Speaker 1: This episode is brought to you by all State. Some
Speaker 1: people just know they could save hundreds on car insurance
Speaker 1: by checking all State first, Like you know to check
Speaker 1: the date of the Big Game first before you accidentally
Speaker 1: buy tickets on your twentieth wedding anniversary and have to
Speaker 1: spend the next twenty years of your marriage making up
Speaker 1: for it. Yeah, checking first is smart, So check all
Speaker 1: State first for a quote that could save you hundreds.
Speaker 1: You're in good hands with all States savings. Very terms
Speaker 1: apply all State Fire and Casualty Insurance Company and Affiliates, Northbrook, Illinois.
Speaker 2: What if Chris Rock.
Speaker 3: Hits him back right, then the whole thing goes left.
Speaker 4: I've been in the position of where you don't want
Speaker 4: to start a skirmish but feel obligated because you feel
Speaker 4: your wife or girlfriend will lose respect for you if
Speaker 4: you don't. Right, But I can't imagine it being while
Speaker 4: I'm at work all on me. I think Chris Rock
Speaker 4: gets to do the oscars until he doesn't want to
Speaker 4: do him anymore. I think the poise he showed he
Speaker 4: was great about the situation.
Speaker 3: He was unbelievable.
Speaker 4: It was one of the reasons I think so many
Speaker 4: people thought it was fake at first, right was because
Speaker 4: he handled it? Okay, all right, we can start the
Speaker 4: show now. I have more on this later.
Speaker 2: Welcome in.
Speaker 4: It is What's Right with Nick Wright Episode five. We
Speaker 4: are recording this hours after Will Smith smacked Chris Rock
Speaker 4: on the Oscar stage. I spent about fifteen minutes before
Speaker 4: the show even started talking about that. Hopefully you'll see
Speaker 4: that throughout. Also demands who all introduce him just a moment.
Speaker 4: If you don't have some Chris Rock questions and Will
Speaker 4: Smith questions in this, then you're fired. So you better
Speaker 4: get it together when you can. Before though, we get
Speaker 4: to what we are talking about. Let's get to what
Speaker 4: we're not talking about. What is not on today's What's
Speaker 4: Right with Nick Wright show is Italy missing the World
Speaker 4: Cup lost to North Macedonia, Shack and steph Win oscars
Speaker 4: and Formula one Racing.
Speaker 3: That says, who cares?
Speaker 2: You know what?
Speaker 3: I'm gonna admit I've been knocking it. I might have
Speaker 3: to get into it.
Speaker 4: So many people I like and respect like it for
Speaker 4: me to totally dismiss it, However, that is not gonna
Speaker 4: be on the show today. If you're new to the show,
Speaker 4: My son is deeply involved. You'll meet him in just
Speaker 4: a moment. There's also a clock. It's a race of
Speaker 4: me against the clock, me against the producers. Demanse's right there.
Speaker 4: So Demanse I turned to you. What are we starting
Speaker 4: with today?
Speaker 5: Let's start with some Kyrie. Yeah, great news in Brooklyn.
Speaker 5: Kyrie can play home games again.
Speaker 2: Yep.
Speaker 5: They crushed Miami and then proceeded to lose to Charlotte.
Speaker 5: They now have the second best title odds. Yeah, which
Speaker 5: team are they?
Speaker 2: The team that beat Miami or the team that lost
Speaker 2: to Charlotte.
Speaker 3: It's a great question. It's also a trick question.
Speaker 4: The answer is they're both, which is why picking them
Speaker 4: to win the title is so ridiculously dumb. So over
Speaker 4: the weekend, both the Lakers and the Nets have just
Speaker 4: agregious losses. The Lakers was uglier, but the Nets was
Speaker 4: more damaging. Here's why Lakers have been dead for a
Speaker 4: month now. The Nets again. The Demonzi just said it.
Speaker 4: You said the second best title of us. So, according
Speaker 4: to Vegas, the Sons are the most likely team to
Speaker 4: win the title, and right after them is the Brooklyn Nets,
Speaker 4: who at present have are tight in the standings with Charlotte.
Speaker 3: Who just beat them yesterday.
Speaker 4: Right now, just to make the playoffs, the Nets would
Speaker 4: have to beat Trey Young in Barclays and Trey Young,
Speaker 4: by the way, what an opportunity to Graham become the
Speaker 4: most hated man in New York City. He already killed
Speaker 4: the Knicks last year. Now he can kill the Nets
Speaker 4: this year in one game. If the standings were but
Speaker 4: they'd have to beat the Hawks. Then they would have
Speaker 4: to win the next playing game against Charlotte maybe who
Speaker 4: they just lost to the over the weekend, and then
Speaker 4: play the one seed, whether it be Boston or Philly
Speaker 4: or Milwaukee. I the idea that Brooklyn is going to
Speaker 4: be mediocre for seventy five games and then turn it
Speaker 4: on for four weeks just to get to the conference finals,
Speaker 4: not even the NBA Finals.
Speaker 3: It's ludicrous.
Speaker 4: I can't believe people are still talking themselves into the Nets.
Speaker 2: Now.
Speaker 4: They're upside. Their ceiling is as high as any team,
Speaker 4: almost any team in basketball in the entire Eastern Conference.
Speaker 4: If you tell me this team is gonna play it's
Speaker 4: a plus game, who's the best? The only team who
Speaker 4: I think can beat Brooklyn's a plus is Milwaukee. But
Speaker 4: that it's not March madness. It's not one and done.
Speaker 4: You gotta win four out of seven and then do
Speaker 4: it again, then do it again, then do it again.
Speaker 4: Why would anyone believe Brooklyn that they find out Kyrie
Speaker 4: the vaccine mandates lifted.
Speaker 3: Oh, that should be a huge game for them.
Speaker 4: They lose to the Grizzlies without his first game back
Speaker 4: where he's allowed to play at Barclay's all year. They
Speaker 4: blow a fourteen point lead and lose to the Hornets
Speaker 4: in a game that matters at some point.
Speaker 3: They are who they said they were, and who they
Speaker 3: said they.
Speaker 4: Are is a team that has no consistency whatsoever. So no,
Speaker 4: they can't win the NBA title. It's ridiculous. All right,
Speaker 4: what's next?
Speaker 5: NBA nerds were big mad this weekend. Jo Kitchen and
Speaker 5: b were both eligible for all NBA as cinner Yeah
Speaker 5: and forward.
Speaker 3: Yeah, it is ridiculous.
Speaker 2: Yeah, you're a nerd. Yeah, so I figure you're bad.
Speaker 3: Yeah.
Speaker 2: Why does this matter?
Speaker 3: Oh? Why does it matter?
Speaker 4: Oh?
Speaker 2: I don't know.
Speaker 4: What does history matter? Why does anything matter? So okay,
Speaker 4: so let me explain how this works all NBA, which
Speaker 4: if you're following our bet, well you can't even follow it. Yet,
Speaker 4: but our best fifty players last fifty year series when
Speaker 4: it comes out in a few weeks, what you're gonna see.
Speaker 3: We really value certain things.
Speaker 4: Top five MVP finishes, how you do in the playoffs,
Speaker 4: and all NBA appearances, because for all of NBA history,
Speaker 4: this has been a snapshot of the best guys at
Speaker 4: each position in the league. First team, second team, and
Speaker 4: thirty years ago they added the third team, and all
Speaker 4: of a sudden, despite the fact that Joe Lmbi and
Speaker 4: Nikoli Jokic have played zero minutes at forward the NBA,
Speaker 4: because I guess they want to make sure Jokic makes
Speaker 4: first team. The NBA is changing the rules. They started
Speaker 4: going down the path last year. Now it's full on
Speaker 4: embrace where a guy who doesn't play forward can make
Speaker 4: the team it forward.
Speaker 3: So why does it matter? Here's why it matters.
Speaker 4: I'm not saying that it's perfect that you're a guy
Speaker 4: who's gonna finish top four in MVP voting isn't going
Speaker 4: to get a first team spot, But that's how it's
Speaker 4: always been. We had Wilt and Russell dueling each other
Speaker 4: for a dozen years. Do you know how many times
Speaker 4: they both made first Team All NBA zero. We had
Speaker 4: Bob McAdoo once come in second in MVP voting. He
Speaker 4: didn't make first or second team All NBA. Munzleos Oh
Speaker 4: put him on there alongside that guys, you had Robinson
Speaker 4: and a Keen and Ewing. Was there any time where
Speaker 4: you could have Shack came along where he should add
Speaker 4: two centers? Yeah, could have made an argument, but you
Speaker 4: didn't go through history. Has there been two centers on
Speaker 4: an All NBA team? No, because it's mattered what position
Speaker 4: you actually play.
Speaker 3: So now if you change.
Speaker 4: The rules, and you wouldn't change the rules when it
Speaker 4: was Kareem involved and it was, or when it was
Speaker 4: Shack involved, or when it was Wilt and Russell, to
Speaker 4: change them now and change the way we are able
Speaker 4: to judge different eras.
Speaker 2: I hate it, but he's.
Speaker 3: Not spicing anything up. How do I sound like an
Speaker 3: old head?
Speaker 2: It's the way it was in the best guys.
Speaker 4: Guys, Moses Malone at his apex was getting All NBA
Speaker 4: second team some years because he wasn't better than Kareem.
Speaker 4: But we're going to change the rule for Nikola Jokic. Okay, Yeah,
Speaker 4: makes a ton of sense. Alright, We're still talking all
Speaker 4: of you.
Speaker 5: Good okay, So since you care about the All NBA
Speaker 5: so much despite not even having a.
Speaker 2: Vote, that's a god dog cheap shot. What would your
Speaker 2: team look like?
Speaker 3: Oh my All NBA team?
Speaker 2: Yes, all right?
Speaker 4: First and second team is almost locked, with a couple
Speaker 4: of weeks to go. Third team there's some openings, but
Speaker 4: first team obvious jaw despite missing all the games Joe,
Speaker 4: I think makes it. Could he could get dropped a
Speaker 4: second team defending on having more games he misses. But
Speaker 4: at the guard position, the only lock is Luca. Luca's
Speaker 4: got to be there. Jow's gotta be I think we'll
Speaker 4: be there. At the forward spot, Giannis is obviously going
Speaker 4: to be unanimous. I clearly would not go Jokic and
Speaker 4: Embiid forward center. I would only put one of them
Speaker 4: because they're a center, so the other forward spot would
Speaker 4: go to Lebron.
Speaker 2: Hold on, hold on it, it's all making sense. Now.
Speaker 2: What you mean to tell me this?
Speaker 5: This yokicch and b things getting to you so much
Speaker 5: because they'll take Lebron's spot.
Speaker 3: No, how dare that's that's.
Speaker 2: What it sounds. No, it is.
Speaker 4: Because they don't place forward, So I think the all
Speaker 4: NBA forward should be a forward. That's what I think
Speaker 4: now would as it happens. Are you correct that if Yo,
Speaker 4: Kitch and Embiid make it, and you honest we know
Speaker 4: is gonna make it, Lebron would be out? That does
Speaker 4: happen to be true? That is not the reasoning.
Speaker 3: You don't believe me.
Speaker 2: I don't.
Speaker 4: I don't know how my own son is doubting my my.
Speaker 3: My integrity Here is going to do with Lebron.
Speaker 4: It has to do with NBA history, has to do
Speaker 4: with the you know, paying respect to our elders like
Speaker 4: Bob McAdoo.
Speaker 3: Yeah, it does, buddy. But to answer the question, my.
Speaker 4: All NBA team would be right now, Jah, Luca, Giannis, Lebron, Embiid.
Speaker 3: That would be my first team.
Speaker 4: And the Luca and Giannis and Embiid to me are
Speaker 4: pretty much locked in in those spots Lebron all. So
Speaker 4: if assuming you're not doing the two centers, but I
Speaker 4: wouldn't my second team Steph, Devin Booker, Jason Tatum. Your
Speaker 4: guy who's been unbelievable for six weeks now, Durant. I
Speaker 4: know he's missed a bunch of games. Durant's got to
Speaker 4: be on there, and then my second team center would
Speaker 4: be Jokisch. Those ten names I just mentioned there, eight
Speaker 4: of them must be first or second team Tatum and Durant.
Speaker 4: Some people will make arguments about again there's a spot
Speaker 4: missing for one of them. If you use a center
Speaker 4: spot on a forward or a forward spot on a center,
Speaker 4: I should say, and then third team to me, there's
Speaker 4: right now three lines DeRozan, Karl Anthony, Townsend, CP three
Speaker 4: and for those final two spots, Donovan Mitchell, Jimmy Butler,
Speaker 4: Jalen Brown.
Speaker 3: Pascal Siakam. Do we want to get a cav on there?
Speaker 4: Darius Garland, Trey Young as a case, should we get
Speaker 4: two bulls on their?
Speaker 3: Zach Lavine?
Speaker 4: So, I don't know about third team, but I think
Speaker 4: those I think we're pretty set on how the all
Speaker 4: NBA teams, the general skeleton of it should be.
Speaker 3: And you're right, I don't have a vote.
Speaker 4: Yeah, listen, I'm sorry that didn't work once upon a
Speaker 4: time for the New Orleans Times picking you and follow.
Speaker 2: A team around.
Speaker 4: All I do is studying NBA history and watch all
Speaker 4: the games and talk about as much as anyone and
Speaker 4: where God dogged the NBA's jumpsuits officially licensed gear no less,
Speaker 4: but they can't give me a vote.
Speaker 3: Okay, what's last? Well, hold on, you're you didn't like
Speaker 3: any of that.
Speaker 2: I mean it just sounds like exactly what you do
Speaker 2: for Labron. But okay, you know what, you know what,
Speaker 2: Let's let's let's hit some NFL.
Speaker 5: Yeah, green Bay lost DeVante and MVS. Yeah, they haven't
Speaker 5: done much in free agency. I honestly just think nobody
Speaker 5: wants to play Lenari Rogers. Okay, but do you think
Speaker 5: green Bay made it a mistake by, you know, extending
Speaker 5: extending his contract?
Speaker 4: All right, here's what I think. I think a couple
Speaker 4: of things. I'll answer that question in a moment. But
Speaker 4: I also think that I lost my bet. I bet
Speaker 4: your mom that it would take I set the over
Speaker 4: under on eight and a half shows. Before you start
Speaker 4: taking shots at me and inserting your own opinion, this
Speaker 4: is show five, and when in the last four minutes
Speaker 4: have gotten just unfair Lebron accusations questioning my integrity, he
Speaker 4: and you just squeeze in a demanse Aaron Rodgers take.
Speaker 4: Because I'm telling you right now, the are subscribers, the viewers,
Speaker 4: the people are invested in the What's Right Show, they
Speaker 4: woke up this morning, they're like, man, can't wait to
Speaker 4: hear what Demanse thinks.
Speaker 2: About Aaron Rodgers.
Speaker 3: I'm gonna tell you that's what they're air for.
Speaker 4: With that said, it's not a bad take exactly, even
Speaker 4: though I weren't really licensed yet to give it. The
Speaker 4: evidence would say people aren't rushing to go play with
Speaker 4: Aaron at the very least, that Aaron hasn't been able
Speaker 4: to overcome the fact that the team's in Green Bay,
Speaker 4: the weather, all of it, and the fact that I
Speaker 4: think people don't know how much longer he's going to play.
Speaker 4: But to answer your question, did they make a mistake,
Speaker 4: They didn't make a mistake because they had no choice.
Speaker 3: They had.
Speaker 4: You can't risk Aaron forcing a trade or hiring, so
Speaker 4: you paid him because you had to pay him.
Speaker 3: Do I think it's going to work out?
Speaker 4: Do I think they're gonna get closer to the Super
Speaker 4: Bowl in the next two years than they've been in
Speaker 4: the last two years?
Speaker 3: I do not. Will be right back.
Speaker 6: This episode is brought to you by Unstoppable Discover the
Speaker 6: inspiring true story about Anthony Robless, who defined every expectation
Speaker 6: to become a national wrestling champion and Unstoppable, a new
Speaker 6: original movie from Amazon MGM Studios and director William Goldenberg.
Speaker 6: Evoking the excitement and camaraderie of classic sports dramas and
Speaker 6: thrilling wrestling matches. Unstoppable features an all star ensemble cast
Speaker 6: including Jirelle Jerome, Jennifer Lopez, Don Cheatle, Michael Tanya, and
Speaker 6: Bobby Canavalli. Watch Unstoppable now exclusively on Amazon Prime Video.
Speaker 4: Welcome back in What Dry with Nick Wright podcast and
Speaker 4: video show. I'm not supposed to say YouTube show because
Speaker 4: you might be watching this in a different place, but
Speaker 4: video show sounds stupid, so I'm never saying that again. Sorry, Gabe.
Speaker 4: All Right, we got a new segment. The segment is
Speaker 4: called not Quite Right. This is the idea behind this
Speaker 4: is I kind of dry run a take that I'm
Speaker 4: not quite ready for television on. However, if I have
Speaker 4: a feeling what we're talking about here, I am a
Speaker 4: little insulted they think this goes in the Not Quite
Speaker 4: Right ben because I think this is fully ready for television.
Speaker 3: I just wanted to.
Speaker 4: Debut it on the new podcast Demons. What's the first
Speaker 4: question or the only question? For not quite right.
Speaker 5: Lebron won the Razzie for Worst accur Yeah, because you're deranged.
Speaker 2: You actually think this contributes to the goat debate. Explain yourself.
Speaker 4: Okay again, the editorializing that's happened in the last fifteen
Speaker 4: minutes on the show, call me deranged yet inserting your
Speaker 4: own opinions here, I'm gonna have to check the contract
Speaker 4: that wait, you don't have to see what your actual
Speaker 4: responsibilities are. But I'll tell you this one right now.
Speaker 4: It absolutely, unequivocally does give another example as to why
Speaker 4: Lebron is judged so much differently than every other great
Speaker 4: athlete ever. Lebron just became the first basketball player ever
Speaker 4: and I believe athlete ever to win this award. Now,
Speaker 4: is he the first athlete turned actor? No see, the
Speaker 4: first basketball player turned actor?
Speaker 3: No see, the first Los Angeles Laker turned actor.
Speaker 1: No.
Speaker 4: So let's go to Shaquille O'Neal, who was in some
Speaker 4: historically bad movies, including Shazam.
Speaker 2: And the.
Speaker 4: Idea that Shaquille O'Neal has never won a Razzie for
Speaker 4: Best Actor, The idea that we all still to this
Speaker 4: day pretend that Michael Jordan was a good actor in
Speaker 4: Space Jam and Lebron. His movie grosses one hundred and
Speaker 4: sixty million. He puts his kid in it, and everyone's like, oh,
Speaker 4: I gotta tell you his blocking and the second act
Speaker 4: not up to par Oh my goodness, his comedic timing
Speaker 4: could use some work. Just everyone says, I'm deranged. No, no, no.
Speaker 4: This is a microcosm for how we do Lebron James
Speaker 4: on the court too.
Speaker 3: It just through the.
Speaker 4: Prism of Nostala and the haziness of history. Michael Jordan
Speaker 4: never missed a big shot. Michael Jordan never missed a
Speaker 4: big free throw. Michael Jordan never had a bad game. Meanwhile,
Speaker 4: Lebron over the weekend can have thirty nine points against
Speaker 4: the Pelicans, the Lakers losing, We're like, oh, guy scored
Speaker 4: four in the fourth, what does it mean for him.
Speaker 3: As the goat?
Speaker 4: So yeah, this does contribute to the goat argument because
Speaker 4: it's a It is a part and parcel example that
Speaker 4: Lebron James is held to a standard the likes of
Speaker 4: which no athlete ever has been held to the idea
Speaker 4: that it's not like, oh, you're a famous guy, you're
Speaker 4: in a movie. No, go back and watch some of
Speaker 4: those Jim Brown performances in the movies that he left
Speaker 4: football for. Go back and watch literally any Shack movie
Speaker 4: other sorry Shack, other than Blue Chips or Penny Hardaway
Speaker 4: in Blue Chips or the only real athlete actor performance
Speaker 4: that is great was Ray Allen and he got game.
Speaker 4: You know why because he was playing Ray Allen. He's
Speaker 4: playing and he's just like, Hey, a great high school prospect.
Speaker 4: You're gonna throw money in women at me. Oh okay, I
Speaker 4: can play that.
Speaker 3: So yeah.
Speaker 4: It actually does add to the goat debate because it
Speaker 4: shows how unfairly Lebron's been treated by charlottean such as
Speaker 4: yourself in the media. I can't believe I just said,
Speaker 4: like someone such as yourself in the media that you
Speaker 4: have done. You've given five minutes of opinions on the show,
Speaker 4: and now I'm looking at you as like a fellow
Speaker 4: media member. Hey, okay, all right, let's play a game
Speaker 4: and try to keep your takes to a minimum.
Speaker 2: Here, this or that, I'll try. That's time for this
Speaker 2: or that.
Speaker 5: What's harder to explain the Grizzlies record without jaw or
Speaker 5: everybody rooting for Duke Oh.
Speaker 3: The Grizzlies record is way harder to explain. I get
Speaker 3: everybody rooting for Duke because it's the last stand.
Speaker 4: It's even if you've always hated Duke or always hated
Speaker 4: coach k you'll kind of miss him. And so I
Speaker 4: understand that part of it, and the way they've won
Speaker 4: these games, I'm pretty stirring. It's a fun story to
Speaker 4: watch the Grizzlies who listen, Taylor Jenkins should be coach
Speaker 4: of the Year.
Speaker 3: They've done a.
Speaker 4: Great job building out that roster. But and I do listen.
Speaker 4: I like Baine, I like Jared Jackson junior. I liked
Speaker 4: him coming out of school's top five pick. I like
Speaker 4: the guys they have, But at present they are seventeen
Speaker 4: and two without Job. They have a better record, better
Speaker 4: winning percentage without Job than with Job. That is not explainable.
Speaker 4: That is, by definition inexplicable. So no, that is far
Speaker 4: more confusing and far harder to explain. You know, I
Speaker 4: don't think it should work against Job really, but I've
Speaker 4: got to say I think it kind of, in a
Speaker 4: tiniest bit, might push him off some fourth or fifth
Speaker 4: place MVP ballots. I think you look at the Grizzlies,
Speaker 4: You're like, oh, my god, they're the two seed jaws.
Speaker 4: The reason right, but the fact that they win ninety
Speaker 4: percent of their games without him, I don't think it's fair,
Speaker 4: but probably works works against him a bit.
Speaker 5: All Right, what's the next more believable ruvers Brady to
Speaker 5: the Dolphins or Stefan Diggs to the Cowboys.
Speaker 2: Oh?
Speaker 4: I think Brady to the Dolphins is the more believable rumor.
Speaker 3: Listen. I don't think the Cowboys have cap space. I
Speaker 3: don't think they got rid of a Murray Cooper because
Speaker 3: they think he stinks.
Speaker 4: I think they got rid of Amury Cooper because they've
Speaker 4: given some bad contracts out, particularly to Zeke. They owe
Speaker 4: Dak a ton of money. I think they're in real
Speaker 4: trouble up against the cap now. They tried to bring
Speaker 4: back Brandy Gregory, so I guess you could say they
Speaker 4: would use that money for Digs. But I don't think
Speaker 4: Buffalo is letting Digs get out of there, and Diggs
Speaker 4: has a couple of years left on his deal. The
Speaker 4: reason the Digs rumors even exist is because he's making
Speaker 4: fourteen million a year and the new receiver market is
Speaker 4: twenty eight twenty nine million a year, so they're saying
Speaker 4: that he's going to ask for a new deal.
Speaker 3: They don't know if Buffalo will give it to him.
Speaker 3: So that's the reason those exists.
Speaker 4: The Brady stuff is to me a first cousin of
Speaker 4: my Brady to the Niners take, which at this point
Speaker 4: I must admit, I'm starting to doubt that Brady's actually
Speaker 4: going to force his way to the Niners. I think
Speaker 4: he tried to was unsuccessful. But obviously, I absolutely believe
Speaker 4: Tom Brady is going to play for another team in
Speaker 4: his career. Now it is looking less and less likely
Speaker 4: that it's going to be this year that he plays
Speaker 4: for another team. But I believe he was thinking about
Speaker 4: trying to get out of Tampa, that he thinks that
Speaker 4: that run is over, and for some reason he wasn't
Speaker 4: able to get out of it.
Speaker 3: So the Brady rumors to me are way more believable.
Speaker 3: All Right, what's next?
Speaker 2: Time? Best court side video? Court side haircut? Yeah?
Speaker 5: Or Halloway's baby throwing up, which I actually caught live.
Speaker 4: Okay, so again, so Demanse's correct if you haven't seen it,
Speaker 4: the video of the baby throwing up right at the
Speaker 4: end of the Saint Peter's game. I was watching the
Speaker 4: game with Demanse. He did catch it live. He did
Speaker 4: demand we rewind it, so he's like, hey, I think
Speaker 4: this might go viral, I'm going.
Speaker 2: To record it.
Speaker 4: I'm like, all right, buddy, that's fine, I get it,
Speaker 4: no problem. He did catch it live, and you can
Speaker 4: see I didn't know. I didn't see it, and nor
Speaker 4: did I know it was Holloway's baby. So it's a
Speaker 4: good line. I think he might have had Purdue in
Speaker 4: his final four the court side haircut. That was the
Speaker 4: right answer because there are so many parts of the
Speaker 4: court side haircut that are awesome, and I have so
Speaker 4: many questions about them.
Speaker 3: One is, where was the barber seat?
Speaker 4: Did he actually buy the seat directly behind the court
Speaker 4: side seats? The other part of it, and this is
Speaker 4: one of my favorite barber shops flexes, even though I'm.
Speaker 3: Certain it's fake.
Speaker 4: Did you see the Cape Cape Louis Vuitton, the old
Speaker 4: nothing like the barber shop in the hood where everybody's
Speaker 4: got a Louis Vuitton cave heer and a Gucci capier
Speaker 4: And they were all bought for eleven dollars with fake materials.
Speaker 4: But I love it. I have a lot of questions
Speaker 4: about the court side haircut. So to me, that's a
Speaker 4: far better rumor. All right, we were short on time.
Speaker 4: I think we got a couple of these left left.
Speaker 4: What's next?
Speaker 5: Biggest winner from the Oscars, ABC executives or Chris Rocks Trainer.
Speaker 4: Oh listen, obviously the ratings will be great, But the
Speaker 4: answer is Chris Rocks.
Speaker 3: Tran because I don't.
Speaker 4: I remember New Jack City and now that was also
Speaker 4: thirty years ago, but Chris Rock was skinnier than Chet
Speaker 4: Holmgren back then. I remember the movie Dogma, which was
Speaker 4: not thirty years ago, but it was probably fifteen years ago,
Speaker 4: where Chris Rock was still as skinny as.
Speaker 3: Chet Holmgren in that video.
Speaker 4: Not only has Chris Rock put on some weight, but
Speaker 4: Chris Rock's ability to.
Speaker 3: Take up not a punch but an open.
Speaker 4: Hand slash from a larger man where it's not like
Speaker 4: he had his feet set.
Speaker 3: It wasn't like one of those slap competitions.
Speaker 4: To see the grainy video from Eastern Europe where guys
Speaker 4: are sitting there holding the things ready. He's in dress shoes,
Speaker 4: he doesn't have a great stance, his hands are behind
Speaker 4: his back, and he takes it.
Speaker 3: And then just keeps it moving.
Speaker 4: I so Chris Rocks trainer deserves a raise not only
Speaker 4: for what he has done, but maybe for what he
Speaker 4: will do.
Speaker 3: If Chris Rock's like I'm gonna get.
Speaker 4: I'm gonna get in the gym man, So Chris Rocks trainer.
Speaker 4: I think Chris Rock was as much of a winner
Speaker 4: as you can be when you get slapped in the
Speaker 4: face on national television. I think he was a pretty
Speaker 4: big winner. I think his trainer was the biggest winner
Speaker 4: of the entire night.
Speaker 3: I thought that was the last one. You said we
Speaker 3: have a bonus one.
Speaker 2: Well, we've got a bonus question for you. So we
Speaker 2: happen to come across a picture.
Speaker 5: Of Luca were the same exact outfit as you, really,
Speaker 5: so the question is.
Speaker 2: Who wore it better? Who were you or Luka Dacic.
Speaker 4: Okay, let me see and if you're listening, I'll to
Speaker 4: do the best describe it.
Speaker 3: Who wore it better?
Speaker 2: Oh?
Speaker 3: He wore my NBA year. Oh oh, that's so awesome.
Speaker 3: I didn't you know it's so oh.
Speaker 4: Hold up if you're not watching, So Luke and I
Speaker 4: are both wearing the Hugo Boss NBA licensed gorgeous sweatshirt
Speaker 4: I wore it on the show a week ago. I
Speaker 4: also wore it in me and Demont's photo shoot. However,
Speaker 4: the answer to this question, without any EQUI vacation or doubt,
Speaker 4: is I work better.
Speaker 2: Do you know why why you didn't want to?
Speaker 5: I didn't want to make it seem like I had
Speaker 5: a biased opinion like Lucas, you honestly did wear it.
Speaker 4: Thank you, But and put the picture back up for
Speaker 4: our video viewers, and I'll be able to show you
Speaker 4: why I wore it better. Because scan panned down past
Speaker 4: the sweatshirt, you'll see my sweatpants.
Speaker 3: It's the same logo. I'm wearing the whole outfit.
Speaker 4: I'm wearing the Hugo Boss sweatshirt and the Hugo Boss
Speaker 4: NBA license matching sweatpants. Luca, if you notice, has a
Speaker 4: little Jumpman logo on his he's not wearing the whole fit.
Speaker 4: So I I mean, I'm wearing the whole fit. There's
Speaker 4: no question. I mean, it's not even a doubt. Luca,
Speaker 4: you're halfway there, but but you know you didn't quite
Speaker 4: get there.
Speaker 3: You know you're gonna get some MVP boats. But I
Speaker 3: might have I might have moved you down just a
Speaker 3: bit here.
Speaker 2: I think my mom bought that outfit for him just
Speaker 2: for me.
Speaker 4: Oh yeah, it wouldn't make sense for her bought it
Speaker 4: for Luca. That was Yeah, of course she bought it
Speaker 4: for me. You know, I don't know why I said
Speaker 4: for me. It was a dumb question, like, obviously she
Speaker 4: did invite for Luca. Then I have different questions to ask.
Speaker 3: We'll be right back, all right, welcome back.
Speaker 4: In final segment, what's right with the great podcast and
Speaker 4: YouTube show?
Speaker 3: Demands? Tell me that we're gonna talk Chris Rock here.
Speaker 5: It seemed like you had some things to get off
Speaker 5: your chest as far as that situation.
Speaker 4: Yeah, so I have a lot of things to get
Speaker 4: off my chest. I ranted about it for about fifteen
Speaker 4: minutes for the show even started.
Speaker 3: That'll probably be lost to history.
Speaker 4: Uh.
Speaker 3: They were all great takes. But I'm gonna two more.
Speaker 4: Things I passionately believe in. One will undoubtedly be controversial,
Speaker 4: the first one is not. There is no better indicator
Speaker 4: of how broken the public discourse is than in the
Speaker 4: immediacy after the Chris Rock Will Smith moment. Everyone has
Speaker 4: just decided online. I am on one side. There is
Speaker 4: no gray area here either, it should have happened, and
Speaker 4: everyone it's just we all exist just to scream at
Speaker 4: each other.
Speaker 3: That's the thing I think. And I think the.
Speaker 4: Internet's poisoning our brains in that regard. That's something I
Speaker 4: think everyone will agree with. Here's the controversial thing, and
Speaker 4: I am not defending will Smith in this instance. I
Speaker 4: am simply using it as a vessel to discuss something.
Speaker 4: We need a little more casual.
Speaker 3: Violence in this country.
Speaker 4: A little more things were better. And I again I'm
Speaker 4: not saying I'll explain. People are too confident that no
Speaker 4: one's gonna smack them, and the fear I might get
Speaker 4: smacked for this is a really good bumper on public actions.
Speaker 3: There's way too many.
Speaker 4: People getting on Southwest Airline flight. It's like, ain't nobody
Speaker 4: gonna hit me. They're gonna have to listen to me
Speaker 4: ran about this mess. There's way too many people that
Speaker 4: think they can walk down the street wearing a literal
Speaker 4: Nazi patches like my first men right, here's your first
Speaker 4: men right. But they're also used to be my buddy
Speaker 4: slim Festes all the time used me kind of understood code.
Speaker 4: It is your right to, you know, wear that Nazi patch.
Speaker 4: And if I come down the street and smack you up,
Speaker 4: the cops are gonna be like, didn't see it, didn't
Speaker 4: see it. And I happen to believe. Again, the religious
Speaker 4: proliferation of guns and other things have made this to
Speaker 4: where it's a sketcher situation that wants to me. I
Speaker 4: happen to believe we are in a better place if
Speaker 4: grown adults, particularly grown men, have a healthy fear somebody
Speaker 4: might come up side my head. I think it's good.
Speaker 4: I think it is useful. And again that is not
Speaker 4: to say the Chris Roxys we wou'd have thought of it,
Speaker 4: And I'm like, you know what we did. Far too
Speaker 4: many people do walk around being like what are you
Speaker 4: gonna do? And the answer needs to occasionally be I'm
Speaker 4: a smack I'm going to smack.
Speaker 3: You and then we're just gonna see where the chips fall.
Speaker 3: I think that's Do you agree with me?
Speaker 4: There are too many people and you have to deal
Speaker 4: with them far more than I do. Because you're young,
Speaker 4: you're big, and you still go out on chaperone.
Speaker 2: I have a chaperone, yah, the.
Speaker 4: Chaperone's your mother, so I but you go out by
Speaker 4: yourself and there's a lot of people that talk greasy
Speaker 4: to you under the assumption what he's not like, he's
Speaker 4: gonna hit me.
Speaker 3: Nobody hits anybody anymore.
Speaker 4: And I'm just saying, I think it was a better
Speaker 4: place when occasionally there was a little more of a
Speaker 4: fear of casual violence.
Speaker 3: That's today's show.