Speaker 1: You're listening to the Buck Sexton Show podcast, make sure
Speaker 1: you subscribe to the podcast on the iHeartRadio app or
Speaker 1: wherever you get your podcasts. Shoulder to Shoulder Shields. I
Speaker 1: welcome the Buck Sexton Show team, Welcome to the Freedom
Speaker 1: Hut Tuesday, November twenty ninth edition of the program. And
Speaker 1: Elon Musk saying that Western civilization is at stake with
Speaker 1: his fight to make Twitter an actual free speech platform online,
Speaker 1: and we'll break down why he's right. It is super important.
Speaker 1: Matters a whole heck of a lot, more than a
Speaker 1: lot of other things people are fixated on these days.
Speaker 1: Plus the US playing Iran in soccer and it's going
Speaker 1: on right as I speak to you. But what are
Speaker 1: the implications if the US does come out victorious. We
Speaker 1: will have that conversation then. Also a Biden nuclear energy
Speaker 1: experts who stole a piece of luggage from the airport
Speaker 1: used the bag for a month. And oh, by the way,
Speaker 1: this individual is a non binary individual who teaches kink
Speaker 1: classes that involve dressing up like a dog apparently, Deputy
Speaker 1: Assistant Secretary and the by administration, though we shall discuss
Speaker 1: that here in just a moment. But first, my friends.
Speaker 1: The Tunnel to Towers Foundation delivers on its promise to
Speaker 1: do good and never forget the sacrifices America's greatest heroes
Speaker 1: have made. For US, heroes like Mariel Nelson. After nine eleven,
Speaker 1: Mario Nelson help with the recovery efforts at Ground Zero.
Speaker 1: That experience motivated him to enlist in the US Army.
Speaker 1: He deployed to a rock and was two months from
Speaker 1: coming home, and he was killed in action at the
Speaker 1: age of twenty six. He left behind a wife and
Speaker 1: young daughter. Thanks to the Tunnel to Towers Foundation, his
Speaker 1: wife and daughter received a mortgage free home. Your kindness
Speaker 1: and generosity brought them financial stability and peace of mind
Speaker 1: when they needed it most. For some families, the foundation
Speaker 1: brings the comfort of knowing they can stay in the
Speaker 1: home where they made memories with their fall in loved one.
Speaker 1: For other families, the foundation enables new memories to be
Speaker 1: cherished forever. Help our nations greatest heroes and their families
Speaker 1: when they need it most. Done at eleven dollars a
Speaker 1: month to Tunnel of the Towers at t twot dot org.
Speaker 1: That's t the number two t dot org now Elon
Speaker 1: Musk says some very important things here about what he's
Speaker 1: trying to accomplish with his takeover of Twitter. He wrote
Speaker 1: this on Twitter, where he has over one hundred million followers.
Speaker 1: This is a battle for the future of civilization. If
Speaker 1: free speeches lost, even in America, tyranny is all that
Speaker 1: lies ahead. This is important. I understand that for a
Speaker 1: lot of people Owe it's a tech platform that most Americans,
Speaker 1: I think seventy five percent of Americans have never even
Speaker 1: tweeted before, and very few even of those who have
Speaker 1: Twitter accounts, are particularly active. I get that. But it
Speaker 1: is used by all people in journalism, news media, It
Speaker 1: is used by Hollywood, is used by all kinds of
Speaker 1: influencers and people that are trying to steer the national
Speaker 1: conversation one way or another, trying to have outsized influence
Speaker 1: on beliefs, opinions, facts, politics online, and it has become
Speaker 1: an almost entirely left wing fiefdom when it comes to
Speaker 1: censorship and who gets kicked off and who doesn't. Now,
Speaker 1: they do allow some people on the right to be
Speaker 1: active on it, because if they pushed too hard before
Speaker 1: Elon came along, they knew that what would happen was
Speaker 1: already happening, which is there would be competitors. It just
Speaker 1: became intolerable. So they were trying to always see how
Speaker 1: far they could push it, how much the left could
Speaker 1: get away with with their censorship of the right on Twitter,
Speaker 1: before they forced a cleavage, a breakage where all of
Speaker 1: a sudden people were just saying, it's too much. I
Speaker 1: can't deal with this anymore. This is an untenable situation.
Speaker 1: So that's it got to. And then Elon bought Twitter
Speaker 1: because of things like the Hunter post Hunter Biden New
Speaker 1: York Post laptop suppression, which was an inexcusable and obvious
Speaker 1: attempt to try to throw an election to the Democrats,
Speaker 1: that's all it was. And when you have companies that
Speaker 1: are doing this, and then have the same people that
Speaker 1: are pushing for that kind of suppression lecture everybody about
Speaker 1: the need to respect our sacred democracy and the need
Speaker 1: the need to trust in all of election results, all
Speaker 1: the rest of it, a lot of people say to themselves, WHOA,
Speaker 1: what the heck is going on here? Why am I
Speaker 1: supposed to just allow this to continue? Why should the
Speaker 1: government be trusted to regulate or not regulate depending on
Speaker 1: how they view their interest at any given moment. Here
Speaker 1: the regime in charge, the Democrats. And this is why
Speaker 1: Karine Jean Pierre at the White House saying nice Twitter,
Speaker 1: you got there'd be ashamed if something happened to Elon
Speaker 1: should put people on edge a little bit play clip
Speaker 1: one place. It's a researcher at Stanford who says this
Speaker 1: is a critical moment freely in terms of ensuring that
Speaker 1: Twitter does not become a vector for misinformation. Elon Musk says,
Speaker 1: there's more and more subscribers coming online. Are you concerned
Speaker 1: about that? And what tools do you have? Who is
Speaker 1: it at the White House that is really to keeping
Speaker 1: track of this? This is something that we're certainly keeping
Speaker 1: an eye on, a vector for misinformation. Sometimes you wonder
Speaker 1: have these journals ever been on the internet, because there's
Speaker 1: a whole lot of misinformation on there. Have they ever
Speaker 1: actually thought about many of the things the Biden regime
Speaker 1: insisted were fact over the last two years, not even
Speaker 1: just stuff like men can get pregnant not true. It's remarkable,
Speaker 1: isn't it. The people that are so worried all the
Speaker 1: time about misinformation insist the same people insist that men
Speaker 1: can get pregnant, we're going to trust them to be
Speaker 1: the arbiter of fact from fiction. Doesn't seem like a
Speaker 1: good idea to me. But Karen Jean Pierre is doing
Speaker 1: what she's supposed to do there, which is to start
Speaker 1: to condition the American public to the very likely reality
Speaker 1: of a move by the Biden administration in some capacity
Speaker 1: against Elon Musk running Twitter. The Left's ideas are fragile.
Speaker 1: This is why they try to say speech equals violence,
Speaker 1: and it's also why at some level they they don't
Speaker 1: just want totalitarian control of your thoughts and ideas. They
Speaker 1: need it because if they don't have the ability to
Speaker 1: shut down and conversate a conversation, if they don't have
Speaker 1: the ability to silence opposing voices, their ideas will lose.
Speaker 1: It will all start to crumble. And they know that.
Speaker 1: So they are simultaneously The Left is simultaneously and there
Speaker 1: is a cognitive difference, cognitive dissonance in this pardon me.
Speaker 1: They are both incredibly arrogant and deeply insecure, arrogant that
Speaker 1: they know the truth and deeply insecure that if they
Speaker 1: can't tell you what's true and what's not, people find
Speaker 1: out what's really true right truth in quotes for them.
Speaker 1: So Elon's battle is absolutely essential and it's one that
Speaker 1: we must win. And Easy says the future Western civilization
Speaker 1: is at stake, because if you lose on this, you
Speaker 1: lose on everything. If you're not able to share your thoughts, ideas,
Speaker 1: and opinions freely on matters of public importance, what is
Speaker 1: the purpose of the First Amendment? And how can you
Speaker 1: have any faith whatsoever that you have a representative government
Speaker 1: If you can't even share your ideas, never mind support
Speaker 1: the candidates you want, You're never going to feel like
Speaker 1: the government is reflective of your values and ideas, or
Speaker 1: even tries to be. This is really important. The left
Speaker 1: went too far. They showed us their hand, and now
Speaker 1: it's time for payback. Now it's time to push for
Speaker 1: the freedom that to the left is like throwing water
Speaker 1: on the wicked witch of the West. Either I'm melting,
Speaker 1: I'm melting. Remember then, Remember I saw that I was
Speaker 1: a kid. It's kind of scary. Actually, you know that
Speaker 1: it was a good movie. Wizard of Oz holds up. Actually,
Speaker 1: a lot of older movies don't hold up that well.
Speaker 1: I know people will get mad and we're gonna say that,
Speaker 1: I say really a lot of indicating, not acting. People
Speaker 1: who took acting one on one, Like I didn't know
Speaker 1: the difference. My friends, you ever want to invest in
Speaker 1: real estate, but you didn't have the time to do
Speaker 1: it on your own. That's how I felt until I
Speaker 1: met my friends had Done for You real estate. Now
Speaker 1: I'm a real estate investor. It's becoming an important part
Speaker 1: of my overall financial long term strategy and an outlook.
Speaker 1: I own multiple houses that I bought through Done for
Speaker 1: You real Estate. I've done very well with them. I've
Speaker 1: gotten my brothers to become Done for You customers, and
Speaker 1: we're looking to build an even bigger portfolio working with
Speaker 1: Done for You in the years ahead. It's an amazing company,
Speaker 1: and they really care about the people they work with
Speaker 1: because they work with people like me and you, just
Speaker 1: everyday folks who want to invest in real estate who've
Speaker 1: never done it before. I never even bought a house
Speaker 1: to live in before I bought an investment property. We're
Speaker 1: Done for Your real Estate. They'll take you through every
Speaker 1: step of the process, what part of the country. They
Speaker 1: have real deep expertise in that they think you should
Speaker 1: consider buying an investment home and investment property, and then
Speaker 1: going beyond that, they'll tell you which management company they
Speaker 1: think you should work with. Once you get the help
Speaker 1: you get a tenant in place. Now I'm going out
Speaker 1: of order. They'll also help you get the mortgage. They'll
Speaker 1: help you pick the house, work with the upbroker, all
Speaker 1: that everything. So every step of the process is covered
Speaker 1: by Done for Your Real Estate and they make sure
Speaker 1: that you do your real estate investing with real expertise
Speaker 1: and make sound decisions. So go to Done for You
Speaker 1: Buck dot Com. Again, that's done for you Buck dot Com.
Speaker 1: You know, Karen Jean Pierre. I just played before some
Speaker 1: audio from Queen Jean Pierre about how Elon Musk better
Speaker 1: watch out. I'm just gonna note this. She doesn't She
Speaker 1: clearly doesn't know what a Nobel Prize is. She thinks
Speaker 1: it's a Nobel Prize, like, oh, you get it because
Speaker 1: you're noble, like for nobility. Here is kareein Jean Pierre
Speaker 1: play clip two. Today, President By met with three US
Speaker 1: winners of the twenty twenty two Nobel Prize. Doctor Caroline Bertozi,
Speaker 1: who won the Nobel Prize in Chemistry, doctor John Klauser,
Speaker 1: who won the Nobel Prize in physics and doctor Douglas Diamond,
Speaker 1: who won the Nobel Prize in Economic sciences. How is
Speaker 1: it that you could become White House Press Secretary and
Speaker 1: not know what a Nobel Prize is? I just mean,
Speaker 1: have heard of it, know how to pronounce it. How
Speaker 1: is that possible? White House Press secretary? Your job is media? Well,
Speaker 1: the only way I could see it being possible is
Speaker 1: if people your entire professional life have been afraid to
Speaker 1: correct you when you say something that is incorrect. Why
Speaker 1: would you be afraid to correct somebody when they say
Speaker 1: something that are so obviously incorrect. Oh, I leave that
Speaker 1: to others to distinguish. But that's the only way I
Speaker 1: could think of this. That's the only way I think
Speaker 1: of this happening. That's the only explanation I can come
Speaker 1: up with. And it's also shockingly ignorant. Look, I mispronounced
Speaker 1: things sometimes, there are words sometimes that I'll say that,
Speaker 1: but I mean Nobel Prize, you know. I mean if
Speaker 1: somebody were to say that it were you know, President
Speaker 1: Ronald Regan, I think you'd wonder about their knowledge of
Speaker 1: US politics. Like, I think that's reasonable, right. President Ronald
Speaker 1: Regan was amazing. In the eighties, you'd say, okay, but
Speaker 1: she's the White House Press Secretary, and nobody will say
Speaker 1: a thing about this, just because the same reason that
Speaker 1: nobody will say anything to her all along that she's wrong.
Speaker 1: You don't want to get a lawsuit. Oh you're man splaining.
Speaker 1: Don't man splain to Karen Jean Pierre about how to
Speaker 1: pronounce nobel. Ah. That's one of the things that is
Speaker 1: going on. My Another thing that's going on right now
Speaker 1: is the USA Iran soccer match. I have the unenviable
Speaker 1: position of talking to you right now. I don't know.
Speaker 1: When you watch this, you will know who has won.
Speaker 1: As I speak to you. It's looking like the US
Speaker 1: is in pretty good shape. But who knows. I'm trying
Speaker 1: to jinx anything. I'll say this about Iran US soccer.
Speaker 1: First of all, Iran is such a it's such a
Speaker 1: sad place, such a sad country, because it should be
Speaker 1: a great country. Persians are a great people and have
Speaker 1: an amazing history, and there's a lot that is rich
Speaker 1: and that is worthwhile in the Persian culture. And unfortunately
Speaker 1: a bunch of lunatic religious fanatics took over that country
Speaker 1: and have ruined it now for fifty years, just like
Speaker 1: communist fanatics ruined Cuba for going on seventy years now
Speaker 1: sixty some odd years. I got into the math in
Speaker 1: my head. So yeah, it's terrible what's going on in
Speaker 1: that country. The Iranians on the national team were apparently
Speaker 1: told if they did not cheer, I'm sorry, if they
Speaker 1: did not sing the national anthem, their families were under threat.
Speaker 1: I saw that reporting, So that gives you sense of
Speaker 1: what kind of a country we're really dealing with here.
Speaker 1: But it's it's also just a reminder of friends, look
Speaker 1: at all these stories out there about Iran, China, Venezuela,
Speaker 1: North Korea. You'll see these places in the news, Russia.
Speaker 1: Freedom is not only not free, freedom is fragile, freedom
Speaker 1: is temporary, it is transient. There are real places in
Speaker 1: the world, including the largest country in the world, China,
Speaker 1: where there really is no meaningful freedom of any kind,
Speaker 1: not in a governance and polity sense. Is there any
Speaker 1: freedom in China? Not really. No, there's a lot of authoritarianism.
Speaker 1: There's very much the boot he of dictatorship on the
Speaker 1: throats of the people. Same thing in Venezuela, place you
Speaker 1: don't hear very much about at all, because it's socialists there,
Speaker 1: and it was a pretty well off country with a
Speaker 1: bright future with tremendous natural oil reserves that was ruined
Speaker 1: by socialism by people who effectively used envy as a
Speaker 1: political weapon. Maduro's venezuela. That's what they did. They use envy.
Speaker 1: Oh you're poor, you're unhappy. If you just put us
Speaker 1: in charge, give us power, and those rich people that
Speaker 1: don't care about you will make them care about you
Speaker 1: and will give you a lot. You'll have all their stuff,
Speaker 1: or you'll have enough stuff that you'll be happy at least,
Speaker 1: and they'll pay more. Oh you mean redistribution of wealth
Speaker 1: and social justice and putting people in charge who promise
Speaker 1: to care so much about the poor. Note the socialists
Speaker 1: never lived like socialists, meaning the people that put these
Speaker 1: policies into place, they always do just fine. In fact,
Speaker 1: they're rich, incredibly rich. Look at the senior members of
Speaker 1: the Communist Party of China. Are they poor, No, they're
Speaker 1: some of them are billionaires. They're doing just great. Look
Speaker 1: at the leadership eventezuella. They're very wealthy. Ah. So it's
Speaker 1: the other people that have to be poor for social
Speaker 1: justice to be achieved. And I bring all this up
Speaker 1: just because I think in America it's easy to fall
Speaker 1: into this sense of complacency, like we're always going to
Speaker 1: be this shining city on a hill, even for all
Speaker 1: of our problems, which I talk about a lot, all
Speaker 1: the challenges. But you know, freedom can pass away in
Speaker 1: one generation. Freedom can just evaporate. And unfortunately, there's a
Speaker 1: very strong contingent of socialists even commies in this country,
Speaker 1: and they don't learn the lessons of history past or
Speaker 1: the lessons of the world today. They don't care. They
Speaker 1: think it'll be different this time. They think they'll do
Speaker 1: it the right way this time, and they want some
Speaker 1: of the policies here in America. I mean, I just
Speaker 1: read some threat of the weekend from a woman, a
Speaker 1: Canadian woman on Twitter. I don't remember her name. Of
Speaker 1: those of I would give her credit for this, but
Speaker 1: I can't. I also don't remember exactly what she said
Speaker 1: in her Twitter threat, but she talked about how she
Speaker 1: had a very very sick baby, like a super high
Speaker 1: fever one hundred, three hundred and four, trying to get
Speaker 1: the baby to be seen in Canada as a total nightmare.
Speaker 1: You even hear about this in this country. Oh, they
Speaker 1: have free healthcare there, really, because it takes twenty four
Speaker 1: hours basically to get your baby seen by a medical
Speaker 1: professional if they have one hundred and four fever. Even
Speaker 1: if you go to the hospital and wait in line
Speaker 1: for twelve hours, socialized medicine, it's so great. It's all free.
Speaker 1: It's all free. They're lying to you. But you see,
Speaker 1: the people who lie to you do so for their
Speaker 1: own benefit. They do so. They pretend to be altruistic.
Speaker 1: They weaponize fake virtue. They pretend to be altruistic in
Speaker 1: order to have more power to wield in the name
Speaker 1: of the poor and the collective and the people. But
Speaker 1: they have no interest in helping any of those things,
Speaker 1: only themselves. Also known as democrats. Unfortunately, it's what they do.
Speaker 1: Speaking of democrats, this was the headline of the Daily Mail.
Speaker 1: Biden's non binary nuclear waste guru Sam Use two three
Speaker 1: hundred and twenty five dollars bag for a month after
Speaker 1: stealing it from the airport luggage carousel and unpacking the
Speaker 1: female victim's clothes, but claims it was an accident. It
Speaker 1: keeps his job. The White House says nothing. So the
Speaker 1: Biden administration has a non binary individual who uses the
Speaker 1: pronoun they plural pronouns. I'm not doing this. Plural pronouns
Speaker 1: is wrong. You're not multiple people. We don't. We don't
Speaker 1: change language from its plane meaning just because some people
Speaker 1: have emotional instability and mental health crises. I'm sorry, you're
Speaker 1: not a vey. If we want to come up with
Speaker 1: some non binary pronoun that's another discussion. I think that's
Speaker 1: strange too. I don't think we should accede to that
Speaker 1: necessarily either. But they is just totally off limits. It's
Speaker 1: not a they. You're either here or as she deal
Speaker 1: with it, and you know here we are seeing once
Speaker 1: again the Biden administration elevates this person you know, went
Speaker 1: to MT and so we're supposed to think, oh, well
Speaker 1: that he must be so smart, Britain must be so smart.
Speaker 1: I went at m T Okay, well, whereas college essay
Speaker 1: is all about being non binary and a huge LGBTQ
Speaker 1: plus advocate. And did he work the system? I don't know.
Speaker 1: He's a nuclear waste disposal expert, okay, probably much better
Speaker 1: than I am at MATH. I'll get which is not hard,
Speaker 1: by the way. I'll give him that. But you don't
Speaker 1: really know just based on where someone went to school.
Speaker 1: Was this person elevated to being a He's only thirty
Speaker 1: four years old. He's a dashed depe assistant secretary. That's
Speaker 1: a pretty senior role in the federal government and the
Speaker 1: Department of Energy when you're dealing with nuclear requires a
Speaker 1: security clearance, probably a top secret security clearance. It's a
Speaker 1: big deal obviously nuclear energy. So was he elevated? They
Speaker 1: elevated because he's a trans non binary, transgender activist who
Speaker 1: teaches kink and fetish classes, including the fetish where he
Speaker 1: dresses up like a dog for some kind of sexual
Speaker 1: excitement or gratification reasons. This is a real thing. Biden
Speaker 1: administration thinks it's a great person to elevate. This is
Speaker 1: a person who's in a photo with Rachel Levine, a
Speaker 1: man with long hair pretending to be a woman as
Speaker 1: an admiral in the HHS. This is the Biden regime
Speaker 1: showing you what their next round of diversity means. Where
Speaker 1: does it go beyond that? By the way, well, what
Speaker 1: are the next steps? Because there always are next steps.
Speaker 1: We know that it never stops. They can't stop. Ultimately,
Speaker 1: this is just about tearing everything down and destroying everything
Speaker 1: about Western civilization that has held it in place and
Speaker 1: allowed it to grow and become as imperfect as it
Speaker 1: may be, more prosperous, more stable, and more secure for
Speaker 1: everybody over time. This is effectively the eradication of gender.
Speaker 1: Is just a fashionable way for leftist to rage at
Speaker 1: our civilization and try to tear it down from the inside,
Speaker 1: and it's unfortunately a very effective one. But yeah, this
Speaker 1: deputy Assistant secretary for the Department of Energy, whose non
Speaker 1: binary uses they pronouns, stole a bag full of woman's
Speaker 1: clothing and thousands of dollars. There's a value, and we're
Speaker 1: supposed to think this is like normal or no big deal.
Speaker 1: This is a person. Do you want this person in
Speaker 1: charge of any nuclear secrets? Because I think their mental
Speaker 1: health is questionable at best. That kind of thing used
Speaker 1: to matter for security clearances, but not if you're a transactivist.
Speaker 1: It doesn't not anymore. Just the truth as it is,
Speaker 1: my friends, Thanks for along with me back tomorrow, Shields
Speaker 1: time