WEBVTT - SYSK Selects: Have all the good ideas already been discovered?

0:00:00.800 --> 0:00:03.440
<v Speaker 1>Hey, everybody, it's me Josh, and for this week's s

0:00:03.560 --> 0:00:07.240
<v Speaker 1>Y s K Selects, I've chosen an episode from two

0:00:07.240 --> 0:00:10.960
<v Speaker 1>thousand and ten. Have all the good ideas been discovered? Uh?

0:00:11.000 --> 0:00:13.360
<v Speaker 1>It's an interesting one and in a strange way, it

0:00:13.440 --> 0:00:17.160
<v Speaker 1>ties into the planned Obsolescence episode we released recently, even

0:00:17.160 --> 0:00:21.040
<v Speaker 1>though it was recorded almost ten years before. And I

0:00:21.120 --> 0:00:24.760
<v Speaker 1>want to make a note it's possible that the listener

0:00:24.880 --> 0:00:28.880
<v Speaker 1>male person who wrote in in this episode actually predicted

0:00:28.920 --> 0:00:32.880
<v Speaker 1>the coming of the wildly popular site. Damn you auto

0:00:32.920 --> 0:00:37.000
<v Speaker 1>correct proved me wrong at any rate. Enjoy this episode.

0:00:39.760 --> 0:00:42.040
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Stuff You Should Know, a production of My

0:00:42.240 --> 0:00:51.240
<v Speaker 1>Heart Radios How Stuff Works. Hey, and welcome to the podcast.

0:00:51.280 --> 0:00:53.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm Josh Clark. With me as always is Charles W.

0:00:54.120 --> 0:00:57.000
<v Speaker 1>Chuck Bryant. And that makes the stuff you should know.

0:00:58.040 --> 0:01:01.640
<v Speaker 1>That's right, Yes it is not. They're imitators. I wonder

0:01:01.680 --> 0:01:03.840
<v Speaker 1>how many times I've said that that makes the stuff

0:01:03.880 --> 0:01:06.160
<v Speaker 1>you should know. No, that's just the whole spiel, the

0:01:06.200 --> 0:01:08.840
<v Speaker 1>whole opening. Hey, you welcome to the podcast. Well you've

0:01:08.840 --> 0:01:11.800
<v Speaker 1>said it about two hundred and seventy. Sometimes I think,

0:01:12.560 --> 0:01:14.640
<v Speaker 1>luckily we have them all saved, and we could count.

0:01:14.800 --> 0:01:17.400
<v Speaker 1>We do I don't know if it's lucky though, Chuck.

0:01:17.480 --> 0:01:19.040
<v Speaker 1>That's a lot of shows, dude, we should do something

0:01:19.040 --> 0:01:22.480
<v Speaker 1>special for three hundred. That's like, that's a lot of shows.

0:01:22.640 --> 0:01:26.200
<v Speaker 1>It is that makes me proud. Okay, well, do you

0:01:26.200 --> 0:01:28.440
<v Speaker 1>think maybe we could get some cake around here or something?

0:01:28.920 --> 0:01:33.560
<v Speaker 1>Shrimp cocktail? No, I'm allergic to shrimp now, remember I know,

0:01:33.880 --> 0:01:36.319
<v Speaker 1>but I still like to throw it out there. Actually,

0:01:36.400 --> 0:01:40.759
<v Speaker 1>I had a shrimp wanton the other day and nothing happened. Really,

0:01:41.280 --> 0:01:44.240
<v Speaker 1>I ate a wanton with shrimp and nothing happened. So

0:01:44.280 --> 0:01:46.240
<v Speaker 1>it's just like tiny little bits of shrimp. And I

0:01:46.280 --> 0:01:49.160
<v Speaker 1>don't know. Either that or I'm getting stronger. Maybe so

0:01:49.400 --> 0:01:54.960
<v Speaker 1>superhuman you might say, trans human speaking of human Yes, um, Chuck.

0:01:55.280 --> 0:01:58.920
<v Speaker 1>There is a recent study that came out in part

0:01:59.520 --> 0:02:03.760
<v Speaker 1>from one of our universities here in the city, Emory

0:02:04.200 --> 0:02:07.680
<v Speaker 1>right down the street, great school. There's been this problem

0:02:07.720 --> 0:02:11.920
<v Speaker 1>that's been plaguing researchers for a really long time, and

0:02:11.960 --> 0:02:15.120
<v Speaker 1>that is, at the beginning of the Lower Paleolithic period,

0:02:15.320 --> 0:02:19.320
<v Speaker 1>which is about two points seven million years ago, we

0:02:19.360 --> 0:02:25.240
<v Speaker 1>started using sharp rocks as bashing and cutting tools. So

0:02:25.280 --> 0:02:27.959
<v Speaker 1>we figured that out. Okay, you can take a rock

0:02:28.040 --> 0:02:32.280
<v Speaker 1>that's technology. That's not horse, that's technology. Yes, okay, you

0:02:32.320 --> 0:02:33.960
<v Speaker 1>can take this rock and you can use it to

0:02:34.000 --> 0:02:36.679
<v Speaker 1>open a coconut or the head of someone who's wrong.

0:02:36.760 --> 0:02:40.280
<v Speaker 1>Do you using an implement to complete attack? Well, specifically

0:02:40.480 --> 0:02:47.160
<v Speaker 1>sharp rocks? Okay? It took two million years the end

0:02:47.200 --> 0:02:50.800
<v Speaker 1>of the Lower Paleolithic period before we figured out that

0:02:50.840 --> 0:02:53.360
<v Speaker 1>we could actually attach to handles to these things. And

0:02:53.440 --> 0:02:58.000
<v Speaker 1>tournament how long it took? Yes, And this is baffled scientists, like,

0:02:58.120 --> 0:03:01.920
<v Speaker 1>how could it possibly have taken can two million years

0:03:01.919 --> 0:03:05.799
<v Speaker 1>to go from using your hand to attaching a stick?

0:03:06.600 --> 0:03:10.079
<v Speaker 1>You know, this doesn't make any sense. So, um, well

0:03:10.120 --> 0:03:14.239
<v Speaker 1>they were dumb back then. Well a dumb is close

0:03:14.320 --> 0:03:17.480
<v Speaker 1>to it. They would literally were lacking the region of

0:03:17.520 --> 0:03:22.120
<v Speaker 1>the brain needed. Apparently, according to this new study. Um,

0:03:22.240 --> 0:03:26.880
<v Speaker 1>they they basically, we developed a region in the right hemisphere,

0:03:26.919 --> 0:03:32.920
<v Speaker 1>specifically the supra marginal gyrus, which allowed us to go, hey,

0:03:33.080 --> 0:03:36.280
<v Speaker 1>let's put a handle on this. And after we did that,

0:03:36.360 --> 0:03:38.640
<v Speaker 1>we moved out of Africa and started colonizing the rest

0:03:38.680 --> 0:03:41.640
<v Speaker 1>of the world. So that's they've pinpointed the region of

0:03:41.640 --> 0:03:44.880
<v Speaker 1>the brain that is specific to innovation, too specific to

0:03:45.160 --> 0:03:49.480
<v Speaker 1>um stone toolmaking. Okay, I thought you meant innovation in general. No, like,

0:03:49.520 --> 0:03:51.680
<v Speaker 1>that's where your ideas come from. No, give me a

0:03:51.680 --> 0:03:53.920
<v Speaker 1>second old rent all time. Shoot, did I ruin it?

0:03:53.920 --> 0:03:57.400
<v Speaker 1>It's okay. Um. So we go from can't figure out

0:03:57.400 --> 0:03:59.560
<v Speaker 1>how to attach a handle to a sharp rock? Okay,

0:04:00.000 --> 0:04:02.480
<v Speaker 1>a million years we figured that out. We leave Africa

0:04:02.920 --> 0:04:05.160
<v Speaker 1>and we start colonizing the rest of the world, and

0:04:05.200 --> 0:04:07.720
<v Speaker 1>all of a sudden things start entering light speed, right,

0:04:08.320 --> 0:04:12.720
<v Speaker 1>And it seems like over the last couple hundred years,

0:04:13.120 --> 0:04:17.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, especially since the Industrial Revolution, our ability to innovate,

0:04:17.279 --> 0:04:20.360
<v Speaker 1>to grasp new ideas, to understand the world around us,

0:04:20.960 --> 0:04:24.640
<v Speaker 1>has just been hitting this hyper speed, and a lot

0:04:24.680 --> 0:04:28.640
<v Speaker 1>of people wonder if we've reached a point where all

0:04:28.680 --> 0:04:32.159
<v Speaker 1>the ideas, all the good ones at least, have already

0:04:32.200 --> 0:04:36.640
<v Speaker 1>been discovered, all the we understand how everything works, and

0:04:36.680 --> 0:04:39.839
<v Speaker 1>there's really just figuring out how to dot the eyes

0:04:39.920 --> 0:04:43.040
<v Speaker 1>and cross the teas right right. There was actually a

0:04:43.040 --> 0:04:48.159
<v Speaker 1>guy who famously said in guy named Charles Buell. He

0:04:48.240 --> 0:04:51.080
<v Speaker 1>was He was the commissioner of the Patents Office. That's

0:04:51.080 --> 0:04:54.280
<v Speaker 1>attributed to him, I should say, But he said something

0:04:54.320 --> 0:04:57.800
<v Speaker 1>like everything that can be invented has already been invented,

0:04:58.120 --> 0:05:00.359
<v Speaker 1>and he said this in a memo, basically like you

0:05:00.360 --> 0:05:03.039
<v Speaker 1>should go ahead and shut down the patent office. He

0:05:03.240 --> 0:05:09.720
<v Speaker 1>clearly had never considered the snuggy Josh or anything that's

0:05:09.720 --> 0:05:14.000
<v Speaker 1>been invented since. So here's what I'm gonna say. I'm

0:05:14.040 --> 0:05:16.839
<v Speaker 1>gonna go ahead and give you my summation early on. Okay,

0:05:17.560 --> 0:05:20.359
<v Speaker 1>is that I think people think at various times in

0:05:20.440 --> 0:05:24.960
<v Speaker 1>history that they've plateaued, and then I think things happen.

0:05:25.040 --> 0:05:28.120
<v Speaker 1>People come along innovators, and then they reach new heights

0:05:28.160 --> 0:05:31.600
<v Speaker 1>and they go, oh, well, we didn't know that, and

0:05:31.640 --> 0:05:34.680
<v Speaker 1>we there are new ideas, right. It's it's almost umb.

0:05:35.400 --> 0:05:40.599
<v Speaker 1>It almost displays a shameful lack of historic awareness to

0:05:40.800 --> 0:05:44.279
<v Speaker 1>say we've reached the end of all of our good ideas.

0:05:44.360 --> 0:05:46.960
<v Speaker 1>It's just silly. It's just ask him to be made

0:05:46.960 --> 0:05:49.720
<v Speaker 1>a fool of yeah, or for people to maybe people

0:05:49.760 --> 0:05:52.080
<v Speaker 1>do that on purpose, to go the innovators and to

0:05:52.120 --> 0:05:56.120
<v Speaker 1>say no, yeah, right, using reverse psychology exactly, that's how

0:05:56.160 --> 0:05:58.280
<v Speaker 1>innovation works. Yeah, you might as well just give up

0:05:58.320 --> 0:06:03.599
<v Speaker 1>reverse psychology drive innovation. There are people though, that say

0:06:03.680 --> 0:06:08.919
<v Speaker 1>that technological that real technological innovation has been stalled for

0:06:09.040 --> 0:06:13.839
<v Speaker 1>quite a while. Yes, after the nineties computer revolution. Everything

0:06:13.839 --> 0:06:17.160
<v Speaker 1>else since then has kind of been like, uh, packaging

0:06:17.160 --> 0:06:22.600
<v Speaker 1>it and better looking cases and sleeker designs, and it's

0:06:22.600 --> 0:06:26.040
<v Speaker 1>all like design oriented it is or marketing oriented marketing.

0:06:26.440 --> 0:06:31.760
<v Speaker 1>These these guys, Cedric Lagare and Eric Virdo, we're both

0:06:31.800 --> 0:06:36.160
<v Speaker 1>with scheme of business school. Um basically say, smartphones. Yes,

0:06:36.240 --> 0:06:39.680
<v Speaker 1>they seem incredibly new and cutting edge, but really they're

0:06:39.720 --> 0:06:44.440
<v Speaker 1>just the packaging of several already extant technologies into a

0:06:44.480 --> 0:06:48.480
<v Speaker 1>really sharp looking handheld device. But that's still a new idea.

0:06:48.920 --> 0:06:50.880
<v Speaker 1>I would argue it is still a new idea. But

0:06:50.920 --> 0:06:53.520
<v Speaker 1>I think what their point is is saying, like, but

0:06:53.560 --> 0:06:57.159
<v Speaker 1>before the late nineties and before the eighties, let's say,

0:06:57.160 --> 0:06:59.880
<v Speaker 1>with computers, but especially the tech boom of the tele

0:07:00.080 --> 0:07:03.640
<v Speaker 1>com boom of the late nineties, like this stuff wasn't around.

0:07:03.800 --> 0:07:07.360
<v Speaker 1>Like it's not true innovation. It's it's kind of repurposing, right,

0:07:07.960 --> 0:07:10.840
<v Speaker 1>And what you were saying, like the cosmetic changes to

0:07:10.880 --> 0:07:15.280
<v Speaker 1>a computer. Um. One of the reasons why they believe

0:07:15.360 --> 0:07:18.120
<v Speaker 1>that this is going on is because we've come to

0:07:18.160 --> 0:07:23.920
<v Speaker 1>a point in the computer revolution. I think, chuck, where um,

0:07:23.960 --> 0:07:28.080
<v Speaker 1>it's not you can still make tons of cash just

0:07:28.120 --> 0:07:31.560
<v Speaker 1>by changing the casing of a CPU. Yeah, there's like

0:07:31.560 --> 0:07:34.000
<v Speaker 1>no money in innovation basically, is what I got from

0:07:34.000 --> 0:07:38.040
<v Speaker 1>this one article is that innovation costs more than it's

0:07:38.080 --> 0:07:41.240
<v Speaker 1>worth when you can just repackage what you've got in

0:07:41.280 --> 0:07:45.640
<v Speaker 1>a sleeker design and people buy it up exactly. Um.

0:07:45.760 --> 0:07:49.440
<v Speaker 1>These two authors of this article, UM predict that we're

0:07:49.440 --> 0:07:53.200
<v Speaker 1>gonna have two trends that will drive innovation. I guess currently, right, Yes,

0:07:53.520 --> 0:07:57.880
<v Speaker 1>that consolidation where basically, like especially with I think they're

0:07:57.880 --> 0:08:01.560
<v Speaker 1>talking just about computers. Yeah, because they're saying the big

0:08:01.560 --> 0:08:04.160
<v Speaker 1>hardware firms are going to all consolidate all of the

0:08:04.400 --> 0:08:07.680
<v Speaker 1>smaller hardware firms to where they'll just basically be like

0:08:07.720 --> 0:08:11.280
<v Speaker 1>the big three or five, and that will leave it

0:08:11.320 --> 0:08:14.080
<v Speaker 1>to the software firms to compete and innovate. So we'll

0:08:14.080 --> 0:08:16.160
<v Speaker 1>see more innovation in the software side row than the

0:08:16.160 --> 0:08:19.600
<v Speaker 1>hardware side, right. And they're also saying that, um, the

0:08:19.640 --> 0:08:23.600
<v Speaker 1>green boom is going to drive innovation. That makes sense,

0:08:23.640 --> 0:08:28.400
<v Speaker 1>like coming up with sustainable packages. Are sustainable solutions? Yeah, totally.

0:08:29.320 --> 0:08:30.800
<v Speaker 1>One of the other things they pointed out thought was

0:08:30.840 --> 0:08:35.040
<v Speaker 1>interesting was the they said they said the tech uh

0:08:35.040 --> 0:08:38.360
<v Speaker 1>they call it the tech refresh cycle is too small

0:08:38.480 --> 0:08:41.959
<v Speaker 1>right now. So what's happening is they'll say, Um, you

0:08:42.080 --> 0:08:45.160
<v Speaker 1>like your CD, well you're gonna love the the Super

0:08:45.200 --> 0:08:48.120
<v Speaker 1>Audio CD or Blu ray. You like your DVD, You're

0:08:48.160 --> 0:08:50.520
<v Speaker 1>gonna love Blu Ray. But guess what's coming up after

0:08:50.520 --> 0:08:53.320
<v Speaker 1>blue ray. It's gonna be like Super Blue Ray. It's

0:08:53.320 --> 0:08:57.640
<v Speaker 1>happening so fast. People aren't abandoning their current systems. They're

0:08:57.679 --> 0:08:58.840
<v Speaker 1>just like, you know what, I'm gonna hold on because

0:08:58.840 --> 0:09:00.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to be the guy stuck with the

0:09:00.120 --> 0:09:04.040
<v Speaker 1>laser disc player in a couple of years. So all

0:09:04.080 --> 0:09:06.280
<v Speaker 1>of a sudden, the same thing happens. No one's buying it,

0:09:06.440 --> 0:09:08.520
<v Speaker 1>so it's not worth as much money, which means that

0:09:08.559 --> 0:09:11.200
<v Speaker 1>nobody's putting any effort into it and money into it.

0:09:11.280 --> 0:09:15.320
<v Speaker 1>So innovations. Right. And there's a guy um named Edmund

0:09:15.320 --> 0:09:19.640
<v Speaker 1>Phelps who's a professor of political economy at Columbia University, right,

0:09:20.160 --> 0:09:23.640
<v Speaker 1>and he's basically kind of saying the same thing. He's

0:09:23.679 --> 0:09:28.120
<v Speaker 1>saying that, um, there's not enough money going toward innovation.

0:09:28.200 --> 0:09:32.719
<v Speaker 1>But rather than the the onus being put on consumers

0:09:32.720 --> 0:09:35.560
<v Speaker 1>not buying blue rays out of fear of looking like

0:09:35.720 --> 0:09:41.360
<v Speaker 1>laser disc jerks, um, it's actually government and big business

0:09:41.440 --> 0:09:45.360
<v Speaker 1>that's not pouring money into small innovators. Yeah, he said

0:09:45.400 --> 0:09:47.600
<v Speaker 1>that's the innovation is the only thing not subsidized by

0:09:47.600 --> 0:09:50.520
<v Speaker 1>the United States government, which he says is actually attacks

0:09:51.760 --> 0:09:54.079
<v Speaker 1>in a way because it's not being subsidized. Sort of

0:09:54.080 --> 0:09:56.679
<v Speaker 1>a reach, you could definitely, Yeah, I think a lot

0:09:56.720 --> 0:09:59.560
<v Speaker 1>of these guy's points are a reach. But, um, what

0:09:59.679 --> 0:10:04.280
<v Speaker 1>he's suggesting is if the government isn't pouring money into

0:10:04.440 --> 0:10:08.960
<v Speaker 1>big business so that they can pour money into I

0:10:08.960 --> 0:10:12.880
<v Speaker 1>guess small venture firms. Um, these people who are in

0:10:12.880 --> 0:10:16.800
<v Speaker 1>their garages aren't going to take you know, risks, They're

0:10:16.800 --> 0:10:19.920
<v Speaker 1>not going to innovate. There's no incentive. Right. I disagree

0:10:19.960 --> 0:10:23.680
<v Speaker 1>with this. I dispute this because he's saying, like the

0:10:23.800 --> 0:10:26.320
<v Speaker 1>people who do work in their garages and you know,

0:10:26.440 --> 0:10:30.000
<v Speaker 1>are the Steve Jobs and Bill Gates in the seventies,

0:10:30.400 --> 0:10:33.760
<v Speaker 1>that they were driven by this lust for money. And

0:10:33.800 --> 0:10:36.160
<v Speaker 1>I think that that's wrong. I think that people innovate

0:10:36.760 --> 0:10:39.319
<v Speaker 1>first and foremost to get this idea out of their

0:10:39.320 --> 0:10:41.720
<v Speaker 1>head and birth into reality. Right. I'm glad you said

0:10:41.720 --> 0:10:44.760
<v Speaker 1>this because I completely agreed. Regardless of what you think

0:10:44.800 --> 0:10:48.280
<v Speaker 1>of the Facebook, Mark Zuckerberg didn't invent Facebook. To make

0:10:48.360 --> 0:10:51.160
<v Speaker 1>gobs of money. He invented to make real friends. Yeah,

0:10:51.200 --> 0:10:53.920
<v Speaker 1>to to innovate. And that's what that's my point that

0:10:54.000 --> 0:10:56.480
<v Speaker 1>you made is that these people in the garage, the

0:10:56.520 --> 0:10:59.520
<v Speaker 1>true innovators. They don't care if they have two pennies

0:10:59.559 --> 0:11:01.440
<v Speaker 1>to rub the other, right, They're still gonna be trying

0:11:01.480 --> 0:11:04.319
<v Speaker 1>to innovate and make a name for themselves and come

0:11:04.400 --> 0:11:06.520
<v Speaker 1>up with something awesome. Right. And now there are people

0:11:06.520 --> 0:11:09.480
<v Speaker 1>out there who are trying to innovate for you know,

0:11:09.520 --> 0:11:13.600
<v Speaker 1>the riches Snuggy. Sure, the guy who invented the snugg

0:11:13.640 --> 0:11:15.560
<v Speaker 1>he wasn't in his garage and just wanted to kind

0:11:15.559 --> 0:11:17.720
<v Speaker 1>of get this out or else I'm never gonna sleep. Yeah,

0:11:17.760 --> 0:11:19.920
<v Speaker 1>that's the people that are looking for the next get

0:11:20.040 --> 0:11:22.880
<v Speaker 1>rich quick thing. But I think you can also make

0:11:23.000 --> 0:11:27.520
<v Speaker 1>a point that, um, when you introduce money to innovation,

0:11:27.840 --> 0:11:32.720
<v Speaker 1>it leads to actual stagnation because when you introduce money,

0:11:32.760 --> 0:11:37.200
<v Speaker 1>there's now, um something to lose, and people are less

0:11:37.200 --> 0:11:39.440
<v Speaker 1>willing to take risks, and risk is one of the

0:11:39.520 --> 0:11:41.880
<v Speaker 1>driving The willingness to take risk is one of the

0:11:41.960 --> 0:12:08.720
<v Speaker 1>driving forces of innovation. You know, Yeah, stuff pholps had

0:12:08.720 --> 0:12:11.360
<v Speaker 1>a good idea, uh, and this will never happen, of course,

0:12:11.360 --> 0:12:14.360
<v Speaker 1>because it's a good idea to create the first national

0:12:14.400 --> 0:12:18.320
<v Speaker 1>Bank of Innovation all capitalized capitalized not all caps, but

0:12:18.400 --> 0:12:20.720
<v Speaker 1>each word is capitalized. He should do it all in

0:12:20.760 --> 0:12:24.840
<v Speaker 1>all caps with exclamation points. But basically, it would be

0:12:24.920 --> 0:12:29.360
<v Speaker 1>a bank that you could go and partner, you know,

0:12:29.440 --> 0:12:32.079
<v Speaker 1>as a startup company and partner with his bank for financing,

0:12:32.720 --> 0:12:35.240
<v Speaker 1>and you know, get I would guess some sort of

0:12:35.240 --> 0:12:38.400
<v Speaker 1>low interest loans to spur innovation. Right. That was a

0:12:38.400 --> 0:12:40.640
<v Speaker 1>great idea. So it is. It is a good idea,

0:12:40.720 --> 0:12:42.920
<v Speaker 1>and this does happen in the real world, and the

0:12:42.960 --> 0:12:47.800
<v Speaker 1>government does pour money into innovation. He's not exactly correct

0:12:47.840 --> 0:12:50.560
<v Speaker 1>in that sense. And I also kind of resented that

0:12:50.640 --> 0:12:56.000
<v Speaker 1>he placed big business in between you know, people in

0:12:56.040 --> 0:13:00.440
<v Speaker 1>their garage innovating and you know, government subsidies that we

0:13:00.520 --> 0:13:03.000
<v Speaker 1>have to have big business give them the money and

0:13:03.040 --> 0:13:04.960
<v Speaker 1>then skimalt off the top and give it to this

0:13:05.000 --> 0:13:07.520
<v Speaker 1>guy in the garage. He's drawing broad strokes here. For sure.

0:13:07.760 --> 0:13:10.600
<v Speaker 1>There are government programs, and we'll talk about one from

0:13:10.600 --> 0:13:13.920
<v Speaker 1>the National Institutes of Health where the government says, hey,

0:13:14.240 --> 0:13:18.400
<v Speaker 1>you have a really good idea, Mr or MS research scientists,

0:13:18.800 --> 0:13:21.320
<v Speaker 1>and we're gonna give you enough money to survive for

0:13:21.440 --> 0:13:24.240
<v Speaker 1>three years. Yeah, because the deal is you can always

0:13:24.280 --> 0:13:27.200
<v Speaker 1>get grants if you know, you put together a nice package.

0:13:27.200 --> 0:13:30.080
<v Speaker 1>But this program with the ni H what's it called

0:13:30.120 --> 0:13:34.840
<v Speaker 1>the New Innovator Award Director's New Innovator Award. This is

0:13:35.200 --> 0:13:38.480
<v Speaker 1>UH intended for people who have such a good idea,

0:13:39.200 --> 0:13:41.559
<v Speaker 1>but it's so new that they don't have the data

0:13:42.000 --> 0:13:44.080
<v Speaker 1>to write a grant where people would say, like, it

0:13:44.080 --> 0:13:46.280
<v Speaker 1>looks like you're onto something here, So they're sort of

0:13:46.280 --> 0:13:49.079
<v Speaker 1>throwing money at stuff that's like, you know, you're the

0:13:49.160 --> 0:13:51.240
<v Speaker 1>dude in the garage, and we believe in this idea,

0:13:51.480 --> 0:13:53.400
<v Speaker 1>go see what you can find out, right, and we're

0:13:53.480 --> 0:13:56.080
<v Speaker 1>keeping big business out of the way. Yes, But now

0:13:56.120 --> 0:13:58.080
<v Speaker 1>that and I H owns you for the rest of

0:13:58.080 --> 0:14:01.920
<v Speaker 1>your career probably. So so let's talk about UM. There's

0:14:01.960 --> 0:14:05.000
<v Speaker 1>three people at u c l A that got these

0:14:05.240 --> 0:14:07.400
<v Speaker 1>grants recently and they're up to some kind of some

0:14:07.559 --> 0:14:11.480
<v Speaker 1>interesting one could say, innovative stuff. Right. They have some

0:14:11.520 --> 0:14:15.319
<v Speaker 1>good ideas, hugely innovative about how to UM approach problems,

0:14:15.320 --> 0:14:20.160
<v Speaker 1>like the professor Dino di Carlo. All these I think

0:14:20.160 --> 0:14:22.520
<v Speaker 1>these people are younger than us by the way they

0:14:22.520 --> 0:14:26.120
<v Speaker 1>are UM. Dino de Carlo is working on ways to

0:14:26.720 --> 0:14:31.280
<v Speaker 1>basically apply heat or pressure or chemicals to very specific

0:14:31.320 --> 0:14:37.080
<v Speaker 1>sites in cells using nanoparticles and magnets, which is tough,

0:14:37.200 --> 0:14:40.360
<v Speaker 1>sounds like a winning idea to me. It is basically

0:14:40.360 --> 0:14:43.320
<v Speaker 1>one of the big problems we have with UM getting cells,

0:14:43.360 --> 0:14:47.920
<v Speaker 1>engineering cells to do specific things like UM, I don't know,

0:14:48.480 --> 0:14:51.800
<v Speaker 1>attack other cells for fun. Like if tell me that

0:14:51.800 --> 0:14:55.320
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't be like a big Christmas gift this year. If

0:14:55.320 --> 0:14:57.880
<v Speaker 1>you could like make cells fight with one another under

0:14:57.880 --> 0:15:03.520
<v Speaker 1>a microscope, UM, then what you have to basically try

0:15:03.600 --> 0:15:06.720
<v Speaker 1>to engineer the cell, you know, time after time after time,

0:15:06.720 --> 0:15:09.840
<v Speaker 1>and basically program it to do what you want it

0:15:09.920 --> 0:15:12.720
<v Speaker 1>to do. What de Carlo is coming up with is

0:15:12.760 --> 0:15:16.840
<v Speaker 1>a way to use UM very tiny magnets and even

0:15:16.880 --> 0:15:22.000
<v Speaker 1>tinier nano particles that can basically you my brain is

0:15:22.040 --> 0:15:25.880
<v Speaker 1>so small. When you move the magnet with a joystick,

0:15:26.560 --> 0:15:29.920
<v Speaker 1>it attracts the nano particles in a certain direction or whatever,

0:15:29.960 --> 0:15:32.560
<v Speaker 1>and you can have the nano particles apply heat or

0:15:32.560 --> 0:15:35.320
<v Speaker 1>pressure or a specific chemical to a specific site on

0:15:35.360 --> 0:15:38.280
<v Speaker 1>a cell and direct it to go attack another cell

0:15:38.600 --> 0:15:42.000
<v Speaker 1>for your pleasure. That's awesome, your amusement. So one point

0:15:42.040 --> 0:15:45.360
<v Speaker 1>five mill goes to uh de Carlo and for a

0:15:45.360 --> 0:15:47.600
<v Speaker 1>good reason. And for a good reason, the other winner,

0:15:47.600 --> 0:15:50.640
<v Speaker 1>one of the other winners was Hu Huang, And you

0:15:51.520 --> 0:15:55.880
<v Speaker 1>came up with, uh, basically, I'm gonna break this down easy.

0:15:56.120 --> 0:15:58.360
<v Speaker 1>Instead of saying, let me come up with a cure

0:15:58.400 --> 0:16:02.240
<v Speaker 1>for cancer, hu Wang said, let me come up with

0:16:02.280 --> 0:16:06.920
<v Speaker 1>a way to detect cancer so early, like way earlier

0:16:06.920 --> 0:16:09.360
<v Speaker 1>than we've ever detected it before, that we can stop

0:16:09.400 --> 0:16:12.760
<v Speaker 1>in this track, essentially curing cancer. And he's doing this,

0:16:13.040 --> 0:16:17.800
<v Speaker 1>actually I don't know. She's doing this um through uh

0:16:18.160 --> 0:16:23.680
<v Speaker 1>nano material called graphine that is just one atom thick. Yes,

0:16:23.800 --> 0:16:28.400
<v Speaker 1>graphing is like the super clearly not of this world material.

0:16:29.160 --> 0:16:31.880
<v Speaker 1>It's literally a carbon atom thick. That's it. So, but

0:16:32.040 --> 0:16:36.480
<v Speaker 1>it is a biological sensor to tell you when cells

0:16:36.520 --> 0:16:38.320
<v Speaker 1>aren't doing the things they should be doing. So did

0:16:38.320 --> 0:16:41.880
<v Speaker 1>you know a graham of this stuff's flattened covers a

0:16:41.880 --> 0:16:47.000
<v Speaker 1>football field? Am, Wow, it's ultra light. That is thin,

0:16:47.680 --> 0:16:50.960
<v Speaker 1>my friend, it's one atom thin. So one point five

0:16:50.960 --> 0:16:54.200
<v Speaker 1>mail to hu Wang, Right, well, did you explain how? Oh,

0:16:54.880 --> 0:16:56.760
<v Speaker 1>let me let me try my hand at this. So

0:16:56.800 --> 0:17:00.040
<v Speaker 1>basically what you do is you, um, you put a

0:17:00.080 --> 0:17:07.400
<v Speaker 1>graphine conductor transistor UM in a cell and when these

0:17:07.440 --> 0:17:10.960
<v Speaker 1>biological markers, right say his stones or something like that,

0:17:11.240 --> 0:17:15.120
<v Speaker 1>start to accumulate, they're attracted to the graphing. And these,

0:17:15.119 --> 0:17:17.680
<v Speaker 1>by the way these biological markers are, we found are

0:17:17.800 --> 0:17:21.320
<v Speaker 1>correlated with the growth of cancer, the origin of cancer.

0:17:21.359 --> 0:17:23.560
<v Speaker 1>That's where they're starting. UM. And when some of these

0:17:23.600 --> 0:17:26.800
<v Speaker 1>markers like are attracted to the graphing, they create an

0:17:26.800 --> 0:17:30.040
<v Speaker 1>electrical charge that we can sense. And the graphine is

0:17:30.080 --> 0:17:33.879
<v Speaker 1>so thin but so highly conductive that UM. With just

0:17:33.960 --> 0:17:37.560
<v Speaker 1>a couple of these molecules attaching to the graphing, we

0:17:37.560 --> 0:17:42.760
<v Speaker 1>would be able to detect it and be like who right,

0:17:43.040 --> 0:17:45.880
<v Speaker 1>We'd be like, oh crap, you have cancer, and we'd

0:17:45.920 --> 0:17:48.560
<v Speaker 1>cure it right then. Wow. Yeah, that's awesome. Yeah, And

0:17:48.560 --> 0:17:50.080
<v Speaker 1>that's a good way to approach a cure for cancer.

0:17:50.080 --> 0:17:51.800
<v Speaker 1>If you asked me, did I explain that? Well? I

0:17:51.840 --> 0:17:54.040
<v Speaker 1>think so, I think. And the last winner this year

0:17:54.119 --> 0:17:58.960
<v Speaker 1>was Jin Hi Lee and Jin is trying to debug

0:17:58.960 --> 0:18:01.760
<v Speaker 1>the brain circuit useing. You know, we have the Wonder Machine,

0:18:01.840 --> 0:18:03.679
<v Speaker 1>which is our favorite thing in the world. Fm r I,

0:18:04.520 --> 0:18:08.840
<v Speaker 1>which measures UH measures measures blood and oxygen levels in

0:18:08.840 --> 0:18:11.760
<v Speaker 1>the brain. So it tells you. These areas light up

0:18:11.760 --> 0:18:15.080
<v Speaker 1>there called bold signals blood and oxygen level dependent. They

0:18:15.160 --> 0:18:17.920
<v Speaker 1>light up to correspond a certain brain right, And we've

0:18:17.960 --> 0:18:21.760
<v Speaker 1>talked about this before, Like you're seeing that there's more

0:18:21.760 --> 0:18:24.159
<v Speaker 1>oxygen that's going to that part of the brain. So

0:18:24.240 --> 0:18:26.280
<v Speaker 1>we've assumed this is the basis of the f m

0:18:26.359 --> 0:18:29.840
<v Speaker 1>R I. If it has more oxygen being delivered to it,

0:18:29.920 --> 0:18:32.240
<v Speaker 1>that must mean that that region of the brain is active.

0:18:32.240 --> 0:18:35.720
<v Speaker 1>When you show somebody a picture of you know, their kid,

0:18:36.200 --> 0:18:39.399
<v Speaker 1>like being carried away into a van, that you know,

0:18:39.520 --> 0:18:43.040
<v Speaker 1>that's the fear region right there. Um, that doesn't really

0:18:43.080 --> 0:18:47.360
<v Speaker 1>say anything though, and it doesn't it doesn't implicate well

0:18:47.440 --> 0:18:50.680
<v Speaker 1>it's it's not it's showing Okay, well there's more oxygen

0:18:50.720 --> 0:18:53.679
<v Speaker 1>in this region, right. What this is, um, What what

0:18:53.800 --> 0:18:59.200
<v Speaker 1>genuine Lee is looking at is, um, how what specifically

0:18:59.520 --> 0:19:03.639
<v Speaker 1>on the new ronal level is being activated? Right? And

0:19:03.680 --> 0:19:06.359
<v Speaker 1>he's using opt to genetics. So it's going to be

0:19:06.400 --> 0:19:10.080
<v Speaker 1>called the o f m R I. And that's beyond

0:19:10.160 --> 0:19:12.720
<v Speaker 1>even what we thought was the Wonder machine. So this

0:19:12.760 --> 0:19:15.720
<v Speaker 1>is the super duper Wonder machine. Basically, he's using light

0:19:16.440 --> 0:19:20.760
<v Speaker 1>to allow genetically specified neurons to be activated. Right, do

0:19:20.840 --> 0:19:23.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, um are one of our listeners that Emory

0:19:23.640 --> 0:19:26.680
<v Speaker 1>has been harping on us doing one on opti genetics

0:19:26.680 --> 0:19:29.760
<v Speaker 1>for a while. We should get this person in here.

0:19:29.840 --> 0:19:31.840
<v Speaker 1>This is probably as closest forever going to come down

0:19:32.000 --> 0:19:35.719
<v Speaker 1>to do it. Uh. Well, it's a great idea though,

0:19:35.760 --> 0:19:40.280
<v Speaker 1>obviously because Jin Young Lee won one of the Innovator

0:19:40.320 --> 0:19:43.080
<v Speaker 1>Awards as well. Yes, and they give these out every year,

0:19:43.600 --> 0:19:45.880
<v Speaker 1>so they clearly believe that we're not out of good ideas.

0:19:47.040 --> 0:19:50.400
<v Speaker 1>No excellent point the n I h No, and we're

0:19:50.440 --> 0:19:53.400
<v Speaker 1>not out of good ideas. So yes, Chuck, we we

0:19:54.280 --> 0:19:56.679
<v Speaker 1>you pick those out? You found those guys all right,

0:19:56.760 --> 0:19:59.320
<v Speaker 1>Well I didn't personally find them. You're like, these guys

0:19:59.359 --> 0:20:02.800
<v Speaker 1>should get the that and I found them. Um. There

0:20:02.840 --> 0:20:06.800
<v Speaker 1>are very good ideas out there, right, But there is

0:20:07.000 --> 0:20:15.200
<v Speaker 1>a debate that's raging in science UM about whether these

0:20:15.240 --> 0:20:20.560
<v Speaker 1>ideas like optogenetics or um, you know, using graphine or

0:20:20.640 --> 0:20:26.679
<v Speaker 1>nanoparticles to cure detect cancer. Um are these variations on

0:20:26.720 --> 0:20:31.120
<v Speaker 1>a theme? Are they applying cosmetic changes to a computer

0:20:31.640 --> 0:20:36.440
<v Speaker 1>rather than really creating new parts to it? Right? And

0:20:36.800 --> 0:20:41.440
<v Speaker 1>basically the question is, um are are are there any

0:20:41.440 --> 0:20:44.560
<v Speaker 1>more major discoveries for us to make or are these

0:20:44.640 --> 0:20:48.560
<v Speaker 1>really just basically remember I've always said, like we we

0:20:48.640 --> 0:20:50.199
<v Speaker 1>have the pieces on the table, now we just have

0:20:50.240 --> 0:20:53.560
<v Speaker 1>to put it together. Is that the point that we're at, UM? Well,

0:20:53.560 --> 0:20:56.119
<v Speaker 1>as you said we were, I did, and then we

0:20:56.119 --> 0:20:59.040
<v Speaker 1>started researching this, and I'm like, I wonder, I think

0:20:59.080 --> 0:21:02.320
<v Speaker 1>I still do believe that UM. But within that though,

0:21:02.359 --> 0:21:04.880
<v Speaker 1>there's so much that it's to me a little bit

0:21:05.040 --> 0:21:09.399
<v Speaker 1>like splitting hairs. Well, but you're absolutely right, especially when

0:21:09.440 --> 0:21:12.880
<v Speaker 1>you throw in the word discovered, right, Discovery indicates something

0:21:12.920 --> 0:21:15.600
<v Speaker 1>that's already out there. We just figure it out or

0:21:15.680 --> 0:21:19.600
<v Speaker 1>stumble upon it. Sure, and an idea necessarily kind of

0:21:19.760 --> 0:21:23.200
<v Speaker 1>UM invention leads Yeah, it leads to an invention. It's

0:21:23.200 --> 0:21:48.960
<v Speaker 1>something we we've created. Like technology, let's talk about discovery, right,

0:21:48.960 --> 0:21:53.760
<v Speaker 1>we have a lot of UM problems that are still

0:21:53.840 --> 0:21:58.119
<v Speaker 1>facing us and how we understand the universe, like human consciousness.

0:21:58.640 --> 0:22:02.800
<v Speaker 1>How do brain cells create our understanding of the world,

0:22:02.800 --> 0:22:06.080
<v Speaker 1>like what we see as reality? How is that possible?

0:22:06.480 --> 0:22:09.800
<v Speaker 1>And can we figure everything out? Well, that's the big question.

0:22:10.000 --> 0:22:12.640
<v Speaker 1>Is there there's a UM there's Like I said, there's

0:22:12.640 --> 0:22:15.600
<v Speaker 1>a lot of debate about whether or not we'll ever

0:22:15.680 --> 0:22:18.639
<v Speaker 1>be able to figure everything out? Or if the human

0:22:18.680 --> 0:22:24.439
<v Speaker 1>brain just simply isn't um programmed to understand the world,

0:22:25.200 --> 0:22:28.760
<v Speaker 1>uh fully, you know will will. So there's a guy

0:22:28.800 --> 0:22:32.399
<v Speaker 1>who's a physicist. His name is um Russell Standard, and

0:22:32.440 --> 0:22:34.679
<v Speaker 1>he's written this book called The End of Discovery, And

0:22:34.720 --> 0:22:37.280
<v Speaker 1>basically he's saying he says that we're in quote a

0:22:37.320 --> 0:22:41.560
<v Speaker 1>transient age of human development, right where we're past the

0:22:41.560 --> 0:22:45.320
<v Speaker 1>point where we figured out you can put a handle

0:22:45.600 --> 0:22:48.360
<v Speaker 1>on a rock and make it an ax. But we're

0:22:49.359 --> 0:22:53.880
<v Speaker 1>right before the point where we can no longer make discoveries,

0:22:53.920 --> 0:22:57.199
<v Speaker 1>not because we've understood everything or figured everything out, but

0:22:57.240 --> 0:22:59.639
<v Speaker 1>because we've reached the limits of what is noble for

0:22:59.720 --> 0:23:03.480
<v Speaker 1>the mean brain. Sure, but even that look at that

0:23:03.480 --> 0:23:08.040
<v Speaker 1>that part of the right hemisphere that developed and allowed

0:23:08.119 --> 0:23:11.639
<v Speaker 1>us to put the acts handle on, Right, who's to

0:23:11.680 --> 0:23:14.439
<v Speaker 1>say that our brain won't, that we won't reach that

0:23:14.480 --> 0:23:17.600
<v Speaker 1>point where we can't know anything any longer or I

0:23:17.680 --> 0:23:21.119
<v Speaker 1>can't know everything? And then uh, we evolve even further

0:23:21.359 --> 0:23:23.919
<v Speaker 1>and all of a sudden we're even better at um

0:23:24.440 --> 0:23:28.840
<v Speaker 1>understanding our world. Right, But will we end up eventually

0:23:29.160 --> 0:23:33.880
<v Speaker 1>coming to a point where humans understand everything and there

0:23:34.000 --> 0:23:36.960
<v Speaker 1>is no more discovery to make I say no, because

0:23:37.119 --> 0:23:38.800
<v Speaker 1>he points out in here and this is I think

0:23:38.920 --> 0:23:42.199
<v Speaker 1>very valid from the Midnight century, the nineteenth century. I'm

0:23:42.240 --> 0:23:44.840
<v Speaker 1>sorry they said that. A lot of people in science said,

0:23:44.840 --> 0:23:47.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, we've kind of debunked religion and philosophy and

0:23:47.040 --> 0:23:50.640
<v Speaker 1>all these things with scientific discovery. But he points out,

0:23:50.680 --> 0:23:52.960
<v Speaker 1>and I agree that even if you figure out all

0:23:53.000 --> 0:23:56.400
<v Speaker 1>the problems of science, which will never happen, there's still

0:23:57.280 --> 0:24:01.720
<v Speaker 1>human life and consciousness in the subjectivity of what goes

0:24:01.720 --> 0:24:05.320
<v Speaker 1>on inside a person's head. You're never going to solve

0:24:05.600 --> 0:24:11.360
<v Speaker 1>that's not solvable, right, That's what I argue. That's subjectivism. Yeah,

0:24:11.680 --> 0:24:13.560
<v Speaker 1>before I think I believe in that there, well, they're

0:24:13.640 --> 0:24:17.399
<v Speaker 1>the whole, I guess I I agree with you. Um,

0:24:17.560 --> 0:24:21.120
<v Speaker 1>there's this aspect of the universe that Kant called the

0:24:21.240 --> 0:24:26.320
<v Speaker 1>new Amenon new Amenon. Okay, that was specifically tailored from

0:24:26.320 --> 0:24:29.720
<v Speaker 1>my thick time. But basically the new Aminon is the

0:24:29.760 --> 0:24:35.520
<v Speaker 1>thing itself right where um it has it's just the objective.

0:24:36.800 --> 0:24:41.159
<v Speaker 1>It's the objective universe, and we don't interact with that.

0:24:41.359 --> 0:24:45.040
<v Speaker 1>Everything we know and understand is subjective. And this is

0:24:45.040 --> 0:24:48.160
<v Speaker 1>where subjectivism is is based. That basically we can never

0:24:48.359 --> 0:24:53.000
<v Speaker 1>fully know anything or and we certainly won't ever know everything,

0:24:53.000 --> 0:24:55.720
<v Speaker 1>because one thing that will always be elusive is what

0:24:55.920 --> 0:24:58.960
<v Speaker 1>you see. My reality is different than your reality exactly,

0:24:59.200 --> 0:25:01.760
<v Speaker 1>and there's a different There's an extreme version of it

0:25:01.840 --> 0:25:08.600
<v Speaker 1>called so solipsism, right, yes, and solipsism is the the um,

0:25:08.760 --> 0:25:14.760
<v Speaker 1>this extreme version of subjectivism that basically says, um, we

0:25:15.440 --> 0:25:19.119
<v Speaker 1>everything is so subjective that I can't fully verify that

0:25:19.200 --> 0:25:22.000
<v Speaker 1>you exist. The only thing I know that exists is

0:25:22.040 --> 0:25:24.800
<v Speaker 1>my reality. But all of you may be made up.

0:25:24.840 --> 0:25:27.639
<v Speaker 1>I may be totally completely out of my mind and

0:25:27.680 --> 0:25:30.560
<v Speaker 1>actually in a padded cell right now, and none of

0:25:30.600 --> 0:25:34.040
<v Speaker 1>you are really real. Well that's sort of touches on

0:25:34.080 --> 0:25:39.120
<v Speaker 1>the whole quantum mechanics thing, right, don't you think. Please? Well,

0:25:39.160 --> 0:25:40.360
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I don't have a whole lot to say

0:25:40.359 --> 0:25:43.280
<v Speaker 1>about it because we've covered it, but it definitely is

0:25:43.600 --> 0:25:45.680
<v Speaker 1>along the same line. So you think, well, yeah, there's

0:25:45.720 --> 0:25:50.600
<v Speaker 1>a there's an interpretation of quantum mechanics that basically says, um,

0:25:50.640 --> 0:25:53.640
<v Speaker 1>everything we know about the universe we know through observation,

0:25:54.560 --> 0:25:57.400
<v Speaker 1>and but once you observe it, it it changes. That's part

0:25:57.400 --> 0:26:01.440
<v Speaker 1>of it. And when when we observe we we gain information, right,

0:26:01.640 --> 0:26:04.280
<v Speaker 1>but we can't observe everything at once. So all we

0:26:04.359 --> 0:26:08.120
<v Speaker 1>know exists in our reality for sure, is what we're observing.

0:26:08.440 --> 0:26:11.119
<v Speaker 1>So everything else, like what's going on out there in

0:26:11.160 --> 0:26:14.360
<v Speaker 1>the office right now, doesn't exist because we're not there

0:26:14.400 --> 0:26:18.359
<v Speaker 1>to observe it. Mind blowing. Once again, it is mind blowing.

0:26:18.359 --> 0:26:20.719
<v Speaker 1>But it also that we say all this not just

0:26:20.800 --> 0:26:26.119
<v Speaker 1>to you know, rock out to Floyd, but um, because

0:26:26.200 --> 0:26:28.199
<v Speaker 1>this is this is what science is up against. This

0:26:28.240 --> 0:26:31.399
<v Speaker 1>isn't just jibberish. This isn't just philosophical jibberish. As much

0:26:31.400 --> 0:26:34.080
<v Speaker 1>as science would like it to be, there is a

0:26:34.160 --> 0:26:38.840
<v Speaker 1>true problem with the fact that subjectivity, not objectivity, is

0:26:38.880 --> 0:26:41.280
<v Speaker 1>how we interact with our universe. Even though science is

0:26:41.320 --> 0:26:46.960
<v Speaker 1>based it's supposed to be based exclusively on objectivity. Right. Well, uh,

0:26:47.200 --> 0:26:50.240
<v Speaker 1>Stephen Hawking, you might have heard of him, and another

0:26:50.320 --> 0:26:55.119
<v Speaker 1>dude name Leonard load Loader. Now is how I'm going

0:26:55.200 --> 0:26:57.359
<v Speaker 1>to pronounce that there's a silent m in there somewhere.

0:26:57.720 --> 0:26:59.639
<v Speaker 1>They have a new book called The Grand Design, and

0:26:59.680 --> 0:27:03.040
<v Speaker 1>they are now saying that I think scientists used to

0:27:03.080 --> 0:27:04.720
<v Speaker 1>say we're going to find the theory of everything. Now

0:27:04.760 --> 0:27:06.680
<v Speaker 1>they're saying, you know what, We're probably not going to

0:27:06.760 --> 0:27:09.040
<v Speaker 1>find the theory of everything, but it's probably gonna be

0:27:09.240 --> 0:27:12.560
<v Speaker 1>more like what they call, quote a family of interconnected theories,

0:27:13.520 --> 0:27:17.040
<v Speaker 1>which describe your reality under very specific conditions. And this

0:27:17.119 --> 0:27:19.520
<v Speaker 1>is kind of huge for Stephen Hawking because he's long

0:27:19.600 --> 0:27:22.160
<v Speaker 1>been a big supporter of the theory of everything, which

0:27:22.320 --> 0:27:27.359
<v Speaker 1>takes the standard model of physics, includes gravity, which has

0:27:27.400 --> 0:27:31.240
<v Speaker 1>always been elusive, and then marries it with quantum mechanics

0:27:31.680 --> 0:27:33.959
<v Speaker 1>to explain everything. That's the theory of everything. It's one

0:27:34.040 --> 0:27:37.960
<v Speaker 1>theory that explains everything, right, Like that surfer guy exactly,

0:27:38.320 --> 0:27:41.280
<v Speaker 1>Garrett Leacy. I think it's a long time ago it was,

0:27:41.400 --> 0:27:43.800
<v Speaker 1>and you know it's going to be years before he's

0:27:43.920 --> 0:27:48.160
<v Speaker 1>shown to be correct or incorrect. But Hawking saying it's

0:27:48.160 --> 0:27:49.960
<v Speaker 1>probably not going to be the case. There's going to

0:27:50.040 --> 0:27:54.400
<v Speaker 1>there's too many different variables that don't fit together. Right.

0:27:54.640 --> 0:27:57.000
<v Speaker 1>But the thing that really scares a physicist, that will

0:27:57.040 --> 0:28:02.720
<v Speaker 1>scare any physicist is this sports. Those are those models

0:28:02.760 --> 0:28:06.280
<v Speaker 1>that we've come up with. Are they how the universe

0:28:06.280 --> 0:28:09.679
<v Speaker 1>actually works or how we look at the universe and

0:28:09.760 --> 0:28:11.560
<v Speaker 1>see how it works. You see what I'm saying. There's

0:28:11.600 --> 0:28:14.600
<v Speaker 1>that subjectivism again. It can't be whipped well. And all

0:28:14.640 --> 0:28:16.400
<v Speaker 1>the things that we've said over the years that we

0:28:16.440 --> 0:28:21.000
<v Speaker 1>have formed to be true, are those even true? Or

0:28:21.040 --> 0:28:24.639
<v Speaker 1>are or the conclusions we're reaching just based on years

0:28:24.680 --> 0:28:28.200
<v Speaker 1>of thought compiled that may not have been true to

0:28:28.240 --> 0:28:31.640
<v Speaker 1>begin with. So I mean like we arrive at reality

0:28:31.680 --> 0:28:34.920
<v Speaker 1>by consensus. Yeah, but is that consensus was that even

0:28:35.040 --> 0:28:37.880
<v Speaker 1>accurate along the way? Not necessarily. It's been showing time

0:28:37.880 --> 0:28:41.280
<v Speaker 1>and time again that it's hasn't been accurate through these

0:28:41.400 --> 0:28:46.360
<v Speaker 1>um the Five Revolutions, as VM Ramashchandra and puts them.

0:28:46.360 --> 0:28:49.160
<v Speaker 1>Bernicus Copernicus was the first one who said that Earth

0:28:49.200 --> 0:28:52.720
<v Speaker 1>is not the center of the universe. Darwinism dark very good.

0:28:52.840 --> 0:28:55.520
<v Speaker 1>Chuck Darwin's says like, hey, we're actually just a bunch

0:28:55.520 --> 0:29:00.520
<v Speaker 1>of apes DNA Freud Freud Freud saying like we we

0:29:00.600 --> 0:29:03.720
<v Speaker 1>actually are driven by desires that we can't control and

0:29:03.760 --> 0:29:07.920
<v Speaker 1>aren't really aware of d NA, which is saying I

0:29:07.960 --> 0:29:12.000
<v Speaker 1>think James Watson, who found DNA along with Francis Crick,

0:29:12.080 --> 0:29:15.520
<v Speaker 1>said quote, there are only molecules, everything else is sociologist.

0:29:15.520 --> 0:29:17.200
<v Speaker 1>I love that quote, man, It's one of my favorites.

0:29:17.480 --> 0:29:21.040
<v Speaker 1>And then um, the Fifth Revolution, the neuroscience revolution, that

0:29:21.120 --> 0:29:25.280
<v Speaker 1>we're all everything, are all of our understanding of movements

0:29:25.280 --> 0:29:31.000
<v Speaker 1>and and experiences are nothing but um neuronal transmissions electrochemical impulses. Right,

0:29:31.040 --> 0:29:34.080
<v Speaker 1>so there's not even sociology that even is just based

0:29:34.120 --> 0:29:37.080
<v Speaker 1>on firing neurons. Right, That's that's where we're at right now.

0:29:37.120 --> 0:29:40.200
<v Speaker 1>That's why I say, I think we have everything on

0:29:40.200 --> 0:29:42.959
<v Speaker 1>the table, just haven't put it together. But it's entirely

0:29:43.000 --> 0:29:47.960
<v Speaker 1>possible historically speaking to say, well we thought that before

0:29:48.600 --> 0:29:51.880
<v Speaker 1>and we didn't. And what revolution is next? Will that?

0:29:52.160 --> 0:29:57.520
<v Speaker 1>Will the next revolution get us over the wall of subjectivism?

0:29:57.640 --> 0:29:59.920
<v Speaker 1>Or will that be the wall that we always run into?

0:30:01.040 --> 0:30:02.960
<v Speaker 1>This is a good one, and well I was worried

0:30:02.960 --> 0:30:05.200
<v Speaker 1>about this one. It came out pretty good in it.

0:30:05.240 --> 0:30:07.080
<v Speaker 1>I think, so, yeah, don't you like it when we

0:30:07.640 --> 0:30:09.000
<v Speaker 1>like pat ourselves in the back of the end of

0:30:09.040 --> 0:30:11.800
<v Speaker 1>the show. I think this one deserves it. Man. Well,

0:30:11.960 --> 0:30:15.440
<v Speaker 1>so we're from blue Rays to Turns and at the

0:30:15.520 --> 0:30:18.440
<v Speaker 1>end of the day, Josh and Chuck say, we are

0:30:18.480 --> 0:30:21.200
<v Speaker 1>not out of new ideas. Canna speak for you, go ahead,

0:30:21.560 --> 0:30:23.520
<v Speaker 1>We are not out of new ideas. And just when

0:30:23.560 --> 0:30:24.920
<v Speaker 1>you think you're out of new ideas, just when you

0:30:24.960 --> 0:30:29.520
<v Speaker 1>think of plateaued comes up. You wang along to say no, no, no, no,

0:30:29.960 --> 0:30:32.280
<v Speaker 1>there are new ideas, and here's one. Not give me

0:30:32.320 --> 0:30:35.880
<v Speaker 1>the cash exactly. If you want to learn more about

0:30:35.960 --> 0:30:39.960
<v Speaker 1>innovation and new ideas, we have tons of stuff all

0:30:39.960 --> 0:30:44.000
<v Speaker 1>over the site. Just type in innovation, type in discovery.

0:30:44.000 --> 0:30:47.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure that'll bring up a ton of stuff. Um,

0:30:47.280 --> 0:30:50.760
<v Speaker 1>and type in neurons. That will bring up some pretty

0:30:50.760 --> 0:30:54.480
<v Speaker 1>cool stuff too. Agreed. Uh. You can type all those

0:30:54.520 --> 0:30:57.760
<v Speaker 1>words into the handy search bar at how stuff works

0:30:57.800 --> 0:31:05.040
<v Speaker 1>dot com, which means it's time for a sner mail. Yes, Josh,

0:31:05.040 --> 0:31:09.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna follow this very heavy podcast with the opposite

0:31:09.800 --> 0:31:12.560
<v Speaker 1>an email for him. Okay, this is from our thirteen

0:31:12.600 --> 0:31:16.600
<v Speaker 1>year old fan Peyton in California. Well, hello, I'm sending

0:31:16.680 --> 0:31:18.840
<v Speaker 1>this from my eye touch while laying in bed. I'm

0:31:18.880 --> 0:31:22.280
<v Speaker 1>supposed to be asleep, so anyway, I just started listening

0:31:22.320 --> 0:31:24.880
<v Speaker 1>to your podcast after my friend Claire. Yes, that's the

0:31:24.920 --> 0:31:28.200
<v Speaker 1>Claire from California whose email you read on the air,

0:31:28.240 --> 0:31:31.280
<v Speaker 1>who thinks Jerry looks like Tina f A. Uh. Claire

0:31:31.400 --> 0:31:33.720
<v Speaker 1>is his his Peyton's friend. So she said, oh, you

0:31:33.760 --> 0:31:37.040
<v Speaker 1>got on the year. So I'm gonna start listening to you. Um, actually,

0:31:37.080 --> 0:31:39.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm saying Peyton is a girl. Peyton maybe a boy?

0:31:39.000 --> 0:31:43.720
<v Speaker 1>You never know? Oh? Really, yeah, it's in dragyn this right, Yeah,

0:31:44.640 --> 0:31:49.080
<v Speaker 1>ambivalent at least. Uh. Claire posted on her Facebook page

0:31:49.080 --> 0:31:51.080
<v Speaker 1>that I said, listen to the most recent podcast because

0:31:51.080 --> 0:31:53.360
<v Speaker 1>you guys read her letter or something. I thought it

0:31:53.400 --> 0:31:56.320
<v Speaker 1>was so cool. Claire and I are really good friends. Anyways,

0:31:56.400 --> 0:31:59.440
<v Speaker 1>I love this podcast. Gosh, I feel so boring because

0:31:59.440 --> 0:32:02.760
<v Speaker 1>I keep saying podcast. Is there like another word for that?

0:32:04.320 --> 0:32:08.520
<v Speaker 1>Jared laughed at that. Anyways, I definitely she does that

0:32:08.600 --> 0:32:10.120
<v Speaker 1>thing like the kids do now where they put like

0:32:10.160 --> 0:32:11.840
<v Speaker 1>eight s at the end of a word. Have you

0:32:11.880 --> 0:32:13.880
<v Speaker 1>seen that? Yeah? I don't get that. I don't either.

0:32:13.920 --> 0:32:16.120
<v Speaker 1>We're getting old, I guess so. I most definitely enjoyed

0:32:16.120 --> 0:32:18.920
<v Speaker 1>the podcast on the OCTOPI and stuff. I thought it

0:32:19.000 --> 0:32:21.920
<v Speaker 1>was OCTOPI. I thought it was informational and funny. By

0:32:21.920 --> 0:32:24.320
<v Speaker 1>the way, this email doesn't make any sense. It's because

0:32:24.320 --> 0:32:27.360
<v Speaker 1>my eye touch is dumb and auto correct words that

0:32:27.360 --> 0:32:32.680
<v Speaker 1>I've already spelled, right, ERG moving on your iPhone does

0:32:32.720 --> 0:32:35.719
<v Speaker 1>that too? And mind does that? What's this? An email

0:32:35.840 --> 0:32:37.720
<v Speaker 1>written with one of those pens that has like four

0:32:37.720 --> 0:32:40.480
<v Speaker 1>different color inc you can select rons, but it feels

0:32:40.520 --> 0:32:42.480
<v Speaker 1>like But the reason I brought that up is I

0:32:42.520 --> 0:32:46.200
<v Speaker 1>have an idea to start a website called my Ipop

0:32:46.280 --> 0:32:50.840
<v Speaker 1>my iPhone spelled what dot com because you ever look

0:32:50.880 --> 0:32:52.840
<v Speaker 1>at some of them, you sinned and you're like, can

0:32:52.880 --> 0:32:55.080
<v Speaker 1>you please make sure you take the sofa out of

0:32:55.120 --> 0:32:58.920
<v Speaker 1>the oven when you get home when you meant to say, um, sturgeon,

0:33:00.520 --> 0:33:04.520
<v Speaker 1>let's say, surgeon is so far I would surgeon, Okay,

0:33:04.560 --> 0:33:06.520
<v Speaker 1>take the surgeon out of the oven? Which is I

0:33:06.520 --> 0:33:08.120
<v Speaker 1>think so much better. I wish you would have planned this.

0:33:08.120 --> 0:33:10.320
<v Speaker 1>It's okay, buddy. Anyway, it can make for a lot

0:33:10.360 --> 0:33:14.000
<v Speaker 1>of fun. So that's my new idea. Okay, And that's um.

0:33:14.120 --> 0:33:17.200
<v Speaker 1>Lots of love from Peyton age thirteen and Cali. Thanks

0:33:17.200 --> 0:33:19.880
<v Speaker 1>a lot, Peyton, age thirteen and Callie boy or girl.

0:33:19.920 --> 0:33:22.239
<v Speaker 1>We're not exactly sure, but either way, we appreciate you

0:33:22.280 --> 0:33:24.360
<v Speaker 1>taking the time to write in. And if you have

0:33:24.480 --> 0:33:27.440
<v Speaker 1>a movie that Chuck and I have not seen, you

0:33:27.480 --> 0:33:29.520
<v Speaker 1>assume we haven't seen that you think we should see,

0:33:29.640 --> 0:33:33.000
<v Speaker 1>best movie, best overlooked movie of all time. We're always

0:33:33.040 --> 0:33:36.480
<v Speaker 1>looking for good suggestions. Wrap it up in an email

0:33:36.520 --> 0:33:40.200
<v Speaker 1>and send it to Stuff podcast at how stuff works

0:33:40.240 --> 0:33:53.320
<v Speaker 1>dot com. Stuff you Should Know is a production of

0:33:53.360 --> 0:33:56.120
<v Speaker 1>iHeart Radio's How Stuff Works. For more podcasts for my

0:33:56.160 --> 0:33:58.840
<v Speaker 1>heart Radio is at the iHeart Radio app, Apple Podcasts,

0:33:58.880 --> 0:34:00.600
<v Speaker 1>or wherever you listen to your favorite shows.