WEBVTT - Tech News: Exploring the Amazon (News)

0:00:04.400 --> 0:00:07.800
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to tech Stuff, a production from I Heart Radio.

0:00:12.160 --> 0:00:14.920
<v Speaker 1>Hey there, and welcome to tech Stuff. I'm your host,

0:00:15.000 --> 0:00:18.040
<v Speaker 1>Jonathan Strickland. I'm an executive producer with I Heart Radio.

0:00:18.079 --> 0:00:20.479
<v Speaker 1>And how the tech are Yet, it's time for the

0:00:20.520 --> 0:00:25.480
<v Speaker 1>tech news for Tuesday, April five, twenty twenty two. Let's

0:00:25.600 --> 0:00:28.600
<v Speaker 1>get to it now. A lot has happened over the

0:00:28.680 --> 0:00:31.360
<v Speaker 1>last few days, and some of it was even real.

0:00:32.080 --> 0:00:34.480
<v Speaker 1>I am, of course referencing the fact that between our

0:00:34.600 --> 0:00:38.760
<v Speaker 1>last news episode and this one, we had April Fool's Day,

0:00:39.159 --> 0:00:42.199
<v Speaker 1>a day where in the past we've seen numerous companies

0:00:42.240 --> 0:00:47.040
<v Speaker 1>release joke news items, fake press releases. Some might go

0:00:47.200 --> 0:00:50.880
<v Speaker 1>so far as to describe them as lies, and it's

0:00:50.920 --> 0:00:53.479
<v Speaker 1>hard to argue against that. I think whether or not

0:00:53.520 --> 0:00:56.080
<v Speaker 1>you think of them as lies really depends heavily on

0:00:56.080 --> 0:00:59.800
<v Speaker 1>whether or not you thought the joke was funny. Anyway,

0:01:00.600 --> 0:01:04.720
<v Speaker 1>On top of all that tomfoolery, some important real stuff

0:01:04.760 --> 0:01:08.880
<v Speaker 1>actually happened. For example, Amazon workers at the JFK eight

0:01:09.000 --> 0:01:12.960
<v Speaker 1>warehouse on Staten Island, New York, voted to form an

0:01:12.959 --> 0:01:16.520
<v Speaker 1>employee union. This has been going on for quite some time.

0:01:16.600 --> 0:01:19.640
<v Speaker 1>The votes are in and they've passed. They needed a

0:01:19.680 --> 0:01:22.919
<v Speaker 1>simple majority, and that's what they got with two thousand,

0:01:23.000 --> 0:01:26.160
<v Speaker 1>six hundred fifty four employees voting to form a union

0:01:26.560 --> 0:01:31.160
<v Speaker 1>and two thousand, one thirty one voting against. So now

0:01:31.200 --> 0:01:34.560
<v Speaker 1>the employees there can form an independent union and that

0:01:34.600 --> 0:01:37.479
<v Speaker 1>will get the backing of the National Labor Relations Board

0:01:37.520 --> 0:01:40.560
<v Speaker 1>here in the US. That union will then have the

0:01:40.600 --> 0:01:44.600
<v Speaker 1>authority to negotiate collectively for all the employees that the

0:01:44.720 --> 0:01:48.480
<v Speaker 1>union represents. This is something that Amazon has been fighting

0:01:48.560 --> 0:01:52.080
<v Speaker 1>against for several years now, and we've heard numerous stories

0:01:52.120 --> 0:01:57.040
<v Speaker 1>about the company attempting to dissuade employees from organizing. Meanwhile,

0:01:57.400 --> 0:02:00.720
<v Speaker 1>in Bessemer, Alabama, we're still waiting to find now whether

0:02:00.800 --> 0:02:05.080
<v Speaker 1>Amazon warehouse workers there have voted to unionize. They actually

0:02:05.520 --> 0:02:08.480
<v Speaker 1>held the vote and they counted the vote, and the

0:02:08.560 --> 0:02:13.680
<v Speaker 1>results came in and showed more confirmed votes against unionizing

0:02:13.919 --> 0:02:17.520
<v Speaker 1>than four But there are also more than four hundred

0:02:17.600 --> 0:02:21.760
<v Speaker 1>challenged votes in the balance, and that's actually enough to

0:02:21.840 --> 0:02:26.040
<v Speaker 1>swing the vote in favor of unionizing if enough of

0:02:26.080 --> 0:02:29.519
<v Speaker 1>them come out as being uh in favor of a union.

0:02:30.040 --> 0:02:32.680
<v Speaker 1>So that all has to get resolved before we have

0:02:32.760 --> 0:02:35.560
<v Speaker 1>a firm answer on whether or not a union is

0:02:35.600 --> 0:02:38.959
<v Speaker 1>forming at that warehouse Uh, the matter is going to

0:02:39.040 --> 0:02:42.280
<v Speaker 1>have to go to a judiciary authority to determine the outcome,

0:02:42.480 --> 0:02:44.079
<v Speaker 1>so we'll have to wait a little bit longer to

0:02:44.120 --> 0:02:47.880
<v Speaker 1>hear back on that. Um. This is a dramatic story

0:02:47.919 --> 0:02:50.080
<v Speaker 1>that's been playing out for more than a year now,

0:02:50.760 --> 0:02:52.760
<v Speaker 1>and it's also gonna be interesting to see if the

0:02:52.800 --> 0:02:55.880
<v Speaker 1>Staten Island vote is going to prompt more employees both

0:02:55.919 --> 0:03:00.840
<v Speaker 1>of Amazon and of other companies to consider unionizing. If so,

0:03:01.520 --> 0:03:04.800
<v Speaker 1>we can see some pretty dramatic changes in business in

0:03:04.840 --> 0:03:08.840
<v Speaker 1>general and the tech industry in particular. UM. And those changes,

0:03:09.040 --> 0:03:13.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's hard to even understand the consequences of them. Uh.

0:03:13.440 --> 0:03:17.080
<v Speaker 1>It could affect all sorts of things, from the speed

0:03:17.360 --> 0:03:21.519
<v Speaker 1>of products getting rolled out to the price of them.

0:03:22.480 --> 0:03:25.520
<v Speaker 1>But importantly, the thing we should keep in mind is

0:03:26.040 --> 0:03:29.799
<v Speaker 1>the whole purpose of the unions is to guarantee that

0:03:29.840 --> 0:03:37.160
<v Speaker 1>employees have a fair and uh, you know, equitable treatment

0:03:37.600 --> 0:03:41.240
<v Speaker 1>from their employer. That's the important thing to remember. The

0:03:41.280 --> 0:03:45.720
<v Speaker 1>Intercept reports that an Amazon worker chat app that is

0:03:45.840 --> 0:03:50.080
<v Speaker 1>in development currently contains a list of banned words that includes,

0:03:50.200 --> 0:03:53.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, stuff you would expect like profanity and slurs.

0:03:53.040 --> 0:03:55.600
<v Speaker 1>Those are on the no No list and if you

0:03:55.600 --> 0:03:58.080
<v Speaker 1>were to use this app and try to use those words,

0:03:58.120 --> 0:04:02.400
<v Speaker 1>your message would presumably be locked. But that list also

0:04:02.440 --> 0:04:09.320
<v Speaker 1>contains other words like union and ethics and restrooms, which

0:04:09.320 --> 0:04:13.360
<v Speaker 1>should probably raise some red flags. Now, to clarify things

0:04:13.400 --> 0:04:16.839
<v Speaker 1>a little bit, the purpose of this particular app, which

0:04:16.960 --> 0:04:21.120
<v Speaker 1>Amazon officials say it may never be deployed, Like this

0:04:21.200 --> 0:04:23.880
<v Speaker 1>might be a fuss over something that never actually is

0:04:24.040 --> 0:04:27.839
<v Speaker 1>used because it is still in development, But the purpose

0:04:28.440 --> 0:04:30.960
<v Speaker 1>is to let employees give shoutouts to each other. So,

0:04:31.000 --> 0:04:35.000
<v Speaker 1>in other words, it's all about praising other employees so

0:04:35.160 --> 0:04:39.640
<v Speaker 1>that they are recognized for their contributions as such, say

0:04:39.640 --> 0:04:42.440
<v Speaker 1>Amazon reps, the company wants to weed out words and

0:04:42.480 --> 0:04:45.679
<v Speaker 1>phrases that could potentially be a downer or allow someone

0:04:45.720 --> 0:04:50.440
<v Speaker 1>to abuse the app, and you know, might prevent someone

0:04:50.480 --> 0:04:53.320
<v Speaker 1>from saying something like, hey, Bob, you did great work today.

0:04:53.480 --> 0:04:55.360
<v Speaker 1>Sorry you have to pee in a bottle in order

0:04:55.400 --> 0:04:59.680
<v Speaker 1>to make quota. Now, as you imagine, acknowledging reality in

0:04:59.680 --> 0:05:03.159
<v Speaker 1>an Amazon warehouse can really be a drag sometimes and

0:05:03.200 --> 0:05:05.679
<v Speaker 1>I'm being a bit harsh, but then the whole endeavor

0:05:05.760 --> 0:05:09.760
<v Speaker 1>seems insincere to me. Then again, the app still is

0:05:09.800 --> 0:05:13.440
<v Speaker 1>in development. It could change significantly before it's rolled out,

0:05:13.520 --> 0:05:16.960
<v Speaker 1>and again, it may never be rolled out, so I

0:05:17.000 --> 0:05:19.800
<v Speaker 1>really shouldn't rush to judge. I think I just do

0:05:19.920 --> 0:05:24.240
<v Speaker 1>because Amazon has this history of trying to suppress employee organization,

0:05:24.839 --> 0:05:30.599
<v Speaker 1>and so this news story strikes me as a little insidious. Now,

0:05:30.640 --> 0:05:34.679
<v Speaker 1>normally I save space stuff for the end of news episodes,

0:05:34.720 --> 0:05:36.440
<v Speaker 1>and we will have some space stuff at the end

0:05:36.440 --> 0:05:40.039
<v Speaker 1>of this one. But this particular space story relates to Amazon,

0:05:40.360 --> 0:05:42.719
<v Speaker 1>so I thought I would round out the trilogy of

0:05:42.800 --> 0:05:47.600
<v Speaker 1>Amazon news stories. The company has secured eighty three launches

0:05:47.880 --> 0:05:51.960
<v Speaker 1>over the next five years. These launches relate to the

0:05:52.000 --> 0:05:55.800
<v Speaker 1>company's Project Kiper, which is similar to space x is

0:05:56.040 --> 0:06:02.039
<v Speaker 1>starlink product. Amazon plans to launch around three thousand satellites

0:06:02.240 --> 0:06:06.520
<v Speaker 1>into low Earth orbit, and the satellites will provide Internet access.

0:06:07.120 --> 0:06:09.839
<v Speaker 1>So customers on Earth will presumably get some sort of

0:06:10.160 --> 0:06:14.560
<v Speaker 1>like satellite antenna dish kit to set up and that

0:06:14.600 --> 0:06:17.480
<v Speaker 1>will track satellites as they move overhead and the satellites

0:06:17.520 --> 0:06:22.120
<v Speaker 1>will provide Internet connectivity to the customers. Satellite provided internet

0:06:22.160 --> 0:06:25.240
<v Speaker 1>is not a new thing, obviously, but in some regions,

0:06:25.240 --> 0:06:29.400
<v Speaker 1>like a lot of regions, really satellite service can be

0:06:29.440 --> 0:06:33.320
<v Speaker 1>your only real Internet solution for you know, a broadband

0:06:33.360 --> 0:06:37.400
<v Speaker 1>access and they rarely have very many competitors in those spaces.

0:06:38.000 --> 0:06:41.080
<v Speaker 1>UM and satellite connections do have a couple of downsides,

0:06:41.120 --> 0:06:43.680
<v Speaker 1>the main one being that due to the distance between

0:06:43.680 --> 0:06:47.120
<v Speaker 1>your antenna and the satellite and everything else down here

0:06:47.160 --> 0:06:51.320
<v Speaker 1>on Earth, there can be noticeable latency ak a delay

0:06:51.360 --> 0:06:55.000
<v Speaker 1>when you want to do stuff. The bandwidth itself can

0:06:55.040 --> 0:06:57.839
<v Speaker 1>be pretty decent, so once things are initiated, like once

0:06:57.880 --> 0:07:01.159
<v Speaker 1>you start a download the down it can move pretty quickly,

0:07:01.520 --> 0:07:05.440
<v Speaker 1>but there's still a lag between when you command something

0:07:05.480 --> 0:07:07.880
<v Speaker 1>like when you click on a download link and when

0:07:07.880 --> 0:07:11.800
<v Speaker 1>it actually happens because there's all that distance between the

0:07:11.840 --> 0:07:13.960
<v Speaker 1>Earth and the satellite. You know, even at the speed

0:07:13.960 --> 0:07:16.600
<v Speaker 1>of light, it takes a little time for that to

0:07:16.640 --> 0:07:18.200
<v Speaker 1>go through and it can be long enough for you

0:07:18.240 --> 0:07:21.000
<v Speaker 1>to notice it. So that's a bit of a downside.

0:07:21.040 --> 0:07:24.760
<v Speaker 1>It means also that certain things like high end streaming

0:07:24.800 --> 0:07:30.280
<v Speaker 1>gaming is not really viable on a satellite communication. Still,

0:07:30.320 --> 0:07:33.000
<v Speaker 1>for some folks in rural and out of the way locations,

0:07:33.080 --> 0:07:36.920
<v Speaker 1>satellite internet is often the best option for Internet service. UH.

0:07:36.960 --> 0:07:40.400
<v Speaker 1>There are other issues that this raises, like, just like

0:07:40.400 --> 0:07:44.480
<v Speaker 1>with starlink UH, the idea of launching thousands of satellites

0:07:44.480 --> 0:07:48.680
<v Speaker 1>into low Earth orbit concerns scientists on Earth who are

0:07:48.720 --> 0:07:53.840
<v Speaker 1>worried that they will interfere with astronomical observations and such.

0:07:54.520 --> 0:07:57.520
<v Speaker 1>But that's where we are now. Over the next five years,

0:07:57.760 --> 0:08:02.080
<v Speaker 1>Amazon plans on launching the satellites in those three launches,

0:08:02.200 --> 0:08:05.280
<v Speaker 1>so we'll have to see how that develops. Moving on,

0:08:05.760 --> 0:08:09.920
<v Speaker 1>Elon Musk, the you know man famous for companies like

0:08:09.960 --> 0:08:13.240
<v Speaker 1>Tesla and SpaceX, can add yet another title to his

0:08:13.320 --> 0:08:16.560
<v Speaker 1>business card. He is now a member of Twitter's board

0:08:16.600 --> 0:08:20.640
<v Speaker 1>of directors. Musk has accumulated nine point to five per

0:08:20.720 --> 0:08:24.680
<v Speaker 1>cent of Twitter ownership, which makes him the largest shareholder

0:08:24.800 --> 0:08:28.040
<v Speaker 1>in Twitter. He also posted a poll not too long

0:08:28.040 --> 0:08:31.160
<v Speaker 1>ago to his followers asking if they thought Twitter rigorously

0:08:31.240 --> 0:08:35.280
<v Speaker 1>adheres to the ideals of free speech, and a little

0:08:35.280 --> 0:08:38.560
<v Speaker 1>more than two thirds of the respondents, which numbered more

0:08:38.559 --> 0:08:42.840
<v Speaker 1>than two million people, said no. This has naturally led

0:08:42.880 --> 0:08:46.880
<v Speaker 1>some people to worry that Musk might use his position

0:08:46.920 --> 0:08:51.960
<v Speaker 1>on the board to maybe reverse some decisions regarding blocking

0:08:52.040 --> 0:08:55.840
<v Speaker 1>certain accounts that were found to be abusive or responsible

0:08:55.880 --> 0:08:59.280
<v Speaker 1>for spreading misinformation Like there. There's worried that Musk might

0:08:59.360 --> 0:09:02.880
<v Speaker 1>undermine uh certain moves that Twitter has made in order

0:09:02.920 --> 0:09:05.880
<v Speaker 1>to fight back against those things. He also pulled his

0:09:05.960 --> 0:09:09.440
<v Speaker 1>followers asking if they might like an edit button, something

0:09:09.520 --> 0:09:12.520
<v Speaker 1>that long time Twitter users have wanted for years. Um

0:09:12.720 --> 0:09:15.960
<v Speaker 1>Musk spent nearly three billion dollars to acquire his stake

0:09:16.000 --> 0:09:18.760
<v Speaker 1>in Twitter, which seems like a pretty steep price for

0:09:18.840 --> 0:09:21.839
<v Speaker 1>me to buy an edit button, but there you have it.

0:09:23.800 --> 0:09:29.240
<v Speaker 1>BuzzFeed News has an interesting article titled TikTok's parent byte Dance,

0:09:29.400 --> 0:09:33.439
<v Speaker 1>made fake accounts with content scraped from Instagram and Snapchat.

0:09:33.520 --> 0:09:37.719
<v Speaker 1>Former employees say, uh, that's a lengthy title, and it's

0:09:37.720 --> 0:09:40.800
<v Speaker 1>a lengthy article, but it's well worth a read. It's

0:09:41.360 --> 0:09:45.360
<v Speaker 1>also about something that happened around five years ago, so

0:09:45.640 --> 0:09:49.080
<v Speaker 1>it's not like this is, you know, fresh news, but

0:09:49.320 --> 0:09:53.000
<v Speaker 1>it's something that we've gotten details about recently. So five

0:09:53.080 --> 0:09:55.880
<v Speaker 1>years ago is when byte Dance acquired a company called

0:09:56.040 --> 0:10:00.120
<v Speaker 1>flip a Gram. Flip Agram was a photo and video

0:10:00.320 --> 0:10:05.360
<v Speaker 1>sharing service, and according to buzzfeeds sources, byte Dance then

0:10:05.440 --> 0:10:10.160
<v Speaker 1>scraped content off of other services, including Instagram, in order

0:10:10.200 --> 0:10:14.280
<v Speaker 1>to upload that content to flip Agram, and in the

0:10:14.320 --> 0:10:18.200
<v Speaker 1>process also created fake accounts that would host that content,

0:10:18.280 --> 0:10:21.440
<v Speaker 1>so they were taking someone else's videos, creating a fake

0:10:21.480 --> 0:10:25.640
<v Speaker 1>account on Flipogram, and then putting those videos onto that account.

0:10:26.120 --> 0:10:29.360
<v Speaker 1>So why did byte Dance do this, Well, one reason

0:10:29.480 --> 0:10:32.000
<v Speaker 1>might have been to test out what kinds of content

0:10:32.080 --> 0:10:35.760
<v Speaker 1>would perform best on the platform, sort of like industry research,

0:10:36.360 --> 0:10:41.120
<v Speaker 1>and byte Dance was primarily interested in targeting American customers,

0:10:41.200 --> 0:10:44.760
<v Speaker 1>so stealing content from other sources and putting it up

0:10:44.760 --> 0:10:49.040
<v Speaker 1>on Flipogram was a type of research into the American market.

0:10:49.440 --> 0:10:51.440
<v Speaker 1>This would inform the company as to what types of

0:10:51.480 --> 0:10:54.679
<v Speaker 1>content were most likely to draw more people to Flipogram.

0:10:54.720 --> 0:10:57.600
<v Speaker 1>The company could even inflate the view numbers on such content,

0:10:57.760 --> 0:11:02.120
<v Speaker 1>giving those account a boost in an effort to attract

0:11:02.160 --> 0:11:05.240
<v Speaker 1>new users and guide existing once towards the types of

0:11:05.320 --> 0:11:08.520
<v Speaker 1>content that we're performing best on the platform. So, in

0:11:08.559 --> 0:11:11.120
<v Speaker 1>other words, you might look at at something and say, oh,

0:11:11.200 --> 0:11:13.800
<v Speaker 1>this is a thousand likes on it, and it turns

0:11:13.840 --> 0:11:16.520
<v Speaker 1>out that no, maybe it was only like two hundred likes,

0:11:16.520 --> 0:11:20.160
<v Speaker 1>and then the company boosted that. Now. Another reason that

0:11:20.240 --> 0:11:23.840
<v Speaker 1>they were scraping content might have just been to create inventory.

0:11:24.200 --> 0:11:28.800
<v Speaker 1>Social apps gain value from active users and also their

0:11:28.920 --> 0:11:31.600
<v Speaker 1>user generated content. So if you have a social app

0:11:31.679 --> 0:11:33.800
<v Speaker 1>but no one's on it, then it's worthless. Right. The

0:11:33.840 --> 0:11:36.760
<v Speaker 1>social app is only worth anything if there are people

0:11:36.840 --> 0:11:39.760
<v Speaker 1>on it and that they're doing stuff there. So the

0:11:39.800 --> 0:11:42.480
<v Speaker 1>app on its own is just a platform, and empty

0:11:42.480 --> 0:11:45.160
<v Speaker 1>platforms are not very interesting. This is one of the

0:11:45.200 --> 0:11:48.520
<v Speaker 1>big reasons why it's hard for new social networking platforms

0:11:48.520 --> 0:11:52.040
<v Speaker 1>to really make a big impact. The value of Facebook

0:11:52.400 --> 0:11:56.720
<v Speaker 1>to its user base is typically voiced in a way

0:11:56.760 --> 0:11:59.920
<v Speaker 1>that's like, that's where everyone I know happens to be.

0:12:00.240 --> 0:12:02.920
<v Speaker 1>So that's why I'm on Facebook, at least for those

0:12:02.960 --> 0:12:05.240
<v Speaker 1>of us who are in a certain age range, because

0:12:05.280 --> 0:12:08.480
<v Speaker 1>it's well documented that younger people are not flocking to

0:12:08.559 --> 0:12:13.280
<v Speaker 1>Facebook anyway. The practice of scraping is generally looked down upon,

0:12:13.480 --> 0:12:17.599
<v Speaker 1>and sometimes it's litigated, And in this particular case, I

0:12:17.600 --> 0:12:21.240
<v Speaker 1>would argue it's even worse because it involves taking content

0:12:21.320 --> 0:12:25.880
<v Speaker 1>that does not belong to Bite Dance without permission and

0:12:25.920 --> 0:12:29.080
<v Speaker 1>then falsely posting it elsewhere using a fake profile. So

0:12:29.120 --> 0:12:32.120
<v Speaker 1>we've seen companies like Meta come down hard on on

0:12:32.400 --> 0:12:36.440
<v Speaker 1>researchers who are scraping data off public profiles just for

0:12:36.520 --> 0:12:40.720
<v Speaker 1>the purposes of conducting research. Facebook or Meta has said

0:12:40.800 --> 0:12:45.239
<v Speaker 1>that's expressly against company policy, and they've shut down researcher

0:12:45.360 --> 0:12:48.559
<v Speaker 1>profiles for doing that, even if the research itself had

0:12:48.920 --> 0:12:53.440
<v Speaker 1>real scholastic value to it. You can bet that Meta

0:12:53.559 --> 0:12:58.400
<v Speaker 1>really doesn't like it when some other corporation is scraping

0:12:58.440 --> 0:13:01.560
<v Speaker 1>content off of their their services in an effort to

0:13:01.559 --> 0:13:05.840
<v Speaker 1>build competing products. Anyway, the article is a really good read.

0:13:06.160 --> 0:13:08.120
<v Speaker 1>It goes into much more detail on the matter and

0:13:08.160 --> 0:13:11.560
<v Speaker 1>covers other related stuff as well. I recommend you check

0:13:11.600 --> 0:13:14.480
<v Speaker 1>it out. We've got some more news items to cover,

0:13:14.559 --> 0:13:16.640
<v Speaker 1>but before we get to that, let's take a quick break.

0:13:24.600 --> 0:13:27.559
<v Speaker 1>I've talked a lot in recent episodes about how Apple's

0:13:27.640 --> 0:13:31.560
<v Speaker 1>policy of requiring app developers to use Apple's own payment

0:13:31.640 --> 0:13:35.199
<v Speaker 1>processing system is landing the company in hot water around

0:13:35.240 --> 0:13:38.200
<v Speaker 1>the world. You might remember that Dutch authorities have find

0:13:38.240 --> 0:13:43.720
<v Speaker 1>Apple fifty million euro for that and are considering doing more. Well.

0:13:44.000 --> 0:13:48.480
<v Speaker 1>We also have to remember that Google has very similar requirements,

0:13:48.840 --> 0:13:53.160
<v Speaker 1>but until recently, the company wasn't enforcing those requirements with

0:13:53.200 --> 0:13:57.360
<v Speaker 1>any particular fervor. In other words, for a while, companies

0:13:57.400 --> 0:14:00.080
<v Speaker 1>can kind of get away with just ignoring that requirement it,

0:14:00.360 --> 0:14:04.080
<v Speaker 1>but that has changed now. Companies like Amazon and Barnes

0:14:04.160 --> 0:14:06.400
<v Speaker 1>Noble have found themselves at a point where they either

0:14:06.520 --> 0:14:10.960
<v Speaker 1>have to accept Google's policy, which is that all digital

0:14:11.000 --> 0:14:15.520
<v Speaker 1>transactions have to go through Google Plays building system, or

0:14:15.960 --> 0:14:20.960
<v Speaker 1>they can't offer digital transactions through apps. The policy does

0:14:21.000 --> 0:14:24.920
<v Speaker 1>not affect stuff like ordering physical goods. So if you

0:14:24.960 --> 0:14:26.960
<v Speaker 1>know you were using an app in order to order

0:14:27.080 --> 0:14:29.600
<v Speaker 1>a hard copy of a book from Barnes and Noble,

0:14:29.800 --> 0:14:32.480
<v Speaker 1>Barnes and Noble could still use its preferred payment processing

0:14:32.520 --> 0:14:36.360
<v Speaker 1>system for that like that would not be against the

0:14:36.440 --> 0:14:39.520
<v Speaker 1>rules because you're ordering something physical. It's only if it

0:14:39.560 --> 0:14:42.120
<v Speaker 1>were a digital copy of the book that you would

0:14:42.160 --> 0:14:47.080
<v Speaker 1>have to go through Google Plays billing system. So anyway,

0:14:47.120 --> 0:14:52.320
<v Speaker 1>now you can't use the Barnes and Noble Enook Book

0:14:52.360 --> 0:14:55.640
<v Speaker 1>Reader to order new e books. It has just become

0:14:55.640 --> 0:14:59.520
<v Speaker 1>a tablet. It is no longer used to to order

0:14:59.520 --> 0:15:04.680
<v Speaker 1>and down load digital books to your device. In Amazon's case,

0:15:05.160 --> 0:15:08.760
<v Speaker 1>we're mostly talking about stuff like Audible content, so audio

0:15:08.880 --> 0:15:14.000
<v Speaker 1>books and other audio content off of Audible can no

0:15:14.080 --> 0:15:19.960
<v Speaker 1>longer be purchased unless you're going through Google Play. So

0:15:20.440 --> 0:15:24.160
<v Speaker 1>you can still buy credits for Audible through the Audible app,

0:15:24.680 --> 0:15:26.840
<v Speaker 1>but you won't be able to buy titles using a

0:15:26.880 --> 0:15:30.960
<v Speaker 1>credit or debit card. Directly through the app. Audible memberships

0:15:30.960 --> 0:15:34.680
<v Speaker 1>will be handled through Google Play billing. And Google has

0:15:34.720 --> 0:15:39.200
<v Speaker 1>a different arrangement in place for a very small number

0:15:39.360 --> 0:15:43.880
<v Speaker 1>of companies, notably Spotify as one of those where it's

0:15:43.920 --> 0:15:48.920
<v Speaker 1>testing a pilot program, but it has not extended that

0:15:49.040 --> 0:15:52.680
<v Speaker 1>arrangement to companies like Barnes and Noble and Amazon. Now

0:15:53.320 --> 0:15:56.200
<v Speaker 1>I imagine we'll see some legal challenges to Google's policy

0:15:56.280 --> 0:15:58.920
<v Speaker 1>similar to what we're seeing with Apple, and that the

0:15:59.000 --> 0:16:03.080
<v Speaker 1>Spotify arrangement, which is where Google will allow alternate payment

0:16:03.120 --> 0:16:05.520
<v Speaker 1>systems to be included in apps as long as those

0:16:05.560 --> 0:16:09.000
<v Speaker 1>apps also include Google Play, like you have to have

0:16:09.120 --> 0:16:12.040
<v Speaker 1>the official Google building system as an option in there,

0:16:12.880 --> 0:16:16.360
<v Speaker 1>even in this pilot program. But I imagined that is

0:16:16.400 --> 0:16:19.600
<v Speaker 1>what we're going to see become the norm overtime. Like

0:16:19.640 --> 0:16:21.360
<v Speaker 1>it's just I think that's just gonna be the way

0:16:21.400 --> 0:16:24.600
<v Speaker 1>it has to go. Otherwise, Google is going to be

0:16:24.640 --> 0:16:28.520
<v Speaker 1>facing some pretty serious antitrust legislation around the world, just

0:16:28.560 --> 0:16:32.760
<v Speaker 1>as Apple has been. German authorities concluded a month's long

0:16:32.840 --> 0:16:36.920
<v Speaker 1>investigation into a dark web ring by seizing that rings

0:16:37.080 --> 0:16:42.520
<v Speaker 1>server infrastructure within Germany. Those servers powered this ring's dark

0:16:42.600 --> 0:16:46.120
<v Speaker 1>web marketplace, so a black market on the dark web.

0:16:47.240 --> 0:16:49.840
<v Speaker 1>It appeared to be a market that was Russian and

0:16:49.920 --> 0:16:53.440
<v Speaker 1>origin because the primary language in the marketplace was Russian

0:16:53.960 --> 0:16:57.280
<v Speaker 1>and according to the authorities, the market was a popular

0:16:57.360 --> 0:17:01.080
<v Speaker 1>place to deal in such illegal materials as prohibited drugs,

0:17:01.840 --> 0:17:07.840
<v Speaker 1>fraudulent documents, and stolen data, among other illegal things. So

0:17:07.880 --> 0:17:10.600
<v Speaker 1>in addition to shutting down the market, the authorities also

0:17:10.640 --> 0:17:14.600
<v Speaker 1>sees more than twenty five million dollars worth of cryptocurrency.

0:17:14.800 --> 0:17:17.560
<v Speaker 1>Million dollars is a lot of money, but it's loose

0:17:17.680 --> 0:17:19.920
<v Speaker 1>change when you look at how much business passed through

0:17:19.960 --> 0:17:24.639
<v Speaker 1>the market just back in According to prosecutors, that was

0:17:24.680 --> 0:17:31.000
<v Speaker 1>that around one point to three billion euros that year. Yauza. Now,

0:17:31.040 --> 0:17:34.480
<v Speaker 1>typically the shutdown of markets like this one, which the

0:17:34.520 --> 0:17:38.840
<v Speaker 1>authorities called the Hydra market, that usually ends up just

0:17:38.880 --> 0:17:41.880
<v Speaker 1>being a bump in the road for illegal activity and

0:17:41.960 --> 0:17:44.280
<v Speaker 1>black markets in general. It's usually just a matter of

0:17:44.320 --> 0:17:48.160
<v Speaker 1>time before some other market takes its place. We've seen

0:17:48.200 --> 0:17:50.560
<v Speaker 1>that in the past with the famous dark web markets

0:17:50.640 --> 0:17:53.960
<v Speaker 1>like the Silk Road. The United States has formed a

0:17:53.960 --> 0:17:57.680
<v Speaker 1>new department called the Bureau of Cyberspace and Digital Policy

0:17:57.880 --> 0:18:00.920
<v Speaker 1>or c d P. According to the US State Department,

0:18:01.280 --> 0:18:07.600
<v Speaker 1>this organization will quote address the national security challenges, economic opportunities,

0:18:07.800 --> 0:18:13.520
<v Speaker 1>and implications for US values associated with cyberspace, digital technologies,

0:18:13.560 --> 0:18:18.639
<v Speaker 1>and digital policy end quote. It will also include three

0:18:18.760 --> 0:18:22.640
<v Speaker 1>policy units within the bureau. There will be the International

0:18:22.680 --> 0:18:28.800
<v Speaker 1>Information and Communications Policy, the International Cyberspace Security Unit, and

0:18:28.840 --> 0:18:32.480
<v Speaker 1>the Digital Freedom Unit. The U. S. Senate will have

0:18:32.560 --> 0:18:36.320
<v Speaker 1>the responsibility to appoint the head of the bureau, which

0:18:36.320 --> 0:18:39.960
<v Speaker 1>will be known as an ambassador at large. The State

0:18:40.000 --> 0:18:44.399
<v Speaker 1>Department has already transferred about sixty employees to the new bureau,

0:18:44.480 --> 0:18:47.000
<v Speaker 1>and these are employees who are already working in departments

0:18:47.040 --> 0:18:52.760
<v Speaker 1>relating to international communications and cyber coordination projects. The Department

0:18:52.800 --> 0:18:56.120
<v Speaker 1>also plans to fill out another thirty or so positions,

0:18:56.119 --> 0:18:58.520
<v Speaker 1>which will bring up the total staff for this department

0:18:58.560 --> 0:19:03.320
<v Speaker 1>to nearly one. Honestly, when I first read this news item,

0:19:03.359 --> 0:19:07.560
<v Speaker 1>my thought, wait, we didn't already have this, am I

0:19:07.560 --> 0:19:10.160
<v Speaker 1>sure this news item didn't come out like twenty years ago,

0:19:10.680 --> 0:19:13.480
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, this is a new thing, and I think

0:19:13.480 --> 0:19:17.840
<v Speaker 1>it's safe to say it's long past do. My hope

0:19:17.960 --> 0:19:20.320
<v Speaker 1>is that the staff will include experts who can go

0:19:20.359 --> 0:19:24.600
<v Speaker 1>on to provide useful insight into digital matters, because I'm

0:19:24.600 --> 0:19:28.760
<v Speaker 1>sure You've all seen examples of politicians who just they're

0:19:28.880 --> 0:19:33.640
<v Speaker 1>they're in charge of creating legislation that affects the tech sector,

0:19:34.440 --> 0:19:38.560
<v Speaker 1>but they themselves lack any savvy when it comes to technology.

0:19:38.600 --> 0:19:41.040
<v Speaker 1>A lot of times we see that kind of legislation

0:19:41.840 --> 0:19:46.119
<v Speaker 1>not just failed to solve a problem, which frequently is

0:19:46.119 --> 0:19:50.160
<v Speaker 1>the case, sometimes they create new problems or they'll make

0:19:50.200 --> 0:19:54.119
<v Speaker 1>an existing problem a worse one. So my hope is,

0:19:54.640 --> 0:19:56.679
<v Speaker 1>and I realized this is a long shot, but my

0:19:56.760 --> 0:20:00.920
<v Speaker 1>hope is that this bureau will really help be an

0:20:00.920 --> 0:20:04.439
<v Speaker 1>asset so that, uh, when, when, when it comes to

0:20:04.520 --> 0:20:10.000
<v Speaker 1>forming legislation that revolves around the Internet in particular, that

0:20:10.080 --> 0:20:12.680
<v Speaker 1>we have a more informed approach and one that's more

0:20:12.800 --> 0:20:16.680
<v Speaker 1>likely to succeed and to achieve the actual goal of

0:20:16.720 --> 0:20:20.960
<v Speaker 1>the proposed legislation. Uh. That's that's asking a lot, but

0:20:21.560 --> 0:20:25.879
<v Speaker 1>you know, hope. Springs Eternal CNN Business has an interesting

0:20:25.920 --> 0:20:30.840
<v Speaker 1>piece about Axie Infinity and a recent hack that has

0:20:31.320 --> 0:20:35.560
<v Speaker 1>affected that game and the company behind it. The article

0:20:35.680 --> 0:20:40.280
<v Speaker 1>is titled After a six hundred twenty five million dollar hack,

0:20:40.760 --> 0:20:45.200
<v Speaker 1>the party must go on And I think I might

0:20:45.240 --> 0:20:48.320
<v Speaker 1>have to do a full episode on sky Mavis, that's

0:20:48.359 --> 0:20:53.199
<v Speaker 1>the company that developed the game Axi Infinity, and to

0:20:53.359 --> 0:20:56.320
<v Speaker 1>cover that not just that company, but other companies like it,

0:20:56.359 --> 0:20:59.280
<v Speaker 1>because these are businesses that are built on top of

0:20:59.320 --> 0:21:05.520
<v Speaker 1>the cryptome mining industry, and the value proposition of the

0:21:06.080 --> 0:21:11.479
<v Speaker 1>company is that by participating in its products, you end

0:21:11.560 --> 0:21:15.760
<v Speaker 1>up earning cryptocurrency, the idea being that you make money

0:21:15.800 --> 0:21:20.359
<v Speaker 1>by using the thing. So in the case of Axi Infinity,

0:21:20.480 --> 0:21:24.320
<v Speaker 1>that's a game in which players collect digital pets essentially

0:21:24.359 --> 0:21:28.760
<v Speaker 1>called axes. It's in some ways similar to something like Pokemon,

0:21:29.480 --> 0:21:32.560
<v Speaker 1>and in order to play the game, you first have

0:21:32.680 --> 0:21:38.000
<v Speaker 1>to either purchase or rent three axis for yourself. The

0:21:38.040 --> 0:21:40.320
<v Speaker 1>money that you spend in order to enter the game

0:21:40.600 --> 0:21:44.560
<v Speaker 1>essentially goes into a crypto network called the Ronan network,

0:21:45.200 --> 0:21:48.919
<v Speaker 1>and playing the game powers the crypto mining efforts, and

0:21:49.000 --> 0:21:52.560
<v Speaker 1>you earn cryptocurrency through playing. And I really want to

0:21:52.560 --> 0:21:55.440
<v Speaker 1>look into this further because just from a casual glance,

0:21:56.160 --> 0:21:59.120
<v Speaker 1>it comes across to me kind of like a pyramid

0:21:59.200 --> 0:22:02.159
<v Speaker 1>scheme or a an Zi scheme in particular, and that

0:22:02.240 --> 0:22:05.200
<v Speaker 1>in order for this thing to keep moving ahead, you

0:22:05.280 --> 0:22:09.240
<v Speaker 1>constantly need a fresh influx of new players to buy

0:22:09.400 --> 0:22:13.760
<v Speaker 1>into it. Um. But the company, I should stress, has

0:22:13.840 --> 0:22:17.119
<v Speaker 1>dismissed those criticisms and said, no, it's not a Ponzi scheme.

0:22:17.320 --> 0:22:19.919
<v Speaker 1>It's not that, and that the aim is to have

0:22:19.960 --> 0:22:25.320
<v Speaker 1>a self perpetuating system that presumably would not require having

0:22:25.480 --> 0:22:29.200
<v Speaker 1>new people signing on just to keep it going. Anyway,

0:22:29.320 --> 0:22:31.800
<v Speaker 1>That's really just part of the story, that little bit,

0:22:31.960 --> 0:22:34.280
<v Speaker 1>like just the fact that this is a thing that

0:22:34.359 --> 0:22:36.240
<v Speaker 1>I wasn't really aware of. That was part of the

0:22:36.280 --> 0:22:38.919
<v Speaker 1>story for me. But the larger part in the article

0:22:39.440 --> 0:22:42.119
<v Speaker 1>is that the Ronan network was the target of a

0:22:42.200 --> 0:22:45.760
<v Speaker 1>massive hack and as a result, the hackers were able

0:22:45.760 --> 0:22:49.960
<v Speaker 1>to steal about twenty million dollars in USDC and around

0:22:49.960 --> 0:22:54.440
<v Speaker 1>a hundred seventy three thousand ether on the Ethereum blockchain,

0:22:54.720 --> 0:22:57.359
<v Speaker 1>which is a big old yikes now. The news item

0:22:57.400 --> 0:23:00.639
<v Speaker 1>also describes that despite activity across the own a network

0:23:00.720 --> 0:23:04.199
<v Speaker 1>freezing while the company tries to resolve these issues, and

0:23:04.240 --> 0:23:06.199
<v Speaker 1>we don't know yet if they will be able to

0:23:06.240 --> 0:23:09.320
<v Speaker 1>recover any of that stolen money. Hopefully they will, but

0:23:09.359 --> 0:23:11.720
<v Speaker 1>we don't know if that's going to happen or not. Uh.

0:23:11.960 --> 0:23:15.600
<v Speaker 1>We still see enthusiasts supporting the game and the company,

0:23:16.200 --> 0:23:20.480
<v Speaker 1>which is really enthusiastic. Now I've got feelings about that,

0:23:20.760 --> 0:23:24.800
<v Speaker 1>but I haven't played the game. I am also notably

0:23:24.920 --> 0:23:28.600
<v Speaker 1>not a fan of crypto in general, and I definitely

0:23:28.640 --> 0:23:32.800
<v Speaker 1>have a bias against this whole sort of thing, and

0:23:32.840 --> 0:23:35.760
<v Speaker 1>I readily admit that. But I do plan to look

0:23:35.960 --> 0:23:39.120
<v Speaker 1>into these types of games and companies further to get

0:23:39.119 --> 0:23:43.120
<v Speaker 1>a better understanding of them, how they work, how secure

0:23:43.160 --> 0:23:46.240
<v Speaker 1>they are. Uh, and so there will be an episode

0:23:46.320 --> 0:23:51.439
<v Speaker 1>about these in the future. I will definitely do that. Okay,

0:23:51.480 --> 0:23:54.320
<v Speaker 1>we've got a few more stories to cover before we

0:23:54.400 --> 0:24:04.399
<v Speaker 1>get into those. Let's take another quick break. We're back.

0:24:04.960 --> 0:24:09.840
<v Speaker 1>According to stat Counter, which analyzes stuff like web browser

0:24:09.960 --> 0:24:15.600
<v Speaker 1>market share, Microsoft's browser Edge managed to edge out Apple's

0:24:15.760 --> 0:24:19.520
<v Speaker 1>Safari browser to become the second most popular browser on

0:24:19.560 --> 0:24:23.080
<v Speaker 1>the Internet. But we've got a major caveat to talk about.

0:24:23.200 --> 0:24:28.480
<v Speaker 1>We're specifically talking about desktop browsers, so we're not including

0:24:28.880 --> 0:24:32.920
<v Speaker 1>mobile devices at all in this, just browsers that are

0:24:32.960 --> 0:24:37.159
<v Speaker 1>on desktop and laptop computers. Now in the lead with

0:24:37.240 --> 0:24:41.560
<v Speaker 1>a bullet is Google's Chrome browser, that maintains around sixty

0:24:43.040 --> 0:24:46.960
<v Speaker 1>of the market share of all dusktop browsers. Edge is

0:24:47.000 --> 0:24:50.040
<v Speaker 1>at nine point six five, which puts it slightly ahead

0:24:50.040 --> 0:24:53.119
<v Speaker 1>of Safari, which is sitting at seven point five seven

0:24:54.520 --> 0:24:57.879
<v Speaker 1>and again, once you factor in mobile devices, the story

0:24:57.960 --> 0:25:02.840
<v Speaker 1>changes dramatically. At that point, Chrome's share drops slightly to

0:25:02.960 --> 0:25:06.040
<v Speaker 1>sixty four point five percent, Edge goes all the way

0:25:06.040 --> 0:25:08.639
<v Speaker 1>down to four point oh five percent, and so far

0:25:08.720 --> 0:25:11.240
<v Speaker 1>he jumps up to eight team point eight four percent

0:25:11.320 --> 0:25:15.359
<v Speaker 1>thanks to all those iPhones out there. Still, I'm sure

0:25:15.400 --> 0:25:18.359
<v Speaker 1>Microsoft is happy to see the performance climb on desktops,

0:25:18.440 --> 0:25:22.240
<v Speaker 1>which is nearly where all the focus of Microsoft is like,

0:25:23.680 --> 0:25:27.080
<v Speaker 1>that's their bread and butter is the desktop world now.

0:25:27.160 --> 0:25:30.760
<v Speaker 1>Part of the reason for the jump could be because

0:25:31.040 --> 0:25:35.040
<v Speaker 1>of Windows eleven. The adoption rate of Windows eleven hasn't

0:25:35.080 --> 0:25:39.959
<v Speaker 1>been spectacular. It has underperformed and also has shown signs

0:25:40.000 --> 0:25:44.000
<v Speaker 1>of already having plateaued. But those who did purchase new

0:25:44.040 --> 0:25:48.240
<v Speaker 1>machines with Windows eleven on it found that it became

0:25:48.280 --> 0:25:51.960
<v Speaker 1>a bit tricky to switch to a different default web

0:25:51.960 --> 0:25:56.280
<v Speaker 1>browser than Microsoft Edge because Microsoft and made some changes

0:25:56.320 --> 0:25:59.600
<v Speaker 1>to Windows eleven that appeared to purposefully make such a

0:25:59.640 --> 0:26:04.600
<v Speaker 1>switch harder to do. Now, Microsoft has since changed those settings,

0:26:04.600 --> 0:26:07.359
<v Speaker 1>making it much easier to change your default browser if

0:26:07.359 --> 0:26:10.720
<v Speaker 1>you want to. But it's possible that that was one

0:26:10.720 --> 0:26:14.119
<v Speaker 1>of the factors that contributed to the numbers. I just

0:26:14.160 --> 0:26:19.359
<v Speaker 1>don't know for sure, but um, I think Edges a

0:26:19.480 --> 0:26:21.679
<v Speaker 1>decent browser. I've used it a few times. I have

0:26:21.760 --> 0:26:25.719
<v Speaker 1>a computer where that is my main browser. Um, and

0:26:25.760 --> 0:26:29.439
<v Speaker 1>it's fine, it's it's there's nothing wrong with it. I

0:26:29.480 --> 0:26:34.320
<v Speaker 1>think the the tactics used to kind of give it

0:26:34.680 --> 0:26:38.480
<v Speaker 1>quote unquote and edge are a little shady. And it's

0:26:38.520 --> 0:26:41.280
<v Speaker 1>also something that Microsoft has been in trouble for in

0:26:41.320 --> 0:26:44.399
<v Speaker 1>the past, Like there have been cases where Microsoft was

0:26:44.480 --> 0:26:50.520
<v Speaker 1>brought into anti competitive lawsuits due to this sort of stuff.

0:26:51.080 --> 0:26:53.800
<v Speaker 1>But you know, the company did change that, so that's

0:26:53.800 --> 0:26:56.520
<v Speaker 1>a good thing. And uh yeah, it's not a bad browser,

0:26:56.720 --> 0:27:00.879
<v Speaker 1>So good on you. Microsoft. The Dolo and Motor Company

0:27:00.920 --> 0:27:04.240
<v Speaker 1>of Texas, which I should stress is not the same

0:27:04.280 --> 0:27:07.680
<v Speaker 1>company as the one that originally made the iconic DeLorean

0:27:07.880 --> 0:27:11.480
<v Speaker 1>d m C twelve sports car, has announced that it

0:27:11.520 --> 0:27:16.600
<v Speaker 1>will introduce its electric vehicle DeLorean on August twenty two.

0:27:16.720 --> 0:27:19.119
<v Speaker 1>The company has been teasing this for a while now,

0:27:19.840 --> 0:27:22.639
<v Speaker 1>and based on the photo that the company has shared

0:27:22.840 --> 0:27:27.199
<v Speaker 1>of its of its electric vehicle, which only shows a

0:27:27.280 --> 0:27:30.639
<v Speaker 1>bit of the rear of the car, it's going to

0:27:30.720 --> 0:27:34.959
<v Speaker 1>look quite a bit different from the classic DeLorean DMC twelve.

0:27:35.720 --> 0:27:39.840
<v Speaker 1>It is said to feature the beloved and expensive to

0:27:39.880 --> 0:27:45.040
<v Speaker 1>maintain goal wing doors. Um, and I mean going doors

0:27:45.080 --> 0:27:46.919
<v Speaker 1>are are one of the things that really set the

0:27:46.960 --> 0:27:50.520
<v Speaker 1>Delirian apart in my mind. So I am curious about this.

0:27:50.960 --> 0:27:54.879
<v Speaker 1>I love the look of the old DMC twelve. Uh,

0:27:55.840 --> 0:27:57.919
<v Speaker 1>it seems like a kind of car we're looking at.

0:27:57.960 --> 0:28:00.560
<v Speaker 1>It is probably the most satisfying experience you're gonna have

0:28:00.600 --> 0:28:03.439
<v Speaker 1>with a vehicle. UM. I'm also not sure how much

0:28:03.480 --> 0:28:07.879
<v Speaker 1>appeal the DeLorean name will have if it doesn't closely

0:28:07.960 --> 0:28:11.240
<v Speaker 1>resemble the car we all remember from Back to the Future.

0:28:12.040 --> 0:28:15.080
<v Speaker 1>But if it means that we have another interesting, practical,

0:28:15.160 --> 0:28:19.240
<v Speaker 1>and you know, hopefully affordable electric vehicle on the market,

0:28:19.920 --> 0:28:21.520
<v Speaker 1>that's a good thing. I think there needs to be

0:28:21.560 --> 0:28:26.200
<v Speaker 1>a lot of competition in that space, and competition ultimately

0:28:26.240 --> 0:28:29.679
<v Speaker 1>benefits the consumer. No word yet on whether or not

0:28:29.720 --> 0:28:31.720
<v Speaker 1>this electric vehicle will be able to reach eighty eight

0:28:31.720 --> 0:28:33.399
<v Speaker 1>miles per hour, But then I think most of the

0:28:33.480 --> 0:28:36.040
<v Speaker 1>old DMC twelve cars wouldn't hit eighty eight miles per

0:28:36.040 --> 0:28:40.400
<v Speaker 1>hour unless you drove them off a cliff, so that's okay.

0:28:41.280 --> 0:28:44.680
<v Speaker 1>The state of California has contributed twenty million dollars in

0:28:44.720 --> 0:28:47.880
<v Speaker 1>grants to a project that will cover eight thousand, five

0:28:47.960 --> 0:28:52.320
<v Speaker 1>hundred feet of canals in California with solar panels. These

0:28:52.360 --> 0:28:54.680
<v Speaker 1>are canals that are part of the water management system

0:28:54.720 --> 0:28:57.320
<v Speaker 1>in the state, and there are a couple of really

0:28:57.320 --> 0:29:00.280
<v Speaker 1>big goals for the project here. One is to reduce

0:29:00.320 --> 0:29:03.400
<v Speaker 1>the amount of water lost due to stuff like evaporation.

0:29:04.080 --> 0:29:07.120
<v Speaker 1>California requires a lot of water. That's the most populated

0:29:07.120 --> 0:29:09.760
<v Speaker 1>state in the United States, and there are there's a

0:29:09.760 --> 0:29:12.280
<v Speaker 1>lot of farm land out there too, so the state

0:29:12.360 --> 0:29:15.080
<v Speaker 1>requires lots and lots of water. So water management in

0:29:15.120 --> 0:29:18.600
<v Speaker 1>the state has always been a huge issue, and frequently

0:29:18.720 --> 0:29:22.680
<v Speaker 1>that that issue gets exacerbated by stuff like droughts. Now,

0:29:22.720 --> 0:29:26.360
<v Speaker 1>the other big goal, obviously is to generate electricity using

0:29:26.360 --> 0:29:29.400
<v Speaker 1>those solar panels, and this project aims to study the

0:29:29.480 --> 0:29:33.080
<v Speaker 1>viability of rolling this practice out to the nearly four

0:29:33.160 --> 0:29:37.720
<v Speaker 1>thousand miles of canals across California. So if it works

0:29:37.760 --> 0:29:41.440
<v Speaker 1>really well in this kind of test environment, we might

0:29:41.480 --> 0:29:45.000
<v Speaker 1>see it be adopted more broadly throughout the state and

0:29:45.080 --> 0:29:49.760
<v Speaker 1>that could end up supplementing California's electricity needs significantly. Producing

0:29:49.760 --> 0:29:52.760
<v Speaker 1>as much as you know thirteen giga watts of juice

0:29:53.440 --> 0:29:56.160
<v Speaker 1>as well as save more than sixty billion gallons of

0:29:56.200 --> 0:29:59.640
<v Speaker 1>water every year. It will take some time to complete

0:29:59.680 --> 0:30:03.400
<v Speaker 1>this much more modest project. This this sort of experimental

0:30:03.440 --> 0:30:06.400
<v Speaker 1>project at the University of California has estimated it will

0:30:06.480 --> 0:30:10.880
<v Speaker 1>be complete as of June tree, so it'll be a

0:30:10.880 --> 0:30:14.040
<v Speaker 1>while before all of those canals get capped with solar panels.

0:30:14.080 --> 0:30:17.800
<v Speaker 1>Assuming this project proves to be you know, successful and practical.

0:30:18.560 --> 0:30:22.800
<v Speaker 1>Axiom Space, the private space company, is set to send

0:30:22.920 --> 0:30:26.440
<v Speaker 1>an all private astronaut team up to the International Space

0:30:26.480 --> 0:30:29.920
<v Speaker 1>Station on April eight. This will be the first time

0:30:29.960 --> 0:30:33.520
<v Speaker 1>that a crew entirely made up of private enterprise astronauts

0:30:33.840 --> 0:30:35.960
<v Speaker 1>will be sent up to the I s S. I

0:30:36.000 --> 0:30:38.880
<v Speaker 1>will say that the leader of the mission is a

0:30:38.960 --> 0:30:43.840
<v Speaker 1>retired NASA astronaut but is now a private astronaut. So

0:30:43.880 --> 0:30:47.120
<v Speaker 1>Axiom is billing this as being something entirely different from

0:30:47.160 --> 0:30:51.240
<v Speaker 1>space tourism. Instead, it is quote the beginning of many

0:30:51.280 --> 0:30:55.360
<v Speaker 1>beginnings for commercializing low Earth orbit end. Quote that's according

0:30:55.400 --> 0:30:59.040
<v Speaker 1>to Calm Gafarian, a co founder of axiom Com, went

0:30:59.080 --> 0:31:01.760
<v Speaker 1>on to say, quote we're like in the early days

0:31:01.760 --> 0:31:04.880
<v Speaker 1>of the Internet, and we haven't even imagined all the possibilities,

0:31:04.920 --> 0:31:08.320
<v Speaker 1>all the capabilities that we're going to be providing in space.

0:31:08.440 --> 0:31:11.600
<v Speaker 1>End quote. Now, I don't know about you, but based

0:31:11.600 --> 0:31:13.640
<v Speaker 1>on how the Internet has kind of shaped out over

0:31:13.680 --> 0:31:15.960
<v Speaker 1>the last couple of decades, that statement actually fills me

0:31:16.000 --> 0:31:20.040
<v Speaker 1>with more dread than excitement. But I'll try to be

0:31:20.120 --> 0:31:24.040
<v Speaker 1>optimistic here. It's very true that we can't even anticipate

0:31:24.080 --> 0:31:26.720
<v Speaker 1>what sort of things we will learn and benefit from

0:31:26.760 --> 0:31:31.360
<v Speaker 1>through the commercialization of space. Undoubtedly, even those of us

0:31:31.400 --> 0:31:34.080
<v Speaker 1>who will never slip the bonds of Earth and fly

0:31:34.240 --> 0:31:36.920
<v Speaker 1>up into space will still get to see the benefits

0:31:37.040 --> 0:31:40.000
<v Speaker 1>from those developments as companies conduct interesting R and D

0:31:40.200 --> 0:31:43.320
<v Speaker 1>in an environment we simply cannot reproduce here on Earth.

0:31:44.520 --> 0:31:46.320
<v Speaker 1>But I'm still a little bit anxious about it, if

0:31:46.320 --> 0:31:52.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm honest. Finally, Newsweek reported that a group of scientists

0:31:52.040 --> 0:31:54.840
<v Speaker 1>have put together a proposed radio message that could be

0:31:54.840 --> 0:31:58.479
<v Speaker 1>beamed into deep space, and this message would include multiple

0:31:58.520 --> 0:32:03.760
<v Speaker 1>pathways for some strac terrestrial intelligent beings out there to

0:32:04.440 --> 0:32:08.560
<v Speaker 1>understand what the contents of that message actually are. Those

0:32:08.560 --> 0:32:13.760
<v Speaker 1>contents include Earth's location. This is something that physicist Stephen

0:32:13.840 --> 0:32:17.520
<v Speaker 1>Hawking once said was a supremely bad idea, because any

0:32:17.560 --> 0:32:21.360
<v Speaker 1>outcome that involves someone actually hearing and understanding the message

0:32:21.640 --> 0:32:24.800
<v Speaker 1>is more likely to result in negative consequences than positive ones.

0:32:25.520 --> 0:32:29.920
<v Speaker 1>But let me assuage your fears. The first thing to

0:32:30.040 --> 0:32:32.920
<v Speaker 1>keep in mind, this message actually has not been sent.

0:32:33.440 --> 0:32:36.560
<v Speaker 1>It's just been composed, and it might never be sent.

0:32:37.120 --> 0:32:41.959
<v Speaker 1>But secondly, space is enormous. I mean, Douglas Adams had

0:32:42.000 --> 0:32:45.800
<v Speaker 1>it right. Space is big, really big, and radio signals

0:32:45.800 --> 0:32:48.040
<v Speaker 1>travel at the speed of light, which is the fastest

0:32:48.040 --> 0:32:50.720
<v Speaker 1>stuff in the universe, but it still takes a really

0:32:50.760 --> 0:32:55.080
<v Speaker 1>long time for light to reach distant locations in space.

0:32:55.160 --> 0:32:58.400
<v Speaker 1>This is why we describe distances and stuff like light

0:32:58.480 --> 0:33:02.640
<v Speaker 1>years like it literally takes years for light to travel

0:33:02.720 --> 0:33:06.400
<v Speaker 1>from certain points to us. If a star is three

0:33:06.840 --> 0:33:09.640
<v Speaker 1>light years away, that means it takes three hundred years

0:33:09.640 --> 0:33:12.959
<v Speaker 1>for light to get hear from that star. And we

0:33:13.000 --> 0:33:17.600
<v Speaker 1>haven't observed any signs of intelligent life outside of our planet.

0:33:18.000 --> 0:33:20.320
<v Speaker 1>Some days it can be pretty challenging to find signs

0:33:20.320 --> 0:33:24.760
<v Speaker 1>of intelligent life on our planet. It's it's likely that

0:33:24.880 --> 0:33:28.520
<v Speaker 1>any intelligent life that is out there, if there is any,

0:33:28.760 --> 0:33:31.560
<v Speaker 1>is pretty darn far away from us, certainly far enough

0:33:31.560 --> 0:33:35.200
<v Speaker 1>away where we haven't heard any radio signals from them,

0:33:36.240 --> 0:33:41.320
<v Speaker 1>which means that you have to, you know, think in

0:33:41.440 --> 0:33:44.520
<v Speaker 1>terms of how many years have we been listening, uh,

0:33:44.560 --> 0:33:47.400
<v Speaker 1>and you start to expand beyond that, you assume first,

0:33:47.400 --> 0:33:51.880
<v Speaker 1>of course, that the alien races are leveraging radio communications

0:33:51.880 --> 0:33:55.480
<v Speaker 1>in some way. But we haven't heard anything. So that

0:33:55.560 --> 0:34:00.360
<v Speaker 1>suggests that if there is intelligent life in our galaxy,

0:34:00.400 --> 0:34:03.280
<v Speaker 1>that it's not very close to us. So it's gonna

0:34:03.280 --> 0:34:06.160
<v Speaker 1>take a long time for our message to get to

0:34:06.760 --> 0:34:09.799
<v Speaker 1>some place where someone might be listening. Then it will

0:34:09.800 --> 0:34:13.400
<v Speaker 1>take them even longer to go from that location to

0:34:13.520 --> 0:34:16.279
<v Speaker 1>get here, because they will have to travel slower than

0:34:16.360 --> 0:34:18.880
<v Speaker 1>the speed of light, unless we're talking about beings that

0:34:18.920 --> 0:34:20.560
<v Speaker 1>are made up of pure energy, in which case we

0:34:20.560 --> 0:34:24.440
<v Speaker 1>probably wouldn't even recognize them as being alive anyway. So

0:34:25.560 --> 0:34:28.040
<v Speaker 1>I just think that, you know, worrying about this is

0:34:28.040 --> 0:34:30.840
<v Speaker 1>is being a little premature. Also, we should keep in

0:34:30.840 --> 0:34:34.200
<v Speaker 1>mind that again, because space is so big. If you're

0:34:34.239 --> 0:34:37.800
<v Speaker 1>beaming a message where you're like have a concentrated radio

0:34:37.880 --> 0:34:41.760
<v Speaker 1>signal and you're sending it out into deep space, if

0:34:41.800 --> 0:34:46.160
<v Speaker 1>if the intelligent life is off the path of that

0:34:46.320 --> 0:34:49.560
<v Speaker 1>radio beam, it's not gonna pick up the message anyway,

0:34:49.600 --> 0:34:53.640
<v Speaker 1>So you'd have to be like incredibly lucky to be

0:34:53.719 --> 0:34:58.040
<v Speaker 1>targeting the intelligent life in the first place. Otherwise like

0:34:58.120 --> 0:35:02.040
<v Speaker 1>you could be sending a signal in the wrong direction. Um. Yeah,

0:35:02.080 --> 0:35:04.120
<v Speaker 1>I just don't think that there's any reason for us

0:35:04.120 --> 0:35:07.480
<v Speaker 1>to be scared about this. I also don't really think

0:35:07.480 --> 0:35:13.000
<v Speaker 1>there's any benefit in doing it, um because again, if

0:35:13.040 --> 0:35:16.560
<v Speaker 1>anything does pick up that message, by the time it

0:35:16.600 --> 0:35:20.319
<v Speaker 1>gets to our planet, we will have changed so much

0:35:21.440 --> 0:35:25.239
<v Speaker 1>now it'll be generations and generations after our own that one,

0:35:25.320 --> 0:35:29.000
<v Speaker 1>we can't assume that that generation wants to make contact

0:35:29.040 --> 0:35:32.279
<v Speaker 1>with alien life. Two, we don't even really know what

0:35:32.400 --> 0:35:35.000
<v Speaker 1>will be like at that point um, or even if

0:35:35.040 --> 0:35:38.040
<v Speaker 1>we'll still be on Earth, maybe we'll have abandoned it

0:35:38.120 --> 0:35:42.080
<v Speaker 1>for some other place. So the whole practice to me

0:35:42.200 --> 0:35:46.680
<v Speaker 1>seems impractical. But maybe maybe I'm just being Maybe I'm

0:35:46.719 --> 0:35:49.120
<v Speaker 1>just being too cynical here. Let me know. Let me

0:35:49.160 --> 0:35:51.960
<v Speaker 1>know what you think, and if there are any suggestions

0:35:51.960 --> 0:35:53.960
<v Speaker 1>for topics I should cover on Tech Stuff, let me

0:35:54.000 --> 0:35:55.719
<v Speaker 1>know that as well. The best way to get in

0:35:55.719 --> 0:35:57.920
<v Speaker 1>touch with me is to use Twitter. The handle we

0:35:58.000 --> 0:36:01.239
<v Speaker 1>use for the show is tech Stuff h s W

0:36:01.920 --> 0:36:09.719
<v Speaker 1>and I'll talk to you again really soon. Y text

0:36:09.719 --> 0:36:13.160
<v Speaker 1>Stuff is an I heart Radio production. For more podcasts

0:36:13.200 --> 0:36:15.960
<v Speaker 1>from I heart Radio, visit the i heart Radio app,

0:36:16.080 --> 0:36:19.240
<v Speaker 1>Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to your favorite shows.