WEBVTT - Uncertainty for Venture Banking Following SVB Collapse

0:00:01.280 --> 0:00:05.640
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg business Week Inside from the reporters and

0:00:05.840 --> 0:00:09.400
<v Speaker 1>editors who bring you America's most trusted business magazine, plus

0:00:09.480 --> 0:00:13.640
<v Speaker 1>global business, finance and tech news. The Bloomberg Business Week

0:00:13.680 --> 0:00:18.600
<v Speaker 1>Podcast with Carol Messer and Tim Stenebec from Bloomberg Radio.

0:00:20.000 --> 0:00:21.880
<v Speaker 1>Remember the movie Damian. I don't know if you remember this.

0:00:21.920 --> 0:00:25.040
<v Speaker 1>The day after it was nineteen eighty three. ABCTV streaming

0:00:25.480 --> 0:00:28.640
<v Speaker 1>wasn't even on our narrative day after a nuclear war,

0:00:28.880 --> 0:00:33.879
<v Speaker 1>god forbid. Today, very different scale, but it does kind

0:00:33.880 --> 0:00:35.879
<v Speaker 1>of feel like the day after. We've had twenty four

0:00:35.920 --> 0:00:38.360
<v Speaker 1>more hours to kind of think about what happened over

0:00:38.400 --> 0:00:40.680
<v Speaker 1>the weekend, and it does feel like some calmness has

0:00:40.680 --> 0:00:43.319
<v Speaker 1>come in, has come in, has come back to the market. Yeah,

0:00:43.360 --> 0:00:45.040
<v Speaker 1>but I think, you know, the whole episode is definitely

0:00:45.040 --> 0:00:47.320
<v Speaker 1>revealing puddles in the US economy right now. We're seeing

0:00:47.360 --> 0:00:49.040
<v Speaker 1>some things deep down. You know. I'm really excited to

0:00:49.080 --> 0:00:51.280
<v Speaker 1>get Johnson of JP Morgan in later in the show.

0:00:51.320 --> 0:00:53.600
<v Speaker 1>He's going to tell us what's going on in US housing.

0:00:53.640 --> 0:00:55.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean, for me, that is the key element here.

0:00:55.600 --> 0:00:57.480
<v Speaker 1>If you talk about SVB, you talk about you know,

0:00:57.520 --> 0:00:59.600
<v Speaker 1>what went wrong there. It wasn't necessarily that they were

0:00:59.680 --> 0:01:01.480
<v Speaker 1>lending to venture It was that they had stuff on

0:01:01.480 --> 0:01:03.800
<v Speaker 1>their balance sheet they shouldn't have. Well, speaking of venture,

0:01:03.840 --> 0:01:06.959
<v Speaker 1>we've got a great knowing perspective with us from the

0:01:07.040 --> 0:01:11.039
<v Speaker 1>venture capital world. Longtime venture capitalist Alan Patricof, chairperson co

0:01:11.120 --> 0:01:14.520
<v Speaker 1>founder at Primetime Partners, author of No Red Lights Reflections

0:01:14.520 --> 0:01:17.360
<v Speaker 1>on life fifty years in venture capital and Never Driving Alone.

0:01:17.480 --> 0:01:20.880
<v Speaker 1>Great book, He joins us via zoom from New York City.

0:01:21.280 --> 0:01:23.039
<v Speaker 1>I can say great because Alan joined us to talk

0:01:23.080 --> 0:01:26.080
<v Speaker 1>about it before. Alan, good to have you here with

0:01:26.160 --> 0:01:29.520
<v Speaker 1>Damian myself. It is twenty four hours you got. You

0:01:29.520 --> 0:01:32.440
<v Speaker 1>were gracious enough to join some of our colleagues on

0:01:32.480 --> 0:01:36.440
<v Speaker 1>TV yesterday as you're thinking about Silicon Valley and the

0:01:36.520 --> 0:01:42.360
<v Speaker 1>impact the venture world and capital raising fundraising world four

0:01:42.480 --> 0:01:47.480
<v Speaker 1>startups changed at all. Well, clearly it's got to change

0:01:47.520 --> 0:01:50.920
<v Speaker 1>somebody after what happened yesterday. And you know, as you

0:01:51.040 --> 0:01:53.800
<v Speaker 1>just said a second ago, that the full wasn't really

0:01:54.240 --> 0:01:56.560
<v Speaker 1>in with the venture capitalis. It was the full with

0:01:56.600 --> 0:02:00.560
<v Speaker 1>the bank itself. And as far as I can tell emails,

0:02:00.600 --> 0:02:03.960
<v Speaker 1>I've been getting the bank is back in business again.

0:02:04.480 --> 0:02:07.600
<v Speaker 1>Uh and and based on their own words or lending

0:02:07.640 --> 0:02:11.760
<v Speaker 1>money and I've gotten an email from another bank besides SVB,

0:02:11.919 --> 0:02:15.760
<v Speaker 1>and they are lending money. And the big question over

0:02:15.800 --> 0:02:19.560
<v Speaker 1>the weekend, which you know, unnerved everybody, including me, even

0:02:19.600 --> 0:02:24.440
<v Speaker 1>though I frankly had very little exposure, thank god, so

0:02:24.480 --> 0:02:28.239
<v Speaker 1>I had a little bit less less violent weekend and

0:02:28.400 --> 0:02:33.680
<v Speaker 1>some but it was the concern over the deposits, and

0:02:34.360 --> 0:02:36.880
<v Speaker 1>and I you know, said this broadly over the weekend.

0:02:37.120 --> 0:02:39.919
<v Speaker 1>There was no way the banking system, the stock market

0:02:39.919 --> 0:02:42.360
<v Speaker 1>could open on Monday without solving the problem. And I

0:02:42.360 --> 0:02:46.120
<v Speaker 1>think the government did a great job in solving the

0:02:46.320 --> 0:02:50.960
<v Speaker 1>deposit problem and taking over a couple of banks, and

0:02:51.520 --> 0:02:53.720
<v Speaker 1>so no worry about contagion. Do you think we're done?

0:02:54.960 --> 0:02:59.040
<v Speaker 1>Uh well, no, yes, I think contagion a sense you're

0:02:59.120 --> 0:03:02.400
<v Speaker 1>thinking of. I think the contagion is how it's going

0:03:02.440 --> 0:03:07.520
<v Speaker 1>to affect loans and draw downs from banks and what

0:03:07.639 --> 0:03:10.799
<v Speaker 1>kind of lending they're going to do, and how that

0:03:11.480 --> 0:03:15.639
<v Speaker 1>will affect the industry going forward, because venture lending has

0:03:15.760 --> 0:03:19.359
<v Speaker 1>been a you know, on the edge of the traditional

0:03:19.400 --> 0:03:24.000
<v Speaker 1>banking system and now you know, all of these loans

0:03:24.040 --> 0:03:28.400
<v Speaker 1>and people's nervousness about being able to draw down loans

0:03:28.440 --> 0:03:33.000
<v Speaker 1>in an appropriate fashion timely and whether they really existed

0:03:33.040 --> 0:03:36.800
<v Speaker 1>the bigger The first question was deposits. The second moment

0:03:37.840 --> 0:03:39.240
<v Speaker 1>was if you had a line, are you gonna be

0:03:39.280 --> 0:03:42.760
<v Speaker 1>able to draw down? And obviously they are drawing down

0:03:42.760 --> 0:03:46.400
<v Speaker 1>on all their deposits axsume me and all their lines

0:03:46.680 --> 0:03:49.560
<v Speaker 1>and have made a point of setting we're open for business.

0:03:49.640 --> 0:03:54.880
<v Speaker 1>So I would say that we're back. We can't be

0:03:54.960 --> 0:03:58.800
<v Speaker 1>back to normal. People have to have some second thoughts now.

0:03:59.000 --> 0:04:01.600
<v Speaker 1>Is so how they go forward and basically in terms

0:04:01.640 --> 0:04:04.240
<v Speaker 1>of lending lines and how much they could depend on it.

0:04:04.280 --> 0:04:07.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm surely wanted to. I mean, Alan, look, you've had

0:04:07.600 --> 0:04:10.560
<v Speaker 1>an unbelievable career, right, I mean in your autobiography entitled

0:04:10.560 --> 0:04:12.640
<v Speaker 1>No Red Lights, which released last year, you discussed not

0:04:12.680 --> 0:04:14.920
<v Speaker 1>only the successes of your career but also the failures.

0:04:14.920 --> 0:04:17.760
<v Speaker 1>And one that stood out for me was your that

0:04:17.800 --> 0:04:19.839
<v Speaker 1>you didn't make an investment in Starbucks. I want you

0:04:19.839 --> 0:04:21.719
<v Speaker 1>to take that forward to Chair Powell when he writes

0:04:21.760 --> 0:04:25.200
<v Speaker 1>his autobiography and he has to discuss his failures. Is

0:04:25.240 --> 0:04:27.000
<v Speaker 1>he going to have to state that he was late

0:04:27.040 --> 0:04:28.840
<v Speaker 1>to the game on inflation and that the FED is

0:04:28.880 --> 0:04:30.640
<v Speaker 1>behind the curve or do you think that you know

0:04:30.680 --> 0:04:32.720
<v Speaker 1>they can manage through this and we can achieve that

0:04:33.080 --> 0:04:36.560
<v Speaker 1>soft landing. Well, you really are stretching the point of

0:04:36.920 --> 0:04:41.600
<v Speaker 1>of my making mistake of not investing in a coffee

0:04:41.640 --> 0:04:48.200
<v Speaker 1>chap like that one with the strengths that affect the world. Yeah. Probably,

0:04:49.600 --> 0:04:53.400
<v Speaker 1>You know, the acceleration of rate increasing rates didn't help

0:04:53.440 --> 0:04:55.880
<v Speaker 1>the situation, but you have to understand that did not

0:04:56.040 --> 0:04:59.360
<v Speaker 1>have an impact on the venture business per se, or

0:05:00.279 --> 0:05:03.799
<v Speaker 1>that were outstanding. I think that that didn't topple anything.

0:05:04.480 --> 0:05:08.279
<v Speaker 1>I would personally say that this would not be the

0:05:08.320 --> 0:05:11.440
<v Speaker 1>best time to increase rates again next week. I would

0:05:11.520 --> 0:05:13.800
<v Speaker 1>let the market settle down a little bit here and

0:05:13.839 --> 0:05:18.400
<v Speaker 1>get used to what's happened. But I think the whole

0:05:19.160 --> 0:05:23.560
<v Speaker 1>the real challenge the industry is thinking about venture banking,

0:05:23.680 --> 0:05:27.400
<v Speaker 1>the venture at the sdpiece of the world, which there's

0:05:27.480 --> 0:05:30.280
<v Speaker 1>more at least a dozen or two dozen like that.

0:05:31.640 --> 0:05:35.880
<v Speaker 1>How what role are they going to play going forward?

0:05:36.160 --> 0:05:37.920
<v Speaker 1>How much are you going to depend on those kind

0:05:37.920 --> 0:05:43.560
<v Speaker 1>of lines. The government has clearly done a great job,

0:05:43.640 --> 0:05:47.080
<v Speaker 1>and the fact not just that all the deposits are safe,

0:05:47.080 --> 0:05:50.680
<v Speaker 1>but the fact that they're telling everybody go forward and

0:05:50.839 --> 0:05:54.320
<v Speaker 1>keep lending on the same basis is really a very

0:05:54.360 --> 0:05:59.719
<v Speaker 1>strong sign that the government is standing behind these banks

0:05:59.720 --> 0:06:02.000
<v Speaker 1>and does not want to see well you know, well Alan,

0:06:02.080 --> 0:06:03.960
<v Speaker 1>not just the government, cosal Ventures is going to be

0:06:03.960 --> 0:06:06.320
<v Speaker 1>backstopping pay for some of its impacted companies. Is that

0:06:06.360 --> 0:06:08.320
<v Speaker 1>going to be a role that you know, VC funds

0:06:08.360 --> 0:06:10.279
<v Speaker 1>are going to have to take on in the future,

0:06:10.320 --> 0:06:12.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, being that sort of backstop is something should

0:06:12.360 --> 0:06:16.640
<v Speaker 1>go wrong with the bank and should they Yeah, you know,

0:06:17.000 --> 0:06:20.880
<v Speaker 1>it's misleading to say banks their backstop. They're not doing that.

0:06:21.160 --> 0:06:24.240
<v Speaker 1>If they're an investor in a company as we are,

0:06:25.200 --> 0:06:28.080
<v Speaker 1>and you you depended on a line and all of

0:06:28.120 --> 0:06:30.479
<v Speaker 1>a sudden the lines not there, you got to figure

0:06:30.480 --> 0:06:33.840
<v Speaker 1>out how we got to replace it. And the easiest way,

0:06:33.960 --> 0:06:36.920
<v Speaker 1>of course is to get the existing investors to put

0:06:37.000 --> 0:06:40.720
<v Speaker 1>up additional capital, whether it's at an interim or a

0:06:40.760 --> 0:06:43.840
<v Speaker 1>long term basis. But they're not doing to, you know,

0:06:44.000 --> 0:06:47.200
<v Speaker 1>act as a backstop for lending their act act is

0:06:47.240 --> 0:06:51.360
<v Speaker 1>a backstop to you know, the alternative to these loans

0:06:51.560 --> 0:06:54.200
<v Speaker 1>was going out and raising more actuate capital. So I

0:06:54.240 --> 0:06:57.360
<v Speaker 1>think if anything but this is going to do is

0:06:57.400 --> 0:07:01.800
<v Speaker 1>to put some pressure on companies to build up their

0:07:01.839 --> 0:07:06.520
<v Speaker 1>equity positions and they in the process. It would not

0:07:06.640 --> 0:07:13.280
<v Speaker 1>surprise me if there were some britdowns and some reef

0:07:13.520 --> 0:07:16.680
<v Speaker 1>or financings to build up these balance sheets at lower

0:07:16.760 --> 0:07:19.200
<v Speaker 1>prices than we saw. I mean, the market was very

0:07:19.400 --> 0:07:22.080
<v Speaker 1>very strong in twenty one and twenty two for a

0:07:22.080 --> 0:07:25.520
<v Speaker 1>lot of venture financing, whether it startup or even later stage.

0:07:25.880 --> 0:07:29.120
<v Speaker 1>And I think that to the extent that companies want

0:07:29.120 --> 0:07:33.200
<v Speaker 1>to improve their overall balance sheet position, even if they

0:07:33.240 --> 0:07:37.520
<v Speaker 1>have these lines, they would probably want to build their

0:07:37.560 --> 0:07:40.800
<v Speaker 1>equity and that may be at a lower price in

0:07:40.880 --> 0:07:46.680
<v Speaker 1>the last round. Possibly so Alan in terms of longer

0:07:46.800 --> 0:07:50.120
<v Speaker 1>lasting impact, you know, how does it? I think you

0:07:50.120 --> 0:07:52.600
<v Speaker 1>know the doomsday is like, oh, it's going to affect innovation,

0:07:52.800 --> 0:07:57.600
<v Speaker 1>and you know the startup community is that overblown. There's

0:07:57.640 --> 0:08:00.080
<v Speaker 1>money to be made. Investors will find a way. I

0:08:00.160 --> 0:08:03.200
<v Speaker 1>know it started to wind away. I will not use

0:08:03.240 --> 0:08:06.520
<v Speaker 1>the vernacular, but I don't believe that it is going

0:08:06.560 --> 0:08:09.520
<v Speaker 1>to have very very little impact. I will tell you

0:08:09.640 --> 0:08:13.320
<v Speaker 1>a specific I am involved with one company that had

0:08:13.520 --> 0:08:16.400
<v Speaker 1>a large deposit of one of these banks not named,

0:08:16.680 --> 0:08:20.000
<v Speaker 1>and had a line not used that they had not

0:08:20.200 --> 0:08:24.840
<v Speaker 1>drawn down upon, and they were encouraged on Monday to

0:08:25.040 --> 0:08:28.800
<v Speaker 1>draw down that line, and they did, and the money

0:08:28.960 --> 0:08:33.280
<v Speaker 1>transferred into the bank account of the company. So clearly

0:08:33.360 --> 0:08:38.320
<v Speaker 1>the banks are back providing capital again. But if you

0:08:38.440 --> 0:08:41.120
<v Speaker 1>don't have a line at this time, I don't know

0:08:41.400 --> 0:08:43.319
<v Speaker 1>what the attitude is going to be to put on

0:08:43.920 --> 0:08:45.920
<v Speaker 1>new lines at the moment. And I would think it

0:08:45.920 --> 0:08:48.000
<v Speaker 1>will be prudent for a company to build up its

0:08:48.040 --> 0:08:52.440
<v Speaker 1>equity base that may come at a discount from the

0:08:52.520 --> 0:08:54.920
<v Speaker 1>last round, because a lot of these last rounds were

0:08:55.080 --> 0:08:59.520
<v Speaker 1>very very high prices in retrospect and then they cause

0:09:00.120 --> 0:09:04.640
<v Speaker 1>some uh, you know, some type of markdowns. But other

0:09:04.679 --> 0:09:09.000
<v Speaker 1>than that, the business is so healthy and innovation is

0:09:09.040 --> 0:09:11.199
<v Speaker 1>not going to be stopped. Well, Alan, I mean you

0:09:11.640 --> 0:09:14.360
<v Speaker 1>you're now with Primetime Partners, right, you founded that along

0:09:14.360 --> 0:09:16.920
<v Speaker 1>with Addy Levy, who's with the former SVP of Soul Cycle.

0:09:17.000 --> 0:09:19.240
<v Speaker 1>Your goal, your mandate as a word, is to invest

0:09:19.280 --> 0:09:22.400
<v Speaker 1>in early stage startups that bring products and services to

0:09:22.400 --> 0:09:25.120
<v Speaker 1>individuals above the age of sixty, which of course is

0:09:25.160 --> 0:09:27.360
<v Speaker 1>twenty five percent of the world's population. My question for

0:09:27.400 --> 0:09:30.160
<v Speaker 1>you is those early stage startups that you're investing in,

0:09:30.240 --> 0:09:33.200
<v Speaker 1>would you tell them to bank at some you know,

0:09:33.400 --> 0:09:35.760
<v Speaker 1>made and small sized regional banks going forward, or you

0:09:35.840 --> 0:09:38.160
<v Speaker 1>encourage them to be banking at you know, the big ones,

0:09:38.200 --> 0:09:40.160
<v Speaker 1>the JP Morgan's The City Groups of the World, and

0:09:40.240 --> 0:09:43.560
<v Speaker 1>Alan just got about thirty thirty five seconds unfortunately. Yeah,

0:09:44.640 --> 0:09:47.200
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to answer that question directly, but I

0:09:48.120 --> 0:09:51.120
<v Speaker 1>would say that for the moment, I think they continue

0:09:51.160 --> 0:09:54.360
<v Speaker 1>banking as usual. But remember, for these early early stage deals,

0:09:54.640 --> 0:09:58.320
<v Speaker 1>they're not doing too much banking. They're really relying almost

0:09:58.520 --> 0:10:03.240
<v Speaker 1>entirely on equity stage. All right, Gonna leave it on

0:10:03.240 --> 0:10:05.600
<v Speaker 1>that note. Alan. Always good to get some time with

0:10:05.679 --> 0:10:08.560
<v Speaker 1>you and so appreciated. Alan Patrikof is your person and

0:10:08.559 --> 0:10:11.480
<v Speaker 1>co founder at Prime Time Partners, showing us via new

0:10:12.160 --> 0:10:14.199
<v Speaker 1>zoom excuse me in New York City, and his book

0:10:14.320 --> 0:10:16.679
<v Speaker 1>is No Red Lights Reflections on life fifty years in

0:10:16.760 --> 0:10:19.920
<v Speaker 1>venture capital and never driving alone. Did you know he

0:10:19.960 --> 0:10:22.320
<v Speaker 1>really likes music, Carol? Did you know Alan ran at

0:10:22.360 --> 0:10:24.280
<v Speaker 1>eighty eight years old in New York City Marathon last

0:10:24.320 --> 0:10:27.200
<v Speaker 1>year and he finished and he finished. He's pretty remarkable,

0:10:27.320 --> 0:10:30.280
<v Speaker 1>unbelievable and so delighted to have him here. And just

0:10:30.480 --> 0:10:32.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, I feel like calm right, like it's not

0:10:32.280 --> 0:10:34.600
<v Speaker 1>like the good. It's not good. It's I feel better now.

0:10:34.600 --> 0:10:37.680
<v Speaker 1>If you're talking to Alan, yeah, yeah, it's good. You're

0:10:37.720 --> 0:10:41.280
<v Speaker 1>listening to the Bloomberg Business Week podcast. Catch us live

0:10:41.400 --> 0:10:45.040
<v Speaker 1>week afternoons from three to six Eastern Listen on Bloomberg

0:10:45.080 --> 0:10:48.440
<v Speaker 1>dot com, the Ihart Radio app, and the Bloomberg Business App,

0:10:48.760 --> 0:10:52.320
<v Speaker 1>or watch us live on YouTube. Really looking forward to

0:10:52.320 --> 0:10:55.520
<v Speaker 1>this next guest courtesy of Damian Sashower because I do

0:10:55.559 --> 0:10:57.440
<v Speaker 1>feel like when you're trying to figure out what's going

0:10:57.480 --> 0:10:59.600
<v Speaker 1>on in the outlook, you have to talk to CEOs,

0:11:00.080 --> 0:11:01.679
<v Speaker 1>have to talk to all kinds of companies and all

0:11:01.760 --> 0:11:04.800
<v Speaker 1>kinds of market watchers, especially when there's so many things

0:11:04.800 --> 0:11:07.480
<v Speaker 1>and so much volatility, I think, even in the rate environment.

0:11:07.679 --> 0:11:09.680
<v Speaker 1>So let's get to it. Because one of the things

0:11:09.679 --> 0:11:13.920
<v Speaker 1>that was key in the CPI report today had to

0:11:13.960 --> 0:11:19.440
<v Speaker 1>do with housing specifically right big time, underlying consumer price

0:11:19.520 --> 0:11:23.480
<v Speaker 1>growth accelerating in February, Americans continued to experience the sting

0:11:23.520 --> 0:11:26.240
<v Speaker 1>of rising rates and sticky prices for services over the

0:11:26.280 --> 0:11:29.480
<v Speaker 1>past year. Key housing category, which includes everything from actual

0:11:29.480 --> 0:11:31.720
<v Speaker 1>rents to what a homeowner would charge and rent to

0:11:31.760 --> 0:11:35.000
<v Speaker 1>hotel stays, climbed Damien to a record eight point two percent.

0:11:35.080 --> 0:11:36.600
<v Speaker 1>You want to do the honors and bring in our guests.

0:11:36.600 --> 0:11:38.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to do that. John sim head of Securitized

0:11:38.960 --> 0:11:42.520
<v Speaker 1>Products Research at JP Morgan. Welcome to the program. John.

0:11:43.000 --> 0:11:46.440
<v Speaker 1>Housing demand is weak. Existing home sales declined thirty four

0:11:46.480 --> 0:11:48.800
<v Speaker 1>point four percent year over year in January two, an

0:11:48.840 --> 0:11:52.200
<v Speaker 1>all time low. What will it take for housing demand

0:11:52.200 --> 0:11:54.760
<v Speaker 1>to rebound here in the US? So, hey, guys, thank

0:11:54.760 --> 0:11:57.480
<v Speaker 1>you so much for having me on. It's a real pleasure. Yeah,

0:11:57.679 --> 0:11:59.760
<v Speaker 1>you already hit the nail on the head with the CPI.

0:12:00.240 --> 0:12:03.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think the good news is that if

0:12:03.080 --> 0:12:06.000
<v Speaker 1>the Fed officials at least are getting that it's sticky. Um,

0:12:06.080 --> 0:12:08.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, the owner equivalent rent number which which was

0:12:08.440 --> 0:12:10.840
<v Speaker 1>just over eight percent, as you mentioned, it's about a

0:12:10.880 --> 0:12:14.000
<v Speaker 1>third of the CPI number index that comes out. So,

0:12:14.240 --> 0:12:15.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean, the good news is that we're already seeing

0:12:15.880 --> 0:12:20.080
<v Speaker 1>rent growth the climb, and that's that's measured say by

0:12:20.160 --> 0:12:22.240
<v Speaker 1>other factors, say like look at ZILLO is a good

0:12:22.240 --> 0:12:24.120
<v Speaker 1>index one of the ones we use rather than the

0:12:24.160 --> 0:12:26.680
<v Speaker 1>oear measure, which is really lagged, which has kind of

0:12:26.679 --> 0:12:28.240
<v Speaker 1>been the burden I think for for a lot of

0:12:28.320 --> 0:12:30.840
<v Speaker 1>us is watching how slow Um it's like watching paint

0:12:30.920 --> 0:12:34.360
<v Speaker 1>dry almost and then you know, so we do think

0:12:34.400 --> 0:12:36.839
<v Speaker 1>that ZILLO moderation that we're seeing well will hit into

0:12:36.880 --> 0:12:39.240
<v Speaker 1>the low single digits by by the end of the year.

0:12:39.840 --> 0:12:41.440
<v Speaker 1>But the un bad news to that is that that

0:12:41.480 --> 0:12:44.240
<v Speaker 1>oear measure really isn't going to probably reflect that into

0:12:44.240 --> 0:12:47.839
<v Speaker 1>well into twenty twenty four. Um, so it's a it's

0:12:47.840 --> 0:12:50.480
<v Speaker 1>a very slow process. But I guess if you're going

0:12:50.559 --> 0:12:52.440
<v Speaker 1>to look at the good side, is how much could

0:12:52.440 --> 0:12:54.560
<v Speaker 1>it take off of the headline CPI number by the

0:12:54.559 --> 0:12:56.200
<v Speaker 1>time you get to that low single digits, you know,

0:12:56.200 --> 0:12:58.720
<v Speaker 1>into twenty twenty four, it's probably about one and a half,

0:12:58.880 --> 0:13:02.079
<v Speaker 1>maybe even two points. So it will help, but it's

0:13:02.120 --> 0:13:04.440
<v Speaker 1>going to be slow to get there. John, You know,

0:13:04.520 --> 0:13:05.800
<v Speaker 1>I wonder if you could talk to us, I mean,

0:13:05.840 --> 0:13:07.280
<v Speaker 1>a lot of our audience here. You know, we're based

0:13:07.280 --> 0:13:08.800
<v Speaker 1>here in New York City. You know we're only getting

0:13:08.800 --> 0:13:10.360
<v Speaker 1>a small piece of the pie. But I wonder if

0:13:10.400 --> 0:13:13.080
<v Speaker 1>you could talk about, you know, the United States of America,

0:13:13.120 --> 0:13:15.760
<v Speaker 1>the dispersion and housing performance across the major regions. It

0:13:15.800 --> 0:13:18.040
<v Speaker 1>seems to me that some of the biggest you know,

0:13:18.720 --> 0:13:21.720
<v Speaker 1>housing prices appreciation clients have occurred out West. I'm talking Seattle,

0:13:21.760 --> 0:13:25.280
<v Speaker 1>San Francisco, while other regions and I'm thinking Florida, I'm thinking,

0:13:25.400 --> 0:13:29.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, Miami, Tampa, I'm thinking Charlotte, Dallas, Atlanta have

0:13:29.400 --> 0:13:32.200
<v Speaker 1>only seen a fraction of those losses. Talk to us,

0:13:32.200 --> 0:13:36.360
<v Speaker 1>can those regions hold onto those pandemic induced gains? Oh?

0:13:36.440 --> 0:13:38.360
<v Speaker 1>Some of them? I mean that's the that's the definitely

0:13:38.480 --> 0:13:41.679
<v Speaker 1>the story with the clients to spend region without questions.

0:13:41.720 --> 0:13:44.760
<v Speaker 1>So our national headline number is is we think home

0:13:44.800 --> 0:13:47.480
<v Speaker 1>prices well declined by ten percent. A lot of that

0:13:47.559 --> 0:13:49.920
<v Speaker 1>has to do with affordability. I think one thing when

0:13:49.960 --> 0:13:52.520
<v Speaker 1>we're talking regions is to look at a very interesting

0:13:52.559 --> 0:13:56.839
<v Speaker 1>statistic around um the percentage of mussas where it's cheaper

0:13:56.880 --> 0:13:59.200
<v Speaker 1>to rent than it is to buy. And it's right now,

0:13:59.240 --> 0:14:01.640
<v Speaker 1>it's saying ninety nine percent of all ms says it's

0:14:01.640 --> 0:14:04.520
<v Speaker 1>actually cheaper to rent. So that speaks well to the

0:14:04.559 --> 0:14:07.000
<v Speaker 1>rent growth narrative we were saying earlier about why that's positive.

0:14:07.000 --> 0:14:08.960
<v Speaker 1>But well, yeah, well we think home prices will decline

0:14:08.960 --> 0:14:11.319
<v Speaker 1>because I think we get that confusion at times where

0:14:11.320 --> 0:14:13.120
<v Speaker 1>people look at rent say, how could rents go up?

0:14:13.160 --> 0:14:16.000
<v Speaker 1>At home prices go down? Well, because it's actually better

0:14:16.040 --> 0:14:19.280
<v Speaker 1>to rent. But the regions say, like Seattle, you mentioned,

0:14:19.320 --> 0:14:22.920
<v Speaker 1>you know what, They're down fifteen percent already from the peak.

0:14:23.000 --> 0:14:26.880
<v Speaker 1>San Francisco down eleven, San Diego down nine, Denver down eight.

0:14:26.960 --> 0:14:28.920
<v Speaker 1>But then you see places like New York Florida only

0:14:28.960 --> 0:14:31.240
<v Speaker 1>down one percent. So there I think you have the

0:14:31.520 --> 0:14:34.360
<v Speaker 1>little bit of tech, a little bit of work from home,

0:14:34.480 --> 0:14:37.680
<v Speaker 1>probably from the Denver side, and then unwinding there also

0:14:37.760 --> 0:14:39.480
<v Speaker 1>had just big run ups. But then you look at

0:14:39.520 --> 0:14:42.080
<v Speaker 1>areas like Florida, where I think actually benefited a lot

0:14:42.200 --> 0:14:44.240
<v Speaker 1>from the migrations and work from home. It's just a

0:14:44.320 --> 0:14:47.160
<v Speaker 1>lot easier to work from the beach, right. But in

0:14:47.160 --> 0:14:48.920
<v Speaker 1>New York everyone loves to live here, so I think

0:14:48.960 --> 0:14:50.480
<v Speaker 1>that that holds up a little bit, and then we

0:14:50.560 --> 0:14:52.640
<v Speaker 1>are more back in the office. I think hasn't hit

0:14:52.680 --> 0:14:55.320
<v Speaker 1>as hard in New York as it has versus other areas. John,

0:14:55.400 --> 0:14:58.520
<v Speaker 1>can we start to do you start to model that

0:14:59.000 --> 0:15:01.560
<v Speaker 1>I understand it rent a place, you're stuck into that

0:15:01.680 --> 0:15:04.080
<v Speaker 1>cost right for a while, and that plays into the

0:15:04.120 --> 0:15:07.200
<v Speaker 1>inflationary metric. But can you start to model I don't

0:15:07.200 --> 0:15:09.560
<v Speaker 1>know whether it's a year from now or two years

0:15:09.880 --> 0:15:12.480
<v Speaker 1>where you get a better understanding of kind of where

0:15:12.520 --> 0:15:15.520
<v Speaker 1>inflation ultimately will be. Because shelter is such a big

0:15:15.520 --> 0:15:17.320
<v Speaker 1>part of this component, can you start to think about

0:15:17.360 --> 0:15:20.200
<v Speaker 1>when people are renegotiating some of this or a softer

0:15:20.360 --> 0:15:24.280
<v Speaker 1>housing market, that it's a different, a very different picture. Yeah,

0:15:24.680 --> 0:15:26.800
<v Speaker 1>so we got to the one part which is just

0:15:26.920 --> 0:15:29.200
<v Speaker 1>the lag. So we already think that you know, you

0:15:29.320 --> 0:15:31.160
<v Speaker 1>already have one and a half to two percent coming off,

0:15:31.360 --> 0:15:34.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, in twenty twenty four, with all is being equal.

0:15:34.280 --> 0:15:37.000
<v Speaker 1>But then you start getting into potential negotiations of where

0:15:37.080 --> 0:15:40.200
<v Speaker 1>rents could actually get a little too frothy and home

0:15:40.240 --> 0:15:43.160
<v Speaker 1>prices continue to decline, where you could continue even push

0:15:43.960 --> 0:15:48.320
<v Speaker 1>that headline inflation number lower. For sure, we start to

0:15:48.360 --> 0:15:50.480
<v Speaker 1>try to model that out. It's it's pretty tricky, but

0:15:50.720 --> 0:15:52.200
<v Speaker 1>certainly as you start to see a lot of the

0:15:52.280 --> 0:15:54.760
<v Speaker 1>renegotiation for rents, you can even see it locally in

0:15:54.800 --> 0:15:58.360
<v Speaker 1>New York City where you know, the concessions are coming

0:15:58.400 --> 0:16:00.520
<v Speaker 1>in the one month, three, the one half month through

0:16:00.600 --> 0:16:03.000
<v Speaker 1>the free gym membership and whatnot to try to lower

0:16:03.440 --> 0:16:06.640
<v Speaker 1>lower the dynamics of getting you into the property. John.

0:16:06.680 --> 0:16:09.080
<v Speaker 1>You know, mortgage borrows from my perspective, appeared to be

0:16:09.080 --> 0:16:10.680
<v Speaker 1>in a pretty solid position. Right. We know about the

0:16:10.720 --> 0:16:12.280
<v Speaker 1>equity build up, you know, we know about the low

0:16:12.320 --> 0:16:14.280
<v Speaker 1>fixed mortgage rates that they locked into. You know, some

0:16:14.480 --> 0:16:16.680
<v Speaker 1>years back. But it's not all roses now, is it.

0:16:16.720 --> 0:16:18.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean, if you look further down the curve, I

0:16:18.240 --> 0:16:22.880
<v Speaker 1>mean fh borrow delinquencies, you know, subprime auto delinquencies. I

0:16:22.920 --> 0:16:24.120
<v Speaker 1>wonder if you could talk to us about some of

0:16:24.120 --> 0:16:26.720
<v Speaker 1>the more some of these more high frequency data points

0:16:26.760 --> 0:16:28.920
<v Speaker 1>and what they're telling you. Yeah, that's really been a

0:16:29.040 --> 0:16:31.040
<v Speaker 1>key for us to watch, and we've been highlighting that

0:16:31.200 --> 0:16:33.640
<v Speaker 1>really even as the tone prices we're still going up.

0:16:33.680 --> 0:16:35.800
<v Speaker 1>We're saying, look, look for things to crack on the

0:16:35.880 --> 0:16:39.720
<v Speaker 1>low end, and that is low FLICO, high DTI, high

0:16:39.880 --> 0:16:43.160
<v Speaker 1>LTV borrowing, and that typically happens in the fh A programs.

0:16:43.440 --> 0:16:46.200
<v Speaker 1>The DTIs in those programs are around fifty five percent,

0:16:46.320 --> 0:16:48.600
<v Speaker 1>so they're they're basically spending more than half of their

0:16:48.640 --> 0:16:51.520
<v Speaker 1>income on their mortgage payment. So when things start to crack,

0:16:51.600 --> 0:16:53.640
<v Speaker 1>the crack they're going to happen there, and you are

0:16:53.640 --> 0:16:57.240
<v Speaker 1>seeing delinquencies build up in that program and really in

0:16:57.640 --> 0:17:00.359
<v Speaker 1>low FLCO in general. So I think that really speaks

0:17:00.440 --> 0:17:03.520
<v Speaker 1>to stress on the low end of the consumer range,

0:17:03.560 --> 0:17:06.520
<v Speaker 1>and you will probably start to see modification programs come

0:17:06.600 --> 0:17:08.879
<v Speaker 1>in to try to help save them, just like we

0:17:08.960 --> 0:17:11.239
<v Speaker 1>had through the last cycle and through COVID, we've got

0:17:11.320 --> 0:17:14.760
<v Speaker 1>a really good playbook for modifying modifying barros when they

0:17:14.800 --> 0:17:17.040
<v Speaker 1>get into trouble. The other side of it is that

0:17:17.119 --> 0:17:20.920
<v Speaker 1>we watch is around subprime auto. Really what you're seeing

0:17:21.000 --> 0:17:23.560
<v Speaker 1>there is the delinquency sixty plus day delinquencies in the

0:17:23.600 --> 0:17:27.680
<v Speaker 1>autosector for subprime, so we're talking low end again is

0:17:28.160 --> 0:17:30.800
<v Speaker 1>actually as high as what we saw during the Financial crisis.

0:17:31.440 --> 0:17:35.720
<v Speaker 1>Beginning to see stress there as well. Well. As you mentioned,

0:17:35.760 --> 0:17:37.520
<v Speaker 1>it's not all doom and gloom. I think when you

0:17:37.560 --> 0:17:40.399
<v Speaker 1>look at those things that looks scary. You kind of

0:17:40.520 --> 0:17:43.800
<v Speaker 1>mentioned it before that borrowers are in a really really

0:17:43.840 --> 0:17:46.280
<v Speaker 1>good position. You know, they about eighty percent of them

0:17:46.320 --> 0:17:48.280
<v Speaker 1>of locked in a four percent mortgage rate or lower,

0:17:48.520 --> 0:17:51.639
<v Speaker 1>and I think that means that they're going to fight

0:17:51.720 --> 0:17:53.639
<v Speaker 1>to stay in their property. The other side of it

0:17:53.800 --> 0:17:56.040
<v Speaker 1>is just the accumulated equity that they've built up in

0:17:56.080 --> 0:17:58.840
<v Speaker 1>the property themselves. Like just to put it in context,

0:17:58.960 --> 0:18:01.960
<v Speaker 1>the dea that was built up in the mortgage market

0:18:02.920 --> 0:18:05.840
<v Speaker 1>just post the Financial crisis around ten trillion overall for

0:18:05.960 --> 0:18:08.520
<v Speaker 1>like the mortgage market the equity at that time just

0:18:08.640 --> 0:18:11.320
<v Speaker 1>post GFC. So as the home prices were going down

0:18:11.640 --> 0:18:14.000
<v Speaker 1>was about eight trillions, so there was two trillion underwater

0:18:14.440 --> 0:18:16.119
<v Speaker 1>like in the properties, and that's why you saw all

0:18:16.119 --> 0:18:18.600
<v Speaker 1>these exits. People just enp mailing the keys back in.

0:18:19.000 --> 0:18:22.360
<v Speaker 1>But now the equities around thirty trillion and the debt

0:18:22.760 --> 0:18:26.600
<v Speaker 1>is only fourteen so so you know, you can have

0:18:26.680 --> 0:18:28.840
<v Speaker 1>a pretty big correction and these guys are going to stay.

0:18:29.080 --> 0:18:30.680
<v Speaker 1>They're not going anywhere, which is you kind of have

0:18:30.720 --> 0:18:34.320
<v Speaker 1>a frozen market now. Effectively the no one really I

0:18:34.359 --> 0:18:36.719
<v Speaker 1>don't see no one, but it's really hard to afford

0:18:36.800 --> 0:18:39.399
<v Speaker 1>to buy given where mortgage rates are. But there's not

0:18:39.480 --> 0:18:41.240
<v Speaker 1>a lot of supply coming in and not a lot

0:18:41.280 --> 0:18:43.639
<v Speaker 1>of supply pressure because even from the delinquencies that we

0:18:43.720 --> 0:18:46.600
<v Speaker 1>mentioned earlier, the mod programs will start to keep them

0:18:46.680 --> 0:18:49.280
<v Speaker 1>from hitting the markets, so homebuilders don't start building. In

0:18:49.359 --> 0:18:53.080
<v Speaker 1>your view, I think they're already started to slow down

0:18:53.119 --> 0:18:54.800
<v Speaker 1>their builds, so you start you're seeing that in some

0:18:54.920 --> 0:18:58.879
<v Speaker 1>of the construction data back to at one point the

0:18:58.960 --> 0:19:01.000
<v Speaker 1>peak was all control units coming in, the mark was

0:19:01.000 --> 0:19:02.879
<v Speaker 1>about one point seven million. I think you've got the

0:19:02.960 --> 0:19:05.359
<v Speaker 1>total now down to like one point to three so

0:19:06.400 --> 0:19:09.119
<v Speaker 1>now I think you're back to underbuilding again. John one

0:19:09.320 --> 0:19:11.040
<v Speaker 1>one more question while I have you twenty seconds here.

0:19:11.119 --> 0:19:13.480
<v Speaker 1>You know, look securitized products. You know we're hearing about

0:19:13.520 --> 0:19:15.359
<v Speaker 1>you know, some of the stressed in these delinquencies. Is

0:19:15.400 --> 0:19:17.960
<v Speaker 1>that filtering through into the secondary market for structured credit?

0:19:18.000 --> 0:19:20.200
<v Speaker 1>Are you seeing any of that showing up in you know,

0:19:20.280 --> 0:19:22.520
<v Speaker 1>some of these low quality credits and just got about

0:19:22.560 --> 0:19:25.359
<v Speaker 1>thirty seconds. Yeah, not in UM, not at all. In

0:19:25.400 --> 0:19:28.520
<v Speaker 1>the residential sector, You're not seeing that stress there yet.

0:19:28.560 --> 0:19:30.879
<v Speaker 1>The stressor seeing is more coming stress for broader credit

0:19:30.960 --> 0:19:33.720
<v Speaker 1>off right now. You are seeing stress in CMBs though

0:19:33.800 --> 0:19:37.560
<v Speaker 1>from that's a different whole different topic. But yeah, listen,

0:19:37.680 --> 0:19:40.560
<v Speaker 1>great vantage point, John, Thank you so much. Johnson, Managing

0:19:40.640 --> 0:19:43.520
<v Speaker 1>director ahead of Securitized Products Research over at JP Morgan

0:19:43.600 --> 0:19:47.680
<v Speaker 1>jutting us on the phone in New York City. You're

0:19:47.760 --> 0:19:51.320
<v Speaker 1>listening to the Bloomberg Business Week podcast. Catch us live

0:19:51.440 --> 0:19:55.120
<v Speaker 1>weekday afternoons from three to six Eastern on Bloomberg Radio,

0:19:55.320 --> 0:19:58.560
<v Speaker 1>the Bloomberg Business app and YouTube. You can also listen

0:19:58.720 --> 0:20:01.879
<v Speaker 1>live on Amazon All So from our flagship New York station,

0:20:02.160 --> 0:20:06.840
<v Speaker 1>jo Say Alexa playing Bloomberg eleven thirty while the world

0:20:06.960 --> 0:20:09.280
<v Speaker 1>is focused on a ship to EVS at the same time,

0:20:09.400 --> 0:20:12.840
<v Speaker 1>startups around the globe there continuing to work on developing

0:20:12.880 --> 0:20:16.240
<v Speaker 1>and refining the technology behind what the industry calls EVE

0:20:16.400 --> 0:20:20.920
<v Speaker 1>tolls or electrical vertical takeoff and landing aircraft in that

0:20:21.119 --> 0:20:23.480
<v Speaker 1>mix is our next gas Beta. It's a builder of

0:20:23.800 --> 0:20:26.560
<v Speaker 1>EVE toll aircraft and charging systems to move both people

0:20:26.600 --> 0:20:30.080
<v Speaker 1>and cargo around. They count the Amazon Climate Pledge Fund,

0:20:30.160 --> 0:20:32.840
<v Speaker 1>TPG and Fidelity among its investors. So with us to

0:20:32.880 --> 0:20:35.159
<v Speaker 1>tell us what they're up to and the outlook is

0:20:35.240 --> 0:20:38.320
<v Speaker 1>Kyle Clark, founder and CEO at Beta. He's also a

0:20:38.400 --> 0:20:41.760
<v Speaker 1>pilot and he joins us via zoom from Burlington, Vermont. Kyle,

0:20:41.880 --> 0:20:44.359
<v Speaker 1>nice to have you here with Damien and myself, So

0:20:44.840 --> 0:20:46.560
<v Speaker 1>tell us a little bit more about your company. I'm

0:20:46.640 --> 0:20:49.840
<v Speaker 1>kind of obsessed with your website and for those who

0:20:49.840 --> 0:20:53.280
<v Speaker 1>are watching on YouTube and our streaming service Bloomberg originals

0:20:53.280 --> 0:20:54.520
<v Speaker 1>will get to see a little bit. But tell us

0:20:54.560 --> 0:20:58.359
<v Speaker 1>about Beta. Hey guys, great to be here. Yeah. Beta,

0:20:58.720 --> 0:21:02.919
<v Speaker 1>we're a small aerospace company up here in Snowy, Vermont

0:21:03.040 --> 0:21:07.960
<v Speaker 1>today and we've been focused on developing electric propulsion systems,

0:21:08.359 --> 0:21:12.399
<v Speaker 1>initially for EV toll aircraft, but as you know, we've

0:21:13.200 --> 0:21:17.320
<v Speaker 1>we've now introduced a fixed wing electric cargo aircraft and

0:21:17.880 --> 0:21:20.679
<v Speaker 1>are launching that commercially. So talk to us. I mean,

0:21:20.720 --> 0:21:23.920
<v Speaker 1>how far away are we from seeing electric airlines really

0:21:23.960 --> 0:21:27.960
<v Speaker 1>penetrating the market A cargo passenger, you name it. Yeah. So,

0:21:28.080 --> 0:21:30.159
<v Speaker 1>I mean on the technical front, we've been flying up

0:21:30.200 --> 0:21:32.320
<v Speaker 1>here in the northeast. We've flown halfway across the country.

0:21:32.400 --> 0:21:36.239
<v Speaker 1>The technology exists to move cargo and people all over

0:21:36.280 --> 0:21:40.640
<v Speaker 1>the country with electric propulsion. Our longest range flights are

0:21:40.880 --> 0:21:45.240
<v Speaker 1>three hundred and thirty six nautical miles, and we just

0:21:45.320 --> 0:21:47.520
<v Speaker 1>have to work through certification, which is kind of the

0:21:48.280 --> 0:21:51.320
<v Speaker 1>essence of launching a fixed wing aircraft where the certification

0:21:51.440 --> 0:21:54.000
<v Speaker 1>path is more known than what a lot of folks

0:21:54.040 --> 0:21:56.240
<v Speaker 1>are talking about, which is an electric vertical takeoff and

0:21:56.359 --> 0:21:59.919
<v Speaker 1>landing aircraft. So tell us what's involved, what's the infrastructure need?

0:22:01.080 --> 0:22:03.479
<v Speaker 1>Give us an idea. And to Damien's question, I mean,

0:22:03.720 --> 0:22:06.440
<v Speaker 1>is there in the near future point where we see

0:22:06.480 --> 0:22:09.639
<v Speaker 1>a significant ramp up? Yeah? Absolutely, I mean we're going

0:22:09.680 --> 0:22:11.720
<v Speaker 1>to see electric on the ranges that make sense for

0:22:11.840 --> 0:22:18.080
<v Speaker 1>regional cargo, regional passenger twenty twenty twenty six, and then

0:22:18.119 --> 0:22:21.000
<v Speaker 1>it'll ramp as batteries improve every year five to eight

0:22:21.080 --> 0:22:25.719
<v Speaker 1>percent the ranges will improve commensurately, and then and then

0:22:25.800 --> 0:22:27.560
<v Speaker 1>we'll get to get on the nipping of the heels

0:22:27.720 --> 0:22:30.680
<v Speaker 1>of the regional kind of single aisle airlines. And in

0:22:30.760 --> 0:22:33.840
<v Speaker 1>the twenty thirties we'll start doing things in half the

0:22:33.920 --> 0:22:35.800
<v Speaker 1>United States, and by the end of the twenty thirties

0:22:35.880 --> 0:22:40.000
<v Speaker 1>twenty forties, we're going across the country in sustainable aircraft.

0:22:40.320 --> 0:22:44.240
<v Speaker 1>Is it a different type of infrastructure that's needed. Yeah. Absolutely, Look,

0:22:44.320 --> 0:22:46.960
<v Speaker 1>we know that there's a lot of charging networks that

0:22:47.040 --> 0:22:48.960
<v Speaker 1>are required to be put in place. We'd put a

0:22:49.040 --> 0:22:52.000
<v Speaker 1>charging network that reaches from here in Vermont down through

0:22:52.080 --> 0:22:55.480
<v Speaker 1>New York out to Arkansas. We are putting in systems

0:22:55.480 --> 0:22:57.440
<v Speaker 1>about fifty five of them down the East Coast and

0:22:57.720 --> 0:23:00.960
<v Speaker 1>across to Texas, mostly at airports right now, a few

0:23:00.960 --> 0:23:03.440
<v Speaker 1>of them off airports. But you know, from a from

0:23:03.440 --> 0:23:06.800
<v Speaker 1>an infrastructure perspective, air aircraft carry a lot more energy

0:23:06.880 --> 0:23:09.880
<v Speaker 1>than cars, and to get their charging time down into

0:23:09.960 --> 0:23:13.840
<v Speaker 1>the sub hour regionum, the charging power levels have to

0:23:13.880 --> 0:23:16.840
<v Speaker 1>be significantly higher. So we have to bring in new

0:23:16.920 --> 0:23:20.640
<v Speaker 1>charging technologies, higher rate charging, kind of like a supercharger

0:23:20.760 --> 0:23:25.520
<v Speaker 1>on steroids, and we place those at airports, and and

0:23:25.600 --> 0:23:28.560
<v Speaker 1>then there's some amount of infrastructure within the air traffic

0:23:28.600 --> 0:23:31.399
<v Speaker 1>control system, especially as we move into the vertical takeoff

0:23:31.400 --> 0:23:36.680
<v Speaker 1>and landing domain, to manage increased traffic, especially in urban environments. Kyle,

0:23:36.760 --> 0:23:40.320
<v Speaker 1>do you think that you know, um, the like similar

0:23:40.320 --> 0:23:42.320
<v Speaker 1>to cars, they have hybrid models where they run on

0:23:42.560 --> 0:23:44.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, on gasoline as well as electric. I mean,

0:23:44.920 --> 0:23:47.119
<v Speaker 1>is that an option going forward for the industry to

0:23:47.200 --> 0:23:49.280
<v Speaker 1>try and get you know, those passenger miles up and

0:23:49.320 --> 0:23:51.639
<v Speaker 1>get those cargoes you know, those cargo planes you know

0:23:51.920 --> 0:23:55.880
<v Speaker 1>further along. Yeah. Absolutely, Um, there will be hybrid aircraft.

0:23:56.040 --> 0:23:58.040
<v Speaker 1>There's kits that we can put onto our aircraft that

0:23:58.080 --> 0:24:01.440
<v Speaker 1>we're using that our hybrid Um, those will be stop

0:24:01.520 --> 0:24:04.959
<v Speaker 1>gaps to get to all electric. I mean, look, aviation

0:24:05.400 --> 0:24:07.879
<v Speaker 1>is a huge contributor to climate change right now, and

0:24:07.880 --> 0:24:09.600
<v Speaker 1>if we don't do anything about it, all other forms

0:24:09.640 --> 0:24:11.520
<v Speaker 1>of transportation of gone electric. As you noted in the

0:24:11.600 --> 0:24:15.920
<v Speaker 1>interim introduction, you know, bikes, car, scooters, trucks, trains, marine

0:24:16.359 --> 0:24:19.360
<v Speaker 1>and it's aviation's turn. And we operate, you know, kind

0:24:19.359 --> 0:24:21.520
<v Speaker 1>of in a cognitive dissidence, in the sense that we

0:24:21.640 --> 0:24:26.240
<v Speaker 1>are operating in nineteen sixties technology that prioritize performance over efficiency,

0:24:26.760 --> 0:24:31.679
<v Speaker 1>and therefore our carbon emissions in aviation is kind of disgusting.

0:24:32.160 --> 0:24:35.440
<v Speaker 1>So there's this huge bow wave of technology and opportunity

0:24:35.520 --> 0:24:38.800
<v Speaker 1>that electric aviation can overcome. So hybrid will get us close.

0:24:39.200 --> 0:24:42.359
<v Speaker 1>But the reality is is working through the regulatory challenges

0:24:43.040 --> 0:24:46.080
<v Speaker 1>and the introduction of this new technology, it's not a

0:24:46.160 --> 0:24:49.760
<v Speaker 1>technological challenge, and to introduce hybridization, you're inducing two new

0:24:49.840 --> 0:24:53.119
<v Speaker 1>technologies at once. Here, it's actually easier to just go

0:24:53.280 --> 0:24:55.879
<v Speaker 1>straight to electric. Well, Kyle, you know, I just have

0:24:55.960 --> 0:24:57.600
<v Speaker 1>to say this, you know, and I do you want

0:24:57.640 --> 0:24:59.000
<v Speaker 1>to focus on the fact that you know, this is

0:24:59.040 --> 0:25:01.520
<v Speaker 1>electric aircraft talking that here, but the fact that it

0:25:01.680 --> 0:25:04.560
<v Speaker 1>takes off and lands vertically to me is just awesome

0:25:04.600 --> 0:25:07.679
<v Speaker 1>and fascinating. And the impact of that on for example,

0:25:07.760 --> 0:25:10.280
<v Speaker 1>airports right and runways an amount of land that you

0:25:10.400 --> 0:25:12.280
<v Speaker 1>need in order to you know, kind of have one.

0:25:12.560 --> 0:25:14.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean, do you see that being a structural change

0:25:14.240 --> 0:25:17.520
<v Speaker 1>over the next few years into the future. Yeah, absolutely,

0:25:17.520 --> 0:25:20.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's just fundamentally transformative of how we access

0:25:20.720 --> 0:25:23.000
<v Speaker 1>the Z dimension in our world. Right right now, we

0:25:23.119 --> 0:25:26.000
<v Speaker 1>have to go through an airport predominantly to go up.

0:25:27.280 --> 0:25:30.880
<v Speaker 1>Electric propulsion is very very powered, dense. The electric motors

0:25:30.920 --> 0:25:34.360
<v Speaker 1>are small and powerful relative to their gas kind of brothers.

0:25:35.040 --> 0:25:38.080
<v Speaker 1>Yet the batteries are relatively low energy dense, so short

0:25:38.200 --> 0:25:41.880
<v Speaker 1>range vertical takeoff and landing aircraft. They kind of get

0:25:41.960 --> 0:25:44.440
<v Speaker 1>us away from the three most annoying things in aviation,

0:25:44.520 --> 0:25:47.680
<v Speaker 1>which is the noise, the fuel, and the airports. Nobody

0:25:47.720 --> 0:25:50.960
<v Speaker 1>likes any of those things. So the market just gets

0:25:51.040 --> 0:25:54.320
<v Speaker 1>really big, really quick. And even in a cargo application

0:25:54.400 --> 0:25:58.240
<v Speaker 1>where you can avoid trucking things in vans and unloading

0:25:58.280 --> 0:26:00.680
<v Speaker 1>and loading them and increasing the time transit in the

0:26:00.760 --> 0:26:04.359
<v Speaker 1>human touch time by just going point to point. It

0:26:04.600 --> 0:26:07.440
<v Speaker 1>is not just a replacement for one tool, it's a

0:26:07.480 --> 0:26:10.560
<v Speaker 1>replacement for multiple tools, right, And that's why everybody is

0:26:10.600 --> 0:26:13.159
<v Speaker 1>so excited about a huge TAM that we open up

0:26:13.200 --> 0:26:15.440
<v Speaker 1>with vertical takeoff and landing electric aircraft. All right, So

0:26:15.920 --> 0:26:17.879
<v Speaker 1>give us an idea. Then that means everybody's not going

0:26:17.920 --> 0:26:20.520
<v Speaker 1>to get your doors to line up orders. So give

0:26:20.600 --> 0:26:25.920
<v Speaker 1>us an idea of who you're partnering with. Major airlines. Yeah,

0:26:26.040 --> 0:26:28.680
<v Speaker 1>I mean so folks like the largest helicopter operating in

0:26:28.680 --> 0:26:31.440
<v Speaker 1>the world, Bristow. They're one of our launch customers for

0:26:31.520 --> 0:26:34.320
<v Speaker 1>both C toll and then V toll aircraft, the Air Force,

0:26:34.440 --> 0:26:37.680
<v Speaker 1>the Army, United Therapeutics, which is a medical company that

0:26:37.760 --> 0:26:42.320
<v Speaker 1>moves organs and tissues and medical products. Ups. We've got

0:26:42.600 --> 0:26:45.480
<v Speaker 1>Air New Zealand that's starting cargo, moving to passenger. They're

0:26:45.520 --> 0:26:47.040
<v Speaker 1>starting with a C toll and we'll go to V

0:26:47.119 --> 0:26:50.840
<v Speaker 1>toll with them. There are airlines that I think can't

0:26:50.840 --> 0:26:53.639
<v Speaker 1>be announced publicly yet that are working with us. But

0:26:53.720 --> 0:26:57.080
<v Speaker 1>you're talking to some of the majors. Oh, absolutely, yeah.

0:26:57.119 --> 0:26:59.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean, look, there is an insatiable desire for sustainable

0:27:00.000 --> 0:27:02.480
<v Speaker 1>aviation and we're trying to get there with SAP sustainable

0:27:02.480 --> 0:27:06.320
<v Speaker 1>Aviation fuels. But everybody who really cares about the world

0:27:06.359 --> 0:27:09.560
<v Speaker 1>in the environment knows that electric is the right step

0:27:09.640 --> 0:27:12.680
<v Speaker 1>for aviation. And all the majors they care about it,

0:27:12.920 --> 0:27:16.520
<v Speaker 1>and they just know that the technology is not quite

0:27:16.600 --> 0:27:19.520
<v Speaker 1>ready for what their main lines run. But they're all

0:27:19.600 --> 0:27:23.640
<v Speaker 1>looking for these secondary kind of introductory points, so when

0:27:23.720 --> 0:27:26.399
<v Speaker 1>it comes to replace their main lines, they have an

0:27:26.440 --> 0:27:29.680
<v Speaker 1>acute knowledge, the training, the infrastructure that you talked about.

0:27:29.880 --> 0:27:33.320
<v Speaker 1>Got it for the airlines. All right, we gotta run, Kyle,

0:27:33.680 --> 0:27:36.280
<v Speaker 1>look forward to future updates. Come join us again. Kyle Clark,

0:27:36.359 --> 0:27:39.320
<v Speaker 1>Founder and chief executive Officer, of Beta Technologies, joining us

0:27:39.400 --> 0:27:42.679
<v Speaker 1>via zoom from Burlington, Vermont, Carol Master Damian sas are

0:27:42.720 --> 0:27:45.000
<v Speaker 1>you ready? Right? So cool? He obviously hasn't been to

0:27:45.000 --> 0:27:48.119
<v Speaker 1>the Nilguardi Airport. I love it. There. You're listening to

0:27:48.240 --> 0:27:51.639
<v Speaker 1>the Bloomberg Business Week podcast. Catch us live week do

0:27:51.760 --> 0:27:55.400
<v Speaker 1>afternoons from three to six Eastern Listen on Bloomberg dot com,

0:27:55.640 --> 0:27:58.760
<v Speaker 1>the Ion Radio app, and the Bloomberg Business App, or

0:27:58.840 --> 0:28:07.240
<v Speaker 1>watch us live on YouTube. I'm a journal now, but

0:28:07.400 --> 0:28:09.520
<v Speaker 1>you let me drive? Oh no, no, no, no, Who's

0:28:09.600 --> 0:28:13.800
<v Speaker 1>gonna drive home? Honey? Please? I'll do the riding gravels.

0:28:14.800 --> 0:28:23.680
<v Speaker 1>I want to drive. The question this is the drive

0:28:23.760 --> 0:28:27.280
<v Speaker 1>to the Globe com commute thing? Well, rip jother down

0:28:27.680 --> 0:28:31.760
<v Speaker 1>on Bloomberg Radio. All right, everybody, just about seventeen minutes

0:28:31.840 --> 0:28:34.440
<v Speaker 1>left in today's trading sessions, and he's just giving you

0:28:34.560 --> 0:28:36.520
<v Speaker 1>the lowdown when it comes to the equity and the

0:28:36.600 --> 0:28:39.280
<v Speaker 1>treasury trade. Bouncing around a little bit, definitely off our

0:28:39.320 --> 0:28:41.400
<v Speaker 1>highs of the session when it comes to stocks, and

0:28:41.560 --> 0:28:44.320
<v Speaker 1>we've seen some volatility once again when it comes to

0:28:44.400 --> 0:28:47.560
<v Speaker 1>the treasury trade. Let's get to it, because lucky for us,

0:28:47.680 --> 0:28:50.640
<v Speaker 1>Damian and I have with us Bloomberg Intelligence Chief equity

0:28:50.680 --> 0:28:53.280
<v Speaker 1>Strategist Gina Martin Adams. Gina is on the phone in

0:28:53.400 --> 0:28:56.320
<v Speaker 1>New Jersey. Gina, good, good, Good to have you here.

0:28:56.320 --> 0:29:00.600
<v Speaker 1>I've been thinking about what your rethink has been, if any,

0:29:00.760 --> 0:29:03.120
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to the trade that we saw over

0:29:03.200 --> 0:29:07.040
<v Speaker 1>the past week, on Friday on yesterday, and when it

0:29:07.120 --> 0:29:09.920
<v Speaker 1>comes to the health and overall direction of the equity markets.

0:29:09.960 --> 0:29:12.800
<v Speaker 1>What are you thinking about? What are you studying? Well,

0:29:12.880 --> 0:29:15.080
<v Speaker 1>I think the most important thing, Carol, first, thank you

0:29:15.120 --> 0:29:16.840
<v Speaker 1>for having me, But the most important thing that I'm

0:29:16.880 --> 0:29:19.440
<v Speaker 1>watching really is the market technicals. If you think about it,

0:29:19.640 --> 0:29:21.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, as of two weeks ago, the only thing

0:29:21.680 --> 0:29:24.640
<v Speaker 1>really going for the market in an environment where fundamentals

0:29:24.680 --> 0:29:28.080
<v Speaker 1>were deteriorating and valuations are still quite high considering the

0:29:28.160 --> 0:29:31.000
<v Speaker 1>level of interest rates, is that the technicals were in

0:29:31.080 --> 0:29:34.320
<v Speaker 1>support of some version of recovery. And over the last

0:29:34.440 --> 0:29:37.880
<v Speaker 1>couple of days, we've definitely seen the technicals breakdown. Small

0:29:37.920 --> 0:29:41.480
<v Speaker 1>cap index in particular has weakened materially below some pretty

0:29:41.560 --> 0:29:45.080
<v Speaker 1>key moving averages. The large cap index is hanging on

0:29:46.960 --> 0:29:49.680
<v Speaker 1>barely with its fingernails. It's still hanging onto that two

0:29:49.720 --> 0:29:52.080
<v Speaker 1>hotter day moving average and testing that level with a

0:29:52.160 --> 0:29:54.920
<v Speaker 1>little bit of a bounce back today, so the technical

0:29:54.960 --> 0:29:57.400
<v Speaker 1>pictures not as bad in large caps as it isn't

0:29:57.440 --> 0:30:02.040
<v Speaker 1>small But certainly we're teetering on the brink of testing

0:30:02.280 --> 0:30:04.600
<v Speaker 1>some key technical support levels, and I think those are

0:30:04.680 --> 0:30:09.400
<v Speaker 1>important to watch considering certainly this doesn't improve the fundamental outlook.

0:30:09.560 --> 0:30:12.000
<v Speaker 1>It might change the landscape at the FED, but we

0:30:12.040 --> 0:30:14.200
<v Speaker 1>won't know that until next week. It really is all

0:30:14.200 --> 0:30:17.240
<v Speaker 1>about how does the price trend right now? Geane, I'm

0:30:17.240 --> 0:30:19.960
<v Speaker 1>just reading this new piece of research you co authored

0:30:20.000 --> 0:30:23.160
<v Speaker 1>Taether with Maman Christopher Kane, where you talking about factor investing,

0:30:23.280 --> 0:30:25.520
<v Speaker 1>and you know, we were looking at, you know, which

0:30:26.040 --> 0:30:29.440
<v Speaker 1>strategies performed best and worst in other sort of environments

0:30:29.440 --> 0:30:32.120
<v Speaker 1>where you had elevated interest rate and certainty. What's stands

0:30:32.160 --> 0:30:36.240
<v Speaker 1>out to you there? Yeah, So we run MVP portfolio,

0:30:36.360 --> 0:30:40.760
<v Speaker 1>which combines the factor families of the high momentum, low volatility,

0:30:40.920 --> 0:30:43.120
<v Speaker 1>high value and high profitability stocks. So we want to

0:30:43.160 --> 0:30:45.880
<v Speaker 1>really keep an eye on how that family of stocks

0:30:46.040 --> 0:30:48.800
<v Speaker 1>is going to do in an environment of crisis or

0:30:49.400 --> 0:30:52.080
<v Speaker 1>sort of distress in the financial sector. So we did

0:30:52.200 --> 0:30:55.640
<v Speaker 1>go back and we looked at how those factors performed

0:30:55.920 --> 0:30:59.480
<v Speaker 1>in the Lehman crisis just as a representative example of

0:31:00.320 --> 0:31:04.400
<v Speaker 1>really precipitous conditions in the financial markets. And indeed, the

0:31:04.520 --> 0:31:07.760
<v Speaker 1>fact the performance was pretty decent with the exception of

0:31:07.800 --> 0:31:11.880
<v Speaker 1>the value factor. Value unfortunately is somewhat subject to swing

0:31:12.200 --> 0:31:15.360
<v Speaker 1>given the financial sector exposure that's in the value segment.

0:31:16.200 --> 0:31:19.160
<v Speaker 1>That said, our portfolio when we rebalanced it as of

0:31:19.280 --> 0:31:22.080
<v Speaker 1>December did not have any bank stocks in it, thankfully.

0:31:22.240 --> 0:31:26.880
<v Speaker 1>So the value component of the finish yeah, we got

0:31:26.920 --> 0:31:32.800
<v Speaker 1>really lucky, frankly because they weren't. They weren't particularly positive

0:31:32.840 --> 0:31:36.200
<v Speaker 1>screens on our factors, thank goodness. So the portfolio, once

0:31:36.200 --> 0:31:39.080
<v Speaker 1>against it looks like it's going to perform relatively well

0:31:39.120 --> 0:31:42.240
<v Speaker 1>in this environment of distress. So in terms of the

0:31:42.360 --> 0:31:45.080
<v Speaker 1>technical view, then are you at a point where you're

0:31:45.480 --> 0:31:48.120
<v Speaker 1>like it can go one way or another, Like the

0:31:48.200 --> 0:31:51.840
<v Speaker 1>odds are fifty fifty at this point. In terms of equities,

0:31:52.640 --> 0:31:55.120
<v Speaker 1>it's not clear. I will say, Carol, you know, I'm

0:31:55.160 --> 0:31:58.240
<v Speaker 1>watching some really key levels. You know, I do think

0:31:58.280 --> 0:32:01.160
<v Speaker 1>that October was a massive wash out moment for stocks,

0:32:01.160 --> 0:32:03.320
<v Speaker 1>and we run our own market Pulse index that would

0:32:03.360 --> 0:32:06.160
<v Speaker 1>suggest and confirm that it was a major sentiment low

0:32:06.240 --> 0:32:08.160
<v Speaker 1>for the equity market. That doesn't mean we don't go

0:32:08.240 --> 0:32:11.000
<v Speaker 1>back and retest that low, but it is a critical

0:32:11.120 --> 0:32:14.080
<v Speaker 1>level to watch and we're still nowhere near those levels.

0:32:14.120 --> 0:32:16.320
<v Speaker 1>So that's the good news. The bad news is though,

0:32:16.400 --> 0:32:18.440
<v Speaker 1>that some of the technical improvements that we made over

0:32:18.480 --> 0:32:20.880
<v Speaker 1>the course of the last several months really have been

0:32:21.640 --> 0:32:24.480
<v Speaker 1>washed out over the last couple of days, and especially

0:32:24.560 --> 0:32:26.920
<v Speaker 1>in the small cap index. We're back to testing our

0:32:26.960 --> 0:32:30.640
<v Speaker 1>December lows on small caps again. Still not near those

0:32:30.680 --> 0:32:33.600
<v Speaker 1>October lows or even the major June lows that were

0:32:33.640 --> 0:32:35.400
<v Speaker 1>made in the small cap index. But when the small

0:32:35.440 --> 0:32:38.280
<v Speaker 1>cap chart is deteriorating, it's really tough to get optimistic

0:32:38.320 --> 0:32:41.520
<v Speaker 1>about the outlook for stocks, and small caps have just

0:32:41.720 --> 0:32:43.920
<v Speaker 1>gotten creamed over the course of the last week, so

0:32:44.200 --> 0:32:46.520
<v Speaker 1>we'd like to see some stability emerged there before we

0:32:46.560 --> 0:32:51.200
<v Speaker 1>can get too opportunistic about the market at large. That's it.

0:32:51.320 --> 0:32:54.680
<v Speaker 1>I also think though, that if you are thinking about

0:32:55.440 --> 0:32:59.480
<v Speaker 1>individual equity investments, industry investment sector investments, there are some

0:32:59.560 --> 0:33:03.600
<v Speaker 1>opportunit entities that have emerged in this washout, And you know,

0:33:03.720 --> 0:33:07.000
<v Speaker 1>I think from the standpoint of looking beneath the headline

0:33:07.040 --> 0:33:10.120
<v Speaker 1>market industries, you probably will find some pretty deep values

0:33:10.200 --> 0:33:12.880
<v Speaker 1>that are worth investigating at this time. It's just the

0:33:13.040 --> 0:33:17.160
<v Speaker 1>market itself. The charts still looks so great, So I

0:33:17.560 --> 0:33:19.479
<v Speaker 1>would say I would err on the side of caution

0:33:19.600 --> 0:33:22.280
<v Speaker 1>right now. You know, Gina, you're talking about you're talking

0:33:22.360 --> 0:33:25.880
<v Speaker 1>about value, You're talking about you know, you know some

0:33:26.000 --> 0:33:28.000
<v Speaker 1>of the small caps, you know, the one you know

0:33:28.080 --> 0:33:30.280
<v Speaker 1>talking about the MVP portfolio and all these portfolios. The

0:33:30.320 --> 0:33:31.960
<v Speaker 1>one thing that kind of stands out to me is

0:33:32.200 --> 0:33:34.480
<v Speaker 1>is the banking sector and the exposure they're in. And

0:33:34.800 --> 0:33:37.360
<v Speaker 1>obviously in small caps the KP I mean, regional banks

0:33:37.400 --> 0:33:39.480
<v Speaker 1>are you know, a very healthy portion of that index.

0:33:39.560 --> 0:33:42.480
<v Speaker 1>Hence the reason you know it's down so significantly. You know,

0:33:42.840 --> 0:33:44.800
<v Speaker 1>just a few months ago, Gene, we were talking as

0:33:44.840 --> 0:33:47.000
<v Speaker 1>banks as being, you know, a place you wanted to

0:33:47.080 --> 0:33:50.680
<v Speaker 1>be in this environment, right so exactly so, so how

0:33:50.760 --> 0:33:54.080
<v Speaker 1>has everything changed so very quickly? Well in our so

0:33:54.240 --> 0:33:56.400
<v Speaker 1>in our models, banks actually have not been a place

0:33:56.480 --> 0:33:59.400
<v Speaker 1>you wanted to be. Financials were, but banks were not.

0:33:59.640 --> 0:34:02.640
<v Speaker 1>We do run industry relative models within the sectors themselves,

0:34:02.680 --> 0:34:06.600
<v Speaker 1>and certainly that financials started to pop toward the top

0:34:06.680 --> 0:34:09.280
<v Speaker 1>of our sector allocations. But it wasn't because of banks.

0:34:09.320 --> 0:34:12.640
<v Speaker 1>It's because of the consumer finance company that are at

0:34:12.719 --> 0:34:15.880
<v Speaker 1>the top of our financial sector scorecard. And as I mentioned,

0:34:16.200 --> 0:34:17.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, it was a signal to us that no

0:34:17.800 --> 0:34:21.480
<v Speaker 1>banks or even in the MVP portfolio as of December's rebalance.

0:34:21.640 --> 0:34:25.480
<v Speaker 1>So for us, the banks were not the primary reason

0:34:25.600 --> 0:34:27.840
<v Speaker 1>to get a little bit more excited about financials. The

0:34:27.920 --> 0:34:29.960
<v Speaker 1>reason to get a little more excited about financials are

0:34:30.040 --> 0:34:32.759
<v Speaker 1>the lenders to consumers, where consumers are still borrowing and

0:34:32.840 --> 0:34:36.600
<v Speaker 1>borrowing even more at higher levels of interest rate, but

0:34:36.800 --> 0:34:40.400
<v Speaker 1>yet not likely to default. Those companies are the companies

0:34:40.440 --> 0:34:43.360
<v Speaker 1>that are likely to experience the most upside in that

0:34:43.480 --> 0:34:47.000
<v Speaker 1>kind of climate. So, you know, I think that financials

0:34:47.080 --> 0:34:49.480
<v Speaker 1>is a really big sector and you had definitely right

0:34:49.520 --> 0:34:51.680
<v Speaker 1>now have to look beyond the banks to get excited

0:34:51.680 --> 0:34:56.320
<v Speaker 1>about anything in financials. You know, small caps are exposed,

0:34:56.400 --> 0:34:59.120
<v Speaker 1>but maybe we're overstating how much small caps are exposed.

0:34:59.120 --> 0:35:01.719
<v Speaker 1>I'm actually worried about the smallest of the big cap

0:35:01.800 --> 0:35:04.680
<v Speaker 1>stocks when it comes to the banks, because that's where

0:35:04.680 --> 0:35:07.800
<v Speaker 1>you've seen the deposit growth, That's where you've seen the

0:35:07.880 --> 0:35:11.280
<v Speaker 1>regular boiligion. All right, can leave on that note. Always

0:35:11.280 --> 0:35:13.880
<v Speaker 1>great insight, Gina, Thank you, Thank you, Gina. Mart Adams

0:35:13.920 --> 0:35:16.400
<v Speaker 1>Geef Beck can describe us at Bloomberg Intelligence, joining us

0:35:16.480 --> 0:35:18.440
<v Speaker 1>on the phone from New Jersey. If you're lucky enough,

0:35:18.480 --> 0:35:20.920
<v Speaker 1>you can check out our research. It is on the

0:35:21.000 --> 0:35:25.680
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg terminal. This is the Bloomberg Business Week podcast, available

0:35:25.760 --> 0:35:29.200
<v Speaker 1>on Apple, Spotify, and anywhere else you get your podcast.

0:35:29.760 --> 0:35:33.279
<v Speaker 1>Listen live week afternoons from three to six Eastern on

0:35:33.440 --> 0:35:36.759
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg dot com, the iHeartRadio app tune In, and the

0:35:36.840 --> 0:35:39.799
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Business App. You can also watch us live every

0:35:39.840 --> 0:35:43.399
<v Speaker 1>weekday on YouTube and always on the Bloomberg Germinal. Lom