WEBVTT - Steel, GDP, Geopolitics, and Lamborghini

0:00:00.760 --> 0:00:04.040
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Markets Podcast. I'm Paul Sweeney alongside

0:00:04.040 --> 0:00:06.920
<v Speaker 1>my co host Matt Miller. Every business day, we bring

0:00:06.920 --> 0:00:11.520
<v Speaker 1>you interviews from CEOs, market pros, and Bloomberg experts, along

0:00:11.520 --> 0:00:15.520
<v Speaker 1>with essential market moving news. Find the Bloomberg Markets Podcast

0:00:15.600 --> 0:00:18.400
<v Speaker 1>on Apple Podcasts or wherever you listen to podcasts, and

0:00:18.480 --> 0:00:21.480
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg dot com slash podcast. I want to get

0:00:21.480 --> 0:00:25.239
<v Speaker 1>back to the big picture stories that have been swinging

0:00:25.280 --> 0:00:27.720
<v Speaker 1>this market around, giving us the kind of volatility that

0:00:27.720 --> 0:00:31.680
<v Speaker 1>we haven't certainly in the rates sector seen in decades,

0:00:31.720 --> 0:00:34.239
<v Speaker 1>if ever before, And I want to do that with

0:00:34.320 --> 0:00:41.000
<v Speaker 1>Chris Campbell. He is a senior policy analyst and sorry,

0:00:41.000 --> 0:00:44.639
<v Speaker 1>he's the chief strategist at Kroll, but he has had

0:00:44.680 --> 0:00:50.040
<v Speaker 1>a number of other important look at them before. Yeah,

0:00:50.080 --> 0:00:53.880
<v Speaker 1>former assistant secretary from the US Department of Treasury, he

0:00:54.120 --> 0:00:57.440
<v Speaker 1>went to FSOCK meetings, former Stack director of the Senate

0:00:58.040 --> 0:01:03.040
<v Speaker 1>Finance Committee, and so lifetime member the accountl on Foreign Relations.

0:01:03.080 --> 0:01:06.600
<v Speaker 1>You're basically plugged in on Wall Street and in Washington, Christ,

0:01:06.640 --> 0:01:08.920
<v Speaker 1>So it's great to have you here in the studio

0:01:08.600 --> 0:01:11.520
<v Speaker 1>with you. What do you make of the banking turmoil

0:01:11.600 --> 0:01:14.119
<v Speaker 1>that we've seen in the government response, do you think

0:01:14.120 --> 0:01:17.920
<v Speaker 1>it's behind us? As I say, the system worked, you know,

0:01:17.959 --> 0:01:21.160
<v Speaker 1>like their banks will go under um, and you know,

0:01:21.200 --> 0:01:24.080
<v Speaker 1>companies fail, but uh, and there's going to be an

0:01:24.120 --> 0:01:26.600
<v Speaker 1>enormous amount of investigations going on, you know as to

0:01:26.680 --> 0:01:29.120
<v Speaker 1>why the you know, these two banks failed in the

0:01:29.200 --> 0:01:32.920
<v Speaker 1>United States. But the reality is the federals, federal Federal

0:01:33.120 --> 0:01:37.560
<v Speaker 1>Federal Reserve and Treasury worked very quickly, very expeditiously, and

0:01:37.800 --> 0:01:40.280
<v Speaker 1>decisively to make sure that depositors were taken care of,

0:01:40.640 --> 0:01:42.840
<v Speaker 1>which is the way I think which is important. UM.

0:01:43.080 --> 0:01:45.959
<v Speaker 1>It stopped a run on banks, which, as you know,

0:01:46.120 --> 0:01:49.960
<v Speaker 1>is deeply emotional. And so with with that prevention and

0:01:50.040 --> 0:01:53.880
<v Speaker 1>with the with confidence restored largely, UM, I think that

0:01:53.960 --> 0:01:57.400
<v Speaker 1>we can now go back to a quote unquote normal system,

0:01:57.440 --> 0:01:59.880
<v Speaker 1>if you will, where we're actually seen looking at fun

0:02:00.040 --> 0:02:02.880
<v Speaker 1>mentals for banks and others in the market and uh

0:02:02.920 --> 0:02:06.760
<v Speaker 1>and judging them on their fundamentals. Should we expand insurance

0:02:06.840 --> 0:02:10.600
<v Speaker 1>beyond the two hundred and fifty thousand? How problematic is that?

0:02:10.880 --> 0:02:13.080
<v Speaker 1>It's going to be deeply problematic and very very political

0:02:13.080 --> 0:02:16.360
<v Speaker 1>in DC. UM. You know, it's you can kind of

0:02:16.360 --> 0:02:18.200
<v Speaker 1>see the each side where they're going to come out

0:02:18.200 --> 0:02:20.720
<v Speaker 1>the Democrats, like they're going to say that, uh, you know,

0:02:20.880 --> 0:02:23.360
<v Speaker 1>two hundred fifty thousand dollars is a lot of money

0:02:23.440 --> 0:02:26.160
<v Speaker 1>for most Americans. You know, the average American makes about

0:02:26.160 --> 0:02:29.160
<v Speaker 1>fifty seven thousand dollars a year, So having two unrefty

0:02:29.200 --> 0:02:31.040
<v Speaker 1>thousand dollars in their bank account, it's just you know,

0:02:31.080 --> 0:02:34.560
<v Speaker 1>it's it's it's like it's aspirational um and you know,

0:02:34.600 --> 0:02:38.519
<v Speaker 1>and especially we're talking about savings accounts, right, so yeah,

0:02:38.560 --> 0:02:41.880
<v Speaker 1>if if hopefully, uh, they can save up that much

0:02:42.160 --> 0:02:44.800
<v Speaker 1>before retirement, because people live so long now and if

0:02:44.840 --> 0:02:47.079
<v Speaker 1>you retire at sixty five or seventy, you still got

0:02:47.120 --> 0:02:49.680
<v Speaker 1>another thirty years to fund. But they'll do it in

0:02:49.680 --> 0:02:52.079
<v Speaker 1>different accounts. And there are four one ks and there's

0:02:52.120 --> 0:02:54.600
<v Speaker 1>another issues that are not insured and so and so yeah,

0:02:54.600 --> 0:02:56.359
<v Speaker 1>like I think that, you know, Republicans will take a

0:02:56.360 --> 0:02:58.200
<v Speaker 1>different view of this, and so I just it's very deep,

0:02:58.720 --> 0:03:01.440
<v Speaker 1>very tough to see, especially today's Washington, where there me

0:03:01.639 --> 0:03:05.720
<v Speaker 1>be can census on on any legislation involving banks, changing

0:03:05.760 --> 0:03:08.280
<v Speaker 1>Dodd Frank or anything like that in the current environment.

0:03:08.320 --> 0:03:11.280
<v Speaker 1>But it's de facto done, isn't it. Raising the insurance?

0:03:11.400 --> 0:03:14.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean, even though they're not going to officially do it. Um,

0:03:14.560 --> 0:03:17.239
<v Speaker 1>if you have three hundred thousand, then your regional bank

0:03:17.320 --> 0:03:20.480
<v Speaker 1>goes under, you can count on the government to bail

0:03:20.520 --> 0:03:23.720
<v Speaker 1>you out. It's clear that the Federal Reserve has used

0:03:23.720 --> 0:03:27.160
<v Speaker 1>its powers within Dodd, Frank and and supervisor authority to

0:03:27.240 --> 0:03:29.959
<v Speaker 1>be able to step in and prevent and make sure

0:03:29.960 --> 0:03:32.600
<v Speaker 1>the depositors will made whole. I think you know, again,

0:03:33.280 --> 0:03:35.720
<v Speaker 1>you can argue moral hazard or not, but the reality

0:03:35.840 --> 0:03:37.680
<v Speaker 1>is that that now the Federals Serve has done this.

0:03:37.840 --> 0:03:39.920
<v Speaker 1>It's now well known that they can, and I think

0:03:39.960 --> 0:03:42.200
<v Speaker 1>the depositors now I think you know it should have

0:03:42.240 --> 0:03:45.360
<v Speaker 1>the Commons probably that that that Federserve likely step in

0:03:45.280 --> 0:03:48.280
<v Speaker 1>in the future. Can I bring up a debt limit

0:03:48.360 --> 0:03:50.920
<v Speaker 1>with you negotiating on Oh man, are we talking about

0:03:50.960 --> 0:03:54.640
<v Speaker 1>the debt ceiling? Yeah? We are. I'm so well, we

0:03:54.680 --> 0:03:57.360
<v Speaker 1>have to don't fortunately or not. I've I've actually negotiated

0:03:57.360 --> 0:03:59.840
<v Speaker 1>the last twelve of them. So now is that you

0:04:00.080 --> 0:04:03.040
<v Speaker 1>using that as a point of negotiation over whatever? Is

0:04:03.080 --> 0:04:07.720
<v Speaker 1>that like playing Russian rule in It's very, very difficult

0:04:07.760 --> 0:04:11.200
<v Speaker 1>and deeply problematic to suggest that the United States may

0:04:11.240 --> 0:04:13.760
<v Speaker 1>walk up to the line and actually and not pay

0:04:13.200 --> 0:04:16.760
<v Speaker 1>our bills. Um, it's you know, it's very and for

0:04:16.760 --> 0:04:18.800
<v Speaker 1>for the listeners, it's really important to buy. For Kate,

0:04:19.080 --> 0:04:21.640
<v Speaker 1>this is this is you know, not funding the Post

0:04:21.680 --> 0:04:24.719
<v Speaker 1>office or the National parks. This is paying back our

0:04:24.720 --> 0:04:28.040
<v Speaker 1>debt ors our debt and effectively, you know, and I

0:04:28.120 --> 0:04:31.159
<v Speaker 1>think about this, and I tending which was already approved,

0:04:31.240 --> 0:04:33.320
<v Speaker 1>was that's correct. Spening has already been improved, and actually

0:04:33.320 --> 0:04:36.520
<v Speaker 1>it's already been spent. This is debt that we're paying back,

0:04:36.560 --> 0:04:39.440
<v Speaker 1>and so um, you know, I think it's it really

0:04:39.480 --> 0:04:43.160
<v Speaker 1>does affect the rate at which Treasury or where I

0:04:43.240 --> 0:04:46.599
<v Speaker 1>used to work, can sell our our debt U and

0:04:46.640 --> 0:04:49.360
<v Speaker 1>it'll affect that the amount of that and the confidence

0:04:49.360 --> 0:04:52.039
<v Speaker 1>of people who buy buying our debt. And so the

0:04:52.120 --> 0:04:55.080
<v Speaker 1>reality is, and we make quabble over this is the

0:04:55.160 --> 0:04:57.240
<v Speaker 1>right thing to do or not, But if we you know,

0:04:57.279 --> 0:04:59.839
<v Speaker 1>the government spends one point three dollars for every dollar

0:05:00.080 --> 0:05:02.760
<v Speaker 1>takes in, we just we you know, the federal government

0:05:02.920 --> 0:05:05.480
<v Speaker 1>likes to spend like drug and sailors, um, and they

0:05:05.480 --> 0:05:07.960
<v Speaker 1>don't they don't balance the budget, and so we we

0:05:08.080 --> 0:05:11.360
<v Speaker 1>just rely on debt to finance our operations in our

0:05:11.400 --> 0:05:15.040
<v Speaker 1>in our government and so and so So John and

0:05:15.040 --> 0:05:21.320
<v Speaker 1>I have covered uh these um impasses. The twenty eleven

0:05:21.839 --> 0:05:25.320
<v Speaker 1>um one probably the most noteworthy. When we were our

0:05:25.360 --> 0:05:28.640
<v Speaker 1>credit rating was lowered. You actually were in the room

0:05:28.680 --> 0:05:32.280
<v Speaker 1>negotiating them UM as you said the last twelve. So

0:05:32.320 --> 0:05:34.919
<v Speaker 1>this happens fairly often. Now at Kroll you're in a

0:05:34.960 --> 0:05:37.960
<v Speaker 1>different role where you have to advise your clients on

0:05:38.440 --> 0:05:41.320
<v Speaker 1>um You know what could happen around this in terms

0:05:41.320 --> 0:05:43.880
<v Speaker 1>of the economy, in terms of the markets. What are

0:05:43.880 --> 0:05:46.560
<v Speaker 1>you expecting this time? This will be the hardest one

0:05:46.560 --> 0:05:49.120
<v Speaker 1>I've ever seen. When first, I'm so grateful that I'm

0:05:49.160 --> 0:05:53.560
<v Speaker 1>out there. Uh, it's I really believe this is there

0:05:53.600 --> 0:05:56.480
<v Speaker 1>actually maybe a chance we actually may do a technical

0:05:56.520 --> 0:05:59.360
<v Speaker 1>default in this in this setting, UM, I really don't

0:05:59.400 --> 0:06:02.599
<v Speaker 1>know how how you get there. You have we have

0:06:02.640 --> 0:06:05.320
<v Speaker 1>a president who's unwilling to talk to House Republicans or

0:06:05.360 --> 0:06:07.480
<v Speaker 1>House Republicans or have made it very clear that they

0:06:07.520 --> 0:06:12.280
<v Speaker 1>want spending introductions in the package as an overall way

0:06:12.320 --> 0:06:15.000
<v Speaker 1>to get to yes. And so with that, with those

0:06:15.080 --> 0:06:18.520
<v Speaker 1>two postures, and we're and we're coming. We're going coming

0:06:18.600 --> 0:06:21.360
<v Speaker 1>so quickly up to the to the deadline that there's

0:06:21.480 --> 0:06:24.320
<v Speaker 1>really we're going to quickly come to a time where

0:06:24.320 --> 0:06:26.520
<v Speaker 1>we're actually going to pass a red line where we can't,

0:06:27.040 --> 0:06:28.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, because it just takes time to pass things

0:06:28.640 --> 0:06:31.320
<v Speaker 1>in Congress. Hey, I just want to drain your experience.

0:06:31.440 --> 0:06:34.160
<v Speaker 1>You were got about thirty seconds, Leff, you were Orange

0:06:34.200 --> 0:06:37.800
<v Speaker 1>Hatch's right hand man. That mistaken could in an Orange

0:06:37.800 --> 0:06:41.240
<v Speaker 1>Hatch function in today's Congress, or he'd be an outlier.

0:06:41.800 --> 0:06:44.839
<v Speaker 1>You know, there's a couple couple I call statesmen left

0:06:44.880 --> 0:06:46.799
<v Speaker 1>in the in the in the US and the US Congress,

0:06:47.120 --> 0:06:48.880
<v Speaker 1>but they are a dying breed. And uh, I know,

0:06:48.960 --> 0:06:51.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm so grateful to have been mentored by him. Um

0:06:51.800 --> 0:06:54.120
<v Speaker 1>and I really our country would be much better off

0:06:54.120 --> 0:06:55.400
<v Speaker 1>if we had more and more ore in hatches in

0:06:55.480 --> 0:06:57.840
<v Speaker 1>the Senate today. Well, it's been awesome to have you

0:06:57.920 --> 0:06:59.360
<v Speaker 1>in the studio and I hope we can get you

0:06:59.440 --> 0:07:03.960
<v Speaker 1>back for more time. Chris Campbell, their chief strategist at Kroll,

0:07:04.080 --> 0:07:07.880
<v Speaker 1>talking us through the bank. Well, we're not going to

0:07:07.920 --> 0:07:11.240
<v Speaker 1>call it a crisis, right the bank. We camil is

0:07:11.280 --> 0:07:15.320
<v Speaker 1>the word I think that we've landed on. You're listening

0:07:15.440 --> 0:07:19.200
<v Speaker 1>to the Team Cancer Live program Bloomberg Markets weekdays at

0:07:19.240 --> 0:07:22.160
<v Speaker 1>ten am Eastering on Bloomberg dot Com, the I Heart

0:07:22.240 --> 0:07:24.880
<v Speaker 1>Radio app, and the Bloomberg Business app. We're listening on

0:07:24.960 --> 0:07:30.080
<v Speaker 1>demand wherever you get your podcast. We have an opportunity

0:07:30.640 --> 0:07:33.640
<v Speaker 1>to talk about steel right now at David Stickler. He's

0:07:33.680 --> 0:07:36.960
<v Speaker 1>the CEO of High Bar. It's a newly formed company,

0:07:37.160 --> 0:07:39.840
<v Speaker 1>comes with a lot of experience though as a CEO

0:07:40.120 --> 0:07:44.880
<v Speaker 1>former CEO of Big River Steel, and he's in the

0:07:45.000 --> 0:07:46.600
<v Speaker 1>studio with us right now. So I think it's a

0:07:46.640 --> 0:07:50.280
<v Speaker 1>great opportunity to get a look at, you know, one

0:07:50.320 --> 0:07:56.320
<v Speaker 1>of the underlying sort of signals of economic growth or

0:07:56.880 --> 0:08:00.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, contraction. Thanks so much for joining us, David.

0:08:00.800 --> 0:08:03.880
<v Speaker 1>What's the steel market like right now? Because it's obviously

0:08:04.000 --> 0:08:07.440
<v Speaker 1>a primary building block of the economy. Sure, the steel

0:08:07.440 --> 0:08:10.800
<v Speaker 1>market is if you look historically, it's in very very

0:08:10.880 --> 0:08:15.800
<v Speaker 1>strong shape. It's been in strong shape for eighteen twenty

0:08:15.840 --> 0:08:20.240
<v Speaker 1>four months now. But the steel market, when you talk steel,

0:08:20.760 --> 0:08:23.440
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people look at just half of the equation.

0:08:23.560 --> 0:08:26.560
<v Speaker 1>They look at what the steel price is. And today

0:08:27.520 --> 0:08:31.080
<v Speaker 1>seventy percent of the steel in North America is made

0:08:31.240 --> 0:08:35.520
<v Speaker 1>from recycled scrap metal, all right. Now, that's different where

0:08:35.559 --> 0:08:39.000
<v Speaker 1>twenty years ago seventy percent was made from iron. Ore

0:08:39.160 --> 0:08:42.920
<v Speaker 1>and coking coal. So there's been a huge, huge shift

0:08:43.920 --> 0:08:47.480
<v Speaker 1>in the sustainability of steelmaking. But when you look at

0:08:47.520 --> 0:08:49.760
<v Speaker 1>steel price, as I said a moment ago, that's just

0:08:49.920 --> 0:08:53.280
<v Speaker 1>half the equation. It's what's the scrap metal price, And

0:08:53.440 --> 0:08:56.319
<v Speaker 1>it's really the spread that everybody plays in, and that's

0:08:56.360 --> 0:08:59.520
<v Speaker 1>where you make your money, the difference between scrap metal

0:09:00.080 --> 0:09:02.400
<v Speaker 1>and steel. What are the benchmark contracts that you look

0:09:02.480 --> 0:09:06.079
<v Speaker 1>at to find that price, So you you really in

0:09:06.200 --> 0:09:11.080
<v Speaker 1>the steel industry, unlike the alunium industry or the oil

0:09:11.160 --> 0:09:14.760
<v Speaker 1>industry or the gas industry, you don't have a liquid

0:09:14.880 --> 0:09:19.440
<v Speaker 1>futures market. So you're really looking on a daily monthly

0:09:19.559 --> 0:09:24.120
<v Speaker 1>basis on what the scrap price is trading at all, right,

0:09:24.160 --> 0:09:26.920
<v Speaker 1>what you can buy scrap metal for, and then you're

0:09:27.040 --> 0:09:30.040
<v Speaker 1>trying to add on your margin to set your steel price.

0:09:30.160 --> 0:09:35.520
<v Speaker 1>And that's really gentleman. What's interesting, Manton John is with

0:09:35.679 --> 0:09:38.600
<v Speaker 1>scrap metal, there's nothing else to do with it other

0:09:38.720 --> 0:09:42.080
<v Speaker 1>than make new steel. But they have scrap metal overseas

0:09:43.040 --> 0:09:46.439
<v Speaker 1>they do. And when I'm buying stuff like that, I

0:09:46.480 --> 0:09:49.520
<v Speaker 1>would imagine as a purchaser, I'm just looking at, you know,

0:09:50.000 --> 0:09:53.079
<v Speaker 1>who's the best producer, the best price I can get,

0:09:53.720 --> 0:09:55.920
<v Speaker 1>And those are two different things, by the way, right,

0:09:56.160 --> 0:09:58.839
<v Speaker 1>the best producer and the best price you can get

0:09:58.960 --> 0:10:02.120
<v Speaker 1>are often too very different things. It's hugely different. Now

0:10:02.320 --> 0:10:06.520
<v Speaker 1>you can buy steel. Steel isn't steel. Steel is not steel.

0:10:06.640 --> 0:10:10.000
<v Speaker 1>You can buy steel from all the reaches of the

0:10:10.280 --> 0:10:12.400
<v Speaker 1>globe pretty much. You can buy it from China, you

0:10:12.480 --> 0:10:17.280
<v Speaker 1>can buy it from Russia, Brazil, India, Japan, Korea, Canada,

0:10:17.679 --> 0:10:22.880
<v Speaker 1>the US and imported steel certainly is here and will

0:10:22.960 --> 0:10:28.960
<v Speaker 1>always be here. The difference is the quality and more recently,

0:10:29.080 --> 0:10:33.760
<v Speaker 1>the environmental sustainability. I will tell you the global average

0:10:34.440 --> 0:10:38.520
<v Speaker 1>for carbon emissions per ton of steel. For each ton

0:10:38.600 --> 0:10:41.800
<v Speaker 1>of steel, the world average is one point eight five

0:10:41.960 --> 0:10:45.199
<v Speaker 1>tons of carbon. All right, one ton of steel one

0:10:45.240 --> 0:10:47.599
<v Speaker 1>point eight five tons of carbon in the air. The

0:10:47.800 --> 0:10:51.280
<v Speaker 1>last mill, prior to my high bar effort here, our

0:10:51.360 --> 0:10:55.640
<v Speaker 1>carbon emissions was point one two three. But how would

0:10:55.679 --> 0:10:57.880
<v Speaker 1>I know that as the consumer? I mean, does its

0:10:57.880 --> 0:11:02.080
<v Speaker 1>stamped on the steel lumbered one way? By the way, David,

0:11:02.080 --> 0:11:05.439
<v Speaker 1>you're not selling steel rebar to John for his home

0:11:05.520 --> 0:11:11.360
<v Speaker 1>renovation projects. I've got You've got much bigger customers. These

0:11:11.400 --> 0:11:17.079
<v Speaker 1>are bridge tunnel, airport projects, roadway projects, sixty seventy you know,

0:11:17.360 --> 0:11:20.840
<v Speaker 1>floor office and condominium towers. And I've heard we are

0:11:20.840 --> 0:11:22.520
<v Speaker 1>going to do a little bit of infrastructure spending in

0:11:22.520 --> 0:11:27.760
<v Speaker 1>this control. We certainly are. And what's interesting, since the

0:11:27.880 --> 0:11:32.600
<v Speaker 1>nineteen sixties, anytime there's been a federal highway dollar used

0:11:32.640 --> 0:11:36.400
<v Speaker 1>in a project, there's a concept called buy America. The

0:11:36.480 --> 0:11:41.840
<v Speaker 1>rebar has to be melted, cast enrolled in the United States,

0:11:42.040 --> 0:11:45.600
<v Speaker 1>all right. Now, That's been around since the nineteen sixties.

0:11:45.679 --> 0:11:47.439
<v Speaker 1>So when you talk about, hey, can I buy some

0:11:47.600 --> 0:11:50.920
<v Speaker 1>rebar from Turkey, absolutely you can. But if it's a

0:11:51.000 --> 0:11:58.319
<v Speaker 1>federal highway project, you're restricted only two US produced rebar

0:11:58.880 --> 0:12:02.240
<v Speaker 1>And I guess you know, especially with this administration, they

0:12:02.320 --> 0:12:06.720
<v Speaker 1>probably want to do a better job for the environment.

0:12:06.840 --> 0:12:10.520
<v Speaker 1>We import as a country like thirty million metric tons

0:12:10.600 --> 0:12:15.679
<v Speaker 1>of steel every year, but that is incredibly pollutive, right.

0:12:16.320 --> 0:12:19.400
<v Speaker 1>I'll give you an example. So on the West Coast,

0:12:19.520 --> 0:12:22.880
<v Speaker 1>there's really no natural home for scrap metal, so it

0:12:23.000 --> 0:12:27.679
<v Speaker 1>either has to travel east into Chicago, into Arkansas, into

0:12:28.120 --> 0:12:30.960
<v Speaker 1>the Carolinas where steel a lot of steels produced Texas

0:12:31.880 --> 0:12:34.600
<v Speaker 1>or gets shipped overseas. So you take your scrap metal

0:12:34.880 --> 0:12:38.360
<v Speaker 1>off your West coast ports, ship it over to Asia,

0:12:38.679 --> 0:12:40.360
<v Speaker 1>gets put on a truck that you don't want to

0:12:40.520 --> 0:12:43.720
<v Speaker 1>be anywhere near, driving behind with all of the pollution

0:12:43.760 --> 0:12:47.040
<v Speaker 1>coming out of the tailpipe, gets melted in those steel mills.

0:12:47.120 --> 0:12:50.160
<v Speaker 1>That as I said, one point eight five tons of carbon,

0:12:50.520 --> 0:12:53.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, per ton of steel put on a truck,

0:12:53.520 --> 0:12:56.400
<v Speaker 1>put on a ship delivered to the West coast. That

0:12:57.000 --> 0:13:02.120
<v Speaker 1>is not an environmental fuel both ways is not environmentally sustainable.

0:13:02.160 --> 0:13:06.360
<v Speaker 1>So so what will you do? You were at Big

0:13:06.520 --> 0:13:10.359
<v Speaker 1>River Steel, now you're at High Bar. You're focused on recycling,

0:13:10.400 --> 0:13:12.560
<v Speaker 1>in the in the production. What will you do differently

0:13:12.640 --> 0:13:15.600
<v Speaker 1>than your competitors? Oh? Number one will be LEAD certified.

0:13:16.040 --> 0:13:19.720
<v Speaker 1>At Big River we were the world's first LEADS certified

0:13:20.040 --> 0:13:26.160
<v Speaker 1>scrap metal, recycling, steel production, facility leadership and environmental design

0:13:27.080 --> 0:13:33.760
<v Speaker 1>and LEAD certification is typically for office buildings, hospital complexes,

0:13:33.920 --> 0:13:36.560
<v Speaker 1>university building. We have it at the Bloomberg headquarters. When

0:13:36.640 --> 0:13:38.920
<v Speaker 1>when people heard that we were going to get Big

0:13:39.040 --> 0:13:41.840
<v Speaker 1>River Steel or attempt to get Big River Steel LEADS certified,

0:13:42.200 --> 0:13:44.439
<v Speaker 1>they thought we had lost our minds. But we did it.

0:13:45.040 --> 0:13:47.640
<v Speaker 1>And after two years of operation at Big River Steel,

0:13:48.320 --> 0:13:51.920
<v Speaker 1>Dommler Mercedes called us up and said, Dave, are you

0:13:52.000 --> 0:13:54.200
<v Speaker 1>going to be in town in three weeks. I said,

0:13:54.240 --> 0:13:56.120
<v Speaker 1>well I am. They said, we want to give you

0:13:56.240 --> 0:14:00.240
<v Speaker 1>our Environmental Supplier of the Year award, and not just

0:14:00.400 --> 0:14:04.920
<v Speaker 1>for steel, not just in North America. Everything that Donler

0:14:05.040 --> 0:14:08.600
<v Speaker 1>Mercedes buys plastic, glass, aluminum. Here's a two year old

0:14:08.640 --> 0:14:11.679
<v Speaker 1>company at that point in time, given our lead certification,

0:14:11.960 --> 0:14:15.600
<v Speaker 1>given our carbon footprint, and that really makes a difference. Now,

0:14:15.679 --> 0:14:18.160
<v Speaker 1>what I will tell you is people don't pay more

0:14:18.240 --> 0:14:22.680
<v Speaker 1>for our steel because it's environmentally sustainable, but everything else

0:14:22.720 --> 0:14:25.320
<v Speaker 1>being equal, If my steel selling for a thousand bucks

0:14:25.360 --> 0:14:27.960
<v Speaker 1>delivered in one of my competitors up along the Great

0:14:28.040 --> 0:14:31.800
<v Speaker 1>Lakes that uses coal and iron ore to make steel

0:14:31.840 --> 0:14:34.480
<v Speaker 1>selling for a thousand bucks, nine times out of ten

0:14:34.800 --> 0:14:37.000
<v Speaker 1>will get the order. It's like a tiebreaker when you

0:14:37.080 --> 0:14:39.120
<v Speaker 1>go to Vegas and the house has, you know, the

0:14:39.240 --> 0:14:43.640
<v Speaker 1>blackjack tiebreaker. I'll take the tiebreaker. What's the future of

0:14:43.760 --> 0:14:47.360
<v Speaker 1>the industry. Do you face competition from things like carbon fiber?

0:14:48.160 --> 0:14:51.120
<v Speaker 1>You're always facing you replacement. You know, for a while

0:14:51.200 --> 0:14:53.400
<v Speaker 1>it was going to be the cars are all going

0:14:53.440 --> 0:14:55.320
<v Speaker 1>to be aluminum. The steel industry is going to be

0:14:55.400 --> 0:15:01.080
<v Speaker 1>on its tail. Talk about an energy intensive deducing aluminum, yeah,

0:15:01.120 --> 0:15:06.720
<v Speaker 1>can and energy intensive carbon intensive. You know, the one

0:15:06.800 --> 0:15:09.560
<v Speaker 1>thing about aluminum is you do have you know, a

0:15:09.760 --> 0:15:13.560
<v Speaker 1>high level of recycling. You're seeing a shift away from

0:15:14.120 --> 0:15:18.760
<v Speaker 1>plastic bottles to now water and other drinks are being

0:15:19.240 --> 0:15:22.880
<v Speaker 1>more and more in aluminum cans, aluminium bottles, what have you. So,

0:15:23.080 --> 0:15:25.680
<v Speaker 1>the aluminum industry is here to stay. It's not going away.

0:15:25.800 --> 0:15:30.280
<v Speaker 1>But to answer your question, the steel industry, the key

0:15:30.480 --> 0:15:36.240
<v Speaker 1>is lightweight and strong. All right, lightweight and strong. And

0:15:36.440 --> 0:15:40.400
<v Speaker 1>thirty years ago steel was you know, half inch thick.

0:15:40.680 --> 0:15:43.240
<v Speaker 1>It was you know, you couldn't bend it, couldn't press it.

0:15:43.760 --> 0:15:47.000
<v Speaker 1>It was tough for some of these applications, and aluminum

0:15:47.200 --> 0:15:52.080
<v Speaker 1>and carbon fiber were quite frankly nipping it the tails

0:15:52.120 --> 0:15:54.800
<v Speaker 1>of the steel industry. The steel industry, to their credit,

0:15:55.080 --> 0:15:59.920
<v Speaker 1>has come out with advanced high strength steels, corrosion resists

0:16:00.120 --> 0:16:03.480
<v Speaker 1>in steels, and really over the last twenty years has

0:16:04.120 --> 0:16:07.840
<v Speaker 1>just done a complete life cycle change. When I first

0:16:07.840 --> 0:16:11.960
<v Speaker 1>started this twenty years ago, steelmaking was eighty percent braun

0:16:12.560 --> 0:16:16.280
<v Speaker 1>twenty percent brains. Today at High Bar and Big River

0:16:16.920 --> 0:16:21.040
<v Speaker 1>it's ten percent braun ninety percent brains. We have this

0:16:22.440 --> 0:16:28.160
<v Speaker 1>green market steel. Bloomberg Company Rebar report here available to

0:16:28.320 --> 0:16:33.640
<v Speaker 1>our terminal customers. Is there do you think enough support

0:16:33.680 --> 0:16:37.480
<v Speaker 1>for sustainability around this industry. I don't think you'll see

0:16:37.520 --> 0:16:40.240
<v Speaker 1>a green premium. All right. There's a lot of people

0:16:40.280 --> 0:16:43.000
<v Speaker 1>in the industry saying you're going to be sustainable, you'll

0:16:43.000 --> 0:16:45.520
<v Speaker 1>be able to get an extra ten percent for your

0:16:45.560 --> 0:16:49.040
<v Speaker 1>steel products. I don't believe that. What I believe it's

0:16:49.040 --> 0:16:52.560
<v Speaker 1>a tiebreaker. If you're the most sustainable, you're going to

0:16:52.600 --> 0:16:55.240
<v Speaker 1>get the order, everything else being equal. But I do

0:16:55.400 --> 0:16:58.840
<v Speaker 1>not expect a developer or a builder to pay me

0:16:58.960 --> 0:17:01.920
<v Speaker 1>a premium because my steal is green. All right, Well,

0:17:02.040 --> 0:17:04.920
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna be hearing more from you at this roundtable

0:17:04.960 --> 0:17:07.720
<v Speaker 1>discussion here at Bloomberg. So we're glad you could stop

0:17:07.760 --> 0:17:10.360
<v Speaker 1>by the radio booth and talk to us because it's

0:17:10.520 --> 0:17:13.920
<v Speaker 1>a fascinating topic and I think John and I love

0:17:13.920 --> 0:17:15.600
<v Speaker 1>all the things that are made of steel. No, I'm

0:17:15.640 --> 0:17:18.760
<v Speaker 1>in the market for rebar for my basement, So keep

0:17:18.800 --> 0:17:21.480
<v Speaker 1>you in mind. Thank you very much, Thank thank you

0:17:21.600 --> 0:17:24.199
<v Speaker 1>so much. You're listening to the tape. Ken's a our

0:17:24.280 --> 0:17:27.879
<v Speaker 1>live program Bloomberg Markets weekdays at ten am Eastern on

0:17:28.040 --> 0:17:31.040
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Radio, the tune in app, Bloomberg dot Com, and

0:17:31.160 --> 0:17:33.920
<v Speaker 1>the Bloomberg Business app. You can also listen live on

0:17:34.000 --> 0:17:37.240
<v Speaker 1>Amazon Alexa from our flagship New York station. Just say

0:17:37.320 --> 0:17:42.199
<v Speaker 1>Alexa play Bloomberg eleven thirty. We want to get right

0:17:42.280 --> 0:17:47.200
<v Speaker 1>now to James Lanthier. He's a CEO at Mindset Pharma

0:17:47.960 --> 0:17:52.520
<v Speaker 1>and they have it's it's a business that I am

0:17:52.640 --> 0:17:58.200
<v Speaker 1>very interested in psychedelics, plant based psychedelics to treat What

0:17:58.320 --> 0:18:00.760
<v Speaker 1>do you treat James with these psycho delics other than

0:18:01.119 --> 0:18:05.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, the duldrums? Well, you know, I think we're

0:18:05.440 --> 0:18:08.560
<v Speaker 1>at a pretty fascinating point. There are a couple of

0:18:08.720 --> 0:18:12.800
<v Speaker 1>clinical trials that are in their later stages. Um, for

0:18:13.520 --> 0:18:16.520
<v Speaker 1>for the use of psilocybin, which is a psychoactive component

0:18:16.560 --> 0:18:21.720
<v Speaker 1>of magic mushrooms rooms exactly three of resistant depression and

0:18:22.160 --> 0:18:27.320
<v Speaker 1>m DMA to treat PTSD. But there are literally hundreds

0:18:27.520 --> 0:18:31.639
<v Speaker 1>of clinical trials right now, and uh, you know, academic

0:18:31.720 --> 0:18:38.200
<v Speaker 1>studies exploring different indications, you know, for psilocybin, DMT, a

0:18:38.280 --> 0:18:41.439
<v Speaker 1>whole range of different psychedelics. You know. But you are

0:18:41.520 --> 0:18:44.399
<v Speaker 1>actually so I'll just tell listeners, um, this is a

0:18:44.480 --> 0:18:50.200
<v Speaker 1>publicly traded company, Mindset Pharma. The ticker is MSSTF. You

0:18:51.560 --> 0:18:56.560
<v Speaker 1>actually sell like shrooms in ecstasy to clients in Canada. No,

0:18:56.960 --> 0:18:59.800
<v Speaker 1>we're we're a classic biotech. So what we are doing

0:19:00.280 --> 0:19:05.000
<v Speaker 1>is we are trying to develop new psychedelic drugs that

0:19:05.080 --> 0:19:08.040
<v Speaker 1>have been really optimized to make up for some of

0:19:08.119 --> 0:19:10.680
<v Speaker 1>the shortcomings of the of the known drugs, so that

0:19:10.720 --> 0:19:14.920
<v Speaker 1>they're gonna work better as medicines. They'll be safer, more predictable,

0:19:15.280 --> 0:19:20.960
<v Speaker 1>have potentially different durations. So better than like SSRIs the

0:19:21.080 --> 0:19:23.760
<v Speaker 1>prozacts of the world is what you're saying. Well, better

0:19:23.920 --> 0:19:27.399
<v Speaker 1>not only than the established therapies. Yeah, absolutely better than

0:19:27.440 --> 0:19:31.240
<v Speaker 1>the SSRIs, but but better than the psychedelic drugs that

0:19:31.440 --> 0:19:36.080
<v Speaker 1>we are you know, studying today. So you know, for instance, psilocybin,

0:19:36.160 --> 0:19:38.720
<v Speaker 1>there's amazing data to show that it can do a

0:19:38.800 --> 0:19:41.760
<v Speaker 1>really great job of helping people with uh, you know,

0:19:41.880 --> 0:19:45.359
<v Speaker 1>different depressive disorders, but the durations really long. You have

0:19:45.480 --> 0:19:48.199
<v Speaker 1>to spend you know, up to eight hours in clinic

0:19:48.320 --> 0:19:51.640
<v Speaker 1>and be supervised by multiple therapists, and we just think

0:19:51.680 --> 0:19:54.399
<v Speaker 1>that's not really a very convenient model for you know,

0:19:54.520 --> 0:19:57.399
<v Speaker 1>either for therapists or you know, or for patients. So

0:19:57.520 --> 0:20:01.240
<v Speaker 1>we're trying to you know, develop drugs that still you know,

0:20:01.400 --> 0:20:04.159
<v Speaker 1>have the same benefit are still going to likely induce

0:20:04.240 --> 0:20:08.199
<v Speaker 1>the same you know, psychedelic experience, but have a shorter duration.

0:20:08.440 --> 0:20:11.000
<v Speaker 1>All right, since you mentioned startup, I got to ask

0:20:11.080 --> 0:20:15.920
<v Speaker 1>the obligatory tangential question about funding and how svb's collapse

0:20:16.440 --> 0:20:21.240
<v Speaker 1>may have affected you or your industry. Well, it hasn't

0:20:21.280 --> 0:20:24.640
<v Speaker 1>affected mindset. We're in a bit of a unique position.

0:20:24.920 --> 0:20:28.959
<v Speaker 1>We're the only biotech startup out there that actually has

0:20:29.000 --> 0:20:33.600
<v Speaker 1>a big pharma collaboration. So we're we're partnered with the

0:20:33.720 --> 0:20:38.240
<v Speaker 1>development arm of Otsuka Pharmaceuticals, which is a top psychia

0:20:38.520 --> 0:20:43.280
<v Speaker 1>psychiatric drug company, and they fund the majority of our expenses.

0:20:43.600 --> 0:20:46.679
<v Speaker 1>I think generally speaking, you know, the psychedelic space has

0:20:46.760 --> 0:20:50.840
<v Speaker 1>not had a ton of exposure to SVB or you know,

0:20:51.000 --> 0:20:54.359
<v Speaker 1>any of the other regional banks that have Why is

0:20:54.400 --> 0:20:58.120
<v Speaker 1>it structured that way? The does big farma not want

0:20:58.160 --> 0:21:00.680
<v Speaker 1>to touch this or they'd rather have somebody like you

0:21:00.800 --> 0:21:04.640
<v Speaker 1>and if it is successful, take you over or whatever. Yeah,

0:21:04.840 --> 0:21:07.879
<v Speaker 1>the I think it's it's it's really more of the latter,

0:21:08.160 --> 0:21:11.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, we're most of the new drug work is

0:21:11.720 --> 0:21:13.800
<v Speaker 1>is still at a kind of a pre clinical stage,

0:21:13.840 --> 0:21:15.920
<v Speaker 1>which is just you know a little bit early for

0:21:16.080 --> 0:21:18.760
<v Speaker 1>big pharma and so the way that you know a

0:21:18.840 --> 0:21:21.320
<v Speaker 1>law you know, not only in psychedelics, but you know,

0:21:21.400 --> 0:21:23.760
<v Speaker 1>a kind of a cross farma now have a lot

0:21:23.840 --> 0:21:27.840
<v Speaker 1>of these, you know, early stage collaborations where pharma's uh,

0:21:27.960 --> 0:21:31.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, partner up with promising biotechs that have you know,

0:21:32.119 --> 0:21:35.080
<v Speaker 1>have some promising kind of early results before they actually

0:21:35.520 --> 0:21:41.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, go all the way into a licensing partnership. So, um,

0:21:41.520 --> 0:21:44.760
<v Speaker 1>what could what are you finding in terms of treatments

0:21:44.840 --> 0:21:48.480
<v Speaker 1>because um, you know, you mentioned the psychedelic experience, and

0:21:48.560 --> 0:21:51.960
<v Speaker 1>I thought the way people use sila cybin to treat

0:21:52.320 --> 0:21:57.639
<v Speaker 1>um disorders was through micro dosing. At least that seems

0:21:57.680 --> 0:21:59.760
<v Speaker 1>to be the kind of trendy way that people are

0:21:59.800 --> 0:22:02.800
<v Speaker 1>doing it in Silicon Valley and some others here on

0:22:02.800 --> 0:22:05.880
<v Speaker 1>the East Coast as well. Um, well, what's the most

0:22:05.920 --> 0:22:08.720
<v Speaker 1>successful way that you're that you found so far? Yeah,

0:22:08.760 --> 0:22:11.399
<v Speaker 1>I'm really glad you asked that question because it's actually

0:22:11.520 --> 0:22:14.400
<v Speaker 1>a kind of a common misconception because you do hear

0:22:14.440 --> 0:22:18.560
<v Speaker 1>a lot about microdosing, but but actually the the the

0:22:18.840 --> 0:22:22.640
<v Speaker 1>approach that has had you know, the most positive data

0:22:22.720 --> 0:22:26.200
<v Speaker 1>so far is what we call macrodosing. So you go

0:22:26.320 --> 0:22:28.520
<v Speaker 1>into a clinic, you take a large dose of a

0:22:28.600 --> 0:22:31.840
<v Speaker 1>psychedelic drug. You know, it puts you off into a

0:22:31.920 --> 0:22:36.399
<v Speaker 1>real psychedelic trip for you know, a period of time. Um,

0:22:36.560 --> 0:22:38.320
<v Speaker 1>and you've got to do it, you know, in clinic

0:22:38.480 --> 0:22:45.680
<v Speaker 1>under supervision, typically with multiple therapists. Yeah. Yeah, Typically there's

0:22:45.760 --> 0:22:48.439
<v Speaker 1>there's you know often there's music too, and and uh

0:22:48.760 --> 0:22:51.639
<v Speaker 1>and it's really interesting. All the data suggests that, you

0:22:51.720 --> 0:22:56.000
<v Speaker 1>know that that that profound psychedelic experience is really kind

0:22:56.040 --> 0:22:59.760
<v Speaker 1>of essential to to getting you know, the relief from

0:23:00.600 --> 0:23:03.760
<v Speaker 1>depressive symptoms. It's almost like a we still don't really

0:23:04.040 --> 0:23:07.200
<v Speaker 1>fully understand like how this all works, but you know,

0:23:07.280 --> 0:23:09.639
<v Speaker 1>the assumption is that there's some level of kind of

0:23:10.119 --> 0:23:12.760
<v Speaker 1>rewiring and it helps, you know, helps give you kind

0:23:12.760 --> 0:23:15.920
<v Speaker 1>of a break from being stuck in uh, in these

0:23:16.000 --> 0:23:19.119
<v Speaker 1>negative thought patterns. That's you know, really a hallmark of

0:23:19.200 --> 0:23:21.959
<v Speaker 1>people who are suffering, you know, badly from depression. How

0:23:22.040 --> 0:23:27.199
<v Speaker 1>far are you from something prescribable? If you look across

0:23:27.280 --> 0:23:31.240
<v Speaker 1>the psychedelic space, the drug that's going to get likely

0:23:31.359 --> 0:23:35.159
<v Speaker 1>get to FDA approval first is going to be MDMA. Uh,

0:23:35.280 --> 0:23:37.600
<v Speaker 1>psilocybin is going to come and that could be as

0:23:37.640 --> 0:23:41.120
<v Speaker 1>early as you know, next year. Psilocybin is probably another

0:23:41.200 --> 0:23:43.960
<v Speaker 1>twelve months behind that. We have a couple of candidates

0:23:44.000 --> 0:23:46.960
<v Speaker 1>that are just entering, uh you know, clinical trials. Now,

0:23:47.359 --> 0:23:50.080
<v Speaker 1>are you actually like growing mushrooms in the basement? I mean, went,

0:23:50.119 --> 0:23:53.119
<v Speaker 1>how does this work? No? This is all this is

0:23:53.160 --> 0:23:57.080
<v Speaker 1>all synthetic. So the problem with using the mushroom in

0:23:57.200 --> 0:24:01.240
<v Speaker 1>a therapeutic you know, regulated context, is that the psilocybin

0:24:01.359 --> 0:24:04.879
<v Speaker 1>content can really vary, you know, wildly, you know, from

0:24:04.960 --> 0:24:07.840
<v Speaker 1>mushroom to mushroom by as much as you know ten x.

0:24:08.240 --> 0:24:11.360
<v Speaker 1>So the mushroom, you know, you there's really no way

0:24:11.440 --> 0:24:14.720
<v Speaker 1>for for physicians to kind of dose it appropriately. You

0:24:14.880 --> 0:24:18.800
<v Speaker 1>really have to use the synthetic versions, and that's what

0:24:18.880 --> 0:24:22.000
<v Speaker 1>we're working with. Also, Uh, John, if you haven't been

0:24:22.040 --> 0:24:24.040
<v Speaker 1>watching The Last of Us, you might not know that

0:24:24.160 --> 0:24:27.760
<v Speaker 1>fungus can cause a global pandemic, could be world ending.

0:24:28.680 --> 0:24:30.520
<v Speaker 1>I have no idea what you're telling you about. Which

0:24:30.520 --> 0:24:34.359
<v Speaker 1>show is the HBO The Last of Us? Um? All right,

0:24:34.520 --> 0:24:37.959
<v Speaker 1>James the Pleasure from Narcos? Right, yeah, Okay, No, that's

0:24:38.000 --> 0:24:41.119
<v Speaker 1>pretty cool, James Pleasure talking to you. And I obviously

0:24:41.160 --> 0:24:45.520
<v Speaker 1>find this, uh topic absolutely fascinating, and you know, I

0:24:45.560 --> 0:24:49.240
<v Speaker 1>think SSRIs have been fairly successful, but there are obvious

0:24:49.320 --> 0:24:52.440
<v Speaker 1>drawbacks and side effects, so it would be quite cool,

0:24:52.800 --> 0:24:55.720
<v Speaker 1>um if you were successful. Great for the mental health

0:24:56.200 --> 0:24:59.840
<v Speaker 1>of the world. John Lanthier there the CEO at minds

0:25:00.040 --> 0:25:03.439
<v Speaker 1>at Farm. Sorry, James Lanthier, the CEO of Mindset Farmer.

0:25:03.560 --> 0:25:10.040
<v Speaker 1>The ticker again is mss TF. This is Bloomberg. You're

0:25:10.160 --> 0:25:14.240
<v Speaker 1>listening to the team can'cer live program Bloomberg Markets weekdays

0:25:14.240 --> 0:25:17.000
<v Speaker 1>at ten am, easting on Bloomberg dot com, the I

0:25:17.119 --> 0:25:19.960
<v Speaker 1>Heart Radio app, and the Bloomberg Business app. We're listening

0:25:20.000 --> 0:25:25.000
<v Speaker 1>on demand wherever you get your podcast. Hannah Elliott has

0:25:25.119 --> 0:25:29.120
<v Speaker 1>probably the best job at Bloomberg News. You did no well.

0:25:29.200 --> 0:25:32.639
<v Speaker 1>I mean I read all everything, she writes, everything, she

0:25:32.760 --> 0:25:36.280
<v Speaker 1>puts out follower on all social media, and she has

0:25:37.080 --> 0:25:41.400
<v Speaker 1>just put out a piece on the update the follower

0:25:41.600 --> 0:25:44.480
<v Speaker 1>to what is my probably favorite car of all time,

0:25:44.520 --> 0:25:47.040
<v Speaker 1>the Lamborghini evented Door. Hannah, I must tell you that

0:25:47.720 --> 0:25:50.040
<v Speaker 1>we had a talk it was like last week about

0:25:50.080 --> 0:25:52.920
<v Speaker 1>Lamborghini's and you were very upset about one model that

0:25:53.240 --> 0:25:57.080
<v Speaker 1>was I don't know, naturally aspirated but with a turbo

0:25:57.200 --> 0:26:00.200
<v Speaker 1>charger or whatever. No, is that right? No, it's not

0:26:00.320 --> 0:26:02.240
<v Speaker 1>the case. What was it. I'm not I'm not in

0:26:02.320 --> 0:26:05.480
<v Speaker 1>love with the urists. The power train for the Lamborghinists. Yeah,

0:26:05.800 --> 0:26:08.720
<v Speaker 1>oh yeah, that's fair. I have to say I love

0:26:08.760 --> 0:26:12.760
<v Speaker 1>the earists. I just had the Performante last week and

0:26:12.920 --> 0:26:17.040
<v Speaker 1>drove it out to Palm Springs. How for how does

0:26:17.080 --> 0:26:18.920
<v Speaker 1>that work? How do you hook me up? You know

0:26:20.119 --> 0:26:23.359
<v Speaker 1>I can help you with that. Um, as Matt said,

0:26:23.480 --> 0:26:26.280
<v Speaker 1>I agree. I have the best job at at Bloomberg

0:26:26.359 --> 0:26:28.760
<v Speaker 1>and I had it for um let's call it a

0:26:28.840 --> 0:26:32.359
<v Speaker 1>long weekend, four days over the weekend. So um it was.

0:26:32.640 --> 0:26:34.960
<v Speaker 1>It was a great experience. And I really you know,

0:26:35.040 --> 0:26:37.920
<v Speaker 1>I just drove the Farie par Songua the Ferrari Suv,

0:26:38.400 --> 0:26:41.000
<v Speaker 1>so it was very interesting to check back to back

0:26:41.080 --> 0:26:44.840
<v Speaker 1>the Lamborghini Suv versus the Ferrari Suv. I have to

0:26:44.920 --> 0:26:47.720
<v Speaker 1>say I give the Lambo the edge. Actually, well the Lamb.

0:26:47.800 --> 0:26:49.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean, look, the Lambo is a great car, But

0:26:50.119 --> 0:26:54.480
<v Speaker 1>is it just a Porsche Kayen with a different steel

0:26:54.520 --> 0:26:56.359
<v Speaker 1>on top? They have the same don't they have the

0:26:56.880 --> 0:27:01.520
<v Speaker 1>floor leader va with the twin turbos and oh sure,

0:27:01.640 --> 0:27:03.399
<v Speaker 1>but you know, there's a lot more power in the

0:27:03.480 --> 0:27:06.680
<v Speaker 1>earthst There's a lot more. There's a lot more power

0:27:06.720 --> 0:27:09.280
<v Speaker 1>in torque, I will say, I mean the performance figures

0:27:09.320 --> 0:27:12.680
<v Speaker 1>are stronger. It's it's a very cool car. But I

0:27:12.760 --> 0:27:15.960
<v Speaker 1>just personally I prefer a naturally aspirated engine. But I'm

0:27:16.040 --> 0:27:18.880
<v Speaker 1>old and there are new things. You're a purist, yeah,

0:27:18.920 --> 0:27:21.479
<v Speaker 1>I mean, hey, I don't believe it. You're you're a purist.

0:27:21.520 --> 0:27:23.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean, so that brings me to well, how do

0:27:23.560 --> 0:27:26.360
<v Speaker 1>you feel about Lamborghini making a hybrid? I feel very

0:27:26.440 --> 0:27:28.560
<v Speaker 1>good about that. I have. I've always said there's no

0:27:28.720 --> 0:27:32.320
<v Speaker 1>replacement for displacement, but I think now there is, and

0:27:32.480 --> 0:27:35.719
<v Speaker 1>that is okay, battery power, because of the instant torque,

0:27:35.800 --> 0:27:41.000
<v Speaker 1>because of um, just the incredible performance. Tell us about

0:27:41.040 --> 0:27:42.960
<v Speaker 1>the new car. I can't even pronounce the name. What's

0:27:42.960 --> 0:27:48.880
<v Speaker 1>the new eventidor the Eventador successor called? So I'm gonna

0:27:49.040 --> 0:27:53.040
<v Speaker 1>go with Rouelto. Um. You know, some people are saying

0:27:53.400 --> 0:27:57.640
<v Speaker 1>velto and some people are saying Rouelto. I think Rowelto

0:27:57.760 --> 0:28:02.240
<v Speaker 1>is a bit easier to say, basically the word. Of course,

0:28:02.359 --> 0:28:04.920
<v Speaker 1>it's named after a fighting bowl a bull that fought

0:28:05.040 --> 0:28:08.600
<v Speaker 1>in of s in Spain in Barcelona in the eighteen eighties.

0:28:08.840 --> 0:28:11.000
<v Speaker 1>John and a lot of our listeners may not know

0:28:11.160 --> 0:28:15.280
<v Speaker 1>that all, most all Lamborghinis are named after famous bulls.

0:28:15.359 --> 0:28:19.400
<v Speaker 1>This is this is firmly in line with Lamborghini heritage.

0:28:19.680 --> 0:28:24.640
<v Speaker 1>So the roualto. That word also means mixed up in Spanish.

0:28:24.720 --> 0:28:27.280
<v Speaker 1>It can be used to mean mixed up some people

0:28:27.440 --> 0:28:29.000
<v Speaker 1>even have you even told me, well, it kind of

0:28:29.080 --> 0:28:32.800
<v Speaker 1>means like scrambled eggs, and that's a very fitting name

0:28:33.119 --> 0:28:39.040
<v Speaker 1>for a vehicle that combines three electric motors with that

0:28:39.280 --> 0:28:43.360
<v Speaker 1>V twelve engine. So we've got a mixed up drive

0:28:43.440 --> 0:28:47.560
<v Speaker 1>train here. It's not really about like you said, this

0:28:47.720 --> 0:28:50.640
<v Speaker 1>is the successor to the evented door. It's the hybrid function.

0:28:50.800 --> 0:28:54.200
<v Speaker 1>Is not really about a fuel efficiency because we only

0:28:54.280 --> 0:28:58.720
<v Speaker 1>get six miles on an all electric charge, so it's

0:28:59.160 --> 0:29:01.840
<v Speaker 1>it's not about that. It's exactly what you say. It's

0:29:01.880 --> 0:29:07.360
<v Speaker 1>about instant torque, really um and some really seamless power,

0:29:08.320 --> 0:29:13.280
<v Speaker 1>which I think sounds fabulous. Who buys this? Oh? I

0:29:13.560 --> 0:29:17.160
<v Speaker 1>you know what, I expect that Lamborghini will have no

0:29:17.400 --> 0:29:21.600
<v Speaker 1>problem selling this vehicle. They mister Winkleman, Stefan Winkleman told

0:29:21.640 --> 0:29:27.280
<v Speaker 1>me that their order books are full through twenty twenty four. So, oh,

0:29:27.360 --> 0:29:30.280
<v Speaker 1>I forgot to mention. Can we just say the Roberto

0:29:30.400 --> 0:29:34.720
<v Speaker 1>has a thousand and one horsepower. Yes, so this How

0:29:34.760 --> 0:29:37.440
<v Speaker 1>could I forget? Um top speed of over two hundred

0:29:37.480 --> 0:29:39.720
<v Speaker 1>and seventeen miles an hour two point five zero to

0:29:39.880 --> 0:29:43.480
<v Speaker 1>sixty two. Okay, here's here's my other stupid question. Where

0:29:43.480 --> 0:29:45.760
<v Speaker 1>do you drive this? It's not going to be on

0:29:45.840 --> 0:29:49.640
<v Speaker 1>the turnpike. I think you actually could take it right

0:29:49.680 --> 0:29:53.920
<v Speaker 1>down the turnpike. I mean speeds like well, no, I

0:29:53.920 --> 0:29:56.120
<v Speaker 1>don't think there are some people who do those speeds,

0:29:56.200 --> 0:29:58.320
<v Speaker 1>but I think you know, you know, so the numbers,

0:29:58.360 --> 0:30:01.720
<v Speaker 1>that performance is truly impressive. It's almost as impressive as

0:30:01.800 --> 0:30:05.920
<v Speaker 1>the Dodge Challenger Demon one seventy but not quite. Design

0:30:06.360 --> 0:30:12.280
<v Speaker 1>is amazing, I think, Hannah, it's absolutely gorgeous too. What's

0:30:12.320 --> 0:30:15.880
<v Speaker 1>your take? Yeah, I love it. Okay, so let's get

0:30:15.960 --> 0:30:19.040
<v Speaker 1>some background. This was the head designers, Mitya Borkert, who

0:30:19.120 --> 0:30:22.920
<v Speaker 1>we all love. He actually came from Porsche, so he's

0:30:22.960 --> 0:30:26.120
<v Speaker 1>been at Lamborghini for some time. He led design on

0:30:26.240 --> 0:30:30.360
<v Speaker 1>this and I love it because it combines elements of

0:30:30.760 --> 0:30:33.080
<v Speaker 1>heritage Lamborghinis that we've seen. You can see a little

0:30:33.080 --> 0:30:36.440
<v Speaker 1>bit of a contosh in the front. You can see

0:30:36.680 --> 0:30:39.480
<v Speaker 1>a bit of a Mercy lago as well. The demensions

0:30:39.480 --> 0:30:44.760
<v Speaker 1>are a sort of a Diablo size, so I feel

0:30:44.840 --> 0:30:48.240
<v Speaker 1>like we can see the heritage of Lamborghini. But then

0:30:48.320 --> 0:30:51.640
<v Speaker 1>also we have really new elements, like a totally exposed

0:30:51.840 --> 0:30:56.680
<v Speaker 1>engine in the rear, which let's not forget. You know,

0:30:56.760 --> 0:30:58.920
<v Speaker 1>Bugatti has done that before, but I don't think we've

0:30:58.960 --> 0:31:01.760
<v Speaker 1>seen that at Lamborghini. So we've got a totally exposed engine,

0:31:01.760 --> 0:31:04.600
<v Speaker 1>which I think is really cool and still twelve thank god.

0:31:04.800 --> 0:31:08.400
<v Speaker 1>Exactly exactly, yeah, And we still have these design elements

0:31:08.600 --> 0:31:12.480
<v Speaker 1>of the shape of a Yum throughout the car, from

0:31:12.720 --> 0:31:16.000
<v Speaker 1>the led headlights at the front to inside in the

0:31:16.120 --> 0:31:20.320
<v Speaker 1>cockpit it's oriented in a Y shape to a funneling

0:31:20.480 --> 0:31:23.640
<v Speaker 1>to the rear. I think it's really really cool. I

0:31:23.720 --> 0:31:26.719
<v Speaker 1>think it's very cool. As well, n turn off your mic.

0:31:26.880 --> 0:31:29.680
<v Speaker 1>You can't talk anymore. No, I just as well. I'll

0:31:29.720 --> 0:31:31.720
<v Speaker 1>turn off back. I'm going to ask one final question.

0:31:31.760 --> 0:31:33.560
<v Speaker 1>I'll go away because I don't know what I'm talking about.

0:31:33.600 --> 0:31:35.720
<v Speaker 1>What kind of um looks did you get while driving

0:31:35.720 --> 0:31:37.960
<v Speaker 1>in the car. What's what's the reaction when you're in

0:31:38.040 --> 0:31:41.320
<v Speaker 1>this car driving around your neighborhood. Well, I must admit

0:31:41.440 --> 0:31:44.000
<v Speaker 1>I have not yet driven this vehicle, and I don't

0:31:44.040 --> 0:31:47.840
<v Speaker 1>think anybody is. They're going to This is the world debut,

0:31:47.960 --> 0:31:51.800
<v Speaker 1>so we haven't had press drives yet, but my prediction

0:31:52.040 --> 0:31:54.720
<v Speaker 1>is people are going to love it or hate it,

0:31:54.960 --> 0:31:57.600
<v Speaker 1>which is pretty much what Lamborghini does. You know, it's

0:31:57.640 --> 0:32:00.880
<v Speaker 1>a very strong statement. You're you're either on board or not.

0:32:02.080 --> 0:32:04.680
<v Speaker 1>But I do think one nice thing about this is

0:32:05.000 --> 0:32:08.520
<v Speaker 1>with that electric powertrain, you can kind of sneak out

0:32:08.560 --> 0:32:11.440
<v Speaker 1>of your neighborhood without all the belching and popping and

0:32:11.560 --> 0:32:15.080
<v Speaker 1>growling in the engine, which your neighbors might appreciate. And

0:32:15.200 --> 0:32:17.080
<v Speaker 1>then once you get on the get on the you

0:32:17.200 --> 0:32:19.959
<v Speaker 1>know the highway, they're turnpike, then you can turn your

0:32:20.000 --> 0:32:23.600
<v Speaker 1>engine on. Now, so maybe that'll go over well, well,

0:32:23.640 --> 0:32:25.680
<v Speaker 1>we'll see it. It'll be here at the New York

0:32:25.680 --> 0:32:28.680
<v Speaker 1>Auto Show next week, so and Hannah will be here too. Yeah.

0:32:28.680 --> 0:32:33.840
<v Speaker 1>I have to preface this next comment with a warning.

0:32:33.960 --> 0:32:38.960
<v Speaker 1>I am a reactionary. I often have very strong feelings

0:32:39.040 --> 0:32:43.280
<v Speaker 1>about things right away and voice them in a pretty

0:32:43.320 --> 0:32:47.240
<v Speaker 1>loud tone. Then after thinking about it or debating it

0:32:47.480 --> 0:32:50.280
<v Speaker 1>or reading it for a while, I realize I'm wrong

0:32:50.320 --> 0:32:52.480
<v Speaker 1>and I go back. So but at least I do

0:32:52.600 --> 0:32:56.360
<v Speaker 1>change my opinion. To me this new Ferrari puro sang

0:32:56.720 --> 0:33:00.600
<v Speaker 1>is the ugliest thing that they've ever aid and it

0:33:01.320 --> 0:33:03.320
<v Speaker 1>to me, it looks so cheap. I mean, they spent

0:33:03.480 --> 0:33:07.280
<v Speaker 1>so much money to develop a Mazda MX thirty. I

0:33:07.400 --> 0:33:13.640
<v Speaker 1>saw that mean too? What what on earth? And yeah,

0:33:13.680 --> 0:33:16.080
<v Speaker 1>I think in the Alps, which sounds awesome. I'm the

0:33:16.120 --> 0:33:19.680
<v Speaker 1>powertrain is so cool, but what Yes, this is one

0:33:19.760 --> 0:33:22.400
<v Speaker 1>reason why I do give the edge to the eurists

0:33:22.520 --> 0:33:27.480
<v Speaker 1>in terms of SUVs from Lamborghini versus Ferrari. I do

0:33:27.640 --> 0:33:29.760
<v Speaker 1>think the Earist looks cooler and more in line with

0:33:29.880 --> 0:33:34.840
<v Speaker 1>Lamborghini heritage. The Ferrari. Yeah, look, it looks better in person.

0:33:34.960 --> 0:33:37.160
<v Speaker 1>I don't think it photographs very well. I'm not going

0:33:37.240 --> 0:33:40.880
<v Speaker 1>to argue with you that it's not the greatest looking Ferrari.

0:33:41.160 --> 0:33:44.200
<v Speaker 1>It's not, you know. I love the roma, the classic

0:33:44.320 --> 0:33:47.760
<v Speaker 1>lines of the roma. It's so minimal and elegant, and

0:33:48.640 --> 0:33:51.400
<v Speaker 1>I agree I think they missed it a little bit

0:33:52.120 --> 0:33:55.920
<v Speaker 1>on the persang way. Um. I don't find it personally.

0:33:56.080 --> 0:33:59.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm not personally offended by it. I actually think the

0:33:59.440 --> 0:34:03.000
<v Speaker 1>Ferrari California was the worst calif Ferrari they made because

0:34:03.040 --> 0:34:07.520
<v Speaker 1>it was so bland and just so boring. Um, at

0:34:07.600 --> 0:34:12.200
<v Speaker 1>least there's something with the parrosangway. But yeah, you're right,

0:34:12.360 --> 0:34:14.960
<v Speaker 1>it's not it's not great. I think they pulled some

0:34:15.080 --> 0:34:17.799
<v Speaker 1>punches that maybe they could have gone a little harder. Yeah,

0:34:17.880 --> 0:34:21.000
<v Speaker 1>I haven't seen it in person, and as I said,

0:34:21.080 --> 0:34:23.319
<v Speaker 1>I maybe i'll see it and in a few years

0:34:23.440 --> 0:34:25.680
<v Speaker 1>fall in love with it. I do love the ff

0:34:26.120 --> 0:34:30.680
<v Speaker 1>is my favorite Ferrari. Okay, but I just I'm glad

0:34:30.719 --> 0:34:33.160
<v Speaker 1>they left the power to V twelve there as well,

0:34:33.320 --> 0:34:36.759
<v Speaker 1>so at least we haven't lost that. And I really

0:34:36.800 --> 0:34:38.680
<v Speaker 1>look forward to seeing you next week. I'm so glad

0:34:38.719 --> 0:34:41.480
<v Speaker 1>you're coming to New York Auto Show. And yes, I'm

0:34:41.520 --> 0:34:44.399
<v Speaker 1>gonna I'll bring John Tucker along. I'm gonna give him

0:34:44.400 --> 0:34:47.480
<v Speaker 1>a history lesson, a few books to read. I'll tell

0:34:47.560 --> 0:34:50.120
<v Speaker 1>him to also follow you on Twitter and on Instagram.

0:34:50.200 --> 0:34:52.840
<v Speaker 1>And thank you for not telling the kitty litter story.

0:34:53.600 --> 0:34:57.840
<v Speaker 1>Tucker put kitty litter in his car. No, yeah, I

0:34:57.880 --> 0:35:02.640
<v Speaker 1>mean sprinkled it around. Is this the reef thing? Yeah?

0:35:02.680 --> 0:35:05.879
<v Speaker 1>Well no, it's spilled gas. Somebody I sent to get

0:35:05.960 --> 0:35:09.239
<v Speaker 1>gasoline in a can, a five gallon can, came back

0:35:09.320 --> 0:35:11.480
<v Speaker 1>with three gallons and said, oh, I filled it up

0:35:11.480 --> 0:35:14.799
<v Speaker 1>with five, so I won't name names. It's actually good.

0:35:15.080 --> 0:35:16.960
<v Speaker 1>It's a good trick if you need to get it

0:35:17.040 --> 0:35:19.279
<v Speaker 1>didn't quite work because they refused to park the car

0:35:19.360 --> 0:35:22.520
<v Speaker 1>in the garage across the stream. In any case, Hannah Elliott,

0:35:23.400 --> 0:35:25.239
<v Speaker 1>go on the Bloomberg dot Com read her stuff, or

0:35:25.280 --> 0:35:27.840
<v Speaker 1>go on social media. Hannah, thanks so much for joining us.

0:35:28.280 --> 0:35:31.360
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the tape. Catch our live program Bloomberg

0:35:31.480 --> 0:35:35.680
<v Speaker 1>Markets weekdays at ten am Eastern on Bloomberg Radio, Tuna half,

0:35:35.760 --> 0:35:38.600
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg dot Com, and the Bloomberg Business Half. You can

0:35:38.680 --> 0:35:41.880
<v Speaker 1>also listen live on Amazon Alexa from our flagship New

0:35:42.000 --> 0:35:47.399
<v Speaker 1>York station. Just say Alexa play Bloomberg eleven thirty. Let's

0:35:47.440 --> 0:35:50.560
<v Speaker 1>get over to Washington, DC so I can ask one

0:35:50.600 --> 0:35:53.640
<v Speaker 1>of my favorite Bloomberg intelligence analysts the same question I

0:35:53.760 --> 0:35:56.520
<v Speaker 1>always ask him about the salt deduction that we so

0:35:56.680 --> 0:36:03.120
<v Speaker 1>badly need. Nathan Dean joins US senior policy analysts and King.

0:36:03.239 --> 0:36:06.320
<v Speaker 1>Before you came out, we were comparing property taxes me

0:36:06.400 --> 0:36:11.000
<v Speaker 1>in New Jersey, Manton, Westchester, so and it's here. It's

0:36:11.200 --> 0:36:13.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I don't know if I can remain solvent

0:36:14.280 --> 0:36:19.560
<v Speaker 1>until the salt deduction restriction sunsets in twenty twenty five.

0:36:20.719 --> 0:36:24.880
<v Speaker 1>Why did Donald Trump and the Republicans do this to me?

0:36:26.040 --> 0:36:28.160
<v Speaker 1>Because unfortunately, for those of you who live in New

0:36:28.280 --> 0:36:30.800
<v Speaker 1>Jersey and New York, it's just it's easy money to

0:36:30.880 --> 0:36:33.360
<v Speaker 1>take and pay for something else. And that's the problem

0:36:33.400 --> 0:36:36.080
<v Speaker 1>with the salt deduction going forward, is that you know,

0:36:36.239 --> 0:36:37.880
<v Speaker 1>if you're going to give it back, you got to

0:36:37.920 --> 0:36:39.920
<v Speaker 1>pay for some pay for it somewhere else. And it's

0:36:40.000 --> 0:36:43.200
<v Speaker 1>easy for the forty eight other states, maybe not California,

0:36:43.320 --> 0:36:45.480
<v Speaker 1>but it's easy for the book the rest of the

0:36:45.560 --> 0:36:48.400
<v Speaker 1>states and say, yeah, you know, New York, New Jersey,

0:36:48.400 --> 0:36:50.320
<v Speaker 1>they've got great pizza and they've got great food and

0:36:50.360 --> 0:36:52.239
<v Speaker 1>so forth. But you know, we don't we don't need

0:36:52.280 --> 0:36:54.560
<v Speaker 1>to give them back their salt deduction. So you know,

0:36:55.000 --> 0:36:56.640
<v Speaker 1>the best I think you could hope for is it

0:36:56.840 --> 0:37:00.560
<v Speaker 1>just being in the conversation. And I think the policymakers,

0:37:00.680 --> 0:37:03.440
<v Speaker 1>especially from New Jersey, are really pushing this, so at

0:37:03.480 --> 0:37:06.640
<v Speaker 1>least you can prepare for that twenty twenty five date.

0:37:07.000 --> 0:37:08.960
<v Speaker 1>But obviously we'll have a new Congress and a new

0:37:09.000 --> 0:37:11.560
<v Speaker 1>president and so forth like that. So unfortunately, you're just

0:37:11.640 --> 0:37:13.080
<v Speaker 1>gonna have to live with your good pizza for the

0:37:13.480 --> 0:37:15.840
<v Speaker 1>time being, I just you know, the other what I

0:37:15.920 --> 0:37:18.120
<v Speaker 1>want to do is move to Connecticut where taxes are like,

0:37:18.400 --> 0:37:20.360
<v Speaker 1>what is it going to be extended? Do you do

0:37:20.480 --> 0:37:22.600
<v Speaker 1>you think? I mean it's supposed to sunset then, but

0:37:23.320 --> 0:37:25.880
<v Speaker 1>is there a chance it will be extended? Well? The

0:37:26.160 --> 0:37:28.160
<v Speaker 1>challenge is is that then you have to decide how

0:37:28.160 --> 0:37:30.960
<v Speaker 1>are you going to pay for it? And you know

0:37:31.360 --> 0:37:36.040
<v Speaker 1>it's I mean, will the lack of the deduction continue? Well,

0:37:36.200 --> 0:37:38.640
<v Speaker 1>And that's my point is is that if you were

0:37:38.760 --> 0:37:42.000
<v Speaker 1>to say, if you were to bring it back, it's

0:37:42.160 --> 0:37:44.120
<v Speaker 1>sort of like in an entitlement, it's like, okay, if

0:37:44.200 --> 0:37:46.759
<v Speaker 1>you you know, once you give it, it's hard to

0:37:46.800 --> 0:37:49.680
<v Speaker 1>take away. Once it's out there and it's gone, it's

0:37:49.719 --> 0:37:53.359
<v Speaker 1>hard to bring back. And so you know, I think

0:37:53.400 --> 0:37:55.360
<v Speaker 1>the best you could hope for at this point is

0:37:55.560 --> 0:37:58.520
<v Speaker 1>these policymakers to continue to put it into the conversation

0:37:59.280 --> 0:38:02.600
<v Speaker 1>and for you know, other states. You know, because we

0:38:02.680 --> 0:38:05.600
<v Speaker 1>haven't seen other states. You know, other states and property

0:38:06.719 --> 0:38:09.360
<v Speaker 1>values have gone up dramatically since COVID. You know that

0:38:09.400 --> 0:38:12.040
<v Speaker 1>there are more states that are now impacted by this. Illinois,

0:38:12.040 --> 0:38:15.280
<v Speaker 1>for example, I think the folks there have already started

0:38:15.360 --> 0:38:17.960
<v Speaker 1>talking about this as well. So I don't want to

0:38:18.000 --> 0:38:19.759
<v Speaker 1>be optimistic, but I just want to say that it

0:38:19.880 --> 0:38:22.319
<v Speaker 1>is part of the conversation and hopefully in two years

0:38:22.840 --> 0:38:25.240
<v Speaker 1>it's a better resort for those of you in the Northeast.

0:38:25.560 --> 0:38:30.400
<v Speaker 1>I mean, temporary tax hikes never go away. Let's be honest.

0:38:30.520 --> 0:38:36.719
<v Speaker 1>And my question is why are taxes in Westchester so

0:38:36.880 --> 0:38:39.160
<v Speaker 1>much higher? Why are taxes in the state of New

0:38:39.239 --> 0:38:41.600
<v Speaker 1>York so much higher than every other state? But we

0:38:42.480 --> 0:38:45.800
<v Speaker 1>I don't need to belabor this point. We need to

0:38:46.120 --> 0:38:48.480
<v Speaker 1>get to the banks. You know, a lot of people

0:38:48.560 --> 0:38:51.160
<v Speaker 1>are talking about dougcass again was telling us that he's

0:38:51.239 --> 0:38:53.319
<v Speaker 1>buying some of these banks have been hit. He thinks

0:38:53.360 --> 0:38:56.080
<v Speaker 1>a little bit too hard. The reason other people aren't

0:38:56.200 --> 0:39:00.239
<v Speaker 1>is because they think there's a real regulatory over hang.

0:39:00.400 --> 0:39:04.400
<v Speaker 1>And Nathan, is it inevitable that we just see a

0:39:04.520 --> 0:39:09.040
<v Speaker 1>lot more banking regulation come into play. Inevitable but manageable.

0:39:09.200 --> 0:39:11.400
<v Speaker 1>And what I mean by that is is that this

0:39:11.640 --> 0:39:13.799
<v Speaker 1>report that's going to come out on May first will

0:39:14.000 --> 0:39:17.080
<v Speaker 1>essentially have two things that I think investors should really

0:39:17.120 --> 0:39:20.480
<v Speaker 1>pay attention to. The First one is the special FDIC assessment.

0:39:20.880 --> 0:39:24.440
<v Speaker 1>You know, yesterday Chairman FDIC Chairman Martin Gruenberg said that,

0:39:24.840 --> 0:39:26.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, they have to make up the twenty two

0:39:26.719 --> 0:39:30.560
<v Speaker 1>point five billion dollars that the lost on Silicon Valley

0:39:30.600 --> 0:39:33.360
<v Speaker 1>Bank and Signature Bank. And it put in perspective the

0:39:33.520 --> 0:39:36.160
<v Speaker 1>last time the special assessment, or one of the special

0:39:36.200 --> 0:39:39.640
<v Speaker 1>assessments in two thousand and nine for five point five billion,

0:39:40.080 --> 0:39:42.040
<v Speaker 1>ended up with a six hundred and seventy five million

0:39:42.040 --> 0:39:44.800
<v Speaker 1>dollar hit for JP Morgan. And they've already said that

0:39:44.920 --> 0:39:47.880
<v Speaker 1>they want big banks, or at least not community banks,

0:39:47.960 --> 0:39:50.319
<v Speaker 1>to pay for it. So that's going to be out

0:39:50.440 --> 0:39:52.560
<v Speaker 1>via a notice proposed rulemaking. So there's gonna be a

0:39:52.600 --> 0:39:55.080
<v Speaker 1>lot of time to figure out how that impact works out,

0:39:55.360 --> 0:39:58.840
<v Speaker 1>but that's important. The other one is the ongoing regulatory matters,

0:39:58.920 --> 0:40:00.719
<v Speaker 1>and this is where I think you're gonna see what

0:40:00.800 --> 0:40:03.799
<v Speaker 1>is known as enhanced prudential standards for banks that are

0:40:03.800 --> 0:40:06.040
<v Speaker 1>one hundred billion in assets and up, so like Huntington

0:40:06.560 --> 0:40:10.359
<v Speaker 1>Key Corps fifth third examples. And what you're gonna see

0:40:10.400 --> 0:40:12.800
<v Speaker 1>here is not only just higher capital but tougher liquidity

0:40:12.880 --> 0:40:15.960
<v Speaker 1>coverage ratios. But I think ultimately that if you were

0:40:16.000 --> 0:40:18.879
<v Speaker 1>to talk to those hundred billion dollar banks, they'd see

0:40:18.920 --> 0:40:21.840
<v Speaker 1>in the long run, this is manageable. So I'm not

0:40:21.880 --> 0:40:23.359
<v Speaker 1>I don't think it's going to be the heavy hand

0:40:23.760 --> 0:40:26.879
<v Speaker 1>regulatory hit that some people are thinking. Do they get

0:40:27.040 --> 0:40:30.279
<v Speaker 1>stress tested? The regionals, the smaller banks at some point

0:40:31.080 --> 0:40:34.640
<v Speaker 1>they do, So it's actually a tiered process, you know.

0:40:34.760 --> 0:40:37.920
<v Speaker 1>And so banks that are one hundred to two hundred

0:40:37.920 --> 0:40:40.120
<v Speaker 1>and fifty billion due to stress tests. But this is

0:40:40.160 --> 0:40:43.160
<v Speaker 1>where the problem with Silicon Valley banking in is Silicon

0:40:43.280 --> 0:40:46.239
<v Speaker 1>Valley Bank rose from eighty billion to two hundred and

0:40:46.320 --> 0:40:49.560
<v Speaker 1>eleven billion almost instantly over a year, you know, almost

0:40:49.600 --> 0:40:52.680
<v Speaker 1>just under two years. And the way that the transition

0:40:52.920 --> 0:40:56.200
<v Speaker 1>played from the first stress to the next, it was

0:40:56.200 --> 0:40:58.919
<v Speaker 1>actually gonna be twenty twenty five until their next stress test.

0:40:59.000 --> 0:41:00.160
<v Speaker 1>And I think that's going to be one one of

0:41:00.400 --> 0:41:03.319
<v Speaker 1>the solutions you came from the regulators is these banks

0:41:03.360 --> 0:41:05.360
<v Speaker 1>that are hundred billion and up a lot more stress

0:41:05.400 --> 0:41:07.520
<v Speaker 1>tests and a lot more tougher stress tests when all

0:41:07.560 --> 0:41:10.520
<v Speaker 1>this have come up in a stress test, the longer

0:41:10.640 --> 0:41:14.840
<v Speaker 1>dated whatever they were, you know, yes and no. So

0:41:15.120 --> 0:41:18.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, I think there is a regulatory issue here.

0:41:18.360 --> 0:41:21.279
<v Speaker 1>And what I mean by that is I think the

0:41:21.400 --> 0:41:24.200
<v Speaker 1>regulators and this was the San Francisco Fed plus some

0:41:24.320 --> 0:41:27.920
<v Speaker 1>of the others were a little hesitant to actually sound

0:41:27.960 --> 0:41:30.760
<v Speaker 1>the alarm on Silicon Valley Bank. You know, Vice Chairman

0:41:31.040 --> 0:41:33.719
<v Speaker 1>bar said that he got his first briefing in February,

0:41:34.160 --> 0:41:35.880
<v Speaker 1>but they said that they've been looking at this. The

0:41:36.239 --> 0:41:39.920
<v Speaker 1>mria's matters requiring immediate attention had been placed on the

0:41:39.960 --> 0:41:43.080
<v Speaker 1>bank a year ago. And you know they're Camel's rating,

0:41:43.120 --> 0:41:45.640
<v Speaker 1>which is this super secret rating that every bank gets

0:41:45.680 --> 0:41:48.320
<v Speaker 1>and nobody knows what it is. You know, their Camel's

0:41:48.360 --> 0:41:50.840
<v Speaker 1>rating was three, which is actually bad, but it's a

0:41:50.960 --> 0:41:53.919
<v Speaker 1>rating of one to five, one being great, five being bad.

0:41:54.440 --> 0:41:56.120
<v Speaker 1>And if you're going to give the bank of three

0:41:56.239 --> 0:41:59.360
<v Speaker 1>and their liquidity portion was a two, but then weeks

0:41:59.440 --> 0:42:03.440
<v Speaker 1>later it's a contagion risk or a systemic risk. My

0:42:03.600 --> 0:42:05.920
<v Speaker 1>question here is maybe the regulators need to actually get

0:42:06.000 --> 0:42:07.680
<v Speaker 1>sort of their ducks in a row as well, not

0:42:07.880 --> 0:42:10.279
<v Speaker 1>just put more regulations. As a depositor, i'd want to

0:42:10.320 --> 0:42:15.880
<v Speaker 1>know what that index is out and unfortunately this is

0:42:15.960 --> 0:42:18.920
<v Speaker 1>this is confidential, so the Camel's ratings are never made public.

0:42:19.160 --> 0:42:21.640
<v Speaker 1>But what I can say is is that you know,

0:42:21.840 --> 0:42:25.120
<v Speaker 1>in terms of the deposit insurance argument that's going on

0:42:25.360 --> 0:42:28.880
<v Speaker 1>right now, you've seen several policymakers float the idea of

0:42:28.960 --> 0:42:31.320
<v Speaker 1>going to a billion dollars. I'm sorry, a million dollars

0:42:31.480 --> 0:42:34.160
<v Speaker 1>or five million dollars. I don't think there's going to

0:42:34.200 --> 0:42:37.279
<v Speaker 1>be a congressional solution here. I think what's going to happen, though,

0:42:37.800 --> 0:42:40.000
<v Speaker 1>is you'll see the Treasury and the FED say that

0:42:40.120 --> 0:42:42.640
<v Speaker 1>we still have this bank term funding program out there

0:42:43.080 --> 0:42:45.719
<v Speaker 1>that allows banks to borrow to achieve liquidity so that

0:42:45.800 --> 0:42:49.640
<v Speaker 1>their deposits are secured. And this program extends up until

0:42:49.719 --> 0:42:51.840
<v Speaker 1>March of twenty twenty four. But if we're in this

0:42:51.920 --> 0:42:54.279
<v Speaker 1>situation where you're not comfortable putting your money in a

0:42:54.320 --> 0:42:57.840
<v Speaker 1>regional bank and it's an election year, don't be surprised

0:42:57.840 --> 0:42:59.719
<v Speaker 1>if Treasury in the FED just saying, ay, maybe we

0:42:59.800 --> 0:43:03.719
<v Speaker 1>just need another year of this funding program, all right? Uh?

0:43:04.000 --> 0:43:08.120
<v Speaker 1>Nathan Dean Bloomberg intelligence analyst. He knows. This guy knows

0:43:08.239 --> 0:43:10.960
<v Speaker 1>everything about what goes on in Congress. So when it

0:43:11.080 --> 0:43:14.960
<v Speaker 1>comes time for the debt ceiling to be renegotiated, you

0:43:15.040 --> 0:43:16.920
<v Speaker 1>don't want to talk about because I could tell you

0:43:18.080 --> 0:43:21.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm already bored by it. I is it? You know what?

0:43:21.520 --> 0:43:27.000
<v Speaker 1>I remember when, Nathan, I remember when we were downgraded

0:43:27.560 --> 0:43:32.839
<v Speaker 1>by SMP. I think it was SMP, and we had

0:43:33.040 --> 0:43:34.680
<v Speaker 1>we all had, all the anchors had to come in,

0:43:34.840 --> 0:43:38.719
<v Speaker 1>all hands on deck for a special episode of Bloomberg Whatever,

0:43:38.920 --> 0:43:43.440
<v Speaker 1>and everyone bought treasuries. We lost our triple A rating

0:43:43.480 --> 0:43:47.720
<v Speaker 1>and everyone bought treasuries. Nathan Dean from Bloomberg Intelligence talking

0:43:47.760 --> 0:43:50.800
<v Speaker 1>to us about what's going on in the hallowed halls

0:43:51.040 --> 0:43:53.799
<v Speaker 1>of Is that actually a show Bloomberg Whatever? I can't

0:43:53.840 --> 0:43:55.960
<v Speaker 1>remember what it was. That was way back, that was

0:43:56.000 --> 0:43:59.800
<v Speaker 1>twenty eleven. I had hair. You're listening to the tape.

0:44:00.080 --> 0:44:03.319
<v Speaker 1>Ken's are live program Bloomberg Markets weekdays at ten am

0:44:03.400 --> 0:44:07.000
<v Speaker 1>Eastern on Bloomberg Radio, tune in app, Bloomberg dot Com,

0:44:07.200 --> 0:44:09.919
<v Speaker 1>and the Bloomberg Business App. You can also listen live

0:44:10.040 --> 0:44:13.080
<v Speaker 1>on Amazon Alexa from our flagship New York station, Just

0:44:13.280 --> 0:44:19.280
<v Speaker 1>say Alexa play Bloomberg eleven thirty. Really sad news once

0:44:19.320 --> 0:44:26.200
<v Speaker 1>again with Blackhawk helicopters going down and US military members

0:44:26.200 --> 0:44:30.480
<v Speaker 1>of the US military perishing in that tragedy. You know,

0:44:30.560 --> 0:44:32.960
<v Speaker 1>it's a reminder of the sacrifices that are made on

0:44:33.080 --> 0:44:36.400
<v Speaker 1>a daily, hourly basis by men and women in this

0:44:36.560 --> 0:44:40.680
<v Speaker 1>country to keep us safe. Absolutely, and we should we

0:44:40.840 --> 0:44:43.960
<v Speaker 1>do and we should always thank them for their service.

0:44:44.400 --> 0:44:46.520
<v Speaker 1>One such man is Mick Mulroy. He is a co

0:44:46.680 --> 0:44:52.840
<v Speaker 1>founder of the Lobo Institute, and he spent many years

0:44:53.520 --> 0:44:56.799
<v Speaker 1>in the US Marines and infantry officer as well as

0:44:56.840 --> 0:45:01.879
<v Speaker 1>a paramilitary operations officer at the CIA. Mike, it's always, uh,

0:45:02.320 --> 0:45:06.839
<v Speaker 1>it's always awful to have to talk about these things. Um,

0:45:07.560 --> 0:45:10.360
<v Speaker 1>I wonder what your take is on the Blackhawk incident

0:45:10.480 --> 0:45:14.040
<v Speaker 1>that we that we're looking at now, and is there

0:45:14.080 --> 0:45:18.800
<v Speaker 1>a problem with this helicopter because it's um, you know,

0:45:18.920 --> 0:45:23.759
<v Speaker 1>famously had issues in the past. So good to be

0:45:23.880 --> 0:45:26.120
<v Speaker 1>with you guys, But absolutely, it is hard to talk

0:45:26.160 --> 0:45:29.120
<v Speaker 1>about these things. You know, obviously, I'm a retiree, I'm

0:45:29.360 --> 0:45:32.759
<v Speaker 1>a father of a currently serving an Army officer, and

0:45:32.960 --> 0:45:35.960
<v Speaker 1>every American I'm sure our hearts go out to the

0:45:36.000 --> 0:45:42.280
<v Speaker 1>families of these these soldiers. The helicopter has had problems,

0:45:42.480 --> 0:45:45.239
<v Speaker 1>most helicopters do. I'm not I'm a I'm a ground guy,

0:45:45.320 --> 0:45:49.040
<v Speaker 1>not a pilot, but helicopters are exceedingly difficult to fly,

0:45:49.360 --> 0:45:51.960
<v Speaker 1>and we fly them at night in the military because

0:45:52.520 --> 0:45:56.240
<v Speaker 1>that is how we conduct our operations. Our soldiers pilots

0:45:56.280 --> 0:46:00.279
<v Speaker 1>are incredibly competent, and the equipment generally is too. But

0:46:00.440 --> 0:46:03.520
<v Speaker 1>this obviously shouldn't have happened, and I think the US

0:46:03.680 --> 0:46:08.520
<v Speaker 1>Army will do an extensive investigation to determine what exactly

0:46:08.600 --> 0:46:11.600
<v Speaker 1>happened here. The training is realistic, and the training by

0:46:11.680 --> 0:46:14.560
<v Speaker 1>its very nature is going to be incredibly dangerous. I

0:46:14.640 --> 0:46:19.760
<v Speaker 1>mean you know firsthand right it absolutely is. Any training

0:46:20.040 --> 0:46:25.200
<v Speaker 1>is dangerous, especially when you're using helicopters, especially at night. Again,

0:46:25.280 --> 0:46:28.720
<v Speaker 1>that's why we train, because we are most effective because

0:46:28.760 --> 0:46:31.200
<v Speaker 1>we can utilize all of the high technology that we

0:46:31.280 --> 0:46:35.799
<v Speaker 1>have that they of our adversaries don't. If you think

0:46:35.840 --> 0:46:38.600
<v Speaker 1>about it, there those pilots are looking down the equivalent

0:46:38.640 --> 0:46:42.120
<v Speaker 1>of two tubes, which is their nbgs, So it doesn't

0:46:42.160 --> 0:46:46.759
<v Speaker 1>give you great peripheral vision estially, you can look straightforward,

0:46:46.800 --> 0:46:50.480
<v Speaker 1>you can turn your head, but it's very it's very restricted.

0:46:50.880 --> 0:46:52.600
<v Speaker 1>So that might be one of the reasons why this

0:46:53.239 --> 0:46:57.400
<v Speaker 1>Apparently they ran into each other or they collided, and

0:46:57.480 --> 0:46:59.320
<v Speaker 1>I think that's one of the things are going to investigate,

0:46:59.640 --> 0:47:01.480
<v Speaker 1>and then maybe going forward, we can come up with

0:47:01.560 --> 0:47:04.120
<v Speaker 1>a better night vision system where it doesn't have that

0:47:04.239 --> 0:47:07.960
<v Speaker 1>kind of utrich all right, Well, as you say, our

0:47:08.000 --> 0:47:10.279
<v Speaker 1>hearts go out to the families of these soldiers, and

0:47:11.480 --> 0:47:15.360
<v Speaker 1>as John said, you know it's it's a horrible tragedy,

0:47:15.680 --> 0:47:18.560
<v Speaker 1>but it does remind us of the sacrifices that are

0:47:18.600 --> 0:47:22.279
<v Speaker 1>made on a daily basis by the soldiers that the

0:47:22.560 --> 0:47:25.359
<v Speaker 1>troops that are protecting us and really not just us,

0:47:26.120 --> 0:47:28.319
<v Speaker 1>kind of the free world. Let me let me ask

0:47:28.400 --> 0:47:32.600
<v Speaker 1>you in that vein about Evan Gerskovich. Not a soldier,

0:47:33.600 --> 0:47:38.480
<v Speaker 1>He's a journalist that was detained in Russia and has

0:47:38.520 --> 0:47:43.480
<v Speaker 1>been accused of espionage. My first thought, Mick was, as

0:47:43.520 --> 0:47:47.120
<v Speaker 1>someone who reads, you know, spy novels extensively, there's no

0:47:47.280 --> 0:47:51.480
<v Speaker 1>way that we're going to put a spy embedded with

0:47:51.600 --> 0:47:54.400
<v Speaker 1>the Wall Street Journal I mean the Journal for example.

0:47:54.600 --> 0:47:57.600
<v Speaker 1>I wouldn't want to do it, and I can't understand

0:47:57.640 --> 0:48:00.479
<v Speaker 1>why we would think that. But time and time again

0:48:00.560 --> 0:48:04.080
<v Speaker 1>in China and now in Russia, these journalists are being

0:48:04.200 --> 0:48:08.080
<v Speaker 1>sidelined under the accusation that they're spies. What do you

0:48:08.160 --> 0:48:11.520
<v Speaker 1>what do you make of it? So you're absolutely right,

0:48:11.640 --> 0:48:15.040
<v Speaker 1>we would not use a journalist to collect intelligence. In

0:48:15.040 --> 0:48:17.440
<v Speaker 1>the fact, we're legally restricted from doing it. We have

0:48:17.600 --> 0:48:21.680
<v Speaker 1>been since the nineteen seventies. So there's a zero chance,

0:48:21.760 --> 0:48:26.880
<v Speaker 1>in my opinion, that any journalists overseas collecting intelligence for

0:48:27.640 --> 0:48:31.359
<v Speaker 1>the United States. I think this is essentially perhaps they

0:48:32.000 --> 0:48:34.480
<v Speaker 1>do that, they being China and Russia, so they just

0:48:34.800 --> 0:48:38.160
<v Speaker 1>assume we do. But it's pretty it's pretty clear that

0:48:38.280 --> 0:48:40.160
<v Speaker 1>we do not, and you can simply just look it

0:48:40.280 --> 0:48:44.239
<v Speaker 1>up and see that. I think they're using Evan as

0:48:44.320 --> 0:48:47.120
<v Speaker 1>a political hostage, and they're going to try to get

0:48:47.239 --> 0:48:50.680
<v Speaker 1>some of their people out that have been incarcerated in

0:48:50.840 --> 0:48:54.640
<v Speaker 1>say like Germany for example, that we're actually convicted for

0:48:54.719 --> 0:48:56.839
<v Speaker 1>real crimes in that case, murder, and I think they're

0:48:56.880 --> 0:49:01.880
<v Speaker 1>trying to gather enough Americans where we'll actually approach the

0:49:01.960 --> 0:49:05.279
<v Speaker 1>German government and see if this is possible. So I

0:49:05.320 --> 0:49:08.320
<v Speaker 1>think that's what it. Then was it a mistake to

0:49:10.239 --> 0:49:13.520
<v Speaker 1>trade a war criminal for Brittany Grinder? I mean, and

0:49:14.080 --> 0:49:16.319
<v Speaker 1>the worst part about that is that we left one

0:49:16.400 --> 0:49:21.600
<v Speaker 1>of our soldiers over there. But was it you know,

0:49:21.760 --> 0:49:24.120
<v Speaker 1>it was that encouraging to the Russians And now they're

0:49:24.120 --> 0:49:28.439
<v Speaker 1>trying to do more of this. So I do think

0:49:28.520 --> 0:49:31.359
<v Speaker 1>that it did encourage them to do more of this. Unfortunately,

0:49:31.440 --> 0:49:33.920
<v Speaker 1>I don't know what else we would have done. Bertie

0:49:33.960 --> 0:49:37.640
<v Speaker 1>Griner should have been returned. Obviously, Paul Willen as well.

0:49:38.360 --> 0:49:41.640
<v Speaker 1>But this is how Russia operates. We probably should do

0:49:41.800 --> 0:49:45.120
<v Speaker 1>war to keep Americans out of Russia. It is the

0:49:45.239 --> 0:49:48.600
<v Speaker 1>highest level of Travis and Travel Advisory Level four, which

0:49:48.640 --> 0:49:51.239
<v Speaker 1>says don't go to Russia. Whether we can do more

0:49:51.320 --> 0:49:53.840
<v Speaker 1>than that, I don't know. It probably requires legislation, but

0:49:53.960 --> 0:49:58.080
<v Speaker 1>it does give Russia this opportunity to simply grab Americans,

0:49:58.200 --> 0:50:01.359
<v Speaker 1>fabricate charges in cars them for years, and then use

0:50:01.480 --> 0:50:05.640
<v Speaker 1>them as leverage points against US, both to get their

0:50:05.680 --> 0:50:08.960
<v Speaker 1>people out and potentially other things that they would like

0:50:09.000 --> 0:50:11.359
<v Speaker 1>to see United States do. Hey, man, can I back

0:50:11.440 --> 0:50:14.880
<v Speaker 1>up and ask you a really broad question? As co

0:50:15.040 --> 0:50:19.200
<v Speaker 1>founder Lobo Institute, how do you assess where we are

0:50:19.440 --> 0:50:21.680
<v Speaker 1>in the world today? Is it a more dangerous place?

0:50:21.960 --> 0:50:26.399
<v Speaker 1>Is it less dangerous? So, unfortunately, I would say it's

0:50:26.480 --> 0:50:31.680
<v Speaker 1>getting more dangerous. We're seeing country like Russia who have

0:50:31.800 --> 0:50:35.200
<v Speaker 1>just decided to completely violate the international rules based order,

0:50:35.800 --> 0:50:40.040
<v Speaker 1>an order that every country benefits from, but apparently not

0:50:40.160 --> 0:50:43.800
<v Speaker 1>every country wishes to defend when it comes to another country.

0:50:44.080 --> 0:50:47.960
<v Speaker 1>I think that's very problematic. China is certainly trying to

0:50:48.040 --> 0:50:52.320
<v Speaker 1>gain prominence. They are building up their military. We're seeing

0:50:52.400 --> 0:50:56.080
<v Speaker 1>countries that are on the verge of acquiring nuclear weapons,

0:50:56.160 --> 0:50:59.160
<v Speaker 1>like Iran. I don't want to be a doomsdayer here,

0:50:59.239 --> 0:51:01.960
<v Speaker 1>but it's simply the facts that the world is not

0:51:02.160 --> 0:51:05.040
<v Speaker 1>getting safer and the United States needs to recognize that,

0:51:05.560 --> 0:51:08.840
<v Speaker 1>and that's part of why we spend so much of

0:51:08.920 --> 0:51:13.000
<v Speaker 1>our resources on our national defense. And as a citizen,

0:51:13.239 --> 0:51:17.279
<v Speaker 1>I need to be prepared for, you know, gladly paying

0:51:17.320 --> 0:51:20.440
<v Speaker 1>more taxes to protect me and my family and advancing

0:51:20.480 --> 0:51:24.880
<v Speaker 1>my country's interests. I think, well, I don't know that

0:51:24.960 --> 0:51:26.360
<v Speaker 1>we need to pay more taxes, and I'm not going

0:51:26.400 --> 0:51:28.719
<v Speaker 1>to advocate for that, but I do think that our

0:51:29.360 --> 0:51:32.600
<v Speaker 1>defense budget is in line with the threats that we

0:51:32.680 --> 0:51:36.200
<v Speaker 1>currently face in the world, and to be prepared for

0:51:36.520 --> 0:51:38.640
<v Speaker 1>things that we don't foresee. You know, it could be

0:51:38.719 --> 0:51:42.800
<v Speaker 1>a Chinese attempted invasion of Taiwan. It could be Russia

0:51:42.960 --> 0:51:46.719
<v Speaker 1>going past Ukraine, potentially even into a NATO country, which

0:51:46.760 --> 0:51:49.080
<v Speaker 1>of course we draw the United States in to that

0:51:49.200 --> 0:51:51.680
<v Speaker 1>war under Article five of the NATO Treaty. So there's

0:51:51.680 --> 0:51:53.320
<v Speaker 1>a lot of things that could happen. We need to

0:51:53.400 --> 0:51:56.520
<v Speaker 1>be ready now and not wait and try to catch

0:51:56.600 --> 0:51:58.960
<v Speaker 1>up later. And I think that's part of why we

0:51:59.120 --> 0:52:02.480
<v Speaker 1>do spend someone when it comes to our national offense

0:52:02.520 --> 0:52:06.600
<v Speaker 1>here our defense budget, what do we do about Iran?

0:52:06.719 --> 0:52:10.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean, obviously how to deal with Russia and Ukraine

0:52:10.680 --> 0:52:13.439
<v Speaker 1>as being hotly debated right now, and China is something

0:52:13.480 --> 0:52:15.520
<v Speaker 1>that we talk about on a regular basis, we don't

0:52:15.560 --> 0:52:18.800
<v Speaker 1>talk that much about Iran. What what can America do

0:52:19.360 --> 0:52:24.759
<v Speaker 1>about this, you know, aspiring nuclear power, So that is

0:52:24.800 --> 0:52:28.040
<v Speaker 1>a really good question. I guess the immediate issue is

0:52:28.200 --> 0:52:32.840
<v Speaker 1>the level of Iranian attacks that we're sustaining in Iraq,

0:52:33.040 --> 0:52:38.040
<v Speaker 1>in Syria against our military presence. That's got to stop.

0:52:38.160 --> 0:52:41.240
<v Speaker 1>And you know, I was just look up the statistics today.

0:52:41.800 --> 0:52:44.080
<v Speaker 1>We've been hit about eighty times in the last two years.

0:52:44.160 --> 0:52:47.680
<v Speaker 1>We responded about six. We need to get a lot

0:52:47.760 --> 0:52:50.440
<v Speaker 1>more strong, stronger in our responses. We need to make

0:52:50.520 --> 0:52:54.280
<v Speaker 1>them do a calculation that it's simply not worth striking

0:52:55.560 --> 0:52:58.560
<v Speaker 1>an American facility in either of those countries. So I

0:52:58.680 --> 0:53:02.480
<v Speaker 1>think that the chairman yesterday, General Melly, was pretty specific

0:53:02.560 --> 0:53:05.480
<v Speaker 1>about how this is going to escalate as far as

0:53:05.600 --> 0:53:07.880
<v Speaker 1>our responses if we are hit again, and I think

0:53:07.960 --> 0:53:12.000
<v Speaker 1>that's good. The other issue is, as you pointed out rightly,

0:53:12.440 --> 0:53:15.040
<v Speaker 1>they're on the version of getting a nuclear weapon. Most

0:53:15.080 --> 0:53:17.440
<v Speaker 1>analysts thinks it could take two weeks to get to

0:53:17.520 --> 0:53:20.200
<v Speaker 1>the level of enrichment to get the typer Ran ammunied,

0:53:20.600 --> 0:53:23.360
<v Speaker 1>and then a couple of months to actually weaponize and

0:53:23.480 --> 0:53:27.560
<v Speaker 1>into a deliverable weapon. That's a big problem. There's no

0:53:27.719 --> 0:53:31.440
<v Speaker 1>easy answers. Should the United States strike when we decided

0:53:31.520 --> 0:53:36.040
<v Speaker 1>it's that closed. Potentially will Israel strike regardless of whether

0:53:37.000 --> 0:53:40.080
<v Speaker 1>we want them to or not. Potentially, in fact, they've

0:53:40.080 --> 0:53:42.520
<v Speaker 1>said they would. So there's a lot of things that

0:53:42.600 --> 0:53:46.759
<v Speaker 1>could happen in the next few months that could even

0:53:46.880 --> 0:53:51.680
<v Speaker 1>increase the level of international instability and conflict, and I

0:53:51.760 --> 0:53:53.040
<v Speaker 1>think that's one of the things we're going to be

0:53:53.200 --> 0:53:56.359
<v Speaker 1>determining as we go forward. Hopefully Round pulls back from

0:53:56.400 --> 0:53:59.120
<v Speaker 1>the level of getting a nuclear weapon back into the

0:53:59.160 --> 0:54:02.719
<v Speaker 1>community nations, but they haven't shown any interest lately to

0:54:02.840 --> 0:54:05.040
<v Speaker 1>do that. All right, Mick, thanks so much for joining us.

0:54:05.080 --> 0:54:09.160
<v Speaker 1>Mick mulroy there, co founder of the Lobo Institute, former

0:54:09.400 --> 0:54:15.799
<v Speaker 1>US Marine and paramilitary operations officer at the CIA as well.

0:54:16.360 --> 0:54:19.400
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg Markets podcast. You can

0:54:19.440 --> 0:54:23.200
<v Speaker 1>subscribe and listen to interviews with Apple Podcasts or whatever

0:54:23.360 --> 0:54:26.960
<v Speaker 1>podcast platform you prefer. I'm Matt Miller. I'm on Twitter

0:54:27.239 --> 0:54:30.520
<v Speaker 1>at Matt Miller nineteen seventy three. And I'm fall Sweeney.

0:54:30.560 --> 0:54:33.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm on Twitter at pt Sweeney. Before the podcast, you

0:54:33.200 --> 0:54:35.600
<v Speaker 1>can always catch us worldwide at Bloomberg Radio