WEBVTT - Leading Off: April 16th, 2025 (Ep. 977)

0:00:00.200 --> 0:00:03.320
<v Speaker 1>Out here, there's no one way of doing things, no

0:00:03.400 --> 0:00:07.120
<v Speaker 1>one written rules, and no shortage of adventure, because out

0:00:07.160 --> 0:00:11.280
<v Speaker 1>here the only requirement is having fun. Bank of America

0:00:11.320 --> 0:00:13.840
<v Speaker 1>invites kids six to eighteen to golf with Us for

0:00:13.920 --> 0:00:16.600
<v Speaker 1>a limited time. Sign them up for free one year membership,

0:00:16.600 --> 0:00:19.120
<v Speaker 1>giving them access to discount to tee times at thousands

0:00:19.120 --> 0:00:22.080
<v Speaker 1>of courses. Learn more at Bankofamerica dot com slash golf

0:00:22.120 --> 0:00:24.080
<v Speaker 1>with Us. What would you like the power to do?

0:00:24.280 --> 0:00:27.280
<v Speaker 1>Bank of America Restriction supply CBA dot com slash golf

0:00:27.280 --> 0:00:29.040
<v Speaker 1>with Us for complete details covered right twenty twenty five.

0:00:29.040 --> 0:00:30.000
<v Speaker 1>Bank of America Corporation.

0:00:35.680 --> 0:00:39.120
<v Speaker 2>What's up, Friendos and welcome in too, Fantasy pros MLB

0:00:39.320 --> 0:00:41.440
<v Speaker 2>right here for leading off, I am Chris Welsh. That

0:00:41.960 --> 0:00:45.240
<v Speaker 2>is the Joe Rico and we are back for another

0:00:45.280 --> 0:00:50.080
<v Speaker 2>Big Baseball Day. Happy, Happy Spencer Strider Day. If you

0:00:50.240 --> 0:00:53.440
<v Speaker 2>celebrate as you should. Our boy, Spencer Strider is back

0:00:53.479 --> 0:00:56.400
<v Speaker 2>in the early onset. Actually probably right a couple minutes

0:00:56.400 --> 0:00:58.040
<v Speaker 2>after we get off here from leading off, where you're

0:00:58.080 --> 0:01:01.959
<v Speaker 2>going to see Spencer Stryder's debut again Joe Rico's Toronto

0:01:02.000 --> 0:01:05.399
<v Speaker 2>Blue Jays. We got a lot to cover disappointing performances,

0:01:05.640 --> 0:01:08.399
<v Speaker 2>a lot of injury news out there, and one of

0:01:08.440 --> 0:01:10.560
<v Speaker 2>the weirdest home runs I think I have seen in

0:01:10.640 --> 0:01:11.320
<v Speaker 2>quite some time.

0:01:11.400 --> 0:01:13.160
<v Speaker 3>Joe Rico, how.

0:01:13.000 --> 0:01:15.480
<v Speaker 2>Excited or not excited are you for Spencer's Strider to

0:01:15.520 --> 0:01:17.640
<v Speaker 2>slice and dice? Because they did get to the other

0:01:17.760 --> 0:01:20.640
<v Speaker 2>Spencer yesterday? Will they get to two Spencer's.

0:01:20.920 --> 0:01:23.320
<v Speaker 4>I can only hope so for my Blue Jay's sake.

0:01:23.360 --> 0:01:25.440
<v Speaker 4>You know, if this was an evening game, if it

0:01:25.520 --> 0:01:27.760
<v Speaker 4>was like a seven Eastern game, I might have gone

0:01:27.800 --> 0:01:29.920
<v Speaker 4>to this one, because Lord knows that Blue Jays aren't

0:01:29.959 --> 0:01:31.360
<v Speaker 4>selling anything out. I might have been able to get

0:01:31.400 --> 0:01:33.640
<v Speaker 4>some last minute tickets. But a little bit of Mattine,

0:01:33.720 --> 0:01:35.360
<v Speaker 4>We're gonna do a lot of shows together today.

0:01:35.480 --> 0:01:37.600
<v Speaker 5>Well, so have that one in the background.

0:01:37.680 --> 0:01:40.240
<v Speaker 4>And you know, I was thinking about betting his over strikeouts,

0:01:40.280 --> 0:01:42.240
<v Speaker 4>but I didn't want to be going too crazy on

0:01:42.280 --> 0:01:42.840
<v Speaker 4>the first day.

0:01:42.840 --> 0:01:44.680
<v Speaker 5>I want to see how he balances out. But it

0:01:44.680 --> 0:01:45.559
<v Speaker 5>should be a lot of fun.

0:01:45.840 --> 0:01:48.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, Well, it didn't work out for the other Spencer yesterday,

0:01:48.120 --> 0:01:50.680
<v Speaker 2>and debuts are a little bit tough. But we are

0:01:50.680 --> 0:01:53.880
<v Speaker 2>here live on the Fantasy Pros Twitch, Twitch dot Tv,

0:01:54.080 --> 0:01:57.720
<v Speaker 2>Slash Fantasy Pros if you guys watch back on the YouTube.

0:01:57.720 --> 0:01:59.400
<v Speaker 2>You can come over and check us out live every

0:01:59.400 --> 0:02:03.080
<v Speaker 2>twelve pm Eastern Monday through Friday and shout out to

0:02:03.080 --> 0:02:04.600
<v Speaker 2>all the people that are hanging with us here.

0:02:04.800 --> 0:02:07.160
<v Speaker 3>We are getting in on that follow count. We got

0:02:07.200 --> 0:02:08.040
<v Speaker 3>Taco with a.

0:02:08.000 --> 0:02:12.400
<v Speaker 2>Subscription using their Prime account that gets us so closer

0:02:12.440 --> 0:02:15.240
<v Speaker 2>to the one hundred marker for subs this month with

0:02:15.480 --> 0:02:17.720
<v Speaker 2>is just you know, the second nice fun goal. We

0:02:17.800 --> 0:02:19.639
<v Speaker 2>love hanging with you guys live. Plus we'll be answering

0:02:19.680 --> 0:02:22.560
<v Speaker 2>your questions during the show, so you're welcome in the

0:02:22.639 --> 0:02:24.960
<v Speaker 2>chat to be dropping questions and we will be taking

0:02:25.000 --> 0:02:25.760
<v Speaker 2>that here and there.

0:02:26.000 --> 0:02:28.720
<v Speaker 3>Let's talk about the hottest.

0:02:28.280 --> 0:02:32.280
<v Speaker 2>Player in all of baseball, and funny enough, this player

0:02:32.320 --> 0:02:34.520
<v Speaker 2>we've been trying to ship somewhere else so we can

0:02:34.560 --> 0:02:38.079
<v Speaker 2>get the hottest minor leaguer in baseball to be Coming up,

0:02:38.440 --> 0:02:42.520
<v Speaker 2>we have got to talk about Tyler Sodastrom, the former

0:02:43.360 --> 0:02:47.840
<v Speaker 2>kind of still ish catcher. Tyler Sodastrom again with a

0:02:47.880 --> 0:02:52.320
<v Speaker 2>pair of homers six runs on tuesday A's beat up

0:02:52.320 --> 0:02:54.000
<v Speaker 2>on the White Sox twelve to three.

0:02:54.280 --> 0:02:55.160
<v Speaker 3>A very very.

0:02:55.000 --> 0:02:57.040
<v Speaker 2>Important thing happened in this though I don't want to

0:02:57.040 --> 0:02:59.880
<v Speaker 2>take away from Sodastrom. But as I have been saying

0:03:00.040 --> 0:03:02.160
<v Speaker 2>kind of at nauseum and maybe even kind of annoyingly,

0:03:02.400 --> 0:03:06.200
<v Speaker 2>is for us to get Nick Kurtz, we need someone

0:03:06.320 --> 0:03:08.919
<v Speaker 2>to go somewhere else. We did see a report yesterday

0:03:08.960 --> 0:03:12.320
<v Speaker 2>about potentially Tyler Soderstrm going and playing some third, which

0:03:12.320 --> 0:03:14.880
<v Speaker 2>I think would be great, good arm, former catcher, But

0:03:15.000 --> 0:03:17.919
<v Speaker 2>the real unlocking of this has been Brent Rooker playing

0:03:17.960 --> 0:03:20.400
<v Speaker 2>in the outfield. Well, guess what, Brent Rooker in left

0:03:20.400 --> 0:03:24.280
<v Speaker 2>field again. That's two outfield appearances since I believe Saturday

0:03:24.360 --> 0:03:24.880
<v Speaker 2>or Sunday.

0:03:24.919 --> 0:03:25.440
<v Speaker 3>That's huge.

0:03:25.560 --> 0:03:27.640
<v Speaker 2>Nick Kurtz is on the way, but it will not

0:03:27.800 --> 0:03:31.280
<v Speaker 2>be at the expense of Tyler Sodostrum. Let's talk about

0:03:31.280 --> 0:03:34.320
<v Speaker 2>the viability because there is nobody hotter. There's kind of

0:03:34.320 --> 0:03:36.640
<v Speaker 2>a maybe you'll want to feel like you're going to

0:03:36.760 --> 0:03:40.040
<v Speaker 2>sell off of Sodastrum. But he leads baseball in Homer's

0:03:40.120 --> 0:03:42.520
<v Speaker 2>right now. We can talk about his hitting metrics as well,

0:03:42.560 --> 0:03:44.840
<v Speaker 2>But what you take on Tyler Soderstrom right now and

0:03:44.880 --> 0:03:47.640
<v Speaker 2>what he is for you rest of season.

0:03:48.440 --> 0:03:49.920
<v Speaker 5>It feels pretty legit.

0:03:50.040 --> 0:03:52.080
<v Speaker 4>I mean, I know we did some videos talking about

0:03:52.160 --> 0:03:54.600
<v Speaker 4>him as a good late first base power option in

0:03:54.640 --> 0:03:55.240
<v Speaker 4>the offseason.

0:03:55.280 --> 0:03:57.000
<v Speaker 5>I didn't think it would be this extreme.

0:03:57.320 --> 0:03:59.000
<v Speaker 4>But if you look at the power numbers from last

0:03:59.040 --> 0:04:01.840
<v Speaker 4>year sixty one game, he did hit nine homers. He

0:04:01.880 --> 0:04:04.640
<v Speaker 4>had a fifteen percent barrel rate, fifty percent hard hit,

0:04:04.680 --> 0:04:06.840
<v Speaker 4>and he's carried that over. I don't think he's going

0:04:06.920 --> 0:04:10.040
<v Speaker 4>to continue at a nineteen percent barrel necessarily, but Tyler

0:04:10.080 --> 0:04:12.200
<v Speaker 4>Soderstrom looks well on his way to a thirty home

0:04:12.280 --> 0:04:12.840
<v Speaker 4>run season.

0:04:12.880 --> 0:04:13.080
<v Speaker 5>Here.

0:04:13.920 --> 0:04:16.240
<v Speaker 4>You know, there's people who are talking about like redoing

0:04:16.240 --> 0:04:18.320
<v Speaker 4>first base rankings. Is he a top ten guy? Is

0:04:18.320 --> 0:04:20.919
<v Speaker 4>he a top seven or eight guys? He's definitely a

0:04:20.960 --> 0:04:23.279
<v Speaker 4>top ten first baseman for me at this point, especially

0:04:23.320 --> 0:04:24.240
<v Speaker 4>considering that ballpark.

0:04:24.240 --> 0:04:26.360
<v Speaker 5>The lineup is actually really good.

0:04:26.520 --> 0:04:30.520
<v Speaker 4>Like a Butler, Rookers, Soderstrom, Langaliers, Bladey, you add Kurtz

0:04:30.560 --> 0:04:33.240
<v Speaker 4>in there, It's a pretty decent lineup all things considered.

0:04:33.279 --> 0:04:35.440
<v Speaker 4>I think Soderstrom is going to end up as one

0:04:35.480 --> 0:04:36.920
<v Speaker 4>of the better deals of draft season.

0:04:37.480 --> 0:04:39.120
<v Speaker 2>I don't think that's even a question at this point.

0:04:39.160 --> 0:04:41.320
<v Speaker 2>I like, what did who just put?

0:04:41.320 --> 0:04:41.400
<v Speaker 5>That?

0:04:41.520 --> 0:04:44.040
<v Speaker 2>Was Alwonkee the Big Kurtz or no? No, this is

0:04:44.080 --> 0:04:45.640
<v Speaker 2>well the Big Kurts instead of.

0:04:45.600 --> 0:04:47.560
<v Speaker 3>The Big Hurt. I like that for Nick Kurtz.

0:04:47.760 --> 0:04:50.760
<v Speaker 2>Looking at Soderstrom, by the way, you mentioned his barrel

0:04:50.839 --> 0:04:53.680
<v Speaker 2>rate around twenty percent this year. He's also getting the

0:04:53.720 --> 0:04:55.480
<v Speaker 2>ball in the air a ton more. And you talk

0:04:55.520 --> 0:04:57.960
<v Speaker 2>about being able to take advantage of that minor league ballpark.

0:04:58.320 --> 0:05:00.760
<v Speaker 2>He had a nine and a half degree line. It's

0:05:00.839 --> 0:05:01.560
<v Speaker 2>thirteen and.

0:05:01.480 --> 0:05:02.560
<v Speaker 3>A half this year.

0:05:02.600 --> 0:05:05.920
<v Speaker 2>That's huge launch aangle. He's getting that sweet spot right

0:05:05.960 --> 0:05:08.320
<v Speaker 2>now forty three percent. That's it's shorts ample sized, but

0:05:08.360 --> 0:05:11.080
<v Speaker 2>it's elite. Hard hit rates are through the freakin roof

0:05:11.160 --> 0:05:14.640
<v Speaker 2>on average evs ninety two and a half and a

0:05:14.720 --> 0:05:17.800
<v Speaker 2>secondary like in this the most important thing is like

0:05:17.839 --> 0:05:19.599
<v Speaker 2>get the ball, pull the ball, get the ball in

0:05:19.600 --> 0:05:22.320
<v Speaker 2>the air for a guy like him. But the other

0:05:22.520 --> 0:05:26.919
<v Speaker 2>very exciting piece is strikeouts are down eighteen eighteen percent,

0:05:27.360 --> 0:05:30.680
<v Speaker 2>which is huge and speaking of this is taking an advantage.

0:05:30.720 --> 0:05:32.839
<v Speaker 2>I wanted to pull this number up. Last year pulled

0:05:32.920 --> 0:05:36.320
<v Speaker 2>air percentage was only twelve percent. This year twenty five percent.

0:05:36.640 --> 0:05:39.000
<v Speaker 2>Twenty five percent for him. So I ask you this,

0:05:39.520 --> 0:05:41.799
<v Speaker 2>Tyler Soderstrom or Tristan Kasis rest.

0:05:41.640 --> 0:05:44.320
<v Speaker 3>Of season, it takes Oderstrom.

0:05:44.600 --> 0:05:46.400
<v Speaker 4>I think I would take Soderstrim at this point, like

0:05:46.400 --> 0:05:49.080
<v Speaker 4>there's just so many improvements across the board. Everything we've

0:05:49.080 --> 0:05:51.880
<v Speaker 4>mentioned already. The swing strike rates down, the oh swing

0:05:51.920 --> 0:05:54.160
<v Speaker 4>percentage is down, he's not chasing as much, he's making

0:05:54.200 --> 0:05:57.359
<v Speaker 4>more contact in the zone. Everything is positive. So I

0:05:57.360 --> 0:05:59.280
<v Speaker 4>think I would have to go with him at this point.

0:05:59.360 --> 0:06:00.320
<v Speaker 3>I think so too.

0:06:00.680 --> 0:06:03.000
<v Speaker 2>What about Jake Berger, who I've talked about is kind

0:06:03.000 --> 0:06:05.159
<v Speaker 2>of a by low. He's still not picking back. I'm

0:06:05.160 --> 0:06:07.480
<v Speaker 2>not sure at this point. I mean, there's definitely a

0:06:07.520 --> 0:06:09.520
<v Speaker 2>from here on out that could change, but I think

0:06:09.560 --> 0:06:10.480
<v Speaker 2>it's Sodastrim as well.

0:06:10.520 --> 0:06:11.920
<v Speaker 3>The hitting profiles ridiculous.

0:06:12.279 --> 0:06:15.720
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I think it's Soderstrim. I mean, the third base,

0:06:15.880 --> 0:06:19.200
<v Speaker 4>first base eligibility of Burger's nice. The lineup is objectively

0:06:19.240 --> 0:06:21.919
<v Speaker 4>better in Texas, but I think Soderstrom.

0:06:21.520 --> 0:06:23.600
<v Speaker 5>Has to be the choice at this point. Yeah.

0:06:23.640 --> 0:06:25.880
<v Speaker 2>I'd be curious too if anybody else has got any

0:06:25.920 --> 0:06:29.599
<v Speaker 2>other hooju rathers on on Tyler Soderstrim. Let's play it

0:06:29.600 --> 0:06:31.320
<v Speaker 2>today because it is it is.

0:06:31.279 --> 0:06:32.280
<v Speaker 3>Time to celebrate him.

0:06:32.320 --> 0:06:35.839
<v Speaker 2>Eight homers three twenty eight average, four hundred OVP and

0:06:35.920 --> 0:06:39.400
<v Speaker 2>a seven hundred slug right now. They definitely is something

0:06:39.400 --> 0:06:41.200
<v Speaker 2>we want to watch and not get like two over

0:06:41.279 --> 0:06:44.200
<v Speaker 2>zealous about but he doesn't have overinflated Babbitt.

0:06:44.400 --> 0:06:46.040
<v Speaker 3>He's got great, great.

0:06:45.960 --> 0:06:49.080
<v Speaker 2>Just barreling and contact numbers, and he's got a ballpark

0:06:49.120 --> 0:06:51.840
<v Speaker 2>that you know, we broke down. It's just no matter

0:06:51.880 --> 0:06:53.960
<v Speaker 2>what it is, if it's the home run factor, the

0:06:54.520 --> 0:06:57.080
<v Speaker 2>actual ballpark factor. Right, he's and left, he's That ballpark

0:06:57.160 --> 0:07:00.680
<v Speaker 2>is just good. It's just an absolute good one real quick.

0:07:00.720 --> 0:07:03.640
<v Speaker 2>Since these are up here, soda Strom or Torque, it's

0:07:03.680 --> 0:07:04.720
<v Speaker 2>soda Strom.

0:07:04.680 --> 0:07:06.920
<v Speaker 5>Soda Sum. Yeah, I love, I love Tork. Talk has

0:07:06.960 --> 0:07:08.240
<v Speaker 5>been great, but it's Soderstrom.

0:07:08.480 --> 0:07:10.440
<v Speaker 2>Well, talk is also striking out like thirty percent of

0:07:10.480 --> 0:07:12.640
<v Speaker 2>the time, so it's it's not close. Michael Bush, we

0:07:12.680 --> 0:07:15.240
<v Speaker 2>talked about that's a good one, but it is Sodastrum.

0:07:15.280 --> 0:07:16.920
<v Speaker 3>I got this exact question yesterday.

0:07:17.640 --> 0:07:20.600
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I think it's relatively close all things considered, but

0:07:20.600 --> 0:07:21.640
<v Speaker 4>it's still sodastrom.

0:07:22.280 --> 0:07:23.840
<v Speaker 3>Yandy Diaz or soda Strum.

0:07:24.600 --> 0:07:28.320
<v Speaker 5>Yeah. Probably. I really like Yandy, but it's it's probably Soderstrom.

0:07:28.520 --> 0:07:30.920
<v Speaker 2>It's probably Sodastrum. So these are there's some good ones.

0:07:30.960 --> 0:07:33.720
<v Speaker 2>We'll kind of keep rolling and see what we've got.

0:07:34.080 --> 0:07:37.320
<v Speaker 2>It was not a great day man for betting, but

0:07:37.480 --> 0:07:41.520
<v Speaker 2>also Spencer Schwellenbach. He was hit hard in Tuesday's loss

0:07:41.560 --> 0:07:44.280
<v Speaker 2>against the Blue Jays. He gave up six runs, six hits,

0:07:44.280 --> 0:07:47.680
<v Speaker 2>four and two thirds of an inning, a massive blast.

0:07:47.680 --> 0:07:49.960
<v Speaker 2>I think we had a questions yesterday about Anthony Santander.

0:07:50.200 --> 0:07:54.200
<v Speaker 2>Anthony Santander took him to space. His ball joined all

0:07:54.240 --> 0:07:55.200
<v Speaker 2>the ladies that went in.

0:07:55.160 --> 0:07:58.840
<v Speaker 3>Space with Jeff Bezos's stuff. That ball was destroyed.

0:07:58.840 --> 0:08:00.880
<v Speaker 2>I was obviously watching that because he was getting a

0:08:00.920 --> 0:08:03.960
<v Speaker 2>little bit shaky. I will say this, and I am

0:08:04.320 --> 0:08:07.360
<v Speaker 2>so sick of the umps, especially for somebody that just

0:08:07.520 --> 0:08:11.440
<v Speaker 2>bets in general. When you have you know, first fives,

0:08:11.480 --> 0:08:14.080
<v Speaker 2>whatever the hell it is, all you're looking for is

0:08:14.200 --> 0:08:16.160
<v Speaker 2>just like get me out of this. And the amount

0:08:16.160 --> 0:08:18.880
<v Speaker 2>of bad calls out. The Strider had a nice pitch

0:08:18.960 --> 0:08:22.160
<v Speaker 2>right on the corner. I think it was on Vlatty

0:08:22.200 --> 0:08:24.040
<v Speaker 2>now that I'm thinking going through it, but it was

0:08:24.080 --> 0:08:25.960
<v Speaker 2>like right on the corner, should have been a strikeout,

0:08:26.280 --> 0:08:29.400
<v Speaker 2>it's a walk, and then Santander just blasted out.

0:08:29.600 --> 0:08:30.760
<v Speaker 3>So I mean that's a little.

0:08:30.480 --> 0:08:33.360
<v Speaker 2>Bit making excuses, but it just kind of opened up

0:08:33.400 --> 0:08:36.360
<v Speaker 2>that whole bag of just how bad the umps have been.

0:08:36.559 --> 0:08:39.800
<v Speaker 2>But Schwellenbach was bad. He looked kind of gassed at

0:08:39.800 --> 0:08:41.880
<v Speaker 2>the end. The Blue Jays are making a lot of contact.

0:08:41.920 --> 0:08:43.920
<v Speaker 2>He wasn't getting any of that swing and miss stuff.

0:08:44.600 --> 0:08:46.920
<v Speaker 2>Talk to me about Schwellenbach. Is there any worries after

0:08:46.960 --> 0:08:50.560
<v Speaker 2>that start, like as in, was the early onset of

0:08:50.640 --> 0:08:54.240
<v Speaker 2>starts to you maybe a little bit miraji or was

0:08:54.280 --> 0:08:55.560
<v Speaker 2>this one just the outlier?

0:08:55.960 --> 0:08:58.319
<v Speaker 4>No, I'm more inclined to say this is the outlier.

0:08:58.640 --> 0:09:00.520
<v Speaker 4>Just made a few bad pitches. Like you said, he

0:09:00.520 --> 0:09:03.199
<v Speaker 4>got squeezed a little bit. There's nothing I would take

0:09:03.240 --> 0:09:05.840
<v Speaker 4>from this other than throw an offer to the Schwellenbach

0:09:05.840 --> 0:09:07.760
<v Speaker 4>owner in your league, just in case there's some early

0:09:07.840 --> 0:09:11.120
<v Speaker 4>season jitters. This time of year, people panic all all

0:09:11.160 --> 0:09:12.959
<v Speaker 4>over the place. So throw a low ball at the

0:09:12.960 --> 0:09:15.520
<v Speaker 4>Schwellenbock owner and maybe he's a little bit nervous. Toronto's

0:09:15.559 --> 0:09:17.760
<v Speaker 4>not a juggernaut team, so maybe they think, Okay, maybe

0:09:17.800 --> 0:09:19.439
<v Speaker 4>there's he's getting exposed.

0:09:19.080 --> 0:09:21.040
<v Speaker 5>A little bit or whatever. But I'm not worried. I

0:09:21.120 --> 0:09:22.040
<v Speaker 5>think he's totally fine.

0:09:22.120 --> 0:09:24.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, looking here too, Vila was just kind of up

0:09:24.559 --> 0:09:28.959
<v Speaker 2>in general fastball. Yeah, looking in here, this is actually interesting.

0:09:28.960 --> 0:09:30.679
<v Speaker 2>He really threw his I guess i'd have to look

0:09:30.720 --> 0:09:33.720
<v Speaker 2>at his pitch mix his season long pitch mix, because

0:09:33.720 --> 0:09:36.160
<v Speaker 2>I'm looking at the game, but he barely threw his splitter.

0:09:36.679 --> 0:09:39.160
<v Speaker 2>That seven percent cutter was down there. I mean, you

0:09:39.320 --> 0:09:42.240
<v Speaker 2>and your curveball. A lot of the strikeout pitches, he

0:09:42.440 --> 0:09:45.560
<v Speaker 2>wasn't throwing a bunch. The slider was his third most used.

0:09:45.559 --> 0:09:47.760
<v Speaker 2>That was only thirty eight percent in the zone and

0:09:47.880 --> 0:09:51.560
<v Speaker 2>it got absolutely no whiffs. Kind of tough here when

0:09:51.559 --> 0:09:54.360
<v Speaker 2>I'm playing hosts and I want to like do these

0:09:54.400 --> 0:09:56.200
<v Speaker 2>dig ins to these players. I'm just gonna do this

0:09:56.240 --> 0:09:59.480
<v Speaker 2>real quick on Schwellenbach on the season. It'll now be

0:09:59.520 --> 0:10:03.199
<v Speaker 2>affected by this. Yeah, look at this almost fourteen percent

0:10:03.280 --> 0:10:06.440
<v Speaker 2>splitter on the season, and it was his and he

0:10:06.520 --> 0:10:09.400
<v Speaker 2>uses it as the third most used pitch. It was

0:10:09.440 --> 0:10:13.760
<v Speaker 2>the least used pitch in yesterday's start, and the sinker

0:10:13.880 --> 0:10:17.079
<v Speaker 2>the fourth most used pitch. He used the second most yesterday.

0:10:17.160 --> 0:10:19.600
<v Speaker 2>So what I'm getting at is he was he didn't

0:10:19.640 --> 0:10:22.560
<v Speaker 2>have his strikeout stuff. He was throwing that sinker just

0:10:22.600 --> 0:10:24.280
<v Speaker 2>to try to, you know, get out of innings and

0:10:24.320 --> 0:10:28.040
<v Speaker 2>pitch to some bad contact. But he down used the slider,

0:10:28.120 --> 0:10:30.600
<v Speaker 2>the curve, and the split finger. He just didn't have

0:10:30.679 --> 0:10:32.600
<v Speaker 2>it in the zone. So I tend to think that

0:10:32.600 --> 0:10:35.079
<v Speaker 2>that's just a little bit of an anomaly. But I'm

0:10:35.120 --> 0:10:39.240
<v Speaker 2>also a Spencer Schwellenbach homer, and I can't help myself

0:10:39.240 --> 0:10:40.320
<v Speaker 2>with Spencer Swellenbach.

0:10:40.400 --> 0:10:41.560
<v Speaker 3>But we'll move through it, right.

0:10:41.960 --> 0:10:43.360
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I think he's gonna be okay.

0:10:43.360 --> 0:10:46.960
<v Speaker 4>He's still at eleven whiffs, no real drop in velocity

0:10:47.040 --> 0:10:48.560
<v Speaker 4>or anything. I think we just chalk it up to

0:10:48.600 --> 0:10:50.760
<v Speaker 4>a rocky start and you put him back in your

0:10:50.760 --> 0:10:52.520
<v Speaker 4>lineup next week, no question about it for me.

0:10:52.920 --> 0:10:53.120
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

0:10:53.120 --> 0:10:55.240
<v Speaker 2>Well, I like the idea of, like off of that start,

0:10:55.280 --> 0:10:58.000
<v Speaker 2>just real quick going and hitting up an owner that

0:10:58.040 --> 0:11:00.400
<v Speaker 2>maybe was like, oh crap, you know, he's a pumpkin,

0:11:00.720 --> 0:11:02.720
<v Speaker 2>and then trying to get something cheap if you can.

0:11:03.080 --> 0:11:06.320
<v Speaker 2>A couple bigger performances. Alex Bregman five for five, had

0:11:06.360 --> 0:11:09.800
<v Speaker 2>a couple solo homers, Red Sox beating on the Rays,

0:11:10.000 --> 0:11:11.959
<v Speaker 2>just kind of getting back to everything. Thought, also, I

0:11:12.000 --> 0:11:14.440
<v Speaker 2>think he's out today on maternity leave. They brought up

0:11:14.760 --> 0:11:17.480
<v Speaker 2>Eric Soguard and I put this on here even though

0:11:17.840 --> 0:11:21.160
<v Speaker 2>the stat isn't crazy many Machado was one for four,

0:11:21.400 --> 0:11:23.720
<v Speaker 2>had a solo homer, But what I wanted to talk

0:11:23.720 --> 0:11:26.320
<v Speaker 2>about was that homer if anyone paid attention.

0:11:26.559 --> 0:11:27.679
<v Speaker 3>My god, you.

0:11:27.760 --> 0:11:32.400
<v Speaker 2>Had two dropped fly balls that then turned in, So

0:11:33.160 --> 0:11:37.440
<v Speaker 2>pop up over into right field. Kyle Tucker comes in,

0:11:37.600 --> 0:11:40.520
<v Speaker 2>leans down, kind of ducks ball, drops out of his glove.

0:11:40.679 --> 0:11:42.600
<v Speaker 2>All right, egg on our face, let's move on.

0:11:42.880 --> 0:11:43.280
<v Speaker 3>Next.

0:11:43.679 --> 0:11:47.839
<v Speaker 2>He pops up to the catcher and third baseman comes in,

0:11:48.320 --> 0:11:51.880
<v Speaker 2>drops the ball at home plate, and then what happens

0:11:51.960 --> 0:11:52.559
<v Speaker 2>right after that?

0:11:53.360 --> 0:11:54.199
<v Speaker 3>Good, good gone.

0:11:54.720 --> 0:11:58.280
<v Speaker 2>Manny Machado absolutely rips it. Yeah, Unicorn Homer.

0:11:58.360 --> 0:11:59.040
<v Speaker 3>It was incredible.

0:11:59.040 --> 0:12:00.480
<v Speaker 2>It's one of those that you were like, you know,

0:12:00.559 --> 0:12:02.680
<v Speaker 2>this is going to happen right now. But also I

0:12:02.679 --> 0:12:04.640
<v Speaker 2>just want to point out, like, MANA Machado is just

0:12:04.679 --> 0:12:07.840
<v Speaker 2>having like a hell of a season, averages up. Homer's

0:12:07.840 --> 0:12:10.400
<v Speaker 2>are there still, He's stealing bases, just having like an

0:12:10.440 --> 0:12:11.960
<v Speaker 2>absolutely hell of a season right now.

0:12:12.040 --> 0:12:15.320
<v Speaker 4>Rico, Yeah, I honestly didn't see the play in question

0:12:15.440 --> 0:12:18.760
<v Speaker 4>last night, but that's just such a classic baseball type

0:12:18.760 --> 0:12:19.560
<v Speaker 4>of thing to happen.

0:12:19.679 --> 0:12:21.600
<v Speaker 5>You know, it just screams baseball at you.

0:12:21.679 --> 0:12:24.200
<v Speaker 4>But Manny was somebody that I was kind of interested

0:12:24.240 --> 0:12:26.240
<v Speaker 4>in coming into the year. I didn't really expect the

0:12:26.280 --> 0:12:28.440
<v Speaker 4>walk rate to jump back up the way it has

0:12:28.480 --> 0:12:30.880
<v Speaker 4>so far. The WRC plus is at one fifty four.

0:12:30.920 --> 0:12:32.640
<v Speaker 4>It would be the best mark of his career if

0:12:32.679 --> 0:12:34.920
<v Speaker 4>he's able to keep it up. Heart hit rate at

0:12:34.960 --> 0:12:39.000
<v Speaker 4>fifty five percent, Like he's been objectively really really good.

0:12:39.000 --> 0:12:40.880
<v Speaker 4>And of those third basemen that we're in that like

0:12:40.960 --> 0:12:43.880
<v Speaker 4>second third round grouping, Austin Riley's kind of picked it

0:12:43.960 --> 0:12:45.680
<v Speaker 4>up recently, but I think Machado might have been the

0:12:45.679 --> 0:12:47.040
<v Speaker 4>best answer out of that group.

0:12:47.320 --> 0:12:50.280
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean, I have a lot of I think

0:12:50.280 --> 0:12:52.040
<v Speaker 2>it's in the state of his career where I'm looking

0:12:52.080 --> 0:12:53.920
<v Speaker 2>at Manny Machado and I'm just thinking, like, you know,

0:12:54.000 --> 0:12:55.960
<v Speaker 2>the Hall of Fame and just where he's going and

0:12:56.000 --> 0:12:58.320
<v Speaker 2>what we're watching. Sometimes I like to kind of reminisce

0:12:58.360 --> 0:13:00.280
<v Speaker 2>and take a step back on players and be like,

0:13:00.280 --> 0:13:01.520
<v Speaker 2>who are the great players that.

0:13:01.480 --> 0:13:02.160
<v Speaker 3>We're looking at?

0:13:02.240 --> 0:13:04.720
<v Speaker 2>You know, like I think the parameters for being a

0:13:04.720 --> 0:13:07.120
<v Speaker 2>Hall of Famer feels like it should be. Maybe is

0:13:07.200 --> 0:13:09.920
<v Speaker 2>tougher statistically anymore, And you just kind of see that

0:13:09.960 --> 0:13:13.480
<v Speaker 2>from him, but just a ridiculously crazy. It's one of

0:13:13.520 --> 0:13:16.160
<v Speaker 2>those things that there's so many elements of baseball that

0:13:16.200 --> 0:13:18.880
<v Speaker 2>we're gonna miss that even when we just you look

0:13:18.880 --> 0:13:21.360
<v Speaker 2>at like stat sheets, if you're not watching from one

0:13:21.400 --> 0:13:24.160
<v Speaker 2>of the worst strike calls of all our ball calls

0:13:24.200 --> 0:13:26.839
<v Speaker 2>of all time yesterday. Why the umps are so bad?

0:13:26.880 --> 0:13:28.120
<v Speaker 2>I think someone put it in the chat. It was

0:13:28.120 --> 0:13:29.080
<v Speaker 2>the j t Romuto.

0:13:29.160 --> 0:13:30.320
<v Speaker 5>It was literally.

0:13:30.280 --> 0:13:33.839
<v Speaker 2>Completely in the zone and it didn't get called to strikeout,

0:13:33.880 --> 0:13:37.600
<v Speaker 2>and then everything turned bad to unicorn homers of foul balls.

0:13:37.800 --> 0:13:41.360
<v Speaker 2>Speaking of over on that Phillies game, Jesus Lozardo five

0:13:41.400 --> 0:13:43.599
<v Speaker 2>and one third did give up three runs. It was

0:13:43.640 --> 0:13:47.240
<v Speaker 2>a no decision. Most interesting in this though, and I

0:13:47.280 --> 0:13:50.440
<v Speaker 2>think we know the reason behind it. But Jose Alvarado,

0:13:51.040 --> 0:13:54.680
<v Speaker 2>he pitched in like a three run lead situation in

0:13:54.720 --> 0:13:57.720
<v Speaker 2>the eighth, and I guess they considered it like super

0:13:57.800 --> 0:14:00.560
<v Speaker 2>high leverage and they were concerned and that led to

0:14:00.600 --> 0:14:03.840
<v Speaker 2>Matt Strong coming in the ninth and cleaning up, having

0:14:03.880 --> 0:14:07.280
<v Speaker 2>an absolute cleanup of an inning and picking up the save.

0:14:08.120 --> 0:14:11.640
<v Speaker 2>But also, is Matt Strong maybe the guy that they're

0:14:11.640 --> 0:14:13.880
<v Speaker 2>gonna go to before or is this just one of

0:14:13.920 --> 0:14:16.000
<v Speaker 2>those You know, there's plenty of teams that run out.

0:14:15.840 --> 0:14:16.400
<v Speaker 3>Like three or four.

0:14:16.440 --> 0:14:18.280
<v Speaker 2>Guy the Dodgers do that, like they'll throw out like

0:14:18.360 --> 0:14:21.400
<v Speaker 2>Vesia or something. Is there anything with Matt Strong for you?

0:14:21.440 --> 0:14:23.480
<v Speaker 2>Hoe Alvarado's got the gig. They put him in high

0:14:23.520 --> 0:14:25.600
<v Speaker 2>leverage here, but do you think he's a next up

0:14:25.600 --> 0:14:26.920
<v Speaker 2>type of player that you want to look at.

0:14:27.400 --> 0:14:29.280
<v Speaker 4>They're kind of a hard team to figure out with

0:14:29.320 --> 0:14:32.320
<v Speaker 4>bullpen usage because there's I mean, Ryan Kirkering, if I

0:14:32.400 --> 0:14:34.720
<v Speaker 4>was managing, would probably be the guy getting a lot

0:14:34.720 --> 0:14:37.840
<v Speaker 4>of the save opportunities. But Alvarado, they brought him into

0:14:37.840 --> 0:14:41.680
<v Speaker 4>face Ramos Willia, Damas Jung Hu Lee. I think they're

0:14:41.720 --> 0:14:44.920
<v Speaker 4>gonna let him, for the most part, continue with the ninth.

0:14:45.000 --> 0:14:47.040
<v Speaker 4>But if there is a situation where you're getting the

0:14:47.040 --> 0:14:48.480
<v Speaker 4>toughest part of the order to up in the eighth,

0:14:48.600 --> 0:14:51.120
<v Speaker 4>maybe they go with him. But if there's one arm

0:14:51.200 --> 0:14:54.400
<v Speaker 4>to own in Philadelphia, I'd say it is probably still Alvarado.

0:14:55.160 --> 0:14:56.760
<v Speaker 2>Oh yeah, I don't think that's a question. I think

0:14:56.760 --> 0:14:58.880
<v Speaker 2>Alvarado is still He's the he.

0:14:58.880 --> 0:15:01.360
<v Speaker 3>Got squeezed the little bit, and you know he gave up.

0:15:02.320 --> 0:15:04.560
<v Speaker 2>By the way, I had live bet just to clean

0:15:04.640 --> 0:15:06.200
<v Speaker 2>up my day because it was a bad betting day

0:15:06.240 --> 0:15:08.680
<v Speaker 2>for me, just an idiot, but I live bet to

0:15:08.800 --> 0:15:12.000
<v Speaker 2>save my day, and I had live bet the inning

0:15:12.080 --> 0:15:16.000
<v Speaker 2>prior Philly to one and a half and then they

0:15:16.040 --> 0:15:18.560
<v Speaker 2>got that lead, and then Alvarado started giving it up

0:15:18.640 --> 0:15:22.400
<v Speaker 2>right after, and I was like, let's close this thing down, Jose,

0:15:22.680 --> 0:15:26.960
<v Speaker 2>good lord. A couple pitching performances, Max Freed really strong

0:15:27.120 --> 0:15:29.360
<v Speaker 2>and Tuesdays went over the Royals. He struck out seven

0:15:29.440 --> 0:15:31.600
<v Speaker 2>six and two thirds. Two run ball has been great,

0:15:31.800 --> 0:15:34.440
<v Speaker 2>and Bailey over with a bounce back. He pitched well,

0:15:34.480 --> 0:15:37.720
<v Speaker 2>three runs, five hits over six and one third. Are

0:15:37.760 --> 0:15:39.720
<v Speaker 2>you kind of a I know you are a big

0:15:39.720 --> 0:15:42.320
<v Speaker 2>ober guy you with this bounce back? Is he kind

0:15:42.320 --> 0:15:43.640
<v Speaker 2>of a bye for you right now? I think the

0:15:43.640 --> 0:15:46.640
<v Speaker 2>era is still pretty inflated. Hasn't been good to start, but.

0:15:46.640 --> 0:15:50.280
<v Speaker 4>This was, Yeah, he's been a little bit shaky. I

0:15:50.360 --> 0:15:52.160
<v Speaker 4>kind of bounced back and forth on him like I

0:15:52.200 --> 0:15:53.720
<v Speaker 4>was really into him, and then I did that show

0:15:53.760 --> 0:15:55.760
<v Speaker 4>with Eno and Nick, and then Eno kind of poppooed

0:15:55.800 --> 0:15:57.640
<v Speaker 4>him a little bit and I took my foot off

0:15:57.640 --> 0:15:59.960
<v Speaker 4>the gas. But I think he's still going to be fine,

0:16:00.080 --> 0:16:02.040
<v Speaker 4>and the overall numbers are still going to be inflated

0:16:02.200 --> 0:16:03.920
<v Speaker 4>like they were last year for a while because of

0:16:03.960 --> 0:16:06.400
<v Speaker 4>that first start. But I think we're gonna look at

0:16:06.400 --> 0:16:09.040
<v Speaker 4>it probably somewhere in mid June or July and say

0:16:09.080 --> 0:16:10.960
<v Speaker 4>if you took out that first start, the era would

0:16:10.960 --> 0:16:13.320
<v Speaker 4>be x with the with the bad start.

0:16:13.360 --> 0:16:14.160
<v Speaker 5>It's still pretty bad.

0:16:14.160 --> 0:16:15.960
<v Speaker 4>But like even after that huge blow up, Hey, at

0:16:16.000 --> 0:16:17.560
<v Speaker 4>the beginning of last year, he still finished with the

0:16:17.560 --> 0:16:19.680
<v Speaker 4>sub for e RA. The whip was at one on

0:16:19.720 --> 0:16:21.680
<v Speaker 4>the dot, so I'm not really worried. I think he

0:16:21.720 --> 0:16:24.240
<v Speaker 4>still falls out of that bi low territory. For those

0:16:24.280 --> 0:16:26.120
<v Speaker 4>who are playing with people who maybe don't pay quite

0:16:26.120 --> 0:16:27.880
<v Speaker 4>as much attention, They're just gonna look at the surface

0:16:27.880 --> 0:16:29.320
<v Speaker 4>and look at that era and say, I need to

0:16:29.320 --> 0:16:31.000
<v Speaker 4>get this guy the hell off my team. If you're

0:16:31.040 --> 0:16:32.840
<v Speaker 4>in a league like that where the ober manager is

0:16:32.840 --> 0:16:35.520
<v Speaker 4>still panicking, then I wouldn't hesitate to try and acquire him.

0:16:36.120 --> 0:16:38.560
<v Speaker 2>Let's go to the audience. Let's see some questions of

0:16:38.560 --> 0:16:41.040
<v Speaker 2>what we got going down here. Anthony, is Louise Robert

0:16:41.080 --> 0:16:44.120
<v Speaker 2>and Riley Green? Are they buy lows that cast pages

0:16:44.200 --> 0:16:49.600
<v Speaker 2>look horriboo? Luise Robert, Yeah, everything doesn't look great, but

0:16:49.640 --> 0:16:52.000
<v Speaker 2>he's stealing a bunch of bases. Riley Green always has

0:16:52.040 --> 0:16:54.400
<v Speaker 2>really great hard hit numbers. But I don't know, man,

0:16:54.520 --> 0:16:57.760
<v Speaker 2>I'm actually a little like on Riley Green right now,

0:16:57.880 --> 0:16:59.920
<v Speaker 2>So I think he if I remember correctly, like the

0:17:00.040 --> 0:17:02.480
<v Speaker 2>babup isn't telling us any good story where things are

0:17:02.480 --> 0:17:05.160
<v Speaker 2>going to bounce back. The K's are still there. I'm

0:17:05.200 --> 0:17:07.440
<v Speaker 2>a little indifferent about Riley Green. I kind of think

0:17:07.520 --> 0:17:09.840
<v Speaker 2>Luis Robert is at like an all time low, So

0:17:09.880 --> 0:17:11.639
<v Speaker 2>I'm into that. Are you into buying either one of

0:17:11.680 --> 0:17:12.359
<v Speaker 2>these guys?

0:17:12.680 --> 0:17:14.000
<v Speaker 5>I like buying lou Bob.

0:17:14.359 --> 0:17:16.359
<v Speaker 4>You know, even with the kind of slow start we

0:17:16.440 --> 0:17:19.480
<v Speaker 4>talked about this yesterday, double digit barrel rad he's still

0:17:19.480 --> 0:17:22.760
<v Speaker 4>stealing bases. I think he's gonna get traded overall, not

0:17:22.800 --> 0:17:23.480
<v Speaker 4>really worried there.

0:17:23.480 --> 0:17:24.280
<v Speaker 5>With Riley Green.

0:17:25.280 --> 0:17:27.720
<v Speaker 4>It's a little bit different, Like you need him to

0:17:27.800 --> 0:17:30.480
<v Speaker 4>really smash in the power and counting stats departments, because

0:17:30.480 --> 0:17:32.200
<v Speaker 4>he's not going to give you stolen bases. He might

0:17:32.240 --> 0:17:34.640
<v Speaker 4>give you a pretty good batting average, but you need

0:17:34.720 --> 0:17:36.560
<v Speaker 4>kind of thirty plus home runs from him, which he's

0:17:36.560 --> 0:17:39.720
<v Speaker 4>definitely capable of. But that lineup in Detroit is terrible.

0:17:39.840 --> 0:17:42.880
<v Speaker 4>It is an awful lineup. Labor Torre is leading off.

0:17:42.920 --> 0:17:45.159
<v Speaker 4>I really like Kerry Carpenter, I do like Green and

0:17:45.200 --> 0:17:49.840
<v Speaker 4>Spencer Torkelsen, but cold Keith, Dylan Dingler, Zach McKinstry, Bias Sweeney.

0:17:50.040 --> 0:17:52.520
<v Speaker 4>It's a tough group there for counting on him in

0:17:52.560 --> 0:17:54.919
<v Speaker 4>terms of the runs and RBI. So I'd prefer to

0:17:54.920 --> 0:17:56.600
<v Speaker 4>buy lou Bob. I think the price would probably be

0:17:56.600 --> 0:17:58.520
<v Speaker 4>a little bit lower. People seem to be kind of

0:17:58.640 --> 0:18:01.199
<v Speaker 4>out on him in general. Between the two of them,

0:18:01.200 --> 0:18:02.600
<v Speaker 4>I would go with lou Bob. I don't think that

0:18:02.760 --> 0:18:04.959
<v Speaker 4>Green is a bad buy. I just I don't have

0:18:05.040 --> 0:18:07.240
<v Speaker 4>him as as high of a priority as Loo Bob.

0:18:07.560 --> 0:18:09.919
<v Speaker 2>Who do you like better rest of season? From Lee

0:18:10.080 --> 0:18:13.240
<v Speaker 2>Jonathan India or Brooks Lee Brooksley. I think hit his

0:18:13.280 --> 0:18:14.720
<v Speaker 2>first homer yesterday.

0:18:14.960 --> 0:18:18.160
<v Speaker 4>It's don in India for me. That second base only

0:18:18.200 --> 0:18:19.920
<v Speaker 4>that you're seeing on there as well, Like we talked

0:18:19.960 --> 0:18:22.000
<v Speaker 4>about that yesterday as well, that's gonna change. He's already

0:18:22.040 --> 0:18:24.119
<v Speaker 4>picking up a ton of appearances, a third and then left.

0:18:24.280 --> 0:18:26.280
<v Speaker 4>He's gonna be triple eligible pretty soon, if he's not

0:18:26.320 --> 0:18:28.199
<v Speaker 4>already on your on your given site.

0:18:29.000 --> 0:18:29.959
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I'm with that, all right.

0:18:30.000 --> 0:18:32.080
<v Speaker 2>We have a whole bunch of Kurtzes, by the way,

0:18:32.240 --> 0:18:33.280
<v Speaker 2>so let's do this real quick.

0:18:33.280 --> 0:18:33.800
<v Speaker 3>Thrasher said.

0:18:33.840 --> 0:18:36.359
<v Speaker 2>Curt's only six percent owned on ESPN, but one hundred

0:18:36.359 --> 0:18:38.720
<v Speaker 2>percent on his two teams. I like that, but also

0:18:39.480 --> 0:18:42.200
<v Speaker 2>ESPN lol, all right, so we're gonna plowut through these

0:18:42.359 --> 0:18:43.320
<v Speaker 2>Manzardo or.

0:18:43.359 --> 0:18:46.280
<v Speaker 5>Kurtz Manzardo, I think.

0:18:47.000 --> 0:18:47.560
<v Speaker 3>Oh I forgot.

0:18:47.640 --> 0:18:48.879
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, this is a Kurtz one and we got the

0:18:48.920 --> 0:18:52.040
<v Speaker 2>soda Strom ones in here. I would go with Kurts

0:18:52.040 --> 0:18:54.240
<v Speaker 2>as well. All right, so now here's our soda strom ones.

0:18:54.400 --> 0:18:56.720
<v Speaker 2>These are all these are all putting us to test

0:18:56.760 --> 0:19:03.040
<v Speaker 2>here game soda Strom or Vientos Man, you know, And no, I'm.

0:19:02.960 --> 0:19:04.520
<v Speaker 5>Gonna say probably Viano's still.

0:19:04.800 --> 0:19:06.760
<v Speaker 4>I know that's probably of an already take at this point,

0:19:06.800 --> 0:19:08.520
<v Speaker 4>but give me that guy in that lineup who can

0:19:08.520 --> 0:19:10.359
<v Speaker 4>still drive in a hundred plus. I'm filling it for

0:19:10.440 --> 0:19:11.760
<v Speaker 4>joeyp in more ways than one today.

0:19:11.800 --> 0:19:13.399
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, you one hundred percent are about to say a

0:19:13.440 --> 0:19:14.879
<v Speaker 3>piece of pa was here. We know exactly what this

0:19:14.920 --> 0:19:16.160
<v Speaker 3>would be. I am.

0:19:16.280 --> 0:19:18.600
<v Speaker 2>I'm gonna be recentcy. I'm gonna say sodas strum on

0:19:18.640 --> 0:19:20.400
<v Speaker 2>that one. I'm not, but I'm not a big.

0:19:20.800 --> 0:19:23.560
<v Speaker 3>I'm not a big Vento's guy right now, Goldie or

0:19:23.600 --> 0:19:24.360
<v Speaker 3>soda strum.

0:19:27.240 --> 0:19:29.440
<v Speaker 4>Man the soda strim questions. The more that we get,

0:19:29.440 --> 0:19:31.320
<v Speaker 4>the more I realize how much I like him. I

0:19:31.600 --> 0:19:35.480
<v Speaker 4>think it's probably Soderstrom Goldschmid has been pretty decent to

0:19:35.480 --> 0:19:37.280
<v Speaker 4>start the year. I mean, he's batt in three point fifty.

0:19:38.280 --> 0:19:39.920
<v Speaker 4>But I think it's Soderstrom.

0:19:40.200 --> 0:19:42.320
<v Speaker 3>I think it's Soda Strim as well. All Right, this one.

0:19:43.280 --> 0:19:45.120
<v Speaker 2>I'm not going to go to sodastrm on this one.

0:19:45.200 --> 0:19:47.040
<v Speaker 2>And it's not a Homer take. But you tell me

0:19:47.320 --> 0:19:49.040
<v Speaker 2>Josh Naylor or Soda Strom.

0:19:49.160 --> 0:19:51.240
<v Speaker 5>No, it's Naylor. We need to draw the line somewhere.

0:19:51.520 --> 0:19:53.400
<v Speaker 2>Okay, we drew the line, so there you go. We're

0:19:53.440 --> 0:19:57.000
<v Speaker 2>definitely like in on on what Soda Strim is doing

0:19:57.040 --> 0:19:59.320
<v Speaker 2>for the most part. Maybe me a tiny bit more,

0:19:59.359 --> 0:20:01.320
<v Speaker 2>but not over a guy like Josh Naylor. So that's

0:20:01.320 --> 0:20:03.840
<v Speaker 2>where the lines are a little rookie. Lookie here, Logan

0:20:03.880 --> 0:20:07.600
<v Speaker 2>Henderson is getting the call by the Brewers. We've been

0:20:07.600 --> 0:20:09.919
<v Speaker 2>talking about this for a little bit, just waiting to

0:20:09.920 --> 0:20:10.520
<v Speaker 2>get him up.

0:20:11.119 --> 0:20:12.719
<v Speaker 3>A couple of people had asked some questions.

0:20:12.760 --> 0:20:16.199
<v Speaker 2>I think it was yeah, right here, trill, what's your

0:20:16.200 --> 0:20:17.959
<v Speaker 2>take on Logan Henderson getting the call and need one

0:20:18.000 --> 0:20:20.120
<v Speaker 2>more pitching streamer this week? Is he worth an ad

0:20:20.160 --> 0:20:23.520
<v Speaker 2>head to head points twelve team? I kind of think

0:20:23.560 --> 0:20:27.000
<v Speaker 2>he is. He definitely builds off of a lot of command.

0:20:27.080 --> 0:20:29.000
<v Speaker 2>I think he's gonna get some early swing and misses.

0:20:29.040 --> 0:20:31.080
<v Speaker 2>The problem is is, like, you know, he's going to

0:20:31.119 --> 0:20:33.520
<v Speaker 2>pitch around in the zone a decent amount, so you know,

0:20:33.560 --> 0:20:36.159
<v Speaker 2>pinning that matchup, there could be a little bit of

0:20:36.200 --> 0:20:38.600
<v Speaker 2>home runs going. But I think he can go deeper

0:20:38.600 --> 0:20:40.840
<v Speaker 2>into game. In a points league, I'm even a little

0:20:40.880 --> 0:20:42.520
<v Speaker 2>bit more likely to do it because I don't think

0:20:42.520 --> 0:20:45.879
<v Speaker 2>he's gonna get absolutely blown up. And I'm not chasing

0:20:45.920 --> 0:20:48.040
<v Speaker 2>like a quality start or anything like that. I'm just,

0:20:48.119 --> 0:20:50.840
<v Speaker 2>you know cha, I'm just chasing the stats every single inning,

0:20:50.840 --> 0:20:51.560
<v Speaker 2>So I think I would.

0:20:51.560 --> 0:20:52.920
<v Speaker 3>What about you and Logan Henderson?

0:20:53.160 --> 0:20:55.720
<v Speaker 4>Again, I'm not like a huge minor league guy, but

0:20:55.760 --> 0:20:57.679
<v Speaker 4>like you mentioned, the home runs have kind of been

0:20:57.680 --> 0:21:00.520
<v Speaker 4>pretty prevalent for him, especially last season across the miners

0:21:00.560 --> 0:21:03.480
<v Speaker 4>one point four homer for nine. But I think that

0:21:03.520 --> 0:21:06.040
<v Speaker 4>he's pretty solid. I'm always a little bit nervous about

0:21:06.080 --> 0:21:09.080
<v Speaker 4>starting a guy in their first career outing. I would

0:21:09.119 --> 0:21:11.200
<v Speaker 4>prefer to go a different route depending on what's on

0:21:11.240 --> 0:21:13.520
<v Speaker 4>the wire, but it's not a horrible idea. I just

0:21:13.560 --> 0:21:17.600
<v Speaker 4>tend to generally just fade guys making their debut this.

0:21:17.560 --> 0:21:19.800
<v Speaker 2>Is well, I'm gonna this isn't the question this person

0:21:19.880 --> 0:21:22.680
<v Speaker 2>is doing. But Til though says Kumar was just dropped

0:21:22.680 --> 0:21:24.600
<v Speaker 2>in a twelve team dynasty, points like should I chase

0:21:24.680 --> 0:21:27.800
<v Speaker 2>upside and speculatively add I'd say yeah in the dynasty

0:21:28.080 --> 0:21:30.040
<v Speaker 2>pinning what the drop is, Yeah, maybe, but who would

0:21:30.080 --> 0:21:32.240
<v Speaker 2>you rather for this season and redraft right now?

0:21:32.320 --> 0:21:33.640
<v Speaker 3>Kumar or Logan Henderson.

0:21:34.680 --> 0:21:37.960
<v Speaker 4>Probably take the chance on Henderson. Rocker just hasn't really

0:21:38.000 --> 0:21:39.960
<v Speaker 4>looked good. That start against Seattle was kind of the

0:21:40.040 --> 0:21:41.000
<v Speaker 4>nail on the coffin for me.

0:21:41.520 --> 0:21:42.560
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and I will.

0:21:42.400 --> 0:21:45.760
<v Speaker 2>Say I don't think Logan Henderson is as solidified anything.

0:21:45.800 --> 0:21:47.520
<v Speaker 2>He's probably gonna go back down to the miners because

0:21:47.520 --> 0:21:49.760
<v Speaker 2>you've got Myers who's about to come back in woodrift.

0:21:49.800 --> 0:21:52.440
<v Speaker 3>But Kumar is not really doing anything for anybody.

0:21:52.800 --> 0:21:54.560
<v Speaker 2>A little bit more in the rookie lookie, we had

0:21:54.640 --> 0:22:00.880
<v Speaker 2>had this hopeful, optimistic speculative since with Zebi Matthews. It was, Oh,

0:22:00.960 --> 0:22:02.640
<v Speaker 2>David Festa is going to come up, but guess what

0:22:02.680 --> 0:22:06.240
<v Speaker 2>on Monday, there's an open spot. Nope, David fest is

0:22:06.280 --> 0:22:08.480
<v Speaker 2>pitching today. Zebe is still down in the minors, but

0:22:08.600 --> 0:22:12.320
<v Speaker 2>in his last start had seven strikeouts, one run, five

0:22:12.400 --> 0:22:15.120
<v Speaker 2>innings in a Triple A start. In his fastball, he

0:22:15.200 --> 0:22:17.320
<v Speaker 2>kind of tapered it down to start and then he

0:22:17.400 --> 0:22:19.920
<v Speaker 2>was pumping like ninety eight I think close to ninety nine.

0:22:20.240 --> 0:22:22.800
<v Speaker 2>Zebi looks really good if he gets an opportunity. I mean,

0:22:22.840 --> 0:22:25.480
<v Speaker 2>if Festa gets blown up at all today, I think

0:22:25.520 --> 0:22:28.800
<v Speaker 2>we could see Zebi soon. Jordan Walker one for four

0:22:29.119 --> 0:22:32.600
<v Speaker 2>solo home run in Triple A over with Reno on Tuesday.

0:22:32.960 --> 0:22:35.320
<v Speaker 2>He's now hitting two ninety two with a three ninety

0:22:35.320 --> 0:22:38.679
<v Speaker 2>five OBP and a five twenty three slug so almost

0:22:38.720 --> 0:22:41.320
<v Speaker 2>a three four five sixteen games so far this season,

0:22:41.359 --> 0:22:46.840
<v Speaker 2>three homers, twelve RBI, four steals. I think the speculation is, oh, hey,

0:22:47.000 --> 0:22:50.160
<v Speaker 2>Kateel could miss time. I am told that kuld Tell

0:22:50.240 --> 0:22:51.840
<v Speaker 2>will be back for the next home.

0:22:51.720 --> 0:22:52.840
<v Speaker 3>Series that is next week.

0:22:53.000 --> 0:22:56.560
<v Speaker 2>Could Tell I was at the Diamondbacks facility yesterday. He

0:22:56.800 --> 0:22:59.800
<v Speaker 2>was working out. He was on the side field working

0:23:00.080 --> 0:23:02.840
<v Speaker 2>you in his stuff. Didn't stay for any games. Could

0:23:02.880 --> 0:23:05.879
<v Speaker 2>be in a game this weekend and then is going

0:23:05.960 --> 0:23:08.520
<v Speaker 2>to stay here and then Tuesday. So look for Kotel

0:23:08.600 --> 0:23:11.840
<v Speaker 2>Marte to be coming up Tuesday. But I don't think

0:23:12.040 --> 0:23:13.960
<v Speaker 2>he is going to be the reason that Jordan Walker

0:23:14.000 --> 0:23:16.760
<v Speaker 2>is gonna come up. Jordan Walker's playing second base right now.

0:23:16.840 --> 0:23:18.520
<v Speaker 2>I wonder if they keep moving him around. But he

0:23:18.640 --> 0:23:21.440
<v Speaker 2>is hot, hot, hot right now. And if he does

0:23:21.480 --> 0:23:23.160
<v Speaker 2>come up, he's someone we're gonna want to look at.

0:23:23.200 --> 0:23:27.480
<v Speaker 2>And then finally on the rookie lookies, Matt Shaw. Matt

0:23:27.480 --> 0:23:31.760
<v Speaker 2>Shaw has been demoted. We salute you, Jordan Lawler, I said,

0:23:31.800 --> 0:23:35.720
<v Speaker 2>Jordan Walker. We salute you and say goodbye. Is there

0:23:35.800 --> 0:23:38.920
<v Speaker 2>any worth for you to hold on to Matt Shaw

0:23:38.960 --> 0:23:40.280
<v Speaker 2>while he tries to figure this out?

0:23:41.119 --> 0:23:42.320
<v Speaker 5>Not in redraft leagues?

0:23:42.440 --> 0:23:44.680
<v Speaker 4>No, Like he's a solid hold in Dynasty, of course,

0:23:44.760 --> 0:23:48.840
<v Speaker 4>but Redraft now you move on well, And that.

0:23:48.840 --> 0:23:50.480
<v Speaker 2>Is the reason that is going to take us to

0:23:50.680 --> 0:23:55.600
<v Speaker 2>this week's Microsoft Challenge. Chasing challenges brought to you by Microsoft.

0:23:55.640 --> 0:23:58.280
<v Speaker 2>Just like the athletes who push boundaries and redefine what's

0:23:58.320 --> 0:24:02.480
<v Speaker 2>possible business decision makers today or turning challenges into opportunities,

0:24:02.520 --> 0:24:05.480
<v Speaker 2>Microsoft meets you where you are with tools and guidance

0:24:05.520 --> 0:24:08.960
<v Speaker 2>to help you make an impact with safe, secure AI solutions.

0:24:09.000 --> 0:24:12.560
<v Speaker 2>Whatever challenge you're facing, Microsoft empowers you with the expertise

0:24:12.640 --> 0:24:15.280
<v Speaker 2>to say bring it on. And in this segment, we

0:24:15.320 --> 0:24:19.200
<v Speaker 2>spotlight the challenge faced by Matt Shaw because Matt Shaw

0:24:19.640 --> 0:24:22.920
<v Speaker 2>was overmatched. Unfortunately in his debut, even though we saw

0:24:23.000 --> 0:24:26.159
<v Speaker 2>him hit high in the lineup in the Japan series,

0:24:26.440 --> 0:24:28.399
<v Speaker 2>he went all the way down to nine, could not

0:24:28.440 --> 0:24:31.760
<v Speaker 2>find consistent contact on a team that desperately needs to win.

0:24:31.840 --> 0:24:33.160
<v Speaker 3>But this story has been.

0:24:33.000 --> 0:24:36.840
<v Speaker 2>Told over years and years. We see it all the time.

0:24:37.000 --> 0:24:40.040
<v Speaker 2>A top prospect comes up, he doesn't do great in

0:24:40.119 --> 0:24:43.320
<v Speaker 2>his debut, he's sent down, and then people say he's done,

0:24:43.680 --> 0:24:46.520
<v Speaker 2>he's cooked, but he's not, and they are not. We

0:24:46.560 --> 0:24:49.959
<v Speaker 2>saw Mike Trout go through this. We've seen countless prospects

0:24:50.400 --> 0:24:53.240
<v Speaker 2>just take time. Hunter Green had gone through this, whether

0:24:53.359 --> 0:24:56.320
<v Speaker 2>whether it's pitching or hitting. So do we want to

0:24:56.320 --> 0:24:58.200
<v Speaker 2>hold on to match on fantasy right now?

0:24:58.600 --> 0:24:58.719
<v Speaker 5>No?

0:24:58.880 --> 0:25:01.120
<v Speaker 3>I think he is expended, but we need to keep a.

0:25:01.000 --> 0:25:03.320
<v Speaker 2>Close eye on because just because he was sent to

0:25:03.359 --> 0:25:06.760
<v Speaker 2>the miners doesn't mean that his fantasy season is going

0:25:06.800 --> 0:25:08.960
<v Speaker 2>to be completely done. Let's see if he can check

0:25:08.960 --> 0:25:11.040
<v Speaker 2>a few boxes in the miners and maybe he'll be

0:25:11.080 --> 0:25:13.240
<v Speaker 2>back up in May, because they're probably still going to

0:25:13.280 --> 0:25:16.440
<v Speaker 2>need him unless they make some big moves. That, my friends,

0:25:16.520 --> 0:25:20.760
<v Speaker 2>is this week's chasing challenges. Remember Microsoft's AI solutions empower

0:25:20.840 --> 0:25:22.800
<v Speaker 2>you to take bold steps and new ideas to help

0:25:22.880 --> 0:25:25.960
<v Speaker 2>drive your business forward. With Microsoft as your trusted partner,

0:25:26.000 --> 0:25:29.399
<v Speaker 2>you can navigate your journey with confidence, finding innovative solutions,

0:25:29.760 --> 0:25:33.240
<v Speaker 2>and reaching new possibilities. Visit Microsoft dot com slash challengers

0:25:33.800 --> 0:25:34.520
<v Speaker 2>to learn more.

0:25:35.440 --> 0:25:41.560
<v Speaker 6>It's the Smucker's Uncrustables podcast with your host Uncrustables. Okay,

0:25:41.600 --> 0:25:45.320
<v Speaker 6>today's guest is Rough around the Edges. Please welcome Crust.

0:25:45.640 --> 0:25:48.880
<v Speaker 6>Thanks for having me today's topic. He's round with soft

0:25:48.920 --> 0:25:52.840
<v Speaker 6>pillowy bread hey filled with delicious pbnjy, are you talking

0:25:52.880 --> 0:25:55.320
<v Speaker 6>about yourself? And you can take him anywhere?

0:25:55.680 --> 0:25:56.480
<v Speaker 2>Why do you invite?

0:25:56.520 --> 0:25:58.120
<v Speaker 3>And we are out of time?

0:25:59.000 --> 0:26:00.879
<v Speaker 6>Are you really cutting me off on.

0:26:01.040 --> 0:26:04.479
<v Speaker 3>Crestables are the best part of the sandwich? Sorry, Crust,

0:26:05.080 --> 0:26:05.560
<v Speaker 3>there we go.

0:26:05.880 --> 0:26:07.600
<v Speaker 2>That's always a joey thing. So I was able to

0:26:07.840 --> 0:26:09.399
<v Speaker 2>We're able to get through that with a little bit

0:26:09.400 --> 0:26:09.960
<v Speaker 2>of challenges.

0:26:10.000 --> 0:26:10.440
<v Speaker 3>That was fun.

0:26:10.440 --> 0:26:14.040
<v Speaker 2>All right, let's go do some three up and three down,

0:26:14.200 --> 0:26:18.359
<v Speaker 2>three up. Dylan Moore three for five, two homers against

0:26:18.400 --> 0:26:21.240
<v Speaker 2>the Red, stepping in the Red, stepping in for Victor

0:26:21.320 --> 0:26:23.800
<v Speaker 2>Roebliss a bunch. Alan Roden hit his first career homer

0:26:23.880 --> 0:26:27.399
<v Speaker 2>off of Spencer Schwellenbach and Tyler Molly six shutout innings

0:26:27.480 --> 0:26:30.320
<v Speaker 2>versus the Angels picked up nine strikeouts.

0:26:29.720 --> 0:26:30.080
<v Speaker 5>In the win.

0:26:31.440 --> 0:26:34.359
<v Speaker 2>It is just lally man to me because they had

0:26:34.400 --> 0:26:37.720
<v Speaker 2>originally put Patrick Corbin in as the starter for that

0:26:37.880 --> 0:26:40.280
<v Speaker 2>and I was betting against it, and then Molly comes

0:26:40.280 --> 0:26:42.879
<v Speaker 2>in and they shut that thing down. Dude, Tyler Molly

0:26:42.920 --> 0:26:45.120
<v Speaker 2>looked really good against that Angels team.

0:26:45.440 --> 0:26:46.600
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, on short notice.

0:26:46.760 --> 0:26:48.800
<v Speaker 4>I mean the different sites, there were some of them

0:26:48.800 --> 0:26:50.399
<v Speaker 4>that had Corbyn going, there were some of them that

0:26:50.440 --> 0:26:52.199
<v Speaker 4>had Molly going. It looks like the kind of had

0:26:52.240 --> 0:26:53.280
<v Speaker 4>to fill in for some reason.

0:26:53.280 --> 0:26:54.000
<v Speaker 5>They did a swap.

0:26:54.040 --> 0:26:56.159
<v Speaker 3>But Corbyn's today.

0:26:56.520 --> 0:26:58.960
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, Tyler Molly through nineteen innings as a sub one

0:26:59.080 --> 0:27:01.560
<v Speaker 4>era a point eight six whip.

0:27:01.920 --> 0:27:02.880
<v Speaker 5>Is that going to continue?

0:27:03.119 --> 0:27:03.199
<v Speaker 1>No?

0:27:03.480 --> 0:27:05.480
<v Speaker 5>I would say that probably not going to get a

0:27:05.520 --> 0:27:06.960
<v Speaker 5>hell of a lot for him, But package him up

0:27:06.960 --> 0:27:08.320
<v Speaker 5>and see what you can get for him after your

0:27:08.359 --> 0:27:10.439
<v Speaker 5>daylight today. For me, personally, I just don't buy it

0:27:10.480 --> 0:27:11.240
<v Speaker 5>in the long run.

0:27:11.680 --> 0:27:14.000
<v Speaker 2>If Logan Henderson was out there and you had to

0:27:14.040 --> 0:27:15.320
<v Speaker 2>drop Tyler Molly, would you do it?

0:27:16.880 --> 0:27:19.639
<v Speaker 5>God, I'd probably take a chance on Henderson.

0:27:19.720 --> 0:27:22.199
<v Speaker 4>Yeah. I Just with a guy like Molly who's been

0:27:22.240 --> 0:27:24.520
<v Speaker 4>around for so long, we know who he is, right,

0:27:24.600 --> 0:27:27.399
<v Speaker 4>unless he's making drastic changes this year, which I'm not

0:27:27.480 --> 0:27:29.440
<v Speaker 4>really seeing. He's still walking a lot of batters. He

0:27:29.520 --> 0:27:31.520
<v Speaker 4>has a really low babbit high strand rate. I think

0:27:31.560 --> 0:27:33.639
<v Speaker 4>it's just been a lucky couple starts for him. I

0:27:33.640 --> 0:27:35.159
<v Speaker 4>would kind of try and take advantage of that in

0:27:35.160 --> 0:27:36.520
<v Speaker 4>the trade market if you can. You're not going to

0:27:36.520 --> 0:27:38.159
<v Speaker 4>get a king's ransom for him. But you know, as

0:27:38.160 --> 0:27:40.800
<v Speaker 4>a package with another guy could do something.

0:27:41.240 --> 0:27:42.080
<v Speaker 3>I wouldn't do that.

0:27:42.119 --> 0:27:44.320
<v Speaker 2>I would not drop Molly to pick up Logan Henderson.

0:27:44.359 --> 0:27:46.280
<v Speaker 2>And I guess I always kind of come back to

0:27:46.400 --> 0:27:49.280
<v Speaker 2>the same thing and prove me wrong, show me and

0:27:49.600 --> 0:27:51.640
<v Speaker 2>I'll jump on it. But there's so many guys that

0:27:51.720 --> 0:27:54.280
<v Speaker 2>we just we sit on these shows and just are like,

0:27:54.280 --> 0:27:55.800
<v Speaker 2>we should trade this guy, we should trade this guy.

0:27:55.800 --> 0:27:57.520
<v Speaker 2>And it's like, who in God's name is buying Tyler

0:27:57.560 --> 0:27:59.439
<v Speaker 2>Molly that is worth moving off of him? Like what

0:27:59.480 --> 0:28:02.639
<v Speaker 2>if Tyler becomes a nine K per nine guy on

0:28:02.680 --> 0:28:05.040
<v Speaker 2>a Rangers team that picks up their offense and there's

0:28:05.080 --> 0:28:07.080
<v Speaker 2>tons of wins support it's not a great ballpark, But

0:28:07.119 --> 0:28:09.320
<v Speaker 2>what if he's a what if he's an under four

0:28:09.440 --> 0:28:11.520
<v Speaker 2>era pitcher for the rest of the year, picks up

0:28:11.560 --> 0:28:14.640
<v Speaker 2>eleven wins. It's like, was it worth trading him when

0:28:14.680 --> 0:28:17.159
<v Speaker 2>no one believes? So that's Kiren Parris to him. I

0:28:17.240 --> 0:28:20.040
<v Speaker 2>just I struggle with guys like this. But the context

0:28:20.040 --> 0:28:22.160
<v Speaker 2>of what you're saying, I totally understand. You're like, hey,

0:28:22.320 --> 0:28:25.119
<v Speaker 2>this is not gonna last. I don't really buy into it.

0:28:25.240 --> 0:28:27.040
<v Speaker 2>Move off of him. I don't know what that looks

0:28:27.040 --> 0:28:29.040
<v Speaker 2>like outside of maybe like a two person trade like

0:28:29.040 --> 0:28:30.200
<v Speaker 2>you were saying, Yeah.

0:28:30.080 --> 0:28:33.720
<v Speaker 4>Like Kien Paris and Tyler Molly for I don't know,

0:28:33.880 --> 0:28:36.280
<v Speaker 4>pick any top one hundred player who's been struggling so

0:28:36.359 --> 0:28:38.560
<v Speaker 4>far and maybe it gets it done. Probably not, but

0:28:38.720 --> 0:28:41.600
<v Speaker 4>we see see crazy stuff come across the inbox every day.

0:28:41.640 --> 0:28:44.360
<v Speaker 5>You never know, no harm in trying, right, Yeah.

0:28:44.280 --> 0:28:45.920
<v Speaker 2>No, you're one hundred percent right about that. There's no

0:28:45.960 --> 0:28:48.600
<v Speaker 2>harm in trying. And uh, you know, you look at

0:28:48.640 --> 0:28:50.680
<v Speaker 2>the YouTube comments, You're going to see people that are

0:28:50.760 --> 0:28:53.200
<v Speaker 2>able to pull some crazy trades together. So maybe you

0:28:53.240 --> 0:28:55.800
<v Speaker 2>can put him out there and see who's overreacting.

0:28:55.280 --> 0:28:55.960
<v Speaker 3>On the down.

0:28:56.760 --> 0:28:59.360
<v Speaker 2>Are we overreacting? I don't know, but Joe and I

0:28:59.480 --> 0:29:02.160
<v Speaker 2>just did the trade video about a day and a

0:29:02.200 --> 0:29:04.800
<v Speaker 2>half or a day ago, and one of the highlighted

0:29:04.800 --> 0:29:07.200
<v Speaker 2>players we were trying to get out from was Luis Castillo,

0:29:07.600 --> 0:29:09.959
<v Speaker 2>and Luis Castillo was tagged for six runs and four

0:29:10.040 --> 0:29:12.200
<v Speaker 2>and one third innings by the Reds. On Tuesday, we

0:29:12.240 --> 0:29:14.960
<v Speaker 2>also saw Sean Burke give up five against the A's

0:29:15.080 --> 0:29:18.040
<v Speaker 2>not so great and then making his season debut after

0:29:18.120 --> 0:29:22.480
<v Speaker 2>returning from the IL. Alexis Diaz with the Reds was

0:29:22.520 --> 0:29:25.520
<v Speaker 2>pulled mid inning after walking two of four batters that

0:29:25.600 --> 0:29:30.200
<v Speaker 2>he faced in the game against the Mariners. There so

0:29:30.280 --> 0:29:32.920
<v Speaker 2>not a great return, especially with Francona kind of like,

0:29:33.440 --> 0:29:36.040
<v Speaker 2>you know, jumping around to closers and potential, you know,

0:29:36.040 --> 0:29:38.640
<v Speaker 2>Emilio Pagan. I'm not sure that really bodes super well.

0:29:38.680 --> 0:29:40.600
<v Speaker 2>But you want to add anything on the Lais Castillo

0:29:40.680 --> 0:29:42.120
<v Speaker 2>thing because you and I were and you can go

0:29:42.160 --> 0:29:44.160
<v Speaker 2>to Diaz as well, but you and I were really

0:29:44.240 --> 0:29:47.160
<v Speaker 2>hyper focused on Castillo as kind of a trade and

0:29:47.280 --> 0:29:48.560
<v Speaker 2>things were not great yesterday.

0:29:49.520 --> 0:29:52.479
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I'm totally into trading Castillo. It might be a

0:29:52.520 --> 0:29:55.080
<v Speaker 4>little bit harder after today. When we were talking yesterday,

0:29:55.120 --> 0:29:57.880
<v Speaker 4>his ERA for the season was like two point one

0:29:57.920 --> 0:29:59.840
<v Speaker 4>and now it's at four point two two, So that

0:30:00.400 --> 0:30:03.160
<v Speaker 4>might have been very short for you. Maybe you can

0:30:03.200 --> 0:30:04.800
<v Speaker 4>still do something to move off of him. But go

0:30:04.920 --> 0:30:07.800
<v Speaker 4>check out the trade video on the channel from yesterday, kind.

0:30:07.640 --> 0:30:08.400
<v Speaker 5>Of laid it all out.

0:30:08.480 --> 0:30:11.280
<v Speaker 4>The stuff and fastball velocity declining in each of the

0:30:11.320 --> 0:30:13.960
<v Speaker 4>last four seasons as he enters into his mid thirties.

0:30:14.520 --> 0:30:15.600
<v Speaker 5>Just kind of a bad recipe.

0:30:15.600 --> 0:30:18.120
<v Speaker 4>And also with Seattle, you trust them for the home starts,

0:30:18.120 --> 0:30:20.360
<v Speaker 4>but then you see what happens when they're away from Seattle.

0:30:20.360 --> 0:30:21.240
<v Speaker 5>It's a big risk.

0:30:21.320 --> 0:30:23.880
<v Speaker 4>Not just for Castillo, but all of their pitchers have

0:30:23.960 --> 0:30:25.600
<v Speaker 4>kind of extreme home and a waste splits. But for

0:30:25.640 --> 0:30:28.120
<v Speaker 4>a guy like Castillo when there's the other concerns, that's

0:30:28.200 --> 0:30:31.400
<v Speaker 4>not good. But for the Reds, Alexis Diaz is probably

0:30:31.440 --> 0:30:33.960
<v Speaker 4>a drop. I think, like Terry Francona, wasn't the one

0:30:33.960 --> 0:30:36.560
<v Speaker 4>who christened him the closer, He wasn't his closer. For

0:30:36.600 --> 0:30:39.560
<v Speaker 4>these past several years. He seems to like Pegan. Pegan

0:30:39.640 --> 0:30:42.200
<v Speaker 4>has been getting the saves consistently. We see Das continue

0:30:42.240 --> 0:30:44.640
<v Speaker 4>to struggle dealing with an early season injury. Maybe he

0:30:44.680 --> 0:30:46.960
<v Speaker 4>gets back into that role at some point, but I

0:30:46.960 --> 0:30:48.960
<v Speaker 4>think Diaz is the third or fourth best reliever on

0:30:49.000 --> 0:30:51.480
<v Speaker 4>this team. Tony Santian is probably better at this point.

0:30:51.480 --> 0:30:54.560
<v Speaker 4>Pegan has been doing well. Holding Diaz is gonna be tricky.

0:30:54.640 --> 0:30:56.280
<v Speaker 3>I think I can't do it.

0:30:56.360 --> 0:30:59.640
<v Speaker 2>I can't cut Diez off of his return from the

0:30:59.680 --> 0:31:03.160
<v Speaker 2>IL and one bad outing because he has been the closer.

0:31:03.200 --> 0:31:05.480
<v Speaker 2>I think that's way too preemptive. I think you need

0:31:05.520 --> 0:31:08.640
<v Speaker 2>to wait and see what does the next outing look like.

0:31:08.760 --> 0:31:11.320
<v Speaker 2>I don't think it'll be a save situation. I think

0:31:11.360 --> 0:31:13.440
<v Speaker 2>you need a tiny bit of time before you go

0:31:13.480 --> 0:31:15.240
<v Speaker 2>and make a drastic move off of him. But I

0:31:15.320 --> 0:31:17.720
<v Speaker 2>understand Francona, he might be done. We just don't have

0:31:17.760 --> 0:31:21.000
<v Speaker 2>any big actual word on that. I'd also say when

0:31:21.000 --> 0:31:23.680
<v Speaker 2>you were talking about, you know, the comments section going

0:31:23.720 --> 0:31:26.200
<v Speaker 2>in and talking about Luis Castillo or Alexis Diaz or

0:31:26.240 --> 0:31:27.720
<v Speaker 2>whatever it is that we've been talking about on the

0:31:27.760 --> 0:31:30.959
<v Speaker 2>YouTube side, an opportunity to win Nico Horner jersey that

0:31:31.000 --> 0:31:33.600
<v Speaker 2>we've got. We've We're always given away great things. I know,

0:31:33.680 --> 0:31:35.320
<v Speaker 2>our boy CALLI we got it right there.

0:31:35.320 --> 0:31:35.760
<v Speaker 5>There you go.

0:31:36.320 --> 0:31:38.840
<v Speaker 2>You can win this Nico Horner signed jersey. All you've

0:31:38.840 --> 0:31:40.920
<v Speaker 2>got to do is subscribe to the Fantasy pros MLB

0:31:41.040 --> 0:31:43.280
<v Speaker 2>YouTube channel. Guys are watching live on Twitch. Now go

0:31:43.360 --> 0:31:47.360
<v Speaker 2>over there YouTube dot com slash Fantasy pros MLB, hit subscribe,

0:31:47.480 --> 0:31:49.080
<v Speaker 2>and then comment on a video so you can go

0:31:49.120 --> 0:31:51.800
<v Speaker 2>to our trade video and talk about players that you

0:31:52.000 --> 0:31:53.120
<v Speaker 2>are looking to trade away.

0:31:53.160 --> 0:31:55.720
<v Speaker 3>Trade four. Comment on any video and that gets you

0:31:55.800 --> 0:31:57.320
<v Speaker 3>locked in. You could win this.

0:31:57.480 --> 0:32:02.840
<v Speaker 2>Nico Horner signed jersey courtesy of US I think Priscine

0:32:02.840 --> 0:32:05.200
<v Speaker 2>auction as well. The Nico Horner putting them putting them

0:32:05.240 --> 0:32:07.240
<v Speaker 2>cubs up and o'kali probably hurts for that. When Nico

0:32:07.280 --> 0:32:09.240
<v Speaker 2>Horner got that run, I think it was in the

0:32:09.400 --> 0:32:11.640
<v Speaker 2>tenth or ninth or whatever it was, but Nico Horner

0:32:11.720 --> 0:32:14.680
<v Speaker 2>getting some of it done. Let's hit Let's hit a

0:32:14.680 --> 0:32:17.160
<v Speaker 2>few questions in here. You guys have been stacking that up.

0:32:17.720 --> 0:32:22.320
<v Speaker 2>Let's go right here. Thoughts on Jonathan Aranda. Jonathan Ronda

0:32:22.320 --> 0:32:24.600
<v Speaker 2>has been hitting four for the Reds. Are you a

0:32:24.640 --> 0:32:25.720
<v Speaker 2>by on Ronda right now?

0:32:26.640 --> 0:32:28.840
<v Speaker 5>Yeah? I'm kind of a by on him.

0:32:28.880 --> 0:32:31.000
<v Speaker 4>The only problem is that there's been so many breakouts

0:32:31.000 --> 0:32:34.760
<v Speaker 4>that are all first baseman this year. Soderstrom tarkles, it's

0:32:34.800 --> 0:32:39.160
<v Speaker 4>hard for dhs. Yeah, first base slash DH Manzardo's kind

0:32:39.160 --> 0:32:41.040
<v Speaker 4>of cooled off, but there's been so many first base

0:32:41.120 --> 0:32:43.000
<v Speaker 4>pickups that it does get a little bit hard to

0:32:43.680 --> 0:32:45.200
<v Speaker 4>pick up all of them and start all of them.

0:32:45.200 --> 0:32:47.640
<v Speaker 4>A lot of leagues don't even have those corner infield spots,

0:32:47.640 --> 0:32:50.320
<v Speaker 4>so it's just like a guy sent me a question yesterday.

0:32:50.360 --> 0:32:53.640
<v Speaker 4>He has Schwarber, Harper, and Soderstrom and just the first

0:32:53.640 --> 0:32:56.040
<v Speaker 4>base in DH spot, so he's sitting one of them

0:32:56.080 --> 0:32:58.120
<v Speaker 4>every single day. In the shallow leagues, it does get

0:32:58.240 --> 0:33:00.600
<v Speaker 4>very hard. But Miranda, I think, I think his first

0:33:00.600 --> 0:33:03.760
<v Speaker 4>in Major League baseball at WRC plus three homers, he's

0:33:03.760 --> 0:33:07.000
<v Speaker 4>batt in four thirteen twenty one on the barrel, sixty

0:33:07.040 --> 0:33:09.480
<v Speaker 4>two hard hit. The numbers are stupid, they're unsustainable to

0:33:09.520 --> 0:33:12.840
<v Speaker 4>this degree, but last year nearly a seventeen percent barrel rate,

0:33:12.920 --> 0:33:14.200
<v Speaker 4>forty seven on the hard hit.

0:33:14.440 --> 0:33:17.320
<v Speaker 5>The ballpark is great. I love him. It's hard to

0:33:17.320 --> 0:33:17.960
<v Speaker 5>figure out.

0:33:17.840 --> 0:33:20.160
<v Speaker 4>The priority for these first basemen, but like, would you

0:33:20.200 --> 0:33:20.960
<v Speaker 4>take him over?

0:33:21.000 --> 0:33:22.920
<v Speaker 3>So Tostrom, absolutely not.

0:33:23.000 --> 0:33:25.880
<v Speaker 2>I don't like Ronda as much as you have good

0:33:25.880 --> 0:33:28.840
<v Speaker 2>contact skills and he's being putting. Sometimes you just get

0:33:28.840 --> 0:33:31.280
<v Speaker 2>these dudes that just make the contact and you put

0:33:31.360 --> 0:33:33.240
<v Speaker 2>them at four and then all of a sudden, they're

0:33:33.280 --> 0:33:35.360
<v Speaker 2>just good. Things are gonna happen. I'm just not sure

0:33:35.360 --> 0:33:37.200
<v Speaker 2>he's ever going to be a massive counting stat guy.

0:33:37.240 --> 0:33:40.080
<v Speaker 2>I am a firm sodastrom over Aroanda.

0:33:39.680 --> 0:33:41.480
<v Speaker 3>But you know, maybe he might.

0:33:41.520 --> 0:33:43.600
<v Speaker 2>He might have a really great shot at staying in

0:33:43.600 --> 0:33:45.040
<v Speaker 2>that spot all season, though.

0:33:44.920 --> 0:33:47.160
<v Speaker 5>I think I'm still so strom over Aranda. I just

0:33:47.160 --> 0:33:48.760
<v Speaker 5>wanted to figure out where you were on that one.

0:33:48.880 --> 0:33:52.440
<v Speaker 2>Sure, Lisa, will Dylan Cruz get sent down? You think

0:33:52.440 --> 0:33:54.200
<v Speaker 2>they're gonna send Cruise down.

0:33:55.840 --> 0:34:00.840
<v Speaker 4>It's definitely possible. He's not really looked that great dealing bases.

0:34:00.880 --> 0:34:04.320
<v Speaker 4>He has what is it, four stolen bases so far,

0:34:04.400 --> 0:34:07.000
<v Speaker 4>but he's patting a buck twenty thirty five percent strikeout right.

0:34:07.040 --> 0:34:11.319
<v Speaker 5>His WRC plus this is minus thirteen. It's just really bad.

0:34:11.360 --> 0:34:13.400
<v Speaker 4>He might he might end up going down at some point.

0:34:13.560 --> 0:34:16.720
<v Speaker 4>I wouldn't drop him just yet, but there's a chance.

0:34:17.719 --> 0:34:19.640
<v Speaker 2>There was one more I wanted to hit in this

0:34:19.640 --> 0:34:21.560
<v Speaker 2>little section. I just went away from it. Thoughts on

0:34:21.640 --> 0:34:24.920
<v Speaker 2>Cameron Meisner. So we're going to be doing the Waiver

0:34:24.960 --> 0:34:26.960
<v Speaker 2>Wire video that's going to be coming out tomorrow, and

0:34:27.000 --> 0:34:28.719
<v Speaker 2>I can I'm gonna just preview to tell you that

0:34:28.760 --> 0:34:31.359
<v Speaker 2>we're going to talk about Cameron Meisner. I'm very much

0:34:31.400 --> 0:34:34.799
<v Speaker 2>in on Meisner, and the Rays have got a bunch

0:34:34.840 --> 0:34:37.560
<v Speaker 2>of sneak They're just sneaky guys. And which of those

0:34:37.600 --> 0:34:40.400
<v Speaker 2>guys are going to stick around you Like Aronda, you

0:34:40.480 --> 0:34:43.759
<v Speaker 2>got Mangum that's up there stealing bases. I'm very much

0:34:43.760 --> 0:34:47.040
<v Speaker 2>in to Cameron Meisner right now. Ten percent barrel rate,

0:34:47.239 --> 0:34:50.560
<v Speaker 2>fifty one percent hard hit. He's not striking out, consistently

0:34:50.600 --> 0:34:52.680
<v Speaker 2>hitting the ball. Frankly, you know what, the profile kind

0:34:52.680 --> 0:34:54.879
<v Speaker 2>of looks like, kind of looks like a SODASTRM right now.

0:34:55.040 --> 0:34:59.319
<v Speaker 2>I mean slow strikeout rate, walking some crazy good hit tool.

0:34:59.400 --> 0:35:01.759
<v Speaker 2>He's striking the ball really hard. He's hitting almost four

0:35:01.840 --> 0:35:05.040
<v Speaker 2>hundred with three homers. I think my end Meiser's being

0:35:05.080 --> 0:35:08.239
<v Speaker 2>put in some good RBI opportunities. I think Meisner is

0:35:08.280 --> 0:35:09.560
<v Speaker 2>a definite pick up right now.

0:35:09.600 --> 0:35:12.960
<v Speaker 4>What's say you, Yeah, I think the cheap comp But

0:35:13.000 --> 0:35:14.520
<v Speaker 4>the one that actually does make sense kind of.

0:35:14.520 --> 0:35:15.320
<v Speaker 5>Is Josh Lowe.

0:35:15.400 --> 0:35:18.000
<v Speaker 4>You know, decent power, really good speed, he pulls the

0:35:18.040 --> 0:35:21.440
<v Speaker 4>ball up, he strikes out. He is the replacement essentially,

0:35:21.560 --> 0:35:23.600
<v Speaker 4>so it's a little bit of an obvious one, but

0:35:24.000 --> 0:35:26.080
<v Speaker 4>he's put up some really good minor league seasons in

0:35:26.120 --> 0:35:30.200
<v Speaker 4>twenty twenty four, it was seventeen homers and thirty steals.

0:35:30.280 --> 0:35:32.920
<v Speaker 4>Twenty twenty three it was twenty one homers twenty one steals.

0:35:32.920 --> 0:35:35.560
<v Speaker 4>The strikeouts are usually a bit of a concern. Wouldn't

0:35:35.560 --> 0:35:38.480
<v Speaker 4>expect the sixteen percent strikeout right to last like at all,

0:35:38.480 --> 0:35:40.920
<v Speaker 4>He's probably going to be above thirty percent. But while

0:35:40.920 --> 0:35:43.319
<v Speaker 4>he's doing what he's doing, he's definitely worth picking up

0:35:43.320 --> 0:35:45.680
<v Speaker 4>in the upshot. Is a fifteen to fifteen season from

0:35:45.719 --> 0:35:46.880
<v Speaker 4>him potentially, if not even.

0:35:46.800 --> 0:35:49.239
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, I really I really like Meiser right now,

0:35:49.239 --> 0:35:52.240
<v Speaker 2>I'm picking him up for sure. Let's talk about some injuries.

0:35:52.239 --> 0:35:54.040
<v Speaker 2>There are a bunch of things. Let's burn through these.

0:35:54.080 --> 0:35:57.000
<v Speaker 2>Carlos Korea had to leave Tuesday after injuring his wrist

0:35:57.040 --> 0:35:57.520
<v Speaker 2>on a swing.

0:35:57.600 --> 0:35:58.399
<v Speaker 3>Considered day to day.

0:35:58.400 --> 0:36:00.480
<v Speaker 2>He's out of the lineup today as his Mount Walner,

0:36:00.600 --> 0:36:05.320
<v Speaker 2>so they're a little bit light, with David Festa Orioles

0:36:05.400 --> 0:36:08.239
<v Speaker 2>hopeful that Efflyn is out weeks instead of months. We

0:36:08.320 --> 0:36:12.800
<v Speaker 2>also had Grace Rodriguez with no timetable, still a lot ahead,

0:36:12.920 --> 0:36:15.160
<v Speaker 2>which is a really bad sign for him coming back

0:36:15.200 --> 0:36:18.279
<v Speaker 2>anytime soon. And Kyle Bradish is moving along really well

0:36:18.280 --> 0:36:20.799
<v Speaker 2>in his rehab from Tommy John hoping to return later

0:36:20.800 --> 0:36:23.320
<v Speaker 2>in this summer, So they've got an arsenal of pitchers

0:36:23.360 --> 0:36:25.759
<v Speaker 2>they need to come back. They have almost nobody right now,

0:36:26.000 --> 0:36:28.719
<v Speaker 2>Go make a trade, please? Why at Langford could be

0:36:28.760 --> 0:36:31.880
<v Speaker 2>activated as soon as this weekend recovering from that oblique injury.

0:36:31.960 --> 0:36:34.279
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely huge for all of us in fantasy and just

0:36:34.320 --> 0:36:36.719
<v Speaker 2>a good boost to that Rangers team. I'd love to

0:36:36.719 --> 0:36:38.600
<v Speaker 2>have a really good contact hitter at the middle of

0:36:38.640 --> 0:36:41.920
<v Speaker 2>the lineup after Corey Seeger because then you've got, you know,

0:36:42.360 --> 0:36:44.880
<v Speaker 2>Jock who's struggling, one of the lowest babtists in baseball.

0:36:44.920 --> 0:36:47.480
<v Speaker 3>Behind Josh Young Berger. All these guys are struggling.

0:36:47.520 --> 0:36:50.080
<v Speaker 2>It's like it's a struggle sandwich is Corey Seger in

0:36:50.120 --> 0:36:52.600
<v Speaker 2>the middle of like Simeon who's at the front, he's

0:36:52.640 --> 0:36:55.040
<v Speaker 2>one bun he's struggling, and then all these other big

0:36:55.080 --> 0:36:55.640
<v Speaker 2>power hitters.

0:36:55.640 --> 0:36:57.879
<v Speaker 3>So we need Langford to come back big, big time.

0:36:58.239 --> 0:36:59.719
<v Speaker 2>I don't know if there's anything to say in here,

0:37:00.080 --> 0:37:02.600
<v Speaker 2>but like, I want the Rangers to kick back. I

0:37:02.600 --> 0:37:04.319
<v Speaker 2>thought these guys are going to be crazy, and it's

0:37:04.360 --> 0:37:07.120
<v Speaker 2>just everybody is struggling outside of like Josh Young and Seeger.

0:37:07.239 --> 0:37:09.759
<v Speaker 4>Right now, Yeah, I called them the best offense in

0:37:09.800 --> 0:37:12.279
<v Speaker 4>the American League before the season. It doesn't feel very

0:37:12.320 --> 0:37:13.839
<v Speaker 4>smart at this point. I think we're going to get

0:37:13.840 --> 0:37:17.440
<v Speaker 4>there eventually, and getting Langford back should do wonders for them.

0:37:17.480 --> 0:37:18.960
<v Speaker 5>He looked very good before he went down.

0:37:19.040 --> 0:37:21.759
<v Speaker 4>I worry a little bit with the oblique because wasn't

0:37:21.760 --> 0:37:24.000
<v Speaker 4>there something in spring as well? Like I hope this

0:37:24.000 --> 0:37:25.960
<v Speaker 4>doesn't become a recurring thing for him, But it's good

0:37:25.960 --> 0:37:27.040
<v Speaker 4>that he should be back this weekend.

0:37:27.080 --> 0:37:30.280
<v Speaker 2>Oh, obliques in general, obliques in general, it's Scarry Jackson

0:37:30.280 --> 0:37:31.319
<v Speaker 2>Merril slowly ramping up.

0:37:31.360 --> 0:37:33.920
<v Speaker 3>He did some VP and bunting drills. He's still not running.

0:37:34.080 --> 0:37:35.560
<v Speaker 2>He's not going to come off the IL when he

0:37:35.600 --> 0:37:38.799
<v Speaker 2>is first eligible, so mark your fantasy calendars for that.

0:37:38.920 --> 0:37:41.520
<v Speaker 2>Zach Netto could be activated. I think I'm saying as

0:37:41.560 --> 0:37:44.759
<v Speaker 2>soon as tomorrow. I saw something saying this weekend. But

0:37:45.120 --> 0:37:46.600
<v Speaker 2>like he's been at Triple A. I think he had

0:37:46.640 --> 0:37:49.120
<v Speaker 2>another homer. He's got four homers in twelve rehab games

0:37:49.120 --> 0:37:51.240
<v Speaker 2>with Triple A. Salt Lake doesn't need to be there anymore.

0:37:51.239 --> 0:37:54.600
<v Speaker 2>It's any day and Friend of the Show DJ hers

0:37:55.480 --> 0:37:58.080
<v Speaker 2>he's undergoing Tommy John surgery. I think that is really

0:37:58.120 --> 0:38:00.360
<v Speaker 2>friends of the show are not want to be friends of.

0:38:00.320 --> 0:38:01.959
<v Speaker 5>The show, right, We're gonna stay away from us.

0:38:02.280 --> 0:38:03.680
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, exactly, all right.

0:38:04.400 --> 0:38:06.439
<v Speaker 2>It doesn't deserve the song because it was a bad

0:38:06.480 --> 0:38:10.000
<v Speaker 2>betting day, so we're not gonna joyfully sing it's the

0:38:10.000 --> 0:38:12.399
<v Speaker 2>best bets that No, it's the best bets of the day.

0:38:12.480 --> 0:38:16.560
<v Speaker 2>Let's get serious. We're talking bets here, Joe Rico. It's

0:38:16.600 --> 0:38:19.360
<v Speaker 2>an interesting slate today. There's a bunch of early games.

0:38:19.680 --> 0:38:22.040
<v Speaker 2>I kind of moved away from the early games. You are,

0:38:22.239 --> 0:38:24.360
<v Speaker 2>you're back on the heavy player prop. So what do

0:38:24.360 --> 0:38:25.040
<v Speaker 2>you got today?

0:38:25.840 --> 0:38:29.279
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I'm targeting some total bass overs. There's one safer bet.

0:38:29.320 --> 0:38:30.520
<v Speaker 4>We're gonna get to it in a little bit, but

0:38:30.560 --> 0:38:33.399
<v Speaker 4>the total basis, I'm going with Lawrence Butler over one

0:38:33.400 --> 0:38:35.960
<v Speaker 4>and a half at plus one thirty, I don't really

0:38:36.040 --> 0:38:38.560
<v Speaker 4>understand it. Going up against Jonathan Cannon and the White Sox.

0:38:38.600 --> 0:38:41.080
<v Speaker 4>This feels like a pretty easy opportunity.

0:38:40.600 --> 0:38:41.160
<v Speaker 5>To make some money.

0:38:41.160 --> 0:38:43.719
<v Speaker 4>And then Jose Ramirez plus one twenty over one and

0:38:43.719 --> 0:38:47.000
<v Speaker 4>a half total bases going up against Dean Kramer. It

0:38:47.120 --> 0:38:49.040
<v Speaker 4>just feels like these lines are a little odd. I

0:38:49.040 --> 0:38:51.320
<v Speaker 4>would have thought maybe you'd see a you know, point

0:38:51.360 --> 0:38:53.200
<v Speaker 4>five bases at a bit of a juiced line for

0:38:53.280 --> 0:38:55.080
<v Speaker 4>both of these guys. But I'll take the one and

0:38:55.080 --> 0:38:58.080
<v Speaker 4>a half at plus one twenty and then this one

0:38:58.400 --> 0:39:01.040
<v Speaker 4>is minus one seventy five. So in terms of the value,

0:39:01.040 --> 0:39:03.280
<v Speaker 4>it's not great, but it just feels like a really

0:39:03.320 --> 0:39:05.960
<v Speaker 4>weird number. Max Meyer over three and a half strikeouts.

0:39:05.960 --> 0:39:09.200
<v Speaker 4>He's facing the Diamondbacks, but I'm striking out less than

0:39:09.200 --> 0:39:10.720
<v Speaker 4>any team in baseball at the moment.

0:39:11.280 --> 0:39:12.200
<v Speaker 5>That being said, three and a.

0:39:12.200 --> 0:39:15.160
<v Speaker 4>Half still feels really easy for a guy like Max Meyer,

0:39:15.200 --> 0:39:17.959
<v Speaker 4>who's a twenty five percent roughly twenty five percent strikeout.

0:39:17.680 --> 0:39:18.600
<v Speaker 5>Rate guy to achieve.

0:39:19.120 --> 0:39:21.520
<v Speaker 4>He's been doing well so far this season. If you

0:39:21.520 --> 0:39:23.560
<v Speaker 4>think it's a little bit too juice, you can maybe

0:39:23.600 --> 0:39:25.520
<v Speaker 4>pair one of those together and get that number down.

0:39:25.560 --> 0:39:27.600
<v Speaker 4>You probably get plus three hundred or so if you

0:39:27.600 --> 0:39:30.640
<v Speaker 4>throw those in a parlay. But Lawrence Butler, Jose Ramirez

0:39:30.680 --> 0:39:32.840
<v Speaker 4>over on the basis and then Max Meyer over on

0:39:32.880 --> 0:39:34.920
<v Speaker 4>three and a half strikeouts.

0:39:34.760 --> 0:39:37.200
<v Speaker 3>I'm I think you're mentioning the Angels one of those.

0:39:37.239 --> 0:39:39.640
<v Speaker 2>I'm tailing some first fives today, just you know, an

0:39:39.640 --> 0:39:43.560
<v Speaker 2>all transparency bad day for me yesterday, not even like

0:39:43.560 --> 0:39:46.160
<v Speaker 2>like I'll say many times. You know, sometimes the process

0:39:46.239 --> 0:39:49.360
<v Speaker 2>is really great and then blah, now it wasn't good yesterday.

0:39:50.080 --> 0:39:52.440
<v Speaker 2>It kind of a blow up there my life betting

0:39:52.560 --> 0:39:55.080
<v Speaker 2>did save me, so again that's kind of the plug

0:39:55.120 --> 0:39:58.560
<v Speaker 2>to betting pros on the app that picked me up

0:39:58.600 --> 0:40:00.359
<v Speaker 2>pretty big the day.

0:40:00.360 --> 0:40:01.960
<v Speaker 3>So I'm going with a couple first fives right now.

0:40:02.000 --> 0:40:04.480
<v Speaker 2>I don't really love any of the player props as

0:40:04.520 --> 0:40:06.680
<v Speaker 2>far as the pitching market goes. I don't play a

0:40:06.680 --> 0:40:09.799
<v Speaker 2>whole lot of total based stuff in general. But I'm

0:40:09.840 --> 0:40:13.040
<v Speaker 2>gonna be tailing Bryce Miller on the first five money

0:40:13.040 --> 0:40:16.080
<v Speaker 2>line minus won ten, so we're looking for obviously the win,

0:40:16.200 --> 0:40:19.680
<v Speaker 2>but a push can save us. And backing Jose Soriano

0:40:20.160 --> 0:40:22.640
<v Speaker 2>through the first five minus one forty that one's juiced

0:40:22.719 --> 0:40:25.240
<v Speaker 2>up a little bit, but he has just been a monster.

0:40:25.719 --> 0:40:28.960
<v Speaker 2>So first fives in Seattle and the Angels for me for.

0:40:29.239 --> 0:40:31.439
<v Speaker 3>Those best bets of the day where we can earn

0:40:31.480 --> 0:40:34.200
<v Speaker 3>back the song that probably no one really even wants

0:40:34.239 --> 0:40:34.640
<v Speaker 3>us to do.

0:40:35.440 --> 0:40:37.200
<v Speaker 2>Let's take a look at the home run board. There

0:40:37.239 --> 0:40:41.000
<v Speaker 2>were no homers yesterday, I think for absolutely anybody. Maybe

0:40:41.040 --> 0:40:43.000
<v Speaker 2>a couple, but I don't see much movement. I think

0:40:43.040 --> 0:40:45.200
<v Speaker 2>me and Wonkey were seven and eight yesterday, we're both

0:40:45.200 --> 0:40:48.719
<v Speaker 2>sitting at eight. We've got a Ferret and Marty both

0:40:48.760 --> 0:40:50.960
<v Speaker 2>at eleven at the top. We got a couple tens

0:40:50.960 --> 0:40:53.880
<v Speaker 2>in there, Razor Ramone, we got the people. It is

0:40:53.920 --> 0:40:57.080
<v Speaker 2>still very very obtainable. If you guys get an Amazon

0:40:57.520 --> 0:41:01.200
<v Speaker 2>Prime Twitch connection. If you can connect those two bad boys,

0:41:01.760 --> 0:41:04.120
<v Speaker 2>you can get in on the home run contest, or

0:41:04.160 --> 0:41:06.680
<v Speaker 2>you can be a part of the premium discord. You

0:41:06.719 --> 0:41:08.000
<v Speaker 2>can do that as well, and you can win that

0:41:08.080 --> 0:41:10.400
<v Speaker 2>Sammy Sosa Jersey autograph. Samy so said Jersey to the

0:41:10.400 --> 0:41:12.200
<v Speaker 2>winner of the home run contest. So not a lot

0:41:12.200 --> 0:41:15.439
<v Speaker 2>of movement. So that means there are some people to catch.

0:41:15.560 --> 0:41:17.400
<v Speaker 2>Joe who and how are you catching? Who's your home

0:41:17.440 --> 0:41:18.200
<v Speaker 2>run call for today?

0:41:19.239 --> 0:41:22.080
<v Speaker 4>Well, we wanted to target him yesterday. We're gonna target

0:41:22.160 --> 0:41:24.440
<v Speaker 4>him today because of that switch in the pitching matchup

0:41:24.480 --> 0:41:26.919
<v Speaker 4>was Patrick Corbin going up against the Angels. I'm taking

0:41:27.000 --> 0:41:29.760
<v Speaker 4>Jorge Celearra to hit a home run plus two seventy

0:41:29.960 --> 0:41:32.520
<v Speaker 4>on the various books. If you're looking to bet that one,

0:41:32.760 --> 0:41:35.600
<v Speaker 4>it's Patrick Corbyn. Whether you're betting the home runs individually,

0:41:35.719 --> 0:41:39.160
<v Speaker 4>the over earned runs, the over hits, you know the

0:41:39.760 --> 0:41:42.800
<v Speaker 4>Angels team total Angel's money line. Bet against Patrick Corbin.

0:41:43.000 --> 0:41:44.440
<v Speaker 4>Make yourself some free money today?

0:41:44.719 --> 0:41:46.640
<v Speaker 3>What did I call it? You're picking on me? What

0:41:46.680 --> 0:41:49.000
<v Speaker 3>did I say? It's a sub subscription? What did I say?

0:41:49.440 --> 0:41:51.759
<v Speaker 5>They say? I don't know, let me know.

0:41:51.680 --> 0:41:52.000
<v Speaker 3>What I said?

0:41:52.080 --> 0:41:53.879
<v Speaker 5>Call? Is that? So Mayor messing with you? Oh it's

0:41:53.880 --> 0:41:54.520
<v Speaker 5>not Mayor. I don't know.

0:41:54.560 --> 0:41:55.319
<v Speaker 3>I don't know what I said.

0:41:55.360 --> 0:42:01.640
<v Speaker 2>I said something stupid shock welshism. So yesterday, dummy, I

0:42:01.680 --> 0:42:04.919
<v Speaker 2>saw that Patrick Corbin was on the slate, I bet

0:42:04.960 --> 0:42:07.560
<v Speaker 2>against it. I went with Mike Trout and then apparently

0:42:07.600 --> 0:42:09.960
<v Speaker 2>I looked at the wrong place. I got screwed or

0:42:10.080 --> 0:42:12.680
<v Speaker 2>just screwed myself and it went against me.

0:42:12.840 --> 0:42:13.880
<v Speaker 3>Tyler Molly was amazing.

0:42:14.760 --> 0:42:17.520
<v Speaker 2>But I see Patrick Corbin is back, So I am

0:42:17.560 --> 0:42:20.040
<v Speaker 2>going right back to Mike Trout. That was my whole

0:42:20.239 --> 0:42:22.799
<v Speaker 2>dig was Mike Trout versus Patrick Corbin. So I am

0:42:22.880 --> 0:42:26.000
<v Speaker 2>back on Mike Trout today, going up Patrick Corbin. Bang,

0:42:26.040 --> 0:42:28.080
<v Speaker 2>we're not going to go over runs, but you and

0:42:28.120 --> 0:42:30.400
<v Speaker 2>I both attacking him. So he is assuredly going to

0:42:30.480 --> 0:42:32.440
<v Speaker 2>go six and strike out nine and he'll be at

0:42:32.440 --> 0:42:33.320
<v Speaker 2>Tyler Molly again.

0:42:33.800 --> 0:42:35.040
<v Speaker 3>But you guys can be a part of it.

0:42:35.320 --> 0:42:37.000
<v Speaker 2>Join in on the Discord and you can get on

0:42:37.000 --> 0:42:39.640
<v Speaker 2>the home run contest and guess what more opportunities to

0:42:39.680 --> 0:42:42.000
<v Speaker 2>talk to us today? Tons of questions, tons in the

0:42:42.080 --> 0:42:43.560
<v Speaker 2>chat and I know we didn't get to a lot

0:42:43.560 --> 0:42:45.000
<v Speaker 2>of it. Well, guess what you want to get to

0:42:45.080 --> 0:42:47.319
<v Speaker 2>more of it? You guys can come over to the

0:42:47.400 --> 0:42:51.399
<v Speaker 2>discord two pm Eastern today Arico and I we're doing

0:42:51.400 --> 0:42:55.760
<v Speaker 2>the live show on Discord. We're doing cleaning Up. I remember,

0:42:55.840 --> 0:42:57.680
<v Speaker 2>there's so many shows in there where we're going to

0:42:57.719 --> 0:42:59.520
<v Speaker 2>be bringing you guys on to answer questions. And then

0:42:59.520 --> 0:43:03.000
<v Speaker 2>at four pm Eastern live on YouTube, we'll be back

0:43:03.040 --> 0:43:05.879
<v Speaker 2>again answering questions for a full hour. So if it's

0:43:05.920 --> 0:43:08.520
<v Speaker 2>missed here, come on over and hang out live with us.

0:43:08.640 --> 0:43:10.720
<v Speaker 2>And you can always hang out live Monday through Friday

0:43:10.719 --> 0:43:14.040
<v Speaker 2>on Twitch at twitch dot tv slash Fantasy Pros. That

0:43:14.200 --> 0:43:15.719
<v Speaker 2>is going to do it, my friends. Hope you guys

0:43:15.760 --> 0:43:18.760
<v Speaker 2>have a fantastic day. For Joe Rico. I'm Chris Welsh.

0:43:18.840 --> 0:43:21.080
<v Speaker 2>We will talk to you next time right here on

0:43:21.239 --> 0:43:21.719
<v Speaker 2>leading off.

0:43:22.360 --> 0:43:25.600
<v Speaker 7>Thanks for listening to the Fantasy Pros Fantasy Baseball Podcast.

0:43:25.800 --> 0:43:28.200
<v Speaker 7>If you love the show, the best freeway to support

0:43:28.280 --> 0:43:31.120
<v Speaker 7>us is by leaving a positive review on Apple Podcasts

0:43:31.239 --> 0:43:34.920
<v Speaker 7>or Spotify. Follow us on x, Instagram, and TikTok at

0:43:34.960 --> 0:43:37.920
<v Speaker 7>Fantasy pros At. Subscribe to our YouTube channel at YouTube

0:43:37.920 --> 0:43:40.120
<v Speaker 7>dot com Slash Fantasy Pros MLB