WEBVTT - Surveillance: Jobless Aid With Scalia

0:00:09.880 --> 0:00:13.800
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast, and I'm Tom Keane Jailey.

0:00:13.960 --> 0:00:17.560
<v Speaker 1>We bring you insight from the best in economics, finance, investment,

0:00:18.000 --> 0:00:23.520
<v Speaker 1>and international relations. Find Bloomberg Surveillance on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud,

0:00:23.600 --> 0:00:27.400
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg dot Com, and of course, on the Bloomberg Right now,

0:00:27.400 --> 0:00:30.480
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna get proportionately smarter. On a Tuesday, Mornamahangen joins

0:00:30.560 --> 0:00:33.760
<v Speaker 1>us from Alians here as we consider not so much

0:00:33.840 --> 0:00:38.000
<v Speaker 1>investment strategy, but the shock and awe of SMP three

0:00:38.040 --> 0:00:42.600
<v Speaker 1>thousand and doubt twenty five thousand, bona. It has been

0:00:42.640 --> 0:00:48.040
<v Speaker 1>an unloved bull market. How bull market? Is this or

0:00:48.120 --> 0:00:51.400
<v Speaker 1>is this a pause along the way along the struggles

0:00:51.400 --> 0:00:54.200
<v Speaker 1>of this pandemic? Yeah, you know, first of all, thanks

0:00:54.240 --> 0:00:56.640
<v Speaker 1>for having me. This is a great new format. Enjoying

0:00:56.640 --> 0:01:00.400
<v Speaker 1>it immensely. But certainly that three thousand level TOM on

0:01:00.440 --> 0:01:03.080
<v Speaker 1>the SMP is something that's not only psychological, but it

0:01:03.120 --> 0:01:05.520
<v Speaker 1>happens to be close to the two day moving average,

0:01:05.560 --> 0:01:08.399
<v Speaker 1>so it does have some technical significance that well as well.

0:01:09.040 --> 0:01:11.480
<v Speaker 1>We certainly think that if we can get through that,

0:01:11.520 --> 0:01:13.880
<v Speaker 1>breakthrough that and sustain that for at least, you know,

0:01:13.959 --> 0:01:17.360
<v Speaker 1>a few days, that is meaningful in terms of perhaps

0:01:18.120 --> 0:01:21.560
<v Speaker 1>moving some opinions over to more bullish stands. You know,

0:01:21.640 --> 0:01:25.200
<v Speaker 1>to us, clearly, this has been a bifurcated market. Um.

0:01:25.240 --> 0:01:28.320
<v Speaker 1>The winners and the SMP have been tech and healthcare

0:01:28.760 --> 0:01:32.600
<v Speaker 1>and the unloved cyclical sectors you know, energy, financial, industrials

0:01:32.640 --> 0:01:37.759
<v Speaker 1>all still down over still very much in bear market territory. Um. Really,

0:01:37.800 --> 0:01:40.440
<v Speaker 1>we think if if the market is a buyer of

0:01:40.480 --> 0:01:44.200
<v Speaker 1>this reopening story, we should start to see a broadening

0:01:44.319 --> 0:01:48.280
<v Speaker 1>of performance and that should include some of those cyclical sectors. Certainly,

0:01:48.320 --> 0:01:50.640
<v Speaker 1>we started to see that last week as well, with

0:01:50.720 --> 0:01:54.200
<v Speaker 1>industrials and energy at the top of the performance list. Um,

0:01:54.320 --> 0:01:56.960
<v Speaker 1>we think that trend could continue and help carry us

0:01:57.000 --> 0:02:01.240
<v Speaker 1>beyond the three thousand moves. Certainly, this morning we are

0:02:01.240 --> 0:02:04.480
<v Speaker 1>seeing a buying of the reopening narrative. What kind of

0:02:04.520 --> 0:02:08.200
<v Speaker 1>reopening our traders pricing in because there is the possibility

0:02:08.240 --> 0:02:11.040
<v Speaker 1>that you reopen and nobody shows up because they don't

0:02:11.080 --> 0:02:13.280
<v Speaker 1>have faith that they have the health controls in place

0:02:13.480 --> 0:02:17.160
<v Speaker 1>that they won't get sick. Yeah, now that's a fair point.

0:02:17.240 --> 0:02:20.079
<v Speaker 1>And look, as we're watching this reopening just like everyone else,

0:02:20.120 --> 0:02:22.480
<v Speaker 1>we're watching the health data alongside of it. You know,

0:02:22.520 --> 0:02:25.080
<v Speaker 1>one thing that's notable to us is that areas that

0:02:25.160 --> 0:02:27.359
<v Speaker 1>had been the epicenter of this crisis, like New York

0:02:27.400 --> 0:02:30.720
<v Speaker 1>and New Jersey, UM, really the pressure on their hospital

0:02:30.760 --> 0:02:33.120
<v Speaker 1>systems has alleviated quite a bit. And so I think

0:02:33.320 --> 0:02:35.520
<v Speaker 1>when we think about why we flatten this curve in

0:02:35.520 --> 0:02:37.840
<v Speaker 1>the first place, is so that we wouldn't pressure the

0:02:37.880 --> 0:02:41.120
<v Speaker 1>hospital systems. And some of the more southern states that

0:02:41.200 --> 0:02:43.200
<v Speaker 1>we are seeing a little bit more uptick in some

0:02:43.320 --> 0:02:46.720
<v Speaker 1>of the virus cases, UM, their hospital systems are generally

0:02:46.880 --> 0:02:51.120
<v Speaker 1>still underutilized, I CU beds, etcetera. So to us, you know,

0:02:51.160 --> 0:02:53.960
<v Speaker 1>in order to really think about re shutting the economy,

0:02:54.000 --> 0:02:56.040
<v Speaker 1>or at least reshutting parts of the economy, you need

0:02:56.080 --> 0:02:58.800
<v Speaker 1>to see pressure on that hospital system. So it's not

0:02:59.200 --> 0:03:02.440
<v Speaker 1>another point that we are watching. The other thing I'd

0:03:02.480 --> 0:03:04.959
<v Speaker 1>say briefly is just that when we think about investing

0:03:04.960 --> 0:03:08.399
<v Speaker 1>in the market broadly, you know, sadly, this crisis has

0:03:08.440 --> 0:03:13.960
<v Speaker 1>really impacted mom and pop businesses largely, you know, the restaurants, bars, gym's, etcetera.

0:03:14.400 --> 0:03:17.359
<v Speaker 1>The SMP five hundred, however, is you know, the five

0:03:17.440 --> 0:03:22.520
<v Speaker 1>hundred best capitalized, best balance sheets, biggest companies in the

0:03:22.600 --> 0:03:24.720
<v Speaker 1>U S economy, and so when you think about where

0:03:24.720 --> 0:03:27.840
<v Speaker 1>to put your money, perhaps that's relatively safer and it

0:03:27.919 --> 0:03:30.000
<v Speaker 1>could be a driver of of what we're seeing now

0:03:30.000 --> 0:03:31.880
<v Speaker 1>in the market as well. I got to lift the

0:03:31.919 --> 0:03:34.160
<v Speaker 1>lid on that SMP five hundred. You did that briefly

0:03:34.200 --> 0:03:35.720
<v Speaker 1>just moments ago and moment and I think that's the

0:03:35.720 --> 0:03:38.280
<v Speaker 1>big topic for so many people. On the one side,

0:03:38.320 --> 0:03:42.440
<v Speaker 1>we've got these crowding, stretched valuations in growth. Then on

0:03:42.480 --> 0:03:44.360
<v Speaker 1>the other side we've got the potential for the value

0:03:44.400 --> 0:03:47.680
<v Speaker 1>trap playing out over encyclicals. How do you draw distinction

0:03:47.720 --> 0:03:49.200
<v Speaker 1>between the two at the moment and make sure you're

0:03:49.200 --> 0:03:51.720
<v Speaker 1>in the right companies. Yeah, no, that's a great point,

0:03:51.720 --> 0:03:53.520
<v Speaker 1>and we get that question all the time. Look, I

0:03:53.600 --> 0:03:56.400
<v Speaker 1>think for a post COVID world, you need to be

0:03:56.440 --> 0:04:00.000
<v Speaker 1>involved with some of these technology, particularly on the software side,

0:04:00.160 --> 0:04:05.280
<v Speaker 1>that include areas like cybersecurity, cloud computing, the e gaming space,

0:04:05.360 --> 0:04:08.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, the whole complex around the zoom conferencing and

0:04:08.760 --> 0:04:11.480
<v Speaker 1>remote learning. Even um, it's not going to be a

0:04:11.480 --> 0:04:13.560
<v Speaker 1>one year story. It's going to be a three, five,

0:04:13.680 --> 0:04:16.599
<v Speaker 1>even ten year story down the road. Uh. Similarly, on

0:04:16.640 --> 0:04:18.919
<v Speaker 1>the healthcare side, which may not be that long of

0:04:18.920 --> 0:04:21.320
<v Speaker 1>a story, but still very important in the next probably

0:04:21.360 --> 0:04:24.640
<v Speaker 1>two to five years. So I think we continue to

0:04:24.680 --> 0:04:29.599
<v Speaker 1>see opportunities tactically there. So obviously it's harder to chase

0:04:29.720 --> 0:04:32.440
<v Speaker 1>at these levels, but when we do get the pull backs,

0:04:32.440 --> 0:04:35.400
<v Speaker 1>we've had some sideway sideways movements over the last few weeks.

0:04:35.560 --> 0:04:38.520
<v Speaker 1>There has been opportunities to get involved again. On the

0:04:38.560 --> 0:04:40.240
<v Speaker 1>other side, you know, we would be a little bit

0:04:40.279 --> 0:04:43.920
<v Speaker 1>more selective when we think about some of the industrials, energy, financials,

0:04:44.320 --> 0:04:46.680
<v Speaker 1>um there's only parts of the energy complex that are

0:04:46.720 --> 0:04:50.440
<v Speaker 1>interesting to us, you know, refiners for example, or even

0:04:50.520 --> 0:04:53.800
<v Speaker 1>renewable energy. On the industrial side, you know, we're we're

0:04:53.800 --> 0:04:55.920
<v Speaker 1>taking a look at airlines here. I think their risk

0:04:55.960 --> 0:04:59.039
<v Speaker 1>reward is interesting as well. When you think about limited

0:04:59.080 --> 0:05:02.120
<v Speaker 1>downside government it might be stepping in to help bail

0:05:02.120 --> 0:05:05.040
<v Speaker 1>out some of the companies and eventually we probably all

0:05:05.120 --> 0:05:08.840
<v Speaker 1>will you know, have to travel again. So selective parts

0:05:08.960 --> 0:05:11.520
<v Speaker 1>across both sides of the spectrum, we think makes sense.

0:05:11.880 --> 0:05:14.400
<v Speaker 1>I've got to pick up on that airlines. I'm sure

0:05:14.400 --> 0:05:16.200
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people set up a little bit when

0:05:16.200 --> 0:05:18.799
<v Speaker 1>you said that. I know you can't do single names,

0:05:18.839 --> 0:05:22.320
<v Speaker 1>but surely that's a really, really difficult decision mix when

0:05:22.360 --> 0:05:24.560
<v Speaker 1>you look at that sector at the moment, some of

0:05:24.560 --> 0:05:26.480
<v Speaker 1>these companies, I think it's fair to say, and I'm

0:05:26.480 --> 0:05:29.640
<v Speaker 1>not being extreme saying this, some of these companies won't exist,

0:05:29.680 --> 0:05:33.600
<v Speaker 1>will they. M Yeah, I certainly have to be careful

0:05:33.640 --> 0:05:36.920
<v Speaker 1>across the spectrum here. Um. You know, one of the

0:05:36.960 --> 0:05:39.920
<v Speaker 1>things about active management during the crisis, any crisis, but

0:05:40.000 --> 0:05:42.520
<v Speaker 1>certainly this one, is there will be winners and losers,

0:05:42.600 --> 0:05:45.240
<v Speaker 1>and the fundamental research will really matter. You need to

0:05:45.240 --> 0:05:47.720
<v Speaker 1>look at balance sheets. You know, in a sector like airlines,

0:05:47.760 --> 0:05:50.200
<v Speaker 1>you probably need to look at our the domestic internationally,

0:05:50.200 --> 0:05:51.880
<v Speaker 1>you need to look at what the routes are, etcetera,

0:05:51.960 --> 0:05:55.520
<v Speaker 1>etcetera UM. And you know, obviously that was one example

0:05:55.560 --> 0:05:57.720
<v Speaker 1>on how to play the recovery. There are other you know,

0:05:57.960 --> 0:06:01.960
<v Speaker 1>you look across hotels, gamings, that, etra, etcetera, UM, larger

0:06:01.960 --> 0:06:05.000
<v Speaker 1>industrials as well, and so I think there are certainly

0:06:06.440 --> 0:06:09.359
<v Speaker 1>ways to play it up. Mona, I'm not gonna buy it, Mona,

0:06:09.440 --> 0:06:12.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm not gonna buy it. This is the most barbelled

0:06:12.120 --> 0:06:15.520
<v Speaker 1>market we've ever had, with five or seven or ten

0:06:15.720 --> 0:06:20.000
<v Speaker 1>stocks leading the way. If I'm institutional investor here in

0:06:20.040 --> 0:06:22.480
<v Speaker 1>my ELPAE so far behind, I'm not going to get

0:06:22.520 --> 0:06:25.240
<v Speaker 1>paid my bonus. What do I do? Buy more Amazon,

0:06:25.600 --> 0:06:29.279
<v Speaker 1>buy more Apple. You know, it's interesting. I do think

0:06:29.400 --> 0:06:31.520
<v Speaker 1>you make a good point about performance catch up here.

0:06:31.560 --> 0:06:35.039
<v Speaker 1>You know, not many people got in at Marye and

0:06:35.080 --> 0:06:39.080
<v Speaker 1>have written this move higher, and so certainly you're going

0:06:39.120 --> 0:06:40.960
<v Speaker 1>to see a lot of that. I think the implications

0:06:40.960 --> 0:06:44.000
<v Speaker 1>of that are more that now when you do get

0:06:44.360 --> 0:06:47.240
<v Speaker 1>dips um, are they more likely to be bought or

0:06:47.240 --> 0:06:49.279
<v Speaker 1>they more likely to be sold? And I think given

0:06:49.320 --> 0:06:53.240
<v Speaker 1>the momentum behind the health the economy, um, and you know,

0:06:53.600 --> 0:06:56.000
<v Speaker 1>just the reopening broadly, I think we're going to see

0:06:56.000 --> 0:06:58.440
<v Speaker 1>a little bit more buying at this point. And so

0:06:58.480 --> 0:07:01.039
<v Speaker 1>I think that's important to recting eyes as well. You know,

0:07:01.120 --> 0:07:04.200
<v Speaker 1>so any opportunities you get, you know, if you can

0:07:04.279 --> 0:07:07.159
<v Speaker 1>position yourself tactically during those times, it will be important.

0:07:07.520 --> 0:07:09.400
<v Speaker 1>Now that being said, you know, this is a long

0:07:09.520 --> 0:07:12.720
<v Speaker 1>term game here. So um, you know, while we've had

0:07:12.880 --> 0:07:15.480
<v Speaker 1>a great thirty percent move, now do we expect another

0:07:15.520 --> 0:07:18.640
<v Speaker 1>thirty percent you know, in the next six or eight

0:07:18.680 --> 0:07:21.320
<v Speaker 1>week period or even the next quarter or two. Probably not.

0:07:21.480 --> 0:07:23.760
<v Speaker 1>So you're not going to get um, you know, the

0:07:23.920 --> 0:07:26.400
<v Speaker 1>quote unquote easy money once again. And so in that

0:07:26.440 --> 0:07:30.080
<v Speaker 1>scenario you will get some sideways movements, you will get

0:07:30.200 --> 0:07:32.160
<v Speaker 1>pull backs, you will even get those five or ten

0:07:32.200 --> 0:07:34.200
<v Speaker 1>percent corrections along the way, And so those are your

0:07:34.200 --> 0:07:39.559
<v Speaker 1>opportunities to get involved. Mono, what's the best hedge right now? Interesting? Yeah,

0:07:39.560 --> 0:07:41.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, I think we continue to like some of

0:07:41.800 --> 0:07:45.280
<v Speaker 1>those eventsive asset classes as hedges as well. So, um,

0:07:45.400 --> 0:07:48.840
<v Speaker 1>we're still buyers or believers in the gold story, the

0:07:48.920 --> 0:07:51.800
<v Speaker 1>US dollar. I think it's interesting still, you know, given

0:07:51.840 --> 0:07:54.080
<v Speaker 1>the economy is the the U S economy has been

0:07:54.160 --> 0:07:57.400
<v Speaker 1>the flight to safety asset class broadly. Um, treasuries are

0:07:57.440 --> 0:07:59.560
<v Speaker 1>are somewhat interesting as well, just given you know, the

0:07:59.600 --> 0:08:02.360
<v Speaker 1>support we're seeing from the Fed in the stimulus etcetera.

0:08:02.360 --> 0:08:04.440
<v Speaker 1>And so I think you know, people will flock to

0:08:04.640 --> 0:08:06.920
<v Speaker 1>treasures as a hedge as well. Still, so some of

0:08:06.960 --> 0:08:10.200
<v Speaker 1>those as the classes, certainly parts of the high high

0:08:10.280 --> 0:08:12.720
<v Speaker 1>quality investment grade bond market still makes sense to us

0:08:12.720 --> 0:08:14.680
<v Speaker 1>as well. Mon Of fantastic to catch up with you.

0:08:14.840 --> 0:08:16.040
<v Speaker 1>So I'm my best of the team. Well you might

0:08:16.160 --> 0:08:22.400
<v Speaker 1>want to thank you for that of the job was claims.

0:08:22.400 --> 0:08:25.560
<v Speaker 1>Of course, folks have been terrible. Yes, the vector is improving,

0:08:26.000 --> 0:08:29.960
<v Speaker 1>but Nevertheless, it is a labor economy in America that

0:08:30.160 --> 0:08:34.959
<v Speaker 1>is absolutely extraordinary. Lisa John and I said, Okay, we're

0:08:35.000 --> 0:08:37.640
<v Speaker 1>gonna do a simulcast and you could get you know,

0:08:37.800 --> 0:08:40.640
<v Speaker 1>Beyonce and his you know on our first show, or

0:08:40.960 --> 0:08:43.320
<v Speaker 1>you know someone like that, maybe the guy that invented

0:08:43.360 --> 0:08:47.200
<v Speaker 1>bed wars from Microsoft. And we said, wait, this is serious.

0:08:47.240 --> 0:08:51.000
<v Speaker 1>The labor economy is imploding. So let us speak to

0:08:51.080 --> 0:08:54.160
<v Speaker 1>the Secretary of Labor. He is, of course from one

0:08:54.200 --> 0:08:59.120
<v Speaker 1>of the great storied conservative families of America. Eugene Scalia

0:08:59.240 --> 0:09:02.800
<v Speaker 1>joins us. Now, Mr Secretary, thank you so much for

0:09:02.920 --> 0:09:06.679
<v Speaker 1>starting your day with us. I want you to explain

0:09:07.320 --> 0:09:11.800
<v Speaker 1>how the administration and particularly how your Cabinet office will

0:09:11.840 --> 0:09:17.120
<v Speaker 1>react to twenty unemployment. What can you do from a

0:09:17.280 --> 0:09:26.360
<v Speaker 1>regulation and institutional basis to protect the millions of Americans unemployed. Well, Tom,

0:09:26.400 --> 0:09:29.800
<v Speaker 1>it's good to join you. Thanks for having me, and um,

0:09:29.920 --> 0:09:34.920
<v Speaker 1>we have been acting on many different fronts to help

0:09:35.000 --> 0:09:39.120
<v Speaker 1>the actually tens of millions Americans who have been put

0:09:39.120 --> 0:09:41.120
<v Speaker 1>out a work over the last couple of months as

0:09:41.120 --> 0:09:45.640
<v Speaker 1>we've idled our economy. UM, as you know, the Cares

0:09:45.720 --> 0:09:49.400
<v Speaker 1>Act included a very substantial benefit for people out on

0:09:49.880 --> 0:09:53.400
<v Speaker 1>unemployment six dollars a week on top of what is

0:09:53.440 --> 0:09:56.000
<v Speaker 1>paid by the States. We've been working very closely with

0:09:56.120 --> 0:10:00.160
<v Speaker 1>the States UH to to get those payments out and

0:10:00.480 --> 0:10:03.720
<v Speaker 1>UH to help people during this challenging time. We've also

0:10:03.800 --> 0:10:09.160
<v Speaker 1>been administering the paid lead provisions that Congress enacted and

0:10:09.440 --> 0:10:11.920
<v Speaker 1>UH in a program that we don't administer here, but

0:10:12.200 --> 0:10:14.640
<v Speaker 1>I think it's been just invaluable to American workers right

0:10:14.640 --> 0:10:17.880
<v Speaker 1>now has been the Paycheck Protection Program. We estimate about

0:10:17.920 --> 0:10:21.480
<v Speaker 1>fifty million American workers have been kept on payroll through

0:10:21.520 --> 0:10:24.640
<v Speaker 1>that program. That said, Tom, you know we're we're pivoting

0:10:24.640 --> 0:10:29.040
<v Speaker 1>now right we're reopening. I was in Florida and Georgia

0:10:29.080 --> 0:10:32.400
<v Speaker 1>with the Vice President last week and and it was

0:10:32.480 --> 0:10:34.400
<v Speaker 1>encouraging to see. We saw more of that over the

0:10:34.440 --> 0:10:37.440
<v Speaker 1>weekend too. Secretary Scalleier, you've done a fantastic job over

0:10:37.440 --> 0:10:39.200
<v Speaker 1>the last several months of providing a lot of aid

0:10:39.480 --> 0:10:42.400
<v Speaker 1>to everyday Americans and companies as well down in Washington,

0:10:42.480 --> 0:10:44.920
<v Speaker 1>not just the Republican Party, working with Democrats as well.

0:10:45.200 --> 0:10:47.560
<v Speaker 1>I think we've all set down this program many times.

0:10:47.800 --> 0:10:50.160
<v Speaker 1>What we're trying to work out though, is what happens

0:10:50.360 --> 0:10:53.640
<v Speaker 1>after the reopening the help that you offered during the shutdown,

0:10:53.640 --> 0:10:56.280
<v Speaker 1>Will any of that be extended at some point over

0:10:56.320 --> 0:10:59.600
<v Speaker 1>the next several months. What's the current stance. Well, of course,

0:11:00.400 --> 0:11:05.120
<v Speaker 1>the paid leave program UH remains in place. UH. The

0:11:05.400 --> 0:11:07.840
<v Speaker 1>unemployment plus up that I mentioned in six dollars a

0:11:07.840 --> 0:11:12.080
<v Speaker 1>week is in place through the end of July and UM.

0:11:12.640 --> 0:11:15.599
<v Speaker 1>But as we focus on the reopening, the President is

0:11:15.640 --> 0:11:20.400
<v Speaker 1>also looking at things to get the economy UH started

0:11:20.400 --> 0:11:25.120
<v Speaker 1>again more broadly, not simply aid, but returning to that

0:11:25.240 --> 0:11:29.200
<v Speaker 1>incredibly vibrant economy that we had through through early March.

0:11:29.280 --> 0:11:33.160
<v Speaker 1>The President and I believe strongly that UH part of

0:11:33.160 --> 0:11:38.679
<v Speaker 1>what was key to that economy was lightening unnecessary regulatory

0:11:38.720 --> 0:11:40.760
<v Speaker 1>burdens on business. So you had the President last week

0:11:40.840 --> 0:11:44.679
<v Speaker 1>signing this new executive order urging agencies to look further

0:11:44.720 --> 0:11:48.319
<v Speaker 1>at ways that we can renew reduce unnecessary burdens on

0:11:48.440 --> 0:11:51.760
<v Speaker 1>business so we can get businesses reopen. It was by

0:11:51.800 --> 0:11:55.200
<v Speaker 1>having that vibrant business sector that we had that record

0:11:55.280 --> 0:11:59.600
<v Speaker 1>low unemployment through March. So that's something that we consider

0:11:59.679 --> 0:12:03.319
<v Speaker 1>a very important. Yes, we'll also look at what further

0:12:03.400 --> 0:12:06.240
<v Speaker 1>support may be needed, but that this situation has been

0:12:06.320 --> 0:12:10.760
<v Speaker 1>so fluid with the virus UH, and UH, you know,

0:12:11.080 --> 0:12:13.400
<v Speaker 1>I'd like to see how we progress into the month

0:12:13.440 --> 0:12:18.679
<v Speaker 1>of June before making decisions about what particular further measures

0:12:18.679 --> 0:12:22.400
<v Speaker 1>may be needed. Secretary, the market has largely priced in

0:12:22.440 --> 0:12:25.679
<v Speaker 1>an extension of those additional unemployment benefits that you were

0:12:25.679 --> 0:12:27.920
<v Speaker 1>talking about in the John Ray's and I'm just wondering

0:12:28.320 --> 0:12:30.840
<v Speaker 1>what metrics you're looking for that you will see in

0:12:30.960 --> 0:12:33.560
<v Speaker 1>June that will make you decide that they're either needed

0:12:33.679 --> 0:12:36.680
<v Speaker 1>as far as an extension goes, or not. Well. I

0:12:36.679 --> 0:12:42.400
<v Speaker 1>think the six plus up was a very important support

0:12:42.440 --> 0:12:45.320
<v Speaker 1>being given to American workers during a time that state

0:12:45.320 --> 0:12:48.640
<v Speaker 1>and local governments were shutting down businesses and UH and

0:12:48.800 --> 0:12:51.920
<v Speaker 1>telling people not to go to work. I don't see

0:12:52.240 --> 0:12:56.480
<v Speaker 1>UH continuing that program in its precise form going forward

0:12:56.600 --> 0:13:01.080
<v Speaker 1>from July. As we are reopening and now looking to

0:13:01.080 --> 0:13:04.440
<v Speaker 1>get people UH from the sidelines back into the workplace.

0:13:04.480 --> 0:13:07.719
<v Speaker 1>I think I think we'll be looking at different measures, UH,

0:13:07.880 --> 0:13:09.679
<v Speaker 1>at least in terms of the things I'll be looking at.

0:13:10.000 --> 0:13:13.880
<v Speaker 1>Of greatest interest will be simply how quickly we put

0:13:13.880 --> 0:13:16.360
<v Speaker 1>people back to work as we reopen. We know that

0:13:16.480 --> 0:13:19.800
<v Speaker 1>millions of people are starting to return to work now, UH,

0:13:19.800 --> 0:13:22.040
<v Speaker 1>and we'll be getting. I think more insights into that

0:13:22.080 --> 0:13:25.520
<v Speaker 1>in the coming weeks, Mr Secretary. The minimum wage is

0:13:25.600 --> 0:13:29.480
<v Speaker 1>delivering my food to my house, and the elites are

0:13:29.520 --> 0:13:33.360
<v Speaker 1>doing fine. I would say, as a generalization, I drove

0:13:33.360 --> 0:13:37.320
<v Speaker 1>down Columbus Avenue this weekend in Manhattan and it looked

0:13:37.320 --> 0:13:40.400
<v Speaker 1>like one of those movies with Bruce Willison. It was

0:13:40.480 --> 0:13:45.760
<v Speaker 1>so destitute Armageddon, Like, what is your administration gonna do

0:13:46.320 --> 0:13:50.440
<v Speaker 1>to get labor to get its fair share back in

0:13:50.480 --> 0:13:55.920
<v Speaker 1>a spirited, open American economy. What's the strategy to stop

0:13:55.960 --> 0:14:01.040
<v Speaker 1>the fifty year atomization of labor? Well all, I think

0:14:01.080 --> 0:14:03.840
<v Speaker 1>before the virus struck, one of the really remarkable things

0:14:03.880 --> 0:14:07.680
<v Speaker 1>about President Trump's economy was how well people lower end

0:14:07.760 --> 0:14:11.560
<v Speaker 1>of the pay scale we're doing. You uh, saw the

0:14:11.559 --> 0:14:15.880
<v Speaker 1>wages rising generally, but wages were rising more quickly for

0:14:16.160 --> 0:14:19.680
<v Speaker 1>people in the lowest ten percent of the income scale,

0:14:19.760 --> 0:14:23.080
<v Speaker 1>for people who didn't have a high school degree. We

0:14:23.160 --> 0:14:26.920
<v Speaker 1>had a record low unemployment for seminarity groups who historically

0:14:26.920 --> 0:14:29.640
<v Speaker 1>had been disadvantaged in the marketplace. So, you know, in

0:14:29.680 --> 0:14:32.480
<v Speaker 1>all seriousness, when I look at what will be most

0:14:32.520 --> 0:14:35.360
<v Speaker 1>important going forward, the single most important thing we can

0:14:35.400 --> 0:14:39.640
<v Speaker 1>do for American workers, particularly those at the lower end

0:14:39.640 --> 0:14:42.760
<v Speaker 1>of the pay scale is returned to the kind of

0:14:42.960 --> 0:14:46.560
<v Speaker 1>vibrant economy that we had uh just just two months ago,

0:14:47.000 --> 0:14:49.640
<v Speaker 1>and that was an economy driven in substantial part by

0:14:50.280 --> 0:14:54.560
<v Speaker 1>a reasonable tax burden and by reducing unnecessary regulatory burden.

0:14:54.680 --> 0:14:57.880
<v Speaker 1>So those will remain areas of focus, even as we

0:14:57.960 --> 0:15:00.400
<v Speaker 1>also assess whether we are going to need to continue

0:15:00.480 --> 0:15:04.880
<v Speaker 1>some forms of additional support, for example, for small businesses

0:15:04.920 --> 0:15:07.400
<v Speaker 1>and for some workers. I think a lot of people

0:15:07.400 --> 0:15:09.840
<v Speaker 1>have still going to need a lot of help, Mr Secretary,

0:15:09.880 --> 0:15:11.160
<v Speaker 1>I look forward to going to be back soon so

0:15:11.160 --> 0:15:12.800
<v Speaker 1>we can talk about doing just that. Because there's some

0:15:12.880 --> 0:15:16.400
<v Speaker 1>real agency even as we reopened this economy, Secretary Scalia,

0:15:16.480 --> 0:15:22.320
<v Speaker 1>that of the United States, the Labor Secretary. So we

0:15:22.400 --> 0:15:26.240
<v Speaker 1>spoke to the Secretary of Labor, Mr Scalia. We thought

0:15:26.320 --> 0:15:28.720
<v Speaker 1>we would speak to a gentleman who had the FED

0:15:28.800 --> 0:15:32.280
<v Speaker 1>more than anyone in the last twenty years, his stead

0:15:32.360 --> 0:15:36.920
<v Speaker 1>steadfastly on regulation and the operation of business. That is

0:15:37.040 --> 0:15:39.800
<v Speaker 1>Mr Trulo now at Harvard Law, and of course the

0:15:39.840 --> 0:15:43.760
<v Speaker 1>former governor of the Fellow Reserve System. Wonderful to have

0:15:43.840 --> 0:15:47.480
<v Speaker 1>you with us, Professor at today. I was talking to

0:15:47.520 --> 0:15:52.840
<v Speaker 1>the Secretary of Labor about the atomization of the labor economy.

0:15:53.360 --> 0:15:59.920
<v Speaker 1>Now we're gonna atomize it estimated twenty three or unemployment rate.

0:16:00.520 --> 0:16:04.440
<v Speaker 1>What will be the societal reaction. Well, I don't know

0:16:04.480 --> 0:16:07.720
<v Speaker 1>what the public reaction will be, but I think as

0:16:07.760 --> 0:16:11.880
<v Speaker 1>a macroeconomic matter, and and certainly just as a human matter,

0:16:12.360 --> 0:16:16.960
<v Speaker 1>taking measures now to ensure that there is income support

0:16:17.200 --> 0:16:19.920
<v Speaker 1>for the millions and millions of people who are going

0:16:20.000 --> 0:16:23.200
<v Speaker 1>to remain unemployed for quite some time to come ought

0:16:23.240 --> 0:16:26.920
<v Speaker 1>to be the country's highest priority right now. And I'm

0:16:26.960 --> 0:16:29.760
<v Speaker 1>a bit concerned that people are are more than a

0:16:29.760 --> 0:16:32.520
<v Speaker 1>bit concerned that so many people are taking what they

0:16:32.560 --> 0:16:35.480
<v Speaker 1>see is a wait and see attitude. I mean, looks,

0:16:35.600 --> 0:16:38.680
<v Speaker 1>as you just said, unemployment is likely to be reported

0:16:38.680 --> 0:16:42.960
<v Speaker 1>in the vicinity of Remember eleven years ago, during the

0:16:43.000 --> 0:16:46.440
<v Speaker 1>Great Financial Crisis, we were scrambling to try to do

0:16:46.560 --> 0:16:50.200
<v Speaker 1>something a lot about ten percent unemployment. So even if

0:16:50.240 --> 0:16:53.880
<v Speaker 1>you postulate a having of what the current rate probably is,

0:16:54.240 --> 0:16:57.960
<v Speaker 1>would still be in a very serious position relative to

0:16:58.000 --> 0:17:01.240
<v Speaker 1>the postwar econmy so, I think any in this notion

0:17:01.280 --> 0:17:04.200
<v Speaker 1>of delaying and seeing whether we need to do more

0:17:04.720 --> 0:17:08.480
<v Speaker 1>is really quite a bad mistake. Well, Dan, you touched

0:17:08.480 --> 0:17:10.160
<v Speaker 1>on the other floor as well. It's not just about

0:17:10.200 --> 0:17:12.680
<v Speaker 1>the timing, it's the composition of the next response. You're

0:17:12.680 --> 0:17:16.480
<v Speaker 1>talking about a demand side effort the administration increasingly whenever

0:17:16.520 --> 0:17:17.960
<v Speaker 1>I listened to them, whenever I get the chance to

0:17:18.000 --> 0:17:20.680
<v Speaker 1>speak to them, a talking about a supply side response

0:17:20.720 --> 0:17:23.200
<v Speaker 1>to how this economy reopen and get people back to work.

0:17:23.560 --> 0:17:25.920
<v Speaker 1>What are the limitations of that down? Well, I think

0:17:26.240 --> 0:17:31.200
<v Speaker 1>you don't think, Jonathan. We all recognize that this problem

0:17:31.240 --> 0:17:34.880
<v Speaker 1>has been driven by epidemiology. It hasn't been driven by

0:17:35.200 --> 0:17:37.720
<v Speaker 1>they're fed stepping on the branch too hard. It hasn't

0:17:37.760 --> 0:17:42.600
<v Speaker 1>been driven by excessive credit, although that's probably exacerbated things.

0:17:42.840 --> 0:17:46.560
<v Speaker 1>It's been driven by the epidemiology. And so getting people

0:17:46.680 --> 0:17:51.960
<v Speaker 1>back to work is dependent upon the medical developments, not

0:17:52.160 --> 0:17:56.879
<v Speaker 1>strictly speaking economic development. We can provide income support, but

0:17:57.240 --> 0:18:00.479
<v Speaker 1>we cannot just through economic measures, make it safe for

0:18:00.520 --> 0:18:03.760
<v Speaker 1>people to go out. We can't make people comfortable about

0:18:03.800 --> 0:18:06.160
<v Speaker 1>going out. And I think what that means is we've

0:18:06.200 --> 0:18:09.200
<v Speaker 1>got an enormous amount of uncertainty that's probably going to

0:18:09.280 --> 0:18:11.520
<v Speaker 1>be with us for some time. I mean, you folks

0:18:11.520 --> 0:18:15.199
<v Speaker 1>on Bloomberg have been reporting on the enormous volatility and

0:18:15.280 --> 0:18:18.080
<v Speaker 1>markets over the last couple of months. We get good

0:18:18.080 --> 0:18:22.879
<v Speaker 1>news on on the medical front, and everything goes up.

0:18:22.960 --> 0:18:25.600
<v Speaker 1>You get some bad news, everything goes down. I think

0:18:25.640 --> 0:18:28.240
<v Speaker 1>that just reflects the fact that we just don't know,

0:18:28.680 --> 0:18:33.200
<v Speaker 1>and we ought to care for the possibility that things

0:18:33.200 --> 0:18:36.640
<v Speaker 1>are going to be quite difficult quite some time. Dan.

0:18:36.800 --> 0:18:39.040
<v Speaker 1>And to this point, this this sort of volatility that

0:18:39.080 --> 0:18:41.479
<v Speaker 1>we saw in markets has basically gone away to a

0:18:41.480 --> 0:18:44.199
<v Speaker 1>certain degree, in part due to what the Federal Reserve

0:18:44.280 --> 0:18:46.760
<v Speaker 1>has done in terms of monetizing the debt of the

0:18:46.800 --> 0:18:50.960
<v Speaker 1>United States. What's the risk for financial stability going forward,

0:18:51.119 --> 0:18:54.359
<v Speaker 1>given how much debt the US is incurring, given how

0:18:54.400 --> 0:18:59.040
<v Speaker 1>much the feed is interfering and pushing investors further into risk. Well,

0:18:59.320 --> 0:19:02.760
<v Speaker 1>I think, you know, we we do need to acknowledge

0:19:03.160 --> 0:19:06.680
<v Speaker 1>that there are going to be some risks in when

0:19:06.720 --> 0:19:11.000
<v Speaker 1>everyone takes the range of fiscal and monetary measures that

0:19:11.040 --> 0:19:13.679
<v Speaker 1>have been taken. But I think we need to quickly

0:19:13.800 --> 0:19:18.720
<v Speaker 1>qualify that observation by saying it is absolutely necessary to

0:19:18.840 --> 0:19:23.160
<v Speaker 1>do whatever we can to stop what is a very

0:19:23.200 --> 0:19:27.879
<v Speaker 1>serious situation from being a chronic, highly depressed situation. In

0:19:27.920 --> 0:19:30.840
<v Speaker 1>other words, we're going to have to take some risks

0:19:31.040 --> 0:19:35.960
<v Speaker 1>with respect to debt levels of respect to financial stability

0:19:36.240 --> 0:19:39.600
<v Speaker 1>in order to stop this thing from getting worse and

0:19:39.800 --> 0:19:43.400
<v Speaker 1>staying at a at a low level. Having said that,

0:19:43.520 --> 0:19:48.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, I think again we do need to recognize that, uh,

0:19:48.200 --> 0:19:51.040
<v Speaker 1>there were some vulnerabilities. There were some vulnerabilities in the

0:19:51.080 --> 0:19:55.440
<v Speaker 1>commercial paper market. There were some vulnerabilities in the repo market. Uh.

0:19:55.600 --> 0:19:58.080
<v Speaker 1>And to return to the theme that that Jonathan was

0:19:58.119 --> 0:20:00.920
<v Speaker 1>asking me about a moment ago. You know, if we're

0:20:01.119 --> 0:20:05.520
<v Speaker 1>in a situation in which the FED will provide assistance

0:20:05.560 --> 0:20:10.399
<v Speaker 1>to large asset managers because they have exchange traded funds

0:20:10.480 --> 0:20:15.399
<v Speaker 1>with relatively illiquid assets, why why are we hesitating to

0:20:15.440 --> 0:20:19.280
<v Speaker 1>provide assistance to middle and lower middle income people who

0:20:19.280 --> 0:20:21.000
<v Speaker 1>are probably going to be out of many of whom

0:20:21.000 --> 0:20:22.520
<v Speaker 1>are going to be out of work for a long

0:20:22.560 --> 0:20:26.040
<v Speaker 1>time to come. So, yes, there are there are risks,

0:20:26.080 --> 0:20:28.320
<v Speaker 1>but I don't think we need to we should be

0:20:28.359 --> 0:20:31.520
<v Speaker 1>paralyzed by the risks. We've got to act to try

0:20:31.640 --> 0:20:35.560
<v Speaker 1>to people floor under income of floor under the economy,

0:20:35.880 --> 0:20:40.879
<v Speaker 1>and then as the medical developments permit, to start taking

0:20:40.920 --> 0:20:45.359
<v Speaker 1>measures actively to build it up again. Right, Governor, have

0:20:45.440 --> 0:20:47.960
<v Speaker 1>got one final question. I remember the day you joined

0:20:48.000 --> 0:20:51.560
<v Speaker 1>the FED and the entire market community stood up and said,

0:20:51.560 --> 0:20:54.200
<v Speaker 1>who is this guy? Why is he on the FED?

0:20:54.840 --> 0:20:58.040
<v Speaker 1>They said the same thing about Chairman Powell. How's the

0:20:58.119 --> 0:21:03.160
<v Speaker 1>chairman doing well? Look j J the Jed Powell has

0:21:03.240 --> 0:21:08.000
<v Speaker 1>confronted a challenge that only Ben Bernankie really has confronted.

0:21:08.040 --> 0:21:13.080
<v Speaker 1>The two very different kinds of challenges. Uh Ben's challenge

0:21:13.440 --> 0:21:19.200
<v Speaker 1>was originating in financial markets, and everything was imploding because

0:21:19.240 --> 0:21:23.560
<v Speaker 1>of the vulnerabilities in markets and in vans. Jara Powell

0:21:23.720 --> 0:21:27.200
<v Speaker 1>is facing a situation in which an anxiety, an external

0:21:27.240 --> 0:21:31.679
<v Speaker 1>shock has created an unprecedented situation, and you know he

0:21:31.800 --> 0:21:35.320
<v Speaker 1>moved very quickly, I think to push the FED to

0:21:36.280 --> 0:21:39.440
<v Speaker 1>get in place a set of emergency programs. I think

0:21:39.440 --> 0:21:42.280
<v Speaker 1>he's made it clear that the Fed will do what

0:21:42.440 --> 0:21:45.680
<v Speaker 1>they believe needs to be done. But I'm sure he'd

0:21:45.680 --> 0:21:47.600
<v Speaker 1>be the first to say it's got a lot of

0:21:47.640 --> 0:21:49.640
<v Speaker 1>work ahead of us. Down. I don't want to cause

0:21:49.680 --> 0:21:52.280
<v Speaker 1>any trouble between you and your friend Jay, but I

0:21:52.320 --> 0:21:54.600
<v Speaker 1>didn't want to when he first took the job at

0:21:54.600 --> 0:21:56.919
<v Speaker 1>the top of the Federal Reserve, and there was a

0:21:56.920 --> 0:21:58.879
<v Speaker 1>side of him where he wanted to play almost the

0:21:58.920 --> 0:22:01.239
<v Speaker 1>hard guy with financial markets, the guy that was going

0:22:01.280 --> 0:22:03.080
<v Speaker 1>to run the FED and not respond to where the

0:22:03.200 --> 0:22:07.359
<v Speaker 1>SPX was, the SMP five was on any given day.

0:22:07.880 --> 0:22:09.640
<v Speaker 1>Is there a part of you down that just feels,

0:22:09.680 --> 0:22:12.439
<v Speaker 1>now that the Federal Reserve is completely capitulated, that the

0:22:12.480 --> 0:22:16.199
<v Speaker 1>one mandate seems to be financial conditions. That is the

0:22:16.280 --> 0:22:20.359
<v Speaker 1>exclusive channel which monety policy flows through, and therefore that

0:22:20.480 --> 0:22:23.200
<v Speaker 1>is the only thing that matters right now. I don't

0:22:23.200 --> 0:22:27.120
<v Speaker 1>think it. I don't think it's the only thing that matters. Um. Look,

0:22:27.160 --> 0:22:32.600
<v Speaker 1>I think over a longish period of time there has

0:22:32.840 --> 0:22:37.320
<v Speaker 1>been more focused on markets by all people at the FED,

0:22:37.920 --> 0:22:43.080
<v Speaker 1>and perhaps some oversensitivity to markets. Having said that, though,

0:22:43.680 --> 0:22:47.120
<v Speaker 1>to the degree that what happens in markets then has

0:22:47.160 --> 0:22:51.040
<v Speaker 1>an impact on the real economy, it would be unwise

0:22:51.160 --> 0:22:54.560
<v Speaker 1>to ignore what is going on in markets. Um. And

0:22:54.600 --> 0:22:57.040
<v Speaker 1>I think what you've seen actually in the last week

0:22:57.119 --> 0:22:59.840
<v Speaker 1>or so is just a little bit of pushback by

0:22:59.840 --> 0:23:03.040
<v Speaker 1>the FED against that. I mean, both Vice Chair Clarida

0:23:03.240 --> 0:23:07.320
<v Speaker 1>and President Williams the New York Fed, we're out last

0:23:07.440 --> 0:23:12.200
<v Speaker 1>week making pretty clear that despite the requests or demands

0:23:12.240 --> 0:23:16.800
<v Speaker 1>of markets for some more explicit forward guidance right now,

0:23:17.240 --> 0:23:19.960
<v Speaker 1>that the FED was going to hold back and think

0:23:20.080 --> 0:23:23.560
<v Speaker 1>a while longer about what it's going to say about

0:23:23.600 --> 0:23:28.320
<v Speaker 1>monetary policy going for I don't know Jonathan that that

0:23:28.400 --> 0:23:33.199
<v Speaker 1>that's directly and responsively concerned that that you articulated, but

0:23:33.280 --> 0:23:36.760
<v Speaker 1>it's at least consistent with trying to push back Dan.

0:23:36.800 --> 0:23:39.639
<v Speaker 1>How concerned are you about the Federal Reserve providing a

0:23:39.680 --> 0:23:43.240
<v Speaker 1>backstop to companies that otherwise would be going bankrupt? In

0:23:43.240 --> 0:23:46.679
<v Speaker 1>other words, they're offering a liquidity solution, but increasingly the

0:23:46.720 --> 0:23:50.280
<v Speaker 1>problem is becoming a solvency one, and the Fed increasingly

0:23:50.760 --> 0:23:53.080
<v Speaker 1>is being expected or priced in, at least by the market,

0:23:53.680 --> 0:23:56.199
<v Speaker 1>as being willing to step in. Do you think that

0:23:56.200 --> 0:23:59.040
<v Speaker 1>that's realistic and do you think that they should? Well,

0:23:59.119 --> 0:24:05.199
<v Speaker 1>two things on any any economic um agency part of

0:24:05.200 --> 0:24:08.159
<v Speaker 1>the government that is trying to respond in an emergency

0:24:08.240 --> 0:24:13.119
<v Speaker 1>situation is based with the problem that on the one hand,

0:24:13.520 --> 0:24:16.200
<v Speaker 1>there's an imperative to get money out the door quickly,

0:24:16.640 --> 0:24:18.920
<v Speaker 1>and on the other hand, they know they'll be second

0:24:18.960 --> 0:24:23.920
<v Speaker 1>guests in retrospect if any of that money has landed

0:24:23.920 --> 0:24:26.879
<v Speaker 1>in a place whereupon consideration, you wouldn't have wanted it

0:24:26.920 --> 0:24:31.119
<v Speaker 1>to land. So I think that, uh, you've got to

0:24:31.200 --> 0:24:36.440
<v Speaker 1>expect a certain amount of under shooting and over shooting.

0:24:36.440 --> 0:24:39.480
<v Speaker 1>With any program like this, you try to shape the

0:24:39.520 --> 0:24:42.800
<v Speaker 1>program quickly as best you can to direct it where

0:24:42.840 --> 0:24:44.840
<v Speaker 1>you want to direct it. But you have to have

0:24:44.880 --> 0:24:48.520
<v Speaker 1>to understand that you're not going to have accuracy when

0:24:48.520 --> 0:24:51.760
<v Speaker 1>you're trying to do things on the plot um. That's

0:24:51.800 --> 0:24:56.280
<v Speaker 1>that's number one. Number two that I think after after

0:24:56.520 --> 0:25:01.439
<v Speaker 1>the um economy has improved, I think everybody needs to

0:25:01.720 --> 0:25:05.680
<v Speaker 1>step back and once again ask the question, what is

0:25:05.720 --> 0:25:08.760
<v Speaker 1>the nature of the financial system, What have we done

0:25:08.800 --> 0:25:11.400
<v Speaker 1>well and what have we not done well. I think

0:25:11.720 --> 0:25:14.840
<v Speaker 1>the performance of the banks over the last couple of

0:25:14.880 --> 0:25:19.639
<v Speaker 1>months has suggested that the Dodd Frank Act and the

0:25:19.680 --> 0:25:23.600
<v Speaker 1>reforms that were made thereafter did indeed strengthen the facts.

0:25:23.960 --> 0:25:26.080
<v Speaker 1>The banks have been a source of strength, not a

0:25:26.200 --> 0:25:29.880
<v Speaker 1>vulnerability this time around, and I hope they remain that way,

0:25:29.880 --> 0:25:33.440
<v Speaker 1>and that's a good thing. It's in shadow banking, it's

0:25:33.480 --> 0:25:37.360
<v Speaker 1>in other parts of financial markets, asset managers, hedge funds,

0:25:38.000 --> 0:25:41.919
<v Speaker 1>the repo market. That's where we've seen from vulnerabilities, and

0:25:42.000 --> 0:25:45.960
<v Speaker 1>that's where the FED action uh in an effort to

0:25:46.040 --> 0:25:50.840
<v Speaker 1>stabilize the economy needs to be looked at after the fact.

0:25:50.960 --> 0:25:54.400
<v Speaker 1>Not to criticize the FED for maybe acting to put

0:25:54.400 --> 0:25:58.240
<v Speaker 1>a floor under financial markets, to ask the question, just

0:25:58.400 --> 0:26:00.480
<v Speaker 1>as we did with the banks and two thousand and

0:26:00.560 --> 0:26:03.080
<v Speaker 1>nine and ten, what do we need to do now

0:26:03.400 --> 0:26:07.560
<v Speaker 1>in other markets to make sure that financial instability doesn't

0:26:07.600 --> 0:26:12.800
<v Speaker 1>grow outside the regulative Always thoughtful, Always appreciate your time.

0:26:12.800 --> 0:26:14.800
<v Speaker 1>I've gotta get you back on soon, form a fed governor.

0:26:14.880 --> 0:26:20.960
<v Speaker 1>That dance and real life, Well, you know, John, we

0:26:21.080 --> 0:26:23.399
<v Speaker 1>like to do it here on television on radio, and

0:26:23.400 --> 0:26:27.720
<v Speaker 1>that is cross asset data checks. But for so much

0:26:27.760 --> 0:26:30.200
<v Speaker 1>of America, for so much of the world, it's still

0:26:30.240 --> 0:26:33.920
<v Speaker 1>about the stock market. It can be that port Portico

0:26:34.040 --> 0:26:36.760
<v Speaker 1>whatever it is, a platform at the New York Stock Exchange,

0:26:36.920 --> 0:26:41.359
<v Speaker 1>or it can be the seven story video extravaganza of

0:26:41.400 --> 0:26:45.000
<v Speaker 1>the NASDACK. Going I p O and going public is

0:26:45.000 --> 0:26:47.840
<v Speaker 1>a good and beautiful thing. Nelson Griggs joins us. He

0:26:48.000 --> 0:26:51.240
<v Speaker 1>is the president of the NASDACK. Now, so let me

0:26:51.280 --> 0:26:54.359
<v Speaker 1>ask the money question right now for New York Wall Street,

0:26:54.680 --> 0:27:00.280
<v Speaker 1>How will those pandemic change your NASDACK. Well, it's just

0:27:00.400 --> 0:27:03.720
<v Speaker 1>quite a bit. We went from having four percent of

0:27:03.720 --> 0:27:07.119
<v Speaker 1>our population working from home to in a matter of

0:27:07.920 --> 0:27:10.880
<v Speaker 1>a week, and that was pretty remarkable. And I think

0:27:10.920 --> 0:27:13.960
<v Speaker 1>we have seen the markets work very efficiently and effectively.

0:27:14.359 --> 0:27:17.080
<v Speaker 1>There's certainly been an impact on I think you're leading

0:27:17.160 --> 0:27:18.879
<v Speaker 1>there to the I p O market, So happy to

0:27:18.960 --> 0:27:23.199
<v Speaker 1>discuss that. But we've been work working pretty well well. Now,

0:27:23.240 --> 0:27:25.919
<v Speaker 1>So let's talk about physical trading flaws. Just touch on

0:27:25.920 --> 0:27:27.960
<v Speaker 1>that topic and we can move on pretty quickly. But

0:27:28.040 --> 0:27:30.159
<v Speaker 1>you think the pandemic has on the line that we

0:27:30.200 --> 0:27:33.400
<v Speaker 1>don't need them anymore. Yeah. I think if you look

0:27:33.440 --> 0:27:36.080
<v Speaker 1>at the equities that have a pretty simple price action

0:27:36.400 --> 0:27:39.200
<v Speaker 1>up or down, we have a long believe that the

0:27:39.280 --> 0:27:42.880
<v Speaker 1>best outcome for investors is to do that in electronic format.

0:27:43.359 --> 0:27:45.240
<v Speaker 1>I think these last two months, the data that we

0:27:45.320 --> 0:27:49.040
<v Speaker 1>see now how stocks open, the efficiently, training throughout the

0:27:49.119 --> 0:27:52.440
<v Speaker 1>day and in particularly the close, we've seen better performance

0:27:52.520 --> 0:27:55.160
<v Speaker 1>in the electronic market. So I think we we are

0:27:55.240 --> 0:27:58.040
<v Speaker 1>of a strong belief and investors investor with an open,

0:27:58.160 --> 0:28:02.119
<v Speaker 1>transparent and elect on a marketplace. But that's that's our opinion.

0:28:03.840 --> 0:28:05.159
<v Speaker 1>People like to come down to the try it in

0:28:05.240 --> 0:28:06.760
<v Speaker 1>floor for the big I po is, the big song,

0:28:06.800 --> 0:28:08.879
<v Speaker 1>good dance, the Dalcom party show. You've seen a minion

0:28:08.960 --> 0:28:11.520
<v Speaker 1>times now soon I PO is in the pipeline. Can

0:28:11.520 --> 0:28:13.840
<v Speaker 1>you just give us some insight to what you're seeing

0:28:13.880 --> 0:28:15.879
<v Speaker 1>just in terms of activity. Can we expect and I

0:28:15.920 --> 0:28:19.040
<v Speaker 1>think anytime soon? Yeah, a great great questions. So we

0:28:19.119 --> 0:28:22.120
<v Speaker 1>have performed at NASDAC fiften I p o s since

0:28:22.160 --> 0:28:24.360
<v Speaker 1>the middle of March, and a lot of that has

0:28:24.400 --> 0:28:27.320
<v Speaker 1>been in the healthcare space. I think the biggest challenge

0:28:27.320 --> 0:28:30.000
<v Speaker 1>for an I p O is can they go out

0:28:30.080 --> 0:28:34.520
<v Speaker 1>on dual road show and talk constantly about the upcoming quarters. Um,

0:28:34.560 --> 0:28:37.639
<v Speaker 1>that's not as important for a healthcare or biotic I

0:28:37.720 --> 0:28:39.320
<v Speaker 1>p O. So we have seen those go out and

0:28:39.320 --> 0:28:42.560
<v Speaker 1>do very well. We are starting to see other companies

0:28:42.600 --> 0:28:45.960
<v Speaker 1>though you saw this morning water music file up for

0:28:45.960 --> 0:28:47.520
<v Speaker 1>a very large I p O. They're going on the

0:28:47.600 --> 0:28:50.280
<v Speaker 1>road today and you will see more of this week

0:28:50.360 --> 0:28:56.040
<v Speaker 1>actually file to start. So we are seeing some non healthcare,

0:28:56.160 --> 0:28:58.680
<v Speaker 1>non what we call spack I p o s start

0:28:58.760 --> 0:29:01.600
<v Speaker 1>to launch the road shows. Many of them were very

0:29:01.600 --> 0:29:04.960
<v Speaker 1>close to going in the March time frame and then

0:29:05.000 --> 0:29:07.280
<v Speaker 1>put their plans on holds. So these are deals that

0:29:07.360 --> 0:29:10.160
<v Speaker 1>were in the works for a period of time. I

0:29:10.200 --> 0:29:12.480
<v Speaker 1>will say that we are starting to see new deals

0:29:13.080 --> 0:29:15.360
<v Speaker 1>pop up, and I think what we have here is

0:29:15.400 --> 0:29:19.680
<v Speaker 1>we have a November election, but up from now until November.

0:29:19.720 --> 0:29:22.320
<v Speaker 1>If the markets do hold, which you know again today

0:29:22.320 --> 0:29:25.480
<v Speaker 1>we're seeing some pretty impressive performance, there's a chance we'll

0:29:25.480 --> 0:29:29.840
<v Speaker 1>have a healthy I P O market. That's multisector Nelson.

0:29:29.880 --> 0:29:32.240
<v Speaker 1>Who are the investors here, especially as we talk about

0:29:32.240 --> 0:29:37.400
<v Speaker 1>an increase in retail investors coming into stocks right now? Yeah,

0:29:37.520 --> 0:29:39.480
<v Speaker 1>you you are seeing to be more broad based. I

0:29:39.480 --> 0:29:42.160
<v Speaker 1>think the initial rally we did not see a lot

0:29:42.200 --> 0:29:44.840
<v Speaker 1>of long investors come into the marketplace. But I think

0:29:44.880 --> 0:29:48.920
<v Speaker 1>as you have watched the indusseries continue to go up,

0:29:49.280 --> 0:29:51.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, we're the nagic when Hunter is up almost

0:29:51.920 --> 0:29:54.880
<v Speaker 1>eight percent for the year, we haven't Askeda positive almost

0:29:54.880 --> 0:29:58.360
<v Speaker 1>three percent, the bots up. So we are starting to

0:29:58.400 --> 0:30:01.040
<v Speaker 1>see some long investors coming into the marketplace as we're

0:30:01.080 --> 0:30:05.120
<v Speaker 1>seeing the ability to get a bit more predictability in

0:30:05.240 --> 0:30:07.840
<v Speaker 1>terms of what they're hearing companies say. So once we

0:30:07.840 --> 0:30:11.280
<v Speaker 1>went through a obviously a pretty challenging earnings quarter where

0:30:11.360 --> 0:30:13.840
<v Speaker 1>a lot of companies and Polk guidance, we are now

0:30:13.880 --> 0:30:15.560
<v Speaker 1>seeing them able to go out and have a bit

0:30:15.560 --> 0:30:17.840
<v Speaker 1>more pretability and what they think may happen over the

0:30:17.880 --> 0:30:22.680
<v Speaker 1>coming quarters in a year. Also, Greggs one more question,

0:30:22.720 --> 0:30:24.720
<v Speaker 1>if we could as well one day you're gonna get

0:30:24.720 --> 0:30:27.160
<v Speaker 1>back to work. The pandemic is gonna be over, and

0:30:27.200 --> 0:30:30.000
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna reinstitute I p o s. How are you

0:30:30.080 --> 0:30:33.280
<v Speaker 1>going to compete with the New York Stock Exchange. What's

0:30:33.280 --> 0:30:38.360
<v Speaker 1>the key distinction you have in two thousand twenty one. Yeah,

0:30:38.360 --> 0:30:40.520
<v Speaker 1>our our key distinction we we obviously do very well.

0:30:40.600 --> 0:30:42.600
<v Speaker 1>Last year were one seventy eight percent of I p

0:30:42.720 --> 0:30:45.880
<v Speaker 1>o s. We're on that same track record this year. Um.

0:30:46.040 --> 0:30:49.440
<v Speaker 1>I think our big story is life cycle support, so

0:30:49.600 --> 0:30:53.120
<v Speaker 1>we do a lot to help companies the right investors

0:30:53.720 --> 0:30:56.400
<v Speaker 1>uh position their story. There's obviously, as you mentioned, a

0:30:56.440 --> 0:30:59.400
<v Speaker 1>lot of different media and support around that. So we've

0:30:59.400 --> 0:31:01.320
<v Speaker 1>been on quite a quite a run the last handful

0:31:01.360 --> 0:31:03.640
<v Speaker 1>of years, and that sev win rate and it is

0:31:03.680 --> 0:31:06.800
<v Speaker 1>a very holistic splorer. We have a residents, very wealth

0:31:06.800 --> 0:31:11.160
<v Speaker 1>companies now, So before we round things out quite clearly,

0:31:11.480 --> 0:31:13.720
<v Speaker 1>looking at the retoric coming out of Washington and the

0:31:13.720 --> 0:31:15.960
<v Speaker 1>policy too, there's got to be far more scrutiny of

0:31:16.000 --> 0:31:19.920
<v Speaker 1>foreign companies listing on US exchanges. What is the role

0:31:19.960 --> 0:31:22.600
<v Speaker 1>of foreign governments in those companies? Are we going to

0:31:22.640 --> 0:31:25.720
<v Speaker 1>have the same auditing standards the US companies have to

0:31:25.760 --> 0:31:28.760
<v Speaker 1>abide by all things that just make a whole lot

0:31:28.800 --> 0:31:32.000
<v Speaker 1>of sense. What's the stance of the NASTAC on that

0:31:32.040 --> 0:31:35.360
<v Speaker 1>situation at the moment. Yeah, I think you hit on

0:31:35.400 --> 0:31:38.080
<v Speaker 1>the one in the middle there the auditing standards, um

0:31:38.120 --> 0:31:40.680
<v Speaker 1>and and we obviously would like the US to continuity

0:31:41.200 --> 0:31:44.640
<v Speaker 1>the the global focal point for growth companies to come

0:31:44.720 --> 0:31:48.200
<v Speaker 1>and list. That said, there does need to be transparency

0:31:48.640 --> 0:31:51.560
<v Speaker 1>in terms of reportings. So we we're happy the SEC

0:31:51.880 --> 0:31:55.640
<v Speaker 1>has gotten together a group around table for a discussion

0:31:55.720 --> 0:31:58.560
<v Speaker 1>of all the ecosystem on July nine. I think that

0:31:58.600 --> 0:32:00.760
<v Speaker 1>was a very prudent move as we are seeing a

0:32:00.800 --> 0:32:03.640
<v Speaker 1>lot more he said rhetor coming out of Washington. We

0:32:03.680 --> 0:32:06.520
<v Speaker 1>need to be prepared as the ecosystem meeting the exchanges,

0:32:06.720 --> 0:32:10.040
<v Speaker 1>the banks, the auditors as well as the SEC to

0:32:10.120 --> 0:32:13.560
<v Speaker 1>make sure there's enough invest protection to invest in all

0:32:13.600 --> 0:32:15.840
<v Speaker 1>companies that come to the US. So we're supportive of

0:32:15.880 --> 0:32:18.960
<v Speaker 1>the path we're all taking. And now, so do you

0:32:19.000 --> 0:32:21.440
<v Speaker 1>look into tighten your own rules before the government does

0:32:21.480 --> 0:32:25.000
<v Speaker 1>it for you. We consistent look at our rules and

0:32:25.040 --> 0:32:26.960
<v Speaker 1>we we have tightened the rules to some degree. We

0:32:26.960 --> 0:32:30.160
<v Speaker 1>did last week. Um, it is a it's a journey.

0:32:30.400 --> 0:32:32.680
<v Speaker 1>You need to work again within the ecosystem. So those

0:32:32.760 --> 0:32:36.720
<v Speaker 1>were done in in concert with some feedback from other participants,

0:32:37.400 --> 0:32:40.120
<v Speaker 1>but we're prepared to do when we have discussions with

0:32:40.160 --> 0:32:43.040
<v Speaker 1>again that the broad based ecosystem is real important here

0:32:43.360 --> 0:32:46.800
<v Speaker 1>because not just the exchanges. It's not just the bankers

0:32:46.920 --> 0:32:49.960
<v Speaker 1>or the accountants, Detroy, everybody coming together and saying what

0:32:50.080 --> 0:32:52.560
<v Speaker 1>makes the most sense. But we we certainly will do

0:32:52.680 --> 0:32:56.160
<v Speaker 1>our our role as a producery, you know, exchange. We

0:32:56.520 --> 0:33:00.480
<v Speaker 1>have a place I think that are appropriate now, so

0:33:00.600 --> 0:33:02.920
<v Speaker 1>cover station. We've got to continue look forward, towny back

0:33:02.960 --> 0:33:05.720
<v Speaker 1>soon Nowson Griggs, that of an Astact, the president of

0:33:05.760 --> 0:33:12.560
<v Speaker 1>an Astack. The pandemic is changing. There's no question. This weekend,

0:33:12.720 --> 0:33:16.480
<v Speaker 1>the three day weekend, we saw the color of the

0:33:16.600 --> 0:33:19.239
<v Speaker 1>nation change, the tone of the nation change, and all

0:33:19.280 --> 0:33:22.600
<v Speaker 1>the ebb and flow of his tragedy from that exceptional

0:33:23.120 --> 0:33:26.280
<v Speaker 1>New York Times cover of a thousand names who have

0:33:26.400 --> 0:33:30.040
<v Speaker 1>died in this pandemic to the celebrations that were beginning

0:33:30.040 --> 0:33:32.720
<v Speaker 1>to see as America re engages, we need to get

0:33:32.760 --> 0:33:35.040
<v Speaker 1>an update on the pandemic, and we do that at

0:33:35.040 --> 0:33:39.960
<v Speaker 1>the Johns Hopkins House Hospital, Department of Medicine and their

0:33:40.040 --> 0:33:44.800
<v Speaker 1>niece Earnest. Here's Miss Earnest. We have never seen anything

0:33:44.880 --> 0:33:49.080
<v Speaker 1>like COVID nineteen and so there are hospitals have never

0:33:49.120 --> 0:33:54.480
<v Speaker 1>seen an impact like this. Frontline nurses are in a

0:33:54.800 --> 0:34:00.520
<v Speaker 1>fairly solid position. It's the nursing piece of around the

0:34:00.560 --> 0:34:05.120
<v Speaker 1>front line that is subject to review. And that's as

0:34:05.160 --> 0:34:08.600
<v Speaker 1>in any financial market situation. This is similar to what

0:34:08.800 --> 0:34:10.799
<v Speaker 1>the I was in the hotel business. We saw this

0:34:10.920 --> 0:34:14.160
<v Speaker 1>in two thousand and one with nine eleven, where the

0:34:14.280 --> 0:34:18.120
<v Speaker 1>volume dropped completely and different decisions had to be made.

0:34:18.520 --> 0:34:21.359
<v Speaker 1>But I do think that nursing is a in an

0:34:21.440 --> 0:34:26.520
<v Speaker 1>excellent position to rebound in any way because we have

0:34:26.600 --> 0:34:30.840
<v Speaker 1>a lot of professional agility. Do nurses across the country

0:34:31.040 --> 0:34:34.319
<v Speaker 1>feel like they've been taking care of both from you know,

0:34:34.440 --> 0:34:38.400
<v Speaker 1>physical but also mental point of view? I can speak

0:34:38.440 --> 0:34:41.840
<v Speaker 1>for Johns Hopkins and I know that we are reaching

0:34:41.840 --> 0:34:44.880
<v Speaker 1>out to all of our employees and encouraging them to

0:34:44.920 --> 0:34:48.799
<v Speaker 1>take advantage of the many support systems that we here

0:34:49.239 --> 0:34:51.000
<v Speaker 1>have here at Johns Hopkins, and I do know that

0:34:51.040 --> 0:34:54.040
<v Speaker 1>other institutions are doing that as well. And I think

0:34:54.080 --> 0:34:55.959
<v Speaker 1>this is one of the first times that I've seen

0:34:56.040 --> 0:34:59.480
<v Speaker 1>this big push to say to people we don't know

0:34:59.600 --> 0:35:03.440
<v Speaker 1>how we're supposed to feel. So we need to develop

0:35:03.480 --> 0:35:07.640
<v Speaker 1>some different resiliency and emotional agility skills. I know we

0:35:07.680 --> 0:35:11.800
<v Speaker 1>talked about blended rolls, so nurses actually having slightly different

0:35:11.880 --> 0:35:14.919
<v Speaker 1>roles or going and moving from one department to the next.

0:35:15.400 --> 0:35:17.520
<v Speaker 1>How do you think COVID nineteen will actually change the

0:35:17.600 --> 0:35:21.600
<v Speaker 1>nursing world forever. I think the blended model is going

0:35:21.640 --> 0:35:24.239
<v Speaker 1>to be here for quite a while. I know that

0:35:24.320 --> 0:35:27.480
<v Speaker 1>we at Johns Hopkins are looking at that very seriously.

0:35:28.120 --> 0:35:30.360
<v Speaker 1>That we're training a nurse who used to work on

0:35:30.360 --> 0:35:33.920
<v Speaker 1>a general board two elevate her skills to an i

0:35:34.080 --> 0:35:37.520
<v Speaker 1>MC level intermediate care, and the same with an intermediate

0:35:37.560 --> 0:35:40.319
<v Speaker 1>care nurse to develop those skills that are needed at

0:35:40.320 --> 0:35:42.680
<v Speaker 1>the i c U. I will tell you this with

0:35:42.800 --> 0:35:47.160
<v Speaker 1>COVID with a big wake up call about how limited

0:35:47.280 --> 0:35:50.680
<v Speaker 1>we are in the valuable I c U nursing resource.

0:35:51.320 --> 0:35:54.080
<v Speaker 1>What do we still not understand about the virus? I'm varying.

0:35:54.320 --> 0:35:58.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm reading various reports that, for example, of those who

0:35:58.160 --> 0:36:02.719
<v Speaker 1>have recovered from coronavirus could have long lasting effects on

0:36:02.840 --> 0:36:05.799
<v Speaker 1>their lungs. How much do we know about the secondary

0:36:05.800 --> 0:36:08.880
<v Speaker 1>effects of this of this disease. Well, we're learning a

0:36:08.920 --> 0:36:12.279
<v Speaker 1>little more every day, but you're absolutely right, Francine. The

0:36:12.360 --> 0:36:15.600
<v Speaker 1>impact on the long the impact on the long long

0:36:15.680 --> 0:36:20.720
<v Speaker 1>term physical condition for patients is really our next step.

0:36:21.040 --> 0:36:26.320
<v Speaker 1>One of our impatient medicine units has converted into a

0:36:26.480 --> 0:36:31.000
<v Speaker 1>mini rehab facility where we can start that rehabilitation for

0:36:31.080 --> 0:36:34.759
<v Speaker 1>patients before they're even discharged from the hospital, because we've

0:36:34.800 --> 0:36:38.920
<v Speaker 1>recognized that this is a long, long recovery process for

0:36:38.960 --> 0:36:43.000
<v Speaker 1>some patients. Sir Johns Hopkins, you know we're sitting there

0:36:43.000 --> 0:36:46.600
<v Speaker 1>with an update is well. Thanks for listening to the

0:36:46.600 --> 0:36:53.120
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Surveillance podcast. Subscribe and listen to interviews on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud,

0:36:53.480 --> 0:36:57.680
<v Speaker 1>or whichever podcast platform you prefer. I'm on Twitter at

0:36:57.719 --> 0:37:02.000
<v Speaker 1>Tom Keane before the podcast. You can always catch us worldwide.

0:37:02.440 --> 0:37:03.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm Bloomberg Radio.