WEBVTT - How Can We Recycle More, and Smarter?

0:00:02.040 --> 0:00:07.080
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to brain Stuff from How Stuff Works, Hey, brain Stuff,

0:00:07.120 --> 0:00:10.119
<v Speaker 1>Lauren Vogel bomb here. For years, China has been the

0:00:10.160 --> 0:00:13.840
<v Speaker 1>top importer of recyclable material taking in about half of

0:00:13.840 --> 0:00:16.720
<v Speaker 1>the world's plastics and paper and turning the rubbish into

0:00:16.840 --> 0:00:20.320
<v Speaker 1>useful materials, so it was quite a shock. In seventeen

0:00:20.400 --> 0:00:23.200
<v Speaker 1>Wendy Chinese government announced it was changing its rules on

0:00:23.239 --> 0:00:26.840
<v Speaker 1>the importation of waste. Instead of accepting bales of recycled

0:00:26.880 --> 0:00:30.040
<v Speaker 1>materials with five percent impurities, as had been the norm,

0:00:30.120 --> 0:00:32.800
<v Speaker 1>China said it would only accept bales containing less than

0:00:32.840 --> 0:00:35.960
<v Speaker 1>one percent, a nearly impossible standard to meet in the

0:00:35.960 --> 0:00:38.919
<v Speaker 1>short term. When the Chinese announced the change, no one

0:00:38.960 --> 0:00:41.800
<v Speaker 1>was exactly sure how it would play out, but now

0:00:41.800 --> 0:00:45.720
<v Speaker 1>they know. As the new rule took effect in January eighteen,

0:00:45.960 --> 0:00:49.440
<v Speaker 1>many countries, including the United States, Canada, Ireland, Great Britain

0:00:49.479 --> 0:00:52.400
<v Speaker 1>and Germany, began to scramble to find ways to dispose

0:00:52.440 --> 0:00:55.000
<v Speaker 1>of their recyclables that just months ago would have gone

0:00:55.000 --> 0:00:58.640
<v Speaker 1>to China. As a consequence, tons of inventory began piling

0:00:58.680 --> 0:01:02.480
<v Speaker 1>up on docks in manicip landfills and in processing facilities.

0:01:02.800 --> 0:01:05.839
<v Speaker 1>In Halifax, Nova Scotia, for example, the city needed special

0:01:05.840 --> 0:01:09.640
<v Speaker 1>permission to bury three thirty tons. That's three metric tons

0:01:09.640 --> 0:01:12.680
<v Speaker 1>of plastic in the local landfill, and just for the

0:01:12.720 --> 0:01:15.200
<v Speaker 1>sake of simplicity, I'm going to refer just to tons

0:01:15.200 --> 0:01:18.200
<v Speaker 1>for the rest of this piece. Apologies, metric users. Just

0:01:18.280 --> 0:01:20.440
<v Speaker 1>keep in mind that our tons are a wee bit heavier,

0:01:20.680 --> 0:01:23.440
<v Speaker 1>and feel free to insert your own joke about Americans

0:01:23.440 --> 0:01:27.640
<v Speaker 1>and heaviness here anyway. Adina Renee Rattlers, Senior director of

0:01:27.640 --> 0:01:31.199
<v Speaker 1>International Relations and international Affairs for the Institute of Scrap

0:01:31.240 --> 0:01:34.520
<v Speaker 1>Recycling Industries, says China didn't give the world a whole

0:01:34.560 --> 0:01:37.080
<v Speaker 1>lot of time to get ready for this. The rules

0:01:37.160 --> 0:01:41.680
<v Speaker 1>changing compasses twenty four categories of solid waste, including certain plastics, paper,

0:01:41.760 --> 0:01:46.080
<v Speaker 1>and textiles. The problem, Chinese officials claim, though others dispute this,

0:01:46.440 --> 0:01:49.400
<v Speaker 1>is that large amounts of contaminated material were being mixed

0:01:49.400 --> 0:01:52.200
<v Speaker 1>in with the recyclables that the country was accepting. The

0:01:52.240 --> 0:01:54.520
<v Speaker 1>officials also said that much of what they were taking

0:01:54.560 --> 0:01:57.680
<v Speaker 1>in was not properly scrubbed and sorted. They wrote to

0:01:57.680 --> 0:02:00.760
<v Speaker 1>the World Trade Organization when announcing the move. Large amounts

0:02:00.760 --> 0:02:03.400
<v Speaker 1>of dirty wastes or even hazardous wastes are mixed in

0:02:03.400 --> 0:02:06.200
<v Speaker 1>with the solid waste that can be used as raw materials.

0:02:06.200 --> 0:02:10.560
<v Speaker 1>This polluted China's environment seriously. Since the nineteen eighties, China

0:02:10.639 --> 0:02:13.560
<v Speaker 1>has been the world's largest importer of solid waste, using

0:02:13.560 --> 0:02:17.120
<v Speaker 1>these recyclables to power its manufacturing industry and to fuel

0:02:17.200 --> 0:02:21.040
<v Speaker 1>its burgeoning economy. As Chinese industry grew more robust, the

0:02:21.080 --> 0:02:24.120
<v Speaker 1>country also became one of the world's most polluted, forcing

0:02:24.120 --> 0:02:27.200
<v Speaker 1>the government to take steps to protect the environment. Adler

0:02:27.280 --> 0:02:30.720
<v Speaker 1>says they do have a tremendous environmental problem on their hands.

0:02:31.000 --> 0:02:33.440
<v Speaker 1>One of the government's directives has been to better manage

0:02:33.480 --> 0:02:36.760
<v Speaker 1>waste domestically and do it quickly. They gave us practically

0:02:36.800 --> 0:02:40.760
<v Speaker 1>no time for any kind of transition. Regardless, China's crackdown

0:02:40.840 --> 0:02:43.400
<v Speaker 1>has provoked a soul searching moment as the rest of

0:02:43.400 --> 0:02:45.760
<v Speaker 1>the planet tries to find both near term and long

0:02:45.880 --> 0:02:49.520
<v Speaker 1>term solutions. For years, the world's nations relied on China

0:02:49.560 --> 0:02:53.320
<v Speaker 1>to take in its unwanted refuse. In for example, China

0:02:53.360 --> 0:02:56.680
<v Speaker 1>bought almost fifty million tons of trash, while the European

0:02:56.760 --> 0:03:00.240
<v Speaker 1>Union in sent eight percent of its sorted plastic to

0:03:00.320 --> 0:03:04.120
<v Speaker 1>the Asian giant Ireland of its plastic waste, and the

0:03:04.200 --> 0:03:08.680
<v Speaker 1>United States sixteen million tons of recycled scrap. In sixteen,

0:03:08.840 --> 0:03:12.520
<v Speaker 1>China processed seven point three million tons of paper, metals

0:03:12.560 --> 0:03:16.160
<v Speaker 1>and used plastic. Now that China has essentially closed its doors,

0:03:16.320 --> 0:03:18.240
<v Speaker 1>there are those who say its actions should be a

0:03:18.240 --> 0:03:20.560
<v Speaker 1>wake up call because there's simply no more room at

0:03:20.600 --> 0:03:24.760
<v Speaker 1>the local landfill or incinerator plant. Consider these numbers. Every

0:03:24.760 --> 0:03:27.640
<v Speaker 1>American will send about sixty four tons of waste to

0:03:27.680 --> 0:03:30.639
<v Speaker 1>a landfill over the course of his or her life. Moreover,

0:03:30.800 --> 0:03:33.400
<v Speaker 1>the average American throws away four point three pounds that's

0:03:33.440 --> 0:03:37.280
<v Speaker 1>one point nine kilograms of trash every day. Americans as

0:03:37.320 --> 0:03:40.360
<v Speaker 1>a whole toss out eleven million tons of glass each year.

0:03:40.760 --> 0:03:42.920
<v Speaker 1>All that glass weighs as much as four hundred and

0:03:42.960 --> 0:03:47.240
<v Speaker 1>forty Titanics or thirty Empire State buildings. According to the

0:03:47.320 --> 0:03:51.440
<v Speaker 1>US Environmental Protection Agency, Americans recycle or compost only a

0:03:51.520 --> 0:03:54.840
<v Speaker 1>third of the solid waste stream. The world produces more

0:03:54.880 --> 0:03:58.280
<v Speaker 1>than three hundred million tons of plastic each year. The

0:03:58.320 --> 0:04:00.920
<v Speaker 1>World Economic Forum says that by any fifty there will

0:04:00.920 --> 0:04:02.880
<v Speaker 1>be so much plastic floating in the ocean it will

0:04:02.920 --> 0:04:06.880
<v Speaker 1>outweigh all of the world's fish. So what's the solution.

0:04:07.600 --> 0:04:11.240
<v Speaker 1>Simon Ellen, chief executive of Britain's Recycling Association told The

0:04:11.240 --> 0:04:13.960
<v Speaker 1>New York Times, we've got to start producing less and

0:04:14.000 --> 0:04:18.200
<v Speaker 1>we've got to produce better quality recyclable goods. Consider the

0:04:18.240 --> 0:04:21.120
<v Speaker 1>example San Francisco has set for the rest of the planet.

0:04:21.200 --> 0:04:24.279
<v Speaker 1>That city is one of the most recyclable friendly communities

0:04:24.320 --> 0:04:27.480
<v Speaker 1>in the world. It's so called zero Waste initiative, one

0:04:27.480 --> 0:04:30.160
<v Speaker 1>of the most muscular in the nation, is designed not

0:04:30.200 --> 0:04:32.960
<v Speaker 1>to send any trash to the landfill or incinerator, but

0:04:33.120 --> 0:04:36.479
<v Speaker 1>rather to increase the rate of recycling and composting. In

0:04:36.520 --> 0:04:38.680
<v Speaker 1>two thousand two, the city set a goal to be

0:04:38.800 --> 0:04:43.120
<v Speaker 1>zero waste by To that end, Recollogy San Francisco, the

0:04:43.160 --> 0:04:46.520
<v Speaker 1>employee owned firm that runs San Francisco's recycling program along

0:04:46.520 --> 0:04:49.479
<v Speaker 1>with the city, has developed many programs to produce better

0:04:49.560 --> 0:04:54.599
<v Speaker 1>quality recyclables while drastically reducing the amount of trash people toss. Together.

0:04:54.800 --> 0:04:58.240
<v Speaker 1>Recollogy and San Francisco instituted one of the first programs

0:04:58.279 --> 0:05:01.760
<v Speaker 1>that picks upcome postable material at the curb. People simply

0:05:01.760 --> 0:05:04.279
<v Speaker 1>put compost into green bins so it doesn't co mingle

0:05:04.320 --> 0:05:08.960
<v Speaker 1>and contaminate other recyclables. Robert Reid, spokesman for Ecology, set

0:05:09.000 --> 0:05:11.760
<v Speaker 1>in an email. The goal of these zero waste initiative

0:05:11.839 --> 0:05:15.680
<v Speaker 1>encourages San Franciscans to reduce waste, reuse materials, and be

0:05:15.760 --> 0:05:19.640
<v Speaker 1>more attentive to recycling and composting. Last November, we reached

0:05:19.680 --> 0:05:23.040
<v Speaker 1>the milestone of composting two million tons. We diverted all

0:05:23.040 --> 0:05:26.320
<v Speaker 1>that material from landfill disposal and instead turned it into

0:05:26.400 --> 0:05:30.039
<v Speaker 1>nutrient rich compost that's applied to local farms and vineyards.

0:05:30.080 --> 0:05:32.960
<v Speaker 1>Recycling is good for the economy too, he continued. We

0:05:33.080 --> 0:05:36.000
<v Speaker 1>created more than two hundred new jobs permanent local jobs

0:05:36.000 --> 0:05:38.920
<v Speaker 1>in San Francisco in ten years while expanding the city's

0:05:38.960 --> 0:05:43.640
<v Speaker 1>recycling program. Each day, the world's population generates nearly three

0:05:43.680 --> 0:05:46.960
<v Speaker 1>point five million tons of garbage, ten times the amount

0:05:46.960 --> 0:05:50.520
<v Speaker 1>from a century ago in and that number is expected

0:05:50.560 --> 0:05:52.599
<v Speaker 1>to grow to eleven million tons by the end of

0:05:52.600 --> 0:05:55.520
<v Speaker 1>the twenty first century. But there is a glimmer of hope.

0:05:55.800 --> 0:05:58.800
<v Speaker 1>The zero waste movement is strong in many communities. The

0:05:58.839 --> 0:06:01.200
<v Speaker 1>best way out of the trash and we've created, it seems,

0:06:01.320 --> 0:06:10.000
<v Speaker 1>is to recycle and recycle smartly. Today's episode was written

0:06:10.000 --> 0:06:13.159
<v Speaker 1>by John Paritano and produced by Tristan McNeil. For more

0:06:13.160 --> 0:06:15.960
<v Speaker 1>on this and lots of other environmental topics, visit our

0:06:16.040 --> 0:06:29.440
<v Speaker 1>home planet, how stuff works dot com.