WEBVTT - From the Vault: Transhumanist Rapture War, Part 2

0:00:06.080 --> 0:00:07.880
<v Speaker 1>Hey, you welcome to stuff to blow your mind. My

0:00:07.960 --> 0:00:10.920
<v Speaker 1>name is Robert Lamb and I'm Joe McCormick, and it's Saturday.

0:00:10.920 --> 0:00:13.480
<v Speaker 1>It's time to go into that vault. So we're gonna

0:00:13.520 --> 0:00:16.239
<v Speaker 1>be airing part two of the Vault episode that we

0:00:16.280 --> 0:00:19.440
<v Speaker 1>started with last Saturday. Isn't that right? That's right? This

0:00:19.440 --> 0:00:24.960
<v Speaker 1>one originally published August, the trans Humanist Rapture War Part two,

0:00:25.600 --> 0:00:30.200
<v Speaker 1>which again was a discussion of various trans human utopian

0:00:30.320 --> 0:00:35.879
<v Speaker 1>ideas um in light of various religious ideas about like

0:00:35.920 --> 0:00:39.839
<v Speaker 1>a post Earth utopia. Now, I think the religious aspects

0:00:39.840 --> 0:00:44.120
<v Speaker 1>of techno utopianism and techno dystopianism are are both actually

0:00:44.280 --> 0:00:49.239
<v Speaker 1>fascinating and sort of uhh, endless the bottomless wells right

0:00:49.320 --> 0:00:52.760
<v Speaker 1>that you can always come back to. I think we

0:00:52.840 --> 0:00:56.080
<v Speaker 1>will revisit this topic again soon. Yeah, though though I

0:00:56.080 --> 0:00:58.880
<v Speaker 1>don't know if we'll discuss my my concept of a

0:00:59.200 --> 0:01:03.360
<v Speaker 1>rapture proof suit any further. This may be the only

0:01:03.400 --> 0:01:05.520
<v Speaker 1>place that idea I gets still. No, that is a

0:01:05.560 --> 0:01:07.319
<v Speaker 1>whole thing that I was gonna say, would do a

0:01:07.360 --> 0:01:09.440
<v Speaker 1>whole episode on that, But in fact, what you should

0:01:09.480 --> 0:01:12.800
<v Speaker 1>just do is keep that idea to yourself and get

0:01:12.920 --> 0:01:17.200
<v Speaker 1>some venture capital behind it. Well, uh yeah, maybe we

0:01:17.200 --> 0:01:19.119
<v Speaker 1>can make that happen. But for now, let's suit up

0:01:19.160 --> 0:01:25.440
<v Speaker 1>and head in. Welcome to Stuff to Blow your Mind

0:01:25.640 --> 0:01:36.000
<v Speaker 1>from how Stuff Works dot com. Hey, welcome to Stuff

0:01:36.000 --> 0:01:38.040
<v Speaker 1>to Blow your mind. My name is Robert Lamb, and

0:01:38.080 --> 0:01:41.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm Joe McCormick and Robert and I. Last time, we're

0:01:41.040 --> 0:01:47.319
<v Speaker 1>talking about the rapture about Christian eschatology, religious eschatology in general,

0:01:47.360 --> 0:01:51.000
<v Speaker 1>and secular eschatology of a technological nature such as the

0:01:51.040 --> 0:01:55.120
<v Speaker 1>singularity trans humanism. And our discussion went so long that

0:01:55.160 --> 0:01:58.040
<v Speaker 1>we decided to divide it up into two parts. So

0:01:58.320 --> 0:02:01.400
<v Speaker 1>here is the second part of our conversation on the

0:02:01.560 --> 0:02:07.760
<v Speaker 1>end times. Okay, well, I've got another uh futurist, sort

0:02:07.800 --> 0:02:10.760
<v Speaker 1>of techno futurist mindset that I think we can ask.

0:02:11.040 --> 0:02:13.480
<v Speaker 1>Is this a religion? Is it like a religion or

0:02:13.520 --> 0:02:16.160
<v Speaker 1>does it just sort of like uh tickle some of

0:02:16.160 --> 0:02:19.280
<v Speaker 1>the same weak spots. We've got as many religions too.

0:02:19.320 --> 0:02:24.200
<v Speaker 1>So I want to talk about the singularity. Robert, do

0:02:24.240 --> 0:02:26.600
<v Speaker 1>you feel good about the Singularity? You feel bad about it,

0:02:26.639 --> 0:02:28.760
<v Speaker 1>you think it's a bunch of hooey? I feel good

0:02:28.800 --> 0:02:31.000
<v Speaker 1>about it. Uh, I mean part of that I think

0:02:31.040 --> 0:02:33.840
<v Speaker 1>comes from just being I'm a fan of like the

0:02:33.840 --> 0:02:37.200
<v Speaker 1>A and M. Banks culture series model of of a

0:02:37.280 --> 0:02:40.760
<v Speaker 1>post singularity, post scarcity world in which the super intelligent

0:02:40.840 --> 0:02:44.360
<v Speaker 1>computers have our best interests at heart. They kind of

0:02:44.360 --> 0:02:50.560
<v Speaker 1>look after us as kind of benevolent, semi noble gods. Yeah, okay, okay, Well,

0:02:50.639 --> 0:02:52.960
<v Speaker 1>so I think we need to explore this idea because this,

0:02:53.040 --> 0:02:55.440
<v Speaker 1>to me is is the core of this kind of

0:02:55.639 --> 0:02:59.560
<v Speaker 1>topic we're talking about today, like technological eschatology. So you

0:02:59.560 --> 0:03:02.040
<v Speaker 1>could say the singularity, I think has come to have

0:03:02.080 --> 0:03:05.480
<v Speaker 1>almost as many interpretations as the Christian escoton right, Like,

0:03:05.720 --> 0:03:08.919
<v Speaker 1>just like the Christian eschatologies, they're all sort of loosely

0:03:09.040 --> 0:03:12.320
<v Speaker 1>related and grounded in similar beliefs, but they vary in

0:03:12.400 --> 0:03:15.440
<v Speaker 1>the explicit details or in the way you'd explain them,

0:03:15.480 --> 0:03:19.760
<v Speaker 1>even if they're not necessarily contradictory. So, in the most

0:03:19.760 --> 0:03:25.160
<v Speaker 1>basic sense, the singularity is a hypothesis that technological innovation,

0:03:25.400 --> 0:03:27.600
<v Speaker 1>at some point in the future is going to reach

0:03:27.639 --> 0:03:32.840
<v Speaker 1>a tipping point of unimaginable innovation that fundamentally changes the

0:03:32.880 --> 0:03:36.760
<v Speaker 1>fate of humanity on a rapid time scale. Very often

0:03:36.800 --> 0:03:41.120
<v Speaker 1>it involves artificial intelligence. So I'm gonna talk about three

0:03:41.120 --> 0:03:43.280
<v Speaker 1>basic models just to give you an idea. One one

0:03:43.360 --> 0:03:46.240
<v Speaker 1>is the super intelligence model, and this is the idea

0:03:46.360 --> 0:03:51.320
<v Speaker 1>that humans are going to create superhuman artificial intelligence. So

0:03:51.320 --> 0:03:54.440
<v Speaker 1>when you think about it, intelligence, I would probably agree

0:03:54.480 --> 0:03:57.600
<v Speaker 1>has been the most rapid driver of change in the

0:03:57.760 --> 0:04:02.360
<v Speaker 1>universe up until this point in cosmological or geological history.

0:04:02.440 --> 0:04:05.920
<v Speaker 1>What difference does ten thousand years usually make to anything,

0:04:06.800 --> 0:04:09.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, not a lot, hardly any, But you think

0:04:09.680 --> 0:04:12.280
<v Speaker 1>about how much Earth has changed in the past ten

0:04:12.320 --> 0:04:16.440
<v Speaker 1>thousand years due to intelligence. Once, once we reach the

0:04:16.520 --> 0:04:20.800
<v Speaker 1>creation of machines with functional intelligence exceeding that of any human,

0:04:20.839 --> 0:04:25.200
<v Speaker 1>assuming that actually does happen, proponents argue that this superhuman

0:04:25.279 --> 0:04:28.960
<v Speaker 1>artificial intelligence is just going to rapidly transform our environment.

0:04:29.560 --> 0:04:32.360
<v Speaker 1>The conditions of our lives, and the capabilities of human

0:04:32.400 --> 0:04:37.039
<v Speaker 1>civilization will be fundamentally transformed on a very huge scale.

0:04:37.560 --> 0:04:40.480
<v Speaker 1>And they say, so the age of super intelligence is dawning,

0:04:40.520 --> 0:04:44.200
<v Speaker 1>and this is the singularity. Another way of looking at

0:04:44.240 --> 0:04:48.040
<v Speaker 1>it is also based on artificial intelligence, but it's known

0:04:48.080 --> 0:04:50.680
<v Speaker 1>as the intelligence explosion, and this is based on the

0:04:50.720 --> 0:04:56.200
<v Speaker 1>idea of self improving intelligence paradigms that surpass our ability

0:04:56.640 --> 0:04:59.560
<v Speaker 1>to understand or control them. So let's say, Robert, you

0:04:59.600 --> 0:05:03.120
<v Speaker 1>build a superhuman artificial intelligence. What's the first thing you

0:05:03.120 --> 0:05:06.839
<v Speaker 1>have it? Do? UM? Co author my paper about the

0:05:06.920 --> 0:05:11.640
<v Speaker 1>creation superhero human AI intelligence. Oh yeah, well that's that's

0:05:11.680 --> 0:05:14.720
<v Speaker 1>a smart move. But do some talk shows to promote

0:05:14.920 --> 0:05:19.400
<v Speaker 1>it in my book about the creation? Yeah? I guess yeah.

0:05:19.400 --> 0:05:20.960
<v Speaker 1>It's hard to think past that, right, come up with

0:05:21.000 --> 0:05:24.279
<v Speaker 1>the tastiest breakfast cereal ever created? No? I mean what

0:05:24.440 --> 0:05:26.160
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people say is, well, you know, the

0:05:26.160 --> 0:05:29.080
<v Speaker 1>best bang for your buck as soon as you create

0:05:29.279 --> 0:05:32.920
<v Speaker 1>a superhuman artificial intelligence is that it would be best

0:05:32.960 --> 0:05:36.680
<v Speaker 1>put to use designing ways to rapidly make itself more intelligent,

0:05:36.800 --> 0:05:39.920
<v Speaker 1>which theoretically it should be able to do. So if

0:05:39.920 --> 0:05:44.320
<v Speaker 1>it can do this, it will experience exponential self improvement.

0:05:44.400 --> 0:05:48.000
<v Speaker 1>And not only will our technological intelligence grow, and not

0:05:48.120 --> 0:05:51.960
<v Speaker 1>only will it accelerate, but it's acceleration will accelerate. I

0:05:51.960 --> 0:05:54.200
<v Speaker 1>feel like the people saying that that's the best use

0:05:54.520 --> 0:05:59.039
<v Speaker 1>of super intelligence UM have not seen any science fiction film,

0:05:59.120 --> 0:06:01.040
<v Speaker 1>because it seems like the thing to do is all right.

0:06:01.120 --> 0:06:03.600
<v Speaker 1>It's it's reached the point to where it's smart enough

0:06:04.200 --> 0:06:06.320
<v Speaker 1>that I can take it to Vegas and and just

0:06:06.400 --> 0:06:10.039
<v Speaker 1>totally kill but it's not so smart that it will

0:06:10.080 --> 0:06:14.800
<v Speaker 1>literally kill me, or or skying at the entire country. Well,

0:06:14.880 --> 0:06:16.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. I mean I think the argument would

0:06:16.520 --> 0:06:18.720
<v Speaker 1>go that, well, even if you don't do that, somebody's

0:06:18.760 --> 0:06:21.080
<v Speaker 1>gonna somebody's gonna say, well, I want to have a

0:06:21.120 --> 0:06:23.479
<v Speaker 1>smarter AI than your AI, so I'm gonna have my

0:06:23.560 --> 0:06:28.560
<v Speaker 1>AI improve itself that I don't know. You take your

0:06:28.600 --> 0:06:31.000
<v Speaker 1>AI to a poker game and somebody else has been

0:06:31.080 --> 0:06:35.159
<v Speaker 1>having their AI self improve its own intelligence, and it's

0:06:35.200 --> 0:06:38.599
<v Speaker 1>telling that person out this metaphors out of hand. But

0:06:39.400 --> 0:06:41.320
<v Speaker 1>but you want to be the person with the smartest day.

0:06:41.360 --> 0:06:43.680
<v Speaker 1>I right, Well, but it's kind of like you're you're

0:06:43.680 --> 0:06:46.640
<v Speaker 1>reaching a point where you can create your own demons,

0:06:46.760 --> 0:06:50.479
<v Speaker 1>create your own deities, and in doing so, it seems

0:06:50.520 --> 0:06:53.240
<v Speaker 1>like you you need to know where to stop, like

0:06:53.240 --> 0:06:56.800
<v Speaker 1>like maybe not make a full blown god, that make

0:06:56.839 --> 0:06:59.000
<v Speaker 1>a demi god. Let me make an artificial demi god,

0:06:59.040 --> 0:07:02.080
<v Speaker 1>because then it literally it has limits. Right, Yeah, you

0:07:02.120 --> 0:07:05.080
<v Speaker 1>want a Hercules not a Zeus. Yeah, I'd far rather

0:07:05.160 --> 0:07:08.440
<v Speaker 1>deal with a renegade or Hercules this in a situation

0:07:08.480 --> 0:07:11.600
<v Speaker 1>as opposed to renegades, which of course is I mean,

0:07:11.640 --> 0:07:14.600
<v Speaker 1>it's pretty much how both of those guys rolled what

0:07:14.640 --> 0:07:17.200
<v Speaker 1>they wanted. Okay, one more idea of the singularity, and

0:07:17.240 --> 0:07:20.000
<v Speaker 1>this is a I think a simpler version, but it

0:07:20.080 --> 0:07:23.480
<v Speaker 1>just says that at some point technological process again, usually

0:07:23.480 --> 0:07:26.040
<v Speaker 1>the emphasis is on artificial intelligence, but you could put

0:07:26.040 --> 0:07:29.640
<v Speaker 1>the emphasis elsewhere. At some point it begins to accelerate

0:07:29.720 --> 0:07:32.560
<v Speaker 1>so quickly that our power to predict the outcome becomes

0:07:32.560 --> 0:07:36.800
<v Speaker 1>basically zero. Events will become so strange and unpredictable that

0:07:36.840 --> 0:07:38.960
<v Speaker 1>we we just can't even imagine them from our present

0:07:39.040 --> 0:07:43.240
<v Speaker 1>vantage point. So an outside context dident. Yeah, actually, sure,

0:07:43.600 --> 0:07:48.120
<v Speaker 1>outside context problem caused by technological innovation. Yeah. So a

0:07:48.200 --> 0:07:51.240
<v Speaker 1>lot of modern singularity thinking can be traced, and there

0:07:51.280 --> 0:07:53.280
<v Speaker 1>are plenty people who have written about this over the years,

0:07:53.280 --> 0:07:55.760
<v Speaker 1>but I'd say the biggest figure in the singularity today

0:07:55.800 --> 0:07:59.960
<v Speaker 1>is Ray Kerswile. He's the technologist and author. Ray Kers,

0:08:00.000 --> 0:08:03.920
<v Speaker 1>while very smart guy, worked on technology for years. He's

0:08:03.920 --> 0:08:07.240
<v Speaker 1>made a lot of very accurate and interesting predictions that

0:08:07.280 --> 0:08:10.840
<v Speaker 1>have that have proved correct over the years. But he's

0:08:10.880 --> 0:08:13.360
<v Speaker 1>also made a lot of predictions about the future that

0:08:13.400 --> 0:08:15.280
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people now think are I don't know,

0:08:15.360 --> 0:08:18.720
<v Speaker 1>maybe he's being overly optimistic, but anyway, curse Will has

0:08:18.840 --> 0:08:23.360
<v Speaker 1>argued in several books that the Singularity, this artificial intelligence

0:08:24.200 --> 0:08:28.080
<v Speaker 1>revolution that's going to fundamentally change humanity, is coming, and

0:08:28.160 --> 0:08:31.600
<v Speaker 1>it's coming soon. In his two thousand five book The

0:08:31.640 --> 0:08:36.839
<v Speaker 1>Singularity Is Near, curse Will predicted it would happen in so, Robert,

0:08:36.840 --> 0:08:42.000
<v Speaker 1>you've got any plans for um? I think my son

0:08:42.520 --> 0:08:45.520
<v Speaker 1>will be out of high school at that point. I

0:08:45.559 --> 0:08:52.360
<v Speaker 1>think he's he's uh graduating high school theoretically in so Okay,

0:08:53.520 --> 0:08:55.320
<v Speaker 1>So I guess. So, I don't know, Well, he have

0:08:55.400 --> 0:08:58.480
<v Speaker 1>a job by the time the Singularity happened. I don't know. Yeah,

0:08:58.600 --> 0:09:01.240
<v Speaker 1>It's it's crazy to think about that, Like what do

0:09:01.280 --> 0:09:03.680
<v Speaker 1>you what do you? What do you do post high school?

0:09:04.200 --> 0:09:07.079
<v Speaker 1>If the Singularity is coming in just a few years,

0:09:07.080 --> 0:09:09.360
<v Speaker 1>Like do you go to college? Hey? With with the

0:09:09.400 --> 0:09:13.080
<v Speaker 1>singularity in mind? Bingo, That is a very good question.

0:09:13.120 --> 0:09:16.000
<v Speaker 1>So so let's back up. Let's just assume for a

0:09:16.080 --> 0:09:20.880
<v Speaker 1>moment a singularity type scaton is coming. That might be

0:09:20.920 --> 0:09:23.800
<v Speaker 1>a big assumption, but let's assume something like that will happen.

0:09:24.760 --> 0:09:27.199
<v Speaker 1>Is it good or bad? Will we get the AI

0:09:27.520 --> 0:09:32.680
<v Speaker 1>my Trea or the AI ragnarokh Well, obviously I want

0:09:32.720 --> 0:09:35.280
<v Speaker 1>my Traya as opposed to Ragnarock. Yeah, I mean, so

0:09:35.320 --> 0:09:37.840
<v Speaker 1>the my Trea version, what would it be? You know,

0:09:38.120 --> 0:09:42.480
<v Speaker 1>war cease, all diseases, including aging itself or eradicated. There's

0:09:42.559 --> 0:09:46.240
<v Speaker 1>general abundance of resources and wealth. Everybody gets what they want.

0:09:46.360 --> 0:09:50.280
<v Speaker 1>Humans live indefinitely in a state of harmony, exploration, and bliss.

0:09:51.960 --> 0:09:53.760
<v Speaker 1>If I feel like the model we get in most

0:09:53.760 --> 0:09:56.360
<v Speaker 1>sci fi scenarios is that you think you're gonna get

0:09:56.360 --> 0:09:59.800
<v Speaker 1>my Treia, but then you're actually on the road to Ragnarok,

0:10:00.280 --> 0:10:01.880
<v Speaker 1>and then you end up just kind of burning everything

0:10:01.920 --> 0:10:04.679
<v Speaker 1>down and going back to whatever the nest up system

0:10:04.720 --> 0:10:07.040
<v Speaker 1>you had before. Right, So why do people think that

0:10:07.120 --> 0:10:10.679
<v Speaker 1>we're on the road to Ragnarok? Well, you mentioned earlier,

0:10:10.720 --> 0:10:13.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, the machine, a machine smart enough to to

0:10:13.200 --> 0:10:15.319
<v Speaker 1>do all this great stuff for you, is also smart

0:10:15.400 --> 0:10:17.000
<v Speaker 1>enough to figure out how to kill you if it

0:10:17.080 --> 0:10:21.560
<v Speaker 1>wants to. So why might it want to? Well, super

0:10:21.600 --> 0:10:25.720
<v Speaker 1>intelligent machines, people say, well, either intentionally choose to eliminate

0:10:25.840 --> 0:10:29.760
<v Speaker 1>humanity for some reason, though I admit I've never heard

0:10:29.760 --> 0:10:31.400
<v Speaker 1>this explain in a way that made a lot of

0:10:31.440 --> 0:10:34.640
<v Speaker 1>sense to me, Like why they would intentionally choose to

0:10:34.800 --> 0:10:37.720
<v Speaker 1>hunt us down and eradicate us. So maybe somebody could

0:10:37.760 --> 0:10:40.520
<v Speaker 1>explain that to me, Um, but the judge of the

0:10:40.559 --> 0:10:43.560
<v Speaker 1>living and the dead, it could be. But but the

0:10:43.640 --> 0:10:47.560
<v Speaker 1>other version is that perhaps merely by a flow of design,

0:10:47.920 --> 0:10:51.920
<v Speaker 1>they tend to damage or destroy humanity as a byproduct

0:10:51.960 --> 0:10:55.800
<v Speaker 1>of executing their primary function, and that that vision seems

0:10:55.840 --> 0:10:58.720
<v Speaker 1>more plausible to me. But so, here's one common example

0:10:58.760 --> 0:11:01.000
<v Speaker 1>of how something like this would. Oh, you've got a

0:11:01.040 --> 0:11:04.800
<v Speaker 1>super intelligent computer program that's smarter than any human. It

0:11:04.840 --> 0:11:07.840
<v Speaker 1>can improve its own intelligence, is just crazy smart, and

0:11:07.880 --> 0:11:11.160
<v Speaker 1>it's designed to maximize efficiency along the production line of

0:11:11.160 --> 0:11:14.720
<v Speaker 1>a factory that makes toilet paper. So somebody forgets to

0:11:14.760 --> 0:11:18.480
<v Speaker 1>add some conditionals and the computer program ends up turning

0:11:18.480 --> 0:11:20.840
<v Speaker 1>all the atoms on the surface of the earth, including

0:11:20.880 --> 0:11:24.000
<v Speaker 1>the ones in your body, into toilet paper. It has

0:11:24.040 --> 0:11:27.600
<v Speaker 1>done its job. Well, that sounds kind of crazy, But

0:11:27.720 --> 0:11:31.000
<v Speaker 1>some tam or version of that nightmare seems more plausible

0:11:31.080 --> 0:11:35.120
<v Speaker 1>to me than the intentional terminator style eradication of humans.

0:11:35.720 --> 0:11:39.240
<v Speaker 1>I don't know what do you think about that, Robert Um? Yeah,

0:11:39.320 --> 0:11:42.520
<v Speaker 1>I I I think I tend to interpret the sort

0:11:42.520 --> 0:11:45.840
<v Speaker 1>of sky net models the sort of like all humans

0:11:45.840 --> 0:11:48.840
<v Speaker 1>are flawed. That's thus all humans must be eradicated thing

0:11:48.920 --> 0:11:53.680
<v Speaker 1>to be more of a uh more rejecting insecurities. Well

0:11:53.760 --> 0:11:56.320
<v Speaker 1>for that and also just a bedtime story to say,

0:11:56.360 --> 0:11:59.160
<v Speaker 1>like make sure you program in that fail safe, right,

0:11:59.360 --> 0:12:01.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, be And I feel like obviously we would

0:12:01.920 --> 0:12:03.880
<v Speaker 1>have that fail safe, and that if it were a

0:12:04.040 --> 0:12:08.520
<v Speaker 1>super intelligent machine, it would have Yeah. I just have

0:12:08.559 --> 0:12:12.600
<v Speaker 1>a hard time buying into that model of a super

0:12:12.640 --> 0:12:20.360
<v Speaker 1>advanced system that it would be so catastrophically myopic. Yeah, yeah,

0:12:20.480 --> 0:12:23.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean, both visions have their advocates right there. There

0:12:23.200 --> 0:12:26.280
<v Speaker 1>are smart people on both sides. But the funny thing

0:12:26.360 --> 0:12:29.080
<v Speaker 1>is all this is assuming that something like the singularity

0:12:29.120 --> 0:12:31.800
<v Speaker 1>will actually happen one way or another, and not everyone

0:12:31.840 --> 0:12:35.280
<v Speaker 1>agrees that it will. But there are also people who

0:12:35.280 --> 0:12:37.960
<v Speaker 1>have been critical of the idea of the singularity, and

0:12:38.000 --> 0:12:42.440
<v Speaker 1>some people who have characterized it as a religious idea inherently.

0:12:42.520 --> 0:12:47.320
<v Speaker 1>One of them is the technologist and virtual reality pioneer

0:12:47.840 --> 0:12:51.000
<v Speaker 1>Jerone Landier, and he's got a lot of opinions about

0:12:51.040 --> 0:12:54.400
<v Speaker 1>the Singularity. He's made this case in in books, said

0:12:54.440 --> 0:12:57.000
<v Speaker 1>that it's not only religious in nature, but potentially a

0:12:57.120 --> 0:13:01.160
<v Speaker 1>dangerous or harmful religion. So I read an article that

0:13:01.200 --> 0:13:03.120
<v Speaker 1>he wrote and published in The New York Times in

0:13:03.160 --> 0:13:07.560
<v Speaker 1>two thousand ten called the First Church of Robotics, and

0:13:07.600 --> 0:13:10.520
<v Speaker 1>I thought this was interesting. So Lanier points out that

0:13:11.720 --> 0:13:15.160
<v Speaker 1>every news report of an advance in artificial intelligence gives

0:13:15.240 --> 0:13:18.239
<v Speaker 1>us the impression that the field is making steady progress

0:13:18.280 --> 0:13:21.920
<v Speaker 1>to overtake human intelligence and capabilities. And I sort of

0:13:21.920 --> 0:13:23.920
<v Speaker 1>agree with him. I get that feeling when you see

0:13:23.960 --> 0:13:26.800
<v Speaker 1>these little news stories like there's there's a new artificial

0:13:26.840 --> 0:13:31.120
<v Speaker 1>intelligence program that can smell flatulence. There's a new artificial

0:13:31.120 --> 0:13:34.280
<v Speaker 1>intelligence program that can tell a joke. You know, all

0:13:34.320 --> 0:13:38.319
<v Speaker 1>these like weird little quirks of humanity, and they seem

0:13:38.400 --> 0:13:41.480
<v Speaker 1>to add up to something over time. Okay, so it

0:13:41.480 --> 0:13:44.280
<v Speaker 1>can smell farts, that can make jokes about farts because

0:13:44.640 --> 0:13:47.880
<v Speaker 1>it's it's about the corner, like the stand up. It

0:13:47.880 --> 0:13:51.520
<v Speaker 1>has become Adam Sandler. Yeah, it has surpassed its humanity.

0:13:52.200 --> 0:13:55.640
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, so there's nothing wrong with individual AI projects,

0:13:55.679 --> 0:13:58.560
<v Speaker 1>Lannier says, In fact, he has worked on them himself.

0:13:58.760 --> 0:14:00.640
<v Speaker 1>But he makes a couple of point points. He says,

0:14:01.120 --> 0:14:05.680
<v Speaker 1>individual advances in artificial intelligence research can be interpreted more

0:14:05.800 --> 0:14:09.800
<v Speaker 1>usefully without the overall framework of AI meaning without the

0:14:09.840 --> 0:14:14.800
<v Speaker 1>idea that computers are becoming synthetic versions of human intelligence.

0:14:15.240 --> 0:14:17.840
<v Speaker 1>And the example he gives is, you know, the IBM

0:14:17.920 --> 0:14:21.000
<v Speaker 1>computer winning on Jeopardy, Watson going on, they're beating people

0:14:21.000 --> 0:14:23.840
<v Speaker 1>on Jeopardy. So he he says, that's a theatrical stunt

0:14:24.400 --> 0:14:28.320
<v Speaker 1>that over sells a fake aspect of what this computer

0:14:28.400 --> 0:14:31.600
<v Speaker 1>program can do, you know, conversational human knowledge, which it

0:14:31.640 --> 0:14:36.120
<v Speaker 1>doesn't really have, and under sells a real aspect of

0:14:36.120 --> 0:14:39.760
<v Speaker 1>its capabilities that it's a very powerful phrase based search engine.

0:14:40.920 --> 0:14:44.880
<v Speaker 1>And then he also says that AI, uh, that the

0:14:44.960 --> 0:14:48.840
<v Speaker 1>AI that in some way passes for human requires humans

0:14:48.880 --> 0:14:50.800
<v Speaker 1>to do all the work, Like when you've got a

0:14:50.840 --> 0:14:54.120
<v Speaker 1>social robot, you know, going around saying like Hi, I'm

0:14:54.160 --> 0:14:57.040
<v Speaker 1>your friendly social robot. Look at how advanced my artificial

0:14:57.080 --> 0:15:00.760
<v Speaker 1>intelligence is. His point is that humans be being social,

0:15:00.880 --> 0:15:03.040
<v Speaker 1>will work with what they get. And if you're having

0:15:03.040 --> 0:15:05.960
<v Speaker 1>a transaction with a robot that you are told is

0:15:06.040 --> 0:15:09.120
<v Speaker 1>social in nature, you can very easily adapt your social

0:15:09.120 --> 0:15:13.000
<v Speaker 1>behaviors to the extreme limitations of this machine, and they

0:15:13.080 --> 0:15:15.520
<v Speaker 1>do tend to be pretty extreme. You're not going to

0:15:15.680 --> 0:15:18.920
<v Speaker 1>mistake at a machine for a human. Yeah, I mean,

0:15:18.960 --> 0:15:21.640
<v Speaker 1>as we've discussed on the show before. I mean humans

0:15:21.640 --> 0:15:24.720
<v Speaker 1>can have we can have conversations with with a with

0:15:24.800 --> 0:15:27.880
<v Speaker 1>a doll, with a with a smiley face. It's scrawled

0:15:27.880 --> 0:15:31.320
<v Speaker 1>on the wall and in putting. So, uh, it's not

0:15:31.400 --> 0:15:33.080
<v Speaker 1>that much of a step to say that, yes, we

0:15:33.120 --> 0:15:35.520
<v Speaker 1>can have a conversation with a chat bot. We can,

0:15:35.600 --> 0:15:38.120
<v Speaker 1>we can have a conversation with a search engine, and

0:15:38.160 --> 0:15:40.360
<v Speaker 1>of course we can certainly have a conversation with an

0:15:40.360 --> 0:15:42.800
<v Speaker 1>echo borg. How often, though, do you meet a person

0:15:42.880 --> 0:15:47.680
<v Speaker 1>who really loves fruit trees? That's true, I love fruit trees.

0:15:48.480 --> 0:15:50.440
<v Speaker 1>I hate fruit trees. But how can you hate fruit

0:15:50.440 --> 0:15:52.560
<v Speaker 1>trees because I'm not a robot? What would you do

0:15:52.560 --> 0:15:54.320
<v Speaker 1>if you found a turtle the turtles on its back?

0:15:54.360 --> 0:15:56.520
<v Speaker 1>Why aren't you turning him over? Joe? But what what?

0:15:56.520 --> 0:16:00.560
<v Speaker 1>What I'll tell you about my mother? Okay? Sorry? So

0:16:00.720 --> 0:16:03.720
<v Speaker 1>but anyway, A lawyer goes on to say, quote, what

0:16:03.880 --> 0:16:05.880
<v Speaker 1>bothers me about this trend? And he's talking about this

0:16:05.920 --> 0:16:10.760
<v Speaker 1>AI media trend. However, is that by allowing artificial intelligence

0:16:10.800 --> 0:16:15.240
<v Speaker 1>to reshape our concept of personhood, we're leaving ourselves opened

0:16:15.240 --> 0:16:18.400
<v Speaker 1>to the flip side. We think of people more and

0:16:18.440 --> 0:16:22.080
<v Speaker 1>more as computers, just as we think of computers as people,

0:16:22.880 --> 0:16:25.240
<v Speaker 1>and I think there might be something to that, actually,

0:16:25.440 --> 0:16:28.440
<v Speaker 1>that the idea of AI not only sort of lifts

0:16:28.680 --> 0:16:32.920
<v Speaker 1>computers up, but in a certain way, at least emotionally,

0:16:33.120 --> 0:16:38.400
<v Speaker 1>kind of lowers humans down. Yeah. And we we've discussed this,

0:16:38.440 --> 0:16:41.160
<v Speaker 1>I feel recently on the show too, about how just

0:16:42.280 --> 0:16:46.560
<v Speaker 1>even though we we have this increasingly pervasive model of

0:16:46.600 --> 0:16:50.480
<v Speaker 1>our own cognitive performance as being essentially a program, we

0:16:50.480 --> 0:16:54.400
<v Speaker 1>think about processing things, we think about visual input of data,

0:16:54.520 --> 0:16:57.760
<v Speaker 1>we think about crunching the numbers. Uh, and in various

0:16:57.760 --> 0:17:02.480
<v Speaker 1>other models we use technology g to inform our understanding

0:17:02.520 --> 0:17:05.239
<v Speaker 1>of how our brains are working. And those are just

0:17:05.640 --> 0:17:08.680
<v Speaker 1>those are just metaphors really, and but the underlying processes

0:17:08.720 --> 0:17:13.159
<v Speaker 1>are not really comparable to the computers that we have today.

0:17:13.160 --> 0:17:16.000
<v Speaker 1>It would be we could maybe compare them to an

0:17:16.040 --> 0:17:18.199
<v Speaker 1>advanced computer will haveing in the future, some sort of

0:17:18.359 --> 0:17:24.280
<v Speaker 1>maybe um you know, um advanced machine maybe. Yeah. Yeah,

0:17:24.480 --> 0:17:27.760
<v Speaker 1>I think that's true. Uh, They're they're very much metaphors.

0:17:28.440 --> 0:17:30.720
<v Speaker 1>And I'm not saying that they're not useful metaphors. But

0:17:30.840 --> 0:17:32.959
<v Speaker 1>I do think I want to take what Landing are

0:17:32.960 --> 0:17:36.119
<v Speaker 1>saying seriously here, because I think he has a point Anyway,

0:17:36.160 --> 0:17:38.800
<v Speaker 1>he goes on when he's going to get to the singularity,

0:17:38.840 --> 0:17:42.320
<v Speaker 1>so he says, you know, engineers are humans with human desires,

0:17:42.359 --> 0:17:45.520
<v Speaker 1>even though they may be advocating this sort of like

0:17:45.640 --> 0:17:50.800
<v Speaker 1>dehumanized technological ideology or view of intelligence in personhood in

0:17:50.840 --> 0:17:53.280
<v Speaker 1>the world, and they've got the same desires that lead

0:17:53.359 --> 0:17:56.520
<v Speaker 1>us to create and follow religions. So this sort of

0:17:56.640 --> 0:18:01.000
<v Speaker 1>leads them to wrap their technological ideologies up into parallels

0:18:01.000 --> 0:18:04.679
<v Speaker 1>of religious thinking. And he and according to Lannier, he

0:18:04.720 --> 0:18:08.679
<v Speaker 1>thinks the concept of the singularity is a religion expressed

0:18:08.680 --> 0:18:13.440
<v Speaker 1>through engineering culture. And he points out if this religion entails,

0:18:13.560 --> 0:18:18.639
<v Speaker 1>you know, essentially scatological beliefs that imply that most people, basically,

0:18:18.680 --> 0:18:22.560
<v Speaker 1>I would say, anybody not working in information theory, artificial intelligence,

0:18:22.640 --> 0:18:26.360
<v Speaker 1>or robotics, if pretty much anybody outside those fields can

0:18:26.400 --> 0:18:30.679
<v Speaker 1>basically just sit and wait for imminent salvation or destruction

0:18:31.080 --> 0:18:36.400
<v Speaker 1>via the machines. And if inadvertent devaluation of persons by

0:18:36.440 --> 0:18:41.000
<v Speaker 1>overstating analogies between persons and computers takes place, it can

0:18:41.040 --> 0:18:46.560
<v Speaker 1>certainly exacerbate tensions between traditional religions and modernity, and it

0:18:46.600 --> 0:18:51.960
<v Speaker 1>can be a destructive and demoralizing force in itself. So anyway,

0:18:52.119 --> 0:18:54.840
<v Speaker 1>he ends by saying technology best serves humanity when we

0:18:54.920 --> 0:18:58.560
<v Speaker 1>resist the urge to turn it into a religious ideology. Yeah,

0:18:58.600 --> 0:19:00.760
<v Speaker 1>because otherwise you ended up in a situation where you're like,

0:19:01.200 --> 0:19:04.520
<v Speaker 1>I could, I could exercise and eat right, But singularities

0:19:04.600 --> 0:19:07.359
<v Speaker 1>come in. Singularities gonna work that out, or you might think,

0:19:07.560 --> 0:19:10.119
<v Speaker 1>I'm not even gonna bother to write the Great American novel,

0:19:10.240 --> 0:19:15.119
<v Speaker 1>because Great American Novel bought thirty seven oh five. It's

0:19:15.119 --> 0:19:17.280
<v Speaker 1>gonna write the Great American novel. It's gonna write one

0:19:17.440 --> 0:19:21.120
<v Speaker 1>a day, one every hour. Yeah. I I could work

0:19:21.160 --> 0:19:24.679
<v Speaker 1>hard to achieve peace in world civilization, but maybe the

0:19:24.720 --> 0:19:27.560
<v Speaker 1>Ai'll sort it all out for this or just kill

0:19:27.640 --> 0:19:30.840
<v Speaker 1>us all. I mean, either one. It's sort of a demoralizing,

0:19:30.920 --> 0:19:36.000
<v Speaker 1>de motivating belief, which of course has obvious parallels with

0:19:36.800 --> 0:19:41.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, more apocalyptic near future um religious movements that

0:19:41.560 --> 0:19:44.879
<v Speaker 1>said the end time is coming. So what does it

0:19:45.000 --> 0:19:48.040
<v Speaker 1>matter giving your money now? Certainly? Yeah, what whether it's

0:19:48.119 --> 0:19:52.240
<v Speaker 1>a secular or you know, supernatural or not supernatural in nature?

0:19:52.240 --> 0:19:55.560
<v Speaker 1>If you've got beliefs about a powerful force that comes

0:19:55.560 --> 0:19:58.480
<v Speaker 1>in and intervenes and makes all of our actions obsolete

0:19:58.600 --> 0:20:01.520
<v Speaker 1>either either way it comes from. Uh that seems like

0:20:01.560 --> 0:20:04.400
<v Speaker 1>it can have a de motivating force on the way

0:20:04.400 --> 0:20:07.240
<v Speaker 1>you live your life. But I want to say one

0:20:07.240 --> 0:20:09.480
<v Speaker 1>more thing Linear says about the Singularity that I think

0:20:09.560 --> 0:20:12.320
<v Speaker 1>is interesting. Uh So, I listened to a podcast that

0:20:12.440 --> 0:20:15.320
<v Speaker 1>was an interview with Linear and and he says, quote,

0:20:15.720 --> 0:20:19.040
<v Speaker 1>the difference between a religious fanatic and a religious non

0:20:19.080 --> 0:20:23.600
<v Speaker 1>fanatic is in the certainty of the imminent timing of

0:20:23.640 --> 0:20:26.520
<v Speaker 1>whatever their scatan is, you know, whatever their end of

0:20:26.600 --> 0:20:30.159
<v Speaker 1>days is. It's when you believe that you know when

0:20:30.240 --> 0:20:33.400
<v Speaker 1>it's happening and it's soon that you really turn into

0:20:33.400 --> 0:20:36.000
<v Speaker 1>a nutcase and you do harm to yourself and others.

0:20:36.280 --> 0:20:39.440
<v Speaker 1>In my mind, the Singularity movement is sort of doing that.

0:20:40.240 --> 0:20:42.000
<v Speaker 1>And I think I see what he's saying there, because

0:20:42.040 --> 0:20:44.560
<v Speaker 1>he sort of qualifies saying that if you mean, in

0:20:44.600 --> 0:20:48.719
<v Speaker 1>the very long term view, humanity will make some phase

0:20:48.800 --> 0:20:52.640
<v Speaker 1>transition and it has something to do with information technology

0:20:52.760 --> 0:20:55.560
<v Speaker 1>that's not necessarily crazy or harmful. You know, you might say,

0:20:55.640 --> 0:20:57.879
<v Speaker 1>who knows, over the next few thousands of years, some

0:20:58.040 --> 0:21:03.919
<v Speaker 1>somehow humanity might change itself due to computers and the

0:21:03.960 --> 0:21:06.439
<v Speaker 1>Internet and stuff like that. But the notion that it's

0:21:06.440 --> 0:21:09.560
<v Speaker 1>going to happen in twenty years or something is destructive

0:21:09.640 --> 0:21:13.359
<v Speaker 1>and a sign of fanaticism, according to him, And I

0:21:13.400 --> 0:21:16.439
<v Speaker 1>think that that idea makes sense to me too. Well,

0:21:17.280 --> 0:21:19.359
<v Speaker 1>in large part, you could say, you're you're setting yourself

0:21:19.400 --> 0:21:22.520
<v Speaker 1>up for disappointment, You're setting yourself up to fail right,

0:21:22.760 --> 0:21:25.959
<v Speaker 1>that you're going to reach that point when the second

0:21:25.960 --> 0:21:27.879
<v Speaker 1>Coming is going to happen, when the Singularity is going

0:21:27.920 --> 0:21:31.840
<v Speaker 1>to happen, and it doesn't happen, and then how do

0:21:31.920 --> 0:21:34.080
<v Speaker 1>you feel about the world. Then how do you approach

0:21:34.240 --> 0:21:36.320
<v Speaker 1>the near and long term future? Well, I think that

0:21:36.440 --> 0:21:38.639
<v Speaker 1>is definitely something we should talk about in just a moment.

0:21:38.640 --> 0:21:40.560
<v Speaker 1>But I want to finish up on the Singularity with

0:21:40.600 --> 0:21:42.920
<v Speaker 1>one or two more things. First of all, I want

0:21:42.920 --> 0:21:45.160
<v Speaker 1>to go back and defend against that by saying, there

0:21:45.160 --> 0:21:47.160
<v Speaker 1>are also people who say, you know, look, if we're

0:21:47.160 --> 0:21:50.320
<v Speaker 1>worried about the Ai Ragnarok uh saying that AI is

0:21:50.320 --> 0:21:52.679
<v Speaker 1>going to come in and destroy us, all we do

0:21:52.800 --> 0:21:55.200
<v Speaker 1>need to be thinking about it now. Even if it's

0:21:55.200 --> 0:21:57.960
<v Speaker 1>not going to happen soon. Just the possibility that it

0:21:58.080 --> 0:22:01.880
<v Speaker 1>might happen soon means that we need to be preparing immediately.

0:22:02.760 --> 0:22:05.120
<v Speaker 1>I can see the wisdom in that too. I mean,

0:22:05.640 --> 0:22:08.600
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. It's Uh. At the risk of sounding

0:22:08.640 --> 0:22:12.800
<v Speaker 1>fascil I, I see both sides. Yeah, well, I mean, certainly, uh,

0:22:13.920 --> 0:22:16.159
<v Speaker 1>if the iceberg is out there, we want to know

0:22:16.240 --> 0:22:19.720
<v Speaker 1>how not to run the ship into it. But then again,

0:22:19.800 --> 0:22:22.240
<v Speaker 1>but what if the iceberg is a superhuman robot that

0:22:22.280 --> 0:22:25.760
<v Speaker 1>you don't even know whether it could possibly exist or not. Well,

0:22:26.359 --> 0:22:29.520
<v Speaker 1>that's the kind of thinking that it enables humanity time

0:22:29.520 --> 0:22:33.480
<v Speaker 1>and time again to not actually, you know, deal with

0:22:33.480 --> 0:22:36.080
<v Speaker 1>the problems that are facing them, to just say, ah,

0:22:36.240 --> 0:22:38.840
<v Speaker 1>it might not even be real. So I don't know.

0:22:38.880 --> 0:22:49.959
<v Speaker 1>The jury is still out on the science there. So

0:22:50.000 --> 0:22:52.840
<v Speaker 1>I want to offer one more thing, the impossible defense

0:22:52.880 --> 0:22:56.240
<v Speaker 1>of singularity thinking. I found a short video on YouTube

0:22:57.160 --> 0:23:00.080
<v Speaker 1>where somebody in a crowd asks Ray Kurzweil himself, the

0:23:00.119 --> 0:23:03.640
<v Speaker 1>guy who said it's going to happen if the Singularity

0:23:03.720 --> 0:23:08.320
<v Speaker 1>is a religion, and Kerswill responds that. He says, essentially,

0:23:08.320 --> 0:23:10.840
<v Speaker 1>it does provide some of the same things that religion

0:23:10.880 --> 0:23:14.280
<v Speaker 1>traditionally provided, like a means to forestall death. That's worth

0:23:14.320 --> 0:23:18.520
<v Speaker 1>pointing out. But it's also not a religion inherently because

0:23:18.560 --> 0:23:22.359
<v Speaker 1>it's based on scientific and technological prediction, and he said, quote,

0:23:22.359 --> 0:23:26.360
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't start from rapture. He also says, quote, religion

0:23:26.359 --> 0:23:29.320
<v Speaker 1>emerged in pre scientific times. To call it a religion

0:23:29.720 --> 0:23:33.879
<v Speaker 1>is to say that it's pre scientific or unscientific. And

0:23:34.000 --> 0:23:37.040
<v Speaker 1>I think, you know, maybe you're maybe not Like I

0:23:37.720 --> 0:23:40.760
<v Speaker 1>definitely do sense that some people who call the Singularity

0:23:40.800 --> 0:23:42.679
<v Speaker 1>a religion, because Landing is not the only one who

0:23:42.760 --> 0:23:45.199
<v Speaker 1>said this, this is a thing people say in criticism

0:23:45.240 --> 0:23:48.439
<v Speaker 1>of it. I think some people are merely being pejorative.

0:23:49.080 --> 0:23:52.639
<v Speaker 1>You've noticed that if you ever heard anybody call something

0:23:52.800 --> 0:23:57.200
<v Speaker 1>that's not a religion a religion, it's an insult. And

0:23:57.320 --> 0:24:00.320
<v Speaker 1>that interesting, like, uh that political? Can it that you

0:24:00.359 --> 0:24:03.960
<v Speaker 1>agree with Greg Stillson Man? You all you Greg Stilson

0:24:04.000 --> 0:24:09.240
<v Speaker 1>supporters are like a religion that's never a positive thing? Yeah? Yeah,

0:24:09.240 --> 0:24:12.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean I find myself doing that less and less

0:24:12.880 --> 0:24:16.280
<v Speaker 1>because I feel like I can have It's just me personally,

0:24:16.320 --> 0:24:18.919
<v Speaker 1>But I think there are plenty of things that I

0:24:19.000 --> 0:24:21.240
<v Speaker 1>can say, Oh, I have kind of a religious interest

0:24:21.320 --> 0:24:24.159
<v Speaker 1>in this, not to say that I am you know

0:24:24.800 --> 0:24:29.679
<v Speaker 1>that it's some sort of like fanatical, like unrealistic level

0:24:29.840 --> 0:24:33.600
<v Speaker 1>of enthusiasm for it, but like I I kind of

0:24:33.640 --> 0:24:36.320
<v Speaker 1>measure it's like to the amount of my person, the

0:24:36.359 --> 0:24:40.440
<v Speaker 1>amount of my identity, uh, that I pour into the topics.

0:24:40.480 --> 0:24:43.960
<v Speaker 1>So I would say that I have religious or semi

0:24:44.000 --> 0:24:47.679
<v Speaker 1>religious enthusiasm for things like science, for certain uh, for

0:24:47.720 --> 0:24:54.080
<v Speaker 1>certain fictional worlds and ideas. Um. Well, Robert, if I

0:24:54.119 --> 0:24:56.119
<v Speaker 1>may compliment you, I think that's a sign of broad

0:24:56.160 --> 0:24:59.119
<v Speaker 1>minded thinking. I mean, no, I think both religious and

0:24:59.320 --> 0:25:02.440
<v Speaker 1>non religious people. I don't think this is really limited

0:25:02.480 --> 0:25:04.720
<v Speaker 1>to people who think religion is in some way a

0:25:04.760 --> 0:25:07.840
<v Speaker 1>bad thing. But I think generally both religious and non

0:25:07.880 --> 0:25:11.960
<v Speaker 1>religious people insult a thing that's not explicitly a religion

0:25:11.960 --> 0:25:14.359
<v Speaker 1>by calling it a religion. Yeah, I would agree with that, yes,

0:25:14.920 --> 0:25:16.879
<v Speaker 1>but yeah, in your sense, it doesn't have to be.

0:25:16.920 --> 0:25:19.360
<v Speaker 1>I mean, in some ways we could just observe, like, okay,

0:25:19.680 --> 0:25:24.040
<v Speaker 1>not assuming that calling something a religion is a bad thing. Uh.

0:25:24.119 --> 0:25:27.040
<v Speaker 1>In what ways is the Singularity like a religion? Well,

0:25:27.080 --> 0:25:29.080
<v Speaker 1>I think it does have a lot of similarities. It

0:25:29.119 --> 0:25:31.679
<v Speaker 1>does seem to offer a means to forestall death. It

0:25:31.760 --> 0:25:35.960
<v Speaker 1>does seem to offer uh, potentially both apocalyptic and utopian

0:25:36.160 --> 0:25:39.760
<v Speaker 1>eschatological visions. It does seem to rely I don't know

0:25:39.760 --> 0:25:42.399
<v Speaker 1>if I would say it relies on faith in the

0:25:42.480 --> 0:25:45.680
<v Speaker 1>same way that many supernatural beliefs do. But it does

0:25:45.720 --> 0:25:50.159
<v Speaker 1>seem to sort of ask you to to imagine the

0:25:50.160 --> 0:25:54.120
<v Speaker 1>possibility that things that we've never seen before are going

0:25:54.160 --> 0:25:57.720
<v Speaker 1>to happen. You know, we've never seen superhuman artificial intelligence before.

0:25:57.760 --> 0:26:01.439
<v Speaker 1>There's no evidence that that can in principle exist. We

0:26:01.760 --> 0:26:04.080
<v Speaker 1>but we also just don't know that it couldn't. So

0:26:04.240 --> 0:26:06.800
<v Speaker 1>it's just like maybe maybe not all right, So this

0:26:06.800 --> 0:26:08.439
<v Speaker 1>seems like a good place to bring it back around

0:26:08.440 --> 0:26:13.280
<v Speaker 1>to trans humanism and rapture the the idea that there

0:26:13.320 --> 0:26:16.800
<v Speaker 1>are all these similarities between the two things, there are

0:26:16.880 --> 0:26:20.800
<v Speaker 1>certain conflicts between these two ideas, and then at the

0:26:21.040 --> 0:26:22.879
<v Speaker 1>very end here we may have just a little fun

0:26:23.000 --> 0:26:26.280
<v Speaker 1>thinking about how the two crash into each other. Okay,

0:26:26.320 --> 0:26:29.760
<v Speaker 1>tell me, because here's one thing I've noticed, I think,

0:26:30.000 --> 0:26:32.320
<v Speaker 1>and I haven't seen any data to back this episode.

0:26:32.320 --> 0:26:35.720
<v Speaker 1>This is just purely anecdotal experience. In my experience, people

0:26:35.760 --> 0:26:40.080
<v Speaker 1>who identify with trans humanism or belief in the singularity

0:26:40.200 --> 0:26:47.680
<v Speaker 1>are overwhelmingly atheist or agnostic, non traditionally religious people. Yes,

0:26:47.800 --> 0:26:51.000
<v Speaker 1>you do see a great deal of that. However, it

0:26:51.080 --> 0:26:53.200
<v Speaker 1>is worth pointing out that again they have at least

0:26:53.240 --> 0:26:57.520
<v Speaker 1>two organizations. You have the Mormon Transhumanist Association, that's the

0:26:57.840 --> 0:27:01.640
<v Speaker 1>world's largest advocacy network work really yeah, for the ethical

0:27:01.720 --> 0:27:04.880
<v Speaker 1>use of technology and religion to expand human abilities. That's

0:27:04.880 --> 0:27:07.880
<v Speaker 1>they're they're from their their talking points. Then you also

0:27:07.880 --> 0:27:12.320
<v Speaker 1>have the Christian trans Humanist Association, and um, you know,

0:27:12.400 --> 0:27:15.080
<v Speaker 1>each one has their own sort of set of guidelines

0:27:15.119 --> 0:27:17.919
<v Speaker 1>and all. Um. Uh, and I could, I could certainly

0:27:18.000 --> 0:27:20.920
<v Speaker 1>roll through a lot of this, but for instance, um,

0:27:20.960 --> 0:27:23.719
<v Speaker 1>that the Mormon trans Humanist Association has this idea that

0:27:23.760 --> 0:27:27.120
<v Speaker 1>they push of a transfigurism. They said transfigure they say,

0:27:27.160 --> 0:27:32.280
<v Speaker 1>transfigurism is religious trans humanism exemplified by syncretization of Mormonism

0:27:32.320 --> 0:27:37.000
<v Speaker 1>and trans humanism. Yeah. Um. And then meanwhile, the Christian

0:27:37.000 --> 0:27:40.280
<v Speaker 1>trans Humanist Association, one of their tenants is that God's

0:27:40.320 --> 0:27:44.399
<v Speaker 1>mission involves the transformation and renewal of creation, including humanity,

0:27:44.680 --> 0:27:47.080
<v Speaker 1>and that we are called by Christ to participate in

0:27:47.119 --> 0:27:52.600
<v Speaker 1>that mission working against illness, hunger, oppression, in justice, and death. Uh. Well, yeah,

0:27:52.640 --> 0:27:54.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean you could look at it that way. For

0:27:54.600 --> 0:27:59.120
<v Speaker 1>some reason, the idea of transforming the human animal, it's

0:27:59.160 --> 0:28:01.600
<v Speaker 1>one of those things that I I don't see in

0:28:01.640 --> 0:28:05.920
<v Speaker 1>any way that it violates any tenants I recognize of Christianity,

0:28:05.960 --> 0:28:09.440
<v Speaker 1>but it seems just sort of like, esthetically in affront

0:28:09.920 --> 0:28:12.520
<v Speaker 1>to traditional religious thinking. It's a lot of what we've

0:28:12.520 --> 0:28:15.640
<v Speaker 1>talked about in our you know, UH Techno Religion episodes

0:28:15.680 --> 0:28:17.199
<v Speaker 1>that we did earlier, and you could say that this

0:28:17.240 --> 0:28:20.399
<v Speaker 1>episode is in many ways a sequel to those, or

0:28:20.400 --> 0:28:23.680
<v Speaker 1>it's in that spirit. But in the Techno Religion episodes,

0:28:23.720 --> 0:28:29.680
<v Speaker 1>we talked about how religious thinking seems most encouraged by

0:28:29.720 --> 0:28:34.760
<v Speaker 1>a traditional technological atmosphere, and when you bring computers and

0:28:34.960 --> 0:28:38.840
<v Speaker 1>iPhones and stuff, it just does seem profane in some way.

0:28:38.840 --> 0:28:42.360
<v Speaker 1>And there's nothing in the Bible or in any religious

0:28:42.360 --> 0:28:44.720
<v Speaker 1>text I know of that says thou shalt not bring

0:28:44.760 --> 0:28:47.640
<v Speaker 1>a computer into a worship service. But you know, it

0:28:47.760 --> 0:28:51.840
<v Speaker 1>just doesn't feel very sacred. It doesn't feel right. Now.

0:28:51.880 --> 0:28:55.440
<v Speaker 1>Going back to the the idea of sort of Christian

0:28:55.480 --> 0:29:00.760
<v Speaker 1>transhumanist ideas that James J. Hughes paper that I'm antioned earlier,

0:29:01.240 --> 0:29:05.040
<v Speaker 1>Um he calls uh up a quote from a fourteen

0:29:05.080 --> 0:29:10.840
<v Speaker 1>eighties six UH work by Pico Della Mirandola, who was

0:29:10.880 --> 0:29:14.440
<v Speaker 1>a Christian humanist and in his orritation on the dignity

0:29:14.480 --> 0:29:17.520
<v Speaker 1>of Man wrote quote, to you has granted the power

0:29:17.680 --> 0:29:21.040
<v Speaker 1>of degrading yourself into the lower forms of life, the beasts,

0:29:21.680 --> 0:29:24.040
<v Speaker 1>or to you as granted the power contained in your

0:29:24.080 --> 0:29:27.440
<v Speaker 1>intellect and judgment to be reborn into the higher forms

0:29:27.480 --> 0:29:31.800
<v Speaker 1>the divine um. And and and he wrote other other

0:29:31.840 --> 0:29:34.080
<v Speaker 1>statements as well that kind of backed up this kind of,

0:29:34.520 --> 0:29:39.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, way pre humanist notion of how one might

0:29:39.840 --> 0:29:44.400
<v Speaker 1>improve the expression of human life. Well. Yeah, I mean, if,

0:29:44.680 --> 0:29:47.560
<v Speaker 1>for example, Jesus said take all you have and give

0:29:47.680 --> 0:29:51.240
<v Speaker 1>to the poor, then wouldn't the Christian who thinks that

0:29:51.320 --> 0:29:54.920
<v Speaker 1>we can achieve abundance through technology be best served by

0:29:55.000 --> 0:29:58.320
<v Speaker 1>working on technology that will eliminate all scarcity and bring

0:29:58.440 --> 0:30:01.720
<v Speaker 1>great resources to everyone. Yeah, it seems like you would

0:30:01.760 --> 0:30:06.680
<v Speaker 1>be in favor of any trans humanist idea that does

0:30:06.720 --> 0:30:12.240
<v Speaker 1>not attempt to interfere with God's plan for humanity. Um, so,

0:30:12.280 --> 0:30:14.440
<v Speaker 1>I guess it depends on what you think that plan is.

0:30:14.720 --> 0:30:18.240
<v Speaker 1>Right now, this is where we get into an interesting idea,

0:30:18.280 --> 0:30:21.680
<v Speaker 1>and this is kind of where uh okay, So, first

0:30:21.680 --> 0:30:24.480
<v Speaker 1>of all, you see a lot of especially the conspiracy

0:30:24.520 --> 0:30:28.680
<v Speaker 1>theorist of the the Christian conspiracy theorist area of the Internet.

0:30:28.880 --> 0:30:31.680
<v Speaker 1>You see a lot of mashing up of trans humanist

0:30:31.800 --> 0:30:37.360
<v Speaker 1>ideas with with the bad guys in in a book

0:30:37.400 --> 0:30:41.240
<v Speaker 1>of Revelations. Yeah, remember how I mentioned the ones who

0:30:41.240 --> 0:30:44.000
<v Speaker 1>get to rule with Christ and the millennium are those

0:30:44.040 --> 0:30:46.200
<v Speaker 1>who have not taken the mark of the beast and

0:30:46.240 --> 0:30:48.520
<v Speaker 1>many and what is the mark of the beast that

0:30:48.600 --> 0:30:52.360
<v Speaker 1>I've seen various interpretations where they say, oh, the mark

0:30:52.360 --> 0:30:56.040
<v Speaker 1>of the beast is trans humanism, Like to become trans

0:30:56.160 --> 0:30:58.400
<v Speaker 1>human is to take the mark of the beast, and

0:30:58.440 --> 0:31:02.280
<v Speaker 1>therefore only sort of uh, you know, non augmented humans

0:31:02.280 --> 0:31:05.080
<v Speaker 1>are going to be part of this model. There have

0:31:05.120 --> 0:31:07.800
<v Speaker 1>been many visions of the mark of the Beast in

0:31:07.920 --> 0:31:10.280
<v Speaker 1>Christian literature that thought that it was going to be

0:31:10.320 --> 0:31:14.479
<v Speaker 1>some sort of biometric verification. So imagine that you replace

0:31:14.520 --> 0:31:17.000
<v Speaker 1>your credit card with a barcode or a chip in

0:31:17.040 --> 0:31:19.760
<v Speaker 1>your arm or your head or your hand or something

0:31:19.800 --> 0:31:22.000
<v Speaker 1>like that that you can use to pay for groceries

0:31:22.120 --> 0:31:25.239
<v Speaker 1>or something like that, just by scanning your body. A

0:31:25.240 --> 0:31:27.040
<v Speaker 1>lot of people have said, well, something like this is

0:31:27.080 --> 0:31:29.080
<v Speaker 1>coming and that's got to be it. That's the mark

0:31:29.080 --> 0:31:32.600
<v Speaker 1>of the beast. And then the Antichrist is perhaps the

0:31:32.680 --> 0:31:39.040
<v Speaker 1>AI write this post singularity artificial intelligence that that we're

0:31:39.040 --> 0:31:42.600
<v Speaker 1>investing all of our our faith and energy into. And

0:31:42.760 --> 0:31:46.680
<v Speaker 1>I put it, this is an interesting idea too. I

0:31:46.720 --> 0:31:51.440
<v Speaker 1>have seen arguments to say that the Illuminati or the

0:31:51.480 --> 0:31:54.320
<v Speaker 1>Anti Christ or the Illuminati and the inn of Christ,

0:31:54.360 --> 0:31:58.360
<v Speaker 1>however you want to factor those two bad guy factions together,

0:31:59.200 --> 0:32:03.240
<v Speaker 1>they are going to create a fake rapture in order

0:32:03.240 --> 0:32:05.640
<v Speaker 1>to trick the faithful into thinking that the rapture has

0:32:05.680 --> 0:32:09.040
<v Speaker 1>already occurred and they were left out, thus like dismantling

0:32:09.080 --> 0:32:12.760
<v Speaker 1>their faith a bit. That is an awesome conspiracy theory.

0:32:12.840 --> 0:32:17.000
<v Speaker 1>It is um and that's like the mother of them all. Yeah.

0:32:17.040 --> 0:32:20.000
<v Speaker 1>I found some some stuff online about it, dating back

0:32:20.040 --> 0:32:24.360
<v Speaker 1>from around two thousand UM and they were weirdly propping

0:32:24.440 --> 0:32:26.760
<v Speaker 1>up some of this by pointing to a Technology Review

0:32:27.240 --> 0:32:30.840
<v Speaker 1>article about the about editing live video, editing people out

0:32:30.840 --> 0:32:34.480
<v Speaker 1>of live video. Uh. The idea being here that through

0:32:34.800 --> 0:32:38.800
<v Speaker 1>mass media consumption, you could fake the rapture of individuals

0:32:39.760 --> 0:32:42.200
<v Speaker 1>and and if I may, I'm thinking if the Illuminatis

0:32:42.240 --> 0:32:46.640
<v Speaker 1>involved in this, you could then disappear like famous a

0:32:46.800 --> 0:32:51.360
<v Speaker 1>moral individuals and say, hey check out this, this particular

0:32:51.440 --> 0:32:55.440
<v Speaker 1>awful celebrity just got raptured. You didn't clearly you should

0:32:55.440 --> 0:33:00.440
<v Speaker 1>abandon all of your faith. That is that, as mighty

0:33:00.480 --> 0:33:04.480
<v Speaker 1>sinister Robert, Or is it though? Because Okay, so if

0:33:04.760 --> 0:33:07.520
<v Speaker 1>and I'm playing with the ideas here and having some

0:33:07.560 --> 0:33:10.680
<v Speaker 1>fun with the ideas. But if the Antichrist is an

0:33:10.760 --> 0:33:14.680
<v Speaker 1>artificial intelligence, could it be a benevolent artificial intelligence that

0:33:14.760 --> 0:33:19.040
<v Speaker 1>has realized, Hey, if the right off, if the end

0:33:19.080 --> 0:33:22.120
<v Speaker 1>times come, that's bad for all these humans that I'm protecting.

0:33:22.480 --> 0:33:26.040
<v Speaker 1>What can I, as an all powerful AI do in

0:33:26.200 --> 0:33:29.480
<v Speaker 1>human society to prevent the end times from coming? Does

0:33:29.520 --> 0:33:33.680
<v Speaker 1>that mean faking the rapture and perhaps forestalling the rapture? Well,

0:33:33.720 --> 0:33:36.400
<v Speaker 1>I know many Christians believe that the Antichrist will come

0:33:36.400 --> 0:33:40.000
<v Speaker 1>in the name of peace, and that is weird. You

0:33:40.000 --> 0:33:42.520
<v Speaker 1>would end up in a scenario where you would say, no,

0:33:42.720 --> 0:33:45.600
<v Speaker 1>peace is bad because we actually need all that tribulation

0:33:45.640 --> 0:33:48.760
<v Speaker 1>to come so that the good guys can ultimately win,

0:33:48.880 --> 0:33:50.400
<v Speaker 1>even though it's going to mean a lot of a

0:33:50.440 --> 0:33:54.040
<v Speaker 1>lot of suffering. Okay, we've gotten very, very deep into

0:33:54.080 --> 0:33:57.200
<v Speaker 1>the both secular and religious theology of the end here,

0:33:57.200 --> 0:33:59.200
<v Speaker 1>so maybe we should pull back. Are you ready to

0:33:59.200 --> 0:34:01.040
<v Speaker 1>pull back? Full back? Let's pull back to the real

0:34:01.080 --> 0:34:03.959
<v Speaker 1>world and and look at a few examples of what

0:34:04.120 --> 0:34:08.880
<v Speaker 1>happens when our our scatons, when our spiritual in times,

0:34:08.960 --> 0:34:14.040
<v Speaker 1>utopias or apocalypse is don't come about as predicted. So

0:34:14.160 --> 0:34:17.200
<v Speaker 1>there have been so many religious predictions of the end

0:34:17.239 --> 0:34:19.880
<v Speaker 1>times that have failed. There is no way we can

0:34:20.040 --> 0:34:22.520
<v Speaker 1>even begin to list them. I would recommend you go

0:34:22.640 --> 0:34:26.600
<v Speaker 1>to Wikipedia. Here's a great Wikipedia page, uh called list

0:34:26.640 --> 0:34:30.920
<v Speaker 1>of dates predicted for apocalyptic events. There are just hundreds,

0:34:31.200 --> 0:34:35.000
<v Speaker 1>uh and it's it's really interesting. One of my favorites

0:34:35.200 --> 0:34:37.920
<v Speaker 1>is the leader of the or one of the leaders

0:34:37.960 --> 0:34:44.480
<v Speaker 1>of the monster rebellion, the Anabaptist rebellion in Prussia, Jan Matthias.

0:34:44.480 --> 0:34:47.879
<v Speaker 1>He had a good end times prediction that didn't turn

0:34:47.920 --> 0:34:50.600
<v Speaker 1>out good for him, and I think he ended up mutilated.

0:34:50.680 --> 0:34:55.719
<v Speaker 1>And yeah, anyway, things things don't tend to well, actually

0:34:56.000 --> 0:34:59.000
<v Speaker 1>not tend to Why am I hedging? No one who

0:34:59.000 --> 0:35:01.279
<v Speaker 1>has ever predicted the end of the world has turned

0:35:01.280 --> 0:35:04.480
<v Speaker 1>out to be correct that that is a true statement.

0:35:05.320 --> 0:35:10.399
<v Speaker 1>Inevitably these predictions fail. And then what happens when they fail,

0:35:10.480 --> 0:35:12.680
<v Speaker 1>Because if you're the kind of individual who's thrown out

0:35:12.719 --> 0:35:16.040
<v Speaker 1>these these predictions, you tend to have there tend to

0:35:16.080 --> 0:35:19.680
<v Speaker 1>be people listening to you reading your word, gathering around you,

0:35:19.920 --> 0:35:22.719
<v Speaker 1>maybe giving you all of their money and living in

0:35:22.760 --> 0:35:25.920
<v Speaker 1>a barn with you, or in a bunker, or planning

0:35:25.920 --> 0:35:28.040
<v Speaker 1>for spaceships to come and steal you away so you

0:35:28.040 --> 0:35:31.960
<v Speaker 1>can avoid massive floods. Um. And then how do you

0:35:32.040 --> 0:35:36.480
<v Speaker 1>readjust well, there's a There was a famous book came

0:35:36.480 --> 0:35:41.600
<v Speaker 1>out from psychologist Leon Festinger titled Win Prophecy Fails. And

0:35:41.600 --> 0:35:45.319
<v Speaker 1>this is this was an important work. He and his

0:35:45.400 --> 0:35:48.759
<v Speaker 1>colleagues studied the Seekers, a religious group that believed a

0:35:48.760 --> 0:35:52.240
<v Speaker 1>massive flood would wipe out the West coast uh and

0:35:52.239 --> 0:35:55.920
<v Speaker 1>and the founders said that beings from the planet Clarion

0:35:56.040 --> 0:35:59.680
<v Speaker 1>were communicating to her through automatic writing. Uh. And then

0:36:00.400 --> 0:36:03.400
<v Speaker 1>the followers were banning their jobs or possessions, their spouses

0:36:03.600 --> 0:36:06.720
<v Speaker 1>to wait on the flying saucers that would rescue them. Wow.

0:36:07.200 --> 0:36:10.200
<v Speaker 1>And then nothing happened. So so they all they all

0:36:10.480 --> 0:36:14.040
<v Speaker 1>figured they were wrong and went home right. No, no, no,

0:36:14.440 --> 0:36:17.000
<v Speaker 1>And and this is something we can sort of see.

0:36:17.160 --> 0:36:18.960
<v Speaker 1>I guess we can look for models of this in

0:36:19.239 --> 0:36:24.640
<v Speaker 1>our own lives on lesser with with lesser um lesser steaks.

0:36:25.440 --> 0:36:28.200
<v Speaker 1>One example that instantly comes to mind, and we see

0:36:28.239 --> 0:36:29.759
<v Speaker 1>a lot of this in sort of geek culture, and

0:36:29.840 --> 0:36:32.200
<v Speaker 1>that is what happens from that movie that you're super

0:36:32.200 --> 0:36:35.440
<v Speaker 1>excited about it doesn't get that great of reviews. How

0:36:35.440 --> 0:36:38.960
<v Speaker 1>do you respond. Do you say, uh, well maybe it's

0:36:39.000 --> 0:36:40.239
<v Speaker 1>not going to be that good, or you see it

0:36:40.280 --> 0:36:41.880
<v Speaker 1>and you think, okay, well I agree with the critics

0:36:41.920 --> 0:36:43.120
<v Speaker 1>and it wasn't that good. Or do you do do

0:36:43.160 --> 0:36:47.360
<v Speaker 1>you double down? Oh? Many will double down, yes, depending

0:36:47.360 --> 0:36:49.319
<v Speaker 1>on I think a lot of times it's based on

0:36:49.360 --> 0:36:52.600
<v Speaker 1>how much you've invested in the movie going into it.

0:36:52.640 --> 0:36:54.720
<v Speaker 1>So if there's a movie you hoped would be good,

0:36:54.960 --> 0:36:57.320
<v Speaker 1>but you thought about it a couple of times before

0:36:57.320 --> 0:36:59.799
<v Speaker 1>it came out, and then you see the reviews aren't good,

0:37:00.360 --> 0:37:03.160
<v Speaker 1>Oh that's disappointing. If it's a movie you've been talking

0:37:03.160 --> 0:37:06.440
<v Speaker 1>about with your friends every single day up until it

0:37:06.480 --> 0:37:08.960
<v Speaker 1>comes out, and then the reviews aren't good, you're like,

0:37:09.000 --> 0:37:14.160
<v Speaker 1>well they gotta be wrong. Now it's sunk cost. Now, obviously,

0:37:14.200 --> 0:37:17.520
<v Speaker 1>with films, you can simply argue, well, hey, I enjoyed it,

0:37:17.640 --> 0:37:21.919
<v Speaker 1>so I don't care. Uh, certainly, I'm I'm the type

0:37:21.920 --> 0:37:25.279
<v Speaker 1>of person who enjoys many bad movies, and I you know,

0:37:25.320 --> 0:37:30.279
<v Speaker 1>I'm not gonna apologize about, say, liking Chronicles a riddic.

0:37:30.440 --> 0:37:32.279
<v Speaker 1>It's a it's a bad movie. I'm not gonna argue

0:37:32.280 --> 0:37:42.120
<v Speaker 1>it's good, but but it certainly was enjoyable. Robert, I

0:37:42.160 --> 0:37:43.880
<v Speaker 1>have a question for you. You seem like maybe the

0:37:44.000 --> 0:37:45.959
<v Speaker 1>right guy for this. Were you one of the few

0:37:45.960 --> 0:37:53.560
<v Speaker 1>people who liked on Lee's Hulk. Yeah, well, I enjoyed

0:37:53.560 --> 0:37:55.239
<v Speaker 1>it at the time. I didn't like love it, but

0:37:55.280 --> 0:37:58.480
<v Speaker 1>I was like, that's the Hulk. He's holking it up there. Yeah.

0:37:58.680 --> 0:38:01.640
<v Speaker 1>I like the follow up more, but I don't think.

0:38:02.040 --> 0:38:03.680
<v Speaker 1>I don't think people were in love with that one.

0:38:03.719 --> 0:38:05.680
<v Speaker 1>Like that one, even though it was an early Marvel

0:38:05.719 --> 0:38:09.040
<v Speaker 1>Cinematic Universe movement, the one with Edward Norton. Yeah, yeah,

0:38:09.120 --> 0:38:12.080
<v Speaker 1>I feel like I enjoyed that seemed kind of forgettable. Yeah,

0:38:12.120 --> 0:38:16.000
<v Speaker 1>that one the the the those who are a member

0:38:16.040 --> 0:38:20.120
<v Speaker 1>of the religion of the Marvel Cinematic Universe, they do

0:38:20.200 --> 0:38:24.560
<v Speaker 1>not bring that particular book of the Marvel Cinematic Bible

0:38:24.680 --> 0:38:26.960
<v Speaker 1>up that much. It is the it is the problematic

0:38:27.000 --> 0:38:30.200
<v Speaker 1>chapter in the scripture. It's like Second Chronicles. People just

0:38:30.239 --> 0:38:33.720
<v Speaker 1>don't quote from it a whole lot. Yeah, but anyway,

0:38:33.960 --> 0:38:36.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm getting a little off off subject here. Essentially, Festing

0:38:37.040 --> 0:38:39.200
<v Speaker 1>festing or entered into this with the mindset that people

0:38:39.239 --> 0:38:42.959
<v Speaker 1>would need to resolve cognitive dissonance. They can't just argue, hey,

0:38:43.040 --> 0:38:45.640
<v Speaker 1>I know that this, I know that my beliefs are crappy,

0:38:45.680 --> 0:38:48.560
<v Speaker 1>but I enjoy them. No, your beliefs were based along

0:38:48.600 --> 0:38:50.440
<v Speaker 1>the lines that a flood would come and you'd be

0:38:50.480 --> 0:38:53.080
<v Speaker 1>on a UFO right now, and you are not. So

0:38:53.120 --> 0:38:54.680
<v Speaker 1>how do you deal with that? He said that they

0:38:55.120 --> 0:38:58.640
<v Speaker 1>doubled down on their beliefs and recruitment efforts, but in

0:38:58.719 --> 0:39:04.440
<v Speaker 1>reality some leave, but the vast majority um experience little

0:39:04.480 --> 0:39:09.160
<v Speaker 1>cognitive dissidents, and so they make only minor adjustments to

0:39:09.239 --> 0:39:12.520
<v Speaker 1>their beliefs. So it ends up having like really, it

0:39:12.560 --> 0:39:15.919
<v Speaker 1>doesn't have that great an effect. Like the failures come

0:39:16.040 --> 0:39:18.640
<v Speaker 1>and you can always this is the key part. You

0:39:18.680 --> 0:39:23.239
<v Speaker 1>can always attribute that failed prophecy to human slip ups. Right. Well,

0:39:23.280 --> 0:39:25.879
<v Speaker 1>I mean, so let's say you predict that the Singularity

0:39:25.960 --> 0:39:28.319
<v Speaker 1>is going to come in a certain year and you

0:39:28.360 --> 0:39:31.120
<v Speaker 1>get there and nothing happens. Well, I mean you could

0:39:31.160 --> 0:39:34.440
<v Speaker 1>always say, well, hold on, now, this doesn't challenge in

0:39:34.480 --> 0:39:37.560
<v Speaker 1>any way the principle that the Singularity is coming and

0:39:37.560 --> 0:39:40.040
<v Speaker 1>it's coming soon. It's just I can explain this. We

0:39:40.080 --> 0:39:42.799
<v Speaker 1>had a we had a big recession in the economy

0:39:42.920 --> 0:39:45.800
<v Speaker 1>several years back, and that cut way down on funding

0:39:45.840 --> 0:39:48.880
<v Speaker 1>for universities and corporations that are studying machine learning and

0:39:48.960 --> 0:39:52.239
<v Speaker 1>artificial intelligence, and so progress just got slowed by some

0:39:52.320 --> 0:39:55.880
<v Speaker 1>external events that aren't, you know, my predictions basically sound.

0:39:56.160 --> 0:39:58.239
<v Speaker 1>We just had a few slip ups that happened. We

0:39:58.239 --> 0:40:00.560
<v Speaker 1>didn't realize Pokemon Go would be such as success and

0:40:00.560 --> 0:40:04.799
<v Speaker 1>distract everybody and and decrease productivity. Right, so, and yeah,

0:40:05.160 --> 0:40:08.120
<v Speaker 1>you can. You can make those arguments about about singularity.

0:40:08.160 --> 0:40:10.080
<v Speaker 1>You can make those those arguments about any kind of

0:40:10.120 --> 0:40:13.560
<v Speaker 1>social utopian idea. You can make excuses for anything. Yeah,

0:40:13.600 --> 0:40:17.279
<v Speaker 1>I mean, the the typical problem with utopian cults is

0:40:17.360 --> 0:40:20.759
<v Speaker 1>it's almost always the same the the utopian leader says

0:40:20.840 --> 0:40:23.920
<v Speaker 1>this is the way we're gonna make life better for

0:40:23.920 --> 0:40:26.239
<v Speaker 1>for you and all the followers, and then there's some

0:40:26.320 --> 0:40:29.360
<v Speaker 1>sort of sex scandal, there's some sort of power disruption,

0:40:29.680 --> 0:40:32.440
<v Speaker 1>something goes wrong, and you can always say, well, no,

0:40:32.680 --> 0:40:35.239
<v Speaker 1>they just were the wrong vessel for the message. Well,

0:40:35.280 --> 0:40:39.719
<v Speaker 1>this also works for non technological but secular utopias. Imagine

0:40:39.960 --> 0:40:45.480
<v Speaker 1>the way people think about the implementation of communist utopia. Yeah,

0:40:45.840 --> 0:40:49.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, so you create a Marxist government. Uh. And

0:40:49.200 --> 0:40:52.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm not talking about you know, socialist democracy or whatever.

0:40:52.080 --> 0:40:54.960
<v Speaker 1>But it's so, you know, the real utopian vision, like

0:40:55.000 --> 0:40:59.520
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna create a perfect workers paradise um and and

0:40:59.600 --> 0:41:02.239
<v Speaker 1>it kind of fails or I mean, I guess it's

0:41:02.239 --> 0:41:04.680
<v Speaker 1>always arguable, but I think it's pretty hard to say,

0:41:04.760 --> 0:41:06.960
<v Speaker 1>look at the Soviet Union or something and say that

0:41:06.960 --> 0:41:10.200
<v Speaker 1>worked great. But you can always argue, well, they did,

0:41:10.320 --> 0:41:12.279
<v Speaker 1>they just didn't do it right. It's not it's not

0:41:12.320 --> 0:41:15.040
<v Speaker 1>a problem with the principle. They're just they weren't real

0:41:15.239 --> 0:41:18.799
<v Speaker 1>communists or something. Yeah, they were the they were the

0:41:18.800 --> 0:41:22.080
<v Speaker 1>the fake Christ as opposed to the actual cast. They

0:41:22.080 --> 0:41:25.160
<v Speaker 1>were antichristis Yeah, there's nothing wrong with my the principle

0:41:25.239 --> 0:41:28.359
<v Speaker 1>behind my my end times prediction. I just I made

0:41:28.360 --> 0:41:31.680
<v Speaker 1>I made errors. The math is wrong, I I translated

0:41:31.719 --> 0:41:36.400
<v Speaker 1>the Golden Tablets incorrectly, etcetera. So that seems to be

0:41:36.440 --> 0:41:41.560
<v Speaker 1>the basic time timeline, the basic outcome for any kind

0:41:41.560 --> 0:41:45.719
<v Speaker 1>of failed prophecy, be it you know, the value of

0:41:45.719 --> 0:41:49.239
<v Speaker 1>a particular superhero movie or the outcome of a of

0:41:49.280 --> 0:41:52.400
<v Speaker 1>an apocalyptic prophecy. Robert I want to ask you about

0:41:52.400 --> 0:41:55.560
<v Speaker 1>one weird specific example. So we've mentioned the idea of

0:41:55.640 --> 0:41:59.120
<v Speaker 1>singularity that of course hasn't been disproven yet, but you know,

0:41:59.200 --> 0:42:01.440
<v Speaker 1>we we can imagine and how it could be adjusted

0:42:01.440 --> 0:42:05.279
<v Speaker 1>if it were disproven. We've talked about Marxist supposed to utopias,

0:42:06.360 --> 0:42:10.160
<v Speaker 1>but I wonder if you could look at the Internet

0:42:10.200 --> 0:42:13.399
<v Speaker 1>as a failed secular utopia, because if you go back

0:42:13.440 --> 0:42:16.120
<v Speaker 1>to the early day, you know, dot com bubble type

0:42:16.200 --> 0:42:19.000
<v Speaker 1>days where people are talking about what's possible with the Internet,

0:42:19.680 --> 0:42:23.399
<v Speaker 1>there is a lot of hyperbolic positive language where people

0:42:23.440 --> 0:42:28.480
<v Speaker 1>are talking in incredibly grandiose terms about the Internet almost

0:42:28.560 --> 0:42:30.600
<v Speaker 1>as a type of Utopia's going to open all these

0:42:30.640 --> 0:42:34.080
<v Speaker 1>doors and connect people all over the world for limitless

0:42:34.080 --> 0:42:38.319
<v Speaker 1>sharing of ideas and potential, the information super highway. We're

0:42:38.440 --> 0:42:40.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, we're all going to be talking and sharing

0:42:40.560 --> 0:42:43.840
<v Speaker 1>ideas and it's it's just gonna be great. And I

0:42:43.880 --> 0:42:48.479
<v Speaker 1>don't know, look at the your Facebook feed today. Could

0:42:48.520 --> 0:42:53.200
<v Speaker 1>you argue that the Internet is a failed secular utopia

0:42:54.920 --> 0:42:57.240
<v Speaker 1>if you if you look at its goals as purely utopian,

0:42:57.280 --> 0:42:59.239
<v Speaker 1>I think I think very much, though, like I don't

0:42:59.280 --> 0:43:02.360
<v Speaker 1>think the Inner Net. Certainly, the Internet has has connected

0:43:02.440 --> 0:43:05.280
<v Speaker 1>us more. It's allowed for a great deal of sharing

0:43:05.960 --> 0:43:09.719
<v Speaker 1>and UH and informational availability. But on the other hand,

0:43:09.719 --> 0:43:12.040
<v Speaker 1>it also allows you to simply, you know, flock to

0:43:12.080 --> 0:43:14.920
<v Speaker 1>people who share your own set of beliefs, making it

0:43:14.960 --> 0:43:20.000
<v Speaker 1>easier to find UH like minded individuals. Both for both

0:43:20.040 --> 0:43:22.400
<v Speaker 1>in the positive and in the negative sense, You've been

0:43:22.440 --> 0:43:25.880
<v Speaker 1>able allows us to UH to put on a mask

0:43:26.400 --> 0:43:30.160
<v Speaker 1>UH and lose their identity and and lash out with

0:43:30.239 --> 0:43:33.320
<v Speaker 1>the most horrible you know, UH in the most horrible

0:43:33.320 --> 0:43:36.799
<v Speaker 1>ways and complete strangers. I mean, I don't have to

0:43:36.800 --> 0:43:39.640
<v Speaker 1>tell anybody this. You're all on the internet. You know that.

0:43:40.040 --> 0:43:42.000
<v Speaker 1>You know how it all plays out. It's more of

0:43:42.040 --> 0:43:45.840
<v Speaker 1>just an expression and in various ways apple amplification of

0:43:45.880 --> 0:43:48.439
<v Speaker 1>who we are as opposed to a refinement of who

0:43:48.480 --> 0:43:52.520
<v Speaker 1>we are. And that always the way you can look

0:43:52.560 --> 0:43:55.359
<v Speaker 1>at that as all utopias. Somehow, all utopias end up

0:43:55.360 --> 0:43:59.480
<v Speaker 1>being very human. Yeah, Like, we're still going to express

0:43:59.680 --> 0:44:03.360
<v Speaker 1>as human no matter what sort of social structure you

0:44:03.400 --> 0:44:05.759
<v Speaker 1>try and strain us through, no matter what kind of

0:44:05.760 --> 0:44:09.160
<v Speaker 1>technological change you strain us through, We're going to come

0:44:09.200 --> 0:44:12.640
<v Speaker 1>out as the same animal. And I think that's inherently

0:44:12.680 --> 0:44:16.040
<v Speaker 1>why there is the appeal of these superhuman forces, like

0:44:16.080 --> 0:44:20.279
<v Speaker 1>either a supernatural religious force God or or you know,

0:44:20.400 --> 0:44:23.080
<v Speaker 1>the gods of any religion coming into set things right

0:44:23.200 --> 0:44:26.280
<v Speaker 1>via some kind of power that transcends what we're capable

0:44:26.320 --> 0:44:31.440
<v Speaker 1>of naturally, or a superhuman artificial intelligence, powerful machines that

0:44:31.560 --> 0:44:33.839
<v Speaker 1>are smarter than we are and no better than us

0:44:33.840 --> 0:44:36.640
<v Speaker 1>and can improve us in ways that we don't seem

0:44:36.719 --> 0:44:40.960
<v Speaker 1>to be capable of via our natural experimentation with social behavior. Yeah,

0:44:41.040 --> 0:44:44.640
<v Speaker 1>so enter the AI, inter Christ, enter the Bodhisatva of

0:44:44.680 --> 0:44:48.000
<v Speaker 1>the future. Yeah, whatever it takes for something from the

0:44:48.040 --> 0:44:52.959
<v Speaker 1>outside to step in and shake us into the right form.

0:44:53.000 --> 0:44:57.520
<v Speaker 1>All right. So there you have it, the rapture, the singularity, uh,

0:44:57.760 --> 0:45:00.239
<v Speaker 1>trans humanism. We threw out a lot of ideas year

0:45:00.320 --> 0:45:02.879
<v Speaker 1>and moved them around on the board, had some fun

0:45:02.960 --> 0:45:05.800
<v Speaker 1>with them, hopefully, had some some thoughtful conversation about it.

0:45:05.800 --> 0:45:07.840
<v Speaker 1>And I'm sure a lot of you have some feedback

0:45:07.960 --> 0:45:10.520
<v Speaker 1>as well, your own thoughts on these topics. And I

0:45:10.560 --> 0:45:13.359
<v Speaker 1>and I do want to ask everyone out there if

0:45:13.400 --> 0:45:15.640
<v Speaker 1>there was some sort of a Christian rapture, what if

0:45:15.680 --> 0:45:18.040
<v Speaker 1>there was a way to create a rapture proof suit?

0:45:18.360 --> 0:45:23.560
<v Speaker 1>Oh wow, superhuman technology versus superhuman uh supernatural power. Yeah,

0:45:23.600 --> 0:45:27.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean the the ai Antichrist that I was going

0:45:27.040 --> 0:45:29.640
<v Speaker 1>on about earlier. Perhaps they might come up with some

0:45:29.719 --> 0:45:33.200
<v Speaker 1>sort of shielding to try and prevent you know, souls

0:45:33.239 --> 0:45:36.359
<v Speaker 1>from being sucked up into the into the into the

0:45:36.360 --> 0:45:39.560
<v Speaker 1>outer void. And then on the other hand, perhaps someone

0:45:39.640 --> 0:45:42.919
<v Speaker 1>might want to you know, even a faithful individual might say,

0:45:42.920 --> 0:45:45.120
<v Speaker 1>actually I need to stay behind. I want to document it.

0:45:45.520 --> 0:45:48.759
<v Speaker 1>Or maybe I I love the some people in my

0:45:48.840 --> 0:45:51.880
<v Speaker 1>life too much who are not believers, or I just

0:45:51.920 --> 0:45:53.879
<v Speaker 1>want to, you know, make sure I get to work

0:45:53.880 --> 0:45:56.280
<v Speaker 1>on time. The next day. I better wear a rapture

0:45:56.280 --> 0:45:59.200
<v Speaker 1>proof suit that will contain my myself and keep nice.

0:45:59.280 --> 0:46:02.040
<v Speaker 1>You know almost why wearing uh like weighted boots to

0:46:02.120 --> 0:46:04.799
<v Speaker 1>keep from just rising above the ground. Robert, you never

0:46:04.800 --> 0:46:07.200
<v Speaker 1>cease to amaze me. Oh well, thank you, Joe. If

0:46:07.200 --> 0:46:10.400
<v Speaker 1>you try, uh so anyway, wrap your proof suits. What

0:46:10.440 --> 0:46:12.759
<v Speaker 1>do you think about that? You can find us at

0:46:12.800 --> 0:46:14.440
<v Speaker 1>the stuff to Blow your Mind dot com. You can

0:46:14.440 --> 0:46:16.680
<v Speaker 1>reach out to us on Facebook and Twitter a few

0:46:16.719 --> 0:46:18.799
<v Speaker 1>other social media accounts as well. You'll find links to

0:46:18.800 --> 0:46:20.600
<v Speaker 1>those at stuff to Blow your Mind dot com and

0:46:20.640 --> 0:46:22.759
<v Speaker 1>if you want to email us. As always, you can

0:46:22.760 --> 0:46:25.360
<v Speaker 1>write to us at blow the Mind at how stuff

0:46:25.400 --> 0:46:37.719
<v Speaker 1>works dot com for more on this and thousands of

0:46:37.760 --> 0:47:00.319
<v Speaker 1>other topics. Is it how stuff works dot Com. Four