WEBVTT - David Rubenstein Examines The American Experiment

0:00:04.360 --> 0:00:07.840
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to Bloomberg Business Week with Carol Masser and

0:00:07.960 --> 0:00:12.440
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Quick Takes Tim Stinovic on Bloomberg Radio. All right,

0:00:12.560 --> 0:00:15.600
<v Speaker 1>so grab your drink of choice. UH, settle into a

0:00:15.600 --> 0:00:18.040
<v Speaker 1>comfy chair. If you're driving, pull over because we've got

0:00:18.079 --> 0:00:20.400
<v Speaker 1>a great guest. Our next guest talks with all kinds

0:00:20.400 --> 0:00:23.560
<v Speaker 1>of leaders from all walks of our lives, the household names,

0:00:23.560 --> 0:00:26.480
<v Speaker 1>the exacts, the innovators, the warriors, the up starts, the artist,

0:00:26.720 --> 0:00:29.520
<v Speaker 1>and from those conversations, he has written a trilogy of books,

0:00:29.760 --> 0:00:32.520
<v Speaker 1>How to Lead on Leadership. The second, The American Story,

0:00:32.640 --> 0:00:36.640
<v Speaker 1>was all about the American history. UH, and the book's title,

0:00:36.760 --> 0:00:39.400
<v Speaker 1>The American Experiment, Dialogues and a Dream is his third

0:00:39.400 --> 0:00:42.279
<v Speaker 1>book in this series. So it's great to have joining us. UH.

0:00:42.360 --> 0:00:45.560
<v Speaker 1>David Rubinstein, he's host of Bloomberg Wealth on Bloomberg TV

0:00:45.600 --> 0:00:47.320
<v Speaker 1>and Bloomberg Radio, and of course you know him as

0:00:47.360 --> 0:00:49.880
<v Speaker 1>co founder and co chair of the private equity from

0:00:49.920 --> 0:00:52.839
<v Speaker 1>the Carlisle Group. He joins us in our interactive broker studio.

0:00:53.080 --> 0:00:54.920
<v Speaker 1>Thank you for joining us. My pleasure to be here.

0:00:54.960 --> 0:00:56.920
<v Speaker 1>Thank you for having me. It's really wonderful and I

0:00:56.960 --> 0:00:59.680
<v Speaker 1>feel like you are someone who talks with so many

0:00:59.680 --> 0:01:03.400
<v Speaker 1>different people, different points of view. Um, we were wondering

0:01:03.600 --> 0:01:05.880
<v Speaker 1>about the last couple of years, with everything going on,

0:01:06.240 --> 0:01:08.160
<v Speaker 1>how that kind of has shaped who you want to

0:01:08.200 --> 0:01:11.600
<v Speaker 1>talk to and how you were thinking about this book,

0:01:12.040 --> 0:01:15.039
<v Speaker 1>The American Experiment. Well, generally, I'd like to talk to

0:01:15.040 --> 0:01:17.040
<v Speaker 1>people who are willing to say something, as you know

0:01:17.200 --> 0:01:20.200
<v Speaker 1>from being an interviewer. Uh, if you watch the Sunday

0:01:20.200 --> 0:01:22.200
<v Speaker 1>talk shows, sometimes you say, why do these people go

0:01:22.240 --> 0:01:23.760
<v Speaker 1>on these shows? Because they don't want you want to

0:01:23.800 --> 0:01:26.160
<v Speaker 1>say anything. What you want is somebody who's willing to

0:01:26.200 --> 0:01:29.080
<v Speaker 1>say something and say something they haven't said before. That's

0:01:29.120 --> 0:01:31.959
<v Speaker 1>the best interview, right, And so I'm always looking for

0:01:32.000 --> 0:01:35.040
<v Speaker 1>somebody who is willing to be engaging and doesn't want

0:01:35.080 --> 0:01:37.360
<v Speaker 1>to just spar with the interviewer and not say anything.

0:01:37.440 --> 0:01:40.520
<v Speaker 1>So you know, that's that's a challenge, but that's what

0:01:40.560 --> 0:01:42.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm trying to do. And you always want somebody that

0:01:42.760 --> 0:01:45.440
<v Speaker 1>people will listen to and want to hear. So if

0:01:45.480 --> 0:01:47.920
<v Speaker 1>I got an engaging guest but nobody's ever heard of

0:01:47.920 --> 0:01:49.880
<v Speaker 1>that person, it may not be as effective. If you

0:01:49.880 --> 0:01:52.840
<v Speaker 1>can get Jeff Bezos, you know, you know that's people

0:01:52.880 --> 0:01:55.279
<v Speaker 1>want to hear from him. So if you want somebody

0:01:55.280 --> 0:01:57.240
<v Speaker 1>has a name and who's willing to engage. And some

0:01:57.280 --> 0:01:59.360
<v Speaker 1>people are great and some people are not as great,

0:01:59.440 --> 0:02:02.400
<v Speaker 1>And you know you've just figured out during the interview.

0:02:02.440 --> 0:02:04.840
<v Speaker 1>But we think about what's happened with the pandemic, the

0:02:04.880 --> 0:02:08.800
<v Speaker 1>capital riots, um, the inequities, George Floyd, We could go

0:02:08.840 --> 0:02:11.440
<v Speaker 1>on and on. There's it feels like a decade or

0:02:11.440 --> 0:02:13.360
<v Speaker 1>two decades of history have happened in the last year

0:02:13.360 --> 0:02:15.840
<v Speaker 1>and a half. How is that, David shaped kind of

0:02:15.880 --> 0:02:18.200
<v Speaker 1>your thinking and putting this book together? And again, the

0:02:18.280 --> 0:02:20.440
<v Speaker 1>voices you wanted to get to, each one has a

0:02:20.440 --> 0:02:24.400
<v Speaker 1>different thing. The January six event, um, I do talk

0:02:24.440 --> 0:02:26.840
<v Speaker 1>about it extensively in the book, and I basically say

0:02:27.280 --> 0:02:30.720
<v Speaker 1>it was a severe stress test for America and America one.

0:02:31.120 --> 0:02:33.280
<v Speaker 1>And I dedicate the book to the public servants who

0:02:33.280 --> 0:02:36.960
<v Speaker 1>protect our democracy. Because remember we had sixty five lawsuits

0:02:36.960 --> 0:02:40.040
<v Speaker 1>that were filed to overturn the January, to overturn the election,

0:02:40.400 --> 0:02:42.800
<v Speaker 1>and none of them actually prevailed, none of them got

0:02:42.919 --> 0:02:45.480
<v Speaker 1>very far. All the judges basically complied with what is

0:02:45.520 --> 0:02:47.680
<v Speaker 1>the rule of law, and they basically didn't act political.

0:02:48.080 --> 0:02:50.400
<v Speaker 1>So I think we learned a lot about the importance

0:02:50.400 --> 0:02:52.520
<v Speaker 1>of the rule of law in this country. We also

0:02:52.600 --> 0:02:55.480
<v Speaker 1>learned a lot in terms of the importance of healthcare

0:02:55.560 --> 0:02:58.640
<v Speaker 1>in this country. How it's so unfair that people are

0:02:58.680 --> 0:03:02.760
<v Speaker 1>her minority status are or are poor. Really we're suffering

0:03:02.880 --> 0:03:06.200
<v Speaker 1>disproportionately because of COVID because they don't have good health

0:03:06.240 --> 0:03:08.240
<v Speaker 1>care to begin with, and then have access to the

0:03:08.240 --> 0:03:11.280
<v Speaker 1>best health care. And it's a sad situation. But it

0:03:11.320 --> 0:03:15.000
<v Speaker 1>also made me think about this, my mortality. I'm seventy

0:03:15.000 --> 0:03:17.760
<v Speaker 1>two years old, and when you're seventy two, you had

0:03:17.800 --> 0:03:20.160
<v Speaker 1>a chance of you got this disease that you could

0:03:20.240 --> 0:03:22.959
<v Speaker 1>maybe not survive. And we now know that six the

0:03:22.960 --> 0:03:25.400
<v Speaker 1>people when on ventilators didn't actually come back out of

0:03:25.400 --> 0:03:28.400
<v Speaker 1>the ventilators. We were putting people ventilators thinking was helping,

0:03:28.600 --> 0:03:30.200
<v Speaker 1>it wasn't. So we learned a lot about how to

0:03:30.200 --> 0:03:32.360
<v Speaker 1>treat people. But suppose I had gotten this and I

0:03:32.400 --> 0:03:34.240
<v Speaker 1>went on a ventilator, I probably wouldn't be here now.

0:03:34.400 --> 0:03:36.839
<v Speaker 1>So I learned a lot about my mortality and thinking

0:03:36.880 --> 0:03:38.920
<v Speaker 1>about it, and the result is I'm rushing to get

0:03:38.920 --> 0:03:41.880
<v Speaker 1>more things done because I now realize, Hey, life is

0:03:41.960 --> 0:03:44.920
<v Speaker 1>very sure, and something bad can happen very quickly, and

0:03:45.240 --> 0:03:47.560
<v Speaker 1>so that that's been something that I've been thinking a

0:03:47.560 --> 0:03:50.080
<v Speaker 1>lot about. It's like the Hamilton's right, I'm running out

0:03:50.080 --> 0:03:52.680
<v Speaker 1>of time right, As you point out in the book,

0:03:52.800 --> 0:03:55.960
<v Speaker 1>the American experiment has been relatively short at this point.

0:03:56.080 --> 0:03:58.120
<v Speaker 1>And I'm wondering if you could contextualize the way that

0:03:58.240 --> 0:04:00.200
<v Speaker 1>you think about what happened over the last year, year,

0:04:00.360 --> 0:04:02.440
<v Speaker 1>year and a half as to to what extent it

0:04:02.480 --> 0:04:04.920
<v Speaker 1>really stress tested us, because you do you do make

0:04:04.960 --> 0:04:08.120
<v Speaker 1>note of the judiciary essentially saving the United States, not

0:04:08.200 --> 0:04:10.320
<v Speaker 1>the lawmakers, because you do call out in the book

0:04:10.400 --> 0:04:13.800
<v Speaker 1>the lawmakers, the senators and the members of Congress who

0:04:13.880 --> 0:04:16.760
<v Speaker 1>voted to overturn the election. They are still in power

0:04:16.880 --> 0:04:19.839
<v Speaker 1>right now. Yes, And I know many of them, and

0:04:20.040 --> 0:04:22.000
<v Speaker 1>privately they will say to you, well, I had to

0:04:22.040 --> 0:04:24.200
<v Speaker 1>do that, or I knew it wasn't going to really prevail.

0:04:24.520 --> 0:04:26.159
<v Speaker 1>Sure many of these people are you know, I live

0:04:26.240 --> 0:04:29.039
<v Speaker 1>in Washington. I host I host a series uh in

0:04:29.080 --> 0:04:31.480
<v Speaker 1>front of Members of Congress once a month. With COVID

0:04:31.800 --> 0:04:34.440
<v Speaker 1>ending soon hopefully I'll be resuming that. And I know

0:04:34.480 --> 0:04:36.400
<v Speaker 1>a lot of members and so forth, and you know

0:04:36.440 --> 0:04:38.680
<v Speaker 1>privately what they say is, um, well I had to

0:04:38.680 --> 0:04:41.080
<v Speaker 1>do this and they didn't really believe in it, but

0:04:41.440 --> 0:04:43.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, and so forth. Some will say that I'm

0:04:43.560 --> 0:04:45.960
<v Speaker 1>not going to go say who said that, but clearly

0:04:46.720 --> 0:04:49.360
<v Speaker 1>it's a very political situation. It's just the saddest part

0:04:49.360 --> 0:04:51.960
<v Speaker 1>of the whole situation we now face is that we've

0:04:52.160 --> 0:04:55.920
<v Speaker 1>politicized the government so much so that the country's really

0:04:56.320 --> 0:04:59.000
<v Speaker 1>unable to move forward very much. We have people who

0:04:59.040 --> 0:05:01.240
<v Speaker 1>don't want to wear masks, who think that it's a

0:05:01.240 --> 0:05:04.440
<v Speaker 1>good thing to force people not to wear masks. In effect,

0:05:04.760 --> 0:05:06.920
<v Speaker 1>we we we you know, a sad situation in many

0:05:06.960 --> 0:05:09.560
<v Speaker 1>ways when you think about it that school children whose

0:05:09.560 --> 0:05:11.840
<v Speaker 1>teachers want them to have masks are being told they

0:05:12.040 --> 0:05:15.640
<v Speaker 1>aren't supposed to have that mask. So bad situation, and

0:05:15.680 --> 0:05:18.480
<v Speaker 1>people are dying because of this. When did debate become

0:05:18.760 --> 0:05:21.240
<v Speaker 1>like a bad thing? I thought that was what kind

0:05:21.240 --> 0:05:23.480
<v Speaker 1>of the routes of democracy. We're all about, this whole

0:05:23.520 --> 0:05:26.400
<v Speaker 1>idea of having different perspectives and hopefully talking it through

0:05:26.400 --> 0:05:28.719
<v Speaker 1>and getting to a better place. When I worked in

0:05:28.760 --> 0:05:31.839
<v Speaker 1>Congress and nineteen seventies and in the White House, uh,

0:05:31.920 --> 0:05:34.279
<v Speaker 1>there was obviously political disputes all the time, and obviously

0:05:34.320 --> 0:05:38.000
<v Speaker 1>this was after Watergate, but people thought eventually you've got

0:05:38.000 --> 0:05:40.880
<v Speaker 1>to get something done. And so you had bipartisan legislation.

0:05:40.960 --> 0:05:43.600
<v Speaker 1>Now if to be considered a great legislator, used to

0:05:43.600 --> 0:05:46.080
<v Speaker 1>be were good at bipartisan legislation, get people on both

0:05:46.120 --> 0:05:49.400
<v Speaker 1>sides of work together. Now to be a great legislator, um,

0:05:49.480 --> 0:05:51.880
<v Speaker 1>you're probably somebody that is good in only getting your

0:05:51.920 --> 0:05:54.640
<v Speaker 1>Democrats or your Republicans to support you. And members of

0:05:54.680 --> 0:05:57.640
<v Speaker 1>Congress now spend so much time raising money because they

0:05:57.680 --> 0:06:00.560
<v Speaker 1>want to raise money for their campaigns or to wort

0:06:00.560 --> 0:06:03.520
<v Speaker 1>anybody from challenging them. And they have to spend their

0:06:03.520 --> 0:06:05.320
<v Speaker 1>time in the case of members of the House, to

0:06:05.440 --> 0:06:07.960
<v Speaker 1>raising money. And the money and the Internet and social

0:06:08.000 --> 0:06:10.599
<v Speaker 1>media has just divided the country in so many ways

0:06:10.640 --> 0:06:13.279
<v Speaker 1>that I find it interesting when I host these dinners,

0:06:13.279 --> 0:06:15.120
<v Speaker 1>so many people say this is the most interesting thing

0:06:15.160 --> 0:06:17.400
<v Speaker 1>that members feel they're doing. In Washington. They can have

0:06:17.400 --> 0:06:19.680
<v Speaker 1>a dinner when nobody sees their meeting with somebody from

0:06:19.680 --> 0:06:21.560
<v Speaker 1>the opposite party because there's no press there, and they

0:06:21.560 --> 0:06:23.240
<v Speaker 1>can talk to people from the opposite house, which they

0:06:23.240 --> 0:06:26.120
<v Speaker 1>really do because they rarely have conference committees anymore. It's uh,

0:06:26.560 --> 0:06:30.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, look, I also recognize this every generation ten

0:06:30.240 --> 0:06:33.560
<v Speaker 1>thousand years back and so forth has always said, well,

0:06:33.640 --> 0:06:35.880
<v Speaker 1>in my time it was better, and now it's not

0:06:35.960 --> 0:06:39.000
<v Speaker 1>as good now. George Washington's father allegedly told him, well,

0:06:39.240 --> 0:06:41.479
<v Speaker 1>your dinner generation are not gonna achieve anything because you

0:06:41.480 --> 0:06:44.320
<v Speaker 1>guys are not hard working or whatever. Well, the truth is,

0:06:44.360 --> 0:06:48.120
<v Speaker 1>every every generation tells the younger people, you're not gonna

0:06:48.120 --> 0:06:49.839
<v Speaker 1>be tough enough, you're not gonna be surviving, and I

0:06:50.120 --> 0:06:53.440
<v Speaker 1>ultimately civilization goes forward. So sure, they're they're challenges. Now.

0:06:53.640 --> 0:06:56.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm not happy with many things that have happened. One

0:06:56.600 --> 0:06:59.039
<v Speaker 1>thing that did happen, though, uh, during all this period

0:06:59.040 --> 0:07:01.920
<v Speaker 1>of time, it is the is the George Floyd murder.

0:07:02.440 --> 0:07:04.480
<v Speaker 1>In that case, the thing that struck me was this,

0:07:05.000 --> 0:07:07.400
<v Speaker 1>we've been through. I lived for the Civil Rights Revolution,

0:07:07.480 --> 0:07:09.720
<v Speaker 1>We've lived through the Voting Rights Act, the Civil Rights Act,

0:07:09.960 --> 0:07:12.480
<v Speaker 1>and so many things that have been done, infirmative action

0:07:12.520 --> 0:07:16.400
<v Speaker 1>of the things. But this one murder crystallized for people

0:07:16.440 --> 0:07:18.640
<v Speaker 1>in this country the fact that we are still discriminating

0:07:18.640 --> 0:07:20.640
<v Speaker 1>in so many ways. Just think about it. All the

0:07:20.680 --> 0:07:22.840
<v Speaker 1>people that have been lynched over the years didn't seem

0:07:22.880 --> 0:07:25.280
<v Speaker 1>to have the same resonance as this one murder, maybe

0:07:25.320 --> 0:07:27.760
<v Speaker 1>because it was on TV. Maybe everybody saw it, maybe

0:07:27.760 --> 0:07:29.640
<v Speaker 1>because people saw it was so ridiculous the way it

0:07:29.680 --> 0:07:33.440
<v Speaker 1>was handled. But we've made some progress obviously on racial relations.

0:07:33.440 --> 0:07:35.240
<v Speaker 1>And i'd say in the book that while we've made

0:07:35.280 --> 0:07:37.640
<v Speaker 1>a lot of progress on racial relations and and and

0:07:37.800 --> 0:07:40.160
<v Speaker 1>gender equality and other things, we still have a long

0:07:40.160 --> 0:07:42.560
<v Speaker 1>way to go. The rhetoric that is in the Declaration

0:07:42.560 --> 0:07:44.960
<v Speaker 1>of Independence and the rhetoric in the Constitution is wonderful.

0:07:45.240 --> 0:07:47.400
<v Speaker 1>What we've been spending two thirty years try to live

0:07:47.480 --> 0:07:49.920
<v Speaker 1>up to that rhetoric, and to some extent we've made progress,

0:07:49.920 --> 0:07:51.720
<v Speaker 1>and some extent we haven't. And what I say in

0:07:51.720 --> 0:07:54.160
<v Speaker 1>the book is that we have these genes. These genes

0:07:54.200 --> 0:07:56.320
<v Speaker 1>are part of us, the belief in the rule of law,

0:07:56.520 --> 0:07:59.080
<v Speaker 1>the belief and equality, the belief in the power of voting.

0:07:59.320 --> 0:08:02.200
<v Speaker 1>And we've been trying to make sure that people um

0:08:02.400 --> 0:08:04.520
<v Speaker 1>kind of honor these things that are part of our genes.

0:08:04.520 --> 0:08:06.920
<v Speaker 1>And sometimes we do and sometimes we don't. The rule

0:08:07.000 --> 0:08:09.080
<v Speaker 1>of law is a gene that's so strong that it

0:08:09.160 --> 0:08:12.000
<v Speaker 1>prevailed in the January sixth situation and and the and

0:08:12.080 --> 0:08:14.440
<v Speaker 1>the post election fight, and I think that was good

0:08:14.600 --> 0:08:16.800
<v Speaker 1>in many other countries. And you had a leader of

0:08:16.920 --> 0:08:18.840
<v Speaker 1>do what was done here. I think you could have

0:08:18.840 --> 0:08:21.960
<v Speaker 1>had a military takeover. Yeah, it could have been much closer.

0:08:22.280 --> 0:08:26.000
<v Speaker 1>I I wonder, David, about this sense of optimism that

0:08:26.040 --> 0:08:28.520
<v Speaker 1>you have potentially after writing a book like this. I

0:08:28.520 --> 0:08:31.160
<v Speaker 1>do think there is this collective despair over the last

0:08:31.200 --> 0:08:33.360
<v Speaker 1>eighteen nineteen months, as this pandemic has played out and

0:08:33.360 --> 0:08:34.560
<v Speaker 1>we try to get to the other side of it.

0:08:34.600 --> 0:08:37.840
<v Speaker 1>And here we are sandwiched between extreme weather events. You

0:08:37.840 --> 0:08:40.640
<v Speaker 1>know that they're affecting the entire country, whether it's drought

0:08:40.720 --> 0:08:45.120
<v Speaker 1>or hurricane or fires. Uh, trying to get our kids

0:08:45.240 --> 0:08:47.920
<v Speaker 1>back to school. After writing this book and speaking to

0:08:48.480 --> 0:08:50.400
<v Speaker 1>these people and looking so closely at the history of

0:08:50.400 --> 0:08:54.000
<v Speaker 1>the United States, are you optimistic? I think most people

0:08:54.200 --> 0:08:57.680
<v Speaker 1>who are asked that question will say yes, because nobody

0:08:57.679 --> 0:08:59.800
<v Speaker 1>wants to say no, I'm pessimistic. It sounds bad to

0:08:59.800 --> 0:09:02.080
<v Speaker 1>say pessimistic, and I'd be lying. If I said I

0:09:02.120 --> 0:09:04.360
<v Speaker 1>was pessimistic, it might make news as they I'm pessimistic.

0:09:04.480 --> 0:09:07.480
<v Speaker 1>I am optimistic about many things. The young people are

0:09:07.520 --> 0:09:11.720
<v Speaker 1>so creative. We are solving some problems like global climate change.

0:09:11.720 --> 0:09:14.240
<v Speaker 1>We're working on some things. Racial relations are getting better

0:09:14.240 --> 0:09:17.480
<v Speaker 1>than not perfect. But uh, if you weren't optimistic. You'd

0:09:17.520 --> 0:09:18.959
<v Speaker 1>be hard to get through life. If every day you

0:09:19.000 --> 0:09:21.240
<v Speaker 1>were so depressed you couldn't get through life, you know,

0:09:21.280 --> 0:09:24.080
<v Speaker 1>what would you do? So I'm optimistic, and I've had

0:09:24.120 --> 0:09:26.000
<v Speaker 1>been fortunate in my life to be be able to

0:09:26.320 --> 0:09:28.200
<v Speaker 1>be optimistic because of good things that happen to me.

0:09:28.360 --> 0:09:30.840
<v Speaker 1>But generally I'm reasonably optimistic. I've just been worried about

0:09:31.200 --> 0:09:33.200
<v Speaker 1>some things that we could solve that we don't seem

0:09:33.200 --> 0:09:34.839
<v Speaker 1>to be solving as quickly as I wish we would.

0:09:34.920 --> 0:09:38.520
<v Speaker 1>Let's talk about some of the conversations ken Burns Medline, Albright, Um,

0:09:38.600 --> 0:09:41.400
<v Speaker 1>juliep or who I don't know is necessarily a household name,

0:09:41.840 --> 0:09:45.520
<v Speaker 1>Um Alter, Isaacson, David McCullough, some of the things, Rita

0:09:45.600 --> 0:09:48.640
<v Speaker 1>morano Um. Some of the conversations that stood out, And

0:09:48.640 --> 0:09:52.480
<v Speaker 1>obviously they talked about very different topics, the different topics

0:09:52.520 --> 0:09:55.880
<v Speaker 1>of well. Ken Burns talked about Vietnam. And it turns

0:09:55.880 --> 0:09:58.720
<v Speaker 1>out in Vietnam, the political leaders knew all along, They

0:09:58.760 --> 0:10:00.800
<v Speaker 1>knew all along that we had no chance of winning

0:10:00.800 --> 0:10:03.839
<v Speaker 1>that war military. It was really a political um exercise,

0:10:03.960 --> 0:10:06.080
<v Speaker 1>which was disappointed because we lost fifty eight thousand men

0:10:06.120 --> 0:10:09.320
<v Speaker 1>and the Vietnamese lost millions of people. Um, David McCullough

0:10:09.400 --> 0:10:11.720
<v Speaker 1>did a wonderful job of explaining how nobody took the

0:10:11.800 --> 0:10:13.520
<v Speaker 1>right brother seriously in this country. They had to go

0:10:13.559 --> 0:10:15.720
<v Speaker 1>to France to kind of prove um that they could

0:10:15.720 --> 0:10:19.880
<v Speaker 1>they could they could fly. Another reason why we love France, right. UM.

0:10:19.920 --> 0:10:22.640
<v Speaker 1>You know, so, Rina Moreno is an incredible story and

0:10:23.320 --> 0:10:25.880
<v Speaker 1>a woman from Puerto Rico who was not taken that

0:10:25.960 --> 0:10:28.480
<v Speaker 1>seriously as an actress because she was from Puerto Rico,

0:10:28.640 --> 0:10:31.920
<v Speaker 1>she was given kind of Latino Latino jobs, but she

0:10:31.960 --> 0:10:34.040
<v Speaker 1>turned out to be an Academy Award winner and she

0:10:34.080 --> 0:10:37.240
<v Speaker 1>had an interesting life. She lived with um, a very

0:10:37.240 --> 0:10:40.120
<v Speaker 1>famous person for quite some time, Marlon Brando and I

0:10:40.120 --> 0:10:42.120
<v Speaker 1>think eight years or so, and then try to commit

0:10:42.160 --> 0:10:46.120
<v Speaker 1>suicide because he was unfaithful. And then she recovered from

0:10:46.160 --> 0:10:49.040
<v Speaker 1>that and obviously went on to now win an Emmy,

0:10:48.520 --> 0:10:52.160
<v Speaker 1>a Grammy, uh, every other world Tony that you can win.

0:10:52.240 --> 0:10:55.040
<v Speaker 1>So she's UM quite an impressive person now still performing

0:10:55.080 --> 0:10:57.920
<v Speaker 1>at age eight or eighty nine. She was at our

0:10:57.920 --> 0:11:00.920
<v Speaker 1>Boston Pops event and she just fire got to meet her,

0:11:00.960 --> 0:11:04.280
<v Speaker 1>and she's unbelievable in terms of her energy. You also

0:11:04.520 --> 0:11:07.240
<v Speaker 1>talked with m Walter Isaacson, and I think innovation is

0:11:07.240 --> 0:11:09.800
<v Speaker 1>something we spend a lot of time here, uh talking

0:11:09.840 --> 0:11:13.840
<v Speaker 1>about around the table. And you know that governments the

0:11:13.880 --> 0:11:16.680
<v Speaker 1>complicated relationship really between governments and innovation. We're seeing it

0:11:16.720 --> 0:11:20.680
<v Speaker 1>once again. What did you glean from that conversation? Walter

0:11:20.800 --> 0:11:23.800
<v Speaker 1>points out in his book really focus on the Innovators,

0:11:23.800 --> 0:11:26.640
<v Speaker 1>a book right before The Codebreakers. Codebreakers, a new book

0:11:26.640 --> 0:11:30.680
<v Speaker 1>about a woman that won the Nobel Prize for infect

0:11:30.679 --> 0:11:33.920
<v Speaker 1>discovering crisper Um, and and that's a great book as well.

0:11:34.160 --> 0:11:36.440
<v Speaker 1>But but the Innovators is about all the people that

0:11:36.480 --> 0:11:40.840
<v Speaker 1>have changed our lives. Who invented the micro processor, that transistor,

0:11:41.200 --> 0:11:44.360
<v Speaker 1>the smartphone, the internet, all the things. How could we

0:11:44.400 --> 0:11:46.640
<v Speaker 1>live today without the internet? How could we live today

0:11:46.679 --> 0:11:49.959
<v Speaker 1>without smartphones? All these things? But now these all came

0:11:50.000 --> 0:11:52.840
<v Speaker 1>about because of smart people doing things that people said

0:11:52.880 --> 0:11:54.959
<v Speaker 1>couldn't be done. And typically as part of the teams,

0:11:54.960 --> 0:11:58.280
<v Speaker 1>there are very few geniuses. They're discovering things by themselves,

0:11:58.280 --> 0:12:01.280
<v Speaker 1>he points out. Usually it's a person working with somebody else,

0:12:01.400 --> 0:12:03.679
<v Speaker 1>and usually they're building on some something that somebody else

0:12:03.720 --> 0:12:06.160
<v Speaker 1>actually did before them. But the most important thing is

0:12:06.320 --> 0:12:08.680
<v Speaker 1>our country has been a country where We've been strong

0:12:08.720 --> 0:12:11.800
<v Speaker 1>because of innovation. We are the country that innovates. We're

0:12:11.800 --> 0:12:14.679
<v Speaker 1>reinventing ourselves all the time. Why aren't people in Europe

0:12:14.760 --> 0:12:17.360
<v Speaker 1>inventing great companies like with companies we have. You don't

0:12:17.360 --> 0:12:19.240
<v Speaker 1>see as much in Europe or in other parts of

0:12:19.240 --> 0:12:21.719
<v Speaker 1>the world as we have been seeing here right now.

0:12:21.760 --> 0:12:24.480
<v Speaker 1>The technology that's dominating the world, certainly outside of China

0:12:24.679 --> 0:12:29.800
<v Speaker 1>is American technology, Microsoft, Amazon, Apple, Facebook, um. All these

0:12:29.800 --> 0:12:32.760
<v Speaker 1>companies are American companies. Why don't we aren't we dominated

0:12:32.760 --> 0:12:35.800
<v Speaker 1>by European technology companies or Middle East technology companies? Because

0:12:35.800 --> 0:12:39.080
<v Speaker 1>Americans have innovative style and we really incent people to

0:12:39.120 --> 0:12:41.760
<v Speaker 1>do things innovative here. Wait, I gotta follow, So what

0:12:41.800 --> 0:12:43.720
<v Speaker 1>do you think about what's going on in China right

0:12:43.760 --> 0:12:46.240
<v Speaker 1>now in terms of really clamping down It feels like

0:12:46.280 --> 0:12:48.839
<v Speaker 1>on the innovators. Well, in China, I think what's going

0:12:48.880 --> 0:12:51.000
<v Speaker 1>on is the Chinese government is trying to make it

0:12:51.040 --> 0:12:53.360
<v Speaker 1>clear to everybody that we, the government, are the most

0:12:53.440 --> 0:12:56.679
<v Speaker 1>important thing and not the innovators. And so I think

0:12:56.720 --> 0:13:00.559
<v Speaker 1>there's a concern that sometimes you get entre preneurs are

0:13:00.559 --> 0:13:02.840
<v Speaker 1>worth a lot of money, they're they're cult figures themselves.

0:13:02.920 --> 0:13:05.280
<v Speaker 1>Jack ma on the equivalent, and they kind of rival

0:13:05.360 --> 0:13:07.719
<v Speaker 1>the government leaders, and the government doesn't think that's appropriate.

0:13:07.960 --> 0:13:10.680
<v Speaker 1>So the government is doing some things to constrain this.

0:13:11.000 --> 0:13:13.240
<v Speaker 1>We'll see whether the impact is to have people not

0:13:13.280 --> 0:13:15.480
<v Speaker 1>be quite as innovative, or whether people will try to

0:13:15.480 --> 0:13:18.320
<v Speaker 1>take more money offshore, or or or entrepreneurs will come

0:13:18.320 --> 0:13:20.040
<v Speaker 1>to this country and not go back to China. You

0:13:20.040 --> 0:13:22.920
<v Speaker 1>don't know yet. We're talking parts with David Rubinstein. His

0:13:22.960 --> 0:13:25.840
<v Speaker 1>new book is The American Experiment, also host of Bloomberg

0:13:25.880 --> 0:13:28.560
<v Speaker 1>Wealth here at Bloomberg Radio and TV and co chair

0:13:28.600 --> 0:13:31.360
<v Speaker 1>co founder of the Carlisle Group. But it's interesting, David,

0:13:31.360 --> 0:13:34.520
<v Speaker 1>do you think it will prevent China from being um

0:13:34.720 --> 0:13:38.240
<v Speaker 1>kind of a global presence when it comes to innovative technologies,

0:13:38.240 --> 0:13:40.240
<v Speaker 1>which is what President ga said he wants to be.

0:13:41.160 --> 0:13:43.600
<v Speaker 1>It may have some impact, but right now, for example,

0:13:43.920 --> 0:13:46.160
<v Speaker 1>what is up in the air is who is going

0:13:46.160 --> 0:13:48.640
<v Speaker 1>to dominate technology and the around the world of the

0:13:48.640 --> 0:13:51.280
<v Speaker 1>next ten years. Is it going to be the American

0:13:51.320 --> 0:13:53.960
<v Speaker 1>technology companies or is it going to be the Chinese

0:13:54.360 --> 0:13:57.000
<v Speaker 1>trying right now, the Chinese technology companies have largely been

0:13:57.120 --> 0:14:01.200
<v Speaker 1>successful in China. Google and Facebook really don't quite operate

0:14:01.200 --> 0:14:03.839
<v Speaker 1>in China. They have their own equivalent there. But have

0:14:04.120 --> 0:14:07.239
<v Speaker 1>China been able to take Alie pay Uh and financial

0:14:07.800 --> 0:14:10.640
<v Speaker 1>Um or Ali Baba outside of China that much? Not

0:14:10.760 --> 0:14:13.080
<v Speaker 1>so much, or the same with Bai Do now. The

0:14:13.120 --> 0:14:15.480
<v Speaker 1>only one that's really become a major force outside of

0:14:15.520 --> 0:14:18.800
<v Speaker 1>China is Byte Dance, which has TikTok, but it doesn't

0:14:18.840 --> 0:14:22.280
<v Speaker 1>operate all in China. It really operates outside. But over

0:14:22.280 --> 0:14:24.600
<v Speaker 1>the next ten twenty years, twenty or thirty years or so,

0:14:24.880 --> 0:14:27.080
<v Speaker 1>there will be an effort by the Chinese to say,

0:14:27.120 --> 0:14:30.120
<v Speaker 1>let's take our technology companies and use them in Europe,

0:14:30.320 --> 0:14:32.840
<v Speaker 1>Latin America, the Middle East, and who will dominate what

0:14:33.000 --> 0:14:35.200
<v Speaker 1>we have two internets or we just have one internet?

0:14:35.640 --> 0:14:37.840
<v Speaker 1>And and it's not clear to the extent that we

0:14:37.840 --> 0:14:40.480
<v Speaker 1>weaken our technology companies in this country. It may be

0:14:40.600 --> 0:14:42.440
<v Speaker 1>that we won't be dominant around the world as much

0:14:42.480 --> 0:14:44.000
<v Speaker 1>as we have been. But you think about it. You

0:14:44.040 --> 0:14:46.040
<v Speaker 1>go anywhere in the world. Now you can turn you

0:14:46.080 --> 0:14:48.920
<v Speaker 1>can use Google, you can use Facebook. You can't go

0:14:49.080 --> 0:14:51.800
<v Speaker 1>use Bai Do or or Alie pay anywhere in the world.

0:14:51.840 --> 0:14:53.520
<v Speaker 1>That may change unless you're in a part of China

0:14:53.560 --> 0:14:57.000
<v Speaker 1>where it's correct blocked uh. David given what's happened in

0:14:57.080 --> 0:14:59.200
<v Speaker 1>China over the last few months, would you be hesitant

0:14:59.240 --> 0:15:02.000
<v Speaker 1>to deploy appital there to to invest there, at least

0:15:02.040 --> 0:15:04.200
<v Speaker 1>for the near future. I am an investor in China.

0:15:04.200 --> 0:15:06.720
<v Speaker 1>I've been a long term investor there my firm UM

0:15:06.800 --> 0:15:10.440
<v Speaker 1>as an investor there. I personally invested there UM, but

0:15:10.480 --> 0:15:12.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm not thinking forward over the next few years. Given

0:15:12.760 --> 0:15:15.400
<v Speaker 1>what's happened over the last few months, there clearly are

0:15:15.400 --> 0:15:18.320
<v Speaker 1>going to be some constraints on growth and valuation. So,

0:15:18.400 --> 0:15:21.200
<v Speaker 1>for example, UM, many of the companies have had some

0:15:21.240 --> 0:15:25.280
<v Speaker 1>constraints the and financial transaction is one and where the

0:15:25.360 --> 0:15:27.840
<v Speaker 1>valuations come down because they're not going to go public

0:15:27.880 --> 0:15:29.960
<v Speaker 1>quite as quickly as they were going to. I still

0:15:30.000 --> 0:15:32.200
<v Speaker 1>think though, you've got a population of one point three

0:15:32.200 --> 0:15:35.600
<v Speaker 1>billion people and a gigantic market, the biggest market in

0:15:35.640 --> 0:15:38.960
<v Speaker 1>the world, and the country is becoming increasingly wealthy, and

0:15:39.000 --> 0:15:42.240
<v Speaker 1>therefore people are recently spending money. We operate a number

0:15:42.240 --> 0:15:44.360
<v Speaker 1>of companies there. We operate with our Chinese partners and

0:15:44.440 --> 0:15:47.600
<v Speaker 1>McDonald's in in uh in China, and clearly that's a

0:15:47.640 --> 0:15:49.840
<v Speaker 1>growing business doing well. So I wouldn't be hesitant to

0:15:49.880 --> 0:15:52.800
<v Speaker 1>invest in China. I just be hesitant to do things

0:15:52.800 --> 0:15:54.400
<v Speaker 1>that the government isn't going to really like. You've got

0:15:54.520 --> 0:15:55.960
<v Speaker 1>to be very careful and make sure you know what

0:15:56.000 --> 0:15:58.640
<v Speaker 1>the government will tolerate and not the book at the

0:15:58.720 --> 0:16:02.800
<v Speaker 1>very beginning you include the preamble to the Constitution. If

0:16:02.840 --> 0:16:04.880
<v Speaker 1>you could sit down with a forefather today, who would

0:16:04.880 --> 0:16:07.320
<v Speaker 1>it be and what would you want to know? Well,

0:16:07.480 --> 0:16:09.720
<v Speaker 1>I winswer on one second. I would just say that, interestingly,

0:16:09.840 --> 0:16:14.960
<v Speaker 1>we had white Christian property owners men who are founding fathers, right.

0:16:15.280 --> 0:16:18.200
<v Speaker 1>If we had a new constitutional declaration independence, who would

0:16:18.200 --> 0:16:20.920
<v Speaker 1>those people be? It wouldn't be all white men right

0:16:21.120 --> 0:16:24.680
<v Speaker 1>or property. We'd have presumably women, We'd have minorities. Would

0:16:24.720 --> 0:16:26.800
<v Speaker 1>we get a different constitution? Will we get a different

0:16:26.840 --> 0:16:29.560
<v Speaker 1>declaration of independence? Probably would um. If I could have

0:16:29.600 --> 0:16:32.480
<v Speaker 1>dinner with any one of those founding fathers, I guess

0:16:32.480 --> 0:16:34.920
<v Speaker 1>it would be Thomas Jefferson, just because his rhetoric is

0:16:35.160 --> 0:16:37.320
<v Speaker 1>writing style is so wonderful, And I'd ask him how

0:16:37.360 --> 0:16:39.320
<v Speaker 1>come you never made a speech as presidently made one

0:16:39.360 --> 0:16:42.600
<v Speaker 1>public speech. If you ask Water Risings, he would say

0:16:42.600 --> 0:16:44.200
<v Speaker 1>he'd like to have all the people he's written about,

0:16:44.280 --> 0:16:45.840
<v Speaker 1>He'd like to have dinner. I think he would say

0:16:45.840 --> 0:16:49.120
<v Speaker 1>with Benjamin Franklin, because he's so creative and so brilliant,

0:16:49.120 --> 0:16:53.320
<v Speaker 1>so many ways uneducated by traditional standards, but now any

0:16:53.360 --> 0:16:55.120
<v Speaker 1>of them. I think if I could have dinner with

0:16:55.120 --> 0:16:58.800
<v Speaker 1>anybody that's ever lived and who's an American not currently live,

0:16:58.840 --> 0:17:00.920
<v Speaker 1>it would be, without doubt Abraham Lincoln. It might be

0:17:00.920 --> 0:17:03.440
<v Speaker 1>the greatest American of them all. Kept the Union together.

0:17:03.960 --> 0:17:06.440
<v Speaker 1>Uh freed the slaves, though not as quickly as some

0:17:06.480 --> 0:17:09.680
<v Speaker 1>people would want it. But he was an incredible person, writer,

0:17:09.800 --> 0:17:12.320
<v Speaker 1>credit speaker, and and I just like to ask him

0:17:12.359 --> 0:17:14.639
<v Speaker 1>this a lot of questions. And it's interesting phenomenon. You

0:17:14.720 --> 0:17:17.240
<v Speaker 1>and you and I are all in the interview business.

0:17:17.560 --> 0:17:20.040
<v Speaker 1>And this is a business where it's just relatively common now,

0:17:20.080 --> 0:17:22.440
<v Speaker 1>it's not unique to be an interviewer, right, lots of people.

0:17:22.920 --> 0:17:24.600
<v Speaker 1>Everybody has a podcast. I think there should be a

0:17:24.600 --> 0:17:26.840
<v Speaker 1>bumper secret and says punk if you don't have a podcast.

0:17:26.920 --> 0:17:28.920
<v Speaker 1>Everybody kept their own podcasts. Everybody cut there on TV show,

0:17:28.920 --> 0:17:31.680
<v Speaker 1>everybody's got their on radio show. But this is relatively new.

0:17:31.960 --> 0:17:34.679
<v Speaker 1>For most of organized history, there were no interviews. So

0:17:34.720 --> 0:17:37.159
<v Speaker 1>we have no interviews of Shakespeare, we have no interviews

0:17:37.160 --> 0:17:39.760
<v Speaker 1>of Cleopatrick, we have no interviews of Abraham Lincoln, George Washington.

0:17:39.960 --> 0:17:41.879
<v Speaker 1>I wish we could go back and interview them. I

0:17:41.960 --> 0:17:44.400
<v Speaker 1>thought about doing a book interviewing what these people would

0:17:44.400 --> 0:17:46.639
<v Speaker 1>have said if I'd interviewed him. That's a great idea.

0:17:46.760 --> 0:17:50.320
<v Speaker 1>So I got to say, William Shakespeare, No, will Um,

0:17:50.400 --> 0:17:52.119
<v Speaker 1>why do you think it is that people think you

0:17:52.119 --> 0:17:54.520
<v Speaker 1>didn't write these plays? Or did you really write these plays?

0:17:54.480 --> 0:17:57.040
<v Speaker 1>Tell us the truth? Or Cleopatri who was a better lover?

0:17:57.080 --> 0:18:00.960
<v Speaker 1>When Mark Anthony or Julius Caesar? When the interviews right? Yeah?

0:18:01.040 --> 0:18:02.919
<v Speaker 1>For Henry the Eighth, why why didn't you just get

0:18:02.960 --> 0:18:04.960
<v Speaker 1>a prenup instead of chopping off the head of your wife.

0:18:05.119 --> 0:18:06.880
<v Speaker 1>There'll be a lot of great questions. We we want

0:18:06.880 --> 0:18:08.600
<v Speaker 1>to know the answers to what you took. Number four.

0:18:09.320 --> 0:18:11.680
<v Speaker 1>You did get some fantastic names for for this book,

0:18:11.760 --> 0:18:14.159
<v Speaker 1>you know, including Ken Burns as we talked about, Madeline Albred,

0:18:14.240 --> 0:18:17.919
<v Speaker 1>John meetch Um, Billy Jean King. Uh. Who did you

0:18:17.960 --> 0:18:20.720
<v Speaker 1>reach out to that you couldn't get? Who said I'm sorry?

0:18:20.720 --> 0:18:25.720
<v Speaker 1>Who's this? David Rubinstein? I don't have time kidding. No, Look,

0:18:25.840 --> 0:18:28.520
<v Speaker 1>some people do not like to do interviews, and some

0:18:28.560 --> 0:18:31.879
<v Speaker 1>people are more more complicated to get a hold up

0:18:32.200 --> 0:18:35.840
<v Speaker 1>and so forth. So I UM on this particular book,

0:18:35.880 --> 0:18:38.439
<v Speaker 1>I have not interested so did this way. I have

0:18:38.560 --> 0:18:41.120
<v Speaker 1>not yet interviewed Elon Musk. I'd like to do that.

0:18:41.600 --> 0:18:44.199
<v Speaker 1>Um Water Isaacson is writing a book about him and

0:18:44.240 --> 0:18:46.000
<v Speaker 1>that presumably will be the source of a lot of

0:18:46.000 --> 0:18:48.840
<v Speaker 1>information on Twitter a few weeks ago talking about that.

0:18:48.880 --> 0:18:51.359
<v Speaker 1>I talked to Water about it and he's very happy

0:18:51.480 --> 0:18:54.879
<v Speaker 1>spending time with him now. And Ellen is uh, I

0:18:54.880 --> 0:18:57.399
<v Speaker 1>won't give away all this, all the stories it's gonna be.

0:18:57.520 --> 0:19:00.800
<v Speaker 1>It's gonna happen absolutely, um, And I would say that

0:19:01.359 --> 0:19:03.720
<v Speaker 1>i'd like to interview I have an interview Mark Zuckerberg.

0:19:03.840 --> 0:19:06.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm on a board with him in China. I've been

0:19:06.640 --> 0:19:08.520
<v Speaker 1>there when we talk to him a couple of times,

0:19:08.560 --> 0:19:10.400
<v Speaker 1>but I haven't really interviewed him, and I think that'd

0:19:10.400 --> 0:19:12.199
<v Speaker 1>be interesting. I had a chance to invest in that

0:19:12.240 --> 0:19:14.360
<v Speaker 1>company when my son in law to be was at

0:19:14.720 --> 0:19:17.600
<v Speaker 1>Harvard and he said investment company. I said, it's a

0:19:17.680 --> 0:19:20.480
<v Speaker 1>dating service, and dating service never get anywhere. That was

0:19:20.680 --> 0:19:23.720
<v Speaker 1>thirteen billion dollars ago. Is there a woman that you

0:19:23.760 --> 0:19:26.280
<v Speaker 1>haven't talked to you that you would like to talk to? Well,

0:19:26.359 --> 0:19:30.040
<v Speaker 1>Queen Elizabeth doesn't do interviews. UM, so I think that's

0:19:30.040 --> 0:19:32.280
<v Speaker 1>probably not gonna happen. But I would say I have

0:19:32.400 --> 0:19:35.919
<v Speaker 1>not interviewed Mrs Obama. I've met her many times, I

0:19:35.920 --> 0:19:39.520
<v Speaker 1>haven't interviewed her. You should be very good as an interviewee.

0:19:39.560 --> 0:19:43.960
<v Speaker 1>I have interviewed Melinda Gates. Uh. I've interviewed many business

0:19:44.040 --> 0:19:47.960
<v Speaker 1>leaders who are prominent women. Uh. And in scott have

0:19:48.040 --> 0:19:51.120
<v Speaker 1>you thought about I have met her, but I don't

0:19:51.160 --> 0:19:54.240
<v Speaker 1>haven't interviewed I. I haven't actually asked her yet. I don't.

0:19:54.240 --> 0:19:57.600
<v Speaker 1>I think she's relatively shy and doesn't seek publicity as

0:19:57.600 --> 0:19:59.720
<v Speaker 1>the way she's doing it. But if she's watching or

0:19:59.800 --> 0:20:02.600
<v Speaker 1>listen thing right now, I'm ready to come out Seattle

0:20:02.680 --> 0:20:05.320
<v Speaker 1>tomorrow and do that interview because she's doing some really

0:20:05.320 --> 0:20:07.639
<v Speaker 1>good things in philanthropy and really turned the world upside

0:20:07.680 --> 0:20:10.680
<v Speaker 1>down by doing it fast, doing it very differently than

0:20:10.880 --> 0:20:12.600
<v Speaker 1>how a lot of other people have done it for

0:20:12.640 --> 0:20:15.040
<v Speaker 1>a long time. Yes, and uh, I mean she's got

0:20:15.320 --> 0:20:17.560
<v Speaker 1>I think she was given thirty four billion dollars and

0:20:17.560 --> 0:20:19.600
<v Speaker 1>now it's probably worth seventy five billions, So she's got

0:20:19.600 --> 0:20:23.160
<v Speaker 1>a lot of money. Your three minutes left, Please don't

0:20:23.160 --> 0:20:26.639
<v Speaker 1>go anywhere. No, just stay forever. Um the investment environment,

0:20:26.800 --> 0:20:29.120
<v Speaker 1>I don't know whether it's back, whether it's crypto. What's

0:20:29.119 --> 0:20:32.400
<v Speaker 1>interesting to you right now? Well, clearly crypto is something

0:20:32.400 --> 0:20:34.360
<v Speaker 1>that gets a lot of attention. It's amazing how many

0:20:34.400 --> 0:20:37.040
<v Speaker 1>people are interested in crypto. Are you invested in crypto

0:20:37.080 --> 0:20:41.240
<v Speaker 1>in any way? I have not invested in crypto currencies myself.

0:20:41.280 --> 0:20:43.240
<v Speaker 1>I have invested in some companies that kind of service

0:20:43.320 --> 0:20:46.280
<v Speaker 1>the industry. And my standard view on crypto is when

0:20:46.320 --> 0:20:49.280
<v Speaker 1>you go to Las Vegas, most people are smart to

0:20:49.280 --> 0:20:51.040
<v Speaker 1>know you're not gonna win there, maybe spend more time

0:20:51.040 --> 0:20:53.080
<v Speaker 1>than you're certainly not gonna win, but you enjoy it.

0:20:53.119 --> 0:20:55.560
<v Speaker 1>You have the pleasure of gambling. So you picked one

0:20:55.640 --> 0:20:57.640
<v Speaker 1>or two percent of your net worth and do that. Well,

0:20:57.680 --> 0:21:00.879
<v Speaker 1>the same as true in crypto. Crypto you want to speculate,

0:21:00.880 --> 0:21:02.359
<v Speaker 1>you don't really know that much about it. Try it

0:21:02.440 --> 0:21:04.720
<v Speaker 1>one or two or three percent. It's not harmful and

0:21:04.760 --> 0:21:08.840
<v Speaker 1>you'll probably have enjoyable time. Perhaps. I interviewed for my

0:21:08.840 --> 0:21:12.440
<v Speaker 1>my show on Bloomberg John Paulson recently, and he is

0:21:12.520 --> 0:21:14.760
<v Speaker 1>dead set against it. He just said, this is terrible

0:21:14.920 --> 0:21:17.000
<v Speaker 1>and it's going to zero. And but on the other hand,

0:21:17.040 --> 0:21:18.920
<v Speaker 1>I've interviewed some other people that will come out soon

0:21:18.920 --> 0:21:20.639
<v Speaker 1>who are gonna be saying, hey, I think it's a

0:21:20.680 --> 0:21:22.280
<v Speaker 1>way to make a lot of money. There's one person

0:21:22.320 --> 0:21:25.280
<v Speaker 1>I be interviewing soon who's who's made billions of dollars

0:21:25.320 --> 0:21:28.240
<v Speaker 1>in crypto. What about when it comes to SPACs and

0:21:28.280 --> 0:21:30.959
<v Speaker 1>where we are in this cycle with SPACs? Are they

0:21:31.000 --> 0:21:33.480
<v Speaker 1>here to stay? And look, spacts aren't anything new, They're

0:21:33.480 --> 0:21:37.000
<v Speaker 1>just having a moment right now. SPACs are not going away. Um.

0:21:37.040 --> 0:21:39.960
<v Speaker 1>But you have to be wary of what you're doing.

0:21:40.000 --> 0:21:41.560
<v Speaker 1>You have to know what you're really doing. So spacts

0:21:41.560 --> 0:21:43.600
<v Speaker 1>are a way to accelerate an I p O process,

0:21:43.880 --> 0:21:46.240
<v Speaker 1>And right now it's harder to raise money for SPACs

0:21:46.280 --> 0:21:48.160
<v Speaker 1>and not just the spack money. There are two types

0:21:48.160 --> 0:21:49.800
<v Speaker 1>of money yet you have to really raise You raise

0:21:49.840 --> 0:21:51.720
<v Speaker 1>the riditional money for the spact, but then you raise

0:21:51.800 --> 0:21:54.000
<v Speaker 1>money that's called a pre I p O pipe money,

0:21:54.119 --> 0:21:56.399
<v Speaker 1>which is the money to help you get public um

0:21:56.520 --> 0:21:59.399
<v Speaker 1>or help the public evaluation uh state at what you

0:21:59.640 --> 0:22:02.040
<v Speaker 1>think it should be. And it's harder to raise that

0:22:02.080 --> 0:22:04.480
<v Speaker 1>money right now. A lot of somebody is raising I

0:22:04.480 --> 0:22:07.119
<v Speaker 1>think it's Apollo is raising a fund to invest in

0:22:07.160 --> 0:22:09.840
<v Speaker 1>the SPACs that aren't doing so well and to buy

0:22:09.880 --> 0:22:12.000
<v Speaker 1>them on the cheap, which is an idea that I

0:22:12.200 --> 0:22:14.159
<v Speaker 1>think is probably has some merit. We've already gone to

0:22:14.200 --> 0:22:17.040
<v Speaker 1>distress SPACs. UM. Thirty seconds left here? What do you

0:22:17.040 --> 0:22:21.920
<v Speaker 1>think will be the next Grand American Experiment? Just quickly? Well,

0:22:22.760 --> 0:22:25.359
<v Speaker 1>the next experiment that I think we'll see UM. I

0:22:25.400 --> 0:22:28.399
<v Speaker 1>think probably we're going to see UM at some point,

0:22:28.440 --> 0:22:33.000
<v Speaker 1>I hope UM greater cooperation between the Republicans and Democratic

0:22:33.040 --> 0:22:35.880
<v Speaker 1>parties when we have some crisis that really unites them

0:22:35.920 --> 0:22:38.520
<v Speaker 1>in ways that we haven't really truly been united since

0:22:38.600 --> 0:22:41.480
<v Speaker 1>nine eleven. Now we're getting ready to celebrate or mark

0:22:41.520 --> 0:22:45.399
<v Speaker 1>I shouldn't I celebrate than the aversary nine eleven. UM,

0:22:45.400 --> 0:22:46.960
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna do at the Kenny Center on the chairman

0:22:46.960 --> 0:22:48.600
<v Speaker 1>of the Kenny Center. We're gonna have an event doing

0:22:48.640 --> 0:22:51.520
<v Speaker 1>that and thanking our military people, but also thanking the

0:22:51.560 --> 0:22:54.320
<v Speaker 1>healthcare workers we've got us through this most recent period

0:22:54.359 --> 0:22:57.359
<v Speaker 1>of time. We thank you, thank you very much for

0:22:57.359 --> 0:22:59.960
<v Speaker 1>having so much. David Rubinstein, of course, co founder coach

0:23:00.000 --> 0:23:02.879
<v Speaker 1>share of the Carlisle Group. His latest book, The American Experiment,

0:23:03.040 --> 0:23:05.720
<v Speaker 1>Dialogues on a Dream Do check it out it's a

0:23:05.760 --> 0:23:08.959
<v Speaker 1>great still summer. It is still summer. Everyone still summer.

0:23:09.000 --> 0:23:10.560
<v Speaker 1>Read This is Bloomberg Radio.