WEBVTT - Sternlicht’s Starwood Gives Up on Malls

0:00:01.800 --> 0:00:04.440
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Business Week. I'm Charle Masser and I'm

0:00:04.480 --> 0:00:07.280
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Quick Takes Tim Stanovik. We're here every day bringing

0:00:07.320 --> 0:00:09.840
<v Speaker 1>you the latest news from the world to business and finance,

0:00:09.840 --> 0:00:13.640
<v Speaker 1>plus technology, politics, economics, all purtnising the power of Business

0:00:13.680 --> 0:00:17.159
<v Speaker 1>Week reporters and editors, not to mention our journalists and

0:00:17.120 --> 0:00:20.000
<v Speaker 1>analysts in more than one twenty countries. You can download

0:00:20.000 --> 0:00:23.479
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Business Weekend iTunes, SoundCloud, or Bloomberg dot com. You

0:00:23.480 --> 0:00:25.439
<v Speaker 1>can also listen to our radio show at two pm

0:00:25.440 --> 0:00:27.880
<v Speaker 1>Eastern Time on the Bloomberg Radio or watch us on

0:00:27.920 --> 0:00:32.120
<v Speaker 1>YouTube search Bloomberg Global News. And we've been watching a

0:00:32.120 --> 0:00:34.600
<v Speaker 1>couple of the names. When it comes to their results.

0:00:34.640 --> 0:00:36.720
<v Speaker 1>Chippy Morgan is down one point three percent, and a

0:00:36.800 --> 0:00:39.839
<v Speaker 1>quick check on Goldman Sacks again it is down just

0:00:39.840 --> 0:00:41.800
<v Speaker 1>about half percent off its loads of the days. Yeah,

0:00:41.880 --> 0:00:43.600
<v Speaker 1>let's get right into it with Alison at william Senior

0:00:43.640 --> 0:00:46.400
<v Speaker 1>Global Banks Analysts for Bloomberg Intelligence. Okay, so here, we

0:00:46.440 --> 0:00:49.000
<v Speaker 1>are not quite halfway through a big bank earnings. Allison,

0:00:49.120 --> 0:00:51.040
<v Speaker 1>how would you summarize what we know so far based

0:00:51.080 --> 0:00:54.160
<v Speaker 1>on the two banks that reported today? So I think

0:00:54.400 --> 0:00:58.400
<v Speaker 1>no big surprises, but really a sort of a continuation

0:00:58.640 --> 0:01:01.480
<v Speaker 1>of the trend in terms of some of the key

0:01:01.480 --> 0:01:08.559
<v Speaker 1>concerns around that interesting income and higher expenses. So the

0:01:08.200 --> 0:01:12.360
<v Speaker 1>the key for investors that are really focusing on is

0:01:12.440 --> 0:01:16.760
<v Speaker 1>the potential for loan growth to return in the second half.

0:01:17.480 --> 0:01:20.880
<v Speaker 1>Banks really need that to help loose their net interest income.

0:01:21.520 --> 0:01:24.319
<v Speaker 1>Trading was very good in the quarter on the equity

0:01:24.360 --> 0:01:27.080
<v Speaker 1>side of things. Fixed income down as we expected. We

0:01:27.120 --> 0:01:30.480
<v Speaker 1>expect further normalization in the second half. The big surprise

0:01:30.520 --> 0:01:33.560
<v Speaker 1>out of the investment banking arm of the businesses was

0:01:34.080 --> 0:01:38.720
<v Speaker 1>U merger and advisory. We expect that, excuse me, mergers

0:01:38.760 --> 0:01:41.959
<v Speaker 1>and acquisitions. The advised business we expect to continue to

0:01:41.959 --> 0:01:46.560
<v Speaker 1>be strong in the second half UM. But but that's

0:01:46.560 --> 0:01:48.800
<v Speaker 1>a small piece of it. And so in general we

0:01:48.880 --> 0:01:53.840
<v Speaker 1>have the big capital markets piece normalizing. We have UM

0:01:54.000 --> 0:01:58.160
<v Speaker 1>not interesting income a little bit disappointment. Disappointing just because

0:01:58.200 --> 0:02:02.520
<v Speaker 1>consumers are not borrowing. Corporations are using cash to buy companies,

0:02:02.520 --> 0:02:06.320
<v Speaker 1>consumers are using cash to fund their spending. Where well,

0:02:06.520 --> 0:02:10.240
<v Speaker 1>it's interesting. Well when it comes to borrowing, Uh, is

0:02:10.240 --> 0:02:14.320
<v Speaker 1>it just consumers and businesses aren't interested, or is it

0:02:14.400 --> 0:02:17.519
<v Speaker 1>that the banks are picky about who they give loans

0:02:17.560 --> 0:02:22.720
<v Speaker 1>to it's really more about the cash that corporations and

0:02:22.760 --> 0:02:27.639
<v Speaker 1>consumers have on their balancy. For consumers, it's really UM.

0:02:27.760 --> 0:02:32.639
<v Speaker 1>It's been fueled by the stimulus, so UM. Our Economics

0:02:32.639 --> 0:02:37.000
<v Speaker 1>Department of UM Bloomberg and Economics department has calculated over

0:02:37.080 --> 0:02:40.480
<v Speaker 1>two trillion dollars UM. And what we've seen with all

0:02:40.520 --> 0:02:43.600
<v Speaker 1>the stimulants payments that have come so far is consumers

0:02:43.639 --> 0:02:46.000
<v Speaker 1>have used that money to pay down debt. So that's

0:02:46.120 --> 0:02:50.320
<v Speaker 1>healthy UM but UM and they're spending, but they're just

0:02:50.400 --> 0:02:52.720
<v Speaker 1>paying that out of savings. And then on the corporate

0:02:52.720 --> 0:02:55.799
<v Speaker 1>side of things UM. As you recall a year ago,

0:02:55.840 --> 0:02:59.359
<v Speaker 1>in the pandemic took hold, corporations drew down on their

0:02:59.360 --> 0:03:03.280
<v Speaker 1>credit lines banks. However, when the capital markets opened up,

0:03:03.400 --> 0:03:07.040
<v Speaker 1>especially the large corporates, UM tapped those capital markets. So

0:03:07.040 --> 0:03:11.400
<v Speaker 1>we've seen very strong debt issuance UM over the past

0:03:11.480 --> 0:03:13.640
<v Speaker 1>year and effect in the most recent quarter, very strong

0:03:13.720 --> 0:03:18.200
<v Speaker 1>high yield issuance UM. So they're continuing to to raise

0:03:18.320 --> 0:03:21.840
<v Speaker 1>funds UM. And then what you know on the commercial

0:03:21.919 --> 0:03:26.519
<v Speaker 1>side of things, UM, it's really that UM again, we

0:03:26.520 --> 0:03:28.639
<v Speaker 1>we need the demand side to pick up. So it's

0:03:28.639 --> 0:03:31.800
<v Speaker 1>not the banks are out there, they have tons of deposits,

0:03:32.280 --> 0:03:34.440
<v Speaker 1>tons of liquidity. They want to make lens, but the

0:03:34.520 --> 0:03:36.840
<v Speaker 1>demand is just not there yet. So I wonder what

0:03:36.960 --> 0:03:40.560
<v Speaker 1>what was expected from from shareholders and if their expectations

0:03:41.320 --> 0:03:43.920
<v Speaker 1>were not met, especially when it comes to JP Morgan,

0:03:43.960 --> 0:03:46.160
<v Speaker 1>because shares down by more than one point three percent,

0:03:46.200 --> 0:03:49.960
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't sound like there wasn't that much that was surprising. Well, yes,

0:03:50.200 --> 0:03:52.080
<v Speaker 1>so I would keep in mind it was a very

0:03:52.080 --> 0:03:54.960
<v Speaker 1>strong quarter, but most of the strength that we saw

0:03:55.040 --> 0:03:59.080
<v Speaker 1>were things that UM had been expected. We had a

0:03:59.160 --> 0:04:03.680
<v Speaker 1>huge reserve release UM. Again, that's something that investors are

0:04:03.760 --> 0:04:07.520
<v Speaker 1>expecting that I guess the new news and again that

0:04:07.640 --> 0:04:10.080
<v Speaker 1>interest in come disappointing, but we had sort of, you know,

0:04:10.160 --> 0:04:12.480
<v Speaker 1>been trending that way over the last several quarters. But

0:04:12.520 --> 0:04:15.920
<v Speaker 1>the new news in terms of expenses and expenses I

0:04:15.960 --> 0:04:18.320
<v Speaker 1>think are something we're going to continue to be focusing

0:04:18.320 --> 0:04:21.640
<v Speaker 1>on this week. Across the banks. JP Morgan got into

0:04:21.680 --> 0:04:24.920
<v Speaker 1>sixty eight billion of expenses in January. That's gone up

0:04:25.440 --> 0:04:28.760
<v Speaker 1>UM to sixty nine, to seventy and now today seventy

0:04:28.839 --> 0:04:33.440
<v Speaker 1>one billion. And I do think that, you know, part

0:04:33.440 --> 0:04:35.880
<v Speaker 1>of it is because the revenue is better, but part

0:04:35.920 --> 0:04:38.720
<v Speaker 1>of it is they're investing. And I think that even

0:04:38.760 --> 0:04:43.240
<v Speaker 1>though investors might be disappointed today, JP Morgan has shown

0:04:43.240 --> 0:04:48.040
<v Speaker 1>over the last several years UM this ability to fund

0:04:48.080 --> 0:04:51.320
<v Speaker 1>what we call the virtuous cycle. So they're spending more UM,

0:04:51.320 --> 0:04:55.080
<v Speaker 1>but that's helping them to make more right, it's longer

0:04:55.200 --> 0:04:58.279
<v Speaker 1>term investments. It's you know, we all want management to

0:04:58.320 --> 0:05:00.160
<v Speaker 1>think long term, and so I think we need to

0:05:01.160 --> 0:05:04.560
<v Speaker 1>think long term along with them. And and with the

0:05:04.680 --> 0:05:07.520
<v Speaker 1>incredible trading that we've had over the last couple of years,

0:05:07.520 --> 0:05:10.600
<v Speaker 1>we think it's actually healthy UM that the banks are

0:05:10.640 --> 0:05:14.520
<v Speaker 1>investing this, especially with all the talk about fintech, all

0:05:14.520 --> 0:05:17.760
<v Speaker 1>the competition from fintech UM and everything going on on

0:05:17.760 --> 0:05:21.360
<v Speaker 1>that front. Well exactly, we just talked about city groups specifically, right, like,

0:05:21.520 --> 0:05:23.719
<v Speaker 1>you know, looking at fintech, I mean they're all staring

0:05:23.720 --> 0:05:27.039
<v Speaker 1>at down city city debuting that no fee retail trading

0:05:27.080 --> 0:05:31.640
<v Speaker 1>to compete with you know, others. So a little bit

0:05:31.680 --> 0:05:33.920
<v Speaker 1>of an opener for the rest of the big banks too.

0:05:33.960 --> 0:05:35.800
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna get here from what city group we've got,

0:05:35.839 --> 0:05:38.640
<v Speaker 1>what Bank of America we've got Wales, UM, tell us

0:05:38.640 --> 0:05:42.240
<v Speaker 1>what you're watching out for. So with city group UM,

0:05:42.360 --> 0:05:46.279
<v Speaker 1>they had actually already got into a higher expenses for

0:05:46.320 --> 0:05:49.360
<v Speaker 1>this particular quarter. We're going to be listening to see

0:05:49.400 --> 0:05:51.480
<v Speaker 1>what the guidance is for the full year. We think

0:05:51.520 --> 0:05:53.760
<v Speaker 1>the expense story there is a little bit more negative

0:05:53.880 --> 0:05:56.120
<v Speaker 1>because a lot of the driver there is that they

0:05:56.160 --> 0:05:59.279
<v Speaker 1>have to spend more UM to get sort of their

0:06:00.000 --> 0:06:03.760
<v Speaker 1>systems and compliance, so they have some regulatory concerns and issues,

0:06:03.800 --> 0:06:08.160
<v Speaker 1>So that UM expense spending where it's not generating revenue

0:06:08.200 --> 0:06:10.400
<v Speaker 1>is a little bit less positive to us, but that

0:06:10.400 --> 0:06:13.520
<v Speaker 1>that's the main thing we're looking for them. Bank America similarly,

0:06:13.560 --> 0:06:16.520
<v Speaker 1>they last quarter guided up expenses for the full year,

0:06:17.160 --> 0:06:20.000
<v Speaker 1>whilst Fargo already has had out of it expenses. We're

0:06:20.000 --> 0:06:22.760
<v Speaker 1>hoping them to come down. For all those banks, we're

0:06:22.760 --> 0:06:25.479
<v Speaker 1>going to be looking in terms of again what is

0:06:25.480 --> 0:06:28.520
<v Speaker 1>the loan growth outlook, what is the nut interesting some outlook,

0:06:28.760 --> 0:06:31.240
<v Speaker 1>and then one thing we didn't touch on quickly, prime

0:06:31.279 --> 0:06:35.760
<v Speaker 1>brokerage business very strong. Will Bank America and City Group

0:06:35.880 --> 0:06:38.479
<v Speaker 1>also show some strength. They're gaining some share in the

0:06:38.480 --> 0:06:41.040
<v Speaker 1>week of start see is pulled back. You did it.

0:06:41.120 --> 0:06:43.960
<v Speaker 1>You cover the universe. You're incredible, Alison, Thank you, thank you.

0:06:44.000 --> 0:06:47.120
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Intelligence Senior Global Banks analyst, Allison Williams. This is

0:06:47.120 --> 0:06:49.240
<v Speaker 1>a busy week for her. We know that she's joining

0:06:49.320 --> 0:06:53.960
<v Speaker 1>us on the phone and now earning is often running.

0:06:54.040 --> 0:06:56.400
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg. This story among our most read on

0:06:56.440 --> 0:07:00.240
<v Speaker 1>the Bloomberg about Barry Stern Licks investment firm and given

0:07:00.320 --> 0:07:02.400
<v Speaker 1>up on malls. Yes, Starward Capital Group they owned a

0:07:02.480 --> 0:07:05.160
<v Speaker 1>thirty mills before the COVID nineteen pandemic. It is now

0:07:05.480 --> 0:07:08.440
<v Speaker 1>down to eight. That is a massive decline. Yeah, so

0:07:08.520 --> 0:07:10.360
<v Speaker 1>let's find out what's going on. John Getleson is it

0:07:10.400 --> 0:07:12.600
<v Speaker 1>with us real Estate and Investing Report at Bloomberg News

0:07:12.600 --> 0:07:14.520
<v Speaker 1>on the phone in l a Hey, John, nice to

0:07:14.560 --> 0:07:16.360
<v Speaker 1>have you here with Tim and me. First of all,

0:07:16.560 --> 0:07:19.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean Barrastone looks really well known to our audience.

0:07:19.120 --> 0:07:21.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean this is a guy who is big time

0:07:21.040 --> 0:07:25.160
<v Speaker 1>in different types of commercial real estate. That's right, Yeah,

0:07:25.200 --> 0:07:29.440
<v Speaker 1>I mean Starwood Hotels now part of Marriott anyway, that

0:07:29.520 --> 0:07:34.280
<v Speaker 1>was his original you know, branding opportunity. Um. But yeah,

0:07:34.280 --> 0:07:37.840
<v Speaker 1>he started out and distressed real estate, and uh around

0:07:37.920 --> 0:07:42.800
<v Speaker 1>twelve he started buying up malls. He thought, you know,

0:07:42.960 --> 0:07:44.680
<v Speaker 1>I can get a good deal on these and I

0:07:44.720 --> 0:07:49.120
<v Speaker 1>could make money on him. Uh. But basically the market

0:07:49.160 --> 0:07:51.760
<v Speaker 1>was changing fast and then COVID hit and things got

0:07:51.800 --> 0:07:55.480
<v Speaker 1>even worse. So he got caught basically underwater with a

0:07:55.520 --> 0:07:59.160
<v Speaker 1>lot of these properties, and rather than pay and try

0:07:59.160 --> 0:08:01.600
<v Speaker 1>and revive them, it didn't make sense to him. It

0:08:01.680 --> 0:08:05.200
<v Speaker 1>made more sense essentially, self for loss or walk away

0:08:05.720 --> 0:08:08.400
<v Speaker 1>and look, two billion dollars sounds like a lot of

0:08:08.400 --> 0:08:10.680
<v Speaker 1>money to for most things. But this is a relatively

0:08:10.680 --> 0:08:15.680
<v Speaker 1>small part of star Wars portfolio, right, Well, yeah, I

0:08:15.680 --> 0:08:20.160
<v Speaker 1>mean about five of Star Wars portfolio was in what

0:08:20.200 --> 0:08:25.120
<v Speaker 1>it was is known as Starwood Retail Partners, So um, yeah,

0:08:25.120 --> 0:08:28.520
<v Speaker 1>it's it's I mean, imagine your stock portfolio and you

0:08:28.600 --> 0:08:30.640
<v Speaker 1>have a bunch of companies that you're like, I'm just

0:08:30.680 --> 0:08:33.680
<v Speaker 1>going to get rid of them and focus my energy

0:08:34.080 --> 0:08:38.640
<v Speaker 1>my resources on other opportunities out there that have more upside.

0:08:38.880 --> 0:08:40.880
<v Speaker 1>It's a lot of work to deal with these malls.

0:08:41.160 --> 0:08:45.240
<v Speaker 1>If you want to redevelop them, you take time, patient

0:08:45.440 --> 0:08:48.559
<v Speaker 1>skill sets that maybe, if I'm very stern lick, I'd

0:08:48.640 --> 0:08:50.640
<v Speaker 1>rather be spending my time on something that I can

0:08:50.720 --> 0:08:53.760
<v Speaker 1>make money on faster. Is this someone who's cutting their

0:08:53.840 --> 0:08:56.720
<v Speaker 1>losses before they get worse? Like seeing the writing on

0:08:56.760 --> 0:08:58.880
<v Speaker 1>the wall. Let me think what other little cool phrases,

0:08:58.880 --> 0:09:00.920
<v Speaker 1>pity phrases. Can I say, but you know what I'm saying,

0:09:00.960 --> 0:09:05.000
<v Speaker 1>like saying, this is just not a good commercial space anymore.

0:09:05.040 --> 0:09:09.280
<v Speaker 1>And does it speak to a bigger larger story here, John, Well,

0:09:09.320 --> 0:09:11.560
<v Speaker 1>it's definitely a bigger larger story. I mean we've all

0:09:11.600 --> 0:09:16.760
<v Speaker 1>seen ghost malls have been developing for decades now, um,

0:09:16.880 --> 0:09:21.160
<v Speaker 1>and it's accelerated since COVID, since you know, e commerce,

0:09:21.760 --> 0:09:25.640
<v Speaker 1>um and and since shopping habits changed, Like Carol you

0:09:25.640 --> 0:09:27.360
<v Speaker 1>were saying earlier, you haven't been to a mall in

0:09:27.360 --> 0:09:31.600
<v Speaker 1>a while. Malls were built around department stores, and department

0:09:31.679 --> 0:09:36.239
<v Speaker 1>stores are like the biggest casualties you know of shoppers

0:09:36.520 --> 0:09:40.880
<v Speaker 1>who can go to Amazon or go to Walmart and

0:09:41.200 --> 0:09:42.920
<v Speaker 1>all those other kind of things. But John, I do

0:09:42.960 --> 0:09:44.920
<v Speaker 1>you always wonder and forgive me because I do feel

0:09:44.920 --> 0:09:47.320
<v Speaker 1>like the coasts, you know, especially in New York, were like,

0:09:47.720 --> 0:09:50.880
<v Speaker 1>all right, I'm just shop online constantly. But if I

0:09:50.920 --> 0:09:53.840
<v Speaker 1>go across the country and I've been in different states

0:09:54.080 --> 0:09:56.040
<v Speaker 1>where I'm traveling and you do go to a mall

0:09:56.160 --> 0:09:58.200
<v Speaker 1>or you have to go to a store for like

0:09:58.280 --> 0:10:01.400
<v Speaker 1>you just you shop different? Is that true the case?

0:10:01.440 --> 0:10:03.760
<v Speaker 1>I just don't want to be so East Coast centric

0:10:04.520 --> 0:10:06.760
<v Speaker 1>or is it? I mean, yeah, are they breaking down

0:10:06.840 --> 0:10:10.000
<v Speaker 1>kind of all over the country. I would say it's

0:10:10.040 --> 0:10:12.400
<v Speaker 1>all over the country. I mean because these malls that

0:10:12.720 --> 0:10:15.679
<v Speaker 1>Barry Sternly gones, they're sort of like secondary malls and

0:10:15.800 --> 0:10:19.760
<v Speaker 1>secondary markets. If you have a good mall. I live

0:10:19.840 --> 0:10:26.800
<v Speaker 1>in southern California, in Beverly Hills, UH in Orange County,

0:10:27.200 --> 0:10:29.520
<v Speaker 1>UH in the right parts of you know, the San

0:10:29.520 --> 0:10:33.880
<v Speaker 1>Francisco Bay Area, Silicon Valley outside Seattle. Those those are

0:10:33.880 --> 0:10:36.720
<v Speaker 1>doing great and people are still going to them, and

0:10:36.760 --> 0:10:41.520
<v Speaker 1>they're now eating outside, They're going to movies, they're starting

0:10:41.559 --> 0:10:43.440
<v Speaker 1>to do all of the other kind of activities on

0:10:43.520 --> 0:10:46.120
<v Speaker 1>top of buying clothes that used to do it a mall,

0:10:46.600 --> 0:10:50.480
<v Speaker 1>but there's so many malls in the United States. We

0:10:50.559 --> 0:10:55.040
<v Speaker 1>are overstored, over retailed compared everywhere else and on Earth's

0:10:55.559 --> 0:10:57.439
<v Speaker 1>And then there are places that are really easy to

0:10:57.440 --> 0:11:00.640
<v Speaker 1>get to. I mean a Walmart or It's Target is

0:11:00.679 --> 0:11:03.400
<v Speaker 1>like a mall in one place for a lot of people,

0:11:03.640 --> 0:11:08.560
<v Speaker 1>and they're really you know, discount good prices and easy

0:11:08.640 --> 0:11:11.080
<v Speaker 1>and easy out. Hey, John, just in the last thirty

0:11:11.080 --> 0:11:13.439
<v Speaker 1>seconds we have with you, who's buying these malls and

0:11:13.679 --> 0:11:18.280
<v Speaker 1>what are they doing with them? Well, basically, people who

0:11:18.360 --> 0:11:21.200
<v Speaker 1>are getting them are getting them at very low cost,

0:11:21.679 --> 0:11:25.120
<v Speaker 1>And it really depends on the location. You can take

0:11:25.160 --> 0:11:28.240
<v Speaker 1>out a department store, turn it into an apartment, You

0:11:28.280 --> 0:11:31.040
<v Speaker 1>can turn it into maybe an office. You can turn

0:11:31.080 --> 0:11:34.640
<v Speaker 1>it into a medical office or a school, or you

0:11:34.640 --> 0:11:38.040
<v Speaker 1>could turn it into a sort of last mild distribution place.

0:11:38.520 --> 0:11:41.560
<v Speaker 1>But you have to get the cost of the property

0:11:41.640 --> 0:11:46.840
<v Speaker 1>down and an owner who has patient money so that

0:11:46.920 --> 0:11:49.200
<v Speaker 1>they could take time because it takes a long time

0:11:49.720 --> 0:11:52.760
<v Speaker 1>to get all the approvals that are involved with re

0:11:53.640 --> 0:11:56.800
<v Speaker 1>purposing a mall like this, right, It's it's not so

0:11:56.880 --> 0:11:58.720
<v Speaker 1>easy to just make a quick quick stetch. What what

0:11:58.760 --> 0:12:01.080
<v Speaker 1>are you thinking? Yeah, it's just like such a small

0:12:01.080 --> 0:12:04.040
<v Speaker 1>portion of the portfolio, It's crazy. Yeah, And I do

0:12:04.080 --> 0:12:06.719
<v Speaker 1>think there's something to be like top tier versus secondary tier.

0:12:06.720 --> 0:12:08.840
<v Speaker 1>I think that's a good point that John made. Um

0:12:08.920 --> 0:12:11.160
<v Speaker 1>John kittleson Thank You so Much, real estate and investing

0:12:11.160 --> 0:12:13.800
<v Speaker 1>reporter at Bloomberg News from l A, joined him on

0:12:13.840 --> 0:12:18.880
<v Speaker 1>Twitter at John gitt This is Bloomberg Business Week with

0:12:19.000 --> 0:12:23.720
<v Speaker 1>Carol Messer and Bloomberg Quick Takes. Tim Stinovich from Bloomberg Radio.

0:12:23.960 --> 0:12:25.959
<v Speaker 1>We are highlighting another one of our most read stories

0:12:25.960 --> 0:12:29.040
<v Speaker 1>on the Bloomberg Today, This one about the NFL player

0:12:29.080 --> 0:12:32.199
<v Speaker 1>turn lawmaker that was a rising star in the Republican

0:12:32.240 --> 0:12:35.200
<v Speaker 1>Party tim until he wasn't. It's in the upcoming issue

0:12:35.200 --> 0:12:37.840
<v Speaker 1>of the magazine. It's written by Josh Green, National correspondent

0:12:37.840 --> 0:12:40.360
<v Speaker 1>for Bloomberg Business Week. Joel Weber is joining us as

0:12:40.400 --> 0:12:42.800
<v Speaker 1>well editor for Bloomberg Business Leeak. He's with us in

0:12:42.800 --> 0:12:45.319
<v Speaker 1>the Interactive Broker studio in New York. Josh is joining

0:12:45.400 --> 0:12:49.720
<v Speaker 1>us on the phone from Washington. D c Um, who

0:12:49.880 --> 0:12:55.400
<v Speaker 1>is Anthony Gonzolison? Why why isn't he a national name? Well,

0:12:55.480 --> 0:12:58.800
<v Speaker 1>he is a national name, I think, um, And I

0:12:58.800 --> 0:13:01.480
<v Speaker 1>guess it's well, I guess in the Cheney I guess

0:13:01.480 --> 0:13:04.640
<v Speaker 1>I would say, well, he's he's actually kind of purposely

0:13:04.760 --> 0:13:08.640
<v Speaker 1>kept his profile slightly lower, I think, than than Cheney did.

0:13:08.679 --> 0:13:12.120
<v Speaker 1>And you know, Cheney obviously it's like pretty prominent position

0:13:12.240 --> 0:13:15.120
<v Speaker 1>in the GOP. But I think what's really interesting about

0:13:15.160 --> 0:13:21.600
<v Speaker 1>Josh's story is there were people pre January six who

0:13:21.679 --> 0:13:23.760
<v Speaker 1>who really kind of looked like the future of the

0:13:24.040 --> 0:13:27.079
<v Speaker 1>of the GOP right, and and Gonzalez was one of those.

0:13:27.559 --> 0:13:31.520
<v Speaker 1>And now he finds himself in a very difficult role

0:13:31.760 --> 0:13:35.840
<v Speaker 1>of being a kind of once future leader of GOP,

0:13:36.000 --> 0:13:40.400
<v Speaker 1>potentially a rising star, but mired by what has become

0:13:40.520 --> 0:13:46.040
<v Speaker 1>from the Trump Um supporting GOP. Uh and and Josh's

0:13:46.080 --> 0:13:48.280
<v Speaker 1>brtting you in a little bit to talk about that.

0:13:48.320 --> 0:13:51.920
<v Speaker 1>What what has been his his tactic to date and

0:13:51.920 --> 0:13:55.920
<v Speaker 1>and how does that put him um with his constituents,

0:13:56.640 --> 0:13:58.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, I mean, what's passing about Gonzalez is that

0:13:58.840 --> 0:14:02.600
<v Speaker 1>he is every he embodies everything the Republican Party has

0:14:02.640 --> 0:14:05.800
<v Speaker 1>wanted itself to be for the last twenty five years. Uh,

0:14:05.800 --> 0:14:09.040
<v Speaker 1>he's young, he has the son of a Cuban immigrant,

0:14:09.160 --> 0:14:11.720
<v Speaker 1>he was the first round draft pick of the Indianpolis

0:14:11.800 --> 0:14:14.760
<v Speaker 1>called he's got a business school degree, you know, serious

0:14:14.840 --> 0:14:17.640
<v Speaker 1>young hip, all that kind of stuff. Clearly marked as

0:14:17.679 --> 0:14:20.360
<v Speaker 1>a rising star. And then Trump came along and and

0:14:20.440 --> 0:14:23.120
<v Speaker 1>Gonzalez became one of the ten people who had voted

0:14:23.200 --> 0:14:26.880
<v Speaker 1>who voted to impeach him, and practically overnight, that's sort

0:14:26.880 --> 0:14:30.320
<v Speaker 1>of eclipsed everything else there is about Anthony Gonzalez and

0:14:30.360 --> 0:14:33.680
<v Speaker 1>the reason I picked this race as as somebody said earlier,

0:14:33.800 --> 0:14:36.560
<v Speaker 1>he's not as prominent as Liz Cheney, who also voted

0:14:36.560 --> 0:14:38.640
<v Speaker 1>doing peach Trump and has made that the entire like

0:14:38.800 --> 0:14:41.880
<v Speaker 1>centerpiece of her political life. Uh, he's just a guy

0:14:41.920 --> 0:14:44.840
<v Speaker 1>who who voted on his conscious voted in peach Trump,

0:14:45.160 --> 0:14:47.920
<v Speaker 1>but is still a conservative congressman with what he thinks

0:14:48.000 --> 0:14:50.640
<v Speaker 1>of a successful record. So what it sets up is

0:14:50.680 --> 0:14:54.560
<v Speaker 1>this wonderful test case. It's almost like a laboratory experiment

0:14:54.800 --> 0:15:00.280
<v Speaker 1>in whether a serious Republican conservative can get reelected after

0:15:00.360 --> 0:15:03.600
<v Speaker 1>voting for Donald Trump. And and what what's so interesting

0:15:03.640 --> 0:15:06.160
<v Speaker 1>about this is that it's not just Republicans. The Democrats

0:15:06.200 --> 0:15:10.040
<v Speaker 1>too are fascinated by this race because we think it's

0:15:10.080 --> 0:15:12.040
<v Speaker 1>going to be a sort of a gauge about how

0:15:12.240 --> 0:15:16.400
<v Speaker 1>strong Trump's influence continues to be. One of my consultants,

0:15:16.440 --> 0:15:19.720
<v Speaker 1>i quote in Peace, likened it to groundhog Day. That

0:15:19.800 --> 0:15:23.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, if if if the Trump challenger to Gonzalez's wins,

0:15:23.880 --> 0:15:26.000
<v Speaker 1>then we know it's gonna be another season of Trump

0:15:26.040 --> 0:15:30.360
<v Speaker 1>dominating Republican Party. But if Gonzalez manages to hold onto

0:15:30.360 --> 0:15:33.360
<v Speaker 1>his seat, then maybe spring has arrived and we've begun

0:15:33.400 --> 0:15:37.320
<v Speaker 1>to move beyond Donald Trump and who's he gonna be

0:15:37.320 --> 0:15:41.160
<v Speaker 1>in a showdown with who's the lukie at their faces?

0:15:41.200 --> 0:15:43.840
<v Speaker 1>So his main challenge has got named Max Miller, who

0:15:43.960 --> 0:15:47.360
<v Speaker 1>is a former Trump aide um from the local area.

0:15:48.000 --> 0:15:50.880
<v Speaker 1>Immediately one Trump's endorsement as soon as he jumped in

0:15:50.920 --> 0:15:54.600
<v Speaker 1>the race. Because Trump, as we all know, revels in

0:15:54.720 --> 0:15:59.440
<v Speaker 1>punishing his enemies, especially Republicans, and has gone after Gonzalez

0:15:59.520 --> 0:16:04.200
<v Speaker 1>with Avenger. It's his first big rally. Trump's post election.

0:16:04.240 --> 0:16:07.200
<v Speaker 1>At the end of June, he flew to Ohio, right

0:16:07.240 --> 0:16:10.880
<v Speaker 1>outside gonzalez district to trash him and tell Republicans to

0:16:11.000 --> 0:16:13.240
<v Speaker 1>vote against him. So that's a bit of a millstone

0:16:13.280 --> 0:16:15.840
<v Speaker 1>if you're a Republican congressman running for re election. But

0:16:15.920 --> 0:16:18.440
<v Speaker 1>that's what Gonzalez has to deal with. I love that

0:16:18.520 --> 0:16:21.800
<v Speaker 1>you write in your story that he Gonzalez appears to

0:16:21.840 --> 0:16:25.320
<v Speaker 1>have a healthy relationship with his own political mortality. So

0:16:25.520 --> 0:16:28.880
<v Speaker 1>he understands. He's a football player. Sometimes you win, sometimes

0:16:28.920 --> 0:16:32.160
<v Speaker 1>you lose. Sometimes you're gonna play and be a star player,

0:16:32.200 --> 0:16:35.400
<v Speaker 1>and sometimes you're gonna have another career after it tell

0:16:35.480 --> 0:16:38.800
<v Speaker 1>us a little bit about his his kind of approach. Yeah, well,

0:16:38.840 --> 0:16:41.240
<v Speaker 1>I mean, what's what's been so I think disconcerting to

0:16:41.360 --> 0:16:43.920
<v Speaker 1>a lot of you know, Republicans and just just sort

0:16:43.920 --> 0:16:47.280
<v Speaker 1>of Americans general. I think is is the the number

0:16:47.320 --> 0:16:50.000
<v Speaker 1>of Republicans who have kind of truckled to Trump and

0:16:50.040 --> 0:16:53.360
<v Speaker 1>gone along with, you know, whatever the conspiracy theory or

0:16:53.400 --> 0:16:56.480
<v Speaker 1>why is that that he's sort of pushing. One name

0:16:56.520 --> 0:17:00.000
<v Speaker 1>that gets mentioned a lot as South Carolina Senator Lindsey Graham,

0:17:00.200 --> 0:17:06.040
<v Speaker 1>who who sort of reinvents himself according to whatever politics necessitates.

0:17:06.080 --> 0:17:09.280
<v Speaker 1>And Gonzalez is adamant that he's not going to do that. Um,

0:17:09.320 --> 0:17:12.000
<v Speaker 1>and I think the impeachment vote backs that up. But

0:17:12.040 --> 0:17:13.199
<v Speaker 1>as he put it to me, I mean, he was

0:17:13.200 --> 0:17:16.600
<v Speaker 1>a first round draft pick with a great NFL career going. Uh,

0:17:16.640 --> 0:17:19.400
<v Speaker 1>he tore up his knee, that that career ended abruptly,

0:17:19.760 --> 0:17:22.320
<v Speaker 1>but he was able to reinvent himself, went to business school,

0:17:22.400 --> 0:17:25.320
<v Speaker 1>got elected as a congressman. So he doesn't fear his

0:17:25.359 --> 0:17:28.320
<v Speaker 1>own political mortality and quite the way I think a

0:17:28.400 --> 0:17:32.040
<v Speaker 1>lot of other UH politicians do, and that makes him interesting.

0:17:32.160 --> 0:17:34.320
<v Speaker 1>He's willing to kind of speak the truth, stand up

0:17:34.320 --> 0:17:36.440
<v Speaker 1>for what he believes in, and let the chips fall

0:17:36.480 --> 0:17:38.359
<v Speaker 1>where they may. You also make the point, Josh, that

0:17:38.400 --> 0:17:41.240
<v Speaker 1>he's set out to do and he's actually getting done

0:17:41.320 --> 0:17:44.240
<v Speaker 1>exactly what he set out to do, from infrastructure to

0:17:44.240 --> 0:17:48.080
<v Speaker 1>to COVID relief, to vaccines. And also he's had a

0:17:48.119 --> 0:17:51.680
<v Speaker 1>pretty good couple of quarters of fundraising, so he's been

0:17:51.680 --> 0:17:54.480
<v Speaker 1>pretty successful thus far. Yeah. I mean the other fast

0:17:54.520 --> 0:17:55.840
<v Speaker 1>thing you think about this is like back in the

0:17:56.040 --> 0:17:58.960
<v Speaker 1>times before Trump, Um, you know, congressman used to get

0:17:58.960 --> 0:18:01.240
<v Speaker 1>measured for re election on hey did you do what

0:18:01.320 --> 0:18:04.080
<v Speaker 1>your campaigned and and said you had set out to do?

0:18:04.200 --> 0:18:07.240
<v Speaker 1>The two two big components of of Gonzalz's last race

0:18:07.280 --> 0:18:09.480
<v Speaker 1>where he said, look, we want to produce vaccine and

0:18:09.520 --> 0:18:12.960
<v Speaker 1>distribute to everybody who wants it. That's obviously happening now.

0:18:13.359 --> 0:18:17.360
<v Speaker 1>And I want to push for a big bipartisan infrastructure bill. Uh.

0:18:17.400 --> 0:18:18.920
<v Speaker 1>You know, and in a couple of weeks ago, Biden

0:18:18.960 --> 0:18:23.040
<v Speaker 1>came out and announced big bipartisan infrastructure agreement the Gonzals

0:18:23.119 --> 0:18:25.720
<v Speaker 1>had had a hand in negotiating. So, you know, by

0:18:25.720 --> 0:18:27.679
<v Speaker 1>the old measure of whether or not you're you're an

0:18:27.720 --> 0:18:30.760
<v Speaker 1>effective congressman, Gonzalas has a really good case to make

0:18:30.840 --> 0:18:33.320
<v Speaker 1>and he is a believer. Not everybody is, but he

0:18:33.440 --> 0:18:36.119
<v Speaker 1>is a believer that that will still count for something

0:18:36.119 --> 0:18:39.600
<v Speaker 1>with the Republican voters when primary time comes next spring.

0:18:40.080 --> 0:18:42.720
<v Speaker 1>So next spring still feels like a long way away.

0:18:43.280 --> 0:18:44.800
<v Speaker 1>When when are we going to start to get a

0:18:44.840 --> 0:18:48.119
<v Speaker 1>sense of what even the polls might suggest in this

0:18:48.160 --> 0:18:50.959
<v Speaker 1>case study, Josh, I don't think we're gonna note for

0:18:51.000 --> 0:18:55.280
<v Speaker 1>a long time. By the early measures Gonzalaz is doing, okay.

0:18:55.359 --> 0:18:58.440
<v Speaker 1>I mean, his favorability ratings are strong, as you mentioned,

0:18:58.480 --> 0:19:01.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, he had He's had two quarters very strong fundraising.

0:19:01.720 --> 0:19:04.560
<v Speaker 1>But he also has the loudest, most important voice in

0:19:04.600 --> 0:19:07.960
<v Speaker 1>the Repulican Party, Donald Trump's going against him. So I

0:19:07.960 --> 0:19:10.520
<v Speaker 1>think part of it will depend, you know, is Trump

0:19:11.040 --> 0:19:14.160
<v Speaker 1>as powerful and influenced, you know, nine months from now

0:19:14.200 --> 0:19:16.800
<v Speaker 1>as he is today. If so, I think Gonzalas is

0:19:16.840 --> 0:19:19.320
<v Speaker 1>gonna have a tough time getting reelected. But a lot

0:19:19.400 --> 0:19:22.560
<v Speaker 1>can happen between now and then, and Gonzalas has enough

0:19:22.600 --> 0:19:24.880
<v Speaker 1>money to make a good case for himself publicly. So

0:19:25.160 --> 0:19:26.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, we're going to get just what I said,

0:19:26.640 --> 0:19:28.040
<v Speaker 1>We're going to get into this piece, which is a

0:19:28.080 --> 0:19:31.000
<v Speaker 1>measure of Trump's effectiveness. Um. And I think that's why

0:19:31.040 --> 0:19:32.720
<v Speaker 1>everybody in the country is gonna be looking at this

0:19:32.840 --> 0:19:34.760
<v Speaker 1>race come next spring. Yeah. I did also think, as

0:19:34.760 --> 0:19:37.560
<v Speaker 1>you pointed out, that it's he's had some strong fundraising

0:19:37.600 --> 0:19:39.240
<v Speaker 1>kind of the strongest that he's ever seen, and maybe

0:19:39.280 --> 0:19:41.679
<v Speaker 1>it's an early indication. Hey, Josh, thank you so much.

0:19:41.800 --> 0:19:44.080
<v Speaker 1>Josh Green, National correspondent, Bloomberg Business Week on the phone

0:19:44.080 --> 0:19:47.040
<v Speaker 1>from Washington, d C. Joel Da have a last thought. Well,

0:19:47.080 --> 0:19:49.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm also you know, this is one of many races

0:19:49.880 --> 0:19:54.160
<v Speaker 1>where there were people who voted again for impeachment, and

0:19:54.680 --> 0:19:56.359
<v Speaker 1>I just am also going to be very curious to

0:19:56.400 --> 0:19:58.880
<v Speaker 1>what happens in all those other districts and do they

0:19:58.880 --> 0:20:01.320
<v Speaker 1>go one way or is it like half and half

0:20:01.400 --> 0:20:03.520
<v Speaker 1>or something? You know, Yeah, it'll be really telling in

0:20:03.600 --> 0:20:05.160
<v Speaker 1>terms of what it means for how much just Trump

0:20:05.240 --> 0:20:08.040
<v Speaker 1>hit the road ahead of that too. Yeah, well, I'm

0:20:08.080 --> 0:20:16.760
<v Speaker 1>guessing a lot. You're listening to Bloomberg Business Week with

0:20:16.840 --> 0:20:21.159
<v Speaker 1>Carol Messer and Bloomberg Quick Takes Tim Stinovic on Bloomberg

0:20:21.240 --> 0:20:24.919
<v Speaker 1>Radio on the Wall. I couldn't wait to get to

0:20:25.000 --> 0:20:27.399
<v Speaker 1>our next This is what's so great about having everyone

0:20:27.440 --> 0:20:30.000
<v Speaker 1>come back to work. We can like talk during the breaks.

0:20:30.119 --> 0:20:31.960
<v Speaker 1>I love it all right, so let's get to it.

0:20:32.480 --> 0:20:34.320
<v Speaker 1>She is in our studio with Tim and myself. It's

0:20:34.440 --> 0:20:36.719
<v Speaker 1>one of our most read stories about those that are

0:20:36.720 --> 0:20:39.919
<v Speaker 1>speaking out pushing for more aggressive government policies to address

0:20:39.960 --> 0:20:42.480
<v Speaker 1>societal problems. Let's get more on the X E s

0:20:42.520 --> 0:20:46.200
<v Speaker 1>G insiders who are dissing and dismissing corporate cream goals

0:20:46.240 --> 0:20:49.480
<v Speaker 1>as hype on this story. Bloomberg NEWSSG reporter Sagel Kashan,

0:20:49.600 --> 0:20:51.720
<v Speaker 1>she is with us in our Interactor Broker studio. I

0:20:51.720 --> 0:20:55.119
<v Speaker 1>do love this story, So tell us about the individual.

0:20:55.480 --> 0:20:59.639
<v Speaker 1>Um Tarik Fancy. Yeah, well, he was well in the

0:20:59.680 --> 0:21:01.320
<v Speaker 1>hospital the b so to speak. He should be at

0:21:01.359 --> 0:21:06.040
<v Speaker 1>Black Rock, the world's biggest black cute UM. And as

0:21:06.040 --> 0:21:08.160
<v Speaker 1>you remember last year, Life Fink came out and said

0:21:08.200 --> 0:21:10.000
<v Speaker 1>he was going to put climate at the center of

0:21:10.040 --> 0:21:14.480
<v Speaker 1>its investments and its investment strategy. Um Tarret was actually there.

0:21:14.480 --> 0:21:18.800
<v Speaker 1>He actually left before black really ramped up. But you know,

0:21:19.080 --> 0:21:21.640
<v Speaker 1>he talked about his experiences and it wasn't so much

0:21:21.680 --> 0:21:24.840
<v Speaker 1>about being at Black Rocket. His experiences were more broadly

0:21:25.400 --> 0:21:29.960
<v Speaker 1>directed at the sort of the sustainable investment of investing world. UM.

0:21:30.000 --> 0:21:32.919
<v Speaker 1>And yeah, he talked about how it's great having all

0:21:32.960 --> 0:21:36.320
<v Speaker 1>these like low carbon funds, these climate friendly friends E

0:21:36.400 --> 0:21:39.520
<v Speaker 1>s g. E. T f s and exchange traded funds,

0:21:39.960 --> 0:21:42.200
<v Speaker 1>but they're not really enough to move the needle when

0:21:42.200 --> 0:21:44.960
<v Speaker 1>we're dealing with the climate crisis because it is a crisis.

0:21:45.320 --> 0:21:47.680
<v Speaker 1>That's what the scientists are saying. So what more needs

0:21:47.720 --> 0:21:49.159
<v Speaker 1>to be done? I mean, what are these ex SG

0:21:49.280 --> 0:21:52.360
<v Speaker 1>insiders saying, isn't going far enough? Yeah? I mean, look,

0:21:52.480 --> 0:21:55.800
<v Speaker 1>they all say corporate sustainability efforts have been good. It's

0:21:55.800 --> 0:21:58.040
<v Speaker 1>not like it's been a waste of time, but there

0:21:58.040 --> 0:22:01.560
<v Speaker 1>needs to be more aggressive government. Well okay, So I'm

0:22:01.560 --> 0:22:03.439
<v Speaker 1>glad you brought that up because when I when I

0:22:03.480 --> 0:22:05.959
<v Speaker 1>read your piece, I was again reminded of the lofty

0:22:05.960 --> 0:22:08.240
<v Speaker 1>goals that we hear from companies. And these are companies

0:22:08.280 --> 0:22:12.159
<v Speaker 1>that say, Okay, in three decades we will be carbon

0:22:12.240 --> 0:22:15.920
<v Speaker 1>neutral or net zero emissions. And I'm thinking to myself, Okay,

0:22:16.160 --> 0:22:18.480
<v Speaker 1>is anyone listening to this right now or involved in

0:22:18.520 --> 0:22:20.800
<v Speaker 1>what they're saying going to be involved in this company

0:22:20.880 --> 0:22:23.000
<v Speaker 1>three decades from now? Like these are goals that are

0:22:23.040 --> 0:22:26.040
<v Speaker 1>are so far away now, absolutely, And I think that's

0:22:26.000 --> 0:22:28.280
<v Speaker 1>what I mean. What we've seen just this year, with

0:22:28.680 --> 0:22:32.159
<v Speaker 1>just in the last last week week before, with the

0:22:32.160 --> 0:22:36.240
<v Speaker 1>heats in the Northwest and Texas earlier this year, like

0:22:36.320 --> 0:22:38.199
<v Speaker 1>this is a you know, we're seeing the effects of

0:22:38.200 --> 0:22:40.399
<v Speaker 1>climate change as we speak. You know, this is not

0:22:40.440 --> 0:22:42.240
<v Speaker 1>something that's going to happen in fifty years on. We're

0:22:42.359 --> 0:22:45.600
<v Speaker 1>already there. Well, you know, because we have the Sustainable

0:22:45.600 --> 0:22:48.000
<v Speaker 1>Business Summit Global going on right now by Bloomberg. It's

0:22:48.040 --> 0:22:49.879
<v Speaker 1>a couple of days of programming. I you know, and

0:22:49.920 --> 0:22:51.560
<v Speaker 1>we'll hear a little bit of my conversation with the

0:22:51.560 --> 0:22:55.000
<v Speaker 1>CFO of ab InBev and also the Chief Sustainability Officer,

0:22:55.119 --> 0:22:57.040
<v Speaker 1>and you know, we talked about this and I think

0:22:57.040 --> 0:23:00.400
<v Speaker 1>they would agree that it's not perfect, but it's a journey.

0:23:00.440 --> 0:23:02.959
<v Speaker 1>But I think what you're saying to me is, you know,

0:23:03.119 --> 0:23:05.919
<v Speaker 1>there's those slow, meandering walks that we take through the

0:23:05.960 --> 0:23:08.200
<v Speaker 1>park and then there's like I gotta get to work, bam.

0:23:08.760 --> 0:23:12.760
<v Speaker 1>That's where we are. We from what you're hearing is

0:23:12.800 --> 0:23:15.119
<v Speaker 1>that we need to be more aggressive about the steps exactly.

0:23:15.119 --> 0:23:17.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean, this is what all of these executives or

0:23:17.280 --> 0:23:20.080
<v Speaker 1>former executives have said, is that you know, we're in

0:23:20.080 --> 0:23:23.240
<v Speaker 1>a crisis mode. So yeah, all of these efforts are great,

0:23:23.320 --> 0:23:26.840
<v Speaker 1>all the corporate saying ability efforts are good, Um, but

0:23:26.960 --> 0:23:30.480
<v Speaker 1>we are in a climate crisis. So they're saying that

0:23:30.560 --> 0:23:32.919
<v Speaker 1>the government needs to come in and implement things like

0:23:33.000 --> 0:23:36.200
<v Speaker 1>carbon taxes and the like and more aggressive ones, more

0:23:36.200 --> 0:23:38.720
<v Speaker 1>penalties to some right impunitive actions that if you don't

0:23:38.720 --> 0:23:42.320
<v Speaker 1>abide more quickly, right, you're going to pay unfortunately, But

0:23:42.480 --> 0:23:46.719
<v Speaker 1>we are so entangled with the phiosophial industry using you know, oh,

0:23:46.840 --> 0:23:50.639
<v Speaker 1>existence is all the fueling emissions. So we really need

0:23:50.720 --> 0:23:52.719
<v Speaker 1>to sort of like change things around if we're going

0:23:52.760 --> 0:23:54.959
<v Speaker 1>to meet any of these targets that companies are setting.

0:23:55.080 --> 0:23:57.240
<v Speaker 1>Someone who spoke to you said, the problem with greenwashing

0:23:57.359 --> 0:24:00.640
<v Speaker 1>is green wishing. What does that mean? Great quote? Yeah,

0:24:01.119 --> 0:24:03.840
<v Speaker 1>um so he used to work Duk duncan Astin used

0:24:03.840 --> 0:24:07.000
<v Speaker 1>to work at out Goals investment firm. And you know,

0:24:07.040 --> 0:24:10.520
<v Speaker 1>there's always this talk about greenwashing, which is where companies

0:24:10.640 --> 0:24:15.520
<v Speaker 1>or groups are exaggerating their environmental sort of credentials. But

0:24:15.600 --> 0:24:18.639
<v Speaker 1>he's saying, like green wishing, thinking that we're doing better

0:24:19.080 --> 0:24:21.960
<v Speaker 1>than what we what we really are is even more

0:24:22.040 --> 0:24:26.520
<v Speaker 1>harmful because it's this sort of like false sense of security. Well,

0:24:26.800 --> 0:24:29.959
<v Speaker 1>it's interesting. I do feel like the EU is leading

0:24:29.960 --> 0:24:32.800
<v Speaker 1>the way, especially with the government involvement, and they are

0:24:32.840 --> 0:24:36.959
<v Speaker 1>putting metrics and money um to that is that the model,

0:24:37.040 --> 0:24:39.719
<v Speaker 1>but just a more aggressive form of what you know,

0:24:39.720 --> 0:24:42.320
<v Speaker 1>what is I'm always like caught up in this specifics

0:24:42.320 --> 0:24:45.640
<v Speaker 1>of what more we need to do to make it different.

0:24:45.760 --> 0:24:47.679
<v Speaker 1>I'm on the same the same page as you on

0:24:47.720 --> 0:24:49.840
<v Speaker 1>that one. I mean, there are lots of things going on.

0:24:50.000 --> 0:24:52.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean the SEC is looking at a raft of

0:24:52.440 --> 0:24:55.439
<v Speaker 1>you know, potential moves and yeah, those debates going on

0:24:55.800 --> 0:24:59.159
<v Speaker 1>and be anything from like disclosing like things like you know, E,

0:24:59.359 --> 0:25:01.320
<v Speaker 1>s G metro And that's part of the problem, right,

0:25:01.359 --> 0:25:03.160
<v Speaker 1>I know, even the A, B and guys are like,

0:25:03.280 --> 0:25:05.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, the metrics between you know, when you're defining

0:25:05.920 --> 0:25:08.520
<v Speaker 1>E or S or T, some of them are easier

0:25:08.600 --> 0:25:11.080
<v Speaker 1>than others. Absolutely, Yes, it seems to be the sort

0:25:11.080 --> 0:25:12.840
<v Speaker 1>of the sticking point where there's just a lack of

0:25:12.920 --> 0:25:15.680
<v Speaker 1>data compared with the E where there is emissions data

0:25:15.840 --> 0:25:18.920
<v Speaker 1>or wor to usage data and the like. So it's

0:25:18.960 --> 0:25:21.840
<v Speaker 1>a it's a working motion. Yeah. We hear from companies

0:25:21.880 --> 0:25:25.320
<v Speaker 1>that that have s G products that investors are demanding these.

0:25:25.520 --> 0:25:28.439
<v Speaker 1>What do we know about actual investor demand for for

0:25:28.560 --> 0:25:32.840
<v Speaker 1>products that provide more than just a return? Yeah, no, absolutely,

0:25:32.840 --> 0:25:35.399
<v Speaker 1>I mean you know we've got like the country's biggest

0:25:35.440 --> 0:25:38.880
<v Speaker 1>pension plans like Calsters, Cowper's new York City who are

0:25:39.040 --> 0:25:41.439
<v Speaker 1>And so in New York States, sorry, who are really

0:25:41.560 --> 0:25:44.520
<v Speaker 1>ramping up. They've set their own like net zero goals

0:25:44.600 --> 0:25:47.960
<v Speaker 1>on the East Coast here, So it's all in line

0:25:48.000 --> 0:25:52.400
<v Speaker 1>of sort of like divesting, ramping up and putting sort

0:25:52.400 --> 0:25:55.679
<v Speaker 1>of channeling capsule to sort of cleaner technologies and the like.

0:25:55.760 --> 0:25:58.399
<v Speaker 1>That's going to help us all meet these goals. But

0:25:58.640 --> 0:26:01.040
<v Speaker 1>yes to investing, I mean this as part of the problem,

0:26:01.160 --> 0:26:05.320
<v Speaker 1>Like you can have a company that's working on it,

0:26:05.359 --> 0:26:08.159
<v Speaker 1>but it is still really hurting the environment. But people

0:26:08.280 --> 0:26:10.040
<v Speaker 1>say you can be in the e s G Fund

0:26:10.080 --> 0:26:13.040
<v Speaker 1>because you're working on it. So so as an investor,

0:26:13.359 --> 0:26:15.360
<v Speaker 1>it's like, wait a minute, is really my money going

0:26:15.400 --> 0:26:19.000
<v Speaker 1>to support you know, the better end outcome? I mean

0:26:19.040 --> 0:26:21.240
<v Speaker 1>what somebody has says has said to me, it's really

0:26:21.240 --> 0:26:24.119
<v Speaker 1>difficult to be a purist here, Like we're all entangled

0:26:24.160 --> 0:26:29.880
<v Speaker 1>in this. So it is a working motion. Unfortunately, which

0:26:29.880 --> 0:26:33.280
<v Speaker 1>government is most aggressive right now. I mean, well the

0:26:33.320 --> 0:26:36.760
<v Speaker 1>e USE, as Carol said that, they are way ahead,

0:26:36.800 --> 0:26:39.360
<v Speaker 1>but I mean the US is fast catching up. And

0:26:39.359 --> 0:26:42.199
<v Speaker 1>and again it's like a geopolitical thing as well, like

0:26:42.240 --> 0:26:44.280
<v Speaker 1>he wants to own this space, he wants to own

0:26:44.320 --> 0:26:46.840
<v Speaker 1>clean technologies. He wants to be sort of at the

0:26:46.840 --> 0:26:50.040
<v Speaker 1>forefront of this sort of like transition to a low

0:26:50.080 --> 0:26:52.400
<v Speaker 1>carbon existence. But if the pandemic taught us anything, it's

0:26:52.440 --> 0:26:54.199
<v Speaker 1>so just a reminder that, you know, things like a

0:26:54.240 --> 0:26:57.120
<v Speaker 1>health crisis or things like climate change really no no borders.

0:26:57.119 --> 0:27:01.040
<v Speaker 1>So if we don't figure out something globally the situation,

0:27:01.160 --> 0:27:03.480
<v Speaker 1>it's already very difficult for certain parts of the world.

0:27:03.920 --> 0:27:06.240
<v Speaker 1>I love, love, love this story. It's a most read

0:27:06.280 --> 0:27:07.840
<v Speaker 1>and I'll be bringing it up with some of my

0:27:07.880 --> 0:27:12.080
<v Speaker 1>panels at the Sustainable Business Summit. Um Sachel, thank you.

0:27:12.160 --> 0:27:15.240
<v Speaker 1>I really appreciate you coming by. Sachel. Um is e

0:27:15.440 --> 0:27:18.000
<v Speaker 1>s G. Report of Bloomberg News in or Bloomberg Interactive

0:27:18.560 --> 0:27:21.239
<v Speaker 1>Broker Studio. Yeah, a great, great piece. Check it out

0:27:21.320 --> 0:27:23.480
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg dot Com in on the terminal. I'm somebody who

0:27:23.520 --> 0:27:27.280
<v Speaker 1>likes metrics and how do you you know, UM measure something?

0:27:27.320 --> 0:27:29.760
<v Speaker 1>And I think it's really tricky right now, we don't know,

0:27:30.000 --> 0:27:38.120
<v Speaker 1>we don't know, it's not exact. I'm bro a journal Yeah,

0:27:38.160 --> 0:27:43.440
<v Speaker 1>but you let me drive No, no, honey, please, I'll

0:27:43.480 --> 0:28:04.600
<v Speaker 1>do I want to drive strive the question. Yeah, thanks,

0:28:04.640 --> 0:28:08.600
<v Speaker 1>we'll try us down. Bloomberg Radio all right, just about

0:28:08.920 --> 0:28:11.400
<v Speaker 1>ten and a half minutes left. Its trade flies, Carol,

0:28:11.440 --> 0:28:15.080
<v Speaker 1>when you're having fun. It has been a busy two days.

0:28:15.359 --> 0:28:18.200
<v Speaker 1>Luck going on, and equity is definitely off their has

0:28:18.240 --> 0:28:20.200
<v Speaker 1>of the session. Charlie breaking down. Those numbers were down

0:28:20.200 --> 0:28:22.919
<v Speaker 1>across the board, just about point three percent down on

0:28:23.000 --> 0:28:25.879
<v Speaker 1>those major equity averages. Let's get to with Anna Barton.

0:28:25.920 --> 0:28:29.000
<v Speaker 1>She is co director of Global of Growth Equities at

0:28:29.080 --> 0:28:31.800
<v Speaker 1>Eaton Vanced, Co director of Growth Equities. Let's get it

0:28:31.880 --> 0:28:35.040
<v Speaker 1>right at Eaton Vance on the phone from Boston. Um, yeah,

0:28:35.760 --> 0:28:37.480
<v Speaker 1>nice to have you here with us. How are you

0:28:38.400 --> 0:28:40.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm doing great, good afternoon. Good to be with you

0:28:40.480 --> 0:28:42.560
<v Speaker 1>guys again. Yeah, good to have you here. It's a

0:28:42.560 --> 0:28:45.200
<v Speaker 1>funny day. Bank earnings. I don't know what what is

0:28:45.240 --> 0:28:47.320
<v Speaker 1>it that you think we should be focusing on in

0:28:47.360 --> 0:28:51.760
<v Speaker 1>today's trade. Well, there's a lot that is coming at investors,

0:28:51.800 --> 0:28:55.280
<v Speaker 1>and I think the market is reacting to uh, pretty

0:28:55.360 --> 0:28:57.280
<v Speaker 1>much a little bit for everyone. I think, you know,

0:28:57.280 --> 0:28:59.560
<v Speaker 1>when you think about the marketplaces a balance sheet, there

0:28:59.480 --> 0:29:02.520
<v Speaker 1>are plenty of assets and liabilities. On the plus side,

0:29:02.520 --> 0:29:05.520
<v Speaker 1>I think we've got a ton of confirmation that economic

0:29:05.560 --> 0:29:09.840
<v Speaker 1>recovery is with us, a very positive comments from Jamie

0:29:09.920 --> 0:29:13.360
<v Speaker 1>Diamond and the rest on the consumer spending and the sentiment.

0:29:13.840 --> 0:29:16.920
<v Speaker 1>But on the flip side, obviously, the the million dollar

0:29:17.000 --> 0:29:20.560
<v Speaker 1>question on the stickiness of the inflationary pressures and whether

0:29:20.600 --> 0:29:23.120
<v Speaker 1>it remains with us for years to come or just

0:29:23.200 --> 0:29:26.680
<v Speaker 1>a couple of months. Is um kind of confirmation of

0:29:26.720 --> 0:29:29.280
<v Speaker 1>the fact that inflation is heading higher, But I would

0:29:29.280 --> 0:29:33.680
<v Speaker 1>say it's heading higher alongside higher growth rate. So uh,

0:29:33.760 --> 0:29:37.640
<v Speaker 1>that equation if holes is okay for now, well, is

0:29:37.680 --> 0:29:40.320
<v Speaker 1>it heading higher though permanently, or is it heading higher

0:29:40.320 --> 0:29:43.240
<v Speaker 1>in a way that that lumber prices headed higher Because

0:29:43.240 --> 0:29:45.080
<v Speaker 1>if we look and we talked about this with Carl

0:29:45.160 --> 0:29:49.120
<v Speaker 1>Ricdona from Bloomberg Intelligence Bloomberg Economics earlier in the day today,

0:29:49.160 --> 0:29:52.040
<v Speaker 1>and he pointed out that the prices for used cars

0:29:52.040 --> 0:29:54.880
<v Speaker 1>and trucks they jumped ten point five but that was

0:29:54.960 --> 0:29:59.400
<v Speaker 1>responsible for a third of the rise of the index. Yeah,

0:29:59.440 --> 0:30:02.080
<v Speaker 1>that's a fair appoint him. And I think, um, I

0:30:02.120 --> 0:30:06.400
<v Speaker 1>think many of your guests previous to me stated correctly,

0:30:06.440 --> 0:30:09.440
<v Speaker 1>which is some of these pressures are truly going to

0:30:09.480 --> 0:30:12.480
<v Speaker 1>be transitory and some are not. Lumber is a perfect

0:30:12.480 --> 0:30:15.800
<v Speaker 1>example where um it was transitory and now where something

0:30:15.840 --> 0:30:19.400
<v Speaker 1>like off where we were just even a couple of

0:30:19.440 --> 0:30:22.680
<v Speaker 1>months ago. UM wages, for example, you can't give somebody

0:30:22.720 --> 0:30:25.040
<v Speaker 1>a raise and then take it away. UM. So I

0:30:25.080 --> 0:30:28.320
<v Speaker 1>think the the answer to the question ultimately pricing power.

0:30:28.360 --> 0:30:30.920
<v Speaker 1>That's something that we've talked about. Companies that haven't you

0:30:30.920 --> 0:30:33.600
<v Speaker 1>can pass it on UM. You know, Pepsi being a

0:30:33.600 --> 0:30:37.120
<v Speaker 1>perfect example of that, will not see as much a

0:30:37.200 --> 0:30:41.360
<v Speaker 1>destrimental sort of impact to the margins as companies that

0:30:41.640 --> 0:30:45.520
<v Speaker 1>have to eat the higher input costs. So UM. Again,

0:30:45.640 --> 0:30:47.200
<v Speaker 1>it's a little bit of everything, and we just have

0:30:47.320 --> 0:30:50.080
<v Speaker 1>to be contient and watch what the market is giving us.

0:30:50.280 --> 0:30:54.280
<v Speaker 1>So you're not worried about runaway inflation, not yet, uh

0:30:54.320 --> 0:30:56.800
<v Speaker 1>not yet. But I think I think what what what

0:30:56.840 --> 0:31:00.000
<v Speaker 1>we are worried about is going after sort of those

0:31:00.480 --> 0:31:03.200
<v Speaker 1>theme that was taking a hold in the beginning of

0:31:03.240 --> 0:31:06.080
<v Speaker 1>the year, which is this reopening trade, this value trade,

0:31:06.360 --> 0:31:10.680
<v Speaker 1>irrespective of you know, legitimacy and sustain sustainability of that

0:31:10.840 --> 0:31:13.320
<v Speaker 1>trend and that growth rate. And I think the most

0:31:13.360 --> 0:31:16.600
<v Speaker 1>important thing for investors to focus on is a balance

0:31:16.640 --> 0:31:22.320
<v Speaker 1>diversified approach in in stories that are stock specific meanings,

0:31:22.440 --> 0:31:26.920
<v Speaker 1>secular growth stories with addressable market that is disrupting along

0:31:27.480 --> 0:31:32.320
<v Speaker 1>alongside stable growth opportunities like apochescy for example, UM and

0:31:32.400 --> 0:31:36.120
<v Speaker 1>others that provide that sort of buoyancy and provide that

0:31:36.440 --> 0:31:39.080
<v Speaker 1>UM eligibility to kind of play in both sides of

0:31:39.120 --> 0:31:41.600
<v Speaker 1>the trade. What are some other of those stocks that

0:31:41.680 --> 0:31:45.920
<v Speaker 1>you're betting on? So some other ones interesting enough? You

0:31:45.960 --> 0:31:48.840
<v Speaker 1>know where I would go is with laggers. I mean,

0:31:48.920 --> 0:31:51.640
<v Speaker 1>that's one area of the market. Unfortunately, we've got something

0:31:51.720 --> 0:31:54.240
<v Speaker 1>like six areas of the market that have lagged the

0:31:54.400 --> 0:31:56.440
<v Speaker 1>S and P five hundreds. So I would go where

0:31:56.480 --> 0:31:59.520
<v Speaker 1>the price performance and the valuation has already been reset.

0:32:00.040 --> 0:32:02.520
<v Speaker 1>Technology is actually a perfect place for that. I think

0:32:02.800 --> 0:32:05.640
<v Speaker 1>we're undergoing that right now, particularly in the Hardware and

0:32:05.680 --> 0:32:09.920
<v Speaker 1>Equipment UM area of the market. UM SMPI is up

0:32:09.960 --> 0:32:13.680
<v Speaker 1>something like seventeen and a half percentage points, but tech

0:32:13.760 --> 0:32:18.000
<v Speaker 1>well definitely regained some leadership, is still lagging. Another interesting

0:32:18.080 --> 0:32:22.560
<v Speaker 1>area is chemicals. Believe it or not, While materials UM

0:32:22.760 --> 0:32:26.880
<v Speaker 1>is underperforming interesting enough, chemicals is trading at a discount

0:32:26.960 --> 0:32:30.480
<v Speaker 1>to the market, casually yield and accessible percentage points and

0:32:30.560 --> 0:32:34.560
<v Speaker 1>has growth rate that is double digits. So that's another area. Hey,

0:32:34.600 --> 0:32:36.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna ask you, you're eating vans growth opportunities fun.

0:32:36.920 --> 0:32:40.320
<v Speaker 1>It's up about in the last twelve months. I also

0:32:40.360 --> 0:32:43.880
<v Speaker 1>beating most of its peers, UH in that category, the

0:32:43.920 --> 0:32:47.720
<v Speaker 1>top names Amazon, Microsoft, Alphabet. I mean, these are a

0:32:47.720 --> 0:32:49.840
<v Speaker 1>bunch of your big growth names. So are you guys

0:32:49.840 --> 0:32:53.560
<v Speaker 1>still all in on this? Yeah? I think UM. Just

0:32:53.640 --> 0:32:56.160
<v Speaker 1>as a note, I'm actually no longer a PM of

0:32:56.200 --> 0:32:59.440
<v Speaker 1>that strategy, but I have a ton of a ton

0:32:59.480 --> 0:33:03.520
<v Speaker 1>of my own personal investment associated with that strategy. I

0:33:03.560 --> 0:33:05.360
<v Speaker 1>think growth is a place where you want to be

0:33:05.520 --> 0:33:08.080
<v Speaker 1>right now, UM, and the names that you mentioned have

0:33:08.280 --> 0:33:12.719
<v Speaker 1>more cash on hand, have more top line growth, and

0:33:12.800 --> 0:33:15.280
<v Speaker 1>I would argue more pricing power than many of the

0:33:15.320 --> 0:33:19.000
<v Speaker 1>companies UM that we talked about. So I think growth

0:33:19.040 --> 0:33:21.080
<v Speaker 1>at a reasonable prices where you want to be in

0:33:21.120 --> 0:33:23.440
<v Speaker 1>many of those names, to be honest with your trading,

0:33:23.480 --> 0:33:25.400
<v Speaker 1>at a discount to their growth rate. So that's interesting

0:33:25.440 --> 0:33:27.360
<v Speaker 1>because I was gonna say, Dave Wilson was talking about

0:33:27.400 --> 0:33:30.040
<v Speaker 1>technology in particular being a little hot in terms of

0:33:30.120 --> 0:33:33.240
<v Speaker 1>valuation and kind of making the comparison to what we

0:33:33.280 --> 0:33:37.320
<v Speaker 1>saw in the tech bubble, and so I did wonder

0:33:37.480 --> 0:33:39.800
<v Speaker 1>if are you comfortable letting some of these names run

0:33:39.840 --> 0:33:41.720
<v Speaker 1>a little bit hot because of who they are and

0:33:41.720 --> 0:33:46.480
<v Speaker 1>their growth opportunities and possibilities and potentials versus maybe some

0:33:46.560 --> 0:33:49.640
<v Speaker 1>other names. That's fair. I think tech is one of

0:33:49.640 --> 0:33:52.720
<v Speaker 1>those areas of the market, like industrials, where you have

0:33:52.960 --> 0:33:56.040
<v Speaker 1>a ton of different industries. So there's definitely a lot

0:33:56.040 --> 0:34:00.880
<v Speaker 1>of enablers and software plays that have UM had tremendous

0:34:00.920 --> 0:34:04.040
<v Speaker 1>price appreciation. But if you take a step back and

0:34:04.080 --> 0:34:06.720
<v Speaker 1>you think about all the things that we've been talking about, identity,

0:34:06.760 --> 0:34:10.240
<v Speaker 1>governance and cyber attacks and all of those things, UM,

0:34:10.280 --> 0:34:13.920
<v Speaker 1>there is still this wallet share that is transitioning, and

0:34:13.960 --> 0:34:16.279
<v Speaker 1>there's still not enough money being spent on the most

0:34:16.320 --> 0:34:19.480
<v Speaker 1>important things right now, and that's infrastructure as we think

0:34:19.520 --> 0:34:22.600
<v Speaker 1>about sort of the digital world and digital economy that

0:34:22.640 --> 0:34:24.799
<v Speaker 1>we're part of. So I think we just have a

0:34:24.800 --> 0:34:27.640
<v Speaker 1>lot of investment that is still yet to take hold.

0:34:27.960 --> 0:34:30.360
<v Speaker 1>When we think about the overall I T spend is

0:34:30.400 --> 0:34:32.800
<v Speaker 1>being in trillions of dollars in less than time, percent

0:34:32.880 --> 0:34:36.960
<v Speaker 1>being spent on security, UM or other sort of enabling things.

0:34:37.600 --> 0:34:38.719
<v Speaker 1>And I want to jump back to something that you

0:34:38.719 --> 0:34:40.880
<v Speaker 1>said earlier in our conversation. You said you're not concerned,

0:34:40.920 --> 0:34:42.320
<v Speaker 1>and this is because this is what the market is

0:34:42.680 --> 0:34:45.600
<v Speaker 1>doing today. This is what it's thinking about. Um, you're

0:34:45.640 --> 0:34:51.680
<v Speaker 1>not concerned about inflation yet, when will you be? I think,

0:34:52.719 --> 0:34:55.479
<v Speaker 1>you know, statsulation was the most um, I think, most

0:34:55.520 --> 0:34:59.279
<v Speaker 1>heated word in economics, which is when you just don't

0:34:59.320 --> 0:35:03.920
<v Speaker 1>have enough growth to offset these taxes to your to

0:35:04.000 --> 0:35:08.480
<v Speaker 1>your bottom line. And what we need to be mindful of.

0:35:08.560 --> 0:35:11.319
<v Speaker 1>And this is why I think, you know, investors will

0:35:11.440 --> 0:35:14.880
<v Speaker 1>benefit from being active in the market and responding to

0:35:14.920 --> 0:35:17.480
<v Speaker 1>what the market is telling us right now. What it's

0:35:17.520 --> 0:35:20.440
<v Speaker 1>telling us exactly what you mentioned is that if you

0:35:20.520 --> 0:35:24.000
<v Speaker 1>sort of decipher where the inflationary pressures are coming from,

0:35:24.040 --> 0:35:26.680
<v Speaker 1>a third of it is is driven by you know,

0:35:26.760 --> 0:35:30.279
<v Speaker 1>demand and supply um dynamics that we believe are going

0:35:30.320 --> 0:35:35.080
<v Speaker 1>to be transitory, some supply chain dynamics that we also

0:35:35.760 --> 0:35:38.040
<v Speaker 1>there might be more lingering that we'd like them to be,

0:35:38.120 --> 0:35:41.560
<v Speaker 1>but should be transitory. So I think what you need

0:35:41.600 --> 0:35:44.560
<v Speaker 1>to be mindful of is cause and effect and understanding

0:35:44.560 --> 0:35:47.640
<v Speaker 1>what are the sources of the inflationary pressures and how

0:35:47.680 --> 0:35:50.080
<v Speaker 1>the company sort of offset them for the longer term.

0:35:50.080 --> 0:35:51.800
<v Speaker 1>And that's why I go back to the big guys

0:35:51.840 --> 0:35:53.960
<v Speaker 1>that do have the price and power and can do

0:35:54.040 --> 0:35:57.759
<v Speaker 1>well irrespective of the inflation um levels that we're living with,

0:35:57.800 --> 0:35:59.600
<v Speaker 1>and I do under when do we respect the bond market?

0:35:59.640 --> 0:36:01.200
<v Speaker 1>Do we resk backed it? You know? Sometimes we blow

0:36:01.239 --> 0:36:02.920
<v Speaker 1>it off when it gets too low. Thing, well, that

0:36:02.960 --> 0:36:05.000
<v Speaker 1>can't be real um. And then when it goes up,

0:36:05.000 --> 0:36:07.799
<v Speaker 1>we're like, go, wait, that's real. So it's interesting kind

0:36:07.840 --> 0:36:10.440
<v Speaker 1>of investor perspective on all of this. U Jana Barton,

0:36:10.480 --> 0:36:12.319
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much, co director of Growth Equities at

0:36:12.360 --> 0:36:14.920
<v Speaker 1>EAT Advance, joining us once again on the phone from Boston.

0:36:16.440 --> 0:36:19.280
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for listening to Bloomberg Business Week. Download the podcast

0:36:19.320 --> 0:36:22.279
<v Speaker 1>on iTunes, SoundCloud, or Bloomberg dot com, and you can

0:36:22.320 --> 0:36:24.440
<v Speaker 1>also listen to our radio show at two pm Eastern

0:36:24.480 --> 0:36:27.160
<v Speaker 1>on Bloomberg Radio or watch us on YouTube. Search to

0:36:27.160 --> 0:36:28.279
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Global News