31.440
<v Speaker 1>constructive as ever in the post Brexit era. That sounds

0:27:31.480 --> 0:27:33.679
<v Speaker 1>like a very sort of down with faint praise.

0:27:35.840 --> 0:27:38.200
<v Speaker 2>I didn't want to be too effusive in my praise

0:27:38.200 --> 0:27:40.360
<v Speaker 2>that there are you have this new budget, for example,

0:27:40.400 --> 0:27:43.320
<v Speaker 2>from from the Labor government sort of takes takes things

0:27:43.320 --> 0:27:47.480
<v Speaker 2>in the right direction, right and inverted commace because it's

0:27:47.520 --> 0:27:51.439
<v Speaker 2>focusing a bit less on things like subsidizing consumption, so

0:27:51.520 --> 0:27:54.320
<v Speaker 2>things like the winter fuel. We could talk about inequality

0:27:54.400 --> 0:27:56.920
<v Speaker 2>and issues with folks to having the ability to pay

0:27:56.960 --> 0:27:59.359
<v Speaker 2>for their heating bills, but it's not productive and it

0:27:59.400 --> 0:28:04.040
<v Speaker 2>pure economic sense relative to encouraging investment in particular and

0:28:04.080 --> 0:28:07.199
<v Speaker 2>then raising the incomes of public sector workers. So that

0:28:07.280 --> 0:28:10.640
<v Speaker 2>keeps the nominal economy humming along to a degree, which

0:28:10.720 --> 0:28:12.720
<v Speaker 2>will help on the revenue side down the road. It

0:28:12.720 --> 0:28:15.159
<v Speaker 2>also helps on the Bank of England not having to

0:28:15.400 --> 0:28:18.199
<v Speaker 2>or being able to cut rates as much, so it

0:28:18.240 --> 0:28:20.000
<v Speaker 2>just keeps the UK economy humming along.

0:28:20.280 --> 0:28:22.159
<v Speaker 1>It was a terrible budget for business. I don't know

0:28:22.280 --> 0:28:25.120
<v Speaker 1>to interrupt your optimism there, but you know you can't.

0:28:24.880 --> 0:28:27.159
<v Speaker 2>Talk business optimism.

0:28:27.200 --> 0:28:29.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm trying to, you know, desperately trying to find a

0:28:29.480 --> 0:28:31.600
<v Speaker 1>way to cut costs and cutting staff. And there's a

0:28:31.640 --> 0:28:35.200
<v Speaker 1>horrible realization that maybe enough modeling wasn't done on cutting

0:28:35.200 --> 0:28:38.400
<v Speaker 1>the threshold for employers and I that may have very

0:28:38.480 --> 0:28:41.280
<v Speaker 1>very unpleasant consequences. So I'm going to go with you

0:28:41.320 --> 0:28:42.000
<v Speaker 1>on the optimism.

0:28:42.320 --> 0:28:47.280
<v Speaker 2>But an equal degree to an equal degree on this

0:28:47.360 --> 0:28:51.520
<v Speaker 2>prediction was the negativity around Europe, and we see that

0:28:51.600 --> 0:28:53.600
<v Speaker 2>right now and then the headlines constantly. And when we

0:28:53.600 --> 0:28:56.400
<v Speaker 2>wrote these predictions, we didn't know that Germany's government was

0:28:56.440 --> 0:28:59.360
<v Speaker 2>going to fail. That happened shortly afterward, and we are

0:28:59.360 --> 0:29:01.360
<v Speaker 2>going to have new actions in February. And we do

0:29:01.400 --> 0:29:04.640
<v Speaker 2>see the opposition making very different noises on fiscal in

0:29:04.640 --> 0:29:07.640
<v Speaker 2>a very cautious German kind of way, talking about ways

0:29:07.640 --> 0:29:10.680
<v Speaker 2>that they can look to avoid the imposition of the

0:29:10.720 --> 0:29:14.280
<v Speaker 2>debt break or schuldin bompsen to stop the ability to

0:29:14.320 --> 0:29:16.479
<v Speaker 2>expand fiscal which is desperately needed in Germany, which has

0:29:16.480 --> 0:29:20.200
<v Speaker 2>had its model, its economic model disrupted by the end

0:29:20.240 --> 0:29:24.520
<v Speaker 2>of cheap Russian energy inputs and now China become a

0:29:24.560 --> 0:29:27.800
<v Speaker 2>global competitor for some of its key traditional exports. So

0:29:28.000 --> 0:29:30.640
<v Speaker 2>that in there's France where we can see the political

0:29:30.680 --> 0:29:35.640
<v Speaker 2>dysfunction there, the Barnier austerity, the terrible budget that would

0:29:35.640 --> 0:29:38.320
<v Speaker 2>have really just killed the French economy. What looks like

0:29:38.320 --> 0:29:41.239
<v Speaker 2>it will be avoided because Lipen wants to take down

0:29:41.320 --> 0:29:45.160
<v Speaker 2>that government. But some big problems in questions at the

0:29:45.200 --> 0:29:47.640
<v Speaker 2>heart of Europe, right, equally dragging on the Europe as

0:29:47.720 --> 0:29:51.640
<v Speaker 2>much as we're sort of lukewarm slightly positive on the pound.

0:29:51.880 --> 0:29:54.320
<v Speaker 2>And it's also again it's this sort of you know,

0:29:54.680 --> 0:29:57.080
<v Speaker 2>pushing back a little bit with the outrageous prediction against

0:29:57.080 --> 0:29:59.880
<v Speaker 2>the quote unquote common knowledge that breaks it as only

0:30:00.120 --> 0:30:02.000
<v Speaker 2>a disaster and was only going to ever be negative

0:30:02.040 --> 0:30:03.720
<v Speaker 2>for the post.

0:30:04.680 --> 0:30:08.840
<v Speaker 1>I don't hear that here, right, And the result here

0:30:09.160 --> 0:30:13.120
<v Speaker 1>encouraging domestic investment and a more robust growth outlook supports

0:30:13.120 --> 0:30:15.760
<v Speaker 1>seiling vessels, the flailing euro seeing the euro steling rate

0:30:15.800 --> 0:30:18.400
<v Speaker 1>fall as low as zero point seventy five, below the

0:30:18.480 --> 0:30:21.560
<v Speaker 1>rate of the day before the Brexit vote. As a result,

0:30:21.600 --> 0:30:24.760
<v Speaker 1>the UK foot seat one hundred posts a strong performance.

0:30:25.320 --> 0:30:27.680
<v Speaker 1>So that's great. Here we've got we've got a stronger

0:30:27.720 --> 0:30:30.360
<v Speaker 1>economy than Europe. Who can argue with that? A rising

0:30:30.400 --> 0:30:33.200
<v Speaker 1>stock market, a strong pound. We're all going on holiday,

0:30:33.200 --> 0:30:33.560
<v Speaker 1>aren't we.

0:30:33.680 --> 0:30:34.440
<v Speaker 2>That sounds great?

0:30:34.640 --> 0:30:38.040
<v Speaker 1>It does sound great of all of these. Of all

0:30:38.120 --> 0:30:40.040
<v Speaker 1>of these, I know you've got your favorite, the US dollar.

0:30:40.240 --> 0:30:41.840
<v Speaker 1>But if you and I know they're all supposed to

0:30:41.880 --> 0:30:44.800
<v Speaker 1>be outrageous, which do you think is most likely if

0:30:44.800 --> 0:30:46.640
<v Speaker 1>you had to hang your hat on one of them

0:30:46.800 --> 0:30:47.520
<v Speaker 1>for next year?

0:30:47.840 --> 0:30:49.600
<v Speaker 2>I still I would actually still go with my favorite,

0:30:49.600 --> 0:30:52.080
<v Speaker 2>which is, yes, Trump blows up the US dollar.

0:30:52.480 --> 0:30:56.560
<v Speaker 1>Okay, but it's still it's still not the most likely scenarios.

0:30:56.640 --> 0:30:59.440
<v Speaker 1>So what do you think will actually happen next year?

0:31:00.000 --> 0:31:02.280
<v Speaker 2>I think we could see a stronger dollar for a while.

0:31:02.680 --> 0:31:04.760
<v Speaker 2>The list of factors that could drive the dollar weaker

0:31:05.120 --> 0:31:07.200
<v Speaker 2>are slower to come in then than would be in

0:31:07.240 --> 0:31:10.680
<v Speaker 2>the timeline of the twenty twenty five prediction, and that

0:31:10.760 --> 0:31:13.600
<v Speaker 2>the dollar actually stays volatile but relatively strong. It would

0:31:13.600 --> 0:31:16.400
<v Speaker 2>be a forecast that I would if I was asked

0:31:16.560 --> 0:31:18.960
<v Speaker 2>to pen my forecast, that would be it for the

0:31:19.000 --> 0:31:21.520
<v Speaker 2>coming year. But it will depend on so many things

0:31:21.520 --> 0:31:24.120
<v Speaker 2>that and I think the cone of uncertainty is particularly

0:31:24.160 --> 0:31:27.880
<v Speaker 2>wide because you have a Trump two point zero, you

0:31:27.960 --> 0:31:31.040
<v Speaker 2>have forceful policy measures relative too, if you did not

0:31:31.080 --> 0:31:33.040
<v Speaker 2>have Trump two point oh coming into office with both

0:31:33.080 --> 0:31:35.800
<v Speaker 2>Houses of Congress, if very narrowly so in the case

0:31:35.840 --> 0:31:39.800
<v Speaker 2>of the House. And the uncertainties around how China responds,

0:31:39.840 --> 0:31:43.080
<v Speaker 2>how you respond, what's going to happen in Ukraine, Russia

0:31:43.560 --> 0:31:45.600
<v Speaker 2>or all these all these factors, they are a heck

0:31:45.600 --> 0:31:47.760
<v Speaker 2>a lot of uncertainties in this world as we head

0:31:47.800 --> 0:31:50.720
<v Speaker 2>into twenty twenty five. So I almost can't imagine anything,

0:31:50.720 --> 0:31:54.479
<v Speaker 2>but it becomes an out rather outrageous year probably in

0:31:54.480 --> 0:31:57.280
<v Speaker 2>many ways that are absolutely not at all on our

0:31:57.320 --> 0:31:58.800
<v Speaker 2>map and in our set of predictions.

0:31:58.920 --> 0:32:00.640
<v Speaker 1>Are you cooking up on go? And bitcoin?

0:32:00.840 --> 0:32:03.720
<v Speaker 2>Gold is just a nice to have a portion of

0:32:03.760 --> 0:32:08.040
<v Speaker 2>your portfolio for retention of value. It's not a it's

0:32:08.040 --> 0:32:10.200
<v Speaker 2>not a speculative asset that one should expect to go

0:32:10.280 --> 0:32:12.840
<v Speaker 2>up by leaps and bounds. If you're expecting oil, sorry

0:32:12.880 --> 0:32:15.479
<v Speaker 2>oil gold to go up by leaps and bounds, I

0:32:15.520 --> 0:32:17.160
<v Speaker 2>really don't want to see what's to happening to the

0:32:17.160 --> 0:32:19.120
<v Speaker 2>world at that point in time. And when I say

0:32:19.160 --> 0:32:21.440
<v Speaker 2>leaps and bounds, I'm talking about multiples. Yes, then you're

0:32:21.440 --> 0:32:24.120
<v Speaker 2>talking about some kind of hyperinflationary scenario which is really

0:32:24.960 --> 0:32:27.200
<v Speaker 2>sort of beyond the pale. Even with outragious, I would

0:32:27.240 --> 0:32:28.440
<v Speaker 2>say to expect that.

0:32:28.680 --> 0:32:31.200
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and bitcoin slightly feels that in video is going

0:32:31.240 --> 0:32:32.480
<v Speaker 1>to the moon. Social Bitcoin.

0:32:33.120 --> 0:32:35.920
<v Speaker 2>We don't really do forecasts on bitcoin. We try to

0:32:36.000 --> 0:32:38.400
<v Speaker 2>keep it very generic in that space just as a

0:32:39.080 --> 0:32:39.600
<v Speaker 2>as a rule.

0:32:39.800 --> 0:32:42.320
<v Speaker 1>You really don't want to hate mail, do you. I'll

0:32:42.400 --> 0:32:44.880
<v Speaker 1>leave it to you to thank you. John, Thank you

0:32:44.920 --> 0:32:46.840
<v Speaker 1>so much for joining us day in our London studio,

0:32:46.920 --> 0:32:47.760
<v Speaker 1>but appreciate it.

0:32:48.280 --> 0:32:49.640
<v Speaker 2>It's been my pleasure. Thanks so much.

0:32:55.160 --> 0:32:57.120
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for listening to this week's Mare and Dogs Money.

0:32:57.320 --> 0:32:59.840
<v Speaker 1>If you like our show, rate review and subscribe wherever

0:32:59.880 --> 0:33:02.240
<v Speaker 1>you listen to your podcasts and keep sending questions or

0:33:02.280 --> 0:33:05.360
<v Speaker 1>comments to Merin Money at Bloomberg dot net. You can

0:33:05.400 --> 0:33:07.840
<v Speaker 1>also follow me and John on Twitter or x. I'm

0:33:07.880 --> 0:33:11.560
<v Speaker 1>at marinas w and John is John Underscorestepic. This episode

0:33:11.640 --> 0:33:15.080
<v Speaker 1>was hosted by Me Marenzumset Web was produced by Summersadi,

0:33:15.240 --> 0:33:18.800
<v Speaker 1>production and support by Moses and special thanks to John Hardi.

0:33:18.880 --> 0:33:22.840
<v Speaker 1>Thanks John. Want to listen to episodes of Marrindalks Money

0:33:22.840 --> 0:33:25.760
<v Speaker 1>ad free become a Bloomberg dot com subscriber today check

0:33:25.800 --> 0:33:28.640
<v Speaker 1>out our special infro offer right now at Bloomberg dot

0:33:28.640 --> 0:33:30.880
<v Speaker 1>com for with Slash Podcast offer or click on the

0:33:30.880 --> 0:33:34.000
<v Speaker 1>link in the show notes. You'll also unlock deep reporting

0:33:34.120 --> 0:33:38.160
<v Speaker 1>data and analysis from reporters around the world. If you're

0:33:38.160 --> 0:33:40.719
<v Speaker 1>already at Bloomberg dot com subscriber, connect your account within

0:33:40.800 --> 0:33:43.680
<v Speaker 1>Apple Podcast to listen to this episode ad free