WEBVTT - Bull Run’s Third Year Nears Close

0:00:02.520 --> 0:00:13.760
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news. This is the Bloomberg

0:00:13.840 --> 0:00:17.920
<v Speaker 1>Surveillance Podcast. Catch us live weekdays at seven am Eastern

0:00:18.200 --> 0:00:21.240
<v Speaker 1>on Apple car Play or Android Auto with the Bloomberg

0:00:21.320 --> 0:00:24.840
<v Speaker 1>Business App. Listen on demand wherever you get your podcasts,

0:00:25.280 --> 0:00:27.160
<v Speaker 1>or watch us live on YouTube.

0:00:27.320 --> 0:00:29.720
<v Speaker 2>Our next guest, a bit of a contrarian, I'm going

0:00:29.760 --> 0:00:32.000
<v Speaker 2>to call hers, is not quite as bullish as some

0:00:32.040 --> 0:00:34.839
<v Speaker 2>of our other guests have been about the outlook for

0:00:34.920 --> 0:00:38.680
<v Speaker 2>equities in twenty twenty six. She's even talking maybe possibly

0:00:38.720 --> 0:00:39.560
<v Speaker 2>a recession.

0:00:39.720 --> 0:00:40.040
<v Speaker 3>I don't know.

0:00:40.120 --> 0:00:43.040
<v Speaker 2>Let's talk it over with Christina Hooper, chief market strategist

0:00:43.360 --> 0:00:46.000
<v Speaker 2>at Man Group. Christina, great to have you here in

0:00:46.080 --> 0:00:48.360
<v Speaker 2>an early Happy New Year to you and your family.

0:00:48.840 --> 0:00:51.080
<v Speaker 2>All right, let's talk about it. Are we going to

0:00:51.159 --> 0:00:54.959
<v Speaker 2>be able to make this four consecutive up years by

0:00:55.000 --> 0:00:57.840
<v Speaker 2>double digits in a row for US equities?

0:00:59.600 --> 0:01:02.640
<v Speaker 4>Well, that's a great question, Alexis, and I think we

0:01:02.760 --> 0:01:05.800
<v Speaker 4>certainly could see that, but I think we have to

0:01:05.840 --> 0:01:10.720
<v Speaker 4>anticipate more volatility, and in fact, I would expect some

0:01:10.840 --> 0:01:15.440
<v Speaker 4>kind of significant sell off earlier in the year, foreshadowing

0:01:15.680 --> 0:01:20.760
<v Speaker 4>an economic downturn, arguably a modest recession. And then are recovery.

0:01:21.000 --> 0:01:24.240
<v Speaker 4>So I certainly think stocks US stocks could eke out

0:01:24.280 --> 0:01:27.559
<v Speaker 4>gains next year, maybe even as much as a ten

0:01:27.600 --> 0:01:30.759
<v Speaker 4>percent gain next year, but it will not be an

0:01:30.800 --> 0:01:34.160
<v Speaker 4>easy path to the end of the year. And I

0:01:34.200 --> 0:01:37.560
<v Speaker 4>think that makes sense just given the kind of gains

0:01:37.560 --> 0:01:40.520
<v Speaker 4>we've seen thus far and also the kind of vulnerabilities

0:01:40.560 --> 0:01:42.160
<v Speaker 4>we're seeing with the US economy.

0:01:42.880 --> 0:01:46.560
<v Speaker 3>Talk to us about your economic call here, Christina A.

0:01:46.360 --> 0:01:49.240
<v Speaker 3>What are you calling for in twenty twenty six and

0:01:49.280 --> 0:01:51.200
<v Speaker 3>kind of what are the drivers there that maybe some

0:01:51.440 --> 0:01:52.880
<v Speaker 3>folks in the market might be missing.

0:01:54.240 --> 0:01:56.200
<v Speaker 4>So if we think about twenty twenty five, and there

0:01:56.200 --> 0:02:01.080
<v Speaker 4>were two key drivers of economic growth, consumers spending and

0:02:01.240 --> 0:02:05.720
<v Speaker 4>AI CAPEC spending, and both of them could see significant

0:02:06.360 --> 0:02:11.200
<v Speaker 4>declines in twenty twenty six. Let's take consumer spending largely

0:02:11.320 --> 0:02:15.800
<v Speaker 4>driven by higher income consumers. Certainly they benefited from the

0:02:15.840 --> 0:02:19.400
<v Speaker 4>wealth effect in twenty five. We saw how well capital

0:02:19.480 --> 0:02:23.800
<v Speaker 4>markets did. Certainly if that could change in that could

0:02:23.840 --> 0:02:26.400
<v Speaker 4>easily change in twenty six, especially if we do see

0:02:26.400 --> 0:02:28.560
<v Speaker 4>a sell off earlier in the year. But I actually

0:02:28.560 --> 0:02:31.840
<v Speaker 4>think the bigger threat is an increase in unemployment. What

0:02:31.880 --> 0:02:34.079
<v Speaker 4>we've heard from a number of companies is that they

0:02:34.200 --> 0:02:39.960
<v Speaker 4>plan on layoffs related largely to AI, not entirely, that

0:02:40.000 --> 0:02:46.320
<v Speaker 4>could easily accelerate and again tamp down consumer spending. Fear

0:02:47.000 --> 0:02:50.600
<v Speaker 4>also can breed some reduction in consumer spending and for

0:02:50.760 --> 0:02:53.120
<v Speaker 4>lower and middle income Americans. Of course, the issue has

0:02:53.160 --> 0:02:57.560
<v Speaker 4>been affordability that doesn't go away. In my opinion, I

0:02:57.560 --> 0:03:00.400
<v Speaker 4>think it gets worse in twenty twenty six. It doesn't

0:03:00.440 --> 0:03:04.360
<v Speaker 4>mean that inflation moves higher necessarily, but it means that

0:03:04.400 --> 0:03:08.800
<v Speaker 4>they're still under the strain of higher than normal, above

0:03:08.960 --> 0:03:14.119
<v Speaker 4>target inflation. So that can be very very problematic. Since

0:03:14.120 --> 0:03:17.000
<v Speaker 4>we've relied so much on consumer spending, and add in

0:03:17.040 --> 0:03:21.000
<v Speaker 4>the potential for reduction in or a slowdown in AI

0:03:21.120 --> 0:03:25.600
<v Speaker 4>capex spending growth, this is an environment in which there

0:03:25.680 --> 0:03:31.799
<v Speaker 4>are more vulnerabilities. Access to rare earth resources is questionable. Also,

0:03:31.960 --> 0:03:34.360
<v Speaker 4>just the ability to continue the build out of data

0:03:34.400 --> 0:03:39.200
<v Speaker 4>centers from a financing perspective, as well as perhaps legislative

0:03:39.240 --> 0:03:42.960
<v Speaker 4>opposition we're talking about Bernie. We've heard from Bernie Sanders

0:03:43.080 --> 0:03:48.320
<v Speaker 4>arguing for as cessation on data center build out. We

0:03:48.360 --> 0:03:52.880
<v Speaker 4>could see more opposition growing, especially with electricity issues. That

0:03:52.960 --> 0:03:56.040
<v Speaker 4>was one of the big concerns coming out of exit

0:03:56.080 --> 0:03:58.840
<v Speaker 4>polls in the New Jersey race this fall, So a

0:03:58.880 --> 0:04:04.640
<v Speaker 4>lot could certainly the strength of both consumer spending and

0:04:04.760 --> 0:04:07.080
<v Speaker 4>ai CAAPX spending in twenty twenty six.

0:04:07.320 --> 0:04:09.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's a good point, especially with the midterm elections,

0:04:09.520 --> 0:04:12.160
<v Speaker 2>right Christina. I mean, that's another big wild card that

0:04:12.200 --> 0:04:15.280
<v Speaker 2>could affect things like regulation. I want to talk about

0:04:15.280 --> 0:04:17.680
<v Speaker 2>precious metals though, because we've been talking about it a

0:04:17.680 --> 0:04:20.920
<v Speaker 2>whole lot. Given the year that they've had, spot gold

0:04:21.000 --> 0:04:23.839
<v Speaker 2>up sixty five percent year to date, silver up one

0:04:23.880 --> 0:04:26.880
<v Speaker 2>hundred and fifty percent year to date, copper up better

0:04:26.920 --> 0:04:29.279
<v Speaker 2>than forty three percent year to date. Do you think

0:04:29.320 --> 0:04:32.479
<v Speaker 2>there's still room in the portfolio to have these precious

0:04:32.520 --> 0:04:35.719
<v Speaker 2>medals for investors and to what extent in the new year.

0:04:37.000 --> 0:04:42.719
<v Speaker 4>So absolutely, I think those are important, although relatively small

0:04:42.839 --> 0:04:47.719
<v Speaker 4>components of investors' portfolios perhaps should be larger. I do

0:04:47.800 --> 0:04:50.120
<v Speaker 4>think there is a lot. There are a lot of

0:04:50.160 --> 0:04:53.200
<v Speaker 4>good reasons why, especially when it comes to gold. I

0:04:53.200 --> 0:04:55.880
<v Speaker 4>think what we're going to see is more concerns around

0:04:55.920 --> 0:04:58.960
<v Speaker 4>growing deficits. Not just a US problem, This is a

0:04:58.960 --> 0:05:03.800
<v Speaker 4>problem in a number of countries. Questions about Fiat currencies

0:05:04.279 --> 0:05:12.080
<v Speaker 4>and growing growing interest and perceptions of gold. As we

0:05:12.240 --> 0:05:14.960
<v Speaker 4>go to safe haven asset class. And what we know

0:05:15.040 --> 0:05:19.000
<v Speaker 4>from history is that in almost every bear market, six

0:05:19.080 --> 0:05:22.400
<v Speaker 4>out of seven bear markets, gold held up better than

0:05:22.400 --> 0:05:24.719
<v Speaker 4>the S and P five hundred in most of those

0:05:24.800 --> 0:05:28.760
<v Speaker 4>environments produced a positive return when stock sold off six

0:05:28.800 --> 0:05:33.279
<v Speaker 4>out of six corrections. So gold has been historically a

0:05:33.320 --> 0:05:35.440
<v Speaker 4>safe haven asset class, and I think it will be

0:05:35.560 --> 0:05:38.839
<v Speaker 4>even more so going forward. But it also has other

0:05:38.960 --> 0:05:42.919
<v Speaker 4>drivers that that mean it could perform well in a

0:05:43.000 --> 0:05:46.320
<v Speaker 4>variety of different environments. I think there's a place for silver,

0:05:46.560 --> 0:05:49.159
<v Speaker 4>but we have to recognize that the volatility we've seen

0:05:49.240 --> 0:05:53.960
<v Speaker 4>this year could easily continue or even exacerbate in the future.

0:05:54.680 --> 0:05:57.240
<v Speaker 3>Christina, we've had some really really strong earnings in twenty

0:05:57.240 --> 0:06:00.400
<v Speaker 3>twenty five. What's the earnings outlook for twenty six years opinion?

0:06:00.440 --> 0:06:03.039
<v Speaker 3>And is that enough to support risk assets?

0:06:04.320 --> 0:06:07.360
<v Speaker 4>So I certainly think the outlook is, in my opinion,

0:06:07.640 --> 0:06:11.159
<v Speaker 4>a bit weaker. I think again there are vulnerabilities there,

0:06:11.680 --> 0:06:15.640
<v Speaker 4>especially when it comes to consumer related companies, but not

0:06:16.520 --> 0:06:20.119
<v Speaker 4>exclusively there, and of course if one thing goes wrong,

0:06:20.360 --> 0:06:24.320
<v Speaker 4>multiple things can go wrong. So I would anticipate tepid

0:06:24.480 --> 0:06:28.600
<v Speaker 4>earnings growth. But again I think that we're going to

0:06:28.640 --> 0:06:33.359
<v Speaker 4>hear from companies that will relay to us in first

0:06:33.440 --> 0:06:36.840
<v Speaker 4>quarter earnings calls excuse me fourth quarter earnings calls in

0:06:37.080 --> 0:06:41.360
<v Speaker 4>the first quarter, that the situation is getting more difficult,

0:06:41.560 --> 0:06:45.680
<v Speaker 4>especially when it comes to consumer spending, and that there

0:06:45.720 --> 0:06:49.120
<v Speaker 4>will be more layoffs. And I anticipate again there will

0:06:49.160 --> 0:06:52.839
<v Speaker 4>be a lot of negative sentiment or increase in negative

0:06:52.839 --> 0:06:57.039
<v Speaker 4>sentiment as we move through the early part of twenty

0:06:57.120 --> 0:07:00.440
<v Speaker 4>twenty six. So I think again we'll see earn growth,

0:07:00.440 --> 0:07:03.480
<v Speaker 4>but I think it's going to be significantly lower than

0:07:03.520 --> 0:07:06.440
<v Speaker 4>most anticipate as they sit here at the end of

0:07:06.440 --> 0:07:07.279
<v Speaker 4>twenty twenty five.

0:07:07.880 --> 0:07:10.040
<v Speaker 2>Christina, want to touch on the bond market before we

0:07:10.120 --> 0:07:11.920
<v Speaker 2>let you go. You said, I was looking at your note.

0:07:11.960 --> 0:07:15.160
<v Speaker 2>You said you expect bond vigilantes to come out in

0:07:15.240 --> 0:07:18.920
<v Speaker 2>greater force in next year. Why do you think that's

0:07:18.960 --> 0:07:21.000
<v Speaker 2>true and what kind of an impact might that have

0:07:21.120 --> 0:07:23.000
<v Speaker 2>on I guess like the ten year treasury yield.

0:07:24.640 --> 0:07:27.920
<v Speaker 4>So we've certainly seen some hints of it in twenty

0:07:27.960 --> 0:07:31.600
<v Speaker 4>twenty five, for the US, for Japan, for the UK,

0:07:32.480 --> 0:07:35.800
<v Speaker 4>for France. There are a number of countries that do

0:07:35.920 --> 0:07:39.880
<v Speaker 4>not appear to be on a fiscally sustainable path, and

0:07:40.840 --> 0:07:46.480
<v Speaker 4>I believe bond bond holders are growing more concerned about

0:07:46.480 --> 0:07:50.400
<v Speaker 4>countries like the US. We saw some real hints of it,

0:07:50.560 --> 0:07:54.040
<v Speaker 4>especially as the One Big Beautiful Bill worked its way

0:07:54.040 --> 0:07:58.360
<v Speaker 4>through Congress, because of the potential for increased piscal depthsits.

0:07:58.640 --> 0:08:00.320
<v Speaker 4>So I think this is a year in which we're

0:08:00.320 --> 0:08:03.440
<v Speaker 4>going to see some greater punishment. I think the yield

0:08:03.520 --> 0:08:07.640
<v Speaker 4>goes up significantly, which can very well weigh down on

0:08:08.080 --> 0:08:10.960
<v Speaker 4>stock prices. But I wouldn't be surprised to see the tenure.

0:08:11.000 --> 0:08:14.560
<v Speaker 4>You'd get close to or get to five percent in

0:08:14.600 --> 0:08:15.520
<v Speaker 4>twenty twenty six.

0:08:15.800 --> 0:08:18.240
<v Speaker 2>All right, bringing us some fresh ideas for this market

0:08:18.320 --> 0:08:21.840
<v Speaker 2>at twenty twenty six, Christina Hooper, chief market strategist at

0:08:21.880 --> 0:08:22.400
<v Speaker 2>Man Group.

0:08:24.120 --> 0:08:27.280
<v Speaker 3>Stay with us more from Bloomberg Surveillance coming up after this.

0:08:33.480 --> 0:08:37.080
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Surveillance podcast. Catch us live

0:08:37.160 --> 0:08:40.160
<v Speaker 1>weekday afternoons from seven to ten am. He's durn Listen

0:08:40.240 --> 0:08:43.800
<v Speaker 1>on Applecarplay and Android Otto with the Bloomberg Business app,

0:08:43.960 --> 0:08:45.840
<v Speaker 1>or watch us live on YouTube.

0:08:46.000 --> 0:08:47.959
<v Speaker 3>This economy, what's the economy going to look like in

0:08:48.040 --> 0:08:51.839
<v Speaker 3>a twenty twenty six inflation, job growth, economic growth. Let's

0:08:51.920 --> 0:08:54.160
<v Speaker 3>check in with our next guest, Ian Wyatt he's a

0:08:54.240 --> 0:08:59.400
<v Speaker 3>chief economist at Huntington Bank. He joins us via zoom Ian.

0:08:59.400 --> 0:09:00.920
<v Speaker 3>Thanks so much for joining us here. I love to

0:09:00.920 --> 0:09:04.800
<v Speaker 3>get your backdrop how you're kind of framing out your

0:09:04.840 --> 0:09:07.080
<v Speaker 3>economic outlook for twenty twenty six.

0:09:08.640 --> 0:09:10.720
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, we've really looked at it. We always like to

0:09:10.720 --> 0:09:13.280
<v Speaker 5>look at it through a few key themes. I think

0:09:13.320 --> 0:09:16.040
<v Speaker 5>one of the key themes we see is there's still

0:09:16.200 --> 0:09:18.480
<v Speaker 5>largely a healthy consumer, but you kind of have that

0:09:18.600 --> 0:09:21.800
<v Speaker 5>case shaped split, So we do see households when we

0:09:21.840 --> 0:09:24.040
<v Speaker 5>talk to companies. We're seeing it in the data. Now.

0:09:24.040 --> 0:09:27.199
<v Speaker 5>We were anticipating three and a half four percent raises

0:09:27.240 --> 0:09:30.280
<v Speaker 5>coming to most consumers. You have Social Security coming in

0:09:30.240 --> 0:09:32.679
<v Speaker 5>at almost three percent. In terms of the COLA adjustment.

0:09:33.040 --> 0:09:35.200
<v Speaker 5>You have a lot of people with as you know,

0:09:35.280 --> 0:09:39.199
<v Speaker 5>our previous guests mentioned decent equity gains and potentially decent

0:09:39.240 --> 0:09:41.400
<v Speaker 5>equity gains going forward. So you have that wealth effect

0:09:41.440 --> 0:09:44.480
<v Speaker 5>for upper income households. How or for lower income households,

0:09:44.520 --> 0:09:47.640
<v Speaker 5>we still see the stress. We see that delayed effect

0:09:47.679 --> 0:09:50.760
<v Speaker 5>of inflation. If you think about inflation, really it tends

0:09:50.840 --> 0:09:53.080
<v Speaker 5>to hit with a lag for a lot of people,

0:09:53.120 --> 0:09:55.880
<v Speaker 5>even if it's being measured in more of a linear basis,

0:09:55.960 --> 0:09:57.640
<v Speaker 5>Like you know, we only buy a car every three

0:09:57.760 --> 0:10:01.400
<v Speaker 5>four years, so that you know, that rise and used

0:10:01.480 --> 0:10:05.400
<v Speaker 5>car prices took a while to spread across households, as

0:10:05.440 --> 0:10:07.280
<v Speaker 5>well as the rise in interest rate center and we

0:10:07.280 --> 0:10:09.040
<v Speaker 5>haven't seen that much of a decline in that area.

0:10:09.080 --> 0:10:09.880
<v Speaker 1>So we see it.

0:10:09.920 --> 0:10:12.400
<v Speaker 5>We see a healthy consumer. We think that drives spending.

0:10:12.440 --> 0:10:15.439
<v Speaker 5>Next year, we think that drives growth. We're targeting one

0:10:15.480 --> 0:10:17.960
<v Speaker 5>and a half to two percent growth. And we think

0:10:18.120 --> 0:10:20.640
<v Speaker 5>also though a little bit of a tight labor market

0:10:20.960 --> 0:10:24.200
<v Speaker 5>keeps inflation somewhat elevated two seven, two eight next year.

0:10:25.360 --> 0:10:27.560
<v Speaker 5>Part of that really is the immigration story. We think

0:10:27.600 --> 0:10:31.960
<v Speaker 5>that's one a huge story and the implications are incredibly widespread.

0:10:31.960 --> 0:10:34.720
<v Speaker 5>So that's another theme we've really been talking about this year.

0:10:35.360 --> 0:10:37.679
<v Speaker 2>You are we going to see the immigration story, as

0:10:37.679 --> 0:10:40.880
<v Speaker 2>you put it, play out in the jobs report coming

0:10:40.920 --> 0:10:43.440
<v Speaker 2>up on January ninth and in subsequent jobs reports.

0:10:43.440 --> 0:10:45.760
<v Speaker 3>Do you think, oh, no question.

0:10:46.240 --> 0:10:49.520
<v Speaker 5>When we talk to companies, you know, it's kind of fascinating.

0:10:49.800 --> 0:10:52.199
<v Speaker 5>First of all, it's the supply story. Although as we're

0:10:52.240 --> 0:10:56.520
<v Speaker 5>seeing the unemployment rate ticking up, the supply of labor

0:10:56.800 --> 0:11:00.720
<v Speaker 5>hasn't was growing at a tremendous CLIPID a bit slower.

0:11:00.720 --> 0:11:02.800
<v Speaker 5>We think that that slows consumption spending next year a

0:11:02.800 --> 0:11:06.120
<v Speaker 5>little bit. So you have that, but you still get

0:11:06.120 --> 0:11:07.920
<v Speaker 5>a little bit of a tighter labor market than at

0:11:07.920 --> 0:11:10.480
<v Speaker 5>that lower end. So over the next few months, yes,

0:11:10.559 --> 0:11:13.360
<v Speaker 5>we expect that it just limits the potential growth rate

0:11:13.400 --> 0:11:17.280
<v Speaker 5>of the economy in terms of job growth. So that's

0:11:17.280 --> 0:11:19.240
<v Speaker 5>one area. Another I think we're going to see a

0:11:19.240 --> 0:11:21.320
<v Speaker 5>lot more automation. You know, I was talking to a

0:11:21.320 --> 0:11:25.720
<v Speaker 5>company that makes high end lawnmowers basically for golf carts,

0:11:26.480 --> 0:11:28.520
<v Speaker 5>golf courses, that kind of thing, and they said, and

0:11:28.559 --> 0:11:30.720
<v Speaker 5>this is not the only company where I've had this conversation,

0:11:30.800 --> 0:11:34.360
<v Speaker 5>but only Onaldmowing company, And they said, look are golf

0:11:34.400 --> 0:11:38.240
<v Speaker 5>course clients. They're interested in the automated mowers, the ones

0:11:38.280 --> 0:11:43.720
<v Speaker 5>that basically operate without without human inter interaction. And they're

0:11:43.800 --> 0:11:46.840
<v Speaker 5>much less concerned about cost than they were a few

0:11:46.840 --> 0:11:49.319
<v Speaker 5>months ago, because they're really worried that they just can't

0:11:49.360 --> 0:11:52.120
<v Speaker 5>find the labor. And so at that lower end and

0:11:52.200 --> 0:11:55.400
<v Speaker 5>a lot of those manual jobs. We were an economy

0:11:55.440 --> 0:11:59.840
<v Speaker 5>pretty reliant on immigrant labor, and so that's that's sort

0:11:59.840 --> 0:12:02.760
<v Speaker 5>of playing out in a lot of different areas and.

0:12:02.920 --> 0:12:05.319
<v Speaker 3>We're going to get the one the benefits of the

0:12:05.360 --> 0:12:09.080
<v Speaker 3>one big, beautiful build, presumably in twenty twenty six. How

0:12:09.080 --> 0:12:10.640
<v Speaker 3>did you guys kind of model that out?

0:12:12.400 --> 0:12:14.280
<v Speaker 5>We saw a couple of ways. We're seeing that hit

0:12:14.320 --> 0:12:16.679
<v Speaker 5>and we've heard it from clients too, So it's a

0:12:16.720 --> 0:12:19.400
<v Speaker 5>mix of you know, what we're modeling what's reasonable. We

0:12:19.480 --> 0:12:22.400
<v Speaker 5>see that as maybe close to zero point four point

0:12:22.440 --> 0:12:26.800
<v Speaker 5>five percent growth to GDP you get a positive benefit

0:12:26.880 --> 0:12:30.719
<v Speaker 5>obviously similar tax rates. On the investment side. It's really

0:12:30.760 --> 0:12:33.800
<v Speaker 5>a shift I think we have from structures to equipment.

0:12:34.240 --> 0:12:37.520
<v Speaker 5>So in the previous administration, you had a lot of

0:12:37.840 --> 0:12:40.719
<v Speaker 5>factors that were you know, the Chips Act, you had

0:12:40.880 --> 0:12:45.120
<v Speaker 5>EV mandates, you had a lot of things driving construction

0:12:45.200 --> 0:12:48.640
<v Speaker 5>activity and manufacturing. We had record manufacturing construction activities. So

0:12:48.720 --> 0:12:51.640
<v Speaker 5>really a structure story, a building story. We see that

0:12:51.760 --> 0:12:53.520
<v Speaker 5>pulling back, you know, I think we've seen that in

0:12:53.559 --> 0:12:55.920
<v Speaker 5>a lot of categories, and the construction activities got in

0:12:56.160 --> 0:13:01.200
<v Speaker 5>pretty narrow. It's pretty much data centers, energy empower related

0:13:01.240 --> 0:13:04.080
<v Speaker 5>to data centers and infrastructure because still some of the

0:13:04.120 --> 0:13:06.160
<v Speaker 5>infrastructure money is out there and there's a lot of

0:13:06.160 --> 0:13:08.840
<v Speaker 5>infrastructure spending, but otherwise, we see a lot of weakness

0:13:08.880 --> 0:13:12.240
<v Speaker 5>in the construction category, but on the investment side, the

0:13:12.280 --> 0:13:15.319
<v Speaker 5>one big beautiful bill in terms of equipment, the equipment

0:13:15.320 --> 0:13:18.319
<v Speaker 5>side's pretty strong. We're hearing that broadly that a lot

0:13:18.360 --> 0:13:22.360
<v Speaker 5>of companies are looking at that immediate depreciation expense advantage

0:13:22.760 --> 0:13:27.640
<v Speaker 5>and we're seeing orders. We add I did a finance

0:13:27.720 --> 0:13:30.160
<v Speaker 5>or I was in Pittsburgh a couple of weeks ago

0:13:30.440 --> 0:13:32.240
<v Speaker 5>and we had a client come into one of our

0:13:32.280 --> 0:13:34.480
<v Speaker 5>rms there saying, Hey, I need four million dollars before

0:13:34.480 --> 0:13:35.880
<v Speaker 5>the end of the year because I want to lower

0:13:35.880 --> 0:13:37.400
<v Speaker 5>my tax bill and I'm going to buy a bunch

0:13:37.440 --> 0:13:40.080
<v Speaker 5>of equipment. And that's playing out. You know, we see

0:13:40.080 --> 0:13:42.760
<v Speaker 5>that as zero point one point two percent, really driving

0:13:42.800 --> 0:13:45.160
<v Speaker 5>a shift though in the investment mix, the investment mix

0:13:45.240 --> 0:13:47.320
<v Speaker 5>shifting from structures to equipment.

0:13:48.559 --> 0:13:51.439
<v Speaker 2>Ian as a chief as chief economist over at Huntington Bank,

0:13:51.640 --> 0:13:55.320
<v Speaker 2>what's your outlook for rate cuts from the Fed next year?

0:13:55.320 --> 0:13:58.200
<v Speaker 2>How many do we get, if any at all?

0:13:58.360 --> 0:14:01.720
<v Speaker 5>Oh, we expect obviously the paw we'd anticipate and we said,

0:14:01.840 --> 0:14:03.839
<v Speaker 5>you know, going into December, we said, you know, one

0:14:03.880 --> 0:14:05.600
<v Speaker 5>more cut and then pause. We thought that was pretty

0:14:05.640 --> 0:14:07.920
<v Speaker 5>well signaled you know, I don't think we're any sort

0:14:07.920 --> 0:14:10.080
<v Speaker 5>of miracle workers here. We're just listening to the FED

0:14:10.120 --> 0:14:12.200
<v Speaker 5>in terms of that kind of signaling. And when we

0:14:12.240 --> 0:14:16.119
<v Speaker 5>saw the FED minutes come out yesterday, that was confirming

0:14:16.120 --> 0:14:18.280
<v Speaker 5>that idea that we're we're in the pause stage now.

0:14:18.480 --> 0:14:21.320
<v Speaker 5>If we look back to twenty four and twenty five,

0:14:21.400 --> 0:14:23.960
<v Speaker 5>we had pauses at the beginning of the year. Those

0:14:24.000 --> 0:14:27.160
<v Speaker 5>didn't end till September in both kid cases. We don't

0:14:27.200 --> 0:14:29.840
<v Speaker 5>think it lasts that long this pause. We expect one

0:14:29.880 --> 0:14:32.800
<v Speaker 5>more cut come March. Then of course Pal's term ends

0:14:32.880 --> 0:14:35.920
<v Speaker 5>in May. I think there'll be a couple more cuts likely,

0:14:36.040 --> 0:14:38.640
<v Speaker 5>So it probably puts us right around three percent over

0:14:38.680 --> 0:14:40.480
<v Speaker 5>the course of the year. But if we look at

0:14:40.480 --> 0:14:43.240
<v Speaker 5>the forecast, if we listen to the FED governors, we're

0:14:43.240 --> 0:14:45.280
<v Speaker 5>getting pretty close to that neutral rate. And what that

0:14:45.360 --> 0:14:47.320
<v Speaker 5>neutral rate means, of course, is that the FED really

0:14:47.400 --> 0:14:49.080
<v Speaker 5>views it as they're not stepping on the gas for

0:14:49.120 --> 0:14:51.040
<v Speaker 5>the economy. They're not hitting the brakes for the economy.

0:14:51.040 --> 0:14:52.520
<v Speaker 5>They're just sort of letting a glide. We're in a

0:14:52.520 --> 0:14:54.800
<v Speaker 5>glide path right now. They still think they're hitting the

0:14:54.840 --> 0:14:57.760
<v Speaker 5>brakes for the economy. And as we get closer to

0:14:57.800 --> 0:15:01.040
<v Speaker 5>that neutral rate. We think the FED governors, some of

0:15:01.120 --> 0:15:03.320
<v Speaker 5>those governors who are really open to cuts now are

0:15:03.360 --> 0:15:05.280
<v Speaker 5>going to become more resistant. This is going to be

0:15:05.280 --> 0:15:08.520
<v Speaker 5>a more hesitant Fed. We still expect, partly because of

0:15:08.560 --> 0:15:11.760
<v Speaker 5>a somewhat tight lower end labor market, especially in areas

0:15:11.840 --> 0:15:17.360
<v Speaker 5>like healthcare services when you're talking about lodging restaurants, We

0:15:17.400 --> 0:15:21.000
<v Speaker 5>think that those wage increases are going to keep pushing

0:15:21.080 --> 0:15:24.360
<v Speaker 5>up some price increases across the board, and that's roughly

0:15:24.400 --> 0:15:27.560
<v Speaker 5>a third of the CPI is the services we were

0:15:27.560 --> 0:15:31.840
<v Speaker 5>talking about there. So we expect that that plays into

0:15:31.880 --> 0:15:34.040
<v Speaker 5>a couple more cuts this year. Still, you have a

0:15:34.080 --> 0:15:36.920
<v Speaker 5>pretty soft labor market that gets the FED moving. The

0:15:36.920 --> 0:15:39.400
<v Speaker 5>federally cares way more about the labor market than the

0:15:39.560 --> 0:15:42.440
<v Speaker 5>stock market, and that gets them to do a couple

0:15:42.560 --> 0:15:44.320
<v Speaker 5>more cuts. But we think, you know, you get close

0:15:44.360 --> 0:15:47.360
<v Speaker 5>to three, you're really at that neutral rate where some

0:15:47.440 --> 0:15:49.760
<v Speaker 5>of those dubbish voices maybe get a little more hawkish.

0:15:49.960 --> 0:15:52.080
<v Speaker 3>Yep, yep, all right, Ian, thank you so much, appreciate

0:15:52.080 --> 0:15:54.040
<v Speaker 3>getting a few minutes of your time. Ian, whytt he's

0:15:54.080 --> 0:15:58.840
<v Speaker 3>a chief economist over there at Huntington Bank. Stay with us.

0:15:58.920 --> 0:16:01.400
<v Speaker 3>More from Bloomberg Survail. It's coming up after this.

0:16:07.640 --> 0:16:11.200
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. Catch us live

0:16:11.280 --> 0:16:14.440
<v Speaker 1>weekday afternoons from seven to ten am Eastern. Listen on

0:16:14.520 --> 0:16:18.200
<v Speaker 1>Applecarplay and Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business app, or

0:16:18.320 --> 0:16:19.960
<v Speaker 1>watch us live on YouTube.

0:16:20.520 --> 0:16:24.760
<v Speaker 3>Eric Sterner, the chief investment officer Apollin Wealth Management, joins

0:16:24.840 --> 0:16:26.760
<v Speaker 3>us here in studio. You can be down there in

0:16:26.800 --> 0:16:29.400
<v Speaker 3>Times Square here later on tonight it did ball drop,

0:16:29.480 --> 0:16:31.880
<v Speaker 3>so a lot of fun down there. Eric, Thanks so

0:16:31.960 --> 0:16:34.680
<v Speaker 3>much for joining us here. How are you what's the

0:16:34.680 --> 0:16:37.800
<v Speaker 3>conversation you're having with your clients these days about setting

0:16:37.840 --> 0:16:40.360
<v Speaker 3>expectations for twenty twenty six. We had three years of

0:16:40.840 --> 0:16:43.680
<v Speaker 3>double digit returns for the equity markets. The bond market's

0:16:43.680 --> 0:16:46.520
<v Speaker 3>been really good for investors. They've if they had some

0:16:46.600 --> 0:16:50.200
<v Speaker 3>gold or silver even better. How do you set expectations

0:16:50.200 --> 0:16:50.880
<v Speaker 3>for twenty six?

0:16:51.160 --> 0:16:55.200
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, we've certainly been very spoiled the last three years

0:16:55.240 --> 0:17:00.359
<v Speaker 6>with very strong returns kind of SMP five hundred. We're

0:17:01.000 --> 0:17:04.240
<v Speaker 6>talking to our clients and just reminding them that while

0:17:04.320 --> 0:17:06.800
<v Speaker 6>we know the market breath has been very narrow for

0:17:06.840 --> 0:17:11.159
<v Speaker 6>the past you know, two and three years, we expect

0:17:11.160 --> 0:17:15.919
<v Speaker 6>that to broaden out and between value stocks, large guy value,

0:17:16.000 --> 0:17:19.919
<v Speaker 6>small cap international. So now's not the time. Now's a

0:17:19.920 --> 0:17:23.000
<v Speaker 6>good time, I should say, to rebalance the portfolio and

0:17:23.920 --> 0:17:27.400
<v Speaker 6>to take a little off on the technology side, because

0:17:27.440 --> 0:17:29.800
<v Speaker 6>I think there's plenty of sectors that have really strong

0:17:29.840 --> 0:17:33.160
<v Speaker 6>returns going into twenty twenty six, both domestically as well

0:17:33.160 --> 0:17:34.000
<v Speaker 6>as international.

0:17:34.240 --> 0:17:36.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I'm glad you mentioned international as well, and Eric,

0:17:36.640 --> 0:17:40.240
<v Speaker 2>give us if you can some specifics. I love specifics

0:17:40.240 --> 0:17:43.240
<v Speaker 2>when guests can come on and join us names or

0:17:43.440 --> 0:17:45.160
<v Speaker 2>ideas sectors outside of tech.

0:17:45.480 --> 0:17:49.200
<v Speaker 6>Sure, yeah, I mean so within Maybe I'll start off

0:17:49.200 --> 0:17:53.160
<v Speaker 6>with domestically if some sectors I like, if that's financials

0:17:53.400 --> 0:17:56.240
<v Speaker 6>had a tremendous year, and I expect you know, there's

0:17:56.280 --> 0:17:58.520
<v Speaker 6>a little bump in the road when Jamie Diamond made

0:17:58.520 --> 0:17:59.640
<v Speaker 6>that conroach.

0:18:00.480 --> 0:18:03.160
<v Speaker 2>And not the credit at Tricolor and First Brand.

0:18:03.200 --> 0:18:06.240
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, exactly, But I don't think there's any evidence of

0:18:06.359 --> 0:18:09.800
<v Speaker 6>widespread concerns there. Even within the high yield market. We

0:18:09.840 --> 0:18:16.600
<v Speaker 6>see investment grade levels within high yield, but I think financials,

0:18:16.720 --> 0:18:19.600
<v Speaker 6>just with the interest rates coming down, I think we're

0:18:19.600 --> 0:18:21.600
<v Speaker 6>going to see some more m and a activity pick

0:18:21.680 --> 0:18:25.160
<v Speaker 6>up in twenty twenty six. In fact, during the government shutdown,

0:18:25.280 --> 0:18:29.080
<v Speaker 6>more than nine hundred registration statements, including IPOs were filed

0:18:29.119 --> 0:18:32.360
<v Speaker 6>with SEC. So I was already expecting a big year

0:18:32.400 --> 0:18:35.320
<v Speaker 6>in MA activity within financials, but now even more so

0:18:35.440 --> 0:18:38.639
<v Speaker 6>as they worked through that backlog. And then another sector

0:18:38.720 --> 0:18:41.440
<v Speaker 6>that really got its legs in the fourth quarter is healthcare.

0:18:41.600 --> 0:18:43.879
<v Speaker 6>And healthcare has just been stuck in the rut for

0:18:43.920 --> 0:18:46.760
<v Speaker 6>a long time, and it typically does with new White

0:18:46.800 --> 0:18:50.720
<v Speaker 6>House administration, just because there's so much policy uncertainty. But

0:18:50.720 --> 0:18:52.840
<v Speaker 6>I think we're starting to get past that. And I

0:18:52.840 --> 0:18:56.680
<v Speaker 6>think it's great with healthcare is that you have it's

0:18:56.920 --> 0:18:59.440
<v Speaker 6>traditionally a defensive play, but I think there's so much

0:18:59.480 --> 0:19:02.760
<v Speaker 6>innovation in there. Besides the AI. I think the weight

0:19:02.800 --> 0:19:05.359
<v Speaker 6>loss drugs are the second biggest innovation in the markets

0:19:05.440 --> 0:19:09.440
<v Speaker 6>right now, and there was a bottleneck and drug supplies

0:19:09.480 --> 0:19:12.400
<v Speaker 6>there earlier year that's been cleared. A lot of these

0:19:12.440 --> 0:19:14.920
<v Speaker 6>biotech companies made a deal with the Weight House. We're

0:19:14.960 --> 0:19:17.400
<v Speaker 6>in exchange for lowering prices, they're going to get more

0:19:17.440 --> 0:19:21.960
<v Speaker 6>weight loss coverage with Medicare and potentially Medicaid, and that

0:19:22.119 --> 0:19:24.680
<v Speaker 6>opens up those weight loss drugs the forty million more

0:19:24.760 --> 0:19:27.080
<v Speaker 6>people and that industry is expected to be one hundred

0:19:27.080 --> 0:19:30.200
<v Speaker 6>and fifty billion by twenty thirty, so I think that's

0:19:30.240 --> 0:19:34.440
<v Speaker 6>another sector that I really like going into twenty twenty six.

0:19:35.280 --> 0:19:39.919
<v Speaker 6>And then on the international front, the valuations are still

0:19:40.160 --> 0:19:45.320
<v Speaker 6>very attractive compared to US stocks specifically, I think Japan

0:19:45.920 --> 0:19:48.720
<v Speaker 6>is just such an incredible story and still plenty of

0:19:48.760 --> 0:19:52.000
<v Speaker 6>legs to go, and many people are surprised if you

0:19:52.080 --> 0:19:56.439
<v Speaker 6>look at the past decade earnings per share. Cumulative earnings

0:19:56.480 --> 0:19:58.720
<v Speaker 6>per share for Japanese companies are up over two hundred

0:19:58.720 --> 0:20:03.040
<v Speaker 6>fifty percent, which exceeds the US, Europe, even the UK.

0:20:03.720 --> 0:20:06.640
<v Speaker 6>And now with Prime Minister Takashi bringing in some more

0:20:06.680 --> 0:20:10.200
<v Speaker 6>pro growth policies, I expect stronger returns or more strong

0:20:10.280 --> 0:20:11.320
<v Speaker 6>returns coming out of Japan.

0:20:11.640 --> 0:20:13.679
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I mean international has been the place here is

0:20:13.720 --> 0:20:15.320
<v Speaker 3>as good as the returns have been in the US

0:20:15.400 --> 0:20:19.080
<v Speaker 3>if you look at EMEA. Much better returns here, I mean,

0:20:19.160 --> 0:20:23.000
<v Speaker 3>led by Spain, particularly when you adjust for currencies. Spain

0:20:23.080 --> 0:20:26.199
<v Speaker 3>adjusted for the currency's up seventy percent this year, just extraordinary.

0:20:26.240 --> 0:20:29.200
<v Speaker 3>We've seen double digit games across Europe and a couple

0:20:29.240 --> 0:20:32.480
<v Speaker 3>of the Asian markets, including Hong Kong. Kind of emerging

0:20:32.480 --> 0:20:35.359
<v Speaker 3>markets here. I think the chatter around emerging markets is

0:20:35.400 --> 0:20:37.680
<v Speaker 3>just kind of a little bit louder and louder and

0:20:37.720 --> 0:20:40.520
<v Speaker 3>louder over the course of twenty twenty five, and people

0:20:40.640 --> 0:20:41.879
<v Speaker 3>were talking about that a little more. How do you

0:20:41.880 --> 0:20:42.600
<v Speaker 3>guys think about that?

0:20:42.960 --> 0:20:46.919
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, I expect those returns again to still have some

0:20:46.960 --> 0:20:49.760
<v Speaker 6>more lakes to them. I mean, typically you see emerging

0:20:49.880 --> 0:20:52.600
<v Speaker 6>market because a lot of their debt is US denominate it.

0:20:52.880 --> 0:20:55.280
<v Speaker 6>When the FED starts easing, you could see your merging

0:20:55.320 --> 0:20:58.720
<v Speaker 6>market equities rally more. Certainly certainly seeing that especially with

0:20:58.760 --> 0:21:03.320
<v Speaker 6>the US dollar to depreciate. And we know this AI

0:21:03.359 --> 0:21:07.679
<v Speaker 6>revolution is worldwide phenomenal, So some of those tech really

0:21:07.720 --> 0:21:12.239
<v Speaker 6>centric nations, especially outside of China or benefiting of some

0:21:12.280 --> 0:21:16.440
<v Speaker 6>of these companies redesigning supply chains away from China are benefiting.

0:21:16.480 --> 0:21:19.760
<v Speaker 6>And even countries like Mexico as we're looking for more

0:21:19.920 --> 0:21:23.720
<v Speaker 6>near shoring opportunities with the US, have benefited. So I

0:21:23.720 --> 0:21:26.080
<v Speaker 6>think we could still see some strong returns have a

0:21:26.160 --> 0:21:29.160
<v Speaker 6>marching markets going forward into twenty twenty six.

0:21:29.680 --> 0:21:33.520
<v Speaker 2>You talked about lower interest rates being a tailwind for financials,

0:21:33.560 --> 0:21:36.640
<v Speaker 2>they could also be for those small caps. Russell two

0:21:36.640 --> 0:21:39.479
<v Speaker 2>thousand taking a look here on the Bloomberg terminal up

0:21:39.520 --> 0:21:41.719
<v Speaker 2>twelve percent year to date. Not too shabby, I mean,

0:21:41.800 --> 0:21:45.879
<v Speaker 2>underperforming the other major indexes, but still solid respectable gains there.

0:21:46.040 --> 0:21:49.240
<v Speaker 2>Even more so, what's your outlook for the small caps?

0:21:49.400 --> 0:21:52.320
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, I think twenty twenty five was the big year

0:21:52.359 --> 0:21:55.080
<v Speaker 6>what international made to come back. I think twenty twenty

0:21:55.080 --> 0:21:57.080
<v Speaker 6>six could be the big year where small cap makes

0:21:57.160 --> 0:21:59.720
<v Speaker 6>come back. And it didn't have a bad year like

0:21:59.760 --> 0:22:01.600
<v Speaker 6>you said, I mean the wrestle it was up. I

0:22:01.640 --> 0:22:05.240
<v Speaker 6>think we could see stronger returns. Is just uh, that's

0:22:05.280 --> 0:22:07.879
<v Speaker 6>a very interest rate sensitive sector. We know that the

0:22:08.000 --> 0:22:10.520
<v Speaker 6>lagged effects of all the rate cuts and potentially maybe

0:22:10.840 --> 0:22:13.760
<v Speaker 6>one to two more rate cuts, all the benefits to

0:22:13.920 --> 0:22:18.920
<v Speaker 6>domestic companies with the OBBA and deregulation. You know, these

0:22:18.960 --> 0:22:23.159
<v Speaker 6>smaller companies have higher costs from a regulatory perspective. But

0:22:23.440 --> 0:22:26.160
<v Speaker 6>the one thing that will continue this rally is really

0:22:26.200 --> 0:22:29.119
<v Speaker 6>it needs the earnings. And right now, the earnings estimates

0:22:29.119 --> 0:22:32.320
<v Speaker 6>are expected for small cap companies to be up sixty

0:22:32.320 --> 0:22:35.160
<v Speaker 6>percent this year. Now, in the beginning of the year

0:22:35.280 --> 0:22:39.200
<v Speaker 6>is typical for small caps that you know, they temper

0:22:39.320 --> 0:22:42.240
<v Speaker 6>down those those expectations and you look at the last

0:22:42.280 --> 0:22:47.680
<v Speaker 6>twenty years. The projected earnings growth versus the actual earnings

0:22:47.680 --> 0:22:52.280
<v Speaker 6>growth is about negative twenty percent from for small cap stocks.

0:22:52.680 --> 0:22:55.639
<v Speaker 6>So if we're projecting sixty percent earnings growth for small

0:22:55.640 --> 0:22:58.280
<v Speaker 6>caps and let's say we deduct that twenty percent, as

0:22:58.280 --> 0:23:01.520
<v Speaker 6>we you know, throughout the y, we may see those

0:23:01.600 --> 0:23:05.080
<v Speaker 6>expectations lower a bit. That's still forty percent earnings growth

0:23:05.119 --> 0:23:08.320
<v Speaker 6>rate amongst small cap companies if that holds to the average,

0:23:08.560 --> 0:23:12.240
<v Speaker 6>which would really continue to drive this rally. The one

0:23:12.640 --> 0:23:15.879
<v Speaker 6>item that I would just make noteworthy is that I

0:23:15.920 --> 0:23:20.840
<v Speaker 6>am surprised that the Russell two thousand has outperformed the

0:23:20.960 --> 0:23:23.399
<v Speaker 6>S and P six hundred, which is another small cap index.

0:23:23.480 --> 0:23:26.760
<v Speaker 6>Russell two thousand and forty percent or so companies unprofitable,

0:23:27.080 --> 0:23:29.879
<v Speaker 6>whilst S and P six hundred it focuses more on

0:23:29.960 --> 0:23:33.440
<v Speaker 6>profitable companies. I expect that to reverse this year, because

0:23:33.480 --> 0:23:34.960
<v Speaker 6>I think there's going to be some months in the

0:23:35.040 --> 0:23:36.639
<v Speaker 6>road and I think we're going to see some heightened

0:23:36.680 --> 0:23:40.480
<v Speaker 6>volatility in twenty twenty six. But overall, I remain bullish,

0:23:40.520 --> 0:23:43.560
<v Speaker 6>and I would just advise advisors to lean more into

0:23:43.600 --> 0:23:47.479
<v Speaker 6>that quality factor. Companies with solid earning, solid balance sheets,

0:23:47.640 --> 0:23:49.080
<v Speaker 6>and solid cash flows.

0:23:49.280 --> 0:23:52.080
<v Speaker 3>What do you at your firm. Is it pronounced apollan

0:23:52.320 --> 0:23:55.080
<v Speaker 3>upolland yes, is it? Do you guys have a view

0:23:55.119 --> 0:23:57.919
<v Speaker 3>on alternative investments and maybe what percentage that should be

0:23:57.960 --> 0:23:59.879
<v Speaker 3>of a typical client's portfolio.

0:24:00.760 --> 0:24:04.639
<v Speaker 6>It varies, you know, certainly for our Apollum models, we

0:24:05.080 --> 0:24:09.760
<v Speaker 6>design models more just on the public market asset classes,

0:24:10.119 --> 0:24:13.320
<v Speaker 6>and then for very specific client situations, that's when we

0:24:13.480 --> 0:24:17.119
<v Speaker 6>look to potentially incorporate private investments into our portfolios if

0:24:17.160 --> 0:24:20.920
<v Speaker 6>they can afford the ill liquidity a great I'd say

0:24:20.920 --> 0:24:24.280
<v Speaker 6>a good portion of our clients do have some private

0:24:24.320 --> 0:24:28.360
<v Speaker 6>investments in their portfolios. We think we like to take

0:24:28.440 --> 0:24:33.320
<v Speaker 6>our typical asset allocation portfolio and then we basically substitute

0:24:33.320 --> 0:24:36.800
<v Speaker 6>some of those asset classes in so we may complement

0:24:37.240 --> 0:24:40.080
<v Speaker 6>the fixed income allocation with private credit. I mean, over

0:24:40.080 --> 0:24:43.480
<v Speaker 6>the last ten years, the yield for the bloom Barclay's

0:24:43.520 --> 0:24:46.720
<v Speaker 6>AD is about three percent, but private credit is all

0:24:46.800 --> 0:24:50.520
<v Speaker 6>over ten percent. So for clients that are entering and retirement,

0:24:50.560 --> 0:24:53.360
<v Speaker 6>that's why we think private credit could really boost the income.

0:24:53.920 --> 0:24:57.000
<v Speaker 6>And then we know there's less you know, publicly traded

0:24:57.119 --> 0:24:58.879
<v Speaker 6>stocks in the markets right now, so that's why we

0:24:58.880 --> 0:25:02.200
<v Speaker 6>think there's great opportunities. Private equity companies are staying private

0:25:02.240 --> 0:25:05.160
<v Speaker 6>for longer, so we like to complement small cap exposure

0:25:05.160 --> 0:25:09.639
<v Speaker 6>with private equity. So for our higher network clients, a

0:25:09.720 --> 0:25:12.359
<v Speaker 6>high majority of them do have those private investments. We

0:25:12.440 --> 0:25:15.480
<v Speaker 6>really consider that a client by client basis, as opposed

0:25:15.520 --> 0:25:20.200
<v Speaker 6>to creating portfolios with alternatives al rating involved or out

0:25:20.280 --> 0:25:21.200
<v Speaker 6>allocated to them.

0:25:21.520 --> 0:25:23.159
<v Speaker 3>Eric, thanks so much for joining us. We appreciate it.

0:25:23.240 --> 0:25:26.960
<v Speaker 3>Eric Sturner, he is chief investment officer Apollent Wealth Management.

0:25:28.760 --> 0:25:31.920
<v Speaker 3>Stay with us. More from Bloomberg Surveillance coming up after this.

0:25:38.119 --> 0:25:41.680
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Surveillance podcast. Catch us live

0:25:41.760 --> 0:25:44.919
<v Speaker 1>weekday afternoons from seven to ten am Eastern Listen on

0:25:45.000 --> 0:25:48.679
<v Speaker 1>Applecarplay and Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business app, or

0:25:48.800 --> 0:25:50.439
<v Speaker 1>watch us live on YouTube.

0:25:50.720 --> 0:25:55.040
<v Speaker 3>Our next guest says residential real estate twenty twenty six

0:25:55.080 --> 0:25:58.080
<v Speaker 3>will be a transition year and not a turnaround.

0:25:58.080 --> 0:25:58.199
<v Speaker 5>Here.

0:25:58.280 --> 0:25:59.560
<v Speaker 3>Let's see what she means there, at least a start

0:25:59.560 --> 0:26:03.160
<v Speaker 3>of it, joins us. She's a chief economist for Bright MLS.

0:26:03.520 --> 0:26:07.800
<v Speaker 3>Boy Lisa, Housing affordability has been the challenge for would

0:26:07.800 --> 0:26:10.679
<v Speaker 3>be homeowners out there. Talk to us about kind of

0:26:10.680 --> 0:26:12.520
<v Speaker 3>where we are as we enter twenty twenty six.

0:26:13.920 --> 0:26:16.800
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, you know, housing affordability has really been the major

0:26:16.840 --> 0:26:19.720
<v Speaker 7>constraint on the housing market, and we're starting to see

0:26:19.800 --> 0:26:23.280
<v Speaker 7>affordability improve a little bit, right. We've seen mortgage rates

0:26:23.320 --> 0:26:26.560
<v Speaker 7>come down a little bit at their lowest levels, about

0:26:27.040 --> 0:26:30.159
<v Speaker 7>as they've been all year. We've seen price growth slow

0:26:30.280 --> 0:26:32.800
<v Speaker 7>a little bit, which has also helped, and so that's

0:26:32.800 --> 0:26:35.600
<v Speaker 7>made it affordability a little bit easier. But boy, it

0:26:35.720 --> 0:26:38.120
<v Speaker 7>still is a big challenge for those who are still

0:26:38.119 --> 0:26:40.760
<v Speaker 7>trying to get into the market. First time buyers, moderate

0:26:40.760 --> 0:26:43.800
<v Speaker 7>income buyers are still facing a really big challenge in

0:26:44.480 --> 0:26:45.199
<v Speaker 7>the year ahead.

0:26:46.160 --> 0:26:48.159
<v Speaker 2>So what do we have to look forward to if

0:26:48.200 --> 0:26:50.679
<v Speaker 2>you're wanting to get in a first time home buyer,

0:26:51.200 --> 0:26:53.439
<v Speaker 2>which we know, I think the average age now of

0:26:53.440 --> 0:26:55.600
<v Speaker 2>a first time home buyer is close to forty in

0:26:55.640 --> 0:26:58.320
<v Speaker 2>this country, which is hard to believe. And lots of

0:26:58.320 --> 0:27:01.879
<v Speaker 2>folks have given up owning home dream or delaying you know,

0:27:02.200 --> 0:27:05.719
<v Speaker 2>lots of life milestones just because I cannot afford that home.

0:27:06.440 --> 0:27:09.520
<v Speaker 2>Is that going to change in a meaningful way and

0:27:09.600 --> 0:27:11.359
<v Speaker 2>in the new year, and if so, what parts of

0:27:11.359 --> 0:27:13.080
<v Speaker 2>the country should those folks be looking at?

0:27:13.760 --> 0:27:16.919
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, you're absolutely right, this idea of becoming a homeowner.

0:27:16.960 --> 0:27:19.080
<v Speaker 7>For first time home buyers, it's all tied up with

0:27:19.160 --> 0:27:21.760
<v Speaker 7>all sorts of other life milestones right that people are

0:27:21.800 --> 0:27:25.720
<v Speaker 7>either delaying or sort of taking another look at. And

0:27:25.760 --> 0:27:27.520
<v Speaker 7>I think it is going to get easier for first

0:27:27.520 --> 0:27:31.200
<v Speaker 7>time home buyers, but not in every market across the country.

0:27:31.400 --> 0:27:33.680
<v Speaker 7>You know, there are places where inventory is still very

0:27:33.800 --> 0:27:36.800
<v Speaker 7>very tight. Places in the Midwest, places in the Northeast

0:27:37.080 --> 0:27:40.679
<v Speaker 7>where it's very competitive, where homes are still selling above asking,

0:27:40.680 --> 0:27:44.880
<v Speaker 7>where there's still multiple offers on homes. Other markets, though,

0:27:45.000 --> 0:27:47.280
<v Speaker 7>parts of the South, parts of the Southwest, we're seeing

0:27:47.280 --> 0:27:50.240
<v Speaker 7>a lot more inventory and frankly, a lot more leverage

0:27:50.240 --> 0:27:52.280
<v Speaker 7>for buyers. And that's where first time buyers are thinker

0:27:52.320 --> 0:27:54.040
<v Speaker 7>are going to have a little bit better options in

0:27:54.040 --> 0:27:55.679
<v Speaker 7>the year ahead. That's what I did.

0:27:55.720 --> 0:27:57.480
<v Speaker 3>I left the metro New York area and went to Richmond,

0:27:57.520 --> 0:28:03.800
<v Speaker 3>Virginia to get my first home to Affordability, as you mentioned, Lisa,

0:28:03.880 --> 0:28:06.280
<v Speaker 3>is a key key issue here, but it's also if

0:28:06.280 --> 0:28:07.760
<v Speaker 3>someone's going to buy a house, they have to feel

0:28:07.800 --> 0:28:09.960
<v Speaker 3>pretty good about the economy, they have to feel pretty

0:28:09.960 --> 0:28:13.240
<v Speaker 3>good about their jobs. Is that a tailwind or a

0:28:13.280 --> 0:28:14.679
<v Speaker 3>headwind here in this marketplace.

0:28:15.119 --> 0:28:16.560
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, you know, I'm really thinking about it as a

0:28:16.560 --> 0:28:18.920
<v Speaker 7>little bit of a tug of war. In twenty twenty six.

0:28:18.960 --> 0:28:22.399
<v Speaker 7>We have lower mortgage rates, lower price growth, really bringing

0:28:22.440 --> 0:28:24.840
<v Speaker 7>people into the market, making people want to get into

0:28:24.840 --> 0:28:28.080
<v Speaker 7>the market, improving affordability. But at the same time, there

0:28:28.119 --> 0:28:30.760
<v Speaker 7>is a lot of economic uncertainty. We're going to get

0:28:30.800 --> 0:28:33.640
<v Speaker 7>some new jobs numbers here next week, but people are

0:28:33.680 --> 0:28:36.920
<v Speaker 7>feeling more uncertain about their own economic situations. And when

0:28:36.960 --> 0:28:40.520
<v Speaker 7>people are feeling uncertain, they're less likely to do big

0:28:40.560 --> 0:28:43.080
<v Speaker 7>things like buy a home or sell a home. And

0:28:43.120 --> 0:28:44.760
<v Speaker 7>so there's going to be a push and pull between

0:28:44.760 --> 0:28:49.280
<v Speaker 7>these economic anxieties and these more favorable affordability conditions. And

0:28:49.360 --> 0:28:51.480
<v Speaker 7>right now, frankly, I don't think it's clear which one's

0:28:51.480 --> 0:28:52.120
<v Speaker 7>going to win out.

0:28:53.160 --> 0:28:55.520
<v Speaker 2>All right, let's talk mortgage rates, because they are a

0:28:55.520 --> 0:28:58.960
<v Speaker 2>part of the affordability issue. Paul, you said a moment

0:28:59.000 --> 0:29:01.239
<v Speaker 2>ago six point three percent on the fixed thirty year.

0:29:01.320 --> 0:29:03.959
<v Speaker 2>Right now, we were at seven percent at the beginning

0:29:03.960 --> 0:29:06.120
<v Speaker 2>of this year. What's the range you think for the

0:29:06.120 --> 0:29:08.760
<v Speaker 2>thirty year and the fifteen year that's popular for folks

0:29:08.800 --> 0:29:10.800
<v Speaker 2>looking to refinance in the new year.

0:29:11.680 --> 0:29:11.880
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:29:11.920 --> 0:29:14.400
<v Speaker 7>Our forecaster for the average rate on a thirty year

0:29:14.400 --> 0:29:16.920
<v Speaker 7>fix to stay above six percent in twenty twenty six.

0:29:17.040 --> 0:29:18.960
<v Speaker 7>You know, I think there are some forecasters who are

0:29:19.040 --> 0:29:21.880
<v Speaker 7>saying that rate will dip below six percent, But I

0:29:21.920 --> 0:29:25.560
<v Speaker 7>think there's a lot of unknown still, and so we're

0:29:25.600 --> 0:29:27.120
<v Speaker 7>going to be watching. I think the key thing is

0:29:27.200 --> 0:29:30.440
<v Speaker 7>for home buyers to not try to time rates. Think

0:29:30.480 --> 0:29:32.960
<v Speaker 7>they can time them, or they can look at ways

0:29:33.000 --> 0:29:35.600
<v Speaker 7>to sort of maneuver it. I think you have to

0:29:35.640 --> 0:29:38.240
<v Speaker 7>decide when is the best time for you to buy.

0:29:38.280 --> 0:29:41.200
<v Speaker 7>But let me let me on the thing about affordability. Though,

0:29:41.200 --> 0:29:43.640
<v Speaker 7>even if rates were at six percent, let's say at

0:29:43.640 --> 0:29:45.920
<v Speaker 7>a four hundred and ten thousand dollars home, you still

0:29:45.920 --> 0:29:47.920
<v Speaker 7>need the income of about one hundred and fifteen thousand

0:29:47.960 --> 0:29:51.600
<v Speaker 7>dollars to qualify. That's much higher than the median household

0:29:51.600 --> 0:29:53.840
<v Speaker 7>income in the US and really highlights how out of

0:29:54.240 --> 0:29:57.000
<v Speaker 7>balance between income and home prices we've gotten over the

0:29:57.080 --> 0:29:57.920
<v Speaker 7>last few years.

0:29:58.200 --> 0:29:59.920
<v Speaker 3>Why don't we just build more houses?

0:30:01.280 --> 0:30:04.400
<v Speaker 7>That would help, right, And so I think increasing the

0:30:04.440 --> 0:30:07.040
<v Speaker 7>supply would help. But it's not just about supply. You know.

0:30:07.040 --> 0:30:09.520
<v Speaker 7>We hear those high level numbers of what the housing

0:30:09.560 --> 0:30:11.720
<v Speaker 7>supply gap is, but we need to build homes in

0:30:11.760 --> 0:30:15.080
<v Speaker 7>the places that people want to live, right where there's

0:30:15.160 --> 0:30:18.719
<v Speaker 7>job growth, where there's an economic opportunity, and those are

0:30:18.760 --> 0:30:21.480
<v Speaker 7>the places where we need to see more homes be built.

0:30:21.480 --> 0:30:23.680
<v Speaker 7>We also need to see whether there are ways to

0:30:24.400 --> 0:30:27.000
<v Speaker 7>free up homes by encouraging people who want to sell

0:30:27.360 --> 0:30:29.920
<v Speaker 7>to actually do so, to get out from a mortgage

0:30:29.960 --> 0:30:31.960
<v Speaker 7>rate that they don't want to give up. So I

0:30:31.960 --> 0:30:34.400
<v Speaker 7>think there are ways to increase supply and that would

0:30:34.400 --> 0:30:35.880
<v Speaker 7>help the affordability challenge.

0:30:36.440 --> 0:30:39.360
<v Speaker 2>What do you do to incentivize somebody to want to

0:30:39.400 --> 0:30:41.640
<v Speaker 2>sell their home, especially if I'm not going to call

0:30:41.640 --> 0:30:43.560
<v Speaker 2>it a buyer's market in twenty twenty six, but if

0:30:43.560 --> 0:30:47.320
<v Speaker 2>it starts to move in that direction, what gets somebody

0:30:47.320 --> 0:30:48.120
<v Speaker 2>out of their house?

0:30:49.080 --> 0:30:50.760
<v Speaker 7>Yeah? So I think there's a couple of ways to

0:30:50.760 --> 0:30:52.760
<v Speaker 7>think about it. I mean, one is some people aren't

0:30:52.800 --> 0:30:55.120
<v Speaker 7>moving because there's nowhere for them to go, right, Folks

0:30:55.120 --> 0:30:57.000
<v Speaker 7>who might want to downsize don't see.

0:30:56.840 --> 0:30:57.320
<v Speaker 3>Nowhere to go.

0:30:57.400 --> 0:30:59.520
<v Speaker 7>So that gets back to that let's build more housing

0:30:59.720 --> 0:31:02.440
<v Speaker 7>for peace people to downsize into, folks who are retiring

0:31:02.480 --> 0:31:04.400
<v Speaker 7>and so on. But there may be other ways to

0:31:04.440 --> 0:31:08.920
<v Speaker 7>provide incentives, tax incentives or other incentives that could encourage

0:31:08.920 --> 0:31:11.440
<v Speaker 7>people to sell the home, maybe so they're not hit

0:31:11.520 --> 0:31:15.720
<v Speaker 7>with a big tax bill. If they've got huge gains

0:31:15.760 --> 0:31:18.320
<v Speaker 7>and the equity of their home, there may be ways

0:31:18.320 --> 0:31:20.360
<v Speaker 7>to encourage people to sell there, but it's really going

0:31:20.400 --> 0:31:21.120
<v Speaker 7>to be at the margins.

0:31:21.160 --> 0:31:23.200
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, Lisa, thank you so much for joining us. Always

0:31:23.240 --> 0:31:25.680
<v Speaker 3>appreciate getting some of your thoughts least sort of at

0:31:25.720 --> 0:31:28.000
<v Speaker 3>Chief Economists at Bright MLS.

0:31:28.000 --> 0:31:32.840
<v Speaker 1>This is the Bloomberg Surveillance podcast, available on apples, Spotify,

0:31:32.960 --> 0:31:37.240
<v Speaker 1>and anywhere else you get your podcasts. Listen live each weekday,

0:31:37.360 --> 0:31:40.600
<v Speaker 1>seven to ten am Easter and on Bloomberg dot com,

0:31:40.760 --> 0:31:44.560
<v Speaker 1>the iHeartRadio app, tune In, and the Bloomberg Business app.

0:31:44.840 --> 0:31:47.960
<v Speaker 1>You can also watch us live every weekday on YouTube

0:31:48.240 --> 0:31:50.280
<v Speaker 1>and always on the Bloomberg terminal.