WEBVTT - Will Smith’s Slap, All-NBA Teams, Kyrie Finally Plays in Brooklyn, and Aaron Rodgers Receiver-less?

0:00:00.360 --> 0:00:03.240
<v Speaker 1>This episode is brought to you by all State. Some

0:00:03.279 --> 0:00:06.080
<v Speaker 1>people just know they could save hundreds on car insurance

0:00:06.160 --> 0:00:08.840
<v Speaker 1>by checking all State first, Like you know to check

0:00:08.880 --> 0:00:12.440
<v Speaker 1>the date of the Big Game first before you accidentally

0:00:12.440 --> 0:00:15.480
<v Speaker 1>buy tickets on your twentieth wedding anniversary and have to

0:00:15.480 --> 0:00:17.920
<v Speaker 1>spend the next twenty years of your marriage making up

0:00:17.920 --> 0:00:21.520
<v Speaker 1>for it. Yeah, checking first is smart, So check all

0:00:21.560 --> 0:00:23.880
<v Speaker 1>State first for a quote that could save you hundreds.

0:00:24.000 --> 0:00:26.600
<v Speaker 1>You're in good hands with all States savings. Very terms

0:00:26.640 --> 0:00:30.080
<v Speaker 1>apply all State Fire and Casualty Insurance Company and Affiliates, Northbrook, Illinois.

0:00:30.200 --> 0:00:31.160
<v Speaker 2>What if Chris Rock.

0:00:31.120 --> 0:00:35.519
<v Speaker 3>Hits him back right, then the whole thing goes left.

0:00:35.840 --> 0:00:41.080
<v Speaker 4>I've been in the position of where you don't want

0:00:41.440 --> 0:00:46.800
<v Speaker 4>to start a skirmish but feel obligated because you feel

0:00:46.800 --> 0:00:50.919
<v Speaker 4>your wife or girlfriend will lose respect for you if

0:00:50.920 --> 0:00:55.680
<v Speaker 4>you don't. Right, But I can't imagine it being while

0:00:55.840 --> 0:01:00.600
<v Speaker 4>I'm at work all on me. I think Chris Rock

0:01:00.640 --> 0:01:02.440
<v Speaker 4>gets to do the oscars until he doesn't want to

0:01:02.440 --> 0:01:06.039
<v Speaker 4>do him anymore. I think the poise he showed he

0:01:06.200 --> 0:01:07.360
<v Speaker 4>was great about the situation.

0:01:07.959 --> 0:01:09.840
<v Speaker 3>He was unbelievable.

0:01:10.920 --> 0:01:12.880
<v Speaker 4>It was one of the reasons I think so many

0:01:12.880 --> 0:01:15.720
<v Speaker 4>people thought it was fake at first, right was because

0:01:15.760 --> 0:01:18.520
<v Speaker 4>he handled it? Okay, all right, we can start the

0:01:18.520 --> 0:01:30.800
<v Speaker 4>show now. I have more on this later.

0:01:32.640 --> 0:01:33.120
<v Speaker 2>Welcome in.

0:01:33.240 --> 0:01:36.039
<v Speaker 4>It is What's Right with Nick Wright Episode five. We

0:01:36.120 --> 0:01:40.720
<v Speaker 4>are recording this hours after Will Smith smacked Chris Rock

0:01:40.880 --> 0:01:44.399
<v Speaker 4>on the Oscar stage. I spent about fifteen minutes before

0:01:44.440 --> 0:01:47.040
<v Speaker 4>the show even started talking about that. Hopefully you'll see

0:01:47.080 --> 0:01:50.080
<v Speaker 4>that throughout. Also demands who all introduce him just a moment.

0:01:50.160 --> 0:01:51.960
<v Speaker 4>If you don't have some Chris Rock questions and Will

0:01:52.000 --> 0:01:54.360
<v Speaker 4>Smith questions in this, then you're fired. So you better

0:01:54.360 --> 0:01:56.600
<v Speaker 4>get it together when you can. Before though, we get

0:01:56.640 --> 0:01:58.760
<v Speaker 4>to what we are talking about. Let's get to what

0:01:58.800 --> 0:02:02.000
<v Speaker 4>we're not talking about. What is not on today's What's

0:02:02.080 --> 0:02:05.000
<v Speaker 4>Right with Nick Wright show is Italy missing the World

0:02:05.040 --> 0:02:09.720
<v Speaker 4>Cup lost to North Macedonia, Shack and steph Win oscars

0:02:09.840 --> 0:02:12.040
<v Speaker 4>and Formula one Racing.

0:02:12.280 --> 0:02:13.160
<v Speaker 3>That says, who cares?

0:02:13.480 --> 0:02:13.760
<v Speaker 2>You know what?

0:02:13.800 --> 0:02:16.120
<v Speaker 3>I'm gonna admit I've been knocking it. I might have

0:02:16.160 --> 0:02:16.800
<v Speaker 3>to get into it.

0:02:16.880 --> 0:02:19.440
<v Speaker 4>So many people I like and respect like it for

0:02:19.480 --> 0:02:22.080
<v Speaker 4>me to totally dismiss it, However, that is not gonna

0:02:22.080 --> 0:02:23.840
<v Speaker 4>be on the show today. If you're new to the show,

0:02:24.080 --> 0:02:26.240
<v Speaker 4>My son is deeply involved. You'll meet him in just

0:02:26.280 --> 0:02:28.520
<v Speaker 4>a moment. There's also a clock. It's a race of

0:02:28.520 --> 0:02:31.679
<v Speaker 4>me against the clock, me against the producers. Demanse's right there.

0:02:31.680 --> 0:02:34.200
<v Speaker 4>So Demanse I turned to you. What are we starting

0:02:34.240 --> 0:02:34.720
<v Speaker 4>with today?

0:02:35.120 --> 0:02:38.680
<v Speaker 5>Let's start with some Kyrie. Yeah, great news in Brooklyn.

0:02:38.880 --> 0:02:40.480
<v Speaker 5>Kyrie can play home games again.

0:02:40.560 --> 0:02:40.760
<v Speaker 2>Yep.

0:02:41.240 --> 0:02:44.639
<v Speaker 5>They crushed Miami and then proceeded to lose to Charlotte.

0:02:45.240 --> 0:02:48.160
<v Speaker 5>They now have the second best title odds. Yeah, which

0:02:48.240 --> 0:02:48.880
<v Speaker 5>team are they?

0:02:49.360 --> 0:02:52.120
<v Speaker 2>The team that beat Miami or the team that lost

0:02:52.160 --> 0:02:52.800
<v Speaker 2>to Charlotte.

0:02:52.880 --> 0:02:55.280
<v Speaker 3>It's a great question. It's also a trick question.

0:02:55.720 --> 0:02:58.959
<v Speaker 4>The answer is they're both, which is why picking them

0:02:58.960 --> 0:03:03.680
<v Speaker 4>to win the title is so ridiculously dumb. So over

0:03:03.720 --> 0:03:06.280
<v Speaker 4>the weekend, both the Lakers and the Nets have just

0:03:06.360 --> 0:03:09.920
<v Speaker 4>agregious losses. The Lakers was uglier, but the Nets was

0:03:09.960 --> 0:03:13.720
<v Speaker 4>more damaging. Here's why Lakers have been dead for a

0:03:13.840 --> 0:03:17.200
<v Speaker 4>month now. The Nets again. The Demonzi just said it.

0:03:17.280 --> 0:03:20.560
<v Speaker 4>You said the second best title of us. So, according

0:03:20.600 --> 0:03:22.960
<v Speaker 4>to Vegas, the Sons are the most likely team to

0:03:22.960 --> 0:03:26.120
<v Speaker 4>win the title, and right after them is the Brooklyn Nets,

0:03:26.480 --> 0:03:31.120
<v Speaker 4>who at present have are tight in the standings with Charlotte.

0:03:31.160 --> 0:03:32.560
<v Speaker 3>Who just beat them yesterday.

0:03:32.919 --> 0:03:35.800
<v Speaker 4>Right now, just to make the playoffs, the Nets would

0:03:35.840 --> 0:03:39.360
<v Speaker 4>have to beat Trey Young in Barclays and Trey Young,

0:03:39.400 --> 0:03:41.040
<v Speaker 4>by the way, what an opportunity to Graham become the

0:03:41.080 --> 0:03:43.320
<v Speaker 4>most hated man in New York City. He already killed

0:03:43.360 --> 0:03:45.240
<v Speaker 4>the Knicks last year. Now he can kill the Nets

0:03:45.280 --> 0:03:47.320
<v Speaker 4>this year in one game. If the standings were but

0:03:47.320 --> 0:03:50.240
<v Speaker 4>they'd have to beat the Hawks. Then they would have

0:03:50.280 --> 0:03:53.200
<v Speaker 4>to win the next playing game against Charlotte maybe who

0:03:53.280 --> 0:03:56.280
<v Speaker 4>they just lost to the over the weekend, and then

0:03:56.920 --> 0:03:59.360
<v Speaker 4>play the one seed, whether it be Boston or Philly

0:03:59.440 --> 0:04:03.440
<v Speaker 4>or Milwaukee. I the idea that Brooklyn is going to

0:04:03.480 --> 0:04:08.840
<v Speaker 4>be mediocre for seventy five games and then turn it

0:04:08.920 --> 0:04:15.080
<v Speaker 4>on for four weeks just to get to the conference finals,

0:04:15.200 --> 0:04:16.440
<v Speaker 4>not even the NBA Finals.

0:04:16.520 --> 0:04:17.400
<v Speaker 3>It's ludicrous.

0:04:17.839 --> 0:04:22.839
<v Speaker 4>I can't believe people are still talking themselves into the Nets.

0:04:22.880 --> 0:04:23.159
<v Speaker 2>Now.

0:04:23.440 --> 0:04:27.120
<v Speaker 4>They're upside. Their ceiling is as high as any team,

0:04:27.160 --> 0:04:29.760
<v Speaker 4>almost any team in basketball in the entire Eastern Conference.

0:04:29.760 --> 0:04:32.160
<v Speaker 4>If you tell me this team is gonna play it's

0:04:32.200 --> 0:04:35.880
<v Speaker 4>a plus game, who's the best? The only team who

0:04:35.960 --> 0:04:38.920
<v Speaker 4>I think can beat Brooklyn's a plus is Milwaukee. But

0:04:39.000 --> 0:04:42.080
<v Speaker 4>that it's not March madness. It's not one and done.

0:04:42.240 --> 0:04:44.760
<v Speaker 4>You gotta win four out of seven and then do

0:04:44.800 --> 0:04:47.839
<v Speaker 4>it again, then do it again, then do it again.

0:04:48.640 --> 0:04:53.640
<v Speaker 4>Why would anyone believe Brooklyn that they find out Kyrie

0:04:53.680 --> 0:04:55.760
<v Speaker 4>the vaccine mandates lifted.

0:04:55.800 --> 0:04:57.440
<v Speaker 3>Oh, that should be a huge game for them.

0:04:57.640 --> 0:05:01.720
<v Speaker 4>They lose to the Grizzlies without his first game back

0:05:01.880 --> 0:05:04.440
<v Speaker 4>where he's allowed to play at Barclay's all year. They

0:05:04.480 --> 0:05:07.279
<v Speaker 4>blow a fourteen point lead and lose to the Hornets

0:05:07.279 --> 0:05:10.160
<v Speaker 4>in a game that matters at some point.

0:05:10.360 --> 0:05:12.839
<v Speaker 3>They are who they said they were, and who they

0:05:13.000 --> 0:05:13.480
<v Speaker 3>said they.

0:05:13.400 --> 0:05:17.359
<v Speaker 4>Are is a team that has no consistency whatsoever. So no,

0:05:17.839 --> 0:05:21.240
<v Speaker 4>they can't win the NBA title. It's ridiculous. All right,

0:05:21.279 --> 0:05:21.839
<v Speaker 4>what's next?

0:05:22.440 --> 0:05:26.240
<v Speaker 5>NBA nerds were big mad this weekend. Jo Kitchen and

0:05:26.320 --> 0:05:29.360
<v Speaker 5>b were both eligible for all NBA as cinner Yeah

0:05:29.440 --> 0:05:30.040
<v Speaker 5>and forward.

0:05:30.120 --> 0:05:31.080
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it is ridiculous.

0:05:31.120 --> 0:05:33.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, you're a nerd. Yeah, so I figure you're bad.

0:05:33.839 --> 0:05:34.000
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:05:34.040 --> 0:05:34.880
<v Speaker 2>Why does this matter?

0:05:35.360 --> 0:05:36.240
<v Speaker 3>Oh? Why does it matter?

0:05:36.320 --> 0:05:36.400
<v Speaker 4>Oh?

0:05:36.480 --> 0:05:36.839
<v Speaker 2>I don't know.

0:05:36.839 --> 0:05:40.000
<v Speaker 4>What does history matter? Why does anything matter? So okay,

0:05:40.000 --> 0:05:42.839
<v Speaker 4>so let me explain how this works all NBA, which

0:05:42.880 --> 0:05:46.000
<v Speaker 4>if you're following our bet, well you can't even follow it. Yet,

0:05:46.000 --> 0:05:48.640
<v Speaker 4>but our best fifty players last fifty year series when

0:05:48.640 --> 0:05:50.520
<v Speaker 4>it comes out in a few weeks, what you're gonna see.

0:05:50.760 --> 0:05:53.000
<v Speaker 3>We really value certain things.

0:05:53.080 --> 0:05:55.760
<v Speaker 4>Top five MVP finishes, how you do in the playoffs,

0:05:55.880 --> 0:06:00.000
<v Speaker 4>and all NBA appearances, because for all of NBA history,

0:06:00.839 --> 0:06:04.120
<v Speaker 4>this has been a snapshot of the best guys at

0:06:04.120 --> 0:06:06.120
<v Speaker 4>each position in the league. First team, second team, and

0:06:06.160 --> 0:06:08.880
<v Speaker 4>thirty years ago they added the third team, and all

0:06:08.880 --> 0:06:11.600
<v Speaker 4>of a sudden, despite the fact that Joe Lmbi and

0:06:11.680 --> 0:06:16.440
<v Speaker 4>Nikoli Jokic have played zero minutes at forward the NBA,

0:06:17.040 --> 0:06:19.480
<v Speaker 4>because I guess they want to make sure Jokic makes

0:06:19.480 --> 0:06:22.320
<v Speaker 4>first team. The NBA is changing the rules. They started

0:06:22.360 --> 0:06:24.000
<v Speaker 4>going down the path last year. Now it's full on

0:06:24.040 --> 0:06:27.440
<v Speaker 4>embrace where a guy who doesn't play forward can make

0:06:27.480 --> 0:06:28.320
<v Speaker 4>the team it forward.

0:06:28.600 --> 0:06:31.400
<v Speaker 3>So why does it matter? Here's why it matters.

0:06:31.600 --> 0:06:35.600
<v Speaker 4>I'm not saying that it's perfect that you're a guy

0:06:35.600 --> 0:06:38.640
<v Speaker 4>who's gonna finish top four in MVP voting isn't going

0:06:38.680 --> 0:06:40.880
<v Speaker 4>to get a first team spot, But that's how it's

0:06:40.920 --> 0:06:44.520
<v Speaker 4>always been. We had Wilt and Russell dueling each other

0:06:44.800 --> 0:06:48.000
<v Speaker 4>for a dozen years. Do you know how many times

0:06:48.040 --> 0:06:50.880
<v Speaker 4>they both made first Team All NBA zero. We had

0:06:50.920 --> 0:06:55.599
<v Speaker 4>Bob McAdoo once come in second in MVP voting. He

0:06:55.640 --> 0:06:58.840
<v Speaker 4>didn't make first or second team All NBA. Munzleos Oh

0:06:58.839 --> 0:07:03.480
<v Speaker 4>put him on there alongside that guys, you had Robinson

0:07:03.600 --> 0:07:07.159
<v Speaker 4>and a Keen and Ewing. Was there any time where

0:07:07.200 --> 0:07:09.760
<v Speaker 4>you could have Shack came along where he should add

0:07:09.760 --> 0:07:11.920
<v Speaker 4>two centers? Yeah, could have made an argument, but you

0:07:12.040 --> 0:07:14.960
<v Speaker 4>didn't go through history. Has there been two centers on

0:07:15.000 --> 0:07:18.480
<v Speaker 4>an All NBA team? No, because it's mattered what position

0:07:18.560 --> 0:07:19.320
<v Speaker 4>you actually play.

0:07:19.720 --> 0:07:21.880
<v Speaker 3>So now if you change.

0:07:21.560 --> 0:07:24.160
<v Speaker 4>The rules, and you wouldn't change the rules when it

0:07:24.240 --> 0:07:27.520
<v Speaker 4>was Kareem involved and it was, or when it was

0:07:27.760 --> 0:07:31.200
<v Speaker 4>Shack involved, or when it was Wilt and Russell, to

0:07:31.360 --> 0:07:35.080
<v Speaker 4>change them now and change the way we are able

0:07:35.120 --> 0:07:36.679
<v Speaker 4>to judge different eras.

0:07:37.040 --> 0:07:39.640
<v Speaker 2>I hate it, but he's.

0:07:39.520 --> 0:07:43.200
<v Speaker 3>Not spicing anything up. How do I sound like an

0:07:43.200 --> 0:07:43.640
<v Speaker 3>old head?

0:07:43.720 --> 0:07:47.080
<v Speaker 2>It's the way it was in the best guys.

0:07:47.840 --> 0:07:52.800
<v Speaker 4>Guys, Moses Malone at his apex was getting All NBA

0:07:53.000 --> 0:07:56.160
<v Speaker 4>second team some years because he wasn't better than Kareem.

0:07:56.320 --> 0:07:58.920
<v Speaker 4>But we're going to change the rule for Nikola Jokic. Okay, Yeah,

0:07:59.080 --> 0:08:01.000
<v Speaker 4>makes a ton of sense. Alright, We're still talking all

0:08:01.040 --> 0:08:01.440
<v Speaker 4>of you.

0:08:01.480 --> 0:08:04.559
<v Speaker 5>Good okay, So since you care about the All NBA

0:08:04.840 --> 0:08:07.440
<v Speaker 5>so much despite not even having a.

0:08:07.440 --> 0:08:11.640
<v Speaker 2>Vote, that's a god dog cheap shot. What would your

0:08:11.680 --> 0:08:12.400
<v Speaker 2>team look like?

0:08:12.760 --> 0:08:13.880
<v Speaker 3>Oh my All NBA team?

0:08:13.960 --> 0:08:14.560
<v Speaker 2>Yes, all right?

0:08:14.600 --> 0:08:17.840
<v Speaker 4>First and second team is almost locked, with a couple

0:08:17.880 --> 0:08:20.520
<v Speaker 4>of weeks to go. Third team there's some openings, but

0:08:21.200 --> 0:08:25.800
<v Speaker 4>first team obvious jaw despite missing all the games Joe,

0:08:25.800 --> 0:08:28.240
<v Speaker 4>I think makes it. Could he could get dropped a

0:08:28.280 --> 0:08:30.840
<v Speaker 4>second team defending on having more games he misses. But

0:08:30.920 --> 0:08:34.559
<v Speaker 4>at the guard position, the only lock is Luca. Luca's

0:08:34.559 --> 0:08:37.000
<v Speaker 4>got to be there. Jow's gotta be I think we'll

0:08:37.040 --> 0:08:39.600
<v Speaker 4>be there. At the forward spot, Giannis is obviously going

0:08:39.640 --> 0:08:43.400
<v Speaker 4>to be unanimous. I clearly would not go Jokic and

0:08:43.520 --> 0:08:45.880
<v Speaker 4>Embiid forward center. I would only put one of them

0:08:45.920 --> 0:08:48.320
<v Speaker 4>because they're a center, so the other forward spot would

0:08:48.320 --> 0:08:48.840
<v Speaker 4>go to Lebron.

0:08:50.280 --> 0:08:52.520
<v Speaker 2>Hold on, hold on it, it's all making sense. Now.

0:08:52.760 --> 0:08:54.280
<v Speaker 2>What you mean to tell me this?

0:08:54.280 --> 0:08:56.720
<v Speaker 5>This yokicch and b things getting to you so much

0:08:56.760 --> 0:08:58.319
<v Speaker 5>because they'll take Lebron's spot.

0:08:58.480 --> 0:09:01.320
<v Speaker 3>No, how dare that's that's.

0:09:01.160 --> 0:09:02.880
<v Speaker 2>What it sounds. No, it is.

0:09:02.920 --> 0:09:06.120
<v Speaker 4>Because they don't place forward, So I think the all

0:09:06.240 --> 0:09:08.679
<v Speaker 4>NBA forward should be a forward. That's what I think

0:09:08.920 --> 0:09:13.560
<v Speaker 4>now would as it happens. Are you correct that if Yo,

0:09:13.640 --> 0:09:16.240
<v Speaker 4>Kitch and Embiid make it, and you honest we know

0:09:16.360 --> 0:09:19.200
<v Speaker 4>is gonna make it, Lebron would be out? That does

0:09:19.520 --> 0:09:22.440
<v Speaker 4>happen to be true? That is not the reasoning.

0:09:22.640 --> 0:09:23.400
<v Speaker 3>You don't believe me.

0:09:23.760 --> 0:09:24.199
<v Speaker 2>I don't.

0:09:25.440 --> 0:09:32.960
<v Speaker 4>I don't know how my own son is doubting my my.

0:09:32.400 --> 0:09:34.520
<v Speaker 3>My integrity Here is going to do with Lebron.

0:09:34.800 --> 0:09:37.120
<v Speaker 4>It has to do with NBA history, has to do

0:09:37.200 --> 0:09:40.000
<v Speaker 4>with the you know, paying respect to our elders like

0:09:40.080 --> 0:09:40.920
<v Speaker 4>Bob McAdoo.

0:09:41.160 --> 0:09:44.800
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it does, buddy. But to answer the question, my.

0:09:44.960 --> 0:09:51.160
<v Speaker 4>All NBA team would be right now, Jah, Luca, Giannis, Lebron, Embiid.

0:09:51.280 --> 0:09:53.839
<v Speaker 3>That would be my first team.

0:09:53.160 --> 0:09:56.520
<v Speaker 4>And the Luca and Giannis and Embiid to me are

0:09:56.559 --> 0:10:00.280
<v Speaker 4>pretty much locked in in those spots Lebron all. So

0:10:00.520 --> 0:10:03.160
<v Speaker 4>if assuming you're not doing the two centers, but I

0:10:03.160 --> 0:10:08.960
<v Speaker 4>wouldn't my second team Steph, Devin Booker, Jason Tatum. Your

0:10:09.040 --> 0:10:14.120
<v Speaker 4>guy who's been unbelievable for six weeks now, Durant. I

0:10:14.160 --> 0:10:15.920
<v Speaker 4>know he's missed a bunch of games. Durant's got to

0:10:15.920 --> 0:10:18.160
<v Speaker 4>be on there, and then my second team center would

0:10:18.160 --> 0:10:23.480
<v Speaker 4>be Jokisch. Those ten names I just mentioned there, eight

0:10:23.559 --> 0:10:27.920
<v Speaker 4>of them must be first or second team Tatum and Durant.

0:10:28.440 --> 0:10:31.320
<v Speaker 4>Some people will make arguments about again there's a spot

0:10:31.440 --> 0:10:33.920
<v Speaker 4>missing for one of them. If you use a center

0:10:33.960 --> 0:10:35.800
<v Speaker 4>spot on a forward or a forward spot on a center,

0:10:35.800 --> 0:10:38.199
<v Speaker 4>I should say, and then third team to me, there's

0:10:38.280 --> 0:10:42.120
<v Speaker 4>right now three lines DeRozan, Karl Anthony, Townsend, CP three

0:10:42.600 --> 0:10:47.560
<v Speaker 4>and for those final two spots, Donovan Mitchell, Jimmy Butler,

0:10:48.080 --> 0:10:49.280
<v Speaker 4>Jalen Brown.

0:10:49.280 --> 0:10:51.600
<v Speaker 3>Pascal Siakam. Do we want to get a cav on there?

0:10:51.880 --> 0:10:54.640
<v Speaker 4>Darius Garland, Trey Young as a case, should we get

0:10:54.679 --> 0:10:55.320
<v Speaker 4>two bulls on their?

0:10:55.400 --> 0:10:56.160
<v Speaker 3>Zach Lavine?

0:10:56.240 --> 0:10:59.200
<v Speaker 4>So, I don't know about third team, but I think

0:10:59.240 --> 0:11:02.160
<v Speaker 4>those I think we're pretty set on how the all

0:11:02.240 --> 0:11:04.600
<v Speaker 4>NBA teams, the general skeleton of it should be.

0:11:04.760 --> 0:11:06.160
<v Speaker 3>And you're right, I don't have a vote.

0:11:06.679 --> 0:11:09.680
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, listen, I'm sorry that didn't work once upon a

0:11:09.720 --> 0:11:13.000
<v Speaker 4>time for the New Orleans Times picking you and follow.

0:11:12.760 --> 0:11:13.440
<v Speaker 2>A team around.

0:11:13.480 --> 0:11:15.720
<v Speaker 4>All I do is studying NBA history and watch all

0:11:15.760 --> 0:11:17.800
<v Speaker 4>the games and talk about as much as anyone and

0:11:17.840 --> 0:11:22.040
<v Speaker 4>where God dogged the NBA's jumpsuits officially licensed gear no less,

0:11:22.080 --> 0:11:23.200
<v Speaker 4>but they can't give me a vote.

0:11:23.240 --> 0:11:26.800
<v Speaker 3>Okay, what's last? Well, hold on, you're you didn't like

0:11:26.840 --> 0:11:27.240
<v Speaker 3>any of that.

0:11:27.320 --> 0:11:29.280
<v Speaker 2>I mean it just sounds like exactly what you do

0:11:29.360 --> 0:11:32.320
<v Speaker 2>for Labron. But okay, you know what, you know what,

0:11:33.080 --> 0:11:34.920
<v Speaker 2>Let's let's let's hit some NFL.

0:11:35.080 --> 0:11:40.360
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, green Bay lost DeVante and MVS. Yeah, they haven't

0:11:40.400 --> 0:11:43.839
<v Speaker 5>done much in free agency. I honestly just think nobody

0:11:43.880 --> 0:11:47.160
<v Speaker 5>wants to play Lenari Rogers. Okay, but do you think

0:11:47.200 --> 0:11:50.679
<v Speaker 5>green Bay made it a mistake by, you know, extending

0:11:50.800 --> 0:11:51.920
<v Speaker 5>extending his contract?

0:11:51.920 --> 0:11:53.680
<v Speaker 4>All right, here's what I think. I think a couple

0:11:53.679 --> 0:11:55.400
<v Speaker 4>of things. I'll answer that question in a moment. But

0:11:55.440 --> 0:11:59.040
<v Speaker 4>I also think that I lost my bet. I bet

0:11:59.120 --> 0:12:01.480
<v Speaker 4>your mom that it would take I set the over

0:12:01.559 --> 0:12:04.240
<v Speaker 4>under on eight and a half shows. Before you start

0:12:04.280 --> 0:12:07.079
<v Speaker 4>taking shots at me and inserting your own opinion, this

0:12:07.160 --> 0:12:09.680
<v Speaker 4>is show five, and when in the last four minutes

0:12:09.720 --> 0:12:14.440
<v Speaker 4>have gotten just unfair Lebron accusations questioning my integrity, he

0:12:14.640 --> 0:12:17.920
<v Speaker 4>and you just squeeze in a demanse Aaron Rodgers take.

0:12:18.000 --> 0:12:21.240
<v Speaker 4>Because I'm telling you right now, the are subscribers, the viewers,

0:12:21.240 --> 0:12:23.160
<v Speaker 4>the people are invested in the What's Right Show, they

0:12:23.160 --> 0:12:25.240
<v Speaker 4>woke up this morning, they're like, man, can't wait to

0:12:25.240 --> 0:12:26.520
<v Speaker 4>hear what Demanse thinks.

0:12:26.320 --> 0:12:27.280
<v Speaker 2>About Aaron Rodgers.

0:12:27.559 --> 0:12:29.599
<v Speaker 3>I'm gonna tell you that's what they're air for.

0:12:29.960 --> 0:12:33.839
<v Speaker 4>With that said, it's not a bad take exactly, even

0:12:33.840 --> 0:12:37.360
<v Speaker 4>though I weren't really licensed yet to give it. The

0:12:37.480 --> 0:12:40.520
<v Speaker 4>evidence would say people aren't rushing to go play with

0:12:40.559 --> 0:12:43.800
<v Speaker 4>Aaron at the very least, that Aaron hasn't been able

0:12:43.840 --> 0:12:46.240
<v Speaker 4>to overcome the fact that the team's in Green Bay,

0:12:46.640 --> 0:12:49.000
<v Speaker 4>the weather, all of it, and the fact that I

0:12:49.080 --> 0:12:51.360
<v Speaker 4>think people don't know how much longer he's going to play.

0:12:51.679 --> 0:12:53.760
<v Speaker 4>But to answer your question, did they make a mistake,

0:12:54.080 --> 0:12:56.400
<v Speaker 4>They didn't make a mistake because they had no choice.

0:12:56.640 --> 0:12:56.959
<v Speaker 3>They had.

0:12:57.240 --> 0:13:00.840
<v Speaker 4>You can't risk Aaron forcing a trade or hiring, so

0:13:00.920 --> 0:13:02.880
<v Speaker 4>you paid him because you had to pay him.

0:13:03.040 --> 0:13:04.440
<v Speaker 3>Do I think it's going to work out?

0:13:04.640 --> 0:13:06.600
<v Speaker 4>Do I think they're gonna get closer to the Super

0:13:06.640 --> 0:13:08.720
<v Speaker 4>Bowl in the next two years than they've been in

0:13:08.760 --> 0:13:09.640
<v Speaker 4>the last two years?

0:13:09.960 --> 0:13:12.120
<v Speaker 3>I do not. Will be right back.

0:13:18.720 --> 0:13:21.520
<v Speaker 6>This episode is brought to you by Unstoppable Discover the

0:13:21.559 --> 0:13:24.920
<v Speaker 6>inspiring true story about Anthony Robless, who defined every expectation

0:13:25.000 --> 0:13:27.880
<v Speaker 6>to become a national wrestling champion and Unstoppable, a new

0:13:27.920 --> 0:13:31.480
<v Speaker 6>original movie from Amazon MGM Studios and director William Goldenberg.

0:13:31.600 --> 0:13:34.720
<v Speaker 6>Evoking the excitement and camaraderie of classic sports dramas and

0:13:34.760 --> 0:13:38.199
<v Speaker 6>thrilling wrestling matches. Unstoppable features an all star ensemble cast

0:13:38.280 --> 0:13:41.760
<v Speaker 6>including Jirelle Jerome, Jennifer Lopez, Don Cheatle, Michael Tanya, and

0:13:41.800 --> 0:13:46.040
<v Speaker 6>Bobby Canavalli. Watch Unstoppable now exclusively on Amazon Prime Video.

0:13:48.000 --> 0:13:50.840
<v Speaker 4>Welcome back in What Dry with Nick Wright podcast and

0:13:51.040 --> 0:13:53.280
<v Speaker 4>video show. I'm not supposed to say YouTube show because

0:13:53.320 --> 0:13:54.960
<v Speaker 4>you might be watching this in a different place, but

0:13:55.040 --> 0:13:58.440
<v Speaker 4>video show sounds stupid, so I'm never saying that again. Sorry, Gabe.

0:13:58.440 --> 0:14:00.599
<v Speaker 4>All Right, we got a new segment. The segment is

0:14:00.640 --> 0:14:03.480
<v Speaker 4>called not Quite Right. This is the idea behind this

0:14:03.640 --> 0:14:06.079
<v Speaker 4>is I kind of dry run a take that I'm

0:14:06.120 --> 0:14:09.560
<v Speaker 4>not quite ready for television on. However, if I have

0:14:09.559 --> 0:14:11.319
<v Speaker 4>a feeling what we're talking about here, I am a

0:14:11.320 --> 0:14:13.440
<v Speaker 4>little insulted they think this goes in the Not Quite

0:14:13.520 --> 0:14:16.599
<v Speaker 4>Right ben because I think this is fully ready for television.

0:14:16.760 --> 0:14:17.320
<v Speaker 3>I just wanted to.

0:14:17.320 --> 0:14:20.200
<v Speaker 4>Debut it on the new podcast Demons. What's the first

0:14:20.240 --> 0:14:22.120
<v Speaker 4>question or the only question? For not quite right.

0:14:22.920 --> 0:14:27.359
<v Speaker 5>Lebron won the Razzie for Worst accur Yeah, because you're deranged.

0:14:27.480 --> 0:14:31.640
<v Speaker 2>You actually think this contributes to the goat debate. Explain yourself.

0:14:31.640 --> 0:14:35.600
<v Speaker 4>Okay again, the editorializing that's happened in the last fifteen

0:14:35.600 --> 0:14:38.760
<v Speaker 4>minutes on the show, call me deranged yet inserting your

0:14:38.760 --> 0:14:41.200
<v Speaker 4>own opinions here, I'm gonna have to check the contract

0:14:41.200 --> 0:14:43.640
<v Speaker 4>that wait, you don't have to see what your actual

0:14:43.680 --> 0:14:47.440
<v Speaker 4>responsibilities are. But I'll tell you this one right now.

0:14:47.840 --> 0:14:54.320
<v Speaker 4>It absolutely, unequivocally does give another example as to why

0:14:54.440 --> 0:14:59.240
<v Speaker 4>Lebron is judged so much differently than every other great

0:14:59.480 --> 0:15:04.600
<v Speaker 4>athlete ever. Lebron just became the first basketball player ever

0:15:04.640 --> 0:15:07.680
<v Speaker 4>and I believe athlete ever to win this award. Now,

0:15:07.760 --> 0:15:10.560
<v Speaker 4>is he the first athlete turned actor? No see, the

0:15:10.560 --> 0:15:12.480
<v Speaker 4>first basketball player turned actor?

0:15:12.520 --> 0:15:15.880
<v Speaker 3>No see, the first Los Angeles Laker turned actor.

0:15:16.280 --> 0:15:16.360
<v Speaker 1>No.

0:15:16.720 --> 0:15:18.920
<v Speaker 4>So let's go to Shaquille O'Neal, who was in some

0:15:19.320 --> 0:15:22.359
<v Speaker 4>historically bad movies, including Shazam.

0:15:22.880 --> 0:15:23.480
<v Speaker 2>And the.

0:15:24.960 --> 0:15:27.880
<v Speaker 4>Idea that Shaquille O'Neal has never won a Razzie for

0:15:27.920 --> 0:15:30.480
<v Speaker 4>Best Actor, The idea that we all still to this

0:15:30.600 --> 0:15:34.360
<v Speaker 4>day pretend that Michael Jordan was a good actor in

0:15:34.480 --> 0:15:38.440
<v Speaker 4>Space Jam and Lebron. His movie grosses one hundred and

0:15:38.520 --> 0:15:41.760
<v Speaker 4>sixty million. He puts his kid in it, and everyone's like, oh,

0:15:41.880 --> 0:15:44.880
<v Speaker 4>I gotta tell you his blocking and the second act

0:15:45.280 --> 0:15:48.400
<v Speaker 4>not up to par Oh my goodness, his comedic timing

0:15:48.440 --> 0:15:52.080
<v Speaker 4>could use some work. Just everyone says, I'm deranged. No, no, no.

0:15:52.400 --> 0:15:55.680
<v Speaker 4>This is a microcosm for how we do Lebron James

0:15:55.720 --> 0:15:56.520
<v Speaker 4>on the court too.

0:15:56.960 --> 0:15:58.160
<v Speaker 3>It just through the.

0:15:58.200 --> 0:16:02.640
<v Speaker 4>Prism of Nostala and the haziness of history. Michael Jordan

0:16:02.920 --> 0:16:05.120
<v Speaker 4>never missed a big shot. Michael Jordan never missed a

0:16:05.160 --> 0:16:07.920
<v Speaker 4>big free throw. Michael Jordan never had a bad game. Meanwhile,

0:16:08.120 --> 0:16:12.880
<v Speaker 4>Lebron over the weekend can have thirty nine points against

0:16:12.920 --> 0:16:16.240
<v Speaker 4>the Pelicans, the Lakers losing, We're like, oh, guy scored

0:16:16.320 --> 0:16:19.560
<v Speaker 4>four in the fourth, what does it mean for him.

0:16:19.360 --> 0:16:20.040
<v Speaker 3>As the goat?

0:16:20.520 --> 0:16:24.640
<v Speaker 4>So yeah, this does contribute to the goat argument because

0:16:24.680 --> 0:16:27.960
<v Speaker 4>it's a It is a part and parcel example that

0:16:28.080 --> 0:16:30.280
<v Speaker 4>Lebron James is held to a standard the likes of

0:16:30.320 --> 0:16:34.800
<v Speaker 4>which no athlete ever has been held to the idea

0:16:35.160 --> 0:16:37.040
<v Speaker 4>that it's not like, oh, you're a famous guy, you're

0:16:37.080 --> 0:16:40.200
<v Speaker 4>in a movie. No, go back and watch some of

0:16:40.240 --> 0:16:43.200
<v Speaker 4>those Jim Brown performances in the movies that he left

0:16:43.200 --> 0:16:46.320
<v Speaker 4>football for. Go back and watch literally any Shack movie

0:16:46.320 --> 0:16:49.920
<v Speaker 4>other sorry Shack, other than Blue Chips or Penny Hardaway

0:16:50.000 --> 0:16:54.240
<v Speaker 4>in Blue Chips or the only real athlete actor performance

0:16:54.280 --> 0:16:55.880
<v Speaker 4>that is great was Ray Allen and he got game.

0:16:56.080 --> 0:16:58.240
<v Speaker 4>You know why because he was playing Ray Allen. He's

0:16:58.240 --> 0:17:00.720
<v Speaker 4>playing and he's just like, Hey, a great high school prospect.

0:17:00.840 --> 0:17:02.640
<v Speaker 4>You're gonna throw money in women at me. Oh okay, I

0:17:02.640 --> 0:17:03.200
<v Speaker 4>can play that.

0:17:03.840 --> 0:17:04.479
<v Speaker 3>So yeah.

0:17:04.640 --> 0:17:07.720
<v Speaker 4>It actually does add to the goat debate because it

0:17:07.840 --> 0:17:11.479
<v Speaker 4>shows how unfairly Lebron's been treated by charlottean such as

0:17:11.480 --> 0:17:15.480
<v Speaker 4>yourself in the media. I can't believe I just said,

0:17:15.920 --> 0:17:18.879
<v Speaker 4>like someone such as yourself in the media that you

0:17:18.920 --> 0:17:21.640
<v Speaker 4>have done. You've given five minutes of opinions on the show,

0:17:21.720 --> 0:17:23.560
<v Speaker 4>and now I'm looking at you as like a fellow

0:17:23.640 --> 0:17:27.280
<v Speaker 4>media member. Hey, okay, all right, let's play a game

0:17:27.600 --> 0:17:29.600
<v Speaker 4>and try to keep your takes to a minimum.

0:17:29.600 --> 0:17:31.959
<v Speaker 2>Here, this or that, I'll try. That's time for this

0:17:32.080 --> 0:17:32.280
<v Speaker 2>or that.

0:17:32.640 --> 0:17:37.200
<v Speaker 5>What's harder to explain the Grizzlies record without jaw or

0:17:37.280 --> 0:17:39.600
<v Speaker 5>everybody rooting for Duke Oh.

0:17:40.000 --> 0:17:42.480
<v Speaker 3>The Grizzlies record is way harder to explain. I get

0:17:42.520 --> 0:17:45.320
<v Speaker 3>everybody rooting for Duke because it's the last stand.

0:17:45.520 --> 0:17:48.879
<v Speaker 4>It's even if you've always hated Duke or always hated

0:17:48.920 --> 0:17:52.679
<v Speaker 4>coach k you'll kind of miss him. And so I

0:17:52.880 --> 0:17:55.080
<v Speaker 4>understand that part of it, and the way they've won

0:17:55.119 --> 0:17:57.800
<v Speaker 4>these games, I'm pretty stirring. It's a fun story to

0:17:57.840 --> 0:18:01.680
<v Speaker 4>watch the Grizzlies who listen, Taylor Jenkins should be coach

0:18:01.720 --> 0:18:02.120
<v Speaker 4>of the Year.

0:18:02.320 --> 0:18:02.800
<v Speaker 3>They've done a.

0:18:02.800 --> 0:18:05.920
<v Speaker 4>Great job building out that roster. But and I do listen.

0:18:05.960 --> 0:18:08.159
<v Speaker 4>I like Baine, I like Jared Jackson junior. I liked

0:18:08.240 --> 0:18:10.439
<v Speaker 4>him coming out of school's top five pick. I like

0:18:10.560 --> 0:18:16.600
<v Speaker 4>the guys they have, But at present they are seventeen

0:18:16.880 --> 0:18:20.880
<v Speaker 4>and two without Job. They have a better record, better

0:18:20.880 --> 0:18:23.920
<v Speaker 4>winning percentage without Job than with Job. That is not explainable.

0:18:24.080 --> 0:18:28.720
<v Speaker 4>That is, by definition inexplicable. So no, that is far

0:18:28.800 --> 0:18:32.520
<v Speaker 4>more confusing and far harder to explain. You know, I

0:18:32.520 --> 0:18:35.760
<v Speaker 4>don't think it should work against Job really, but I've

0:18:35.760 --> 0:18:37.480
<v Speaker 4>got to say I think it kind of, in a

0:18:37.600 --> 0:18:40.760
<v Speaker 4>tiniest bit, might push him off some fourth or fifth

0:18:40.800 --> 0:18:43.680
<v Speaker 4>place MVP ballots. I think you look at the Grizzlies,

0:18:43.720 --> 0:18:45.560
<v Speaker 4>You're like, oh, my god, they're the two seed jaws.

0:18:45.600 --> 0:18:48.159
<v Speaker 4>The reason right, but the fact that they win ninety

0:18:48.200 --> 0:18:51.399
<v Speaker 4>percent of their games without him, I don't think it's fair,

0:18:51.640 --> 0:18:53.520
<v Speaker 4>but probably works works against him a bit.

0:18:53.560 --> 0:18:56.480
<v Speaker 5>All Right, what's the next more believable ruvers Brady to

0:18:56.520 --> 0:18:59.159
<v Speaker 5>the Dolphins or Stefan Diggs to the Cowboys.

0:18:59.359 --> 0:18:59.520
<v Speaker 2>Oh?

0:18:59.560 --> 0:19:03.840
<v Speaker 4>I think Brady to the Dolphins is the more believable rumor.

0:19:04.560 --> 0:19:06.480
<v Speaker 3>Listen. I don't think the Cowboys have cap space. I

0:19:06.480 --> 0:19:08.080
<v Speaker 3>don't think they got rid of a Murray Cooper because

0:19:08.119 --> 0:19:08.880
<v Speaker 3>they think he stinks.

0:19:08.960 --> 0:19:11.080
<v Speaker 4>I think they got rid of Amury Cooper because they've

0:19:11.080 --> 0:19:14.359
<v Speaker 4>given some bad contracts out, particularly to Zeke. They owe

0:19:14.640 --> 0:19:16.800
<v Speaker 4>Dak a ton of money. I think they're in real

0:19:16.840 --> 0:19:19.360
<v Speaker 4>trouble up against the cap now. They tried to bring

0:19:19.400 --> 0:19:21.399
<v Speaker 4>back Brandy Gregory, so I guess you could say they

0:19:21.440 --> 0:19:23.600
<v Speaker 4>would use that money for Digs. But I don't think

0:19:23.640 --> 0:19:25.600
<v Speaker 4>Buffalo is letting Digs get out of there, and Diggs

0:19:25.640 --> 0:19:27.840
<v Speaker 4>has a couple of years left on his deal. The

0:19:27.880 --> 0:19:32.040
<v Speaker 4>reason the Digs rumors even exist is because he's making

0:19:32.200 --> 0:19:35.159
<v Speaker 4>fourteen million a year and the new receiver market is

0:19:35.440 --> 0:19:38.480
<v Speaker 4>twenty eight twenty nine million a year, so they're saying

0:19:38.480 --> 0:19:39.880
<v Speaker 4>that he's going to ask for a new deal.

0:19:39.920 --> 0:19:41.440
<v Speaker 3>They don't know if Buffalo will give it to him.

0:19:41.600 --> 0:19:43.399
<v Speaker 3>So that's the reason those exists.

0:19:43.640 --> 0:19:46.800
<v Speaker 4>The Brady stuff is to me a first cousin of

0:19:46.840 --> 0:19:49.280
<v Speaker 4>my Brady to the Niners take, which at this point

0:19:49.320 --> 0:19:52.359
<v Speaker 4>I must admit, I'm starting to doubt that Brady's actually

0:19:52.400 --> 0:19:54.040
<v Speaker 4>going to force his way to the Niners. I think

0:19:54.080 --> 0:20:00.000
<v Speaker 4>he tried to was unsuccessful. But obviously, I absolutely believe

0:20:00.560 --> 0:20:04.040
<v Speaker 4>Tom Brady is going to play for another team in

0:20:04.080 --> 0:20:07.120
<v Speaker 4>his career. Now it is looking less and less likely

0:20:07.160 --> 0:20:08.879
<v Speaker 4>that it's going to be this year that he plays

0:20:08.880 --> 0:20:11.200
<v Speaker 4>for another team. But I believe he was thinking about

0:20:11.240 --> 0:20:13.280
<v Speaker 4>trying to get out of Tampa, that he thinks that

0:20:13.280 --> 0:20:16.040
<v Speaker 4>that run is over, and for some reason he wasn't

0:20:16.040 --> 0:20:16.840
<v Speaker 4>able to get out of it.

0:20:16.880 --> 0:20:19.800
<v Speaker 3>So the Brady rumors to me are way more believable.

0:20:19.840 --> 0:20:20.680
<v Speaker 3>All Right, what's next?

0:20:20.760 --> 0:20:25.720
<v Speaker 2>Time? Best court side video? Court side haircut? Yeah?

0:20:25.920 --> 0:20:29.240
<v Speaker 5>Or Halloway's baby throwing up, which I actually caught live.

0:20:29.600 --> 0:20:34.040
<v Speaker 4>Okay, so again, so Demanse's correct if you haven't seen it,

0:20:34.400 --> 0:20:37.000
<v Speaker 4>the video of the baby throwing up right at the

0:20:37.080 --> 0:20:39.000
<v Speaker 4>end of the Saint Peter's game. I was watching the

0:20:39.040 --> 0:20:41.520
<v Speaker 4>game with Demanse. He did catch it live. He did

0:20:41.560 --> 0:20:44.040
<v Speaker 4>demand we rewind it, so he's like, hey, I think

0:20:44.040 --> 0:20:45.320
<v Speaker 4>this might go viral, I'm going.

0:20:45.240 --> 0:20:45.679
<v Speaker 2>To record it.

0:20:45.680 --> 0:20:47.320
<v Speaker 4>I'm like, all right, buddy, that's fine, I get it,

0:20:47.440 --> 0:20:49.480
<v Speaker 4>no problem. He did catch it live, and you can

0:20:49.480 --> 0:20:51.400
<v Speaker 4>see I didn't know. I didn't see it, and nor

0:20:51.480 --> 0:20:54.679
<v Speaker 4>did I know it was Holloway's baby. So it's a

0:20:54.680 --> 0:20:56.199
<v Speaker 4>good line. I think he might have had Purdue in

0:20:56.200 --> 0:20:59.159
<v Speaker 4>his final four the court side haircut. That was the

0:20:59.240 --> 0:21:02.639
<v Speaker 4>right answer because there are so many parts of the

0:21:02.720 --> 0:21:05.560
<v Speaker 4>court side haircut that are awesome, and I have so

0:21:05.640 --> 0:21:07.000
<v Speaker 4>many questions about them.

0:21:07.359 --> 0:21:10.520
<v Speaker 3>One is, where was the barber seat?

0:21:10.560 --> 0:21:14.080
<v Speaker 4>Did he actually buy the seat directly behind the court

0:21:14.119 --> 0:21:16.280
<v Speaker 4>side seats? The other part of it, and this is

0:21:16.320 --> 0:21:20.800
<v Speaker 4>one of my favorite barber shops flexes, even though I'm.

0:21:20.680 --> 0:21:21.360
<v Speaker 3>Certain it's fake.

0:21:21.400 --> 0:21:26.879
<v Speaker 4>Did you see the Cape Cape Louis Vuitton, the old

0:21:27.160 --> 0:21:30.200
<v Speaker 4>nothing like the barber shop in the hood where everybody's

0:21:30.240 --> 0:21:32.800
<v Speaker 4>got a Louis Vuitton cave heer and a Gucci capier

0:21:33.040 --> 0:21:36.720
<v Speaker 4>And they were all bought for eleven dollars with fake materials.

0:21:36.880 --> 0:21:39.639
<v Speaker 4>But I love it. I have a lot of questions

0:21:39.880 --> 0:21:42.800
<v Speaker 4>about the court side haircut. So to me, that's a

0:21:42.840 --> 0:21:45.840
<v Speaker 4>far better rumor. All right, we were short on time.

0:21:45.880 --> 0:21:47.720
<v Speaker 4>I think we got a couple of these left left.

0:21:47.760 --> 0:21:48.320
<v Speaker 4>What's next?

0:21:49.119 --> 0:21:54.879
<v Speaker 5>Biggest winner from the Oscars, ABC executives or Chris Rocks Trainer.

0:21:55.320 --> 0:21:58.199
<v Speaker 4>Oh listen, obviously the ratings will be great, But the

0:21:58.280 --> 0:21:59.960
<v Speaker 4>answer is Chris Rocks.

0:21:59.680 --> 0:22:02.160
<v Speaker 3>Tran because I don't.

0:22:02.200 --> 0:22:05.439
<v Speaker 4>I remember New Jack City and now that was also

0:22:05.480 --> 0:22:08.800
<v Speaker 4>thirty years ago, but Chris Rock was skinnier than Chet

0:22:08.800 --> 0:22:12.879
<v Speaker 4>Holmgren back then. I remember the movie Dogma, which was

0:22:12.920 --> 0:22:15.400
<v Speaker 4>not thirty years ago, but it was probably fifteen years ago,

0:22:15.600 --> 0:22:18.000
<v Speaker 4>where Chris Rock was still as skinny as.

0:22:17.960 --> 0:22:19.000
<v Speaker 3>Chet Holmgren in that video.

0:22:19.359 --> 0:22:22.560
<v Speaker 4>Not only has Chris Rock put on some weight, but

0:22:22.640 --> 0:22:24.680
<v Speaker 4>Chris Rock's ability to.

0:22:24.920 --> 0:22:28.000
<v Speaker 3>Take up not a punch but an open.

0:22:27.720 --> 0:22:31.399
<v Speaker 4>Hand slash from a larger man where it's not like

0:22:31.440 --> 0:22:32.360
<v Speaker 4>he had his feet set.

0:22:32.400 --> 0:22:34.360
<v Speaker 3>It wasn't like one of those slap competitions.

0:22:34.400 --> 0:22:37.960
<v Speaker 4>To see the grainy video from Eastern Europe where guys

0:22:37.960 --> 0:22:41.080
<v Speaker 4>are sitting there holding the things ready. He's in dress shoes,

0:22:41.520 --> 0:22:44.480
<v Speaker 4>he doesn't have a great stance, his hands are behind

0:22:44.520 --> 0:22:46.800
<v Speaker 4>his back, and he takes it.

0:22:47.280 --> 0:22:48.440
<v Speaker 3>And then just keeps it moving.

0:22:49.240 --> 0:22:54.040
<v Speaker 4>I so Chris Rocks trainer deserves a raise not only

0:22:54.080 --> 0:22:56.359
<v Speaker 4>for what he has done, but maybe for what he

0:22:56.400 --> 0:22:56.720
<v Speaker 4>will do.

0:22:56.760 --> 0:22:58.080
<v Speaker 3>If Chris Rock's like I'm gonna get.

0:22:57.960 --> 0:23:03.119
<v Speaker 4>I'm gonna get in the gym man, So Chris Rocks trainer.

0:23:03.600 --> 0:23:05.960
<v Speaker 4>I think Chris Rock was as much of a winner

0:23:05.960 --> 0:23:07.879
<v Speaker 4>as you can be when you get slapped in the

0:23:07.880 --> 0:23:10.200
<v Speaker 4>face on national television. I think he was a pretty

0:23:10.200 --> 0:23:13.280
<v Speaker 4>big winner. I think his trainer was the biggest winner

0:23:13.320 --> 0:23:14.400
<v Speaker 4>of the entire night.

0:23:14.680 --> 0:23:16.520
<v Speaker 3>I thought that was the last one. You said we

0:23:16.560 --> 0:23:17.280
<v Speaker 3>have a bonus one.

0:23:17.359 --> 0:23:20.160
<v Speaker 2>Well, we've got a bonus question for you. So we

0:23:20.240 --> 0:23:22.440
<v Speaker 2>happen to come across a picture.

0:23:22.119 --> 0:23:25.720
<v Speaker 5>Of Luca were the same exact outfit as you, really,

0:23:25.720 --> 0:23:26.800
<v Speaker 5>so the question is.

0:23:27.320 --> 0:23:30.280
<v Speaker 2>Who wore it better? Who were you or Luka Dacic.

0:23:30.480 --> 0:23:32.960
<v Speaker 4>Okay, let me see and if you're listening, I'll to

0:23:33.040 --> 0:23:34.080
<v Speaker 4>do the best describe it.

0:23:34.080 --> 0:23:34.840
<v Speaker 3>Who wore it better?

0:23:35.280 --> 0:23:35.600
<v Speaker 2>Oh?

0:23:35.600 --> 0:23:39.800
<v Speaker 3>He wore my NBA year. Oh oh, that's so awesome.

0:23:40.119 --> 0:23:42.000
<v Speaker 3>I didn't you know it's so oh.

0:23:42.040 --> 0:23:45.000
<v Speaker 4>Hold up if you're not watching, So Luke and I

0:23:45.040 --> 0:23:51.359
<v Speaker 4>are both wearing the Hugo Boss NBA licensed gorgeous sweatshirt

0:23:51.400 --> 0:23:53.560
<v Speaker 4>I wore it on the show a week ago. I

0:23:53.600 --> 0:23:56.320
<v Speaker 4>also wore it in me and Demont's photo shoot. However,

0:23:57.040 --> 0:24:01.000
<v Speaker 4>the answer to this question, without any EQUI vacation or doubt,

0:24:01.560 --> 0:24:02.480
<v Speaker 4>is I work better.

0:24:03.280 --> 0:24:06.200
<v Speaker 2>Do you know why why you didn't want to?

0:24:06.440 --> 0:24:08.000
<v Speaker 5>I didn't want to make it seem like I had

0:24:08.000 --> 0:24:11.199
<v Speaker 5>a biased opinion like Lucas, you honestly did wear it.

0:24:11.480 --> 0:24:13.920
<v Speaker 4>Thank you, But and put the picture back up for

0:24:14.040 --> 0:24:16.399
<v Speaker 4>our video viewers, and I'll be able to show you

0:24:16.440 --> 0:24:21.080
<v Speaker 4>why I wore it better. Because scan panned down past

0:24:21.119 --> 0:24:23.640
<v Speaker 4>the sweatshirt, you'll see my sweatpants.

0:24:24.280 --> 0:24:26.800
<v Speaker 3>It's the same logo. I'm wearing the whole outfit.

0:24:27.000 --> 0:24:30.000
<v Speaker 4>I'm wearing the Hugo Boss sweatshirt and the Hugo Boss

0:24:30.080 --> 0:24:33.840
<v Speaker 4>NBA license matching sweatpants. Luca, if you notice, has a

0:24:33.840 --> 0:24:36.480
<v Speaker 4>little Jumpman logo on his he's not wearing the whole fit.

0:24:37.080 --> 0:24:39.360
<v Speaker 4>So I I mean, I'm wearing the whole fit. There's

0:24:39.400 --> 0:24:41.520
<v Speaker 4>no question. I mean, it's not even a doubt. Luca,

0:24:41.680 --> 0:24:44.280
<v Speaker 4>you're halfway there, but but you know you didn't quite

0:24:44.280 --> 0:24:44.800
<v Speaker 4>get there.

0:24:44.600 --> 0:24:47.240
<v Speaker 3>You know you're gonna get some MVP boats. But I

0:24:47.320 --> 0:24:49.320
<v Speaker 3>might have I might have moved you down just a

0:24:49.320 --> 0:24:49.600
<v Speaker 3>bit here.

0:24:49.720 --> 0:24:52.560
<v Speaker 2>I think my mom bought that outfit for him just

0:24:52.680 --> 0:24:52.960
<v Speaker 2>for me.

0:24:53.800 --> 0:24:55.879
<v Speaker 4>Oh yeah, it wouldn't make sense for her bought it

0:24:55.920 --> 0:24:57.840
<v Speaker 4>for Luca. That was Yeah, of course she bought it

0:24:57.880 --> 0:24:59.920
<v Speaker 4>for me. You know, I don't know why I said

0:25:00.000 --> 0:25:02.040
<v Speaker 4>for me. It was a dumb question, like, obviously she

0:25:02.080 --> 0:25:04.560
<v Speaker 4>did invite for Luca. Then I have different questions to ask.

0:25:04.640 --> 0:25:11.840
<v Speaker 3>We'll be right back, all right, welcome back.

0:25:11.880 --> 0:25:14.760
<v Speaker 4>In final segment, what's right with the great podcast and

0:25:14.880 --> 0:25:15.760
<v Speaker 4>YouTube show?

0:25:16.440 --> 0:25:19.840
<v Speaker 3>Demands? Tell me that we're gonna talk Chris Rock here.

0:25:21.040 --> 0:25:22.920
<v Speaker 5>It seemed like you had some things to get off

0:25:22.920 --> 0:25:24.600
<v Speaker 5>your chest as far as that situation.

0:25:24.720 --> 0:25:26.400
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, so I have a lot of things to get

0:25:26.440 --> 0:25:29.240
<v Speaker 4>off my chest. I ranted about it for about fifteen

0:25:29.240 --> 0:25:30.520
<v Speaker 4>minutes for the show even started.

0:25:30.520 --> 0:25:32.040
<v Speaker 3>That'll probably be lost to history.

0:25:32.440 --> 0:25:32.560
<v Speaker 4>Uh.

0:25:32.680 --> 0:25:36.440
<v Speaker 3>They were all great takes. But I'm gonna two more.

0:25:37.760 --> 0:25:42.000
<v Speaker 4>Things I passionately believe in. One will undoubtedly be controversial,

0:25:42.040 --> 0:25:46.200
<v Speaker 4>the first one is not. There is no better indicator

0:25:46.920 --> 0:25:52.639
<v Speaker 4>of how broken the public discourse is than in the

0:25:52.680 --> 0:25:57.480
<v Speaker 4>immediacy after the Chris Rock Will Smith moment. Everyone has

0:25:57.680 --> 0:26:01.800
<v Speaker 4>just decided online. I am on one side. There is

0:26:01.920 --> 0:26:04.480
<v Speaker 4>no gray area here either, it should have happened, and

0:26:05.280 --> 0:26:08.679
<v Speaker 4>everyone it's just we all exist just to scream at

0:26:08.720 --> 0:26:09.080
<v Speaker 4>each other.

0:26:09.440 --> 0:26:11.400
<v Speaker 3>That's the thing I think. And I think the.

0:26:11.400 --> 0:26:13.920
<v Speaker 4>Internet's poisoning our brains in that regard. That's something I

0:26:13.920 --> 0:26:16.840
<v Speaker 4>think everyone will agree with. Here's the controversial thing, and

0:26:16.920 --> 0:26:22.439
<v Speaker 4>I am not defending will Smith in this instance. I

0:26:22.520 --> 0:26:26.160
<v Speaker 4>am simply using it as a vessel to discuss something.

0:26:27.800 --> 0:26:30.240
<v Speaker 4>We need a little more casual.

0:26:29.840 --> 0:26:30.800
<v Speaker 3>Violence in this country.

0:26:31.640 --> 0:26:36.800
<v Speaker 4>A little more things were better. And I again I'm

0:26:36.840 --> 0:26:43.800
<v Speaker 4>not saying I'll explain. People are too confident that no

0:26:43.800 --> 0:26:48.800
<v Speaker 4>one's gonna smack them, and the fear I might get

0:26:48.800 --> 0:26:55.840
<v Speaker 4>smacked for this is a really good bumper on public actions.

0:26:56.240 --> 0:26:57.520
<v Speaker 3>There's way too many.

0:26:57.320 --> 0:27:00.840
<v Speaker 4>People getting on Southwest Airline flight. It's like, ain't nobody

0:27:00.840 --> 0:27:02.679
<v Speaker 4>gonna hit me. They're gonna have to listen to me

0:27:02.760 --> 0:27:05.520
<v Speaker 4>ran about this mess. There's way too many people that

0:27:05.600 --> 0:27:09.040
<v Speaker 4>think they can walk down the street wearing a literal

0:27:09.200 --> 0:27:11.920
<v Speaker 4>Nazi patches like my first men right, here's your first

0:27:12.000 --> 0:27:15.000
<v Speaker 4>men right. But they're also used to be my buddy

0:27:15.040 --> 0:27:17.880
<v Speaker 4>slim Festes all the time used me kind of understood code.

0:27:18.000 --> 0:27:21.520
<v Speaker 4>It is your right to, you know, wear that Nazi patch.

0:27:22.000 --> 0:27:24.359
<v Speaker 4>And if I come down the street and smack you up,

0:27:24.520 --> 0:27:27.000
<v Speaker 4>the cops are gonna be like, didn't see it, didn't

0:27:27.040 --> 0:27:31.240
<v Speaker 4>see it. And I happen to believe. Again, the religious

0:27:31.520 --> 0:27:34.119
<v Speaker 4>proliferation of guns and other things have made this to

0:27:34.160 --> 0:27:36.520
<v Speaker 4>where it's a sketcher situation that wants to me. I

0:27:36.680 --> 0:27:40.240
<v Speaker 4>happen to believe we are in a better place if

0:27:40.440 --> 0:27:46.000
<v Speaker 4>grown adults, particularly grown men, have a healthy fear somebody

0:27:46.040 --> 0:27:48.920
<v Speaker 4>might come up side my head. I think it's good.

0:27:49.200 --> 0:27:51.679
<v Speaker 4>I think it is useful. And again that is not

0:27:51.720 --> 0:27:53.320
<v Speaker 4>to say the Chris Roxys we wou'd have thought of it,

0:27:53.320 --> 0:27:55.720
<v Speaker 4>And I'm like, you know what we did. Far too

0:27:55.720 --> 0:27:57.639
<v Speaker 4>many people do walk around being like what are you

0:27:57.680 --> 0:28:00.360
<v Speaker 4>gonna do? And the answer needs to occasionally be I'm

0:28:00.359 --> 0:28:02.800
<v Speaker 4>a smack I'm going to smack.

0:28:02.520 --> 0:28:04.600
<v Speaker 3>You and then we're just gonna see where the chips fall.

0:28:05.000 --> 0:28:06.600
<v Speaker 3>I think that's Do you agree with me?

0:28:09.640 --> 0:28:11.520
<v Speaker 4>There are too many people and you have to deal

0:28:11.560 --> 0:28:13.960
<v Speaker 4>with them far more than I do. Because you're young,

0:28:14.280 --> 0:28:17.080
<v Speaker 4>you're big, and you still go out on chaperone.

0:28:17.119 --> 0:28:18.760
<v Speaker 2>I have a chaperone, yah, the.

0:28:18.760 --> 0:28:22.119
<v Speaker 4>Chaperone's your mother, so I but you go out by

0:28:22.160 --> 0:28:25.640
<v Speaker 4>yourself and there's a lot of people that talk greasy

0:28:25.720 --> 0:28:29.440
<v Speaker 4>to you under the assumption what he's not like, he's

0:28:29.440 --> 0:28:30.000
<v Speaker 4>gonna hit me.

0:28:30.200 --> 0:28:31.880
<v Speaker 3>Nobody hits anybody anymore.

0:28:32.359 --> 0:28:35.359
<v Speaker 4>And I'm just saying, I think it was a better

0:28:35.480 --> 0:28:39.000
<v Speaker 4>place when occasionally there was a little more of a

0:28:39.040 --> 0:28:41.200
<v Speaker 4>fear of casual violence.

0:28:41.920 --> 0:28:42.760
<v Speaker 3>That's today's show.