WEBVTT - Listener Mail: Hungry Like The Wolf

0:00:03.040 --> 0:00:06.080
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Stuff to Blow Your Mind, a production of iHeartRadio.

0:00:09.680 --> 0:00:12.559
<v Speaker 2>Hey, welcome to Stuff to Blow your Mind Listener mail.

0:00:12.960 --> 0:00:14.560
<v Speaker 2>My name is Robert Lamb.

0:00:14.680 --> 0:00:17.560
<v Speaker 3>And I am Joe McCormick. And it is Monday, the

0:00:17.640 --> 0:00:19.920
<v Speaker 3>day of each week that we read back messages from

0:00:20.040 --> 0:00:23.680
<v Speaker 3>the Stuff to Blow your Mind mailbox. If you have

0:00:23.800 --> 0:00:26.639
<v Speaker 3>never gotten in touch before, why not give it a shot.

0:00:26.920 --> 0:00:30.120
<v Speaker 3>You can email us at contact at stuff to Blow

0:00:30.160 --> 0:00:33.480
<v Speaker 3>your Mind dot com. Whatever you want to send us fine.

0:00:33.560 --> 0:00:36.879
<v Speaker 3>Of course, we always appreciate feedback to recent episodes. If

0:00:36.880 --> 0:00:39.000
<v Speaker 3>you have something interesting to add to a topic we've

0:00:39.040 --> 0:00:41.360
<v Speaker 3>talked about, or a correction you need to make, whatever,

0:00:41.560 --> 0:00:44.680
<v Speaker 3>just send it on our way that is contact at

0:00:44.800 --> 0:00:48.720
<v Speaker 3>stuff to Blow your Mind dot com. Let's see rob.

0:00:48.880 --> 0:00:51.159
<v Speaker 3>I think I'm going to kick things off today with

0:00:51.280 --> 0:00:54.760
<v Speaker 3>this message from Adam, which was a response to our

0:00:54.880 --> 0:00:56.960
<v Speaker 3>Vault episodes on throwing.

0:00:57.560 --> 0:00:58.400
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, let's have it.

0:01:03.480 --> 0:01:08.319
<v Speaker 3>Adam says, Hello, my favorite podcasters and producer, longtime listener,

0:01:08.360 --> 0:01:12.720
<v Speaker 3>first time quote Collar on your Humans and Animals Throwing series,

0:01:12.760 --> 0:01:17.600
<v Speaker 3>you discussed humans in their throws using a slingshot structure

0:01:17.760 --> 0:01:21.680
<v Speaker 3>in the shoulder. I am a disc golf player and

0:01:21.880 --> 0:01:25.440
<v Speaker 3>longtime martial arts practitioner and have found a different mechanism

0:01:25.520 --> 0:01:29.520
<v Speaker 3>for the transfer of force momentum. When I go to

0:01:29.600 --> 0:01:32.360
<v Speaker 3>throw a disc during a game, the motion I use

0:01:32.480 --> 0:01:36.320
<v Speaker 3>is more analogous to a whip motion, starting at my step,

0:01:36.840 --> 0:01:40.240
<v Speaker 3>moving through my hips, and being released by my arm.

0:01:40.920 --> 0:01:43.840
<v Speaker 3>During this action, I notice, when I've thrown properly that

0:01:43.920 --> 0:01:47.280
<v Speaker 3>the tips of my fingers feel the most force and

0:01:47.360 --> 0:01:50.920
<v Speaker 3>can even bruise. I believe that this whip like motion

0:01:51.080 --> 0:01:54.760
<v Speaker 3>is also present in the animal kingdom many places, and

0:01:54.840 --> 0:01:58.320
<v Speaker 3>your discussion, which I listened to during a game, made

0:01:58.400 --> 0:02:01.560
<v Speaker 3>me think of my anatomical structure in a way I

0:02:01.560 --> 0:02:04.720
<v Speaker 3>hadn't before. Please keep doing what you're doing. You've gotten

0:02:04.720 --> 0:02:07.200
<v Speaker 3>me through many day long trips and have kept my

0:02:07.280 --> 0:02:10.520
<v Speaker 3>mind active with respect to Adam, well, thank you, Adam.

0:02:10.560 --> 0:02:12.960
<v Speaker 3>I'm a little perplexed though, about the idea that you're

0:02:13.000 --> 0:02:16.440
<v Speaker 3>listening during a game like you can. I guess maybe

0:02:16.440 --> 0:02:18.800
<v Speaker 3>in disc golf, can that be kind of a solitary

0:02:18.840 --> 0:02:20.559
<v Speaker 3>game where you don't need to communicate.

0:02:20.680 --> 0:02:24.000
<v Speaker 2>I don't know, I'm assuming so or it. Certainly he's

0:02:24.040 --> 0:02:26.919
<v Speaker 2>not listening to us during competitive play, Yeah, because I

0:02:26.919 --> 0:02:29.359
<v Speaker 2>would not advise that, because you know, I think We

0:02:29.440 --> 0:02:33.200
<v Speaker 2>have a pretty chill vibe going on here, and you know,

0:02:33.240 --> 0:02:36.840
<v Speaker 2>we tend to be exactly what you expect out of everything.

0:02:37.200 --> 0:02:40.320
<v Speaker 2>But you know, I don't want to be held responsible

0:02:40.560 --> 0:02:41.799
<v Speaker 2>should we throw your game off.

0:02:42.040 --> 0:02:45.880
<v Speaker 3>I think I was confusing disc golf with ultimate frisbee, right,

0:02:46.240 --> 0:02:48.080
<v Speaker 3>or that's a team sport where you need to like

0:02:48.280 --> 0:02:49.919
<v Speaker 3>hear what's going on and communicate.

0:02:50.040 --> 0:02:53.440
<v Speaker 2>But I think so this would be penultimate frisbee.

0:02:54.080 --> 0:02:57.040
<v Speaker 3>I have actually played disc golf before, and in the

0:02:57.160 --> 0:02:59.200
<v Speaker 3>version I played, one thing I really liked about it

0:02:59.240 --> 0:03:03.560
<v Speaker 3>was simply the the design of the holes. So like Rob,

0:03:03.600 --> 0:03:07.480
<v Speaker 3>have you played this where there's sort of a pole,

0:03:07.720 --> 0:03:10.160
<v Speaker 3>like a metal pole, where you're trying to get your

0:03:10.200 --> 0:03:12.160
<v Speaker 3>disc to land in a cup at the bottom of

0:03:12.200 --> 0:03:14.960
<v Speaker 3>the pole. And when I played, there was like an

0:03:15.080 --> 0:03:18.200
<v Speaker 3>arrangement of hanging chains that function kind of like the

0:03:18.280 --> 0:03:21.400
<v Speaker 3>net in a basketball hoop, except I guess it was

0:03:21.440 --> 0:03:23.560
<v Speaker 3>different because what the chains would do is if you

0:03:24.360 --> 0:03:28.320
<v Speaker 3>hit the chains with your with your disc, the disc

0:03:28.320 --> 0:03:30.640
<v Speaker 3>would just kind of drop down into the hole, like

0:03:30.680 --> 0:03:34.520
<v Speaker 3>it would absorb the energy and the thing would fall down.

0:03:35.320 --> 0:03:37.440
<v Speaker 3>It was an elegant system. I liked that design.

0:03:38.000 --> 0:03:39.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I haven't I haven't played that. I've thrown a

0:03:39.600 --> 0:03:43.200
<v Speaker 2>frisbee around, and I've played discs of Tron. Those are

0:03:43.200 --> 0:03:44.920
<v Speaker 2>those are my main activities with the disc.

0:03:45.320 --> 0:03:46.720
<v Speaker 3>But anyway, thank you Adam.

0:03:46.920 --> 0:03:50.119
<v Speaker 2>All Right, this next one is a response to our

0:03:50.320 --> 0:03:52.760
<v Speaker 2>series on Hermit Crabs. I believe this was a response

0:03:52.800 --> 0:03:56.360
<v Speaker 2>to the first episode kicking off our three part series.

0:03:56.640 --> 0:03:59.000
<v Speaker 2>This comes to us from Hannah, but I'm gonna take

0:03:59.000 --> 0:04:01.520
<v Speaker 2>a little creative license in reading this.

0:04:07.640 --> 0:04:12.680
<v Speaker 4>Across the barren landscape of January, tattered streamers and cracked

0:04:12.880 --> 0:04:17.400
<v Speaker 4>champagne flutes, rolling in the gutters in the bleak midwinter,

0:04:17.920 --> 0:04:22.000
<v Speaker 4>the coldest time for toes the season when your car

0:04:22.200 --> 0:04:26.080
<v Speaker 4>is somehow either freezing or way too hot. But never

0:04:26.360 --> 0:04:31.360
<v Speaker 4>just write. When we return blearily to our occupations, uncertain

0:04:31.440 --> 0:04:36.839
<v Speaker 4>of our grasp on reality, the universe, or anything slightly bloated,

0:04:37.080 --> 0:04:41.680
<v Speaker 4>but already regretting our new workout regime, a hope came

0:04:41.720 --> 0:04:45.520
<v Speaker 4>to us. Crabs are back on stuff to blow your mind.

0:04:46.160 --> 0:04:48.760
<v Speaker 3>Thanks for that, Thank you, Verner Hertzog.

0:04:49.240 --> 0:04:51.320
<v Speaker 2>Indeed, Crabs are back on stuff to blow your mind.

0:04:51.920 --> 0:04:54.039
<v Speaker 2>Came back for a three part series, and like we said,

0:04:54.240 --> 0:04:57.520
<v Speaker 2>who knows what the future will bring. There's so much

0:04:57.560 --> 0:05:01.119
<v Speaker 2>crab content out there, and we've discussed crabs a lot,

0:05:01.160 --> 0:05:02.200
<v Speaker 2>but there's so much more.

0:05:02.560 --> 0:05:05.320
<v Speaker 3>I wonder if Herzog ever has done anything on hermit

0:05:05.400 --> 0:05:08.000
<v Speaker 3>crabs that seems like it seems perfect for him, you know,

0:05:08.160 --> 0:05:11.280
<v Speaker 3>like a like a documentary on the shell trading and

0:05:11.320 --> 0:05:12.760
<v Speaker 3>the battle for the shells.

0:05:13.080 --> 0:05:14.520
<v Speaker 2>I would not be surprised at all. I mean, the

0:05:14.560 --> 0:05:19.240
<v Speaker 2>man has a tremendous filmography, a lot of documentaries in there.

0:05:19.279 --> 0:05:22.080
<v Speaker 2>I haven't seen them all. The main ones I've seen

0:05:22.160 --> 0:05:24.960
<v Speaker 2>from him are the two that he did with volcanogist

0:05:25.000 --> 0:05:30.680
<v Speaker 2>Clive Oppenheimer, the one on Volcanoes and the other one Fireball.

0:05:31.680 --> 0:05:33.840
<v Speaker 2>Those are both tremendous, but there are no crabs in

0:05:33.880 --> 0:05:36.599
<v Speaker 2>them that I remember. But you know, occasionally there's just

0:05:36.640 --> 0:05:39.520
<v Speaker 2>something that else that just wanders through the scene that

0:05:40.200 --> 0:05:44.239
<v Speaker 2>bears rumination from Herzog, like like just a stray dog

0:05:44.279 --> 0:05:45.480
<v Speaker 2>in the street, that sort of thing.

0:05:46.040 --> 0:05:49.520
<v Speaker 3>Can you imagine how he would pronounce the phrase merciless

0:05:49.560 --> 0:05:51.840
<v Speaker 3>eviction I'm talking about.

0:05:51.600 --> 0:05:54.560
<v Speaker 2>There, It would be go I would attempt it, But

0:05:54.920 --> 0:06:00.279
<v Speaker 2>my impersonation is it's just a shallow, shallow attempt to

0:06:00.279 --> 0:06:02.960
<v Speaker 2>to grasp the majesty of Werner Herzog's narration.

0:06:03.640 --> 0:06:07.919
<v Speaker 3>All right, This next message comes to us from Matt.

0:06:12.960 --> 0:06:15.760
<v Speaker 3>Matt says, hey, Robert and Joe. I was just listening

0:06:15.800 --> 0:06:18.640
<v Speaker 3>to your episode about hermit crabs, and you kept bringing

0:06:18.760 --> 0:06:23.279
<v Speaker 3>up the handedness of the shells and crabs several times

0:06:23.279 --> 0:06:26.039
<v Speaker 3>throughout the episode, and it brought back some information I

0:06:26.120 --> 0:06:29.359
<v Speaker 3>learned in biology. Though it sounded like the handed direction

0:06:29.480 --> 0:06:34.040
<v Speaker 3>in crabs might be species specific. At least in some snails,

0:06:34.160 --> 0:06:39.120
<v Speaker 3>the direction their shell rotates is the result of maternal effect.

0:06:39.640 --> 0:06:43.640
<v Speaker 3>This means that direction isn't decided by the individual, but

0:06:43.760 --> 0:06:46.800
<v Speaker 3>rather their mother. In the case we studied, the snail

0:06:46.800 --> 0:06:50.760
<v Speaker 3>shell direction was genetically decided, with right handed being recessive

0:06:50.880 --> 0:06:54.440
<v Speaker 3>and left handed being dominant, but it was the genetics

0:06:54.480 --> 0:06:57.560
<v Speaker 3>of the mother that started the spiral. This means that

0:06:57.600 --> 0:07:00.440
<v Speaker 3>you kind of a snail that is genetically left handed

0:07:01.000 --> 0:07:04.680
<v Speaker 3>have a right handed shell because their mother had right

0:07:04.720 --> 0:07:08.839
<v Speaker 3>handed genes, who potentially would have a left handed shell

0:07:08.960 --> 0:07:13.080
<v Speaker 3>themselves based on their mother's genetics. I think it's a

0:07:13.080 --> 0:07:17.240
<v Speaker 3>pretty interesting thing to think about and thought i'd share. Also,

0:07:17.400 --> 0:07:20.360
<v Speaker 3>I was thinking about possible topics for discussion, and I've

0:07:20.400 --> 0:07:25.239
<v Speaker 3>got a couple. First, the witching hour aka the Devil's Hour.

0:07:25.720 --> 0:07:28.160
<v Speaker 3>This is something that was brought to my attention recently.

0:07:28.480 --> 0:07:32.400
<v Speaker 3>The thing is, I distinctly remember that hour starting at midnight,

0:07:33.040 --> 0:07:35.760
<v Speaker 3>but it seems right now it's more commonly assumed to

0:07:35.800 --> 0:07:39.520
<v Speaker 3>be three am. I have clear memories of old cartoons

0:07:39.560 --> 0:07:43.760
<v Speaker 3>featuring a clock striking twelve when supernatural events begin to happen,

0:07:44.200 --> 0:07:47.200
<v Speaker 3>as well as poems and the like. I had also

0:07:47.400 --> 0:07:51.760
<v Speaker 3>always associated this with the general belief that the veil

0:07:52.040 --> 0:07:55.040
<v Speaker 3>keeping ghosts, fairies and the like out of our world

0:07:55.160 --> 0:07:59.040
<v Speaker 3>is thinnest in the place between and midnight, marking the

0:07:59.080 --> 0:08:01.800
<v Speaker 3>time version of this being the point between one day

0:08:01.880 --> 0:08:04.160
<v Speaker 3>and the next. This could be a topic you might

0:08:04.200 --> 0:08:06.840
<v Speaker 3>look into, or perhaps even the idea of a place

0:08:06.920 --> 0:08:11.400
<v Speaker 3>between and its association with magical happenings. That being more cultural,

0:08:11.480 --> 0:08:14.000
<v Speaker 3>I have another more science you might look into, the

0:08:14.160 --> 0:08:18.080
<v Speaker 3>circadian rhythm, and in particular in things like plants. It

0:08:18.120 --> 0:08:21.840
<v Speaker 3>seems everything has something like that rhythm, and there has

0:08:21.920 --> 0:08:25.920
<v Speaker 3>been some research into plants related to the effectiveness of

0:08:26.040 --> 0:08:29.360
<v Speaker 3>using herbicides based on the time of day it is applied.

0:08:30.640 --> 0:08:32.679
<v Speaker 3>Many of these could be a good topic for a

0:08:32.720 --> 0:08:35.080
<v Speaker 3>future episode, or at least lead due to something to

0:08:35.200 --> 0:08:38.160
<v Speaker 3>discuss anyway. Love the podcast. It makes my forty minute

0:08:38.160 --> 0:08:41.679
<v Speaker 3>commute to work so much more bearable. Thanks Matt oh,

0:08:41.760 --> 0:08:44.360
<v Speaker 3>this is fabulous. Yeah, there's some wonderful suggestions in here

0:08:44.440 --> 0:08:48.200
<v Speaker 3>and now the whole mention of the cut off points

0:08:48.240 --> 0:08:51.440
<v Speaker 3>for various things like the Witching Hour reminds me of

0:08:51.480 --> 0:08:53.920
<v Speaker 3>something I just learned about that I was not aware of.

0:08:54.880 --> 0:08:58.040
<v Speaker 3>I'm not a huge April Fool's Day fan. I think

0:08:58.480 --> 0:09:04.160
<v Speaker 3>it can be, but it almost always isn't. And I

0:09:04.280 --> 0:09:07.360
<v Speaker 3>was watching the first episode of the latest season of

0:09:07.400 --> 0:09:11.640
<v Speaker 3>the BBC series Ghosts, and which is a fabulous series

0:09:11.679 --> 0:09:13.880
<v Speaker 3>if anyone out there hasn't seen it, but they have

0:09:13.920 --> 0:09:16.199
<v Speaker 3>an episode that deals with April Fool's Day and they

0:09:16.280 --> 0:09:20.160
<v Speaker 3>mention that you don't want to carry out your April

0:09:20.200 --> 0:09:26.040
<v Speaker 3>Fool's Day gag after midday. This is apparently the tradition

0:09:26.240 --> 0:09:29.880
<v Speaker 3>in the UK that if you carry out an April

0:09:29.880 --> 0:09:33.679
<v Speaker 3>Fool's Day prank after midday, you are the fool and

0:09:34.320 --> 0:09:36.520
<v Speaker 3>you have stepped out of line. And I have to

0:09:36.520 --> 0:09:38.200
<v Speaker 3>say I like that. I like the idea of taking

0:09:38.280 --> 0:09:40.480
<v Speaker 3>a holiday that it's not even a holiday, it's sort

0:09:40.480 --> 0:09:44.360
<v Speaker 3>of a holiday. Taking an April Fool's Day, a day

0:09:44.400 --> 0:09:46.360
<v Speaker 3>I already don't care for, and let's just go ahead

0:09:46.400 --> 0:09:48.040
<v Speaker 3>and cut it in half. Let's just go out in

0:09:48.040 --> 0:09:50.920
<v Speaker 3>a half fifty percent less of that. Maybe in time

0:09:50.960 --> 0:09:53.040
<v Speaker 3>we can work it down to like just twenty five

0:09:53.080 --> 0:09:56.200
<v Speaker 3>percent of the day can be utilized. Now I would

0:09:56.200 --> 0:09:59.360
<v Speaker 3>have a question about that, which is, okay, let's assume

0:09:59.440 --> 0:10:02.840
<v Speaker 3>you work all of your April Fools into the witching hour,

0:10:02.920 --> 0:10:05.400
<v Speaker 3>Like you're only allowed to do April Fools pranks between

0:10:05.440 --> 0:10:09.320
<v Speaker 3>three and four am on the on the night of

0:10:09.440 --> 0:10:12.760
<v Speaker 3>April first. So part of what I hate about April

0:10:12.800 --> 0:10:16.319
<v Speaker 3>Fool's Day these days is the asynchronous nature of how

0:10:16.440 --> 0:10:19.439
<v Speaker 3>pranks are propagated in the age of the Internet. So,

0:10:19.640 --> 0:10:23.120
<v Speaker 3>like you post an article that's an April Fool's joke

0:10:23.200 --> 0:10:25.080
<v Speaker 3>that a lot of these are not even funny to

0:10:25.080 --> 0:10:30.240
<v Speaker 3>begin with, but imagine it is funny and you get to,

0:10:30.400 --> 0:10:32.400
<v Speaker 3>you know, read it on the morning of April first.

0:10:32.480 --> 0:10:35.400
<v Speaker 3>It's usually still on the internet after that. And so

0:10:35.520 --> 0:10:38.840
<v Speaker 3>I think most of these pranks, which are largely online

0:10:38.880 --> 0:10:41.200
<v Speaker 3>in one way or another these days, there would be

0:10:41.320 --> 0:10:44.640
<v Speaker 3>asynchronous reception of the prank, even if the prank is

0:10:45.800 --> 0:10:49.079
<v Speaker 3>you know, sort of quote published during the allowed time.

0:10:49.559 --> 0:10:52.880
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it muddies the waters, and the waters remain to

0:10:53.000 --> 0:10:55.520
<v Speaker 2>some degree muddied until they clear out a bit. But

0:10:55.760 --> 0:10:57.720
<v Speaker 2>you know, on top of that, there's so much disinformation

0:10:57.760 --> 0:11:01.360
<v Speaker 2>and misinformation on the internet. Do we really need one

0:11:01.400 --> 0:11:03.680
<v Speaker 2>day of the year that's all about doing more of it,

0:11:05.520 --> 0:11:09.280
<v Speaker 2>even if it's supposedly just for laughs, And again a

0:11:09.280 --> 0:11:11.839
<v Speaker 2>lot of them are not calibrated well enough to really

0:11:11.840 --> 0:11:14.960
<v Speaker 2>be laugh intensive. There's some some establishments do it well.

0:11:15.040 --> 0:11:19.880
<v Speaker 2>I always like the the MPR April Fool's Day gags,

0:11:19.920 --> 0:11:22.400
<v Speaker 2>But you know, it's it's a rare occurrence that I

0:11:22.480 --> 0:11:25.400
<v Speaker 2>actually enjoy one of these things. But to your point,

0:11:25.440 --> 0:11:27.320
<v Speaker 2>if you cut it down to like three in between

0:11:27.320 --> 0:11:30.320
<v Speaker 2>three and four am, on one hand, great limiting it

0:11:30.360 --> 0:11:32.680
<v Speaker 2>to just like that one hour or so, But then

0:11:32.920 --> 0:11:35.720
<v Speaker 2>you're pushing it all into like the wee morning hours.

0:11:35.960 --> 0:11:39.319
<v Speaker 2>Maybe that's going to inspire like even worse practical jokes

0:11:39.320 --> 0:11:40.760
<v Speaker 2>you're gonna get It's gonna be, you know, trying to

0:11:40.760 --> 0:11:43.240
<v Speaker 2>wake people up and so forth. I don't know, they

0:11:43.800 --> 0:11:44.640
<v Speaker 2>just need to get rid of.

0:11:44.559 --> 0:11:54.840
<v Speaker 3>It all right now. One message we got this week

0:11:54.960 --> 0:11:57.520
<v Speaker 3>was a follow up to an email we talked about

0:11:57.600 --> 0:12:00.880
<v Speaker 3>last week. Last week we got an email from Jim,

0:12:01.120 --> 0:12:04.360
<v Speaker 3>a listener who works as an environmental and domestic pest

0:12:04.400 --> 0:12:10.560
<v Speaker 3>controller in Australia, who expressed some skepticism about the subject

0:12:10.600 --> 0:12:13.280
<v Speaker 3>of rat kings. Now, we did an episode on ratkings

0:12:13.320 --> 0:12:16.080
<v Speaker 3>back in December, and one of the big questions about

0:12:16.120 --> 0:12:19.800
<v Speaker 3>ratkings is do they occur naturally or are they all

0:12:19.880 --> 0:12:24.679
<v Speaker 3>hoaxes perpetrated by humans. We looked at some scientific sources

0:12:24.760 --> 0:12:28.880
<v Speaker 3>that investigated the issue and concluded that more likely than not,

0:12:29.040 --> 0:12:32.040
<v Speaker 3>they probably do occur naturally, and at least I was

0:12:32.080 --> 0:12:35.960
<v Speaker 3>somewhat persuaded by that. But Jim expressed a few reasons

0:12:35.960 --> 0:12:39.280
<v Speaker 3>for skepticism about whether rat kings do occur in nature.

0:12:40.000 --> 0:12:41.960
<v Speaker 3>First of all, he just mentioned that in his many

0:12:42.040 --> 0:12:45.280
<v Speaker 3>years of work, has you know, looked, he has found

0:12:45.280 --> 0:12:47.600
<v Speaker 3>the lots and lots of rat nests, but has never

0:12:47.640 --> 0:12:50.760
<v Speaker 3>come across anything like a ratking. But he also mentioned

0:12:50.840 --> 0:12:53.840
<v Speaker 3>that and here's a slightly grizzly detail coming. Here's a

0:12:53.880 --> 0:12:57.360
<v Speaker 3>warning that when a rat is caught by the tail

0:12:57.559 --> 0:13:00.520
<v Speaker 3>in a trap, it will often sever its own tail

0:13:00.640 --> 0:13:04.600
<v Speaker 3>to escape, in Jim's experience, presumably gnawing the tail off.

0:13:05.640 --> 0:13:08.680
<v Speaker 3>So you know you could extrapolate from that that if

0:13:08.760 --> 0:13:11.720
<v Speaker 3>rat kings were to occur in nature with live rats,

0:13:11.760 --> 0:13:14.240
<v Speaker 3>you would wonder why they don't gnaw their tails off

0:13:14.280 --> 0:13:17.400
<v Speaker 3>and escape. Now, I thought that was interesting information. I

0:13:17.400 --> 0:13:20.000
<v Speaker 3>don't know if that's decisive one way or another, especially

0:13:20.040 --> 0:13:23.000
<v Speaker 3>about the rat biting its own tail off. But I

0:13:23.200 --> 0:13:25.600
<v Speaker 3>asked in the episode whether Jim was talking about the

0:13:25.640 --> 0:13:29.760
<v Speaker 3>same species that has been observed in alleged natural rat kings,

0:13:30.160 --> 0:13:34.720
<v Speaker 3>because if you recall from that episode, basically the supposedly

0:13:34.800 --> 0:13:38.440
<v Speaker 3>natural rat kings all feature Rattus ratus, commonly known as

0:13:38.440 --> 0:13:42.200
<v Speaker 3>the black rat, rather than any other species like Ratus norvegicus.

0:13:43.440 --> 0:13:46.360
<v Speaker 3>So Jim writes, I wrote to you about ratkings and

0:13:46.440 --> 0:13:49.560
<v Speaker 3>forgot to mention the species we were controlling. My apologies,

0:13:49.600 --> 0:13:52.600
<v Speaker 3>and yes it is Ratus ratus. And he goes on

0:13:52.679 --> 0:13:57.640
<v Speaker 3>to say that Ratus ratus is a serious pest in Australia,

0:13:57.760 --> 0:14:00.800
<v Speaker 3>that Ratus norvegicus is also in all Australia but is

0:14:00.800 --> 0:14:04.560
<v Speaker 3>mainly found in coastal areas, and that Australia also has

0:14:04.640 --> 0:14:08.000
<v Speaker 3>several native species of rats, but those are threatened due

0:14:08.040 --> 0:14:11.600
<v Speaker 3>to introduced species such as foxes and cats. And the

0:14:11.840 --> 0:14:15.800
<v Speaker 3>introduced rats. So thank you for the update, Jim. And yeah,

0:14:15.800 --> 0:14:18.280
<v Speaker 3>I would still say that the severing of the tail

0:14:18.360 --> 0:14:22.040
<v Speaker 3>when trapped does seem to be relevant information to plug

0:14:22.080 --> 0:14:26.520
<v Speaker 3>into the likelihood calculation there though. Another thing I would

0:14:26.560 --> 0:14:30.600
<v Speaker 3>comment on is, you know, Jim, you were saying that

0:14:30.640 --> 0:14:33.920
<v Speaker 3>you've never come across a ratking, and it may just

0:14:33.960 --> 0:14:36.360
<v Speaker 3>be that, even if they do occur in nature, maybe

0:14:36.360 --> 0:14:38.240
<v Speaker 3>they're just very rare, so you can see lots of

0:14:38.320 --> 0:14:42.400
<v Speaker 3>rats nest and never see one. But another thing I

0:14:42.400 --> 0:14:45.520
<v Speaker 3>would comment on is that almost all alleged ratkings come

0:14:45.520 --> 0:14:48.880
<v Speaker 3>from places with very cold winter weather. The sources we

0:14:48.880 --> 0:14:52.640
<v Speaker 3>were reading about them and mentioned this, So usually there

0:14:52.640 --> 0:14:56.800
<v Speaker 3>are places on the north end of continental Europe like Germany, Poland,

0:14:57.000 --> 0:15:01.280
<v Speaker 3>Estonia and places like that. And Jim, I wonder if

0:15:01.360 --> 0:15:03.040
<v Speaker 3>where you are in Australia, I think you said you

0:15:03.080 --> 0:15:06.280
<v Speaker 3>were in the area of Canberra. I wonder whether that

0:15:06.360 --> 0:15:09.560
<v Speaker 3>would have cold enough winters to create rat kings if

0:15:09.640 --> 0:15:11.680
<v Speaker 3>rat kings are indeed created in nature.

0:15:12.240 --> 0:15:12.720
<v Speaker 4>So I don't know.

0:15:13.120 --> 0:15:15.480
<v Speaker 3>Interesting question still open in my mind.

0:15:16.040 --> 0:15:18.480
<v Speaker 2>All right, This one comes to us from Jessper. Jessper

0:15:18.480 --> 0:15:21.960
<v Speaker 2>writes in and says, hey, Joe and Rob thanks for

0:15:22.000 --> 0:15:24.680
<v Speaker 2>another great episode. This is responding to the rat king

0:15:24.720 --> 0:15:28.480
<v Speaker 2>episode from last month. There is indeed at least one

0:15:28.480 --> 0:15:32.000
<v Speaker 2>metal band that uses rat king iconography, the doom metal

0:15:32.040 --> 0:15:36.040
<v Speaker 2>outfit Throne List from my hometown Milmo, Sweden. You can

0:15:36.200 --> 0:15:40.000
<v Speaker 2>listen to them here and they include a link for

0:15:40.120 --> 0:15:43.320
<v Speaker 2>us to follow and check out some artwork below and

0:15:43.560 --> 0:15:49.400
<v Speaker 2>into the email. Jasper has pasted the logo here for

0:15:49.480 --> 0:15:53.720
<v Speaker 2>this band that does indeed contain a grotesque rat king.

0:15:54.320 --> 0:15:57.280
<v Speaker 3>Right, and it does seem like perfect metal band iconography.

0:15:57.640 --> 0:16:01.600
<v Speaker 3>An interesting connection. So the band is called Throneless and

0:16:01.640 --> 0:16:03.600
<v Speaker 3>they use a rat king on at least one of

0:16:03.640 --> 0:16:06.920
<v Speaker 3>their album covers or something, so some imagery associated with

0:16:07.000 --> 0:16:09.440
<v Speaker 3>the band. I thought that was interesting. This is probably

0:16:09.440 --> 0:16:11.840
<v Speaker 3>just a coincidence. But remember in the episode we talked

0:16:11.840 --> 0:16:15.200
<v Speaker 3>about the history of the term rat king and how

0:16:15.680 --> 0:16:20.600
<v Speaker 3>the book chapter that we talked about documented that the

0:16:20.640 --> 0:16:23.640
<v Speaker 3>earliest uses of rat king all apparently referred to this

0:16:23.880 --> 0:16:27.840
<v Speaker 3>old and venerable rat who was like loyally served by

0:16:27.840 --> 0:16:30.480
<v Speaker 3>the other rats in his nest, you know, perhaps even

0:16:30.640 --> 0:16:34.840
<v Speaker 3>sometimes perching on a throne made of twisted tails. But

0:16:34.920 --> 0:16:37.560
<v Speaker 3>then somehow, over time the concept of a rat King

0:16:38.640 --> 0:16:42.360
<v Speaker 3>became kingless and became throneless. There was no longer a

0:16:42.560 --> 0:16:45.240
<v Speaker 3>king being served by the other rats. It was just

0:16:45.360 --> 0:16:49.400
<v Speaker 3>the rats with the twisted tails. Though again, I would

0:16:49.440 --> 0:16:52.040
<v Speaker 3>be surprised if that connection is what the band had

0:16:52.040 --> 0:16:54.280
<v Speaker 3>in mind. It seems more likely, I don't know, you know,

0:16:54.800 --> 0:16:56.840
<v Speaker 3>it's metal, it's probably just more like whoa, that's a

0:16:56.840 --> 0:16:57.600
<v Speaker 3>gruesome image.

0:16:58.000 --> 0:16:59.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, I think that's most likely here.

0:17:00.400 --> 0:17:02.520
<v Speaker 3>And by the way, Jasper, I will say I didn't

0:17:02.600 --> 0:17:05.760
<v Speaker 3>know this band beforehand, but I checked out the band

0:17:05.760 --> 0:17:08.119
<v Speaker 3>camp page you linked and listened to a couple of tracks,

0:17:08.160 --> 0:17:09.760
<v Speaker 3>and yeah, I kind of liked it. It was my

0:17:10.480 --> 0:17:13.320
<v Speaker 3>sort of thing. I'm less into like the death metal

0:17:13.359 --> 0:17:16.760
<v Speaker 3>and metal core type stuff and more into the stoner

0:17:16.760 --> 0:17:19.280
<v Speaker 3>doom kind of metal, and this was in that genre,

0:17:19.359 --> 0:17:22.000
<v Speaker 3>and I it was a pretty pretty heavy example of it.

0:17:22.680 --> 0:17:24.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Yeah, I listened to just part of one of

0:17:24.560 --> 0:17:26.720
<v Speaker 2>the tracks, and it did seem like it was hidden

0:17:26.800 --> 0:17:30.679
<v Speaker 2>on that doom metal, stoner metal kind of vibe. I

0:17:30.720 --> 0:17:34.280
<v Speaker 2>have another musical response here. This one comes to us

0:17:34.480 --> 0:17:36.840
<v Speaker 2>via discord. And if you're like, WHOA, what's you have

0:17:36.880 --> 0:17:38.560
<v Speaker 2>a discord? Well, yeah, there is a stuff to blow

0:17:38.560 --> 0:17:40.560
<v Speaker 2>your mind. Discord and if you would like to join it,

0:17:41.080 --> 0:17:42.560
<v Speaker 2>you just need to email us and we'll send you

0:17:42.600 --> 0:17:50.200
<v Speaker 2>the link anyway, Taylor says, it is a quick comment

0:17:50.240 --> 0:17:53.399
<v Speaker 2>here per the synth Wave Conversation on the recent Listener

0:17:53.440 --> 0:17:56.560
<v Speaker 2>Mail episode. I'm not old enough to have particular nostalgic

0:17:56.680 --> 0:17:59.720
<v Speaker 2>ties to this kind of music, but I really dig it. Nonetheless,

0:18:00.080 --> 0:18:02.320
<v Speaker 2>that said, I am old enough to have grown up

0:18:02.320 --> 0:18:04.600
<v Speaker 2>with a lot of eight to sixteen bit video game

0:18:04.640 --> 0:18:07.879
<v Speaker 2>tracks that gave me an early appreciation for synth music

0:18:07.960 --> 0:18:10.800
<v Speaker 2>in general. And that's a great point. I mean, yeah,

0:18:11.240 --> 0:18:15.520
<v Speaker 2>video game music has also influenced and created whole genres

0:18:15.520 --> 0:18:16.480
<v Speaker 2>of electronic music.

0:18:17.359 --> 0:18:20.280
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. I don't know what the name for this genre is,

0:18:20.359 --> 0:18:23.320
<v Speaker 3>but there is a thing I've heard where people will

0:18:23.320 --> 0:18:27.720
<v Speaker 3>go through and like painstakingly recreate a piece of original

0:18:27.800 --> 0:18:31.840
<v Speaker 3>popular music fully in the like sound textures of one

0:18:31.840 --> 0:18:34.600
<v Speaker 3>of these video game consoles. So it's like the song

0:18:34.800 --> 0:18:37.880
<v Speaker 3>is made all out of the sounds that you had

0:18:37.920 --> 0:18:40.680
<v Speaker 3>available as a music programmer of like a game Boy

0:18:40.720 --> 0:18:42.000
<v Speaker 3>game or an AS game.

0:18:42.840 --> 0:18:46.400
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, this is what this is considered chiptune.

0:18:47.280 --> 0:18:48.680
<v Speaker 3>Oh that sounds a failure.

0:18:49.080 --> 0:18:52.440
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, I don't know that. I've listened to any

0:18:52.480 --> 0:18:58.399
<v Speaker 2>like dedicated chiptune artists recently, you know, but it seems

0:18:58.440 --> 0:19:00.800
<v Speaker 2>like there have been a number of bands that have

0:19:00.960 --> 0:19:03.280
<v Speaker 2>at least been inspired by it to some degree, you know.

0:19:03.400 --> 0:19:05.880
<v Speaker 2>So you'll hear a little bit of it sprinkled in

0:19:05.960 --> 0:19:06.520
<v Speaker 2>here and there.

0:19:07.400 --> 0:19:10.359
<v Speaker 3>Man, those Anys game soundtracks were really good at pumping

0:19:10.440 --> 0:19:14.600
<v Speaker 3>you up. There are some that I know I'll never forget.

0:19:14.680 --> 0:19:19.119
<v Speaker 3>You remember the original nes Batman side scroller game and

0:19:19.160 --> 0:19:21.880
<v Speaker 3>the music in that, the music.

0:19:22.000 --> 0:19:24.359
<v Speaker 2>But I think I remember the game, Yeah.

0:19:23.880 --> 0:19:25.840
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, where you could like cling to the walls and

0:19:26.240 --> 0:19:26.879
<v Speaker 3>it was cool.

0:19:28.480 --> 0:19:30.200
<v Speaker 2>All right, Joe, I think we have time for one

0:19:30.320 --> 0:19:33.439
<v Speaker 2>weird house cinema listener mail. What do you have for us?

0:19:33.760 --> 0:19:36.919
<v Speaker 3>Oh? We got this one from Fernando. This is in

0:19:37.240 --> 0:19:46.200
<v Speaker 3>response to I Come in Peace starring Dolph Londergren. Fernando says, Hello,

0:19:46.320 --> 0:19:49.080
<v Speaker 3>Robert and Joe. Longtime listener, and I might have written

0:19:49.119 --> 0:19:51.640
<v Speaker 3>to you before. I just finished listening to your episode

0:19:51.680 --> 0:19:54.040
<v Speaker 3>on I Come in Peace. I am old enough that

0:19:54.119 --> 0:19:59.400
<v Speaker 3>I actually saw that movie in theaters with my buddies. Congratulations, Fernando.

0:20:00.000 --> 0:20:02.000
<v Speaker 3>Fernando says, anyway, since at the end of the episode,

0:20:02.040 --> 0:20:05.200
<v Speaker 3>you were talking about notable alien buddy cops. I thought

0:20:05.240 --> 0:20:07.360
<v Speaker 3>I would bring to your attention one of my favorite

0:20:07.359 --> 0:20:11.560
<v Speaker 3>movies of the genre, The Hidden It is gory, suspenseful,

0:20:11.680 --> 0:20:15.280
<v Speaker 3>and I believe would fit right in weird house cinema. Also,

0:20:15.400 --> 0:20:17.840
<v Speaker 3>I wanted to say hello, see you later, keep up

0:20:17.880 --> 0:20:22.640
<v Speaker 3>the good work. Cheers Fernando, well Fernando, thank you, hello back,

0:20:22.680 --> 0:20:24.879
<v Speaker 3>and thank you for getting in touch. I looked up

0:20:24.920 --> 0:20:28.120
<v Speaker 3>the trailer to this and this does look quite quite

0:20:28.160 --> 0:20:32.040
<v Speaker 3>amusing there. So it looks like a cop movie, sort

0:20:32.040 --> 0:20:35.879
<v Speaker 3>of a cop movie variation on Invasion of the Body Snatchers.

0:20:36.359 --> 0:20:39.320
<v Speaker 3>So an Earthling gets possessed. Everybody's like, I've known him

0:20:39.359 --> 0:20:41.520
<v Speaker 3>for years, you know, he's he's my neighbor. He's a

0:20:41.600 --> 0:20:44.120
<v Speaker 3>nice guy. So why is it that he is now

0:20:44.240 --> 0:20:48.320
<v Speaker 3>robbing banks and looting pawn shops like the replicant. The

0:20:48.320 --> 0:20:52.040
<v Speaker 3>alien replicants are just doing crimes, and it seems that

0:20:52.119 --> 0:20:55.359
<v Speaker 3>only an odd couple of mismatched cops can stop them,

0:20:55.440 --> 0:20:59.080
<v Speaker 3>and one of those cops is Kyle McLaughlin. The other

0:20:59.160 --> 0:21:02.040
<v Speaker 3>weird thing is that it appears to have at least two,

0:21:02.240 --> 0:21:07.120
<v Speaker 3>maybe more cast members from Twin Peaks. M Yeah, yeah,

0:21:07.600 --> 0:21:10.919
<v Speaker 3>so of course there's coll MacLaughlin, agent Cooper. He plays

0:21:10.920 --> 0:21:12.520
<v Speaker 3>one of the cops here, but one of the bad

0:21:12.560 --> 0:21:15.280
<v Speaker 3>guys from Twin Peaks seems to be one of the

0:21:15.320 --> 0:21:16.720
<v Speaker 3>alien crime doers.

0:21:17.200 --> 0:21:19.240
<v Speaker 2>And then you also got a klue Galligher in there.

0:21:19.359 --> 0:21:22.000
<v Speaker 2>So it's a it's a great cast. Have you seen

0:21:22.000 --> 0:21:23.920
<v Speaker 2>this one, Rotten, I haven't seen this one. This is

0:21:24.040 --> 0:21:26.280
<v Speaker 2>this is not one I'm really familiar with. I don't

0:21:26.320 --> 0:21:31.120
<v Speaker 2>even recognize the poster art in the VHS art that's

0:21:31.119 --> 0:21:33.000
<v Speaker 2>popping up here, So I don't know this one. This

0:21:33.040 --> 0:21:34.040
<v Speaker 2>one's off my radar.

0:21:34.240 --> 0:21:36.240
<v Speaker 3>We'll give it a look. Well, we'll see, we'll see

0:21:36.240 --> 0:21:36.880
<v Speaker 3>if it is right.

0:21:37.720 --> 0:21:40.120
<v Speaker 2>All right, Well, we're gonna go ahead and close out

0:21:40.160 --> 0:21:42.880
<v Speaker 2>this episode of Listener Mail, but hey, keep them coming,

0:21:42.960 --> 0:21:46.600
<v Speaker 2>keep writing in about past, current and future possible episodes

0:21:47.000 --> 0:21:49.600
<v Speaker 2>of Stuff to bliwl Your Mind, Weird House Cinema, anything

0:21:49.600 --> 0:21:51.120
<v Speaker 2>else we're doing in the Stuff to Blil Your Mind

0:21:51.119 --> 0:21:53.840
<v Speaker 2>podcast feed. And hey, speaking of that feed, if you

0:21:53.880 --> 0:21:56.600
<v Speaker 2>haven't reviewed it, rated it, given it a bunch of

0:21:56.720 --> 0:21:59.280
<v Speaker 2>nice stars. That's something you can do that helps out

0:21:59.320 --> 0:22:01.399
<v Speaker 2>the show. Go go where they allow you to do

0:22:01.440 --> 0:22:04.720
<v Speaker 2>that and do that for us, we would greatly appreciate it,

0:22:05.200 --> 0:22:07.480
<v Speaker 2>and if you have critiques of the show, you know, hey,

0:22:07.520 --> 0:22:09.159
<v Speaker 2>write in about it. That's the best way to get

0:22:09.200 --> 0:22:11.959
<v Speaker 2>in touch with us to air your grievances or whatnot.

0:22:12.440 --> 0:22:15.199
<v Speaker 2>And finally, if you listen to the show on an

0:22:15.200 --> 0:22:18.439
<v Speaker 2>Apple device, if you use Apple Podcasts and so forth,

0:22:18.720 --> 0:22:20.080
<v Speaker 2>why don't you go on in there and check and

0:22:20.119 --> 0:22:23.119
<v Speaker 2>make sure you're still subscribed and that you are receiving downloads.

0:22:23.359 --> 0:22:27.200
<v Speaker 3>Huge thanks as always to our excellent audio producer JJ Posway.

0:22:27.320 --> 0:22:29.000
<v Speaker 3>If you would like to get in touch with us

0:22:29.040 --> 0:22:32.040
<v Speaker 3>with feedback on this episode or any other, to suggest

0:22:32.080 --> 0:22:34.119
<v Speaker 3>a topic for the future, or just to say hello,

0:22:34.200 --> 0:22:36.880
<v Speaker 3>you can email us at contact at stuff to Blow

0:22:36.920 --> 0:22:44.600
<v Speaker 3>your Mind dot com.

0:22:44.760 --> 0:22:47.720
<v Speaker 1>Stuff to Blow Your Mind is production of iHeartRadio. For

0:22:47.800 --> 0:22:50.600
<v Speaker 1>more podcasts from my Heart Radio, visit the iHeartRadio app,

0:22:50.720 --> 0:22:53.479
<v Speaker 1>Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to your favorite shows.