WEBVTT - Wilkins on Xi Putin Meeting (Audio)

0:00:00.040 --> 0:00:01.880
<v Speaker 1>Jules eight minutes here before the top of the our

0:00:02.000 --> 0:00:05.800
<v Speaker 1>Chinese president Shi Jinping is re emerging this week alongside

0:00:05.920 --> 0:00:09.280
<v Speaker 1>Russia's President Vladimir Putin. They will have a meeting on

0:00:09.320 --> 0:00:11.520
<v Speaker 1>Thursday that will be the first time they sat down

0:00:11.560 --> 0:00:16.160
<v Speaker 1>together since Russia invaded Ukraine. Joining US Now is Rebecca

0:00:16.200 --> 0:00:21.440
<v Speaker 1>shown Wilkins, Bloomberg's Asia Government and Politics correspondent. Well, it's

0:00:21.440 --> 0:00:24.200
<v Speaker 1>a pretty interesting time, and I think you'd have to say,

0:00:24.440 --> 0:00:27.080
<v Speaker 1>Rebecca that given the losses that we've seen of late

0:00:27.760 --> 0:00:32.040
<v Speaker 1>by Vladimir Putin in Ukraine, that this could give Si

0:00:32.120 --> 0:00:35.479
<v Speaker 1>Jumping the upper hand. What does Shi Jinping want from

0:00:35.560 --> 0:00:41.480
<v Speaker 1>Vladimir Putin? Well, I think the big sort of goal

0:00:41.680 --> 0:00:44.240
<v Speaker 1>from from this type of trip. On the one hand,

0:00:44.240 --> 0:00:46.320
<v Speaker 1>it does seem to sort of be this victory lap

0:00:46.400 --> 0:00:49.400
<v Speaker 1>for sejim Ping ahead of Congress um and a return

0:00:49.479 --> 0:00:51.840
<v Speaker 1>to the global stage. But on the other he does

0:00:51.880 --> 0:00:56.280
<v Speaker 1>seem very keen with projecting his image of an alternative

0:00:56.480 --> 0:01:01.440
<v Speaker 1>world order, and of course Putin very much and Russia

0:01:01.520 --> 0:01:05.640
<v Speaker 1>support very much feeds into that idea. And we've seen

0:01:05.800 --> 0:01:09.960
<v Speaker 1>both comments from Moscow and Beijing sort of apping upping

0:01:10.000 --> 0:01:15.160
<v Speaker 1>the anti on this type of rhetoric around combating the hedgemony,

0:01:15.920 --> 0:01:19.479
<v Speaker 1>count acting as a counterweight to NATO for example, and

0:01:19.520 --> 0:01:24.160
<v Speaker 1>creating this multipolar context. And of course it's those this

0:01:24.480 --> 0:01:27.880
<v Speaker 1>this seeds In Ping and and Vladimer Putin meeting will

0:01:28.000 --> 0:01:30.959
<v Speaker 1>be the centerpiece. I think of this visit is important

0:01:31.000 --> 0:01:33.280
<v Speaker 1>to to understand as well. This is all happening in

0:01:33.319 --> 0:01:37.720
<v Speaker 1>Central Asia where Seedimping, you know, almost nine years to

0:01:37.800 --> 0:01:41.880
<v Speaker 1>the day launched that landmark piece of foreign policy, his

0:01:42.040 --> 0:01:46.560
<v Speaker 1>Belt and Road initiative, mean nine years ago. So again

0:01:46.640 --> 0:01:49.640
<v Speaker 1>we are seeing very much he Jimping coming to lay

0:01:49.680 --> 0:01:53.720
<v Speaker 1>out not just to this sort of clear tilt towards Russia,

0:01:53.800 --> 0:01:57.680
<v Speaker 1>but this much more global vision that he has just

0:01:57.880 --> 0:02:01.000
<v Speaker 1>ahead of that Congress, that issue can mentioned, which is

0:02:01.040 --> 0:02:05.600
<v Speaker 1>coming up mid next month, and we read that Vladimir

0:02:05.640 --> 0:02:08.360
<v Speaker 1>Putin could seek to push through an agreement on the

0:02:08.400 --> 0:02:11.880
<v Speaker 1>power of Siberia too. That's a gas pipeline that would

0:02:11.919 --> 0:02:15.760
<v Speaker 1>carry Russian gas to China. What is the current status

0:02:15.760 --> 0:02:19.760
<v Speaker 1>of that, Yes, indeed, I think that is a big

0:02:19.840 --> 0:02:23.600
<v Speaker 1>question mark. I mean, Russia exports to China have jumped

0:02:24.000 --> 0:02:27.360
<v Speaker 1>nearly fifty percent to forty one billion dollars in the

0:02:27.360 --> 0:02:30.040
<v Speaker 1>first five months of this year. So we have seen

0:02:30.160 --> 0:02:35.640
<v Speaker 1>ties trade ties, certainly between Moscow and Beijing grow this year.

0:02:36.240 --> 0:02:39.680
<v Speaker 1>When it comes to energy in particular, clearly China is

0:02:39.840 --> 0:02:43.600
<v Speaker 1>leaning on Russia to source more of its coal imports

0:02:43.600 --> 0:02:47.280
<v Speaker 1>for example about this year, but saying that, you know,

0:02:47.520 --> 0:02:52.240
<v Speaker 1>China still does primarily rely on on its local minds

0:02:52.560 --> 0:02:56.960
<v Speaker 1>to to supply its coal, and so there is certainly

0:02:57.000 --> 0:03:01.880
<v Speaker 1>a very asymmetric relationship here, even as Russia clearly is

0:03:02.000 --> 0:03:06.079
<v Speaker 1>likely to push for more support from China um and

0:03:06.080 --> 0:03:10.400
<v Speaker 1>obtain more industrial, more technological imports to help fill the

0:03:10.840 --> 0:03:14.839
<v Speaker 1>whole and that void of Western goods because of sanctions.

0:03:15.480 --> 0:03:17.360
<v Speaker 1>On the other side of the coin, we have seen

0:03:17.400 --> 0:03:21.320
<v Speaker 1>plenty of calls from Chinese officials and calls in China

0:03:21.760 --> 0:03:26.280
<v Speaker 1>for Russia to do more to protect civilians in Ukraine.

0:03:26.840 --> 0:03:29.880
<v Speaker 1>Is there any chance that we would see a strong

0:03:29.919 --> 0:03:32.959
<v Speaker 1>pushback from Hi Jimping? I mean, what are we hearing

0:03:33.400 --> 0:03:36.920
<v Speaker 1>about some sort of pushback on the aggressive nature of

0:03:37.080 --> 0:03:41.880
<v Speaker 1>Russia in Ukraine? Well on the whole. Although we have

0:03:42.040 --> 0:03:46.640
<v Speaker 1>seen some of those quite carefully placed comments on you know, repeating,

0:03:46.680 --> 0:03:51.360
<v Speaker 1>I think mainly comments made in the past for compromise

0:03:51.440 --> 0:03:56.000
<v Speaker 1>and for peaceful negotiations and more peaceful resolution. UM. I

0:03:56.040 --> 0:03:58.760
<v Speaker 1>think you know, we from some of China sort of

0:03:58.800 --> 0:04:02.400
<v Speaker 1>top leaders that's number three official for example, UM, it's

0:04:02.440 --> 0:04:06.000
<v Speaker 1>top diplomat, we have seen more sort of comments along

0:04:06.280 --> 0:04:11.200
<v Speaker 1>that promote sort of Russia that and supposedly seemed to

0:04:11.240 --> 0:04:15.400
<v Speaker 1>support and back Russia. UM. I will say it is

0:04:15.440 --> 0:04:19.520
<v Speaker 1>important to note that China itself, in its state media

0:04:19.640 --> 0:04:23.760
<v Speaker 1>and it's sort of readouts from from diplomatic interactions, hasn't

0:04:23.880 --> 0:04:27.480
<v Speaker 1>made that many explicit comments on its willingness to assist

0:04:27.680 --> 0:04:33.080
<v Speaker 1>and specifically is that word assist Ukraine, although Russian readouts have, Yeah,

0:04:33.120 --> 0:04:36.680
<v Speaker 1>it hasn't because it seems that the larger goal is

0:04:36.720 --> 0:04:41.960
<v Speaker 1>that the two stand together countering the West absolutely, and

0:04:42.000 --> 0:04:44.800
<v Speaker 1>I think that is the broader goal here, and and

0:04:44.920 --> 0:04:49.120
<v Speaker 1>China itself, of course, will be very carefully treading this

0:04:49.200 --> 0:04:52.520
<v Speaker 1>line between on the one hand, wanting to support that

0:04:52.720 --> 0:04:56.240
<v Speaker 1>counterweight to the West account way ultimately to a US

0:04:56.400 --> 0:05:00.200
<v Speaker 1>lad world order, but on the other steering very are

0:05:00.360 --> 0:05:05.440
<v Speaker 1>of anything that could risk um invoking sanctions. And if

0:05:05.480 --> 0:05:08.800
<v Speaker 1>you kind of look at the actions that China took

0:05:09.000 --> 0:05:11.919
<v Speaker 1>initially at the outset of the war, they were quite

0:05:11.920 --> 0:05:15.279
<v Speaker 1>careful to sort of severe some some of its links

0:05:15.279 --> 0:05:17.919
<v Speaker 1>and some of its economic links with Russia. So we

0:05:18.000 --> 0:05:22.080
<v Speaker 1>have seen this very delicate balance. Yeah, it is all right, Rebecca.

0:05:22.120 --> 0:05:25.760
<v Speaker 1>Thanks very much for your insights, Rebecca. John Wilkins, Bloomberg Asia,

0:05:25.800 --> 0:05:28.320
<v Speaker 1>Government and Politics corresponded