WEBVTT - Fantasy Baseball 2020: Third Baseman Rankings! 

0:00:00.400 --> 0:00:02.760
<v Speaker 1>Hey, thanks for downloading the podcast. If you want to

0:00:02.800 --> 0:00:05.160
<v Speaker 1>listen live, all you have to do is download the

0:00:05.200 --> 0:00:09.400
<v Speaker 1>I Heart Radio app and search for Fantasy Sports Radio Network. Also,

0:00:09.440 --> 0:00:11.119
<v Speaker 1>if you want to catch this show on video, for

0:00:11.200 --> 0:00:14.000
<v Speaker 1>sure to check out Zoo TV channel seven nineteen and

0:00:14.080 --> 0:00:17.200
<v Speaker 1>that's where you can find sports Grids Fantasy Sports Network.

0:00:17.440 --> 0:00:32.640
<v Speaker 1>Enjoy the show, and thanks so much for listening to tons. Yeah,

0:00:42.040 --> 0:01:01.160
<v Speaker 1>that's welcome. Great with now you get you inside up

0:01:01.240 --> 0:01:05.160
<v Speaker 1>Studio thirty four. This he's in BFS. He is Frank Standfell.

0:01:05.319 --> 0:01:09.679
<v Speaker 1>I am Greg Susman's having a happy Monday to you.

0:01:10.319 --> 0:01:14.200
<v Speaker 1>Here to talk about the deepest position in fantasy baseball today,

0:01:14.560 --> 0:01:16.640
<v Speaker 1>the third base position. Yes, we are here to talk

0:01:16.720 --> 0:01:19.240
<v Speaker 1>about the third base position. But before we do, I

0:01:19.319 --> 0:01:22.240
<v Speaker 1>just leave. But I slept very well. It was tough

0:01:22.280 --> 0:01:23.640
<v Speaker 1>to get out of bed. I don't know. I didn't

0:01:23.640 --> 0:01:27.559
<v Speaker 1>stay up too late. Nothing crazy last night. Just man

0:01:27.760 --> 0:01:29.959
<v Speaker 1>alarm went off today. It was tough getting out of bed.

0:01:30.440 --> 0:01:32.720
<v Speaker 1>How about you something well? I was I was up

0:01:32.760 --> 0:01:35.240
<v Speaker 1>thinking about work pretty early and I was like very

0:01:35.319 --> 0:01:37.800
<v Speaker 1>up before my alarm went off. Taking with the third

0:01:37.840 --> 0:01:40.559
<v Speaker 1>base ranks early in the morning. Greg, No, not really,

0:01:40.600 --> 0:01:42.000
<v Speaker 1>I was just thinking about the whole stuff I had

0:01:42.040 --> 0:01:44.000
<v Speaker 1>to do before anyone was like, oh, man, I gotta

0:01:44.040 --> 0:01:47.360
<v Speaker 1>do my third base ranks, right, So I you know,

0:01:47.400 --> 0:01:50.360
<v Speaker 1>I just I was just often about very early. I

0:01:50.400 --> 0:01:54.120
<v Speaker 1>was in College Park, Maryland over the weekend. It was

0:01:54.160 --> 0:01:57.600
<v Speaker 1>cool being back. Nostalgic. Not so cool with the result,

0:01:58.200 --> 0:02:01.320
<v Speaker 1>but cool being back. Oh does that mean Maryland actually played?

0:02:01.360 --> 0:02:02.840
<v Speaker 1>Is that why you were there? You went to a game? Yes?

0:02:03.160 --> 0:02:07.440
<v Speaker 1>What happened? Who they face? Oh? College game Day? Was there?

0:02:07.640 --> 0:02:11.720
<v Speaker 1>What happened? They lost? They were very badly. The first

0:02:11.760 --> 0:02:13.680
<v Speaker 1>time out, the under sixteen time out was the first

0:02:13.720 --> 0:02:18.200
<v Speaker 1>time basketball. It would be down nine nothing. They wind

0:02:18.280 --> 0:02:21.400
<v Speaker 1>up tying the game three Michigan State. They went on

0:02:21.440 --> 0:02:24.040
<v Speaker 1>a seven point run. Michigan stay good. Yeah there it

0:02:24.160 --> 0:02:28.400
<v Speaker 1>was good. Um, Maryland, Maryland good. I didn't think so

0:02:28.880 --> 0:02:31.400
<v Speaker 1>that was wrong. Um. In the second half, they never

0:02:31.400 --> 0:02:35.440
<v Speaker 1>got closer than nine any point, and you were there

0:02:35.440 --> 0:02:37.040
<v Speaker 1>to watch it all in person. It was very bad.

0:02:37.280 --> 0:02:39.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry. Greg. Well, outside of that, that was the

0:02:39.040 --> 0:02:41.560
<v Speaker 1>rest of your weekend. It was awesome because after the game,

0:02:41.880 --> 0:02:44.239
<v Speaker 1>we got like two beers and a mixed drink. It

0:02:44.360 --> 0:02:46.680
<v Speaker 1>was like a fifteen dollars total, and I was like

0:02:46.919 --> 0:02:49.280
<v Speaker 1>I love color. I haven't seen these prices since. How

0:02:49.320 --> 0:02:52.080
<v Speaker 1>was it called? It was fantastic and you just you know.

0:02:52.080 --> 0:02:54.560
<v Speaker 1>I'll tell you some off gap, but that's fine. Come on,

0:02:54.680 --> 0:02:56.640
<v Speaker 1>we got a third base ranks. I want some updates,

0:02:56.840 --> 0:02:59.480
<v Speaker 1>some pictures that were worried about Blake Snell for all that.

0:03:00.000 --> 0:03:12.000
<v Speaker 1>Alex Pisano with your news updab I am Alex Passano

0:03:12.080 --> 0:03:15.079
<v Speaker 1>with your sport grid news update here on the fantasy

0:03:15.200 --> 0:03:18.400
<v Speaker 1>bfs in the NFL, that Jaguars will use their franchise

0:03:18.480 --> 0:03:21.680
<v Speaker 1>tag on defensive end yannick In Gotuay leads. Sources told

0:03:21.840 --> 0:03:24.360
<v Speaker 1>ESPNS Adam Schefter the tag will allow them to trade

0:03:24.400 --> 0:03:27.160
<v Speaker 1>him if that's what they decide on or forced to do.

0:03:27.400 --> 0:03:29.960
<v Speaker 1>Fun facts for you, Greggy uh In Gotay is a

0:03:30.040 --> 0:03:33.320
<v Speaker 1>Maryland Terrapin graduate. There you go, right there. In Gottway

0:03:33.320 --> 0:03:36.280
<v Speaker 1>tweeted on Monday morning that his time in Jacksonville is over.

0:03:36.320 --> 0:03:38.920
<v Speaker 1>Here's a quick quote from the tweet. The Jaguars are

0:03:38.960 --> 0:03:40.960
<v Speaker 1>aware I no longer have interests in signing a long

0:03:41.080 --> 0:03:44.840
<v Speaker 1>term contract in Jacksonville. The franchise tag carriage an approximate

0:03:44.880 --> 0:03:49.520
<v Speaker 1>salary of nineteen point three million dollars in in the NBA.

0:03:49.560 --> 0:03:51.839
<v Speaker 1>The New York Knicks have officially named former player agent

0:03:51.920 --> 0:03:55.160
<v Speaker 1>Leon Rose and as their new president. In a letter

0:03:55.200 --> 0:03:57.640
<v Speaker 1>to the team's fans, Rose said that he will support

0:03:57.680 --> 0:04:00.480
<v Speaker 1>interim coach Mike Miller and his staff. I want to

0:04:00.480 --> 0:04:02.600
<v Speaker 1>thank Mike. This is a quote from Leon Rose. I

0:04:02.640 --> 0:04:05.760
<v Speaker 1>want to thank Mike for his continued leadership and professionalism

0:04:05.840 --> 0:04:08.640
<v Speaker 1>during this period. While noting that the Knicks have young talent,

0:04:08.840 --> 0:04:12.080
<v Speaker 1>Rose continued, nothing about this is easy or quick, so

0:04:12.160 --> 0:04:16.120
<v Speaker 1>I ask you for your continued patients. This was a

0:04:16.160 --> 0:04:20.080
<v Speaker 1>part one of three part tweet from Rose to the

0:04:20.160 --> 0:04:22.359
<v Speaker 1>Knicks fans. Rose has been one of the top agents

0:04:22.360 --> 0:04:26.400
<v Speaker 1>in basketball for decades, with clients including Joel Embid, Chris Paul,

0:04:26.480 --> 0:04:30.000
<v Speaker 1>Devin Booker, and Kyle Kuzma, and in Major League Baseball,

0:04:30.000 --> 0:04:33.000
<v Speaker 1>Guys Randing Nationallygue MVP. Cody Bellinger was a late scratch

0:04:33.200 --> 0:04:36.200
<v Speaker 1>in the Dodgers spring training lineup on Monday with side discomfort.

0:04:36.360 --> 0:04:39.279
<v Speaker 1>He took part in Albert Pooh Holes, his annual charity event,

0:04:39.480 --> 0:04:43.000
<v Speaker 1>held in Scottsdale, Arizona, on Sunday, but Dodgers manager Dave

0:04:43.120 --> 0:04:45.520
<v Speaker 1>Roberts said Monday he did not believe Bellinger's side sword

0:04:45.520 --> 0:04:47.800
<v Speaker 1>and this had anything to do with the golf swings.

0:04:47.920 --> 0:04:50.400
<v Speaker 1>He said he expects Bellinger to return this week. He

0:04:50.440 --> 0:04:53.239
<v Speaker 1>got a full slate of NBA, NHL, and college hoops tonight.

0:04:53.360 --> 0:04:55.480
<v Speaker 1>Some games you want to look at the Portland Trailblazers

0:04:55.560 --> 0:04:58.479
<v Speaker 1>visiting the Orlando Magic. Magic your seven point favorites. The

0:04:58.520 --> 0:05:01.560
<v Speaker 1>total two one. Also, the Milwaukee Bucks take on the

0:05:01.600 --> 0:05:03.880
<v Speaker 1>Miami Heat. Bucks are your four and a half point favorites.

0:05:03.920 --> 0:05:07.200
<v Speaker 1>The total is two. I'm Alex Passano and this has

0:05:07.240 --> 0:05:09.919
<v Speaker 1>been your sports grid news update. Now back to the

0:05:09.920 --> 0:05:14.200
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy b FF's all right back here. B f f's

0:05:14.520 --> 0:05:19.159
<v Speaker 1>Frank Greg and job Alex uh Frankie Blake Snell over

0:05:19.200 --> 0:05:22.880
<v Speaker 1>the weekend and a quarter zone shot in his elbow

0:05:23.920 --> 0:05:27.560
<v Speaker 1>doesn't seem good. That seems terrible. He said. He was

0:05:27.600 --> 0:05:30.200
<v Speaker 1>fine pitching even afterwards, get a little more soreness, so

0:05:30.200 --> 0:05:31.880
<v Speaker 1>he wanted to be cautious and he's not sure if

0:05:31.880 --> 0:05:35.640
<v Speaker 1>he'll be ready for opening day. He is not going

0:05:35.680 --> 0:05:37.279
<v Speaker 1>to be ready for opening day. Greg, and this is

0:05:37.320 --> 0:05:39.719
<v Speaker 1>one of your keepers. I take it ready, it is, Frank.

0:05:42.120 --> 0:05:45.720
<v Speaker 1>So we did get an update earlier today. Noon Raise

0:05:45.800 --> 0:05:49.000
<v Speaker 1>manager Kevin Cass said Monday that Blake Snell it's quote

0:05:49.000 --> 0:05:52.960
<v Speaker 1>feeling good and remains on track to play catch on Tuesday.

0:05:53.040 --> 0:05:55.680
<v Speaker 1>So obviously something to monitor here when it comes to

0:05:55.720 --> 0:05:58.840
<v Speaker 1>Blake's now. And again just another picture that is going

0:05:58.880 --> 0:06:00.839
<v Speaker 1>to fall down draft boards right now due to injury.

0:06:00.880 --> 0:06:04.919
<v Speaker 1>Luis Savourno after the year, Chris Sale with the flu

0:06:05.120 --> 0:06:07.560
<v Speaker 1>is obviously falling down draft boards, going to start the

0:06:07.640 --> 0:06:10.480
<v Speaker 1>year on the I L Mike Clevinger. Uh, We've actually

0:06:10.520 --> 0:06:13.320
<v Speaker 1>seen some positive reports from cleve I saw just last week.

0:06:13.360 --> 0:06:15.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean he was ramping up his throwing activity. Guy

0:06:15.560 --> 0:06:17.680
<v Speaker 1>looks like he's ready to pitch right now. Hopefully they

0:06:17.680 --> 0:06:20.040
<v Speaker 1>don't push him too quickly. But some good news there

0:06:20.040 --> 0:06:22.440
<v Speaker 1>out of Clevinger. And then obviously everything that's going on

0:06:22.480 --> 0:06:24.560
<v Speaker 1>with Blake Snow Greig gets a Cornzon shot in his

0:06:24.680 --> 0:06:28.200
<v Speaker 1>left elbow, his throwing arm, the same elbow where he

0:06:28.279 --> 0:06:31.920
<v Speaker 1>had a clean up last year mid season. Man, this

0:06:32.640 --> 0:06:35.120
<v Speaker 1>this is a scary situation. Look, I think if you're

0:06:35.160 --> 0:06:37.040
<v Speaker 1>going into perhaps you're gonna get him a bit of

0:06:37.080 --> 0:06:39.279
<v Speaker 1>a value. Same thing when it comes to auctions. I

0:06:39.279 --> 0:06:41.839
<v Speaker 1>think he went for like eighteen dollars in labor yesterday

0:06:41.839 --> 0:06:45.480
<v Speaker 1>in the mixed the twelve team mixed auction yesterday, um,

0:06:45.520 --> 0:06:47.880
<v Speaker 1>which obviously is much lower than he would have gone

0:06:47.920 --> 0:06:51.960
<v Speaker 1>for normally. But um, there's a there's risk, there's there's

0:06:52.000 --> 0:06:54.320
<v Speaker 1>obviously a big reward, but I would say right now

0:06:54.600 --> 0:06:57.480
<v Speaker 1>the uh, the risk outweighs the reward in my opinion

0:06:57.560 --> 0:06:59.280
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to Blake Snow. Yeah, you know, I

0:06:59.600 --> 0:07:01.719
<v Speaker 1>get very nervous where it comes to these picture injuries

0:07:01.720 --> 0:07:04.039
<v Speaker 1>and they normally more often than not come back to

0:07:04.080 --> 0:07:06.960
<v Speaker 1>bite you in the ass and other times like you're fine,

0:07:07.560 --> 0:07:11.400
<v Speaker 1>but what reserving shot ready like this would be a

0:07:11.440 --> 0:07:13.760
<v Speaker 1>fifteen d fifteen a d Elston he had he and

0:07:13.880 --> 0:07:17.120
<v Speaker 1>you have to work his way back up. It's really

0:07:17.160 --> 0:07:21.040
<v Speaker 1>really scary as the Blake Snell Uh, as a Blake

0:07:21.080 --> 0:07:24.080
<v Speaker 1>Snell owner here, do you hear out what to do?

0:07:24.120 --> 0:07:27.400
<v Speaker 1>I wouldn't pay eighteen dollars from I couldn't. Just to

0:07:27.520 --> 0:07:30.840
<v Speaker 1>put that in perspective, Blake Snell went for eighteen dollars

0:07:30.960 --> 0:07:34.480
<v Speaker 1>yesterday and then trying to see someone else who went

0:07:34.520 --> 0:07:37.280
<v Speaker 1>for a simone price like Clevinger went for seventeen, Granky

0:07:37.360 --> 0:07:40.440
<v Speaker 1>went for nineteen, so her Shaw twenty. So at an

0:07:40.440 --> 0:07:44.000
<v Speaker 1>eighteen dollar price tag, that's someone who based on these

0:07:44.000 --> 0:07:46.960
<v Speaker 1>other prices is like a fourth, fifth round starting pitcher.

0:07:47.760 --> 0:07:49.760
<v Speaker 1>Still might be too much risk to take on there

0:07:49.760 --> 0:07:51.320
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to Blake's Now, there was more going

0:07:51.360 --> 0:07:54.520
<v Speaker 1>on of course last night. Is there more going around

0:07:54.560 --> 0:07:57.679
<v Speaker 1>the last weekend in regards to fantasy baseball? Before we continue,

0:07:57.800 --> 0:08:00.720
<v Speaker 1>let's talk a little fantasy basketball for this evening. For Yeah,

0:08:00.720 --> 0:08:03.120
<v Speaker 1>and I know earlier today you met up with not

0:08:03.200 --> 0:08:05.360
<v Speaker 1>met up with you, you did the tip drill with

0:08:05.440 --> 0:08:08.000
<v Speaker 1>Drew dig Meyer of Deli Rodo dot com. And obviously

0:08:08.080 --> 0:08:11.440
<v Speaker 1>Drew and those guys have been phenomenal all season long

0:08:11.480 --> 0:08:14.000
<v Speaker 1>and especially recently when it comes to the NBA tip draw.

0:08:14.040 --> 0:08:15.640
<v Speaker 1>I know you had a chance to speak to him

0:08:15.640 --> 0:08:18.160
<v Speaker 1>about who he's targeting at the center position tonight. Let's

0:08:18.160 --> 0:08:30.640
<v Speaker 1>take a look at that on tonight's NBA dfeste. Let's

0:08:30.640 --> 0:08:32.400
<v Speaker 1>move over to the center here. And this one another

0:08:32.440 --> 0:08:35.520
<v Speaker 1>obvious one for us as Incleuveland Tristan Thompson. He's not

0:08:35.559 --> 0:08:39.199
<v Speaker 1>expected to play, which means increased playing time for Andre

0:08:39.320 --> 0:08:41.480
<v Speaker 1>Drummond tonight. The top matchup though it gets ready to

0:08:41.480 --> 0:08:44.440
<v Speaker 1>go there, Yeah, that's the big thing with Andrea Drummond. Now,

0:08:44.480 --> 0:08:45.920
<v Speaker 1>you know the press texts dipped all the way down

0:08:45.960 --> 0:08:48.440
<v Speaker 1>to seventy. And that's in large part because when you

0:08:48.480 --> 0:08:51.280
<v Speaker 1>have Tristan Thompson playing behind you, they have to regulate

0:08:51.360 --> 0:08:53.920
<v Speaker 1>Andre Drummond's minutes more than they did in Detroit. You know,

0:08:53.920 --> 0:08:56.760
<v Speaker 1>he's playing kind of low thirties, uh sometimes, you know,

0:08:56.800 --> 0:08:58.800
<v Speaker 1>struggling to get up at the thirty minutes because Tris

0:08:58.880 --> 0:09:01.439
<v Speaker 1>and Thompson behind him was it needs to play eighteen

0:09:01.480 --> 0:09:03.800
<v Speaker 1>to twenty five minutes on each and every night. So

0:09:03.880 --> 0:09:06.520
<v Speaker 1>you remove Tristan Thompson from that equation, fins out that

0:09:06.559 --> 0:09:08.200
<v Speaker 1>front court for the Calves a little bit and gives

0:09:08.200 --> 0:09:10.360
<v Speaker 1>that minutes upside Andre Drummond to get back into the

0:09:10.360 --> 0:09:13.679
<v Speaker 1>thirty thirty six range. He's always handled his own pretty

0:09:13.679 --> 0:09:15.800
<v Speaker 1>well against Rudy Gobert. We think he'll be able to

0:09:15.840 --> 0:09:18.720
<v Speaker 1>do so tonight. And the seventy price tag is miles

0:09:18.800 --> 0:09:20.680
<v Speaker 1>away from the price tags you were paying for Andre

0:09:20.760 --> 0:09:23.000
<v Speaker 1>Drummond in Detroit earlier in the season, so we think

0:09:23.000 --> 0:09:29.400
<v Speaker 1>he's severely under priced here. Bff's there, Andre Jonman, the

0:09:29.440 --> 0:09:31.440
<v Speaker 1>guy you don't want to get in your lab tonight.

0:09:31.440 --> 0:09:34.040
<v Speaker 1>Without Tristan Thompson expected to play for Cleveland rank yeah,

0:09:34.080 --> 0:09:35.800
<v Speaker 1>I think that makes a lot of sense obviously what

0:09:35.880 --> 0:09:38.599
<v Speaker 1>Drew dick Meyer said about Tristan Thompson. Since German was

0:09:38.600 --> 0:09:41.439
<v Speaker 1>traded over to the Cleveland Cavs obviously had to split

0:09:41.480 --> 0:09:43.240
<v Speaker 1>some time there, which are just in Thompson still playing

0:09:43.240 --> 0:09:47.160
<v Speaker 1>around twenty five minutes to night with him expected out tonight,

0:09:47.160 --> 0:09:49.920
<v Speaker 1>we should expect Andre Drummond to get back into the

0:09:50.000 --> 0:09:53.400
<v Speaker 1>thirties in minutes and obviously had a suppressed price tag.

0:09:53.679 --> 0:09:55.400
<v Speaker 1>He's someone that you should be building your lineups around,

0:09:55.440 --> 0:09:57.600
<v Speaker 1>especially at the center position. All right, So heading back

0:09:57.640 --> 0:10:00.400
<v Speaker 1>to fantasy baseball, though, Frank, I was just so anxious

0:10:00.400 --> 0:10:02.240
<v Speaker 1>and answy to talk to you about publicks. Now, what

0:10:02.280 --> 0:10:04.319
<v Speaker 1>else did I miss over the weekend about players gonna

0:10:04.400 --> 0:10:08.760
<v Speaker 1>hurt like Aaron Judge. Yeah, Aaron Judge on Friday apparently

0:10:08.840 --> 0:10:12.320
<v Speaker 1>extend some discomfort again while swinging, and I know that

0:10:12.360 --> 0:10:14.040
<v Speaker 1>he was going to undergo some test today. I haven't

0:10:14.040 --> 0:10:16.720
<v Speaker 1>seen any results or anything mentioned about Aaron Judge so far.

0:10:16.880 --> 0:10:18.440
<v Speaker 1>We can check that out during the break and see

0:10:18.440 --> 0:10:21.480
<v Speaker 1>if anything. There's nothing on Aaron Judge. All right, so

0:10:21.520 --> 0:10:23.360
<v Speaker 1>we'll have to pay attention and to see I know

0:10:23.440 --> 0:10:25.640
<v Speaker 1>that he is someone who's going for cheaper prices right

0:10:25.640 --> 0:10:28.440
<v Speaker 1>now at auctions and slipping non draft boards because again

0:10:29.240 --> 0:10:31.360
<v Speaker 1>his dealt with injuries in the past, had the oblique

0:10:31.440 --> 0:10:34.120
<v Speaker 1>last year, has the shoulder right now, had surgery on

0:10:34.160 --> 0:10:36.840
<v Speaker 1>the other shoulder a couple of years ago. You don't

0:10:36.840 --> 0:10:38.440
<v Speaker 1>know if he's going to be ready for opening day.

0:10:38.480 --> 0:10:40.800
<v Speaker 1>They still they keep saying that there's a chance that

0:10:40.840 --> 0:10:43.040
<v Speaker 1>he could be ready for opening Day, but obviously that's

0:10:43.040 --> 0:10:44.680
<v Speaker 1>all up in the air right now. When it comes

0:10:44.679 --> 0:10:47.360
<v Speaker 1>to Aaron Judge and another one, Greig, where if he's

0:10:47.360 --> 0:10:49.400
<v Speaker 1>good to go by opening day, or even if he

0:10:49.440 --> 0:10:51.720
<v Speaker 1>misses the first week or so, you're gonna get him

0:10:51.720 --> 0:10:54.319
<v Speaker 1>at a massive discount when it comes to Fantasy baseball.

0:10:54.360 --> 0:10:57.280
<v Speaker 1>So he was typically someone I wasn't targeting because he

0:10:57.320 --> 0:10:58.920
<v Speaker 1>was still a second third round pick and I didn't

0:10:58.920 --> 0:11:01.400
<v Speaker 1>really like that price. Say if he starts falling into

0:11:01.400 --> 0:11:04.520
<v Speaker 1>the four fifth round and you know you're getting him

0:11:04.520 --> 0:11:06.719
<v Speaker 1>at that value, then maybe there's a chance that I

0:11:06.760 --> 0:11:08.960
<v Speaker 1>do jump in on him right at that cost. We

0:11:09.000 --> 0:11:11.200
<v Speaker 1>talked to last week we're doing our outfielders. How you

0:11:11.200 --> 0:11:13.840
<v Speaker 1>commented how high I have Aaron Judge, and I said,

0:11:13.920 --> 0:11:17.520
<v Speaker 1>if your mains hurt, it all changes. It's scary right now,

0:11:17.760 --> 0:11:20.120
<v Speaker 1>and I don't see how I can keep him where

0:11:20.160 --> 0:11:24.120
<v Speaker 1>I have them, which was outfielder there number ten, you're

0:11:24.120 --> 0:11:26.120
<v Speaker 1>not driving. Here's the top swelve outfielder right now, there's

0:11:26.120 --> 0:11:28.080
<v Speaker 1>no there's no way. I'll have to figure out where

0:11:28.080 --> 0:11:29.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to drop him. I don't know where that's

0:11:30.160 --> 0:11:33.360
<v Speaker 1>going to be quite yet, but it's probably gonna be

0:11:33.360 --> 0:11:36.760
<v Speaker 1>closer to He has ten play that much. So over

0:11:36.800 --> 0:11:40.640
<v Speaker 1>the weekend his a DP was thirty two, So it

0:11:40.679 --> 0:11:42.720
<v Speaker 1>really hasn't fallen that far. I thought it would have,

0:11:42.800 --> 0:11:44.559
<v Speaker 1>you know, dropped a little bit further than that. But

0:11:45.040 --> 0:11:48.320
<v Speaker 1>those are from drafts one from Friday through yesterday, and

0:11:48.400 --> 0:11:50.959
<v Speaker 1>his a DP is at thirty two, so still you know,

0:11:51.120 --> 0:11:53.520
<v Speaker 1>solid third round pick. When it comes to Fantasy Baseball,

0:11:54.120 --> 0:11:58.559
<v Speaker 1>that seems like too big of a price action you

0:11:58.559 --> 0:12:01.440
<v Speaker 1>would spend. H don't fifteen bucks? Can we get him

0:12:01.440 --> 0:12:09.800
<v Speaker 1>in fifteen bucks? Probably? Not? Alright? Alright? Where I want

0:12:09.840 --> 0:12:12.480
<v Speaker 1>to be the next Daily Fantasy Millionaire. Dunk on your

0:12:12.559 --> 0:12:16.160
<v Speaker 1>NBA dfs competition with Daily Rodal dot com and dominate

0:12:16.200 --> 0:12:19.360
<v Speaker 1>on fandel and DraftKings this season. Compete with the pros

0:12:19.400 --> 0:12:22.480
<v Speaker 1>with Daily Rodal dot com optimizer and the most accurate

0:12:22.520 --> 0:12:26.360
<v Speaker 1>projections in NBA DFS plus line up alerts, breaking news,

0:12:26.480 --> 0:12:29.200
<v Speaker 1>late swap support, and much more. Save ten percent on

0:12:29.280 --> 0:12:32.959
<v Speaker 1>winning NBA DFS advice with promo code Dunk. Visit daily

0:12:33.000 --> 0:12:46.079
<v Speaker 1>Rodo dot com backslash dunk to learn more. It's a

0:12:46.160 --> 0:12:48.040
<v Speaker 1>third base ranking s Frank, you have any more news

0:12:48.040 --> 0:12:50.800
<v Speaker 1>and notes yet too before we reveal our ranking, Greg,

0:12:51.000 --> 0:12:52.760
<v Speaker 1>the biggest news of all that you missed from the

0:12:52.760 --> 0:12:56.120
<v Speaker 1>weekend was that Joe Musgrove is dealing with shoulders. I

0:12:56.200 --> 0:12:59.240
<v Speaker 1>did see that. I'm so sorry and I felt terrible

0:12:59.320 --> 0:13:04.040
<v Speaker 1>because I woke up yesterday in a little breakfast prep myself,

0:13:04.080 --> 0:13:07.840
<v Speaker 1>got everything ready to watch Joe Musgrove against the Toronto

0:13:07.880 --> 0:13:13.079
<v Speaker 1>Blue Perfect Sundown Pirates broadcast is talking about how Joe

0:13:13.120 --> 0:13:16.760
<v Speaker 1>Musgrove is hitting nine miles per hour consistently on the gun.

0:13:17.240 --> 0:13:19.679
<v Speaker 1>The fastball Vello was up late last year. That's when

0:13:19.679 --> 0:13:22.840
<v Speaker 1>he started performing well. The breaking pitches look great. And then,

0:13:22.880 --> 0:13:26.160
<v Speaker 1>of course, late last night on a Sunday evening, Greg,

0:13:26.360 --> 0:13:29.719
<v Speaker 1>we got the news Joe Musgrove is dealing with shoulder discomfort.

0:13:30.679 --> 0:13:33.360
<v Speaker 1>So do with that what you will. I mean, most

0:13:33.360 --> 0:13:35.680
<v Speaker 1>people he's more nothing more than a back end rotation

0:13:35.720 --> 0:13:38.400
<v Speaker 1>piece anyway, your SP five, R s P six, maybe

0:13:38.440 --> 0:13:40.080
<v Speaker 1>even if you're playing a twelve team league, he's one

0:13:40.080 --> 0:13:43.199
<v Speaker 1>of your bench starting pitchers. But somebody I was targeting

0:13:43.200 --> 0:13:46.160
<v Speaker 1>once again is Joe Musgrove. Let's see what comes out

0:13:46.160 --> 0:13:49.679
<v Speaker 1>of this, Greig. I'm sorry, Frankie, right, okay, all Rlet's

0:13:49.679 --> 0:13:52.200
<v Speaker 1>move over our third DAS rankings. Frank And this is

0:13:52.240 --> 0:13:55.360
<v Speaker 1>the first time this season we have a different player

0:13:55.880 --> 0:14:00.280
<v Speaker 1>at number one. This is weird. This is years for

0:14:00.360 --> 0:14:03.000
<v Speaker 1>me for a couple of reasons. Your number one overall

0:14:03.080 --> 0:14:07.679
<v Speaker 1>third baseman, my number one here is Alex Bregman. Your

0:14:07.760 --> 0:14:11.080
<v Speaker 1>number one third basement overall is Josie Ramirez. And this

0:14:11.240 --> 0:14:15.000
<v Speaker 1>is weird for me because I am the Josie Ramirez guy.

0:14:15.320 --> 0:14:18.200
<v Speaker 1>You know that about me. I've been on Josie Ramirez forever.

0:14:19.120 --> 0:14:21.440
<v Speaker 1>And I'm also the guy that likes to ignore first

0:14:21.480 --> 0:14:24.520
<v Speaker 1>half like they don't matter. He's just say, hey, the

0:14:24.560 --> 0:14:26.520
<v Speaker 1>second half was great, Like who cares about the first half.

0:14:27.840 --> 0:14:34.080
<v Speaker 1>I can't do that right now, because we saw how

0:14:34.160 --> 0:14:38.320
<v Speaker 1>bad that Jose Ramirez can be. You yourself, as a

0:14:38.440 --> 0:14:42.760
<v Speaker 1>Jose Ramirez owner, suffered through that first half. Where he

0:14:42.840 --> 0:14:46.000
<v Speaker 1>batted under two hundred for most of the half. Still ran,

0:14:46.760 --> 0:14:52.040
<v Speaker 1>but he couldn't fine, he couldn't hit a damn thing. Now,

0:14:52.080 --> 0:14:54.920
<v Speaker 1>the second half was un freaking real, and he's one

0:14:54.920 --> 0:14:57.280
<v Speaker 1>of the only players legitimately there's a chance to go

0:14:57.920 --> 0:15:01.080
<v Speaker 1>if not forty forty, and you're getting him way later

0:15:01.120 --> 0:15:03.640
<v Speaker 1>than you're getting Trout and yell at Nacunia, you know,

0:15:03.720 --> 0:15:10.680
<v Speaker 1>and way later. But that slump was really disgusting, Frank

0:15:11.600 --> 0:15:15.480
<v Speaker 1>and if he middles out somewhere, I'm going to rather

0:15:15.560 --> 0:15:20.440
<v Speaker 1>have Alex Bregman. I feel safer drafting Alex Bregman that

0:15:20.640 --> 0:15:24.000
<v Speaker 1>I do no one A Ronando because those start home

0:15:24.080 --> 0:15:27.200
<v Speaker 1>road splits and Josier mirrors, because we know how bad

0:15:27.280 --> 0:15:30.240
<v Speaker 1>that slump can be. Alex Bregman is not going to

0:15:30.360 --> 0:15:34.240
<v Speaker 1>hit the depths that Jose Ramirez did. You're not getting

0:15:34.320 --> 0:15:37.680
<v Speaker 1>stolen basis. I get that, and everything else you should

0:15:38.480 --> 0:15:41.800
<v Speaker 1>better average. I like Alex Bregman more than I like

0:15:41.840 --> 0:15:44.400
<v Speaker 1>the other two guys, which is, by the way, he

0:15:44.520 --> 0:15:47.120
<v Speaker 1>is third in your poll right now through the top

0:15:47.160 --> 0:15:49.760
<v Speaker 1>third basement. The first baseman you want to draft, it's

0:15:49.920 --> 0:15:52.640
<v Speaker 1>Arnadano by far and away number one you have by far,

0:15:53.200 --> 0:15:56.680
<v Speaker 1>then Jose Ramirez, then Alex Bregman. Alex Bregman is my

0:15:56.840 --> 0:15:58.880
<v Speaker 1>number one overall third basement and I think some people

0:15:58.960 --> 0:16:01.400
<v Speaker 1>might be scared off by the whole cheating scandal when

0:16:01.400 --> 0:16:06.760
<v Speaker 1>it comes to you're not wrong, uh. Injury risk also

0:16:06.840 --> 0:16:08.880
<v Speaker 1>going up with those hit by pitches, Greg. But I

0:16:08.880 --> 0:16:10.800
<v Speaker 1>will preface this by saying, in a head to head

0:16:10.800 --> 0:16:13.080
<v Speaker 1>points league, Alex Bregman should be the number one third

0:16:13.080 --> 0:16:15.240
<v Speaker 1>baseman off the board. In fact, he should probably be

0:16:15.520 --> 0:16:17.880
<v Speaker 1>a top ten pick overall, maybe even higher than that.

0:16:17.920 --> 0:16:19.800
<v Speaker 1>He was the number one hitter in head to head

0:16:19.800 --> 0:16:22.400
<v Speaker 1>points leagues last year. That was Alex Bregman. And I

0:16:22.440 --> 0:16:24.360
<v Speaker 1>really do like no Erronado as well. I think you

0:16:24.400 --> 0:16:26.560
<v Speaker 1>can make the argument for any of these three third

0:16:26.560 --> 0:16:29.000
<v Speaker 1>baseman to be the number one third baseman this year,

0:16:29.160 --> 0:16:33.200
<v Speaker 1>Greg Nolan. Erronado's average offensive line over the past five

0:16:33.240 --> 0:16:37.680
<v Speaker 1>seasons three d batting average, forty home runs, one and

0:16:37.680 --> 0:16:41.360
<v Speaker 1>four runs scored, one and twenty four ribbies and three

0:16:41.360 --> 0:16:44.840
<v Speaker 1>stolen bases. He is as elite of a four category

0:16:44.840 --> 0:16:47.320
<v Speaker 1>contributor as you can find. Of course, there is risk

0:16:47.440 --> 0:16:50.280
<v Speaker 1>that he could be traded away from Colorado, which would

0:16:50.280 --> 0:16:52.840
<v Speaker 1>affect his overall production because his home road splits, as

0:16:52.840 --> 0:16:55.840
<v Speaker 1>Greg mentioned, are very stark. He's much better in coors Field,

0:16:56.120 --> 0:16:58.160
<v Speaker 1>like most hitters who played for the Rockies, So how

0:16:58.200 --> 0:16:59.680
<v Speaker 1>you have to keep that in mind. As of now,

0:16:59.720 --> 0:17:01.640
<v Speaker 1>it looks like Nolan Arronado is going to stay put

0:17:01.680 --> 0:17:05.119
<v Speaker 1>with the Colorado Rockies and Alex Bregman, the guy just

0:17:05.160 --> 0:17:07.000
<v Speaker 1>continues to get better and better. Say what you want

0:17:07.000 --> 0:17:08.960
<v Speaker 1>about him, whether it's cheating related or not. I guess

0:17:08.960 --> 0:17:11.800
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna find out this upcoming season. But look in

0:17:11.840 --> 0:17:16.320
<v Speaker 1>two thousand, eighteen eighties sixty homers up over a hundred, runs,

0:17:16.520 --> 0:17:20.520
<v Speaker 1>over a hundred Ribbies, ten Stone bass p s. Last year,

0:17:20.560 --> 0:17:27.960
<v Speaker 1>Greg ops over a thousand and twenty two runs, hundred

0:17:28.000 --> 0:17:30.320
<v Speaker 1>and twelve r b I's five steals and stole basis

0:17:30.359 --> 0:17:31.600
<v Speaker 1>are coming down. I don't know if you're gonna get

0:17:31.640 --> 0:17:35.160
<v Speaker 1>many steals out of Bregman anymore. UM and Craig Miss

0:17:35.240 --> 0:17:37.240
<v Speaker 1>actually spoke with him on Fantasy Supports today. We had

0:17:37.240 --> 0:17:39.560
<v Speaker 1>an interview with Alex Bregman and said he's focused on

0:17:39.600 --> 0:17:41.960
<v Speaker 1>getting off to a quicker start because the past couple

0:17:41.960 --> 0:17:43.760
<v Speaker 1>of seasons he really gets off to a slow start.

0:17:43.960 --> 0:17:47.200
<v Speaker 1>Had absolutely ridiculous second half last year with an OPS

0:17:47.240 --> 0:17:49.960
<v Speaker 1>over eleven hundred. If he gets off to a faster start,

0:17:50.240 --> 0:17:52.359
<v Speaker 1>and of course there is an opportunity for Alex Bregman

0:17:52.440 --> 0:17:55.600
<v Speaker 1>to have a even better season. Maybe it's three fifteen,

0:17:55.680 --> 0:17:58.320
<v Speaker 1>three twenty with forty home runs and and the rest

0:17:58.320 --> 0:18:00.960
<v Speaker 1>of those county sets. Greg from me, I do have

0:18:01.040 --> 0:18:04.440
<v Speaker 1>Jose Aramirez first, because uh, these are for Roto rankings

0:18:04.440 --> 0:18:07.359
<v Speaker 1>five by five, and I just think the ability to

0:18:07.400 --> 0:18:10.879
<v Speaker 1>get thirty stolen bases what we saw out of him.

0:18:10.920 --> 0:18:13.680
<v Speaker 1>You know, from July one on last year and only

0:18:13.960 --> 0:18:17.840
<v Speaker 1>forty nine games, he finally figured out stop trying to

0:18:17.920 --> 0:18:20.399
<v Speaker 1>lift the ball so much. Zira miror Is, You're a

0:18:20.480 --> 0:18:22.320
<v Speaker 1>great hitter the way that you are. You don't need

0:18:22.359 --> 0:18:25.000
<v Speaker 1>to change a single thing. In the first half, Greg,

0:18:25.240 --> 0:18:29.120
<v Speaker 1>his flyball percentage was nearly fifty percent from July one

0:18:29.200 --> 0:18:32.439
<v Speaker 1>on the fly ball percentage was he lowered it nine

0:18:32.480 --> 0:18:35.439
<v Speaker 1>percentage points, started hitting more line drives, started pulling the

0:18:35.480 --> 0:18:37.720
<v Speaker 1>ball more. That is what made Jose Aramire is a

0:18:37.720 --> 0:18:40.240
<v Speaker 1>great player. A couple of seasons ago. You brought up

0:18:40.280 --> 0:18:43.840
<v Speaker 1>that upside, Greg, someone that can flirt at type season.

0:18:44.080 --> 0:18:45.959
<v Speaker 1>I don't know that we'll see the batting average well

0:18:45.960 --> 0:18:50.280
<v Speaker 1>over three anymore. I think he can approach two eighty average,

0:18:50.280 --> 0:18:53.760
<v Speaker 1>twenty five home runs, five stolen bases, really good county

0:18:53.800 --> 0:18:55.919
<v Speaker 1>stacks in the middle of the Cleveland Indians lineup. This

0:18:55.960 --> 0:18:58.200
<v Speaker 1>just comes down to preference. What categories do you want?

0:18:58.400 --> 0:19:00.280
<v Speaker 1>If you trust that you can find stolen bases later

0:19:00.280 --> 0:19:02.920
<v Speaker 1>on in the draft, then go ahead by all means,

0:19:03.000 --> 0:19:05.080
<v Speaker 1>take a Bregman, take a Eranado. I don't have a

0:19:05.080 --> 0:19:07.320
<v Speaker 1>problem with either of those guys. Greg I like building

0:19:07.320 --> 0:19:10.320
<v Speaker 1>out my foundation early on with everything and holds your

0:19:10.359 --> 0:19:12.360
<v Speaker 1>mirrors to me, is one of those players that will

0:19:12.400 --> 0:19:14.679
<v Speaker 1>give you everything. I think he started to figure it

0:19:14.680 --> 0:19:16.840
<v Speaker 1>out there in the second half, and it's frankly, it's

0:19:16.840 --> 0:19:18.560
<v Speaker 1>something that I do trust going into this show. So

0:19:18.600 --> 0:19:20.640
<v Speaker 1>I agree you figured it out in the second half.

0:19:20.680 --> 0:19:22.520
<v Speaker 1>He was amazing. He talked about how he became the

0:19:22.560 --> 0:19:25.040
<v Speaker 1>line drive hit her again. But it's really hard to

0:19:25.040 --> 0:19:27.600
<v Speaker 1>get that first half out of my mind. Like it happened,

0:19:27.840 --> 0:19:30.040
<v Speaker 1>and it wasn't like it happened five years ago. It

0:19:30.320 --> 0:19:35.320
<v Speaker 1>just happened. That's really scary, Like to invest what you're

0:19:35.320 --> 0:19:37.520
<v Speaker 1>gonna have to invest in here as your number one

0:19:37.600 --> 0:19:40.959
<v Speaker 1>overall third basement. You want a little more safety than

0:19:40.960 --> 0:19:44.159
<v Speaker 1>you're a safe player normally. Do you want that? I

0:19:44.200 --> 0:19:46.480
<v Speaker 1>want the safe stolen basis? Greg, That's when it comes

0:19:46.480 --> 0:19:48.679
<v Speaker 1>down to and you know, look, Greg, last year I

0:19:48.720 --> 0:19:51.040
<v Speaker 1>was all over a position scarcity didn't really work out

0:19:51.040 --> 0:19:53.040
<v Speaker 1>for me. I was pulling outfielders up the board. You know,

0:19:53.080 --> 0:19:55.000
<v Speaker 1>maybe this year I'm going a little bit too far

0:19:55.040 --> 0:19:59.439
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to the category scarcity, batting average, stolen basis.

0:19:59.560 --> 0:20:02.880
<v Speaker 1>But I do trust what I saw from Josei miire

0:20:02.960 --> 0:20:05.639
<v Speaker 1>is in that second half. And look, if you don't understand,

0:20:05.680 --> 0:20:07.600
<v Speaker 1>you want someone a little bit more safe. Aeronado is

0:20:07.600 --> 0:20:09.399
<v Speaker 1>the safet of the three. If you want safety, you

0:20:09.440 --> 0:20:11.840
<v Speaker 1>think he's gonna remain in Colorado, then take non Arnado.

0:20:11.840 --> 0:20:13.720
<v Speaker 1>There's no doubt about that. But there is a chance

0:20:14.000 --> 0:20:16.119
<v Speaker 1>that Bregman continues to get even better. And if he

0:20:16.160 --> 0:20:18.239
<v Speaker 1>does get better than what we saw last year, then

0:20:18.280 --> 0:20:20.360
<v Speaker 1>that means he's going to be better than non Arronado.

0:20:20.680 --> 0:20:23.240
<v Speaker 1>And if Josier Miirez is the player he was over

0:20:23.280 --> 0:20:26.560
<v Speaker 1>those final forty nine games for an entire season again,

0:20:26.680 --> 0:20:28.920
<v Speaker 1>then he's more than likely the number one third base

0:20:29.000 --> 0:20:31.560
<v Speaker 1>and he's probably you know, thirty thirty player with a

0:20:31.600 --> 0:20:34.160
<v Speaker 1>good batting average as well. Greg, those final forty nine

0:20:34.160 --> 0:20:36.840
<v Speaker 1>games he had three one awesome. He was awesome, man,

0:20:37.359 --> 0:20:41.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, I love him. I think it's more of

0:20:41.160 --> 0:20:43.439
<v Speaker 1>a type of league format do you play in more

0:20:43.480 --> 0:20:45.120
<v Speaker 1>than anything. I think if you play in Rhodo again,

0:20:45.160 --> 0:20:46.919
<v Speaker 1>for me, it's Jose and if you play in head

0:20:46.960 --> 0:20:49.399
<v Speaker 1>to head points it's Alex Bregman. And if you're a

0:20:49.440 --> 0:20:51.760
<v Speaker 1>safe player, then just take Eronado right up next. Let's

0:20:51.800 --> 0:20:54.359
<v Speaker 1>get you are fourth and fifth, top third basion because

0:20:54.359 --> 0:20:57.119
<v Speaker 1>I think there's a clear drop off after that. For me,

0:20:57.280 --> 0:20:59.399
<v Speaker 1>I think it's the same for you. Um for me,

0:20:59.480 --> 0:21:01.520
<v Speaker 1>I haven't at the Rendon raffievers you have it, Rafi

0:21:01.560 --> 0:21:05.720
<v Speaker 1>devers Anthony Rendon. How come I just expect a little

0:21:05.720 --> 0:21:09.119
<v Speaker 1>bit more power out of Anthony Rendon and he is

0:21:09.160 --> 0:21:11.720
<v Speaker 1>switching leagues. It's kind of like the Mookie Bets argument

0:21:11.760 --> 0:21:13.520
<v Speaker 1>that I made. Greg. I think Anthony Rendon is a

0:21:13.520 --> 0:21:15.760
<v Speaker 1>phenomenal player and I still have in my top five.

0:21:15.800 --> 0:21:18.280
<v Speaker 1>But if I'm splitting hairs, I mean last year was

0:21:18.320 --> 0:21:21.280
<v Speaker 1>a career year for Anthony Rendon, and of course he

0:21:21.359 --> 0:21:23.720
<v Speaker 1>came in a contract year, so I'm not gonna be

0:21:23.800 --> 0:21:26.800
<v Speaker 1>completely skeptical of what I saw from Anthony Rendon, because

0:21:26.800 --> 0:21:29.040
<v Speaker 1>I do trust that he is a great player. The

0:21:29.080 --> 0:21:31.480
<v Speaker 1>bad of ball data was great last year. The stack

0:21:31.480 --> 0:21:34.199
<v Speaker 1>cast data was awesome when it came to Anthony Rendon.

0:21:34.400 --> 0:21:37.239
<v Speaker 1>He doesn't strike out under fourteen percent strike out right

0:21:37.280 --> 0:21:40.000
<v Speaker 1>now three years in a row. Really great plate discipline.

0:21:40.480 --> 0:21:43.760
<v Speaker 1>Except instead of getting the thirty four home runs in

0:21:43.800 --> 0:21:46.040
<v Speaker 1>the juice ball, a hundred and twenty six r B

0:21:46.160 --> 0:21:49.520
<v Speaker 1>I s, I think we're probably closer to right around

0:21:49.520 --> 0:21:52.840
<v Speaker 1>thirty home runs close to a three batting average. Good

0:21:52.840 --> 0:21:56.800
<v Speaker 1>counting stats for me, Greg Raphael Devers can get even better.

0:21:57.320 --> 0:21:58.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean, he did what he did last year and

0:21:59.000 --> 0:22:01.920
<v Speaker 1>and his what age twenty to twenty three season um

0:22:02.480 --> 0:22:05.480
<v Speaker 1>look three eleven batting average, a hundred and twenty nine

0:22:05.520 --> 0:22:07.680
<v Speaker 1>runs scored. He'll even chip in five to ten soul

0:22:07.720 --> 0:22:11.960
<v Speaker 1>and basses. That is Raphael Devers. And he really really

0:22:12.040 --> 0:22:16.120
<v Speaker 1>cut down on his strikeouts from C to SE. That's

0:22:16.160 --> 0:22:19.119
<v Speaker 1>the biggest difference when it comes to Raphael Devers. The

0:22:19.160 --> 0:22:21.440
<v Speaker 1>strides that he's made is that he's just making more contact.

0:22:21.640 --> 0:22:24.439
<v Speaker 1>Extremely aggressive swinger reminds me a lot of Javier Baias

0:22:24.560 --> 0:22:27.080
<v Speaker 1>go to swing it pitches outside the strike zone. But Greg,

0:22:27.119 --> 0:22:29.520
<v Speaker 1>I look at Rafael Devers and I see a player

0:22:29.600 --> 0:22:34.480
<v Speaker 1>that is a sending. Not that Rendon is necessarily descending,

0:22:34.600 --> 0:22:37.080
<v Speaker 1>but I think that if Devers continues to get better,

0:22:37.440 --> 0:22:43.399
<v Speaker 1>that better will be better right now. But it comes

0:22:43.440 --> 0:22:45.160
<v Speaker 1>down to splitting hairs. I do like both of those guys.

0:22:45.080 --> 0:22:47.120
<v Speaker 1>I like both of them to Endeavor's year last year

0:22:47.200 --> 0:22:48.720
<v Speaker 1>was just remarkable. Was the year that we hoped he

0:22:48.800 --> 0:22:51.359
<v Speaker 1>had UH the year prior batting three eleven compared the

0:22:51.440 --> 0:22:54.640
<v Speaker 1>two forty UH the year the year before that. Um,

0:22:54.640 --> 0:22:56.560
<v Speaker 1>I think there is he was a much much better hitter.

0:22:56.760 --> 0:22:59.320
<v Speaker 1>But again I go with safety and quite frankly, I

0:22:59.320 --> 0:23:01.640
<v Speaker 1>just trust and Rendown a little bit more to give

0:23:01.640 --> 0:23:06.320
<v Speaker 1>you what he did last year more than ever. Maybe

0:23:06.320 --> 0:23:10.240
<v Speaker 1>that's where my head's at. What I think, Rendown, you

0:23:10.240 --> 0:23:12.360
<v Speaker 1>know what you're getting. I think Devers could still be ascending,

0:23:12.560 --> 0:23:14.399
<v Speaker 1>or maybe last year is a career here, I don't know.

0:23:14.440 --> 0:23:16.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm not altor Raffie Denvers by any means that we're

0:23:16.359 --> 0:23:20.360
<v Speaker 1>splitting hairs. I just trust more what every Rendown did.

0:23:20.600 --> 0:23:24.000
<v Speaker 1>I think that don't worry about him changing leaks. Probably

0:23:24.040 --> 0:23:27.119
<v Speaker 1>not professional hitter, professional hitter. I like that the babbit

0:23:27.240 --> 0:23:29.640
<v Speaker 1>was the same exact number in back to back years

0:23:29.680 --> 0:23:33.280
<v Speaker 1>at I love points the lead type of stuff. He

0:23:33.320 --> 0:23:36.000
<v Speaker 1>walks almost as much as he caves, Like that's the stuff.

0:23:36.040 --> 0:23:38.080
<v Speaker 1>I absolutely love all these numbers across that we were

0:23:38.119 --> 0:23:40.840
<v Speaker 1>all very similar over the past few years. And the

0:23:40.880 --> 0:23:42.320
<v Speaker 1>only thing one up with the all runs and everyone's

0:23:42.359 --> 0:23:44.840
<v Speaker 1>home runs went up because the US Ball clue Raffie nevers.

0:23:44.960 --> 0:23:47.960
<v Speaker 1>So for me, I'm taking every rendown very very confidently.

0:23:48.480 --> 0:23:51.600
<v Speaker 1>It's again just like he's safer pick. It reminds me

0:23:51.600 --> 0:23:54.000
<v Speaker 1>of my bregmant, Like it's just why I take a

0:23:54.119 --> 0:23:57.200
<v Speaker 1>chance we can get safety here with a any rendom,

0:23:57.240 --> 0:24:00.320
<v Speaker 1>And I think that's maybe play an area that I'm

0:24:00.400 --> 0:24:02.560
<v Speaker 1>growing as a fantasy ping Greg, is that you know,

0:24:02.600 --> 0:24:04.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm starting to take more risks early on in drafting

0:24:05.000 --> 0:24:08.200
<v Speaker 1>me more like you, I think. So we're we're swapping.

0:24:08.760 --> 0:24:13.080
<v Speaker 1>We're swapping draft philosophies here. Normally I do like the

0:24:13.119 --> 0:24:15.760
<v Speaker 1>safer player, but it's hard to argue with what Raffi

0:24:15.840 --> 0:24:18.159
<v Speaker 1>Devons did last year, and on the off chance that

0:24:18.320 --> 0:24:22.040
<v Speaker 1>he is again ascending um and potentially even getting better

0:24:22.080 --> 0:24:24.240
<v Speaker 1>than what we saw last year and I think that

0:24:24.400 --> 0:24:27.920
<v Speaker 1>season will outproduce what Anthony Rendon will do in year

0:24:27.960 --> 0:24:29.840
<v Speaker 1>one with the Angels. At number six, we got the

0:24:29.840 --> 0:24:33.040
<v Speaker 1>same third baseman. We'll go through that next year of

0:24:33.119 --> 0:24:42.240
<v Speaker 1>our top third baseman right here on the BFFs. Want

0:24:42.280 --> 0:24:44.919
<v Speaker 1>to be the next Daily Fantasy Millionaire. Dunk on your

0:24:45.000 --> 0:24:48.600
<v Speaker 1>NBA DFS competition with Daily Rodal dot Com and dominate

0:24:48.680 --> 0:24:51.480
<v Speaker 1>on fandel and draft kings this season. Compete with the

0:24:51.520 --> 0:24:54.359
<v Speaker 1>pros with Daily Rodal dot Com optimizer and the most

0:24:54.400 --> 0:24:58.800
<v Speaker 1>accurate projections in NBA DFS, plus line up alerts, breaking news,

0:24:58.920 --> 0:25:03.000
<v Speaker 1>lake swap support, and much more on winning NBA DFS

0:25:03.080 --> 0:25:07.320
<v Speaker 1>advice with promo code Dunk. Visit dot com backslash dunk

0:25:07.440 --> 0:25:18.920
<v Speaker 1>to learn more. All right, here we go. Let's keep

0:25:18.920 --> 0:25:22.119
<v Speaker 1>it rocking, Frank, keep it going. Let's go. This is

0:25:22.119 --> 0:25:24.280
<v Speaker 1>a deep position, man. We gotta get as many in

0:25:24.400 --> 0:25:27.000
<v Speaker 1>as we possibly can. So my six and seven here

0:25:27.040 --> 0:25:29.000
<v Speaker 1>for me, or many Machado and you on Mocado. Those

0:25:29.040 --> 0:25:32.200
<v Speaker 1>are your six and seven. Yeah, let's go. I've talked

0:25:32.200 --> 0:25:34.200
<v Speaker 1>to you a lot, so that's kind of why we're

0:25:34.240 --> 0:25:36.040
<v Speaker 1>on the same page year at six and seven. These

0:25:36.080 --> 0:25:38.960
<v Speaker 1>are two players that very in on I'm interested in

0:25:39.040 --> 0:25:42.639
<v Speaker 1>drafting because I believe that they very easily wind up

0:25:42.640 --> 0:25:44.879
<v Speaker 1>in the top tier. You're getting them at a not

0:25:45.000 --> 0:25:47.680
<v Speaker 1>top tier price. Yeah, these are players that you're getting

0:25:47.680 --> 0:25:50.320
<v Speaker 1>in the fourth fifth round range right now. And Manny Machado,

0:25:50.400 --> 0:25:52.480
<v Speaker 1>we've seen him have a down year before and then

0:25:52.520 --> 0:25:55.520
<v Speaker 1>bounce back um the following year. We've seen in two

0:25:55.520 --> 0:25:58.639
<v Speaker 1>thousand and seventeen he hit two fifty nine and then

0:25:58.680 --> 0:26:02.359
<v Speaker 1>bounced back the next year. We batting average, thirty seven

0:26:02.359 --> 0:26:04.720
<v Speaker 1>home runs, a hundred and seven Ribbies. That was the

0:26:04.800 --> 0:26:06.800
<v Speaker 1>year that he spent half the year with the Dodgers,

0:26:07.040 --> 0:26:10.199
<v Speaker 1>half the year with the Baltimore Orioles. And he was

0:26:10.200 --> 0:26:12.440
<v Speaker 1>someone who was a borderline first round pick last year,

0:26:12.680 --> 0:26:16.280
<v Speaker 1>first year, mega contract, new location in San Diego. I'm

0:26:16.359 --> 0:26:17.920
<v Speaker 1>kind of giving him a pass for what we saw

0:26:18.040 --> 0:26:21.480
<v Speaker 1>last year out of Manny Machado. Uh. And he struggled

0:26:21.480 --> 0:26:24.040
<v Speaker 1>against right handed pitching in two thousand nineteen, which is

0:26:24.040 --> 0:26:27.440
<v Speaker 1>not like him to thirty nine batting average seven OPS

0:26:27.680 --> 0:26:30.360
<v Speaker 1>in his career to seventy five batting average in eight

0:26:30.359 --> 0:26:33.439
<v Speaker 1>oh eight OPS. And that's with a huge sample size

0:26:33.440 --> 0:26:35.760
<v Speaker 1>of data. So I expect him to bounce back against

0:26:35.840 --> 0:26:39.199
<v Speaker 1>right handed pitching. Greg. If you are a conspiracy theorists,

0:26:39.240 --> 0:26:42.200
<v Speaker 1>I have this for your Jeff Zimmerman of Rhodograss tweeted

0:26:42.200 --> 0:26:44.680
<v Speaker 1>this out a couple of weeks ago that Manny Machado

0:26:44.720 --> 0:26:46.879
<v Speaker 1>was hit by a pitch on August eighth last season.

0:26:47.200 --> 0:26:49.639
<v Speaker 1>Before that hit bi pitch, he was batting two seventy

0:26:49.640 --> 0:26:55.280
<v Speaker 1>two three triple slash after the Hippi pitch to thirteen three,

0:26:55.920 --> 0:26:59.080
<v Speaker 1>three seventy five. So if you continued to play through

0:26:59.359 --> 0:27:01.440
<v Speaker 1>some kind of in jury after the hit by pitch,

0:27:01.800 --> 0:27:03.919
<v Speaker 1>then I think that that's that's what can explain the

0:27:03.960 --> 0:27:07.320
<v Speaker 1>final two months slump there. But we like Fernando Tatis,

0:27:07.520 --> 0:27:10.480
<v Speaker 1>Greg still likes Tommy fam It's a solid line up there.

0:27:10.680 --> 0:27:13.240
<v Speaker 1>I think that there's gonna be, you know, opportunities for

0:27:13.359 --> 0:27:16.560
<v Speaker 1>county stats and maybe you know seven eight stolen bases,

0:27:16.880 --> 0:27:20.080
<v Speaker 1>thirty to thirty five home runs to eighty. He's just

0:27:20.160 --> 0:27:22.320
<v Speaker 1>solid Greg across the board. He's not going to hurt

0:27:22.359 --> 0:27:25.520
<v Speaker 1>you anywhere. It's a clear life rank. He's all right

0:27:25.760 --> 0:27:28.680
<v Speaker 1>finding those solid guys aren't going to hurt you. That's

0:27:28.680 --> 0:27:31.719
<v Speaker 1>why I think I found hope. Yeah, I hope so

0:27:31.760 --> 0:27:35.160
<v Speaker 1>as well. And look Joan Moncata last year really reminded

0:27:35.200 --> 0:27:37.399
<v Speaker 1>me a lot of what we saw from Raphael. He

0:27:37.440 --> 0:27:40.679
<v Speaker 1>was actually more aggressive last year. He was someone in

0:27:40.680 --> 0:27:43.280
<v Speaker 1>the past who was a little bit more passive, and

0:27:43.320 --> 0:27:45.240
<v Speaker 1>he was. He has a really good eye at the plate,

0:27:45.400 --> 0:27:48.240
<v Speaker 1>but last year started chasing pitches outside of the zone

0:27:48.600 --> 0:27:52.280
<v Speaker 1>nine percent more than in eighteen. Yet his contact rate

0:27:52.440 --> 0:27:55.280
<v Speaker 1>on pitches both inside and outside of the zone went up.

0:27:55.560 --> 0:27:58.080
<v Speaker 1>He struck out less last year as well. His four

0:27:58.160 --> 0:28:00.720
<v Speaker 1>h six babit was incredibly high for you on Moncada,

0:28:00.960 --> 0:28:03.080
<v Speaker 1>but look at the quality of contact that he makes

0:28:03.880 --> 0:28:07.080
<v Speaker 1>point eight mile per hour average eggit velocity nine seven

0:28:07.200 --> 0:28:12.040
<v Speaker 1>percentile in baseball career best twelve percent barrel rate, and

0:28:12.080 --> 0:28:14.720
<v Speaker 1>he maintained high babbos across every level in the minor

0:28:14.760 --> 0:28:17.960
<v Speaker 1>leagues as well. So I think he's another one like

0:28:18.000 --> 0:28:20.400
<v Speaker 1>Devor's who could take that next examply and he's someone

0:28:20.440 --> 0:28:22.640
<v Speaker 1>that we're drafting as like a borderline first round pick

0:28:22.960 --> 0:28:25.800
<v Speaker 1>next year, Greg, you on Moncada wouldn't surprise me if

0:28:26.200 --> 0:28:29.160
<v Speaker 1>it's to eighty to ninety. I don't think he's gonna

0:28:29.200 --> 0:28:31.080
<v Speaker 1>hit over three hundred like he did last year, but

0:28:31.320 --> 0:28:34.200
<v Speaker 1>approach thirty home runs really take that next step. Counting

0:28:34.240 --> 0:28:36.320
<v Speaker 1>stats are gonna be there, really good line up, ten

0:28:36.359 --> 0:28:38.959
<v Speaker 1>to fifteen stolen bases, another one doesn't hurt you anywhere,

0:28:39.000 --> 0:28:40.560
<v Speaker 1>and he's probably going to give you more speed than

0:28:40.560 --> 0:28:43.040
<v Speaker 1>Manny Machado as well. Totally. And if you've made the

0:28:43.080 --> 0:28:45.320
<v Speaker 1>case for put Moncada ahead of Machado, I think I

0:28:45.320 --> 0:28:48.080
<v Speaker 1>would actually be okay with it. But I think there's

0:28:48.120 --> 0:28:51.320
<v Speaker 1>a clear top seven, and Moncada has that ability over

0:28:51.360 --> 0:28:53.440
<v Speaker 1>thirty home runs proce just power in a good line

0:28:53.520 --> 0:28:55.720
<v Speaker 1>up in a good ballpark. It all ends up to

0:28:55.760 --> 0:28:58.560
<v Speaker 1>be really nice year from me on Moncada. Then we

0:28:58.680 --> 0:29:01.520
<v Speaker 1>get to my eight nine, which I feel very passionately

0:29:01.560 --> 0:29:04.120
<v Speaker 1>about as well, specifically Vladim errig Guerrero Jr. I think

0:29:05.040 --> 0:29:06.600
<v Speaker 1>also could I kind of ascend like we thought he

0:29:06.600 --> 0:29:08.360
<v Speaker 1>was gonna happen last year. It didn't. Maybe there's a

0:29:08.360 --> 0:29:12.280
<v Speaker 1>little project fatigue on him and people may have written

0:29:12.360 --> 0:29:15.240
<v Speaker 1>him off way too quickly. So I like Vladimir Guerrero.

0:29:15.720 --> 0:29:17.560
<v Speaker 1>And then in there I also Chris Bryan. I know

0:29:17.640 --> 0:29:19.720
<v Speaker 1>you have Chris Bryant way late later than I do,

0:29:19.880 --> 0:29:22.480
<v Speaker 1>and I think I get that you don't like Chris Bryant.

0:29:22.480 --> 0:29:25.280
<v Speaker 1>I understand that, but I think the heat has just

0:29:25.760 --> 0:29:28.760
<v Speaker 1>gone too far. He's not nearly as bad as you

0:29:28.880 --> 0:29:31.440
<v Speaker 1>think he is. Great. I think you should pull up

0:29:31.520 --> 0:29:34.239
<v Speaker 1>his Baseball Savant stat cast page. I have a fan

0:29:34.320 --> 0:29:36.960
<v Speaker 1>graphs page, and you'll see a lot of You see

0:29:37.000 --> 0:29:39.000
<v Speaker 1>a lot of blue on that page. Blue. It's a

0:29:39.040 --> 0:29:40.920
<v Speaker 1>lot of white and green on his fan graphs. Ice

0:29:41.040 --> 0:29:43.480
<v Speaker 1>cold for Chris Bryant. The stat cast data the bad

0:29:43.560 --> 0:29:46.200
<v Speaker 1>and ball data for Chris Bryant, and it really doesn't

0:29:46.200 --> 0:29:49.040
<v Speaker 1>do much outside of hit home runs. Fine, they'll give

0:29:49.040 --> 0:29:50.800
<v Speaker 1>you a run thirty home runs, and he's gonna score

0:29:50.880 --> 0:29:55.080
<v Speaker 1>runs runs scored a scatters category as well. Seventy seven

0:29:55.160 --> 0:29:57.960
<v Speaker 1>RBIs last year, fifty two r BIS the year before,

0:29:58.240 --> 0:30:01.200
<v Speaker 1>seventy three r bis and two thousand seventeen expected to

0:30:01.320 --> 0:30:03.080
<v Speaker 1>lead off. The guy's not going to be a contributor

0:30:03.520 --> 0:30:06.360
<v Speaker 1>in rb I's not going to steal many bases that

0:30:06.560 --> 0:30:09.240
<v Speaker 1>it's been seven to four each of the past three seasons.

0:30:09.840 --> 0:30:12.200
<v Speaker 1>Average is fine, not gonna hurt you, they're not going

0:30:12.280 --> 0:30:14.240
<v Speaker 1>to help you. So but average runs and home runs

0:30:14.320 --> 0:30:16.360
<v Speaker 1>that's pretty good. I would say he's more of a

0:30:16.400 --> 0:30:19.680
<v Speaker 1>two and a half category player. No, I mean I don't.

0:30:19.680 --> 0:30:21.239
<v Speaker 1>I don't think he's gonna hit two eighty. I think

0:30:21.280 --> 0:30:23.240
<v Speaker 1>it's I think that's who gazy. I think he's probably

0:30:23.280 --> 0:30:27.200
<v Speaker 1>more of like a town he's never been. But his

0:30:27.560 --> 0:30:30.120
<v Speaker 1>stat cast data, Gregg says that he got incredibly lucky

0:30:30.200 --> 0:30:33.080
<v Speaker 1>least like he was hurt last year too. Well, he's

0:30:33.120 --> 0:30:34.760
<v Speaker 1>hurt every year. Look at the year before that in

0:30:34.840 --> 0:30:36.600
<v Speaker 1>two thousand and eighteen, he played a hundred and two games.

0:30:36.640 --> 0:30:38.720
<v Speaker 1>He's dealt with shoulders. Something's not hurt every year. He

0:30:38.800 --> 0:30:42.560
<v Speaker 1>was hurting eighteen. All right, he played a hundred forty

0:30:42.600 --> 0:30:47.720
<v Speaker 1>seven games last year. But he has dealt with like

0:30:47.840 --> 0:30:49.720
<v Speaker 1>nagging stuff, you know what I'm saying, Greg, Like he's

0:30:49.720 --> 0:30:51.960
<v Speaker 1>played through it before and and that might be why

0:30:52.040 --> 0:30:54.720
<v Speaker 1>it's hurt his performance in the past. All Right, Maybe

0:30:54.760 --> 0:30:57.040
<v Speaker 1>maybe he's a three category contribute. That's fine, Agree to disagree.

0:30:57.040 --> 0:30:58.480
<v Speaker 1>You think he's gonna hit two eighty. I think he's

0:30:58.600 --> 0:31:01.760
<v Speaker 1>probably closer to like at two sixty. That's fine. Yeah,

0:31:01.760 --> 0:31:03.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm out on Chris Bryan. I'm not gonna have him anywhere.

0:31:03.560 --> 0:31:05.560
<v Speaker 1>I just think that's why I have him ranked the

0:31:05.560 --> 0:31:08.720
<v Speaker 1>way that I do. I have him down at fresh

0:31:08.760 --> 0:31:10.360
<v Speaker 1>brankings back up like, I think you've just you've gone

0:31:10.400 --> 0:31:12.840
<v Speaker 1>too far here, you really have, So I don't think

0:31:12.880 --> 0:31:15.680
<v Speaker 1>there's much upside there is my opinion. Why can't Chris

0:31:15.760 --> 0:31:19.960
<v Speaker 1>Bryant be better better than Josh Donaldson. You guys have

0:31:20.040 --> 0:31:22.400
<v Speaker 1>gonna hurt. You have Ben hurt. Last year you wouldn't

0:31:22.440 --> 0:31:25.400
<v Speaker 1>draft Shosh and I was roll. Now he's back inside

0:31:25.440 --> 0:31:27.520
<v Speaker 1>your top eight. He's in the best lineup in baseball,

0:31:27.560 --> 0:31:30.600
<v Speaker 1>Greg Chris Bryant is leading off a regular field. What

0:31:30.760 --> 0:31:32.520
<v Speaker 1>is it? So what he's not gonna give you RBIs

0:31:32.920 --> 0:31:34.840
<v Speaker 1>Josh Donaldson is going to give you home runs. He's

0:31:34.840 --> 0:31:36.600
<v Speaker 1>going to give you r bis, gonna give you run scores,

0:31:37.040 --> 0:31:39.080
<v Speaker 1>gonna give you run more run scored at a better average.

0:31:40.520 --> 0:31:45.880
<v Speaker 1>And is he gonna batting average? Yes, slightly better, slightly

0:31:45.960 --> 0:31:47.760
<v Speaker 1>better batting average, more home runs out of Josh Town.

0:31:47.800 --> 0:31:50.400
<v Speaker 1>It's definitely way more RBIs. We're talking like thirty more

0:31:50.480 --> 0:31:53.880
<v Speaker 1>rbs and they're both talk gonna give you stolen basis.

0:31:54.000 --> 0:31:56.200
<v Speaker 1>So pick and choose. What do you want? You want

0:31:56.240 --> 0:31:58.120
<v Speaker 1>a little more average time he's speaking choosing you have

0:31:58.240 --> 0:32:01.400
<v Speaker 1>him everybody by five spots. It's not like they're all

0:32:01.440 --> 0:32:02.840
<v Speaker 1>in the same tear for me, they're all in the

0:32:02.880 --> 0:32:05.640
<v Speaker 1>same time. My tears from six through sixteen, I wouldn't

0:32:05.640 --> 0:32:08.160
<v Speaker 1>mind getting again. This is a deep position pick and

0:32:08.240 --> 0:32:11.120
<v Speaker 1>choose who you want. Josh Donaldson isn't the best line

0:32:11.200 --> 0:32:13.440
<v Speaker 1>up in baseball with the Minnesota Twins get hurt again.

0:32:14.320 --> 0:32:16.760
<v Speaker 1>I don't have any shares of him yet because no,

0:32:16.880 --> 0:32:19.400
<v Speaker 1>I've been drafting Manny Machado everywhere. Like, to me, he's

0:32:19.440 --> 0:32:21.720
<v Speaker 1>the best value on the board. Like so, I haven't

0:32:21.760 --> 0:32:24.200
<v Speaker 1>wound up with Josh Jonalson. But if if you're just

0:32:24.240 --> 0:32:27.560
<v Speaker 1>asking me, let's say we're in the sixth round, my

0:32:27.720 --> 0:32:32.080
<v Speaker 1>first what is that? Eight third basement are are already gone,

0:32:32.280 --> 0:32:36.160
<v Speaker 1>and I'm deciding between Josh Donaldson, Matt Chapman, and Chris Bryant.

0:32:36.640 --> 0:32:40.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm not taking Chris Bryant. I'm taking either Josh Jonalson

0:32:40.360 --> 0:32:43.840
<v Speaker 1>or Matt Chapman. Mat Chapman to me, is young Josh Donaldson.

0:32:44.000 --> 0:32:46.560
<v Speaker 1>He does a lot of the same things. Good played, disciplined,

0:32:46.640 --> 0:32:48.840
<v Speaker 1>walks a lot, hits the ball extremely hard, hits the

0:32:48.840 --> 0:32:51.440
<v Speaker 1>ball in the air, and his batting average was incredibly unlucky.

0:32:51.520 --> 0:32:54.040
<v Speaker 1>Last year. He went from like two eighty to nine.

0:32:54.560 --> 0:32:57.480
<v Speaker 1>Nobody's always been like a tithe of the hitter. But

0:32:57.600 --> 0:32:59.840
<v Speaker 1>his quality of contact Regy, it's all so hard that

0:32:59.880 --> 0:33:03.600
<v Speaker 1>his batting average based on actually improved his play discipline

0:33:03.600 --> 0:33:04.960
<v Speaker 1>a ton from when he was in the minors to

0:33:05.040 --> 0:33:06.600
<v Speaker 1>the Major He doesn't strike out as much as he

0:33:06.680 --> 0:33:10.720
<v Speaker 1>used to. Any projections system's batting fifty Matt Chapman. I

0:33:10.760 --> 0:33:12.800
<v Speaker 1>think he could be better than that. Literally, I think

0:33:12.840 --> 0:33:18.120
<v Speaker 1>he'd be like he's done at once. Yeah, but I

0:33:18.160 --> 0:33:20.080
<v Speaker 1>mean he's only been up in then the majors for

0:33:20.160 --> 0:33:23.520
<v Speaker 1>what two and a half years, So he's one of

0:33:23.560 --> 0:33:25.080
<v Speaker 1>those guys. Were you still young enough where he can

0:33:25.120 --> 0:33:28.120
<v Speaker 1>take that next step as well? Greg, he is a

0:33:28.200 --> 0:33:33.560
<v Speaker 1>year younger than Chris Bryan. It makes him younger like

0:33:33.720 --> 0:33:35.800
<v Speaker 1>Josh Donaldton and match happened to me are just their

0:33:35.880 --> 0:33:40.760
<v Speaker 1>clones to sixty good home runs, power numbers runs RB.

0:33:40.880 --> 0:33:44.840
<v Speaker 1>I that's fine, really, I think you can make the argument. Look,

0:33:44.840 --> 0:33:46.680
<v Speaker 1>if you think he's safer, you're not worried about as

0:33:46.680 --> 0:33:49.440
<v Speaker 1>many injuries. Fine, yeah, I mean you can. Honestly, Greg,

0:33:49.560 --> 0:33:51.160
<v Speaker 1>you can talk me into moving Match Chapman ahead of

0:33:51.240 --> 0:33:53.320
<v Speaker 1>Josh Jhnson. Now. The only reason why I didn't is

0:33:53.320 --> 0:33:57.720
<v Speaker 1>because you're almost paying for Matt Chapman to do what

0:33:57.840 --> 0:34:01.200
<v Speaker 1>Josh Donaldson does every single year until he's or cowls

0:34:01.280 --> 0:34:04.920
<v Speaker 1>Josh Donaldson and Greg. If you're worried about the injuries,

0:34:04.960 --> 0:34:07.000
<v Speaker 1>that's fine, then you should be fading before. To be fair,

0:34:07.200 --> 0:34:09.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm not taking I'm not I'm not taking Josh Donaldson

0:34:09.280 --> 0:34:11.120
<v Speaker 1>the same exact things last year. But again, look best

0:34:11.200 --> 0:34:13.480
<v Speaker 1>linem in baseball, just put get it. Where does easily

0:34:13.560 --> 0:34:15.640
<v Speaker 1>Mayhew following all this because he's a different player than

0:34:15.680 --> 0:34:18.160
<v Speaker 1>these other guys, right Like, we're talking about Matt Chapman,

0:34:18.239 --> 0:34:21.360
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about Chris Bryant, We're talking about Josh Donaldson.

0:34:21.400 --> 0:34:22.919
<v Speaker 1>These are all guys that are gonna get your thirty

0:34:23.000 --> 0:34:25.600
<v Speaker 1>home runs score close to a hundred runs ideally have

0:34:25.640 --> 0:34:28.000
<v Speaker 1>close to hundred RB eis Obviously Chris Bryan hasn't gotten

0:34:28.000 --> 0:34:31.359
<v Speaker 1>near that recently. Lea Mayhew for me is number ten

0:34:31.520 --> 0:34:34.240
<v Speaker 1>for you, he's right around the same number. He's rund

0:34:34.280 --> 0:34:37.239
<v Speaker 1>the same number here. Where does where does he kind

0:34:37.239 --> 0:34:39.400
<v Speaker 1>of fall in this mix? I think he gets drafted

0:34:39.440 --> 0:34:42.239
<v Speaker 1>in a similar range as Donaldson, as Matt Chapman, and

0:34:42.400 --> 0:34:43.800
<v Speaker 1>I don't have a problem with that. I think it

0:34:43.840 --> 0:34:46.880
<v Speaker 1>comes down to draft philosophy what you need on your

0:34:46.920 --> 0:34:48.560
<v Speaker 1>team in that moment. If you want to put an

0:34:48.560 --> 0:34:51.520
<v Speaker 1>emphasis on power, then I think you lean with a

0:34:51.600 --> 0:34:53.879
<v Speaker 1>Josh Donaldson or a Matt Chapman. But if you want

0:34:53.960 --> 0:34:56.400
<v Speaker 1>to solidify your batting average and your run scored, then

0:34:56.880 --> 0:34:59.040
<v Speaker 1>then you can leave with D. L. Mayhew. And again,

0:34:59.280 --> 0:35:02.280
<v Speaker 1>taking someone like le Mayhew allows you to take risks

0:35:02.520 --> 0:35:05.080
<v Speaker 1>on power hitters later on in your draft that are

0:35:05.160 --> 0:35:08.480
<v Speaker 1>going to hurt your batting average. So LEA. Mayhew last year,

0:35:08.680 --> 0:35:11.120
<v Speaker 1>while it was a career season, he had three seven.

0:35:11.600 --> 0:35:13.560
<v Speaker 1>We have seen him hit for that hive of a

0:35:13.560 --> 0:35:15.759
<v Speaker 1>batting average in the past. When he has now led,

0:35:16.160 --> 0:35:18.080
<v Speaker 1>he has won a batting title in both the National

0:35:18.160 --> 0:35:21.040
<v Speaker 1>League and the American League. His expected batting average was

0:35:21.160 --> 0:35:23.080
<v Speaker 1>three twenty two last year. That was the third best

0:35:23.120 --> 0:35:27.600
<v Speaker 1>in baseball. His quality of contact GJ. Mayhew was ridiculous.

0:35:27.800 --> 0:35:30.359
<v Speaker 1>His swing is built for Yankee Stadium. He's a line

0:35:30.440 --> 0:35:32.680
<v Speaker 1>drive hitter. He hits the ball to right field. I

0:35:32.760 --> 0:35:36.280
<v Speaker 1>think you expect some natural regression, but it wouldn't surprise

0:35:36.320 --> 0:35:38.120
<v Speaker 1>me at all. If he hits three fifteen, if he

0:35:38.200 --> 0:35:40.640
<v Speaker 1>hits three twenty, if he even approaches that number, that

0:35:40.719 --> 0:35:42.279
<v Speaker 1>we saw last year. But he's going to give you

0:35:42.280 --> 0:35:45.759
<v Speaker 1>a batting average probably closer to twenty home runs than

0:35:45.880 --> 0:35:48.120
<v Speaker 1>the what do you have twenty seven last year? That's

0:35:48.120 --> 0:35:51.480
<v Speaker 1>not realistic. I think eighteen to twenty home runs really

0:35:51.560 --> 0:35:53.520
<v Speaker 1>good run scored could lead the American League, and run

0:35:53.560 --> 0:35:55.480
<v Speaker 1>scored to be honest, uh, seventy to a d r

0:35:55.520 --> 0:35:58.120
<v Speaker 1>BIS and a handful of stolen basis. Greg. It just

0:35:58.200 --> 0:35:59.719
<v Speaker 1>comes down to what you want at that point in

0:35:59.760 --> 0:36:01.520
<v Speaker 1>the AFT. If you want to continue to build out

0:36:01.800 --> 0:36:03.840
<v Speaker 1>your runs and your batting average, you know that you

0:36:03.880 --> 0:36:06.239
<v Speaker 1>can find home run, home runs and RBIs later on

0:36:06.239 --> 0:36:08.800
<v Speaker 1>in your in your drafts, then I think Mayhew was

0:36:08.840 --> 0:36:10.920
<v Speaker 1>the answer for you. Um I think that he is

0:36:11.000 --> 0:36:12.719
<v Speaker 1>right in the same range, fifth sixth round. I don't

0:36:12.719 --> 0:36:14.680
<v Speaker 1>have a problem where he's going, you know, le maayhew A.

0:36:15.800 --> 0:36:18.920
<v Speaker 1>This this interesting because I don't want him. I'd rather

0:36:19.000 --> 0:36:23.560
<v Speaker 1>have Chapman, Bryant, Pinstripe, Prime, Donaldson. If it's my sense,

0:36:23.920 --> 0:36:27.319
<v Speaker 1>I don't want my third basement basement because you want

0:36:27.360 --> 0:36:31.120
<v Speaker 1>power run. Second base sucks and we'll talk about that

0:36:31.239 --> 0:36:33.040
<v Speaker 1>later in the week. Say they sucks. And I was

0:36:33.080 --> 0:36:35.000
<v Speaker 1>doing my second base rankings earlier today and I was like,

0:36:35.000 --> 0:36:37.000
<v Speaker 1>oh my god, you're right. You're right about that. This

0:36:37.120 --> 0:36:41.840
<v Speaker 1>is horrible and I feel Mayhew has versatility everywhere first, second,

0:36:41.880 --> 0:36:43.799
<v Speaker 1>third base. But if you use him anywhere other than

0:36:43.880 --> 0:36:46.440
<v Speaker 1>second base, you are making a mistake. It's like using

0:36:46.480 --> 0:36:48.640
<v Speaker 1>a catcher at first base. Don't do it. I think

0:36:48.640 --> 0:36:51.359
<v Speaker 1>you're making a big mistake. Dj Le Mayhew as your

0:36:51.400 --> 0:36:54.000
<v Speaker 1>second nation, makes a whole lot more, says your third basement.

0:36:54.320 --> 0:36:56.319
<v Speaker 1>I'd rather have the power guys and then maybe think

0:36:56.680 --> 0:36:59.000
<v Speaker 1>he was my second basement. That's cool that averaging runs,

0:36:59.160 --> 0:37:01.719
<v Speaker 1>but that fits well with remember whole stadium. You have

0:37:01.760 --> 0:37:04.160
<v Speaker 1>power guys in dead All right, we've gone through basically

0:37:04.200 --> 0:37:05.719
<v Speaker 1>the first half. We got a touch on flat. We

0:37:05.719 --> 0:37:12.520
<v Speaker 1>didn't talk about lad what time around. I want to

0:37:12.560 --> 0:37:15.439
<v Speaker 1>be the next Daily Fantasy Millionaire. Dunk on your NBA

0:37:15.560 --> 0:37:18.880
<v Speaker 1>DFS competition with Daily Rodal dot Com and dominate on

0:37:19.080 --> 0:37:22.080
<v Speaker 1>fandel and DraftKings this season. Compete with the pros with

0:37:22.160 --> 0:37:25.799
<v Speaker 1>Daily Rodal dot Com optimizer and the most accurate projections

0:37:25.880 --> 0:37:30.080
<v Speaker 1>in NBA DFS, plus lineup alerts, breaking news, lake swap support,

0:37:30.160 --> 0:37:33.200
<v Speaker 1>and much more safe ten percent on winning NBA DFS

0:37:33.239 --> 0:37:36.440
<v Speaker 1>advice with promo code Dunk. Visit Daily Rodal dot com

0:37:36.600 --> 0:37:50.359
<v Speaker 1>backslash dunk to learn more. All here, we gonna get

0:37:50.360 --> 0:37:52.480
<v Speaker 1>a lot to do. Frank, Let's let's roll right through

0:37:52.600 --> 0:37:55.000
<v Speaker 1>power through power hour. Right now, it's talk more about

0:37:55.000 --> 0:37:57.880
<v Speaker 1>a lad Yeah. I think Vladimir Guerrero Jr. Can have

0:37:58.080 --> 0:38:00.760
<v Speaker 1>an Anthony Rendell in type season. Greg, it wouldn't surprise

0:38:00.800 --> 0:38:03.800
<v Speaker 1>me one bit. Talk about him being in better shape

0:38:04.080 --> 0:38:06.920
<v Speaker 1>this upcoming season in his second season, and I tweeted

0:38:06.960 --> 0:38:08.400
<v Speaker 1>out a video of a home run that he hit

0:38:08.520 --> 0:38:12.040
<v Speaker 1>yesterday against the Pittsburgh Pirates. Just ridiculous. It was like

0:38:12.080 --> 0:38:14.719
<v Speaker 1>a frozen rope that went like four hundred feet. It

0:38:14.840 --> 0:38:18.040
<v Speaker 1>was like, this guy's hands are incredibly quick. I think

0:38:18.120 --> 0:38:20.960
<v Speaker 1>that last year obviously got a taste in the majors,

0:38:21.080 --> 0:38:23.080
<v Speaker 1>got worn down a little bit, We saw some fatigue

0:38:23.160 --> 0:38:26.719
<v Speaker 1>later on, comes back to shape, comes back this year

0:38:27.040 --> 0:38:29.600
<v Speaker 1>to camp in better shape. Um, and what he did

0:38:29.640 --> 0:38:31.839
<v Speaker 1>in the minor leagues, Greg and two thousand, eight three

0:38:32.160 --> 0:38:34.960
<v Speaker 1>one batting average, thousands, seventy three o p s. He's

0:38:34.960 --> 0:38:37.239
<v Speaker 1>gotta raise the launchego. He hit too many groundballs, but

0:38:37.719 --> 0:38:40.000
<v Speaker 1>I think if he does that, we're looking at someone

0:38:40.040 --> 0:38:42.919
<v Speaker 1>who can approach the three D batting average twenty five

0:38:43.000 --> 0:38:45.560
<v Speaker 1>to thirty home runs, good counting stats because they have

0:38:45.600 --> 0:38:48.160
<v Speaker 1>a solid line up out there in Toronto, good ballpark

0:38:48.239 --> 0:38:50.440
<v Speaker 1>to hit in other good ballparks that hidden in his

0:38:50.560 --> 0:38:53.560
<v Speaker 1>division in the American League East. After Machado and Yoan

0:38:53.600 --> 0:38:56.000
<v Speaker 1>Maka to go off the board, Greg Vladim mcguarreo Jr.

0:38:56.120 --> 0:38:58.239
<v Speaker 1>Is the next third baseman that I would be looking

0:38:58.280 --> 0:39:01.040
<v Speaker 1>for the problem is I that point? More often than not,

0:39:01.160 --> 0:39:03.560
<v Speaker 1>he's already gone. Yeah, because there's someone that likes lad

0:39:03.600 --> 0:39:07.280
<v Speaker 1>more than I do. There's obviously hype surrounding um Latimer,

0:39:07.640 --> 0:39:10.239
<v Speaker 1>as there should be, but you can't make that jump,

0:39:10.280 --> 0:39:12.719
<v Speaker 1>which is kind of exciting. Let's move on to the

0:39:13.040 --> 0:39:15.200
<v Speaker 1>next crew over third base man, hear a frank and

0:39:15.200 --> 0:39:17.959
<v Speaker 1>it's my it's really the start. Oh my next tier

0:39:18.360 --> 0:39:20.800
<v Speaker 1>and it's Max Munsey's in there, Mike mus Stocks is

0:39:20.840 --> 0:39:23.480
<v Speaker 1>in there like I. Justin Turner is in there as well.

0:39:23.520 --> 0:39:25.440
<v Speaker 1>I bumped Justin turn up because it Justin Turner and

0:39:25.440 --> 0:39:28.880
<v Speaker 1>I feel he's underappreciated. Munsey stock Is are similar to

0:39:29.080 --> 0:39:32.680
<v Speaker 1>Donaldson and to Chapman, as these guys are just monstrous

0:39:32.719 --> 0:39:34.120
<v Speaker 1>power hitters, and he's just get a little bit later

0:39:34.520 --> 0:39:36.680
<v Speaker 1>and the value is still really good. Yeah, I think

0:39:36.719 --> 0:39:39.239
<v Speaker 1>that makes a lot of sense. Um, Max Munsey someone

0:39:39.280 --> 0:39:41.160
<v Speaker 1>who if you thought it was a fluke, it's clearly

0:39:41.320 --> 0:39:43.800
<v Speaker 1>not a fluke when it comes to Max Munsey improved

0:39:43.800 --> 0:39:46.560
<v Speaker 1>against left handed pitching last year. Gonna bat uh, you know,

0:39:46.719 --> 0:39:49.799
<v Speaker 1>towards the top of that Dodger's lineup, probably gonna score

0:39:49.840 --> 0:39:52.120
<v Speaker 1>over a hundred runs as long as he stays healthy,

0:39:52.239 --> 0:39:54.880
<v Speaker 1>remains in that lineup. Um, not gonna help you in

0:39:54.920 --> 0:39:57.239
<v Speaker 1>batting average, obviously, he's actually gonna hurt. He's probably more

0:39:57.320 --> 0:39:59.719
<v Speaker 1>like a two fifty two STICKSI hitter, but going to

0:39:59.800 --> 0:40:02.680
<v Speaker 1>hit a thirty five home runs maybe even approach forty

0:40:03.200 --> 0:40:05.120
<v Speaker 1>RBIs might be a little bit low because he's again

0:40:05.160 --> 0:40:07.520
<v Speaker 1>probably gonna bat second in the lineup. But I think

0:40:07.560 --> 0:40:09.480
<v Speaker 1>that Maxi Monty is very similar to those players that

0:40:09.520 --> 0:40:12.160
<v Speaker 1>you mentioned Greg. Same thing with Mike mustak is, same

0:40:12.200 --> 0:40:14.400
<v Speaker 1>thing with a Uhniyo Suarez, who I all have in

0:40:14.440 --> 0:40:16.719
<v Speaker 1>the same area. It's you know, I have months He

0:40:16.800 --> 0:40:19.880
<v Speaker 1>at twelve, Chris Bryan at thirteen, I have Mustakis at fourteen,

0:40:20.120 --> 0:40:22.600
<v Speaker 1>Jeff McNeil at fifteen, uh and then a U Henio

0:40:22.640 --> 0:40:25.920
<v Speaker 1>Suarez at sixteen, Jeff McNeil, similar to DJ Lemayhew, you

0:40:26.000 --> 0:40:28.480
<v Speaker 1>gotta use that guy at second base or even in

0:40:28.560 --> 0:40:31.560
<v Speaker 1>your outfield. You're not using him at third base in

0:40:31.680 --> 0:40:34.280
<v Speaker 1>my opinion, Greg, But that rounds out my top sixteen.

0:40:34.680 --> 0:40:36.880
<v Speaker 1>Suarez I have a little bit lower, just because I

0:40:36.920 --> 0:40:39.480
<v Speaker 1>think him and Micha Umsakis are gonna give you similar numbers. Great,

0:40:39.800 --> 0:40:42.000
<v Speaker 1>but I worry about the shoulder injury. I agree, isn't

0:40:42.000 --> 0:40:43.719
<v Speaker 1>playing it. Is he gonna be ready for opening Day?

0:40:44.080 --> 0:40:46.400
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, you know, so my question with Anyo

0:40:46.440 --> 0:40:49.600
<v Speaker 1>Suarez was where how far drawings remember sixteen third basement

0:40:49.719 --> 0:40:51.480
<v Speaker 1>right exactly where I have him too, And I'm wondering

0:40:51.520 --> 0:40:54.239
<v Speaker 1>I did with Miguel Sha know, ahead of him, I

0:40:54.320 --> 0:40:57.520
<v Speaker 1>don't think so. I think that's because at least with Suarez,

0:40:57.560 --> 0:40:59.920
<v Speaker 1>he's not gonna bat h He's not gonna have as such,

0:41:00.120 --> 0:41:02.239
<v Speaker 1>uh such of a low batting average as mcguils soon know.

0:41:02.280 --> 0:41:06.080
<v Speaker 1>He's gonna hit like two sixty probably similar power. Maybe

0:41:06.120 --> 0:41:08.600
<v Speaker 1>Snow has more power upside, but hasn't shown the ability

0:41:08.600 --> 0:41:10.440
<v Speaker 1>to stay healthy as well, So you know, if you're

0:41:10.440 --> 0:41:12.239
<v Speaker 1>talking about risk, I think Snow does have a little

0:41:12.239 --> 0:41:15.160
<v Speaker 1>bit more than a u Heno Sauarez, okay um, I

0:41:15.160 --> 0:41:17.840
<v Speaker 1>want to open about Justin Turner. We drest him. I

0:41:17.920 --> 0:41:20.800
<v Speaker 1>don't mind Justin Turner as like a corner infielder. No,

0:41:20.880 --> 0:41:23.719
<v Speaker 1>it's fine if we could get him for I don't

0:41:23.719 --> 0:41:27.080
<v Speaker 1>have the auction values. You have forty five tabs open,

0:41:27.239 --> 0:41:29.600
<v Speaker 1>and that's not one of them. I I changed it

0:41:29.680 --> 0:41:33.880
<v Speaker 1>back to a DP, right, he legitimately has thirty tabs open. Computer.

0:41:34.040 --> 0:41:36.600
<v Speaker 1>You never know what you're gonna need. You just say

0:41:36.680 --> 0:41:41.440
<v Speaker 1>Turner nine dollars nine dollar corner infielder. Expensive, maybe too expensive.

0:41:41.719 --> 0:41:43.680
<v Speaker 1>We'll talk more about it, but he is what he is.

0:41:43.719 --> 0:41:45.400
<v Speaker 1>It's fine. He's gonna give you a good batting average.

0:41:45.440 --> 0:41:47.800
<v Speaker 1>You know, he's gonna miss probably thirty games throughout the

0:41:47.840 --> 0:41:50.719
<v Speaker 1>course of the season, good county stats, lift the ball

0:41:51.000 --> 0:41:53.560
<v Speaker 1>with the Dodgers, gonna hit twenty five home runs, he's firing.

0:41:53.600 --> 0:41:55.640
<v Speaker 1>He gives a good batting average at a good point

0:41:55.680 --> 0:41:58.240
<v Speaker 1>in the draft as well. Nine dollars his average auction

0:41:58.320 --> 0:42:02.359
<v Speaker 1>value over at the NFBC and his a DP from

0:42:02.520 --> 0:42:07.160
<v Speaker 1>over the weekend Greg is one. So he's the twenty

0:42:07.239 --> 0:42:09.600
<v Speaker 1>second third baseman off the board. It's just it's so weird.

0:42:09.719 --> 0:42:12.040
<v Speaker 1>That's how deep the position is that you're talking about

0:42:12.080 --> 0:42:14.960
<v Speaker 1>Justin Turner as the twenty second third baseman off the board. Greg,

0:42:15.440 --> 0:42:17.759
<v Speaker 1>It's crazy, It's ridiculous. Where do you have him again?

0:42:18.600 --> 0:42:23.640
<v Speaker 1>I haven't met, Sorry Greig. My reasoning Miguel Sinnell. I

0:42:23.680 --> 0:42:25.240
<v Speaker 1>love Miguel Sinell, and I think he has the upside

0:42:25.280 --> 0:42:27.480
<v Speaker 1>to hit fifty home runs. Juli Gurriel, I think is

0:42:27.520 --> 0:42:30.400
<v Speaker 1>probably gonna give you similar numbers to Justin Turner and

0:42:30.520 --> 0:42:34.400
<v Speaker 1>probably going to stay healthy as an been as injury

0:42:34.480 --> 0:42:37.120
<v Speaker 1>prone as a Justin Turner in the past. A really

0:42:37.120 --> 0:42:39.160
<v Speaker 1>good line up with the Houston Ashtari is my number

0:42:39.239 --> 0:42:43.279
<v Speaker 1>twenty third baseman. And it's interesting cause they never been

0:42:43.360 --> 0:42:46.000
<v Speaker 1>the Julie Gurriel guy and I always neither. I'm always

0:42:46.040 --> 0:42:47.680
<v Speaker 1>surprised about how old he is. He started five. That

0:42:47.840 --> 0:42:50.399
<v Speaker 1>just turns younger. He came over a little bit later

0:42:50.480 --> 0:42:52.879
<v Speaker 1>than then some of the other Cubans came to the league.

0:42:52.960 --> 0:42:54.920
<v Speaker 1>Juli gary Hell was amazing last year. There's thirty home

0:42:55.000 --> 0:42:59.000
<v Speaker 1>runs essentially all those RV eyes. He was awsome, doesn't

0:42:59.000 --> 0:43:00.840
<v Speaker 1>really strike out, which I like a lot, makes a

0:43:00.920 --> 0:43:03.040
<v Speaker 1>lot of contact, always hits for good batting average. The

0:43:03.120 --> 0:43:05.399
<v Speaker 1>difference for him last year was he raised the launch

0:43:05.440 --> 0:43:08.279
<v Speaker 1>angle and the juice ball. So I'd be a little

0:43:08.280 --> 0:43:10.279
<v Speaker 1>skeptical that he comes close to the thirty home runs

0:43:10.320 --> 0:43:12.800
<v Speaker 1>he hit last year, but you know, mid twenties, I

0:43:12.840 --> 0:43:14.959
<v Speaker 1>think he can approach that good county seat. Is gonna

0:43:14.960 --> 0:43:17.040
<v Speaker 1>play every day for the Houston Astros, really good lineup.

0:43:18.040 --> 0:43:19.560
<v Speaker 1>The only other name I have ahead of Turner as

0:43:19.600 --> 0:43:23.239
<v Speaker 1>well greg is Scott Kingary because I think he could

0:43:23.239 --> 0:43:27.160
<v Speaker 1>be player this year, very very n and the and

0:43:27.239 --> 0:43:30.800
<v Speaker 1>the position versatility third base in outfield. It helps, especially

0:43:30.840 --> 0:43:35.799
<v Speaker 1>in deeper leagues where is war. I have ed wardo

0:43:35.920 --> 0:43:39.440
<v Speaker 1>Escarty one. I'm I don't know. I'm just not buying it.

0:43:40.480 --> 0:43:42.880
<v Speaker 1>Look if I'm wrong. If edwardo Escuar comes out and

0:43:42.880 --> 0:43:45.719
<v Speaker 1>has another fantastic season, that's fine. He really really struggled

0:43:46.040 --> 0:43:48.000
<v Speaker 1>in the second half. Is that something that's gonna carry

0:43:48.080 --> 0:43:50.080
<v Speaker 1>over this year? I do worry about it with him.

0:43:50.120 --> 0:43:52.000
<v Speaker 1>He's gonna hit in the middle of the Arizona diamond

0:43:52.000 --> 0:43:55.239
<v Speaker 1>Backs lineup, so the RBI opportunities should continue to be there.

0:43:55.520 --> 0:43:57.840
<v Speaker 1>But last year strikes me as a career year in

0:43:58.000 --> 0:44:00.640
<v Speaker 1>terms of the power. I think he's probably gonna give

0:44:00.640 --> 0:44:05.080
<v Speaker 1>you similar power numbers. So like a Gurio twenty three,

0:44:05.239 --> 0:44:07.840
<v Speaker 1>maybe home runs not nearly as good of a batting

0:44:07.840 --> 0:44:11.919
<v Speaker 1>average man. I'm out, man, he's better on a point,

0:44:11.960 --> 0:44:13.920
<v Speaker 1>so he hits a lot of doubles. We got about

0:44:14.000 --> 0:44:16.279
<v Speaker 1>six minutes left. She's some sleepers were like, yeah, let's

0:44:16.280 --> 0:44:18.719
<v Speaker 1>go all right. So I asked you about a month

0:44:18.800 --> 0:44:21.719
<v Speaker 1>ago because I looked at the list list. I looked

0:44:21.719 --> 0:44:24.440
<v Speaker 1>at the list, and there was one name on the

0:44:24.520 --> 0:44:26.839
<v Speaker 1>list is the first name he's talking about that long ago,

0:44:27.520 --> 0:44:30.160
<v Speaker 1>and it was Brave Story Basement Austin Riley. And you

0:44:30.280 --> 0:44:32.319
<v Speaker 1>had obviously not gotten there yet. You haven't looked into

0:44:32.400 --> 0:44:35.680
<v Speaker 1>it um and you weren't super in and I kind

0:44:35.719 --> 0:44:37.040
<v Speaker 1>of tried to sell. He was like, hey, he's a

0:44:37.080 --> 0:44:39.440
<v Speaker 1>really good lineup. He's obviously a top prospect. Like I

0:44:39.520 --> 0:44:41.520
<v Speaker 1>feel like people kind of overlooking him now that he

0:44:41.640 --> 0:44:43.879
<v Speaker 1>just had some time to research. Now you've been about

0:44:43.920 --> 0:44:48.200
<v Speaker 1>Austin Riley. I like Austin Riley. I have him as

0:44:48.280 --> 0:44:51.840
<v Speaker 1>my seven third baseman right now, and I have just

0:44:51.920 --> 0:44:53.600
<v Speaker 1>ahead of him the Yankee guys and to R and

0:44:53.640 --> 0:44:55.640
<v Speaker 1>g or Schella, who I think are great values right

0:44:55.680 --> 0:44:58.719
<v Speaker 1>now as well. Austin Riley. The risk with Austin Riley

0:44:58.880 --> 0:45:01.520
<v Speaker 1>is that he still is in a position battle with

0:45:01.600 --> 0:45:06.200
<v Speaker 1>Johann Camargo. So obviously Riley has more prospect pedigree and

0:45:06.280 --> 0:45:09.319
<v Speaker 1>has higher upside. And what I really like so far

0:45:09.480 --> 0:45:11.319
<v Speaker 1>is I think he has like thirteen spring training at bats.

0:45:11.360 --> 0:45:14.080
<v Speaker 1>I tweeted this out yesterday, drink Greg, he only has

0:45:14.120 --> 0:45:16.359
<v Speaker 1>one strikeout in thirteen at bats so far in the spring.

0:45:16.440 --> 0:45:19.040
<v Speaker 1>What he really struggled with in the Major's last season

0:45:19.200 --> 0:45:22.840
<v Speaker 1>was a thirty six percent strikeout rate. That's something that

0:45:22.920 --> 0:45:25.840
<v Speaker 1>we need to see him cut down, obviously, uh and

0:45:26.080 --> 0:45:28.040
<v Speaker 1>at every level in the minors he struck out less

0:45:28.040 --> 0:45:30.080
<v Speaker 1>than the thirty six percent. So if he does that,

0:45:30.320 --> 0:45:32.319
<v Speaker 1>I think it could be like a two sixty ish

0:45:32.360 --> 0:45:35.879
<v Speaker 1>hitter with obviously very big power upside in a really

0:45:35.920 --> 0:45:38.399
<v Speaker 1>good lineup. But he still needs to win that third

0:45:38.440 --> 0:45:41.239
<v Speaker 1>base job against Johan Camargo first, So there still is

0:45:41.239 --> 0:45:43.160
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of a downside here, Greg. But I

0:45:43.200 --> 0:45:45.440
<v Speaker 1>also do really like the Yankees guys with Andrew Harror

0:45:45.560 --> 0:45:48.440
<v Speaker 1>and he Sella. Considering the injuries to stand and Judge,

0:45:48.680 --> 0:45:50.120
<v Speaker 1>I think at least for the early part of the

0:45:50.160 --> 0:45:52.360
<v Speaker 1>season they have pretty regular playing time. We will be

0:45:52.440 --> 0:45:54.680
<v Speaker 1>in the ladder, but we'll both be able to hit. Obviously,

0:45:54.840 --> 0:45:56.840
<v Speaker 1>Charla has his career year last year out of nowhere,

0:45:56.920 --> 0:45:59.440
<v Speaker 1>and he changes the launch angle, and he bought the

0:45:59.440 --> 0:46:02.120
<v Speaker 1>stack cast evolution obviously, and do har went through all

0:46:02.120 --> 0:46:05.200
<v Speaker 1>of his shoulder injuries last year, but he's been practicing

0:46:05.560 --> 0:46:09.400
<v Speaker 1>uh full bore in spring training and beforehand. But you

0:46:09.480 --> 0:46:11.600
<v Speaker 1>do wonder how the position switch could affect his swing

0:46:12.040 --> 0:46:14.840
<v Speaker 1>and mentally, I think there's question marks running both Yankee

0:46:14.920 --> 0:46:18.000
<v Speaker 1>third basement eligible players. That's fine. I'm just looking for

0:46:18.160 --> 0:46:20.319
<v Speaker 1>exposure to a really good lineup going late in draft.

0:46:20.400 --> 0:46:23.120
<v Speaker 1>It was kind of the reason why you know, people

0:46:23.160 --> 0:46:25.440
<v Speaker 1>were drafting DJ le Mayhew last year. If you did

0:46:25.560 --> 0:46:27.320
<v Speaker 1>look out and get a d J. L. Mayhew, you're like,

0:46:27.520 --> 0:46:29.440
<v Speaker 1>all right, he's a super utility guy for the New

0:46:29.520 --> 0:46:31.600
<v Speaker 1>York Yankees. Really good line up. Let me's just take

0:46:31.600 --> 0:46:33.120
<v Speaker 1>a shot here and see what works out. And then

0:46:33.200 --> 0:46:35.919
<v Speaker 1>look what happened with DJ le Mayhew, Uh, Andrew Hard

0:46:35.960 --> 0:46:38.000
<v Speaker 1>We've seen the upside in the past. Someone who can

0:46:38.080 --> 0:46:40.759
<v Speaker 1>hit near three hundred. The hit tool is obviously there,

0:46:41.040 --> 0:46:43.279
<v Speaker 1>and then we started to see the power developed. Will

0:46:43.360 --> 0:46:45.759
<v Speaker 1>that carry over? He did have shoulder surgery so something

0:46:45.840 --> 0:46:48.080
<v Speaker 1>to consider. Maybe the power takes a little bit of

0:46:48.120 --> 0:46:50.000
<v Speaker 1>a step back for Andy Harr, but I do think

0:46:50.080 --> 0:46:52.160
<v Speaker 1>especially early on Greg, he's going to see every day

0:46:52.200 --> 0:46:55.640
<v Speaker 1>playing time, whether it's in left field, d H, first base,

0:46:56.160 --> 0:46:58.520
<v Speaker 1>H third base. I think if they play six or

0:46:58.560 --> 0:47:00.759
<v Speaker 1>seven times a week, he's probably be playing in five

0:47:00.880 --> 0:47:03.239
<v Speaker 1>or six of those games. Is Mgel and har And

0:47:03.280 --> 0:47:05.440
<v Speaker 1>I would say the same thing for g Orhella. In

0:47:05.520 --> 0:47:07.520
<v Speaker 1>that one game, maybe he doesn't play a third they'll

0:47:07.520 --> 0:47:09.800
<v Speaker 1>put Andy harder there. I'd like to see for Shella,

0:47:09.800 --> 0:47:11.399
<v Speaker 1>I could do what he did last year again because

0:47:11.440 --> 0:47:14.240
<v Speaker 1>he really came out of nowhere as a corner infielder.

0:47:14.280 --> 0:47:16.560
<v Speaker 1>Though I don't mind it, Okay, who was your other

0:47:16.600 --> 0:47:21.920
<v Speaker 1>sleeping was a list? Um? That would be yeah, look,

0:47:22.000 --> 0:47:23.919
<v Speaker 1>not gonna give you a good batting average, obviously gonna

0:47:23.960 --> 0:47:26.480
<v Speaker 1>hurt you there, but hitting in the middle of a

0:47:26.600 --> 0:47:29.920
<v Speaker 1>solid lineup Toronto, and he completely bottomed out last year.

0:47:29.920 --> 0:47:32.480
<v Speaker 1>I realized that, Greg. But you know, his average season

0:47:32.520 --> 0:47:37.040
<v Speaker 1>in the two seasons before last year up over thirty

0:47:37.080 --> 0:47:40.040
<v Speaker 1>home runs, close to a two sixty batting average, solid

0:47:40.160 --> 0:47:42.920
<v Speaker 1>counting stats. He gets on base via the walk, um,

0:47:43.280 --> 0:47:46.680
<v Speaker 1>the strikeouts are gonna hurt you. I'm buying that last

0:47:46.840 --> 0:47:49.719
<v Speaker 1>year was not the real Travis Shaw. I think this

0:47:49.840 --> 0:47:52.160
<v Speaker 1>everything went wrong for last year. He dealt with a

0:47:52.280 --> 0:47:54.560
<v Speaker 1>risk injury. I said he was trying to tweak his

0:47:54.960 --> 0:47:57.240
<v Speaker 1>his swing all season long, which ended up not working.

0:47:57.800 --> 0:48:00.760
<v Speaker 1>But a really really cheap corner infielder in deeper league

0:48:01.320 --> 0:48:04.120
<v Speaker 1>fifteen team mixed roto, maybe even a twelve team roto

0:48:04.480 --> 0:48:06.520
<v Speaker 1>UM and obviously in ale only. I think someone that

0:48:06.560 --> 0:48:08.799
<v Speaker 1>you could look at as well who can hit home

0:48:08.880 --> 0:48:12.440
<v Speaker 1>runs with a to forty fifty batting average. I think

0:48:12.480 --> 0:48:14.719
<v Speaker 1>that's fair. Where he's going. He's free, He's he's like

0:48:14.760 --> 0:48:16.560
<v Speaker 1>a one dollar player. I agree. I like Travis Shaw

0:48:17.160 --> 0:48:19.279
<v Speaker 1>as a utility or as a corner I have no

0:48:19.400 --> 0:48:24.000
<v Speaker 1>issue with that. All right, Uh, quickly, Frank, explain them

0:48:24.000 --> 0:48:26.320
<v Speaker 1>met guys to me, j D. Davis and Jeff MacNeil.

0:48:26.960 --> 0:48:30.000
<v Speaker 1>So Jeff McNeil is probably going to play the outfield

0:48:30.400 --> 0:48:33.040
<v Speaker 1>more than anything. The same thing when it comes to UM.

0:48:33.800 --> 0:48:36.120
<v Speaker 1>When it comes to J. D. Davis and j D

0:48:36.200 --> 0:48:38.080
<v Speaker 1>Davis has a great stack cast numbers. Greg, I mean

0:48:38.160 --> 0:48:39.920
<v Speaker 1>you look at the stack cast page. He hits the

0:48:39.960 --> 0:48:42.200
<v Speaker 1>ball extremely hard, just didn't get the opportunity to play

0:48:42.239 --> 0:48:44.520
<v Speaker 1>every day. He's dealing with the injury in camp right now,

0:48:44.560 --> 0:48:47.040
<v Speaker 1>so we'll see how that plays out. But expected to

0:48:47.120 --> 0:48:50.320
<v Speaker 1>play left field quite regularly for the Mets is J

0:48:50.480 --> 0:48:54.880
<v Speaker 1>D Davis. Uh. And then when it comes to when

0:48:54.920 --> 0:48:57.800
<v Speaker 1>it comes to Jeff McNeil, he's basically DJ Lemahew, like,

0:48:58.680 --> 0:49:01.480
<v Speaker 1>really good contact hitter, hit for batting average in every

0:49:01.560 --> 0:49:03.520
<v Speaker 1>level of the miners, actually showed a little bit of

0:49:03.520 --> 0:49:05.640
<v Speaker 1>power in the miners as well, So maybe you know

0:49:05.719 --> 0:49:09.120
<v Speaker 1>he can actually maintain those twenty home runs that he

0:49:09.200 --> 0:49:11.360
<v Speaker 1>hit last year. You can actually chip in a handful

0:49:11.360 --> 0:49:14.080
<v Speaker 1>of stolen basis. He is dtail La Mayhew like Greig.

0:49:14.120 --> 0:49:15.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna hit near the top of the Mets lineup.

0:49:15.960 --> 0:49:17.800
<v Speaker 1>You're gonna give you a good batting average, probably to

0:49:19.320 --> 0:49:21.839
<v Speaker 1>not the same batting average as La Mayhew, but that's

0:49:21.840 --> 0:49:23.680
<v Speaker 1>why you get him like twenty to thirty picks later.

0:49:23.840 --> 0:49:25.319
<v Speaker 1>All Right, there you have it. That's our third base

0:49:25.320 --> 0:49:27.800
<v Speaker 1>preview tomorrow. We'll move onto the short stops for l

0:49:27.960 --> 0:49:30.160
<v Speaker 1>Coast to coast. He is coming up next. I want

0:49:30.200 --> 0:49:32.400
<v Speaker 1>to thank Shan Waimaki and Alex Psamo for their help.

0:49:32.600 --> 0:49:34.920
<v Speaker 1>Grank staff. I'm Greg Sousman. Having fantast the rest of

0:49:34.920 --> 0:49:38.080
<v Speaker 1>your afternoon. We'll do it all go tomorrow. We hope.

0:49:42.200 --> 0:49:44.919
<v Speaker 1>I want to be the next Daily Fantasy Millionaire. Dunk

0:49:45.000 --> 0:49:48.040
<v Speaker 1>on your NBA DFS competition with Daily Rodal dot com

0:49:48.160 --> 0:49:51.680
<v Speaker 1>and dominate on fandel and DraftKings this season. Compete with

0:49:51.719 --> 0:49:54.320
<v Speaker 1>the pros with Daily Rodal dot Com optimizer and the

0:49:54.440 --> 0:49:58.360
<v Speaker 1>most accurate projections in NBA DFS, plus line up alerts,

0:49:58.440 --> 0:50:01.160
<v Speaker 1>breaking news, lake swaps, a wort and much more. Save

0:50:01.239 --> 0:50:04.879
<v Speaker 1>ten on winning NBA DFS advice with promo code Dunk.

0:50:05.160 --> 0:50:08.279
<v Speaker 1>Visit Daily Rodo dot com backslash donc to learn more.