WEBVTT - Radio Better Offline: Paris Martineau, Jeff Jarvis

0:00:01.800 --> 0:00:03.240
<v Speaker 1>Also media.

0:00:04.680 --> 0:00:07.640
<v Speaker 2>Change is coming. Now it's my time to record radio

0:00:07.680 --> 0:00:11.080
<v Speaker 2>better offline right here in the beautiful iHeartRadio studios on

0:00:11.200 --> 0:00:25.840
<v Speaker 2>fifty fifth Street, and my god, we're back from CS.

0:00:25.880 --> 0:00:28.920
<v Speaker 2>You couldn't stop me. I got off. I did thirteen

0:00:28.960 --> 0:00:31.240
<v Speaker 2>and a half bloody hours on the radio on the

0:00:31.280 --> 0:00:33.279
<v Speaker 2>podcast thing. I'm just don't know why I keep calling

0:00:33.320 --> 0:00:35.440
<v Speaker 2>it radio, and then got on the flight, moved to

0:00:35.440 --> 0:00:37.800
<v Speaker 2>New York. It was nothing, wore off a ducks back

0:00:37.800 --> 0:00:39.879
<v Speaker 2>and now it's Tuesday and we're already recording again. You'll

0:00:39.880 --> 0:00:41.680
<v Speaker 2>never get rid of me. And today I have two

0:00:41.720 --> 0:00:45.479
<v Speaker 2>amazing guests. I have Paris Martineau, reporter at the Information

0:00:46.080 --> 0:00:49.760
<v Speaker 2>and the Mighty Jeff Jarvis, author of the Gutenberg Parenthesis

0:00:49.760 --> 0:00:54.120
<v Speaker 2>and journalisman professor over at Stonybrook University. Mister Jarvis is

0:00:54.160 --> 0:00:56.680
<v Speaker 2>currently he is fielding a phone call, so I'll go

0:00:56.760 --> 0:00:57.960
<v Speaker 2>to Paris. Hey doing Paris.

0:00:58.200 --> 0:01:01.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm doing great. I'm astounded by energy levels given the

0:01:01.160 --> 0:01:04.040
<v Speaker 1>amount of podcasting and radio you've done the last week.

0:01:04.520 --> 0:01:07.240
<v Speaker 2>I am. I am fired up. I love doing this.

0:01:07.360 --> 0:01:08.800
<v Speaker 2>I think this is what I was meant to do.

0:01:08.959 --> 0:01:10.480
<v Speaker 3>How are your feet after cees?

0:01:10.600 --> 0:01:13.880
<v Speaker 2>Fantastic? I got inserts from my I like came to

0:01:13.920 --> 0:01:16.880
<v Speaker 2>this show fully prepared. No one realizes how much like

0:01:17.240 --> 0:01:20.319
<v Speaker 2>the amount of like Google docs, I had of things prepared,

0:01:20.360 --> 0:01:23.360
<v Speaker 2>like the suitcases packed like two weeks in advance, and

0:01:23.360 --> 0:01:25.240
<v Speaker 2>then I got to New York and I'd forgotten things

0:01:25.240 --> 0:01:28.319
<v Speaker 2>like gym shorts and some shoes. And basically I prepared

0:01:28.319 --> 0:01:30.280
<v Speaker 2>my life for one thing, not both things.

0:01:30.080 --> 0:01:33.839
<v Speaker 1>And it's podcasting, podcasting and blogging and nothing else.

0:01:34.360 --> 0:01:38.720
<v Speaker 2>Sleep slave to the content. Now, mister Jarvis, how have

0:01:38.800 --> 0:01:39.119
<v Speaker 2>you been?

0:01:39.360 --> 0:01:40.880
<v Speaker 3>Oh? Good, good, it's cold here.

0:01:41.000 --> 0:01:41.520
<v Speaker 2>It is good.

0:01:41.560 --> 0:01:43.120
<v Speaker 3>Do you have any regret coming here right now?

0:01:43.160 --> 0:01:45.839
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely not. Okay, I'd rather take this real last weather

0:01:45.880 --> 0:01:48.680
<v Speaker 2>than the nonsense I get back in England. Oh it's

0:01:48.760 --> 0:01:51.360
<v Speaker 2>kind of cold, but I usually see you two on

0:01:51.400 --> 0:01:53.000
<v Speaker 2>this week in Tech, so it's good to have you

0:01:53.000 --> 0:01:53.720
<v Speaker 2>here in person.

0:01:54.280 --> 0:01:57.840
<v Speaker 1>Yes, it's lovely to be irl with you. Some might

0:01:57.880 --> 0:01:59.360
<v Speaker 1>say it's better offline.

0:01:59.440 --> 0:02:04.480
<v Speaker 2>It's better offline, but it is very online. So all right, Paris,

0:02:04.520 --> 0:02:06.280
<v Speaker 2>you had a story come out of the weekend. I

0:02:06.360 --> 0:02:07.560
<v Speaker 2>did tell us about it.

0:02:07.920 --> 0:02:11.920
<v Speaker 1>So it is a story about this website called Sniffy's.

0:02:11.960 --> 0:02:12.960
<v Speaker 1>Have you guys ever heard of it?

0:02:13.200 --> 0:02:15.079
<v Speaker 3>Right there, I want to stop and I don't want

0:02:15.080 --> 0:02:15.720
<v Speaker 3>to know anything, Moore.

0:02:15.760 --> 0:02:19.000
<v Speaker 1>I think, well, it's actually where I'm that's probably a

0:02:19.000 --> 0:02:22.640
<v Speaker 1>fair station. It is the up and coming, I guess,

0:02:22.639 --> 0:02:28.000
<v Speaker 1>competitor to Grinder. It's a website for men seeking men.

0:02:28.440 --> 0:02:31.240
<v Speaker 1>But it is specifically unlike you know, kind of your

0:02:31.320 --> 0:02:34.160
<v Speaker 1>dating apps of your it's not really about dating, it's.

0:02:34.000 --> 0:02:35.880
<v Speaker 2>About it's actual hook up.

0:02:35.960 --> 0:02:40.000
<v Speaker 1>It's a hookup app, just for field. It is an

0:02:40.000 --> 0:02:42.600
<v Speaker 1>actual app, and it's supposed to be kind of about

0:02:43.720 --> 0:02:47.080
<v Speaker 1>translating the gay cruising scene into online.

0:02:46.800 --> 0:02:48.360
<v Speaker 2>Potentially, right idea? Why not?

0:02:48.560 --> 0:02:51.440
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, people seem to really love it. It started in

0:02:51.520 --> 0:02:53.639
<v Speaker 1>some kind of infancy form in twenty sixteen, but in

0:02:53.680 --> 0:02:55.760
<v Speaker 1>the last couple of years has really taken off among

0:02:56.040 --> 0:02:59.200
<v Speaker 1>like gays in big cities and cities honestly big and small.

0:02:59.360 --> 0:03:01.120
<v Speaker 2>However, so nothing went wrong.

0:03:01.400 --> 0:03:03.200
<v Speaker 1>Nothing went wrong, that's the end of the story. I

0:03:03.280 --> 0:03:06.560
<v Speaker 1>just like writing about when companies do good. So in

0:03:06.600 --> 0:03:09.680
<v Speaker 1>this case, part of the thing that made Sniffy's so

0:03:09.760 --> 0:03:12.000
<v Speaker 1>attractive to its users is it's kind of a no

0:03:12.120 --> 0:03:14.960
<v Speaker 1>holds barred approach to hook up platforms. You don't even

0:03:15.000 --> 0:03:17.040
<v Speaker 1>have to make an account to sign in. You can

0:03:17.120 --> 0:03:20.320
<v Speaker 1>just type in Sniffy's dot com say yeah, I'm over eighteen,

0:03:20.480 --> 0:03:24.080
<v Speaker 1>and then get to like navigating a map ful of

0:03:24.200 --> 0:03:27.919
<v Speaker 1>dick picks and butt picks and messaging people and meeting up. Okay,

0:03:27.919 --> 0:03:31.440
<v Speaker 1>that is a problem because it seems like the site

0:03:31.440 --> 0:03:33.680
<v Speaker 1>has a bit of a child user issue. And when

0:03:33.680 --> 0:03:35.520
<v Speaker 1>you have a child user issue, when you're a dating

0:03:35.560 --> 0:03:38.840
<v Speaker 1>and sex platform, you also have a child sexual abuse platform.

0:03:39.800 --> 0:03:43.480
<v Speaker 1>So me and my colleague Marie Weinberg identified over the

0:03:43.560 --> 0:03:46.440
<v Speaker 1>last kind of a year or so more than a

0:03:46.480 --> 0:03:50.800
<v Speaker 1>dozen cases where adult men had been charged for sex

0:03:50.880 --> 0:03:52.080
<v Speaker 1>crimes involving a minor.

0:03:52.120 --> 0:03:54.200
<v Speaker 2>They meant all facilitated directly.

0:03:54.720 --> 0:03:58.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and that's a lot, it seems for a relatively

0:03:58.680 --> 0:04:00.800
<v Speaker 1>small platform. It's about decide.

0:04:00.520 --> 0:04:03.400
<v Speaker 2>Still around afterwards? Is the thing that shocks me.

0:04:03.560 --> 0:04:08.080
<v Speaker 1>Well, I mean part of it is because the question

0:04:08.160 --> 0:04:10.600
<v Speaker 1>of legal liability in these cases is a bit tricky.

0:04:11.040 --> 0:04:14.520
<v Speaker 1>You have companies like there's long been an issue of

0:04:14.680 --> 0:04:18.760
<v Speaker 1>kids getting onto adult dating apps and meeting adults, but

0:04:19.160 --> 0:04:22.440
<v Speaker 1>up until recently, every legal challenge that a company that

0:04:22.520 --> 0:04:25.600
<v Speaker 1>a parent or child that has grown up have tried

0:04:25.640 --> 0:04:27.720
<v Speaker 1>to kind of throw against these companies saying, hey, you're

0:04:27.720 --> 0:04:30.839
<v Speaker 1>actually not doing your job when it comes to policing

0:04:30.920 --> 0:04:33.120
<v Speaker 1>underage do there's every legal challenge has been swept away

0:04:33.160 --> 0:04:34.880
<v Speaker 1>by the company saying ah Section two.

0:04:34.680 --> 0:04:37.600
<v Speaker 2>Thirty, even legal challenges aside. Would they not want to

0:04:37.600 --> 0:04:41.039
<v Speaker 2>stop the children getting on the sex app? Well, it's

0:04:41.080 --> 0:04:45.680
<v Speaker 2>hard sensibly, Okay? Did they try? Not?

0:04:45.920 --> 0:04:48.560
<v Speaker 1>Really? Because all they wanted They don't want to have

0:04:48.640 --> 0:04:51.000
<v Speaker 1>to try harder, it seems because right.

0:04:50.880 --> 0:04:53.400
<v Speaker 2>Now the standard thing they don't want to try harder

0:04:53.400 --> 0:04:55.440
<v Speaker 2>on is stopping adults having sex with children.

0:04:56.480 --> 0:05:00.440
<v Speaker 1>Yes, because that would require taking on some responsible ability.

0:05:00.720 --> 0:05:03.520
<v Speaker 1>And right now, what all they all these companies do

0:05:03.560 --> 0:05:05.520
<v Speaker 1>is they just ask you for your birthday and assume

0:05:05.640 --> 0:05:07.880
<v Speaker 1>that you didn't lie, because if they were going to

0:05:07.880 --> 0:05:10.240
<v Speaker 1>do anything more stringent than that, that could open them

0:05:10.279 --> 0:05:11.120
<v Speaker 1>up to liability.

0:05:11.640 --> 0:05:16.560
<v Speaker 3>Explain something to me. So back Page and Craigslist took

0:05:16.640 --> 0:05:20.160
<v Speaker 3>down their their sex sections.

0:05:19.720 --> 0:05:22.200
<v Speaker 2>And also just for the for the listeners, Backpage, can

0:05:22.240 --> 0:05:23.080
<v Speaker 2>you just run us through that.

0:05:23.160 --> 0:05:27.360
<v Speaker 3>Backpage was a place where you could hook up. It

0:05:27.440 --> 0:05:31.039
<v Speaker 3>was probably more of a singles into sex thing, right

0:05:31.400 --> 0:05:35.040
<v Speaker 3>and Craigslist was pretty much singles but in within that

0:05:35.120 --> 0:05:37.320
<v Speaker 3>people would find each other for that purpose.

0:05:37.360 --> 0:05:38.520
<v Speaker 2>And then back Page was shut down.

0:05:38.520 --> 0:05:41.080
<v Speaker 3>But the back Page shut down and Craigslist voluntarily got

0:05:41.080 --> 0:05:43.360
<v Speaker 3>out of it because the liability was high, right, that

0:05:43.480 --> 0:05:45.440
<v Speaker 3>was so they were shut down because it was sex

0:05:45.520 --> 0:05:52.960
<v Speaker 3>trafficking or between that and what Snuffy.

0:05:54.000 --> 0:05:57.919
<v Speaker 1>I believe part of the difference is when it comes

0:05:57.960 --> 0:06:01.840
<v Speaker 1>to Backpage and Craigslist seeking connecttions, part of what they

0:06:01.839 --> 0:06:04.960
<v Speaker 1>were originally shut down for involved fast assessed it involved

0:06:04.960 --> 0:06:11.080
<v Speaker 1>specifically like sexual exploitation and sex traffic. FOSTA and SESTA

0:06:11.240 --> 0:06:14.240
<v Speaker 1>were a package of bills that kind of went through

0:06:14.560 --> 0:06:17.560
<v Speaker 1>some amounts of years ago that ended up regulating and

0:06:17.600 --> 0:06:22.640
<v Speaker 1>making it making it so that these companies could not

0:06:22.839 --> 0:06:25.120
<v Speaker 1>use the Section two thirty defense as a way to

0:06:25.480 --> 0:06:27.560
<v Speaker 1>get around claims.

0:06:28.839 --> 0:06:32.240
<v Speaker 2>They were made responsible for us to generated content. Yes, right,

0:06:32.279 --> 0:06:32.680
<v Speaker 2>got it.

0:06:32.839 --> 0:06:37.320
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, And so in Sniffy's case, it's a bit different. Well,

0:06:37.839 --> 0:06:39.960
<v Speaker 1>in some ways it's not a lot different, because part

0:06:39.960 --> 0:06:43.080
<v Speaker 1>of the issue of what we found of those a

0:06:43.120 --> 0:06:45.520
<v Speaker 1>dozen cases, i'd say like over a third of them

0:06:45.560 --> 0:06:49.720
<v Speaker 1>did involve money being exchanged for sex with minors. However,

0:06:50.279 --> 0:06:51.160
<v Speaker 1>part of it comes.

0:06:50.920 --> 0:06:53.000
<v Speaker 2>To the fact love of the game, I guess.

0:06:53.040 --> 0:06:56.520
<v Speaker 1>I guess part of it is that up until fairly recently,

0:06:56.600 --> 0:07:01.560
<v Speaker 1>dating apps hadn't really badly claims like this against them.

0:07:02.080 --> 0:07:05.640
<v Speaker 1>Whenever they had, they'd been basically laughed at of corpse, saying, Oh,

0:07:05.920 --> 0:07:09.240
<v Speaker 1>of course, Grinder is not responsible for connecting your fourteen

0:07:09.320 --> 0:07:11.960
<v Speaker 1>year old to a bunch of thirty year olds. It's

0:07:12.000 --> 0:07:14.840
<v Speaker 1>a tech platform, it's user generated content. However, due to

0:07:15.120 --> 0:07:19.240
<v Speaker 1>kind of shifting tides in the way that judges are

0:07:19.360 --> 0:07:24.160
<v Speaker 1>viewing Internet companies, like defense says that's starting to change

0:07:24.240 --> 0:07:27.120
<v Speaker 1>right now. There is a lawsuit that is going to

0:07:27.160 --> 0:07:30.560
<v Speaker 1>be heard by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals involving

0:07:30.560 --> 0:07:33.480
<v Speaker 1>a case called Dovee Grinder where a fifteen year old

0:07:33.800 --> 0:07:36.080
<v Speaker 1>basically got on Grinder ended up being connected with four

0:07:36.120 --> 0:07:40.600
<v Speaker 1>men who raped him. And part of what the attorney

0:07:40.640 --> 0:07:44.600
<v Speaker 1>carry Goldberg is claiming in this appeal or arguing is

0:07:44.640 --> 0:07:47.760
<v Speaker 1>that Grinder shouldn't be able to hide behind Section two

0:07:47.840 --> 0:07:49.800
<v Speaker 1>thirty to say, hey, it's not our fault that we

0:07:50.040 --> 0:07:54.960
<v Speaker 1>didn't age verify, that Grinder should be held liable for

0:07:55.000 --> 0:07:59.640
<v Speaker 1>its faulty age verification policies under kind of product liability law,

0:07:59.680 --> 0:08:02.440
<v Speaker 1>saying that this is a defectively designed product. And that's

0:08:03.080 --> 0:08:06.720
<v Speaker 1>a specific argument the Ninth Circuit Court has been like

0:08:06.760 --> 0:08:10.120
<v Speaker 1>amenable to when it comes to other tech companies like Snapchat,

0:08:10.200 --> 0:08:10.760
<v Speaker 1>for instance.

0:08:10.880 --> 0:08:12.680
<v Speaker 2>So what happened in the rest of the story.

0:08:12.840 --> 0:08:14.760
<v Speaker 1>In the rest of the story, basically we identified all

0:08:14.800 --> 0:08:18.080
<v Speaker 1>these different cases. We talked to Sniffy's. They said that

0:08:18.160 --> 0:08:21.920
<v Speaker 1>they are working on an ID based age verification solution,

0:08:22.320 --> 0:08:25.520
<v Speaker 1>but in reality, the only way that that's currently in

0:08:25.560 --> 0:08:27.720
<v Speaker 1>practice is just in the dozen or so states that

0:08:27.800 --> 0:08:31.000
<v Speaker 1>currently have pornography restrictions to where like part of the

0:08:31.040 --> 0:08:33.240
<v Speaker 1>thing is if you open up Sniffe's, it's like a

0:08:33.280 --> 0:08:36.600
<v Speaker 1>map and all the profile photos are like photos of penises.

0:08:37.600 --> 0:08:40.800
<v Speaker 1>So if you are in one of those states with yeah,

0:08:41.559 --> 0:08:45.199
<v Speaker 1>you're in one of those states, recognize yeah, I mean

0:08:45.280 --> 0:08:48.520
<v Speaker 1>you'll we'll see exactly where they are. If you are

0:08:48.640 --> 0:08:50.959
<v Speaker 1>in one of those states. When you open it up now,

0:08:51.160 --> 0:08:53.000
<v Speaker 1>you'll see a blurred image and if you want to

0:08:53.040 --> 0:08:56.800
<v Speaker 1>see the penis photos, you have to enter in your ID. However,

0:08:56.880 --> 0:08:58.680
<v Speaker 1>the company says that there may be going to expand

0:08:58.679 --> 0:09:00.400
<v Speaker 1>this in some way it hasn't happened yet.

0:09:00.400 --> 0:09:02.880
<v Speaker 2>That would potentially open up legal liability.

0:09:02.400 --> 0:09:04.920
<v Speaker 1>Then yeah, and that's but part of the thing is

0:09:05.000 --> 0:09:06.559
<v Speaker 1>users also don't want to do that.

0:09:06.679 --> 0:09:08.160
<v Speaker 2>So I mean that was kind of what I was

0:09:08.160 --> 0:09:09.320
<v Speaker 2>thinking that would kind of kill it.

0:09:09.520 --> 0:09:12.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, or a platform like that is never going to

0:09:12.559 --> 0:09:15.560
<v Speaker 1>be successful if it has that sort of barrier to

0:09:15.679 --> 0:09:17.960
<v Speaker 1>entry and certiplications are huge.

0:09:18.120 --> 0:09:22.440
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, you're handing over your identification to a company called Sniffies. Yeah,

0:09:22.480 --> 0:09:24.760
<v Speaker 3>and I meant I wouldn't feel terribly secure in that.

0:09:24.880 --> 0:09:27.640
<v Speaker 2>I mean I would, of course, but that's just me.

0:09:28.559 --> 0:09:30.800
<v Speaker 2>But no, you also, you're right though, it's like these

0:09:31.480 --> 0:09:34.400
<v Speaker 2>I imagine part of the thing here, other than the

0:09:34.440 --> 0:09:36.559
<v Speaker 2>thing you're doing on there, is that it is kind

0:09:36.559 --> 0:09:39.640
<v Speaker 2>of anonymous. Yes, that is that's the whole point, completely hidden,

0:09:39.679 --> 0:09:41.760
<v Speaker 2>the thing where you can go off and touch all

0:09:41.800 --> 0:09:45.080
<v Speaker 2>and sundry the problem being all in sundry there. What

0:09:45.240 --> 0:09:48.679
<v Speaker 2>the legal ramifications though, if like the what was it

0:09:48.760 --> 0:09:49.720
<v Speaker 2>do versus Grinder?

0:09:49.880 --> 0:09:51.959
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean, so the thing is if that case,

0:09:52.040 --> 0:09:54.400
<v Speaker 1>when it's appealed nines to the court, if they rule

0:09:54.400 --> 0:09:56.120
<v Speaker 1>in a similar way that they have in the past

0:09:56.200 --> 0:09:58.960
<v Speaker 1>and say, hey, when it comes to product liability cases

0:09:59.000 --> 0:10:02.680
<v Speaker 1>like this, tech companies don't have a defense, that could

0:10:02.720 --> 0:10:04.439
<v Speaker 1>have huge ramifications for every.

0:10:04.360 --> 0:10:06.960
<v Speaker 2>Company in the dating app, not just for dating even I.

0:10:06.960 --> 0:10:10.160
<v Speaker 1>Mean, it could yeah, be way bigger than dating. But

0:10:10.240 --> 0:10:12.360
<v Speaker 1>I mean the immediate impacts, according to the attorneys I

0:10:12.360 --> 0:10:15.200
<v Speaker 1>spoke to, would be certainly on the dating app scene,

0:10:15.200 --> 0:10:16.360
<v Speaker 1>which is huge because.

0:10:16.120 --> 0:10:17.439
<v Speaker 2>We'll all change with those things.

0:10:17.440 --> 0:10:20.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean probably what would change is they'd have to

0:10:20.400 --> 0:10:25.160
<v Speaker 1>find a way to determine user age beyond just asking

0:10:25.200 --> 0:10:27.679
<v Speaker 1>you for your to enter in your birthday, So it

0:10:27.720 --> 0:10:30.000
<v Speaker 1>could be things like some of the other dating app

0:10:30.000 --> 0:10:32.600
<v Speaker 1>companies out there already have stuff in place. For instance,

0:10:32.600 --> 0:10:38.640
<v Speaker 1>I believe Bumble and one other maybe Tender, scan user

0:10:38.679 --> 0:10:41.160
<v Speaker 1>profile photos when they're uploaded to see like, does this

0:10:41.160 --> 0:10:43.679
<v Speaker 1>person look like clearly a child and if so, they

0:10:43.720 --> 0:10:45.640
<v Speaker 1>might ask you to upload your idea to verify that

0:10:45.679 --> 0:10:46.400
<v Speaker 1>you're over eighteen.

0:10:46.480 --> 0:10:48.199
<v Speaker 2>I feel like there could also be a big problem.

0:10:48.320 --> 0:10:50.120
<v Speaker 2>So I've been on the dating apps for a while,

0:10:50.400 --> 0:10:52.960
<v Speaker 2>not that I'm not single, it just nobody likes me.

0:10:53.520 --> 0:10:55.400
<v Speaker 2>And I remember when I was on them it was

0:10:55.440 --> 0:10:58.240
<v Speaker 2>like months and months. Actually, no like last year, like

0:10:58.320 --> 0:11:00.439
<v Speaker 2>early last year. It's been a while. There was a

0:11:00.520 --> 0:11:03.520
<v Speaker 2>huge fake profile problem, and I wonder if there's not

0:11:03.559 --> 0:11:05.920
<v Speaker 2>a secondary problem here where the dominance of these fake

0:11:05.960 --> 0:11:09.720
<v Speaker 2>profiles on there might get pushed away when they have

0:11:09.760 --> 0:11:12.280
<v Speaker 2>to stop verifying every us because that feels like the

0:11:13.040 --> 0:11:13.439
<v Speaker 2>on the s.

0:11:13.679 --> 0:11:17.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, but I mean then part of the problem, if

0:11:17.000 --> 0:11:18.920
<v Speaker 1>you're thinking about it from a corporate perspective, is then

0:11:18.920 --> 0:11:23.040
<v Speaker 1>your user numbers go down, and probably in those cases,

0:11:23.240 --> 0:11:27.520
<v Speaker 1>those fake profiles are like, the person is probably paying

0:11:27.920 --> 0:11:30.320
<v Speaker 1>for that fake proflex that increases their reach. If they're

0:11:30.400 --> 0:11:32.600
<v Speaker 1>running some sort of scam and then they're paying, user

0:11:32.679 --> 0:11:36.199
<v Speaker 1>numbers would go down, which would be bad for most

0:11:36.320 --> 0:11:38.880
<v Speaker 1>dating app companies that are already doing poorly. A weird

0:11:38.960 --> 0:11:42.240
<v Speaker 1>thing I learned during this story is that Grinder is

0:11:42.280 --> 0:11:47.880
<v Speaker 1>like the most profitable dating app company because gay users don't.

0:11:47.920 --> 0:11:50.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean, this is a bit of a simplication, but

0:11:50.840 --> 0:11:53.880
<v Speaker 1>from what I heard, it is that gay users just

0:11:53.880 --> 0:11:56.600
<v Speaker 1>seem to pay for the platform and use it for

0:11:56.720 --> 0:12:00.600
<v Speaker 1>much longer. In part, researchers think because gay users are

0:12:00.440 --> 0:12:03.160
<v Speaker 1>more likely to be in non monogamous relationships. So you're

0:12:03.200 --> 0:12:06.920
<v Speaker 1>not You're not signing up for Hinge premium, using it

0:12:06.920 --> 0:12:09.800
<v Speaker 1>for cons, then getting in a monogamous relationship, and never

0:12:09.880 --> 0:12:10.520
<v Speaker 1>using it again.

0:12:10.840 --> 0:12:13.000
<v Speaker 3>So believe it or not, I once was an executive

0:12:13.280 --> 0:12:15.600
<v Speaker 3>overseeing parts of brides dot com.

0:12:15.880 --> 0:12:17.640
<v Speaker 1>Ah, yes, you're so bridled.

0:12:17.960 --> 0:12:19.800
<v Speaker 3>Yes, And I used to love to say I've got

0:12:19.840 --> 0:12:23.080
<v Speaker 3>to go to a bridees meeting. But the interest thing

0:12:23.120 --> 0:12:26.199
<v Speaker 3>there was that our audience would come in and leave

0:12:26.240 --> 0:12:27.960
<v Speaker 3>in nine months, and for their sake, you hope they

0:12:28.000 --> 0:12:28.640
<v Speaker 3>didn't come back.

0:12:28.960 --> 0:12:29.200
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:12:29.280 --> 0:12:32.400
<v Speaker 3>Right, This is the other extreme of that. What happened

0:12:32.400 --> 0:12:36.160
<v Speaker 3>with the cases that were done against Sniffy's. What was

0:12:36.160 --> 0:12:37.240
<v Speaker 3>the status of those cases?

0:12:37.360 --> 0:12:39.560
<v Speaker 1>Well, I mean, so the cases that we that I

0:12:39.720 --> 0:12:43.640
<v Speaker 1>tracked were all kind of like sex crimes against involving

0:12:43.800 --> 0:12:47.800
<v Speaker 1>specific like male offenders. In two cases that we kind

0:12:47.840 --> 0:12:51.080
<v Speaker 1>of follow throughout the story involving this then fourteen year

0:12:51.120 --> 0:12:53.960
<v Speaker 1>old who made an accountant Sniffy's and had sex to adults.

0:12:54.080 --> 0:12:56.679
<v Speaker 1>Those two adults have since been sentenced to upwards of

0:12:56.960 --> 0:12:57.760
<v Speaker 1>as the question.

0:12:57.960 --> 0:12:59.720
<v Speaker 3>Those work cases against Sniffy's in any.

0:12:59.559 --> 0:13:03.040
<v Speaker 1>Case against people, that's the thing that Sniffy is no

0:13:04.080 --> 0:13:06.439
<v Speaker 1>cases against him. I spoke to a parent, the parent

0:13:06.480 --> 0:13:09.040
<v Speaker 1>of that fourteen year old, and she said, like, of

0:13:09.040 --> 0:13:11.040
<v Speaker 1>course Sniffy should be sued. I don't know how to

0:13:11.040 --> 0:13:12.240
<v Speaker 1>do it. I'm dealing with, you.

0:13:12.160 --> 0:13:14.560
<v Speaker 2>Know, three dealing with a criminal case.

0:13:14.679 --> 0:13:17.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm dealing with three foster kids that already were fucked up,

0:13:17.880 --> 0:13:20.439
<v Speaker 1>and now my fourteen year old is super fucked up

0:13:20.720 --> 0:13:23.080
<v Speaker 1>and has tried to commit suicide because of this whole thing.

0:13:23.320 --> 0:13:24.760
<v Speaker 1>You know, She's like, I don't know how to do this,

0:13:25.080 --> 0:13:27.920
<v Speaker 1>but I do think that if something happens on the

0:13:28.000 --> 0:13:32.480
<v Speaker 1>doversus Grinder front, you might see cases like this increasing

0:13:33.559 --> 0:13:35.160
<v Speaker 1>increasingly being fut in the country.

0:13:35.240 --> 0:13:37.160
<v Speaker 2>And could this not be extrap laid out to a

0:13:37.240 --> 0:13:40.760
<v Speaker 2>much wider series of issues as well, like assaults that

0:13:40.880 --> 0:13:44.960
<v Speaker 2>happen with people of age that still happen as a

0:13:44.960 --> 0:13:46.600
<v Speaker 2>result of a platform. But but.

0:13:48.200 --> 0:13:50.360
<v Speaker 3>That's why I wanted to ask next, is when you

0:13:50.360 --> 0:13:54.160
<v Speaker 3>go to product liability, it's usually that you're not matching

0:13:54.360 --> 0:13:58.240
<v Speaker 3>a product promise. This is going to make you thin,

0:13:58.320 --> 0:14:02.040
<v Speaker 3>this is going to make you beautiful? Yeah, does does

0:14:02.080 --> 0:14:05.520
<v Speaker 3>Sniffy's promise safety?

0:14:05.200 --> 0:14:09.240
<v Speaker 2>This is maybe Tinda has these feeches. I believe Tinda

0:14:09.280 --> 0:14:11.520
<v Speaker 2>has feeches about like check in, So maybe like one

0:14:11.520 --> 0:14:15.400
<v Speaker 2>of the platforms has safety feaches, so kind of okay, Grinder.

0:14:15.440 --> 0:14:17.440
<v Speaker 1>One of the things noted in that is that Grinder

0:14:17.480 --> 0:14:20.480
<v Speaker 1>promotes itself as a quote safe space, and all of

0:14:20.520 --> 0:14:25.600
<v Speaker 1>these platforms say like our users are eighteen and up,

0:14:25.680 --> 0:14:28.920
<v Speaker 1>Like they say that they check users age, so they're

0:14:28.960 --> 0:14:31.600
<v Speaker 1>two promise that in a way but then I guess

0:14:31.600 --> 0:14:35.040
<v Speaker 1>the question goes, does asking someone to enter their date

0:14:35.080 --> 0:14:37.640
<v Speaker 1>of birth in just a form? Does that mean you've

0:14:37.680 --> 0:14:39.000
<v Speaker 1>actually checked their age?

0:14:39.160 --> 0:14:40.760
<v Speaker 3>Well, this is the interesting thing. We've talked about this

0:14:40.880 --> 0:14:43.640
<v Speaker 3>on our podcast on the Speak of Google is where

0:14:43.680 --> 0:14:46.200
<v Speaker 3>does a liability land. Is it at at the platform

0:14:46.240 --> 0:14:49.680
<v Speaker 3>technology level or is it the intermediary level, or is

0:14:49.720 --> 0:14:52.520
<v Speaker 3>it at the user level? And if we try to

0:14:52.600 --> 0:14:55.640
<v Speaker 3>expect the platforms to solve all the problems of mankind,

0:14:55.680 --> 0:14:57.680
<v Speaker 3>we know they're going to fail. Well, I think will fail.

0:14:57.480 --> 0:15:01.280
<v Speaker 2>Specifically with TINDA. Under the Safety Policy Center, it says,

0:15:01.280 --> 0:15:04.240
<v Speaker 2>and I quote our safety tools, we utilize a network

0:15:04.280 --> 0:15:07.680
<v Speaker 2>of industry leading automated and manual moderation review tools, systems,

0:15:07.680 --> 0:15:10.760
<v Speaker 2>and processes, and invest significant resources to prevent, monitor and

0:15:10.840 --> 0:15:14.440
<v Speaker 2>remove inappropriate behavior, impersonation, harassment, and more from our app.

0:15:14.520 --> 0:15:17.880
<v Speaker 2>These tools include automatic scans of profiles, red flag languages

0:15:17.920 --> 0:15:20.640
<v Speaker 2>and images, manual reviews of profiles, and it goes on

0:15:20.680 --> 0:15:23.040
<v Speaker 2>and so forth. And they also have a zero tolerance

0:15:23.040 --> 0:15:26.240
<v Speaker 2>policy of harassment and encourage their community to report any

0:15:26.240 --> 0:15:27.520
<v Speaker 2>instance of misconduct.

0:15:27.560 --> 0:15:29.000
<v Speaker 3>They have a liability statement there.

0:15:29.080 --> 0:15:38.680
<v Speaker 2>Now, yeah, see it's probably an additional policies decoration, harassment

0:15:38.760 --> 0:15:41.360
<v Speaker 2>under it. Bloody hell, they got a lot now, there's

0:15:41.400 --> 0:15:43.520
<v Speaker 2>just a lot of like things that they might be

0:15:43.600 --> 0:15:47.640
<v Speaker 2>under the terms of use. But nevertheless, if this goes,

0:15:47.760 --> 0:15:51.160
<v Speaker 2>if those versus Grinder happens, it feels like that won't

0:15:51.160 --> 0:15:54.600
<v Speaker 2>stop people suing and using this as a promise.

0:15:55.720 --> 0:15:59.280
<v Speaker 3>Certainly, Yeah, but there's a problem with that too. I've argued.

0:15:59.320 --> 0:16:02.960
<v Speaker 3>I mean, Facebook is now completely fucked up and going

0:16:03.080 --> 0:16:07.240
<v Speaker 3>full Maga, but I've argued strenuously over the years that

0:16:07.320 --> 0:16:09.800
<v Speaker 3>it should have had a raisal on debt, a north

0:16:09.880 --> 0:16:12.800
<v Speaker 3>star right right, and it should have said we're here

0:16:13.680 --> 0:16:16.080
<v Speaker 3>to be nice to each other, We're here to build community,

0:16:16.080 --> 0:16:18.120
<v Speaker 3>we're here to make strangers less strange. They do none

0:16:18.120 --> 0:16:21.640
<v Speaker 3>of that, and I wish they would have because perhaps

0:16:21.680 --> 0:16:24.360
<v Speaker 3>then there is a standard to hold them against and

0:16:24.400 --> 0:16:28.000
<v Speaker 3>also their users. However, in this discussion, if they say, well,

0:16:28.000 --> 0:16:29.360
<v Speaker 3>you said you're going to be the place where people

0:16:29.360 --> 0:16:32.040
<v Speaker 3>are nice, and now you're filled with harris but it

0:16:32.240 --> 0:16:35.720
<v Speaker 3>motivates them not to make any promises. Yes, yeah, that's

0:16:36.000 --> 0:16:36.560
<v Speaker 3>a problem. I think.

0:16:36.600 --> 0:16:38.960
<v Speaker 2>Also an IDC company, so I don't really that's the

0:16:39.040 --> 0:16:41.320
<v Speaker 2>company that owns Tinder and match Group and a bunch

0:16:41.320 --> 0:16:43.840
<v Speaker 2>of other ones like Chemistry dot Com and I don't

0:16:44.080 --> 0:16:47.040
<v Speaker 2>they're evil, Like, this is my statement, you don't have

0:16:47.080 --> 0:16:49.760
<v Speaker 2>to follow. I think they're deeply evil companies. But this

0:16:49.880 --> 0:16:51.720
<v Speaker 2>Sniffy's thing is a level worse.

0:16:52.360 --> 0:16:55.280
<v Speaker 1>And I mean, I just think it's interesting because sniffy

0:16:55.360 --> 0:16:57.120
<v Speaker 1>is I mean, is kind of like the worst of

0:16:57.160 --> 0:16:59.520
<v Speaker 1>all these problems because it is completely without any of

0:16:59.520 --> 0:17:00.200
<v Speaker 1>the safe.

0:17:00.920 --> 0:17:02.960
<v Speaker 2>A frictionless experience.

0:17:03.160 --> 0:17:07.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, but it's also gotten so popular in the last

0:17:07.600 --> 0:17:10.119
<v Speaker 1>couple of years dating app the big dating apps are

0:17:10.160 --> 0:17:13.320
<v Speaker 1>taking notice. Like Grinder shouted it out basically in one

0:17:13.359 --> 0:17:15.880
<v Speaker 1>of their most recent earnings called said when an analyst

0:17:15.960 --> 0:17:17.600
<v Speaker 1>had asked, like, oh, are there any competitors in the

0:17:17.600 --> 0:17:20.520
<v Speaker 1>space that you're looking for keeping an eye on, and

0:17:20.560 --> 0:17:22.800
<v Speaker 1>their CFO had said something along as there's like an

0:17:22.800 --> 0:17:27.160
<v Speaker 1>anonymous they basically described Sniffy's in name but without using

0:17:27.200 --> 0:17:28.840
<v Speaker 1>their name, and said we're keeping an eye on them.

0:17:28.880 --> 0:17:31.560
<v Speaker 1>They also then introduced a feature I believe called right

0:17:31.600 --> 0:17:35.000
<v Speaker 1>now that users on Grinder can turn on if they're

0:17:35.040 --> 0:17:40.280
<v Speaker 1>looking for sex right that instant and other apps in

0:17:40.320 --> 0:17:42.919
<v Speaker 1>the gay dating space have kind of emerged that are

0:17:43.000 --> 0:17:46.800
<v Speaker 1>trying to take kind of a similar map based cruising approach.

0:17:46.920 --> 0:17:48.879
<v Speaker 2>It is really funny though that the aultmeth thing is

0:17:48.920 --> 0:17:51.280
<v Speaker 2>they were just like, yeah, why if we didn't follow

0:17:51.320 --> 0:17:52.240
<v Speaker 2>any rules?

0:17:52.800 --> 0:17:53.879
<v Speaker 1>It is pretty funny.

0:17:53.920 --> 0:17:57.199
<v Speaker 2>What if we just turned off the rules pot? And

0:17:57.240 --> 0:18:00.720
<v Speaker 2>I think that kind of leads us to Meta right now,

0:18:00.960 --> 0:18:03.919
<v Speaker 2>because I think what you're seeing with the destruction of Meta,

0:18:03.960 --> 0:18:06.680
<v Speaker 2>and I'm sure you two have heard, but for the listeners,

0:18:07.320 --> 0:18:09.399
<v Speaker 2>Meta has now got rid of all of their content

0:18:09.440 --> 0:18:12.280
<v Speaker 2>moderation stuff. They've got ridly well. They're claiming that well

0:18:12.320 --> 0:18:15.840
<v Speaker 2>their fact check the fact check a sorry sorry fact check,

0:18:15.840 --> 0:18:17.800
<v Speaker 2>and I just fucked up the fact check, didn't I.

0:18:18.640 --> 0:18:21.200
<v Speaker 2>And now and now they're laying off five percent No,

0:18:21.320 --> 0:18:24.040
<v Speaker 2>thank god, someone else you know what's going on now.

0:18:24.040 --> 0:18:26.359
<v Speaker 2>They're laying off five percent of their people for quote

0:18:26.760 --> 0:18:30.120
<v Speaker 2>underperforming and they're gonna They're claiming the lms will replace

0:18:30.240 --> 0:18:34.480
<v Speaker 2>like second tier engineers. And also they have cas in

0:18:34.520 --> 0:18:36.200
<v Speaker 2>you and actually I've given them a lot of shit,

0:18:36.240 --> 0:18:39.000
<v Speaker 2>but he's put out some really good things recently about

0:18:39.400 --> 0:18:41.840
<v Speaker 2>what Meta has said inside and how they're doing allowable

0:18:41.880 --> 0:18:44.520
<v Speaker 2>things like just straight up homophobia, straight up.

0:18:44.760 --> 0:18:47.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean, they just around the same time that these

0:18:47.760 --> 0:18:50.800
<v Speaker 1>announcements rolled out that an internal directive went out to

0:18:50.840 --> 0:18:56.560
<v Speaker 1>remove tampons and pads from any male restrooms on Facebook campuses, which.

0:18:56.400 --> 0:18:57.480
<v Speaker 2>Is just a foolish thing.

0:18:58.280 --> 0:19:00.520
<v Speaker 1>It's just that that is costing you money. You already

0:19:00.560 --> 0:19:03.320
<v Speaker 1>have those dispensers in there, why not just leave them there.

0:19:03.400 --> 0:19:06.120
<v Speaker 2>But I think that it's something above MAGA as well,

0:19:06.240 --> 0:19:08.000
<v Speaker 2>and I think that people willing to do what I'm

0:19:08.000 --> 0:19:11.920
<v Speaker 2>about to describe might lean conservative because it's evil. Now,

0:19:12.000 --> 0:19:14.600
<v Speaker 2>if you're listening to your conservativecy it, don't be so rude,

0:19:14.640 --> 0:19:16.480
<v Speaker 2>shout the fuck up. I don't care now.

0:19:16.840 --> 0:19:18.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm surprised you've made it this far.

0:19:18.160 --> 0:19:20.840
<v Speaker 2>And yeah, I don't know how you are that. No,

0:19:20.960 --> 0:19:24.040
<v Speaker 2>it's all the anti monopoly people who are like, God,

0:19:24.080 --> 0:19:28.240
<v Speaker 2>damn it, yeah, Matt Stola. Anyways, So the point I'm

0:19:28.240 --> 0:19:30.600
<v Speaker 2>making is I think Meta is going to be the

0:19:30.720 --> 0:19:33.800
<v Speaker 2>largest scale example of a company just not giving a

0:19:33.960 --> 0:19:36.920
<v Speaker 2>shit in history. They're just doing all the evil stuff.

0:19:36.920 --> 0:19:38.560
<v Speaker 2>They're using this as a chance to get rid of

0:19:38.560 --> 0:19:42.200
<v Speaker 2>these troublesome things such as any kind of diversity, ecity

0:19:42.240 --> 0:19:46.159
<v Speaker 2>and inclusion, harassing trans people by removing them from spaces.

0:19:46.359 --> 0:19:49.399
<v Speaker 3>It's all around American and industry now, McDonald's, which depends

0:19:49.480 --> 0:19:53.040
<v Speaker 3>upon black customers and depends upon black employees and people

0:19:53.080 --> 0:19:55.880
<v Speaker 3>of color. No, DEI get rid of it. We don't

0:19:55.880 --> 0:19:58.720
<v Speaker 3>care anymore. We're not going to do that anymore. And Meta,

0:19:58.760 --> 0:20:01.679
<v Speaker 3>which cared about you know, and getting together and all

0:20:01.720 --> 0:20:04.880
<v Speaker 3>that bs right. I was very impressed by Mark Limley,

0:20:05.160 --> 0:20:08.040
<v Speaker 3>who is a Stanford law professor and a big deal

0:20:08.200 --> 0:20:13.159
<v Speaker 3>in West Coast law. He is deactivating his account, but

0:20:13.240 --> 0:20:16.280
<v Speaker 3>he's also firing Meta as a customer. Hell yeah, as

0:20:16.280 --> 0:20:18.639
<v Speaker 3>a client, And he said, I have struggled with how

0:20:18.680 --> 0:20:22.360
<v Speaker 3>to respond to Mark Zuckerberg and Facebook's dissent into toxic

0:20:22.440 --> 0:20:27.080
<v Speaker 3>masculinity and neo Nazi madness. Yeay, And that's a lot

0:20:27.080 --> 0:20:31.679
<v Speaker 3>of it is. It's not just political. It's this toast

0:20:31.720 --> 0:20:33.320
<v Speaker 3>your I don't ads.

0:20:33.200 --> 0:20:35.760
<v Speaker 2>I actually know. I take back my hell yeah, overcount

0:20:35.800 --> 0:20:36.760
<v Speaker 2>my hell yeah.

0:20:37.000 --> 0:20:39.320
<v Speaker 3>So this is you, thank you. They're waiting for this moment.

0:20:39.680 --> 0:20:40.360
<v Speaker 3>But also like.

0:20:40.320 --> 0:20:42.680
<v Speaker 2>Hell yeah now, but like Daylight Dollar show. As you

0:20:42.680 --> 0:20:45.040
<v Speaker 2>can ask Jeff Jeff Horwitz, the Wall Street journalists have

0:20:45.080 --> 0:20:48.280
<v Speaker 2>broken code. Meta has been backing up the Mega people

0:20:48.480 --> 0:20:50.840
<v Speaker 2>for years and years and years. They have benefit. They

0:20:51.160 --> 0:20:56.400
<v Speaker 2>allowed plandemic to spread a horrible conspiracy film. Then I'm

0:20:56.400 --> 0:20:58.639
<v Speaker 2>not even going to describe it sounds stupid and it

0:20:58.680 --> 0:21:01.639
<v Speaker 2>is stupid. It's for moron whatever it's meant to be

0:21:01.680 --> 0:21:04.119
<v Speaker 2>a big ten. I don't care. Jeff Kaplan, who is

0:21:04.160 --> 0:21:06.560
<v Speaker 2>now the head of Global policy, I believe right, Joel Coot,

0:21:06.680 --> 0:21:09.320
<v Speaker 2>Why do I keep mixing those back? Check you again, man, Now,

0:21:09.320 --> 0:21:11.159
<v Speaker 2>this is why you have guests because I'm too stupid

0:21:11.200 --> 0:21:14.680
<v Speaker 2>to remember things. He intervened with the Public Health Group

0:21:15.200 --> 0:21:18.879
<v Speaker 2>specifically to allow plandemic to continue to go through. And

0:21:18.920 --> 0:21:21.919
<v Speaker 2>when Kevin Russ attempted to report on this and report

0:21:21.920 --> 0:21:24.560
<v Speaker 2>that crowd Tangle, this internal tool had allowed them to

0:21:24.560 --> 0:21:26.880
<v Speaker 2>see that these things were spreading and that Dan Bongino

0:21:26.920 --> 0:21:29.760
<v Speaker 2>and all the conservatives were basically all that was being recommended.

0:21:30.240 --> 0:21:34.320
<v Speaker 2>Alex Schultz, the CMO of Facebook at the time. Meta,

0:21:34.400 --> 0:21:37.080
<v Speaker 2>Now he just shut down crowd Tangle.

0:21:37.160 --> 0:21:37.480
<v Speaker 3>Baby.

0:21:37.520 --> 0:21:40.480
<v Speaker 2>You can't have that, can't have people knowing. Alex Schultz

0:21:40.560 --> 0:21:44.359
<v Speaker 2>also recently suggested on the anti LGBTQ front, and he

0:21:44.440 --> 0:21:48.800
<v Speaker 2>is a gay man, that seeing homophobia and some such

0:21:48.960 --> 0:21:52.359
<v Speaker 2>business on there would make people more sympathetic to the

0:21:52.359 --> 0:21:53.960
<v Speaker 2>cause of LGBTQP.

0:21:54.359 --> 0:21:55.560
<v Speaker 3>This is perverse it is.

0:21:55.600 --> 0:21:58.400
<v Speaker 2>It's disgusting. But the thing is, it's I think what's

0:21:58.440 --> 0:22:00.560
<v Speaker 2>frustrating me, and perhaps I need to stop things like

0:22:00.640 --> 0:22:02.960
<v Speaker 2>it's not just maga is maga, of course it is,

0:22:03.480 --> 0:22:06.560
<v Speaker 2>but it's been here for a while, and it's been

0:22:06.600 --> 0:22:10.719
<v Speaker 2>here egregiously. They've been supporting the Conservatives at scale, and

0:22:10.760 --> 0:22:14.080
<v Speaker 2>I mean supporting as a media property. And so it's

0:22:14.119 --> 0:22:16.280
<v Speaker 2>just I just can't take it so seriously when people

0:22:16.280 --> 0:22:18.960
<v Speaker 2>are going, well, this is Monk Zika finally giving in. No,

0:22:19.160 --> 0:22:23.280
<v Speaker 2>that repressed little fuck he's oh going on, Joe Rogan Woo,

0:22:24.640 --> 0:22:27.760
<v Speaker 2>things are not masculine enough. What the least masculine thing

0:22:27.760 --> 0:22:28.840
<v Speaker 2>I've ever heard? Anyway? Right?

0:22:28.880 --> 0:22:34.400
<v Speaker 3>No, So on this Week of Google last week, I said,

0:22:34.440 --> 0:22:36.840
<v Speaker 3>you know, is there anybody left? I thought that Jeff

0:22:36.840 --> 0:22:39.840
<v Speaker 3>Bezos was a responsible steward of the Washington Post. He's not.

0:22:40.600 --> 0:22:43.240
<v Speaker 3>Mark Zuckerberg was always a dork, but I didn't think

0:22:43.240 --> 0:22:47.359
<v Speaker 3>he was as bad. Jack Dorsey gets weirder by the

0:22:47.440 --> 0:22:49.800
<v Speaker 3>day and or not. And I said on the show

0:22:50.400 --> 0:22:54.680
<v Speaker 3>that Jensen Wong, the CEO and founder of Nvidia, I'd

0:22:54.720 --> 0:22:58.240
<v Speaker 3>watched his two hour keynote at the CS I was

0:22:58.400 --> 0:23:00.440
<v Speaker 3>I'm impressed by it by him Costley, So well, maybe

0:23:00.480 --> 0:23:03.160
<v Speaker 3>there's maybe there's a smart guy next.

0:23:03.040 --> 0:23:05.240
<v Speaker 1>Day believing the good people.

0:23:05.480 --> 0:23:08.679
<v Speaker 3>The next day on MASTERD and somebody said, this is

0:23:08.720 --> 0:23:11.640
<v Speaker 3>your good guy. Jensen Wong was signing a woman's breast.

0:23:11.960 --> 0:23:15.520
<v Speaker 2>To say, Jeff, well, first of all, if she asked,

0:23:17.040 --> 0:23:19.720
<v Speaker 2>if she asked, But also I would choose the other

0:23:19.760 --> 0:23:22.080
<v Speaker 2>thing that Jensen Huang did. At ces So during one

0:23:22.119 --> 0:23:25.600
<v Speaker 2>of the presentations, an audio guy was like, hurried on,

0:23:25.680 --> 0:23:28.520
<v Speaker 2>he goes, I can hear myself, I can hear myself.

0:23:28.560 --> 0:23:31.760
<v Speaker 2>And the guy's like, no, no, mister, mister Houang. It's

0:23:31.800 --> 0:23:34.320
<v Speaker 2>reflecting off the size. He's like, no, no, And he

0:23:34.400 --> 0:23:36.720
<v Speaker 2>was called Sebastian. I believe he's like I'm when I

0:23:36.760 --> 0:23:38.520
<v Speaker 2>when someone makes a mistake, I'm gonna call it a

0:23:38.560 --> 0:23:43.280
<v Speaker 2>Sebastian going forward, Okay, that's the thing. It is a

0:23:43.280 --> 0:23:45.439
<v Speaker 2>fair thing, though, and I'm not saying I think there

0:23:45.440 --> 0:23:47.480
<v Speaker 2>are some who want this more than others. It would

0:23:47.560 --> 0:23:49.760
<v Speaker 2>be nice if one of them wasn't insane. I thought

0:23:49.760 --> 0:23:52.040
<v Speaker 2>it was Mark Benioff for a while, I thought I

0:23:52.119 --> 0:23:54.600
<v Speaker 2>thought Mark Benioff was all right. And I actually had

0:23:54.600 --> 0:23:56.320
<v Speaker 2>coffee with the report after I met him and like

0:23:56.359 --> 0:23:59.320
<v Speaker 2>described him positively, and she said, so he's just another

0:23:59.359 --> 0:24:01.760
<v Speaker 2>white TEXTI I'm like, oh shit, I'm doing the thing

0:24:01.840 --> 0:24:05.840
<v Speaker 2>that I'm doing the exact thing, but also be too.

0:24:05.920 --> 0:24:08.560
<v Speaker 1>So may I put together my theory forward? My theory

0:24:08.600 --> 0:24:10.480
<v Speaker 1>it's called CEO.

0:24:10.200 --> 0:24:11.760
<v Speaker 2>Brainworms, Please Please.

0:24:11.920 --> 0:24:14.560
<v Speaker 1>It's simply that if you are a CEO of something,

0:24:14.760 --> 0:24:19.639
<v Speaker 1>especially a large company, you increasingly get brainworms, which is

0:24:19.680 --> 0:24:23.160
<v Speaker 1>just you are surrounded by people whose job is largely

0:24:23.200 --> 0:24:25.520
<v Speaker 1>to say yes to you, make you feel good, and

0:24:25.640 --> 0:24:29.240
<v Speaker 1>that would make anyone insane. If you are surrounded by

0:24:29.320 --> 0:24:32.239
<v Speaker 1>sick evans for long enough, I think that you are

0:24:32.280 --> 0:24:34.960
<v Speaker 1>going to become untethered from reality in a way that

0:24:35.160 --> 0:24:38.600
<v Speaker 1>is distressing to a person that exists in conflats.

0:24:38.600 --> 0:24:40.720
<v Speaker 2>Someone on Twitter once said, being a billionaire is like

0:24:40.760 --> 0:24:42.680
<v Speaker 2>being kicked in the horse and the head by horse

0:24:42.720 --> 0:24:44.680
<v Speaker 2>every day. And I think that's fair.

0:24:45.000 --> 0:24:47.919
<v Speaker 3>But there's something different now. I think they've always been sexists.

0:24:48.000 --> 0:24:51.680
<v Speaker 3>It's a male structure that's given, but the permission structure

0:24:51.680 --> 0:24:54.400
<v Speaker 3>has changed, rightly, yes, and I don't think it necessarily.

0:24:54.400 --> 0:24:57.119
<v Speaker 3>Their essence has changed, But they're all freed.

0:24:56.880 --> 0:25:00.919
<v Speaker 2>They're untethered, yes, and yeah, I I fully agree with that.

0:25:00.960 --> 0:25:04.520
<v Speaker 2>And I think you're really seeing it with Zuckerberg, and

0:25:04.560 --> 0:25:06.440
<v Speaker 2>it kind of makes so much more. I wish I

0:25:06.440 --> 0:25:09.880
<v Speaker 2>would have called this one, because he is doing exactly

0:25:10.200 --> 0:25:12.679
<v Speaker 2>what you'd expect. He's just I'm gonna remove all of

0:25:12.720 --> 0:25:16.480
<v Speaker 2>the stuff that makes Facebook already a basically unusable platform.

0:25:16.480 --> 0:25:18.000
<v Speaker 2>I'm gonna make it. I'm just gonna add all the

0:25:18.080 --> 0:25:21.160
<v Speaker 2>racism back. We need some more racism there. And I'm

0:25:21.200 --> 0:25:23.200
<v Speaker 2>just gonna fire a bunch of people, and I'm gonna

0:25:23.240 --> 0:25:25.399
<v Speaker 2>go on Joe Rogan and talk about my sad little

0:25:25.800 --> 0:25:28.000
<v Speaker 2>Willy or whatever he said. I didn't watch. I don't care.

0:25:28.840 --> 0:25:32.119
<v Speaker 2>It's just what happens with Google now? Is my question?

0:25:32.240 --> 0:25:34.800
<v Speaker 2>What is the untethered Sundar Peshai experience.

0:25:35.040 --> 0:25:39.399
<v Speaker 3>I'm gonna be naive again. I think it's different, maybe

0:25:39.400 --> 0:25:44.240
<v Speaker 3>because Sundar is educated and Luri and Sergei are educated,

0:25:44.520 --> 0:25:47.560
<v Speaker 3>and Zuckerberg left sophomore year seminar brain.

0:25:48.240 --> 0:25:53.159
<v Speaker 2>Sure, but I'm not sure that I've met plenty of

0:25:53.200 --> 0:25:57.080
<v Speaker 2>psychotic people in college. True, and I'm just true. I'm

0:25:57.119 --> 0:25:59.480
<v Speaker 2>just wondering, perhaps I should reframe the question. It's like,

0:25:59.480 --> 0:26:03.360
<v Speaker 2>what happens the Google now? How how worried about Google's quality.

0:26:03.560 --> 0:26:06.560
<v Speaker 2>I am if like, because this is what's what Meta

0:26:06.720 --> 0:26:09.640
<v Speaker 2>is doing is effectively what Google's been working on. It's

0:26:09.680 --> 0:26:11.679
<v Speaker 2>the whole thing of degrading the quality of the service

0:26:11.720 --> 0:26:13.720
<v Speaker 2>by taking off the things that makes it good.

0:26:14.240 --> 0:26:18.480
<v Speaker 3>Well, I argue that different industry that the problem for

0:26:18.520 --> 0:26:21.000
<v Speaker 3>Google isn't just Google. The problem is the web. The

0:26:21.040 --> 0:26:23.240
<v Speaker 3>Web is being ruined as a whole, and it's a

0:26:23.280 --> 0:26:26.120
<v Speaker 3>window on to a worse web, and.

0:26:26.160 --> 0:26:30.920
<v Speaker 1>In some ways Google is accelerating that. But yeah, Google has,

0:26:31.359 --> 0:26:34.560
<v Speaker 1>as it is the portal to the Web, entire industries

0:26:34.600 --> 0:26:37.399
<v Speaker 1>upon industries have emerged to a game that portal of

0:26:37.400 --> 0:26:39.640
<v Speaker 1>the web, which results in kind of a self fulfilling

0:26:39.760 --> 0:26:41.840
<v Speaker 1>prophecy of the quality.

0:26:41.920 --> 0:26:44.639
<v Speaker 2>The content that they raise becomes the most popular content,

0:26:44.680 --> 0:26:46.760
<v Speaker 2>which in turn informs what will be popular next.

0:26:46.920 --> 0:26:48.600
<v Speaker 3>Yes, or it's an armload of a chicken today.

0:26:48.640 --> 0:26:53.359
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, I'm angry. It's I think that this is

0:26:53.480 --> 0:26:55.800
<v Speaker 2>really going to hasten the row economy. I think this

0:26:55.920 --> 0:26:59.000
<v Speaker 2>is just going to begin more rot because before there

0:26:59.080 --> 0:27:02.360
<v Speaker 2>was this lair and they obviously all resented it where

0:27:02.359 --> 0:27:05.560
<v Speaker 2>it was just like god, oh yeah, there's different colored people.

0:27:05.600 --> 0:27:08.560
<v Speaker 2>I guess fucking because woman now Jesus Christ, and they've

0:27:08.600 --> 0:27:12.199
<v Speaker 2>always like grumpily accepted it. And Meta has been weirdly

0:27:12.240 --> 0:27:15.400
<v Speaker 2>one of the better ones, which means that the ones

0:27:15.440 --> 0:27:17.600
<v Speaker 2>who are not going, what do you think fucking Tesla's

0:27:17.600 --> 0:27:20.240
<v Speaker 2>gonna be? Like Tesla's not going to have bathroom for

0:27:20.320 --> 0:27:23.200
<v Speaker 2>woman anymore? That's a guess, it's it's it's a joke.

0:27:23.800 --> 0:27:26.119
<v Speaker 2>I don't know who are you worried about jet Like

0:27:26.119 --> 0:27:29.000
<v Speaker 2>who who's the real bastard left? Who's the bustard who

0:27:29.000 --> 0:27:29.960
<v Speaker 2>hasn't basted it yet?

0:27:30.040 --> 0:27:32.560
<v Speaker 3>Well, that's I think that's the I hope the Google

0:27:32.640 --> 0:27:34.760
<v Speaker 3>is not going to go that far, I think for

0:27:34.840 --> 0:27:38.280
<v Speaker 3>their business, and it would be any any good. Here's

0:27:38.320 --> 0:27:39.399
<v Speaker 3>the other question blue Sky?

0:27:39.880 --> 0:27:40.120
<v Speaker 2>Right?

0:27:40.280 --> 0:27:41.720
<v Speaker 3>Do we have any hope for Blue Sky?

0:27:41.840 --> 0:27:41.919
<v Speaker 2>So?

0:27:42.000 --> 0:27:44.760
<v Speaker 3>I have, but I'm an optimist. I hold out hope.

0:27:45.080 --> 0:27:45.880
<v Speaker 3>I like Blue Sky.

0:27:45.960 --> 0:27:47.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm a nihilist, but I have hope for Blue Sky.

0:27:47.960 --> 0:27:50.720
<v Speaker 3>Selfishly yes, And then I saw did you see the

0:27:50.760 --> 0:27:53.120
<v Speaker 3>thing yesterday? I've got to pull up the rundown. There's

0:27:53.119 --> 0:27:55.200
<v Speaker 3>an effort to raise thirty million dollars.

0:27:56.119 --> 0:28:01.280
<v Speaker 2>Is this the free my appads, which which is filled

0:28:01.280 --> 0:28:06.040
<v Speaker 2>with people like Shoshana Zuboff. This to me what I

0:28:06.119 --> 0:28:08.120
<v Speaker 2>was already on my notes. I'm glad you brought this up.

0:28:08.240 --> 0:28:09.600
<v Speaker 2>It's really what is it?

0:28:09.680 --> 0:28:13.359
<v Speaker 3>And Dave Winer, who's one of the pioneers of RSS

0:28:13.359 --> 0:28:16.520
<v Speaker 3>and podcasting and blogging and so on, his response was,

0:28:16.600 --> 0:28:20.000
<v Speaker 3>there's no nerds there, there's no technologists there.

0:28:20.040 --> 0:28:22.240
<v Speaker 2>I also, it doesn't seem to be saying what they'll do.

0:28:22.560 --> 0:28:22.959
<v Speaker 3>No, it did.

0:28:23.080 --> 0:28:25.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, so what have they raised the money too?

0:28:25.160 --> 0:28:27.000
<v Speaker 2>They've not even raised the money.

0:28:26.840 --> 0:28:30.200
<v Speaker 1>They're declaring their hope to raise money. I'd also like

0:28:30.280 --> 0:28:30.840
<v Speaker 1>to declare that.

0:28:30.920 --> 0:28:32.800
<v Speaker 2>I also raise dollars.

0:28:33.640 --> 0:28:35.920
<v Speaker 1>I'll spend it on a Brownstone and give you ten

0:28:36.240 --> 0:28:36.800
<v Speaker 1>twenty millions.

0:28:36.920 --> 0:28:38.800
<v Speaker 2>I will keep the money and do nothing else.

0:28:38.880 --> 0:28:39.840
<v Speaker 3>What's the name of it again?

0:28:40.240 --> 0:28:42.280
<v Speaker 2>Free off feeds because I.

0:28:42.280 --> 0:28:43.520
<v Speaker 3>Want to go to the list of the people who

0:28:43.520 --> 0:28:44.200
<v Speaker 3>are associated.

0:28:44.280 --> 0:28:46.920
<v Speaker 2>No, it's really funny. There's Cory doctor wrote and Shoshana

0:28:47.000 --> 0:28:49.360
<v Speaker 2>zoo Buff right, which if if you've ever talked to

0:28:49.400 --> 0:28:52.360
<v Speaker 2>Corey about Shoshana Zoo Buff, let me just say that's

0:28:52.400 --> 0:28:53.880
<v Speaker 2>a weird coffee date.

0:28:54.840 --> 0:28:58.640
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it marks a sermon from Mozilla, who I think

0:28:58.720 --> 0:29:02.120
<v Speaker 3>is a good guy, but Shoshana drives me crazy. Roger

0:29:03.040 --> 0:29:08.560
<v Speaker 3>mct to me, Oh, doesn't call me anymore, drives me nuts,

0:29:08.600 --> 0:29:12.959
<v Speaker 3>Mark Ruffalo, Jimmy Wales, We like Brian eno Is everywhere,

0:29:13.000 --> 0:29:17.400
<v Speaker 3>Carol Cadwallader from Well the Guardians Soon, Roger Turtle.

0:29:19.800 --> 0:29:21.280
<v Speaker 2>It's just a bunch of people who don't build.

0:29:21.560 --> 0:29:24.960
<v Speaker 3>They don't build, they don't build. So uh, my friend

0:29:25.040 --> 0:29:25.720
<v Speaker 3>Craig new Mark.

0:29:28.200 --> 0:29:30.560
<v Speaker 1>Costically, what they want to use the raised funds for

0:29:30.800 --> 0:29:34.200
<v Speaker 1>is to launching a public interest foundation to support the

0:29:34.200 --> 0:29:40.160
<v Speaker 1>project while creating independently hosted infrastructure giving Blue Sky users, developers,

0:29:40.160 --> 0:29:41.880
<v Speaker 1>and researchers access to content.

0:29:41.920 --> 0:29:43.959
<v Speaker 3>And then you don't need thirty million dollars to do that.

0:29:45.400 --> 0:29:47.960
<v Speaker 3>Mastodon built up to what it was just when went

0:29:48.000 --> 0:29:51.280
<v Speaker 3>after until the point where Musk bought Twitter Masterdon has

0:29:51.320 --> 0:29:53.120
<v Speaker 3>had raised an entirety.

0:29:53.320 --> 0:29:56.400
<v Speaker 2>Thousand Maston literally just did a nonprofit operation like a

0:29:56.480 --> 0:30:12.000
<v Speaker 2>day or two ago, saying that they're kind of decentralizing it. See.

0:30:12.280 --> 0:30:15.680
<v Speaker 2>I don't enjoy Mastodon at all. I don't think.

0:30:15.520 --> 0:30:16.800
<v Speaker 1>I think it's a bunch of scolds.

0:30:17.240 --> 0:30:19.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it feels like I need to do a content

0:30:19.760 --> 0:30:21.560
<v Speaker 2>warning because I didn't use a capital letter in the

0:30:21.640 --> 0:30:26.960
<v Speaker 2>right place exactly like I'm eating lunch. Wow, how dare

0:30:27.040 --> 0:30:28.920
<v Speaker 2>did you see that guy in the matrix. He didn't

0:30:28.920 --> 0:30:32.880
<v Speaker 2>even have a mouth. Now, I think what frustrates me

0:30:32.920 --> 0:30:35.160
<v Speaker 2>here is like Mastodon did something real that they moved

0:30:35.160 --> 0:30:37.640
<v Speaker 2>stuff around and this thing I got reached out to

0:30:37.720 --> 0:30:39.800
<v Speaker 2>by them, and I read a few articles and I'm

0:30:39.840 --> 0:30:42.880
<v Speaker 2>pretty stupid. So I was like, maybe someone else saw song.

0:30:42.920 --> 0:30:44.440
<v Speaker 2>I sent to a few friends. Everyone was like, this

0:30:44.560 --> 0:30:46.920
<v Speaker 2>looks good. I guess it isn't anything.

0:30:47.080 --> 0:30:47.560
<v Speaker 3>There's nothing.

0:30:47.680 --> 0:30:50.520
<v Speaker 2>It's just there's nothing. Why is everyone covered? Will Aramis

0:30:50.520 --> 0:30:52.680
<v Speaker 2>call me? Will it Aramis of the Washington boast to

0:30:52.720 --> 0:30:54.800
<v Speaker 2>I adore? Why are you giving them a Q and

0:30:54.840 --> 0:30:58.400
<v Speaker 2>a they he talked all about them. It's just it's

0:30:58.440 --> 0:31:01.040
<v Speaker 2>frustrating because I think it was the they've done kind

0:31:01.120 --> 0:31:04.240
<v Speaker 2>of I hope I'm wrong. I hope this thing does

0:31:04.320 --> 0:31:06.720
<v Speaker 2>the thing that they're non spit, but you could do it?

0:31:07.160 --> 0:31:09.200
<v Speaker 2>What is actually? I don't why am I even saying

0:31:09.240 --> 0:31:11.360
<v Speaker 2>I hope they do it. I actually cannot tell you

0:31:11.400 --> 0:31:11.960
<v Speaker 2>what they do.

0:31:12.160 --> 0:31:15.120
<v Speaker 3>So the eighth conception, to me, it should be to

0:31:15.200 --> 0:31:18.360
<v Speaker 3>federate Blue Sky, to take the at protocol and make

0:31:18.400 --> 0:31:24.840
<v Speaker 3>it federated like masterodot is like activity put right that

0:31:24.840 --> 0:31:28.080
<v Speaker 3>that requires Jay Graber and Blue Sky to have enough

0:31:28.120 --> 0:31:31.360
<v Speaker 3>resources to put out what's needed for federation.

0:31:31.160 --> 0:31:32.720
<v Speaker 2>And I wonder if that costs thirty million.

0:31:32.840 --> 0:31:33.400
<v Speaker 3>No, it doesn't.

0:31:33.480 --> 0:31:35.680
<v Speaker 2>What they want to do from what I understand of

0:31:35.760 --> 0:31:37.520
<v Speaker 2>this vague promise now is I think they want to

0:31:37.520 --> 0:31:39.080
<v Speaker 2>be like, hey, do you want to fund like the

0:31:39.240 --> 0:31:42.640
<v Speaker 2>other Blue Sky. It just feels this kind of vagueness

0:31:42.640 --> 0:31:44.160
<v Speaker 2>and now that we've listed out all the names and

0:31:44.320 --> 0:31:46.840
<v Speaker 2>just kind of like, this is a cynical This is

0:31:46.920 --> 0:31:48.640
<v Speaker 2>like one of those stand up to cancer thing.

0:31:50.760 --> 0:31:52.360
<v Speaker 3>No, No, it doesn't qualify.

0:31:52.720 --> 0:31:55.000
<v Speaker 2>It's cynical. It's cynical. And I like the thing is

0:31:55.080 --> 0:31:57.520
<v Speaker 2>there of people I look like, Corey's awesome.

0:31:57.240 --> 0:31:59.600
<v Speaker 3>Absolutely, And it's like.

0:32:01.480 --> 0:32:04.640
<v Speaker 2>All of these promises without really promising anything. What does

0:32:04.640 --> 0:32:07.080
<v Speaker 2>that sound like? The tech industry like, why don't you

0:32:07.120 --> 0:32:09.320
<v Speaker 2>come to this with some things? And the answer is

0:32:09.800 --> 0:32:11.880
<v Speaker 2>they just want to talk about we want to make

0:32:11.880 --> 0:32:15.040
<v Speaker 2>it billionaire proof. What the fuck does that mean? Really

0:32:15.160 --> 0:32:17.520
<v Speaker 2>does have way more money than thirty million dollars. They've

0:32:17.520 --> 0:32:19.840
<v Speaker 2>got like one hundred and fifty million more dollars than that.

0:32:19.840 --> 0:32:23.160
<v Speaker 2>That's how much a billion is exactly, And it's just

0:32:24.040 --> 0:32:26.000
<v Speaker 2>everyone's kind of fallen for it. And I hope it

0:32:26.120 --> 0:32:28.280
<v Speaker 2>does something good, but I really cannot say what that

0:32:28.360 --> 0:32:29.880
<v Speaker 2>might be. And if their answer is well you didn't

0:32:29.920 --> 0:32:32.120
<v Speaker 2>read it well enough, not my fucking problem. Mate, You

0:32:32.480 --> 0:32:34.680
<v Speaker 2>explain the shit when you're talking to all and Sundry

0:32:34.680 --> 0:32:34.960
<v Speaker 2>about this.

0:32:35.080 --> 0:32:37.760
<v Speaker 3>Have you seen anything from Jay Graber or Eplusky about

0:32:37.760 --> 0:32:38.800
<v Speaker 3>what she thinks of this.

0:32:39.640 --> 0:32:42.280
<v Speaker 2>She gave a canned quote and said it was good

0:32:42.320 --> 0:32:45.040
<v Speaker 2>because I mean, if in her position, well, it'd be

0:32:45.040 --> 0:32:47.760
<v Speaker 2>funny if it's just like this bullshit fuck these people.

0:32:48.200 --> 0:32:50.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I guess, yeah, if someone wants to buy

0:32:50.200 --> 0:32:53.160
<v Speaker 1>out her startup for thirty million dollars.

0:32:52.800 --> 0:32:54.640
<v Speaker 2>Well, it's not even that. She was just like, yeah,

0:32:54.640 --> 0:32:56.160
<v Speaker 2>it's a pretty good thing. I think it might have

0:32:56.240 --> 0:32:57.440
<v Speaker 2>been Ja. I don't know if it was Jay who

0:32:57.440 --> 0:32:58.920
<v Speaker 2>did the quote, but it was something along the lines

0:32:58.960 --> 0:33:01.760
<v Speaker 2>of like this is cut good. You know that protol.

0:33:01.880 --> 0:33:04.040
<v Speaker 3>Mike Basnik is now on the board a Blue Sky.

0:33:04.560 --> 0:33:06.240
<v Speaker 3>He's the voice I'll trust on this.

0:33:06.360 --> 0:33:10.080
<v Speaker 2>Yes, I generally trust Mike. We have some differing opinions,

0:33:10.120 --> 0:33:12.080
<v Speaker 2>mostly on section two thirty, but I think that that's

0:33:12.120 --> 0:33:13.520
<v Speaker 2>everyone's experience with Mike.

0:33:14.160 --> 0:33:16.480
<v Speaker 3>It's just because I agree with Mike on section Yes.

0:33:18.480 --> 0:33:20.479
<v Speaker 2>No, no, I know you know, I'm a huge man.

0:33:20.560 --> 0:33:21.920
<v Speaker 2>He was a guest on the show. He was one

0:33:21.960 --> 0:33:23.960
<v Speaker 2>of my favorite episodes, The streisand Effects.

0:33:23.960 --> 0:33:25.360
<v Speaker 1>I think. I think Mike is lovely.

0:33:25.480 --> 0:33:30.240
<v Speaker 2>He's wonderful, really really good storyteller and actually a good journalist,

0:33:30.360 --> 0:33:32.280
<v Speaker 2>which is why this whole thing is something I really

0:33:32.320 --> 0:33:34.200
<v Speaker 2>would like his opinion on, because it feels like the

0:33:34.240 --> 0:33:37.160
<v Speaker 2>kind of thing you get like a call bowe bode yes,

0:33:37.480 --> 0:33:39.720
<v Speaker 2>like an article and being like a bunch of tech people.

0:33:39.800 --> 0:33:44.320
<v Speaker 2>Ship it up again, Carl, I love it, but also

0:33:45.240 --> 0:33:47.840
<v Speaker 2>I don't want to be a wet blanket here but bloosh,

0:33:48.120 --> 0:33:51.800
<v Speaker 2>Like it's just frustrating because you know what we actually

0:33:51.840 --> 0:33:54.760
<v Speaker 2>need right now, like pixel fed or whatever, the federated

0:33:54.840 --> 0:33:57.880
<v Speaker 2>Instagram thing that is currently being blocked. What is pixel

0:33:58.120 --> 0:34:02.040
<v Speaker 2>It's just an Instagram that's decentralized, much like massif activity. Yeah,

0:34:02.160 --> 0:34:04.720
<v Speaker 2>it's an actual thing that probably could use thirty million

0:34:04.800 --> 0:34:07.719
<v Speaker 2>dollars and is an actual story beyond it being blocked.

0:34:07.720 --> 0:34:09.800
<v Speaker 2>But the thing getting covered is a bunch of people

0:34:09.920 --> 0:34:11.960
<v Speaker 2>getting together and saying wouldn't it be nice if something

0:34:12.000 --> 0:34:14.960
<v Speaker 2>was nicer when you actually have someone doing the thing.

0:34:15.000 --> 0:34:18.160
<v Speaker 2>Because what we need right now is a blue sky

0:34:18.320 --> 0:34:21.800
<v Speaker 2>for Facebook, or we need Facebook equivalent and Instagram equivalent,

0:34:22.080 --> 0:34:26.960
<v Speaker 2>because once Meta loses their grip on those two things,

0:34:28.000 --> 0:34:31.560
<v Speaker 2>they are fucked. They do not have a real business.

0:34:31.600 --> 0:34:33.880
<v Speaker 2>The whole AI profiles thing, which we'll get to in

0:34:33.880 --> 0:34:36.160
<v Speaker 2>a minute, and all of this here, we're going to

0:34:36.239 --> 0:34:37.840
<v Speaker 2>take off the We're going to take off all the

0:34:37.880 --> 0:34:40.080
<v Speaker 2>things that I don't allow you to say, the fourteen

0:34:40.120 --> 0:34:42.920
<v Speaker 2>words every post. We're going to allow trans people to protect.

0:34:43.320 --> 0:34:43.400
<v Speaker 3>You.

0:34:43.480 --> 0:34:47.920
<v Speaker 2>Don't do that just because you're evil. Capitalism is generally

0:34:48.239 --> 0:34:51.000
<v Speaker 2>gonna move towards the most profitable direction. You do this

0:34:51.120 --> 0:34:53.319
<v Speaker 2>because all that stuff just got in the way of

0:34:53.400 --> 0:34:57.279
<v Speaker 2>more stuff and more growth. You break that machine with

0:34:57.600 --> 0:34:59.960
<v Speaker 2>an alternative that doesn't suck constantly.

0:35:00.920 --> 0:35:03.839
<v Speaker 3>Let we tried different theory on okay, which is that

0:35:04.160 --> 0:35:08.240
<v Speaker 3>I made fun of Musk buying Twitter forty four billion dollars.

0:35:08.239 --> 0:35:09.839
<v Speaker 3>What a fool you are, And we all know how

0:35:09.880 --> 0:35:12.479
<v Speaker 3>wrong that was, because he's worth ten times more because

0:35:12.480 --> 0:35:14.640
<v Speaker 3>he sees access to power around the world around Yeah,

0:35:14.640 --> 0:35:19.840
<v Speaker 3>he used it. Is Zuckerberg simply jealous of Musk's political cloud?

0:35:20.080 --> 0:35:21.400
<v Speaker 2>Nah? I don't think so.

0:35:21.480 --> 0:35:23.560
<v Speaker 3>He's more more by money than power.

0:35:23.640 --> 0:35:26.359
<v Speaker 2>I think he could just given what do you.

0:35:26.280 --> 0:35:28.560
<v Speaker 1>Think, I mean, I think that that could be could thing.

0:35:28.800 --> 0:35:32.840
<v Speaker 1>I think that certainly access to political power is something

0:35:32.880 --> 0:35:36.120
<v Speaker 1>that he wants, as do all of these people. The

0:35:36.160 --> 0:35:40.800
<v Speaker 1>fact that Zuck Musk and who is the third person,

0:35:41.080 --> 0:35:42.720
<v Speaker 1>A bunch of text CEOs are going to be sitting

0:35:42.760 --> 0:35:44.319
<v Speaker 1>in Trump and Besis are going to be sitting in

0:35:44.320 --> 0:35:47.480
<v Speaker 1>Trump's little box of the inauguration, I think speaks volumes.

0:35:47.920 --> 0:35:50.040
<v Speaker 2>Did you cover a Facebook and I feel like you've

0:35:50.080 --> 0:35:50.960
<v Speaker 2>covered them previously?

0:35:51.120 --> 0:35:55.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I covered them earlier on right?

0:35:55.719 --> 0:35:58.239
<v Speaker 2>Is this is there anything historic about? Because I was

0:35:58.280 --> 0:36:01.719
<v Speaker 2>just thinking, has Zuck about generally hung out with presidents

0:36:01.840 --> 0:36:03.960
<v Speaker 2>in any way? Like has he ever really been social

0:36:04.000 --> 0:36:04.719
<v Speaker 2>with them?

0:36:05.200 --> 0:36:09.120
<v Speaker 1>Maderstanding is no, not to this extent.

0:36:08.880 --> 0:36:13.960
<v Speaker 2>But I could be He's period. Remember he like his

0:36:14.040 --> 0:36:14.799
<v Speaker 2>I remember his.

0:36:15.600 --> 0:36:20.200
<v Speaker 1>It was notable in like twenty seventeen or eighteen when

0:36:20.280 --> 0:36:24.520
<v Speaker 1>he did a tour across America taking his little photos

0:36:24.920 --> 0:36:29.600
<v Speaker 1>stage to look like his normal height, and everyone was like,

0:36:29.640 --> 0:36:33.680
<v Speaker 1>oh wow, he's making a political statement. He could be moving.

0:36:33.920 --> 0:36:38.120
<v Speaker 1>He looks like he could be five foot nine. Yeah, yeah, No,

0:36:38.200 --> 0:36:41.520
<v Speaker 1>it's a there's definitely him standing on boxes or in

0:36:41.600 --> 0:36:45.239
<v Speaker 1>photos standing. He's five seven standing forward so that he

0:36:45.239 --> 0:36:47.600
<v Speaker 1>looks taller. However, I remember that being notable because it

0:36:47.640 --> 0:36:51.280
<v Speaker 1>felt like, yeah, he's actually like entering into the political sphere. Maybe,

0:36:51.320 --> 0:36:55.080
<v Speaker 1>but I think that he is, just as his political

0:36:55.600 --> 0:37:00.160
<v Speaker 1>star has risen, for better or worse over the last decade,

0:37:00.200 --> 0:37:03.080
<v Speaker 1>is cozied up to power quite a bit.

0:37:03.320 --> 0:37:06.719
<v Speaker 3>I'm about to say something terrible. Hell yeah, which is

0:37:06.880 --> 0:37:10.239
<v Speaker 3>when I was in Davos, I'm sorry.

0:37:11.960 --> 0:37:12.560
<v Speaker 1>By Jeff.

0:37:12.640 --> 0:37:16.239
<v Speaker 3>I was there in a session with Mark Zuckerberg, and

0:37:16.280 --> 0:37:20.399
<v Speaker 3>it was before he was media trained, And I've watched

0:37:20.440 --> 0:37:22.520
<v Speaker 3>him in a few conference settings back in the day

0:37:22.520 --> 0:37:26.279
<v Speaker 3>ten years ago, and he obviously hated it then. But

0:37:26.400 --> 0:37:27.040
<v Speaker 3>he's changed.

0:37:27.800 --> 0:37:31.680
<v Speaker 2>I think he has got the brainworms. But also, like

0:37:31.760 --> 0:37:33.800
<v Speaker 2>many of these guys, he's got all of this money

0:37:33.800 --> 0:37:36.600
<v Speaker 2>and got a reasonable age, and then he's like, what

0:37:36.640 --> 0:37:41.440
<v Speaker 2>do I enjoy? And then he's realized he enjoys nothing.

0:37:41.960 --> 0:37:44.960
<v Speaker 2>I personally am a barbecue guy. I have never seen

0:37:45.000 --> 0:37:47.560
<v Speaker 2>a man less interested in cooking in my life. Sweet

0:37:47.560 --> 0:37:48.520
<v Speaker 2>baby raised sweet.

0:37:48.560 --> 0:37:50.719
<v Speaker 1>He loves to smoke those meats, though, And there's nothing.

0:37:50.520 --> 0:37:53.239
<v Speaker 2>Wrong with a cheap record with some sweet baby rays.

0:37:53.280 --> 0:37:56.279
<v Speaker 2>If you're feeling lazy, we've all done it. It took

0:37:56.320 --> 0:37:58.840
<v Speaker 2>six hours. You're not lazy enough, not so lazy you

0:37:58.840 --> 0:38:01.880
<v Speaker 2>wouldn't You don't want to go to the store. And

0:38:01.920 --> 0:38:03.760
<v Speaker 2>also he got a big green egg he got there's

0:38:03.760 --> 0:38:05.480
<v Speaker 2>nothing wrong with the big green egg. But you know what,

0:38:05.960 --> 0:38:07.960
<v Speaker 2>if you got all this money, you can get yourself

0:38:08.000 --> 0:38:10.640
<v Speaker 2>a really interesting stick burner. You gotta look up pit.

0:38:10.719 --> 0:38:11.719
<v Speaker 3>You could buy Nashville.

0:38:11.800 --> 0:38:13.399
<v Speaker 2>You could go and get a Bits and Spits out

0:38:13.400 --> 0:38:15.640
<v Speaker 2>of Texas. That's where I get my girl from beautiful

0:38:15.640 --> 0:38:18.359
<v Speaker 2>Steel Beast coy over there put it together. Really don't

0:38:18.360 --> 0:38:20.719
<v Speaker 2>want to look at the politics there. Just realized as

0:38:20.719 --> 0:38:23.319
<v Speaker 2>they said that never looked at it. Please if it's bad,

0:38:23.360 --> 0:38:27.439
<v Speaker 2>don't tweet it him. But also he doesn't enjoy anything.

0:38:27.480 --> 0:38:29.680
<v Speaker 2>None of these people do. And so yeah, he's just

0:38:29.880 --> 0:38:32.279
<v Speaker 2>like I've seen clips of the Rogan thing, and he

0:38:32.360 --> 0:38:35.320
<v Speaker 2>just seems he seems as bad as Elon Muy. He

0:38:35.320 --> 0:38:39.680
<v Speaker 2>seems just like his like another day with my billions.

0:38:40.239 --> 0:38:42.800
<v Speaker 1>A detail I think is notable has been stuck in

0:38:42.800 --> 0:38:44.279
<v Speaker 1>my head ever since I read it. It was a

0:38:44.680 --> 0:38:48.000
<v Speaker 1>Wall Street journal piece kind of tied to this rebuff

0:38:48.040 --> 0:38:50.000
<v Speaker 1>of fact checking. They had a detail right at the

0:38:50.120 --> 0:38:53.160
<v Speaker 1>end that I think in maybe like November of last year,

0:38:53.440 --> 0:38:55.920
<v Speaker 1>Mark Zuckerberg had had gone through some sort of knee

0:38:55.920 --> 0:38:59.200
<v Speaker 1>surgery because he pulled something relating to MMA and made

0:38:59.200 --> 0:39:01.520
<v Speaker 1>a Facebook post about it, being like, here's me at

0:39:01.520 --> 0:39:04.600
<v Speaker 1>my knee surgery. And I guess the post didn't do well,

0:39:04.920 --> 0:39:07.440
<v Speaker 1>and so he freaked out and messaged his team being like,

0:39:07.640 --> 0:39:09.880
<v Speaker 1>why isn't my post doing well? Turns out it was

0:39:09.960 --> 0:39:14.120
<v Speaker 1>because it was being suppressed due to Facebook policies on

0:39:14.560 --> 0:39:19.760
<v Speaker 1>potential medical misinformation, And I don't know, seems fairly notable.

0:39:19.800 --> 0:39:23.520
<v Speaker 1>But right before Zuck decides to roll back all of

0:39:23.520 --> 0:39:26.879
<v Speaker 1>these policies limiting the reach of certain posts, his own

0:39:27.080 --> 0:39:29.880
<v Speaker 1>knee Facebook post gets limited.

0:39:29.960 --> 0:39:32.120
<v Speaker 2>Well. I love about that first of all, other than

0:39:32.160 --> 0:39:34.719
<v Speaker 2>the lack of post is sparit and this pathetic yeah

0:39:36.480 --> 0:39:39.719
<v Speaker 2>post better, but also post harder. He actually ran into

0:39:39.760 --> 0:39:42.279
<v Speaker 2>a problem of Facebook that people complain about, which is

0:39:42.280 --> 0:39:44.600
<v Speaker 2>that I don't seem to distribute my post to everyone.

0:39:45.320 --> 0:39:47.200
<v Speaker 2>It seems to get stopped somehow. But instead of being

0:39:47.280 --> 0:39:48.920
<v Speaker 2>like maybe that's a problem with the platform's like why

0:39:48.960 --> 0:39:50.799
<v Speaker 2>are people not looking up my knees enough?

0:39:51.520 --> 0:39:53.840
<v Speaker 3>And he knew he knew it was his platform.

0:39:53.440 --> 0:39:55.920
<v Speaker 1>He knew it was his own platforms, and they were like,

0:39:55.960 --> 0:39:57.799
<v Speaker 1>fix it for my thing. And it's a similar thing

0:39:57.800 --> 0:40:00.520
<v Speaker 1>that Elon Musk has done with Twitter to where he

0:40:00.560 --> 0:40:03.360
<v Speaker 1>was like, well, people aren't seeing my tweets enough, so

0:40:03.480 --> 0:40:06.880
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna need to put my tweets in everybody's feed always.

0:40:07.239 --> 0:40:09.759
<v Speaker 2>And it's itald I would do this. I mean it

0:40:09.840 --> 0:40:12.440
<v Speaker 2>just to be clear, like immediately right now, like and

0:40:12.480 --> 0:40:15.759
<v Speaker 2>why because I love people looking at me. But it's

0:40:15.800 --> 0:40:17.800
<v Speaker 2>so much sadder if you have all the money in

0:40:17.840 --> 0:40:20.000
<v Speaker 2>the world and you could actually make people look at you,

0:40:20.080 --> 0:40:21.799
<v Speaker 2>and you could go and like see anyone. You have

0:40:21.920 --> 0:40:24.640
<v Speaker 2>enough money that foreseeably anyone would meet with you. You

0:40:24.719 --> 0:40:27.719
<v Speaker 2>might have to pay someone, but you could meet everyone probably.

0:40:29.120 --> 0:40:31.319
<v Speaker 2>But I was just shocked, even in the clips I

0:40:31.360 --> 0:40:35.640
<v Speaker 2>saw of how like petulant, he seems like he doesn't

0:40:35.880 --> 0:40:39.200
<v Speaker 2>like it's not like he's like finally the attention's like ah,

0:40:39.239 --> 0:40:39.560
<v Speaker 2>he's like.

0:40:39.880 --> 0:40:44.200
<v Speaker 3>Resent because because Baga is anger. Sure, sure, that's the

0:40:44.239 --> 0:40:45.960
<v Speaker 3>whole that's the whole stait.

0:40:46.080 --> 0:40:47.759
<v Speaker 2>He didn't feel like he was leaning into it, though

0:40:47.840 --> 0:40:51.600
<v Speaker 2>he felt like there was a man pissed off.

0:40:51.960 --> 0:40:53.920
<v Speaker 1>I think it makes sense if you think about it historically,

0:40:54.000 --> 0:40:56.800
<v Speaker 1>because Zuck went on this huge apology tour after the

0:40:56.840 --> 0:41:00.480
<v Speaker 1>twenty sixteen election and also with Cambridge Analytica. Stuff happened.

0:41:00.719 --> 0:41:04.080
<v Speaker 1>He was for years just like a political punching bag,

0:41:04.200 --> 0:41:07.400
<v Speaker 1>and he put himself up for it. He went before Congress,

0:41:07.600 --> 0:41:09.640
<v Speaker 1>he went and apologized to a bunch of parents.

0:41:09.680 --> 0:41:13.400
<v Speaker 2>Recently, he did this whole like very reasonable him.

0:41:13.560 --> 0:41:16.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, very I mean, but like in the mind of

0:41:16.600 --> 0:41:19.680
<v Speaker 1>someone who is the head of a company, that might

0:41:19.800 --> 0:41:22.719
<v Speaker 1>seem like you really have gone through the ringer, and

0:41:22.800 --> 0:41:24.960
<v Speaker 1>yet people still continue to be mad at you no

0:41:24.960 --> 0:41:25.640
<v Speaker 1>matter what you do.

0:41:25.840 --> 0:41:29.160
<v Speaker 3>Actually, the apology demanded in Congress was by Josh Holly,

0:41:29.200 --> 0:41:36.040
<v Speaker 3>who's now his bff. It's it's all just sicko pon sick.

0:41:36.360 --> 0:41:39.520
<v Speaker 2>And it's now I'm thinking about sund up Ashy, Probably

0:41:39.520 --> 0:41:42.080
<v Speaker 2>not Sundar or Satch in the Della. I think Saching

0:41:42.120 --> 0:41:45.160
<v Speaker 2>the Della might from Microsoft, might adjust and become the

0:41:45.280 --> 0:41:48.680
<v Speaker 2>nice CEO, or he will find far more specific ways

0:41:48.719 --> 0:41:50.239
<v Speaker 2>to do it that will allow him to get away

0:41:50.280 --> 0:41:52.480
<v Speaker 2>with them. But it really is. It's going to be

0:41:52.560 --> 0:41:55.080
<v Speaker 2>interesting seeing the people who turn their nose up at

0:41:55.080 --> 0:41:57.560
<v Speaker 2>Facebook now because right now I can't delete my Instagram.

0:41:57.560 --> 0:41:59.400
<v Speaker 2>It's the only way I speak to like eleven people,

0:41:59.400 --> 0:42:02.480
<v Speaker 2>and there are people only interact on it. But if

0:42:02.520 --> 0:42:06.200
<v Speaker 2>that's your only business model, that's not great.

0:42:06.200 --> 0:42:11.960
<v Speaker 3>But but that goes back to Musk. My presumption, besides

0:42:11.960 --> 0:42:13.960
<v Speaker 3>it being a bad investment, was he was ruining in

0:42:14.000 --> 0:42:15.360
<v Speaker 3>it and people would leave it. He has, people have

0:42:15.440 --> 0:42:17.759
<v Speaker 3>left it. It doesn't matter to him. It doesn't matter.

0:42:17.800 --> 0:42:21.000
<v Speaker 2>I think Facebook masters uk, I actually do. I think

0:42:21.680 --> 0:42:24.880
<v Speaker 2>I think he is. He's not obsessed with it because

0:42:24.880 --> 0:42:26.600
<v Speaker 2>that would involve him like looking at it for more

0:42:26.600 --> 0:42:30.319
<v Speaker 2>than two seconds. But no, actually, maybe i'd take this back.

0:42:30.760 --> 0:42:33.040
<v Speaker 2>He might not care if you look at it now.

0:42:33.120 --> 0:42:35.040
<v Speaker 2>I guess no, It's just it looks like shit and

0:42:35.080 --> 0:42:35.640
<v Speaker 2>it doesn't really.

0:42:35.520 --> 0:42:37.960
<v Speaker 3>Because what did he care about the stupid goggles? Yeah? Right,

0:42:38.000 --> 0:42:39.520
<v Speaker 3>and now he cares about it? And what Here's one

0:42:39.520 --> 0:42:41.520
<v Speaker 3>of the funny things about Meta is that I think

0:42:41.520 --> 0:42:44.560
<v Speaker 3>that they're a leader in ai. Jon Lacun, who's there

0:42:45.239 --> 0:42:46.719
<v Speaker 3>is one of the well, he's one of the more

0:42:46.880 --> 0:42:49.520
<v Speaker 3>I think rational people around it. He's not a doomster,

0:42:49.680 --> 0:42:50.800
<v Speaker 3>he's not full of all that crap.

0:42:51.360 --> 0:42:54.920
<v Speaker 2>NOI argues with Elon Musk and Gary Malcus all day.

0:42:55.120 --> 0:42:55.960
<v Speaker 3>That's God's work?

0:42:56.840 --> 0:42:57.200
<v Speaker 2>Is it?

0:42:59.320 --> 0:42:59.640
<v Speaker 3>Where is it.

0:43:00.120 --> 0:43:01.520
<v Speaker 2>I'm going to get him on here just to call

0:43:01.600 --> 0:43:05.120
<v Speaker 2>him Yan Lacum, but I think he'll kill me. But no,

0:43:05.200 --> 0:43:07.319
<v Speaker 2>so then leaders same leaders.

0:43:07.360 --> 0:43:12.480
<v Speaker 3>A AI, he's still but he is still doing the

0:43:12.480 --> 0:43:15.920
<v Speaker 3>the goggle crap. Yeah, you know ar and VR. He

0:43:16.000 --> 0:43:18.200
<v Speaker 3>got bored with Facebook a long time ago, So.

0:43:19.520 --> 0:43:22.759
<v Speaker 2>With with that, I agree. I think he might love

0:43:23.120 --> 0:43:25.919
<v Speaker 2>the financial entity known as Meta, though I think he's

0:43:25.960 --> 0:43:28.720
<v Speaker 2>like really attached to just the numbers because they've always

0:43:28.760 --> 0:43:31.520
<v Speaker 2>been from the very early days of jan Olivan and

0:43:32.200 --> 0:43:35.680
<v Speaker 2>Naomi gLite and Alex Schultz, they've always been like growth pigs.

0:43:35.719 --> 0:43:37.359
<v Speaker 2>They love they were written off.

0:43:37.960 --> 0:43:40.719
<v Speaker 3>Remember it wasn't that long ago. All Facebook's over. Meta

0:43:40.800 --> 0:43:41.040
<v Speaker 3>is over.

0:43:41.120 --> 0:43:42.600
<v Speaker 2>It's just a maskets never did that.

0:43:42.800 --> 0:43:44.480
<v Speaker 3>Oh yeah, well they did for a little while. They

0:43:44.520 --> 0:43:46.799
<v Speaker 3>did for a while, and then it's it's been a

0:43:46.880 --> 0:43:47.600
<v Speaker 3>hell of a story.

0:43:47.719 --> 0:43:50.560
<v Speaker 1>Now it's meta. It's the future of the web. We're

0:43:50.600 --> 0:43:52.040
<v Speaker 1>onto webs seventy five.

0:43:51.880 --> 0:43:54.680
<v Speaker 2>We're onto web four point five. And this is when

0:43:54.719 --> 0:43:56.080
<v Speaker 2>it gets more racist.

0:43:56.320 --> 0:43:59.440
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, the legs are racist legs, but I don't forget.

0:43:59.480 --> 0:44:02.759
<v Speaker 3>In the early day, as a print Malius Maleficarum came out,

0:44:02.800 --> 0:44:06.400
<v Speaker 3>which was the guide to burning witches that killed lots

0:44:06.400 --> 0:44:09.480
<v Speaker 3>of people, and it was Print's fault. So maybe this

0:44:09.520 --> 0:44:14.160
<v Speaker 3>is just a phase for want until we have institutions

0:44:14.200 --> 0:44:17.080
<v Speaker 3>that finally bring us quality. Same thing happened, honest to God,

0:44:17.080 --> 0:44:18.840
<v Speaker 3>with print. That's a plug from my book, the Gutenberg

0:44:18.840 --> 0:44:23.240
<v Speaker 3>parentheses now out, you could do it. I write about

0:44:23.239 --> 0:44:29.520
<v Speaker 3>this right, and I think that we're at a stage

0:44:29.560 --> 0:44:33.239
<v Speaker 3>where the scale of speech today is not cannot be

0:44:33.280 --> 0:44:36.680
<v Speaker 3>handled by the institutions we have. When with print came,

0:44:36.800 --> 0:44:39.520
<v Speaker 3>the institutions of editing and publishing were invented for that

0:44:39.600 --> 0:44:43.880
<v Speaker 3>purpose because nobody knew what was made on this press.

0:44:44.680 --> 0:44:46.840
<v Speaker 3>It had no providence. Anybody can make this credit.

0:44:46.840 --> 0:44:48.800
<v Speaker 2>So are you suggesting it would be a private market

0:44:48.840 --> 0:44:51.000
<v Speaker 2>effect rather than the governmental one.

0:44:51.640 --> 0:44:55.200
<v Speaker 3>I'm suggesting it's institutional, and institutions.

0:44:54.600 --> 0:44:58.759
<v Speaker 2>Can be either, right, So I think I think it's possible,

0:44:58.880 --> 0:45:01.600
<v Speaker 2>and I think that I actually think it's very difficult,

0:45:01.600 --> 0:45:04.120
<v Speaker 2>but not as hard as people think to destroy Meta

0:45:04.800 --> 0:45:07.680
<v Speaker 2>in that it would take someone with enough money and

0:45:07.880 --> 0:45:10.879
<v Speaker 2>enough moments like Blue Sky's growth came from a moment

0:45:10.920 --> 0:45:13.840
<v Speaker 2>where people went, let's check out what's on x Ohdroy

0:45:13.880 --> 0:45:17.040
<v Speaker 2>per forty two is threatening to kill me? And that

0:45:17.200 --> 0:45:21.040
<v Speaker 2>is somehow my suggested from the algorithm, and he DM

0:45:21.040 --> 0:45:23.759
<v Speaker 2>me as well. I think that person will kill me though,

0:45:24.040 --> 0:45:25.560
<v Speaker 2>And then people went, I don't want to fucking be there.

0:45:25.600 --> 0:45:27.600
<v Speaker 2>I don't want to be associated with this. I think

0:45:27.640 --> 0:45:30.719
<v Speaker 2>with meta if depending on how bad the guardrails are

0:45:30.719 --> 0:45:33.640
<v Speaker 2>pulled off, because we really don't know yet, it's going

0:45:33.680 --> 0:45:36.080
<v Speaker 2>to take a little time, I think people will just

0:45:36.120 --> 0:45:39.320
<v Speaker 2>be like, this platform already sucks. I won't look at anything.

0:45:39.920 --> 0:45:43.000
<v Speaker 2>And that's the real question. Do they go nowhere? I'm

0:45:43.080 --> 0:45:45.560
<v Speaker 2>really curious about the TikTok ban. It might we might

0:45:45.560 --> 0:45:46.080
<v Speaker 2>find out.

0:45:46.400 --> 0:45:46.720
<v Speaker 3>Well.

0:45:46.880 --> 0:45:50.280
<v Speaker 1>I think you're right on Meta, perhaps in some US circles,

0:45:50.320 --> 0:45:52.120
<v Speaker 1>But I think the question when it comes to something

0:45:52.160 --> 0:45:55.480
<v Speaker 1>like Facebook is what ends up happening to internationally using

0:45:55.600 --> 0:45:57.759
<v Speaker 1>the growth Facebook is the Internet?

0:45:58.200 --> 0:46:01.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, And that's actually that is actually genuinely worrying because

0:46:01.520 --> 0:46:05.440
<v Speaker 2>the destruction of the content. I know content moderation is

0:46:05.480 --> 0:46:08.239
<v Speaker 2>still there, but the very clearly lacks approach they're going

0:46:08.280 --> 0:46:10.919
<v Speaker 2>to use now is going to hit the global South

0:46:11.080 --> 0:46:13.880
<v Speaker 2>so much more, and it's going to hit people that

0:46:14.120 --> 0:46:16.600
<v Speaker 2>are more subject to disinformation and misinformation.

0:46:17.360 --> 0:46:19.800
<v Speaker 1>And I think it's worth noting that while like a

0:46:19.800 --> 0:46:22.200
<v Speaker 1>lot of studies have shown the jury's a bit out

0:46:22.200 --> 0:46:25.640
<v Speaker 1>on whether fact checking works or not. It does in

0:46:25.680 --> 0:46:29.000
<v Speaker 1>some cases, but for most, like politically charged things, it

0:46:29.080 --> 0:46:31.319
<v Speaker 1>just makes people dig their heels and more. The one

0:46:31.360 --> 0:46:35.400
<v Speaker 1>thing I think is undercovered, or I guess underemphasized, is

0:46:36.000 --> 0:46:40.400
<v Speaker 1>fact checking's ability to limit reach of misformation. Like, sure,

0:46:40.520 --> 0:46:45.879
<v Speaker 1>it's not going to saying like, yeah, I posted misinformation

0:46:45.960 --> 0:46:49.040
<v Speaker 1>and saying on my post your post is misinformation probably

0:46:49.120 --> 0:46:51.920
<v Speaker 1>isn't going to change my view, but it will potentially

0:46:51.960 --> 0:46:54.520
<v Speaker 1>have an impact on the twenty people that might have

0:46:54.600 --> 0:46:55.960
<v Speaker 1>seen that and fallen into that.

0:46:55.960 --> 0:46:58.200
<v Speaker 2>Rat And the thing is, and I think it was

0:46:58.200 --> 0:47:01.280
<v Speaker 2>someone from foreig formte the point that metis fact checking

0:47:01.360 --> 0:47:03.640
<v Speaker 2>wasn't great. Certainly, I was.

0:47:03.560 --> 0:47:07.000
<v Speaker 3>There at the beginning. After the twenty sixteen I raised

0:47:07.000 --> 0:47:10.360
<v Speaker 3>a bunch of money from Facebook, gave it away to

0:47:10.520 --> 0:47:13.680
<v Speaker 3>places like Data in Society and another good folks for

0:47:13.760 --> 0:47:17.359
<v Speaker 3>doing lots of work on what as Joe Burnstein has

0:47:17.360 --> 0:47:21.759
<v Speaker 3>since called big disinfo. And I was watching as they

0:47:21.760 --> 0:47:25.080
<v Speaker 3>were trying to build their fact checking structure, and it

0:47:25.120 --> 0:47:27.600
<v Speaker 3>was a clusterfuck from the beginning. They had to well,

0:47:27.640 --> 0:47:29.560
<v Speaker 3>we can't do this. We can't make judgments. Everybody's a

0:47:29.600 --> 0:47:31.680
<v Speaker 3>frightened of judgment. So they had to go to the

0:47:31.719 --> 0:47:37.239
<v Speaker 3>fact checking organization. Imagine their fun conventions they have, and

0:47:37.440 --> 0:47:40.440
<v Speaker 3>you've got to verify who's a good fact checker. And

0:47:40.480 --> 0:47:45.360
<v Speaker 3>then that group wouldn't verify ABC News. So then Facebook

0:47:45.840 --> 0:47:48.360
<v Speaker 3>had a fit about that, And so it was routing

0:47:48.400 --> 0:47:50.840
<v Speaker 3>around and around is who's allowed to be a fact checker?

0:47:51.400 --> 0:47:54.160
<v Speaker 3>Right from the very beginning, that's what it was. And

0:47:54.200 --> 0:47:55.880
<v Speaker 3>then there's debate to how to.

0:47:55.920 --> 0:47:58.120
<v Speaker 2>Other scale that to billions of people.

0:47:57.960 --> 0:48:01.400
<v Speaker 3>Exactly in all kinds of cultures and languge. And so

0:48:01.920 --> 0:48:05.120
<v Speaker 3>I'm not I'm not against fact checking. I'm not against facts,

0:48:05.200 --> 0:48:06.960
<v Speaker 3>but facts, to my mind, are not the problem.

0:48:07.200 --> 0:48:09.600
<v Speaker 2>And I think the problem soory that Jeff just got

0:48:09.640 --> 0:48:13.120
<v Speaker 2>sent five dollars from the fact organization on his phone

0:48:13.280 --> 0:48:21.799
<v Speaker 2>that they sent figure. And you see when you said

0:48:21.920 --> 0:48:23.680
<v Speaker 2>I was there at the beginning, I had to stop

0:48:23.760 --> 0:48:24.719
<v Speaker 2>myself being like.

0:48:25.480 --> 0:48:29.320
<v Speaker 1>Of time, that's me every week on this week in

0:48:29.360 --> 0:48:31.520
<v Speaker 1>Google I'm black and white TV.

0:48:32.600 --> 0:48:36.319
<v Speaker 2>But yeah, it's I think the bigger thing is I'm

0:48:36.360 --> 0:48:39.799
<v Speaker 2>more worried about the ramifications of this attitude, because they

0:48:39.840 --> 0:48:42.440
<v Speaker 2>already were pretty lax and in the global self in

0:48:42.480 --> 0:48:45.200
<v Speaker 2>the rest of the world that even there's even there's

0:48:45.320 --> 0:48:49.760
<v Speaker 2>less media that understands those language, the languages even Jesus,

0:48:50.200 --> 0:48:53.960
<v Speaker 2>but also less people in the Western world, which matter

0:48:54.000 --> 0:48:56.440
<v Speaker 2>is arguably more scared about with the media, and I

0:48:56.480 --> 0:48:58.520
<v Speaker 2>think as well. The other thing I really haven't seen

0:48:58.560 --> 0:49:02.920
<v Speaker 2>talked about is META already limiting traffic on on journalism.

0:49:02.920 --> 0:49:06.560
<v Speaker 2>Do you think that they're gonna increase the sharing decrease it?

0:49:06.760 --> 0:49:10.279
<v Speaker 1>Well, I believe that they said they're no longer going

0:49:10.400 --> 0:49:13.560
<v Speaker 1>to limit the reach of like civix related content, which

0:49:13.600 --> 0:49:16.480
<v Speaker 1>I think I took to mean the political news. I

0:49:16.560 --> 0:49:19.840
<v Speaker 1>don't know whether that will apply to all journalism.

0:49:19.480 --> 0:49:23.960
<v Speaker 2>That is such a youth miss or civics related, civic related.

0:49:24.040 --> 0:49:26.120
<v Speaker 2>So they will allow the influences they.

0:49:26.120 --> 0:49:28.760
<v Speaker 3>Like, but probably not links.

0:49:29.160 --> 0:49:31.480
<v Speaker 2>Yes, well, they will allow links, but they won't they'll

0:49:31.640 --> 0:49:32.239
<v Speaker 2>depress them.

0:49:32.560 --> 0:49:35.040
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, oh yeah, allowed them, well versus Canada, where of

0:49:35.040 --> 0:49:37.480
<v Speaker 3>course they're not allowed. Yes, uh. And I think I

0:49:37.480 --> 0:49:40.919
<v Speaker 3>think Meta was praying that the Canada like bill would

0:49:40.920 --> 0:49:43.360
<v Speaker 3>have would have passed in California because they said that

0:49:43.360 --> 0:49:47.000
<v Speaker 3>they would eliminate news in California, and I think that

0:49:47.040 --> 0:49:49.600
<v Speaker 3>would have been an open door screw it. Let's eliminate

0:49:49.640 --> 0:49:51.960
<v Speaker 3>it in the US. Let's eliminate it everywhere. And that

0:49:51.960 --> 0:49:54.600
<v Speaker 3>would have been easier for them puppies, parties and uh,

0:49:54.680 --> 0:49:57.680
<v Speaker 3>pedophiles and uh, what's another p word for bad people.

0:49:57.920 --> 0:50:01.960
<v Speaker 2>Fiery is going to stop making TV shows. It's just

0:50:02.080 --> 0:50:04.840
<v Speaker 2>it's frustrating and it's only going to push people towards

0:50:04.840 --> 0:50:08.280
<v Speaker 2>blue sky. But it's also I think a real inflection

0:50:08.440 --> 0:50:10.359
<v Speaker 2>point for legacy media as well.

0:50:10.719 --> 0:50:12.799
<v Speaker 3>So there was a story in legacy media is dead.

0:50:12.960 --> 0:50:15.800
<v Speaker 2>Oh, I know. So Jeff Jarvis over here a big

0:50:15.840 --> 0:50:18.040
<v Speaker 2>fan of the Times in the Post. You actually, I

0:50:18.160 --> 0:50:20.480
<v Speaker 2>like he does this thing where it's hashtag hashtag broken

0:50:20.520 --> 0:50:23.080
<v Speaker 2>posts and broken times, broken times, but good times. You've

0:50:23.080 --> 0:50:23.919
<v Speaker 2>also put in a bit.

0:50:24.120 --> 0:50:25.440
<v Speaker 3>A rare moment when they do well.

0:50:25.520 --> 0:50:27.239
<v Speaker 2>Yes, he's got to give it the other day they did,

0:50:27.520 --> 0:50:31.080
<v Speaker 2>But that's I think that those publications are more threat

0:50:31.440 --> 0:50:34.880
<v Speaker 2>from this than people realize. Because Sevenpore had a story saying,

0:50:35.200 --> 0:50:37.640
<v Speaker 2>I think it's today for its media. So I assume

0:50:37.760 --> 0:50:42.000
<v Speaker 2>mister Tani next Zani. He that story said that the

0:50:42.040 --> 0:50:46.000
<v Speaker 2>Post went from having like twenty million unique monthly visitors

0:50:46.040 --> 0:50:48.680
<v Speaker 2>to like two point five to three in twenty twenty

0:50:48.680 --> 0:50:51.319
<v Speaker 2>one to two point five to three and twenty twenty four.

0:50:51.400 --> 0:50:56.080
<v Speaker 2>Jeff is astounded. I was too wow, and Scar, a

0:50:56.239 --> 0:50:57.640
<v Speaker 2>friend of the show, made the good.

0:50:57.440 --> 0:50:59.600
<v Speaker 1>Point eight has about three million months.

0:51:01.360 --> 0:51:03.960
<v Speaker 2>I think if the Post hoped you get late, that

0:51:04.000 --> 0:51:06.840
<v Speaker 2>would probably be We used.

0:51:06.719 --> 0:51:08.080
<v Speaker 3>To have that as a business bottel. We used to

0:51:08.080 --> 0:51:10.799
<v Speaker 3>have personals and newspapers before you were born.

0:51:10.880 --> 0:51:12.319
<v Speaker 2>And that's what they took from us.

0:51:12.480 --> 0:51:16.080
<v Speaker 3>That's all we had. Feel sorry for us old horny people.

0:51:17.640 --> 0:51:21.080
<v Speaker 1>Was submitting a single sentence to the Washington Post.

0:51:20.880 --> 0:51:22.200
<v Speaker 2>My new favorite quote of.

0:51:23.040 --> 0:51:25.120
<v Speaker 1>Feel sorry for us old horny people.

0:51:25.680 --> 0:51:28.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I like last week was already apologizing for the

0:51:28.960 --> 0:51:31.600
<v Speaker 2>amount of times people talked about horny checks and stuff.

0:51:31.640 --> 0:51:36.240
<v Speaker 2>Well we're back, folks. It's just crazy. But I think

0:51:36.280 --> 0:51:39.800
<v Speaker 2>it's these large publications have been so used to social

0:51:39.840 --> 0:51:42.279
<v Speaker 2>traffic and they've not been working out what the hell

0:51:42.360 --> 0:51:44.320
<v Speaker 2>to do with it for a while.

0:51:44.880 --> 0:51:48.560
<v Speaker 1>Well, a lot of them are betting that getting checks

0:51:48.600 --> 0:51:52.520
<v Speaker 1>from AI companies could soften the blow, which I don't

0:51:52.600 --> 0:51:54.200
<v Speaker 1>think is going to change much.

0:51:54.400 --> 0:51:56.000
<v Speaker 2>I mean, you only get one of those as well.

0:51:56.040 --> 0:51:58.319
<v Speaker 1>I mean they're supposed to get one a year or

0:51:58.360 --> 0:51:59.080
<v Speaker 1>something like that.

0:51:59.640 --> 0:52:01.400
<v Speaker 2>I think it burns five billions.

0:52:01.719 --> 0:52:04.840
<v Speaker 1>Dash Meredith had. I think their numbers are public, and

0:52:05.520 --> 0:52:07.680
<v Speaker 1>if you do the math, it equals up to like

0:52:08.480 --> 0:52:11.480
<v Speaker 1>one percent or less than one percent of their yearly revenue.

0:52:11.719 --> 0:52:13.120
<v Speaker 1>Take it and then I just don't. I think it's

0:52:13.160 --> 0:52:15.160
<v Speaker 1>a terrible trade and it's the same sort of mistake

0:52:15.200 --> 0:52:15.960
<v Speaker 1>these companies made.

0:52:16.280 --> 0:52:18.600
<v Speaker 3>It screws the rest of all media, and it's just

0:52:18.640 --> 0:52:21.040
<v Speaker 3>the moguls get their bags of money, but ed here

0:52:21.080 --> 0:52:22.680
<v Speaker 3>it gets nothing from open Ai.

0:52:22.960 --> 0:52:26.920
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I would love to sell everything words wise to

0:52:27.000 --> 0:52:29.640
<v Speaker 2>Sam Olman. You just have to text me back. Sam.

0:52:29.800 --> 0:52:33.399
<v Speaker 2>I've been texting you. I have not heard back, and

0:52:33.440 --> 0:52:36.080
<v Speaker 2>I'm not sure why. I simply asked you a question.

0:52:36.160 --> 0:52:39.120
<v Speaker 2>Come on, come on man, mister open Aye, I need

0:52:39.160 --> 0:52:41.759
<v Speaker 2>you on my show. I won't hurt you much, not

0:52:41.920 --> 0:52:43.400
<v Speaker 2>physically but emotionally.

0:52:43.800 --> 0:52:47.040
<v Speaker 1>Just six texts unanswered. We come on, you coward.

0:52:47.200 --> 0:52:50.360
<v Speaker 2>We are going to be crying, both of us. I

0:52:50.400 --> 0:52:53.160
<v Speaker 2>will start crying and you will finish crying. Mister Altman,

0:53:10.000 --> 0:53:12.960
<v Speaker 2>these deals, I assume that the Washington Post isn't getting

0:53:13.040 --> 0:53:15.480
<v Speaker 2>say one hundred and seventy five million dollars a year,

0:53:15.520 --> 0:53:17.160
<v Speaker 2>which is what their revenue is. They probably getting like

0:53:17.200 --> 0:53:18.719
<v Speaker 2>twenty thirty. I just tried to look it up. I

0:53:18.800 --> 0:53:21.239
<v Speaker 2>could not find it from this open aideal. I think

0:53:21.239 --> 0:53:23.319
<v Speaker 2>it was for the AI powered search. Is that a

0:53:23.320 --> 0:53:25.239
<v Speaker 2>content deal with them or did they out sign one.

0:53:25.160 --> 0:53:27.799
<v Speaker 1>Yet I'm not sure. So what I understand is the

0:53:27.840 --> 0:53:32.600
<v Speaker 1>two big media deals that we have like public numbers

0:53:32.640 --> 0:53:35.560
<v Speaker 1>on as far as the amount it equals up to,

0:53:35.600 --> 0:53:39.240
<v Speaker 1>like a single percentage point or less of their overall

0:53:39.280 --> 0:53:43.040
<v Speaker 1>revenue when you calculate it like they are getting they

0:53:43.040 --> 0:53:44.160
<v Speaker 1>are getting pennies.

0:53:44.640 --> 0:53:46.840
<v Speaker 3>Oh, they're not good at business, otherwise they wouldn't be

0:53:46.840 --> 0:53:49.600
<v Speaker 3>in such terrible shape right now. They screwed up the Internet,

0:53:49.719 --> 0:53:51.920
<v Speaker 3>they missed the boat. They didn't know what they were doing.

0:53:52.320 --> 0:53:55.480
<v Speaker 3>They cry and try to get protectionist legislation, and so

0:53:55.600 --> 0:53:57.560
<v Speaker 3>now they cry and try to get money out of

0:53:57.600 --> 0:53:59.360
<v Speaker 3>open AI and it's not a business model.

0:53:59.360 --> 0:54:01.200
<v Speaker 2>Well, Jeff, this is actually one of the many reasons

0:54:01.200 --> 0:54:02.960
<v Speaker 2>of what did you want? Can you kind of explain

0:54:03.040 --> 0:54:05.520
<v Speaker 2>what you just said? So what is it that they missed?

0:54:05.560 --> 0:54:07.640
<v Speaker 2>What is it that they should have done differently?

0:54:08.760 --> 0:54:10.759
<v Speaker 3>So let's not just make that third person. I'll make

0:54:10.800 --> 0:54:12.680
<v Speaker 3>that first person too, because I worked for the Conte

0:54:12.719 --> 0:54:14.680
<v Speaker 3>and ast in one advance and I was there as

0:54:14.680 --> 0:54:16.640
<v Speaker 3>it was going on, and.

0:54:17.120 --> 0:54:18.720
<v Speaker 2>What was it in this case the Internet.

0:54:19.160 --> 0:54:22.399
<v Speaker 3>I started at Advance in ninety four, just a month

0:54:22.440 --> 0:54:25.320
<v Speaker 3>after the browser came out, right right, So the company

0:54:25.360 --> 0:54:27.439
<v Speaker 3>was debating, Okay, now we're going to uncle Jeff time.

0:54:27.760 --> 0:54:29.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm sad.

0:54:29.800 --> 0:54:32.319
<v Speaker 2>That was the fact when the browser was a room

0:54:32.520 --> 0:54:36.640
<v Speaker 2>sized machine that the website.

0:54:35.000 --> 0:54:41.640
<v Speaker 3>Yes, so we were debating whether to put our content

0:54:42.320 --> 0:54:46.280
<v Speaker 3>onto Prodigy or AOL or this new.

0:54:46.120 --> 0:54:49.080
<v Speaker 2>Web point on the portals themselves when it was just

0:54:49.080 --> 0:54:49.840
<v Speaker 2>like one website.

0:54:49.880 --> 0:54:52.400
<v Speaker 3>So I worked for Steve newhous Is now the chairman

0:54:52.440 --> 0:54:54.879
<v Speaker 3>of Advance and conte and asked, and he's really, really smart,

0:54:54.880 --> 0:54:57.360
<v Speaker 3>and he's the one who taught me about interactivity and community,

0:54:57.360 --> 0:55:01.759
<v Speaker 3>and he knew that print content was not valuable online.

0:55:02.080 --> 0:55:05.319
<v Speaker 3>But every other publisher thought their great value was in

0:55:05.360 --> 0:55:09.520
<v Speaker 3>repurposing their print content to online and trying to license

0:55:09.560 --> 0:55:11.680
<v Speaker 3>it and get money for it and sell it. And

0:55:11.719 --> 0:55:14.640
<v Speaker 3>they didn't understand to the portals, to the portals and

0:55:14.920 --> 0:55:19.000
<v Speaker 3>then eventually and pay walls. They didn't understand that the

0:55:19.080 --> 0:55:22.640
<v Speaker 3>essence of the Internet is conversation and community and collaboration

0:55:22.920 --> 0:55:28.120
<v Speaker 3>and creativity. That's the last of my literations and so

0:55:28.160 --> 0:55:31.399
<v Speaker 3>they can insisted to just do what they'd always done,

0:55:31.560 --> 0:55:33.959
<v Speaker 3>subscription money and add money. And as they add money

0:55:34.000 --> 0:55:37.160
<v Speaker 3>went down because the number of a veils went way

0:55:37.200 --> 0:55:43.000
<v Speaker 3>sky high of advertising. Then, as happens when supply goes up,

0:55:43.200 --> 0:55:45.759
<v Speaker 3>price goes down. So then they tried to put it

0:55:45.800 --> 0:55:47.480
<v Speaker 3>all behind the pay wall and they're not all the

0:55:47.480 --> 0:55:49.960
<v Speaker 3>New York Times, and they can't do that. And they

0:55:50.040 --> 0:55:52.480
<v Speaker 3>never saw I think, what the essence of the Internet is.

0:55:53.000 --> 0:55:55.480
<v Speaker 3>And so now they're still in mass media mind. They're

0:55:55.520 --> 0:55:57.920
<v Speaker 3>still in we have to please everybody while they go

0:55:58.000 --> 0:56:01.719
<v Speaker 3>piss off everybody that they have done what they have done.

0:56:02.760 --> 0:56:04.960
<v Speaker 3>I think that they should have seen themselves that they

0:56:04.960 --> 0:56:09.799
<v Speaker 3>could have started Reddit, they could have started AOL, they

0:56:09.800 --> 0:56:11.200
<v Speaker 3>could have started these things.

0:56:11.200 --> 0:56:15.720
<v Speaker 2>I was part of this funded journalism, like yeah, yeah.

0:56:15.760 --> 0:56:21.120
<v Speaker 1>You're talking about something like Kinja, the commenting uh reddit

0:56:21.320 --> 0:56:22.520
<v Speaker 1>like commenting system.

0:56:22.640 --> 0:56:25.000
<v Speaker 3>Und I was there at the beginning of that too.

0:56:26.280 --> 0:56:28.120
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Conversations the first.

0:56:28.080 --> 0:56:30.640
<v Speaker 3>Well, Nick Detton first hated. I said he had put

0:56:30.640 --> 0:56:33.240
<v Speaker 3>comments on on Gawker. So no, I hate comments. They're awful,

0:56:34.280 --> 0:56:38.640
<v Speaker 3>that's true, they are, actually they're not. But but at

0:56:38.680 --> 0:56:40.960
<v Speaker 3>one point he became a believer because he was going

0:56:41.040 --> 0:56:43.600
<v Speaker 3>to do it nixt way, and that became Kinja, that

0:56:43.640 --> 0:56:44.439
<v Speaker 3>became everything else.

0:56:44.640 --> 0:56:48.680
<v Speaker 2>I think my big thing is that one publication owning Reddit.

0:56:48.760 --> 0:56:51.440
<v Speaker 2>Do you think that that makes like, how would like

0:56:51.520 --> 0:56:53.640
<v Speaker 2>something like Reddit? Because you're saying that they should have

0:56:53.640 --> 0:56:54.640
<v Speaker 2>seen conversations?

0:56:54.719 --> 0:56:55.040
<v Speaker 3>Is the thing?

0:56:56.160 --> 0:56:59.640
<v Speaker 2>Does that mean a social network? Like what? Because what

0:56:59.680 --> 0:57:03.440
<v Speaker 2>you're just describing is a company that sells journalism, and

0:57:03.480 --> 0:57:06.680
<v Speaker 2>you're like, the thing we will sell is not journalism.

0:57:06.920 --> 0:57:08.800
<v Speaker 3>Well, in fact, by old boss Steve Newhouse is the

0:57:08.800 --> 0:57:09.600
<v Speaker 3>one who bought red it.

0:57:10.360 --> 0:57:13.120
<v Speaker 2>He wanted to buy yeah, but he ran it like shit,

0:57:13.320 --> 0:57:13.960
<v Speaker 2>no he didn't.

0:57:14.000 --> 0:57:16.640
<v Speaker 3>It's now worth a fortune and up.

0:57:16.640 --> 0:57:20.320
<v Speaker 1>Until recently he ran election yep, but well it did it.

0:57:20.320 --> 0:57:21.200
<v Speaker 2>Well, now it doesn't.

0:57:21.360 --> 0:57:22.560
<v Speaker 3>It's worth a fortune now right.

0:57:23.920 --> 0:57:24.080
<v Speaker 2>Uh.

0:57:24.520 --> 0:57:26.840
<v Speaker 3>There was also a horrible clusterfuck in the industry called

0:57:26.840 --> 0:57:30.120
<v Speaker 3>the New Century Network, and the newspaper industry got together

0:57:30.320 --> 0:57:33.560
<v Speaker 3>the top twelve companies and we were going to start

0:57:33.880 --> 0:57:36.440
<v Speaker 3>a way to sign into all newspapers across the country

0:57:36.480 --> 0:57:40.240
<v Speaker 3>at once and subscribe at once and sell adworks across

0:57:40.600 --> 0:57:42.280
<v Speaker 3>and it could have been a real thing.

0:57:42.400 --> 0:57:42.560
<v Speaker 2>Right.

0:57:42.560 --> 0:57:44.640
<v Speaker 3>This is the same time that Yahoo's pretty up news

0:57:44.800 --> 0:57:47.920
<v Speaker 3>and AOL's pretty up. They could have done this. What

0:57:48.000 --> 0:57:51.880
<v Speaker 3>stopped them? So half the company along came Kleiner Perkins

0:57:51.920 --> 0:57:54.400
<v Speaker 3>and they said, this is a good idea. We want

0:57:54.400 --> 0:57:56.200
<v Speaker 3>to invest in this. We want to make this scale

0:57:56.200 --> 0:57:59.480
<v Speaker 3>and be big. Half the newspaper publishers said, how dare

0:57:59.560 --> 0:58:01.360
<v Speaker 3>you you can get a piece of our business? No,

0:58:01.480 --> 0:58:05.200
<v Speaker 3>absolutely not, because we're too valuable. You're just a PENMANI line.

0:58:05.240 --> 0:58:07.400
<v Speaker 2>So it seems like that is the shit problem.

0:58:07.440 --> 0:58:10.440
<v Speaker 3>None of it's male CEOs again, so I don't like Jensen.

0:58:10.240 --> 0:58:12.160
<v Speaker 2>Huang very much, but one of his things he would

0:58:12.160 --> 0:58:14.200
<v Speaker 2>say is like, always act like you're going out of business.

0:58:14.400 --> 0:58:17.320
<v Speaker 2>I'm surprised more newspapers don't do that for more obvious reasons.

0:58:17.400 --> 0:58:20.000
<v Speaker 2>But I don't know if I agree with you about

0:58:20.120 --> 0:58:23.240
<v Speaker 2>the conversation pop. I don't actually think doing right now.

0:58:23.920 --> 0:58:26.520
<v Speaker 2>I know, but like this isn't how you run a newspaper.

0:58:27.200 --> 0:58:29.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, i'd agree, And I think there needs to be

0:58:29.600 --> 0:58:33.120
<v Speaker 1>a way to be able to make news and journalism profitable,

0:58:33.160 --> 0:58:37.440
<v Speaker 1>and that doesn't exist at all scales and for all companies.

0:58:37.040 --> 0:58:39.520
<v Speaker 2>Doesn't exist at scale. I think might be the problem.

0:58:39.600 --> 0:58:44.080
<v Speaker 3>Scales the problem. Yeah, scale before the mechanization and industrialization

0:58:44.080 --> 0:58:45.720
<v Speaker 3>to print poor. Paris has heard me say this one

0:58:45.760 --> 0:58:49.760
<v Speaker 3>hundred times. In the mid eighteen fifties, the average circulation

0:58:50.000 --> 0:58:54.560
<v Speaker 3>of a daily newspaper in the United States was four thousand. Interesting,

0:58:54.640 --> 0:58:58.120
<v Speaker 3>it was only with a mechanization distributed because you had

0:58:58.160 --> 0:58:59.640
<v Speaker 3>to pull with the human muscle.

0:58:59.640 --> 0:59:02.160
<v Speaker 2>So you have a local printing press right to print local,

0:59:02.200 --> 0:59:04.320
<v Speaker 2>and you can only print so many and that distribution

0:59:04.400 --> 0:59:07.280
<v Speaker 2>of four thousand people a small town or something, or even.

0:59:07.080 --> 0:59:09.680
<v Speaker 3>In New York and New York in nineteen hundred. By

0:59:09.680 --> 0:59:11.280
<v Speaker 3>this time you had a half century of the steam

0:59:11.280 --> 0:59:13.040
<v Speaker 3>powered press, and you had the linotype, and you had

0:59:13.080 --> 0:59:15.440
<v Speaker 3>other things come in. Then you had scale come up.

0:59:15.440 --> 0:59:18.320
<v Speaker 3>But still in New York City, including Brooklyn, in nineteen hundred,

0:59:18.360 --> 0:59:21.640
<v Speaker 3>there were forty six daily newspapers hu That is to

0:59:21.640 --> 0:59:24.960
<v Speaker 3>say that they spoke at a different and human scale.

0:59:26.000 --> 0:59:29.560
<v Speaker 3>Broadcast killed all that. Broadcast came along, and you had

0:59:29.960 --> 0:59:33.440
<v Speaker 3>one or maybe two papers in a town, and they

0:59:33.480 --> 0:59:36.120
<v Speaker 3>thought they could serve everybody. They thought that scale was

0:59:36.160 --> 0:59:39.280
<v Speaker 3>the only goal. That we are the mass. It's growth,

0:59:39.400 --> 0:59:42.640
<v Speaker 3>and it was a lie. People realize pretty soon this

0:59:42.680 --> 0:59:43.400
<v Speaker 3>doesn't speak to me.

0:59:43.480 --> 0:59:45.960
<v Speaker 2>It's because none of these people, like many businesses in

0:59:46.040 --> 0:59:48.520
<v Speaker 2>tech as well are capable of saying we've grown enough

0:59:49.160 --> 0:59:52.840
<v Speaker 2>if there is a The Athletic was better as an

0:59:52.920 --> 0:59:55.760
<v Speaker 2>independent from the Times. But I forget you said this, Eliot.

0:59:55.800 --> 0:59:57.320
<v Speaker 2>It's like, the reason The Times is picking up this

0:59:57.600 --> 0:59:59.440
<v Speaker 2>stuff is because of The Times is actual brand. Maybe

0:59:59.480 --> 1:00:02.320
<v Speaker 2>in case it the Times, this brand is like falling apart,

1:00:02.640 --> 1:00:06.240
<v Speaker 2>and it sucks because the actual lessons recently that I've

1:00:06.240 --> 1:00:09.360
<v Speaker 2>seen in media are fairly straightforward. It's what if we

1:00:09.440 --> 1:00:12.640
<v Speaker 2>had interesting people doing unique stuff. What if we then

1:00:12.720 --> 1:00:15.520
<v Speaker 2>had them cover something that happened right, and then they'd

1:00:15.560 --> 1:00:18.800
<v Speaker 2>write it down some sort of like analysis I think

1:00:18.800 --> 1:00:21.480
<v Speaker 2>I'd call it, and then at the end of it

1:00:21.520 --> 1:00:23.560
<v Speaker 2>you'd be like, Wow, I know who this person was.

1:00:23.880 --> 1:00:26.040
<v Speaker 2>I know who this person and I heard them talk

1:00:26.080 --> 1:00:28.360
<v Speaker 2>and I like their voice. The last week at CES

1:00:28.440 --> 1:00:31.120
<v Speaker 2>twenty people interviewed I'm not just doing a thing about me,

1:00:31.240 --> 1:00:33.480
<v Speaker 2>don't worry. But the thing I got through it is

1:00:33.960 --> 1:00:37.040
<v Speaker 2>there are so many reporters who are so much more

1:00:37.120 --> 1:00:39.440
<v Speaker 2>charming than their bylines. And it's not a failure of

1:00:39.480 --> 1:00:42.960
<v Speaker 2>their writing. It's a failure of the outlets. It's a

1:00:42.960 --> 1:00:46.040
<v Speaker 2>failure of the form it used to be. At least.

1:00:46.080 --> 1:00:48.280
<v Speaker 2>I don't know much about the history of media, but

1:00:48.880 --> 1:00:51.320
<v Speaker 2>I remember there being a lot more opinion people in

1:00:51.360 --> 1:00:54.920
<v Speaker 2>tech yet Eric Bendroff here, Arthur Brayer think is still around.

1:00:54.920 --> 1:00:56.880
<v Speaker 2>But you had, like David Pogan, these people. I'm not

1:00:56.920 --> 1:00:58.760
<v Speaker 2>saying that they were perfect. In fact, I have some

1:00:59.240 --> 1:01:03.200
<v Speaker 2>views about some of the specifically m there was still

1:01:03.240 --> 1:01:05.880
<v Speaker 2>something to the popularity of having a real voice and

1:01:05.920 --> 1:01:08.520
<v Speaker 2>having a real person and that person being white, and you,

1:01:08.680 --> 1:01:10.200
<v Speaker 2>as a news out there were like shit, I got

1:01:10.240 --> 1:01:12.200
<v Speaker 2>to keep these names and I got to make sure

1:01:12.240 --> 1:01:14.520
<v Speaker 2>they can talk. And the times it's like, well, who

1:01:14.520 --> 1:01:16.760
<v Speaker 2>do we do for that? Who is the most insane person?

1:01:16.800 --> 1:01:18.400
<v Speaker 2>Do we have a transphob Oh, don't worry, we have

1:01:18.440 --> 1:01:21.280
<v Speaker 2>a whole day based those You have any insane warhawks?

1:01:21.280 --> 1:01:21.640
<v Speaker 3>Oh?

1:01:21.680 --> 1:01:24.439
<v Speaker 2>Please? That's the other database that we spent fifty million

1:01:24.480 --> 1:01:26.200
<v Speaker 2>dollars on. We had to lay off a few people.

1:01:26.240 --> 1:01:28.400
<v Speaker 2>We needed to know the people who would put the

1:01:28.480 --> 1:01:30.640
<v Speaker 2>most troops in California Paris.

1:01:30.720 --> 1:01:33.360
<v Speaker 3>Let me ask you something. The information is really good.

1:01:34.000 --> 1:01:37.040
<v Speaker 3>I pay for it same discount, though, I'm we had

1:01:37.040 --> 1:01:43.160
<v Speaker 3>to say, and it works as a business, Yes, now

1:01:44.080 --> 1:01:48.439
<v Speaker 3>it works because there's reporting like yours that's valuable, that

1:01:48.920 --> 1:01:53.720
<v Speaker 3>is specialized and covers technology and the society and business

1:01:53.720 --> 1:01:58.000
<v Speaker 3>around it. Really, well, why is there not an the

1:01:58.200 --> 1:02:03.320
<v Speaker 3>information in areas on the same model? Political one might say,

1:02:03.360 --> 1:02:04.440
<v Speaker 3>is that political's crap.

1:02:04.640 --> 1:02:06.440
<v Speaker 2>Politico is just conservative news.

1:02:06.600 --> 1:02:09.720
<v Speaker 3>Yeah it's awful, right, but heretically it should be the

1:02:10.320 --> 1:02:13.960
<v Speaker 3>information of politics, but it's not. I can't think of

1:02:14.240 --> 1:02:15.880
<v Speaker 3>any the information of.

1:02:17.440 --> 1:02:20.720
<v Speaker 1>I think it's I think the answer is a little

1:02:20.800 --> 1:02:25.560
<v Speaker 1>multifaceted one. I think when Jessica Lesson, our founder, she

1:02:25.640 --> 1:02:27.680
<v Speaker 1>used to work at the Wall Street Journal, founded The

1:02:27.680 --> 1:02:30.880
<v Speaker 1>Information a bit over a decade ago, everyone thought she

1:02:31.160 --> 1:02:33.680
<v Speaker 1>was crazy, like there's a bunch of very funny to

1:02:33.720 --> 1:02:38.040
<v Speaker 1>read now blogs from Business Insider being like this crazy

1:02:38.160 --> 1:02:41.400
<v Speaker 1>lady wants you to pay a couple hundred dollars for

1:02:41.520 --> 1:02:45.160
<v Speaker 1>a subscription to a website with news on it. Who

1:02:45.200 --> 1:02:47.960
<v Speaker 1>would ever do that? And I think that it took

1:02:48.040 --> 1:02:50.120
<v Speaker 1>a while for people in the media industry to come

1:02:50.160 --> 1:02:53.920
<v Speaker 1>around the idea of a truly hard paywall and creating

1:02:54.000 --> 1:02:59.120
<v Speaker 1>content that is worth paying for and sticking by that.

1:02:59.800 --> 1:03:03.200
<v Speaker 1>I also think it's that's because there are obvious trade offs.

1:03:03.320 --> 1:03:05.760
<v Speaker 1>The reach of the information is much smaller than a

1:03:05.760 --> 1:03:08.600
<v Speaker 1>Politico because you can't get around our paywalls, and it

1:03:08.640 --> 1:03:10.200
<v Speaker 1>doesn't need to be huge, and it doesn't need to

1:03:10.200 --> 1:03:12.440
<v Speaker 1>be huge because it is self sustaining.

1:03:12.520 --> 1:03:15.160
<v Speaker 2>I also think there's another detail. She founded this in

1:03:15.200 --> 1:03:18.280
<v Speaker 2>twenty thirteen. At the end of twenty thirteen, so everyone

1:03:18.360 --> 1:03:20.120
<v Speaker 2>was still high on the hog as far as ads,

1:03:20.160 --> 1:03:24.080
<v Speaker 2>when the ads industry had not, it hadn't become as difficult. Also,

1:03:24.800 --> 1:03:27.400
<v Speaker 2>I say this with no offense to your Paris. Jessica

1:03:27.480 --> 1:03:29.440
<v Speaker 2>is also well known as being well connected with the

1:03:29.520 --> 1:03:32.760
<v Speaker 2>Zuckerbergs and also well known for being and there are

1:03:32.800 --> 1:03:36.040
<v Speaker 2>times with the information where the tone shifts and it

1:03:36.120 --> 1:03:38.560
<v Speaker 2>is a little more rah rah. I think is the

1:03:38.560 --> 1:03:41.320
<v Speaker 2>fair thing. I'm not saying that that's a bad thing.

1:03:41.400 --> 1:03:42.480
<v Speaker 3>Maybe just charitable.

1:03:42.600 --> 1:03:44.080
<v Speaker 2>No, the podcast I'm thinking of it.

1:03:44.160 --> 1:03:47.360
<v Speaker 1>Oh, the podcast is a Jessica Lesson podcast.

1:03:47.480 --> 1:03:50.720
<v Speaker 2>Also, it's not a report. Some of the ways that

1:03:50.760 --> 1:03:54.720
<v Speaker 2>AI things are framed are not necessarily critical. Not certainly

1:03:55.000 --> 1:03:57.640
<v Speaker 2>every outlet has biased. I'm also I cite the information

1:03:57.760 --> 1:03:58.240
<v Speaker 2>all the time.

1:03:58.640 --> 1:04:00.760
<v Speaker 1>I think that there's a bit of a difference between

1:04:00.840 --> 1:04:04.640
<v Speaker 1>some of our newsletters or podcasts or opinion stuff versus reporting.

1:04:04.800 --> 1:04:07.080
<v Speaker 2>But agreed, you've got some of the best, like Anissa Goez.

1:04:07.480 --> 1:04:11.280
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, we have fantastic people to do fantastic work. And

1:04:11.320 --> 1:04:13.520
<v Speaker 1>I think part of what you're getting at here with

1:04:13.800 --> 1:04:15.960
<v Speaker 1>comments with Jeska is also what made this work is

1:04:16.040 --> 1:04:19.120
<v Speaker 1>she had like it was self funded. She didn't need

1:04:19.160 --> 1:04:22.360
<v Speaker 1>to take on venture capital to start it, and that

1:04:22.520 --> 1:04:25.560
<v Speaker 1>meant that it could grow at its own pace versus

1:04:26.240 --> 1:04:29.680
<v Speaker 1>I have worked at a total of three places in

1:04:29.720 --> 1:04:33.000
<v Speaker 1>my about a decade of a journalism career. The first

1:04:33.000 --> 1:04:36.320
<v Speaker 1>two I got laid off from. The first one was well,

1:04:36.360 --> 1:04:39.280
<v Speaker 1>I guess other places. The first two staff jobs I

1:04:39.280 --> 1:04:41.160
<v Speaker 1>had I got laid off from. One was a place

1:04:41.200 --> 1:04:45.240
<v Speaker 1>called The Outline that raised venture capital and then quickly

1:04:45.320 --> 1:04:47.200
<v Speaker 1>ran out of it because it spent too much money

1:04:47.240 --> 1:04:49.960
<v Speaker 1>on silly things.

1:04:50.120 --> 1:04:53.080
<v Speaker 2>Favorite game found an outlet, lose the money, walke away.

1:04:53.360 --> 1:04:58.640
<v Speaker 1>You know it's a great Uh, we'll see listen as

1:04:58.720 --> 1:05:01.800
<v Speaker 1>long as people get paid. And the other one was Wired,

1:05:01.800 --> 1:05:03.880
<v Speaker 1>which is part of Conde Nast, which was going through

1:05:03.880 --> 1:05:06.560
<v Speaker 1>its own growing pains because it has a bunch of

1:05:06.560 --> 1:05:10.520
<v Speaker 1>print publications and is largely supported by sabridizing always fucking

1:05:10.600 --> 1:05:11.120
<v Speaker 1>growth pain.

1:05:11.240 --> 1:05:14.080
<v Speaker 2>It's just they must be bigger and the best work

1:05:14.200 --> 1:05:17.280
<v Speaker 2>like one of the things that has made the rise

1:05:17.320 --> 1:05:19.960
<v Speaker 2>of newsletters happen, in my opinion, and indeed this show,

1:05:20.400 --> 1:05:23.360
<v Speaker 2>is that people are kind of tired of the standard

1:05:23.360 --> 1:05:26.400
<v Speaker 2>big box thing. They're tired of these kind of every

1:05:26.440 --> 1:05:30.400
<v Speaker 2>major publication really drains the life out of and I

1:05:30.440 --> 1:05:33.280
<v Speaker 2>don't I think even smaller publications do. They standardize the copy.

1:05:33.280 --> 1:05:35.240
<v Speaker 2>And I realize you can't have everyone beer as being

1:05:35.320 --> 1:05:38.280
<v Speaker 2>a sloppy blog worm like me, but it feels like

1:05:38.520 --> 1:05:42.920
<v Speaker 2>the publications really investing in allowing the person behind the

1:05:42.920 --> 1:05:45.280
<v Speaker 2>thing to talk are doing well. And gadget we had

1:05:45.280 --> 1:05:46.880
<v Speaker 2>a tounnel them on the show and they've done a

1:05:46.880 --> 1:05:48.680
<v Speaker 2>really bloody good job in their coverage and in their

1:05:48.720 --> 1:05:51.240
<v Speaker 2>podcast actually bringing the personality out. You got Sherlin Low,

1:05:51.280 --> 1:05:53.600
<v Speaker 2>You've got the Bingja Hardawa, You've got Carrissa Bell, and

1:05:53.640 --> 1:05:57.200
<v Speaker 2>these people are fun and varied, indifferent, and I wish

1:05:57.320 --> 1:05:58.920
<v Speaker 2>that there was more of that in journalism. But I

1:05:58.920 --> 1:06:01.800
<v Speaker 2>also think it's why people turning away from legacy media.

1:06:02.480 --> 1:06:05.400
<v Speaker 3>Let me ask you another question, do you yourself or

1:06:05.440 --> 1:06:08.560
<v Speaker 3>do you ever hear any colleagues say I'm glad I

1:06:08.600 --> 1:06:10.200
<v Speaker 3>have a salary, but I wish I had a little

1:06:10.200 --> 1:06:12.960
<v Speaker 3>more fame or a little more impact or a little

1:06:12.960 --> 1:06:14.280
<v Speaker 3>more presence.

1:06:15.000 --> 1:06:19.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I can't think of any examples, but I.

1:06:19.920 --> 1:06:21.919
<v Speaker 2>Or even like Piz when I.

1:06:21.560 --> 1:06:23.840
<v Speaker 1>I'll give you this when I was deciding whether or

1:06:23.840 --> 1:06:25.960
<v Speaker 1>not to go to the Information versus a couple of

1:06:26.040 --> 1:06:27.880
<v Speaker 1>other places. I called it my mentor at the time,

1:06:27.920 --> 1:06:29.800
<v Speaker 1>and I was like, oh, if I go to the information, well,

1:06:29.800 --> 1:06:32.680
<v Speaker 1>I like fade away into obscurity behind the paywall. It's

1:06:32.720 --> 1:06:34.960
<v Speaker 1>a terrible career move. And he was like, rightfully, he

1:06:35.000 --> 1:06:36.880
<v Speaker 1>was like, Paris, there are two groups of people that

1:06:36.920 --> 1:06:38.880
<v Speaker 1>you care about reading your work, if we're being honest,

1:06:39.000 --> 1:06:41.360
<v Speaker 1>one is other journalists and the other people that work

1:06:41.360 --> 1:06:43.800
<v Speaker 1>in tech. Both of those groups subscribed to the information,

1:06:43.840 --> 1:06:45.360
<v Speaker 1>You're going to be fine. And I think that that

1:06:45.480 --> 1:06:47.280
<v Speaker 1>is the way that a lot of people at our.

1:06:47.440 --> 1:06:49.120
<v Speaker 2>I don't know if I love that. Listen.

1:06:50.480 --> 1:06:52.840
<v Speaker 1>It's a practical way of thinking about it.

1:06:53.080 --> 1:06:56.080
<v Speaker 2>A careerism. Yeah, yes, careers feel like you do. I

1:06:56.360 --> 1:06:58.160
<v Speaker 2>am actually pushing back. I think you actually give a

1:06:58.160 --> 1:06:59.920
<v Speaker 2>big shit about your readers.

1:07:00.120 --> 1:07:02.000
<v Speaker 1>I do give a huge ship about my readers.

1:07:03.400 --> 1:07:05.040
<v Speaker 2>Just want to make sure that the pigs on ready

1:07:05.080 --> 1:07:08.560
<v Speaker 2>don't come and argue with you about because it doesn't

1:07:08.600 --> 1:07:09.920
<v Speaker 2>seem like that's your point.

1:07:10.280 --> 1:07:13.440
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, no, my I care a lot about my readers

1:07:13.480 --> 1:07:15.880
<v Speaker 1>and things like that. But part of the thing, I guess,

1:07:15.920 --> 1:07:19.360
<v Speaker 1>if you're talking about larger career moves wise like those

1:07:19.400 --> 1:07:21.320
<v Speaker 1>are the two groups you need to think about. Potential

1:07:21.360 --> 1:07:26.520
<v Speaker 1>sources and potential like colleagues and the work. Yes, good doing,

1:07:26.520 --> 1:07:33.760
<v Speaker 1>good work. If part of my calculation for going to

1:07:33.800 --> 1:07:38.000
<v Speaker 1>a place like the Information is despite the limits of

1:07:38.200 --> 1:07:40.560
<v Speaker 1>being behind a hard paywall, it's one of the few

1:07:40.600 --> 1:07:43.040
<v Speaker 1>places I think that exist in media still where I

1:07:43.080 --> 1:07:44.960
<v Speaker 1>get to just do like I spent a month on

1:07:44.960 --> 1:07:47.000
<v Speaker 1>that sniffy story. I spent a month on most of

1:07:47.040 --> 1:07:47.640
<v Speaker 1>my stories.

1:07:47.920 --> 1:07:51.800
<v Speaker 2>That is cool and read is a very focused My.

1:07:51.920 --> 1:07:53.040
<v Speaker 1>Readers are very focused.

1:07:53.120 --> 1:07:53.640
<v Speaker 2>They read.

1:07:54.240 --> 1:07:56.400
<v Speaker 1>We have an incredible like read through rate, and it

1:07:56.800 --> 1:07:59.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, that's really cool, actually quite nice to

1:07:59.520 --> 1:08:01.440
<v Speaker 1>be able to to be at a place where you

1:08:01.480 --> 1:08:03.160
<v Speaker 1>can do that sort of focus. But I don't think

1:08:03.160 --> 1:08:06.560
<v Speaker 1>that that exists. That exists infrequently at scale.

1:08:06.760 --> 1:08:08.600
<v Speaker 2>I think at scale as well, you have the problem

1:08:08.680 --> 1:08:10.800
<v Speaker 2>of you do have those deep readers, but you also

1:08:10.800 --> 1:08:12.920
<v Speaker 2>have the people who saw the headline, they scroll down,

1:08:12.960 --> 1:08:15.200
<v Speaker 2>they see a name, they're like they just hit retweet.

1:08:15.400 --> 1:08:19.360
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, let me ask you in your other life PR.

1:08:19.680 --> 1:08:19.800
<v Speaker 2>Right.

1:08:21.280 --> 1:08:22.920
<v Speaker 3>So I talked to an executive at one of the

1:08:22.960 --> 1:08:25.639
<v Speaker 3>big tech companies and he said, how do we get

1:08:25.640 --> 1:08:27.639
<v Speaker 3>our message out at scale? I said, you don'te anymore?

1:08:28.160 --> 1:08:29.880
<v Speaker 3>And then I talked to a guy who worked just

1:08:29.960 --> 1:08:32.599
<v Speaker 3>left a big PR company. I'll leave them most nameless

1:08:32.600 --> 1:08:35.759
<v Speaker 3>for now, and he said, oh, yeah, the PR industry

1:08:35.840 --> 1:08:39.200
<v Speaker 3>is all about getting on tech meme and and where

1:08:39.240 --> 1:08:40.240
<v Speaker 3>you get the publications.

1:08:40.320 --> 1:08:43.040
<v Speaker 2>That's a guy. That's a guy who hasn't pitched anyone

1:08:43.040 --> 1:08:44.920
<v Speaker 2>and fucking ever. So you ever hear a guy be

1:08:45.000 --> 1:08:46.479
<v Speaker 2>like you canna be on tech? Mean, that's a person

1:08:46.520 --> 1:08:49.479
<v Speaker 2>who does not talk to journalists. I know it's important

1:08:49.479 --> 1:08:52.080
<v Speaker 2>for jendalists. I don't think it's that important.

1:08:52.400 --> 1:08:54.760
<v Speaker 3>Are the clients is what I'm saying, Kinds don't give

1:08:54.760 --> 1:08:56.760
<v Speaker 3>a ship. That's what's That's where I'm going is is

1:08:56.800 --> 1:09:01.280
<v Speaker 3>where's the so? Where is what are they value? Now?

1:09:01.360 --> 1:09:03.320
<v Speaker 2>So what it is is like I actually got this

1:09:03.680 --> 1:09:05.519
<v Speaker 2>last week. It's like, what are your clients like? And

1:09:05.560 --> 1:09:08.600
<v Speaker 2>it's the smart clients. The money I take are the

1:09:08.600 --> 1:09:11.080
<v Speaker 2>ones that know they have a good story and also

1:09:11.160 --> 1:09:13.120
<v Speaker 2>know they don't know how to get to journalists because

1:09:13.120 --> 1:09:15.800
<v Speaker 2>there's one thousand PR people per Do they need the

1:09:15.880 --> 1:09:20.040
<v Speaker 2>journalists still, Yes, absolutely they do because at the moment,

1:09:20.439 --> 1:09:22.439
<v Speaker 2>right now, there may be a lack of trust in

1:09:22.520 --> 1:09:26.240
<v Speaker 2>legacy media, but people still trust media in general. I

1:09:26.280 --> 1:09:30.000
<v Speaker 2>bring up Steve from Gamers Nexus, million plus subscriber coffee

1:09:30.080 --> 1:09:32.400
<v Speaker 2>Zilla on YouTube. Now, I'm not saying those that even

1:09:32.400 --> 1:09:35.439
<v Speaker 2>be PR targets, but Linus tech Tips absolutely would and

1:09:35.479 --> 1:09:38.000
<v Speaker 2>indeed has worked with people I've worked with. People still

1:09:38.000 --> 1:09:39.920
<v Speaker 2>need to get through, but the thing that has changed

1:09:40.000 --> 1:09:42.040
<v Speaker 2>is there's a lot less journalists who are just willing

1:09:42.040 --> 1:09:45.200
<v Speaker 2>to run anything unless it's for open AI. By the way,

1:09:45.240 --> 1:09:47.720
<v Speaker 2>I'm just going to do this. There is a two

1:09:48.400 --> 1:09:51.559
<v Speaker 2>tiered system within the media right now. And the reason

1:09:51.640 --> 1:09:54.320
<v Speaker 2>we have Meta and the reason we have Elon Musk,

1:09:54.360 --> 1:09:56.479
<v Speaker 2>and the reason we have these things is partially to

1:09:56.479 --> 1:09:59.800
<v Speaker 2>blame for the fact that startups actually really have to

1:09:59.800 --> 1:10:03.599
<v Speaker 2>p if they're worth. It's remarkable one of the reasons

1:10:03.600 --> 1:10:06.400
<v Speaker 2>I have a fucking career in PR. And it's frustrating

1:10:06.400 --> 1:10:07.840
<v Speaker 2>because you'll be like, hey, I got a they do

1:10:07.920 --> 1:10:10.400
<v Speaker 2>a really good thing, they make money like school, and

1:10:10.400 --> 1:10:13.559
<v Speaker 2>they're like, yeah, but yeah, but like did they raise

1:10:13.640 --> 1:10:15.599
<v Speaker 2>like more money though, and like I don't know if

1:10:15.640 --> 1:10:17.000
<v Speaker 2>I want to write it, but someone is just a

1:10:17.040 --> 1:10:19.800
<v Speaker 2>good idea and then they will post an open AI

1:10:19.960 --> 1:10:22.599
<v Speaker 2>thing that is like a feature that my toaster has,

1:10:23.040 --> 1:10:25.320
<v Speaker 2>and it's just And the problem is is that I

1:10:25.400 --> 1:10:28.080
<v Speaker 2>understand when you're as these outlets somehow get bigger, but

1:10:28.120 --> 1:10:29.679
<v Speaker 2>they have less people. You have to do more stuff,

1:10:29.720 --> 1:10:31.360
<v Speaker 2>so you just have to go, oh shit, what is

1:10:31.400 --> 1:10:33.719
<v Speaker 2>the public good? What does everyone want to know about?

1:10:34.080 --> 1:10:36.920
<v Speaker 2>Open eye, anthropic what have you? And that makes sense.

1:10:37.640 --> 1:10:40.599
<v Speaker 2>But to your point, startups kind of need PR as

1:10:40.680 --> 1:10:42.840
<v Speaker 2>much as they used to. Big tech also does too,

1:10:42.920 --> 1:10:45.280
<v Speaker 2>because right now all of the big tech companies they're

1:10:45.280 --> 1:10:47.880
<v Speaker 2>playing the same game, which is well, Donald Trump's in

1:10:47.880 --> 1:10:50.560
<v Speaker 2>the White House, and uh, the writer's winning. So I

1:10:50.600 --> 1:10:52.679
<v Speaker 2>don't give a shit about fuck. I'm just gonna say

1:10:52.720 --> 1:10:55.160
<v Speaker 2>whatever I want. And indeed, the two tid system I

1:10:55.200 --> 1:10:57.800
<v Speaker 2>talked about the reason that Sam Altman has been able

1:10:57.840 --> 1:10:59.840
<v Speaker 2>to lie at scale and Elon Musk has been allowed

1:11:00.120 --> 1:11:02.599
<v Speaker 2>like a scale for ten years is because the system

1:11:02.680 --> 1:11:05.120
<v Speaker 2>that operates against these series A and I don't say

1:11:05.120 --> 1:11:07.519
<v Speaker 2>this with any bitterness, by the way, everyone should be

1:11:07.560 --> 1:11:10.160
<v Speaker 2>held to this standard. Everyone with the media should have

1:11:10.200 --> 1:11:13.880
<v Speaker 2>to prove themselves. But someone like Meta, someone like Tesla,

1:11:13.920 --> 1:11:15.559
<v Speaker 2>they come along and say whatever the fuck they want

1:11:15.560 --> 1:11:17.800
<v Speaker 2>and it gets printed even to this day with the

1:11:17.840 --> 1:11:20.160
<v Speaker 2>test the robot of them. So you're in this situation

1:11:20.200 --> 1:11:23.439
<v Speaker 2>where media relations, why don't skim journalous to cover stuff?

1:11:24.400 --> 1:11:27.760
<v Speaker 2>Is very important? And then there's the other problem, which

1:11:27.800 --> 1:11:29.800
<v Speaker 2>is about fifteen years ago when I got into this job,

1:11:29.840 --> 1:11:32.920
<v Speaker 2>people started writing articles called media relations is dead. Why

1:11:33.280 --> 1:11:35.680
<v Speaker 2>because talking to reporters all day and learning everything they do,

1:11:35.720 --> 1:11:37.439
<v Speaker 2>and know what you're talking about, what they're talking about,

1:11:37.479 --> 1:11:38.800
<v Speaker 2>what's happened in the world, and then being able to

1:11:38.840 --> 1:11:40.439
<v Speaker 2>take that and put it into a smart thought including

1:11:40.479 --> 1:11:44.040
<v Speaker 2>the client. That's actually pretty difficult. And PR people are

1:11:44.120 --> 1:11:47.320
<v Speaker 2>lazy animals. They love to sit around and send emails

1:11:47.320 --> 1:11:50.320
<v Speaker 2>and write documents. They're about as functional as sandapieshay as.

1:11:50.320 --> 1:11:52.479
<v Speaker 2>They're just meeting goers. If you're a PR person, I've

1:11:52.479 --> 1:11:54.160
<v Speaker 2>been saying that. I've been saying that you need to

1:11:54.240 --> 1:11:56.880
<v Speaker 2>change your ass for years, except now I have a microphone.

1:11:56.960 --> 1:12:02.439
<v Speaker 2>I hope you're upset, long story, shrecked, get absolutely ragged, bodied, etc.

1:12:03.280 --> 1:12:05.160
<v Speaker 2>You can talk about me on your podcast if anyone

1:12:05.200 --> 1:12:09.760
<v Speaker 2>would listen. But the point I'm making is PR is necessary,

1:12:10.320 --> 1:12:14.680
<v Speaker 2>but it's also killing itself and the biggest clients are

1:12:14.720 --> 1:12:17.680
<v Speaker 2>becoming so weird about it that they'll have PR. But

1:12:17.720 --> 1:12:20.040
<v Speaker 2>then like, why is the media not saying everything we

1:12:20.120 --> 1:12:23.960
<v Speaker 2>want them to say? And it's because the media doesn't

1:12:24.000 --> 1:12:26.360
<v Speaker 2>just copy paste things. They may write down exactly what

1:12:26.400 --> 1:12:30.360
<v Speaker 2>you say with the bigger companies, but journalists have brains

1:12:30.400 --> 1:12:32.000
<v Speaker 2>and we'll hear stuff now and go wait, what the

1:12:32.040 --> 1:12:34.120
<v Speaker 2>fuck does that mean? And even with open AI they're

1:12:34.200 --> 1:12:37.760
<v Speaker 2>finally learning it. It's just that when that happens, you're

1:12:37.800 --> 1:12:40.240
<v Speaker 2>going to need the media relations people. Except the PR

1:12:40.280 --> 1:12:42.680
<v Speaker 2>industry Go on Google, media relations is dead. They've been

1:12:42.760 --> 1:12:45.599
<v Speaker 2>killing them for fifteen years. It's hilarious. It's like the

1:12:45.640 --> 1:12:47.400
<v Speaker 2>one fun job in this industry.

1:12:48.120 --> 1:12:51.439
<v Speaker 1>It's extremely easy to do bad PR and extremely hard

1:12:51.439 --> 1:12:52.200
<v Speaker 1>to do good PR.

1:12:52.439 --> 1:12:54.479
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, there are times when I get an email offering

1:12:54.520 --> 1:12:56.479
<v Speaker 3>me an interview and one time I just want to

1:12:56.520 --> 1:12:59.640
<v Speaker 3>take it, just to say so that afterwards the person says, well,

1:12:59.680 --> 1:13:01.759
<v Speaker 3>what's this audience? So he doesn't have any audience.

1:13:02.479 --> 1:13:05.439
<v Speaker 2>The thing is that a twenty three year old who

1:13:05.439 --> 1:13:07.920
<v Speaker 2>works seventeen hour days is going to get fired because

1:13:08.960 --> 1:13:11.719
<v Speaker 2>they're going to lose their sub lease on an eight person,

1:13:11.800 --> 1:13:13.240
<v Speaker 2>one bedroom.

1:13:13.479 --> 1:13:17.120
<v Speaker 1>It's I probably got ten weird PR pitches that are

1:13:17.120 --> 1:13:19.360
<v Speaker 1>completely unrelated to me while we've been sitting here.

1:13:19.880 --> 1:13:22.200
<v Speaker 3>You still get them, even though I still get all

1:13:22.280 --> 1:13:22.679
<v Speaker 3>the time.

1:13:22.800 --> 1:13:25.080
<v Speaker 2>And I love the PR people who pitch me because

1:13:25.120 --> 1:13:28.559
<v Speaker 2>it's block people I do too, but so and that's

1:13:28.680 --> 1:13:30.280
<v Speaker 2>this is the weird things. While there's like this whole

1:13:30.320 --> 1:13:33.160
<v Speaker 2>PR industry just spams people that'd be making fun of

1:13:33.200 --> 1:13:36.240
<v Speaker 2>for like my entire career and getting in zero trouble

1:13:36.280 --> 1:13:40.280
<v Speaker 2>because they're all cowards. And it's just it's frustrating because

1:13:40.280 --> 1:13:43.360
<v Speaker 2>we're just describing industries run by people who don't understand

1:13:43.479 --> 1:13:46.519
<v Speaker 2>the process, Like how do you run a good news

1:13:46.560 --> 1:13:48.960
<v Speaker 2>out there? I don't know good news and make sure

1:13:49.000 --> 1:13:49.839
<v Speaker 2>that people making.

1:13:49.680 --> 1:13:51.200
<v Speaker 3>Sure it has value in people's lives.

1:13:51.320 --> 1:13:54.760
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and it's this drain of personality from everything. The

1:13:54.840 --> 1:13:59.720
<v Speaker 2>information is fairly straightforward, but you have some specifics. You

1:13:59.760 --> 1:14:02.200
<v Speaker 2>have some who is it that emails me every day?

1:14:02.479 --> 1:14:07.760
<v Speaker 2>Pisses me off? Martin Piers, Yeah, yeah, but that's the thing.

1:14:08.280 --> 1:14:09.719
<v Speaker 1>It's a newsletter and.

1:14:09.640 --> 1:14:11.759
<v Speaker 2>He loves that's.

1:14:11.640 --> 1:14:13.120
<v Speaker 1>Kind of his job to piss you off.

1:14:13.200 --> 1:14:15.400
<v Speaker 2>I am actually saying this. I get pissed off with

1:14:15.400 --> 1:14:17.080
<v Speaker 2>it regularly. I read it every time.

1:14:17.360 --> 1:14:18.280
<v Speaker 1>Jeff gets pissed off.

1:14:18.720 --> 1:14:20.240
<v Speaker 3>I get mad at once.

1:14:22.160 --> 1:14:24.479
<v Speaker 2>But that's the thing. At the very least, he fucking

1:14:24.479 --> 1:14:27.320
<v Speaker 2>stands for something. Why would people go I don't know.

1:14:27.360 --> 1:14:30.840
<v Speaker 2>Why would people go to influencers who don't necessarily run

1:14:30.880 --> 1:14:33.719
<v Speaker 2>their facts very well or at all? And the answer

1:14:33.760 --> 1:14:34.719
<v Speaker 2>is because they can't.

1:14:35.120 --> 1:14:36.840
<v Speaker 3>I got a question for you. So you saw Lisa

1:14:36.960 --> 1:14:40.240
<v Speaker 3>uh Ruben, not Lisa Ribbon, jenn Ribbon.

1:14:40.520 --> 1:14:45.080
<v Speaker 2>It's also my show. I'm kidding thing Jennifer Ruben.

1:14:45.120 --> 1:14:47.880
<v Speaker 3>Jennifer Rubin left the Washington Post right and she started

1:14:47.880 --> 1:14:49.360
<v Speaker 3>a new substack newsletter.

1:14:49.080 --> 1:14:49.880
<v Speaker 2>The Contrarian.

1:14:50.080 --> 1:14:55.080
<v Speaker 3>The Contrarian? Oh god, what is it about Substack? How

1:14:55.120 --> 1:14:58.280
<v Speaker 3>does it that now it's textile? Is that we all

1:14:58.320 --> 1:15:02.360
<v Speaker 3>know that tech is but the Substack has its own

1:15:02.479 --> 1:15:06.200
<v Speaker 3>Nazi yeah problems And why does everybody still go there?

1:15:06.320 --> 1:15:08.240
<v Speaker 2>I actually think it's the thing we've been talking about

1:15:08.280 --> 1:15:10.600
<v Speaker 2>that's just some legacy media shit. They're like, why do

1:15:10.720 --> 1:15:14.160
<v Speaker 2>people come to the newspaper only for Jennifer Ruben and

1:15:14.160 --> 1:15:17.240
<v Speaker 2>the series of bland right wing people that have found

1:15:17.240 --> 1:15:20.080
<v Speaker 2>a way to pretend they're liberals, and they're like, well,

1:15:20.080 --> 1:15:23.439
<v Speaker 2>why do people read the paper for me? Why they

1:15:23.479 --> 1:15:25.439
<v Speaker 2>read it? And the thing they hate about the media

1:15:25.520 --> 1:15:29.760
<v Speaker 2>right now is it's not contrarian enough, Like it's just

1:15:29.840 --> 1:15:32.080
<v Speaker 2>this is exactly the kind of shit that the legacy

1:15:32.120 --> 1:15:34.880
<v Speaker 2>media institution would do. It's what happened in twenty twenty

1:15:34.880 --> 1:15:37.479
<v Speaker 2>one when The Atlantic had like eight different newsletters and

1:15:37.520 --> 1:15:42.720
<v Speaker 2>then didn't treat them any differently. Heart take Factory, but no, god,

1:15:42.720 --> 1:15:46.439
<v Speaker 2>it's the Atlantic. It's luke warm take factory, cry baby shit.

1:15:47.040 --> 1:15:51.280
<v Speaker 2>And it's or just like anti Palestine shit, which is

1:15:51.320 --> 1:15:54.240
<v Speaker 2>disgusting anyway. Get we'll get to that on the other

1:15:54.280 --> 1:15:57.040
<v Speaker 2>show where everyone gets mad at me. But the point

1:15:57.120 --> 1:16:00.000
<v Speaker 2>is it's just the same fucking wheel turning. It's people

1:16:00.120 --> 1:16:02.960
<v Speaker 2>going shit, what do people do? What are big now?

1:16:03.080 --> 1:16:06.120
<v Speaker 2>What big newsletter they send those? What if we all

1:16:06.160 --> 1:16:09.360
<v Speaker 2>got together and combined our audiences of people that barely

1:16:09.360 --> 1:16:11.680
<v Speaker 2>read us and do not look at the facts or

1:16:11.720 --> 1:16:13.760
<v Speaker 2>really care, but they like sharing it with their other

1:16:13.840 --> 1:16:17.519
<v Speaker 2>vacuous friends. Except make it DC, it's not going to

1:16:17.760 --> 1:16:18.439
<v Speaker 2>work very much.

1:16:18.479 --> 1:16:20.960
<v Speaker 3>You are tired of subscription upon subscription upon subscription.

1:16:21.400 --> 1:16:24.200
<v Speaker 2>They've got like George Conway in there. They have George Conway.

1:16:24.200 --> 1:16:27.040
<v Speaker 2>I didn't even know. I didn't even know. I just

1:16:27.200 --> 1:16:30.439
<v Speaker 2>guessed the like it worse.

1:16:30.520 --> 1:16:35.680
<v Speaker 3>They have Andy Burrowitz. Oh fucking know.

1:16:35.840 --> 1:16:39.280
<v Speaker 2>I was not pro censorship before this show, but now

1:16:39.320 --> 1:16:42.280
<v Speaker 2>I am actually really bro I don't put any links

1:16:42.280 --> 1:16:44.479
<v Speaker 2>to anything if it keeps borrow Its out in my feed.

1:16:45.240 --> 1:16:47.800
<v Speaker 2>Oh my god, that's the proper reaction. Oh my god,

1:16:47.840 --> 1:16:50.920
<v Speaker 2>I hate Andy Burrows but it's paris. I'm actually like,

1:16:51.000 --> 1:16:54.240
<v Speaker 2>really glad you were here specifically representing the information though

1:16:54.479 --> 1:16:57.200
<v Speaker 2>having your own opinions, just being cliff legal disclaimer because

1:16:57.200 --> 1:16:59.559
<v Speaker 2>you kind of I have my issues with how the

1:16:59.560 --> 1:17:02.840
<v Speaker 2>Information does business and some internal ones that I will

1:17:02.840 --> 1:17:08.840
<v Speaker 2>not read, but it's it still works. It works, and

1:17:08.880 --> 1:17:11.840
<v Speaker 2>the journalism is like very very good. And Lisa god,

1:17:11.840 --> 1:17:13.439
<v Speaker 2>he's in another person I can't remember the name of

1:17:13.479 --> 1:17:15.840
<v Speaker 2>a link to it. In the episode No, it's they

1:17:15.920 --> 1:17:20.559
<v Speaker 2>had this incredible story about nvideos like has people canceling orders,

1:17:21.000 --> 1:17:24.439
<v Speaker 2>and Anissa is super young, yeah, like in her twenties,

1:17:24.439 --> 1:17:26.280
<v Speaker 2>and she's just getting this shit all the time. She's

1:17:26.280 --> 1:17:28.519
<v Speaker 2>had so much of it. The fact that you have

1:17:28.880 --> 1:17:33.240
<v Speaker 2>this happening is proof that this model works.

1:17:33.120 --> 1:17:35.599
<v Speaker 1>And that I mean, it's proof that journalism can still

1:17:35.640 --> 1:17:36.960
<v Speaker 1>exist and it sells.

1:17:37.200 --> 1:17:40.400
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and and it sells and it matters, and the

1:17:40.439 --> 1:17:43.640
<v Speaker 2>real people doing it matter. And it's frustrating because I

1:17:43.640 --> 1:17:46.960
<v Speaker 2>don't think anyone is learning this lesson very well.

1:17:48.000 --> 1:17:50.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean a lot of outlets are now trying to

1:17:50.040 --> 1:17:52.439
<v Speaker 1>pivot to a more subscription heavy modeled. The Atlantic is

1:17:52.479 --> 1:17:52.920
<v Speaker 1>one of them.

1:17:53.000 --> 1:17:56.719
<v Speaker 4>Live the Verge, I mean, possibly want to miss Alex Heath,

1:17:58.400 --> 1:18:01.679
<v Speaker 4>fucking I'm such a bitch, But it's but the Verge

1:18:01.720 --> 1:18:03.519
<v Speaker 4>is actually the example I think of doing it wrong,

1:18:03.800 --> 1:18:05.880
<v Speaker 4>because the Verge is very much like, we're now going

1:18:05.960 --> 1:18:09.160
<v Speaker 4>to pay wall stuff you weren't paying for, and it's like, okay,

1:18:09.240 --> 1:18:09.799
<v Speaker 4>well now.

1:18:09.680 --> 1:18:11.760
<v Speaker 2>The reader will be pissed off. And you have great

1:18:11.760 --> 1:18:13.640
<v Speaker 2>people like Kylie Robson, one of the best journalists in

1:18:13.640 --> 1:18:18.240
<v Speaker 2>the field, incredible and Misato as well too, incredible journalists.

1:18:18.880 --> 1:18:22.879
<v Speaker 2>Paywalling them hurts them far more than I think they realized.

1:18:23.200 --> 1:18:26.320
<v Speaker 2>How about give make give them more money and then

1:18:26.560 --> 1:18:28.840
<v Speaker 2>let them write private stuff. Put the private stuff in

1:18:28.880 --> 1:18:32.439
<v Speaker 2>the private make it worthwhile at least try. But no,

1:18:32.560 --> 1:18:34.680
<v Speaker 2>it's we're going to pay war what Tom, Tom Moore

1:18:34.720 --> 1:18:35.639
<v Speaker 2>and annx Heath.

1:18:35.840 --> 1:18:38.240
<v Speaker 1>Make it so that at least readers feel like if

1:18:38.240 --> 1:18:41.240
<v Speaker 1>they're paying, they're getting access to something new. Yeah, something

1:18:41.360 --> 1:18:44.000
<v Speaker 1>that they Yeah, it's a you are paying to access

1:18:44.000 --> 1:18:45.480
<v Speaker 1>something rather than being restricted.

1:18:45.520 --> 1:18:47.280
<v Speaker 2>And is that money going into more journalism?

1:18:47.640 --> 1:18:50.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I'd assume it's going into making so that

1:18:50.720 --> 1:18:53.759
<v Speaker 1>vox media doesn't collapse in and of itself.

1:18:53.800 --> 1:18:55.320
<v Speaker 3>It's the last resort business model.

1:18:55.720 --> 1:18:57.599
<v Speaker 2>And the thing is you can make it a deal

1:18:57.680 --> 1:19:00.559
<v Speaker 2>with the customer. You could be like, if we gave

1:19:00.560 --> 1:19:02.320
<v Speaker 2>you more, and now it's like, what if we gave

1:19:02.360 --> 1:19:05.840
<v Speaker 2>you less and you you put out reporters who have

1:19:05.920 --> 1:19:10.840
<v Speaker 2>built relationships with readers in a free environment and then

1:19:10.920 --> 1:19:15.800
<v Speaker 2>say and no, it's gone, and you'll get cited less.

1:19:15.880 --> 1:19:17.960
<v Speaker 2>I cite paywalled stuff all the time, but like you

1:19:18.000 --> 1:19:20.320
<v Speaker 2>will be cited less because people on social media will

1:19:20.360 --> 1:19:23.519
<v Speaker 2>be like, oh, I never pay gave link for the

1:19:23.920 --> 1:19:28.479
<v Speaker 2>no pig No not everything pay pig model. It's just

1:19:28.520 --> 1:19:30.680
<v Speaker 2>frustrating because it could actually be better. But I think

1:19:30.720 --> 1:19:32.919
<v Speaker 2>the actual answer is everything needs to be smaller.

1:19:33.680 --> 1:19:35.280
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, And I mean it's just like, how do we

1:19:35.400 --> 1:19:37.479
<v Speaker 1>get to that. We a lot of ruin and destruction.

1:19:37.600 --> 1:19:38.400
<v Speaker 1>I don't really think we.

1:19:38.400 --> 1:19:41.600
<v Speaker 2>Can Defector four or four after math. The answer is

1:19:41.640 --> 1:19:42.640
<v Speaker 2>that and actually.

1:19:42.520 --> 1:19:46.280
<v Speaker 1>And those came out of ruin and destruction in the

1:19:46.280 --> 1:19:49.640
<v Speaker 1>case of Defector and four O four specifically there you know,

1:19:49.960 --> 1:19:52.160
<v Speaker 1>sites were shut down, they were laid off, and from

1:19:52.200 --> 1:19:54.840
<v Speaker 1>the ashes, rows of worker supported go up.

1:19:54.920 --> 1:19:57.880
<v Speaker 2>So Jeff final question to wrap us up. Do you

1:19:58.000 --> 1:20:01.080
<v Speaker 2>think that there could be a future for journalism where

1:20:01.120 --> 1:20:03.280
<v Speaker 2>it's kind of a return to the I don't mean

1:20:03.360 --> 1:20:06.479
<v Speaker 2>literally four thousand readers, but a return to that kind

1:20:06.520 --> 1:20:11.000
<v Speaker 2>of old thing where it's just it is more distributed.

1:20:11.360 --> 1:20:14.479
<v Speaker 3>I hope. So I want to see media at a

1:20:14.760 --> 1:20:18.040
<v Speaker 3>human scale. I've spent the last ten years of my

1:20:18.120 --> 1:20:21.679
<v Speaker 3>career I kind of accidentally chronically in what I think

1:20:21.800 --> 1:20:24.680
<v Speaker 3>is the end of the long century of mass media.

1:20:25.280 --> 1:20:28.479
<v Speaker 3>And what does that mean? Well, first, it's a confession,

1:20:28.479 --> 1:20:31.080
<v Speaker 3>because I devoted my career to mass media, right I

1:20:31.120 --> 1:20:33.680
<v Speaker 3>worked for being Publications and I wrote about television, and

1:20:35.600 --> 1:20:39.040
<v Speaker 3>I recognize now the bankruptcy of that. And so I

1:20:39.040 --> 1:20:41.479
<v Speaker 3>think that we've got to return to, as I say,

1:20:41.560 --> 1:20:45.080
<v Speaker 3>media human scale. And it's going to be a messy transition.

1:20:45.240 --> 1:20:45.880
<v Speaker 2>It already is.

1:20:46.160 --> 1:20:49.920
<v Speaker 3>It already is, And I don't have the answers to

1:20:49.960 --> 1:20:52.479
<v Speaker 3>every business model of how to get there. The information

1:20:52.600 --> 1:20:55.000
<v Speaker 3>is one. There are a few others out there, and

1:20:55.160 --> 1:20:58.120
<v Speaker 3>I think that we're going to grow new sprouts out

1:20:58.160 --> 1:21:00.840
<v Speaker 3>of the ashes. For a long time, especially working in

1:21:00.840 --> 1:21:03.519
<v Speaker 3>a journalism school, I had to be I think I

1:21:03.560 --> 1:21:05.200
<v Speaker 3>presumed I had to be nice to the likes of

1:21:05.200 --> 1:21:08.960
<v Speaker 3>the New York Times. Right, fuck them, I mean. And

1:21:09.040 --> 1:21:11.040
<v Speaker 3>let's be clear, there is still good report of the

1:21:11.080 --> 1:21:13.360
<v Speaker 3>New York Times. I did a good Times hashtag about

1:21:14.080 --> 1:21:19.000
<v Speaker 3>vaccinations only yesterday. Their institution though, the but the well,

1:21:19.320 --> 1:21:23.120
<v Speaker 3>the culture right now is trying to piss off the people,

1:21:23.240 --> 1:21:24.800
<v Speaker 3>the last people who are loyal to them.

1:21:25.400 --> 1:21:28.200
<v Speaker 2>And who would that be? Just to be clear that liberals, okay, liberals.

1:21:28.280 --> 1:21:32.240
<v Speaker 3>Jay Rosen in twenty eighteen wrote that, hmm, the New

1:21:32.280 --> 1:21:35.639
<v Speaker 3>York Times primary support now has shifted from advertising to subscription.

1:21:35.960 --> 1:21:38.880
<v Speaker 3>This is going to change the relationship of the Times

1:21:38.920 --> 1:21:42.439
<v Speaker 3>newsroom to its public. And he wasn't saying how, But

1:21:42.520 --> 1:21:43.800
<v Speaker 3>now I think the way it is is that I

1:21:43.800 --> 1:21:46.559
<v Speaker 3>think the Times is saying, see, we pissed you off.

1:21:46.600 --> 1:21:49.000
<v Speaker 3>You don't own us, even though we depend upon you

1:21:49.000 --> 1:21:50.200
<v Speaker 3>for money, You don't own us.

1:21:50.479 --> 1:21:52.639
<v Speaker 2>Kankey style yeah, yeah.

1:21:52.680 --> 1:21:55.679
<v Speaker 3>If Steinberger where the publisher of The New York Times

1:21:55.760 --> 1:21:59.360
<v Speaker 3>might as well be. So I'm at the point now

1:21:59.479 --> 1:22:03.360
<v Speaker 3>giving up on big old media. The newspaper chains are

1:22:03.360 --> 1:22:09.440
<v Speaker 3>almost all run by hedge funds. Broadcast as geriatric magazines

1:22:09.439 --> 1:22:13.320
<v Speaker 3>are dying. I wrote a book about that too. The

1:22:13.360 --> 1:22:19.040
<v Speaker 3>major national media is getting it from all sides. Costco

1:22:19.160 --> 1:22:22.639
<v Speaker 3>is going to stop selling books. Hollywood is a mess.

1:22:24.160 --> 1:22:27.040
<v Speaker 3>Linear cable televisions are getting left off because they have cooties.

1:22:27.560 --> 1:22:31.040
<v Speaker 3>That's old big mass media. It is a disaster all around.

1:22:31.400 --> 1:22:34.720
<v Speaker 3>So what interests me? Instead? My students go to They

1:22:34.720 --> 1:22:36.120
<v Speaker 3>don't want to go to places like that. They want

1:22:36.120 --> 1:22:37.559
<v Speaker 3>to go to things that are doing new things like

1:22:37.600 --> 1:22:43.000
<v Speaker 3>documentars or City Bureau or places like that. They're building

1:22:43.200 --> 1:22:46.080
<v Speaker 3>a new ecosystem out there. It's going to be Bessie.

1:22:46.080 --> 1:22:48.479
<v Speaker 3>A lot of things will fail, but some will succeed.

1:22:48.600 --> 1:22:51.439
<v Speaker 3>Like Paris's the Information So.

1:22:51.479 --> 1:22:53.720
<v Speaker 2>Paris, where can people find you?

1:22:53.720 --> 1:22:56.120
<v Speaker 1>You can find me on Twitter if you're still using

1:22:56.160 --> 1:22:59.000
<v Speaker 1>that site at Paris Martina, or better on Blue Sky

1:22:59.520 --> 1:23:04.679
<v Speaker 1>at NYC. I'm also published at the Information regularly. It's

1:23:04.720 --> 1:23:06.360
<v Speaker 1>the Information dot Com.

1:23:06.320 --> 1:23:09.880
<v Speaker 2>Had the story about sniffies. Yes, I'll link it in

1:23:09.920 --> 1:23:16.240
<v Speaker 2>the notes. Mister Jeff Dope, Professor Jeff Jeff. Where can

1:23:16.280 --> 1:23:16.840
<v Speaker 2>people find you?

1:23:17.120 --> 1:23:20.559
<v Speaker 3>I'm at Jeff Jervis everywhere, too many places, and then

1:23:20.680 --> 1:23:23.120
<v Speaker 3>at Jeffjervis dot com. You can buy my books.

1:23:23.479 --> 1:23:26.559
<v Speaker 2>Please buy the books. I've been so this has been

1:23:26.600 --> 1:23:29.599
<v Speaker 2>so much fun and like the first real radio Better Offline,

1:23:29.600 --> 1:23:31.599
<v Speaker 2>it's been so much fun. Thank you both for being here.

1:23:31.720 --> 1:23:34.040
<v Speaker 2>Thank you to our producer of course, Daniel Goodman. You've

1:23:34.040 --> 1:23:38.000
<v Speaker 2>been listening to Better Offline. I'm your chief pig. Mister Zitron.

1:23:38.360 --> 1:23:40.760
<v Speaker 2>You'll know where to find me. You're already listening to

1:23:40.800 --> 1:23:42.880
<v Speaker 2>my words. I just want to repeat to everyone who

1:23:43.000 --> 1:23:45.840
<v Speaker 2>sat through the Cees show, thank you again. We will

1:23:45.840 --> 1:23:48.479
<v Speaker 2>do it next year and we're already planning to add

1:23:48.520 --> 1:23:51.559
<v Speaker 2>a new guest, a stand up comic, and then I'm

1:23:51.600 --> 1:23:54.080
<v Speaker 2>not gonna name yet, but she's going to be absolutely incredible.

1:23:54.280 --> 1:23:56.280
<v Speaker 2>Thank you again for listening. Everyone. You know where to

1:23:56.320 --> 1:23:58.040
<v Speaker 2>find me, and you're going to hear a very old

1:23:58.080 --> 1:23:59.760
<v Speaker 2>message after this, some of you're going to be very

1:24:00.120 --> 1:24:10.639
<v Speaker 2>fair about. Thank you for listening. Thank you for listening

1:24:10.680 --> 1:24:13.320
<v Speaker 2>to Better Offline. The editor and composer of the Better

1:24:13.360 --> 1:24:16.360
<v Speaker 2>Offline theme song is Matasowski. You can check out more

1:24:16.360 --> 1:24:19.880
<v Speaker 2>of his music and audio projects at Matasowski dot com,

1:24:20.000 --> 1:24:23.360
<v Speaker 2>M A T T O S O W s Ki

1:24:23.760 --> 1:24:26.639
<v Speaker 2>dot com. You can email me at easy at better

1:24:26.640 --> 1:24:29.080
<v Speaker 2>offline dot com or visit better offline dot com to

1:24:29.160 --> 1:24:32.000
<v Speaker 2>find more podcast links and of course, my newsletter. I

1:24:32.040 --> 1:24:34.759
<v Speaker 2>also really recommend you go to chat dot Where's youreed

1:24:34.840 --> 1:24:37.080
<v Speaker 2>dot at to visit the discord, and go to our

1:24:37.160 --> 1:24:40.439
<v Speaker 2>slash Better Offline to check out our reddit. Thank you

1:24:40.520 --> 1:24:43.880
<v Speaker 2>so much for listening. Better Offline is a production of

1:24:43.960 --> 1:24:46.800
<v Speaker 2>cool Zone Media. For more from cool Zone Media, visit

1:24:46.880 --> 1:24:49.960
<v Speaker 2>our website cool Zonemedia dot com, or check us out

1:24:49.960 --> 1:24:52.960
<v Speaker 2>on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get

1:24:53.000 --> 1:25:14.760
<v Speaker 2>your podcasts.