WEBVTT - Robinhood's CEO on the Plan to Tokenize Everything

0:00:02.480 --> 0:00:16.160
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, Radio News.

0:00:18.200 --> 0:00:22.080
<v Speaker 2>Hello and welcome to another episode of the Odd Lots podcast.

0:00:22.360 --> 0:00:24.599
<v Speaker 3>I'm Joe Wisenthal, and I'm Tracy Alloway.

0:00:24.960 --> 0:00:27.960
<v Speaker 2>Tracy, here's something that surprised me. Okay, so it's twenty

0:00:28.000 --> 0:00:28.640
<v Speaker 2>twenty five.

0:00:29.800 --> 0:00:31.840
<v Speaker 3>I would have thought, you know, are you surprised it's

0:00:31.840 --> 0:00:32.640
<v Speaker 3>twenty twenty five.

0:00:32.680 --> 0:00:35.199
<v Speaker 2>I'm surprised we made it this long. I'm surprised.

0:00:35.360 --> 0:00:36.160
<v Speaker 3>Fair, that's fair.

0:00:36.800 --> 0:00:39.519
<v Speaker 2>I am surprised, you know. And I think back to

0:00:39.640 --> 0:00:42.760
<v Speaker 2>twenty twenty one and like the crypto boom of that

0:00:42.840 --> 0:00:46.720
<v Speaker 2>ear and the stock, the spac mania and all that stuff,

0:00:46.960 --> 0:00:50.240
<v Speaker 2>that craziness, Like I sort of thought, to some extent

0:00:50.280 --> 0:00:52.040
<v Speaker 2>that would have been a little bit more flash in

0:00:52.080 --> 0:00:55.240
<v Speaker 2>the pan because you know, like ninety nine, two thousand,

0:00:55.720 --> 0:00:57.680
<v Speaker 2>a couple of years later, like people were not talking

0:00:57.680 --> 0:01:01.160
<v Speaker 2>about dot com stocks like two years later. Because I'm like,

0:01:01.480 --> 0:01:02.920
<v Speaker 2>I thought it was going to be a repeat of that,

0:01:03.160 --> 0:01:07.399
<v Speaker 2>all of this retail obsession with options and call options

0:01:07.440 --> 0:01:10.000
<v Speaker 2>and speculation, etc. I thought that'd be a thing, you know,

0:01:10.480 --> 0:01:13.240
<v Speaker 2>short phenomenon. A bunch of people lose their money in

0:01:13.319 --> 0:01:15.920
<v Speaker 2>twenty twenty two and twenty twenty three when some of

0:01:15.959 --> 0:01:18.400
<v Speaker 2>that stuff busts and then they lose interest and they

0:01:18.440 --> 0:01:20.440
<v Speaker 2>go on to other things and sort of forget about

0:01:20.520 --> 0:01:23.039
<v Speaker 2>trading for a while. But I don't think that was

0:01:23.040 --> 0:01:24.720
<v Speaker 2>an incorrect assumption on my part.

0:01:24.760 --> 0:01:27.240
<v Speaker 3>I think people discovered that they really enjoy losing money.

0:01:28.120 --> 0:01:33.200
<v Speaker 3>It is, yes, okay, genuinely. What I would say is

0:01:34.160 --> 0:01:37.720
<v Speaker 3>this all started in the pandemic, right, Yeah, to some extent,

0:01:37.800 --> 0:01:40.920
<v Speaker 3>But I think crypto opened the door to this idea

0:01:41.080 --> 0:01:43.120
<v Speaker 3>that you can have a number on a screen and

0:01:43.280 --> 0:01:45.800
<v Speaker 3>just bet whether it's going to go up or down,

0:01:46.120 --> 0:01:50.160
<v Speaker 3>like basically a synthetic number. Almost right, It's just this token.

0:01:50.680 --> 0:01:53.080
<v Speaker 3>And then what happened during the pandemic is everyone was

0:01:53.120 --> 0:01:56.960
<v Speaker 3>really bored. Game stop became a thing. Everyone kind of

0:01:57.000 --> 0:02:01.720
<v Speaker 3>discovered that momentum was maybe more fun to play than

0:02:02.080 --> 0:02:05.520
<v Speaker 3>boring stuff like value, and I was, you know, it

0:02:05.600 --> 0:02:08.600
<v Speaker 3>did honestly feel like a cultural shift when it came

0:02:08.639 --> 0:02:11.280
<v Speaker 3>to the way people were thinking about trading. And I'm

0:02:11.280 --> 0:02:14.040
<v Speaker 3>not I guess I'm not as surprised that it's it's

0:02:14.120 --> 0:02:16.920
<v Speaker 3>continued to this day, and if anything, this sort of

0:02:16.960 --> 0:02:20.560
<v Speaker 3>tokenization of the stock market, people playing options, people playing

0:02:20.600 --> 0:02:22.880
<v Speaker 3>crypto has become bigger than ever.

0:02:23.400 --> 0:02:26.160
<v Speaker 2>It's just a cultural shift. It's also like everything has

0:02:26.200 --> 0:02:28.520
<v Speaker 2>a price now, which I think is very important. Like today,

0:02:28.720 --> 0:02:32.520
<v Speaker 2>like we're constantly looking at prices for politics right now,

0:02:32.560 --> 0:02:36.880
<v Speaker 2>We're constantly looking for prices related to geopolitical events on

0:02:37.000 --> 0:02:41.440
<v Speaker 2>sites like Kelshi or polymarket, et cetera. It has expanded

0:02:41.520 --> 0:02:45.120
<v Speaker 2>so much so there's crypto, there's options trading there, et cetera.

0:02:45.280 --> 0:02:48.080
<v Speaker 2>Like we are like drenched in a culture of like

0:02:48.280 --> 0:02:51.080
<v Speaker 2>there's a price on something, there's a thing that's going on,

0:02:51.680 --> 0:02:53.600
<v Speaker 2>you can trade it. And I now think, you know,

0:02:53.639 --> 0:02:55.760
<v Speaker 2>it's gonna be with us forever, because it clearly was

0:02:55.840 --> 0:02:58.640
<v Speaker 2>not just like a you know, a one year sort

0:02:58.639 --> 0:03:01.120
<v Speaker 2>of zerp era every on board at home phenomenon.

0:03:01.240 --> 0:03:02.680
<v Speaker 3>Well, it's not just that you could trade it. You

0:03:02.680 --> 0:03:03.760
<v Speaker 3>can trade it really easily.

0:03:03.840 --> 0:03:04.359
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, right.

0:03:04.440 --> 0:03:06.679
<v Speaker 3>You can just open up your phone some things you

0:03:06.720 --> 0:03:09.560
<v Speaker 3>can trade twenty four hours a day and just make

0:03:09.720 --> 0:03:11.240
<v Speaker 3>or lose money as you choose.

0:03:11.680 --> 0:03:15.160
<v Speaker 2>I love making or losing money as I choose. Anyway.

0:03:15.800 --> 0:03:18.440
<v Speaker 2>One of the companies that we really associate with this

0:03:18.520 --> 0:03:22.240
<v Speaker 2>sort of boom and retail participation that era and that

0:03:22.440 --> 0:03:26.919
<v Speaker 2>of course is robin Hood, the company that was famous

0:03:26.919 --> 0:03:29.760
<v Speaker 2>for being the first to introduce fre stock trading just

0:03:29.800 --> 0:03:32.640
<v Speaker 2>kind of mind blowing, and lots of people use it.

0:03:32.680 --> 0:03:36.680
<v Speaker 2>For many people is their introduction to trading options and stocks,

0:03:36.720 --> 0:03:39.840
<v Speaker 2>particularly during the pandemic associated with the meme stock there,

0:03:39.920 --> 0:03:42.920
<v Speaker 2>which kind of still exists. Anyway, we have the perfect

0:03:42.920 --> 0:03:44.160
<v Speaker 2>guest go on what we're gonna say.

0:03:44.200 --> 0:03:47.520
<v Speaker 3>I was going to say, Robinhood in my mind like

0:03:47.720 --> 0:03:51.120
<v Speaker 3>definitely caught the wave of this cultural shift at exactly

0:03:51.200 --> 0:03:53.840
<v Speaker 3>the right time. But it's also, in my mind like

0:03:53.880 --> 0:03:58.080
<v Speaker 3>an ode to the importance of user interface. Genuinely, the

0:03:58.240 --> 0:04:01.960
<v Speaker 3>app is just more interesting, more fun. I guess some

0:04:01.960 --> 0:04:04.240
<v Speaker 3>people would say, more easy to use than a lot

0:04:04.240 --> 0:04:06.360
<v Speaker 3>of other things. This sounds like an ad I don't

0:04:06.400 --> 0:04:09.400
<v Speaker 3>mean it to be, but I remember, for instance, when

0:04:09.920 --> 0:04:12.480
<v Speaker 3>you know, when you used to make trades on robin

0:04:12.520 --> 0:04:15.200
<v Speaker 3>Hood and you would get like a little confetti animation

0:04:15.520 --> 0:04:18.400
<v Speaker 3>every time you did it. Like can you imagine TDAM

0:04:18.440 --> 0:04:22.320
<v Speaker 3>error trade or like Schwab or something doing something like that.

0:04:22.720 --> 0:04:25.039
<v Speaker 2>Uh. The one other thing I'll say about them is

0:04:25.080 --> 0:04:27.600
<v Speaker 2>they're doing phenomenally well. The stock is like back at

0:04:27.720 --> 0:04:30.279
<v Speaker 2>like basically at all time highs. It's not just a

0:04:30.320 --> 0:04:32.279
<v Speaker 2>company that offers free trades I think they have like

0:04:32.400 --> 0:04:35.640
<v Speaker 2>nine different units at one hundred million dollars annual run.

0:04:35.720 --> 0:04:38.800
<v Speaker 2>Raid Truly, I think it is becoming a juggernaut anyway.

0:04:38.880 --> 0:04:42.560
<v Speaker 2>Thrilled to say we have its CEO and founder, Vladteneve

0:04:42.720 --> 0:04:45.719
<v Speaker 2>on the podcast today, so in studio Flad, thank you

0:04:45.760 --> 0:04:47.920
<v Speaker 2>so much for coming on the Outlaws. Thrilled to finally

0:04:47.960 --> 0:04:48.599
<v Speaker 2>be chatting with you.

0:04:48.800 --> 0:04:51.000
<v Speaker 4>Thank you for the warm welcome. It's great to be here.

0:04:51.520 --> 0:04:55.440
<v Speaker 2>That cohort that came into markets in like twenty twenty

0:04:55.480 --> 0:04:58.760
<v Speaker 2>and twenty twenty one, that sort of you know, whatever

0:04:58.800 --> 0:05:02.440
<v Speaker 2>that cohort was, did they behave differently today than say

0:05:02.839 --> 0:05:07.000
<v Speaker 2>the twenty nine teen cohort or the twenty eighteen cohort?

0:05:07.279 --> 0:05:09.240
<v Speaker 2>Is there something about them that if you look at

0:05:09.279 --> 0:05:13.160
<v Speaker 2>say trading in April during the volatility, is there are

0:05:13.600 --> 0:05:14.120
<v Speaker 2>they different?

0:05:16.240 --> 0:05:21.159
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, so I should rewinding four five years at this

0:05:21.279 --> 0:05:26.080
<v Speaker 4>point time ago, there were lots of people that came

0:05:26.120 --> 0:05:30.120
<v Speaker 4>into the market for the first time in twenty nineteen.

0:05:30.560 --> 0:05:34.560
<v Speaker 4>In twenty twenty, I think right before the pandemic, I

0:05:34.640 --> 0:05:37.839
<v Speaker 4>was in New York and I remember that visit because

0:05:37.839 --> 0:05:41.000
<v Speaker 4>it was sort of like before everything got weird. We

0:05:41.080 --> 0:05:45.599
<v Speaker 4>announced ten million approved accounts on the platform, which was

0:05:45.600 --> 0:05:51.839
<v Speaker 4>a crazy number for US, but Robinhood was already quite

0:05:51.920 --> 0:05:55.640
<v Speaker 4>big even before the pandemic started, So we had ten

0:05:55.640 --> 0:06:00.760
<v Speaker 4>million approved accounts. It was like pretty clear that we

0:06:00.839 --> 0:06:04.080
<v Speaker 4>had created sort of the new era of retail investing

0:06:04.320 --> 0:06:09.920
<v Speaker 4>because before the pandemic we were a Series D company,

0:06:10.080 --> 0:06:12.960
<v Speaker 4>so like late stage private company. I think the valuation

0:06:13.160 --> 0:06:15.760
<v Speaker 4>was something like seven billion. We had a few hundred

0:06:15.839 --> 0:06:19.760
<v Speaker 4>million in annual run rate revenue, and basically the entire

0:06:19.800 --> 0:06:24.159
<v Speaker 4>industry ended up having to replicate our business model in

0:06:24.279 --> 0:06:27.200
<v Speaker 4>order to survive, and not all of them could survive

0:06:27.440 --> 0:06:30.720
<v Speaker 4>as independent entities. You know, tedm Miror Trade had to

0:06:30.920 --> 0:06:34.480
<v Speaker 4>get folded into schwab e Trade, which was sort of

0:06:34.520 --> 0:06:38.920
<v Speaker 4>like the leader of the prior disruptive era in retail trading,

0:06:38.960 --> 0:06:42.080
<v Speaker 4>which was the dot com era, had to get folded

0:06:42.120 --> 0:06:46.680
<v Speaker 4>into Morgan Stanley to survive as a standalone company. And

0:06:46.760 --> 0:06:51.000
<v Speaker 4>so we were already I mean, we had already accelerated

0:06:51.040 --> 0:06:55.080
<v Speaker 4>and kind of turned back the clock. Everyone was saying

0:06:55.080 --> 0:06:59.400
<v Speaker 4>retail trading and investing was over. Everyone was indexing into

0:06:59.440 --> 0:07:02.240
<v Speaker 4>et passive was the new thing. So there was a

0:07:02.240 --> 0:07:05.560
<v Speaker 4>lot of skepticism, but we kind of inverted that, and

0:07:05.600 --> 0:07:09.200
<v Speaker 4>then you had the pandemic, where pretty much across all

0:07:09.240 --> 0:07:12.119
<v Speaker 4>of our business metrics, which we already thought were doing well,

0:07:12.520 --> 0:07:15.760
<v Speaker 4>we kind of increased an order of magnitude. And I

0:07:15.800 --> 0:07:20.800
<v Speaker 4>think the behavior of customers as a result of the

0:07:20.840 --> 0:07:25.240
<v Speaker 4>pandemic is a bit of an intricate question because there

0:07:25.240 --> 0:07:27.360
<v Speaker 4>have been so many things that happened in the macro

0:07:27.520 --> 0:07:30.280
<v Speaker 4>since then, and we have so many different types of customers,

0:07:30.640 --> 0:07:35.120
<v Speaker 4>So to like dramatically oversimplify, you could think of Robinhood

0:07:35.120 --> 0:07:39.280
<v Speaker 4>as having two diametrically different classes of customers. One is

0:07:40.040 --> 0:07:45.120
<v Speaker 4>the active trader, and these are the folks. To give

0:07:45.240 --> 0:07:49.600
<v Speaker 4>like a motorsport analogy, right, the active traders are the

0:07:49.640 --> 0:07:53.280
<v Speaker 4>folks that are like motorheads, Like they care about performance,

0:07:53.560 --> 0:07:56.160
<v Speaker 4>they care about having like really fast cars. They want

0:07:56.200 --> 0:07:58.640
<v Speaker 4>to be at the frontier of technology and innovation.

0:07:59.440 --> 0:08:02.720
<v Speaker 3>Said that people posting loss porn on Wall Street bets.

0:08:02.560 --> 0:08:05.520
<v Speaker 4>Right, not necessarily. I think some of them are. I

0:08:05.520 --> 0:08:07.480
<v Speaker 4>think that that's a more general.

0:08:07.160 --> 0:08:11.120
<v Speaker 2>Can we talk about lost porn later? To keep going,

0:08:11.200 --> 0:08:13.440
<v Speaker 2>These are the folks that are like strapped into their

0:08:13.440 --> 0:08:18.280
<v Speaker 2>battle stations and have like nine monitoring the situation exactly.

0:08:18.440 --> 0:08:21.960
<v Speaker 4>Some of them are incredibly sophisticated and wealthy, and they

0:08:22.000 --> 0:08:25.720
<v Speaker 4>even have Bloomberg terminals, or it would have been sort

0:08:25.720 --> 0:08:29.320
<v Speaker 4>of like the Bloomberg terminal customer. And so that's like

0:08:29.360 --> 0:08:34.160
<v Speaker 4>a higher net worth, very active group, small group, but premium.

0:08:34.640 --> 0:08:38.920
<v Speaker 4>And then we have to come back to the motorsport analogy.

0:08:39.160 --> 0:08:43.079
<v Speaker 4>The folks that buy minivans right the mass market, they

0:08:43.160 --> 0:08:46.600
<v Speaker 4>just want to invest. They want a relatively hands free

0:08:47.280 --> 0:08:51.560
<v Speaker 4>and sort of like low friction way of investing and

0:08:51.600 --> 0:08:56.200
<v Speaker 4>saving for the long term. And we have products that

0:08:57.040 --> 0:08:59.480
<v Speaker 4>serve both of those. So we want to be number

0:08:59.480 --> 0:09:02.400
<v Speaker 4>one in the act trader market. We're rapidly we're rapidly

0:09:02.400 --> 0:09:05.160
<v Speaker 4>gaining market share there. But also we want to be

0:09:05.200 --> 0:09:08.480
<v Speaker 4>the place where if you're a millennial or gen Z customer,

0:09:08.679 --> 0:09:11.400
<v Speaker 4>you put all of your wealth, so you deposit your

0:09:11.440 --> 0:09:15.400
<v Speaker 4>bank account direct deposit in there, you do all of

0:09:15.440 --> 0:09:18.160
<v Speaker 4>your spending with us with our credit card. Of course,

0:09:18.200 --> 0:09:20.880
<v Speaker 4>you do your trading, but you also have your retirement

0:09:20.920 --> 0:09:24.880
<v Speaker 4>account your long term passive investments as well. So we're

0:09:24.920 --> 0:09:29.080
<v Speaker 4>kind of focused on both of these things with two

0:09:29.280 --> 0:09:33.640
<v Speaker 4>very different customer bases. And I say it's oversimplifying because

0:09:34.480 --> 0:09:38.120
<v Speaker 4>you also have customers that have both of these behaviors.

0:09:38.440 --> 0:09:41.320
<v Speaker 4>So a lot of our active traders they also need

0:09:41.360 --> 0:09:44.640
<v Speaker 4>banking tools, they need spending. They have a passive portfolio,

0:09:44.679 --> 0:09:47.760
<v Speaker 4>which can be larger elsewhere, but not everyone is an

0:09:47.800 --> 0:09:52.760
<v Speaker 4>active trader. And so also since COVID, you had a

0:09:52.800 --> 0:09:57.280
<v Speaker 4>whipsaw of low rates, zero interest rate environment which made

0:09:57.320 --> 0:10:02.240
<v Speaker 4>stocks and more speculative, higher growth investments more attractive. But

0:10:02.320 --> 0:10:05.280
<v Speaker 4>then we whipsaw to the highest interest rate environment we've

0:10:05.280 --> 0:10:09.080
<v Speaker 4>seen in multiple decades, and then Robinhood had to respond

0:10:09.360 --> 0:10:13.360
<v Speaker 4>very rapidly and aggressively to survive in that environment. And

0:10:13.400 --> 0:10:17.160
<v Speaker 4>we introduce things like retirement, like the highest apy in

0:10:17.200 --> 0:10:20.880
<v Speaker 4>the industry on cash, so that you could earn interest

0:10:21.000 --> 0:10:24.040
<v Speaker 4>while your cash was sitting there, and you know, just

0:10:24.280 --> 0:10:26.480
<v Speaker 4>a ton of diversification of the business so that our

0:10:26.520 --> 0:10:30.480
<v Speaker 4>customers who became less interested in trading during that time

0:10:31.080 --> 0:10:34.320
<v Speaker 4>could could find ways to you know, take advantage of

0:10:34.320 --> 0:10:36.760
<v Speaker 4>the environment and capitalize with their strategies.

0:10:37.200 --> 0:10:41.160
<v Speaker 3>So, I know, one of the initial competitive advantages you

0:10:41.240 --> 0:10:45.160
<v Speaker 3>had was the zero trading fees, but beyond that, you know,

0:10:45.240 --> 0:10:47.559
<v Speaker 3>I mentioned in the intro that, like, I honestly think

0:10:47.840 --> 0:10:50.760
<v Speaker 3>Robinhood is sort of a I guess a story about

0:10:50.760 --> 0:10:54.320
<v Speaker 3>the importance of user interface, and some people would say

0:10:54.400 --> 0:10:56.720
<v Speaker 3>that's a great thing. You know, users can come on

0:10:56.800 --> 0:11:00.880
<v Speaker 3>and you can transfer money relatively quickly. It's very easy

0:11:00.960 --> 0:11:03.600
<v Speaker 3>to set up and execute a trade. You can basically

0:11:03.760 --> 0:11:06.400
<v Speaker 3>do it without typing very much while you're sitting at

0:11:06.400 --> 0:11:09.920
<v Speaker 3>a bar or in a restaurant or whatever. But you know,

0:11:10.040 --> 0:11:13.319
<v Speaker 3>you also have things like the screen itself is very colorful.

0:11:13.559 --> 0:11:17.040
<v Speaker 3>It photographs well so that people can post those screenshots

0:11:17.120 --> 0:11:21.320
<v Speaker 3>on forums like Wall Street bets. I guess my question is, like,

0:11:22.120 --> 0:11:24.280
<v Speaker 3>to what extent would you attribute the success of the

0:11:24.320 --> 0:11:29.640
<v Speaker 3>company versus old school competitors to that user interface or

0:11:29.679 --> 0:11:33.839
<v Speaker 3>maybe the gamification of stock market trading, which you really,

0:11:33.880 --> 0:11:36.520
<v Speaker 3>you know, you played into at exactly the right moment.

0:11:36.800 --> 0:11:40.480
<v Speaker 4>I reject the gamification premise.

0:11:41.320 --> 0:11:45.319
<v Speaker 3>You don't think the app is designed really well.

0:11:45.400 --> 0:11:47.920
<v Speaker 4>I think it's designed well. But I think when I

0:11:47.920 --> 0:11:51.840
<v Speaker 4>think about so, obviously, I grew up as a gamer,

0:11:52.320 --> 0:11:56.360
<v Speaker 4>so I'm a bit of a student of traditional gamification,

0:11:57.000 --> 0:11:59.839
<v Speaker 4>and when you say gamification to me, it means you know,

0:12:00.120 --> 0:12:05.480
<v Speaker 4>leader boards, social dynamics, and people claim we do all that,

0:12:05.679 --> 0:12:08.120
<v Speaker 4>but we actually do none of it. I think the

0:12:08.160 --> 0:12:12.080
<v Speaker 4>reason Robinhood was successful in the early days is that

0:12:12.160 --> 0:12:15.960
<v Speaker 4>we offered something that nobody else offered, which was commission

0:12:15.960 --> 0:12:19.120
<v Speaker 4>free trading. And I think the reality is if I

0:12:19.160 --> 0:12:21.640
<v Speaker 4>look at the design of the Robinhood app and old

0:12:21.640 --> 0:12:25.720
<v Speaker 4>screenshots of it, I don't think it was particularly easy

0:12:25.760 --> 0:12:27.839
<v Speaker 4>to use. I mean, it was easier to use than

0:12:28.160 --> 0:12:32.679
<v Speaker 4>the competition, maybe because we weren't really competing against traditional

0:12:32.679 --> 0:12:36.200
<v Speaker 4>technology companies that are known for user interface. But I

0:12:36.200 --> 0:12:39.560
<v Speaker 4>think the reality was that the value proposition was so

0:12:39.800 --> 0:12:44.040
<v Speaker 4>strong that people could actually put up with a lot

0:12:44.080 --> 0:12:47.679
<v Speaker 4>of cruft in the user interface to just get the

0:12:47.720 --> 0:12:51.600
<v Speaker 4>core value, which was commission free trading and investing. I

0:12:51.640 --> 0:12:55.240
<v Speaker 4>think over time what happens is as sort of like

0:12:55.280 --> 0:12:59.000
<v Speaker 4>the unique thing we had commission free trading became universal.

0:12:59.559 --> 0:13:05.080
<v Speaker 4>There was like competitive dynamic where the services that reduce friction,

0:13:05.600 --> 0:13:10.199
<v Speaker 4>there's just a natural force to make the services less

0:13:10.200 --> 0:13:13.760
<v Speaker 4>friction full and more easy to use. And I think

0:13:13.760 --> 0:13:17.000
<v Speaker 4>you kind of see that across industries, and that just

0:13:17.080 --> 0:13:20.960
<v Speaker 4>comes from paying close attention to the users, looking at

0:13:20.960 --> 0:13:23.720
<v Speaker 4>their pain points, and having a system where you just

0:13:23.800 --> 0:13:28.040
<v Speaker 4>like systematically reduce those pain points. Like we literally spend

0:13:28.040 --> 0:13:31.920
<v Speaker 4>time sitting with users watching them use the product, see

0:13:31.920 --> 0:13:35.440
<v Speaker 4>the points where they get confused and try to try

0:13:35.480 --> 0:13:37.880
<v Speaker 4>to fix it. And I think you'll see that in

0:13:38.320 --> 0:13:42.480
<v Speaker 4>any technology company. But you know, most companies have become

0:13:42.520 --> 0:13:47.040
<v Speaker 4>technology companies at this point. Any company that's like doing

0:13:47.120 --> 0:13:50.199
<v Speaker 4>a reasonable job, I think will come to the level

0:13:50.200 --> 0:13:54.120
<v Speaker 4>where they're actually doing user feedback and iterations on design

0:13:54.280 --> 0:13:57.560
<v Speaker 4>based on it. If you don't do that nowadays, you'll

0:13:57.679 --> 0:14:00.719
<v Speaker 4>essentially not survive in the in the marketplace.

0:14:07.320 --> 0:14:10.800
<v Speaker 2>Just going back though to that twenty twenty one or

0:14:10.840 --> 0:14:14.000
<v Speaker 2>twenty twenty cohort, you said something interesting, which is that

0:14:14.080 --> 0:14:16.920
<v Speaker 2>some people trade and they have like a more passive

0:14:17.160 --> 0:14:21.080
<v Speaker 2>long term book. They're you know, not people do both.

0:14:21.400 --> 0:14:24.320
<v Speaker 2>The word maturation I don't know, a little condescending, but

0:14:24.560 --> 0:14:27.440
<v Speaker 2>has there been a maturation of that base in some

0:14:27.520 --> 0:14:33.240
<v Speaker 2>sense where people who initially got into trading because it

0:14:33.280 --> 0:14:35.600
<v Speaker 2>looked fun or was exciting, or they were bored, et cetera,

0:14:36.040 --> 0:14:38.840
<v Speaker 2>those customers over time of like Oh, and also long

0:14:38.920 --> 0:14:41.520
<v Speaker 2>term buy and hold in indexing is also something that's

0:14:41.560 --> 0:14:45.080
<v Speaker 2>probably a good idea, Like do you see growth among

0:14:45.120 --> 0:14:47.080
<v Speaker 2>that cohort in terms of what they're interested in?

0:14:47.480 --> 0:14:52.640
<v Speaker 4>Generally every person ends up having a need to invest

0:14:53.040 --> 0:14:53.760
<v Speaker 4>now like.

0:14:53.840 --> 0:14:56.080
<v Speaker 2>An actually invest not just trade when you say.

0:14:56.040 --> 0:15:00.640
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, yeah, so not everyone actually sticks with trading becomes

0:15:00.880 --> 0:15:04.720
<v Speaker 4>an active trader. A lot of people trade more actively

0:15:04.920 --> 0:15:08.560
<v Speaker 4>at first and then eventually end up doing like more

0:15:08.600 --> 0:15:13.040
<v Speaker 4>passive investing. Interesting mostly because they don't if you talk

0:15:13.080 --> 0:15:14.880
<v Speaker 4>to these people, they don't want to put in the

0:15:14.920 --> 0:15:18.520
<v Speaker 4>time to like spend that they have other things to do,

0:15:18.640 --> 0:15:21.160
<v Speaker 4>so they prefer all their investments to be hands off.

0:15:21.400 --> 0:15:25.800
<v Speaker 4>Some people end up trading a lot. And I do

0:15:25.920 --> 0:15:29.760
<v Speaker 4>believe that it's a skill that you could actually get

0:15:29.800 --> 0:15:33.400
<v Speaker 4>better at and improve at. And you know, not everyone

0:15:33.640 --> 0:15:36.160
<v Speaker 4>actually wants to put in the time and effort to

0:15:36.920 --> 0:15:39.840
<v Speaker 4>do that, And so we serve those people with other tools,

0:15:39.920 --> 0:15:42.360
<v Speaker 4>you know, retirement accounts. We have a new product that

0:15:42.400 --> 0:15:46.400
<v Speaker 4>we rolled out called Robinhood Strategies that you just deposit

0:15:46.520 --> 0:15:49.400
<v Speaker 4>money and it'll invest for you and of course give

0:15:49.440 --> 0:15:50.200
<v Speaker 4>you the rational.

0:15:50.400 --> 0:15:52.680
<v Speaker 3>Is that like copy trading or is this different?

0:15:52.880 --> 0:15:56.720
<v Speaker 4>It's it's a digital advisory product. Okay, so it's a yeah,

0:15:56.880 --> 0:16:00.600
<v Speaker 4>we have a registerant investment advisor and it will this.

0:16:00.800 --> 0:16:03.120
<v Speaker 2>Is it the closer betterment or something like that sort

0:16:03.120 --> 0:16:04.920
<v Speaker 2>of business like the sort of robo.

0:16:04.800 --> 0:16:07.680
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, it's similar to a robo except there's a couple

0:16:07.720 --> 0:16:11.720
<v Speaker 4>of interesting elements. One is your fee is capped. It's

0:16:11.720 --> 0:16:15.240
<v Speaker 4>capped at two hundred and fifty dollars per year if

0:16:15.280 --> 0:16:18.440
<v Speaker 4>you have one hundred thousand in your account. So most

0:16:18.680 --> 0:16:22.760
<v Speaker 4>robo products, even though they're lower cost than traditional advisors,

0:16:23.240 --> 0:16:26.040
<v Speaker 4>get more expensive for you the more money you put

0:16:26.040 --> 0:16:29.160
<v Speaker 4>in there. And we thought that was like fundamentally broken.

0:16:29.320 --> 0:16:32.720
<v Speaker 4>As you put more money, the service should get more

0:16:32.760 --> 0:16:34.960
<v Speaker 4>compelling for you. You should feel like you're getting more

0:16:35.040 --> 0:16:40.120
<v Speaker 4>value because the overall relationship to Robinhood is much more valuable.

0:16:40.560 --> 0:16:42.760
<v Speaker 4>So we sort of like inverted the model so that

0:16:42.800 --> 0:16:45.480
<v Speaker 4>it actually on a percentage basis, gets cheaper the more

0:16:45.520 --> 0:16:50.200
<v Speaker 4>money you have. And then also we have these personalized insights.

0:16:50.320 --> 0:16:53.560
<v Speaker 4>Every time something happens to your portfolio, you can read

0:16:53.600 --> 0:16:56.280
<v Speaker 4>about it and why we made that change, and you

0:16:56.320 --> 0:17:00.200
<v Speaker 4>can also listen to us explain it via audio, which

0:17:00.200 --> 0:17:03.560
<v Speaker 4>has been really really popular for our customers.

0:17:03.800 --> 0:17:06.040
<v Speaker 3>Well, this leads into something that I want to ask

0:17:06.080 --> 0:17:09.440
<v Speaker 3>you actually, which is you're doing all these different things now,

0:17:09.440 --> 0:17:11.760
<v Speaker 3>and you clearly have ambitions to be a sort of

0:17:11.800 --> 0:17:16.280
<v Speaker 3>like one stop shop for everyone's financial needs. How do

0:17:16.320 --> 0:17:20.880
<v Speaker 3>you actually decide which new products or which new capabilities

0:17:21.200 --> 0:17:24.720
<v Speaker 3>to expand into. Is it a case of like, Okay,

0:17:24.720 --> 0:17:27.280
<v Speaker 3>well people are on the platform, they're trading, so maybe

0:17:27.320 --> 0:17:30.639
<v Speaker 3>they would be interested in some sort of robo advisory service.

0:17:30.760 --> 0:17:33.320
<v Speaker 3>Or is it you look at the competitive landscape and

0:17:33.359 --> 0:17:36.440
<v Speaker 3>you think like, well, this company has you know, they're

0:17:36.520 --> 0:17:38.879
<v Speaker 3>using cobol or something like that, and they can't do

0:17:39.359 --> 0:17:41.080
<v Speaker 3>what we can do with a new tech stack, and

0:17:41.119 --> 0:17:44.040
<v Speaker 3>so there's an opportunity there. How do you assess all

0:17:44.080 --> 0:17:47.040
<v Speaker 3>those different opportunities and then ultimately decide what you want

0:17:47.080 --> 0:17:47.320
<v Speaker 3>to do.

0:17:47.880 --> 0:17:53.160
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, basically our business strategy falls into three buckets, and

0:17:53.240 --> 0:17:56.560
<v Speaker 4>you can kind of align that with time horizon arcs.

0:17:56.680 --> 0:17:58.800
<v Speaker 4>So we have sort of like a near term arc

0:17:59.440 --> 0:18:02.320
<v Speaker 4>which we're in the climax of right now, which is

0:18:02.760 --> 0:18:05.960
<v Speaker 4>to be the number one platform for active traders. If

0:18:05.960 --> 0:18:08.000
<v Speaker 4>you're an active trader, you know, if you're one of

0:18:08.040 --> 0:18:11.040
<v Speaker 4>these people that has the six terminals in front of

0:18:11.080 --> 0:18:13.600
<v Speaker 4>you and you've got your battle station, we want to

0:18:13.600 --> 0:18:16.600
<v Speaker 4>make it clear that you're at a disadvantage using any

0:18:16.640 --> 0:18:19.639
<v Speaker 4>other platform. And these folks are at the frontier of

0:18:19.680 --> 0:18:24.560
<v Speaker 4>technology and innovation. So twenty four Robinhood, twenty four hour

0:18:24.640 --> 0:18:28.439
<v Speaker 4>Market is an example there. It's not just about better

0:18:28.520 --> 0:18:31.680
<v Speaker 4>tools and interfaces, although that's a part of it. It's

0:18:31.720 --> 0:18:35.200
<v Speaker 4>also having things that are not available elsewhere. Twenty four

0:18:35.200 --> 0:18:38.600
<v Speaker 4>hour market being probably the best example there, and that's

0:18:38.640 --> 0:18:42.080
<v Speaker 4>become very, very popular. And you're literally at a disadvantage

0:18:42.119 --> 0:18:44.199
<v Speaker 4>if you're not using Robinhood because if you need to

0:18:44.240 --> 0:18:47.760
<v Speaker 4>manage your risk on a Sunday night, our platform offers

0:18:47.800 --> 0:18:51.240
<v Speaker 4>access to equity markets and you know those aren't easily

0:18:51.280 --> 0:18:54.399
<v Speaker 4>found elsewhere. So that's the near term mark. Then we

0:18:54.480 --> 0:18:57.280
<v Speaker 4>have sort of a medium five year arc, which is

0:18:57.280 --> 0:18:59.840
<v Speaker 4>being number one in wallet share for the next generation

0:19:00.320 --> 0:19:03.399
<v Speaker 4>and that's millennials and Gen Z for now. But we

0:19:03.440 --> 0:19:06.800
<v Speaker 4>don't want to also get stuck in the millennial and

0:19:06.920 --> 0:19:09.639
<v Speaker 4>Gen Z bucket. We always want to be relevant to

0:19:09.640 --> 0:19:12.199
<v Speaker 4>the needs of the next generation as they evolve.

0:19:12.560 --> 0:19:16.880
<v Speaker 3>Of course, Wait, what generation are you saying you are

0:19:17.240 --> 0:19:19.920
<v Speaker 3>of Gen XENX.

0:19:19.320 --> 0:19:21.560
<v Speaker 4>Well, you're in the other direction, Yeah, you're the other

0:19:21.920 --> 0:19:22.560
<v Speaker 4>gen Alpha.

0:19:22.680 --> 0:19:24.240
<v Speaker 3>I thought you were saying that you're really young.

0:19:24.320 --> 0:19:26.440
<v Speaker 2>Oh no, no, no, I want to make sure that there's

0:19:26.480 --> 0:19:28.919
<v Speaker 2>still financial services that cater to old people.

0:19:30.000 --> 0:19:33.800
<v Speaker 4>Gen X. I would say it's a simplification. I mean

0:19:33.800 --> 0:19:37.119
<v Speaker 4>there's Gen X and baby boomers that love Robinhood. I

0:19:37.200 --> 0:19:40.840
<v Speaker 4>think the common ground is actually less your age and

0:19:40.920 --> 0:19:44.240
<v Speaker 4>more how digitally savvy you are. Like, if you're comfortable

0:19:44.359 --> 0:19:48.399
<v Speaker 4>doing digital banking and financial services on your phone, you know,

0:19:48.440 --> 0:19:51.040
<v Speaker 4>you could be eighty years old and really enjoy Robinhood.

0:19:51.080 --> 0:19:54.800
<v Speaker 4>But you know, some people, particularly as they're older, prefer

0:19:54.880 --> 0:19:57.679
<v Speaker 4>to go in person and talk to a human and

0:19:58.040 --> 0:20:01.359
<v Speaker 4>I think we're a laggard in developed those types of services.

0:20:01.840 --> 0:20:05.399
<v Speaker 4>So the second arc medium term mark of being the

0:20:05.400 --> 0:20:08.240
<v Speaker 4>place where you put all of your money, we basically

0:20:08.280 --> 0:20:12.920
<v Speaker 4>look at a few things there. One is where are

0:20:12.920 --> 0:20:15.639
<v Speaker 4>people withdrawing to if you take your money out of

0:20:15.760 --> 0:20:19.760
<v Speaker 4>Robinhood to do something, can we just better serve that

0:20:19.960 --> 0:20:22.920
<v Speaker 4>within our ecosystem. So you know, for example, a lot

0:20:22.920 --> 0:20:25.359
<v Speaker 4>of people took money off of Robinhood to pay their bills.

0:20:26.000 --> 0:20:28.760
<v Speaker 4>So we saw that and we thought that was a

0:20:28.760 --> 0:20:31.280
<v Speaker 4>great opportunity to just allow them to pay their bills

0:20:31.720 --> 0:20:35.200
<v Speaker 4>via us. So we launched the Robinhood Gold Card, which

0:20:35.240 --> 0:20:37.880
<v Speaker 4>you know, in my opinion I'm biased, is the best

0:20:37.880 --> 0:20:40.720
<v Speaker 4>credit card on the market by a wide margin. Three

0:20:40.760 --> 0:20:43.680
<v Speaker 4>percent cash back on all categories, which you have to

0:20:43.720 --> 0:20:46.760
<v Speaker 4>be a high net worth individual to get coupled with

0:20:46.840 --> 0:20:49.800
<v Speaker 4>a very nice user interface that lets you create virtual

0:20:49.880 --> 0:20:53.160
<v Speaker 4>cards on demand. You can add your whole family help

0:20:53.240 --> 0:20:56.520
<v Speaker 4>them build their credit. So that's just an example of

0:20:56.840 --> 0:20:58.880
<v Speaker 4>how we think about it. But for each of these

0:20:58.920 --> 0:21:02.840
<v Speaker 4>products individual, I don't think it's enough to come up

0:21:02.880 --> 0:21:05.000
<v Speaker 4>with the category. I think we have to have a

0:21:05.040 --> 0:21:08.119
<v Speaker 4>great idea for how we can make the economics better

0:21:08.160 --> 0:21:11.600
<v Speaker 4>for users and also how to make the user experience better.

0:21:11.800 --> 0:21:14.199
<v Speaker 4>And when we have that combination, I think that's the

0:21:14.359 --> 0:21:19.040
<v Speaker 4>ingredient to a successful Robinhood product. I should mention the

0:21:19.080 --> 0:21:21.440
<v Speaker 4>third arc because that's the long term away and it's

0:21:21.480 --> 0:21:24.600
<v Speaker 4>pretty relevant here given the event we just had in

0:21:24.640 --> 0:21:27.760
<v Speaker 4>the South of France. It's called building the number one

0:21:27.800 --> 0:21:30.520
<v Speaker 4>global financial ecosystem and what that.

0:21:30.560 --> 0:21:31.760
<v Speaker 3>Means all just that.

0:21:32.080 --> 0:21:34.399
<v Speaker 4>Yes, so that's a long term mark, so it's going

0:21:34.480 --> 0:21:38.919
<v Speaker 4>to take a while, like ten years, But basically it

0:21:39.000 --> 0:21:44.399
<v Speaker 4>involves expanding Robinhood across two linearly independent vectors. One is

0:21:44.680 --> 0:21:47.919
<v Speaker 4>from US only to fully global and the other is

0:21:47.960 --> 0:21:51.440
<v Speaker 4>from retail only to business and institutional, and that's where

0:21:51.440 --> 0:21:56.400
<v Speaker 4>we get into really interesting platform aspects like tokenization.

0:21:56.880 --> 0:22:00.280
<v Speaker 2>So let me talk to me about equity token here's

0:22:00.280 --> 0:22:04.040
<v Speaker 2>my question, in what year tell me about equity tokenization.

0:22:04.480 --> 0:22:07.280
<v Speaker 2>You know, I'm thinking about like a stable coin is

0:22:07.320 --> 0:22:11.199
<v Speaker 2>a tokenized dollar, right, so obviously a you could do

0:22:11.280 --> 0:22:14.280
<v Speaker 2>the same thing where you have like a stock, tesla

0:22:14.359 --> 0:22:16.840
<v Speaker 2>whatever in crypto form, et cetera, and it trades on

0:22:16.920 --> 0:22:20.320
<v Speaker 2>a chain twenty four to seven. In what year will

0:22:20.400 --> 0:22:24.439
<v Speaker 2>I be able to trade any stock twenty four to

0:22:24.440 --> 0:22:25.560
<v Speaker 2>seven on chain?

0:22:26.200 --> 0:22:30.359
<v Speaker 4>Well, if you are a European customer, definitely twenty twenty five.

0:22:30.840 --> 0:22:33.879
<v Speaker 4>So what we announce in our event to catch a

0:22:33.880 --> 0:22:38.800
<v Speaker 4>token in the South of France is stock tokens by Robinhood,

0:22:39.119 --> 0:22:45.240
<v Speaker 4>which are essentially tokenized US equities and ETFs. We also

0:22:45.840 --> 0:22:49.600
<v Speaker 4>did a giveaway of tokenized shares of SpaceX, which is

0:22:49.680 --> 0:22:54.639
<v Speaker 4>very exciting, and that the technology for both is ready

0:22:54.800 --> 0:22:58.600
<v Speaker 4>right now. It's working for tokenized equities, you can trade

0:22:58.600 --> 0:23:00.800
<v Speaker 4>them twenty four to five right now, but twenty four

0:23:00.840 --> 0:23:03.480
<v Speaker 4>to seven is coming over the next few months and

0:23:03.600 --> 0:23:09.280
<v Speaker 4>will also unlock full on chain capabilities, so swapping, collateralized

0:23:09.359 --> 0:23:12.959
<v Speaker 4>lending and borrowing anything you can do in DeFi. So

0:23:13.000 --> 0:23:17.959
<v Speaker 4>the barrier to adoption in the US kind of mirrors

0:23:18.119 --> 0:23:21.040
<v Speaker 4>what we saw on stable coin. The technology is there,

0:23:21.560 --> 0:23:23.800
<v Speaker 4>it's available in Europe, it'll be available in a bunch

0:23:23.840 --> 0:23:28.560
<v Speaker 4>of jurisdictions. It's all just regulatory clarity, which we're hopeful

0:23:28.600 --> 0:23:32.920
<v Speaker 4>will come later this year. But it's not a technological

0:23:32.960 --> 0:23:34.080
<v Speaker 4>barrier by any means.

0:23:34.440 --> 0:23:37.199
<v Speaker 3>Why is tokenization a part of it if we're not

0:23:37.280 --> 0:23:41.400
<v Speaker 3>really solving a technological problem but a regulatory problem.

0:23:42.000 --> 0:23:47.040
<v Speaker 4>Well, tokenization solves a lot of problems, but the necessary

0:23:47.080 --> 0:23:50.280
<v Speaker 4>piece to make it available to the US is essentially

0:23:50.280 --> 0:23:54.879
<v Speaker 4>a regulatory issue. We just need rules of cryptoregulation and

0:23:54.960 --> 0:23:57.920
<v Speaker 4>for the private stock side, which is also an interesting

0:23:57.960 --> 0:24:00.720
<v Speaker 4>element because there you start to really see the benefits

0:24:00.720 --> 0:24:01.480
<v Speaker 4>of tokenization.

0:24:03.119 --> 0:24:06.159
<v Speaker 3>What does tokenization do? What does it allow you to do?

0:24:06.359 --> 0:24:10.280
<v Speaker 4>Yeah? So tokenization takes an asset and puts it on

0:24:10.480 --> 0:24:15.000
<v Speaker 4>chain and essentially makes it tradable twenty four to seven,

0:24:15.640 --> 0:24:18.320
<v Speaker 4>just like a stock or a crypto asset would be.

0:24:18.600 --> 0:24:21.640
<v Speaker 4>So you can buy or sell it on a crypto exchange.

0:24:21.640 --> 0:24:24.120
<v Speaker 3>But why can't I can buy or sell a stock? Right?

0:24:24.200 --> 0:24:24.280
<v Speaker 1>Like?

0:24:24.960 --> 0:24:25.760
<v Speaker 3>What are we doing here?

0:24:25.920 --> 0:24:28.639
<v Speaker 2>What is the different? What does the tokenization accomplished that

0:24:28.680 --> 0:24:31.800
<v Speaker 2>you can't just do on a database that you can

0:24:31.800 --> 0:24:32.440
<v Speaker 2>buy stock com?

0:24:32.920 --> 0:24:36.760
<v Speaker 4>Yeah? So good? Question, I think the answer is slightly

0:24:36.800 --> 0:24:39.320
<v Speaker 4>different if we're talking about a customer in the US

0:24:39.520 --> 0:24:43.200
<v Speaker 4>versus internationally, and I'll explain why. So in the US,

0:24:43.520 --> 0:24:47.760
<v Speaker 4>we already have a pretty robust financial system. Robinhood exists,

0:24:48.040 --> 0:24:51.440
<v Speaker 4>right and you can onboard on Robinhood and buy stocks.

0:24:51.920 --> 0:24:53.800
<v Speaker 4>You can buy them twenty four or five, which is

0:24:53.840 --> 0:24:59.439
<v Speaker 4>pretty good. So there the delta between the tokenized experience

0:25:00.119 --> 0:25:04.040
<v Speaker 4>and what you have currently would be expanding to twenty

0:25:04.040 --> 0:25:08.760
<v Speaker 4>four to seven. And also, eventually when we plug into DeFi,

0:25:09.000 --> 0:25:12.480
<v Speaker 4>making all of the DeFi aspects which are right now

0:25:12.480 --> 0:25:17.160
<v Speaker 4>a little bit more niche but incredibly powerful available. So collateralize,

0:25:17.240 --> 0:25:21.720
<v Speaker 4>lending and borrowing self custody. Self custody is interesting. So

0:25:21.920 --> 0:25:26.240
<v Speaker 4>right now, your stock in your Robinhood or other brokerage

0:25:26.240 --> 0:25:29.920
<v Speaker 4>account is kind of locked into a broker. So let's

0:25:29.960 --> 0:25:33.200
<v Speaker 4>say that broker has issues, you got tech technical outage,

0:25:33.600 --> 0:25:37.080
<v Speaker 4>You're kind of stuck. But if the stock were to

0:25:37.119 --> 0:25:42.640
<v Speaker 4>be tokenized, not only would it become seamless to use

0:25:42.800 --> 0:25:45.800
<v Speaker 4>another broker you just kind of attached to your wallet,

0:25:46.320 --> 0:25:48.160
<v Speaker 4>but the reliability would be much higher.

0:25:48.200 --> 0:25:50.199
<v Speaker 2>I also want to have to worry about losing my

0:25:51.200 --> 0:25:55.360
<v Speaker 2>seed phrase when I have stock in a traditional brokerage.

0:25:55.400 --> 0:25:56.800
<v Speaker 2>Is that something that people are going to have to

0:25:56.840 --> 0:25:58.680
<v Speaker 2>think about if they're trading tokenized equity.

0:25:58.880 --> 0:26:03.399
<v Speaker 4>It's less concerning with traditional assets because there's always going

0:26:03.480 --> 0:26:07.000
<v Speaker 4>to be a process to connect your token with the

0:26:07.040 --> 0:26:11.800
<v Speaker 4>real asset. So you know, it's a big problem with bitcoin,

0:26:12.240 --> 0:26:16.280
<v Speaker 4>for example, because there's no like physical representation. But if

0:26:16.280 --> 0:26:19.680
<v Speaker 4>you have a tokenized dollar or an asset, you will

0:26:19.720 --> 0:26:22.280
<v Speaker 4>be able to there will be a process where you

0:26:22.320 --> 0:26:23.760
<v Speaker 4>can claim the actual real thing.

0:26:24.000 --> 0:26:28.320
<v Speaker 2>Sorry, just to press on this further, I'm trying to understand. Okay,

0:26:28.359 --> 0:26:31.640
<v Speaker 2>So a tokenized equity and it's gonna I think, what's

0:26:31.680 --> 0:26:35.919
<v Speaker 2>the chain. You're using arbitrum like arbitrum at first, but

0:26:36.040 --> 0:26:40.160
<v Speaker 2>not for long. We're actually rolling out our own blockchain. Oh,

0:26:40.280 --> 0:26:41.720
<v Speaker 2>you're gonna have a base competitor.

0:26:42.080 --> 0:26:44.040
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, in a way. I mean it's just a layer

0:26:44.840 --> 0:26:47.879
<v Speaker 4>on top of arbitrum. Then, uh, it's it's gonna be

0:26:48.119 --> 0:26:51.600
<v Speaker 4>on top of etherium. It's a layer two.

0:26:51.840 --> 0:26:54.639
<v Speaker 2>Okay, so you're building your you're building your own ethereum

0:26:54.720 --> 0:26:58.159
<v Speaker 2>layer two. Huh. Setting asaid Europe or the United States.

0:26:58.800 --> 0:27:03.520
<v Speaker 2>Random person who has as some USDC in Indonesia, will

0:27:03.520 --> 0:27:05.280
<v Speaker 2>they be able to interact with this and then have

0:27:05.320 --> 0:27:07.000
<v Speaker 2>Tesla exposure eventually.

0:27:07.080 --> 0:27:08.720
<v Speaker 4>Yes, that's the plan, and so like.

0:27:08.760 --> 0:27:11.440
<v Speaker 2>Right now, if I want to own Tesla shares through

0:27:11.520 --> 0:27:14.760
<v Speaker 2>robin hood, like I tell you my name and I

0:27:14.920 --> 0:27:19.480
<v Speaker 2>presumably give you some identifying information, etc. But in the future,

0:27:20.119 --> 0:27:23.199
<v Speaker 2>in theory, anyone will be able to get exposure to

0:27:23.320 --> 0:27:27.120
<v Speaker 2>these assets without actually having to reveal anything about themselves

0:27:27.119 --> 0:27:30.480
<v Speaker 2>because they're just interacting pseudanonymously on chain.

0:27:31.480 --> 0:27:35.639
<v Speaker 4>In large part, yes, there's some caveats where, depending on

0:27:35.720 --> 0:27:40.640
<v Speaker 4>the jurisdiction, we might have to like KYC, some elements

0:27:40.640 --> 0:27:44.720
<v Speaker 4>of the experience. For example, minting and burning the actual

0:27:44.880 --> 0:27:48.840
<v Speaker 4>physical stocks and turning them back and forth into tokens

0:27:48.960 --> 0:27:52.359
<v Speaker 4>will likely require KYC. But yeah, in the same way

0:27:52.400 --> 0:27:56.760
<v Speaker 4>that you can transfer a token I stable coin on chain,

0:27:56.960 --> 0:28:01.239
<v Speaker 4>you'll be able to transfer token ise stocks identically and

0:28:01.359 --> 0:28:04.280
<v Speaker 4>kind of in the same for the same reasons that

0:28:04.960 --> 0:28:09.400
<v Speaker 4>stable coins have become more popular and have really gained

0:28:10.040 --> 0:28:14.359
<v Speaker 4>mass adoption outside of the US. First, just because outside

0:28:14.400 --> 0:28:16.320
<v Speaker 4>of the US it's much harder to get a hold

0:28:16.359 --> 0:28:21.000
<v Speaker 4>of US dollars. Token ice stocks I think will gain

0:28:22.520 --> 0:28:25.399
<v Speaker 4>a ton of adoption outside of the US before the

0:28:25.440 --> 0:28:28.960
<v Speaker 4>benefits and the technology accruing to the US and kind

0:28:29.000 --> 0:28:31.320
<v Speaker 4>of disrupting the structure here.

0:28:31.520 --> 0:28:33.080
<v Speaker 3>And so just to be clear, if I have a

0:28:33.119 --> 0:28:35.640
<v Speaker 3>token ied stock, I can stake that right and use

0:28:35.680 --> 0:28:36.880
<v Speaker 3>it to do other things.

0:28:37.480 --> 0:28:40.400
<v Speaker 4>You will be able to connect it to all of

0:28:40.440 --> 0:28:44.200
<v Speaker 4>the DeFi capabilities. Now exactly what those are. I think

0:28:44.200 --> 0:28:47.080
<v Speaker 4>we're going to have a developer ecosystem and they're going

0:28:47.160 --> 0:28:50.040
<v Speaker 4>to have to build a whole bunch of things. But yeah,

0:28:50.280 --> 0:28:53.400
<v Speaker 4>you can put it in pools and to collateralize lending pools.

0:28:53.920 --> 0:28:59.440
<v Speaker 4>Staking is interesting because technically staking is dedicating tokens and

0:28:59.480 --> 0:29:04.400
<v Speaker 4>resource is to support the network itself. And so when

0:29:04.440 --> 0:29:06.600
<v Speaker 4>you say staking a stock, a lot of people actually

0:29:06.680 --> 0:29:09.080
<v Speaker 4>mean lending it, which which I think will be able

0:29:09.120 --> 0:29:10.920
<v Speaker 4>to be done eventually.

0:29:11.480 --> 0:29:12.960
<v Speaker 2>But could you stake it.

0:29:12.880 --> 0:29:15.320
<v Speaker 3>To support the network sort of old school as well.

0:29:15.680 --> 0:29:17.640
<v Speaker 4>I think the way that that would actually work is

0:29:17.680 --> 0:29:22.280
<v Speaker 4>you'd have to convert that into the network gas token

0:29:23.200 --> 0:29:25.440
<v Speaker 4>and and you would stake it that way. But I

0:29:25.440 --> 0:29:27.960
<v Speaker 4>think it's a little bit early for us to get

0:29:28.000 --> 0:29:28.520
<v Speaker 4>into yet.

0:29:29.120 --> 0:29:32.200
<v Speaker 3>So you mentioned that you're only doing this on arbitrump

0:29:32.240 --> 0:29:35.560
<v Speaker 3>for a short amount of time, and then you're transitioning

0:29:35.640 --> 0:29:41.120
<v Speaker 3>to your own tech. Why, I guess is my question, like,

0:29:41.160 --> 0:29:44.840
<v Speaker 3>why start there and then do your your own layer

0:29:44.960 --> 0:29:46.920
<v Speaker 3>versus just starting out with your own thing.

0:29:47.880 --> 0:29:53.360
<v Speaker 4>I think that the ambition is to actually make this

0:29:53.480 --> 0:29:57.240
<v Speaker 4>the best chain for real world assets. So we're starting

0:29:57.280 --> 0:30:02.640
<v Speaker 4>with stocks. We're also doing private stocks as well, but

0:30:03.360 --> 0:30:06.720
<v Speaker 4>we want to tokenize everything that people would want to

0:30:06.800 --> 0:30:10.440
<v Speaker 4>make tradable, so you can imagine real estate in the future,

0:30:10.880 --> 0:30:14.320
<v Speaker 4>you can imagine carbon credits, really anything.

0:30:14.600 --> 0:30:16.520
<v Speaker 3>But if you're going to use ethereum, then why not

0:30:16.640 --> 0:30:19.200
<v Speaker 3>start out with Ethereum rather than arbitrum.

0:30:19.440 --> 0:30:23.160
<v Speaker 4>Ethereum is the base layer one, and the problem with

0:30:23.360 --> 0:30:29.240
<v Speaker 4>transacting directly on ethereum is that the fees can be

0:30:29.320 --> 0:30:32.520
<v Speaker 4>quite high. So that that's why Arbitrum, which is a

0:30:32.600 --> 0:30:37.120
<v Speaker 4>layer on top of Ethereum, they've been able to essentially

0:30:37.760 --> 0:30:41.280
<v Speaker 4>consolidate lots and lots of transactions and sync up to

0:30:41.360 --> 0:30:45.840
<v Speaker 4>the base layer one chain at an infrequent cadence, and

0:30:45.840 --> 0:30:47.800
<v Speaker 4>that way you can kind of like split up what

0:30:47.840 --> 0:30:50.800
<v Speaker 4>would be a large transaction fee into lots and lots

0:30:50.800 --> 0:30:54.959
<v Speaker 4>of small transactions and get the costs down from you know,

0:30:55.040 --> 0:30:59.120
<v Speaker 4>high coction, high congestion. You know, Ethereum could be multiples,

0:30:59.360 --> 0:31:05.320
<v Speaker 4>multiple doll per transaction down to like individual sense, you know,

0:31:05.520 --> 0:31:06.480
<v Speaker 4>a handful of sense.

0:31:07.200 --> 0:31:10.000
<v Speaker 3>And I know we've been having this conversation for years now,

0:31:10.120 --> 0:31:12.720
<v Speaker 3>but what happens to the gas fees? What if this

0:31:12.880 --> 0:31:17.040
<v Speaker 3>really takes off and people start using the service en mass?

0:31:17.920 --> 0:31:22.000
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I mean, the gas fees are very scalable. Part

0:31:22.080 --> 0:31:26.160
<v Speaker 4>part of the benefits of being a layer on top

0:31:26.200 --> 0:31:28.840
<v Speaker 4>of the chain is to some degree we'll be running

0:31:28.920 --> 0:31:33.080
<v Speaker 4>sequencers and we'll be able to handle the gas fees.

0:31:33.120 --> 0:31:36.480
<v Speaker 4>And I think that the goal would be for this

0:31:36.560 --> 0:31:40.880
<v Speaker 4>to be essentially transaction costs or very very low costs.

0:31:48.160 --> 0:31:52.040
<v Speaker 2>You obviously as part of the core company competitive advantages,

0:31:52.040 --> 0:31:54.320
<v Speaker 2>building tech right and building And one of the things

0:31:54.320 --> 0:31:56.200
<v Speaker 2>that you did several years ago is you built your

0:31:56.240 --> 0:32:01.520
<v Speaker 2>own clearing stack instead of you know, using some third

0:32:01.520 --> 0:32:04.480
<v Speaker 2>party company, I forget what it was, you know, could

0:32:04.520 --> 0:32:08.600
<v Speaker 2>you in your vision for Robinhood, could you ever see

0:32:08.640 --> 0:32:11.040
<v Speaker 2>whitelisting some of your own tech? You know, I think

0:32:11.040 --> 0:32:15.080
<v Speaker 2>about like Amazon and eventually it built its own computers

0:32:15.080 --> 0:32:16.720
<v Speaker 2>and then it started selling them, and then it started

0:32:16.760 --> 0:32:20.400
<v Speaker 2>selling its warehouse capacity. As you build up these capacities,

0:32:20.480 --> 0:32:23.880
<v Speaker 2>could you see selling it to other FinTechs or access

0:32:23.920 --> 0:32:26.000
<v Speaker 2>to these platforms.

0:32:26.280 --> 0:32:30.320
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, and I think tokenized stock tokens is a great

0:32:30.360 --> 0:32:33.080
<v Speaker 4>example of that. So I think that that could become

0:32:33.080 --> 0:32:37.440
<v Speaker 4>a standard. If you're another fintech Yeah, and you know

0:32:37.480 --> 0:32:40.680
<v Speaker 4>you're you may not be offering stocks to your customers.

0:32:40.680 --> 0:32:43.200
<v Speaker 4>Maybe you have a big international presence and you want

0:32:43.200 --> 0:32:47.400
<v Speaker 4>to add stocks. You would just be able to integrate

0:32:47.480 --> 0:32:50.480
<v Speaker 4>with our chain and then those stocks would be available

0:32:50.600 --> 0:32:54.960
<v Speaker 4>to your customers. We also have a service called robinhood Connect,

0:32:55.520 --> 0:33:01.200
<v Speaker 4>which essentially took our trading services at were that we've

0:33:01.240 --> 0:33:05.520
<v Speaker 4>optimized so finally for our own first party app and

0:33:05.600 --> 0:33:08.960
<v Speaker 4>made them available to third party developers. So, if you're

0:33:09.280 --> 0:33:13.600
<v Speaker 4>a non custodial wallet provider like a Moonshot or Uni

0:33:13.640 --> 0:33:17.479
<v Speaker 4>Swap or meta mask, you have this problem of how

0:33:17.840 --> 0:33:22.280
<v Speaker 4>do you streamline people getting their dollars into crypto and

0:33:22.400 --> 0:33:25.120
<v Speaker 4>back out to dollars if they want to. So robinhood

0:33:25.120 --> 0:33:29.320
<v Speaker 4>Connect offers, you know, one of the lowest rates to

0:33:29.400 --> 0:33:32.320
<v Speaker 4>do that, just because we've optimized that so much that

0:33:32.880 --> 0:33:35.400
<v Speaker 4>you know, handing that out and giving that service to

0:33:35.520 --> 0:33:39.320
<v Speaker 4>third parties is now easy for us to do. So

0:33:39.360 --> 0:33:42.160
<v Speaker 4>we're going to continue to iterate on that the chain

0:33:42.240 --> 0:33:46.320
<v Speaker 4>will be full fledged developer platform, made available to third parties,

0:33:47.040 --> 0:33:50.240
<v Speaker 4>and we always will continue to look for opportunities in

0:33:50.280 --> 0:33:54.560
<v Speaker 4>the future to have our tech. I wouldn't call it

0:33:54.640 --> 0:33:58.680
<v Speaker 4>white labeled, but at least made available to institutions and

0:33:59.160 --> 0:33:59.920
<v Speaker 4>other customers.

0:34:00.080 --> 0:34:02.680
<v Speaker 2>You know what's really interesting to me. I was thinking about,

0:34:02.720 --> 0:34:07.080
<v Speaker 2>like several years ago, when crypto started taking off, and

0:34:07.080 --> 0:34:09.320
<v Speaker 2>I used to make fun of these people when cryptos started,

0:34:09.320 --> 0:34:12.600
<v Speaker 2>when crypto started taking off, and you'd get these conferences

0:34:12.960 --> 0:34:15.600
<v Speaker 2>and people would go on panels and they say, well,

0:34:15.640 --> 0:34:18.160
<v Speaker 2>we're really we're really interested in blockchain.

0:34:17.719 --> 0:34:19.600
<v Speaker 3>Tech, not baitcoin, but block We're.

0:34:19.480 --> 0:34:22.839
<v Speaker 2>Really interested in blockchain technology, not bitcoin. And I never

0:34:22.880 --> 0:34:24.600
<v Speaker 2>really knew what it meant, and it didn't seem to

0:34:24.600 --> 0:34:26.960
<v Speaker 2>go anywhere, and it just seemed like a way like, Okay,

0:34:27.000 --> 0:34:30.200
<v Speaker 2>if I like worked for like a big whatever, big

0:34:30.280 --> 0:34:33.319
<v Speaker 2>legacy financial institution, I want to sound smart, I want

0:34:33.360 --> 0:34:35.600
<v Speaker 2>to get invited to panels. I say like, oh, we're

0:34:35.600 --> 0:34:38.400
<v Speaker 2>really excited about the blockchain here totally yeah, But actually

0:34:38.400 --> 0:34:40.600
<v Speaker 2>it kind of sounds like maybe they're being vindicated a little.

0:34:40.640 --> 0:34:43.040
<v Speaker 4>Well, you've noticed that I'm not using the word blockchain

0:34:43.160 --> 0:34:44.040
<v Speaker 4>or web three.

0:34:44.000 --> 0:34:45.759
<v Speaker 2>But you're using it, we're talking about the you're talking

0:34:45.760 --> 0:34:50.120
<v Speaker 2>about the the idea of chains. Yeah, and like I might,

0:34:50.400 --> 0:34:52.520
<v Speaker 2>like I'm kind of sitting here at twenty twenty five,

0:34:52.560 --> 0:34:54.360
<v Speaker 2>and it's like, maybe I shouldn't have made fun of

0:34:54.360 --> 0:34:56.799
<v Speaker 2>those people as much as I did, because it does

0:34:56.840 --> 0:35:01.400
<v Speaker 2>seem like chains per se, I think, as opposed to coins,

0:35:01.600 --> 0:35:03.000
<v Speaker 2>are kind of allowed of the action.

0:35:03.200 --> 0:35:05.000
<v Speaker 4>I think you should make fun of those people a

0:35:05.040 --> 0:35:08.960
<v Speaker 4>little bit because people have been talking a lot about

0:35:09.000 --> 0:35:11.520
<v Speaker 4>this stuff for many, many years. There's been a lot

0:35:11.520 --> 0:35:14.800
<v Speaker 4>of talk, including for me and you know, more.

0:35:14.640 --> 0:35:17.120
<v Speaker 3>Recent we're going to put yeah, let us on the

0:35:17.120 --> 0:35:17.960
<v Speaker 3>block it.

0:35:18.000 --> 0:35:20.960
<v Speaker 2>We're gonna put you know, fancy I still fancy purses

0:35:21.000 --> 0:35:22.560
<v Speaker 2>on the blockchain, which maybe you'll.

0:35:22.400 --> 0:35:24.640
<v Speaker 4>Do it, it'll happen, but yeah, there's been a lot

0:35:24.640 --> 0:35:28.480
<v Speaker 4>of talk and not much action. So yeah, me personally,

0:35:29.760 --> 0:35:32.759
<v Speaker 4>I try very hard not to brand stuff and say

0:35:32.760 --> 0:35:35.759
<v Speaker 4>it's the next big thing. I just want to make

0:35:35.800 --> 0:35:38.920
<v Speaker 4>products available that people use. And I think the best

0:35:38.960 --> 0:35:45.280
<v Speaker 4>buzzwords come out organically because consumers are actually calling things

0:35:45.560 --> 0:35:49.680
<v Speaker 4>and the things arise naturally, right, And I think that

0:35:49.760 --> 0:35:50.680
<v Speaker 4>there's a running.

0:35:50.440 --> 0:35:52.640
<v Speaker 2>Gag that make fun of them less though I really don't.

0:35:52.719 --> 0:35:55.799
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, mass adoption is a year away. It's always kind

0:35:55.840 --> 0:35:56.719
<v Speaker 4>of been a year away.

0:35:56.800 --> 0:35:59.959
<v Speaker 2>Situational is always a year away too, but it happened.

0:36:00.440 --> 0:36:04.520
<v Speaker 4>But yeah, I think that we're finally at the precipice

0:36:04.640 --> 0:36:09.920
<v Speaker 4>of cryptotechnology not being just bitcoin and meme coins and

0:36:09.960 --> 0:36:12.360
<v Speaker 4>actually being applied to things that are useful in the

0:36:12.360 --> 0:36:13.680
<v Speaker 4>real world.

0:36:13.920 --> 0:36:17.359
<v Speaker 3>I will believe it when I see it. But if

0:36:17.400 --> 0:36:21.280
<v Speaker 3>you have tokenized stocks, what regulatory regime does that actually

0:36:21.280 --> 0:36:23.279
<v Speaker 3>fall under in the US at least? Like is that

0:36:23.320 --> 0:36:25.480
<v Speaker 3>a security or is that a derivative or is that

0:36:25.920 --> 0:36:28.880
<v Speaker 3>something else? And how are you navigating that aspect of it?

0:36:29.160 --> 0:36:32.439
<v Speaker 4>Well, so they're they're not permissible in the US yet,

0:36:32.719 --> 0:36:36.359
<v Speaker 4>But our belief is that in the ideal world they

0:36:36.360 --> 0:36:39.520
<v Speaker 4>would not be treated as a derivative, Okay, they would

0:36:39.520 --> 0:36:43.040
<v Speaker 4>instead be treated as a security kind of pari pasue

0:36:43.719 --> 0:36:47.880
<v Speaker 4>traditional stocks. So basically, all of the protections, all of

0:36:47.920 --> 0:36:52.640
<v Speaker 4>the structure that the SEC can kind of promulgate to

0:36:52.680 --> 0:36:57.560
<v Speaker 4>individual stocks should pass through to stock tokens as well.

0:36:58.040 --> 0:37:03.640
<v Speaker 4>And our belief is actually that this doesn't require new legislation.

0:37:04.000 --> 0:37:08.000
<v Speaker 4>The SEC can basically make the rules. They can do

0:37:08.080 --> 0:37:12.120
<v Speaker 4>a rule making, they can even do relief in advance

0:37:12.160 --> 0:37:15.279
<v Speaker 4>of rule making like they did for reggaets. If you

0:37:15.280 --> 0:37:18.200
<v Speaker 4>guys are familiar a few decades ago. So we've been

0:37:18.200 --> 0:37:21.680
<v Speaker 4>working with them, and I think actually the folks at

0:37:21.719 --> 0:37:25.120
<v Speaker 4>the sec HESTER and the Crypto Task Force, you know,

0:37:25.120 --> 0:37:28.120
<v Speaker 4>we've been engaging in a lot of roundtables, including tokenization.

0:37:29.120 --> 0:37:32.640
<v Speaker 4>I think they're pretty keen to make this happen. And

0:37:32.680 --> 0:37:36.200
<v Speaker 4>I actually think the EU launch and showing that you know,

0:37:36.680 --> 0:37:41.080
<v Speaker 4>these tokens are useful. It works well, Customers love it.

0:37:41.080 --> 0:37:44.560
<v Speaker 4>It's a huge efficiency improvement and infrastructure improvement behind the

0:37:44.600 --> 0:37:46.879
<v Speaker 4>scenes that makes all kinds of things that they care

0:37:46.920 --> 0:37:50.120
<v Speaker 4>about easier. My hope is that that'll help kind of

0:37:50.160 --> 0:37:55.480
<v Speaker 4>spur innovation and spur activity and acceptance worldwide, not just

0:37:55.520 --> 0:37:56.759
<v Speaker 4>in Europe.

0:37:56.800 --> 0:37:59.520
<v Speaker 2>The changing administration must be must have been huge for you.

0:38:00.760 --> 0:38:05.439
<v Speaker 4>It was definitely a positive because you know, probably over

0:38:05.480 --> 0:38:08.400
<v Speaker 4>the much of the past, much of the period of

0:38:08.440 --> 0:38:11.920
<v Speaker 4>twenty twenty to twenty twenty four, we had to play defense.

0:38:12.600 --> 0:38:16.719
<v Speaker 4>Our business was under assault from multiple angles, and I

0:38:16.719 --> 0:38:21.840
<v Speaker 4>think at first when the administration changed, having that not

0:38:21.960 --> 0:38:24.520
<v Speaker 4>be a huge factor was a huge relief, just not

0:38:24.640 --> 0:38:28.160
<v Speaker 4>having regulation by enforcement and not having to like spend

0:38:28.239 --> 0:38:31.520
<v Speaker 4>a significant amount of mind share and resources on defending

0:38:31.560 --> 0:38:37.759
<v Speaker 4>our business from this onslaught, and then that shifted into Okay, well,

0:38:37.760 --> 0:38:40.120
<v Speaker 4>we've got to exercise a muscle that we haven't really

0:38:40.160 --> 0:38:42.880
<v Speaker 4>had to exercise before, which is there's an openness to

0:38:42.880 --> 0:38:47.520
<v Speaker 4>create new rules and to like actually move forward and

0:38:47.640 --> 0:38:50.160
<v Speaker 4>encourage innovation. What does that look like? What does it

0:38:50.200 --> 0:38:53.880
<v Speaker 4>look like to actually work with an administration that wants

0:38:54.400 --> 0:38:56.960
<v Speaker 4>to get on the front foot and make the US

0:38:57.000 --> 0:39:00.239
<v Speaker 4>the leader. And I think that's been very welcome. I

0:39:00.239 --> 0:39:02.399
<v Speaker 4>think you saw with the stable coin bill, you'll see

0:39:02.400 --> 0:39:06.239
<v Speaker 4>with market structure that I think we'll be able to

0:39:06.800 --> 0:39:07.640
<v Speaker 4>execute on this.

0:39:08.040 --> 0:39:10.200
<v Speaker 3>What's it been like working with them? Just give us

0:39:10.200 --> 0:39:13.400
<v Speaker 3>some color of like the actual process in this administration

0:39:13.520 --> 0:39:14.440
<v Speaker 3>versus the last one.

0:39:14.640 --> 0:39:18.279
<v Speaker 4>They've been moving fast, which is pretty amazing. I mean,

0:39:18.800 --> 0:39:22.600
<v Speaker 4>bo Hines and David Sachs care a lot about this,

0:39:22.800 --> 0:39:26.759
<v Speaker 4>they care a lot about us being number one in

0:39:27.160 --> 0:39:31.759
<v Speaker 4>crypto as well as AI. They've been engaging industry, and

0:39:32.239 --> 0:39:35.840
<v Speaker 4>they're also like allergic to bureaucracy. I think in the

0:39:35.840 --> 0:39:40.600
<v Speaker 4>previous administration, frankly, it was hard to get a meeting right.

0:39:41.120 --> 0:39:44.080
<v Speaker 4>First of all, I don't know for how long people

0:39:44.120 --> 0:39:47.760
<v Speaker 4>weren't going into offices. But like it was remote meetings,

0:39:47.800 --> 0:39:49.279
<v Speaker 4>it's hard to get the stuff done.

0:39:49.960 --> 0:39:51.640
<v Speaker 2>You made a substantive difference into.

0:39:51.480 --> 0:39:54.160
<v Speaker 4>That made a substantive difference because I think it's really

0:39:54.200 --> 0:39:58.840
<v Speaker 4>hard to solve complex problems with multiple stakeholders remotely. So

0:39:58.960 --> 0:40:01.520
<v Speaker 4>even just something as simp is like having a round table,

0:40:01.760 --> 0:40:04.040
<v Speaker 4>wasn't really done, couldn't couldn't really be done in the

0:40:04.080 --> 0:40:06.719
<v Speaker 4>previous administration because they were all it was all just

0:40:06.840 --> 0:40:09.400
<v Speaker 4>virtual chats. Everyone was working remotely.

0:40:10.080 --> 0:40:13.839
<v Speaker 2>I have another crypto related question. One of the things

0:40:13.880 --> 0:40:17.560
<v Speaker 2>I wonder about is who makes money in crypto? And

0:40:17.600 --> 0:40:20.080
<v Speaker 2>by that I mean like, at one point there was

0:40:20.120 --> 0:40:23.279
<v Speaker 2>a lot of excitement about the specific l ones right

0:40:23.560 --> 0:40:27.120
<v Speaker 2>so Ethereum, ver Solana, et cetera. But it's not clear

0:40:27.120 --> 0:40:29.720
<v Speaker 2>to me that they're gonna like collect tons of fees.

0:40:29.840 --> 0:40:32.160
<v Speaker 2>Especially you know, it's like you're using a layer two

0:40:32.239 --> 0:40:34.320
<v Speaker 2>I don't know how much value, or you're built, and

0:40:34.360 --> 0:40:35.680
<v Speaker 2>then you're gonna build a layer two I don't know

0:40:35.719 --> 0:40:39.400
<v Speaker 2>how much value. Actually, then crews to uh say, Ethereum

0:40:39.760 --> 0:40:43.880
<v Speaker 2>Circle recently came public doing incredibly well that business is

0:40:43.920 --> 0:40:46.440
<v Speaker 2>it seems like it's insanely good. On the other hand,

0:40:46.840 --> 0:40:50.680
<v Speaker 2>they paid a lot of their money to Coinbase for distribution,

0:40:51.160 --> 0:40:53.520
<v Speaker 2>et cetera. So I don't really know if they're gonna

0:40:53.640 --> 0:40:55.080
<v Speaker 2>make a ton of money in the long time. Maybe

0:40:55.080 --> 0:40:57.040
<v Speaker 2>it'll be the distribution. Are you gonna by the way,

0:40:57.080 --> 0:40:59.000
<v Speaker 2>you're gonna get in on that, like we'll circle, Like

0:40:59.200 --> 0:41:02.799
<v Speaker 2>at some point will you be collecting money from the

0:41:02.840 --> 0:41:06.799
<v Speaker 2>stable coin issuers to the customers who hold that coin.

0:41:06.600 --> 0:41:10.279
<v Speaker 4>On your platform. Well, we we announced last year that

0:41:10.360 --> 0:41:13.719
<v Speaker 4>we joined the Dollar Global Network, which is a consortium

0:41:13.719 --> 0:41:18.680
<v Speaker 4>with Paxos, crack In a bunch of other companies to

0:41:18.760 --> 0:41:21.600
<v Speaker 4>create a new stable coin that's going to be global

0:41:21.640 --> 0:41:25.680
<v Speaker 4>in nature and will pay very competitive interests to holders.

0:41:26.360 --> 0:41:29.239
<v Speaker 4>So the goal would actually be to take much of

0:41:29.480 --> 0:41:33.120
<v Speaker 4>those economics and pay them in the form of interest

0:41:33.200 --> 0:41:35.399
<v Speaker 4>to customers. Because if you think about it, if you're

0:41:35.480 --> 0:41:39.080
<v Speaker 4>if you're holding you know us DC or most are tether,

0:41:39.600 --> 0:41:45.000
<v Speaker 4>most other stable coins, h you're not getting interest, which is.

0:41:45.160 --> 0:41:48.480
<v Speaker 2>FI users are getting interest indirectly though, right if they

0:41:48.520 --> 0:41:53.120
<v Speaker 2>hold us DC on Coinbase and Circle remis money to Coinbase,

0:41:53.160 --> 0:41:55.440
<v Speaker 2>and then Coinbase remix money to the user.

0:41:55.320 --> 0:41:59.040
<v Speaker 4>They are they are getting rewards uh, which is which

0:41:59.120 --> 0:42:01.480
<v Speaker 4>is true, But I think it's a little bit different

0:42:01.520 --> 0:42:05.719
<v Speaker 4>than interest, and I think it's also not universal. I mean,

0:42:05.719 --> 0:42:08.880
<v Speaker 4>you have to be holding it custodially. You can't be

0:42:09.520 --> 0:42:12.960
<v Speaker 4>just like holding it on chain, and you're certainly not

0:42:13.040 --> 0:42:17.360
<v Speaker 4>getting it if you're using tether or one of these others.

0:42:17.760 --> 0:42:19.800
<v Speaker 4>So yeah, I think I think they can get rewards

0:42:19.840 --> 0:42:23.480
<v Speaker 4>and incentives, but I think over time they'll have to

0:42:23.800 --> 0:42:27.319
<v Speaker 4>They'll have to get interest as well, because if you're

0:42:27.320 --> 0:42:30.360
<v Speaker 4>not getting interest, you don't really have an incentive to

0:42:30.440 --> 0:42:34.319
<v Speaker 4>hold US dollars. In the form of stable coin, the

0:42:34.360 --> 0:42:37.680
<v Speaker 4>incentive would just be converted immediately and put it in

0:42:37.680 --> 0:42:40.640
<v Speaker 4>a bank, which I think most crypto people would tell

0:42:40.680 --> 0:42:42.880
<v Speaker 4>you it It kind of defeats the whole point of

0:42:43.719 --> 0:42:47.280
<v Speaker 4>using crypto. I think internationally it's okay because those people

0:42:47.360 --> 0:42:50.600
<v Speaker 4>just want convenience. Yeah, so you can you can get

0:42:50.680 --> 0:42:53.640
<v Speaker 4>rid of I think it's a good enough value proposition

0:42:53.719 --> 0:42:56.600
<v Speaker 4>for now, but I think over time, as the interest

0:42:56.760 --> 0:43:02.239
<v Speaker 4>is unlocked, the best state coins will actually the ones

0:43:02.239 --> 0:43:04.640
<v Speaker 4>that ultimately gain market share are going to pay a

0:43:04.760 --> 0:43:07.279
<v Speaker 4>very competitive interest rate. So that's going to become an

0:43:07.320 --> 0:43:12.080
<v Speaker 4>access for competition, and the end user will benefit. So actually,

0:43:12.239 --> 0:43:15.799
<v Speaker 4>to cut to the chase, I'm not sure that's a

0:43:15.840 --> 0:43:19.200
<v Speaker 4>long term, sustainable, large revenue stream. I think it'll get

0:43:19.239 --> 0:43:19.919
<v Speaker 4>competed away.

0:43:19.920 --> 0:43:22.400
<v Speaker 2>Maybe no one will make money in cryptoni benefit of

0:43:22.400 --> 0:43:22.880
<v Speaker 2>the consumer.

0:43:23.239 --> 0:43:26.919
<v Speaker 3>Well, okay, this is exactly the question I wanted to ask. Okay,

0:43:26.960 --> 0:43:30.319
<v Speaker 3>so who makes money here? When I think about capital markets,

0:43:30.640 --> 0:43:33.080
<v Speaker 3>Like if I'm an old school investor or an old

0:43:33.120 --> 0:43:36.319
<v Speaker 3>school economist thinking about capital markets, I think like, okay, well,

0:43:36.360 --> 0:43:39.120
<v Speaker 3>an investor comes along and they give a company money

0:43:39.800 --> 0:43:42.360
<v Speaker 3>and they get equity in return, and the company uses

0:43:42.360 --> 0:43:44.600
<v Speaker 3>that money to go out and expand their business, and

0:43:44.640 --> 0:43:48.000
<v Speaker 3>eventually they pay back the investor. And then I look

0:43:48.040 --> 0:43:51.680
<v Speaker 3>at investing nowadays. I'm sure you've heard this criticism before,

0:43:51.800 --> 0:43:55.319
<v Speaker 3>but so much of it seems extremely synthetic. You know,

0:43:55.440 --> 0:43:58.600
<v Speaker 3>tokens built on top of tokens on top of tokens.

0:44:00.160 --> 0:44:03.360
<v Speaker 3>I guess my question is, like, to you, what is

0:44:03.400 --> 0:44:07.000
<v Speaker 3>the actual purpose of capital markets and this type of training.

0:44:07.640 --> 0:44:12.920
<v Speaker 4>I do think that there's a valuable purpose of capital formation.

0:44:13.600 --> 0:44:18.120
<v Speaker 4>I think it's gotten a little bit lost, or i'd

0:44:18.160 --> 0:44:21.359
<v Speaker 4>say the retail investor in the US has gotten disconnected

0:44:21.360 --> 0:44:25.319
<v Speaker 4>from that purpose because not too many companies are going

0:44:25.360 --> 0:44:28.440
<v Speaker 4>public nowadays. I think past few months have been an

0:44:28.480 --> 0:44:32.319
<v Speaker 4>exception locally, but if you look out broadly, you know,

0:44:32.400 --> 0:44:35.960
<v Speaker 4>back in the eighties or late seventies, you used to

0:44:36.040 --> 0:44:38.920
<v Speaker 4>be able to get into a public company at IPO

0:44:39.000 --> 0:44:42.880
<v Speaker 4>at a pretty low evaluation and kind of get a

0:44:43.080 --> 0:44:45.839
<v Speaker 4>thousand X or ten thousand X return. I mean, if

0:44:45.840 --> 0:44:50.239
<v Speaker 4>you'd invested in Microsoft or Apple at IPO, you had

0:44:50.280 --> 0:44:52.640
<v Speaker 4>a lot of upside left. So companies used to go

0:44:52.680 --> 0:44:56.359
<v Speaker 4>public earlier. Nowadays, you know, you've got SpaceX Open AI

0:44:56.560 --> 0:45:00.480
<v Speaker 4>companies that are worth hundreds of billions of dollars still

0:45:00.560 --> 0:45:04.240
<v Speaker 4>staying private, and those gains are accruing to a smaller

0:45:04.239 --> 0:45:08.799
<v Speaker 4>and smaller set of wealthy insiders. And I think that's

0:45:08.840 --> 0:45:13.200
<v Speaker 4>another potential for the technology because you know, as I mentioned,

0:45:13.880 --> 0:45:18.400
<v Speaker 4>we release SpaceX tokens to consumers as part of this,

0:45:19.560 --> 0:45:22.520
<v Speaker 4>as part of our to catch a token event. And

0:45:23.280 --> 0:45:26.319
<v Speaker 4>what that will do over time is you'll have twenty

0:45:26.360 --> 0:45:29.840
<v Speaker 4>four to seven liquid markets in private stocks as well,

0:45:29.920 --> 0:45:33.360
<v Speaker 4>and I think that's going to be very exciting in

0:45:33.400 --> 0:45:36.640
<v Speaker 4>the US if those are permissible, which I think requires

0:45:36.640 --> 0:45:41.560
<v Speaker 4>the crypto stuff, but also a relaxation of the accreditation standards.

0:45:41.880 --> 0:45:45.160
<v Speaker 4>I think things start to get really interesting because then

0:45:45.200 --> 0:45:49.400
<v Speaker 4>you unlock capital formation at a greater scale and also

0:45:50.440 --> 0:45:55.400
<v Speaker 4>participation for retail in some of these great opportunities. Like

0:45:55.400 --> 0:45:57.600
<v Speaker 4>if you're a retail and you want to gain exposure

0:45:57.640 --> 0:46:02.320
<v Speaker 4>to the AI boom, your options the US are extremely limited,

0:46:02.360 --> 0:46:04.560
<v Speaker 4>And I actually think that's a huge problem because the

0:46:04.600 --> 0:46:08.600
<v Speaker 4>AI boom is very, very consequential to everyday people.

0:46:08.760 --> 0:46:12.239
<v Speaker 2>Man, I'm also looking at the circle IPO. This thing

0:46:12.320 --> 0:46:15.279
<v Speaker 2>is insane. It goes up like twenty percent a day.

0:46:15.600 --> 0:46:17.440
<v Speaker 2>I have a question about IPOs. I'd love to get

0:46:17.440 --> 0:46:20.920
<v Speaker 2>your take on this. Every time there's an IPO that

0:46:20.960 --> 0:46:23.880
<v Speaker 2>goes up, you have like the sort of like Ninia's like,

0:46:23.920 --> 0:46:25.600
<v Speaker 2>actually this was bad and they left all.

0:46:25.480 --> 0:46:27.120
<v Speaker 3>This money money on the table.

0:46:27.280 --> 0:46:31.600
<v Speaker 2>There have been alternative routes to ipoing for decades actually

0:46:32.400 --> 0:46:35.799
<v Speaker 2>late nineties. Google famously did a Dutch auction when it

0:46:35.840 --> 0:46:40.439
<v Speaker 2>became public, et cetera. Yet the IPO as a thing persists.

0:46:40.719 --> 0:46:43.400
<v Speaker 2>Do you have a theory for why, Like why is

0:46:43.440 --> 0:46:47.479
<v Speaker 2>it that like the IPO model where the big bank,

0:46:47.560 --> 0:46:51.319
<v Speaker 2>the big legacy banks, they get their allocation and their

0:46:51.320 --> 0:46:53.719
<v Speaker 2>best clients get this big bump et cetera, and the

0:46:53.719 --> 0:46:56.440
<v Speaker 2>company leaves money on the table. Why does it persist

0:46:56.680 --> 0:46:58.440
<v Speaker 2>for so long? In your view? What does it say

0:46:58.440 --> 0:46:58.919
<v Speaker 2>about markets?

0:46:59.120 --> 0:47:01.320
<v Speaker 3>Is this a roundabout way of asking why robinhood IPO?

0:47:01.719 --> 0:47:03.719
<v Speaker 2>No? I mean sure maybe, but like, what is it

0:47:03.760 --> 0:47:07.680
<v Speaker 2>about the traditional IPO that's so lindy Well, I think

0:47:07.680 --> 0:47:12.640
<v Speaker 2>it's just the enshrined in regulatory No, it's not. The

0:47:12.760 --> 0:47:15.440
<v Speaker 2>Google did a Dutch auction. There are clearly other ways

0:47:15.480 --> 0:47:19.799
<v Speaker 2>to go. SPACs existed, they're coming back already, and yet

0:47:19.840 --> 0:47:23.480
<v Speaker 2>good companies continue to basically go by the IPO road.

0:47:23.960 --> 0:47:26.120
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, that's a good question. I would say those are

0:47:26.120 --> 0:47:29.880
<v Speaker 4>all kind of variants of the IPO that people have

0:47:29.960 --> 0:47:33.080
<v Speaker 4>experimented with. You have direct listings as well.

0:47:33.160 --> 0:47:33.759
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:47:33.880 --> 0:47:36.359
<v Speaker 4>Downside of course with the direct listing is you can't

0:47:36.440 --> 0:47:40.400
<v Speaker 4>raise primary capital, which I think is useful to a

0:47:40.440 --> 0:47:43.520
<v Speaker 4>lot of companies like they do look at it as

0:47:43.600 --> 0:47:49.200
<v Speaker 4>a financing event. So I think there will be some

0:47:50.200 --> 0:47:54.919
<v Speaker 4>iteration and some experimentation within the IPO sandbox like we've seen.

0:47:55.400 --> 0:47:59.880
<v Speaker 4>But I think you look at tokenization of private companies

0:48:00.400 --> 0:48:03.120
<v Speaker 4>if we kind of pull on that thread, that that

0:48:03.160 --> 0:48:07.040
<v Speaker 4>presents an interesting alternative to to companies as well. Both

0:48:07.080 --> 0:48:13.120
<v Speaker 4>for raising primary capital and for tapping into secondary liquidity

0:48:13.200 --> 0:48:16.520
<v Speaker 4>for shareholders. I think it's not yet clear what the

0:48:16.560 --> 0:48:20.840
<v Speaker 4>impact of that will be long term to capital markets,

0:48:21.520 --> 0:48:22.960
<v Speaker 4>but it's definitely coming.

0:48:23.280 --> 0:48:28.480
<v Speaker 3>So you mentioned the accredited investor limitations regulations in the US,

0:48:28.640 --> 0:48:31.520
<v Speaker 3>and I've never I've never really decided how i feel

0:48:31.520 --> 0:48:33.719
<v Speaker 3>about them, because, you know, on the one hand, they're

0:48:33.840 --> 0:48:37.520
<v Speaker 3>supposed to protect uninformed retail investors. I guess, on the

0:48:37.520 --> 0:48:40.239
<v Speaker 3>other hand, they do seem to lock people out of

0:48:40.280 --> 0:48:44.279
<v Speaker 3>a lot of opportunities in the market. And one thing

0:48:44.320 --> 0:48:46.560
<v Speaker 3>you hear from companies such as robin Hood is this

0:48:46.640 --> 0:48:49.920
<v Speaker 3>idea of democratizing finance, Like that is the buzzword and

0:48:49.960 --> 0:48:52.040
<v Speaker 3>the catchword, and we're going to bring all these offers

0:48:52.160 --> 0:48:52.759
<v Speaker 3>created that.

0:48:52.680 --> 0:48:54.560
<v Speaker 4>By the way, Oh did you that was our mission?

0:48:54.600 --> 0:48:56.360
<v Speaker 4>Democratized finance for all.

0:48:57.200 --> 0:49:01.839
<v Speaker 2>They talked about that, yeah, Trader in ninety nine.

0:49:02.120 --> 0:49:05.440
<v Speaker 3>Also peer to peer lending, like they were all over that. Okay,

0:49:05.440 --> 0:49:06.320
<v Speaker 3>But on that note.

0:49:06.680 --> 0:49:09.760
<v Speaker 4>Well they got it from us, okay.

0:49:09.840 --> 0:49:13.040
<v Speaker 3>But on this note, like, is there a limit to

0:49:13.120 --> 0:49:15.720
<v Speaker 3>how far you can democratize finance or do you believe

0:49:15.760 --> 0:49:20.440
<v Speaker 3>there should be like any guardrails in terms of investor access.

0:49:20.760 --> 0:49:24.040
<v Speaker 4>I think any is a big term. I mean, obviously

0:49:24.080 --> 0:49:28.400
<v Speaker 4>I can think of some examples of things that maybe

0:49:28.400 --> 0:49:33.239
<v Speaker 4>you shouldn't be democratized or at least democratized. First, Like,

0:49:33.280 --> 0:49:37.040
<v Speaker 4>I don't know if retail needs to be trading collateralized

0:49:37.040 --> 0:49:41.600
<v Speaker 4>debt obligations or some of these heavily institutional products. But

0:49:43.040 --> 0:49:45.160
<v Speaker 4>I think with private companies it's a little bit of

0:49:45.200 --> 0:49:50.680
<v Speaker 4>an easier discussion. I think that it's hard to imagine

0:49:50.960 --> 0:49:55.759
<v Speaker 4>an argument for why retail should not have access to that,

0:49:56.200 --> 0:49:59.440
<v Speaker 4>like the an argument that on its face is an

0:49:59.440 --> 0:50:02.680
<v Speaker 4>illogical and you have access to so many things. You

0:50:02.719 --> 0:50:06.719
<v Speaker 4>can just spend your money on Amazon and buy all

0:50:06.760 --> 0:50:10.480
<v Speaker 4>sorts of trinkets that immediately lose value and depreciate. You

0:50:10.520 --> 0:50:14.680
<v Speaker 4>can buy mean coins, right, So the idea that those

0:50:14.719 --> 0:50:17.560
<v Speaker 4>classes of ways to spend your money are okay, But

0:50:18.440 --> 0:50:21.560
<v Speaker 4>buying open ai or SpaceX stock, I think, on its

0:50:21.600 --> 0:50:25.359
<v Speaker 4>face it's illogical. Either we have to ban a whole

0:50:25.360 --> 0:50:28.200
<v Speaker 4>bunch of other things that people do to blow their money.

0:50:29.480 --> 0:50:32.760
<v Speaker 2>Be My issue is that I think in a world

0:50:32.960 --> 0:50:37.200
<v Speaker 2>everything is available, you induce a lot of people to

0:50:37.560 --> 0:50:40.759
<v Speaker 2>essentially find ways to fraud, to create fraud. Whereas a

0:50:40.800 --> 0:50:43.880
<v Speaker 2>trinket is a trinket. Anyway, I think we have to

0:50:44.080 --> 0:50:46.600
<v Speaker 2>let you go. We could talk for a real long time.

0:50:46.680 --> 0:50:48.400
<v Speaker 2>Well everything beyond chain in the future.

0:50:49.200 --> 0:50:52.440
<v Speaker 4>I don't know about everything, okay, but I think anything

0:50:52.520 --> 0:50:55.359
<v Speaker 4>that people want to trade, buy or sell and get

0:50:55.440 --> 0:50:59.360
<v Speaker 4>liquidity on will likely find its way on chain.

0:51:00.560 --> 0:51:03.280
<v Speaker 2>Attend to thank you so much for coming on odlash.

0:51:03.320 --> 0:51:03.920
<v Speaker 2>That was a blast.

0:51:04.000 --> 0:51:05.120
<v Speaker 4>Thank you guys, Thank you.

0:51:18.400 --> 0:51:21.480
<v Speaker 2>Tracy. I really can't believe the degree to which like

0:51:21.640 --> 0:51:24.560
<v Speaker 2>a blockchain. I mean, he didn't say blockchain, but is

0:51:24.840 --> 0:51:27.200
<v Speaker 2>every all these companies have their own chain, so like

0:51:27.520 --> 0:51:31.640
<v Speaker 2>coinbase has its own chain called base, robin Hood with

0:51:31.680 --> 0:51:34.960
<v Speaker 2>its own chain, Like I thought that was so ridiculous,

0:51:35.040 --> 0:51:37.360
<v Speaker 2>the idea of like seven or eight years ago. And

0:51:38.160 --> 0:51:40.560
<v Speaker 2>it's a little different, like they're not putting tomatoes on chain,

0:51:40.800 --> 0:51:44.000
<v Speaker 2>but like the change themselves that were the coin is

0:51:44.000 --> 0:51:45.920
<v Speaker 2>not that important. It sort of took off in a

0:51:45.960 --> 0:51:47.000
<v Speaker 2>way that I wouldn't have guessed.

0:51:47.080 --> 0:51:50.359
<v Speaker 3>Here's my question. If you're a person right now who

0:51:50.440 --> 0:51:53.960
<v Speaker 3>is not trading crypto, Yeah, is there anything in your

0:51:54.080 --> 0:51:58.200
<v Speaker 3>day to day life that is, you know, trading or

0:51:58.239 --> 0:52:00.600
<v Speaker 3>existing or being tracked on chain?

0:52:01.320 --> 0:52:04.319
<v Speaker 2>I don't really think so. Yeah, I don't think so, so,

0:52:04.760 --> 0:52:05.319
<v Speaker 2>but it does.

0:52:05.480 --> 0:52:08.120
<v Speaker 3>But we're so we're still we're still in the wait

0:52:08.200 --> 0:52:12.000
<v Speaker 3>and see mode. People are still talking about it. And yeah,

0:52:12.080 --> 0:52:15.960
<v Speaker 3>I guess, like I'm open to the idea that chain

0:52:16.080 --> 0:52:19.080
<v Speaker 3>technology is going to change things and make things different,

0:52:19.120 --> 0:52:21.480
<v Speaker 3>But I guess, like, why hasn't it happened already? And

0:52:21.520 --> 0:52:25.799
<v Speaker 3>then b it sounds still like the barrier isn't necessarily technology,

0:52:25.880 --> 0:52:27.840
<v Speaker 3>Like we have things that would allow you to do this,

0:52:27.960 --> 0:52:29.080
<v Speaker 3>but it's still regulatory.

0:52:29.680 --> 0:52:32.120
<v Speaker 2>I mean, it sounds like the reason it didn't happen

0:52:32.360 --> 0:52:34.879
<v Speaker 2>is because all the Biden administration people were working from

0:52:34.920 --> 0:52:39.000
<v Speaker 2>home and they couldn't they didn't have around tape. No,

0:52:39.080 --> 0:52:41.319
<v Speaker 2>it does sound like probably that is part of it,

0:52:41.400 --> 0:52:44.960
<v Speaker 2>the sort of changing regulatory environment and the deep suspicion

0:52:45.400 --> 0:52:48.600
<v Speaker 2>towards crypto for better or worse, uh on the part

0:52:48.600 --> 0:52:51.800
<v Speaker 2>of the Democratic Party in the US, Like obviously seems

0:52:51.840 --> 0:52:54.600
<v Speaker 2>pretty real. And I do think it seems like that

0:52:54.960 --> 0:52:58.360
<v Speaker 2>between the Genius Act, definitely change in Congress, and obviously

0:52:58.400 --> 0:53:01.120
<v Speaker 2>the changing of the guard at the Sea See, there

0:53:01.280 --> 0:53:04.239
<v Speaker 2>is a real movement. And to my mind, it's not

0:53:04.480 --> 0:53:07.160
<v Speaker 2>really like and again I always sort of go back

0:53:08.600 --> 0:53:11.200
<v Speaker 2>and think about our episodes with Austin Campbell. To my mind,

0:53:11.200 --> 0:53:14.640
<v Speaker 2>it's not like, okay, like there is some benefit to

0:53:14.680 --> 0:53:18.960
<v Speaker 2>me right now in the existence of chains. But the

0:53:19.080 --> 0:53:22.239
<v Speaker 2>idea that like legacy software for reasons that we all

0:53:22.280 --> 0:53:24.520
<v Speaker 2>know is never get to get its act together to

0:53:24.600 --> 0:53:27.879
<v Speaker 2>have something like twenty four to seven trading for better

0:53:27.920 --> 0:53:29.480
<v Speaker 2>or worse. I don't even know if twenty four to

0:53:29.520 --> 0:53:31.759
<v Speaker 2>seven is trading, but some people want to do it,

0:53:31.760 --> 0:53:33.600
<v Speaker 2>because some people want to trade at three pm in

0:53:33.640 --> 0:53:37.240
<v Speaker 2>the afternoon, And it sounds like or of what I suspect,

0:53:37.280 --> 0:53:40.080
<v Speaker 2>and I think it's probably like real or imminent. Is

0:53:40.120 --> 0:53:43.480
<v Speaker 2>that through change that will that that'll be something that

0:53:43.520 --> 0:53:44.440
<v Speaker 2>becomes fairly common.

0:53:45.120 --> 0:53:47.960
<v Speaker 3>I guess here's where I'm coming from. It seems to

0:53:48.000 --> 0:53:51.279
<v Speaker 3>me that a lot of this is incremental rather than revolutionary,

0:53:51.400 --> 0:53:53.440
<v Speaker 3>and when people were first talking about it, it was

0:53:53.560 --> 0:53:56.239
<v Speaker 3>very much in those revolutionary terms, and now it just

0:53:56.280 --> 0:54:00.520
<v Speaker 3>seems like, you know, like an efficiency improvement.

0:54:01.160 --> 0:54:02.839
<v Speaker 2>I actually I totally agree with that. I mean, one

0:54:02.840 --> 0:54:05.160
<v Speaker 2>thing this is definitely not is some sort of like

0:54:05.320 --> 0:54:09.920
<v Speaker 2>cipherpunk vision where people are trading everything without the government

0:54:10.000 --> 0:54:12.960
<v Speaker 2>being able to look at That is definitely true. But

0:54:13.200 --> 0:54:16.799
<v Speaker 2>you know, like the efficiency improvement is it's nothing like,

0:54:16.840 --> 0:54:20.400
<v Speaker 2>it's not it's not only not nothing. So no, I

0:54:20.400 --> 0:54:22.280
<v Speaker 2>think it's actually kind of a surprise to me because

0:54:22.320 --> 0:54:25.919
<v Speaker 2>the the way people talked about, you know, the thing

0:54:25.960 --> 0:54:30.719
<v Speaker 2>with blockchains is that they're decentralized and costly, and you

0:54:30.800 --> 0:54:33.279
<v Speaker 2>brought up the point of etherorem gaess fees. But if

0:54:33.280 --> 0:54:36.840
<v Speaker 2>everyone can have these sort of basically low fee layer

0:54:36.920 --> 0:54:41.160
<v Speaker 2>twos because they're more they're in large part centrally run,

0:54:41.440 --> 0:54:44.640
<v Speaker 2>you sort of solve some of the compute issues because

0:54:44.640 --> 0:54:47.680
<v Speaker 2>you're not you don't have to like coordinate all these

0:54:47.719 --> 0:54:50.520
<v Speaker 2>different nodes around the world. It's the robin Hood chain,

0:54:50.560 --> 0:54:55.600
<v Speaker 2>it's the coinbase chain, it's whatever. Maybe it is more

0:54:55.600 --> 0:55:01.040
<v Speaker 2>efficient than legacy infrastructure that has been updated and cobbled

0:55:01.080 --> 0:55:04.640
<v Speaker 2>together for like literally decades, and we'll be here decades

0:55:04.640 --> 0:55:05.040
<v Speaker 2>from now.

0:55:05.280 --> 0:55:08.160
<v Speaker 3>It's certainly true that you don't hear the gas fee

0:55:08.320 --> 0:55:11.480
<v Speaker 3>complaints the way you used to write like that that's

0:55:11.520 --> 0:55:13.919
<v Speaker 3>been solved. All right, Well shall we leave it there?

0:55:14.160 --> 0:55:15.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, let's leave it there.

0:55:15.239 --> 0:55:17.759
<v Speaker 3>This has been another episode of the Authots podcast. I'm

0:55:17.800 --> 0:55:20.760
<v Speaker 3>Tracy Alloway. You can follow me at Tracy Alloway.

0:55:20.640 --> 0:55:23.440
<v Speaker 2>And I'm Jill Wisenthal. You can follow me at the Stalwart,

0:55:23.719 --> 0:55:26.960
<v Speaker 2>follow our guests vlaed Tenev at vlad Tenev. Follow our

0:55:26.960 --> 0:55:30.360
<v Speaker 2>producers Carmen Rodriguez at Carmen armand dash Ol Bennett at

0:55:30.440 --> 0:55:33.600
<v Speaker 2>Dashbott and Kale Brooks at Kale Brooks. For more odd

0:55:33.680 --> 0:55:36.399
<v Speaker 2>Laws content, go to Bloomberg dot com slash odd Lots.

0:55:36.440 --> 0:55:38.799
<v Speaker 2>We have been daily newsletter and all of our episodes,

0:55:39.080 --> 0:55:41.200
<v Speaker 2>and you can chat about all of these topics twenty

0:55:41.239 --> 0:55:44.800
<v Speaker 2>four to seven in our discord Discord dot gg slash

0:55:44.880 --> 0:55:45.359
<v Speaker 2>odd Lots.

0:55:45.719 --> 0:55:48.200
<v Speaker 3>And if you enjoy adlots, if you like it when

0:55:48.239 --> 0:55:51.040
<v Speaker 3>we talk about the future of trading them, please leave

0:55:51.120 --> 0:55:54.480
<v Speaker 3>us a positive review on your favorite podcast platform. And remember,

0:55:54.560 --> 0:55:56.799
<v Speaker 3>if you aren't a Bloomberg subscriber, you can listen to

0:55:56.920 --> 0:55:59.680
<v Speaker 3>all of our episodes absolutely add free. All you need

0:55:59.719 --> 0:56:02.480
<v Speaker 3>to do is find the Bloomberg channel on Apple Podcasts

0:56:02.480 --> 0:56:05.080
<v Speaker 3>and follow the instructions there. Thanks for listening.