WEBVTT - Bite Marks

0:00:03.720 --> 0:00:05.920
<v Speaker 1>If you're gonna place your left hand on the Bible

0:00:06.040 --> 0:00:09.440
<v Speaker 1>and raise your right hand, and please repeat after me,

0:00:09.880 --> 0:00:13.920
<v Speaker 1>I do solemnly swear you haven't titled action. Find the

0:00:13.960 --> 0:00:17.320
<v Speaker 1>defendant guilty of the prime. It makes no sense, it

0:00:17.320 --> 0:00:21.119
<v Speaker 1>doesn't fit. If it doesn't fit, you must equit. We

0:00:21.160 --> 0:00:23.680
<v Speaker 1>all took the same of of office. We're all bound

0:00:23.800 --> 0:00:26.960
<v Speaker 1>by that common commitment to support and defend the Constitution,

0:00:27.240 --> 0:00:29.840
<v Speaker 1>to bear true faith in allegiance to the same that

0:00:29.960 --> 0:00:32.680
<v Speaker 1>you faithfully discharge the duties of our office. Do you

0:00:32.720 --> 0:00:36.040
<v Speaker 1>solemnly swear or affirm that the testimony you're about to

0:00:36.080 --> 0:00:38.480
<v Speaker 1>give will be the truth, the whole truth, and nothing

0:00:38.520 --> 0:00:42.120
<v Speaker 1>but the truth. From Tenderfoot TV and I Heart Radio,

0:00:42.680 --> 0:00:54.160
<v Speaker 1>this is sworn. I'm your host, Philip Holloway. You know

0:00:54.240 --> 0:00:58.520
<v Speaker 1>the term the c S I fact he changed everything.

0:01:00.800 --> 0:01:05.240
<v Speaker 1>Everybody believed that what you saw on TV was for real.

0:01:06.920 --> 0:01:08.960
<v Speaker 1>You don't use forty two lasers of the crime scene

0:01:09.000 --> 0:01:13.600
<v Speaker 1>leasures cost about five. So that was preposterous, right, and

0:01:13.680 --> 0:01:19.000
<v Speaker 1>nothing gets done today n c S. Another show, My

0:01:19.040 --> 0:01:23.360
<v Speaker 1>wife watches out that a crow pecks out someone's hypohol

0:01:24.319 --> 0:01:27.800
<v Speaker 1>and then carries it off. And when they found the eyeball.

0:01:28.440 --> 0:01:35.120
<v Speaker 1>They found a fingerprint on the eyeball. Preposterous at best.

0:01:36.040 --> 0:01:39.960
<v Speaker 1>It's not like that. See, they get lost in the

0:01:40.040 --> 0:01:43.840
<v Speaker 1>fact that it was just TV show. They started having

0:01:43.880 --> 0:01:47.280
<v Speaker 1>to explain to the juries, do you believe things that

0:01:47.440 --> 0:01:51.320
<v Speaker 1>you see? Oh yeah, if it's on TV, it's it's no,

0:01:52.200 --> 0:02:05.440
<v Speaker 1>that's not how it is. M That was Chris Robinson,

0:02:05.680 --> 0:02:08.600
<v Speaker 1>a forensic consultant I've worked with on many of my cases.

0:02:09.360 --> 0:02:11.519
<v Speaker 1>In this episode, we're going to look at that c

0:02:11.760 --> 0:02:14.240
<v Speaker 1>s I effect he was talking about, and we're going

0:02:14.280 --> 0:02:16.320
<v Speaker 1>to hear the story of another man who was locked

0:02:16.400 --> 0:02:19.799
<v Speaker 1>up for twenty three years in a case that involved

0:02:19.880 --> 0:02:25.600
<v Speaker 1>police corruption and junk science. Before we hear about Bill,

0:02:25.720 --> 0:02:28.880
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to talk with my colleague, Ashley Merchant. She's

0:02:28.919 --> 0:02:31.200
<v Speaker 1>a lawyer I've worked with many times in the past,

0:02:31.720 --> 0:02:34.520
<v Speaker 1>and I know that she's had to educate herself on

0:02:34.639 --> 0:02:39.040
<v Speaker 1>forensic science, particularly bad forensic science, and how it's used

0:02:39.040 --> 0:02:47.280
<v Speaker 1>in our legal system. Junk science is very difficult to

0:02:47.320 --> 0:02:50.120
<v Speaker 1>deal with when the government offers something and they put

0:02:50.160 --> 0:02:52.520
<v Speaker 1>a fancy name on it, like the you know, FBI

0:02:52.760 --> 0:02:55.120
<v Speaker 1>or the crime Lab, and you know, they bring in

0:02:55.160 --> 0:02:58.919
<v Speaker 1>all these these fancy acronyms and stuff juries just eat

0:02:58.960 --> 0:03:02.000
<v Speaker 1>it up hook line and saying are a lot of

0:03:02.040 --> 0:03:05.920
<v Speaker 1>defense attorneys aren't very good at shedding light on the

0:03:06.000 --> 0:03:09.680
<v Speaker 1>junkiness factor of it, because you know, we're lawyers. Like

0:03:09.919 --> 0:03:12.600
<v Speaker 1>I've never shot a gun. You know, I don't understand ballistics,

0:03:12.600 --> 0:03:13.840
<v Speaker 1>but I had to go learn it. How to go

0:03:13.960 --> 0:03:16.440
<v Speaker 1>learn blood spatter, how to go learn DNA, how to

0:03:16.520 --> 0:03:20.639
<v Speaker 1>learn about fingerprints. I had a case probably fifteen years

0:03:20.639 --> 0:03:24.280
<v Speaker 1>ago with a handwriting expert, and then you know, a

0:03:24.320 --> 0:03:27.480
<v Speaker 1>couple of years later, boom, handwriting experts are it's junk

0:03:27.480 --> 0:03:30.800
<v Speaker 1>science and it's not admissible. We have this evidence that

0:03:30.840 --> 0:03:33.880
<v Speaker 1>the state presents handwriting for example, blood spatter for example,

0:03:34.200 --> 0:03:36.840
<v Speaker 1>and we're arguing, as defense lawyers, this is crazy. This

0:03:36.920 --> 0:03:39.280
<v Speaker 1>is a junk you know. And then finally, years down

0:03:39.280 --> 0:03:43.240
<v Speaker 1>the road, you get exoneration and the exonerations are linked

0:03:43.280 --> 0:03:46.800
<v Speaker 1>to this junk science, and finally, retrospectively the government saying, oh,

0:03:46.880 --> 0:03:50.640
<v Speaker 1>you know what, you're right, that handwriting stuff was, that

0:03:50.720 --> 0:03:55.040
<v Speaker 1>was crazy, but the people are still in jail. As

0:03:55.040 --> 0:03:58.760
<v Speaker 1>defense lawyers, I think we don't challenge it enough. I

0:03:58.800 --> 0:04:02.440
<v Speaker 1>think that we don't question already enough because it's science

0:04:02.920 --> 0:04:05.680
<v Speaker 1>we believe that the government is doing the right thing

0:04:05.680 --> 0:04:09.000
<v Speaker 1>and doing their job, which to me as a defense lawyer,

0:04:09.120 --> 0:04:12.000
<v Speaker 1>scary because if I don't question the blood spatter, why

0:04:12.000 --> 0:04:13.920
<v Speaker 1>would I expect the jury to question the bloods better.

0:04:14.280 --> 0:04:16.600
<v Speaker 1>So you see a lot of times in trials where

0:04:16.600 --> 0:04:19.040
<v Speaker 1>the defense lawyer has no question for the blood spatter expert.

0:04:19.600 --> 0:04:22.279
<v Speaker 1>It's like they just rubber stamp this stuff just because

0:04:22.279 --> 0:04:24.600
<v Speaker 1>some scientists in a lab says that it is. They

0:04:24.600 --> 0:04:27.680
<v Speaker 1>don't really question it, and juries don't question it, and

0:04:27.720 --> 0:04:31.799
<v Speaker 1>defense lawyers don't question it. And I understand why because

0:04:31.800 --> 0:04:35.440
<v Speaker 1>we're Hamstrong. We're not scientists. We're not given funding for experts.

0:04:35.960 --> 0:04:37.720
<v Speaker 1>I mean, half the time we're still trying to get paid,

0:04:37.760 --> 0:04:40.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, let alone asking our clients family for ten

0:04:40.320 --> 0:04:42.159
<v Speaker 1>grand for an expert to fly in who's got a

0:04:42.160 --> 0:04:44.760
<v Speaker 1>pH d and d n A. They barely have the

0:04:44.800 --> 0:04:48.520
<v Speaker 1>money for their defense. We don't challenge that evidence, but

0:04:48.680 --> 0:04:54.440
<v Speaker 1>I think we need to. Jurors want actual physical touch evidence,

0:04:54.960 --> 0:04:56.679
<v Speaker 1>evidence they can put their hands on, they can see.

0:04:57.600 --> 0:05:00.240
<v Speaker 1>You see a huge pull for the prosecution and to

0:05:00.400 --> 0:05:02.920
<v Speaker 1>get this type of science, you know, junk science, whatever

0:05:02.960 --> 0:05:06.920
<v Speaker 1>it is, to try and admit that it's fallible because

0:05:07.120 --> 0:05:11.359
<v Speaker 1>it's a scientist determining if it's a fingerprint match, you know,

0:05:11.400 --> 0:05:14.200
<v Speaker 1>where the next scientists might not determine it's a fingerprint match.

0:05:16.400 --> 0:05:18.880
<v Speaker 1>We do have standards. We do have certain standards that

0:05:18.920 --> 0:05:21.840
<v Speaker 1>have to be met. We have Fry and Dowberd. Those

0:05:21.880 --> 0:05:25.320
<v Speaker 1>are the standards in federal court. Anytime you're gonna admit

0:05:25.320 --> 0:05:27.440
<v Speaker 1>a certain type of evidence, it's got to meet a

0:05:27.440 --> 0:05:32.920
<v Speaker 1>certain level of scientific or reliability. One of those things

0:05:32.920 --> 0:05:35.400
<v Speaker 1>that it has to be subject to peer review. Other

0:05:35.440 --> 0:05:37.680
<v Speaker 1>scientists have to be able to go and check your work.

0:05:38.040 --> 0:05:41.839
<v Speaker 1>That's a huge one. In state court in Georgia, for example,

0:05:41.880 --> 0:05:44.719
<v Speaker 1>we have a standard called Harper standard, which is lower.

0:05:45.760 --> 0:05:48.520
<v Speaker 1>It's ironic to me and I always use my husband

0:05:48.560 --> 0:05:50.680
<v Speaker 1>as an example. He was a civil litigator before he

0:05:50.760 --> 0:05:52.919
<v Speaker 1>joined my law firm, and now he does criminal difference

0:05:52.920 --> 0:05:55.360
<v Speaker 1>with me. He did, you know, a lot of these

0:05:55.400 --> 0:05:58.120
<v Speaker 1>massive litigations that had all these fancy scientists and things.

0:05:58.160 --> 0:05:59.919
<v Speaker 1>He did as Best Jos litigation, a lot of it.

0:06:00.839 --> 0:06:03.640
<v Speaker 1>When he came on as criminal defense, He's like, when

0:06:03.920 --> 0:06:09.280
<v Speaker 1>you're taking someone's life, it's a lower standard for admitting evidence.

0:06:10.120 --> 0:06:12.599
<v Speaker 1>It's harder to get evidence in there's higher standard of

0:06:12.600 --> 0:06:15.200
<v Speaker 1>reliability to get evidence in a civil case we're you're

0:06:15.200 --> 0:06:17.360
<v Speaker 1>shooting over money than it is in a criminal case

0:06:17.360 --> 0:06:22.320
<v Speaker 1>where someone can go to jail. It's insane people, I mean,

0:06:22.360 --> 0:06:24.600
<v Speaker 1>they just they want guilty people to be locked up.

0:06:25.120 --> 0:06:28.080
<v Speaker 1>People are scared of letting guilty people out. And a

0:06:28.120 --> 0:06:31.279
<v Speaker 1>lot of times the state argues, need, we can't meet

0:06:31.360 --> 0:06:35.200
<v Speaker 1>the Fried standard, it can't be verified, but we need

0:06:35.279 --> 0:06:36.839
<v Speaker 1>this evidence. I mean, I hear that argument all the

0:06:36.839 --> 0:06:38.600
<v Speaker 1>time from the state, but I really need this evidence,

0:06:38.680 --> 0:06:41.080
<v Speaker 1>so the judge lets it in. I think that you

0:06:41.120 --> 0:06:44.080
<v Speaker 1>should have a higher standard when you're dealing with people's

0:06:44.120 --> 0:06:47.760
<v Speaker 1>lives first, as you're dealing with people's money. Just makes

0:06:47.800 --> 0:06:52.600
<v Speaker 1>common sense to me. One man who had that c

0:06:52.839 --> 0:06:56.080
<v Speaker 1>s I effect work against him is our next Exonoye

0:06:56.279 --> 0:07:02.960
<v Speaker 1>Bill Richards. Our system in California here is probably one

0:07:02.960 --> 0:07:06.320
<v Speaker 1>of the biggest prison systems in the world. We have

0:07:06.400 --> 0:07:10.600
<v Speaker 1>more people in prison here than most countries. It's hell

0:07:10.680 --> 0:07:15.200
<v Speaker 1>on every level, especially for somebody who live normal life

0:07:15.280 --> 0:07:18.680
<v Speaker 1>and working man. You know, honest person. I mean, my

0:07:18.800 --> 0:07:21.720
<v Speaker 1>criminal career consisted of a couple of traffic tickets spread

0:07:21.720 --> 0:07:25.440
<v Speaker 1>over twenty years of speeding on the freeway. But everything

0:07:25.520 --> 0:07:29.320
<v Speaker 1>is terrible, and Menico was terrible. Now in my late

0:07:29.440 --> 0:07:32.239
<v Speaker 1>sixties with advanced cancer because they didn't treat me in prison,

0:07:33.320 --> 0:07:35.440
<v Speaker 1>had years I knew I had it, didn't even tell me,

0:07:35.520 --> 0:07:38.640
<v Speaker 1>and now it's too late. I mean, I can't think

0:07:38.640 --> 0:07:40.680
<v Speaker 1>of anything that isn't terrible. I don't know how to

0:07:40.960 --> 0:07:43.800
<v Speaker 1>describe it. I could go on for a week and

0:07:43.960 --> 0:07:48.360
<v Speaker 1>never scratched the surface. It is so abnormal for human

0:07:48.440 --> 0:07:56.880
<v Speaker 1>being to put under those conditions. My name is William Richards.

0:07:57.000 --> 0:08:00.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm an exnerie. I served twenty three years for rum.

0:08:00.280 --> 0:08:02.120
<v Speaker 1>I didn't commit, and I have been out for a

0:08:02.160 --> 0:08:06.640
<v Speaker 1>post of three now at my age and just trying

0:08:06.680 --> 0:08:09.160
<v Speaker 1>to live on my retirement and put a life together.

0:08:11.280 --> 0:08:13.680
<v Speaker 1>I came home and I found my wife dead. She

0:08:13.800 --> 0:08:18.560
<v Speaker 1>had been murdered. I called the police three times, actually

0:08:18.600 --> 0:08:21.120
<v Speaker 1>because I was a little bit upset, as you can imagine,

0:08:21.160 --> 0:08:24.760
<v Speaker 1>and they would take a long time getting there. First

0:08:24.760 --> 0:08:28.160
<v Speaker 1>top on the crime scene was just a patrolman. Everything

0:08:28.200 --> 0:08:30.160
<v Speaker 1>man said was proven to be all I not only

0:08:30.200 --> 0:08:33.000
<v Speaker 1>that night, but everything he says any time. He's a

0:08:33.080 --> 0:08:37.280
<v Speaker 1>strange felt But he turned around in the sidewalk. He's

0:08:37.400 --> 0:08:41.200
<v Speaker 1>Columbo he's got the guy right here. He said, my

0:08:41.240 --> 0:08:43.360
<v Speaker 1>actions are strange. Well, as you come home and find

0:08:43.400 --> 0:08:46.120
<v Speaker 1>your wife killed like I did, what are your actions

0:08:46.120 --> 0:08:50.400
<v Speaker 1>supposed to be? So he decided I was guilty, he

0:08:50.480 --> 0:08:53.800
<v Speaker 1>told the detective. They decided that by the time they

0:08:53.840 --> 0:08:56.520
<v Speaker 1>got to the crime scene, they never investigated, They never

0:08:56.600 --> 0:09:00.680
<v Speaker 1>collected DNA fingerprints or anything from the crime scene, and

0:09:00.760 --> 0:09:05.280
<v Speaker 1>just proceeded to start a case against me. Every top

0:09:05.400 --> 0:09:11.000
<v Speaker 1>understand lied a sign of evidence, destroyed exculpatory evidence when

0:09:11.000 --> 0:09:14.000
<v Speaker 1>the process of digging it up now for civil actions.

0:09:14.120 --> 0:09:17.240
<v Speaker 1>But they just set on a course to get the

0:09:17.240 --> 0:09:20.199
<v Speaker 1>easy suspects, and that was it. I was just profiled,

0:09:20.200 --> 0:09:27.959
<v Speaker 1>and the husband is always guilty. At the time she died,

0:09:28.120 --> 0:09:30.560
<v Speaker 1>that were forty six miles away in another city, in

0:09:30.559 --> 0:09:33.240
<v Speaker 1>another county, and I was in a building with thirty people.

0:09:33.400 --> 0:09:37.240
<v Speaker 1>It was a secure bullet the traffic for troll and

0:09:37.400 --> 0:09:39.560
<v Speaker 1>was allowed to testify the time at death based on

0:09:39.640 --> 0:09:42.800
<v Speaker 1>his vast experience with their bodies, which of course we've

0:09:42.920 --> 0:09:48.280
<v Speaker 1>now proven his alfuls. Real doctors said their injuries on

0:09:48.360 --> 0:09:50.560
<v Speaker 1>my wife as are two hours old prior to death,

0:09:50.679 --> 0:09:52.920
<v Speaker 1>determined she had been dead for several hours. Who I

0:09:52.960 --> 0:09:59.800
<v Speaker 1>got home. Police have total control over the cranching and

0:10:00.000 --> 0:10:03.079
<v Speaker 1>in the corners investigator whose job the crime scene is

0:10:03.240 --> 0:10:07.319
<v Speaker 1>the body, did not have an opportunity to examine the

0:10:07.360 --> 0:10:10.440
<v Speaker 1>body and collect the information that would have made it

0:10:10.440 --> 0:10:14.160
<v Speaker 1>easy to determine time of death. The two doctors who

0:10:14.400 --> 0:10:17.880
<v Speaker 1>did look at the case independently for the defense had

0:10:17.920 --> 0:10:19.920
<v Speaker 1>to look at poor feel stuff, you know, things like

0:10:20.040 --> 0:10:23.200
<v Speaker 1>photographs of injuries and said, well, injuries over two hours

0:10:23.240 --> 0:10:26.679
<v Speaker 1>prior to death, But they didn't get the body temperatures

0:10:26.679 --> 0:10:30.080
<v Speaker 1>and things like that that would probably be taking I

0:10:30.080 --> 0:10:32.560
<v Speaker 1>think it's a huge mistake for the police in Bill's

0:10:32.559 --> 0:10:35.360
<v Speaker 1>case to have handled the crime scene the way they did,

0:10:35.920 --> 0:10:38.440
<v Speaker 1>But I also know that as a defense lawyer, I

0:10:38.520 --> 0:10:41.480
<v Speaker 1>have to build a case off of reports and photographs

0:10:41.880 --> 0:10:45.520
<v Speaker 1>long after the alleged crime has been committed. I spoke

0:10:45.520 --> 0:10:48.480
<v Speaker 1>with Chris Robinson, the forensic consultant you heard at the

0:10:48.480 --> 0:10:51.520
<v Speaker 1>beginning of the episode, about what kinds of things he

0:10:51.559 --> 0:10:54.560
<v Speaker 1>looks at in the files that he gets and the

0:10:54.600 --> 0:10:58.800
<v Speaker 1>reliability of the forensics that he works with. My name

0:10:58.840 --> 0:11:02.800
<v Speaker 1>is Christopher Robbins, and I'm a forensic consultant. I generally

0:11:02.840 --> 0:11:09.359
<v Speaker 1>examine reports, evidence, documents, photographs, and I report my findings

0:11:09.480 --> 0:11:12.960
<v Speaker 1>back to the attorneys who have hired me. I'm certified

0:11:13.000 --> 0:11:17.120
<v Speaker 1>there as of crime scene reconstruction, ballistics and fires analysis,

0:11:17.280 --> 0:11:23.400
<v Speaker 1>gunshot wounds, blood spatter analysis, shooting reconstruction. See the beautiful

0:11:23.400 --> 0:11:25.880
<v Speaker 1>thing with what I do? Now, they give me the

0:11:26.120 --> 0:11:30.400
<v Speaker 1>entire case file and they say, read this, here's the statements.

0:11:30.559 --> 0:11:33.520
<v Speaker 1>Tell us is our client li? Is he telling the truth?

0:11:33.720 --> 0:11:36.040
<v Speaker 1>Do you think it's validated by what you see? And

0:11:36.040 --> 0:11:39.320
<v Speaker 1>then I'll report that I'm working a case where an

0:11:39.320 --> 0:11:42.880
<v Speaker 1>individual supposedly shot at his mother down the hallway, and

0:11:42.960 --> 0:11:46.000
<v Speaker 1>she's given all these statements. She said she heard the

0:11:46.000 --> 0:11:47.760
<v Speaker 1>bullet go by your ear. No, you didn't hear the

0:11:47.760 --> 0:11:49.600
<v Speaker 1>bullet go by your hear because it's a forty five,

0:11:49.760 --> 0:11:53.040
<v Speaker 1>so it's not breaking the sound beard. And then the

0:11:53.080 --> 0:11:55.839
<v Speaker 1>holes in the wall are not lined up with her heads.

0:11:55.920 --> 0:11:57.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm saying, you didn't hear the bullet go by your head.

0:11:58.280 --> 0:12:00.319
<v Speaker 1>The fast of the bullet, the sound way just begin

0:12:00.400 --> 0:12:02.920
<v Speaker 1>to spread out perpendicular to the bullet as it moves

0:12:02.960 --> 0:12:06.400
<v Speaker 1>through the air. A slower bullet, they moved with the bullets,

0:12:06.400 --> 0:12:08.520
<v Speaker 1>so the bullet had to almost touch your leg being

0:12:08.520 --> 0:12:11.760
<v Speaker 1>you feel it. Now you hear the concussion from the gun.

0:12:12.720 --> 0:12:14.720
<v Speaker 1>You know you're jerking is a hundred sixty death was

0:12:14.920 --> 0:12:19.280
<v Speaker 1>slow like a chainsaw, an airliner right beside your head. Now,

0:12:19.360 --> 0:12:22.079
<v Speaker 1>I'm already thinking, ma'am, I don't like your story because

0:12:22.200 --> 0:12:25.040
<v Speaker 1>you're telling me what you believe you heard. And that's fine.

0:12:25.080 --> 0:12:27.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm not calling your liar. I'm just saying, that's why

0:12:27.400 --> 0:12:31.880
<v Speaker 1>I like the evidence. The evidence doesn't lie. It's simple.

0:12:31.880 --> 0:12:34.839
<v Speaker 1>When you look at the evidence, you pull trajectory rides

0:12:34.960 --> 0:12:38.480
<v Speaker 1>through the holes of the shot, you triangulate back the

0:12:38.520 --> 0:12:42.480
<v Speaker 1>path of the bullets, how the gun injects, the cartridge cases,

0:12:43.120 --> 0:12:46.000
<v Speaker 1>and when you put all these things together, I'm giving

0:12:46.040 --> 0:12:49.240
<v Speaker 1>the statement and I'm saying, no, ma'am, see, it can't

0:12:49.240 --> 0:12:57.120
<v Speaker 1>happen this way because this is the evidence. One of

0:12:57.120 --> 0:12:59.400
<v Speaker 1>the things Amelia brought up in the last episode was

0:12:59.440 --> 0:13:02.760
<v Speaker 1>how for six science needs to change and evolve with

0:13:03.000 --> 0:13:09.600
<v Speaker 1>new technology. Blood spatter is very expeclative. You have three

0:13:09.720 --> 0:13:12.880
<v Speaker 1>or four people look at the same blood spatter and

0:13:13.320 --> 0:13:16.840
<v Speaker 1>they'll give you a different variation of what they see.

0:13:17.600 --> 0:13:20.120
<v Speaker 1>You have to be careful because at a crime scene

0:13:20.320 --> 0:13:24.120
<v Speaker 1>where there's massive amounts of blood spatter, you have transverse things,

0:13:24.240 --> 0:13:28.320
<v Speaker 1>you have cast off stains. You have high velocity meaning velocity,

0:13:28.360 --> 0:13:32.000
<v Speaker 1>low velocity which you might call medium, I might looking good.

0:13:32.120 --> 0:13:34.600
<v Speaker 1>I think it's more like a low velocity. I do

0:13:34.679 --> 0:13:36.959
<v Speaker 1>get into that a lot where they'll call in their

0:13:37.200 --> 0:13:39.680
<v Speaker 1>expert and I'll go up against them, and it's just

0:13:39.760 --> 0:13:41.679
<v Speaker 1>the jury has to listen to us and they make

0:13:41.760 --> 0:13:46.240
<v Speaker 1>the decision. The biggest problem is when the forensics is

0:13:46.280 --> 0:13:49.960
<v Speaker 1>not tested by an outside source. One of the things

0:13:49.960 --> 0:13:52.120
<v Speaker 1>I admire about Chris, and one of the reasons I've

0:13:52.200 --> 0:13:54.480
<v Speaker 1>used him in my own cases, is that he doesn't

0:13:54.520 --> 0:13:58.600
<v Speaker 1>necessarily draw his own unreasonable conclusions, but he lets the

0:13:58.679 --> 0:14:02.000
<v Speaker 1>evidence speak for itself. I mean, I can give my

0:14:02.080 --> 0:14:06.000
<v Speaker 1>opinion what I believe happened, how I believe it happened.

0:14:06.520 --> 0:14:11.720
<v Speaker 1>I can't speak to someone's intentions. The gun accidentally went off. Okay,

0:14:11.760 --> 0:14:13.599
<v Speaker 1>First of all, I'm gonna look at the gun and

0:14:13.600 --> 0:14:15.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna say, this gun is functioning as it was

0:14:15.960 --> 0:14:19.920
<v Speaker 1>designed to function. This gun is perfect. Did you actually

0:14:19.960 --> 0:14:22.920
<v Speaker 1>mean to squeeze this trigger with three pounds, five pounds,

0:14:22.960 --> 0:14:25.360
<v Speaker 1>eight pounds, I said, Once we get the ten or

0:14:25.400 --> 0:14:27.840
<v Speaker 1>twelve pounds, which is a double action trigger, pull a

0:14:27.840 --> 0:14:29.680
<v Speaker 1>heavy trigger pull, which means you have to pull the

0:14:29.720 --> 0:14:32.040
<v Speaker 1>trigger all the way to the rear. I'm gonna look

0:14:32.080 --> 0:14:35.960
<v Speaker 1>at you and go you didn't accidentally pull with twelve pounds. Now,

0:14:35.960 --> 0:14:37.520
<v Speaker 1>when you have a gun, it's a two or three

0:14:37.520 --> 0:14:40.560
<v Speaker 1>pound trigger pool. What were the circumstances. I took my

0:14:40.640 --> 0:14:43.840
<v Speaker 1>gun down off the counter. You came in and grabbed

0:14:43.840 --> 0:14:47.080
<v Speaker 1>the gun, and then what's your instinct. I'm gonna pull

0:14:47.120 --> 0:14:49.240
<v Speaker 1>away from you. So if you grab the gun and

0:14:49.280 --> 0:14:51.720
<v Speaker 1>pull towards you and I pull away from you, we

0:14:51.800 --> 0:14:54.880
<v Speaker 1>start to divide that way to the trigger pull. I

0:14:54.960 --> 0:14:58.000
<v Speaker 1>better look at your body though. You better have gunpowder

0:14:58.040 --> 0:15:00.440
<v Speaker 1>all over your clothing. You better have stiff knowing your

0:15:00.480 --> 0:15:03.880
<v Speaker 1>skin because she better be within three feet and they

0:15:03.960 --> 0:15:05.760
<v Speaker 1>better have powder all over you for you to reach

0:15:05.800 --> 0:15:11.640
<v Speaker 1>out and grab that gun. When he's brought in to testify,

0:15:11.840 --> 0:15:16.120
<v Speaker 1>his role is to satisfy the jury's desire for that physical,

0:15:16.480 --> 0:15:20.720
<v Speaker 1>hands on type of evidence. Sometimes that can even mean

0:15:21.000 --> 0:15:24.920
<v Speaker 1>putting on something of a show for the jury. When

0:15:24.920 --> 0:15:26.360
<v Speaker 1>you go in there and I'm rolling around on the

0:15:26.400 --> 0:15:30.160
<v Speaker 1>floor in front of the jury, they're amazed. I'm always

0:15:30.200 --> 0:15:33.720
<v Speaker 1>told when I come in, the jury perks up I'm

0:15:33.760 --> 0:15:37.160
<v Speaker 1>talking about guns. I'm not talking about d NA where

0:15:37.360 --> 0:15:40.360
<v Speaker 1>god forbid, you're talking about wanting the quadri and the

0:15:40.440 --> 0:15:45.000
<v Speaker 1>low sign. They get glaze over when I talk about guns.

0:15:45.080 --> 0:15:48.120
<v Speaker 1>Everybody's seen again a bullet my cartridge case. They really

0:15:48.120 --> 0:15:49.880
<v Speaker 1>get up. And then I get off the stand and

0:15:49.880 --> 0:15:51.920
<v Speaker 1>they say, show us how this happened. And I'm rolling

0:15:51.920 --> 0:15:54.280
<v Speaker 1>around the floor where I get out the dummy. These

0:15:54.320 --> 0:15:57.160
<v Speaker 1>people go, what is this guy doing? Now? I tell

0:15:57.200 --> 0:16:01.160
<v Speaker 1>people you play to the strengths. If you can do

0:16:01.200 --> 0:16:03.600
<v Speaker 1>a recreation, I say, you want me to get a

0:16:03.920 --> 0:16:06.840
<v Speaker 1>Then the jury starts to think, now I understand, this

0:16:06.880 --> 0:16:11.480
<v Speaker 1>is how it happened. Photograph is great, pictures worth a

0:16:11.480 --> 0:16:15.360
<v Speaker 1>thousand words, But a recreation in front of the court,

0:16:15.680 --> 0:16:19.400
<v Speaker 1>it's it's amazing. I've seen Chris work. I've seen him

0:16:19.400 --> 0:16:21.400
<v Speaker 1>in court. I've seen him out of court. I've seen

0:16:21.480 --> 0:16:25.000
<v Speaker 1>him test firing unloaded firearms. I've seen him wrestling with

0:16:25.080 --> 0:16:28.680
<v Speaker 1>dummies in a courtroom. It's a strong visual. It grabs

0:16:28.680 --> 0:16:31.520
<v Speaker 1>the jury's attention and it keeps them interested. In any time.

0:16:31.600 --> 0:16:34.200
<v Speaker 1>As a lawyer, you get the opportunity to educate a

0:16:34.280 --> 0:16:37.560
<v Speaker 1>jury and keep their attention and have them learn something

0:16:37.600 --> 0:16:40.120
<v Speaker 1>that they did not know about before. I'm going to

0:16:40.160 --> 0:16:58.080
<v Speaker 1>take advantage of that opportunity. I found my wife at midnight,

0:16:58.160 --> 0:17:01.360
<v Speaker 1>so I've been up since about seven that morning, and

0:17:01.440 --> 0:17:04.639
<v Speaker 1>they let me go five or six and next afternoon,

0:17:04.800 --> 0:17:07.880
<v Speaker 1>so I've been up thirty some hours without sleep, probably

0:17:07.920 --> 0:17:12.600
<v Speaker 1>twenty some hours without food, and under intense interrogation, you know,

0:17:12.640 --> 0:17:16.800
<v Speaker 1>trying to get me to confess. I came down again

0:17:17.000 --> 0:17:19.399
<v Speaker 1>trying to help them. I thought they would actually start

0:17:19.440 --> 0:17:22.000
<v Speaker 1>looking for the real killer, which of course was my

0:17:22.080 --> 0:17:24.080
<v Speaker 1>mistake because they didn't. So I was actually in the

0:17:24.080 --> 0:17:27.960
<v Speaker 1>police station for another fifteen hours of intense interrogation, which

0:17:28.000 --> 0:17:30.840
<v Speaker 1>is not what I came down there for. Then they

0:17:30.880 --> 0:17:32.560
<v Speaker 1>just finally said, well, if you want admit you did it,

0:17:32.600 --> 0:17:35.080
<v Speaker 1>you're under arrest. I always thought, okay, what if I

0:17:35.080 --> 0:17:38.679
<v Speaker 1>did admitted I've been at all. It was such a

0:17:38.760 --> 0:17:43.240
<v Speaker 1>stupid thing to say. That's why you get so many

0:17:43.320 --> 0:17:46.520
<v Speaker 1>false confessions. I can tell you happens. Been through these things,

0:17:46.640 --> 0:17:48.480
<v Speaker 1>I could see why people just give up the crack

0:17:48.800 --> 0:17:50.560
<v Speaker 1>of the same thing you watch, it's only your own

0:17:52.000 --> 0:17:54.800
<v Speaker 1>I listened to tape. There's an edit tape that they

0:17:54.840 --> 0:17:57.639
<v Speaker 1>claimed this was interrogation, but of course, there's only thirty

0:17:57.640 --> 0:18:00.080
<v Speaker 1>hours of interrogation. They have a two hour tape. But

0:18:00.160 --> 0:18:02.880
<v Speaker 1>even on that I hear myself giving them things that

0:18:03.000 --> 0:18:05.439
<v Speaker 1>I didn't want to say because I didn't remember or

0:18:05.440 --> 0:18:07.760
<v Speaker 1>didn't think they were true. But I assureman have said

0:18:07.800 --> 0:18:14.440
<v Speaker 1>I did anything wrong. The first lawyer was very good,

0:18:14.480 --> 0:18:17.800
<v Speaker 1>but he was a public defender. I had considerable equity

0:18:17.800 --> 0:18:19.680
<v Speaker 1>in my land and stuff. I could have hired a

0:18:19.760 --> 0:18:22.520
<v Speaker 1>big name lawyer. I had one lined up, and that's

0:18:22.520 --> 0:18:26.200
<v Speaker 1>when I found out that froze my assets. They had

0:18:26.320 --> 0:18:30.600
<v Speaker 1>not arrested me the first night, which surprised everybody that

0:18:30.600 --> 0:18:32.760
<v Speaker 1>they did a few weeks later. But in that period

0:18:32.760 --> 0:18:36.440
<v Speaker 1>of time they filed papers to freeze my assets. Oh,

0:18:36.520 --> 0:18:38.320
<v Speaker 1>I had a good name attorney, he would have walked

0:18:38.400 --> 0:18:40.520
<v Speaker 1>up and they're told the court, look, there's no evidence,

0:18:40.560 --> 0:18:42.320
<v Speaker 1>let him go. And it makes all the difference in

0:18:42.320 --> 0:18:45.600
<v Speaker 1>the world. Now we have such a fast amount of

0:18:45.640 --> 0:18:48.160
<v Speaker 1>advience of innocence, and we have DNA, we have hair,

0:18:48.440 --> 0:18:50.919
<v Speaker 1>we have all signs of things that proved I'm not

0:18:51.000 --> 0:18:54.359
<v Speaker 1>the killer. But when you sit there and trial and

0:18:54.520 --> 0:18:58.359
<v Speaker 1>you had no investigation and so forth to help you,

0:18:58.640 --> 0:19:01.639
<v Speaker 1>it's kind of a one side it's system like the

0:19:01.680 --> 0:19:04.520
<v Speaker 1>other auxonorees this season. I asked Bill what he thought

0:19:04.560 --> 0:19:07.960
<v Speaker 1>the biggest factor was in the jury finding him guilty

0:19:08.240 --> 0:19:10.920
<v Speaker 1>this time. It was something all of our forensic experts

0:19:11.000 --> 0:19:15.480
<v Speaker 1>have brought up time and again, fight evidence. There's a

0:19:15.560 --> 0:19:17.440
<v Speaker 1>bite on her hand that I saw at the funeral.

0:19:18.080 --> 0:19:20.399
<v Speaker 1>Because at the time I believe that these strengths of

0:19:20.440 --> 0:19:23.439
<v Speaker 1>sciences are real, I've now learned that they're mostly jumped.

0:19:24.440 --> 0:19:27.200
<v Speaker 1>The jury was told this is mine, and it turns

0:19:27.240 --> 0:19:31.200
<v Speaker 1>out that when they did computer comparisons after conviction, none

0:19:31.200 --> 0:19:34.640
<v Speaker 1>of that was true. And that was the only thing

0:19:34.680 --> 0:19:37.920
<v Speaker 1>that really changed in the last trial was fite evidence.

0:19:39.240 --> 0:19:41.320
<v Speaker 1>That's pretty damning when you come in here and to

0:19:41.440 --> 0:19:43.479
<v Speaker 1>throwing all his garbage at the wall. Oh, he had

0:19:43.600 --> 0:19:46.800
<v Speaker 1>arguments every couple as argument. They beat you up with

0:19:46.840 --> 0:19:49.879
<v Speaker 1>all this stuff that kids anybody shaft they make it

0:19:49.920 --> 0:19:53.280
<v Speaker 1>must sound much worse. But when you sit there and say, look,

0:19:53.720 --> 0:19:56.800
<v Speaker 1>there's a bite on her body from the fight and

0:19:57.240 --> 0:20:03.200
<v Speaker 1>it's his, how could they let me go? I wanted

0:20:03.240 --> 0:20:06.040
<v Speaker 1>to know more about bite mark science, or as it's

0:20:06.080 --> 0:20:12.000
<v Speaker 1>more formally known, forensic odontology. This is dr Adam Freeman.

0:20:13.440 --> 0:20:17.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm a forensic odontologist located out of Westport, Connecticut, and

0:20:17.880 --> 0:20:21.840
<v Speaker 1>I am the current chair of the Odontology Section of

0:20:21.880 --> 0:20:27.399
<v Speaker 1>the American Academy of Forensic Sciences. My office Westport, Connecticut

0:20:27.560 --> 0:20:30.199
<v Speaker 1>is very close to New York City, where about a

0:20:30.240 --> 0:20:34.720
<v Speaker 1>forty five minute drive, and in the aftermath of nine eleven,

0:20:34.960 --> 0:20:39.639
<v Speaker 1>we lost several patients. As part of that process, it

0:20:39.840 --> 0:20:46.879
<v Speaker 1>became very apparent that there was not enough people involved

0:20:46.880 --> 0:20:52.000
<v Speaker 1>at a very granular level that really knew forensics. So

0:20:52.119 --> 0:20:54.800
<v Speaker 1>my example would be there were some dentists that had

0:20:55.119 --> 0:20:59.560
<v Speaker 1>done some identification work, but really no formal education in

0:21:00.040 --> 0:21:02.959
<v Speaker 1>the totality of forensics, and they typically were the leaders

0:21:03.000 --> 0:21:06.800
<v Speaker 1>of these operations. And I'm one of those people that

0:21:06.920 --> 0:21:09.560
<v Speaker 1>I don't like to be a little bit educated in something.

0:21:09.560 --> 0:21:11.320
<v Speaker 1>If I'm gonna do something, I really want to be

0:21:11.400 --> 0:21:13.119
<v Speaker 1>the guy or one of the guys that knows the

0:21:13.240 --> 0:21:17.520
<v Speaker 1>most about it. So there really are three areas that

0:21:17.760 --> 0:21:22.760
<v Speaker 1>brensic Good ontology are used in criminal cases. One and

0:21:22.920 --> 0:21:25.800
<v Speaker 1>probably the one that I am most proud of in

0:21:25.840 --> 0:21:31.240
<v Speaker 1>our field is dental identification. Often people are found dead

0:21:31.640 --> 0:21:35.879
<v Speaker 1>and they need to be scientifically identified, and very often

0:21:36.000 --> 0:21:40.800
<v Speaker 1>teeth are used as that identification. Also as an outshoot

0:21:40.840 --> 0:21:43.520
<v Speaker 1>of that is where there's a mass disaster like Hurricane

0:21:43.600 --> 0:21:47.160
<v Speaker 1>Katrino or nine eleven or Hurricane I, where dentists are

0:21:47.160 --> 0:21:51.639
<v Speaker 1>called in to do identifications on lots of people, you

0:21:51.720 --> 0:21:55.000
<v Speaker 1>are giving back a person the dignity of dying with

0:21:55.080 --> 0:22:01.439
<v Speaker 1>a name. Another area is bite mark identify accation, and

0:22:01.560 --> 0:22:05.120
<v Speaker 1>that is much more controversial today, and I have testified

0:22:05.160 --> 0:22:09.959
<v Speaker 1>in several of those cases. And then there's dental age estimation,

0:22:10.160 --> 0:22:15.280
<v Speaker 1>which is becoming much more controversial because of the way

0:22:15.280 --> 0:22:18.040
<v Speaker 1>it's being applied versus the way I believe it was

0:22:18.080 --> 0:22:23.879
<v Speaker 1>originally designed to be applied. Bite mark identification of a

0:22:23.920 --> 0:22:29.000
<v Speaker 1>perpetrator has at its space several hypotheses. The first one

0:22:29.400 --> 0:22:33.359
<v Speaker 1>is that teeth are unique to an individual. Only a

0:22:33.640 --> 0:22:37.760
<v Speaker 1>individual has teeth of a certain shape, size, and arrangement.

0:22:38.320 --> 0:22:43.119
<v Speaker 1>That hypothesis has never been proven. The second hypothesis is

0:22:43.680 --> 0:22:50.720
<v Speaker 1>skin can accurately record a bite. That also has never

0:22:50.760 --> 0:22:56.400
<v Speaker 1>been proven. The scientific research currently doesn't even suggest that

0:22:56.680 --> 0:23:01.159
<v Speaker 1>experts can even identify with some real liability what a

0:23:01.160 --> 0:23:05.600
<v Speaker 1>bite mark looks like. As an example of that, myself

0:23:05.640 --> 0:23:08.159
<v Speaker 1>and a colleague of mine, dr Ian Pretty out of

0:23:08.200 --> 0:23:12.639
<v Speaker 1>Manchester England. We sent every board certified forensic dennis a

0:23:12.720 --> 0:23:16.720
<v Speaker 1>hundred different cases where there were several photographs and said,

0:23:16.800 --> 0:23:20.920
<v Speaker 1>is this a bite mark? Very similar to what happens

0:23:21.200 --> 0:23:24.640
<v Speaker 1>when I'm presented a case. When I'm presented a case,

0:23:24.720 --> 0:23:29.960
<v Speaker 1>typically law enforcement will send some images of a suspected

0:23:30.040 --> 0:23:32.320
<v Speaker 1>injury that they think might be a bite mark, and

0:23:32.400 --> 0:23:34.719
<v Speaker 1>my job is to opine as to whether or not

0:23:35.160 --> 0:23:38.199
<v Speaker 1>that injury is or is not a bite mark. What

0:23:38.320 --> 0:23:40.600
<v Speaker 1>we did is we did that same sort of experiment

0:23:40.920 --> 0:23:44.000
<v Speaker 1>and there was widespread disagreement as to whether or not

0:23:44.160 --> 0:23:46.600
<v Speaker 1>an injury that they were looking at was in fact

0:23:46.600 --> 0:23:51.760
<v Speaker 1>a bite mark. So the ground science that predisposes us

0:23:51.840 --> 0:23:55.160
<v Speaker 1>the ability to do this bite mark work isn't there.

0:23:55.480 --> 0:23:59.520
<v Speaker 1>Yet the work continues to be done. There are those

0:23:59.560 --> 0:24:03.440
<v Speaker 1>who have to me, I believe that this is possible,

0:24:03.480 --> 0:24:07.439
<v Speaker 1>And my response typically is when issues of life and

0:24:07.520 --> 0:24:11.879
<v Speaker 1>liberty are at state, your belief as to whether or

0:24:11.920 --> 0:24:15.119
<v Speaker 1>not something can be done is not important. It's whether

0:24:15.200 --> 0:24:19.800
<v Speaker 1>or not you can scientifically support your opinions. And the

0:24:19.920 --> 0:24:23.520
<v Speaker 1>science is not there for bite marks. It is my

0:24:23.560 --> 0:24:25.840
<v Speaker 1>opinion that bite marks shouldn't be used in courts of

0:24:25.960 --> 0:24:29.959
<v Speaker 1>law at all until we produce some science that suggests

0:24:30.160 --> 0:24:33.720
<v Speaker 1>that forensico and ontologists can agree generally on what a

0:24:33.760 --> 0:24:37.680
<v Speaker 1>bite mark is. I think actually, in Bill Richards case,

0:24:37.880 --> 0:24:40.520
<v Speaker 1>and looking at that bite mark, I'm not sure that

0:24:40.520 --> 0:24:44.119
<v Speaker 1>that's even a bite mark. Dr Freeman has seen the

0:24:44.160 --> 0:24:47.119
<v Speaker 1>evidence in Bill's case firsthand, so I asked him for

0:24:47.160 --> 0:24:56.120
<v Speaker 1>his professional opinion on the evidence left on Bill's wife's hand. So,

0:24:56.280 --> 0:24:58.800
<v Speaker 1>in that particular case, what you're looking at is there's

0:24:58.840 --> 0:25:02.040
<v Speaker 1>a very diffuse bruise of the bite mark, or what

0:25:02.080 --> 0:25:05.440
<v Speaker 1>I would call the patterned injury. I didn't see anything

0:25:05.840 --> 0:25:08.639
<v Speaker 1>on the other side of the hand. For a bite

0:25:08.680 --> 0:25:12.359
<v Speaker 1>to happen, tissue has to be crushed between the upper

0:25:12.400 --> 0:25:15.399
<v Speaker 1>and lower teeth to leave a bruise. And that's really

0:25:15.400 --> 0:25:18.480
<v Speaker 1>one of the problems with bite marks. When somebody has bitten,

0:25:18.720 --> 0:25:22.920
<v Speaker 1>how you bruise versus how I bruise could be very different,

0:25:23.359 --> 0:25:26.000
<v Speaker 1>the type of skin you have, the coloration of your skin.

0:25:26.520 --> 0:25:29.280
<v Speaker 1>All of the listeners here, I'm sure have had situations

0:25:29.280 --> 0:25:32.160
<v Speaker 1>where they bump into something and they bruise and other

0:25:32.200 --> 0:25:35.640
<v Speaker 1>people don't. And then clearly when you look at the

0:25:35.720 --> 0:25:39.800
<v Speaker 1>injury on Mrs Richard's hand, it's a very wide bruise

0:25:39.960 --> 0:25:44.040
<v Speaker 1>teeth are very narrow. That surely isn't individual teeth you're

0:25:44.040 --> 0:25:47.000
<v Speaker 1>looking at, and I surely would have swabbed it for

0:25:47.119 --> 0:25:51.160
<v Speaker 1>DNA and suggested it be swabbed for salivary amilais that

0:25:51.240 --> 0:25:55.879
<v Speaker 1>injury surely does not belong in a criminal court. I

0:25:55.920 --> 0:25:58.400
<v Speaker 1>think that the place that bite marks have, and probably

0:25:58.440 --> 0:26:01.800
<v Speaker 1>the strongest piece we have for them, is that if

0:26:01.840 --> 0:26:04.760
<v Speaker 1>you see something that looks like a suspected bite mark,

0:26:05.160 --> 0:26:07.480
<v Speaker 1>what a good friends to go to ontologists should do

0:26:07.560 --> 0:26:10.280
<v Speaker 1>is instruct the police in the medical examiner's office to

0:26:10.640 --> 0:26:16.800
<v Speaker 1>swab that area for both DNA and salivary emilies. So

0:26:16.880 --> 0:26:21.119
<v Speaker 1>salivary amilies is an enzyme that is in human saliva,

0:26:21.240 --> 0:26:25.520
<v Speaker 1>so that would show that it is human and secondly DNA.

0:26:26.080 --> 0:26:31.240
<v Speaker 1>That is a great purpose for human bite marks. I

0:26:31.320 --> 0:26:34.119
<v Speaker 1>don't think a lot of the people who did bite

0:26:34.119 --> 0:26:40.560
<v Speaker 1>mark cases early on went into it with some malicious attitude.

0:26:40.600 --> 0:26:42.360
<v Speaker 1>I think that they went into it thinking they were

0:26:42.400 --> 0:26:46.760
<v Speaker 1>doing what was cutting edge science. Where I find it

0:26:47.000 --> 0:26:50.760
<v Speaker 1>reprehensible is that when science has presented itself showing that

0:26:50.800 --> 0:26:54.760
<v Speaker 1>what they believed isn't in fact true, they typically don't

0:26:54.760 --> 0:26:58.320
<v Speaker 1>accept the science itself. What they do is they say, well,

0:26:58.640 --> 0:27:00.800
<v Speaker 1>let's not throw the baby out with the bath water.

0:27:01.720 --> 0:27:06.320
<v Speaker 1>I absolutely believe that it is morally wrong to use

0:27:06.960 --> 0:27:11.640
<v Speaker 1>questionable forensics in criminal trials where there's issues of life

0:27:11.680 --> 0:27:14.960
<v Speaker 1>and liberty, and it should not be done by anybody

0:27:15.080 --> 0:27:19.240
<v Speaker 1>until the science supports it. And when people fight so

0:27:19.320 --> 0:27:25.800
<v Speaker 1>hard to keep a modality that has not been scientifically supported,

0:27:26.119 --> 0:27:31.000
<v Speaker 1>it makes me question their motives. I also question those motives,

0:27:31.040 --> 0:27:33.600
<v Speaker 1>and I wonder why someone would be more interested in

0:27:33.720 --> 0:27:37.480
<v Speaker 1>validating a belief than in finding the actual truth. But

0:27:37.600 --> 0:27:41.000
<v Speaker 1>I think this happens more than people know. I can

0:27:41.080 --> 0:27:43.520
<v Speaker 1>understand that people feel pride in their work, and on

0:27:43.680 --> 0:27:46.760
<v Speaker 1>some level they might not want it question. But like

0:27:46.920 --> 0:27:50.000
<v Speaker 1>Dr Freeman said, when it comes to something as precious

0:27:50.160 --> 0:27:54.639
<v Speaker 1>as one's life or their liberty, someone's personal ego just

0:27:54.720 --> 0:28:13.520
<v Speaker 1>should not get in the way. Yeah, first trial was deadlocked,

0:28:13.520 --> 0:28:17.680
<v Speaker 1>I think offishally they say six to six. Second one

0:28:18.000 --> 0:28:20.840
<v Speaker 1>was declared to mistrial because the judge was talking to

0:28:21.320 --> 0:28:24.680
<v Speaker 1>somebody connected with one of the jurors. And then it

0:28:24.800 --> 0:28:28.840
<v Speaker 1>went to a bird trial which was also deadlocked. And

0:28:28.920 --> 0:28:32.879
<v Speaker 1>the last trial, even with the bite evidence, came back deadlocked,

0:28:33.000 --> 0:28:35.880
<v Speaker 1>but the judge was used to accept it and ordered

0:28:35.920 --> 0:28:37.399
<v Speaker 1>them to find the British. She said, I'm going to

0:28:37.480 --> 0:28:39.680
<v Speaker 1>keep you here and see you do. I've had so

0:28:39.760 --> 0:28:43.040
<v Speaker 1>many she would have to let me go. One of

0:28:43.080 --> 0:28:46.480
<v Speaker 1>the jurors come in and wanted to talk to my team,

0:28:46.640 --> 0:28:49.680
<v Speaker 1>basically to say she had been bullied in the jury room,

0:28:49.800 --> 0:28:52.360
<v Speaker 1>but the same judge trial judge wouldn't let us talk

0:28:52.360 --> 0:28:55.479
<v Speaker 1>to her. Given that he had so many trials, I

0:28:55.560 --> 0:28:58.440
<v Speaker 1>was curious as to what kinds of deals might have

0:28:58.480 --> 0:29:02.520
<v Speaker 1>been offered to build behind the scenes. They offered deals

0:29:02.640 --> 0:29:06.040
<v Speaker 1>mostly after the first draw they took a real beating.

0:29:06.280 --> 0:29:09.840
<v Speaker 1>They started offering the time served. Actually, by that time

0:29:09.880 --> 0:29:11.760
<v Speaker 1>I've been in less than two years. So they said,

0:29:11.800 --> 0:29:15.400
<v Speaker 1>did two year low deal, low term man sladder. But

0:29:15.520 --> 0:29:17.760
<v Speaker 1>I couldn't do that. I didn't do this, you know.

0:29:17.760 --> 0:29:19.800
<v Speaker 1>I took my gamble and fought it all the way.

0:29:21.920 --> 0:29:24.320
<v Speaker 1>As a defense attorney, it's in my interest to get

0:29:24.360 --> 0:29:27.720
<v Speaker 1>the best outcome possible for my clients, and sometimes that

0:29:27.800 --> 0:29:31.680
<v Speaker 1>means making a deal. In fact, the vast majority of

0:29:31.680 --> 0:29:35.480
<v Speaker 1>criminal cases are resolved through some type of negotiated agreement.

0:29:35.960 --> 0:29:38.960
<v Speaker 1>I completely understand Bill's hesitation here to plead guilty to

0:29:39.000 --> 0:29:41.720
<v Speaker 1>a crime he did not commit. I see people every

0:29:41.800 --> 0:29:45.120
<v Speaker 1>day who were asked to make compromises, and sometimes they're

0:29:45.200 --> 0:29:50.520
<v Speaker 1>compromises that people just can't make. Bill Richards was convicted

0:29:50.520 --> 0:29:53.480
<v Speaker 1>of first degree murder and served twenty three years of

0:29:53.520 --> 0:29:56.480
<v Speaker 1>a life sentence. You go in there, You've got to

0:29:56.520 --> 0:29:59.360
<v Speaker 1>learn a hole new language, a whole new packing order

0:30:00.040 --> 0:30:02.960
<v Speaker 1>thin and there's such strange conditions. You have all the

0:30:03.000 --> 0:30:05.480
<v Speaker 1>different gangs, and you have all the different factions in

0:30:05.520 --> 0:30:08.120
<v Speaker 1>each game. You have to adapt, you have to you

0:30:08.160 --> 0:30:13.280
<v Speaker 1>have to survive, and that's not easy. I kind of

0:30:13.320 --> 0:30:15.240
<v Speaker 1>described it like being in the bottom of a well.

0:30:15.920 --> 0:30:18.560
<v Speaker 1>You're looking up at this You know you're innocent, you

0:30:18.640 --> 0:30:22.120
<v Speaker 1>know what their sayings lie, but you can't get any representation.

0:30:22.320 --> 0:30:26.640
<v Speaker 1>NET would stand up and present this. Got a description

0:30:26.680 --> 0:30:29.320
<v Speaker 1>be jumping out of airplane a lot of parachute. You

0:30:29.320 --> 0:30:32.040
<v Speaker 1>know you're gonna die, but you just keep lapping around. Anyway,

0:30:34.280 --> 0:30:38.000
<v Speaker 1>My assets were gone. I've lost everything I had. In

0:30:38.120 --> 0:30:39.840
<v Speaker 1>the prison. They put me to work a couple of

0:30:39.880 --> 0:30:42.920
<v Speaker 1>times in shops for the number of years where I

0:30:43.000 --> 0:30:45.280
<v Speaker 1>was teaching the staff. I was teaching the other inmates

0:30:45.320 --> 0:30:48.000
<v Speaker 1>how to do all these things, designing and building things

0:30:48.080 --> 0:30:50.960
<v Speaker 1>for them. They had all these things that need to

0:30:51.000 --> 0:30:52.880
<v Speaker 1>be done, and nobody had a crew how to do it.

0:30:53.040 --> 0:30:55.720
<v Speaker 1>You know, I had to over twenty years background and

0:30:56.000 --> 0:30:58.200
<v Speaker 1>uh I was teaching them how to do all these things,

0:30:58.280 --> 0:31:01.280
<v Speaker 1>how to build things, how to design is under structural strength,

0:31:01.400 --> 0:31:04.320
<v Speaker 1>how power would have to run, and so on. You'd

0:31:04.360 --> 0:31:07.520
<v Speaker 1>make thirty two cents an hour, and they take back

0:31:10.240 --> 0:31:14.040
<v Speaker 1>made fourteen tents an hour, and that doesn't go real

0:31:14.160 --> 0:31:17.880
<v Speaker 1>far because prices in the canteen, you know, the prison

0:31:17.960 --> 0:31:23.440
<v Speaker 1>stores are expensive. I was very angry for a long time,

0:31:23.920 --> 0:31:27.920
<v Speaker 1>but eventually I think you just rejectedn't go on. You

0:31:28.000 --> 0:31:32.000
<v Speaker 1>can't stay angry for twenty five years. They'll burn you out.

0:31:32.120 --> 0:31:36.600
<v Speaker 1>If you do, You're gonna be one miserable person. I'm

0:31:36.960 --> 0:31:41.200
<v Speaker 1>very very unhappy, but that anger. Anger is a reactionary emotion,

0:31:41.720 --> 0:31:44.240
<v Speaker 1>and you just can't maintain that for so many years.

0:31:46.160 --> 0:31:49.840
<v Speaker 1>Bill was exonerated and eventually released in two thousand sixteen.

0:31:50.600 --> 0:31:53.960
<v Speaker 1>Unlike our other exonorees, his case was so personal. He

0:31:54.360 --> 0:31:57.640
<v Speaker 1>lost everything, including his wife. So I asked him if

0:31:57.760 --> 0:32:00.760
<v Speaker 1>at the very least they caught the person who murdered

0:32:01.000 --> 0:32:05.440
<v Speaker 1>his wife. No, because personally, I don't believe the police

0:32:05.480 --> 0:32:09.880
<v Speaker 1>ever looked. I know they didn't look. It's all comes

0:32:09.920 --> 0:32:12.080
<v Speaker 1>back to the police. They decided the first night I

0:32:12.320 --> 0:32:14.239
<v Speaker 1>was the guy they told the friends of people who

0:32:14.320 --> 0:32:18.840
<v Speaker 1>worked under them, and that was it. Everything just went down,

0:32:18.920 --> 0:32:21.720
<v Speaker 1>Like I feel like falling out of an airplane. You're

0:32:21.720 --> 0:32:24.840
<v Speaker 1>going to die. It's gone down because everybody is working

0:32:24.920 --> 0:32:30.160
<v Speaker 1>against you. Before we wrap up forensic science, I wanted

0:32:30.200 --> 0:32:33.960
<v Speaker 1>to bring back Justin Brooks from the California Innocence Project.

0:32:34.760 --> 0:32:39.040
<v Speaker 1>He sees cases like bills all the time. We've got

0:32:39.120 --> 0:32:42.920
<v Speaker 1>an innocence organization in Holland, and when I go over there,

0:32:43.040 --> 0:32:46.400
<v Speaker 1>there's so much more scrutiny given there's so many more resources,

0:32:46.520 --> 0:32:49.800
<v Speaker 1>and they still have wrongful convictions. So all we can

0:32:49.880 --> 0:32:53.480
<v Speaker 1>do is is minimize the number of wrongful convictions. And

0:32:53.680 --> 0:32:56.600
<v Speaker 1>the best way to minimize it is through education and training.

0:32:57.520 --> 0:32:59.479
<v Speaker 1>Like one of the things that's always made me crazy

0:32:59.600 --> 0:33:01.760
<v Speaker 1>is it. See, the defense has a lot more trouble

0:33:01.880 --> 0:33:06.320
<v Speaker 1>getting scientific resources than the government has. So when a

0:33:06.400 --> 0:33:09.760
<v Speaker 1>defense attorney wants to get testing done, wants access to

0:33:09.840 --> 0:33:13.200
<v Speaker 1>the labs, wants to get the same kind of ability

0:33:13.240 --> 0:33:16.200
<v Speaker 1>to develop evidence as the government has, they don't have

0:33:16.280 --> 0:33:20.440
<v Speaker 1>the same resources there's just a lot of pseudo science

0:33:20.520 --> 0:33:22.680
<v Speaker 1>out there. But the problem is a lot of times

0:33:22.720 --> 0:33:25.920
<v Speaker 1>these jurors treat all these sciences the same, if you

0:33:25.960 --> 0:33:29.320
<v Speaker 1>have an expert saying it's a science. We've seen the

0:33:29.400 --> 0:33:31.960
<v Speaker 1>same thing in the area of arson that in the

0:33:32.040 --> 0:33:35.480
<v Speaker 1>past a lot of the arson experts were actually just

0:33:35.760 --> 0:33:38.400
<v Speaker 1>board firemen who loves C. S I and had a

0:33:38.440 --> 0:33:40.840
<v Speaker 1>lot of time on their hands. So you have a

0:33:40.920 --> 0:33:43.200
<v Speaker 1>bunch of people who are sitting in prison on bad

0:33:43.320 --> 0:33:47.160
<v Speaker 1>fire science. So I think we have a real problem

0:33:47.240 --> 0:33:51.960
<v Speaker 1>with expertise in these areas and jurors when they hear

0:33:52.080 --> 0:33:56.560
<v Speaker 1>this stuff, they're convicting because an expert stands up and says,

0:33:56.560 --> 0:33:59.400
<v Speaker 1>in my expert opinion, this person is guilty. Here's why

0:34:00.200 --> 0:34:09.000
<v Speaker 1>you get convictions. One of the things that's important to

0:34:09.040 --> 0:34:11.320
<v Speaker 1>me in my work and in this show is making

0:34:11.400 --> 0:34:14.720
<v Speaker 1>sure that we cover everything from as many sides as possible.

0:34:15.160 --> 0:34:17.800
<v Speaker 1>I've seen the work of Chris Robinson and Tracy Sergeant

0:34:17.840 --> 0:34:20.400
<v Speaker 1>in action, but I also know that many people have

0:34:20.520 --> 0:34:24.920
<v Speaker 1>been wrongfully convicted because of forensic science, or perhaps more accurately,

0:34:25.239 --> 0:34:29.360
<v Speaker 1>because of the misapplication of science or of junk science.

0:34:30.280 --> 0:34:32.320
<v Speaker 1>I think all of the forensic professionals we spoke to

0:34:32.440 --> 0:34:35.440
<v Speaker 1>were right when they said that forensic science should just

0:34:35.560 --> 0:34:39.560
<v Speaker 1>be one of many tools in an investigative toolbox. It's

0:34:39.600 --> 0:34:41.600
<v Speaker 1>important to keep in mind, if you're ever sitting on

0:34:41.680 --> 0:34:43.680
<v Speaker 1>a jury, or if you're just hearing about a trial

0:34:43.760 --> 0:34:46.400
<v Speaker 1>in the news, that science is not perfect, and that

0:34:46.520 --> 0:34:50.719
<v Speaker 1>includes forensic science. There's often more to the story than

0:34:50.840 --> 0:34:55.600
<v Speaker 1>what one piece of information might suggest. Having people like

0:34:55.840 --> 0:34:59.160
<v Speaker 1>Chris or Dr Freeman testifying a courtroom about what their

0:34:59.200 --> 0:35:02.800
<v Speaker 1>discipline can and cannot do is bidely important to getting

0:35:02.840 --> 0:35:05.920
<v Speaker 1>to the true facts of a case. I know how

0:35:06.040 --> 0:35:09.359
<v Speaker 1>important it is to explain all aspects of a case

0:35:09.480 --> 0:35:12.200
<v Speaker 1>to a jury, and the best way I've seen that done,

0:35:12.560 --> 0:35:16.040
<v Speaker 1>especially in cases involving science, is to bring in experts.

0:35:16.840 --> 0:35:19.920
<v Speaker 1>These experts can explain this stuff in a way that

0:35:20.040 --> 0:35:23.120
<v Speaker 1>it's not so complicated and so that a juror who

0:35:23.280 --> 0:35:27.040
<v Speaker 1>is not a scientist can understand the subject matter. As

0:35:27.120 --> 0:35:32.239
<v Speaker 1>forensic science progresses and changes, expert witnesses are becoming increasingly

0:35:32.440 --> 0:35:35.520
<v Speaker 1>vital as a part of a complete and fair trial.

0:35:36.760 --> 0:35:40.040
<v Speaker 1>In my opinion, funds for experts should be available to

0:35:40.160 --> 0:35:43.960
<v Speaker 1>all people, just as the right to counsel is available

0:35:44.000 --> 0:35:47.280
<v Speaker 1>to all people and all stages of the criminal process,

0:35:47.440 --> 0:35:51.440
<v Speaker 1>and that includes a trial. I also want to reiterate

0:35:51.520 --> 0:35:55.279
<v Speaker 1>what Amelia and Dr Freeman both said that one of

0:35:55.320 --> 0:35:58.239
<v Speaker 1>the most important aspects of any science is for the

0:35:58.320 --> 0:36:02.360
<v Speaker 1>disciplines to evolve as new research comes in. We are

0:36:02.440 --> 0:36:05.399
<v Speaker 1>in an incredible age of technology where more and more

0:36:05.520 --> 0:36:09.600
<v Speaker 1>information is available than ever before. As we've become more

0:36:09.640 --> 0:36:12.719
<v Speaker 1>and more dependent on science, it is vitally important that

0:36:12.880 --> 0:36:17.000
<v Speaker 1>we use science responsibly and that we do so accurately.

0:36:17.520 --> 0:36:19.279
<v Speaker 1>A big part of my job is staying up to

0:36:19.400 --> 0:36:22.080
<v Speaker 1>date with new laws and changes in the legal system.

0:36:22.840 --> 0:36:25.759
<v Speaker 1>Scientists are no different. A big part of their job

0:36:25.920 --> 0:36:28.880
<v Speaker 1>is to make sure they are current with the latest science.

0:36:30.000 --> 0:36:33.760
<v Speaker 1>Everyone in the criminal justice system, lawyers, police officers, judges,

0:36:33.960 --> 0:36:38.080
<v Speaker 1>medical examiners, forensic chemists, all these people owe it to

0:36:38.239 --> 0:36:41.399
<v Speaker 1>defendants on trial to be as accurate as possible. As

0:36:41.480 --> 0:36:44.560
<v Speaker 1>Dr Freeman said, a mere belief that something might work

0:36:44.760 --> 0:36:49.560
<v Speaker 1>is not enough. You must base it on science, especially

0:36:49.680 --> 0:36:53.279
<v Speaker 1>when life and liberty are on the line. And the

0:36:53.360 --> 0:36:56.239
<v Speaker 1>next episode will focus on a particular problem that all

0:36:56.320 --> 0:36:59.839
<v Speaker 1>of the Axonorees we've spoken to have brought up. Interrogation

0:37:00.000 --> 0:37:08.040
<v Speaker 1>techniques and false confessions next time on Sworn. This is

0:37:08.080 --> 0:37:10.840
<v Speaker 1>a study published just a few years ago out of Canada.

0:37:11.200 --> 0:37:14.440
<v Speaker 1>With the power of suggestion, they convinced ordinary people that

0:37:14.560 --> 0:37:17.120
<v Speaker 1>as a teenager they committed a crime and the police

0:37:17.200 --> 0:37:20.399
<v Speaker 1>actually came to an investigate, and you know, oftentimes these

0:37:20.480 --> 0:37:22.960
<v Speaker 1>people are trying to figure this out, and you know,

0:37:23.200 --> 0:37:25.719
<v Speaker 1>my mother told you this, It must have happened. I mean,

0:37:26.400 --> 0:37:29.759
<v Speaker 1>did I plan Forrafiti somewhere? And what was I with

0:37:29.880 --> 0:37:32.839
<v Speaker 1>my best friend when we did? And they pretty much

0:37:33.000 --> 0:37:42.160
<v Speaker 1>talked themselves into constructing something that never happened. Sworn is

0:37:42.200 --> 0:37:45.839
<v Speaker 1>a production of Tenderfoot TV and I Heart Radio. Our

0:37:45.960 --> 0:37:50.800
<v Speaker 1>lead producer is Christina Dana. Executive producers are Payne Lindsay

0:37:51.080 --> 0:37:54.920
<v Speaker 1>and Donald Albright for Tenderfoot TV, Matt Frederick and Alex

0:37:54.960 --> 0:37:59.600
<v Speaker 1>Williams for I Heart Radio, and myself Philip Holloway. Additional

0:37:59.640 --> 0:38:04.840
<v Speaker 1>product by Trevor Young, Mason Lindsay, Mike Rooney, Jamie Albright

0:38:05.400 --> 0:38:09.080
<v Speaker 1>and Halle Beadall Original music and sound designed by Makeup

0:38:09.160 --> 0:38:12.040
<v Speaker 1>and Vanity Set. Our theme song is Blood in the

0:38:12.120 --> 0:38:16.640
<v Speaker 1>Water by Layup. Show art and design is by Trevor Eisler.

0:38:17.320 --> 0:38:21.480
<v Speaker 1>Editing by Christina Dana. Mixing and mastering by Mike Rooney

0:38:21.600 --> 0:38:24.840
<v Speaker 1>and Cooper Skinner. Special thanks to the team at I

0:38:25.000 --> 0:38:29.040
<v Speaker 1>Heart Radio from U t a or In Rosenbound and

0:38:29.200 --> 0:38:34.239
<v Speaker 1>Grace Royer, Ryan Nord and Matthew Papa from the Nord

0:38:34.320 --> 0:38:38.640
<v Speaker 1>Group Back Media and Marketing and Station sixteen. I'd also

0:38:38.760 --> 0:38:41.800
<v Speaker 1>like to extend a very personal and special thanks to

0:38:42.120 --> 0:38:44.759
<v Speaker 1>all of our contributors and guests who have helped to

0:38:44.920 --> 0:38:48.440
<v Speaker 1>make all of these episodes possible. You can find Sworn

0:38:48.760 --> 0:38:53.840
<v Speaker 1>on Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram at Sworn podcast and follow

0:38:53.960 --> 0:38:57.760
<v Speaker 1>me your host, Philip Holloway on Twitter at phil Holloway

0:38:57.920 --> 0:39:02.040
<v Speaker 1>e s Q. Our webs is sworn podcast dot com,

0:39:02.360 --> 0:39:05.520
<v Speaker 1>and you can check out other Tenderfoot TV podcasts at

0:39:05.960 --> 0:39:11.120
<v Speaker 1>www dot tenderfoot dot tv. If you have questions or comments,

0:39:11.440 --> 0:39:15.520
<v Speaker 1>you can email us at Sworn at tenderfoot dot tv

0:39:16.200 --> 0:39:20.040
<v Speaker 1>or leave us a voicemail at four zero four for

0:39:20.320 --> 0:39:24.960
<v Speaker 1>one zero zero four f one. As always, thanks for

0:39:25.080 --> 0:39:30.239
<v Speaker 1>listening through all of that. How were you able to

0:39:30.320 --> 0:39:33.520
<v Speaker 1>maintain your innocence in sort of your sense that this

0:39:33.640 --> 0:39:37.960
<v Speaker 1>could be fixed? Yeah? I don't you know. I've seen

0:39:38.000 --> 0:39:40.320
<v Speaker 1>other guys perfectly on this. I've seen other people in

0:39:40.400 --> 0:39:43.160
<v Speaker 1>a situation like mine is hunt themselves or something. It's

0:39:43.239 --> 0:39:46.680
<v Speaker 1>like that wasn't me. I wasn't doing that. Other people

0:39:46.760 --> 0:39:49.320
<v Speaker 1>just endure and sit there for a decade after decade

0:39:49.360 --> 0:39:53.280
<v Speaker 1>in prison innocence like I did. I'm just a stubb ambastard.

0:39:53.280 --> 0:39:54.520
<v Speaker 1>I would give up yourself