WEBVTT - Tesla Provides No Answers On Model 3 Production Issues: Denning

0:00:05.800 --> 0:00:08.720
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg p m L Podcast. I'm pim Fox.

0:00:08.760 --> 0:00:11.520
<v Speaker 1>Along with my co host Lisa Bramowitz. Each day we

0:00:11.640 --> 0:00:15.120
<v Speaker 1>bring you the most important, noteworthy and useful interviews for

0:00:15.200 --> 0:00:17.840
<v Speaker 1>you and your money, whether you're at the grocery store

0:00:17.960 --> 0:00:20.720
<v Speaker 1>or the trading floor. Find the Bloomberg p m L

0:00:20.840 --> 0:00:32.519
<v Speaker 1>Podcast on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud and Bloomberg dot com. Turn

0:00:32.600 --> 0:00:34.880
<v Speaker 1>our attention now to Tesla, the shares down a little

0:00:34.920 --> 0:00:36.920
<v Speaker 1>bit more than three and a quarter percent. Here to

0:00:37.080 --> 0:00:40.720
<v Speaker 1>explain all is Liam Denning. He is our energy, mining

0:00:40.760 --> 0:00:44.280
<v Speaker 1>and commodities columnists for Bloomberg Gadfly, and you can of

0:00:44.280 --> 0:00:48.599
<v Speaker 1>course follow him on Twitter at Liam Denning. All Right,

0:00:48.680 --> 0:00:53.360
<v Speaker 1>Liam elon Musk manages to put his cherry red Tesla

0:00:53.440 --> 0:00:58.480
<v Speaker 1>sports car into space aboard the Falcon Heavy rocket. But

0:00:58.640 --> 0:01:02.440
<v Speaker 1>can he get those are all three automobiles into show rooms?

0:01:02.520 --> 0:01:08.679
<v Speaker 1>Tell us the details? Hi him? Yeah? So obviously on

0:01:08.680 --> 0:01:12.480
<v Speaker 1>on Tuesday everyone got very excited about the the Falcon

0:01:12.560 --> 0:01:18.839
<v Speaker 1>Heavy launch. The issue Tesla has is obviously it's great

0:01:18.880 --> 0:01:21.720
<v Speaker 1>marketing to put a car into space, but what they

0:01:21.760 --> 0:01:25.120
<v Speaker 1>really need is something a bit more mundane, which is

0:01:25.120 --> 0:01:27.520
<v Speaker 1>a few hundred thousand Model three is just sitting on

0:01:28.160 --> 0:01:31.320
<v Speaker 1>car lots in in the Bay Area. UM, they're still

0:01:31.360 --> 0:01:35.280
<v Speaker 1>having problems getting production of the Model three up, and

0:01:35.360 --> 0:01:40.880
<v Speaker 1>on last night's call UM they didn't give an answer

0:01:40.920 --> 0:01:44.680
<v Speaker 1>to repeat repeated questions from analysts asking you know, so

0:01:44.800 --> 0:01:48.240
<v Speaker 1>exactly how many are you churning out a week now.

0:01:48.320 --> 0:01:54.120
<v Speaker 1>They are keeping their targets, albeit with a caveat saying

0:01:54.160 --> 0:01:57.520
<v Speaker 1>that you know, these are targets and history has known

0:01:57.600 --> 0:01:59.720
<v Speaker 1>that we've struggled to meet them in the past. So

0:02:00.120 --> 0:02:03.000
<v Speaker 1>it's still you know, there's still a lot of uncertasied

0:02:03.080 --> 0:02:07.000
<v Speaker 1>over this question. And for a company that has UM

0:02:07.040 --> 0:02:09.480
<v Speaker 1>but it's still burning cash, this is this is kind

0:02:09.520 --> 0:02:11.919
<v Speaker 1>of the key question. Now, when can they get production

0:02:11.919 --> 0:02:16.280
<v Speaker 1>of the Model three really ramping? So Liam, last night

0:02:16.320 --> 0:02:20.600
<v Speaker 1>I showed a video of that rocket Tesla, the SpaceX

0:02:20.760 --> 0:02:23.960
<v Speaker 1>rocket shooting up to my eight year old son and

0:02:24.000 --> 0:02:28.240
<v Speaker 1>he said, who's Elon Musk? What is this company? And

0:02:28.400 --> 0:02:31.040
<v Speaker 1>I thought, you know, well, it's a car company, it's

0:02:31.080 --> 0:02:33.320
<v Speaker 1>also a rocket company. It's also a tunnel company. It

0:02:33.320 --> 0:02:36.520
<v Speaker 1>also is a solar company. What is it focusing on

0:02:36.720 --> 0:02:40.200
<v Speaker 1>and how is it's sort of allocating it's uh negative

0:02:40.240 --> 0:02:44.600
<v Speaker 1>cash flow uh and its potential borrowings to it's it's

0:02:44.639 --> 0:02:47.360
<v Speaker 1>it's endeavors that sort of give it the sheen of

0:02:47.400 --> 0:02:49.280
<v Speaker 1>the future, right, I mean, do they give a sense

0:02:49.320 --> 0:02:53.640
<v Speaker 1>of that. Well, you know, if you take a step back,

0:02:54.480 --> 0:02:59.560
<v Speaker 1>it's clear that Tesla, you know, Tesla my fantastic products.

0:02:59.600 --> 0:03:02.800
<v Speaker 1>You know of the models, and if you you only

0:03:02.800 --> 0:03:06.200
<v Speaker 1>have to look at what's happened to all the other

0:03:06.280 --> 0:03:08.920
<v Speaker 1>carmakers in terms of how much money they're now putting

0:03:09.000 --> 0:03:14.640
<v Speaker 1>into electrified vehicles to know that that Tesla has shifted

0:03:14.639 --> 0:03:18.720
<v Speaker 1>the whole industry. It's basically scared them. Um, So there

0:03:18.840 --> 0:03:23.280
<v Speaker 1>is that. The problem Tesla has is that while the

0:03:23.360 --> 0:03:28.560
<v Speaker 1>products are generally favorably received and generate a lot of buzz,

0:03:29.440 --> 0:03:32.240
<v Speaker 1>it's struggling to get it struggling to do what a

0:03:32.280 --> 0:03:35.960
<v Speaker 1>lot of Silicon Valley companies have to do if they're

0:03:36.000 --> 0:03:39.400
<v Speaker 1>going to become profitable businesses. And that's the scale. So

0:03:39.920 --> 0:03:43.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, Tesla's whole plan has been to sell some

0:03:43.960 --> 0:03:48.080
<v Speaker 1>very highly priced luxury electric vehicles and then use that

0:03:48.160 --> 0:03:50.680
<v Speaker 1>momentum and use some of the money from that to

0:03:50.920 --> 0:03:53.560
<v Speaker 1>their become a mass market player. And where it's struggling

0:03:53.680 --> 0:03:56.080
<v Speaker 1>is to become a mass market player and the Model

0:03:56.240 --> 0:03:59.760
<v Speaker 1>three is key to doing that, and thus far it's

0:03:59.760 --> 0:04:04.360
<v Speaker 1>having real problems, um, getting to production levels you know

0:04:04.400 --> 0:04:07.080
<v Speaker 1>that it originally talked about, which were like, you know,

0:04:07.640 --> 0:04:10.720
<v Speaker 1>five hundred thousand vehicles a year. I mean, right now,

0:04:11.720 --> 0:04:15.040
<v Speaker 1>based on inside EV's estimates, it's looking like it's producing

0:04:15.080 --> 0:04:18.080
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, somewhere between five hundred and a thousand

0:04:18.279 --> 0:04:20.880
<v Speaker 1>a week, which is you know, really speed producing five

0:04:20.920 --> 0:04:24.240
<v Speaker 1>thousand to ten thousand a week. Liam, Who's going to

0:04:24.320 --> 0:04:27.640
<v Speaker 1>be doing all this because I basically been looking at

0:04:27.640 --> 0:04:31.680
<v Speaker 1>the higher ranks of Tesla. John McNeil who joined in,

0:04:33.240 --> 0:04:36.640
<v Speaker 1>he was the global sales ahead of global sales and service,

0:04:36.800 --> 0:04:43.400
<v Speaker 1>he's leaving. The former head of business development has left.

0:04:44.080 --> 0:04:48.360
<v Speaker 1>Who is actually going to be doing all of this work? Um?

0:04:48.560 --> 0:04:52.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I'm you know, Elon Musk is a capable guy,

0:04:52.400 --> 0:04:56.600
<v Speaker 1>and Tesler does have a lot of brand eck with

0:04:56.800 --> 0:04:59.400
<v Speaker 1>here out in out on the West coast, so you know,

0:04:59.520 --> 0:05:03.039
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure they will attract whomever they need. But to

0:05:03.160 --> 0:05:05.600
<v Speaker 1>your point, it's just another ref flag. I mean, part

0:05:05.640 --> 0:05:08.440
<v Speaker 1>of the problem with Tesla is it does have this

0:05:08.600 --> 0:05:12.359
<v Speaker 1>mystique um and this cult like quality that means even

0:05:12.520 --> 0:05:17.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, flipped results and and um, you know, terrible

0:05:17.200 --> 0:05:20.159
<v Speaker 1>cash burn and miss tearnings and all that sort of

0:05:20.200 --> 0:05:23.440
<v Speaker 1>thing doesn't really affect the stock price too much. But

0:05:23.480 --> 0:05:25.039
<v Speaker 1>at the same time, there are a lot of red

0:05:25.080 --> 0:05:30.000
<v Speaker 1>flags the management turnover, the missed targets. I would say

0:05:30.120 --> 0:05:34.839
<v Speaker 1>last year's Solar City deal looks very questionable to me. Um,

0:05:34.880 --> 0:05:36.680
<v Speaker 1>you know this this is this is kind of the

0:05:36.720 --> 0:05:40.480
<v Speaker 1>balance there. There is always plenty of fodder when Tesla

0:05:40.560 --> 0:05:43.479
<v Speaker 1>reports results for both bulls and bears, which is why

0:05:43.520 --> 0:05:46.520
<v Speaker 1>you see the stock not move a great deal even

0:05:46.560 --> 0:05:50.039
<v Speaker 1>if the results for that are terrible. Yeah, Liam Denning,

0:05:50.040 --> 0:05:51.640
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much for being with us. Liam Denning,

0:05:51.720 --> 0:06:09.520
<v Speaker 1>Energy Mining and Commodities calmness with Bloomberg guard Fly. We've

0:06:09.560 --> 0:06:13.640
<v Speaker 1>seen a market rise in benchmark US rates so far

0:06:13.960 --> 0:06:16.880
<v Speaker 1>this year. Have we just seen the beginning or is

0:06:16.920 --> 0:06:18.880
<v Speaker 1>this the end? Can we expect this to sort of

0:06:18.880 --> 0:06:21.719
<v Speaker 1>be the plateau for a couple of months as people

0:06:21.760 --> 0:06:24.160
<v Speaker 1>reassess their expectations. Here to talk about that with us

0:06:24.440 --> 0:06:27.760
<v Speaker 1>is Leo Groshowski, chief investment officer at b n y

0:06:28.000 --> 0:06:31.880
<v Speaker 1>Melon Wealth Management, which oversees two eight billion dollars. He

0:06:31.960 --> 0:06:34.720
<v Speaker 1>joins us here in our eleven three oh Studios, LEO,

0:06:35.160 --> 0:06:39.400
<v Speaker 1>where are we with respect to the treasury yield rise?

0:06:39.480 --> 0:06:41.600
<v Speaker 1>We do have another third year auction today at one

0:06:41.680 --> 0:06:45.160
<v Speaker 1>pm Eastern. Uh. There was a lot of weakness yesterday

0:06:45.200 --> 0:06:48.640
<v Speaker 1>at the ten year auction. What sort of the ceiling

0:06:48.960 --> 0:06:53.159
<v Speaker 1>for this cycle? Our best guests and at this point

0:06:53.279 --> 0:06:57.359
<v Speaker 1>it's it's it's an educated guess. Um, we've got a

0:06:57.440 --> 0:06:59.839
<v Speaker 1>range of three and a quarter percent on the upside

0:06:59.839 --> 0:07:03.039
<v Speaker 1>for two thou eighteen, which we which we haven't changed,

0:07:03.160 --> 0:07:05.120
<v Speaker 1>so that that was our range going into this year.

0:07:05.160 --> 0:07:07.280
<v Speaker 1>We still think we could get to a three and

0:07:07.360 --> 0:07:09.840
<v Speaker 1>a quarter level. It just to be clear, So ten

0:07:09.920 --> 0:07:12.080
<v Speaker 1>ure yields could go to three and a quarter and

0:07:12.080 --> 0:07:15.160
<v Speaker 1>then stop, we think so we think so that's our

0:07:15.160 --> 0:07:17.800
<v Speaker 1>best gut and again we're we're That seemed like a

0:07:17.920 --> 0:07:20.480
<v Speaker 1>very barish call a while ago, but not as much

0:07:20.520 --> 0:07:25.240
<v Speaker 1>this morning at So I'm amazed though, at the degree

0:07:25.240 --> 0:07:28.040
<v Speaker 1>to which the market seems to think that three percent

0:07:28.120 --> 0:07:30.760
<v Speaker 1>is sort of a magic number, and you know three

0:07:30.840 --> 0:07:34.280
<v Speaker 1>percent would trigger decline in the equity market. I think

0:07:34.800 --> 0:07:38.640
<v Speaker 1>the market is recalibrating right. January was a recalibration for

0:07:38.680 --> 0:07:41.920
<v Speaker 1>the equity market to higher earnings, and now we're seeing

0:07:41.920 --> 0:07:46.120
<v Speaker 1>a market recalibrate to you know, forty basis point to

0:07:46.200 --> 0:07:48.280
<v Speaker 1>fifty basis point increase in the ten year in the

0:07:48.320 --> 0:07:51.680
<v Speaker 1>tenure yield. Okay, So if three is not the magic number,

0:07:52.000 --> 0:07:54.000
<v Speaker 1>have we already passed it? I mean, what when does

0:07:54.000 --> 0:07:57.440
<v Speaker 1>it start to matter how high treasury yields are with

0:07:57.480 --> 0:08:01.640
<v Speaker 1>respect to the equity market performance? It always matters, But

0:08:01.680 --> 0:08:04.440
<v Speaker 1>it's what's driving the yield higher? Okay? So that the

0:08:04.520 --> 0:08:10.960
<v Speaker 1>real driver for um PE multiples, particularly late stage equity

0:08:11.000 --> 0:08:14.120
<v Speaker 1>market PE multiples inflation. Right, So I think the market

0:08:14.160 --> 0:08:17.679
<v Speaker 1>is correct in focusing on inflation. But our work shows

0:08:17.760 --> 0:08:20.440
<v Speaker 1>that if inflation is in a range of zero to

0:08:20.480 --> 0:08:24.000
<v Speaker 1>two percent, a market multiple of just over eighteen times

0:08:24.200 --> 0:08:28.440
<v Speaker 1>is allowable. If inflation moves up to two, to that

0:08:28.600 --> 0:08:31.880
<v Speaker 1>range historically allowed by the market is still around seventeen

0:08:31.880 --> 0:08:35.680
<v Speaker 1>times earnings. So there is a gradual reduction in the

0:08:35.760 --> 0:08:39.720
<v Speaker 1>PE multiple allowed by the market. As inflation begins to rise,

0:08:40.360 --> 0:08:44.120
<v Speaker 1>all eyes focused on next week's CPI number. Right that

0:08:44.120 --> 0:08:47.480
<v Speaker 1>that becomes a big number. Um, it looks like it's

0:08:47.480 --> 0:08:51.040
<v Speaker 1>going to remain below two percent year over year. Um

0:08:51.080 --> 0:08:53.800
<v Speaker 1>If we see that perk above two percent, we already

0:08:53.800 --> 0:08:56.319
<v Speaker 1>have the ten uere break even tips at a two eleven. Right,

0:08:56.360 --> 0:09:00.959
<v Speaker 1>that's up pretty significantly. I think directionally, you're already seeing

0:09:00.960 --> 0:09:04.720
<v Speaker 1>pe multiples get questioned. Now. The market today is trading

0:09:04.720 --> 0:09:08.040
<v Speaker 1>at a multiple of seventeen point five times arreestimate for

0:09:08.040 --> 0:09:11.160
<v Speaker 1>this year's earnings. The good news is all of this

0:09:11.240 --> 0:09:13.959
<v Speaker 1>is happening in the midst of a very very powerful

0:09:14.000 --> 0:09:17.360
<v Speaker 1>learnings reporting season. Right, we're about of the way through,

0:09:18.040 --> 0:09:22.199
<v Speaker 1>and of the companies based on Bloomberg's work, right are

0:09:22.240 --> 0:09:24.800
<v Speaker 1>reporting better than expected earnings last year. At this time

0:09:24.800 --> 0:09:27.640
<v Speaker 1>that number was it looks like we're going to have

0:09:27.640 --> 0:09:30.720
<v Speaker 1>a fifteen percent year over your quarter. And the numbers

0:09:30.720 --> 0:09:33.400
<v Speaker 1>that we put in place post tax reform for this

0:09:33.520 --> 0:09:37.840
<v Speaker 1>year one five for the SMP operating this year are

0:09:37.880 --> 0:09:41.120
<v Speaker 1>actually looking like they might be too conservative. So right

0:09:41.160 --> 0:09:43.640
<v Speaker 1>now that's not been the focus. But the market's trading

0:09:43.679 --> 0:09:46.720
<v Speaker 1>at a seventeen and a half times multiple on earnings

0:09:46.720 --> 0:09:48.839
<v Speaker 1>this year that we think may turn out to be conservative.

0:09:48.960 --> 0:09:54.080
<v Speaker 1>That's not cheap, but it's not overvalued. Leo, I wonder

0:09:54.080 --> 0:09:56.320
<v Speaker 1>if you could just tell us about your day on Friday.

0:09:56.480 --> 0:09:59.920
<v Speaker 1>Where were you last Friday? When the when we s

0:10:00.000 --> 0:10:02.760
<v Speaker 1>some loss two you know, in front of like many

0:10:02.920 --> 0:10:08.559
<v Speaker 1>in front of screens looking at the employment numbers, right

0:10:09.120 --> 0:10:16.080
<v Speaker 1>and feeling feeling the recalibration occur over good news potentially

0:10:16.120 --> 0:10:18.440
<v Speaker 1>being bad news. What does that feel like to a

0:10:18.520 --> 0:10:25.400
<v Speaker 1>professional such as yourself, You immediately fast forward to the clothes, right,

0:10:25.440 --> 0:10:28.120
<v Speaker 1>Where where might this close? Where might this go? Because

0:10:28.160 --> 0:10:32.240
<v Speaker 1>remember him, We've been coming off of an extraordinary period

0:10:32.280 --> 0:10:34.600
<v Speaker 1>of low volatility. I've talked I talked about throughout two

0:10:34.640 --> 0:10:37.760
<v Speaker 1>thousand seventeen. It is not normal to have market returns

0:10:37.760 --> 0:10:40.959
<v Speaker 1>of nearly with volatility. The VIX is now on the

0:10:41.000 --> 0:10:44.400
<v Speaker 1>headlines every day. Right, last year, heads tilted when you

0:10:44.440 --> 0:10:45.960
<v Speaker 1>talked about the VIX, and I had to put it

0:10:45.960 --> 0:10:49.319
<v Speaker 1>in the context of one percent market moves. Last year,

0:10:49.360 --> 0:10:52.240
<v Speaker 1>we had eight days in the entire year where the

0:10:52.240 --> 0:10:54.880
<v Speaker 1>market closed up or down one percent. Right, We've more

0:10:54.920 --> 0:10:58.439
<v Speaker 1>than had that already this year. So I think it's

0:10:58.480 --> 0:11:02.360
<v Speaker 1>about investor reaction. But I'm interested in your reaction because

0:11:02.679 --> 0:11:06.240
<v Speaker 1>you know your pro and your behavior. You know the

0:11:06.360 --> 0:11:11.320
<v Speaker 1>behavior of what pros their behavior. It can be different

0:11:11.360 --> 0:11:15.720
<v Speaker 1>than non professional investors. And I'm wondering, what did you

0:11:15.960 --> 0:11:19.720
<v Speaker 1>feel on Friday and then over the weekend when you

0:11:19.840 --> 0:11:23.040
<v Speaker 1>came in on Monday and we saw that four pc

0:11:23.320 --> 0:11:26.040
<v Speaker 1>drop in the SMP. What was going through your mind

0:11:26.080 --> 0:11:28.200
<v Speaker 1>and what was happening? What kind of energy was there

0:11:28.200 --> 0:11:31.600
<v Speaker 1>in the in the office where you were. Well, Friday

0:11:31.720 --> 0:11:35.000
<v Speaker 1>was a day of of sort of concern and watch right,

0:11:35.840 --> 0:11:40.760
<v Speaker 1>Monday was a day of of action and overreaction. Right,

0:11:41.320 --> 0:11:44.360
<v Speaker 1>and then we you quickly go into what what do

0:11:44.440 --> 0:11:47.240
<v Speaker 1>we do about this? Right? And so Tuesday morning we

0:11:47.360 --> 0:11:49.920
<v Speaker 1>quickly had a call with all of our clients and intermediaries,

0:11:50.400 --> 0:11:53.080
<v Speaker 1>and we drew three to four times the normal audience

0:11:53.080 --> 0:11:54.840
<v Speaker 1>for such a call. In mid December we had a

0:11:54.880 --> 0:11:58.120
<v Speaker 1>standard call outlook two thousand eighteen. Well, the call that

0:11:58.160 --> 0:12:01.400
<v Speaker 1>we hastily arranged on Tuesday more drew more than three

0:12:01.400 --> 0:12:04.160
<v Speaker 1>times the audience that we drew in mid December for

0:12:04.280 --> 0:12:07.960
<v Speaker 1>a market outlook call. So there there's definitely a great

0:12:07.960 --> 0:12:10.160
<v Speaker 1>deal of anxiety. We're looking at a market up three

0:12:10.880 --> 0:12:14.360
<v Speaker 1>actually two from March nine of oh I through last

0:12:14.400 --> 0:12:16.560
<v Speaker 1>night's close. There's a lot of profits to be had

0:12:16.600 --> 0:12:18.920
<v Speaker 1>that investors don't want to see whither away. So what

0:12:19.000 --> 0:12:20.839
<v Speaker 1>was the main concern? What was the main question? What

0:12:20.920 --> 0:12:24.600
<v Speaker 1>did you tell them? So much depends on where you're

0:12:24.760 --> 0:12:28.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, if you haven't rebalanced a portfolio for a while, right,

0:12:28.720 --> 0:12:32.160
<v Speaker 1>and you're you're probably still too overweight equities and this

0:12:32.240 --> 0:12:34.000
<v Speaker 1>is a good wake up call and is it too

0:12:34.080 --> 0:12:36.120
<v Speaker 1>late to sell? No, So hold on a second. So

0:12:36.200 --> 0:12:39.640
<v Speaker 1>you actually did not say what everybody is saying out

0:12:39.640 --> 0:12:43.920
<v Speaker 1>there based on uh Google searches. You didn't say by

0:12:43.920 --> 0:12:46.960
<v Speaker 1>the dip, it's oh, it's like, where do you think

0:12:47.000 --> 0:12:49.720
<v Speaker 1>the market's going? And you hate to answer questions with questions,

0:12:49.880 --> 0:12:52.520
<v Speaker 1>but where you what's your time horizon? If you're making

0:12:52.559 --> 0:12:55.880
<v Speaker 1>acid allocation views on a twelve to eighteen month forward basis.

0:12:56.000 --> 0:12:58.720
<v Speaker 1>One of our conclusions was we're closer to a buying

0:12:58.760 --> 0:13:03.079
<v Speaker 1>opportunity than a selling opportun Broadly speaking, Okay, however, there's

0:13:03.160 --> 0:13:06.040
<v Speaker 1>two point eight trillion dollars sitting on our nation's money

0:13:06.080 --> 0:13:09.160
<v Speaker 1>market mutual funds, according to the Investment Company Institute, two

0:13:09.160 --> 0:13:12.200
<v Speaker 1>point eight trillion. There are a lot of investors who

0:13:12.200 --> 0:13:15.560
<v Speaker 1>have been waiting for opportunities. Now, if you're waiting for

0:13:15.640 --> 0:13:18.360
<v Speaker 1>ten or twenty our advice as you might not get there.

0:13:18.800 --> 0:13:22.880
<v Speaker 1>And this was a sell off that had fundamental underpins

0:13:22.920 --> 0:13:25.880
<v Speaker 1>but was exacerbated by technicals, and it did appear to

0:13:26.000 --> 0:13:29.360
<v Speaker 1>us on Tuesday, right to be getting overdone? Okay, so

0:13:29.480 --> 0:13:31.080
<v Speaker 1>you use it as an entry point if you're sitting

0:13:31.080 --> 0:13:34.760
<v Speaker 1>on cash, use it if you haven't rebalanced, though, and

0:13:34.840 --> 0:13:38.640
<v Speaker 1>you have an equity target that after last year, right,

0:13:38.760 --> 0:13:41.280
<v Speaker 1>you're you're up seventeen or eighteen percent above your target?

0:13:41.559 --> 0:13:43.960
<v Speaker 1>Is it too late to rebalance and use what's happened

0:13:43.960 --> 0:13:47.280
<v Speaker 1>this week as a wake up call? Absolutely not right?

0:13:47.360 --> 0:13:53.040
<v Speaker 1>So the yawns that one might normally get around diversification rebalancing,

0:13:53.040 --> 0:13:54.600
<v Speaker 1>and I tell you I'm in front of clients a lot,

0:13:54.600 --> 0:13:57.720
<v Speaker 1>and throughout last year, some of that gets gets the

0:13:57.760 --> 0:14:00.720
<v Speaker 1>donkey nott and it's time to act. Thanks very much

0:14:00.760 --> 0:14:03.160
<v Speaker 1>for being with us. Leo Groshowski. He is the chief

0:14:03.200 --> 0:14:06.600
<v Speaker 1>investment officer for b N y Melon Wealth Management, helping

0:14:06.640 --> 0:14:09.920
<v Speaker 1>to manage more than two hundred and thirty billion dollars.

0:14:23.120 --> 0:14:25.840
<v Speaker 1>You're driving along, you really feel like you could use

0:14:25.880 --> 0:14:28.720
<v Speaker 1>a cup of coffee, and instead of going to your phone,

0:14:28.760 --> 0:14:31.840
<v Speaker 1>you can just hit your dashboard and then go to

0:14:31.920 --> 0:14:34.280
<v Speaker 1>a store and your coffee will be ready for you.

0:14:34.480 --> 0:14:38.080
<v Speaker 1>That is a vision among some automakers. And Rick Ruskin

0:14:38.200 --> 0:14:41.400
<v Speaker 1>joins us now. He's senior manager for online commerce at

0:14:41.440 --> 0:14:44.280
<v Speaker 1>General Motors and he joins us here my phone to

0:14:44.320 --> 0:14:47.800
<v Speaker 1>talk about this program that started in December. So can

0:14:47.840 --> 0:14:51.520
<v Speaker 1>you please explain to us what is this INCR e

0:14:51.720 --> 0:14:55.040
<v Speaker 1>commerce platform and how has it been received since it

0:14:55.360 --> 0:14:59.760
<v Speaker 1>was rolled out in December. Yeah, sure, good morning. So

0:15:00.080 --> 0:15:03.640
<v Speaker 1>Marketplace is a first of its kind UH commerce platform

0:15:03.720 --> 0:15:08.640
<v Speaker 1>that we've built specifically for on dash interactions and transactions

0:15:08.680 --> 0:15:13.720
<v Speaker 1>and GM vehicles, UM. And it really gives the connected driver,

0:15:14.400 --> 0:15:18.000
<v Speaker 1>uh the opportunity for you know, that sort of connected

0:15:18.000 --> 0:15:21.720
<v Speaker 1>experience with merchants and brands that they use and they love.

0:15:21.800 --> 0:15:25.840
<v Speaker 1>So as you mentioned, think about ordering and paying for

0:15:26.320 --> 0:15:29.280
<v Speaker 1>your morning cup of coffee with the tap of the dashboard,

0:15:29.520 --> 0:15:33.320
<v Speaker 1>or reserving parking, reserving hotel room, were even reserving a

0:15:33.440 --> 0:15:35.880
<v Speaker 1>table at t g I Fridays, again, all from the

0:15:36.000 --> 0:15:39.080
<v Speaker 1>dash So Rick, here's my question. I don't know if

0:15:39.080 --> 0:15:42.680
<v Speaker 1>you use ways, but when I've ever used ways, which

0:15:42.760 --> 0:15:45.440
<v Speaker 1>is a way to tell you the directions to get

0:15:45.440 --> 0:15:48.040
<v Speaker 1>somewhere when you're driving, I'm always shocked by the number

0:15:48.040 --> 0:15:52.760
<v Speaker 1>of Duncan donuts that are highlighted and advertised on the app.

0:15:53.080 --> 0:15:56.280
<v Speaker 1>And I'm wondering, I imagine dalk pays Ways a lot

0:15:56.280 --> 0:15:59.600
<v Speaker 1>of money for that advertising. And I'm wondering, from your perspective,

0:16:00.040 --> 0:16:03.640
<v Speaker 1>do some of these uh stores, these brands pay you

0:16:04.120 --> 0:16:08.920
<v Speaker 1>to be more prominently advertised on the dashboard. Yeah. So

0:16:08.960 --> 0:16:12.000
<v Speaker 1>first of all, it's uh, we we are a for

0:16:12.200 --> 0:16:14.640
<v Speaker 1>profit companies, So we put together a business model that

0:16:14.760 --> 0:16:18.640
<v Speaker 1>really works for GM and for our merchant partners. So

0:16:18.720 --> 0:16:20.800
<v Speaker 1>think of it almost as a media platform the same

0:16:20.800 --> 0:16:23.760
<v Speaker 1>way that weighs. You know, first and foremost is about navigation,

0:16:23.840 --> 0:16:27.320
<v Speaker 1>but they're selling those media placements. We too, give our

0:16:27.720 --> 0:16:33.120
<v Speaker 1>merchant partners an opportunity to you know, build those those experiences,

0:16:33.560 --> 0:16:37.120
<v Speaker 1>uh and have that presence on the dashboard. But then

0:16:37.360 --> 0:16:40.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, like the advertising they buy in many different

0:16:40.240 --> 0:16:44.640
<v Speaker 1>digital uh you know mediums were the same, and so

0:16:44.800 --> 0:16:48.360
<v Speaker 1>they're looking for ways to connect with connected drivers. Rick,

0:16:48.440 --> 0:16:50.040
<v Speaker 1>I just wonder if we could go through some of

0:16:50.080 --> 0:16:52.800
<v Speaker 1>the technology partners that you have brought together for this

0:16:52.840 --> 0:16:56.520
<v Speaker 1>so people can understand that it is a conglomeration of

0:16:56.600 --> 0:17:01.160
<v Speaker 1>talent that is making this happen. UH Seattle area based Zvo.

0:17:01.280 --> 0:17:03.040
<v Speaker 1>Now that you've got a lot of veterans there from

0:17:03.120 --> 0:17:06.560
<v Speaker 1>Microsoft and Amazon, tell us what ZVO is doing in

0:17:06.560 --> 0:17:11.719
<v Speaker 1>this partnership yeah, absolutely so. Um, when you think about

0:17:11.800 --> 0:17:16.159
<v Speaker 1>the ways that merchants can can bring their content onto

0:17:16.160 --> 0:17:19.399
<v Speaker 1>the dashboard, what was really critical for us was to

0:17:19.560 --> 0:17:23.800
<v Speaker 1>find what I'll call middleware technology partners that would have

0:17:24.000 --> 0:17:29.280
<v Speaker 1>that relationship with those merchant partners. They actually bring the

0:17:29.359 --> 0:17:33.720
<v Speaker 1>content from the merchant partner temple at tize it and

0:17:33.960 --> 0:17:37.720
<v Speaker 1>safely and securely bring it onto our dashboard in ways

0:17:37.800 --> 0:17:41.560
<v Speaker 1>that have been sort of first designed and tested by

0:17:41.720 --> 0:17:44.840
<v Speaker 1>our user experience and drive a workload teams. So rather

0:17:44.880 --> 0:17:47.840
<v Speaker 1>than us having a direct relationship with each one of

0:17:47.840 --> 0:17:50.600
<v Speaker 1>the merchants, were able to work with Zevo. Uh. And

0:17:50.640 --> 0:17:53.119
<v Speaker 1>then there's a couple other partners Sonic Mobile down in

0:17:53.359 --> 0:17:57.479
<v Speaker 1>Atlanta and Conversible down in Texas, Austin, Texas. Right. Well,

0:17:57.480 --> 0:17:59.640
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to get to that because the Zvo part

0:17:59.640 --> 0:18:03.720
<v Speaker 1>of it's to be all about machine learning technology. What

0:18:03.800 --> 0:18:09.440
<v Speaker 1>does Conversible add to the picture. Well, so, first and foremost,

0:18:09.680 --> 0:18:12.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, as you look at each one of those partners,

0:18:12.680 --> 0:18:17.280
<v Speaker 1>Conversible was doing a lot of Alexis skill work and

0:18:17.800 --> 0:18:22.120
<v Speaker 1>Facebook messenger work for various partners, and what they realized

0:18:22.160 --> 0:18:26.280
<v Speaker 1>were there was that these A p I s, these uh,

0:18:26.359 --> 0:18:30.360
<v Speaker 1>you know connections they had with the various merchants could

0:18:30.400 --> 0:18:33.840
<v Speaker 1>be applied in a very similar way to Marketplace. So

0:18:33.920 --> 0:18:35.880
<v Speaker 1>what we look to them to do is to bring

0:18:36.000 --> 0:18:40.080
<v Speaker 1>some of those relationships that they had already established to Marketplace.

0:18:40.200 --> 0:18:44.920
<v Speaker 1>So that's where Conversible, very similarly to Zevo and or Psionic,

0:18:44.960 --> 0:18:48.520
<v Speaker 1>are tapping into those existing relationships they have. I just

0:18:48.560 --> 0:18:50.440
<v Speaker 1>want to talk about the experience of it. I mean,

0:18:50.640 --> 0:18:54.320
<v Speaker 1>is there only a certain limited number of stores that

0:18:54.480 --> 0:18:57.760
<v Speaker 1>you can access from your dashboard? Can you talk to

0:18:57.760 --> 0:19:00.040
<v Speaker 1>your dashboard? Is it going to be like uh O

0:19:00.160 --> 0:19:04.000
<v Speaker 1>strider or is it all tapping? And how do you

0:19:04.040 --> 0:19:07.280
<v Speaker 1>make sure that people don't get distracted? Yeah, well so

0:19:07.320 --> 0:19:10.280
<v Speaker 1>a lot of great questions in that roll up. UM

0:19:10.320 --> 0:19:15.080
<v Speaker 1>So first, um the um I've been working on this

0:19:15.160 --> 0:19:18.080
<v Speaker 1>platform since day one, so as we started to develop

0:19:18.119 --> 0:19:20.800
<v Speaker 1>a user experience and testing all, you know through our

0:19:20.880 --> 0:19:24.960
<v Speaker 1>driver workload team, there is a very limited scope to

0:19:25.200 --> 0:19:28.240
<v Speaker 1>the number of partners that you would see on the

0:19:28.320 --> 0:19:32.440
<v Speaker 1>dash at any given time. Then, uh, it's really important

0:19:32.480 --> 0:19:36.520
<v Speaker 1>to understand this is not about establishing a first time relationship.

0:19:36.640 --> 0:19:39.560
<v Speaker 1>This is about expanding a relationship that you might have

0:19:39.600 --> 0:19:43.359
<v Speaker 1>already you know, created with a mobile app. So you know,

0:19:43.520 --> 0:19:45.920
<v Speaker 1>Dunkin Donuts is one of our partners. I have a

0:19:46.000 --> 0:19:50.040
<v Speaker 1>dunkin Donuts account. When I link that account to my dashboard,

0:19:50.080 --> 0:19:53.600
<v Speaker 1>now I'm I'm seeing stuff that's familiar to me. I'm

0:19:53.640 --> 0:19:56.800
<v Speaker 1>seeing my recents, my favorites. My payment method is already

0:19:56.800 --> 0:19:59.439
<v Speaker 1>on file with Duncan. So when I go in and

0:19:59.480 --> 0:20:01.879
<v Speaker 1>I open up marketplace and I want to order that

0:20:01.960 --> 0:20:05.439
<v Speaker 1>cup of coffee, well, look, I'm I'm performing one of

0:20:05.440 --> 0:20:08.119
<v Speaker 1>the rituals I would in the morning. I'm ordering my

0:20:08.200 --> 0:20:10.760
<v Speaker 1>favorite And it really is just a few taps on

0:20:10.800 --> 0:20:13.320
<v Speaker 1>the dash to get it done, about as simple as

0:20:13.400 --> 0:20:16.840
<v Speaker 1>changing the radio station. Well, you know what Lisa really wants,

0:20:16.920 --> 0:20:19.280
<v Speaker 1>rick as she wants someone to hand her the coffee

0:20:19.600 --> 0:20:22.359
<v Speaker 1>in the car when you push the button pick up

0:20:22.400 --> 0:20:26.120
<v Speaker 1>my kids, gives me groceries, want to do it all.

0:20:26.160 --> 0:20:29.280
<v Speaker 1>I think that's called an assistant. But just a question

0:20:29.320 --> 0:20:32.240
<v Speaker 1>though about the payment side of this. Is that something

0:20:32.280 --> 0:20:35.680
<v Speaker 1>that let's say JP Morgan Chase is involved with with

0:20:36.280 --> 0:20:40.760
<v Speaker 1>payments for this. Yeah, so where we are currently is

0:20:40.840 --> 0:20:44.600
<v Speaker 1>that we want the merchant to remain your merchant of

0:20:44.720 --> 0:20:51.119
<v Speaker 1>record again safe, safely and securely through a token ized process. Um,

0:20:51.400 --> 0:20:54.080
<v Speaker 1>you know from my dashboard through that rig partner that

0:20:54.119 --> 0:20:56.960
<v Speaker 1>I mentioned, like Zevo over to the merchant. All of

0:20:57.000 --> 0:21:01.080
<v Speaker 1>the tokens are telling you that yep, you're having an interaction.

0:21:01.160 --> 0:21:03.639
<v Speaker 1>We gotta we gotta press we gotta press the button

0:21:03.760 --> 0:21:05.399
<v Speaker 1>because we're out of time. I want to thank you

0:21:05.520 --> 0:21:08.680
<v Speaker 1>very much. Rick Ruskin, he is the senior manager Online

0:21:08.720 --> 0:21:27.240
<v Speaker 1>Commerce for General Motors. Just how much will automation change

0:21:27.280 --> 0:21:30.800
<v Speaker 1>the workforce over the next fifteen years? Here to talk

0:21:30.840 --> 0:21:33.439
<v Speaker 1>about that with us as Karen Harris, Managing director of

0:21:33.560 --> 0:21:36.320
<v Speaker 1>Macro at Trends at Bain and Company, and she joins

0:21:36.400 --> 0:21:38.920
<v Speaker 1>us by phone. Karen, thank you so much for being

0:21:39.000 --> 0:21:42.280
<v Speaker 1>with us. You just released this report that you authored

0:21:42.600 --> 0:21:48.400
<v Speaker 1>Labor twenty thirty, the Collision of Demographics, Automation and Inequality.

0:21:48.920 --> 0:21:52.520
<v Speaker 1>UM I want you just to start with automation, since

0:21:52.560 --> 0:21:55.160
<v Speaker 1>there's been a lot of discussion about whether that will

0:21:55.160 --> 0:21:59.400
<v Speaker 1>eliminate a lot of jobs and create really a two

0:21:59.440 --> 0:22:02.640
<v Speaker 1>tiered society. How much will that come to fruition over

0:22:02.640 --> 0:22:06.520
<v Speaker 1>the next few decades. Thanks Lisa, I'm really happy to

0:22:06.560 --> 0:22:11.280
<v Speaker 1>be here. It is certainly something that we see having

0:22:11.280 --> 0:22:15.520
<v Speaker 1>a very disruptive effect over the next few decades. We

0:22:15.800 --> 0:22:18.960
<v Speaker 1>see what's happening right now is the labor force. We

0:22:19.000 --> 0:22:22.080
<v Speaker 1>still have to start with demographics, even talking about automation,

0:22:22.200 --> 0:22:25.760
<v Speaker 1>because the question is how that impacts jobs, and how

0:22:25.800 --> 0:22:29.200
<v Speaker 1>that impacts the way we live and work, what we buy.

0:22:29.680 --> 0:22:33.280
<v Speaker 1>The labor force is about to experience a very steep deceleration.

0:22:34.200 --> 0:22:37.320
<v Speaker 1>Even shifting life stages working later take the little of

0:22:37.359 --> 0:22:39.760
<v Speaker 1>the edge off right, living longer, healthier lives, but it

0:22:39.840 --> 0:22:43.639
<v Speaker 1>doesn't compensate for the fact that the population, the working

0:22:43.680 --> 0:22:47.919
<v Speaker 1>population is overall shrinking and in many markets and then

0:22:48.080 --> 0:22:51.400
<v Speaker 1>some in some markets just growing much more slowly, which

0:22:51.400 --> 0:22:53.720
<v Speaker 1>in the short term will push wages up. And in

0:22:53.760 --> 0:22:56.320
<v Speaker 1>fact we're seeing some of that impact today in the

0:22:56.359 --> 0:23:00.520
<v Speaker 1>markets as the with the increased volatility around x dictations

0:23:00.520 --> 0:23:05.439
<v Speaker 1>of rising interest rates. But that natural process of rising

0:23:05.440 --> 0:23:09.280
<v Speaker 1>wages will be short circuited in our view, by automation

0:23:10.040 --> 0:23:13.360
<v Speaker 1>um and that front end automation usage your point will

0:23:13.520 --> 0:23:17.480
<v Speaker 1>feel buoyant in our By our estimates, we see another

0:23:17.560 --> 0:23:20.560
<v Speaker 1>eight trillion dollars in investment needed to build and deploy

0:23:20.680 --> 0:23:24.720
<v Speaker 1>that wave of automation, and that surge will temporarily shield

0:23:24.760 --> 0:23:29.320
<v Speaker 1>workers from the full impact. But beneath that surface and

0:23:29.480 --> 0:23:32.720
<v Speaker 1>what bain is seen is that the majority of workers

0:23:32.760 --> 0:23:36.040
<v Speaker 1>will feel the impact of automation as either jobs are

0:23:36.080 --> 0:23:39.119
<v Speaker 1>lost or new jobs that should have been created don't

0:23:39.119 --> 0:23:42.720
<v Speaker 1>show up, or wages struggle to climb past the point

0:23:42.800 --> 0:23:47.160
<v Speaker 1>where automation alternatives actually become cheaper. And so that sets

0:23:47.240 --> 0:23:49.199
<v Speaker 1>us up for this ebb and flow where you have

0:23:49.840 --> 0:23:54.240
<v Speaker 1>a big wave of automation investments, that feeling of buoyancy

0:23:54.280 --> 0:23:57.240
<v Speaker 1>and growth. But at the end of that, the full

0:23:57.520 --> 0:24:02.400
<v Speaker 1>x of automation laid bears as many as workers may

0:24:02.440 --> 0:24:06.919
<v Speaker 1>become displaced, and that means incomes become skewed even further

0:24:07.359 --> 0:24:10.000
<v Speaker 1>towards the top, towards those are who who are employed.

0:24:10.440 --> 0:24:14.200
<v Speaker 1>That lack of demands as people are unemployed, that pervasive

0:24:14.359 --> 0:24:17.919
<v Speaker 1>economic insecurity, that impact on growth is what leads to

0:24:18.480 --> 0:24:22.159
<v Speaker 1>that boom and bus cycle that we're concerned about, Karen,

0:24:22.440 --> 0:24:25.880
<v Speaker 1>Before we get to labor and wondering, if you could

0:24:25.960 --> 0:24:29.359
<v Speaker 1>just describe what you believe the world will look like,

0:24:29.520 --> 0:24:32.080
<v Speaker 1>or indeed your world, our world will look like in

0:24:32.240 --> 0:24:35.080
<v Speaker 1>five to seven years, what will the environment be like,

0:24:35.240 --> 0:24:38.199
<v Speaker 1>and maybe give us some thoughts about what kinds of

0:24:38.320 --> 0:24:41.160
<v Speaker 1>jobs and what kinds of situations are people most likely

0:24:41.240 --> 0:24:44.960
<v Speaker 1>to face. Sure, pim, thank you. It's uh. It's an

0:24:45.040 --> 0:24:49.160
<v Speaker 1>interesting it's a tough question because part of the challenge

0:24:49.200 --> 0:24:53.280
<v Speaker 1>we had at Bain in putting this work together is

0:24:53.359 --> 0:24:57.160
<v Speaker 1>that there are each of these forces push and pull

0:24:57.600 --> 0:25:01.160
<v Speaker 1>on each other. Um it creates a dynamic. And so

0:25:01.800 --> 0:25:04.480
<v Speaker 1>what we see playing out right in the short term,

0:25:04.760 --> 0:25:07.360
<v Speaker 1>we've already I've already spoken about how wages are gonna

0:25:07.440 --> 0:25:11.960
<v Speaker 1>rise over the next short period of time as the

0:25:12.000 --> 0:25:15.959
<v Speaker 1>workforce shrinks, but that adjustment gets cut off through automation.

0:25:16.440 --> 0:25:18.800
<v Speaker 1>Then we see a rise in new sorts of jobs.

0:25:18.800 --> 0:25:23.800
<v Speaker 1>Somebody has to program computers to understand AI right. Artificial

0:25:23.840 --> 0:25:27.919
<v Speaker 1>intelligence requires exposure to larger and larger volumes of information,

0:25:28.000 --> 0:25:32.480
<v Speaker 1>for example, and so we could see somebody has to retrofit.

0:25:32.960 --> 0:25:35.720
<v Speaker 1>Let's take the service sector, which is where we think

0:25:36.240 --> 0:25:40.840
<v Speaker 1>the ripest opportunities are for automation. Take a restaurant where

0:25:40.920 --> 0:25:45.000
<v Speaker 1>you could have an automated prep chef. Just as an example,

0:25:45.000 --> 0:25:46.960
<v Speaker 1>we're all familiar with, right something that does all the

0:25:47.040 --> 0:25:50.960
<v Speaker 1>chopping so that the chef can do the more advanced preparation.

0:25:51.400 --> 0:25:55.399
<v Speaker 1>We'll see have two robots chopping onions and celery. They

0:25:55.400 --> 0:25:57.560
<v Speaker 1>don't necessarily need to work side by side. You could

0:25:57.560 --> 0:25:59.560
<v Speaker 1>stack them on top of each other, which means you

0:25:59.600 --> 0:26:01.880
<v Speaker 1>fit out the kitchen, and in fact it mains view.

0:26:02.640 --> 0:26:07.119
<v Speaker 1>A big chunk of the investments in service sector automation

0:26:07.160 --> 0:26:11.879
<v Speaker 1>will come from not just the actual robotics and tools themselves,

0:26:11.920 --> 0:26:15.080
<v Speaker 1>but also from the infrastructure changes that come around that,

0:26:15.480 --> 0:26:17.920
<v Speaker 1>and that will insulate workers from jobs. So put him

0:26:17.920 --> 0:26:21.040
<v Speaker 1>to your question. By the early to mid part of

0:26:21.080 --> 0:26:24.480
<v Speaker 1>the next decade, we could see a very buoyant economy,

0:26:25.119 --> 0:26:29.240
<v Speaker 1>workers employed in those in the capacity of deploying many

0:26:29.280 --> 0:26:33.000
<v Speaker 1>of the tools that will then eliminate the job opportunities

0:26:33.080 --> 0:26:35.920
<v Speaker 1>later on rising interest rates as we see this capital

0:26:35.960 --> 0:26:39.840
<v Speaker 1>investment boom. So I think the major point and the

0:26:39.840 --> 0:26:42.840
<v Speaker 1>biggest watch out that had been we want businesses to

0:26:42.880 --> 0:26:46.679
<v Speaker 1>think about is the much much greater volatility of this

0:26:46.840 --> 0:26:49.879
<v Speaker 1>next cycle than what we've seen really for the past

0:26:49.920 --> 0:26:53.880
<v Speaker 1>few decades, even including that global financial crisis. Karen, what's

0:26:53.920 --> 0:26:59.000
<v Speaker 1>the most irreplaceable type of worker going forward? Even with

0:26:59.119 --> 0:27:01.400
<v Speaker 1>the boom and automa Asian? In other words, how can

0:27:01.400 --> 0:27:06.960
<v Speaker 1>you guarantee a paycheck going forward no matter what the automation? Sure,

0:27:07.040 --> 0:27:11.520
<v Speaker 1>I think there are there are many sectors, um I

0:27:11.560 --> 0:27:14.040
<v Speaker 1>think some of the most important sectors become ones that

0:27:14.119 --> 0:27:18.160
<v Speaker 1>are around asking the right we call them the sort

0:27:18.160 --> 0:27:23.200
<v Speaker 1>of the normative questions, understanding what people need. Some of these, ironically,

0:27:23.280 --> 0:27:26.480
<v Speaker 1>I think some of the more protected sectors, ironic, based

0:27:26.480 --> 0:27:30.879
<v Speaker 1>on the conversations we have today, are not necessarily advanced

0:27:31.640 --> 0:27:34.959
<v Speaker 1>in engineering and coding. In fact, a lot of coding

0:27:35.000 --> 0:27:38.600
<v Speaker 1>will be automated over the next over the next couple

0:27:38.600 --> 0:27:42.840
<v Speaker 1>of decades, but in fact the ability to for businesses,

0:27:42.920 --> 0:27:48.280
<v Speaker 1>for leaders, for um, for workers to understand and delight

0:27:48.760 --> 0:27:52.960
<v Speaker 1>their customers, understand those customer needs and really develop the

0:27:53.080 --> 0:27:56.239
<v Speaker 1>kinds of products that suit them. Either at the high end,

0:27:56.320 --> 0:28:01.000
<v Speaker 1>right we see more and more customization and and niche products,

0:28:01.080 --> 0:28:04.639
<v Speaker 1>but also where people as incomes are constrained, how do

0:28:04.720 --> 0:28:08.000
<v Speaker 1>we create a better quality of life at a lower cost,

0:28:09.280 --> 0:28:11.879
<v Speaker 1>and that is those are the kinds of businesses that frankly,

0:28:12.280 --> 0:28:16.040
<v Speaker 1>companies like higher Um out of China and Huawei have

0:28:16.119 --> 0:28:18.440
<v Speaker 1>done an excellent job doing what are the good enough

0:28:18.480 --> 0:28:24.040
<v Speaker 1>features that really suit markets where income is more constrained. Karen,

0:28:24.160 --> 0:28:27.680
<v Speaker 1>does increased automation mean that the governments around the world

0:28:27.680 --> 0:28:30.159
<v Speaker 1>will have to change the way they tax their citizens

0:28:30.280 --> 0:28:34.359
<v Speaker 1>as work becomes more automated and robots perhaps don't necessarily

0:28:34.359 --> 0:28:37.840
<v Speaker 1>pay taxes. It's a great it's a it's a really

0:28:37.840 --> 0:28:40.920
<v Speaker 1>critical issue. Right what we see it, Bean is certainly

0:28:41.600 --> 0:28:45.600
<v Speaker 1>the state is governments are going to likely play a

0:28:45.760 --> 0:28:51.600
<v Speaker 1>more active and and uh involved role in thinking about

0:28:51.640 --> 0:28:57.240
<v Speaker 1>the markets. Is the answer taxation. I'm not a policy expert.

0:28:57.320 --> 0:29:01.320
<v Speaker 1>Certainly there are examples of government and prevention that have

0:29:01.440 --> 0:29:07.360
<v Speaker 1>created a lot of positive economic impact for the outside

0:29:07.360 --> 0:29:10.520
<v Speaker 1>of their specific programs. The Space race, so the works

0:29:10.560 --> 0:29:18.040
<v Speaker 1>projects during the depression, um the universal basic education examples

0:29:18.160 --> 0:29:22.960
<v Speaker 1>where big government investments have paid positive dividends over time.

0:29:23.840 --> 0:29:26.960
<v Speaker 1>But there's I mean, the reality is, with a shrinking

0:29:27.000 --> 0:29:30.840
<v Speaker 1>pool of workers in changing taxation may not be the answer.

0:29:31.280 --> 0:29:33.560
<v Speaker 1>Thanks very much. We got to leave it there. Karen

0:29:33.640 --> 0:29:37.720
<v Speaker 1>Harris is managing director macro Trends Group of Bane and Company.

0:29:37.880 --> 0:29:41.880
<v Speaker 1>Check out the report Labor the Collision of Demographics, Automation

0:29:41.960 --> 0:29:48.440
<v Speaker 1>and inequality. Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg P and

0:29:48.520 --> 0:29:51.560
<v Speaker 1>L podcast. You can subscribe and listen to interviews at

0:29:51.600 --> 0:29:56.040
<v Speaker 1>Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, or whatever podcast platform you prefer. I'm

0:29:56.080 --> 0:29:59.520
<v Speaker 1>pim Fox. I'm on Twitter at pim Fox, I'm on

0:29:59.560 --> 0:30:02.840
<v Speaker 1>Twitter at Lisa Abramo. It's one before the podcast. You

0:30:02.880 --> 0:30:05.400
<v Speaker 1>can always catch us worldwide on Bloomberg Radio