WEBVTT - Dividing the World, Pt. 1 feat. Andrew

0:00:01.720 --> 0:00:04.960
<v Speaker 1>All the media.

0:00:06.080 --> 0:00:08.960
<v Speaker 2>Hello, and welcome to it could happen here. I'm here

0:00:09.039 --> 0:00:09.880
<v Speaker 2>once again.

0:00:09.720 --> 0:00:11.280
<v Speaker 3>With it's James again.

0:00:11.680 --> 0:00:13.160
<v Speaker 2>Free to talk to you again, James.

0:00:13.600 --> 0:00:15.280
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, likewise glad to be here.

0:00:15.760 --> 0:00:18.080
<v Speaker 2>You know, I spend a lot of time thinking about

0:00:18.120 --> 0:00:20.520
<v Speaker 2>the world and how it works and all that jazz,

0:00:20.560 --> 0:00:21.880
<v Speaker 2>and I assume you do as well.

0:00:22.200 --> 0:00:25.599
<v Speaker 4>I do, yeah, yeah, increasingly worrying about the word.

0:00:27.400 --> 0:00:31.320
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, this place, this home is quite the puzzle. And

0:00:31.600 --> 0:00:34.360
<v Speaker 2>much like a puzzle, it has been carved up and

0:00:34.440 --> 0:00:38.400
<v Speaker 2>divided in so many different ways, sliced, labeled, ranked, and

0:00:38.440 --> 0:00:41.680
<v Speaker 2>measured from all kinds of different angles. And that's really

0:00:41.720 --> 0:00:45.360
<v Speaker 2>what I'm interested in talking about today, the different ways

0:00:45.400 --> 0:00:48.120
<v Speaker 2>that we try to explain the differences we see on

0:00:48.159 --> 0:00:52.480
<v Speaker 2>the global stage. So going from the concept of civilized

0:00:52.520 --> 0:00:55.960
<v Speaker 2>and primitive, to the East and West binary, to the

0:00:56.080 --> 0:01:01.600
<v Speaker 2>imagined communities called nations, the clash of quote unquoteizations, to

0:01:01.720 --> 0:01:04.240
<v Speaker 2>the concept of first, second, and third worlds, to the

0:01:04.240 --> 0:01:07.080
<v Speaker 2>development spectrum, to the global North and global cell, then

0:01:07.120 --> 0:01:09.480
<v Speaker 2>finally to the core and the periphery. So we have

0:01:09.480 --> 0:01:11.440
<v Speaker 2>a lot of ground to cover in this episode.

0:01:11.800 --> 0:01:14.959
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I really like this stuff, like as a historian,

0:01:15.040 --> 0:01:20.039
<v Speaker 4>like we're always kind of forced into certain divisions, right,

0:01:20.120 --> 0:01:23.319
<v Speaker 4>Like even when you apply to you with your funding, right,

0:01:23.360 --> 0:01:27.640
<v Speaker 4>like you're normally in like a geographical area, or like

0:01:28.080 --> 0:01:32.280
<v Speaker 4>you're trying to shoehorn something that's just interesting into one

0:01:32.360 --> 0:01:34.920
<v Speaker 4>of these boxes that gets funding. And I think like

0:01:35.000 --> 0:01:37.520
<v Speaker 4>often that impacts like how we see the world, So

0:01:37.560 --> 0:01:39.560
<v Speaker 4>we have to write with that goal.

0:01:40.000 --> 0:01:45.399
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely, absolutely, I find the way that we approach the

0:01:45.440 --> 0:01:48.800
<v Speaker 2>telling of history so fascinating And in another life maybe

0:01:48.800 --> 0:01:50.240
<v Speaker 2>I would have been a historian.

0:01:50.760 --> 0:01:54.120
<v Speaker 4>I never I can recommend it. Yeah, yeah, it's I

0:01:54.240 --> 0:01:56.880
<v Speaker 4>enjoy the doing of history. It's the doing of academia

0:01:56.880 --> 0:01:58.040
<v Speaker 4>that I don't enjoy so much.

0:01:59.080 --> 0:02:01.680
<v Speaker 2>So I suppose as historian, I'm going to ask you

0:02:01.800 --> 0:02:07.920
<v Speaker 2>a discomforting question. Great, would you consider yourself civilized or primitive?

0:02:08.240 --> 0:02:08.440
<v Speaker 1>Oh?

0:02:08.520 --> 0:02:10.000
<v Speaker 3>That's a fun one.

0:02:11.120 --> 0:02:15.760
<v Speaker 4>I don't know, Like, I don't like that binary because

0:02:15.760 --> 0:02:18.720
<v Speaker 4>I think it's it's a value statement, right, And I think,

0:02:18.800 --> 0:02:22.480
<v Speaker 4>like James Scott talks about this, Actually, this is a

0:02:22.480 --> 0:02:25.760
<v Speaker 4>really interesting I've had this. James Scott right talks about

0:02:25.800 --> 0:02:28.280
<v Speaker 4>the idea of people who exist outside of the state

0:02:28.320 --> 0:02:31.480
<v Speaker 4>being labeled as primitive by the state. It's in the

0:02:31.600 --> 0:02:34.000
<v Speaker 4>art of not being governed, and that that's the sort

0:02:34.000 --> 0:02:38.000
<v Speaker 4>of the narrative there. The inherent message is that the

0:02:38.080 --> 0:02:41.160
<v Speaker 4>state is the final and superior form of human organizing

0:02:41.200 --> 0:02:44.919
<v Speaker 4>and people who have chosen to exist outside it are

0:02:45.120 --> 0:02:47.880
<v Speaker 4>not because they chose to, but because they haven't made

0:02:47.919 --> 0:02:50.760
<v Speaker 4>it there yet. And of course Scott problematized that suggests

0:02:50.760 --> 0:02:53.200
<v Speaker 4>it maybe it's a choice, not a failure to accede

0:02:53.200 --> 0:02:57.000
<v Speaker 4>to that civilization. And it's a concept that like young

0:02:57.040 --> 0:03:00.440
<v Speaker 4>Burmese fighters have goed.

0:03:00.240 --> 0:03:02.280
<v Speaker 3>Back to me. I don't think they're aware of James C.

0:03:02.320 --> 0:03:06.119
<v Speaker 4>Scott if I'm being honest, but they they will say

0:03:06.120 --> 0:03:08.280
<v Speaker 4>to me, like when, because when they left the cities

0:03:08.400 --> 0:03:13.160
<v Speaker 4>to live with the ethnic revolutionary organizations there, they had

0:03:13.160 --> 0:03:16.240
<v Speaker 4>always been told that the reason those people lived outside

0:03:16.240 --> 0:03:18.800
<v Speaker 4>of the Burmese state was because they were primitive, violent.

0:03:19.480 --> 0:03:21.959
<v Speaker 4>But then they came to live and fight alongside them,

0:03:22.000 --> 0:03:24.800
<v Speaker 4>and they were like, no, these are a family. They

0:03:24.800 --> 0:03:27.320
<v Speaker 4>were brothers and sisters and siblings, and like they want

0:03:27.320 --> 0:03:31.320
<v Speaker 4>the same thing as us, Like they're not primitive, they

0:03:31.400 --> 0:03:34.040
<v Speaker 4>just don't want the state. So I guess in that sense,

0:03:34.080 --> 0:03:36.640
<v Speaker 4>I would want to be labeled as primitive too. I

0:03:36.640 --> 0:03:39.080
<v Speaker 4>think the primitive people are doing cool shit and then

0:03:39.120 --> 0:03:40.320
<v Speaker 4>the civilized people are not.

0:03:41.160 --> 0:03:43.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Yeah, I mean that's one of I think one

0:03:43.560 --> 0:03:46.680
<v Speaker 2>of the one during global binaries, one of the oldest.

0:03:47.160 --> 0:03:50.040
<v Speaker 2>You know, you'd hear that sign, that kind of juxtaposition

0:03:50.240 --> 0:03:54.400
<v Speaker 2>or civilized and primitive or civilized and barbarians. Yeah, you know,

0:03:54.440 --> 0:03:57.640
<v Speaker 2>in ancient role you see that distinction between the civilized

0:03:57.720 --> 0:04:00.520
<v Speaker 2>Roman citizens and the barberia and other.

0:04:00.760 --> 0:04:01.000
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:04:01.240 --> 0:04:03.920
<v Speaker 2>And in that instance, and in a lot of instances

0:04:03.920 --> 0:04:09.240
<v Speaker 2>as used as this ideological tool just a superiority, definitely.

0:04:09.400 --> 0:04:09.640
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:04:10.040 --> 0:04:13.160
<v Speaker 4>Like I think we have to be really careful as

0:04:13.200 --> 0:04:17.360
<v Speaker 4>his story about these assumptions that we make. It'says we'll

0:04:17.360 --> 0:04:19.719
<v Speaker 4>have to make a lot of assumptions about revolutions too,

0:04:20.240 --> 0:04:23.680
<v Speaker 4>And I would wager that I've attended more revolutions and

0:04:23.760 --> 0:04:26.240
<v Speaker 4>many of my academic colleagues, and I think many of

0:04:26.240 --> 0:04:28.800
<v Speaker 4>those are grounded in the truths that people accept as

0:04:28.839 --> 0:04:31.320
<v Speaker 4>truths without ever testing them. And like, I think this

0:04:31.360 --> 0:04:33.719
<v Speaker 4>sort of civilized barbarian one, it's kind of the same

0:04:33.920 --> 0:04:34.159
<v Speaker 4>like that.

0:04:34.480 --> 0:04:36.240
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's a classic one. I mean, do you know

0:04:36.279 --> 0:04:38.520
<v Speaker 2>where the word barbaria and even comes from?

0:04:38.680 --> 0:04:39.839
<v Speaker 3>Isn't it the language?

0:04:39.880 --> 0:04:40.040
<v Speaker 4>Thing?

0:04:40.080 --> 0:04:42.000
<v Speaker 3>Like, because I didn't speak is it Latin? They were

0:04:42.040 --> 0:04:44.680
<v Speaker 3>just going like bar Ba, is that right?

0:04:45.360 --> 0:04:47.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's because of what you know, Rome did did

0:04:47.560 --> 0:04:50.080
<v Speaker 2>this all the time, where they just borrowed whole sale

0:04:50.160 --> 0:04:52.839
<v Speaker 2>from what the Greeks were doing. Yeah, so in Greek

0:04:53.000 --> 0:04:57.760
<v Speaker 2>Barbaros meant anyone who did not speak Greek. Okay, that's

0:04:57.800 --> 0:04:59.680
<v Speaker 2>the rum, and just kind of took that and expanded

0:04:59.720 --> 0:05:03.280
<v Speaker 2>as he to talk about anybody who wasn't on their

0:05:03.320 --> 0:05:07.800
<v Speaker 2>whole wave of urban planning and you know, coudified legal systems,

0:05:07.839 --> 0:05:11.080
<v Speaker 2>the philosophy, the education they are to all of that stuff.

0:05:11.320 --> 0:05:11.520
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:05:11.600 --> 0:05:15.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, the Barbarians didn't have those those refinements, right, Yeah,

0:05:15.640 --> 0:05:18.679
<v Speaker 2>you know, but of course the relationship between the tours

0:05:18.880 --> 0:05:23.000
<v Speaker 2>is not so simple, right because the later on in

0:05:23.080 --> 0:05:27.680
<v Speaker 2>Roman history, as you'd know, Barbarians quote unquote, were incorporated

0:05:27.760 --> 0:05:32.320
<v Speaker 2>slowly into the state and became very useful armies and

0:05:32.360 --> 0:05:34.320
<v Speaker 2>a reserve full of labor and all these different things

0:05:34.360 --> 0:05:36.640
<v Speaker 2>for what Roman was trying to do with the expartnership.

0:05:37.000 --> 0:05:41.000
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, and luckily contemporary American right has been very normal

0:05:41.160 --> 0:05:44.440
<v Speaker 4>about that and it isn't using that for like it's

0:05:44.480 --> 0:05:46.440
<v Speaker 4>sort of eugenic eugenic agenda right.

0:05:46.440 --> 0:05:50.200
<v Speaker 2>Now, yeah, very very much eugenics vibes these days.

0:05:50.320 --> 0:05:53.920
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, where my father lives is right on the border

0:05:53.960 --> 0:05:57.760
<v Speaker 4>between England and Scotland and you can visit Hadrian's Wall.

0:05:57.880 --> 0:05:59.440
<v Speaker 3>I rode my bike all along it a couple of

0:05:59.520 --> 0:05:59.960
<v Speaker 3>years ago.

0:06:00.040 --> 0:06:00.520
<v Speaker 2>Oh ask.

0:06:00.920 --> 0:06:01.120
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:06:01.160 --> 0:06:05.520
<v Speaker 4>It's like a fun edge of empire kind of thought experiment,

0:06:05.720 --> 0:06:09.400
<v Speaker 4>like you beyond this line of the barbarians or uncivilized

0:06:09.440 --> 0:06:13.080
<v Speaker 4>people today, it's like unremarkable, you know, like like it's

0:06:13.120 --> 0:06:13.880
<v Speaker 4>literally it.

0:06:13.760 --> 0:06:16.280
<v Speaker 3>It keeps some people sheep in their fields at points

0:06:16.320 --> 0:06:17.040
<v Speaker 3>along like.

0:06:16.960 --> 0:06:22.560
<v Speaker 4>A yeah, yeah, exactly, Yeah, like some stones kind of

0:06:22.960 --> 0:06:25.280
<v Speaker 4>piled on top of each other and it's kind of

0:06:25.279 --> 0:06:27.880
<v Speaker 4>an unremarkable novelty. But it's funny to think that at

0:06:27.880 --> 0:06:30.560
<v Speaker 4>one point there was this binary world, right, and they

0:06:30.920 --> 0:06:34.240
<v Speaker 4>felt that they the outside was so dangerous to them

0:06:34.240 --> 0:06:37.400
<v Speaker 4>that they had to provide a physical barrier, something we're

0:06:37.480 --> 0:06:38.120
<v Speaker 4>still doing.

0:06:38.720 --> 0:06:41.599
<v Speaker 2>Indeed, and as we're speaking of walls, by the way,

0:06:41.640 --> 0:06:45.400
<v Speaker 2>this reminds me of another major empire where this sort

0:06:45.400 --> 0:06:47.680
<v Speaker 2>of dichotomy was a curtain. You know, it wasn't just

0:06:47.720 --> 0:06:51.560
<v Speaker 2>taking place in the Mediterranean build you had and of

0:06:51.600 --> 0:06:57.440
<v Speaker 2>course ancient China, this whole identity constructed around these moral

0:06:57.560 --> 0:07:02.360
<v Speaker 2>and cultural and political ideals. Had the whole Confucianism Taoism

0:07:02.480 --> 0:07:05.039
<v Speaker 2>a legalist thought or shape and what it meant to be,

0:07:06.000 --> 0:07:09.480
<v Speaker 2>you know, conducting yourself properly and in a civilized manner.

0:07:10.120 --> 0:07:12.920
<v Speaker 2>And so those who did not ascribe to those ideals

0:07:13.240 --> 0:07:15.400
<v Speaker 2>would have been people who were labeled barbarians.

0:07:15.480 --> 0:07:15.720
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:07:15.880 --> 0:07:18.880
<v Speaker 2>Often the people on the other side of the Great Wall.

0:07:19.560 --> 0:07:23.200
<v Speaker 4>Yeah we are the United States is literally doing the

0:07:23.320 --> 0:07:27.280
<v Speaker 4>exact same thing, right, Like it's we're building a giant

0:07:27.320 --> 0:07:30.240
<v Speaker 4>wall and labeling other ring the people on the other

0:07:30.280 --> 0:07:30.720
<v Speaker 4>side of it.

0:07:31.120 --> 0:07:33.760
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, you definitely see the genealogy there. Yeah, but I

0:07:33.800 --> 0:07:36.800
<v Speaker 2>think there's a closer genealogy we could draw upon for

0:07:36.960 --> 0:07:41.840
<v Speaker 2>that particular reference though, which is how later European empires

0:07:41.840 --> 0:07:48.120
<v Speaker 2>would appropriate the Roman civilized barbarian binary to justify their assimilation,

0:07:48.400 --> 0:07:50.240
<v Speaker 2>extermination and colonialism.

0:07:50.800 --> 0:07:54.880
<v Speaker 4>Definitely one of the things I like to do, even

0:07:54.920 --> 0:07:58.040
<v Speaker 4>with you know, the United States and it's in formal empire, right,

0:07:58.120 --> 0:08:06.000
<v Speaker 4>Like I love to show my students cartoons, like political cartoons,

0:08:06.040 --> 0:08:08.480
<v Speaker 4>like there's one of the White Man's Burden, which like

0:08:08.840 --> 0:08:11.440
<v Speaker 4>distill you know, sometimes the patriots worth a thousand words,

0:08:11.480 --> 0:08:16.160
<v Speaker 4>but it distills that whole binary so well in a

0:08:16.200 --> 0:08:21.160
<v Speaker 4>way that seems like repugnant to most of my students today.

0:08:21.200 --> 0:08:23.760
<v Speaker 4>I guess, I don't know, maybe maybe folks are moving

0:08:23.800 --> 0:08:28.200
<v Speaker 4>back that way, but like the imagery and the distinction

0:08:28.520 --> 0:08:31.240
<v Speaker 4>between the way or even like Lewis and Clark when

0:08:31.280 --> 0:08:34.080
<v Speaker 4>they're addressing the indigenous people they meet and calling them children,

0:08:34.520 --> 0:08:38.680
<v Speaker 4>right like like this this binary distinction is so it's

0:08:38.720 --> 0:08:43.480
<v Speaker 4>so apparent, and like, I don't know, it seems so outlandish,

0:08:43.600 --> 0:08:45.880
<v Speaker 4>I think to most folks today maybe, But then we

0:08:45.920 --> 0:08:49.040
<v Speaker 4>do similar things, I guess in uh, you know it

0:08:49.160 --> 0:08:52.000
<v Speaker 4>just in a slightly more subtle way sometimes.

0:08:51.760 --> 0:08:53.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, exactly. I mean when you look at what was

0:08:53.679 --> 0:08:58.520
<v Speaker 2>taking place with the Enlightenment and that whole developments of

0:08:59.240 --> 0:09:02.599
<v Speaker 2>this particular order, it steeped in these particular values with

0:09:02.720 --> 0:09:06.320
<v Speaker 2>the European culture was the ideal standard, and everything that

0:09:06.400 --> 0:09:10.520
<v Speaker 2>did not measure up to that standard was barbarical, primative.

0:09:11.000 --> 0:09:14.520
<v Speaker 2>It's just that has never really gone away, you know,

0:09:14.559 --> 0:09:18.280
<v Speaker 2>and it continues to be used to justify the domination

0:09:18.600 --> 0:09:22.360
<v Speaker 2>of Western powers, particularly in the way that they've instilled

0:09:22.360 --> 0:09:27.360
<v Speaker 2>these European norms and practices across the world. When it

0:09:27.360 --> 0:09:30.080
<v Speaker 2>comes to things like relation to the land when it

0:09:30.080 --> 0:09:35.400
<v Speaker 2>comes to things like the divisions between people, between genders,

0:09:35.960 --> 0:09:41.040
<v Speaker 2>all these things, all these attitudes that are now so widespread,

0:09:41.480 --> 0:09:46.960
<v Speaker 2>originated from in part, this elevation of one above the other.

0:09:48.440 --> 0:09:51.400
<v Speaker 2>And speaking of I mentioned the word western there, and

0:09:51.400 --> 0:09:56.320
<v Speaker 2>that's really another way that we've sort of maintained this

0:09:56.480 --> 0:10:00.840
<v Speaker 2>binary in a different court of paint. It's not quite

0:10:00.880 --> 0:10:06.560
<v Speaker 2>the same. So there's this sort of lingering framework of

0:10:06.640 --> 0:10:09.000
<v Speaker 2>the notion of the East and the West. Right in

0:10:09.040 --> 0:10:13.120
<v Speaker 2>the ancient times, it was China versus Rome. These days

0:10:13.120 --> 0:10:18.439
<v Speaker 2>it's probably China versus America. Yeah, China really is that old?

0:10:19.040 --> 0:10:19.240
<v Speaker 3>Yeah?

0:10:19.280 --> 0:10:23.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, And okay, this is probably a very probably

0:10:23.640 --> 0:10:26.199
<v Speaker 2>very gen z reference for me to make. But I

0:10:26.200 --> 0:10:29.240
<v Speaker 2>don't know if you've seen these edits circulated on social

0:10:29.280 --> 0:10:35.920
<v Speaker 2>media of the Chinese president Chi chen Ping going like

0:10:36.440 --> 0:10:39.240
<v Speaker 2>buzzer Beijing, and there's like a whole bunch of like

0:10:40.320 --> 0:10:46.040
<v Speaker 2>skyscrapers and like like hardcore like electronic music edited to

0:10:46.080 --> 0:10:48.360
<v Speaker 2>show like all these advanced ones, and people in the

0:10:48.360 --> 0:10:52.600
<v Speaker 2>comments are saying things like be China do nothing win.

0:10:55.120 --> 0:10:56.480
<v Speaker 3>I I have not seen those.

0:10:57.000 --> 0:11:02.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, that's definitely dating me a little bit in

0:11:02.120 --> 0:11:06.240
<v Speaker 2>terms of my social media diet. But yeah, just seeing

0:11:07.080 --> 0:11:11.000
<v Speaker 2>the dynamic between China, or between the East and the West,

0:11:11.000 --> 0:11:14.160
<v Speaker 2>the Orient and the occident, to use an older term,

0:11:14.280 --> 0:11:17.360
<v Speaker 2>it's just another way that we've created this sort of

0:11:17.600 --> 0:11:21.240
<v Speaker 2>boundary between people that either on one side or the other,

0:11:21.720 --> 0:11:25.600
<v Speaker 2>there's a necessary tension between the two. You know. This

0:11:25.760 --> 0:11:29.040
<v Speaker 2>concept of the orient and Orientalism is something that it

0:11:29.120 --> 0:11:33.760
<v Speaker 2>would side identified famously as something that was constructed by

0:11:33.840 --> 0:11:39.600
<v Speaker 2>the West as an exotic, irrational, decadent, and dangerous place.

0:11:40.600 --> 0:11:43.120
<v Speaker 2>And so that whole dualistic narrative was then put into

0:11:43.160 --> 0:11:48.000
<v Speaker 2>the imperial project to Legitimizeie domination and to position the

0:11:48.040 --> 0:11:50.800
<v Speaker 2>East as a passive subject without a voice of their

0:11:50.840 --> 0:11:55.360
<v Speaker 2>own and constant need of Western intervention and guidance. So

0:11:55.400 --> 0:11:58.480
<v Speaker 2>this West becomes this sort of stage for modernity and

0:11:58.559 --> 0:12:01.480
<v Speaker 2>science and region and progress, this whole idea of the

0:12:01.520 --> 0:12:08.160
<v Speaker 2>protagonist of history and the orients the East. They're the primitive,

0:12:08.679 --> 0:12:12.800
<v Speaker 2>I guess side of that binary. Although unlike the civilized

0:12:12.840 --> 0:12:16.360
<v Speaker 2>primitive binary or civilized barbarian binary of old I think

0:12:16.880 --> 0:12:19.480
<v Speaker 2>while there could have been racial components to it in

0:12:19.520 --> 0:12:24.079
<v Speaker 2>the past, this one is more explicitly racial and geographic

0:12:24.200 --> 0:12:27.960
<v Speaker 2>in its division, because I mean in ancient room, anybody

0:12:28.000 --> 0:12:31.400
<v Speaker 2>could essentially become a Roman citizen. You know, it wasn't

0:12:31.440 --> 0:12:36.160
<v Speaker 2>necessarily racially, you know, pure area and sense that a

0:12:36.160 --> 0:12:38.440
<v Speaker 2>lot of new Nazis and stuff today like to look

0:12:38.520 --> 0:12:42.280
<v Speaker 2>back at that period as you had a quieter diversity

0:12:42.400 --> 0:12:47.400
<v Speaker 2>of phenotypes in the Roman Empire. Yeah, but you know,

0:12:47.440 --> 0:12:50.840
<v Speaker 2>when you come to this orient and occident dichotomy, it's

0:12:51.000 --> 0:12:53.040
<v Speaker 2>very much racialized. You know, a lot of times when

0:12:53.040 --> 0:12:56.880
<v Speaker 2>people talk about the Western world, it really tends to

0:12:56.920 --> 0:12:59.839
<v Speaker 2>be I guess a more politically correct way of saying

0:12:59.840 --> 0:13:02.280
<v Speaker 2>the white wood. Yes, at least in my observation.

0:13:02.600 --> 0:13:06.240
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, yeah, definitely, that's often the subtext.

0:13:06.080 --> 0:13:08.640
<v Speaker 2>Because I mean that's something I've always struggled with pinning

0:13:08.679 --> 0:13:12.080
<v Speaker 2>down right, because why isn't Brazil considered part of the West?

0:13:12.400 --> 0:13:14.960
<v Speaker 2>You know, why isn't Mexico considered part of the West?

0:13:15.280 --> 0:13:18.240
<v Speaker 3>Right? What are we west of? Like?

0:13:18.240 --> 0:13:21.079
<v Speaker 4>Like what it's not even it's not the western hemisphere

0:13:21.480 --> 0:13:22.480
<v Speaker 4>like as you say.

0:13:22.440 --> 0:13:25.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean Western say is more straightforward, but is

0:13:25.480 --> 0:13:28.720
<v Speaker 2>it because there are too many colored people? Yeah, in

0:13:28.800 --> 0:13:30.559
<v Speaker 2>Mexico and in Brazil.

0:13:30.720 --> 0:13:34.160
<v Speaker 4>It seems to be right, Like it's not even countries

0:13:34.240 --> 0:13:38.120
<v Speaker 4>strongly either from Western Europe was strongly impacted by settler

0:13:38.120 --> 0:13:42.360
<v Speaker 4>colonialism from Western Europe, because the entirety of Latin America

0:13:42.559 --> 0:13:43.679
<v Speaker 4>is impact.

0:13:43.320 --> 0:13:44.920
<v Speaker 2>And they should be included, but they're not.

0:13:45.040 --> 0:13:45.440
<v Speaker 3>That they're not.

0:13:45.679 --> 0:13:49.160
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, yeah, and it yeah, it's I've always struggled with

0:13:49.200 --> 0:13:53.720
<v Speaker 4>that one, other than get neoliberal capitalists white countries, it's

0:13:53.920 --> 0:13:55.320
<v Speaker 4>it's what people don't want to say.

0:13:55.600 --> 0:14:00.440
<v Speaker 2>And Japan sometimes yeah, yeah, Japan, strangely enough, yeah, yeah,

0:14:01.600 --> 0:14:02.840
<v Speaker 2>an member of the club.

0:14:03.240 --> 0:14:06.760
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, or like sometimes also not Spain. This is a

0:14:06.840 --> 0:14:09.040
<v Speaker 4>particular like bug Bury guess of Spanish history.

0:14:09.160 --> 0:14:10.439
<v Speaker 2>Really, I don't think I've seen that one.

0:14:10.760 --> 0:14:13.360
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, for years, like literally you would be excluded from

0:14:13.440 --> 0:14:17.800
<v Speaker 4>European history, like like Africa starts at the Pyrenees.

0:14:18.000 --> 0:14:21.240
<v Speaker 3>It's a sort of phrase that that's hilarious.

0:14:21.440 --> 0:14:24.600
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, Like I guess it compounded because Spain was so

0:14:24.720 --> 0:14:28.320
<v Speaker 4>isolated under Franco. Right, but like yeah, this they called

0:14:28.320 --> 0:14:30.680
<v Speaker 4>it the black legend that like Spain does not belong

0:14:30.720 --> 0:14:34.200
<v Speaker 4>to Europe and and it's not again it's racialized, right,

0:14:34.440 --> 0:14:39.920
<v Speaker 4>it's because Spain had this exchange with the Muslim world, right,

0:14:40.000 --> 0:14:43.560
<v Speaker 4>and like that that culture deeply impacted Spanish culture, and

0:14:43.920 --> 0:14:48.000
<v Speaker 4>even after the Conquista, it's like it's like, you know,

0:14:48.520 --> 0:14:51.280
<v Speaker 4>the French historians were just like, nah, you guys are tainted,

0:14:51.440 --> 0:14:53.360
<v Speaker 4>like you you don't get to come back.

0:14:54.360 --> 0:14:57.280
<v Speaker 2>It's kind of a similar sitribution with the territories the

0:14:57.360 --> 0:15:00.760
<v Speaker 2>former Artsman Empire as well, technically part to Europe and

0:15:00.920 --> 0:15:04.720
<v Speaker 2>yet you know, maligned in some way. Yeah, yeah, a

0:15:04.760 --> 0:15:08.280
<v Speaker 2>little less than Still, it's like y'all have too much,

0:15:08.400 --> 0:15:11.120
<v Speaker 2>too much Turkish to watch Muslim influence.

0:15:11.200 --> 0:15:14.800
<v Speaker 4>You'all got a Yeah, you need like a thousand years

0:15:14.880 --> 0:15:16.640
<v Speaker 4>to decompress before we let you back in.

0:15:17.240 --> 0:15:21.680
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. I mean, honestly, if the Pope wasn't based in Italy,

0:15:22.200 --> 0:15:24.840
<v Speaker 2>I'm sure Italy would have a similar dynamic. I mean,

0:15:24.920 --> 0:15:27.280
<v Speaker 2>Italy is a recent construction right in terms of as

0:15:27.320 --> 0:15:30.320
<v Speaker 2>a country. Ye, but only look at the two Sicilies,

0:15:30.400 --> 0:15:35.200
<v Speaker 2>for example, that was under North African rule for a

0:15:35.280 --> 0:15:49.200
<v Speaker 2>significant period of its history. But let me not get

0:15:49.760 --> 0:15:53.400
<v Speaker 2>too far off track. One day. One more tangent, and

0:15:53.520 --> 0:15:58.000
<v Speaker 2>that is I'm far from being a dentist by any means,

0:15:58.640 --> 0:16:02.240
<v Speaker 2>or a maurist or anything of that show. But there

0:16:02.320 --> 0:16:08.800
<v Speaker 2>is something to be said for the way that the

0:16:08.960 --> 0:16:12.840
<v Speaker 2>East of the Orient has been sidelined, marginalized to treat

0:16:12.840 --> 0:16:16.120
<v Speaker 2>it us lesser than for so long, and now they're

0:16:16.160 --> 0:16:21.560
<v Speaker 2>at a point where their geopolitical sway has to be respected. Yeah,

0:16:22.360 --> 0:16:25.160
<v Speaker 2>I'm not a rooting for them by any means. I'm

0:16:25.200 --> 0:16:27.720
<v Speaker 2>not one of those people is like, yeah, multipolar world.

0:16:28.920 --> 0:16:31.000
<v Speaker 2>I would rather we have no poles, you know, as

0:16:31.040 --> 0:16:31.600
<v Speaker 2>an anarchist.

0:16:32.240 --> 0:16:33.600
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, yeah, I do know what you mean.

0:16:34.200 --> 0:16:36.400
<v Speaker 2>But it's like it's a bit of shodding for it,

0:16:36.480 --> 0:16:36.800
<v Speaker 2>I guess.

0:16:37.080 --> 0:16:40.240
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, yeah, yeah, it is, you know, ironic in a

0:16:40.840 --> 0:16:44.200
<v Speaker 4>but yeah, not necessarily in a good way. Like I've

0:16:44.280 --> 0:16:48.640
<v Speaker 4>just seen Jijienping meeting with Minan Plang, the dictator of

0:16:48.680 --> 0:16:51.280
<v Speaker 4>me and mar today, and I'm like, I'm not excited

0:16:51.400 --> 0:16:52.560
<v Speaker 4>for that pole of the world.

0:16:53.320 --> 0:16:56.560
<v Speaker 2>Not at all, not at all. Yeah. I feel the

0:16:56.640 --> 0:17:03.360
<v Speaker 2>same way about the way that the Sahel Federation has

0:17:03.440 --> 0:17:06.399
<v Speaker 2>kind of kicked out France. I'm like, yeah, stickets of France,

0:17:06.520 --> 0:17:10.040
<v Speaker 2>but also military hunters, you.

0:17:10.119 --> 0:17:14.240
<v Speaker 3>Know, yeah, yeah, like the rebranded Wagner Core now.

0:17:14.240 --> 0:17:17.920
<v Speaker 2>Like yeah, and the collaboration close collaborations Russia. But you know,

0:17:17.960 --> 0:17:19.879
<v Speaker 2>a lot of this thing is really a lot of

0:17:19.960 --> 0:17:25.719
<v Speaker 2>these relationships, these geopidical relationships are so opportunistic. It's all

0:17:25.760 --> 0:17:27.800
<v Speaker 2>opportunists on yeah, end of the day, they don't really

0:17:27.840 --> 0:17:30.440
<v Speaker 2>they're not really necessarily guided by principles.

0:17:31.119 --> 0:17:34.960
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, Like the difference I guess between like, for instance,

0:17:35.040 --> 0:17:36.960
<v Speaker 4>I you know, I've been thinking a lot about anarchist

0:17:37.000 --> 0:17:38.760
<v Speaker 4>at war, right, and people go and fight in other

0:17:38.800 --> 0:17:42.440
<v Speaker 4>people's to depend other people, right, like like the people

0:17:42.440 --> 0:17:44.320
<v Speaker 4>who went to Rajava to fight, people who went to

0:17:44.400 --> 0:17:47.600
<v Speaker 4>Miama to fight. Like there's a difference between doing something

0:17:47.640 --> 0:17:49.679
<v Speaker 4>out of a sense of solidarity and doing something out

0:17:49.680 --> 0:17:53.600
<v Speaker 4>of root opportunism, and like that always shows itself in

0:17:53.680 --> 0:17:54.000
<v Speaker 4>the end.

0:17:54.800 --> 0:17:57.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean the work groups of involvement in Africa

0:17:57.440 --> 0:18:00.720
<v Speaker 2>is the most blatant capitalist tra vun opportunism.

0:18:03.040 --> 0:18:05.119
<v Speaker 4>These people are not there for the anti colonials that

0:18:05.200 --> 0:18:09.920
<v Speaker 4>are like standing with the oppressed peoples of the world. Yeah, yeah,

0:18:10.000 --> 0:18:12.280
<v Speaker 4>like watching the Battle of Algiers and setting off to

0:18:12.920 --> 0:18:14.199
<v Speaker 4>immediately liberate the people of.

0:18:14.200 --> 0:18:19.879
<v Speaker 2>Africa literal mercenaries, right yeah. Yeah, But getting back onto

0:18:20.760 --> 0:18:24.320
<v Speaker 2>the main topic, talking about all these ways we divvy

0:18:24.440 --> 0:18:28.359
<v Speaker 2>up the world. Out of the linguistic and cultural and

0:18:28.440 --> 0:18:33.240
<v Speaker 2>geographical differences that we observe around us, came this concept

0:18:33.320 --> 0:18:37.920
<v Speaker 2>of nations, right, nation as an idea also came out

0:18:38.119 --> 0:18:42.639
<v Speaker 2>of the European imagine nation. It's commonly defined and it's

0:18:42.720 --> 0:18:44.800
<v Speaker 2>USA worldwide today, But it's commonly defined as a large

0:18:44.840 --> 0:18:49.320
<v Speaker 2>community of people who share common identity, often through language, culture, history,

0:18:49.400 --> 0:18:53.280
<v Speaker 2>and sometimes ethnicity, then who usually inhabit a specific geographic

0:18:53.440 --> 0:18:58.399
<v Speaker 2>territory with its own political organization. The comminations without states

0:18:58.840 --> 0:19:01.840
<v Speaker 2>as simply a culturalmmunity force. People feel a collective long

0:19:01.880 --> 0:19:05.080
<v Speaker 2>and then share that snee. But nations are as we know,

0:19:05.240 --> 0:19:08.640
<v Speaker 2>mostly tied up with states today, hence nation being used

0:19:08.680 --> 0:19:09.880
<v Speaker 2>as a synonym for country.

0:19:10.320 --> 0:19:13.520
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, this is one of my bug bears.

0:19:13.520 --> 0:19:16.879
<v Speaker 4>I guess is an academic like I tried to develop

0:19:16.920 --> 0:19:19.840
<v Speaker 4>this concept of Catalan nationalism that like at the time

0:19:20.000 --> 0:19:22.480
<v Speaker 4>was inherently anti fascist. I think I was trying to

0:19:22.560 --> 0:19:25.560
<v Speaker 4>be like, it ain't now like this it's a very

0:19:26.320 --> 0:19:30.480
<v Speaker 4>Catalan right now. And yeah, I do still find it

0:19:30.560 --> 0:19:33.760
<v Speaker 4>hard when people say nation is the the state, especially Americans, Like,

0:19:33.800 --> 0:19:35.960
<v Speaker 4>it's very hard, right because state is like a subset

0:19:36.240 --> 0:19:39.560
<v Speaker 4>of the state here, like the sort of military division

0:19:39.640 --> 0:19:42.080
<v Speaker 4>of the federal state. So it can be hard to

0:19:42.600 --> 0:19:43.760
<v Speaker 4>explain those differences.

0:19:44.280 --> 0:19:47.720
<v Speaker 2>And as you mentioned, this sort of way that that

0:19:47.880 --> 0:19:52.280
<v Speaker 2>Catalan nationalism has shifted. Really, I think gets to the

0:19:52.960 --> 0:19:57.920
<v Speaker 2>whole weakness of the nation idea. So Benick Anderson famously

0:19:58.040 --> 0:20:03.560
<v Speaker 2>called nations imaginedmmunities because the community exists as a collective fantasy.

0:20:04.640 --> 0:20:08.520
<v Speaker 2>You know, they imagine a deep comradeship with people who

0:20:08.560 --> 0:20:12.200
<v Speaker 2>they've never met. Yeah, and this fantasy has boundaries not

0:20:12.359 --> 0:20:16.200
<v Speaker 2>just about who is included, but also famously who is excluded.

0:20:16.560 --> 0:20:20.000
<v Speaker 2>And this fantasy is not necessarily something that is automatic

0:20:20.280 --> 0:20:22.840
<v Speaker 2>or natural as we tend to see it today. But

0:20:23.000 --> 0:20:25.760
<v Speaker 2>it's really the rise of things like print capitalism, with

0:20:25.880 --> 0:20:29.320
<v Speaker 2>the mass production of books and newspapers, and that's what

0:20:29.440 --> 0:20:36.040
<v Speaker 2>really shaped the standardization and formalization of these imagined communities,

0:20:36.520 --> 0:20:40.119
<v Speaker 2>through the creation of like common cultural reference and a

0:20:40.240 --> 0:20:42.920
<v Speaker 2>shared sense of history. Yeah. And then of course you

0:20:43.040 --> 0:20:46.440
<v Speaker 2>had the nation idea of further being developed by liberal

0:20:46.560 --> 0:20:50.680
<v Speaker 2>revolutions and through the shared experience of colonial rule. You know,

0:20:50.720 --> 0:20:55.280
<v Speaker 2>we're subject populations with mobilized nationalism to claim self determination.

0:20:56.600 --> 0:20:57.639
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, definitely like it.

0:20:58.480 --> 0:21:00.920
<v Speaker 4>I'm sure I'm trying to remember borrowed this from someone,

0:21:00.960 --> 0:21:03.960
<v Speaker 4>but the idea of like identity entrepreneurs is what I like.

0:21:04.960 --> 0:21:09.480
<v Speaker 4>Like it's when religion loses its claim on universal truth,

0:21:09.560 --> 0:21:13.760
<v Speaker 4>specifically in Europe. That's like a market for identity that

0:21:13.920 --> 0:21:18.720
<v Speaker 4>is open. And the creation of nations is like, to

0:21:18.840 --> 0:21:21.119
<v Speaker 4>my mind, like a bourgeois project, right Like, it's an

0:21:21.240 --> 0:21:26.479
<v Speaker 4>entrepreneurial endeavor that they seek to create something, a benefit

0:21:26.560 --> 0:21:28.480
<v Speaker 4>from it and like it. Yet to a degree that

0:21:28.680 --> 0:21:32.680
<v Speaker 4>turned against them, it's still an entrepreneurial endeavor, right Like. Still,

0:21:33.160 --> 0:21:36.040
<v Speaker 4>you could be creating a nation which wants to kick

0:21:36.720 --> 0:21:40.600
<v Speaker 4>France out of Morocco, right that that nation may not

0:21:40.720 --> 0:21:43.760
<v Speaker 4>have space for everyone who inhabits that territory of Morocco.

0:21:43.920 --> 0:21:46.720
<v Speaker 3>Like, it's still it's a sort of for some people.

0:21:47.320 --> 0:21:52.760
<v Speaker 2>Construct absolutely absolutely, I think the elite intellectual current of

0:21:52.840 --> 0:21:57.320
<v Speaker 2>a nationalist movements can go under stated. You know, oftentimes

0:21:57.359 --> 0:22:02.359
<v Speaker 2>what stirs up the masses toward that specific direction, because

0:22:02.359 --> 0:22:06.040
<v Speaker 2>I mean, the masses will revolt against their conditions, but

0:22:06.280 --> 0:22:09.800
<v Speaker 2>what sort of directs it in that national independence direction?

0:22:09.880 --> 0:22:12.520
<v Speaker 2>And this concept of nation is tends to be that

0:22:12.600 --> 0:22:14.479
<v Speaker 2>sort of you lead into actual current. I often look

0:22:14.480 --> 0:22:17.040
<v Speaker 2>at the history of and Tobago as a reference point.

0:22:17.080 --> 0:22:20.680
<v Speaker 2>See that's where I come from. The whole process of

0:22:20.800 --> 0:22:23.639
<v Speaker 2>nation building is always ongoing, and we are in a

0:22:23.680 --> 0:22:27.440
<v Speaker 2>position where there's an effort, there's a very strong efforts

0:22:27.520 --> 0:22:32.320
<v Speaker 2>to both push for a nation building but also recognize

0:22:32.760 --> 0:22:36.040
<v Speaker 2>our divergent pasts, you know, because we have this sort

0:22:36.119 --> 0:22:41.840
<v Speaker 2>of almost equal in population Indo Trinadian and Afro Trianadian populations,

0:22:42.200 --> 0:22:44.080
<v Speaker 2>and then a mixed population as well, and then you

0:22:44.160 --> 0:22:48.159
<v Speaker 2>have some Chinese and Syria and Lebanese and Venezuela and

0:22:48.240 --> 0:22:51.480
<v Speaker 2>and Filipino and all these different groups come into Trinidad,

0:22:51.880 --> 0:22:56.000
<v Speaker 2>and because of that colonial past, their tensions is between

0:22:56.080 --> 0:22:58.520
<v Speaker 2>those groups and things are still play out to this day.

0:22:59.440 --> 0:23:01.920
<v Speaker 2>But while tensions are played out, there's also an effort

0:23:02.080 --> 0:23:07.200
<v Speaker 2>to construct a unity through an allegiance to the nation

0:23:07.480 --> 0:23:10.520
<v Speaker 2>of Trinan Tobago to create a sense of national identity,

0:23:10.960 --> 0:23:13.320
<v Speaker 2>and as a very young country, it's still quite difficult

0:23:13.359 --> 0:23:18.359
<v Speaker 2>to do. I can imagine, especially in the United States,

0:23:19.240 --> 0:23:21.240
<v Speaker 2>it might have been a similar situation where you have

0:23:21.359 --> 0:23:25.080
<v Speaker 2>all these different European populations and different populations from around

0:23:25.119 --> 0:23:28.600
<v Speaker 2>the world who are in the US and there hasn't

0:23:28.680 --> 0:23:31.920
<v Speaker 2>quite yet been a fully built up American identity yet,

0:23:32.880 --> 0:23:34.479
<v Speaker 2>and so a lot of those tensions are still kind

0:23:34.480 --> 0:23:36.639
<v Speaker 2>of playing out, and so it takes a couple of

0:23:36.720 --> 0:23:39.040
<v Speaker 2>generations for there to be a sense of American identity

0:23:39.440 --> 0:23:42.680
<v Speaker 2>that arises out of that. Yeah, definitely turnedad being one

0:23:42.840 --> 0:23:46.119
<v Speaker 2>a younger colony and two only recently becoming independent in

0:23:46.240 --> 0:23:49.920
<v Speaker 2>nineteen sixty two, it hasn't had enough time yet to,

0:23:50.960 --> 0:23:54.920
<v Speaker 2>I suppose, develop that patriotism that America is so known for.

0:23:56.359 --> 0:23:58.240
<v Speaker 2>And so you still see a lot of people who

0:23:58.359 --> 0:24:03.080
<v Speaker 2>continue to have allegiance to the ancestry, to the heritage,

0:24:03.920 --> 0:24:06.840
<v Speaker 2>even before they have any sort of sense of connection

0:24:07.040 --> 0:24:09.360
<v Speaker 2>to the country. Concept of truingad.

0:24:09.960 --> 0:24:12.359
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, the American would have interesting because the people who

0:24:12.400 --> 0:24:15.399
<v Speaker 4>did the American Revolution might often call themselves English right like.

0:24:16.960 --> 0:24:22.400
<v Speaker 4>And it's this kind of post hoc nationalism that has applied,

0:24:22.560 --> 0:24:25.920
<v Speaker 4>right like, they did begin constructing a nation, but after

0:24:26.119 --> 0:24:29.960
<v Speaker 4>they after they gained the apparatus of the state, right like.

0:24:30.080 --> 0:24:32.800
<v Speaker 4>And sometimes they'll talk about their freedoms in terms of

0:24:32.920 --> 0:24:35.920
<v Speaker 4>English freedoms, which they themselves are not granted, right that

0:24:35.960 --> 0:24:38.119
<v Speaker 4>they don't have the same freedoms as English people in

0:24:38.280 --> 0:24:41.280
<v Speaker 4>England when they are a British colony. This concept of

0:24:41.320 --> 0:24:43.959
<v Speaker 4>freedom they will elucidate like it, and like so much

0:24:44.000 --> 0:24:46.199
<v Speaker 4>of it is based on like English common law, right,

0:24:46.400 --> 0:24:51.080
<v Speaker 4>they didn't necessarily see themselves as distinct. That comes later.

0:24:51.520 --> 0:24:53.520
<v Speaker 4>And like the US one is interesting because they have

0:24:53.640 --> 0:24:57.080
<v Speaker 4>to develop this kind of civic nationalism much. I guess

0:24:57.080 --> 0:24:59.879
<v Speaker 4>France does that two of course, but like France, probably

0:24:59.920 --> 0:25:04.720
<v Speaker 4>the og there. But like this idea, like you've subscribed

0:25:04.760 --> 0:25:09.080
<v Speaker 4>to these ideas. Therefore you're an American because they're like this,

0:25:09.440 --> 0:25:13.399
<v Speaker 4>this nation constructed by people from all over Europe. For

0:25:13.480 --> 0:25:17.480
<v Speaker 4>the most part, the phrasing is universal, but the implementation

0:25:17.760 --> 0:25:19.600
<v Speaker 4>is not. Right, it's also a country where people own

0:25:19.640 --> 0:25:20.119
<v Speaker 4>other people.

0:25:20.800 --> 0:25:24.320
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, I think I mean, like I was saying earlier,

0:25:25.040 --> 0:25:27.840
<v Speaker 2>it does help in our struggle for autonomy and independence

0:25:27.880 --> 0:25:31.679
<v Speaker 2>from cluding on rule to have this construct the nation, right,

0:25:32.800 --> 0:25:36.560
<v Speaker 2>but it also obscures a lot of the real material

0:25:36.640 --> 0:25:39.560
<v Speaker 2>divisions in society, you know between the with in class

0:25:39.640 --> 0:25:42.600
<v Speaker 2>and the elites. And so you have this national identity

0:25:42.680 --> 0:25:47.360
<v Speaker 2>that is constructed by intellectual and you know, economic elites,

0:25:48.400 --> 0:25:51.400
<v Speaker 2>and it's overlaid onto a population that does not really

0:25:51.480 --> 0:25:55.840
<v Speaker 2>have us see in that construction. And so these nationalist

0:25:55.880 --> 0:25:59.280
<v Speaker 2>projects will try to downplay or suppress differences in conflicts

0:26:00.359 --> 0:26:06.560
<v Speaker 2>and as part of why nationalism so often lends itself

0:26:06.640 --> 0:26:10.040
<v Speaker 2>to fascist well, because fascism is an outgrowth of this

0:26:10.200 --> 0:26:14.520
<v Speaker 2>idea of nation where they promote this vision of national

0:26:14.640 --> 0:26:19.280
<v Speaker 2>unity and stifle class conflict and create a collusion of

0:26:19.600 --> 0:26:23.880
<v Speaker 2>classes that push us aside of people who don't fit

0:26:24.080 --> 0:26:25.480
<v Speaker 2>within their concept of the nation.

0:26:26.280 --> 0:26:26.520
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:26:26.600 --> 0:26:29.200
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I often think, like when I'm talking to my

0:26:29.320 --> 0:26:32.040
<v Speaker 4>undergrads about nation, like the most distinct where I can say,

0:26:32.200 --> 0:26:36.080
<v Speaker 4>is like the salient we through both space and time, right,

0:26:36.240 --> 0:26:38.840
<v Speaker 4>Like it's the people you identify with, it's the us,

0:26:40.000 --> 0:26:44.600
<v Speaker 4>And fascism weaponizes us against the rest of humanity or

0:26:44.760 --> 0:26:48.840
<v Speaker 4>against us mostly like against escapegoat group who become them, right,

0:26:48.960 --> 0:26:52.359
<v Speaker 4>and then like the nation is for us, the state

0:26:52.520 --> 0:26:55.400
<v Speaker 4>is for us, it's not for them. Thus they must

0:26:55.440 --> 0:26:59.720
<v Speaker 4>be exterminated exactly. Is an obvious outgrowth of nationalism.

0:27:00.119 --> 0:27:05.359
<v Speaker 2>Hence xenophobia, hence anti semitism, anti blackness, anti indigeneity, all

0:27:05.400 --> 0:27:09.200
<v Speaker 2>these prejudices. I mean, And that's the thing about nationalism.

0:27:09.240 --> 0:27:13.160
<v Speaker 2>It's not necessarily consistent because you'll say, all people from

0:27:13.240 --> 0:27:15.639
<v Speaker 2>this land, you know, we should desay to be united,

0:27:16.200 --> 0:27:18.080
<v Speaker 2>except for those people who are also from this land.

0:27:18.119 --> 0:27:21.080
<v Speaker 2>They don't get to come, you know, they are perpetual outsiders.

0:27:21.160 --> 0:27:24.480
<v Speaker 2>They don't share the true culture. They'ren't part of our destiny.

0:27:24.560 --> 0:27:28.720
<v Speaker 2>So even if they're legally citizens or legally a long

0:27:28.880 --> 0:27:31.480
<v Speaker 2>term residents, or they haven't residents there for a long

0:27:31.560 --> 0:27:34.359
<v Speaker 2>time the entire lives generations, or if the case may be,

0:27:35.119 --> 0:27:37.399
<v Speaker 2>they don't count. They're outside forever.

0:27:37.960 --> 0:27:41.520
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, yeah, they can never assent to like a sort

0:27:41.520 --> 0:27:45.400
<v Speaker 4>of higher status of being one of us. British people

0:27:45.440 --> 0:27:47.639
<v Speaker 4>like to mobilize this one a lot, right, Like you

0:27:47.720 --> 0:27:48.919
<v Speaker 4>can be British.

0:27:48.760 --> 0:27:50.040
<v Speaker 2>But you can never be English.

0:27:50.280 --> 0:27:50.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:27:51.760 --> 0:27:55.280
<v Speaker 4>I forget who coined that coined the phrase cricket nationalism,

0:27:56.520 --> 0:27:59.600
<v Speaker 4>but it's just particularly kind of ridiculous, Like, oh, if

0:28:00.320 --> 0:28:02.760
<v Speaker 4>if there's a Test match between Britain and Pakistan and

0:28:02.840 --> 0:28:06.520
<v Speaker 4>Britain and Trinidad Tobago, who do you support? Like is that,

0:28:06.800 --> 0:28:08.240
<v Speaker 4>like are you really going to make that the core

0:28:08.320 --> 0:28:11.520
<v Speaker 4>of your national identity? Like the cene qua non of

0:28:11.640 --> 0:28:15.159
<v Speaker 4>being British is like which flag you take to the

0:28:15.240 --> 0:28:21.280
<v Speaker 4>cricket match, Like it's particularly ridiculous and if it doesn't

0:28:21.440 --> 0:28:24.000
<v Speaker 4>reflect exclusion, right, people aren't taking their flags to the

0:28:24.040 --> 0:28:27.119
<v Speaker 4>cricket match because like that's the core of the entity.

0:28:27.280 --> 0:28:29.359
<v Speaker 4>They're just like, yeah, well kind of I get treated

0:28:29.400 --> 0:28:35.080
<v Speaker 4>differently because of my ethnic boundary, like makeup right ethnic presentation.

0:28:35.640 --> 0:28:38.000
<v Speaker 4>So I guess you guys don't like me, so like

0:28:38.240 --> 0:28:40.360
<v Speaker 4>they'll be funny when we kick your ass cricket, like

0:28:40.960 --> 0:28:44.040
<v Speaker 4>it's the cause of arrow points in the wrong direction.

0:28:44.160 --> 0:28:47.360
<v Speaker 2>I guess I can imagine I will not be bringing

0:28:47.520 --> 0:28:50.240
<v Speaker 2>any flags to any cricket match because I don't attend

0:28:50.280 --> 0:28:54.520
<v Speaker 2>cricket matches. I'm not too big of a fan of cricket.

0:28:55.160 --> 0:28:56.040
<v Speaker 3>I can't be doing it.

0:28:56.480 --> 0:28:58.920
<v Speaker 2>Stick to my football, and I say football in the

0:28:59.000 --> 0:28:59.920
<v Speaker 2>international sense.

0:29:00.400 --> 0:29:03.640
<v Speaker 4>Good, yeah, yeah, I can't stand around long enough to

0:29:03.640 --> 0:29:04.880
<v Speaker 4>play cricket, to be honest.

0:29:05.280 --> 0:29:09.040
<v Speaker 2>As we're talking about national liberation, these struggles often took

0:29:09.080 --> 0:29:12.080
<v Speaker 2>place in the context of the Cold War, right, which

0:29:12.160 --> 0:29:14.680
<v Speaker 2>is where we get this other sense of this other

0:29:14.800 --> 0:29:18.040
<v Speaker 2>framework for divving up the world now. Growing up, I

0:29:18.200 --> 0:29:20.320
<v Speaker 2>was always told that, you know, tran Tobago is a

0:29:20.400 --> 0:29:23.560
<v Speaker 2>third World country. I had a social studies textbook, and

0:29:23.640 --> 0:29:26.720
<v Speaker 2>I taught first world, second world, third world. But I

0:29:26.760 --> 0:29:29.320
<v Speaker 2>didn't teach first world, second world, third world in the

0:29:29.400 --> 0:29:31.920
<v Speaker 2>context of the Cold War, because I grew up in

0:29:32.000 --> 0:29:35.479
<v Speaker 2>a post Cold War world, and these terms came from

0:29:35.480 --> 0:29:37.720
<v Speaker 2>the Cool War but persisted after the Cold War. So

0:29:38.400 --> 0:29:42.000
<v Speaker 2>what happened, I was taught we are third world because

0:29:42.080 --> 0:29:45.120
<v Speaker 2>we are still developing. We're not at that intermediate stage

0:29:45.160 --> 0:29:47.440
<v Speaker 2>development where we could say that the second world, and

0:29:47.520 --> 0:29:51.480
<v Speaker 2>we're not at that first world level of development like America, right,

0:29:51.600 --> 0:29:56.920
<v Speaker 2>And that's a smaller side for me. But I've always

0:29:56.960 --> 0:30:01.080
<v Speaker 2>found it mildly irritating when I see people use this

0:30:01.400 --> 0:30:04.920
<v Speaker 2>famous social media catchphrase or America is a third World

0:30:04.960 --> 0:30:06.120
<v Speaker 2>country in a Gucci belt.

0:30:08.040 --> 0:30:11.200
<v Speaker 3>I haven't seen now on the yet. That's annoying.

0:30:11.520 --> 0:30:14.280
<v Speaker 2>I'm sure you've seen similar sentiments, this idea, Oh, America's

0:30:14.320 --> 0:30:15.600
<v Speaker 2>third world, American slid world.

0:30:16.000 --> 0:30:16.720
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I have.

0:30:17.400 --> 0:30:21.040
<v Speaker 2>Like, it's just annoying to me yet. So one, it

0:30:21.160 --> 0:30:23.880
<v Speaker 2>completely divorces the concert of the third world from its

0:30:23.920 --> 0:30:27.560
<v Speaker 2>actual origins and to it. Also, I think reflects that

0:30:27.680 --> 0:30:30.280
<v Speaker 2>kind of a blindness to what's happened in the rest

0:30:30.320 --> 0:30:33.080
<v Speaker 2>of the world, in the countries that are actually considered

0:30:33.120 --> 0:30:35.440
<v Speaker 2>the third world, and the difference is between them, you know,

0:30:35.600 --> 0:30:39.680
<v Speaker 2>for everything that we can express frustrations about in the US,

0:30:40.400 --> 0:30:43.080
<v Speaker 2>anybody in the third world, I think, and I've when

0:30:43.080 --> 0:30:44.760
<v Speaker 2>I when I've visited the US. I've seen it from

0:30:44.800 --> 0:30:48.920
<v Speaker 2>my own eyes. You know, there's still things there that

0:30:49.600 --> 0:30:54.920
<v Speaker 2>Americans might take for granted that are just not that

0:30:55.440 --> 0:30:58.760
<v Speaker 2>would never be taken for granted in other contexts. And

0:30:58.880 --> 0:31:01.680
<v Speaker 2>I see, of course the division see in America's version

0:31:01.720 --> 0:31:04.160
<v Speaker 2>of the First World versus you know, some of the

0:31:04.200 --> 0:31:06.960
<v Speaker 2>European Social Democracy's version of the First World. So I

0:31:07.040 --> 0:31:09.320
<v Speaker 2>get that frustration, you know, the lack of free health

0:31:09.400 --> 0:31:12.560
<v Speaker 2>care and that kind of thing, investment in infrastructure and

0:31:12.600 --> 0:31:16.760
<v Speaker 2>all that. But let me just get into the background

0:31:16.800 --> 0:31:29.760
<v Speaker 2>behind the tomb. Right as we step into the Cool War,

0:31:29.880 --> 0:31:32.520
<v Speaker 2>you have this concept of the three world model that

0:31:32.640 --> 0:31:35.920
<v Speaker 2>came after World War Two. The pre war status cool

0:31:36.000 --> 0:31:38.680
<v Speaker 2>was over and you had new conflicts on the horizon.

0:31:39.360 --> 0:31:43.240
<v Speaker 2>And so the film First World originally described the capitalist

0:31:43.320 --> 0:31:47.760
<v Speaker 2>block led by the United States and Western Europe, where

0:31:47.880 --> 0:31:52.080
<v Speaker 2>capitalist markets, liberal democracy, and economic progress was celebrated. And

0:31:52.200 --> 0:31:55.160
<v Speaker 2>then you had the Second World block, which referred to

0:31:55.200 --> 0:31:58.720
<v Speaker 2>the communist bloc led by the Soviet Union, where what

0:31:58.840 --> 0:32:03.960
<v Speaker 2>I would consider state and centrally planned economies shape their societies.

0:32:04.640 --> 0:32:07.480
<v Speaker 2>So in the First World they had countries like the US, Australia,

0:32:08.200 --> 0:32:12.120
<v Speaker 2>Africa today might be shocking you know, Iran was even

0:32:12.200 --> 0:32:15.600
<v Speaker 2>considered part of the First World Block during the Cool War.

0:32:16.080 --> 0:32:17.800
<v Speaker 2>That might be shockinged now because when we think of

0:32:17.840 --> 0:32:20.040
<v Speaker 2>some of these countries like, oh, those are Third World countries.

0:32:20.080 --> 0:32:23.160
<v Speaker 2>Those are undeveloped countries. They aren't at the developed level

0:32:23.200 --> 0:32:27.120
<v Speaker 2>of the West yet. But in the context in which

0:32:27.120 --> 0:32:30.800
<v Speaker 2>the three World model originated, these were countries that explicitly

0:32:30.960 --> 0:32:35.000
<v Speaker 2>aligned themselves with the policies of the United States and

0:32:35.120 --> 0:32:40.640
<v Speaker 2>its allies as capitalist nations against the Soviet Bloc. And

0:32:40.800 --> 0:32:43.880
<v Speaker 2>the Soviet Bloc you had, of course, countries like China

0:32:44.680 --> 0:32:52.320
<v Speaker 2>and Vietnam, Laos, Ethiopia, Yemen, Huba, all these different countries

0:32:52.440 --> 0:32:57.320
<v Speaker 2>align themselves explicitly with the Soviet Union. Then the Third

0:32:57.400 --> 0:32:59.800
<v Speaker 2>World and where the third will concept came in was

0:33:00.080 --> 0:33:04.680
<v Speaker 2>with all the countries that stood against picking aside. Yeah,

0:33:05.000 --> 0:33:07.440
<v Speaker 2>a lot of these were former colonies and nations that

0:33:07.560 --> 0:33:10.680
<v Speaker 2>chose not to side completely with either and to this

0:33:10.840 --> 0:33:13.640
<v Speaker 2>whole concept, this whole idea of the non aligned movement.

0:33:14.560 --> 0:33:18.200
<v Speaker 2>It really kicked off thanks to the joining of the

0:33:18.280 --> 0:33:22.960
<v Speaker 2>Indian Prime Minister, the Kenaian President, the Indonesian President, and

0:33:23.040 --> 0:33:27.720
<v Speaker 2>the President of the United Arab Republic alongside Yugoslavia, and

0:33:27.840 --> 0:33:31.400
<v Speaker 2>so all these countries who all had very different economic

0:33:31.520 --> 0:33:34.960
<v Speaker 2>arrange ones. Yugoslavia famously was kind of doing its own thing,

0:33:35.560 --> 0:33:39.120
<v Speaker 2>compared to a lot of the other countries associated with socialism,

0:33:40.320 --> 0:33:42.640
<v Speaker 2>India and Ghana, they were also kind of doing their

0:33:42.680 --> 0:33:46.800
<v Speaker 2>own thing, kind of a mix Trancebagos also considered part

0:33:47.000 --> 0:33:52.200
<v Speaker 2>of the non aligned movement. And so these classifications at

0:33:52.240 --> 0:33:56.320
<v Speaker 2>the time, these were geopolitical and all political ideologies, not

0:33:56.440 --> 0:34:00.560
<v Speaker 2>necessarily economic development. So technically speaking, the term shouldn't even

0:34:00.600 --> 0:34:04.120
<v Speaker 2>be relevant US today. I mean, the Cold War of

0:34:04.240 --> 0:34:07.600
<v Speaker 2>the twentieth century is over. But over time the narrative

0:34:07.680 --> 0:34:10.080
<v Speaker 2>began to twist. You know, so because you didn't pick

0:34:10.080 --> 0:34:12.560
<v Speaker 2>a side, you didn't pick the red team or the

0:34:12.600 --> 0:34:14.880
<v Speaker 2>blue team, you didn't pick the first will of the

0:34:14.960 --> 0:34:19.680
<v Speaker 2>Second World, this narrative developed where or you didn't pick

0:34:19.680 --> 0:34:24.160
<v Speaker 2>a side, you're politically independent, so you're poor, you're chaotic,

0:34:24.280 --> 0:34:26.800
<v Speaker 2>you're a failed state, all these different things. And of

0:34:26.880 --> 0:34:30.319
<v Speaker 2>course there were incidents in part influenced of course by

0:34:31.160 --> 0:34:33.360
<v Speaker 2>state actors in the US and state actors in the

0:34:33.960 --> 0:34:38.120
<v Speaker 2>Soviet client block would have contributed to this outcome. But

0:34:38.480 --> 0:34:40.919
<v Speaker 2>over time you get this sense of or the third

0:34:40.960 --> 0:34:45.319
<v Speaker 2>world is failure. All these states were trying different paths

0:34:45.320 --> 0:34:49.840
<v Speaker 2>of development, different approaches to governance from either of the

0:34:49.880 --> 0:34:54.320
<v Speaker 2>two camps, mixed hybrid approaches, but in the end this

0:34:54.520 --> 0:34:57.759
<v Speaker 2>just got them stuck with the label of underdevelopment and

0:34:58.000 --> 0:35:01.560
<v Speaker 2>at having them being seen as last. Now today people

0:35:01.640 --> 0:35:05.920
<v Speaker 2>don't use food world as much as they use developing,

0:35:06.200 --> 0:35:10.840
<v Speaker 2>at least in you know, the more above board discourse.

0:35:11.560 --> 0:35:14.560
<v Speaker 2>But that division also has its own implications, right, the

0:35:14.640 --> 0:35:17.640
<v Speaker 2>developed countries versus the developing countries. It's kind of a

0:35:17.719 --> 0:35:21.279
<v Speaker 2>softer sorts of version of the same thing.

0:35:21.400 --> 0:35:24.080
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it's kind of gentler, Yeah, the same shit.

0:35:25.000 --> 0:35:28.080
<v Speaker 2>What those terms do implicitly, it's like, you know what,

0:35:28.160 --> 0:35:31.920
<v Speaker 2>you're fish in water, so you can't recognize water. It's

0:35:31.960 --> 0:35:36.799
<v Speaker 2>hard to recognize these things, these ideological impulses when we're

0:35:36.840 --> 0:35:40.279
<v Speaker 2>submerged in them. If you take a step back, you realize, oh,

0:35:40.440 --> 0:35:44.000
<v Speaker 2>these terms developed and developing they have very heavy implications.

0:35:44.400 --> 0:35:46.960
<v Speaker 2>And the implication is that there's a single linear path

0:35:47.080 --> 0:35:51.560
<v Speaker 2>to progress modeled after Western capitalism, that all societies are

0:35:51.560 --> 0:35:57.839
<v Speaker 2>progressing towards through industrialization, through consumerism, through the ALMIGHTYGP growth

0:35:58.440 --> 0:36:01.879
<v Speaker 2>and so development of your your underdevelopment becomes a tool

0:36:01.920 --> 0:36:06.880
<v Speaker 2>of intervention. It becomes a way to mask imperial interests

0:36:07.040 --> 0:36:08.759
<v Speaker 2>with the sort of the nair of oh, we're just

0:36:08.880 --> 0:36:10.120
<v Speaker 2>kind of helping you out.

0:36:10.680 --> 0:36:10.800
<v Speaker 1>You know.

0:36:10.880 --> 0:36:14.240
<v Speaker 2>It's like we move from your savage you're a primitive,

0:36:14.840 --> 0:36:18.359
<v Speaker 2>so you're just not developed yet. But theory will help

0:36:18.400 --> 0:36:20.600
<v Speaker 2>you out. And that's how you get the whole sort

0:36:20.640 --> 0:36:24.840
<v Speaker 2>of IMF and World Bank introductions of models of debts

0:36:24.960 --> 0:36:29.080
<v Speaker 2>and policy conditions and metrics and all these different things

0:36:29.160 --> 0:36:33.720
<v Speaker 2>to sort of shape these countries into client states, states

0:36:33.760 --> 0:36:38.680
<v Speaker 2>that can be used to further Western development. The Cold

0:36:38.719 --> 0:36:42.840
<v Speaker 2>War is technically over now, as I said, so I

0:36:42.880 --> 0:36:47.000
<v Speaker 2>suppose we've reached the end of history, as the famous

0:36:47.040 --> 0:36:50.320
<v Speaker 2>saying goes, but not exactly. In the early nineteen nineties,

0:36:50.680 --> 0:36:54.160
<v Speaker 2>Samuel Huntington came up with a thesis to explain the

0:36:54.239 --> 0:36:57.800
<v Speaker 2>conflicts that we define the post Cold War world and

0:36:58.040 --> 0:37:00.440
<v Speaker 2>as we entered into the twenty fifth century, and so

0:37:00.560 --> 0:37:02.759
<v Speaker 2>he argued that the future of global conflict would not

0:37:02.840 --> 0:37:06.880
<v Speaker 2>be defined by competing ideologies or economic systems, but by

0:37:06.960 --> 0:37:10.600
<v Speaker 2>cultural fault lines. In his nineteen ninety three article in

0:37:10.680 --> 0:37:13.480
<v Speaker 2>Foreign Affairs, which Lates expanded into his nineteen ninety six

0:37:13.560 --> 0:37:16.040
<v Speaker 2>book The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of the

0:37:16.080 --> 0:37:19.280
<v Speaker 2>World Order, Huntington predicted that the primary source of conflict

0:37:19.360 --> 0:37:23.560
<v Speaker 2>in a new era would be between distinct civilizations. His

0:37:23.719 --> 0:37:25.800
<v Speaker 2>model would have pointed to clashes between the West and

0:37:25.920 --> 0:37:30.680
<v Speaker 2>other groups Islamic nations, the Confucian East, and of course

0:37:30.719 --> 0:37:32.880
<v Speaker 2>set up this sense that the West is this pinnacle

0:37:33.000 --> 0:37:35.920
<v Speaker 2>of rationality and modernity, and all these others are in

0:37:36.000 --> 0:37:40.360
<v Speaker 2>competition with the fantastic, amazing West. And I always like

0:37:40.440 --> 0:37:42.719
<v Speaker 2>to call out some of these strange ways that he

0:37:42.760 --> 0:37:46.040
<v Speaker 2>has divided the world. Right, So sub Saharan Africa is

0:37:46.120 --> 0:37:51.560
<v Speaker 2>all grouped up into the African camp, all of North Africa,

0:37:51.680 --> 0:37:55.920
<v Speaker 2>the Middle East, into West Asia, all of that is

0:37:56.000 --> 0:37:59.880
<v Speaker 2>considered part of the Islamic civilization. Forget all the different

0:38:00.200 --> 0:38:02.600
<v Speaker 2>between any of them. By the way, Indonesia it's also

0:38:02.680 --> 0:38:05.960
<v Speaker 2>part of the Islamic block. You have the Sinic or

0:38:06.000 --> 0:38:12.560
<v Speaker 2>the Confucian block that includes China, both Koreas, Taiwan, and Vietnam,

0:38:13.440 --> 0:38:16.320
<v Speaker 2>except for the parts of China that are under the

0:38:16.360 --> 0:38:20.239
<v Speaker 2>Buddhist camp, such as Tibet. So Tibet is kind of

0:38:20.280 --> 0:38:23.200
<v Speaker 2>carved up on its own as its own camp. Mongolia

0:38:23.280 --> 0:38:27.759
<v Speaker 2>is also under the Buddhist camp. Thailand and all these

0:38:27.800 --> 0:38:30.279
<v Speaker 2>others in Southeast Asia considered part of the Buddhist camp.

0:38:30.600 --> 0:38:30.799
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:38:31.280 --> 0:38:33.360
<v Speaker 2>And then you have the Latin American block, which is

0:38:33.400 --> 0:38:36.040
<v Speaker 2>everybody part of Latin America and even people who are

0:38:36.080 --> 0:38:39.960
<v Speaker 2>not technically Latin America and are kind of swept in there.

0:38:41.000 --> 0:38:42.239
<v Speaker 2>And I'm going to be a by the base of

0:38:42.360 --> 0:38:45.040
<v Speaker 2>the map that I saw on the Wikipedia article on

0:38:45.200 --> 0:38:45.680
<v Speaker 2>this subject.

0:38:45.760 --> 0:38:46.799
<v Speaker 3>Ye, I found that map.

0:38:46.880 --> 0:38:52.640
<v Speaker 2>Now, it's some very bizarre divisions and ways to cut

0:38:52.760 --> 0:38:55.000
<v Speaker 2>up this world. They have the Western world versus the

0:38:55.160 --> 0:39:02.279
<v Speaker 2>Orthodox world, which includes Kazakhstan and Greece and Ukraine and

0:39:02.480 --> 0:39:06.880
<v Speaker 2>Russia all under that civilizational banner. Yeah. The Philippines is

0:39:06.960 --> 0:39:11.840
<v Speaker 2>somehow part Islamic, part Western, and part Sinic. It's a

0:39:11.920 --> 0:39:13.680
<v Speaker 2>very unusual blend.

0:39:14.080 --> 0:39:14.279
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:39:14.719 --> 0:39:16.920
<v Speaker 4>And then he's just got like Japan it's just hanging

0:39:16.960 --> 0:39:17.880
<v Speaker 4>out there by itself.

0:39:18.040 --> 0:39:22.000
<v Speaker 2>Oh yeah, I forgot to mention, especially pan It's kind

0:39:22.000 --> 0:39:23.000
<v Speaker 2>of it's a one thing. Yeah.

0:39:23.000 --> 0:39:26.400
<v Speaker 4>It just literally says Japanese. I've forgotten about that. And

0:39:26.520 --> 0:39:30.239
<v Speaker 4>then he goes on to freak out about like the

0:39:30.440 --> 0:39:35.120
<v Speaker 4>like Latin world as he sees it, like fucking dividing

0:39:35.200 --> 0:39:38.120
<v Speaker 4>the United States, right, Like in his his is it

0:39:38.239 --> 0:39:40.560
<v Speaker 4>called like who we are or where we are or something?

0:39:40.680 --> 0:39:44.160
<v Speaker 4>His book about migration in the United States. M it

0:39:44.320 --> 0:39:46.839
<v Speaker 4>was after clash of civilizations he wrote this book about

0:39:46.920 --> 0:39:50.080
<v Speaker 4>like how the like I think I don't quite remember

0:39:50.160 --> 0:39:52.120
<v Speaker 4>how he terms it, Like does he use Latino or

0:39:52.200 --> 0:39:56.600
<v Speaker 4>Hispanic or something else, but like that that that population

0:39:56.760 --> 0:40:00.120
<v Speaker 4>increasing in the United States will like divide the to

0:40:00.280 --> 0:40:03.000
<v Speaker 4>day too, too fundamentally opposed civilizations.

0:40:03.880 --> 0:40:09.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, he has some interesting compulsions. Yeah, and unfortunately

0:40:10.320 --> 0:40:15.440
<v Speaker 2>his thesis found its voice following the events of nine

0:40:15.480 --> 0:40:19.120
<v Speaker 2>to eleven partitions and media. These people were taking his

0:40:19.239 --> 0:40:23.520
<v Speaker 2>ideas to kind of justify the war and terror that

0:40:23.560 --> 0:40:27.120
<v Speaker 2>would unfold. It also creates sort of cultural device that

0:40:27.200 --> 0:40:30.080
<v Speaker 2>settle into place at home will not create, but shape

0:40:30.600 --> 0:40:34.120
<v Speaker 2>those cultural divides as you create the sense of oh,

0:40:34.280 --> 0:40:37.359
<v Speaker 2>if there's if we're experiencing a clash of civilizations right now,

0:40:37.880 --> 0:40:41.600
<v Speaker 2>then this flood couldn't quote of people from another civilization

0:40:41.800 --> 0:40:44.879
<v Speaker 2>is a threat to the invasion. It's something that needs

0:40:44.920 --> 0:40:49.280
<v Speaker 2>to be targeted and fought against. And so in a sense,

0:40:49.640 --> 0:40:52.920
<v Speaker 2>his class civilizations is kind of a repackaging of a

0:40:52.960 --> 0:40:55.800
<v Speaker 2>lot of the binaries and divisions we've spoken about before.

0:40:56.120 --> 0:40:59.280
<v Speaker 2>You have elements of nationalism, you have elements of civilized

0:40:59.320 --> 0:41:03.279
<v Speaker 2>versus warber, the evelements of East and West, the Cold

0:41:03.320 --> 0:41:07.279
<v Speaker 2>War dichotomies. All of that kind of comes together in

0:41:07.400 --> 0:41:12.240
<v Speaker 2>this neat package. Finally, we enter the twenty first century,

0:41:12.360 --> 0:41:15.080
<v Speaker 2>and they are two very popular ways that we now

0:41:15.160 --> 0:41:18.680
<v Speaker 2>categorize the world. People tend to use the phrases Global

0:41:18.800 --> 0:41:22.320
<v Speaker 2>North and Global South as a softer or more politically

0:41:22.360 --> 0:41:26.279
<v Speaker 2>correct alternative to develop developing or foods in third world.

0:41:26.800 --> 0:41:30.600
<v Speaker 2>It's considered less loaded, more neutral sounding, and it's originally

0:41:30.640 --> 0:41:35.120
<v Speaker 2>popularized via UN frameworks and the brand line, which is

0:41:35.200 --> 0:41:38.800
<v Speaker 2>done in nineteen eighty, which drew a literal line across

0:41:38.880 --> 0:41:41.640
<v Speaker 2>the globe, separating the wealthier North from the poorer South.

0:41:42.120 --> 0:41:45.000
<v Speaker 2>To be clear, though, despite the geographical language, it's not

0:41:45.239 --> 0:41:49.480
<v Speaker 2>literally about hemispheres. Australia is considered part of the Global

0:41:49.520 --> 0:41:52.759
<v Speaker 2>North and Mongolia is considered part of the Global South.

0:41:53.280 --> 0:41:55.719
<v Speaker 2>But generally speak in the global salth refus to the

0:41:55.760 --> 0:41:58.960
<v Speaker 2>post Coulnar regions and the global North refus the wealthy,

0:41:59.120 --> 0:42:02.360
<v Speaker 2>industrialized trees of the world. To me, again, it's not

0:42:02.520 --> 0:42:05.920
<v Speaker 2>really a flawless framework. It has all the same binaries

0:42:06.120 --> 0:42:12.280
<v Speaker 2>and smoothing over of complexities of internal class divides between

0:42:12.400 --> 0:42:14.919
<v Speaker 2>for example, ritually it's in the global South and poor

0:42:14.960 --> 0:42:18.440
<v Speaker 2>communities in the North. It gives impression that entire countries

0:42:18.440 --> 0:42:22.640
<v Speaker 2>share unified class experience, I think. I think it also

0:42:23.040 --> 0:42:29.320
<v Speaker 2>has the potential to obscure inequality between South South relations.

0:42:29.719 --> 0:42:31.400
<v Speaker 2>So yes, two countries may both be a part of

0:42:31.400 --> 0:42:33.479
<v Speaker 2>the Global South, but there could be a massive power

0:42:33.480 --> 0:42:36.400
<v Speaker 2>differential between them that you know, sets them up for

0:42:36.600 --> 0:42:41.680
<v Speaker 2>interventions and equal treaties and also sort of different sorts

0:42:41.680 --> 0:42:47.000
<v Speaker 2>of medline. For example, Saudi Arabia, at least in one

0:42:47.040 --> 0:42:50.360
<v Speaker 2>map that I saw, is considered part of the Global South.

0:42:50.920 --> 0:42:54.400
<v Speaker 2>But as we know, Saudi Arabia is famous first medland

0:42:54.600 --> 0:42:59.600
<v Speaker 2>across Africa and the Middle East. It's interventions, it's financing

0:42:59.680 --> 0:43:04.000
<v Speaker 2>of the conflicts across the region. Now I get why

0:43:04.719 --> 0:43:07.840
<v Speaker 2>the term is used. It creates a sense of shared struggle,

0:43:08.280 --> 0:43:12.120
<v Speaker 2>especially in anti imperialist and climate justice spaces. But I

0:43:12.200 --> 0:43:16.120
<v Speaker 2>think it has weaknesses, you know, and how we constructlidarity.

0:43:15.239 --> 0:43:17.279
<v Speaker 3>On that basis, yeah, very much too.

0:43:17.920 --> 0:43:20.239
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. And the other and final system that I wanted

0:43:20.280 --> 0:43:23.799
<v Speaker 2>to mention that has gained popularity these days. Is world

0:43:23.840 --> 0:43:27.960
<v Speaker 2>systems theory, which is actually older than class civilizations. It

0:43:28.040 --> 0:43:31.080
<v Speaker 2>came out of Immanuel Wallastein's work during the Cold War,

0:43:32.320 --> 0:43:34.160
<v Speaker 2>and he kind of stood out and said that he

0:43:34.280 --> 0:43:37.320
<v Speaker 2>was rejecting the three world system and the simplistic country

0:43:37.360 --> 0:43:41.040
<v Speaker 2>by country development models. Instead he created this world systems

0:43:41.120 --> 0:43:45.520
<v Speaker 2>theory that saw capitalism as a single global system, not

0:43:45.640 --> 0:43:49.800
<v Speaker 2>a patchwork of individual national economies. So the focuses on

0:43:49.920 --> 0:43:54.239
<v Speaker 2>labor roles, on commodity flows, and on power concentration. And

0:43:54.360 --> 0:43:56.839
<v Speaker 2>I think in an even more globalized world it makes

0:43:56.880 --> 0:43:59.960
<v Speaker 2>the most sense to the wallaceteine. They have three differ

0:44:00.120 --> 0:44:02.759
<v Speaker 2>and zones of the global economy. You have the core,

0:44:03.480 --> 0:44:07.239
<v Speaker 2>which as you know, have strong states, financial capital, tech

0:44:07.280 --> 0:44:11.800
<v Speaker 2>heavy industries controlled with global institutions, and they tend to

0:44:11.840 --> 0:44:15.680
<v Speaker 2>exploit the labor and resources of the periphery, while exports

0:44:15.760 --> 0:44:19.240
<v Speaker 2>and high value goods and debt structures, and the periphery

0:44:19.320 --> 0:44:23.080
<v Speaker 2>of the countries that tend to have weaker institutions, extractive

0:44:23.280 --> 0:44:27.560
<v Speaker 2>or career economies, reliance and export and raw materials, debt

0:44:27.640 --> 0:44:31.719
<v Speaker 2>defendency and structural adjustment policies, and they often dump in

0:44:31.760 --> 0:44:36.080
<v Speaker 2>grounds for pollution waste and arms from the global North.

0:44:36.680 --> 0:44:39.279
<v Speaker 2>The semi periphery are then considered under his model, the

0:44:39.360 --> 0:44:42.239
<v Speaker 2>countries that mediates between the core and the periphery. These

0:44:42.280 --> 0:44:46.560
<v Speaker 2>are industrializing economies with mixed labor and capital exports. They

0:44:46.640 --> 0:44:50.680
<v Speaker 2>sometimes exploit others while being exploited themselves, and these include

0:44:50.680 --> 0:44:54.400
<v Speaker 2>countries like Brazil, India, Mexico, Turkey, and South Africa. And

0:44:54.520 --> 0:44:56.600
<v Speaker 2>they tend to save as the buffers as stabilize the

0:44:56.680 --> 0:45:01.160
<v Speaker 2>system while chasing core status. I think this model is

0:45:01.680 --> 0:45:04.879
<v Speaker 2>very dynamic. It could be more dynamic, but it does

0:45:05.280 --> 0:45:10.320
<v Speaker 2>have the capacity to highlight the systemic interdependence of this

0:45:10.560 --> 0:45:15.200
<v Speaker 2>glocal system, that one region's wealth is contingent on another's dispossession.

0:45:16.000 --> 0:45:18.120
<v Speaker 2>It makes it very useful for understanding that, you know,

0:45:18.320 --> 0:45:21.160
<v Speaker 2>poverty is not something that just happens, it's nan is

0:45:21.360 --> 0:45:26.640
<v Speaker 2>very clearly structured and developed by the wealth of the North.

0:45:27.680 --> 0:45:29.480
<v Speaker 2>And I think also with the corporate free model, you

0:45:29.600 --> 0:45:33.280
<v Speaker 2>see the sense of a one way flow where value

0:45:33.360 --> 0:45:36.279
<v Speaker 2>and labor goes from the periphery to the core. But

0:45:36.520 --> 0:45:40.800
<v Speaker 2>there is another direction that flow goes right because the

0:45:40.920 --> 0:45:43.920
<v Speaker 2>migrants from the periphree they go to the core. They

0:45:44.000 --> 0:45:47.319
<v Speaker 2>fill precurious rules and core economy is like care work

0:45:47.440 --> 0:45:50.560
<v Speaker 2>and agriculture and logistics, and so they almost become an

0:45:50.600 --> 0:45:54.160
<v Speaker 2>important periphery within the core, and their absence from the

0:45:54.200 --> 0:45:58.000
<v Speaker 2>periphree also deprives the periphree. Hence the phenomenon of brain drain,

0:45:59.040 --> 0:46:01.279
<v Speaker 2>where people are sipher the way as label and the

0:46:01.719 --> 0:46:05.040
<v Speaker 2>and the educated population tends to leave, you know, their

0:46:05.080 --> 0:46:08.000
<v Speaker 2>countries of origin. But I'm saying it's not just a

0:46:08.080 --> 0:46:10.120
<v Speaker 2>one way flow, because you also have that sense of

0:46:10.200 --> 0:46:14.000
<v Speaker 2>diaspora and diasporic networks that kind of reverse the flow.

0:46:14.440 --> 0:46:18.680
<v Speaker 2>Remittances for some countries can be a significant chunk of

0:46:19.000 --> 0:46:22.880
<v Speaker 2>their national income. I think the Philippines is a classic

0:46:22.960 --> 0:46:26.720
<v Speaker 2>example of this. Some of the Caribbean countries, either historically

0:46:26.880 --> 0:46:31.719
<v Speaker 2>or presently, we're very dependent on remittances from their diasporic

0:46:31.800 --> 0:46:35.680
<v Speaker 2>populations sending money back home. Lebanon is another example of

0:46:35.800 --> 0:46:38.080
<v Speaker 2>Salvador is another example. They become a key part of

0:46:38.120 --> 0:46:43.520
<v Speaker 2>the national GDP. That sort of relationship of my creatia. Yeah,

0:46:44.600 --> 0:46:46.520
<v Speaker 2>but I think what I want to do with this

0:46:46.640 --> 0:46:50.680
<v Speaker 2>corporate free model or this corefree SEMIPI free model is

0:46:50.760 --> 0:46:53.080
<v Speaker 2>expanded and one of the ways that I found very

0:46:53.160 --> 0:46:57.160
<v Speaker 2>useful to do so comes from fellow podcaster shout out

0:46:57.200 --> 0:47:00.960
<v Speaker 2>to Elia j Ayube. Yeah, I read it. Article of

0:47:01.160 --> 0:47:04.760
<v Speaker 2>is that was on the anarchist libraries called the periphery

0:47:04.880 --> 0:47:08.480
<v Speaker 2>has no time for binaries. This very crucial point, and

0:47:08.600 --> 0:47:11.479
<v Speaker 2>I quote, we are as peripheral to the global soult

0:47:11.480 --> 0:47:14.040
<v Speaker 2>regimes crushing us as they are perceived to be by

0:47:14.080 --> 0:47:17.200
<v Speaker 2>the Western think tanks and foreign ministers who view their

0:47:17.239 --> 0:47:20.040
<v Speaker 2>imagined space as the center of the world. China and

0:47:20.160 --> 0:47:23.200
<v Speaker 2>Russia and Iran are peripheral to the West, and any

0:47:23.239 --> 0:47:26.200
<v Speaker 2>and all activists in China and Russia and Iran are

0:47:26.280 --> 0:47:29.120
<v Speaker 2>peripheral to their governments. So I kind of like this

0:47:29.200 --> 0:47:31.520
<v Speaker 2>sense of not just looking on the country level, but

0:47:31.640 --> 0:47:35.839
<v Speaker 2>looking at particular populations, populations within countries the relationships between them,

0:47:35.920 --> 0:47:41.560
<v Speaker 2>bringing in that class dynamic Yeah, routine populations more prominently.

0:47:42.320 --> 0:47:45.240
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, Like if you look at the like the example

0:47:45.280 --> 0:47:48.400
<v Speaker 4>I'm familiar with, relate like the Cold We could look

0:47:48.400 --> 0:47:51.120
<v Speaker 4>at Kurdistan or Mienma, right, there are ethnic groups within

0:47:51.200 --> 0:47:56.600
<v Speaker 4>that country that are subject to colonialism by the core

0:47:56.680 --> 0:48:00.200
<v Speaker 4>groups within that country, right, like asad Arab belt for

0:48:00.360 --> 0:48:04.840
<v Speaker 4>the Bama majority, using classic colonial divide and rule tactics

0:48:04.960 --> 0:48:07.719
<v Speaker 4>right now against the hinder in the MMR. And like,

0:48:08.200 --> 0:48:10.719
<v Speaker 4>I think it doesn't make sense to see that whole

0:48:10.760 --> 0:48:14.879
<v Speaker 4>country is peripheral, right, Like that binary doesn't function when

0:48:15.000 --> 0:48:18.959
<v Speaker 4>like the salient colonial violence happening, especially in the MMA,

0:48:19.320 --> 0:48:23.480
<v Speaker 4>is happening within the ANMA, but it doesn't make any

0:48:23.600 --> 0:48:28.680
<v Speaker 4>less salient. And like the experience in colonialism is still violent.

0:48:29.640 --> 0:48:34.200
<v Speaker 4>And if we only use this state level binary, we

0:48:34.320 --> 0:48:35.320
<v Speaker 4>will totally miss.

0:48:35.200 --> 0:48:39.879
<v Speaker 2>That exactly exactly, And I think it's important to be clear.

0:48:40.520 --> 0:48:43.879
<v Speaker 2>Obviously I've rejected a lot of these frameworks in covering them.

0:48:44.480 --> 0:48:49.520
<v Speaker 2>You won't see me using the civilized primitive binary anytime soon.

0:48:50.320 --> 0:48:52.640
<v Speaker 2>But some of these concepts can be useful. You know.

0:48:52.760 --> 0:48:55.040
<v Speaker 2>They do shape the way that we view the world,

0:48:55.600 --> 0:48:59.080
<v Speaker 2>how we see ourselves the imperfect, of course, but because

0:48:59.080 --> 0:49:01.360
<v Speaker 2>they're trying to map on reality and reality is a

0:49:01.400 --> 0:49:04.360
<v Speaker 2>shifting beast. But I think it's good to have some

0:49:04.640 --> 0:49:08.680
<v Speaker 2>sense of or some language to understand the inequality and

0:49:08.800 --> 0:49:11.960
<v Speaker 2>podynamics present in the world. So we can reclaim these

0:49:12.000 --> 0:49:14.080
<v Speaker 2>free mooks, so we can reject them. You know, we

0:49:14.120 --> 0:49:17.040
<v Speaker 2>could use them for solidarity or for division. But the

0:49:17.120 --> 0:49:19.160
<v Speaker 2>question I want to leave us with the wrap of

0:49:19.239 --> 0:49:22.960
<v Speaker 2>this episode is how do we build a world where

0:49:23.000 --> 0:49:28.520
<v Speaker 2>these divisions are no longer descriptive or relevant? And that's

0:49:28.520 --> 0:49:32.240
<v Speaker 2>all I have for today? Or power to all the people. Peace.

0:49:36.960 --> 0:49:39.440
<v Speaker 1>It Could Happen Here is a production of cool Zone Media.

0:49:39.640 --> 0:49:42.680
<v Speaker 1>For more podcasts from cool Zone Media, visit our website

0:49:42.800 --> 0:49:45.320
<v Speaker 1>cool Zonemedia dot com, or check us out on the

0:49:45.360 --> 0:49:49.239
<v Speaker 1>iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to podcasts.

0:49:49.760 --> 0:49:51.640
<v Speaker 1>You can now find sources for it Could Happen Here

0:49:51.719 --> 0:49:54.640
<v Speaker 1>listed directly in episode descriptions. Thanks for listening.