WEBVTT - Holy Crap, What a Week

0:00:00.400 --> 0:00:03.520
<v Speaker 1>The media have declared Joe Biden the winner of the

0:00:03.560 --> 0:00:08.440
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty presidential election. But under our constitutional system, it

0:00:08.480 --> 0:00:11.280
<v Speaker 1>turns out that the media don't actually get to pick

0:00:11.640 --> 0:00:15.320
<v Speaker 1>who the president is. Fortunately, we are joined by a

0:00:15.400 --> 0:00:19.560
<v Speaker 1>constitutional expert, somebody who knows a lot about elections. He

0:00:19.600 --> 0:00:22.759
<v Speaker 1>will help us understand the nitty gritty and who, in

0:00:22.840 --> 0:00:25.840
<v Speaker 1>fact will be the president. This is a verdict with

0:00:25.880 --> 0:00:35.040
<v Speaker 1>Ted Cruz. Welcome back to Verdicts with Ted Cruz. I

0:00:35.040 --> 0:00:39.639
<v Speaker 1>am Michael Knowles, Senator. I am no constitutional expert. I

0:00:39.680 --> 0:00:41.839
<v Speaker 1>did not go to law school, but I think I

0:00:41.880 --> 0:00:44.720
<v Speaker 1>am right in saying this. The media don't get to

0:00:44.720 --> 0:00:48.720
<v Speaker 1>pick the president, right, thankfully, although lord knows they're trying.

0:00:50.040 --> 0:00:52.800
<v Speaker 1>It is the voters who decide. And you know, I

0:00:52.840 --> 0:00:56.000
<v Speaker 1>got to say so. You and I are filming this

0:00:56.160 --> 0:01:00.240
<v Speaker 1>on Tuesday night. Election Day was a week ago. We

0:01:00.280 --> 0:01:04.280
<v Speaker 1>haven't done a podcast since before election Day. I kind

0:01:04.280 --> 0:01:08.919
<v Speaker 1>of feel like Thomas Jefferson in the musical Hamilton coming

0:01:08.959 --> 0:01:14.560
<v Speaker 1>back saying so what did I miss? Like, Holy crap,

0:01:14.840 --> 0:01:19.959
<v Speaker 1>what a week this has been. There's never been a

0:01:19.959 --> 0:01:26.080
<v Speaker 1>week like this in politics, in media, in life, and

0:01:27.120 --> 0:01:32.280
<v Speaker 1>the consequence for the nation are enormous. You know, we've

0:01:32.280 --> 0:01:35.240
<v Speaker 1>gotten a lot of messages of people asking why didn't

0:01:35.240 --> 0:01:37.240
<v Speaker 1>you do an episode during the election or the day

0:01:37.240 --> 0:01:40.800
<v Speaker 1>after the election. And I think people sometimes forget you

0:01:40.840 --> 0:01:42.880
<v Speaker 1>are a sitting US senator. You know, you do have

0:01:42.880 --> 0:01:46.240
<v Speaker 1>a pretty busy schedule, and the events have been changing

0:01:46.280 --> 0:01:50.080
<v Speaker 1>in real time. Obviously, on election night, you had certain

0:01:50.120 --> 0:01:54.680
<v Speaker 1>cable networks calling Arizona, for instance, for Joe Biden. Then

0:01:54.720 --> 0:01:56.760
<v Speaker 1>it seems like people were walking that back. Now it

0:01:56.760 --> 0:01:59.560
<v Speaker 1>seems unclear who's going to get Arizona. You had a

0:01:59.600 --> 0:02:03.040
<v Speaker 1>lot of vote coming really late in Pennsylvania, in Wisconsin

0:02:03.040 --> 0:02:08.160
<v Speaker 1>and Michigan, you had the polls counting stopping just at

0:02:08.200 --> 0:02:10.359
<v Speaker 1>ten o'clock at night, and then it was supposed to

0:02:10.440 --> 0:02:12.480
<v Speaker 1>not resume until the morning. Other reports that resumed in

0:02:12.520 --> 0:02:17.440
<v Speaker 1>the middle of the night. There's just so much disinformation, misinformation,

0:02:17.600 --> 0:02:21.800
<v Speaker 1>and on the legal front, obviously, there are so many questions.

0:02:21.800 --> 0:02:24.560
<v Speaker 1>So I know you have been through this actually before.

0:02:24.720 --> 0:02:27.520
<v Speaker 1>You were a lawyer on President George W. Bush's team

0:02:27.800 --> 0:02:30.440
<v Speaker 1>during the Florida recount and the questions of the two

0:02:30.480 --> 0:02:34.440
<v Speaker 1>thousand presidential election. What are we looking at here in

0:02:34.560 --> 0:02:38.200
<v Speaker 1>terms of President's Trump's chances for a second term in

0:02:38.320 --> 0:02:42.200
<v Speaker 1>terms of the ability to find fraud in Philadelphia, for instance.

0:02:42.560 --> 0:02:45.080
<v Speaker 1>Where are we on the legal front. Well, I'll start

0:02:45.080 --> 0:02:49.400
<v Speaker 1>with a radical proposition, which is that elections are decided

0:02:51.080 --> 0:02:54.519
<v Speaker 1>when the results have been counted and the legal proceedings

0:02:54.520 --> 0:02:59.119
<v Speaker 1>are over that that didn't used to be a controversial proposition.

0:03:00.919 --> 0:03:04.600
<v Speaker 1>You know, think back to election night. I was here

0:03:04.600 --> 0:03:08.280
<v Speaker 1>in Houston, was an election party with a number of friends.

0:03:08.440 --> 0:03:13.200
<v Speaker 1>That night was a great night. Republicans were winning, We

0:03:13.200 --> 0:03:16.760
<v Speaker 1>were winning the Senate, we were winning House seats, and

0:03:17.200 --> 0:03:21.680
<v Speaker 1>President Trump was winning re election. Early on Florida was

0:03:21.680 --> 0:03:24.200
<v Speaker 1>called for the president. Early on Ohio was called for

0:03:24.240 --> 0:03:27.600
<v Speaker 1>the president, and we were leading. I went home to

0:03:27.639 --> 0:03:29.720
<v Speaker 1>go to bed about two in the morning, and we

0:03:29.720 --> 0:03:33.760
<v Speaker 1>were leading in Pennsylvania and Michigan and Wisconsin. I mean,

0:03:33.840 --> 0:03:37.760
<v Speaker 1>it looked like a really strong night. And then I

0:03:37.800 --> 0:03:39.440
<v Speaker 1>suspect a lot of us went to bed and we

0:03:39.480 --> 0:03:43.120
<v Speaker 1>woke up in the morning and it's like what happened.

0:03:46.080 --> 0:03:49.040
<v Speaker 1>There are multiple lawsuits all over the country right now

0:03:49.080 --> 0:03:55.120
<v Speaker 1>playing out. There were going to be recounts in multiple states.

0:03:56.320 --> 0:03:58.960
<v Speaker 1>All of those proceedings have to be concluded before we

0:03:59.080 --> 0:04:02.880
<v Speaker 1>know who actually will be the winner state by state.

0:04:02.920 --> 0:04:06.640
<v Speaker 1>By state, and that's going to take, in all likelihood

0:04:06.880 --> 0:04:10.040
<v Speaker 1>several weeks. It's not going to take six months, but

0:04:10.640 --> 0:04:12.800
<v Speaker 1>the litigation is not going to be over by tomorrow.

0:04:12.840 --> 0:04:16.480
<v Speaker 1>And the night of the election. Number one, the media,

0:04:16.920 --> 0:04:21.160
<v Speaker 1>two outlets, Fox News and AP were really precipitous calling Arizona.

0:04:21.240 --> 0:04:25.160
<v Speaker 1>That was clearly a mistake. You know, when when CNNA

0:04:25.279 --> 0:04:29.919
<v Speaker 1>is calling out Fox for being too anti Trump, you know,

0:04:30.040 --> 0:04:32.760
<v Speaker 1>somebody's jumped the shark somewhere. I mean, I mean that

0:04:32.560 --> 0:04:39.080
<v Speaker 1>that's a problem. But the instant the vote totals shifted

0:04:39.120 --> 0:04:43.640
<v Speaker 1>to Joe Biden. We've seen virtually the entire mainstream media

0:04:43.880 --> 0:04:48.280
<v Speaker 1>try to engage in an immediate coronation, big tech engage

0:04:48.320 --> 0:04:52.120
<v Speaker 1>in total censorship of any view to the contrary. And

0:04:52.120 --> 0:04:56.960
<v Speaker 1>and they're behaving with this weird you know. I mean,

0:04:57.000 --> 0:05:02.200
<v Speaker 1>it's almost like their persecuting heritage. If you dare say, well,

0:05:02.279 --> 0:05:05.520
<v Speaker 1>let's wait till the litigation is resolved, they scream at

0:05:05.600 --> 0:05:13.360
<v Speaker 1>you your undermining democracy. That's nutty. No democracy means if

0:05:13.400 --> 0:05:16.760
<v Speaker 1>they're legal challenges, you resolve the legal challenges. And by

0:05:16.760 --> 0:05:19.920
<v Speaker 1>the way, this happens in elections all the time. We

0:05:20.080 --> 0:05:25.560
<v Speaker 1>see recounts, we see litigation. We see disputes over if

0:05:25.600 --> 0:05:29.440
<v Speaker 1>there were votes that were illegally cast, that litigation has

0:05:29.480 --> 0:05:32.880
<v Speaker 1>to be resolved. And you know the way it plays out.

0:05:33.240 --> 0:05:35.880
<v Speaker 1>Their cases in state court, their cases in federal court.

0:05:35.920 --> 0:05:40.599
<v Speaker 1>The cases in state court will be adjudicated in a

0:05:40.640 --> 0:05:43.359
<v Speaker 1>trial court. They will, they will in many instances go

0:05:43.480 --> 0:05:45.719
<v Speaker 1>up to an intermediate court of appeals. They would go

0:05:45.800 --> 0:05:48.960
<v Speaker 1>up maybe to the state Supreme Court, and then the

0:05:49.040 --> 0:05:52.120
<v Speaker 1>US Supreme Court can take it from the state system.

0:05:52.160 --> 0:05:54.479
<v Speaker 1>There will also be cases in federal court that start

0:05:54.520 --> 0:05:56.479
<v Speaker 1>in federal district court, maybe go up to the Court

0:05:56.480 --> 0:05:59.000
<v Speaker 1>of Appeals, and they can go up to the Supreme Court.

0:05:59.000 --> 0:06:03.000
<v Speaker 1>So if you look at Bush versus Gore, as you

0:06:03.040 --> 0:06:05.479
<v Speaker 1>know my book One Vote Away, it's a whole chapter

0:06:05.560 --> 0:06:08.960
<v Speaker 1>on Bush versus Gore, and it goes into great detailed

0:06:09.360 --> 0:06:13.320
<v Speaker 1>Bush versus Gore took thirty six days when we arrived

0:06:13.360 --> 0:06:18.799
<v Speaker 1>in Florida. Within days, we had a chart of seven

0:06:18.960 --> 0:06:21.520
<v Speaker 1>different cases that we're all pending just in one state,

0:06:21.600 --> 0:06:24.479
<v Speaker 1>justin Florida, any one of which could have cost the

0:06:24.480 --> 0:06:27.360
<v Speaker 1>presidency of the United States. And it was chaos. We

0:06:27.400 --> 0:06:29.480
<v Speaker 1>went to the Florida Supreme Court twice. We went to

0:06:29.520 --> 0:06:31.600
<v Speaker 1>the US Supreme Court twice. And when I say went

0:06:31.640 --> 0:06:34.400
<v Speaker 1>to the US Supreme Court, I mean brief the case,

0:06:34.920 --> 0:06:38.120
<v Speaker 1>argued it, and got a written decision from the Supreme

0:06:38.160 --> 0:06:42.680
<v Speaker 1>Court twice in those thirty six days. And by the way,

0:06:42.720 --> 0:06:46.080
<v Speaker 1>we also tried a full case in the Florida Trial

0:06:46.120 --> 0:06:50.159
<v Speaker 1>Court in addition to multiple other arguments. So the court

0:06:50.279 --> 0:06:54.719
<v Speaker 1>system can operate, but all of us should expect the

0:06:54.760 --> 0:06:58.359
<v Speaker 1>courts to resolve these claims. There are lots of claims

0:06:58.400 --> 0:07:03.520
<v Speaker 1>of voter fraud. I don't know which claims are accurate

0:07:03.560 --> 0:07:05.720
<v Speaker 1>and which aren't. You don't know which claims are accurate

0:07:05.760 --> 0:07:08.080
<v Speaker 1>and which aren't. That's why we have a legal system.

0:07:08.160 --> 0:07:13.240
<v Speaker 1>That's what courts do. And in today's world where you

0:07:13.280 --> 0:07:16.600
<v Speaker 1>see you know, this Twitter allegation, that Twitter allegation, all

0:07:16.600 --> 0:07:18.600
<v Speaker 1>sorts of things, it's really hard to know, all right,

0:07:18.640 --> 0:07:23.520
<v Speaker 1>what really is the state of affairs? Well, we ought

0:07:23.520 --> 0:07:27.520
<v Speaker 1>to allow the legal system to actually hear evidence, to

0:07:27.560 --> 0:07:31.360
<v Speaker 1>examine the data, to listen to witnesses, to examine evidence,

0:07:31.840 --> 0:07:35.040
<v Speaker 1>and to make factual determinations. That's why we have a

0:07:35.120 --> 0:07:38.280
<v Speaker 1>judicial system, of course, And the idea that there was

0:07:38.440 --> 0:07:41.520
<v Speaker 1>no fraud whatsoever seems to me very difficult to believe.

0:07:41.640 --> 0:07:44.240
<v Speaker 1>You called this out right, and I have to tell you,

0:07:44.280 --> 0:07:46.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't mean to flatter you, Senator, but you were

0:07:46.080 --> 0:07:48.720
<v Speaker 1>one of the few elected Republicans who actually came out

0:07:48.720 --> 0:07:53.400
<v Speaker 1>strongly on this. Specifically in Philadelphia, you had Republican poll

0:07:53.440 --> 0:07:56.240
<v Speaker 1>watchers show up every election. You got poll watchers from

0:07:56.240 --> 0:07:58.480
<v Speaker 1>both campaigns. They show up, they make sure there are

0:07:58.520 --> 0:08:02.000
<v Speaker 1>no shenanigans going on. Republican poll watchers were turned away.

0:08:02.160 --> 0:08:03.920
<v Speaker 1>There was then a court order that said you have

0:08:03.960 --> 0:08:06.800
<v Speaker 1>to let the Republican poll watchers in. What happened, they

0:08:06.880 --> 0:08:09.800
<v Speaker 1>still encountered resistance trying to take a look at these polls.

0:08:10.040 --> 0:08:14.320
<v Speaker 1>That is outrageous, That is illegal, and who knows if

0:08:14.360 --> 0:08:16.760
<v Speaker 1>that's through an election. We can't know that. Obviously a

0:08:16.800 --> 0:08:18.880
<v Speaker 1>legal process has to play out. But to say that

0:08:18.880 --> 0:08:21.280
<v Speaker 1>there is no evidence whatsoever and we need to certify

0:08:21.320 --> 0:08:24.600
<v Speaker 1>these results and move on and waiting even five days

0:08:24.680 --> 0:08:27.480
<v Speaker 1>is too long and unprecedented. That just seems to be

0:08:27.720 --> 0:08:31.200
<v Speaker 1>not in correspondence with reality. Well, and let's take that

0:08:31.240 --> 0:08:34.480
<v Speaker 1>component for a moment. I've been trying to be very

0:08:34.520 --> 0:08:42.200
<v Speaker 1>active both on social media and also on media media,

0:08:43.040 --> 0:08:48.040
<v Speaker 1>engaging in these issues and leading the fight it's interesting

0:08:48.080 --> 0:08:50.800
<v Speaker 1>the media talking points and the dem talking points on

0:08:51.200 --> 0:08:53.720
<v Speaker 1>the Pennsylvania ballot observers is, well, no, no, no, they

0:08:53.760 --> 0:08:58.120
<v Speaker 1>were in the room. What they ignore is that they

0:08:58.160 --> 0:09:01.440
<v Speaker 1>were being kept twenty feet away or twenty five feet away.

0:09:01.480 --> 0:09:03.560
<v Speaker 1>If you've ever tried to actually look at a ballot

0:09:04.040 --> 0:09:06.880
<v Speaker 1>twenty five feet away, you can't see the damn ballot.

0:09:06.960 --> 0:09:09.920
<v Speaker 1>You are not actually an observer if you're twenty five

0:09:09.960 --> 0:09:13.320
<v Speaker 1>feet away. Ultimately, they went to a Pennsylvania state court

0:09:13.360 --> 0:09:15.720
<v Speaker 1>and got an order to be six feet away. To

0:09:15.720 --> 0:09:18.000
<v Speaker 1>be honest, it's hard to observe a ballot six feet

0:09:18.000 --> 0:09:21.199
<v Speaker 1>away if you're trying to see are the guy's cheating?

0:09:22.200 --> 0:09:27.199
<v Speaker 1>And that's a second point to understand. It couldn't sound like, oh,

0:09:27.200 --> 0:09:30.600
<v Speaker 1>it's a technicality. It's a procedural issue whether there were

0:09:30.600 --> 0:09:35.320
<v Speaker 1>observers there. But the reason that the law mandates the

0:09:35.360 --> 0:09:39.280
<v Speaker 1>observers be there is to prevent people from engaging in fraud,

0:09:39.320 --> 0:09:42.920
<v Speaker 1>to prevent people from stealing votes. You look at Bush

0:09:43.040 --> 0:09:46.440
<v Speaker 1>versus Gore. One of the first things the Democrats did

0:09:46.520 --> 0:09:53.800
<v Speaker 1>is they sought recounts in four overwhelmingly Democratic counties in Florida,

0:09:54.120 --> 0:09:59.600
<v Speaker 1>and I talk about in my book one vote away.

0:10:00.320 --> 0:10:02.520
<v Speaker 1>How on the Bush legal team and I was a

0:10:02.520 --> 0:10:04.120
<v Speaker 1>young lawyer at the time. I was in my late

0:10:04.160 --> 0:10:06.600
<v Speaker 1>twenties and was part of it. Was an incredible legal

0:10:06.600 --> 0:10:10.280
<v Speaker 1>team that came together for George W. Bush. We had

0:10:10.320 --> 0:10:14.439
<v Speaker 1>a big debate about, Okay, do we counter by asking

0:10:14.520 --> 0:10:18.560
<v Speaker 1>for recounts and four overwhelmingly Republican counties. So if they're

0:10:18.559 --> 0:10:21.120
<v Speaker 1>going to go seek recounts and Democratic counties, does it

0:10:21.240 --> 0:10:24.360
<v Speaker 1>help us to do get recounts and Republican counties? We

0:10:24.480 --> 0:10:27.720
<v Speaker 1>didn't do so we decided no, let's not do so.

0:10:27.760 --> 0:10:31.120
<v Speaker 1>And I'll tell you the reason why. Because we believe

0:10:31.240 --> 0:10:34.480
<v Speaker 1>to a person that in the Democratic recounts that the

0:10:34.640 --> 0:10:39.160
<v Speaker 1>hard leftist partisans would cheat, that they'd be sitting there

0:10:39.160 --> 0:10:41.360
<v Speaker 1>those had chads that they literally we've poked them out

0:10:41.360 --> 0:10:43.520
<v Speaker 1>with their fingernails, like if you didn't look, boom, there

0:10:43.559 --> 0:10:46.600
<v Speaker 1>you go another vote for Gore. And what we said is, look,

0:10:47.120 --> 0:10:49.960
<v Speaker 1>our guys won't cheat. Like, if we do a recount

0:10:49.960 --> 0:10:53.040
<v Speaker 1>in a Republican county, it doesn't help us because the

0:10:53.080 --> 0:10:55.960
<v Speaker 1>guys counting us are going to come up with basically

0:10:56.000 --> 0:10:59.400
<v Speaker 1>the same count that. Thankfully, I'm glad our guys won't cheat.

0:11:00.120 --> 0:11:03.880
<v Speaker 1>Now look, some observers may say, oh, that's a pretty

0:11:03.920 --> 0:11:09.280
<v Speaker 1>partisan view of things. I can't prove as a conclusive

0:11:09.360 --> 0:11:12.760
<v Speaker 1>fact that the Democratic counters cheat significantly more than the

0:11:12.760 --> 0:11:15.440
<v Speaker 1>Republican accounters do. What I can tell you is the

0:11:15.480 --> 0:11:18.040
<v Speaker 1>reason we didn't seek a recount in the Republican counties

0:11:18.400 --> 0:11:20.320
<v Speaker 1>is that all of our lawyers, all of George W.

0:11:20.440 --> 0:11:24.120
<v Speaker 1>Bush's lawyers, believe that right, and so we didn't seek

0:11:24.160 --> 0:11:27.000
<v Speaker 1>a recount. It. As they recounted it, you kept seeing

0:11:27.000 --> 0:11:29.920
<v Speaker 1>the numbers for Gore grow and grow and grow. I mean,

0:11:29.960 --> 0:11:34.079
<v Speaker 1>it clearly played out in the pattern we anticipated. And

0:11:34.400 --> 0:11:37.160
<v Speaker 1>just for people who think there isn't historical president here,

0:11:37.200 --> 0:11:40.520
<v Speaker 1>obviously you've got Bush, bigre you've got the two thousand recount,

0:11:40.679 --> 0:11:44.920
<v Speaker 1>but actually your predecessor in the Senate from Texas, Lyndon Johnson,

0:11:44.960 --> 0:11:47.840
<v Speaker 1>who obviously went on to become president. There's great controversy

0:11:47.840 --> 0:11:51.080
<v Speaker 1>about his nineteen forty eight election to the Senate, where

0:11:51.160 --> 0:11:53.320
<v Speaker 1>I think it was about a million votes cast and

0:11:53.400 --> 0:11:56.320
<v Speaker 1>he won by something like eighty seven votes. You know,

0:11:56.320 --> 0:11:58.680
<v Speaker 1>it was fewer than one hundred votes, and it all

0:11:58.760 --> 0:12:03.680
<v Speaker 1>came from back thirteen Box thirteen, a box of ballots

0:12:03.720 --> 0:12:07.560
<v Speaker 1>from a notoriously corrupt county, and there's allegations that it

0:12:07.600 --> 0:12:12.280
<v Speaker 1>had been stuffed at. President Roosevelt actually joked about stuffing

0:12:12.280 --> 0:12:14.920
<v Speaker 1>ballot boxes at the time. This is an American tradition.

0:12:15.840 --> 0:12:20.400
<v Speaker 1>Unfortunately it is. There has been significant voter fraud. And

0:12:20.480 --> 0:12:24.319
<v Speaker 1>by the way, in these big democratic cities, cities like Pennsylvania,

0:12:24.640 --> 0:12:28.520
<v Speaker 1>cities like Philadelphia, cities like Detroit in Michigan. In Detroit,

0:12:28.640 --> 0:12:31.480
<v Speaker 1>they put poster board and covered up the ballot county

0:12:32.080 --> 0:12:36.120
<v Speaker 1>areas to hide them. You know, an analogy I use

0:12:36.240 --> 0:12:39.439
<v Speaker 1>this weekend on one of the Sunday shows, I said, listen,

0:12:39.480 --> 0:12:42.760
<v Speaker 1>if someone goes into a bank and shuts off all

0:12:42.800 --> 0:12:47.480
<v Speaker 1>the security cameras, what is the natural inference that leads

0:12:49.120 --> 0:12:52.120
<v Speaker 1>It's not that they're intending to do nothing wrong. I mean,

0:12:52.160 --> 0:12:56.160
<v Speaker 1>if you're shutting off the mechanism for observing it, that

0:12:56.440 --> 0:12:58.959
<v Speaker 1>people naturally say, well, there's a reason you don't want

0:12:58.960 --> 0:13:02.480
<v Speaker 1>people to see what you're doing. But but let me say, okay,

0:13:03.440 --> 0:13:05.400
<v Speaker 1>in terms of where we are, I mean a lot

0:13:05.440 --> 0:13:07.280
<v Speaker 1>of people are asking, all, right, where do we go?

0:13:07.480 --> 0:13:11.840
<v Speaker 1>What's next? Let me give you good news and bad news. Okay,

0:13:12.000 --> 0:13:15.400
<v Speaker 1>give me the good news first. Okay, the good news. First,

0:13:16.400 --> 0:13:20.400
<v Speaker 1>there is reason for some optimism because listen, this was

0:13:20.440 --> 0:13:24.000
<v Speaker 1>a weird election with COVID and you had massive mail

0:13:24.080 --> 0:13:29.080
<v Speaker 1>in votings and in person voting. The data show that

0:13:29.200 --> 0:13:31.720
<v Speaker 1>on election day the people that went physically to the

0:13:31.760 --> 0:13:35.040
<v Speaker 1>polls and voted in person, that Trump won those by

0:13:35.080 --> 0:13:38.880
<v Speaker 1>a significant margin. The data also show that in many

0:13:38.960 --> 0:13:42.320
<v Speaker 1>states on the mail in votes that Biden won those

0:13:42.320 --> 0:13:45.520
<v Speaker 1>by a significant margin. So here's the good news, and

0:13:45.559 --> 0:13:51.120
<v Speaker 1>a recount or in an election contest litigation, in person

0:13:51.200 --> 0:13:57.120
<v Speaker 1>election day votes are significantly less likely to be deemed

0:13:57.320 --> 0:14:01.800
<v Speaker 1>illegal rights it's hard to cheat those votes. Generally, the

0:14:01.880 --> 0:14:04.280
<v Speaker 1>count is what it is, and the in person election

0:14:04.679 --> 0:14:08.840
<v Speaker 1>good point votes rarely change mail in votes if you

0:14:08.880 --> 0:14:11.320
<v Speaker 1>look at recounts. If you look at election contests, some

0:14:11.480 --> 0:14:16.439
<v Speaker 1>significant percentage of mail in votes fairly predictably are excluded

0:14:16.480 --> 0:14:19.280
<v Speaker 1>as this doesn't meet the legal standards. This is whether

0:14:19.320 --> 0:14:23.720
<v Speaker 1>it's you know someone, a dead person, whether it is

0:14:23.800 --> 0:14:26.800
<v Speaker 1>someone who didn't sign the thing like for whatever reason.

0:14:26.920 --> 0:14:29.800
<v Speaker 1>That varies state by state, but mail in voters have

0:14:29.840 --> 0:14:34.040
<v Speaker 1>a significantly higher percentage of being excluded. In this instance,

0:14:34.080 --> 0:14:39.000
<v Speaker 1>mail in voters are predominantly for Joe Biden, so we

0:14:39.080 --> 0:14:43.360
<v Speaker 1>may well see as these recounts go forward, a larger

0:14:43.400 --> 0:14:47.360
<v Speaker 1>percentage of Biden votes being deemed illegal than Trump votes.

0:14:47.400 --> 0:14:51.960
<v Speaker 1>We don't know that, but there's reason to have optimism.

0:14:52.160 --> 0:14:54.080
<v Speaker 1>Now let me give you the flip side. Okay, I'm

0:14:54.080 --> 0:14:57.200
<v Speaker 1>braced for it. What's the bad news for the Trump

0:14:57.200 --> 0:15:00.880
<v Speaker 1>team to prevail? They can't just win in one state.

0:15:02.360 --> 0:15:06.000
<v Speaker 1>They've got to run the table. So let me give

0:15:06.000 --> 0:15:09.240
<v Speaker 1>you some of the numbers, because it's this is the

0:15:09.320 --> 0:15:13.360
<v Speaker 1>challenging piece. So right now, all right, I'm using the

0:15:13.360 --> 0:15:16.880
<v Speaker 1>New York Times election results as one source. New York

0:15:16.880 --> 0:15:20.280
<v Speaker 1>Times has Biden with a two seventy nine electoral lead

0:15:20.680 --> 0:15:23.240
<v Speaker 1>to two hundred and fourteen. You need two seventy to

0:15:23.320 --> 0:15:26.080
<v Speaker 1>be elected president. So it has Biden with two seventy nine.

0:15:27.240 --> 0:15:31.800
<v Speaker 1>So the Times hasn't called Georgia right now. Biden has

0:15:31.840 --> 0:15:34.720
<v Speaker 1>a fourteen thousand vote lead in Georgia, so we need

0:15:34.760 --> 0:15:38.240
<v Speaker 1>to pick up fourteen thousand votes in Georgia. The Times

0:15:38.240 --> 0:15:41.280
<v Speaker 1>hasn't called Arizona right now. Biden has a twelve thousand

0:15:41.360 --> 0:15:45.680
<v Speaker 1>vote lead in Arizona. Now let's talk about the states

0:15:45.680 --> 0:15:50.080
<v Speaker 1>that they have called for Biden. Wisconsin with ten electoral votes.

0:15:50.120 --> 0:15:53.040
<v Speaker 1>Biden has over a twenty thousand vote lead in Wisconsin.

0:15:54.120 --> 0:15:57.640
<v Speaker 1>Nevada with six electoral votes. Biden has over a thirty

0:15:57.640 --> 0:16:03.720
<v Speaker 1>six thousand vote lead in Nevada. Michigan with sixteen electoral votes.

0:16:03.800 --> 0:16:07.480
<v Speaker 1>Biden unfortunately has one hundred and forty eight thousand vote

0:16:07.560 --> 0:16:12.320
<v Speaker 1>lead in Michigan. That's a big lead. And then Pennsylvania,

0:16:12.400 --> 0:16:14.600
<v Speaker 1>which is the big Enchilada in terms of the most

0:16:14.640 --> 0:16:18.640
<v Speaker 1>electoral votes of the states we're talking about, Biden has

0:16:18.720 --> 0:16:21.880
<v Speaker 1>right now about a forty five thousand vote lead. That

0:16:22.200 --> 0:16:25.720
<v Speaker 1>is a lot of votes to shift in a recount

0:16:25.800 --> 0:16:28.120
<v Speaker 1>or a contest litigation. If you look at Florida and

0:16:28.120 --> 0:16:31.160
<v Speaker 1>Bush versus Gore, the whole course of it, we were

0:16:31.160 --> 0:16:33.680
<v Speaker 1>talking about a few thousand votes. Right at the end

0:16:33.680 --> 0:16:35.880
<v Speaker 1>of the day, George W. Bush won by five hundred

0:16:35.920 --> 0:16:40.160
<v Speaker 1>and thirty seven votes. Right, the totals in Florida started

0:16:40.160 --> 0:16:44.640
<v Speaker 1>out much much closer than where these totals are, And

0:16:44.720 --> 0:16:49.640
<v Speaker 1>if we were talking about one state, you could be

0:16:50.880 --> 0:16:54.200
<v Speaker 1>more optimistic about what the result would be. In this instance,

0:16:54.640 --> 0:16:57.120
<v Speaker 1>the Trump team's got to win in a whole bunch

0:16:57.120 --> 0:17:01.640
<v Speaker 1>of states, right, I suppose even when you hear those numbers,

0:17:01.640 --> 0:17:05.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's amazing how thin some of Michigan accepted,

0:17:05.240 --> 0:17:08.040
<v Speaker 1>how thin some of the margins are in Georgia, for instance,

0:17:08.160 --> 0:17:12.240
<v Speaker 1>or Arizona or Wisconsin even But you know that that

0:17:12.359 --> 0:17:14.959
<v Speaker 1>is very tricky because time is running out. I suppose

0:17:14.960 --> 0:17:16.919
<v Speaker 1>one cause for hope is that we are in this

0:17:17.000 --> 0:17:20.800
<v Speaker 1>bizarre year of the universal unsolicited maland so perhaps that

0:17:21.160 --> 0:17:23.639
<v Speaker 1>gives a greater opportunity to flip them, but perhaps not.

0:17:23.720 --> 0:17:25.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean, that's a lot of votes in a lot

0:17:25.640 --> 0:17:29.000
<v Speaker 1>of states. So what you're saying is, let the legal

0:17:29.040 --> 0:17:32.040
<v Speaker 1>process play out. Do not in no way declare the winner,

0:17:32.119 --> 0:17:33.960
<v Speaker 1>you know it, or go along with the media, but

0:17:34.359 --> 0:17:36.880
<v Speaker 1>maybe don't pop the champagne. Yet, there's still a long

0:17:36.960 --> 0:17:39.720
<v Speaker 1>hill to climb. Well, and look there instances. Let's take

0:17:39.760 --> 0:17:43.360
<v Speaker 1>there was a county in Michigan that has publicly admitted

0:17:43.400 --> 0:17:47.760
<v Speaker 1>that there was a what they called a software glitch

0:17:48.880 --> 0:17:54.320
<v Speaker 1>that shifted six thousand votes from Trump to Bide. Now,

0:17:54.520 --> 0:17:57.439
<v Speaker 1>thankfully they caught it. They caught it and they did

0:17:57.480 --> 0:18:00.200
<v Speaker 1>a hand recount and discovered weight our results are way

0:18:00.240 --> 0:18:04.040
<v Speaker 1>off what we anticipated. And they said it's a glitch.

0:18:04.119 --> 0:18:08.040
<v Speaker 1>This software is used I believe in forty seven counties

0:18:08.040 --> 0:18:11.120
<v Speaker 1>in Michigan. So look, if there were six thousand votes

0:18:11.160 --> 0:18:13.320
<v Speaker 1>shifted in all forty seven counties, that would be enough

0:18:13.359 --> 0:18:19.520
<v Speaker 1>to move the margin. What the Michigan officials are arguing, however,

0:18:19.640 --> 0:18:24.560
<v Speaker 1>is that this quote glitch is idiosyncratic to just this

0:18:24.800 --> 0:18:29.439
<v Speaker 1>county and that it's not present more widely. Now, this

0:18:29.560 --> 0:18:35.080
<v Speaker 1>is an example of there's a reason to be skeptical

0:18:35.160 --> 0:18:40.840
<v Speaker 1>of their sort of self serving explanation. But it actually

0:18:40.920 --> 0:18:44.280
<v Speaker 1>is going to take the lawyers proving this in court.

0:18:44.600 --> 0:18:48.520
<v Speaker 1>It's going to take right now. And I've been on

0:18:48.560 --> 0:18:50.720
<v Speaker 1>the phone with the President. I've been on the phone

0:18:50.720 --> 0:18:52.320
<v Speaker 1>with Jared Kushner. I've been on the phone with the

0:18:52.359 --> 0:18:55.680
<v Speaker 1>White House. I have been urging them to bring in

0:18:57.680 --> 0:19:03.560
<v Speaker 1>a stronger legal team, more curious, high powered litigators, and

0:19:03.640 --> 0:19:07.439
<v Speaker 1>to go make their case. At this point, yelling about

0:19:07.480 --> 0:19:10.679
<v Speaker 1>it isn't going to change it. You got to go

0:19:10.720 --> 0:19:13.360
<v Speaker 1>into court, Yeah, and you got to put on evidence

0:19:14.200 --> 0:19:21.440
<v Speaker 1>and demonstrate to a court a legal basis that the

0:19:21.520 --> 0:19:25.080
<v Speaker 1>margins we're talking about state by state, that that portion

0:19:25.119 --> 0:19:27.159
<v Speaker 1>of the votes were illegally cast and that's got to

0:19:27.200 --> 0:19:32.399
<v Speaker 1>be proven with cross examination, with evidence. And we're not

0:19:32.440 --> 0:19:35.320
<v Speaker 1>there yet. I hope we get there but that's not

0:19:35.400 --> 0:19:41.880
<v Speaker 1>an easy task and it takes some real hard, careful,

0:19:42.000 --> 0:19:46.119
<v Speaker 1>diligent work, right right, Okay, you have not completely thrown

0:19:46.119 --> 0:19:49.000
<v Speaker 1>me into despair. There is still some cause for hope,

0:19:49.040 --> 0:19:51.199
<v Speaker 1>and obviously we'll see that play out. One of the

0:19:51.240 --> 0:19:53.760
<v Speaker 1>reasons I think a lot of people want President Trump

0:19:53.760 --> 0:19:58.680
<v Speaker 1>to get reelected is because they are so infuriated at

0:19:58.840 --> 0:20:03.080
<v Speaker 1>the blob, the deep state, the administrative state, the out

0:20:03.119 --> 0:20:05.640
<v Speaker 1>of control agencies, whatever you want to call it. And

0:20:06.600 --> 0:20:09.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, speaking of legal questions, I was wondering if

0:20:09.320 --> 0:20:11.639
<v Speaker 1>you were going to be arrested for murder earlier today

0:20:12.000 --> 0:20:16.080
<v Speaker 1>because you eviscerated mister Andrew McCabe, one of these corrupt

0:20:16.119 --> 0:20:20.119
<v Speaker 1>officials who was involved in the entire hoax and the

0:20:20.200 --> 0:20:24.200
<v Speaker 1>scandals of twenty sixteen surrounding that election and thereafter. It's

0:20:24.200 --> 0:20:26.800
<v Speaker 1>not getting any play. I noticed the testimony of Andrew

0:20:26.880 --> 0:20:28.800
<v Speaker 1>McCabe is not getting any play because everyone's focused on

0:20:28.840 --> 0:20:31.359
<v Speaker 1>the presidential But I thought it was extraordinarily telling. It's

0:20:31.359 --> 0:20:33.679
<v Speaker 1>one of the most important issues of the past four years.

0:20:33.920 --> 0:20:36.199
<v Speaker 1>And maybe going forward, could you just take us through

0:20:36.200 --> 0:20:38.120
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of what happened. First, we'll just play

0:20:38.119 --> 0:20:43.000
<v Speaker 1>a little clip of your grilling of mister McCabe. Mister mcabe.

0:20:43.040 --> 0:20:47.040
<v Speaker 1>Yesterday on MSNBC, Ben Roods, the former deputy National Security

0:20:47.080 --> 0:20:50.879
<v Speaker 1>advisor to President Obama, said that foreign leaders are already

0:20:50.880 --> 0:20:55.240
<v Speaker 1>having conversations with Joe Biden quote, talking about the agenda

0:20:55.280 --> 0:20:58.480
<v Speaker 1>they're going to pursue January twenty. It's mister McKay. Based

0:20:58.520 --> 0:21:01.160
<v Speaker 1>on that testimony, do you believe Joe Biden is violating

0:21:01.160 --> 0:21:04.520
<v Speaker 1>the Logan Act. I'm not aware of Ben Rhodes's statements,

0:21:05.080 --> 0:21:07.840
<v Speaker 1>or take it on faith he said what I read,

0:21:07.920 --> 0:21:11.000
<v Speaker 1>assuming he's that quote is accurate, and so a verbatim quote,

0:21:11.080 --> 0:21:13.560
<v Speaker 1>is that a violation of the Logan Act under any

0:21:13.600 --> 0:21:17.600
<v Speaker 1>plausible theory? I am not prepared to take your statement

0:21:17.720 --> 0:21:21.640
<v Speaker 1>on faith, and I am also not prepared to conduct

0:21:21.720 --> 0:21:24.359
<v Speaker 1>legal analysis. All right, you're a lawyer. Have you ever

0:21:24.400 --> 0:21:27.919
<v Speaker 1>answered a hypothetical in court? If it is correct that

0:21:28.000 --> 0:21:31.040
<v Speaker 1>I am accurately quoting, it's something the Department of Justice

0:21:31.119 --> 0:21:35.600
<v Speaker 1>frequently did wrong in this investigation. If that is what

0:21:35.680 --> 0:21:38.160
<v Speaker 1>Ben Rhodes said, If Joe Biden is talking with foreign

0:21:38.240 --> 0:21:40.600
<v Speaker 1>leaders right now, does it violate the Logan Act? Yes?

0:21:40.680 --> 0:21:44.359
<v Speaker 1>Or no. I'm not going to opine on a hypothetical

0:21:44.440 --> 0:21:48.040
<v Speaker 1>question about what him he is talking with foreign leaders,

0:21:48.080 --> 0:21:50.280
<v Speaker 1>and it doesn't violate the Logan Act because the Logan

0:21:50.320 --> 0:21:52.800
<v Speaker 1>Act is unconstitutional, which is why it's never been used

0:21:52.800 --> 0:21:56.400
<v Speaker 1>to prosecute anyone. You authorized using it to go after

0:21:56.480 --> 0:22:00.280
<v Speaker 1>General Flynn as part of a political persecution. I can

0:22:00.280 --> 0:22:02.119
<v Speaker 1>give you the answer. Hell, no, Joe Biden is not

0:22:02.200 --> 0:22:05.200
<v Speaker 1>violating the Logan Act. The reason you won't say it

0:22:05.280 --> 0:22:08.560
<v Speaker 1>is because that was your flimsy political basis to go

0:22:08.680 --> 0:22:12.040
<v Speaker 1>after a decorated war hero because you disagreed with politically

0:22:12.080 --> 0:22:15.920
<v Speaker 1>with President Trump. Well, look, McCabe was the deputy director

0:22:15.920 --> 0:22:21.280
<v Speaker 1>of the FBI. Today was significant because there's been a conflict.

0:22:21.280 --> 0:22:23.399
<v Speaker 1>There's been a conflict for a couple of years between

0:22:23.480 --> 0:22:29.560
<v Speaker 1>McCabe and James Coomy, his boss, over whether Comy authorized

0:22:29.680 --> 0:22:33.600
<v Speaker 1>him and directed him to leak to the press. Comy's

0:22:33.640 --> 0:22:36.879
<v Speaker 1>testified now repeatedly under oath under penalty of perjury, that

0:22:37.040 --> 0:22:39.359
<v Speaker 1>he did not, that he never has, that he didn't.

0:22:40.840 --> 0:22:45.800
<v Speaker 1>McCabe had told the press that Comy had authorized to

0:22:46.920 --> 0:22:49.359
<v Speaker 1>But today was the first time McCabe ever said that

0:22:49.440 --> 0:22:54.320
<v Speaker 1>under oath. So that's a big deal. It's one thing. Look,

0:22:55.080 --> 0:22:57.560
<v Speaker 1>it ain't a crime. Delight of the press. May i'd

0:22:57.600 --> 0:23:00.440
<v Speaker 1>be a good idea. It may not be honorable or ethical,

0:23:00.480 --> 0:23:04.200
<v Speaker 1>but it is not. It doesn't carry a prison term

0:23:04.280 --> 0:23:07.680
<v Speaker 1>to lie to the press. If you lie to Congress

0:23:07.720 --> 0:23:14.040
<v Speaker 1>under oath, that is a crime. And so my objective

0:23:14.200 --> 0:23:17.760
<v Speaker 1>in this cross examination was to get and and Comy

0:23:17.840 --> 0:23:22.040
<v Speaker 1>testified before the election. I got him on record again saying, no,

0:23:22.240 --> 0:23:25.879
<v Speaker 1>he didn't authorize McCabe to do this. McCabe, now he

0:23:26.000 --> 0:23:28.480
<v Speaker 1>you want to talk about a slippery witness. Boy, This guy,

0:23:29.000 --> 0:23:32.640
<v Speaker 1>he's smarmy and political and hates Trump and is a

0:23:32.680 --> 0:23:37.600
<v Speaker 1>hardcore Democrat and it was up to his eyeballs in

0:23:37.640 --> 0:23:42.000
<v Speaker 1>the political persecution of the president. But finally, after trying

0:23:42.040 --> 0:23:46.480
<v Speaker 1>to wriggle away repeatedly, repeatedly, repeatedly, he said on the record, Yes,

0:23:46.560 --> 0:23:51.840
<v Speaker 1>Coomy did authorize me. And critically. I ended this cross

0:23:51.920 --> 0:23:57.159
<v Speaker 1>examination by saying, mister McCabe, the FBI has the records

0:23:57.200 --> 0:24:01.000
<v Speaker 1>to demonstrate who's telling the truth. Either you're telling the

0:24:01.000 --> 0:24:03.040
<v Speaker 1>truth or Comy's telling the truth. You can't both be

0:24:03.119 --> 0:24:08.359
<v Speaker 1>one of you's lying. Do you think the FBI should

0:24:08.440 --> 0:24:13.800
<v Speaker 1>release the records, whether emails or remember and or whatever

0:24:13.840 --> 0:24:16.920
<v Speaker 1>documents they have to if you're telling the truth, to

0:24:17.040 --> 0:24:19.200
<v Speaker 1>vindicate you, to tell show that you're telling the truth,

0:24:19.200 --> 0:24:21.840
<v Speaker 1>and if Comey's telling the truth, to vindicate him. Do

0:24:21.880 --> 0:24:25.840
<v Speaker 1>you think the FBI should release the materials? And McCabe said, yes,

0:24:25.960 --> 0:24:29.040
<v Speaker 1>they should release the materials. Well, hot diggity damn, I

0:24:29.040 --> 0:24:31.080
<v Speaker 1>can tell you. I pulled my chief counsel aside right

0:24:31.119 --> 0:24:32.600
<v Speaker 1>after the hearing and said, all right, I want you

0:24:32.640 --> 0:24:35.680
<v Speaker 1>to draft a letter to Bill Barr and to Chris Ray,

0:24:35.800 --> 0:24:37.880
<v Speaker 1>which we will send in the next day or two,

0:24:39.880 --> 0:24:45.040
<v Speaker 1>quoting Comy's testimony, Quoting McCabe's testimony, pointing out there directly

0:24:45.040 --> 0:24:48.080
<v Speaker 1>in conflict that the FBI has records demonstrating who's lying

0:24:48.119 --> 0:24:52.200
<v Speaker 1>and who's telling the truth. And now even McCabe is

0:24:52.240 --> 0:24:54.119
<v Speaker 1>calling for them to be released. And I'm going to

0:24:54.200 --> 0:25:00.359
<v Speaker 1>ask Barr and Ray release them now and let us

0:25:00.400 --> 0:25:04.359
<v Speaker 1>know who committed perjury because they can't both be true true.

0:25:04.400 --> 0:25:08.280
<v Speaker 1>One said yes, one said no. It is impossible for

0:25:08.320 --> 0:25:11.320
<v Speaker 1>both to be testifying truth truthfully. And this is the issue.

0:25:11.359 --> 0:25:14.960
<v Speaker 1>We hope, in Secretary of State Mike Pumpey's words, we

0:25:15.000 --> 0:25:17.320
<v Speaker 1>hope for a smooth transition into a second term for

0:25:17.359 --> 0:25:20.280
<v Speaker 1>the president. But in any case, there is no reason

0:25:20.560 --> 0:25:22.959
<v Speaker 1>not to get this information out. Now you know that

0:25:23.000 --> 0:25:26.680
<v Speaker 1>you won't get it under a democratic administration, So very important,

0:25:26.840 --> 0:25:30.320
<v Speaker 1>I thought. I thought the grilling was just terrific to watch,

0:25:30.400 --> 0:25:33.760
<v Speaker 1>and I do hope that we can see the release

0:25:33.760 --> 0:25:36.000
<v Speaker 1>of this kind of material, and I do hope that

0:25:36.040 --> 0:25:39.600
<v Speaker 1>these people are held to account. Speaking of these agencies

0:25:39.640 --> 0:25:41.560
<v Speaker 1>that are out of control, we'll want to get to

0:25:41.600 --> 0:25:44.959
<v Speaker 1>two mail bad questions. First, one from Kim Joe. Biden,

0:25:45.119 --> 0:25:47.600
<v Speaker 1>if he is named president, wants to issue a lot

0:25:47.640 --> 0:25:51.200
<v Speaker 1>of executive orders that would overturn Trump's executive orders. How

0:25:51.240 --> 0:25:53.919
<v Speaker 1>easy is that to do? After the Supreme Court upheld

0:25:53.960 --> 0:25:57.399
<v Speaker 1>one of Obama's unconstitutional executive orders, doesn't that make it

0:25:57.440 --> 0:26:01.840
<v Speaker 1>harder for Biden to overturn Trump's owes if Biden actually

0:26:01.880 --> 0:26:04.160
<v Speaker 1>gets elected. That is what is the deal here. We've

0:26:04.160 --> 0:26:06.760
<v Speaker 1>always told, you know it lived by the executive order,

0:26:06.800 --> 0:26:09.240
<v Speaker 1>die by the executive order, that they're easy to overturn.

0:26:09.440 --> 0:26:11.679
<v Speaker 1>But sometimes the court has shown us that they're not

0:26:11.720 --> 0:26:14.840
<v Speaker 1>so easy to overturn. So that is a really smart,

0:26:14.920 --> 0:26:19.679
<v Speaker 1>savvy question. If we were living in a world of

0:26:19.840 --> 0:26:24.160
<v Speaker 1>principle and reason, the answer to that should be yes,

0:26:24.240 --> 0:26:29.240
<v Speaker 1>it does make it harder. All right, let me step

0:26:29.280 --> 0:26:33.439
<v Speaker 1>back and answered a little bit differently. In any ordinary

0:26:33.440 --> 0:26:37.159
<v Speaker 1>world where you're following the law, a president condissue an

0:26:37.160 --> 0:26:40.080
<v Speaker 1>executive order, the next president can rescind the executive order,

0:26:40.080 --> 0:26:43.520
<v Speaker 1>and the power to do so is unlimited. Now it's

0:26:43.520 --> 0:26:45.879
<v Speaker 1>a different question whether the executive order is legal, but

0:26:45.920 --> 0:26:49.879
<v Speaker 1>the power to rescind an executive order is complete in total.

0:26:51.560 --> 0:26:54.760
<v Speaker 1>And an executive order, by the way, should not be

0:26:54.880 --> 0:26:58.080
<v Speaker 1>making law. It is directing the executive their executive orders,

0:26:58.119 --> 0:27:01.800
<v Speaker 1>going back to George Washington. But those are instructions from

0:27:01.800 --> 0:27:05.680
<v Speaker 1>the president to the executive branch. Here's how you are

0:27:05.720 --> 0:27:10.600
<v Speaker 1>to execute the law. So it's so, and that's an authority.

0:27:11.000 --> 0:27:14.080
<v Speaker 1>Obama abused it by trying to change the law, which

0:27:14.080 --> 0:27:22.080
<v Speaker 1>an executive order can't do. The Supreme Court lawlessly, and

0:27:22.119 --> 0:27:24.959
<v Speaker 1>the most egregious example of it was this past summer

0:27:24.960 --> 0:27:31.359
<v Speaker 1>in June, the Supreme Court struck down President Trump's revoking

0:27:31.520 --> 0:27:35.879
<v Speaker 1>Obama's amnesty executive order, and it was John robertson the

0:27:35.880 --> 0:27:38.560
<v Speaker 1>Four Liberals, and John Roberts wrote what I think was

0:27:38.600 --> 0:27:45.840
<v Speaker 1>a deeply unprincipled opinion where the Chief Justice didn't dispute

0:27:45.880 --> 0:27:48.560
<v Speaker 1>that Obama had no authority to issue the executive order,

0:27:48.920 --> 0:27:51.840
<v Speaker 1>and he said, of course Trump can rescind it, but

0:27:53.080 --> 0:27:57.560
<v Speaker 1>he didn't provide enough explanations as to why. So we're

0:27:57.560 --> 0:28:00.880
<v Speaker 1>going to call a process foul and send it back.

0:28:00.920 --> 0:28:04.119
<v Speaker 1>And the thing that is utterly and completely hypocritical is

0:28:04.160 --> 0:28:07.919
<v Speaker 1>the chances that John Roberts holds a Joe Biden presidency

0:28:07.920 --> 0:28:12.520
<v Speaker 1>to the same standards or zero. It was clearly a

0:28:12.600 --> 0:28:19.159
<v Speaker 1>pretext to reinstate amnesty, and it's frankly it's the same

0:28:19.200 --> 0:28:25.040
<v Speaker 1>pretext John Roberts and the four liberals did the prior

0:28:25.240 --> 0:28:28.960
<v Speaker 1>term in the census case, where the Trump administration was

0:28:28.960 --> 0:28:31.280
<v Speaker 1>going to ask in the census, are you a US citizen?

0:28:31.320 --> 0:28:34.800
<v Speaker 1>A question that has been asked for two hundred years.

0:28:35.320 --> 0:28:38.240
<v Speaker 1>It's been asked over and over and over again in censuses.

0:28:38.560 --> 0:28:41.720
<v Speaker 1>Are you a citizen? Well, left wing activists don't like

0:28:41.800 --> 0:28:43.719
<v Speaker 1>that question because they don't want how many people are

0:28:43.760 --> 0:28:49.120
<v Speaker 1>here illegally? Yeah, and Roberts played the same game, said, well,

0:28:49.120 --> 0:28:53.560
<v Speaker 1>of course you can ask that question, but the memo

0:28:53.720 --> 0:28:56.640
<v Speaker 1>laying it out you didn't have good enough reasons, So

0:28:56.640 --> 0:28:59.120
<v Speaker 1>we're striking it down and saying, show your work, Go

0:28:59.200 --> 0:29:01.560
<v Speaker 1>show your homework a little more. And it was a

0:29:01.560 --> 0:29:03.480
<v Speaker 1>political game because they ran out of time, and so

0:29:03.480 --> 0:29:07.440
<v Speaker 1>I didn't ask the question. That game has been ship

0:29:08.120 --> 0:29:13.640
<v Speaker 1>will only apply to Trump Biden? Will I think repeal

0:29:13.680 --> 0:29:16.560
<v Speaker 1>executive orders? I think if Biden as president, he will

0:29:16.600 --> 0:29:23.360
<v Speaker 1>re enter the Paris Climate Agreement. If Biden as president,

0:29:23.400 --> 0:29:26.840
<v Speaker 1>I think he will reinstate many aspects, if not the

0:29:27.040 --> 0:29:30.400
<v Speaker 1>entirety of the Iran nuclear deal. There's a lot the

0:29:30.400 --> 0:29:35.120
<v Speaker 1>president can do unilaterally. If Republicans keep the Senate, we

0:29:35.160 --> 0:29:39.560
<v Speaker 1>can stop the worst legislative things. That's also something I

0:29:39.600 --> 0:29:42.800
<v Speaker 1>supposed to hope for now. Senator, I know you don't

0:29:42.840 --> 0:29:45.320
<v Speaker 1>want me to bug you about future plans, so I

0:29:45.360 --> 0:29:47.760
<v Speaker 1>will not. But I felt this was a very important question,

0:29:47.960 --> 0:29:49.800
<v Speaker 1>so I'm going to include it. This is from Tommy.

0:29:50.440 --> 0:29:54.440
<v Speaker 1>If Senator Cruz ever seeks higher office, will he keep

0:29:54.520 --> 0:29:59.120
<v Speaker 1>the beard? I think he should. Senator. Your answer, damn

0:29:59.160 --> 0:30:02.720
<v Speaker 1>define out. The Beard's been fun. I grow it on

0:30:02.840 --> 0:30:06.280
<v Speaker 1>a whim. I've had fun with it. At some point.

0:30:06.400 --> 0:30:09.560
<v Speaker 1>Heidi is not crazy about the beard, so there is

0:30:09.600 --> 0:30:13.600
<v Speaker 1>some pressure to get rid of it. Well, we'll see

0:30:13.600 --> 0:30:16.480
<v Speaker 1>how it shakes out. I'm fun with it, right now, Senator,

0:30:16.520 --> 0:30:18.680
<v Speaker 1>I would like on the record you know I won't

0:30:18.720 --> 0:30:20.360
<v Speaker 1>be like Andy McCabe here. I won't try to be

0:30:20.520 --> 0:30:23.960
<v Speaker 1>weasily about my answers. I am fully one hundred percent

0:30:24.120 --> 0:30:28.640
<v Speaker 1>pro beard. I think if for the Verdict listeners, if

0:30:28.680 --> 0:30:30.600
<v Speaker 1>you agree with my position on this, please let us

0:30:30.640 --> 0:30:33.600
<v Speaker 1>know on Twitter. I think it's great, it's very has

0:30:33.720 --> 0:30:35.800
<v Speaker 1>lots of Abraham Lincoln vibes. I think it's cool. If

0:30:35.840 --> 0:30:38.280
<v Speaker 1>I were able to grow a beard, I would. Unfortunately

0:30:38.640 --> 0:30:41.040
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't quite work out on me, but maybe someday

0:30:41.040 --> 0:30:43.840
<v Speaker 1>in the future. Well, I will say that the baby

0:30:43.920 --> 0:30:47.360
<v Speaker 1>face is a good look for you. Well, that's very kind,

0:30:47.440 --> 0:30:49.880
<v Speaker 1>Thank you, Senator. I appreciate that very much, and I

0:30:49.920 --> 0:30:52.280
<v Speaker 1>will I will try to keep the baby face. We will.

0:30:52.320 --> 0:30:54.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure the next time we speak have a million

0:30:54.640 --> 0:30:58.720
<v Speaker 1>more developments in this crazy, crazy end to a crazy

0:30:58.720 --> 0:31:01.320
<v Speaker 1>crazy year. In the meantime, I'm Michael Knowles. This is

0:31:01.440 --> 0:31:13.840
<v Speaker 1>Verdict with Ted Cruz. This episode of Verdict with Ted

0:31:13.920 --> 0:31:16.520
<v Speaker 1>Cruz is being brought to you by Jobs, Freedom and

0:31:16.640 --> 0:31:22.440
<v Speaker 1>Security Pack, a political action committee dedicated to supporting conservative causes, organizations,

0:31:22.520 --> 0:31:26.080
<v Speaker 1>and candidates across the country. In twenty twenty two, Jobs

0:31:26.120 --> 0:31:29.640
<v Speaker 1>Freedom and Security Pack plans to donate to conservative candidates

0:31:29.680 --> 0:31:33.479
<v Speaker 1>running for Congress and help the Republican Party across the nation.