WEBVTT - A Look At Crypto Regulation And The Markets 

0:00:00.800 --> 0:00:04.000
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Markets Podcast. I'm Paul Sweeney, alongside

0:00:04.040 --> 0:00:06.920
<v Speaker 1>my co host Matt Miller. Every business day, we bring

0:00:06.960 --> 0:00:11.520
<v Speaker 1>you interviews from CEOs, market pros, and Bloomberg experts, along

0:00:11.560 --> 0:00:15.600
<v Speaker 1>with essential market moving news. Find the Bloomberg Markets Podcast

0:00:15.600 --> 0:00:18.479
<v Speaker 1>on Apple Podcasts or wherever you listen to podcasts, and

0:00:18.480 --> 0:00:23.000
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg dot com slash podcast. Now, let's get to crypto.

0:00:23.160 --> 0:00:26.240
<v Speaker 1>I've been waiting. Marco Santor joins us. He's the chief

0:00:26.480 --> 0:00:32.159
<v Speaker 1>legal officer at Kraken and Marco. It's interesting, you know, um,

0:00:32.200 --> 0:00:37.360
<v Speaker 1>a lot of bears, Jamie Diamond among them, are you know,

0:00:37.479 --> 0:00:39.680
<v Speaker 1>continually ensuring the market. Hey, you know what, the US

0:00:39.760 --> 0:00:43.760
<v Speaker 1>Government's gonna regulate this space, and it seems like the

0:00:43.840 --> 0:00:47.080
<v Speaker 1>more it gets regulated, the higher the price climbs. Anyway,

0:00:47.200 --> 0:00:50.240
<v Speaker 1>is it really a bad thing if crypto is regulated?

0:00:52.120 --> 0:00:55.360
<v Speaker 1>That's a that's a terrific question, and really like the

0:00:55.440 --> 0:00:59.400
<v Speaker 1>perfect lens to view crypto regulation as it relates to

0:00:59.440 --> 0:01:03.880
<v Speaker 1>the price. Listen, the price of crypto. Are the price

0:01:03.880 --> 0:01:05.880
<v Speaker 1>of crypto is going to go up. It's just gonna

0:01:05.920 --> 0:01:07.640
<v Speaker 1>go up, and it's gonna go up and sometimes it's

0:01:07.640 --> 0:01:10.880
<v Speaker 1>gonna go down. But By and large, the reason why

0:01:10.920 --> 0:01:13.720
<v Speaker 1>the price of crypto keeps going up is not because

0:01:13.720 --> 0:01:17.679
<v Speaker 1>of a speculative frenzy. It's not because governments have been

0:01:17.760 --> 0:01:21.480
<v Speaker 1>laying off and once they do really crack down, it's

0:01:21.520 --> 0:01:23.560
<v Speaker 1>going to get destroyed. The bottom is going to fall out.

0:01:23.560 --> 0:01:26.120
<v Speaker 1>That is completely the wrong ones to view it. The

0:01:26.280 --> 0:01:27.920
<v Speaker 1>right lens to view it is that this is a

0:01:27.959 --> 0:01:34.720
<v Speaker 1>technological transformation, technological revolution, and unlike other technological revolution, this

0:01:34.760 --> 0:01:38.400
<v Speaker 1>one has a price picker. That's the that's the that's

0:01:38.440 --> 0:01:40.679
<v Speaker 1>the bottom line is that if you could, if you

0:01:40.680 --> 0:01:43.760
<v Speaker 1>could invest in the in the very early days of

0:01:43.920 --> 0:01:49.320
<v Speaker 1>arpa net right, the progenitor to the Internet. Gosh, I mean,

0:01:49.640 --> 0:01:51.800
<v Speaker 1>of course you would have done that. You know. The

0:01:51.840 --> 0:01:54.800
<v Speaker 1>early is that the Internet had websites, right, you can

0:01:54.840 --> 0:01:58.160
<v Speaker 1>buy and sell websites, but it was a highly inefficient market.

0:01:58.200 --> 0:02:03.080
<v Speaker 1>It happened very slowly, it was largely insecure. The difference

0:02:03.120 --> 0:02:06.360
<v Speaker 1>between what happened then and what's happening now is not

0:02:06.520 --> 0:02:10.880
<v Speaker 1>that crmino is any lesson the Internet. Actually it will be,

0:02:11.080 --> 0:02:14.880
<v Speaker 1>and it will be significantly more. I think it's going

0:02:14.919 --> 0:02:18.800
<v Speaker 1>to change every aspect of our financial lives. But the

0:02:18.840 --> 0:02:22.720
<v Speaker 1>difference is that well, this time, there there's there's there's

0:02:22.880 --> 0:02:26.959
<v Speaker 1>there's financial opportunity all tied up in it for everyday

0:02:26.960 --> 0:02:32.160
<v Speaker 1>people because these tokens, many of them work like functional goods. Um.

0:02:32.280 --> 0:02:36.560
<v Speaker 1>And that's that's a that is not only a generational opportunity.

0:02:36.600 --> 0:02:39.840
<v Speaker 1>I think it's a historical opportunity. So look, I wouldn't

0:02:39.840 --> 0:02:42.200
<v Speaker 1>say jump in and by a bunch of crypto because

0:02:42.240 --> 0:02:43.920
<v Speaker 1>you think that because you think the price is going

0:02:43.960 --> 0:02:46.239
<v Speaker 1>to go up. That's that's the wrong lens to view

0:02:46.240 --> 0:02:49.000
<v Speaker 1>it through. You have to view this through. What's really happening.

0:02:49.440 --> 0:02:53.480
<v Speaker 1>This this ground swell opportunity. Uh In in terms of

0:02:53.639 --> 0:02:57.840
<v Speaker 1>technological innovation, Marco, there's a new sheriff on Wall Street,

0:02:57.840 --> 0:03:01.080
<v Speaker 1>if you will, in SEC chair Gary Gensler. What do

0:03:01.240 --> 0:03:03.200
<v Speaker 1>you know about him? What do you know about his

0:03:03.360 --> 0:03:09.720
<v Speaker 1>views on crypto? Gary Densler understands, So I think better

0:03:09.760 --> 0:03:13.360
<v Speaker 1>than better than most people. Um. You know, we we

0:03:13.360 --> 0:03:16.920
<v Speaker 1>we keep open lines of communication with regulators even if

0:03:16.919 --> 0:03:20.000
<v Speaker 1>they are in our primary functional regulator. The SEC is

0:03:20.040 --> 0:03:23.720
<v Speaker 1>not our primary functional regulator. They are not the primary

0:03:23.760 --> 0:03:29.240
<v Speaker 1>functional regulator of any crypto exchanges in the US, UH

0:03:29.360 --> 0:03:32.480
<v Speaker 1>that I'm aware of. But look, I mean, you don't

0:03:32.720 --> 0:03:35.640
<v Speaker 1>need a microscope to to figure out that that they

0:03:35.680 --> 0:03:39.200
<v Speaker 1>probably want to be. Gensler has said on a number

0:03:39.200 --> 0:03:44.360
<v Speaker 1>of occasions that he believes that the protections required uh

0:03:44.520 --> 0:03:48.880
<v Speaker 1>for users of crypto exchanges are investor protections, not just

0:03:49.000 --> 0:03:53.400
<v Speaker 1>consumer protections. And that would mean a real shift from

0:03:53.920 --> 0:03:57.480
<v Speaker 1>the kinds of regulation that applies to crypto exchanges today,

0:03:57.960 --> 0:04:01.160
<v Speaker 1>which is primarily money transmit a regulation or the kind

0:04:01.160 --> 0:04:03.200
<v Speaker 1>of regulation that that that you get when you walk

0:04:03.240 --> 0:04:06.680
<v Speaker 1>into a MoneyGram or a Western unions that he thinks

0:04:06.680 --> 0:04:11.320
<v Speaker 1>it ought to be something different, something more investor protection regulation.

0:04:11.760 --> 0:04:15.480
<v Speaker 1>So all of the investor protector regulations that you talk

0:04:15.560 --> 0:04:17.680
<v Speaker 1>about on this show every day, the kind of regulation

0:04:17.720 --> 0:04:25.000
<v Speaker 1>that applies to broker dealers, um, national securities exchanges, investment advisors,

0:04:25.040 --> 0:04:28.320
<v Speaker 1>that that sort of thing. So UM, I think that's

0:04:28.360 --> 0:04:31.719
<v Speaker 1>that's where we're headed. Uh. It's not really a legal

0:04:31.760 --> 0:04:34.520
<v Speaker 1>discussion yet, it's or at least it shouldn't be. It's

0:04:34.960 --> 0:04:38.800
<v Speaker 1>it's a policy discussion, the question of what kinds of

0:04:38.839 --> 0:04:45.320
<v Speaker 1>regulation to apply to crypto companies, exchanges, custodians, that sort

0:04:45.320 --> 0:04:48.040
<v Speaker 1>of thing. And I don't think it's so easy as

0:04:48.279 --> 0:04:50.000
<v Speaker 1>as to look at it and say, well it looks,

0:04:50.040 --> 0:04:52.080
<v Speaker 1>it walks like a duck, it class like a duck.

0:04:52.120 --> 0:04:54.880
<v Speaker 1>It's got steads. So let's call all these things broker

0:04:54.920 --> 0:04:57.080
<v Speaker 1>dealers and call it a day. I think that would

0:04:57.120 --> 0:05:00.359
<v Speaker 1>be throwing the baby out with bath. Moderate in a

0:05:00.480 --> 0:05:04.760
<v Speaker 1>opportunity to establish a regulatory regime that really works for

0:05:04.800 --> 0:05:08.160
<v Speaker 1>crypto uses. I wonder what it's like as a lawyer

0:05:08.200 --> 0:05:13.479
<v Speaker 1>to deal with. UM. You know, an asset that doesn't

0:05:13.680 --> 0:05:18.480
<v Speaker 1>have you can't touch, it doesn't exist other than as

0:05:18.520 --> 0:05:22.360
<v Speaker 1>a line of code, and it doesn't have any um

0:05:22.960 --> 0:05:27.760
<v Speaker 1>intrinsic value or purpose other than to be you know,

0:05:28.720 --> 0:05:31.800
<v Speaker 1>worth money. Is it different than other kinds of I

0:05:31.960 --> 0:05:34.760
<v Speaker 1>P or do you just lump it all in the

0:05:34.800 --> 0:05:40.440
<v Speaker 1>same kind of baskin. It's absolutely different. It's absolutely different.

0:05:40.800 --> 0:05:42.960
<v Speaker 1>And I can tell you, as a lawyer who's practiced

0:05:43.000 --> 0:05:47.960
<v Speaker 1>in this space since late that makes me aged agent

0:05:48.440 --> 0:05:52.000
<v Speaker 1>in this industry. UM, let me let me tell you

0:05:52.200 --> 0:05:55.560
<v Speaker 1>it is. It is. It is the most fantastic opportunity

0:05:55.680 --> 0:06:02.080
<v Speaker 1>to investigate, to reinvestigate first principles of good regulation, to

0:06:02.160 --> 0:06:06.320
<v Speaker 1>reinvestigate how, how how these laws were originally crafted to

0:06:06.360 --> 0:06:10.359
<v Speaker 1>protect people. UM, and I gotta tell you it is

0:06:10.400 --> 0:06:14.040
<v Speaker 1>a It is a terrific opportunity to to question why

0:06:14.120 --> 0:06:17.280
<v Speaker 1>we have disclosure regimes, for example, just the most fundamental

0:06:17.360 --> 0:06:20.680
<v Speaker 1>questions about how we how we protect people and how

0:06:20.720 --> 0:06:23.960
<v Speaker 1>we protect investors. You know, today we have these disclosure

0:06:24.000 --> 0:06:28.440
<v Speaker 1>regimes that require companies who are issuers to tell all

0:06:28.480 --> 0:06:30.560
<v Speaker 1>the public about what the company is doing so that

0:06:30.640 --> 0:06:34.120
<v Speaker 1>people aren't caught off guard by by things that could

0:06:34.480 --> 0:06:39.880
<v Speaker 1>affect their financial future. Do we need that for crypto? Well,

0:06:40.600 --> 0:06:43.919
<v Speaker 1>we need something like it maybe, But I mean, you

0:06:44.040 --> 0:06:48.080
<v Speaker 1>can't ask a digital you can't ask a computer protocol

0:06:48.560 --> 0:06:52.160
<v Speaker 1>to publish a phase, right, Like that's never going to

0:06:52.279 --> 0:06:54.599
<v Speaker 1>happen for a bitcoint and it would be folly for

0:06:54.680 --> 0:06:58.520
<v Speaker 1>government to require it for some companies though, or for

0:06:58.520 --> 0:07:02.000
<v Speaker 1>for some protocols are actually our companies behind them and

0:07:02.080 --> 0:07:05.440
<v Speaker 1>for them, Well, I think we to start what what

0:07:05.560 --> 0:07:08.440
<v Speaker 1>a new disclosure regime looks like? What it really awful?

0:07:10.000 --> 0:07:13.200
<v Speaker 1>All right? Thanks so much for joining us. Really interesting stuff,

0:07:13.240 --> 0:07:20.360
<v Speaker 1>Marco Sentori there from Kraken. Let's get a sense here

0:07:20.440 --> 0:07:24.560
<v Speaker 1>on this market. We talk about the wall of worry,

0:07:24.720 --> 0:07:27.360
<v Speaker 1>if you will, and there are many bricks in that

0:07:27.440 --> 0:07:30.720
<v Speaker 1>wall of worry. Um, let's get a sense. And people

0:07:30.720 --> 0:07:33.040
<v Speaker 1>are asking themselves. Boys, the next ten percent move gonna

0:07:33.040 --> 0:07:35.680
<v Speaker 1>be up or down. I think the camps are. It

0:07:35.720 --> 0:07:40.480
<v Speaker 1>feels like it's fairly evenly dispersed their Jeff Camarta, Chairman,

0:07:40.560 --> 0:07:43.640
<v Speaker 1>CEO and portfolio board chair of the Camarda Wealth Advisory Group,

0:07:43.880 --> 0:07:46.720
<v Speaker 1>is also author of the Financial Storm Warning for investors,

0:07:46.720 --> 0:07:49.880
<v Speaker 1>How to Prepare and Protect your wealth from taxis and

0:07:49.960 --> 0:07:54.280
<v Speaker 1>market crashes. Jeff, are you concerned about a significant pullback

0:07:54.480 --> 0:07:57.920
<v Speaker 1>in this market? I think it's just inevitable. I mean,

0:07:57.960 --> 0:08:00.520
<v Speaker 1>the market has been soaring, really floated up into space

0:08:00.560 --> 0:08:03.800
<v Speaker 1>as the world burns since COVID. COVID presented in early

0:08:04.960 --> 0:08:07.200
<v Speaker 1>So whether this is the beginning of it or both

0:08:07.240 --> 0:08:09.840
<v Speaker 1>continuing bill trend for a bit longer, I'm not sure,

0:08:09.960 --> 0:08:12.440
<v Speaker 1>but I think sooner or later we're in for quite

0:08:12.480 --> 0:08:16.560
<v Speaker 1>a shock. So how do you especially tax hikes, I'm

0:08:16.600 --> 0:08:20.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm wondering, how do you protect your wealth from tax hikes?

0:08:20.520 --> 0:08:24.000
<v Speaker 1>There's a lot of it regional. I notice you're in Florida. Well,

0:08:24.080 --> 0:08:25.960
<v Speaker 1>I think I think you know. The biggest pie, certainly

0:08:26.080 --> 0:08:28.280
<v Speaker 1>is is federal and there are so many dark forces

0:08:28.320 --> 0:08:32.400
<v Speaker 1>that are really conspiring I think to drive really atrocious

0:08:32.600 --> 0:08:36.880
<v Speaker 1>wealth stormed conditions, But protecting yourself from tax hikes really

0:08:37.160 --> 0:08:40.680
<v Speaker 1>is the function of understanding tax law and what the

0:08:40.720 --> 0:08:45.280
<v Speaker 1>opportunities for legal tax avoidance are. All right, So, Jeff,

0:08:45.360 --> 0:08:49.840
<v Speaker 1>you're you're really worried, You're concerned about a significant pullback

0:08:49.880 --> 0:08:53.800
<v Speaker 1>in this market. What would be the catalyst for that

0:08:53.840 --> 0:08:56.560
<v Speaker 1>in your mind? It really is hard to say. You know,

0:08:56.679 --> 0:08:58.679
<v Speaker 1>right now, we're still pretty much in greed mode and

0:08:58.960 --> 0:09:01.600
<v Speaker 1>folks are buying, you know, it's applying demand and which sellers,

0:09:01.679 --> 0:09:05.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, um out number buyers, and it flips, and

0:09:05.840 --> 0:09:08.160
<v Speaker 1>it's it's really hard to tell what the tipping point

0:09:08.160 --> 0:09:10.440
<v Speaker 1>would be. Could have been an attack in Taiwan, you

0:09:10.440 --> 0:09:13.079
<v Speaker 1>know it, could it be an acknowledgement that inflation really

0:09:13.120 --> 0:09:15.320
<v Speaker 1>is insidious and a lot worse than the FED has

0:09:15.400 --> 0:09:18.000
<v Speaker 1>led us to believe. There are so many different things

0:09:18.040 --> 0:09:20.640
<v Speaker 1>that are really could triggered. But when it happens as

0:09:20.679 --> 0:09:23.800
<v Speaker 1>it did, you know ad mid the third quarter of

0:09:23.840 --> 0:09:27.280
<v Speaker 1>oh eight, you know, it's pretty rapid. By the way.

0:09:27.320 --> 0:09:29.960
<v Speaker 1>As a side note, everything lately is reminding me of

0:09:31.080 --> 0:09:36.760
<v Speaker 1>you know that book by Admiral Turvid so good and

0:09:37.000 --> 0:09:40.160
<v Speaker 1>uh a Taiwan issue is one of the things that

0:09:40.240 --> 0:09:44.640
<v Speaker 1>happens I'm more concerned. Um, well, let's say we're more

0:09:44.679 --> 0:09:48.400
<v Speaker 1>focused on a daily basis on inflation and growth. What

0:09:48.480 --> 0:09:52.559
<v Speaker 1>are your views on economic growth, you know, barring something

0:09:52.640 --> 0:09:56.040
<v Speaker 1>like you know, Grace on black swan issue like an

0:09:56.040 --> 0:09:58.439
<v Speaker 1>attack on Taiwan. What what are your views on growth

0:09:58.480 --> 0:10:00.520
<v Speaker 1>and inflation in the US economy right now? Well? I

0:10:00.559 --> 0:10:02.880
<v Speaker 1>think inflation is a really big factor, right and which

0:10:02.960 --> 0:10:06.200
<v Speaker 1>is not fully acknowledged by by a lot of players.

0:10:06.240 --> 0:10:08.600
<v Speaker 1>For instance, deal is up four times in a year,

0:10:08.679 --> 0:10:11.559
<v Speaker 1>four times. It's an important industrial input, right, And that's

0:10:11.640 --> 0:10:13.760
<v Speaker 1>before you look at logistical problems and you know, you

0:10:13.760 --> 0:10:16.000
<v Speaker 1>get the last count there was sixty five ships anchored

0:10:16.040 --> 0:10:18.400
<v Speaker 1>off the l A port. You can't move the stuff.

0:10:18.760 --> 0:10:21.400
<v Speaker 1>Shipping costs have gone through the roof. Um. But to

0:10:21.679 --> 0:10:24.920
<v Speaker 1>answer your question, you know, the economy still is while

0:10:25.040 --> 0:10:27.760
<v Speaker 1>some sectors are doing well in some countries have done okay,

0:10:28.120 --> 0:10:31.080
<v Speaker 1>it's still very much in tatters, you know, and damaged

0:10:31.120 --> 0:10:35.080
<v Speaker 1>in really unknowable ways. Um. And uh, eventually I think

0:10:35.120 --> 0:10:37.440
<v Speaker 1>that that that that financial stress is going to throughput

0:10:37.559 --> 0:10:40.320
<v Speaker 1>into market prices. Jeff, how long have you had this

0:10:40.480 --> 0:10:43.599
<v Speaker 1>view of markets here, this negative view of markets? And

0:10:43.960 --> 0:10:45.679
<v Speaker 1>what do you tell your clients. What's your advice to

0:10:45.679 --> 0:10:49.000
<v Speaker 1>your clients? I wrote the book Between Semesters, A George

0:10:49.120 --> 0:10:53.200
<v Speaker 1>George town Law last last Christmas, and it really began

0:10:53.440 --> 0:10:57.080
<v Speaker 1>to um, you know, to be unclear to me as

0:10:57.120 --> 0:11:00.040
<v Speaker 1>the COVID stock bubble floated up into space, right, the

0:11:00.080 --> 0:11:04.040
<v Speaker 1>world catches fire in early and stock levels just go,

0:11:04.360 --> 0:11:07.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, incredible record highs, and you're starting to examine.

0:11:07.920 --> 0:11:11.640
<v Speaker 1>I wrote a piece for Forbes, um uh probably about

0:11:11.640 --> 0:11:13.840
<v Speaker 1>a year ago that that got a hundred thousand hits,

0:11:13.840 --> 0:11:16.199
<v Speaker 1>which is, you know, unusual for me. And I really

0:11:16.240 --> 0:11:19.920
<v Speaker 1>focus you know on the various uh, the various factors.

0:11:19.960 --> 0:11:22.079
<v Speaker 1>So what we tell clients, and we've really gone. I've

0:11:22.120 --> 0:11:24.319
<v Speaker 1>been a died in the wolf fundamentalist old CF A

0:11:24.559 --> 0:11:28.360
<v Speaker 1>kind of um efficient markets guy well throughout my decades

0:11:28.360 --> 0:11:31.360
<v Speaker 1>of training. But what happened would COVID really moved me?

0:11:31.600 --> 0:11:34.760
<v Speaker 1>And why the the world's on fire and stock prices

0:11:34.800 --> 0:11:37.079
<v Speaker 1>go through the roof didn't make any sense and that's real.

0:11:37.120 --> 0:11:39.040
<v Speaker 1>And when we really started to examine what was going

0:11:39.080 --> 0:11:42.720
<v Speaker 1>on and look at ways to develop countermeasures to protect

0:11:42.800 --> 0:11:45.440
<v Speaker 1>our clients and to readers, you know, from what we

0:11:45.480 --> 0:11:48.240
<v Speaker 1>see as an inevitable but really devastating market bull back

0:11:48.280 --> 0:11:51.600
<v Speaker 1>and that just stops, right, bonds have got some more stresses. Well,

0:11:51.960 --> 0:11:54.600
<v Speaker 1>you know what, I think it's interesting, um if you

0:11:54.679 --> 0:11:58.480
<v Speaker 1>look in emerging markets, crypto has long had a draw

0:11:58.640 --> 0:12:01.679
<v Speaker 1>just because they're bet and sees are you know, can

0:12:01.720 --> 0:12:04.200
<v Speaker 1>be boxed up and wheelbarrowed out and and and still

0:12:04.200 --> 0:12:06.920
<v Speaker 1>be worthless. What do you think though about the bitcoin

0:12:07.040 --> 0:12:11.120
<v Speaker 1>right now? As from a from a US perspective, it's

0:12:11.160 --> 0:12:14.840
<v Speaker 1>difficult to justify the value right and also as a

0:12:14.840 --> 0:12:17.400
<v Speaker 1>as um as a medium of exchange, you know, with

0:12:17.440 --> 0:12:20.839
<v Speaker 1>a wildly volatile and fluction winning value. Um uh. And

0:12:21.080 --> 0:12:23.720
<v Speaker 1>they're also significant fraud you know, how do you can be?

0:12:23.880 --> 0:12:27.600
<v Speaker 1>By its very nature, it's really hard to identify who

0:12:27.600 --> 0:12:30.000
<v Speaker 1>owns it? So I think that that as part of

0:12:30.040 --> 0:12:34.280
<v Speaker 1>the gold sir, not as hard as gold. Yeah. If

0:12:34.360 --> 0:12:36.000
<v Speaker 1>I throw a gold bar on the floor, who owns that?

0:12:36.120 --> 0:12:39.000
<v Speaker 1>You know? That's right? Yeah, well it depends to guests

0:12:39.000 --> 0:12:41.760
<v Speaker 1>do it first? I guess right, that's a good point.

0:12:42.240 --> 0:12:46.000
<v Speaker 1>I just always, you know, I think it's interesting that

0:12:46.040 --> 0:12:48.079
<v Speaker 1>people are looking at as a as a hedge or

0:12:48.120 --> 0:12:50.160
<v Speaker 1>a store of wealth and it has you know, no

0:12:50.240 --> 0:12:54.480
<v Speaker 1>track record and and really no intrinsic value. I mean,

0:12:54.520 --> 0:12:59.160
<v Speaker 1>it's worth what someone will pay for it. All right,

0:12:59.240 --> 0:13:02.320
<v Speaker 1>interesting stuff, and of course we could go on. I'd

0:13:02.320 --> 0:13:04.520
<v Speaker 1>love to have you back on the program, So appreciate

0:13:04.559 --> 0:13:07.280
<v Speaker 1>you joining us. Jeff Jeff Camera out of their chairman

0:13:07.440 --> 0:13:12.000
<v Speaker 1>and CEO Camerata Wealth Advisory Groups talking to us about

0:13:12.280 --> 0:13:15.840
<v Speaker 1>how to well. He wrote the book about the Financial Storm,

0:13:15.960 --> 0:13:18.840
<v Speaker 1>warning for investors how to prepare and protect your wealth

0:13:18.920 --> 0:13:24.600
<v Speaker 1>from tax hikes and market crashes. Now, let's bring in

0:13:24.600 --> 0:13:29.160
<v Speaker 1>Shawn Snyder, head of investment strategy at City US Consumer

0:13:29.200 --> 0:13:32.920
<v Speaker 1>Wealth Management. Sean great having on the program. What are

0:13:33.000 --> 0:13:36.520
<v Speaker 1>your biggest concerns looking at this market? Is it? Is

0:13:36.520 --> 0:13:40.920
<v Speaker 1>it washing in d C um and and tax policy?

0:13:41.040 --> 0:13:45.199
<v Speaker 1>Is it inflation? Is it the Fed? Is it earning season? What? What?

0:13:45.200 --> 0:13:48.640
<v Speaker 1>What's keeping you up at night? If anything? First off,

0:13:48.679 --> 0:13:51.160
<v Speaker 1>thank you for having me. I guess all of those

0:13:52.000 --> 0:13:54.760
<v Speaker 1>are are a good spot to start. Um. You know,

0:13:54.800 --> 0:13:57.920
<v Speaker 1>the DC drama continues to kind of be an overhang

0:13:57.960 --> 0:14:00.760
<v Speaker 1>on the market. Um. You know, I like to think

0:14:00.840 --> 0:14:03.240
<v Speaker 1>that you know, this kicking the can down the oone

0:14:03.240 --> 0:14:05.920
<v Speaker 1>actually gives them more time to um, you know, kind

0:14:05.920 --> 0:14:08.920
<v Speaker 1>of solidify the party and finalize the details, but it's

0:14:08.960 --> 0:14:12.480
<v Speaker 1>not clear whether you know, no immediate crisis means no

0:14:12.559 --> 0:14:15.440
<v Speaker 1>immediate action. Uh, and are we looking at it an

0:14:15.440 --> 0:14:19.480
<v Speaker 1>awkward Thanksgiving dinner yet again with Congress simply um forcing

0:14:19.520 --> 0:14:23.480
<v Speaker 1>the deadline issue to December three instead of um, you know,

0:14:23.520 --> 0:14:26.720
<v Speaker 1>October eighteen. So I think that's an overhanging uncertainty that

0:14:26.760 --> 0:14:30.520
<v Speaker 1>weighs on the market. You know, history heavily suggests that

0:14:30.560 --> 0:14:32.880
<v Speaker 1>they do get it done. I mean, the White House

0:14:32.880 --> 0:14:36.080
<v Speaker 1>and Congress have acted uh ninety eight times since the

0:14:36.200 --> 0:14:38.240
<v Speaker 1>end of World War Two to modify the debt limit.

0:14:38.240 --> 0:14:40.680
<v Speaker 1>They've always done it seems like they will get it

0:14:40.720 --> 0:14:43.840
<v Speaker 1>done again. Um, you know. Likewise, as far as the

0:14:43.880 --> 0:14:48.080
<v Speaker 1>budget reconciliation bills and infrastructure, uh, twenty one out of

0:14:48.120 --> 0:14:51.400
<v Speaker 1>twenty five reconciliation bills have went on to be signed

0:14:51.400 --> 0:14:54.560
<v Speaker 1>by the President. So still a very heavy lift to

0:14:54.560 --> 0:14:57.960
<v Speaker 1>get the Biden agenda off the ground, But you know,

0:14:58.360 --> 0:15:00.120
<v Speaker 1>I think they should be able to do it. The

0:15:00.160 --> 0:15:02.880
<v Speaker 1>other thing with d C that's interesting is by delaying it,

0:15:02.960 --> 0:15:06.400
<v Speaker 1>they actually give the Treasury Department more time to kind

0:15:06.440 --> 0:15:10.640
<v Speaker 1>of bolster their extraordinary measures. So um, it's possible that

0:15:10.680 --> 0:15:13.640
<v Speaker 1>the soft deadline for the debt ceiling is now December three,

0:15:13.640 --> 0:15:16.680
<v Speaker 1>but if they can bolster those extraordinary measures, then maybe

0:15:17.280 --> 0:15:22.280
<v Speaker 1>the actual hard that ceiling deadline is maybe well into

0:15:22.560 --> 0:15:24.120
<v Speaker 1>So I think that's something to keep an eye on

0:15:24.280 --> 0:15:27.440
<v Speaker 1>and the other things you mentioned. Probably the biggest thing

0:15:27.480 --> 0:15:29.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm hearing about on the street is this notion of

0:15:29.720 --> 0:15:34.560
<v Speaker 1>stag inflation, where we get persistent inflation and weaker than

0:15:34.600 --> 0:15:38.640
<v Speaker 1>expected economic growth, and there are some signs that supply

0:15:38.880 --> 0:15:42.040
<v Speaker 1>chain issues are are causing problems. Um. If you look

0:15:42.040 --> 0:15:45.280
<v Speaker 1>at the Atlanta Fed GDP now tracker, it's at just

0:15:45.360 --> 0:15:49.000
<v Speaker 1>one point three for the third quarter, and I think

0:15:49.040 --> 0:15:51.960
<v Speaker 1>that would surprise most investors if that's what actually happens.

0:15:52.560 --> 0:15:55.080
<v Speaker 1>And we get that report October, which is of course

0:15:55.160 --> 0:15:58.480
<v Speaker 1>just before the FED meeting on November three, where it's

0:15:58.520 --> 0:16:00.960
<v Speaker 1>why they expected that will begin to take bond purchases.

0:16:01.680 --> 0:16:07.160
<v Speaker 1>I think importantly most of this slowing is probably related

0:16:07.160 --> 0:16:10.240
<v Speaker 1>to supply chain issues. UM. If you look at leisure

0:16:10.240 --> 0:16:14.000
<v Speaker 1>and hospitality wages are up ten percent, that still suggests

0:16:14.000 --> 0:16:17.800
<v Speaker 1>as demand for workers. Just four percent of small businesses

0:16:17.840 --> 0:16:21.880
<v Speaker 1>are reporting that poor sales are the most important problem. Uh,

0:16:21.920 --> 0:16:24.960
<v Speaker 1>And we have ten two point eight million more job

0:16:25.000 --> 0:16:27.760
<v Speaker 1>openings that unemployed. So it seems to suggest that we're

0:16:27.800 --> 0:16:30.400
<v Speaker 1>seeing a slowing due to the supply chain issues, but

0:16:30.480 --> 0:16:33.800
<v Speaker 1>the demand is still there and the economy should snap back.

0:16:33.840 --> 0:16:37.360
<v Speaker 1>One seases. So we're about to kick off third quarter

0:16:37.440 --> 0:16:41.040
<v Speaker 1>earning season, Sean, what are you looking for over the

0:16:41.080 --> 0:16:43.880
<v Speaker 1>next several weeks here as we hear from some of

0:16:43.880 --> 0:16:47.760
<v Speaker 1>the larger companies. Sure, I think we'll see a pretty

0:16:47.800 --> 0:16:52.200
<v Speaker 1>good earning season SMP five hundred. Earnings per share expected

0:16:52.200 --> 0:16:55.680
<v Speaker 1>advise about twenty eight percent year and year. A couple

0:16:55.720 --> 0:16:58.440
<v Speaker 1>of things that people will be watching is they'll see

0:16:59.040 --> 0:17:03.000
<v Speaker 1>probably see norm realization in the earnings of so called

0:17:03.080 --> 0:17:06.000
<v Speaker 1>value companies. We saw a massive surge in the second

0:17:06.080 --> 0:17:09.960
<v Speaker 1>quarter for financials and energy and some of those value

0:17:09.960 --> 0:17:13.320
<v Speaker 1>company earnings rose eighty seven percent in the second quarter.

0:17:13.960 --> 0:17:16.359
<v Speaker 1>That's unlikely to repeat. It's likely to come down maybe

0:17:16.359 --> 0:17:19.800
<v Speaker 1>twenty something. I'm along those lines. We'll be watching that.

0:17:20.280 --> 0:17:22.520
<v Speaker 1>Uh and then people are gonna be watching very closely

0:17:23.160 --> 0:17:27.200
<v Speaker 1>any comments about margin pressures, and you're gonna want to

0:17:27.240 --> 0:17:30.640
<v Speaker 1>see if these companies can pass on uh these increased

0:17:30.680 --> 0:17:34.040
<v Speaker 1>costs or input costs onto consumers or not. UM. You know,

0:17:34.040 --> 0:17:37.439
<v Speaker 1>it looks like maybe industrials and retail companies may not

0:17:37.560 --> 0:17:39.439
<v Speaker 1>be as able to pass on those costs as some

0:17:39.480 --> 0:17:42.600
<v Speaker 1>of the other ones, so investors will probably be watching

0:17:42.640 --> 0:17:47.919
<v Speaker 1>that closely. What do you think about hedges? You know,

0:17:48.520 --> 0:17:51.440
<v Speaker 1>gold hasn't been performing the way you might have expected

0:17:51.440 --> 0:17:54.239
<v Speaker 1>it to inflation either, even if you don't, even if

0:17:54.240 --> 0:17:55.600
<v Speaker 1>you're not afraid of it, you might want to hedge

0:17:55.640 --> 0:17:59.560
<v Speaker 1>a little bit against it. How do you do that? Well?

0:17:59.600 --> 0:18:02.440
<v Speaker 1>In some ways, you can actually use the energy sector

0:18:02.640 --> 0:18:05.800
<v Speaker 1>and the financial sector is a hedge against higher interest rates,

0:18:05.800 --> 0:18:08.880
<v Speaker 1>and that's what we've seen almost all year long. Financials

0:18:09.040 --> 0:18:12.040
<v Speaker 1>is the second top performing sector, energy the number one

0:18:12.359 --> 0:18:15.879
<v Speaker 1>performing sector. Uh in those two sectors tend to do

0:18:16.000 --> 0:18:18.560
<v Speaker 1>well when interest rates rise. So if we believe that

0:18:19.000 --> 0:18:21.760
<v Speaker 1>interest rates are going to rise because we're seeing more

0:18:21.800 --> 0:18:25.800
<v Speaker 1>persistent inflation, the feed is about to potentially taper on

0:18:25.880 --> 0:18:29.520
<v Speaker 1>November three, then then those are good hedges against that trade. UM.

0:18:29.600 --> 0:18:31.919
<v Speaker 1>Other things you can do is more of like a

0:18:32.000 --> 0:18:35.679
<v Speaker 1>longer term you know, goal or change in your portfolio

0:18:35.800 --> 0:18:39.560
<v Speaker 1>is to shift over to higher quality companies, companies that

0:18:39.640 --> 0:18:43.760
<v Speaker 1>have really strong revenue growth and earnings growth um even

0:18:43.760 --> 0:18:47.480
<v Speaker 1>in times of more mid cycled type conditions where the

0:18:47.520 --> 0:18:50.760
<v Speaker 1>economy is kind of slowed down from its initial reopening,

0:18:50.880 --> 0:18:54.080
<v Speaker 1>and healthcare shares are a great example of that. They're

0:18:54.160 --> 0:18:57.639
<v Speaker 1>really really stable revenue growth UM. So we're looking at

0:18:57.720 --> 0:19:02.520
<v Speaker 1>higher quality companies UM, strong revenue, strong balance sheets, and

0:19:02.560 --> 0:19:05.679
<v Speaker 1>then also companies with high dividends and their ability to

0:19:05.720 --> 0:19:08.480
<v Speaker 1>grow dividends. Those types of companies do better as you

0:19:08.520 --> 0:19:11.560
<v Speaker 1>move into this more mid cycle type conditions. So that's

0:19:11.560 --> 0:19:13.960
<v Speaker 1>what we're telling our clients to do. Hey, Sean, thanks

0:19:14.000 --> 0:19:16.280
<v Speaker 1>so much for joining us. We really appreciate you taking

0:19:16.280 --> 0:19:19.800
<v Speaker 1>the time here. Shawn Snyder, head of investment strategy for

0:19:19.920 --> 0:19:24.240
<v Speaker 1>City US Consumer Wealth and Management, giving us his sense

0:19:24.320 --> 0:19:26.840
<v Speaker 1>of this market. Again. We've got earnings really kicking off

0:19:26.960 --> 0:19:30.479
<v Speaker 1>in earnest tomorrow. We'll get the banks this week at

0:19:30.480 --> 0:19:33.080
<v Speaker 1>the big banks, and obviously we always like hearing what

0:19:33.119 --> 0:19:36.080
<v Speaker 1>the bank management teams are saying about their customers and

0:19:36.160 --> 0:19:38.680
<v Speaker 1>loan demand and just business conditions. And of course, while

0:19:38.840 --> 0:19:42.080
<v Speaker 1>full earnings coverage over the next several weeks, this is

0:19:42.119 --> 0:19:48.760
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg all right. Berndia uh said, Home managing partner said.

0:19:48.800 --> 0:19:51.840
<v Speaker 1>Home Law Group joins us here and a great great timings.

0:19:51.880 --> 0:19:54.040
<v Speaker 1>We think about just looking at the news this morning.

0:19:54.119 --> 0:19:58.240
<v Speaker 1>John Gruden, uh, the head coach of Las Vegas. We

0:19:58.280 --> 0:20:01.040
<v Speaker 1>can't even talk about that, y leaders. I mean you

0:20:01.080 --> 0:20:03.439
<v Speaker 1>know kind of it's bad. Yeah, it's it's bad. Some

0:20:03.520 --> 0:20:05.320
<v Speaker 1>bad emails there, and it kind of goes to the

0:20:05.840 --> 0:20:08.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, the workplace and behavior and what's acceptable what's

0:20:08.640 --> 0:20:12.240
<v Speaker 1>not acceptable in the toxicity of that workplace. And so Ronnie,

0:20:12.280 --> 0:20:14.840
<v Speaker 1>I thank so much for joining us here. Boy, it

0:20:14.920 --> 0:20:16.640
<v Speaker 1>seems like, you know, you look at some of these

0:20:16.640 --> 0:20:21.080
<v Speaker 1>big companies like Blue Origin, Amazon, Tesla, some real issues

0:20:21.119 --> 0:20:25.359
<v Speaker 1>about the workplace and toxicity, toxicity of that workplace in

0:20:25.400 --> 0:20:28.080
<v Speaker 1>today's environment. Give us a sense of kind of how

0:20:28.160 --> 0:20:32.600
<v Speaker 1>you think this this situation is developing across corporate America.

0:20:33.119 --> 0:20:35.440
<v Speaker 1>Thanks so much for having me on the show. I

0:20:35.720 --> 0:20:39.080
<v Speaker 1>I don't necessarily think this is developing across America. I

0:20:39.160 --> 0:20:42.640
<v Speaker 1>think we're hearing about it now. I think these issues

0:20:42.720 --> 0:20:47.639
<v Speaker 1>have been um sort of swept under the rug previously,

0:20:47.960 --> 0:20:54.879
<v Speaker 1>and now victims have been finding their voice and going

0:20:55.080 --> 0:20:57.040
<v Speaker 1>through the process that they need to go through in

0:20:57.160 --> 0:21:04.680
<v Speaker 1>order to seek some kind of redress. So what is

0:21:04.680 --> 0:21:07.879
<v Speaker 1>is there a line you can draw between things that

0:21:08.400 --> 0:21:11.560
<v Speaker 1>you definitely can't say with colleagues or other people in

0:21:11.600 --> 0:21:14.880
<v Speaker 1>your in your business or your industry, and things that

0:21:14.960 --> 0:21:18.480
<v Speaker 1>you say, you know, to your friends in a private

0:21:18.520 --> 0:21:21.440
<v Speaker 1>group or as you know, President Trump would have said

0:21:21.440 --> 0:21:25.600
<v Speaker 1>the locker room, for example, where's that line? You know

0:21:25.760 --> 0:21:30.040
<v Speaker 1>the line is blurring. On a daily basis, you have

0:21:30.240 --> 0:21:32.920
<v Speaker 1>to be careful about what you're saying and just ask

0:21:32.960 --> 0:21:36.240
<v Speaker 1>yourself before you make your comment, what is the rationale

0:21:36.280 --> 0:21:40.240
<v Speaker 1>behind your comment? Some people say things, uh that are

0:21:40.280 --> 0:21:43.280
<v Speaker 1>meant to be a joke, and that could be okay

0:21:43.320 --> 0:21:46.879
<v Speaker 1>depending on the receiving end. Right, does this person with

0:21:46.880 --> 0:21:49.360
<v Speaker 1>whom you're speaking think it's a joke outside of the workplace.

0:21:50.000 --> 0:21:55.520
<v Speaker 1>But sometimes people say things and they don't care about

0:21:55.560 --> 0:21:58.280
<v Speaker 1>the consequence of what they're saying. For example, in this

0:21:58.440 --> 0:22:01.760
<v Speaker 1>letter that was written by a blue Origin employees or

0:22:01.920 --> 0:22:05.320
<v Speaker 1>in former employees, there was someone who actually stated, you

0:22:05.320 --> 0:22:09.240
<v Speaker 1>should ask my opinion because I'm a man. That type

0:22:09.560 --> 0:22:16.240
<v Speaker 1>of I guess uh statement should not really be permitted

0:22:16.280 --> 0:22:18.879
<v Speaker 1>to be said in the workplace at the very least

0:22:19.320 --> 0:22:24.920
<v Speaker 1>because men and women should be treated equally. And while

0:22:25.000 --> 0:22:28.720
<v Speaker 1>there are various levels of intellect across the board, men

0:22:28.760 --> 0:22:30.960
<v Speaker 1>are not smarter than women. Women are not smarter than men.

0:22:31.119 --> 0:22:34.679
<v Speaker 1>It is on a you know, individualized basis, and to

0:22:34.800 --> 0:22:40.400
<v Speaker 1>just insult an entire group of people, it's not just offensive,

0:22:40.440 --> 0:22:44.720
<v Speaker 1>it's also illegal. You cannot have discriminatory animus in the workplace.

0:22:45.320 --> 0:22:48.200
<v Speaker 1>It's just that simple, Ronnie. What do you advise your

0:22:48.320 --> 0:22:52.719
<v Speaker 1>corporate clients to do here? I mean, there are there

0:22:52.880 --> 0:22:56.840
<v Speaker 1>some best practices that some corporations, or some companies or

0:22:56.880 --> 0:23:00.000
<v Speaker 1>some entities are doing that perhaps should be adopted by

0:23:00.040 --> 0:23:03.520
<v Speaker 1>more others. Yes, that's a great question, Thank you for asking.

0:23:03.560 --> 0:23:07.240
<v Speaker 1>I don't know how widespread these best practices are. Certainly

0:23:07.280 --> 0:23:10.960
<v Speaker 1>when I work with my employer clients, we discuss it,

0:23:11.080 --> 0:23:13.840
<v Speaker 1>and the first thing is to ask yourself, why is

0:23:13.880 --> 0:23:18.359
<v Speaker 1>this happening? Was it just you know, one bad actor actress.

0:23:18.880 --> 0:23:22.040
<v Speaker 1>If so, you know, terminating that person is sufficient, But

0:23:22.640 --> 0:23:25.760
<v Speaker 1>usually it's not just one actor actress. Usually it's a

0:23:25.800 --> 0:23:29.080
<v Speaker 1>group of people. So you need to address that in

0:23:29.119 --> 0:23:33.000
<v Speaker 1>the workplace and figure out why these individuals are being hired.

0:23:33.400 --> 0:23:36.200
<v Speaker 1>What kind of questions are you asking during the interview

0:23:36.520 --> 0:23:40.719
<v Speaker 1>to help mitigate misogyny and gender discrimination? What kind of

0:23:40.760 --> 0:23:44.159
<v Speaker 1>messaging and training are you providing the too employees. After

0:23:44.600 --> 0:23:48.320
<v Speaker 1>someone that's terminated because of an you know, alleged harassment

0:23:48.440 --> 0:23:52.200
<v Speaker 1>or actual harassment. It's not enough to simply send out

0:23:52.200 --> 0:23:55.600
<v Speaker 1>an a p D or a notice company wide that

0:23:55.640 --> 0:23:58.160
<v Speaker 1>says so and says no longer with us. Of course,

0:23:58.240 --> 0:24:02.200
<v Speaker 1>you don't need to delineate this cifics in that communication,

0:24:02.280 --> 0:24:06.560
<v Speaker 1>but there should be other communications afterwards that tell people,

0:24:06.760 --> 0:24:11.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, when someone is terminated because of discrimination, we

0:24:12.080 --> 0:24:14.840
<v Speaker 1>are going to determine whether or not that person was

0:24:14.920 --> 0:24:18.320
<v Speaker 1>aided and embedded by others in the workplace. We're not

0:24:18.359 --> 0:24:21.840
<v Speaker 1>going to stop it just simply, you know, giving out

0:24:21.920 --> 0:24:27.600
<v Speaker 1>hush money to the victim and firing the person who

0:24:27.680 --> 0:24:30.199
<v Speaker 1>was alleged to have done X or y. That is

0:24:30.600 --> 0:24:34.640
<v Speaker 1>normally not enough. And then what measures are you taking

0:24:35.359 --> 0:24:38.680
<v Speaker 1>to be proactive to protect the confidentiality of those individuals

0:24:38.840 --> 0:24:41.399
<v Speaker 1>who complain, Because that is also a fear that I,

0:24:41.960 --> 0:24:44.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, often hear about from others. I didn't want

0:24:44.400 --> 0:24:46.200
<v Speaker 1>to go to HR because I was worried I would

0:24:46.240 --> 0:24:48.480
<v Speaker 1>lose my job. I didn't want to go to HR

0:24:48.560 --> 0:24:51.960
<v Speaker 1>because I was worried that they wouldn't keep it confidential. Well,

0:24:52.040 --> 0:24:56.760
<v Speaker 1>these are you can train employees in HR on how

0:24:56.800 --> 0:25:00.560
<v Speaker 1>to maintain confidentiality. Because I think from my practice I

0:25:00.600 --> 0:25:04.760
<v Speaker 1>see that they often don't understand what that really means. Right, Well,

0:25:04.800 --> 0:25:07.280
<v Speaker 1>it's very important stuff and we really appreciate you joining

0:25:07.320 --> 0:25:09.239
<v Speaker 1>us talk about it. Ronnie I said home. They are

0:25:09.280 --> 0:25:11.720
<v Speaker 1>managing partner at the Said Home Law Group talking to

0:25:11.840 --> 0:25:17.520
<v Speaker 1>us about workplace toxicicity. Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg

0:25:17.520 --> 0:25:20.920
<v Speaker 1>Markets podcast. You can subscribe and listen to interviews with

0:25:21.000 --> 0:25:25.800
<v Speaker 1>Apple Podcasts or whatever podcast platform you prefer. I'm Matt Miller.

0:25:26.080 --> 0:25:30.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm on Twitter at Matt Miller. On Ball Sweeney, I'm

0:25:30.480 --> 0:25:33.119
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter at pt Sweeney Before the podcast. You can

0:25:33.160 --> 0:25:35.400
<v Speaker 1>always catch us worldwide at Bloomberg Radio