WEBVTT - A Volatility Arbitrage Trader On What Markets Are Saying Right Now

0:00:11.039 --> 0:00:14.600
<v Speaker 1>Hello, and welcome to another episode of the Odd Thoughts Podcast.

0:00:14.680 --> 0:00:19.279
<v Speaker 1>I'm Tracy Hallaway and I'm Joe. Wasn't thal Joe? Yes?

0:00:19.640 --> 0:00:25.000
<v Speaker 1>Did you know? Did you know that the VIX futures

0:00:25.000 --> 0:00:28.600
<v Speaker 1>This is super dramatic, it's not that interesting. Did you

0:00:28.640 --> 0:00:33.360
<v Speaker 1>know that the VIX futures curve has been inverted or

0:00:33.800 --> 0:00:37.360
<v Speaker 1>kind of inverted for I think like six months now,

0:00:37.440 --> 0:00:41.239
<v Speaker 1>basically since February. I didn't realize it was then, but

0:00:41.720 --> 0:00:44.120
<v Speaker 1>I didn't realize it had been six months. So basically

0:00:44.360 --> 0:00:51.159
<v Speaker 1>that means that investors are hedging again. It's higher volatility

0:00:51.320 --> 0:00:54.000
<v Speaker 1>out in the future than they are right now, or

0:00:54.040 --> 0:00:56.600
<v Speaker 1>the other way around, the other way around, so it

0:00:56.640 --> 0:01:00.160
<v Speaker 1>means people are paying more for volatility protection in the

0:01:00.200 --> 0:01:03.560
<v Speaker 1>near term than they are in the future. But that's unusual,

0:01:03.800 --> 0:01:07.119
<v Speaker 1>or at least it's counter to how the VIX curve

0:01:07.200 --> 0:01:11.160
<v Speaker 1>normally looks. Normally, the VIX curve is upwards sloping because

0:01:11.200 --> 0:01:14.320
<v Speaker 1>there's more uncertainty further out into the future, and so

0:01:14.400 --> 0:01:18.319
<v Speaker 1>you pay more for that volatility insurance. So kind of

0:01:18.400 --> 0:01:23.080
<v Speaker 1>unusual to have the VIX curve downwards sloping for this long,

0:01:23.160 --> 0:01:25.280
<v Speaker 1>And I guess it's one of those things that that

0:01:25.400 --> 0:01:28.280
<v Speaker 1>tells you that we're in an interesting place when it

0:01:28.319 --> 0:01:30.920
<v Speaker 1>comes to markets at the moment. Yeah, I mean it

0:01:31.000 --> 0:01:34.360
<v Speaker 1>makes sense that people are paying up more for short

0:01:34.520 --> 0:01:37.880
<v Speaker 1>term hedging right now because we obviously are just in

0:01:37.920 --> 0:01:41.720
<v Speaker 1>extraordinary times. You know, you look out a little ways

0:01:42.319 --> 0:01:44.640
<v Speaker 1>one year, two years, you could sort of envision a

0:01:44.720 --> 0:01:47.039
<v Speaker 1>return to normal, but it feels like we're in a

0:01:47.080 --> 0:01:50.559
<v Speaker 1>period where anything could happen tomorrow, whether it's policy, whether

0:01:50.600 --> 0:01:55.080
<v Speaker 1>it's related to the virus, etcetera. And so yes, sort

0:01:55.080 --> 0:01:59.760
<v Speaker 1>of intuitive that people want hedges in the here and now. Yeah,

0:02:00.040 --> 0:02:03.560
<v Speaker 1>of course the big event risk on but can I say,

0:02:03.600 --> 0:02:06.000
<v Speaker 1>can I say something though, go on, No, this is

0:02:06.000 --> 0:02:08.399
<v Speaker 1>something that's always bothered me, and maybe we'll get into

0:02:08.520 --> 0:02:11.600
<v Speaker 1>this with our guest today. But I don't understand why

0:02:11.600 --> 0:02:15.080
<v Speaker 1>it's not always like that, because I understand that most

0:02:15.080 --> 0:02:18.000
<v Speaker 1>of the time people want to pay out for some

0:02:18.080 --> 0:02:21.080
<v Speaker 1>protection because the future seems like less certain than the presence.

0:02:21.080 --> 0:02:23.359
<v Speaker 1>So I get that in theory. But on the other hand,

0:02:23.440 --> 0:02:26.280
<v Speaker 1>one of the central like sort of like dogmas of

0:02:26.360 --> 0:02:29.560
<v Speaker 1>finance is that you know, over the long term, things

0:02:29.600 --> 0:02:33.920
<v Speaker 1>to things go up, the economy improves, stocks go up, etcetera.

0:02:34.280 --> 0:02:36.160
<v Speaker 1>So it always seems to be like it should actually

0:02:36.160 --> 0:02:37.840
<v Speaker 1>be the other way around, where it's like, in the

0:02:37.880 --> 0:02:40.639
<v Speaker 1>short term anything can happen, but in the long term

0:02:40.720 --> 0:02:44.520
<v Speaker 1>things are smooth. So I've never really understood the premise

0:02:44.560 --> 0:02:47.720
<v Speaker 1>of why VIX futures curve slope upward in the first place.

0:02:47.760 --> 0:02:51.240
<v Speaker 1>But anyway we can, we can get into that later. Yeah,

0:02:51.280 --> 0:02:54.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean, there are dozens and dozens of exchange traded

0:02:54.560 --> 0:02:57.959
<v Speaker 1>products whose very existence is predicated on the VIX curve

0:02:58.840 --> 0:03:02.160
<v Speaker 1>upwards in normal times. Um, but yes, we should, we

0:03:02.160 --> 0:03:05.240
<v Speaker 1>should ask the question. I guess, all right, well, you've

0:03:05.280 --> 0:03:07.760
<v Speaker 1>already sort of given it away. But in this episode,

0:03:07.760 --> 0:03:12.079
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna be talking about the current volatility regime. And

0:03:12.120 --> 0:03:14.359
<v Speaker 1>I was about to mention that there is a very

0:03:14.400 --> 0:03:17.200
<v Speaker 1>big event risk coming up on the horizon, which is

0:03:17.280 --> 0:03:19.480
<v Speaker 1>the US elections, and we've seen a lot of talk

0:03:19.560 --> 0:03:22.760
<v Speaker 1>about volatility hedging ahead of that. We're going to get

0:03:22.800 --> 0:03:24.400
<v Speaker 1>into that, and we're also going to talk about some

0:03:24.440 --> 0:03:30.280
<v Speaker 1>of the longer term changes in volatility market structure, including

0:03:30.960 --> 0:03:35.640
<v Speaker 1>maybe even why the VIX futures curve is normally upwards sloping.

0:03:36.520 --> 0:03:38.760
<v Speaker 1>Now I'm super excited about this one. I mean, it's

0:03:38.840 --> 0:03:42.920
<v Speaker 1>obviously been an extraordinary year, I think due to the

0:03:43.080 --> 0:03:47.400
<v Speaker 1>rise of these sort of discrete events, whether it's the

0:03:47.400 --> 0:03:50.400
<v Speaker 1>the virus itself, the big thing that's coming up on

0:03:50.520 --> 0:03:53.680
<v Speaker 1>November three of this year, which could be uh producing

0:03:53.760 --> 0:03:57.960
<v Speaker 1>extraordinary amount of uncertainty. There's been so much interest um

0:03:58.560 --> 0:04:02.920
<v Speaker 1>in uh what volatiary futures or vict futures curves on

0:04:02.960 --> 0:04:05.600
<v Speaker 1>all sorts of asset classes are sort of anticipating on

0:04:05.760 --> 0:04:08.160
<v Speaker 1>how wild things could get. We also, as we spoke

0:04:08.200 --> 0:04:11.240
<v Speaker 1>about with Ben Eifford a few weeks ago, there's the

0:04:11.320 --> 0:04:14.920
<v Speaker 1>emergence of this whole class of sort of retail derivatives

0:04:14.920 --> 0:04:20.120
<v Speaker 1>buyers call options buyers also sort of breaking historical patterns

0:04:20.120 --> 0:04:24.560
<v Speaker 1>potentially in terms of how hedging markets look. So this

0:04:24.680 --> 0:04:27.880
<v Speaker 1>is an extraordinary rich topic to dive into, and although

0:04:27.920 --> 0:04:29.960
<v Speaker 1>we've hit it in some ways in the past, it

0:04:30.000 --> 0:04:34.360
<v Speaker 1>doesn't feel like we can never really talk about it enough. Yeah,

0:04:34.400 --> 0:04:38.000
<v Speaker 1>I totally agree. So our guest for this particular episode

0:04:38.480 --> 0:04:41.560
<v Speaker 1>is Chris Sidile. He's the co c i O over

0:04:41.600 --> 0:04:47.360
<v Speaker 1>at Ambrosk Group, basically a volatility arbitrage trader, and he's

0:04:47.440 --> 0:04:51.200
<v Speaker 1>been in that particular space for well many years now.

0:04:51.279 --> 0:04:54.039
<v Speaker 1>So the perfect person to talk to us about the

0:04:54.080 --> 0:04:58.480
<v Speaker 1>current volatility trading regime. Chris, welcome to a THOTS. Hey,

0:04:58.560 --> 0:05:02.359
<v Speaker 1>good morning, Thank you. Then meet so I guess to

0:05:02.440 --> 0:05:05.240
<v Speaker 1>begin with, you know, Joe asked that question about why

0:05:05.279 --> 0:05:09.200
<v Speaker 1>the vix curve is normally upward sloping. Can you maybe

0:05:09.279 --> 0:05:12.440
<v Speaker 1>explain to us what you've seen over the past few

0:05:12.480 --> 0:05:16.080
<v Speaker 1>months in terms of how the market is pricing volatility

0:05:16.120 --> 0:05:20.480
<v Speaker 1>and what's changed. Why is the vixed curve downward sloping?

0:05:20.720 --> 0:05:23.440
<v Speaker 1>What are you saying in terms of ptging demand and

0:05:23.480 --> 0:05:28.200
<v Speaker 1>things like that? Right, So, uh, it's very easy to

0:05:28.240 --> 0:05:32.920
<v Speaker 1>tell that everybody is fixated on the December ball, right,

0:05:32.960 --> 0:05:35.360
<v Speaker 1>and it's for good reason to write. You have the

0:05:35.400 --> 0:05:40.800
<v Speaker 1>potential resurgence of the comtavirus, you have the election time hotility,

0:05:40.960 --> 0:05:44.680
<v Speaker 1>you have the potential for corporate earning blagging. Thanks for

0:05:44.839 --> 0:05:48.359
<v Speaker 1>pointing this week. So that's pretty big, especially because of

0:05:48.480 --> 0:05:51.440
<v Speaker 1>not everything that's been taking place in trading on the

0:05:51.480 --> 0:05:55.640
<v Speaker 1>baby side. So everybody has been fixated on December ball,

0:05:56.200 --> 0:06:00.359
<v Speaker 1>and there has been a constant bid um. Even back

0:06:00.400 --> 0:06:05.599
<v Speaker 1>in late August, we've seen that correalition break between Vixen

0:06:05.720 --> 0:06:09.120
<v Speaker 1>Spot and you know, people were watching that that was

0:06:09.560 --> 0:06:12.839
<v Speaker 1>a little bit supply and demand driven. We we understand

0:06:12.839 --> 0:06:14.840
<v Speaker 1>that there was a big player in the market that

0:06:15.080 --> 0:06:21.080
<v Speaker 1>helped propel that due to some of the dealer gama hedging, etcetera, etcetera.

0:06:21.120 --> 0:06:23.080
<v Speaker 1>I could go on for for hours about that one.

0:06:23.600 --> 0:06:28.640
<v Speaker 1>I think people have a concern about the upcoming catalysts,

0:06:28.839 --> 0:06:34.080
<v Speaker 1>and we're being across the scope pre hedging that's taking place,

0:06:34.360 --> 0:06:36.599
<v Speaker 1>you know, not only with some of the larger players,

0:06:36.640 --> 0:06:38.919
<v Speaker 1>but you're seeing it with the smaller guys too, with

0:06:39.440 --> 0:06:42.599
<v Speaker 1>some of the you know, registered advisors. You know, they're

0:06:42.640 --> 0:06:45.040
<v Speaker 1>basically instructing their clients, you know, go out, make sure

0:06:45.080 --> 0:06:47.880
<v Speaker 1>you protect yourself. So it's been a constant bid involved

0:06:48.080 --> 0:06:50.960
<v Speaker 1>at that level. You know. I've been tweeting this is

0:06:51.000 --> 0:06:56.080
<v Speaker 1>that when the term structure is so elevated, like what

0:06:56.279 --> 0:07:00.279
<v Speaker 1>we see involves so bit up, it's very difficult to

0:07:00.480 --> 0:07:03.880
<v Speaker 1>get that added convexity in the move. And what I

0:07:03.920 --> 0:07:07.400
<v Speaker 1>mean is that when Vault is so pre bid, it's

0:07:07.480 --> 0:07:09.760
<v Speaker 1>somewhat priced in al right, so people are kind of

0:07:09.760 --> 0:07:13.520
<v Speaker 1>anticipating this. People are pre hedged the move that you

0:07:13.640 --> 0:07:17.000
<v Speaker 1>need to get VIX to like a seventy or eighty.

0:07:17.040 --> 0:07:20.560
<v Speaker 1>It has to be real panic and real fair in

0:07:20.600 --> 0:07:23.880
<v Speaker 1>the market, and you won't get that if guys are

0:07:23.880 --> 0:07:26.000
<v Speaker 1>pre heads, right, because let's think about it in the

0:07:26.040 --> 0:07:30.160
<v Speaker 1>most basic conceptual way. If you have a book, all right,

0:07:30.240 --> 0:07:32.800
<v Speaker 1>let's just say you're running a million dollar books, right,

0:07:33.200 --> 0:07:35.400
<v Speaker 1>and you have your heades on them and the market

0:07:35.480 --> 0:07:40.480
<v Speaker 1>is down seven right, your pre heads. So you're not

0:07:40.560 --> 0:07:43.840
<v Speaker 1>gonna go and rush to the exit door right to

0:07:43.880 --> 0:07:46.600
<v Speaker 1>sell off your positions because you really have your heads.

0:07:46.680 --> 0:07:50.160
<v Speaker 1>And when you have that across the entire landscope, right,

0:07:50.240 --> 0:07:53.960
<v Speaker 1>it becomes much more difficult to get volved to to

0:07:54.120 --> 0:07:57.520
<v Speaker 1>really get going. It's like that example of like what

0:07:57.640 --> 0:07:59.760
<v Speaker 1>causes the vex to really if you have a whole

0:07:59.760 --> 0:08:01.560
<v Speaker 1>bunch of people in the room and they're all trying

0:08:01.560 --> 0:08:03.200
<v Speaker 1>to get to the exit door at the same time.

0:08:03.280 --> 0:08:05.400
<v Speaker 1>But in this case, no, So I mean just just

0:08:05.440 --> 0:08:07.200
<v Speaker 1>sort of like to I mean, if you just sort

0:08:07.200 --> 0:08:11.600
<v Speaker 1>of think about over the last several months, March was

0:08:11.680 --> 0:08:14.120
<v Speaker 1>sort of like the mother of all panics, probably one

0:08:14.120 --> 0:08:16.720
<v Speaker 1>of the biggest panics in the history of Wall streets.

0:08:17.280 --> 0:08:20.640
<v Speaker 1>And since then it's just been nothing but fear of

0:08:20.680 --> 0:08:25.920
<v Speaker 1>a second wave, fear of ongoing economics sort of fall out,

0:08:26.120 --> 0:08:30.760
<v Speaker 1>fear of a policy mistake, fear of the election, everything

0:08:30.800 --> 0:08:33.959
<v Speaker 1>going wrong, massive reason to hedge and stay out of

0:08:34.000 --> 0:08:37.000
<v Speaker 1>the market. But as such, it's hard to get actual

0:08:37.200 --> 0:08:42.120
<v Speaker 1>intense selling when essentially so many people were already have

0:08:42.200 --> 0:08:46.160
<v Speaker 1>already been fearful, right, right, So it's uh, it's that

0:08:46.640 --> 0:08:53.600
<v Speaker 1>pre hedged position that will disable all from going through

0:08:53.600 --> 0:08:56.120
<v Speaker 1>the group, right, It needs to be uh, somewhat of

0:08:56.160 --> 0:08:59.160
<v Speaker 1>a fear factor. And I was saying this that in

0:08:59.240 --> 0:09:02.320
<v Speaker 1>order for VALL to really get going in December, you

0:09:02.360 --> 0:09:06.400
<v Speaker 1>need a fresh catalyst, all right, So the the election

0:09:06.480 --> 0:09:09.079
<v Speaker 1>time just isn't enough to really get the ball to

0:09:09.160 --> 0:09:12.960
<v Speaker 1>go through how people are anticipating. And you were seeing

0:09:13.000 --> 0:09:17.760
<v Speaker 1>that in the divergence between d v I X and X. Right,

0:09:17.840 --> 0:09:20.920
<v Speaker 1>I X is VOLA And what we're seeing is the

0:09:21.000 --> 0:09:24.000
<v Speaker 1>market is not really fearful. You're seeing a divergence between

0:09:24.040 --> 0:09:27.280
<v Speaker 1>the two, and it's showing us that, yeah, guys are

0:09:27.400 --> 0:09:30.920
<v Speaker 1>are pre hedged, but there isn't a massive rush to prehdge.

0:09:31.160 --> 0:09:33.560
<v Speaker 1>Don't get me wrong, right, there is a potential for

0:09:33.559 --> 0:09:38.400
<v Speaker 1>a fresh catalyst, right like, granted a Biden election, right now,

0:09:39.000 --> 0:09:42.319
<v Speaker 1>you have to think you have to immediately shift your

0:09:42.360 --> 0:09:46.040
<v Speaker 1>focus into the trade wards, right, if a Biden election

0:09:46.080 --> 0:09:49.000
<v Speaker 1>takes place, Because what if we wake up the next day,

0:09:49.120 --> 0:09:51.760
<v Speaker 1>right we find out Joe Biden is the president. One

0:09:51.760 --> 0:09:54.840
<v Speaker 1>week later we hear China's like, okay, guys, well sorry,

0:09:54.880 --> 0:09:57.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, we need to reassess these this trade deal

0:09:57.640 --> 0:09:59.960
<v Speaker 1>that we were talking about, right, So, a fresh new

0:10:00.040 --> 0:10:02.719
<v Speaker 1>catalysts like that, or you know, something just completely out

0:10:02.720 --> 0:10:05.560
<v Speaker 1>the woodwork could be enough to get the market to

0:10:05.720 --> 0:10:09.520
<v Speaker 1>get going. But it's very difficult to get volatility to

0:10:10.360 --> 0:10:13.480
<v Speaker 1>really proof like a vix um a X move to

0:10:13.559 --> 0:10:17.160
<v Speaker 1>seventy or eighty on things that are already pre priced.

0:10:17.600 --> 0:10:21.240
<v Speaker 1>I just don't think that the velocity of the move

0:10:21.320 --> 0:10:26.319
<v Speaker 1>will be there without a new catalyst that isn't already predetermined.

0:10:27.320 --> 0:10:30.240
<v Speaker 1>M So one of the questions I have based on

0:10:30.320 --> 0:10:35.120
<v Speaker 1>that is if everyone is pretty well hedged going into

0:10:35.280 --> 0:10:41.640
<v Speaker 1>the presidential elections, who is actually selling vall exposure at

0:10:41.640 --> 0:10:45.400
<v Speaker 1>the moment. So that's a really good question. Um, there

0:10:45.440 --> 0:10:49.520
<v Speaker 1>are people that are out there that are taking advantage

0:10:49.520 --> 0:10:52.640
<v Speaker 1>of this, and and you know they're looking to sell all.

0:10:53.080 --> 0:10:55.760
<v Speaker 1>We actually know a couple of institutional guys who are

0:10:55.800 --> 0:10:59.080
<v Speaker 1>trying to take advantage of this, but no they I

0:10:59.120 --> 0:11:03.160
<v Speaker 1>think they are resting there in a more sophisticated way

0:11:03.400 --> 0:11:07.920
<v Speaker 1>where they are um hedged off. But I would not

0:11:08.120 --> 0:11:12.880
<v Speaker 1>suggest this to the average retail guy because there are

0:11:12.920 --> 0:11:15.760
<v Speaker 1>a lot of complexities that go in to do this.

0:11:16.120 --> 0:11:20.960
<v Speaker 1>With the recent correlation break in spotting VIX, it's very

0:11:21.000 --> 0:11:23.440
<v Speaker 1>difficult to determine what the market is going to do.

0:11:23.559 --> 0:11:27.080
<v Speaker 1>You can't have too much conviction that sid because you

0:11:27.120 --> 0:11:29.880
<v Speaker 1>could have a situation where Spott is down and ball

0:11:29.960 --> 0:11:32.559
<v Speaker 1>is down, all right, or you could have an inverse

0:11:32.559 --> 0:11:35.400
<v Speaker 1>of that situation, right, So you can't be too sure

0:11:35.600 --> 0:11:40.520
<v Speaker 1>of what exactly is going to take place historically and statistically.

0:11:41.200 --> 0:11:44.080
<v Speaker 1>Right now, I'm very confident enough to say that the

0:11:44.160 --> 0:11:49.400
<v Speaker 1>trade is short volatility. Right Statistically and historically, there are

0:11:49.440 --> 0:11:53.000
<v Speaker 1>no numbers that I think an individual could pull up

0:11:53.120 --> 0:11:55.640
<v Speaker 1>that can lead me to say that the trade is

0:11:55.720 --> 0:11:59.920
<v Speaker 1>not shootball. However, as a trader, and you know, as

0:11:59.920 --> 0:12:03.559
<v Speaker 1>a risk manager, you look at this from a different standpoint,

0:12:03.800 --> 0:12:06.040
<v Speaker 1>right because you look at this and you say, Okay,

0:12:06.160 --> 0:12:09.079
<v Speaker 1>the data makes sense, the numbers line up, but there's

0:12:09.080 --> 0:12:12.720
<v Speaker 1>been so much variability in do we really want to

0:12:12.760 --> 0:12:15.920
<v Speaker 1>take this shot? Right? So there are a million other

0:12:16.000 --> 0:12:19.439
<v Speaker 1>trades out there that we could take, we're not expressing

0:12:19.720 --> 0:12:24.959
<v Speaker 1>the the view which with so much conviction, right, So

0:12:25.760 --> 0:12:27.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, we could be short a little bit of

0:12:27.920 --> 0:12:30.080
<v Speaker 1>all in the book to try to capture that, but

0:12:30.840 --> 0:12:36.160
<v Speaker 1>the risk to reward from what we've seen in I mean,

0:12:37.240 --> 0:12:40.040
<v Speaker 1>has just been one of those years where I feel

0:12:40.080 --> 0:12:44.880
<v Speaker 1>like I call it the critosis here because everything that

0:12:45.040 --> 0:12:47.920
<v Speaker 1>is like a two delta, a five delta and under

0:12:48.040 --> 0:12:50.760
<v Speaker 1>is just has been hitting like we've been seeing it

0:12:50.880 --> 0:12:52.800
<v Speaker 1>left and right. And you want to talk about just

0:12:52.960 --> 0:12:55.920
<v Speaker 1>life in general, right, like God rest his soul, Kobe

0:12:55.920 --> 0:12:58.440
<v Speaker 1>Bryant died from a helicopter crash. Right, you're just thinking

0:12:58.480 --> 0:13:01.240
<v Speaker 1>about every little thing you you want to talk about

0:13:01.640 --> 0:13:04.800
<v Speaker 1>the election. I'm a fairly young guy, but I have

0:13:04.880 --> 0:13:07.880
<v Speaker 1>not seen a year where there's been so much variability.

0:13:07.920 --> 0:13:12.520
<v Speaker 1>So with everything taking place, it's very difficult for me

0:13:12.600 --> 0:13:15.360
<v Speaker 1>to say, Okay, I'm just going to fixate on the

0:13:15.440 --> 0:13:17.880
<v Speaker 1>numbers and most specifically, I'm just gonna say, like you know,

0:13:17.960 --> 0:13:21.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm just gonna capture that the VRP and and short

0:13:21.360 --> 0:13:23.800
<v Speaker 1>ball here because the wrist of awards just doesn't really

0:13:23.920 --> 0:13:41.080
<v Speaker 1>pan out. I'm actually I'm really curious about these sort

0:13:41.080 --> 0:13:44.320
<v Speaker 1>of other opportunities you identify. So of course, okay, they

0:13:44.400 --> 0:13:47.600
<v Speaker 1>say the statistics line up and say you should probably

0:13:47.640 --> 0:13:52.760
<v Speaker 1>be short vall because the sort of realized volatility UM

0:13:52.760 --> 0:13:55.600
<v Speaker 1>going into the election is probably not going to be

0:13:55.720 --> 0:14:00.800
<v Speaker 1>as high as the headgers are positioned for, and statistics

0:14:01.280 --> 0:14:03.760
<v Speaker 1>suggest there's probably some money to be made there and

0:14:03.800 --> 0:14:07.000
<v Speaker 1>taking advantage of all the fear. What are the other

0:14:07.200 --> 0:14:11.319
<v Speaker 1>things that you look for in terms of opportunities that

0:14:11.520 --> 0:14:15.680
<v Speaker 1>aren't the sort of simple directional bets on one way

0:14:15.760 --> 0:14:20.160
<v Speaker 1>or another up or down in volatility. Yeah, so we

0:14:20.240 --> 0:14:24.320
<v Speaker 1>look for, um, a little bit of regression in some

0:14:24.440 --> 0:14:29.000
<v Speaker 1>relative value things. I think earning this season is really

0:14:29.080 --> 0:14:33.080
<v Speaker 1>really promit. I think it's going to for guidance, is

0:14:33.120 --> 0:14:35.600
<v Speaker 1>going to really paint the picture for us, and I

0:14:35.640 --> 0:14:38.760
<v Speaker 1>think reality will set in a little bit because um,

0:14:38.800 --> 0:14:41.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm anticipating a little bit of a slowdown in corporate

0:14:41.800 --> 0:14:46.640
<v Speaker 1>earning uh this cycle. So there are ways to capture

0:14:47.440 --> 0:14:52.520
<v Speaker 1>that spread between some of the single names in certain sectors, right,

0:14:52.560 --> 0:14:58.160
<v Speaker 1>so we don't necessarily need to be Mega's focused on

0:14:58.240 --> 0:15:00.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, vix up. You know, we look to express

0:15:00.920 --> 0:15:04.000
<v Speaker 1>some of our views and in some of the sectors

0:15:04.000 --> 0:15:06.480
<v Speaker 1>with single names and then also the ets right. So

0:15:07.000 --> 0:15:11.200
<v Speaker 1>for example, if we're looking at a you know, the

0:15:11.680 --> 0:15:14.160
<v Speaker 1>cues to i w M. You know, maybe we think

0:15:14.560 --> 0:15:19.400
<v Speaker 1>the cues are trading relatively rich and i WM this

0:15:19.480 --> 0:15:22.600
<v Speaker 1>trading relatively cheap from from a ball standpoint, right, maybe

0:15:23.080 --> 0:15:25.840
<v Speaker 1>thirty day implied ball or you know, we we like

0:15:25.960 --> 0:15:29.560
<v Speaker 1>to focus on the wings, so we'll be looking at

0:15:29.840 --> 0:15:33.360
<v Speaker 1>how is Kurtosis trading, right, is the five delta and

0:15:33.440 --> 0:15:36.400
<v Speaker 1>underputs or five delta and under calls trading relatively cheap

0:15:36.480 --> 0:15:40.880
<v Speaker 1>or expensive? So I think this earning cycle brings up

0:15:40.960 --> 0:15:44.760
<v Speaker 1>an opportunity for a lot of dispersion. And I think

0:15:44.800 --> 0:15:48.480
<v Speaker 1>you'll see disparity in a few different sectors. So I

0:15:48.520 --> 0:15:52.160
<v Speaker 1>think people could look to focus on that. And I mean,

0:15:52.840 --> 0:15:57.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, from just eliminating okay, like ball itself this

0:15:57.920 --> 0:16:03.240
<v Speaker 1>election time, it's very important in relationship sectors, right, think

0:16:03.240 --> 0:16:06.160
<v Speaker 1>about how important the oil sector is, Think about how

0:16:06.200 --> 0:16:09.680
<v Speaker 1>important healthcare sectors, think about how important the energy Like

0:16:10.720 --> 0:16:15.120
<v Speaker 1>those sectors are heavily reliant on who will be the

0:16:15.120 --> 0:16:18.080
<v Speaker 1>winner of this election, right, because it's night and day

0:16:18.600 --> 0:16:21.200
<v Speaker 1>for the turnout for that. So you know, I think

0:16:21.320 --> 0:16:26.520
<v Speaker 1>investors could and should focus on um some other areas besides,

0:16:26.840 --> 0:16:29.000
<v Speaker 1>oh yeah, I think you know, volatility is going to spike.

0:16:29.360 --> 0:16:31.760
<v Speaker 1>I think if you look at the volatility on individual

0:16:31.840 --> 0:16:34.680
<v Speaker 1>names and and certain sectors that could present um a

0:16:34.720 --> 0:16:38.520
<v Speaker 1>little bit bit more opportunity there, then oh yeah, I'm

0:16:38.560 --> 0:16:40.440
<v Speaker 1>just gonna play like a calendar spread and you know,

0:16:41.040 --> 0:16:44.640
<v Speaker 1>sell January balls and by December balls or vice versa.

0:16:46.640 --> 0:16:49.960
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to zoom out a little bit and and

0:16:50.080 --> 0:16:54.800
<v Speaker 1>sort of move away from the near term concerns about

0:16:55.160 --> 0:16:58.960
<v Speaker 1>potential fat tails and the upcoming election and talk about

0:16:59.640 --> 0:17:04.840
<v Speaker 1>vol utility trading over the past few years. So one

0:17:04.880 --> 0:17:07.840
<v Speaker 1>thing that we hear a lot is that central banks

0:17:08.040 --> 0:17:14.439
<v Speaker 1>have artificially suppressed volatility through their various unconventional monetary policies.

0:17:14.840 --> 0:17:18.560
<v Speaker 1>But we also hear from various guests. You know, Ben

0:17:18.560 --> 0:17:22.320
<v Speaker 1>Effort's a good example of that, or Chris Cole from Artemis.

0:17:22.320 --> 0:17:27.879
<v Speaker 1>We also hear that Wall Street or traders and the

0:17:27.920 --> 0:17:32.280
<v Speaker 1>sort of ecosystem around volatility trading has actually, in effect

0:17:32.920 --> 0:17:36.880
<v Speaker 1>also had a hand in suppressing volatility as well. I'm

0:17:36.920 --> 0:17:39.240
<v Speaker 1>just curious to get your take on that. If you

0:17:39.280 --> 0:17:43.760
<v Speaker 1>look at ball now, how suppressed would you say it

0:17:43.800 --> 0:17:49.720
<v Speaker 1>actually is and what would you attribute that too? Is

0:17:49.760 --> 0:17:52.840
<v Speaker 1>it central banks or is it the way big ball

0:17:52.920 --> 0:17:56.159
<v Speaker 1>players are actually dealing in the space at the moment.

0:17:57.200 --> 0:18:00.359
<v Speaker 1>First of all, shout out to be Ben, such a

0:18:00.359 --> 0:18:05.000
<v Speaker 1>good dude, I love that. But yeah, so vulatility is

0:18:05.080 --> 0:18:09.560
<v Speaker 1>absolutely suppressed, but we're not seeing the same level of

0:18:09.720 --> 0:18:14.640
<v Speaker 1>suppression as we were seeing pre the covid um because

0:18:14.720 --> 0:18:17.480
<v Speaker 1>a lot of these short ball funds and a lot

0:18:17.560 --> 0:18:20.320
<v Speaker 1>of the funds that just focused on selling you know,

0:18:20.400 --> 0:18:23.960
<v Speaker 1>like the ten delta put or you know, it's put

0:18:24.080 --> 0:18:26.359
<v Speaker 1>or whatnot, those guys are kind of those guys have

0:18:26.440 --> 0:18:29.680
<v Speaker 1>been kind of blown out, all right, So you're not

0:18:29.800 --> 0:18:33.159
<v Speaker 1>really seeing the level of suppression that we were seeing

0:18:33.720 --> 0:18:36.639
<v Speaker 1>pre covid However, there I should say that this is

0:18:36.760 --> 0:18:40.480
<v Speaker 1>on a relative level because it's still a very heavy

0:18:40.520 --> 0:18:43.720
<v Speaker 1>amount of mulatility suppression that's going out there. Central banks

0:18:43.760 --> 0:18:47.960
<v Speaker 1>are absolutely suppressing volatility, and I think the way how

0:18:48.920 --> 0:18:52.880
<v Speaker 1>global rates are actually set up right now, it is

0:18:53.200 --> 0:18:55.679
<v Speaker 1>it's a big problem. I mean, you know, you have

0:18:55.720 --> 0:18:58.080
<v Speaker 1>to look at it like this, with global rates being

0:18:58.119 --> 0:19:02.200
<v Speaker 1>so low. If you are an allocator, you are just

0:19:02.800 --> 0:19:06.560
<v Speaker 1>who's just fixated on on generating a return. What can

0:19:06.680 --> 0:19:09.480
<v Speaker 1>you do in this market? Right? Are you gonna go

0:19:09.520 --> 0:19:11.919
<v Speaker 1>buy corporate bonds where you have to take on the

0:19:11.960 --> 0:19:14.120
<v Speaker 1>same sort of default risks as you would with an equity,

0:19:14.440 --> 0:19:16.960
<v Speaker 1>Or are you gonna go buy a treasury where you're

0:19:17.160 --> 0:19:21.080
<v Speaker 1>yielding like zero percent? Right? There comes to point time

0:19:21.080 --> 0:19:24.879
<v Speaker 1>when you're looking at at the the menu and you're

0:19:24.920 --> 0:19:26.920
<v Speaker 1>saying yourself, all right, you know, I might as well

0:19:26.920 --> 0:19:29.280
<v Speaker 1>just be invested in equity. Right. So what global arrates

0:19:29.280 --> 0:19:34.000
<v Speaker 1>beings so low? Its forces new players who aren't really

0:19:34.040 --> 0:19:37.960
<v Speaker 1>in the market to now move into this new spectrum. Right.

0:19:38.760 --> 0:19:43.320
<v Speaker 1>And with that you also have this this interesting dynamic

0:19:43.359 --> 0:19:46.600
<v Speaker 1>taking place with structure products just blowing up. Right, you

0:19:46.640 --> 0:19:49.320
<v Speaker 1>have I mean I was doing the exotics could be

0:19:49.359 --> 0:19:51.240
<v Speaker 1>a mode and I can tell you for a fact.

0:19:51.680 --> 0:19:56.000
<v Speaker 1>You know, January before UM the COVID situation was an

0:19:56.040 --> 0:20:00.600
<v Speaker 1>amazing month. People were eating structure products. The appetite for

0:20:00.640 --> 0:20:05.640
<v Speaker 1>it is huge. Right. So you think about everybody who

0:20:05.800 --> 0:20:07.760
<v Speaker 1>is in the investing role now, right, they want a

0:20:07.800 --> 0:20:10.320
<v Speaker 1>piece of They want a little bit of everything compiled

0:20:10.359 --> 0:20:12.320
<v Speaker 1>into one. Right, So they want a little bit of

0:20:12.400 --> 0:20:14.600
<v Speaker 1>health care, they want a little bit of check, they

0:20:14.600 --> 0:20:17.080
<v Speaker 1>want a little bit of UM energy, and they wanted

0:20:17.119 --> 0:20:20.720
<v Speaker 1>all on one little one basket right, hence the growth

0:20:20.760 --> 0:20:25.840
<v Speaker 1>of EPP products. But what we are seeing is this

0:20:26.000 --> 0:20:30.840
<v Speaker 1>dynamic is actually taking away from market crept. So if

0:20:30.840 --> 0:20:33.199
<v Speaker 1>you were to look at the main components in the

0:20:33.240 --> 0:20:37.879
<v Speaker 1>spy and the queue, right, the components that are in

0:20:37.920 --> 0:20:40.600
<v Speaker 1>the two are the same thing, right, It's basically the

0:20:40.640 --> 0:20:43.359
<v Speaker 1>exact same thing, right. So what what this is telling

0:20:43.359 --> 0:20:47.480
<v Speaker 1>you is that the market is being driven or no breath. Right.

0:20:47.520 --> 0:20:50.120
<v Speaker 1>So as much as people want to diversify and they're

0:20:50.119 --> 0:20:55.199
<v Speaker 1>just trying to diversify, their portfolio is creditated on the

0:20:55.400 --> 0:20:59.480
<v Speaker 1>large name, right. So with the growth of structure products,

0:20:59.480 --> 0:21:02.280
<v Speaker 1>with the low global rates and the force rush to

0:21:02.640 --> 0:21:07.000
<v Speaker 1>too equities and then to us in passive investing with

0:21:07.200 --> 0:21:10.560
<v Speaker 1>the millennial group, they're just like, oh yeah, I want

0:21:10.640 --> 0:21:13.040
<v Speaker 1>I want to be invested in a novel that's going

0:21:13.080 --> 0:21:15.960
<v Speaker 1>to return, you know, a guarantee twelve percent a year.

0:21:16.280 --> 0:21:20.800
<v Speaker 1>Whereas the reality behind that is it's not as easy

0:21:20.840 --> 0:21:24.040
<v Speaker 1>as that, and you know, people are just very open

0:21:24.119 --> 0:21:27.240
<v Speaker 1>to putting their money into these types of passive products.

0:21:27.920 --> 0:21:32.200
<v Speaker 1>So you mix that in now with a big transfer

0:21:32.240 --> 0:21:36.199
<v Speaker 1>of wealth that comes with the actual market buying power. Right.

0:21:36.240 --> 0:21:39.480
<v Speaker 1>So as a millennial myself, I have friends in the

0:21:39.520 --> 0:21:43.760
<v Speaker 1>business and in different industries who are now becoming seasoned

0:21:43.760 --> 0:21:49.440
<v Speaker 1>professional where you know, they're making a fairly good salary

0:21:49.560 --> 0:21:53.200
<v Speaker 1>and these people are now able to put their money

0:21:53.200 --> 0:21:55.359
<v Speaker 1>invest in the stock market. Right, So the decision making

0:21:55.400 --> 0:21:58.800
<v Speaker 1>has now shifted from the boomers to the millennials, right,

0:21:58.840 --> 0:22:01.720
<v Speaker 1>So the buying out and we're seeing that right because

0:22:01.760 --> 0:22:04.640
<v Speaker 1>people complain so much about you know, the Robin Hooders

0:22:04.720 --> 0:22:07.399
<v Speaker 1>and you know or some of the market flow that

0:22:07.440 --> 0:22:10.840
<v Speaker 1>comes from there, right. But it's not only the Robin Hooders, right,

0:22:10.880 --> 0:22:14.159
<v Speaker 1>it's the millennials that are a little more open to

0:22:14.240 --> 0:22:17.640
<v Speaker 1>taking the risks. Myself and my team, we've we went

0:22:17.680 --> 0:22:20.720
<v Speaker 1>through data on this little phenomenon and you know, some

0:22:20.800 --> 0:22:24.719
<v Speaker 1>of the market psychology and sentiment of the younger group. Right.

0:22:24.760 --> 0:22:28.600
<v Speaker 1>So with that taking place, right, all those things mixing

0:22:28.640 --> 0:22:32.640
<v Speaker 1>into one, right, you have this added volatility right where

0:22:32.680 --> 0:22:38.040
<v Speaker 1>you should and you could definitely have these left tail

0:22:38.080 --> 0:22:42.840
<v Speaker 1>events take place more frequently than you were seeing, you know,

0:22:43.000 --> 0:22:46.919
<v Speaker 1>in the nineties or the eighties. So you know, you

0:22:47.000 --> 0:22:50.800
<v Speaker 1>mentioned having been on the on the cell side on

0:22:50.960 --> 0:22:54.800
<v Speaker 1>the desk at BMO, and of course, um, you know

0:22:54.840 --> 0:22:58.840
<v Speaker 1>again talking about our conversation with Ben a few weeks ago.

0:22:59.600 --> 0:23:03.920
<v Speaker 1>Would you learn from that experience that you've taken over

0:23:04.000 --> 0:23:07.520
<v Speaker 1>to the buy side, and how does that in sort

0:23:07.560 --> 0:23:10.320
<v Speaker 1>of like, what did that experience teach you in terms

0:23:10.400 --> 0:23:14.040
<v Speaker 1>of the opportunities that arise due to the positioning of

0:23:14.160 --> 0:23:17.280
<v Speaker 1>the cell side of the dealers and so forth, how

0:23:17.320 --> 0:23:20.600
<v Speaker 1>does that help you think about in spot opportunities. I

0:23:20.680 --> 0:23:22.840
<v Speaker 1>was actually speaking to UH. I was actually at my

0:23:22.880 --> 0:23:25.600
<v Speaker 1>old university and I was speaking UH two weeks ago,

0:23:25.680 --> 0:23:28.800
<v Speaker 1>and I was speaking to a younger kid, and he

0:23:28.880 --> 0:23:31.560
<v Speaker 1>was telling me that he trades options. So I'm just

0:23:31.640 --> 0:23:34.359
<v Speaker 1>asking him, you know some basic questions. You know, okay,

0:23:34.400 --> 0:23:36.440
<v Speaker 1>how do you expression you? And you know what is

0:23:36.480 --> 0:23:39.080
<v Speaker 1>it that you look for? Right? So this gentleman had

0:23:39.320 --> 0:23:42.919
<v Speaker 1>no idea what delta vega gamma was, which was okay, Right,

0:23:42.960 --> 0:23:45.200
<v Speaker 1>he's a college student who go through what we all learned.

0:23:45.600 --> 0:23:51.920
<v Speaker 1>But the appetite and the willingness to go and trade

0:23:51.920 --> 0:23:56.920
<v Speaker 1>derivatives is at the highest it's ever been. Right. Everybody

0:23:57.000 --> 0:24:00.679
<v Speaker 1>wants a point of leverage. Everybody wants to be invested

0:24:00.800 --> 0:24:05.199
<v Speaker 1>in something that could generate something with a convex the component. Right,

0:24:05.240 --> 0:24:08.080
<v Speaker 1>So people are very fixated on obserus trating even though

0:24:08.119 --> 0:24:10.680
<v Speaker 1>they have no idea what they're doing. So the growth

0:24:10.760 --> 0:24:14.920
<v Speaker 1>is tremendous, right. And now you add in the fact

0:24:15.000 --> 0:24:18.439
<v Speaker 1>that dealers need to carry a matchbook, which means that

0:24:18.520 --> 0:24:21.199
<v Speaker 1>they really just need to heade off their risks, and

0:24:21.280 --> 0:24:25.399
<v Speaker 1>you add that in and that leads to excessive dealer

0:24:25.440 --> 0:24:31.159
<v Speaker 1>gamma heaging, right, and that leads to more emphatic swings

0:24:31.160 --> 0:24:34.320
<v Speaker 1>in the market. And you know, you asked me what

0:24:34.359 --> 0:24:36.679
<v Speaker 1>did I learn at BMO, You know, I learned a

0:24:36.760 --> 0:24:40.720
<v Speaker 1>tremendous amount under those guys. UM truly grateful to have

0:24:40.840 --> 0:24:44.879
<v Speaker 1>experienced the or had the opportunity to help manage a

0:24:44.920 --> 0:24:47.240
<v Speaker 1>book of that size and go through the day to

0:24:47.320 --> 0:24:51.760
<v Speaker 1>day and understand the movie components of all the complexities

0:24:51.800 --> 0:24:54.840
<v Speaker 1>and a book of that size with those type of products, right,

0:24:54.840 --> 0:24:57.520
<v Speaker 1>because you have a million moving pieces. So I think

0:24:58.080 --> 0:25:01.439
<v Speaker 1>understanding how to manage risk from a large book like

0:25:01.520 --> 0:25:04.919
<v Speaker 1>that with all the moving pieces, I think really translated

0:25:04.960 --> 0:25:09.040
<v Speaker 1>well to how we look at risk here at Ambers.

0:25:09.280 --> 0:25:12.879
<v Speaker 1>But one thing that really opened my eyes was a

0:25:12.960 --> 0:25:15.840
<v Speaker 1>situation that took place and I wanted to stay late

0:25:15.920 --> 0:25:19.000
<v Speaker 1>February or launch, but it was really an eye opener

0:25:19.160 --> 0:25:22.600
<v Speaker 1>to me that the book moves in a particular way

0:25:22.640 --> 0:25:27.399
<v Speaker 1>that we didn't anticipate, right, And although obviously you know,

0:25:27.560 --> 0:25:32.959
<v Speaker 1>I understood and knew the intricacies of the other gamma hedging, right,

0:25:33.000 --> 0:25:35.040
<v Speaker 1>and obviously on a day to day base, I went

0:25:35.040 --> 0:25:37.399
<v Speaker 1>through that process right when we hedged off our books,

0:25:37.440 --> 0:25:39.439
<v Speaker 1>you know, at the beginning of the morning or or

0:25:39.440 --> 0:25:41.680
<v Speaker 1>the end of the night, because that was our job.

0:25:41.800 --> 0:25:44.120
<v Speaker 1>One of the exactly success the job was just use

0:25:44.240 --> 0:25:46.200
<v Speaker 1>money for the bank, right, So you're you're basically there

0:25:46.240 --> 0:25:51.720
<v Speaker 1>as the protection trader. So I remember the market was

0:25:51.800 --> 0:25:55.840
<v Speaker 1>taking and we've got the call from the heads up

0:25:56.320 --> 0:26:00.160
<v Speaker 1>and my boss at the time literally just I sat

0:26:00.240 --> 0:26:04.600
<v Speaker 1>um one row away from him, remember him just saying like, Okay,

0:26:04.600 --> 0:26:08.679
<v Speaker 1>we need to hedge everything. And I'm looking at the

0:26:08.680 --> 0:26:11.840
<v Speaker 1>positions I'm looking at like our Vegas moving, our Gamas movies,

0:26:12.119 --> 0:26:14.240
<v Speaker 1>and I'm saying to myself like, man, I don't know

0:26:14.280 --> 0:26:18.280
<v Speaker 1>if this is really the right move. But he just said,

0:26:18.280 --> 0:26:20.320
<v Speaker 1>he's like, we need to hedge everything. We got the

0:26:20.359 --> 0:26:23.120
<v Speaker 1>call up like it does not matter what the prices,

0:26:23.640 --> 0:26:26.480
<v Speaker 1>we have to hedge it. Right. So what that meant

0:26:26.480 --> 0:26:29.800
<v Speaker 1>for us is that we now had to go out

0:26:30.000 --> 0:26:36.960
<v Speaker 1>into the open market and sell sps teachers and basically

0:26:37.119 --> 0:26:42.000
<v Speaker 1>I s so synthetically, what does that do? Right? That

0:26:42.400 --> 0:26:44.600
<v Speaker 1>drives the price of the market down, and that drives

0:26:44.640 --> 0:26:48.040
<v Speaker 1>the price of FIXEL during that time. You know, it

0:26:48.160 --> 0:26:51.000
<v Speaker 1>was an eye opener because US as a large bank,

0:26:51.040 --> 0:26:54.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, we had to basically come in with a

0:26:54.080 --> 0:26:57.800
<v Speaker 1>ton of side and do this when the market was

0:26:57.840 --> 0:27:01.560
<v Speaker 1>already getting hammered. And I see us of myself, this

0:27:01.840 --> 0:27:05.560
<v Speaker 1>is taking place across the streets, and it really sank

0:27:05.600 --> 0:27:10.760
<v Speaker 1>into me that this is much more severe than people

0:27:11.000 --> 0:27:17.520
<v Speaker 1>give give it credit. Because obviously I understood the ramifications

0:27:17.560 --> 0:27:19.840
<v Speaker 1>of this, because you know, I praised on the buy

0:27:19.880 --> 0:27:22.880
<v Speaker 1>side before there, and you know, I I understand how

0:27:23.040 --> 0:27:26.119
<v Speaker 1>market microstruction works. But when you see it in real

0:27:26.200 --> 0:27:29.800
<v Speaker 1>time and you see how you're moving the market with

0:27:29.840 --> 0:27:32.160
<v Speaker 1>so much side and it's other guys that are doing

0:27:32.200 --> 0:27:34.200
<v Speaker 1>the exact same thing, and if you have force liquidations

0:27:34.200 --> 0:27:37.119
<v Speaker 1>things in place, it kind of really just clicks to

0:27:37.119 --> 0:27:39.040
<v Speaker 1>you and you're like, oh my gosh, like that was

0:27:39.119 --> 0:27:41.240
<v Speaker 1>literally just we just dropped the market, or you know,

0:27:41.760 --> 0:27:43.439
<v Speaker 1>us and you know two of the clients really just

0:27:43.720 --> 0:27:48.520
<v Speaker 1>move the market. It emphasizes on what we try to

0:27:48.600 --> 0:27:54.280
<v Speaker 1>do at Amber right. We are fixated on capturing those

0:27:54.640 --> 0:27:58.480
<v Speaker 1>left and right tail events. Right. So we believe that

0:27:58.680 --> 0:28:02.600
<v Speaker 1>with excessive all totally suppression, and we will continue to

0:28:02.600 --> 0:28:05.119
<v Speaker 1>see this right, the market will get back into a

0:28:05.160 --> 0:28:08.639
<v Speaker 1>point of complacency and we will have those short volatility

0:28:08.680 --> 0:28:11.800
<v Speaker 1>funds come back, and we'll have guys that are Chris

0:28:11.840 --> 0:28:14.760
<v Speaker 1>truth selling you know, variants left and right right. So

0:28:15.680 --> 0:28:19.919
<v Speaker 1>it's just about wasting for for the for the complacency,

0:28:19.960 --> 0:28:22.840
<v Speaker 1>the setting right, because when March of points point took place,

0:28:23.520 --> 0:28:26.879
<v Speaker 1>everybody has that fresh in their minds, right, So everybody's

0:28:26.920 --> 0:28:29.000
<v Speaker 1>now they want to manage risk right now. They want

0:28:29.000 --> 0:28:31.520
<v Speaker 1>to focus on on on heading off the book right.

0:28:31.520 --> 0:28:33.240
<v Speaker 1>But there will come a point time where the market

0:28:33.240 --> 0:28:34.880
<v Speaker 1>is just going up and people are gonna be like, oh,

0:28:34.960 --> 0:28:36.639
<v Speaker 1>you know I don't tape the hedge. I don't need to.

0:28:36.840 --> 0:28:39.000
<v Speaker 1>Why do this? You know it's taking away three percent

0:28:39.120 --> 0:28:40.560
<v Speaker 1>deals for me for a year. You know, I don't

0:28:40.560 --> 0:28:43.800
<v Speaker 1>need this anymore. That's when we will have more of

0:28:43.840 --> 0:28:47.280
<v Speaker 1>these emphasized moves takes place where you see a move

0:28:47.400 --> 0:28:49.400
<v Speaker 1>like that, you know you have a right tail event

0:28:49.520 --> 0:28:52.840
<v Speaker 1>or a left till event. And we believe that the

0:28:52.920 --> 0:28:55.640
<v Speaker 1>way how we are set our positioning, we're going to

0:28:55.720 --> 0:28:59.320
<v Speaker 1>be able to capture those type of moves because as

0:28:59.360 --> 0:29:02.360
<v Speaker 1>the market mark streuss things with that, we believe that

0:29:02.400 --> 0:29:05.200
<v Speaker 1>these moves will happen much more frequently than people are

0:29:05.240 --> 0:29:23.520
<v Speaker 1>giving freedance. So this is something I wanted to ask

0:29:23.560 --> 0:29:25.640
<v Speaker 1>about actually, when you were telling the story about how

0:29:25.720 --> 0:29:28.480
<v Speaker 1>everyone on the street was kind of doing the same

0:29:28.520 --> 0:29:33.560
<v Speaker 1>thing all at once and hedging their own volatility exposure

0:29:33.600 --> 0:29:37.120
<v Speaker 1>in similar ways, what are your options when you're doing

0:29:37.200 --> 0:29:40.800
<v Speaker 1>that kind of hedging. Is there an opportunity to do

0:29:41.000 --> 0:29:45.600
<v Speaker 1>something different to what everyone else is doing, or by

0:29:45.640 --> 0:29:49.120
<v Speaker 1>the nature of the exposure, you're sort of forced to,

0:29:49.440 --> 0:29:52.959
<v Speaker 1>you know, buy or sell spy futures or vixed futures

0:29:53.040 --> 0:29:56.200
<v Speaker 1>or something like that. How much freedom freedom is in

0:29:56.240 --> 0:29:59.360
<v Speaker 1>the right word. How much creativity do you have in

0:29:59.560 --> 0:30:04.320
<v Speaker 1>manage in those hedges. Well, you know, you could try

0:30:04.320 --> 0:30:06.680
<v Speaker 1>to get a little bit cute and creative, but at

0:30:06.680 --> 0:30:08.239
<v Speaker 1>the end of the day, it's going to lead to

0:30:08.520 --> 0:30:12.480
<v Speaker 1>one thing. Right, If you are long, you need to

0:30:12.520 --> 0:30:14.240
<v Speaker 1>cut down that dector, right, So at the end of

0:30:14.240 --> 0:30:16.400
<v Speaker 1>the day you're gonna need to be negative delta. So

0:30:16.720 --> 0:30:18.880
<v Speaker 1>no matter how you want to flip it, if you

0:30:19.440 --> 0:30:22.000
<v Speaker 1>want to say, Okay, you know, I'm gonna try to

0:30:22.760 --> 0:30:26.720
<v Speaker 1>sell something that I believe is relatively cheaper that carries

0:30:27.120 --> 0:30:30.880
<v Speaker 1>heavier beta. Sure, but at the end of the day,

0:30:31.240 --> 0:30:34.640
<v Speaker 1>whether you're trying to go through the window or go

0:30:34.760 --> 0:30:36.640
<v Speaker 1>through the front door or the back door, you gotta

0:30:36.640 --> 0:30:39.520
<v Speaker 1>get out of the house, all right. So it's literally

0:30:39.600 --> 0:30:41.640
<v Speaker 1>the the exact same thing. If if you want to

0:30:41.680 --> 0:30:43.880
<v Speaker 1>express it and jump through the attic, you can do that,

0:30:44.320 --> 0:30:46.840
<v Speaker 1>but at the end of the day, you're not gonna

0:30:46.960 --> 0:30:49.880
<v Speaker 1>be able to escape the situation measure, and then then

0:30:49.920 --> 0:30:52.160
<v Speaker 1>that's basically Okay, I'm at a point where I need

0:30:52.200 --> 0:30:55.440
<v Speaker 1>to minimize your all right. So I heard a m

0:30:56.200 --> 0:30:58.880
<v Speaker 1>I think it was actually Chris Cole. Chris Cole said

0:30:58.960 --> 0:31:01.880
<v Speaker 1>this when I podcast, and he was basically saying, like

0:31:02.440 --> 0:31:05.640
<v Speaker 1>when the market was tanking, we had our our phones

0:31:05.760 --> 0:31:08.520
<v Speaker 1>ringing off the hook, and you know, everybody wanted to

0:31:08.520 --> 0:31:10.560
<v Speaker 1>to hide a point, but you're bid crent like, look,

0:31:10.920 --> 0:31:12.960
<v Speaker 1>there's nothing I can do for you at this point,

0:31:13.320 --> 0:31:15.960
<v Speaker 1>Like you you want you want to try to hide

0:31:16.040 --> 0:31:20.320
<v Speaker 1>up your book now when the market takes you down,

0:31:20.320 --> 0:31:23.000
<v Speaker 1>like the time to head was beforehand, right, you should

0:31:23.000 --> 0:31:26.400
<v Speaker 1>have been calling those guys beforehand. So the game of

0:31:26.480 --> 0:31:29.920
<v Speaker 1>volatility is a psychological game, right because people look at

0:31:29.960 --> 0:31:32.560
<v Speaker 1>this and they say, you know, I don't really need

0:31:32.560 --> 0:31:34.760
<v Speaker 1>this right now? Why am I gonna lose flod percent

0:31:34.840 --> 0:31:37.680
<v Speaker 1>off my portfolio paying for this? You know, like things

0:31:37.680 --> 0:31:39.960
<v Speaker 1>are fine, right, but those are the moments where you

0:31:39.960 --> 0:31:43.720
<v Speaker 1>really need it, because yeah, you may lose five percent

0:31:44.480 --> 0:31:47.920
<v Speaker 1>and your books paying for volatility, but it's going to

0:31:48.040 --> 0:31:51.320
<v Speaker 1>off set those losses where you're gonna lose thirty five

0:31:53.040 --> 0:31:57.200
<v Speaker 1>And in some situations, guys, if you were positioned well

0:31:57.320 --> 0:31:59.880
<v Speaker 1>enough like we did. You know, we did um ah

0:32:00.000 --> 0:32:03.320
<v Speaker 1>our tests to see where our positioning would be in

0:32:03.800 --> 0:32:06.240
<v Speaker 1>and watch, and it was very easy to see that

0:32:06.880 --> 0:32:09.720
<v Speaker 1>with a small allocation, not only would you have recoup

0:32:09.800 --> 0:32:12.240
<v Speaker 1>your losses on and based on the allocation that we

0:32:12.280 --> 0:32:14.160
<v Speaker 1>believe and I won't go into it, you know, discussing

0:32:14.200 --> 0:32:17.000
<v Speaker 1>that on the podcast, but you would have not only

0:32:17.000 --> 0:32:19.680
<v Speaker 1>recoup your losses, but you would have made money. So

0:32:20.440 --> 0:32:23.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, obviously contingent on the allocation side and whatnot,

0:32:23.560 --> 0:32:26.760
<v Speaker 1>but there is a situation where this thing is not

0:32:26.840 --> 0:32:29.760
<v Speaker 1>only served as a perspective base, but it could also

0:32:30.080 --> 0:32:32.120
<v Speaker 1>make money for you. And you know, even if you

0:32:32.160 --> 0:32:35.920
<v Speaker 1>were just a blind guy that just decided blinding volatility

0:32:36.440 --> 0:32:40.000
<v Speaker 1>pre February March, you made money. If you were long volatility,

0:32:40.040 --> 0:32:42.120
<v Speaker 1>it was very difficult for you not to make money.

0:32:42.400 --> 0:32:46.400
<v Speaker 1>It's hard to try to express that view and try

0:32:46.400 --> 0:32:48.120
<v Speaker 1>to get cute and creative about it, because at the

0:32:48.200 --> 0:32:50.959
<v Speaker 1>end of the day, your your focus is basically on

0:32:50.960 --> 0:32:54.640
<v Speaker 1>one thing, and that's really just to mitigate list. I

0:32:54.720 --> 0:32:56.760
<v Speaker 1>want to go back to the question that I asked

0:32:57.040 --> 0:32:58.880
<v Speaker 1>right at the beginning, which is why do all curve

0:32:59.000 --> 0:33:01.880
<v Speaker 1>slope upboards? And I mean, I understand that that's how

0:33:01.880 --> 0:33:03.800
<v Speaker 1>it always is, but you know, it seems to me

0:33:04.600 --> 0:33:07.280
<v Speaker 1>that if you wanted to ask, like, oh, what's the

0:33:07.280 --> 0:33:09.800
<v Speaker 1>stock market going to do over the next week or

0:33:09.840 --> 0:33:12.680
<v Speaker 1>the next month, for the next two years, the next

0:33:12.680 --> 0:33:15.880
<v Speaker 1>five years, um, it's probably gonna go up based on

0:33:16.200 --> 0:33:18.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm not talking about the future, but I mean, historically speaking,

0:33:18.760 --> 0:33:21.160
<v Speaker 1>that was just the case that over the long term,

0:33:21.200 --> 0:33:24.080
<v Speaker 1>and this is like a fundamental axiom of investing, just

0:33:24.280 --> 0:33:26.520
<v Speaker 1>like over the long term, hold for the long term

0:33:26.520 --> 0:33:29.720
<v Speaker 1>stocks usually go up, etcetera. And so if this is

0:33:29.760 --> 0:33:32.880
<v Speaker 1>one of the fundamental ideas in investing that the short

0:33:33.000 --> 0:33:35.600
<v Speaker 1>term is noise and the long term is a steady gain,

0:33:36.000 --> 0:33:39.440
<v Speaker 1>which is what most asset managers sort of assume. Why

0:33:39.680 --> 0:33:42.360
<v Speaker 1>do people pay more for protection over the long term

0:33:42.680 --> 0:33:47.440
<v Speaker 1>than the short term. Yeah, that's a really good philosophical question.

0:33:47.560 --> 0:33:50.840
<v Speaker 1>I think it's because we don't have and we can't

0:33:50.920 --> 0:33:55.960
<v Speaker 1>really project an idea of how detrimental the ramistications will be. Right,

0:33:56.160 --> 0:33:59.320
<v Speaker 1>And it's one of those situations where when the AD

0:33:59.440 --> 0:34:04.280
<v Speaker 1>launched to take place, most likely it's the beginning of

0:34:04.280 --> 0:34:06.880
<v Speaker 1>what will be a bigger ball, right, So it's like

0:34:07.040 --> 0:34:10.319
<v Speaker 1>that snowball effect, and it's very hard to try to

0:34:10.400 --> 0:34:12.520
<v Speaker 1>price that out. You know, if we were in a

0:34:12.600 --> 0:34:17.080
<v Speaker 1>situation where guys could buy cheap ball on forward projections,

0:34:17.960 --> 0:34:21.040
<v Speaker 1>I think, from philostrophical standpoint, guys to do it. But

0:34:21.120 --> 0:34:23.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, I think people who don't really trade ball atility.

0:34:24.600 --> 0:34:28.640
<v Speaker 1>I didn't know that when the market tanked in February March,

0:34:29.520 --> 0:34:32.360
<v Speaker 1>the longer dated stuff on the term structure didn't really

0:34:32.360 --> 0:34:34.440
<v Speaker 1>move too much, right if you look at some of

0:34:34.480 --> 0:34:36.600
<v Speaker 1>the I mean, if you want to just talk about

0:34:36.600 --> 0:34:40.200
<v Speaker 1>like an exotic note, um, well let's just say in jail,

0:34:40.280 --> 0:34:43.800
<v Speaker 1>like two years out the vall on that didn't really

0:34:43.840 --> 0:34:47.960
<v Speaker 1>move as much as people anticipate, right, But the longer dated,

0:34:48.280 --> 0:34:50.120
<v Speaker 1>the real longer dated ball stuff like you know, you

0:34:50.160 --> 0:34:53.319
<v Speaker 1>don't know five years, three years the year, that type

0:34:53.360 --> 0:34:56.040
<v Speaker 1>of stuff doesn't really get going when fall is uh

0:34:56.800 --> 0:34:59.719
<v Speaker 1>something like that. You know, So there is that miscon

0:34:59.719 --> 0:35:02.719
<v Speaker 1>stuff and that people have where you know, they think like, well,

0:35:03.000 --> 0:35:05.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, five years, five years of old or whatever,

0:35:05.920 --> 0:35:08.120
<v Speaker 1>it's probably slight. So you know, I'm just gonna sell it. Well,

0:35:09.120 --> 0:35:11.520
<v Speaker 1>it's not easy. I think everybody would just set up

0:35:11.600 --> 0:35:16.040
<v Speaker 1>is you just do that? But yeah, from philostophical standpoint,

0:35:16.719 --> 0:35:19.520
<v Speaker 1>I could see why, uh, or projecting its tough, right,

0:35:19.560 --> 0:35:21.799
<v Speaker 1>And I mean you to think about all the bright

0:35:21.880 --> 0:35:25.160
<v Speaker 1>hands in the market, right, we have so many intelligent guys,

0:35:25.200 --> 0:35:30.080
<v Speaker 1>and nobody can per project volatility. There's a big assumption

0:35:30.120 --> 0:35:32.680
<v Speaker 1>factor and there's a lot of variance and a ton

0:35:32.719 --> 0:35:36.239
<v Speaker 1>of variability and in those types of assumptions and that

0:35:36.320 --> 0:35:39.360
<v Speaker 1>type of modeling. So with all the bright minds that

0:35:39.440 --> 0:35:43.560
<v Speaker 1>this world has produced, nobody has been able to accurately

0:35:44.320 --> 0:35:47.680
<v Speaker 1>forecast volatility. You could have maybe a sense, and you

0:35:47.719 --> 0:35:50.320
<v Speaker 1>know you could, you could make it one or two times,

0:35:50.480 --> 0:35:55.799
<v Speaker 1>but actively forecasting volatility is something that I just don't

0:35:55.800 --> 0:36:01.920
<v Speaker 1>think that humans can do right now. Well, Chris, that

0:36:02.000 --> 0:36:05.520
<v Speaker 1>was a really engaging discussion, and it's always good to

0:36:05.560 --> 0:36:09.000
<v Speaker 1>dive into the volatility space, especially now when we have

0:36:09.120 --> 0:36:11.759
<v Speaker 1>interesting things going on ahead of the election. And I

0:36:11.800 --> 0:36:14.120
<v Speaker 1>guess the good news is we won't have to wait

0:36:14.719 --> 0:36:17.799
<v Speaker 1>that long to see how it all shakes out, so

0:36:18.000 --> 0:36:21.400
<v Speaker 1>just until November December, I guess. Thanks so much for

0:36:21.440 --> 0:36:25.080
<v Speaker 1>coming on. Thanks Chris, that was great. Thank you guys,

0:36:40.760 --> 0:36:43.560
<v Speaker 1>So Joe. I always enjoy it when we talk about

0:36:43.680 --> 0:36:46.279
<v Speaker 1>the volatility trading space, and it's good to get a

0:36:46.440 --> 0:36:49.680
<v Speaker 1>sort of market practitioner like Chris who's in the weeds

0:36:49.680 --> 0:36:53.040
<v Speaker 1>and can really explain what's going on when we see

0:36:53.280 --> 0:36:57.399
<v Speaker 1>a gamma hedging event in markets. Yeah, there's so many

0:36:57.440 --> 0:37:02.279
<v Speaker 1>interesting things to think about. I mean, one is, you know,

0:37:02.719 --> 0:37:06.959
<v Speaker 1>against thinking talking to Chris trying to bend think about

0:37:06.960 --> 0:37:10.480
<v Speaker 1>all these retail traders who have come in to the

0:37:10.560 --> 0:37:13.719
<v Speaker 1>market either and in multiple ways, I mean, some of

0:37:13.800 --> 0:37:16.800
<v Speaker 1>course going crazy with call buying. Also, I thought it

0:37:16.840 --> 0:37:19.160
<v Speaker 1>was interesting Chris mentioning the rise of like this sort

0:37:19.200 --> 0:37:22.320
<v Speaker 1>of like passive like I'm just getting, you know, by

0:37:22.440 --> 0:37:24.759
<v Speaker 1>the same amount of stock every week on an app

0:37:24.840 --> 0:37:28.080
<v Speaker 1>like acorn or whatever. How much of the opportunity sort

0:37:28.120 --> 0:37:31.680
<v Speaker 1>of comes down to like market structure things as opposed

0:37:31.719 --> 0:37:35.800
<v Speaker 1>to taking some directional view like oh, I think Biden

0:37:35.960 --> 0:37:39.920
<v Speaker 1>is going to win and therefore X. Yeah. Absolutely, And

0:37:40.040 --> 0:37:42.840
<v Speaker 1>I guess the big change that we've seen in the

0:37:42.880 --> 0:37:45.640
<v Speaker 1>market in recent years is that volatility trading has sort

0:37:45.680 --> 0:37:50.800
<v Speaker 1>of exploded into its own industry, and with it that's

0:37:50.840 --> 0:37:53.920
<v Speaker 1>had had the impact on dealers, and then what the

0:37:53.920 --> 0:37:56.560
<v Speaker 1>dealers are doing is having an impact on the broader market,

0:37:56.680 --> 0:38:00.600
<v Speaker 1>but also volatility expectations as well, So it turns into

0:38:00.680 --> 0:38:05.040
<v Speaker 1>this sort of um, self fulfilling isn't the right word,

0:38:05.040 --> 0:38:09.879
<v Speaker 1>but I guess self fueling cycle of volatility trading, so

0:38:10.000 --> 0:38:15.839
<v Speaker 1>like suppression begets further suppression. Basically, yes, And you know, look,

0:38:15.880 --> 0:38:18.759
<v Speaker 1>I still don't feel like I understand why volatility curve

0:38:18.800 --> 0:38:23.680
<v Speaker 1>slope upward. It doesn't make any sense to me. The

0:38:23.719 --> 0:38:25.759
<v Speaker 1>short term is weird and we don't know what's going

0:38:25.800 --> 0:38:28.680
<v Speaker 1>to happen tomorrow, but probably the long term will be

0:38:28.800 --> 0:38:33.120
<v Speaker 1>kind of boring, right. I also know, I feel like

0:38:33.160 --> 0:38:36.040
<v Speaker 1>the long term, I mean, look, I think has kind

0:38:36.040 --> 0:38:38.759
<v Speaker 1>of jaded me about what can happen in a single year.

0:38:38.880 --> 0:38:42.040
<v Speaker 1>Let alone over the course of a decade, but any

0:38:42.239 --> 0:38:45.880
<v Speaker 1>tomorrow could be very weird. We know that, what about

0:38:46.320 --> 0:38:50.200
<v Speaker 1>ten years from tomorrow, Well, ten years from tomorrow, every

0:38:50.200 --> 0:38:52.600
<v Speaker 1>single advisor we would ever talk about say, yeah, stocks

0:38:52.600 --> 0:38:54.560
<v Speaker 1>will probably be hard. Yeah, but you don't know what

0:38:55.000 --> 0:38:56.960
<v Speaker 1>it's like, Like this is like but you don't know

0:38:57.000 --> 0:39:01.680
<v Speaker 1>what happens in the meantime. Who cares? And I guess

0:39:02.880 --> 0:39:05.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm still like on the hunt for like a totally

0:39:05.160 --> 0:39:08.759
<v Speaker 1>satisfying answer about how the investment industry's view could be

0:39:09.360 --> 0:39:12.400
<v Speaker 1>docs generally go up, ignore the short term noise. But

0:39:12.480 --> 0:39:14.480
<v Speaker 1>also we're going to pay more for long term hedges

0:39:14.520 --> 0:39:16.919
<v Speaker 1>than we do short term mages. Okay, look, I think

0:39:17.120 --> 0:39:20.960
<v Speaker 1>the moral of this conversation, or the big takeaway is

0:39:21.040 --> 0:39:24.080
<v Speaker 1>that you're going to be selling some very very cheap

0:39:24.280 --> 0:39:27.880
<v Speaker 1>volatility exposure ten years in the future. Everyone should come

0:39:27.920 --> 0:39:30.680
<v Speaker 1>to you for their long term hedging needs. Yeah, I'm

0:39:30.880 --> 0:39:33.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm putting a call out right now. No, I'm not,

0:39:33.520 --> 0:39:35.560
<v Speaker 1>but I guess, you know, thinking about it that way,

0:39:35.560 --> 0:39:37.960
<v Speaker 1>it's like, sure, I can say that that I'll like

0:39:38.200 --> 0:39:40.040
<v Speaker 1>would be a seller of long term vall, but do

0:39:40.080 --> 0:39:41.480
<v Speaker 1>I really want to be on the hook for it?

0:39:41.760 --> 0:39:44.080
<v Speaker 1>Maybe that's the issue. I just don't want to. I

0:39:44.120 --> 0:39:45.800
<v Speaker 1>just don't want to take it on my book. Yeah.

0:39:45.840 --> 0:39:47.640
<v Speaker 1>I think it's going to end up being something like

0:39:47.680 --> 0:39:52.400
<v Speaker 1>the carrying cost over that course of time, isn't it. Okay? Well,

0:39:52.960 --> 0:39:57.839
<v Speaker 1>on that note again, everyone buy vall exposure from Joe

0:39:58.000 --> 0:40:01.160
<v Speaker 1>he's offering. But in the means time. This has been

0:40:01.280 --> 0:40:04.640
<v Speaker 1>another episode of the All Thoughts Podcast. I'm Tracy Alloway.

0:40:04.760 --> 0:40:07.960
<v Speaker 1>You can follow me on Twitter at Tracy Alloway. And

0:40:08.040 --> 0:40:10.879
<v Speaker 1>I'm Joe Wisenthal. You can follow me on Twitter at

0:40:10.880 --> 0:40:14.359
<v Speaker 1>the Stalwork. Follow our guest on Twitter, Chris Steel. He's

0:40:14.440 --> 0:40:19.240
<v Speaker 1>at he S I D I I I So Pasted

0:40:19.360 --> 0:40:23.680
<v Speaker 1>with three Eyes. Follow our producer Laura Carlson at Laura M. Carlson.

0:40:24.000 --> 0:40:28.000
<v Speaker 1>Follow the Bloomberg head of podcast, Francesco Levie at Francesco Today,

0:40:28.400 --> 0:40:31.120
<v Speaker 1>and check out all of our podcasts at Bloomberg under

0:40:31.160 --> 0:41:02.759
<v Speaker 1>the handle at podcast. Thanks for listening to