WEBVTT - We Love Lamp

0:00:01.160 --> 0:00:04.880
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Fantasy Football Weekly, a production of I Heart Radio.

0:00:06.800 --> 0:00:10.520
<v Speaker 1>Time now for Fantasy Football Weekly from I Heart Radio,

0:00:10.920 --> 0:00:14.760
<v Speaker 1>your weekly source for the nation's best fantasy speculation and advice.

0:00:15.200 --> 0:00:18.640
<v Speaker 1>Now along with the guys from fanball dot com, here's

0:00:18.680 --> 0:00:23.520
<v Speaker 1>the host for Fantasy Football Weekly. It is time for

0:00:23.560 --> 0:00:27.640
<v Speaker 1>America's longest running fantasy show, Fantasy Football Weekly. I am

0:00:27.680 --> 0:00:29.760
<v Speaker 1>your host, Paul Charchie, and my co host today are

0:00:29.880 --> 0:00:33.720
<v Speaker 1>Scott Fish and Matt Harrison. Hello, gentlemen, what's going on

0:00:33.840 --> 0:00:38.440
<v Speaker 1>charge you? Gad? It's Fantasy Football Weekly? Gad is I

0:00:38.479 --> 0:00:42.280
<v Speaker 1>don't know? Okay. Over the course of today, we're gonna

0:00:42.280 --> 0:00:44.440
<v Speaker 1>break down every game fantasy style like we like to do.

0:00:44.479 --> 0:00:46.879
<v Speaker 1>You get letter grades on all your fantasy players, and

0:00:46.880 --> 0:00:51.559
<v Speaker 1>we'll explain the rationale behind each letter grades. You can

0:00:51.560 --> 0:00:53.880
<v Speaker 1>decide if we're right or for wrong and make your

0:00:53.920 --> 0:00:57.480
<v Speaker 1>own decisions. We will also answer three tough questions. We'll

0:00:57.480 --> 0:00:59.640
<v Speaker 1>give you nine players upon whom you can take a chance,

0:00:59.720 --> 0:01:03.680
<v Speaker 1>and we will jump into our time machine and identify

0:01:03.800 --> 0:01:07.240
<v Speaker 1>the players. Everybody will be looking to pick up off

0:01:07.240 --> 0:01:11.240
<v Speaker 1>the waiver wire next week, but they will already be

0:01:11.360 --> 0:01:14.319
<v Speaker 1>on your squad. Pamo, I can't find my time machine

0:01:14.400 --> 0:01:19.800
<v Speaker 1>sound bite. Where did there we go? Yes, that must

0:01:19.840 --> 0:01:22.120
<v Speaker 1>have happened last week when I was gone. Yes that

0:01:22.240 --> 0:01:25.240
<v Speaker 1>we invented a time machine. We have we upgraded from

0:01:25.240 --> 0:01:30.959
<v Speaker 1>the flamm Do that super sophisticated sound right there? We've

0:01:31.000 --> 0:01:35.399
<v Speaker 1>done nothing good with that time machine yet, that's probably true. Um,

0:01:35.480 --> 0:01:38.040
<v Speaker 1>let's jump right into the matchups, beginning with Arizona taking

0:01:38.040 --> 0:01:40.560
<v Speaker 1>on New Orleans Chase Edmonds coming up the Big three

0:01:40.600 --> 0:01:42.959
<v Speaker 1>touchdown game. We don't believe David Johnson's going to go,

0:01:43.040 --> 0:01:46.480
<v Speaker 1>but this is a much much tougher matchup for Chase

0:01:46.600 --> 0:01:49.560
<v Speaker 1>Edmonds this week, Matt. Yeah, when your team signs Alfred

0:01:49.560 --> 0:01:52.320
<v Speaker 1>Morris and Zack Center in the same day, it spells

0:01:52.360 --> 0:01:54.720
<v Speaker 1>trouble for your running back depth. So it looks like

0:01:54.800 --> 0:01:57.920
<v Speaker 1>David Johnson's probably going to be out at least this week,

0:01:57.920 --> 0:02:01.160
<v Speaker 1>if not for a while. Um. After DJ hit the bench,

0:02:01.440 --> 0:02:04.600
<v Speaker 1>uh after only three plays last week with knee, ankle,

0:02:04.680 --> 0:02:07.400
<v Speaker 1>and back injuries. Chase tote of the rack twenty seven

0:02:07.400 --> 0:02:09.880
<v Speaker 1>times for one six and three scores. He gets a

0:02:09.960 --> 0:02:12.640
<v Speaker 1>B grade. David Johnson's a bench grade even if he

0:02:12.720 --> 0:02:15.880
<v Speaker 1>does shape up to go in this one. Yeah, because

0:02:15.919 --> 0:02:18.119
<v Speaker 1>it could be it could be exactly what we saw

0:02:18.200 --> 0:02:20.560
<v Speaker 1>last week. Um No running back is top to eighty

0:02:20.560 --> 0:02:22.760
<v Speaker 1>three yards against the ground against on the ground against

0:02:22.800 --> 0:02:25.800
<v Speaker 1>the Saints this year. They've only allowed three total touchdowns

0:02:25.800 --> 0:02:28.280
<v Speaker 1>to the position on the season. But yeah, so why

0:02:28.320 --> 0:02:30.760
<v Speaker 1>even the B grade running back has had at least

0:02:30.800 --> 0:02:32.959
<v Speaker 1>five receptions against the Saints and four of their last

0:02:33.000 --> 0:02:35.239
<v Speaker 1>five games and a PPR. He's a solid B and

0:02:35.240 --> 0:02:36.960
<v Speaker 1>he's gonna get all the work in this game, so

0:02:37.120 --> 0:02:40.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm giving him a B. Larry Fitzgerald he gets a

0:02:40.240 --> 0:02:42.440
<v Speaker 1>B and Christian Kirk gets to see if his ankle

0:02:42.520 --> 0:02:44.600
<v Speaker 1>is healthy. But those are the only wide receivers we want.

0:02:45.080 --> 0:02:47.760
<v Speaker 1>Regular slot corner P J. Williams will miss a few

0:02:47.760 --> 0:02:51.399
<v Speaker 1>weeks due to suspension, meaning Chauncey Gardner Johnson will man

0:02:51.440 --> 0:02:54.520
<v Speaker 1>the slot. Gardner Johnson spent most of his first start

0:02:54.520 --> 0:02:56.919
<v Speaker 1>manning up against Tarik Cohen last week and allowed nine

0:02:56.960 --> 0:02:59.760
<v Speaker 1>catches and to score. And there's a major difference between

0:03:00.120 --> 0:03:02.639
<v Speaker 1>ring the five six Tarik Cohen in the sixth three

0:03:02.760 --> 0:03:07.320
<v Speaker 1>Larry Fitzgerald, uh Saints top corner Marshawn Lattimore won't go

0:03:07.360 --> 0:03:10.160
<v Speaker 1>into the slot. He stayed outside for of his snaps

0:03:10.160 --> 0:03:12.440
<v Speaker 1>this season. So he's gonna be wasted this entire game

0:03:12.440 --> 0:03:15.560
<v Speaker 1>on like Keishawn Johnson and Andy Isabella on the outside.

0:03:15.600 --> 0:03:18.560
<v Speaker 1>So I like Kirk even if he goes so Kyler

0:03:18.680 --> 0:03:21.400
<v Speaker 1>Murray gets a C grade. He's had at least ten

0:03:21.480 --> 0:03:24.079
<v Speaker 1>rushing attempts in three straight weeks. Yeah, that part of it.

0:03:24.120 --> 0:03:26.080
<v Speaker 1>We do love that he scored twice on the ground

0:03:26.080 --> 0:03:28.760
<v Speaker 1>in the last four. The problem is the Saints are

0:03:28.800 --> 0:03:31.440
<v Speaker 1>top five and quarterback sacks and hits, and the Cards

0:03:31.720 --> 0:03:34.840
<v Speaker 1>have allowed Murray to be sacked twenty three times this season.

0:03:35.200 --> 0:03:38.880
<v Speaker 1>That's not good for a fleet of foot quarterback either. Um. Still,

0:03:38.920 --> 0:03:41.800
<v Speaker 1>there's opportunity for Kyle arbage time here if he rack

0:03:41.880 --> 0:03:44.680
<v Speaker 1>up racks up some fourth quarter points. Let's go over

0:03:44.720 --> 0:03:48.120
<v Speaker 1>to the Saints side where Alvin Kamara is shaping up

0:03:48.160 --> 0:03:52.520
<v Speaker 1>to a game time decision. Now he practiced on Friday.

0:03:52.560 --> 0:03:55.600
<v Speaker 1>That's a good thing. Um, I'm giving him a C

0:03:55.880 --> 0:04:01.920
<v Speaker 1>grade and giving Litavius a B grade. If Camara send

0:04:02.000 --> 0:04:05.520
<v Speaker 1>us see if Kamara plays well? Wait, yeah, yeah, that

0:04:05.560 --> 0:04:08.720
<v Speaker 1>makes sense. Latavius if he's alone, gets the B. Why

0:04:08.720 --> 0:04:11.400
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't he be an At that point? Arizona's run defense

0:04:11.480 --> 0:04:16.279
<v Speaker 1>not good. Um, they're okay that the matchup is positive.

0:04:16.880 --> 0:04:20.080
<v Speaker 1>Similar dual threat backs to Camaraw like McCaffrey and Carson

0:04:20.120 --> 0:04:22.599
<v Speaker 1>each top two hundred and forty total yards in the

0:04:22.680 --> 0:04:26.600
<v Speaker 1>last month, but Latavius isn't really a dual threat kind

0:04:26.600 --> 0:04:28.920
<v Speaker 1>of a guy. He did see of the plays and

0:04:29.000 --> 0:04:31.400
<v Speaker 1>last week's win against Chicago, and if he can take

0:04:31.440 --> 0:04:33.200
<v Speaker 1>thirty two touches and turn him into a hundred and

0:04:33.200 --> 0:04:35.640
<v Speaker 1>fifty total yards, that's fine. Uh. He might get to

0:04:35.680 --> 0:04:37.320
<v Speaker 1>do that in this game because they're not going to

0:04:37.360 --> 0:04:39.560
<v Speaker 1>need to pass the ball a lot. Speaking of passing

0:04:39.600 --> 0:04:41.280
<v Speaker 1>the ball, we don't know if it's going to be

0:04:41.360 --> 0:04:44.960
<v Speaker 1>Drew Brees or Teddy Bridgewater. Yeah. They I don't like that.

0:04:45.000 --> 0:04:47.400
<v Speaker 1>They're being evasive about it like they I guess it's

0:04:47.400 --> 0:04:52.880
<v Speaker 1>all strategic, right make the Cardinals, so plan for both guys.

0:04:53.040 --> 0:04:57.560
<v Speaker 1>If you got one or the other, UM, it's better

0:04:57.600 --> 0:05:00.400
<v Speaker 1>to have both really on your roster because we're gonna

0:05:00.400 --> 0:05:04.120
<v Speaker 1>know ninety minutes before game time who's starting. UM. Either way,

0:05:04.279 --> 0:05:07.000
<v Speaker 1>either quarterback gets a b Uh. He might Breeze might

0:05:07.040 --> 0:05:09.560
<v Speaker 1>come back from the thumb injury. But the Saints have

0:05:09.560 --> 0:05:11.880
<v Speaker 1>a bye week next week, so it seems like they

0:05:11.880 --> 0:05:15.400
<v Speaker 1>should rest him against the Cardinals at home and let

0:05:15.480 --> 0:05:18.799
<v Speaker 1>him come back against Atlanta in Week nine. The Cards

0:05:18.800 --> 0:05:21.760
<v Speaker 1>have allowed to touch passing touchdown every game and multiple

0:05:21.800 --> 0:05:23.600
<v Speaker 1>scores in five of seven, and an average of two

0:05:23.600 --> 0:05:26.360
<v Speaker 1>and eighty five passing yards, which makes Michael Thomas an

0:05:26.360 --> 0:05:28.839
<v Speaker 1>easy a eight or more receptions in four straight games.

0:05:29.120 --> 0:05:32.560
<v Speaker 1>And the only other guy Josh Hill. I'm giving him

0:05:32.600 --> 0:05:37.000
<v Speaker 1>kind of a secret. You A cook looks like he's

0:05:37.000 --> 0:05:39.680
<v Speaker 1>gonna be out. He'll had three for forty three in

0:05:39.720 --> 0:05:42.120
<v Speaker 1>a score and the Cards have allowed eight touchdowns to

0:05:42.160 --> 0:05:43.600
<v Speaker 1>the tight end the season. That's the most in the

0:05:43.640 --> 0:05:48.000
<v Speaker 1>league by a ton. Uh. I bared cooks out, He'll

0:05:48.080 --> 0:05:52.640
<v Speaker 1>becomes a great dart throw fanball. It's still gross. Ted

0:05:52.680 --> 0:05:54.760
<v Speaker 1>Gains kind of in play too, But I'll talk about

0:05:54.839 --> 0:05:57.480
<v Speaker 1>him later, all right, we'll learn more about that if

0:05:57.640 --> 0:05:59.560
<v Speaker 1>if Breeze does come back, or when he comes back.

0:06:00.000 --> 0:06:02.360
<v Speaker 1>You know, Michael Thomas has been perfectly usable, but what

0:06:02.440 --> 0:06:05.120
<v Speaker 1>Breeze doesn't He opens up the deep part of the

0:06:05.160 --> 0:06:08.039
<v Speaker 1>field that that Teddy doesn't generally get to, and I

0:06:08.080 --> 0:06:11.480
<v Speaker 1>think we can get more deep passing out of Thomas. Fortunately,

0:06:11.680 --> 0:06:14.400
<v Speaker 1>Teddy fed Thomas so much it hasn't really mattered. Now,

0:06:14.400 --> 0:06:17.680
<v Speaker 1>if you're the Saints with the bye week looming, I'm

0:06:17.800 --> 0:06:21.960
<v Speaker 1>only putting Breeze out there if he's literally one six

0:06:22.040 --> 0:06:25.680
<v Speaker 1>and one at home against the Cardinals. Yeah, if you don't,

0:06:25.720 --> 0:06:27.600
<v Speaker 1>you don't need Breese to win, so you know you

0:06:27.600 --> 0:06:31.039
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't risk it whatsoever. I don't think, uh, Scott, let's

0:06:31.040 --> 0:06:34.040
<v Speaker 1>go to Philly taking on Buffalo. Philadelphia is in a

0:06:34.160 --> 0:06:36.760
<v Speaker 1>dire spot and with a much they really need to

0:06:36.760 --> 0:06:41.000
<v Speaker 1>win here, but Buffalo's past defense is awesome. Tell me

0:06:41.080 --> 0:06:43.440
<v Speaker 1>about how you feel about Carson Wentz in the passing

0:06:43.480 --> 0:06:46.400
<v Speaker 1>game for the Eagles in this one. I don't feel good, Bob.

0:06:46.880 --> 0:06:51.479
<v Speaker 1>Don't feel good about not great, Bob. I don't think

0:06:51.480 --> 0:06:55.360
<v Speaker 1>so Tim, not great, Bob. I don't feel good about

0:06:55.440 --> 0:06:57.640
<v Speaker 1>really any of them. I have Wents on the bench.

0:06:57.680 --> 0:07:00.479
<v Speaker 1>The Bills have only allowed four passing touchdowns this and

0:07:00.560 --> 0:07:04.039
<v Speaker 1>just one quarterback over two hundred fifty yards. Conversely, Wentz

0:07:04.160 --> 0:07:07.359
<v Speaker 1>is surprisingly thrown for under two sixty in five of

0:07:07.440 --> 0:07:10.080
<v Speaker 1>his seven like, he's not throwing for a lot of yards.

0:07:10.360 --> 0:07:12.360
<v Speaker 1>He does have some multiple touchdown games, but this is

0:07:12.400 --> 0:07:15.080
<v Speaker 1>not a good matchup here. So I have Eggler on

0:07:15.120 --> 0:07:18.040
<v Speaker 1>the bench. He's gonna see tarn Johnson in the slot.

0:07:18.080 --> 0:07:20.320
<v Speaker 1>Who is the world you know, the easiest path of

0:07:20.400 --> 0:07:23.280
<v Speaker 1>resistance or like. It's a good matchup for him, but

0:07:23.320 --> 0:07:26.000
<v Speaker 1>he can't be trusted to reel and passes, so I

0:07:26.120 --> 0:07:30.520
<v Speaker 1>can't start him. He's on the bench. Aushan Jeffrey, he's uh.

0:07:30.600 --> 0:07:32.880
<v Speaker 1>I gave him a C grade even even in this

0:07:33.200 --> 0:07:35.840
<v Speaker 1>I think he might be the only startable, just barely

0:07:35.880 --> 0:07:40.000
<v Speaker 1>startable wide receiver. Uh. Jeffrey tends to move around, so

0:07:40.040 --> 0:07:42.760
<v Speaker 1>he's probably gonna be able to avoid Gradavious White, who

0:07:42.920 --> 0:07:46.360
<v Speaker 1>stays glued to the to the left side of the

0:07:46.360 --> 0:07:49.600
<v Speaker 1>field the time to the left, so Jeffrey will move around.

0:07:49.640 --> 0:07:51.920
<v Speaker 1>He plays forty seven percent from one side, forty two

0:07:51.920 --> 0:07:53.920
<v Speaker 1>from the other, like nine from the slot. He's all over,

0:07:54.720 --> 0:07:56.880
<v Speaker 1>so that that might open Jeffrey up just enough to

0:07:56.880 --> 0:07:59.360
<v Speaker 1>give him a C grade. Hurts, I'm given a B grade.

0:07:59.840 --> 0:08:02.120
<v Speaker 1>The Bills haven't really faced the murderer's row against ted

0:08:02.200 --> 0:08:04.120
<v Speaker 1>Ends on their way to being the second best team

0:08:04.120 --> 0:08:06.400
<v Speaker 1>against ted Ends. It's been a lot of They've only

0:08:06.440 --> 0:08:10.520
<v Speaker 1>allowed seventeen receptions, but it's a lot of bad tight ends. Uh.

0:08:10.560 --> 0:08:13.000
<v Speaker 1>The good news is Evan Ingram was one of those.

0:08:13.200 --> 0:08:15.200
<v Speaker 1>They not bad tight end and he caught six balls,

0:08:15.200 --> 0:08:18.280
<v Speaker 1>so there's hope for for. It's for he's getting double

0:08:18.320 --> 0:08:21.920
<v Speaker 1>digit targets. So b grade on Earth's Goddard's on the bench.

0:08:21.960 --> 0:08:24.400
<v Speaker 1>Howard and Sanders also on the bench. Only two running

0:08:24.400 --> 0:08:26.560
<v Speaker 1>backs of top seventy yards against the Bills this year

0:08:26.800 --> 0:08:29.440
<v Speaker 1>and it took twenty touches for each of them, and

0:08:29.520 --> 0:08:32.839
<v Speaker 1>one of them was named Sae Kwon Barkley, So I'm

0:08:32.840 --> 0:08:36.280
<v Speaker 1>pretty sure Jordan Howard isn't Kwan Barkley. No, I will

0:08:36.320 --> 0:08:39.680
<v Speaker 1>say the Bills since Sean McDermott got there, they have

0:08:39.720 --> 0:08:42.640
<v Speaker 1>now allowed thirty eight or thirty nine touchdowns in his

0:08:42.720 --> 0:08:45.839
<v Speaker 1>thirty eight games with them or whatever Russian touchdowns. So

0:08:46.160 --> 0:08:49.800
<v Speaker 1>maybe Howard gets score, maybe, but I'm still having him

0:08:49.800 --> 0:08:53.920
<v Speaker 1>on the bench. On the Bill side, Josh Allen's gonna

0:08:53.920 --> 0:08:56.480
<v Speaker 1>get a lot of a grades nowadays. This month is

0:08:56.520 --> 0:08:59.360
<v Speaker 1>going to be good for for Josh Allen. Um. He

0:08:59.440 --> 0:09:02.400
<v Speaker 1>struggled a little bit against Miami, who randomly showed up

0:09:02.440 --> 0:09:04.800
<v Speaker 1>for the first half of that game, but he's always

0:09:04.800 --> 0:09:07.800
<v Speaker 1>a threat with his legs. Rogers and Dacked attacked on

0:09:08.080 --> 0:09:11.080
<v Speaker 1>decent fantasy points against Philly with their league legs, and

0:09:11.160 --> 0:09:14.320
<v Speaker 1>four of the five quarterbacks not named Luke Fox racked

0:09:14.400 --> 0:09:18.240
<v Speaker 1>up multiple touchdowns on Philly, So I think this is

0:09:18.400 --> 0:09:20.960
<v Speaker 1>a good multiple touchdown game with some some rushing for

0:09:21.000 --> 0:09:24.760
<v Speaker 1>Allen a grade, there be grade for his main guy Brown,

0:09:25.080 --> 0:09:27.520
<v Speaker 1>John Brown does like John Brown in this one. He

0:09:27.600 --> 0:09:30.439
<v Speaker 1>does what Phillies d just can't stop. He gets deep.

0:09:30.640 --> 0:09:33.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean, listen to this list of thirty plus yard

0:09:33.120 --> 0:09:37.760
<v Speaker 1>receptions thirty you know, thirty plus yard plays against the Eagles. McLaurin,

0:09:37.960 --> 0:09:43.640
<v Speaker 1>Julio Julio twice, Ridley Adams, Allison Digs twice, Cooper like

0:09:43.720 --> 0:09:46.560
<v Speaker 1>they all had thirty plus yard receptions on and that's

0:09:46.600 --> 0:09:50.280
<v Speaker 1>just one play. So John Brown's gonna get deep. He's

0:09:50.320 --> 0:09:53.480
<v Speaker 1>the only trustable asset leading in targets, receptions, yards, and

0:09:53.520 --> 0:09:57.719
<v Speaker 1>touchdowns with two, but have a touchdowns. The rest of

0:09:57.720 --> 0:09:59.520
<v Speaker 1>the wide receivers are too hard to protect their on

0:09:59.559 --> 0:10:01.520
<v Speaker 1>the bench. Gore is on the bench as well, because

0:10:01.520 --> 0:10:04.360
<v Speaker 1>the Eagles rundy is surprisingly no joke. It's it makes

0:10:04.440 --> 0:10:06.960
<v Speaker 1>up for the past two doesn't It's good barely allowing

0:10:07.000 --> 0:10:09.040
<v Speaker 1>over three point three yards per carry. So that the

0:10:09.080 --> 0:10:11.600
<v Speaker 1>running backs are on the bench agreed the Chargers taking

0:10:11.600 --> 0:10:14.760
<v Speaker 1>on Chicago, and it's a wreck for this Chargers team

0:10:14.760 --> 0:10:17.920
<v Speaker 1>with injury. Unfortunately, starting guard Forest lamp just went on

0:10:17.920 --> 0:10:20.440
<v Speaker 1>I art now they're gonna and I love lamp, we

0:10:20.480 --> 0:10:23.880
<v Speaker 1>love lamp Um and Russell Okung is gonna come back

0:10:23.920 --> 0:10:25.839
<v Speaker 1>for part of this game, but they don't think he's

0:10:25.840 --> 0:10:28.880
<v Speaker 1>ready to play a full game. And it's I've I've

0:10:28.960 --> 0:10:31.680
<v Speaker 1>really pushed all of my all of my Chargers down

0:10:31.720 --> 0:10:35.880
<v Speaker 1>in my grading fairly significantly in this one. The best

0:10:35.920 --> 0:10:38.320
<v Speaker 1>player you could start though, Hunter Henry and his two

0:10:38.360 --> 0:10:40.680
<v Speaker 1>games back from injury, He's turned into a top target

0:10:40.720 --> 0:10:43.120
<v Speaker 1>for Rivers with seventeen targets of the two games, a

0:10:43.200 --> 0:10:45.560
<v Speaker 1>ninety seven yard game and a one hundred yard game

0:10:45.760 --> 0:10:48.680
<v Speaker 1>for Hunter Henry, rewarding those fantasy owners that stuck with

0:10:48.760 --> 0:10:51.120
<v Speaker 1>him for all those games that he missed. The Bears

0:10:51.120 --> 0:10:53.480
<v Speaker 1>are allowing fifty eight yards per game to tight end,

0:10:54.000 --> 0:10:56.400
<v Speaker 1>but no individual tight end is top to even forty

0:10:56.400 --> 0:10:58.640
<v Speaker 1>six yards and only two have scored. So just a

0:10:58.720 --> 0:11:01.120
<v Speaker 1>B grade for Hunter Henry and it only really gets

0:11:01.160 --> 0:11:04.280
<v Speaker 1>worse from there. I got Philip Rivers on the bench. Yeah,

0:11:04.559 --> 0:11:06.760
<v Speaker 1>you know he didn't um keenan Allen, but let me.

0:11:06.880 --> 0:11:08.480
<v Speaker 1>Let me start with Keenan Allen. Why I don't like

0:11:08.520 --> 0:11:10.559
<v Speaker 1>Allen and that will make more sense for Rivers maybe.

0:11:10.679 --> 0:11:13.080
<v Speaker 1>So Keenan Allen didn't practice all week with a hamstring injury.

0:11:13.120 --> 0:11:14.800
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't look like he's gonna go, although he's a

0:11:14.800 --> 0:11:19.160
<v Speaker 1>game time decision here. Um Allen hasn't exceeded five receptions

0:11:19.360 --> 0:11:22.040
<v Speaker 1>or scored in the last four games, so it's been

0:11:22.080 --> 0:11:25.760
<v Speaker 1>a disaster for Keenan Allen. The only positive for Keenan Allen,

0:11:25.800 --> 0:11:27.559
<v Speaker 1>even if he does go, is that he works the

0:11:27.600 --> 0:11:30.520
<v Speaker 1>slot that gives him Buster Screen, who is probably the

0:11:30.520 --> 0:11:34.920
<v Speaker 1>worst player in the entire Bears defense. I know, I

0:11:34.960 --> 0:11:37.120
<v Speaker 1>don't know. I don't know either. Uh. Screen is at

0:11:37.200 --> 0:11:39.760
<v Speaker 1>least allowed at least five catches in half of his games.

0:11:39.800 --> 0:11:42.120
<v Speaker 1>He's given up two scores in his last four games.

0:11:42.120 --> 0:11:45.120
<v Speaker 1>So there's your angle on Keenan Allen. But with the

0:11:45.120 --> 0:11:47.679
<v Speaker 1>hamstring injury, any played could be his last. So I

0:11:47.679 --> 0:11:50.040
<v Speaker 1>you've got a bench great on him. And if I

0:11:50.080 --> 0:11:52.040
<v Speaker 1>don't like Allen and the only receiver of the starting

0:11:52.040 --> 0:11:54.640
<v Speaker 1>greatest Hunter Henry, I've got to put Philip Rivers on

0:11:54.679 --> 0:11:57.480
<v Speaker 1>the bench. Offensive line is a huge concern the the

0:11:57.520 --> 0:11:59.160
<v Speaker 1>forest lamp part of it as well, But then of

0:11:59.200 --> 0:12:02.640
<v Speaker 1>course the Chicago pass rush makes it so hard. Chicago

0:12:02.800 --> 0:12:05.480
<v Speaker 1>ranks is the number two pass rush by Pro Football Focus.

0:12:06.040 --> 0:12:09.200
<v Speaker 1>The Chargers have the twenty seven ranked pass block unit.

0:12:09.840 --> 0:12:12.560
<v Speaker 1>Philip Rivers is just going to be under siege in

0:12:12.640 --> 0:12:15.600
<v Speaker 1>this game, and that's why I can't put a starting

0:12:15.600 --> 0:12:18.280
<v Speaker 1>grade on him, nor Mike Williams, who has zero touchdowns

0:12:18.280 --> 0:12:20.800
<v Speaker 1>this year, and he's a totally touchdown dependent player. And

0:12:20.840 --> 0:12:23.280
<v Speaker 1>it's a bill secondary that's given up just three sorry

0:12:23.360 --> 0:12:26.839
<v Speaker 1>Bears secondary that's given up just three scores to opposing receivers.

0:12:27.080 --> 0:12:29.480
<v Speaker 1>So Mike Williams also on the bench. The one guy

0:12:29.520 --> 0:12:31.720
<v Speaker 1>who might get help by all the dump offs and

0:12:31.760 --> 0:12:35.000
<v Speaker 1>the quick plays from Philip Rivers is Austin Ekeler. He's

0:12:35.000 --> 0:12:37.960
<v Speaker 1>got the most targets, receptions, receiving yards, and receiving touchdowns

0:12:37.960 --> 0:12:41.560
<v Speaker 1>among all running backs. That should continue against a Bears

0:12:41.559 --> 0:12:44.480
<v Speaker 1>team that's given up the fourth most receptions and the

0:12:44.520 --> 0:12:47.439
<v Speaker 1>fifth most receiving yards per game to running back. So

0:12:47.800 --> 0:12:49.559
<v Speaker 1>I do have a C grade in Austin Ekeler. He

0:12:49.559 --> 0:12:51.480
<v Speaker 1>probably won't get any goal line work if there is

0:12:51.559 --> 0:12:54.079
<v Speaker 1>goal line work to be had, although why would you

0:12:54.120 --> 0:12:56.400
<v Speaker 1>necessarily give Melvin Gordon the ball to goal line again

0:12:56.440 --> 0:12:59.079
<v Speaker 1>after what happened last week. Is Melvin Gordon on the

0:12:59.200 --> 0:13:07.560
<v Speaker 1>Chargers next week? I would say, se chance he's a charter. Okay,

0:13:07.720 --> 0:13:09.880
<v Speaker 1>that's just where that's my that's my finger in the wind.

0:13:10.080 --> 0:13:12.760
<v Speaker 1>But maybe he's a lion at this time next week.

0:13:12.960 --> 0:13:17.079
<v Speaker 1>It's not impossible. Gordon. Um. The Bears are really felt

0:13:17.120 --> 0:13:19.080
<v Speaker 1>the loss of defensive tackle a Keem Hicks. In the

0:13:19.080 --> 0:13:22.800
<v Speaker 1>past two games without him, they've been obliterated by Josh

0:13:22.920 --> 0:13:25.640
<v Speaker 1>Jacobs and Lottavius Murray, which you know we never saw

0:13:25.679 --> 0:13:28.960
<v Speaker 1>it coming, and especially in Chicago last week, Lottavius Murray

0:13:29.040 --> 0:13:31.680
<v Speaker 1>rolled him. I know I had him as a start

0:13:31.800 --> 0:13:35.920
<v Speaker 1>last week. Nice job. Melvin Gordon gets a C grade

0:13:36.000 --> 0:13:38.640
<v Speaker 1>here only because a Kee Hicks is out. Let's flip

0:13:38.679 --> 0:13:41.040
<v Speaker 1>over to the Chicago side. You only want to start

0:13:41.080 --> 0:13:43.720
<v Speaker 1>two guys, and one of them is pretty wobbly. Allen

0:13:43.800 --> 0:13:47.720
<v Speaker 1>Robinson just gets all of the targets here. Half of

0:13:47.880 --> 0:13:52.440
<v Speaker 1>Chicago's wide receiver targets go to Alan Robinson. Half. He

0:13:52.559 --> 0:13:56.040
<v Speaker 1>just beat Saints corner Marshawn Latimer and he's got another

0:13:56.080 --> 0:13:58.520
<v Speaker 1>tough matchup. He's gonna get shadow corner Casey Hayward in

0:13:58.559 --> 0:14:00.880
<v Speaker 1>this one. But if you can beat march On Latimer

0:14:00.920 --> 0:14:02.240
<v Speaker 1>for a good game, I guess you could do it

0:14:02.280 --> 0:14:06.240
<v Speaker 1>to Hayward as well. Chargers have surrendered touchdowns to comparable

0:14:06.280 --> 0:14:09.360
<v Speaker 1>receivers like Kenny Golladay and DeVante Parker and Courtland Sutton

0:14:09.360 --> 0:14:12.440
<v Speaker 1>and Corey Davis. Corey Davis worked Hayward last week, so

0:14:12.480 --> 0:14:14.079
<v Speaker 1>maybe there's a little something we can get done with

0:14:14.160 --> 0:14:17.959
<v Speaker 1>Allen Robinson with a B grade. And then the trickiest

0:14:17.960 --> 0:14:22.080
<v Speaker 1>grade that I had to give all week is this one.

0:14:22.240 --> 0:14:26.800
<v Speaker 1>David Montgomery. I'm giving him a C. We had a

0:14:26.880 --> 0:14:31.040
<v Speaker 1>two carry game last week, so I know it's going

0:14:31.080 --> 0:14:33.000
<v Speaker 1>to be hard to put him in your starting lineup.

0:14:33.160 --> 0:14:36.640
<v Speaker 1>But Matt Nage is under the gun to get a

0:14:36.720 --> 0:14:39.760
<v Speaker 1>running game going. Everybody knows he's got to do it.

0:14:40.120 --> 0:14:43.120
<v Speaker 1>The Bears have to develop the running game, and Montgomery

0:14:43.200 --> 0:14:45.280
<v Speaker 1>is the is their main ball carrier. Of as much

0:14:45.280 --> 0:14:47.680
<v Speaker 1>as you can call eleven carries and two carries the

0:14:47.720 --> 0:14:49.600
<v Speaker 1>past two weeks, the main one and the best way

0:14:49.600 --> 0:14:51.960
<v Speaker 1>to beat the Chargers is on the ground. They're a

0:14:52.120 --> 0:14:54.920
<v Speaker 1>much worse run defense, giving up four point eight yards

0:14:54.920 --> 0:14:57.360
<v Speaker 1>per carry. This is a run defense. You can beat

0:14:58.080 --> 0:15:04.080
<v Speaker 1>David Montgomery. Well, one last starting grade is on the bench.

0:15:04.240 --> 0:15:06.720
<v Speaker 1>He gives you nothing on the ground. He frequently helps

0:15:06.760 --> 0:15:08.920
<v Speaker 1>on the air, and the charge of only allowed one

0:15:09.160 --> 0:15:12.560
<v Speaker 1>notable passing game to a runner, James Conner. Otherwise they've

0:15:12.560 --> 0:15:14.440
<v Speaker 1>shut down a bunch of other receiving backs and the

0:15:14.600 --> 0:15:18.280
<v Speaker 1>entire rest of the Bears passing game is on the bench.

0:15:18.360 --> 0:15:23.160
<v Speaker 1>Because you know who's that quarterback? We are in deep

0:15:23.480 --> 0:15:27.440
<v Speaker 1>sad trombone Ski territory. Can I run a different nickname

0:15:27.480 --> 0:15:32.640
<v Speaker 1>by you? Yeah, Mitch trash Binski. That's pretty good. That's

0:15:32.680 --> 0:15:37.600
<v Speaker 1>pretty good. But you know, I'm heavily invested Sad Trombone,

0:15:38.080 --> 0:15:40.480
<v Speaker 1>so I'm probably not going to adopt it. But it

0:15:40.560 --> 0:15:45.000
<v Speaker 1>is good. There's not a sounder for Mitch trash bin Spinsky,

0:15:45.120 --> 0:15:47.360
<v Speaker 1>not you really, there isn't an audio cute can really

0:15:47.400 --> 0:15:50.360
<v Speaker 1>give for that, I'm afraid, but yeah, we'll leave it

0:15:50.400 --> 0:15:54.880
<v Speaker 1>at that. Hey, when everything charge available at fan ball

0:15:54.920 --> 0:15:57.200
<v Speaker 1>dot com. By going to fanball dot com slash charge,

0:15:57.320 --> 0:16:00.560
<v Speaker 1>you get instant access to my free weekly thankings, my

0:16:00.720 --> 0:16:04.800
<v Speaker 1>free one thousand dollar weekly contest, all our podcasts like

0:16:04.880 --> 0:16:08.160
<v Speaker 1>this one, and it's your portal to Guillotine League Info

0:16:08.760 --> 0:16:11.720
<v Speaker 1>again famba dot com slash chart coming up next a

0:16:11.760 --> 0:16:14.000
<v Speaker 1>segment we like to call take a chance on Me.

0:16:14.160 --> 0:16:17.040
<v Speaker 1>Nine players you would not normally start, but you can

0:16:17.120 --> 0:16:42.920
<v Speaker 1>this week. You're listening to Fantasy Football Weekly. It is

0:16:42.960 --> 0:16:46.600
<v Speaker 1>the start of something new. Fantasy Football Weekly returns Paul

0:16:46.720 --> 0:16:49.920
<v Speaker 1>charch In, Scott Fish and Matt Harrison with you. Nine

0:16:50.200 --> 0:16:52.520
<v Speaker 1>players not normally and you're starting to line up, many

0:16:52.560 --> 0:16:55.120
<v Speaker 1>of whom are available on the waiver wire. It is

0:16:55.160 --> 0:16:57.520
<v Speaker 1>time for our royalty free version of take a chance

0:16:57.560 --> 0:17:00.520
<v Speaker 1>on me. When these sleeper quarterbacks are running back to

0:17:00.520 --> 0:17:04.760
<v Speaker 1>and wide receivers hit paid or you pay us exactly

0:17:04.800 --> 0:17:09.480
<v Speaker 1>what we paid for this crappy song. Nothing zero, not

0:17:09.680 --> 0:17:12.199
<v Speaker 1>a or you could tip us by uh, you know,

0:17:12.359 --> 0:17:16.760
<v Speaker 1>shooting it to Fantasy cares. Well, there's that, yeah, like DNA.

0:17:16.800 --> 0:17:19.679
<v Speaker 1>Try to monetize this segment absolutely. Let's you get at

0:17:19.720 --> 0:17:21.680
<v Speaker 1>the quarterback position. Matt, who is you gonna take a

0:17:21.800 --> 0:17:25.480
<v Speaker 1>chance on me? Quarterback? I've got Mason Rudolph who returns

0:17:25.520 --> 0:17:28.560
<v Speaker 1>from his scary concussion to something he was used to

0:17:28.560 --> 0:17:33.200
<v Speaker 1>seeing in the preseason, a third string NFL defense. That's

0:17:33.240 --> 0:17:35.680
<v Speaker 1>the Miami Dolphins and rule number one of take a

0:17:35.760 --> 0:17:38.840
<v Speaker 1>chance on me is used the quarterback playing the Miami

0:17:38.920 --> 0:17:41.720
<v Speaker 1>Dolphins and the running back and the wide receiver and

0:17:41.800 --> 0:17:44.560
<v Speaker 1>the tight end. Yeah, they're pretty much, uh, pretty much bad.

0:17:44.840 --> 0:17:48.000
<v Speaker 1>They've allowed two point seven passing scores per game and

0:17:48.040 --> 0:17:51.600
<v Speaker 1>have only one interception through six. Rudolph has thrown multiple

0:17:51.640 --> 0:17:53.720
<v Speaker 1>touchdowns in three or four games this season. I like

0:17:53.880 --> 0:17:57.159
<v Speaker 1>him a lot, all right, So I'm gonna change mid

0:17:57.240 --> 0:17:59.399
<v Speaker 1>stream I was gonna do. I was gonna do. A

0:17:59.520 --> 0:18:02.200
<v Speaker 1>man that is nowt all time in NFL passing and

0:18:02.359 --> 0:18:12.000
<v Speaker 1>just tied Bo Jackson for career rushing touchdowns, Ryan Fitzpatrick Jackson.

0:18:12.280 --> 0:18:14.919
<v Speaker 1>I love it, but I'm switching on the fly here

0:18:14.960 --> 0:18:17.399
<v Speaker 1>to Ryan Tannehill, who faces a Bucks team that have

0:18:17.440 --> 0:18:21.080
<v Speaker 1>allowed multiple touchdowns to quarterbacks in four straight They're back

0:18:21.160 --> 0:18:23.560
<v Speaker 1>to who they were last year, and since Week one,

0:18:23.600 --> 0:18:27.880
<v Speaker 1>they're allowing three fifty yards passing per game to opposing

0:18:27.960 --> 0:18:31.040
<v Speaker 1>quarter Switched Ryan Tannehill. Fitzpatrick's going to do better than

0:18:31.119 --> 0:18:36.600
<v Speaker 1>Tannehill every very possible. The last minute Sunday morning switch

0:18:36.720 --> 0:18:41.120
<v Speaker 1>never works. We'll see if this. I've got Ryan Tannehill

0:18:41.200 --> 0:18:45.480
<v Speaker 1>quarterback Eleven Fitzpatrick's a Monday night Hammer. I suppose there's that,

0:18:46.040 --> 0:18:48.159
<v Speaker 1>and he can also be benched at half. So you

0:18:48.200 --> 0:18:52.560
<v Speaker 1>know who's to say my quarterback is Derek Carr going

0:18:52.640 --> 0:18:56.760
<v Speaker 1>up against Houston through injury and age, the Houston secondary

0:18:56.880 --> 0:19:00.520
<v Speaker 1>regressing into one of the league's very worst. Aside from

0:19:00.560 --> 0:19:04.879
<v Speaker 1>games against Green quarterbacks Kyle Allen and Gardner Minshew, the

0:19:05.000 --> 0:19:09.520
<v Speaker 1>Texans are allowing three hundred twenty three passing yards and

0:19:09.720 --> 0:19:13.040
<v Speaker 1>two point eight passing touchdowns per game. I would take

0:19:13.080 --> 0:19:15.320
<v Speaker 1>that from Derek Carr now, but you might be saying, oh,

0:19:15.400 --> 0:19:17.480
<v Speaker 1>but it's Derek Carr. I don't want Derek Carr. Well,

0:19:17.640 --> 0:19:20.920
<v Speaker 1>how about this. He's throwing multiple touchdowns and three of

0:19:21.000 --> 0:19:23.480
<v Speaker 1>us past four games, only the Bears, in their elite

0:19:23.560 --> 0:19:27.160
<v Speaker 1>defense has stopped him from throwing multiple touchdowns. He gets

0:19:27.240 --> 0:19:30.359
<v Speaker 1>the gazelle back Tyroll Williams coming back, and he almost

0:19:30.359 --> 0:19:36.760
<v Speaker 1>scored a rushing touchdown last week. That's right, he did

0:19:36.800 --> 0:19:40.000
<v Speaker 1>fullbow it through the end zone. Hasson, he has no back.

0:19:40.560 --> 0:19:43.440
<v Speaker 1>He is a long way off of Bo Jackson. Let's

0:19:43.480 --> 0:19:45.160
<v Speaker 1>go to our take a chance of me running backs.

0:19:45.560 --> 0:19:48.840
<v Speaker 1>I've got J D. Mckissic of the Lions against the

0:19:48.920 --> 0:19:52.399
<v Speaker 1>Giants last week, rookie Ty Johnson led mckissic in touches

0:19:52.480 --> 0:19:55.800
<v Speaker 1>fourteen to seven, but mckissic was the more dynamic back.

0:19:55.880 --> 0:19:57.840
<v Speaker 1>He gained almost the same amount of yards, in fact,

0:19:57.880 --> 0:20:00.080
<v Speaker 1>a little bit more on half the touches. That what

0:20:00.240 --> 0:20:02.560
<v Speaker 1>then what Ty Johnson did, And if Johnson fails to

0:20:02.600 --> 0:20:04.640
<v Speaker 1>get it going early, I could see this turning into

0:20:04.680 --> 0:20:07.560
<v Speaker 1>a complete time share. The Giants have have had a

0:20:07.680 --> 0:20:10.879
<v Speaker 1>major weakness against pass catching backs as well, allowing almost

0:20:10.960 --> 0:20:13.480
<v Speaker 1>ten yards per reception to opposing backs over the last

0:20:13.520 --> 0:20:16.360
<v Speaker 1>five games. This includes a nine catch effort for James

0:20:16.400 --> 0:20:18.840
<v Speaker 1>White and six catches for eighty six from Dalvin Cook.

0:20:19.240 --> 0:20:22.560
<v Speaker 1>Mckissic is averaging over ten yards per catch, including two

0:20:22.640 --> 0:20:24.600
<v Speaker 1>for thirty one last week. I think he's going to

0:20:24.640 --> 0:20:27.920
<v Speaker 1>be in playing PPR leagues. All right, Scott, your take

0:20:27.920 --> 0:20:29.520
<v Speaker 1>a chance of me running back. I'm gonna make it. No,

0:20:29.600 --> 0:20:34.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm not no, I'm not not on this one. D No,

0:20:35.520 --> 0:20:38.919
<v Speaker 1>Darryl Henderson. Every running back to log over ten touches

0:20:38.920 --> 0:20:41.119
<v Speaker 1>against the Bengals has topped eighty yards. And that's not

0:20:41.240 --> 0:20:43.760
<v Speaker 1>a small it's not a small number. Ten different backs

0:20:43.840 --> 0:20:47.840
<v Speaker 1>in seven weeks have done ten different backs, So you

0:20:47.960 --> 0:20:50.959
<v Speaker 1>get over ten touches eleven or more. Darryl Henderson has

0:20:51.000 --> 0:20:53.359
<v Speaker 1>never had a ten touch game. No, he hasn't, but

0:20:54.359 --> 0:20:59.480
<v Speaker 1>but he looked, so he's due. But Malcolm Brown is

0:20:59.520 --> 0:21:02.200
<v Speaker 1>out for this one. And the Bengals have also allowed

0:21:02.280 --> 0:21:06.399
<v Speaker 1>ten running back touchdowns in seven games. Uh, this is

0:21:06.440 --> 0:21:08.560
<v Speaker 1>a game script where they're twelve and a half point favorites.

0:21:08.640 --> 0:21:10.560
<v Speaker 1>Might be running it down later and it might be

0:21:10.640 --> 0:21:13.720
<v Speaker 1>with Darryl Henderson. Give me him there. Also, the Bengals

0:21:13.760 --> 0:21:16.399
<v Speaker 1>are bottom five and basically every running back category, right,

0:21:17.280 --> 0:21:20.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm with you. If Malcolm Brahm's out, Darryll Henderson's officially

0:21:20.920 --> 0:21:23.240
<v Speaker 1>officially out, all right, perfect, then I'm I'm with you

0:21:23.320 --> 0:21:26.240
<v Speaker 1>on this. Duke Johnson is the one b in the

0:21:26.320 --> 0:21:29.400
<v Speaker 1>Houston running attack. I like him here against the Raiders.

0:21:29.720 --> 0:21:32.879
<v Speaker 1>They just allowed the Packers backs to catch ten balls

0:21:32.920 --> 0:21:35.000
<v Speaker 1>for a hundred two yards and two touchdowns through the air.

0:21:35.440 --> 0:21:38.960
<v Speaker 1>They've also allowed solid games to change of pace specialists

0:21:39.000 --> 0:21:43.280
<v Speaker 1>in the past, like Nike Himes Tarik Cohen. So I

0:21:43.520 --> 0:21:46.080
<v Speaker 1>like Duke Johnson in a in a game in which

0:21:46.080 --> 0:21:48.400
<v Speaker 1>he will catch plenty of passes, and I think he'll

0:21:48.640 --> 0:21:51.560
<v Speaker 1>he'll add in a few extra rushing yards as well.

0:21:51.880 --> 0:21:55.119
<v Speaker 1>Let's go to the receiver position. Usually that's wide receiver.

0:21:55.280 --> 0:21:58.000
<v Speaker 1>Sometimes it means touch tight ends. Matt who you got

0:21:58.040 --> 0:21:59.680
<v Speaker 1>as you take a chance to me receiver? This week

0:22:00.119 --> 0:22:03.440
<v Speaker 1>got DK Metcalf, who quietly has led the Seahawks and

0:22:03.520 --> 0:22:06.120
<v Speaker 1>targets over the last two weeks. The loss of tight

0:22:06.240 --> 0:22:09.399
<v Speaker 1>end Will Disley might have added to this, as Russell

0:22:09.440 --> 0:22:11.720
<v Speaker 1>Wilson's looking for a big bodied guy and hey, there's

0:22:11.800 --> 0:22:15.919
<v Speaker 1>DK Metcalf. Metcalf should match up with corner Isaiah Oliver,

0:22:16.080 --> 0:22:19.760
<v Speaker 1>who's rocking a one thirty point four quarterback rating in

0:22:19.800 --> 0:22:22.879
<v Speaker 1>his coverage, which is good for fifth worst in the league.

0:22:23.119 --> 0:22:25.800
<v Speaker 1>The Falcons are bottom five in the league in receptions,

0:22:26.080 --> 0:22:30.520
<v Speaker 1>yards and touchdowns allowed to the wide receiver position. Alright, Scott,

0:22:30.600 --> 0:22:33.080
<v Speaker 1>your take a chance to me receiver is I'm going

0:22:33.200 --> 0:22:37.640
<v Speaker 1>Dashawn Hamilton's for the Denver Broncos. With with Emmanuel Sanders gone,

0:22:37.920 --> 0:22:40.680
<v Speaker 1>that frees up a little over six extra targets per game.

0:22:40.800 --> 0:22:44.480
<v Speaker 1>It was basically just Sutton and Sanders getting all the targets.

0:22:44.800 --> 0:22:47.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm not afraid to know a fan who keeps dropping

0:22:47.480 --> 0:22:50.119
<v Speaker 1>the ball. Uh DeShawn Hamilton's in the slot if he

0:22:50.440 --> 0:22:53.639
<v Speaker 1>adds those five six targets to the two three. He

0:22:53.800 --> 0:22:56.080
<v Speaker 1>was already three. He was already getting He could be

0:22:56.160 --> 0:22:58.320
<v Speaker 1>a seven and seven to ten target guy against an

0:22:58.359 --> 0:23:01.840
<v Speaker 1>Indiana Indianapolis fence who has allowed the fourth most passing

0:23:01.920 --> 0:23:03.960
<v Speaker 1>yards from th weeks five through seven to the last

0:23:04.000 --> 0:23:06.520
<v Speaker 1>three weeks to that. I read Noah Fanse cut his

0:23:06.600 --> 0:23:09.800
<v Speaker 1>own foot while cutting his tape off on Friday and

0:23:10.040 --> 0:23:13.240
<v Speaker 1>wasn't able to practice. Really, yeah, I hadn't heard that

0:23:14.200 --> 0:23:16.919
<v Speaker 1>one of the worst injuries in the history of the NFL.

0:23:17.440 --> 0:23:21.639
<v Speaker 1>The kicker for the Jags was that the Jags or

0:23:21.720 --> 0:23:24.080
<v Speaker 1>the Panthers it was. It was definitely the Jack del

0:23:24.160 --> 0:23:27.560
<v Speaker 1>rio Ja that was that was bad with the ax.

0:23:27.760 --> 0:23:32.800
<v Speaker 1>This is similar and that it was a coach induced injury. Dang,

0:23:32.880 --> 0:23:36.399
<v Speaker 1>it's just gonna kill me it. This is early nineties

0:23:36.680 --> 0:23:39.800
<v Speaker 1>late and you know, maybe mid nineties. Um back in

0:23:40.160 --> 0:23:44.239
<v Speaker 1>uh there was a Dallas Cowboy receiver who was who

0:23:44.359 --> 0:23:48.080
<v Speaker 1>played opposite Michael Irvin um and he was just this

0:23:48.200 --> 0:23:53.080
<v Speaker 1>field Harper Bruce Bruce Um something Blanche. He went to

0:23:53.240 --> 0:23:56.120
<v Speaker 1>Tampa Bay and at one point he had his fingers

0:23:56.240 --> 0:24:00.080
<v Speaker 1>taped together and he went to the sidelines and they

0:24:00.080 --> 0:24:02.880
<v Speaker 1>were trying to untape his fingers, and instead they sliced

0:24:02.960 --> 0:24:09.720
<v Speaker 1>his finger off the sidelines instead of slicing the tape off. Bruce, Bruce,

0:24:09.760 --> 0:24:12.200
<v Speaker 1>somebody's listening to knowing. I know I can't. I can't.

0:24:12.359 --> 0:24:13.960
<v Speaker 1>I don't have a computer in front of me. Will

0:24:14.200 --> 0:24:16.359
<v Speaker 1>going to come up with it? Not Bruce Willis. I'm

0:24:16.400 --> 0:24:22.040
<v Speaker 1>pretty we'd know, brute almighty, dang it, it's gonna bug me.

0:24:22.440 --> 0:24:24.920
<v Speaker 1>I take a chance of me. Wide receivers Deonte Johnson.

0:24:25.160 --> 0:24:27.400
<v Speaker 1>This is another in these series of pick on the Dolphins.

0:24:27.600 --> 0:24:30.840
<v Speaker 1>But let's remember Dante Johnson was trending very well before

0:24:30.880 --> 0:24:33.119
<v Speaker 1>the whole Duck Hodges thing happened. When it was just

0:24:33.280 --> 0:24:36.480
<v Speaker 1>Mason Rudolph. He had put together solid games with rut

0:24:39.680 --> 0:24:43.680
<v Speaker 1>nicely done. There's Duck Hodges. Pro Football Focus ranks the

0:24:43.720 --> 0:24:46.480
<v Speaker 1>Dolphins dead last and pass coverage and second to last

0:24:46.520 --> 0:24:49.200
<v Speaker 1>and pass rush. They allowed the most passing touchdowns two

0:24:49.240 --> 0:24:51.800
<v Speaker 1>point seven per game, the six highest completion percentage, and

0:24:51.840 --> 0:24:54.320
<v Speaker 1>they've allowed the most touchdowns of wide receivers. We will

0:24:54.359 --> 0:25:00.160
<v Speaker 1>take the touchdown play with Deonte Johnson not bad um out.

0:25:01.480 --> 0:25:04.000
<v Speaker 1>Let's go to our next matchup, Cincinnati taking on the

0:25:04.160 --> 0:25:08.119
<v Speaker 1>l A Rams Joe Mixon with his zero point to

0:25:09.160 --> 0:25:13.560
<v Speaker 1>yards per carry last week. Matt, you know, before we

0:25:13.600 --> 0:25:15.680
<v Speaker 1>get started on this, this is a London game, and

0:25:15.960 --> 0:25:22.080
<v Speaker 1>usually we bring in our London correspondent, Colin mccockney. Colin mccockney, yes, where.

0:25:22.200 --> 0:25:24.800
<v Speaker 1>We don't know where he is. He's missing in action.

0:25:24.920 --> 0:25:29.840
<v Speaker 1>There's been a ransom letter sent to us. We they're

0:25:29.920 --> 0:25:35.639
<v Speaker 1>demanding ten thousand followers for explosive output for him to

0:25:35.720 --> 0:25:39.359
<v Speaker 1>come back on Twitter. So, I don't know, specific, very

0:25:39.520 --> 0:25:42.960
<v Speaker 1>specific and unusual demand. They cut that out of the

0:25:43.040 --> 0:25:47.000
<v Speaker 1>magazine and then yeah, you know, so I'm gonna do

0:25:47.160 --> 0:25:52.280
<v Speaker 1>my best Colin mccockney impression this week. Not really, Um,

0:25:52.800 --> 0:25:57.120
<v Speaker 1>all right, Cincinnati's at the Rams in in Old Blighty. Uh.

0:25:57.520 --> 0:26:00.040
<v Speaker 1>Mixon has done sweet Fanny Adams over the last a

0:26:00.119 --> 0:26:02.800
<v Speaker 1>few weeks. Had eighteen rushing attempts for twelve yards in

0:26:02.840 --> 0:26:06.879
<v Speaker 1>the last two games. Let's average that out to nine

0:26:07.080 --> 0:26:13.360
<v Speaker 1>times per games for six yards. That's bad. Uh. Six

0:26:13.480 --> 0:26:15.800
<v Speaker 1>yards in London is the equivalent of where you take

0:26:15.840 --> 0:26:19.360
<v Speaker 1>a goal kick from in soccer. Unfortunately, he's not playing footie.

0:26:19.880 --> 0:26:22.040
<v Speaker 1>Andy Dalton's also on the bench. Dalton has to be

0:26:22.119 --> 0:26:24.719
<v Speaker 1>worried about being replaced in this game by Ryan Finley.

0:26:24.960 --> 0:26:28.800
<v Speaker 1>He's done an absolute bodge job over the last few weeks. However,

0:26:29.560 --> 0:26:32.080
<v Speaker 1>if the Bengals just leave him in there, he only

0:26:32.160 --> 0:26:35.560
<v Speaker 1>has to wait seven short months for National Redhead Day

0:26:35.640 --> 0:26:38.719
<v Speaker 1>in the UK, which will take place on Saturday. Max

0:26:40.680 --> 0:26:43.200
<v Speaker 1>uh Tyler Boyd is the only Rams starter. He gets

0:26:43.240 --> 0:26:45.359
<v Speaker 1>a garbage time see and out and takes on the bench.

0:26:45.720 --> 0:26:48.119
<v Speaker 1>Tate has got to be feeling really grotty about his

0:26:48.240 --> 0:26:50.920
<v Speaker 1>matchup with Jalen Ramsey and Boyd is third in the

0:26:50.960 --> 0:26:53.080
<v Speaker 1>league and targets and the Bengals seem to have no

0:26:53.280 --> 0:26:56.200
<v Speaker 1>other path to scoring. Uh. Let's go to the ramside

0:26:56.240 --> 0:26:59.520
<v Speaker 1>where Todd Gurley gets an A grade and Darryl Henderson

0:26:59.560 --> 0:27:02.600
<v Speaker 1>was Scott's take a chance on me girlies. Uh, He's

0:27:02.720 --> 0:27:06.240
<v Speaker 1>he's the dogs danglies in London. He's averaging one fifty

0:27:06.280 --> 0:27:09.800
<v Speaker 1>four total yards and a score in his career London games. Okay,

0:27:09.880 --> 0:27:13.040
<v Speaker 1>that was just one game against the Cardinals. In the

0:27:13.119 --> 0:27:15.960
<v Speaker 1>Bengals have allowed the top running back on their opponent's

0:27:16.080 --> 0:27:18.879
<v Speaker 1>depth chart to top a hundred yards or score in

0:27:19.040 --> 0:27:22.200
<v Speaker 1>every game this season, and that's Todd Gurley. Uh. He

0:27:22.359 --> 0:27:24.680
<v Speaker 1>returned to a full workload after taking a week off

0:27:24.720 --> 0:27:27.320
<v Speaker 1>with the thigh contusion. He touched the ball nineteen times

0:27:27.400 --> 0:27:29.720
<v Speaker 1>against the Falcons. He's done next to nothing with his

0:27:29.800 --> 0:27:32.040
<v Speaker 1>carries this season, but have scored six times, which ranks

0:27:32.119 --> 0:27:35.159
<v Speaker 1>him six in the NFL amongst running backs. Uh The

0:27:35.240 --> 0:27:39.159
<v Speaker 1>wide receivers Cooper Cup and Brandon Cooks both get B grades.

0:27:39.560 --> 0:27:42.680
<v Speaker 1>Robert Woods is on the bench. Surprisingly, the Bengals have

0:27:42.760 --> 0:27:45.280
<v Speaker 1>held up pretty well against wide receivers this season and

0:27:45.359 --> 0:27:48.480
<v Speaker 1>have been actually good against the slot. Tyler Lockett is

0:27:48.480 --> 0:27:50.760
<v Speaker 1>the only slot receiver to score against since and he

0:27:50.880 --> 0:27:53.040
<v Speaker 1>was held to that only single catch in the Week

0:27:53.119 --> 0:27:55.560
<v Speaker 1>one meeting d D. Westbrook did top a hundred yards

0:27:55.560 --> 0:27:57.879
<v Speaker 1>and six catches last week from the slot, though former

0:27:57.960 --> 0:28:00.760
<v Speaker 1>first rounder Darky's Dinard return and from the pup list

0:28:00.880 --> 0:28:03.320
<v Speaker 1>last week and only allowed twenty one yards and slot

0:28:03.359 --> 0:28:06.479
<v Speaker 1>coverage in his first game back. Cup is still as

0:28:06.600 --> 0:28:09.960
<v Speaker 1>bright as a button, though he's averaging eleven targets per game.

0:28:10.119 --> 0:28:12.880
<v Speaker 1>The week spot for the Bengals is the deep speed receivers,

0:28:12.920 --> 0:28:16.160
<v Speaker 1>and Cooks will match up against cornerback Tony McCrae, who's

0:28:16.200 --> 0:28:19.320
<v Speaker 1>been brutally awful in limited play. The season, with only

0:28:19.400 --> 0:28:23.240
<v Speaker 1>thirteen passes thrown in McCrae's direction, He's allowed eleven catches

0:28:23.320 --> 0:28:25.359
<v Speaker 1>for a hundred and twenty nine yards and a score.

0:28:25.640 --> 0:28:28.879
<v Speaker 1>Maybe mccraig gets knackered from all that. Running Woods has

0:28:28.960 --> 0:28:31.080
<v Speaker 1>one score on the season, and it's a rushing score.

0:28:31.119 --> 0:28:33.240
<v Speaker 1>On Outside of what a wreck he's been this year,

0:28:33.320 --> 0:28:36.480
<v Speaker 1>he's a good player. Outside of the one huge game

0:28:36.520 --> 0:28:38.760
<v Speaker 1>against Tampa we had like a hundred and sixty four yards,

0:28:39.000 --> 0:28:41.520
<v Speaker 1>he's averaging forty five yards per game. Gross. It's awful.

0:28:41.600 --> 0:28:45.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm seeing get dropped in leagues. Yeah, understandable. It's probably true. Gerald,

0:28:46.120 --> 0:28:50.160
<v Speaker 1>It's it's so true. There we go. Gerald Everett is

0:28:50.240 --> 0:28:52.480
<v Speaker 1>a very weak see start. He's been out on the

0:28:52.560 --> 0:28:54.520
<v Speaker 1>poll and scored in two of the last three weeks.

0:28:55.000 --> 0:28:57.360
<v Speaker 1>Bengals have allowed only one score to the tight end

0:28:57.400 --> 0:28:59.960
<v Speaker 1>position and only one tight end is top three catches

0:29:00.000 --> 0:29:02.760
<v Speaker 1>against them this year. So finally, Jared Goff he gets

0:29:02.800 --> 0:29:05.680
<v Speaker 1>a C grade. It seems like a good matchup, but

0:29:05.800 --> 0:29:08.120
<v Speaker 1>it's a bit dodgy, as the Bengals have not allowed

0:29:08.120 --> 0:29:10.720
<v Speaker 1>a quarterback to top three hundred yards all season, and

0:29:10.920 --> 0:29:13.520
<v Speaker 1>Goff's play has been a picnic short of a Sandwich.

0:29:13.920 --> 0:29:16.840
<v Speaker 1>He hasn't tossed two passing scores in a game this season,

0:29:17.280 --> 0:29:21.120
<v Speaker 1>and when held to ford than fewer than forty passing attempts,

0:29:21.480 --> 0:29:24.280
<v Speaker 1>he's only averaged two hundred sixteen yards on the season.

0:29:24.560 --> 0:29:28.000
<v Speaker 1>If he doesn't get to forty passing attempts two sixteen yards,

0:29:28.040 --> 0:29:29.880
<v Speaker 1>he won't get to forty this week. I don't think

0:29:29.880 --> 0:29:31.560
<v Speaker 1>it's gonna be a good week for Jared Goff. No,

0:29:31.880 --> 0:29:33.960
<v Speaker 1>it may not be. You've been You've been on top

0:29:34.040 --> 0:29:36.440
<v Speaker 1>of the Jared Goff situation from the beginning of the year.

0:29:36.920 --> 0:29:40.920
<v Speaker 1>You're an early skeptic. Mostly that is paid off. Alright,

0:29:41.000 --> 0:29:45.000
<v Speaker 1>So his name's not brous it's Alvin Harper, I said,

0:29:45.040 --> 0:29:48.640
<v Speaker 1>Alvin Harper. Yeah, I missed it. Yes, it was Alvin

0:29:48.680 --> 0:29:51.920
<v Speaker 1>Harper who got his finger cut off on the sidelines,

0:29:52.240 --> 0:29:54.760
<v Speaker 1>which has gotta be And Tampa Bay signed a nine

0:29:54.840 --> 0:29:57.400
<v Speaker 1>fingered wide receiver. Well, he was tended at the top

0:29:57.440 --> 0:29:59.560
<v Speaker 1>at the point of the signing because you can't sign

0:29:59.640 --> 0:30:01.920
<v Speaker 1>right with fingers. I wonder if they which finger it was,

0:30:01.960 --> 0:30:04.480
<v Speaker 1>because that's kind of a big factor here too. Uh

0:30:04.720 --> 0:30:09.760
<v Speaker 1>did you know fanball has daily fantasy auctions? It's true.

0:30:10.240 --> 0:30:13.200
<v Speaker 1>You love auctioning in the preseason. You will love auctioning

0:30:13.360 --> 0:30:16.760
<v Speaker 1>for this weekend's games. Fan ball auctions are fast paced,

0:30:16.800 --> 0:30:20.960
<v Speaker 1>their frantic, incredibly fun. You've been on four players simultaneously

0:30:21.200 --> 0:30:24.640
<v Speaker 1>against real life opponents. Yeah, you can even win money

0:30:24.760 --> 0:30:27.520
<v Speaker 1>fan ball auctions, but just playing them and auctioning is

0:30:27.640 --> 0:30:31.120
<v Speaker 1>so much fun. That's just good enough even if you lose.

0:30:31.520 --> 0:30:33.760
<v Speaker 1>Coming up next in Fantasy Football Weekly, we will break

0:30:33.800 --> 0:30:38.760
<v Speaker 1>down more matchups, including Denver taking on Indianapolis. What can

0:30:38.800 --> 0:30:41.959
<v Speaker 1>you expect from the Denver passing attack without Emmanuel Sanders

0:30:42.040 --> 0:31:07.800
<v Speaker 1>will tell you when we come back. You are listening

0:31:07.840 --> 0:31:10.360
<v Speaker 1>to Fantasy Football Weekly. I am Paul Charchie and my

0:31:10.440 --> 0:31:14.040
<v Speaker 1>co hosts are Scott Fish and Matt Harrison. You can

0:31:14.120 --> 0:31:16.240
<v Speaker 1>hear us over the year in many stations around the country,

0:31:16.320 --> 0:31:19.600
<v Speaker 1>and this show is also a podcast available every Friday

0:31:20.000 --> 0:31:24.720
<v Speaker 1>on all major podcasting platforms, including the number one destination

0:31:24.840 --> 0:31:30.680
<v Speaker 1>for podcasts, the I Heart Radio app. Denver takes on Indianapolis.

0:31:31.240 --> 0:31:34.480
<v Speaker 1>Scott and as we alluded to going into the break,

0:31:34.880 --> 0:31:37.880
<v Speaker 1>they're gonna have to go without their best receiver, well,

0:31:37.960 --> 0:31:40.040
<v Speaker 1>their second best receiver. Maybe they're they're one A and

0:31:40.320 --> 0:31:43.400
<v Speaker 1>I guess one Bmanuel Sanders no longer with the team.

0:31:43.560 --> 0:31:45.520
<v Speaker 1>What do you think about Courtland Sutton and the rest

0:31:45.560 --> 0:31:50.040
<v Speaker 1>of the passing attack here for Denver. I don't exactly

0:31:50.120 --> 0:31:53.320
<v Speaker 1>love Flecco, but I still like Courtland Sutton. I mean

0:31:53.400 --> 0:31:55.520
<v Speaker 1>he has at least seventy five yards and five of

0:31:55.600 --> 0:31:59.480
<v Speaker 1>the seven games, including three straight, and India's they're they're

0:31:59.480 --> 0:32:02.080
<v Speaker 1>giving it up, as I mentioned, with Hamilton's five wide

0:32:02.120 --> 0:32:04.840
<v Speaker 1>receivers over a hundred yards, including three in just the

0:32:04.920 --> 0:32:08.000
<v Speaker 1>last two weeks. I still I you know, I want

0:32:08.040 --> 0:32:10.880
<v Speaker 1>to give Sudden a but I think I'm gonna lean be.

0:32:11.040 --> 0:32:13.560
<v Speaker 1>I really do like him this week, A strong be

0:32:14.400 --> 0:32:17.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't like. I think Flacco is gonna just do

0:32:17.280 --> 0:32:19.600
<v Speaker 1>enough to support those two wide receivers though, and not

0:32:19.840 --> 0:32:21.720
<v Speaker 1>enough to have a good fantasy day for you though,

0:32:21.800 --> 0:32:24.800
<v Speaker 1>So I'm having him on the bench only Derek Carr.

0:32:25.000 --> 0:32:27.680
<v Speaker 1>Derek Carr and Mariota were the only two q qbs

0:32:27.680 --> 0:32:30.320
<v Speaker 1>who didn't throw for three Indie, but I put Flacco

0:32:30.400 --> 0:32:34.520
<v Speaker 1>in that group, if not below. So fantas on the

0:32:34.560 --> 0:32:37.200
<v Speaker 1>bench needs to have a game over forty yards before

0:32:37.240 --> 0:32:40.400
<v Speaker 1>I even want to start him. And and with Lindsay

0:32:40.480 --> 0:32:43.400
<v Speaker 1>and Royce, they are doing just enough to make each

0:32:43.440 --> 0:32:48.080
<v Speaker 1>other miserable for fantasy owners, Colts having allowed of running

0:32:48.080 --> 0:32:50.800
<v Speaker 1>back touchdown since we to know running back under seventeen

0:32:50.840 --> 0:32:53.680
<v Speaker 1>touches is even at sixty yards. On the Colts, it's

0:32:53.720 --> 0:32:57.480
<v Speaker 1>all passing. So I'm mentioning both of them. Royce is

0:32:57.520 --> 0:33:02.280
<v Speaker 1>getting more snaps, more nine catches the last two games. Him, yeah, yeah,

0:33:02.320 --> 0:33:04.560
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. It's it's a it's a weird situation.

0:33:04.680 --> 0:33:06.720
<v Speaker 1>Right now. I'm still benching both. I think here, I

0:33:06.760 --> 0:33:08.080
<v Speaker 1>can't see. I don't have it in me to bench

0:33:08.120 --> 0:33:10.400
<v Speaker 1>Philip Lindsay. I do like him too much. I think

0:33:10.560 --> 0:33:12.520
<v Speaker 1>if you have to start when it's Lindsay, because he's

0:33:12.640 --> 0:33:15.320
<v Speaker 1>still getting better, he's still getting more touches, and he's better,

0:33:15.400 --> 0:33:18.280
<v Speaker 1>and he's more explosive and you know, maybe an explosive play.

0:33:18.360 --> 0:33:21.600
<v Speaker 1>But I have trouble starting either of them. Brissette, I'm

0:33:21.640 --> 0:33:23.400
<v Speaker 1>giving a B grade two, and I kind of want

0:33:23.400 --> 0:33:24.960
<v Speaker 1>to give him an A because he's, you know, the

0:33:25.040 --> 0:33:27.560
<v Speaker 1>touchdown leader. He's had tough matchups and it doesn't matter.

0:33:27.680 --> 0:33:30.840
<v Speaker 1>He's just throwing touchdowns. But the Broncos are allowing the

0:33:31.040 --> 0:33:35.680
<v Speaker 1>third fewest yards, fourth fewest passing touchdowns. Uh. The b

0:33:35.880 --> 0:33:40.800
<v Speaker 1>for Brissette is the Broncos have faced Matt Moore, Mariotta, Tannehill, split, Carterbisky,

0:33:40.880 --> 0:33:44.720
<v Speaker 1>Minshew um on the way to those defensive splits. It's

0:33:44.760 --> 0:33:47.840
<v Speaker 1>a tough matchup, but those aren't great quarterbacks. So I

0:33:47.880 --> 0:33:50.680
<v Speaker 1>think Brissette can get it done. His main guy, t

0:33:50.920 --> 0:33:53.440
<v Speaker 1>Y Hilton is probably gonna avoid Christopher Harris, so I

0:33:53.720 --> 0:33:56.160
<v Speaker 1>I like him. This week. He scored five touchdowns in

0:33:56.200 --> 0:33:59.000
<v Speaker 1>the five games that he's played. The yards aren't exactly there,

0:33:59.400 --> 0:34:02.000
<v Speaker 1>because that's like throwing him thrown to him ten yards

0:34:02.080 --> 0:34:04.959
<v Speaker 1>down field instead of his career average, which I think

0:34:05.040 --> 0:34:07.719
<v Speaker 1>is like fourteen or fifteen. So, but he's still averaging

0:34:07.760 --> 0:34:09.480
<v Speaker 1>six yards per game. I'm still giving him an a.

0:34:09.880 --> 0:34:12.200
<v Speaker 1>The rest of the wide receivers, they are splitting up

0:34:12.239 --> 0:34:15.000
<v Speaker 1>so much it doesn't matter. He can't he can't start him,

0:34:15.040 --> 0:34:19.640
<v Speaker 1>don't chase either. Here's here's the always fun if else

0:34:20.040 --> 0:34:23.040
<v Speaker 1>Jack Doyle has a questionable groin. I probably could have

0:34:23.080 --> 0:34:26.360
<v Speaker 1>phrased that better. Uh. If he does not go, I

0:34:26.440 --> 0:34:29.200
<v Speaker 1>think Ebron's a C grade here. I think he's just startable.

0:34:29.239 --> 0:34:31.719
<v Speaker 1>He might get a touchdown if he does go. If

0:34:31.800 --> 0:34:34.480
<v Speaker 1>they both go, I'm mentioning him. Both Broncos have only

0:34:34.520 --> 0:34:36.759
<v Speaker 1>allowed one touchdown to a tight end this year, and

0:34:36.880 --> 0:34:39.320
<v Speaker 1>only one touchdown tight end over forty five yards, and

0:34:39.360 --> 0:34:42.400
<v Speaker 1>that was Darren Waller on a bunch of targets. Marlon

0:34:42.480 --> 0:34:45.279
<v Speaker 1>Mack it's a B grade for me. Only one game

0:34:45.440 --> 0:34:48.239
<v Speaker 1>under eighteen touches for him, and he's averaging twenty one

0:34:48.320 --> 0:34:52.640
<v Speaker 1>point five every eighteen touchback against Denver ninety plus yards

0:34:52.920 --> 0:34:56.160
<v Speaker 1>or a touchdown and or a touchdown. So I'm giving

0:34:56.200 --> 0:35:01.400
<v Speaker 1>mccabee Tampa Bay taking on Tennessee. To understand the Bucks

0:35:01.880 --> 0:35:03.839
<v Speaker 1>prospects in this one, here's the first thing you need

0:35:03.880 --> 0:35:06.759
<v Speaker 1>to understand. You can't run the ball on Tennessee and

0:35:07.360 --> 0:35:10.879
<v Speaker 1>Peyton Barbera and Ronald Jones are middling runners anyway. Last week,

0:35:10.920 --> 0:35:14.520
<v Speaker 1>a better set of runners, Melvin Gordon Austin Ekeler combined

0:35:14.719 --> 0:35:19.360
<v Speaker 1>for thirty nine rushing yards against Tennessee. And while the

0:35:19.520 --> 0:35:22.880
<v Speaker 1>Titans are vulnerable to pass catching backs Barbara and Jones

0:35:22.920 --> 0:35:26.080
<v Speaker 1>don't catch. They both average one reception of games, so

0:35:26.200 --> 0:35:28.239
<v Speaker 1>they're out and they're on the bench. That brings us

0:35:28.239 --> 0:35:30.080
<v Speaker 1>to the passing game, where there's gonna be a ton

0:35:30.160 --> 0:35:33.360
<v Speaker 1>of volume for Jamis Winston because you can't run on

0:35:33.640 --> 0:35:37.920
<v Speaker 1>Tennessee and its three games with thirty seven or more passes,

0:35:38.560 --> 0:35:42.480
<v Speaker 1>Winston has averaged an amazing three hundred eighty eight yards

0:35:42.520 --> 0:35:45.879
<v Speaker 1>and two points seven touchdowns. And if you're a little

0:35:45.880 --> 0:35:48.759
<v Speaker 1>bit worried about Winston unraveling with the multiple picks like

0:35:48.840 --> 0:35:50.480
<v Speaker 1>he had the five picks last time we saw him,

0:35:50.920 --> 0:35:55.360
<v Speaker 1>note this. The Titans have zero or one interception in

0:35:55.520 --> 0:35:57.719
<v Speaker 1>twenty of their last twenty two games. They are not

0:35:57.880 --> 0:36:01.000
<v Speaker 1>a big turnover defense, so I don't think Winston's going

0:36:01.040 --> 0:36:03.200
<v Speaker 1>to have the multiple interceptions this time, and I like it.

0:36:03.320 --> 0:36:05.759
<v Speaker 1>I'm giving him a B grade and a bounce back performance.

0:36:06.239 --> 0:36:08.080
<v Speaker 1>I've got a B grade on Mike Evans as well.

0:36:08.280 --> 0:36:11.879
<v Speaker 1>After allowing three wide receiver touchdowns over the first three weeks,

0:36:12.000 --> 0:36:15.600
<v Speaker 1>the Titans have stifled opposing receivers, surrendering just one score

0:36:15.600 --> 0:36:18.400
<v Speaker 1>to the position over the last month of play. Evans

0:36:18.480 --> 0:36:20.960
<v Speaker 1>lines up over the field, but he's got tough matchups

0:36:21.200 --> 0:36:24.560
<v Speaker 1>on both of the outside spots of Dory Jackson Malcolm Butler,

0:36:24.600 --> 0:36:27.719
<v Speaker 1>who have improved after some early season struggles. Um, he

0:36:27.760 --> 0:36:29.680
<v Speaker 1>probably won't run from the slot that much because that's

0:36:29.719 --> 0:36:34.040
<v Speaker 1>Chris Godwin's territory. Godwin has been awesome so far this year,

0:36:34.400 --> 0:36:37.960
<v Speaker 1>but a tricky matchup against Logan Ryan. He's allowing a

0:36:38.080 --> 0:36:40.920
<v Speaker 1>modest forty seven yards per game in his coverage. He's

0:36:40.920 --> 0:36:42.839
<v Speaker 1>only given up one touchdown to just a B grade

0:36:42.880 --> 0:36:45.400
<v Speaker 1>on Chris Godwin, and this one O J. Howard has

0:36:45.440 --> 0:36:48.760
<v Speaker 1>been ruled out. If you are in a pinch, Cameron

0:36:48.840 --> 0:36:51.799
<v Speaker 1>Braid is a dart throw hunter. Henry just put up

0:36:51.840 --> 0:36:54.520
<v Speaker 1>ninety seven yards against Tennessee. Austin Hooper put up a

0:36:54.560 --> 0:36:57.600
<v Speaker 1>giant game earlier in the year, and Cameron Braid could

0:36:57.640 --> 0:37:00.239
<v Speaker 1>be your tight end dart throw and that makes a

0:37:00.239 --> 0:37:03.080
<v Speaker 1>little bit of sense with O. J. Howard up, Let's

0:37:03.080 --> 0:37:05.920
<v Speaker 1>go to the Tennessee side. We'll begin with the running game.

0:37:05.960 --> 0:37:07.960
<v Speaker 1>And I don't like Derrick Henry here at all. This

0:37:08.120 --> 0:37:11.680
<v Speaker 1>is probably his toughest matchup of the year. Very tempted

0:37:11.680 --> 0:37:14.160
<v Speaker 1>to give him a bench grade. Altogether, the Bucks give

0:37:14.239 --> 0:37:18.080
<v Speaker 1>up the fewest rushing yards and the fewest yards per carry.

0:37:18.520 --> 0:37:23.719
<v Speaker 1>Get this two point seven yards Perry. That's nothing I

0:37:23.800 --> 0:37:26.560
<v Speaker 1>did not realize. What's more impressive is who's they've done

0:37:26.600 --> 0:37:31.440
<v Speaker 1>it against. Listen to the guys they faced. Christian McCaffrey twice,

0:37:32.320 --> 0:37:36.879
<v Speaker 1>say Kwan Barkley, Todd Gurley, Alvin Kamara. And they're giving

0:37:36.920 --> 0:37:40.319
<v Speaker 1>up two point seven yards per carry. That's it. Now

0:37:40.400 --> 0:37:42.000
<v Speaker 1>they can get dinged a little bit through the air,

0:37:42.040 --> 0:37:45.480
<v Speaker 1>but Derrick Henry doesn't catch. So just to see grade

0:37:45.520 --> 0:37:48.360
<v Speaker 1>on Derrick Henry and really you're hoping for the touchdown

0:37:48.440 --> 0:37:50.840
<v Speaker 1>plunge and that's about it. And really I ought to

0:37:51.040 --> 0:37:53.320
<v Speaker 1>probably give him a bench grade. Let's go to the

0:37:53.320 --> 0:37:55.919
<v Speaker 1>passing game. Ryan Tannehill, we talked to you, talked about

0:37:56.000 --> 0:37:57.719
<v Speaker 1>him earlier to take a chance of a quarterback, and

0:37:57.760 --> 0:37:59.520
<v Speaker 1>I've got a B grade on him, So I'm I'm

0:37:59.560 --> 0:38:03.879
<v Speaker 1>in locks step with you. Corey Davis with Tannehill last week,

0:38:04.000 --> 0:38:07.279
<v Speaker 1>not season highs and targets and receptions. I love that

0:38:07.440 --> 0:38:11.399
<v Speaker 1>part of this game. And to Tampa's secondary so bad.

0:38:11.800 --> 0:38:15.520
<v Speaker 1>They've surrendered a league worst two hundred four yards per

0:38:15.680 --> 0:38:19.680
<v Speaker 1>game to wide receivers, the fifth most touchdowns to wide receivers.

0:38:20.239 --> 0:38:24.160
<v Speaker 1>Corey Davis draws coverage from Carlton Davis and Vernon Hargreaves

0:38:24.200 --> 0:38:28.719
<v Speaker 1>on the outside. Those are both deep C. Davis versus C. Davis, right,

0:38:29.200 --> 0:38:33.000
<v Speaker 1>So it is David's kind of it's kind of like almost, yeah,

0:38:33.080 --> 0:38:37.680
<v Speaker 1>we'll get to that, except then there's that A J.

0:38:37.880 --> 0:38:45.359
<v Speaker 1>You know what the cure for the Tampa defenses, Ryan Tannehill, Well, yeah, uh.

0:38:45.480 --> 0:38:48.239
<v Speaker 1>A J. Brown is usually only on the field like

0:38:49.680 --> 0:38:52.359
<v Speaker 1>the Snaps, so I know it's not easy to start him,

0:38:52.360 --> 0:38:54.359
<v Speaker 1>but the opportunity is so good. I think he's dart

0:38:54.440 --> 0:38:57.520
<v Speaker 1>throws startable here for A J. Brown again, Tampa allowing

0:38:57.560 --> 0:38:59.600
<v Speaker 1>the most yards and all the touchdowns. Everything else I

0:38:59.680 --> 0:39:02.880
<v Speaker 1>told you about about Corey Davis, most of that applies

0:39:02.960 --> 0:39:04.759
<v Speaker 1>d A J. Brown here too, so you could try him.

0:39:05.200 --> 0:39:08.879
<v Speaker 1>Delaney Walker has been ruled out of this game. Let's

0:39:08.920 --> 0:39:11.320
<v Speaker 1>work in one more matchup into the segment, Seattle taking

0:39:11.400 --> 0:39:15.040
<v Speaker 1>on Atlanta. Matt What do you got for the Seattle side?

0:39:15.560 --> 0:39:18.800
<v Speaker 1>Chris Carson's getting an A grade. He's topped twenty rushing

0:39:18.800 --> 0:39:21.399
<v Speaker 1>attempts in four straight games, all of which occurred after

0:39:21.480 --> 0:39:24.000
<v Speaker 1>a shot Penny turned to the lineup. In those four contests,

0:39:24.040 --> 0:39:27.360
<v Speaker 1>He's bested one rushing yards in three but only reached

0:39:27.400 --> 0:39:30.160
<v Speaker 1>paydirt twice on the ground. This season, the Falcons have

0:39:30.200 --> 0:39:33.560
<v Speaker 1>only allowed three backs the top sixty yards and seven contests. However,

0:39:33.680 --> 0:39:36.120
<v Speaker 1>the Dirty Birds have reverted to their old ways of

0:39:36.239 --> 0:39:40.719
<v Speaker 1>being completely submissive to receiving backs, allowing three touchdowns to

0:39:40.800 --> 0:39:42.759
<v Speaker 1>backs through the air in the last two games, so

0:39:43.440 --> 0:39:47.160
<v Speaker 1>it's coming back. Russell Wilson gets an A grade. If

0:39:47.160 --> 0:39:49.719
<v Speaker 1>the Falcons don't sack Russell Wilson this week, they'll be

0:39:49.800 --> 0:39:53.200
<v Speaker 1>the first team since sacks were recorded as a stat

0:39:53.600 --> 0:39:56.399
<v Speaker 1>to not sack the quarterback in five straight weeks. Think

0:39:56.440 --> 0:39:59.279
<v Speaker 1>about that. That's how little pressure the Falcons are getting

0:39:59.320 --> 0:40:01.480
<v Speaker 1>on opposing corps backs too. You're gonna be the first

0:40:01.480 --> 0:40:04.680
<v Speaker 1>team in the modern era to go five straight games

0:40:04.719 --> 0:40:07.160
<v Speaker 1>without a sack. Not only that, their bottom ten and

0:40:07.200 --> 0:40:09.520
<v Speaker 1>rushing yards allowed to quarterbacks too, so that bodes well

0:40:09.560 --> 0:40:12.879
<v Speaker 1>for Wilson. Tyler Lockett gets an A. Lockett will runs

0:40:12.920 --> 0:40:16.120
<v Speaker 1>about his routes from the slot, meaning he'll match up

0:40:16.160 --> 0:40:19.399
<v Speaker 1>with Deamonte Kazi, who's allowed a one nineteen point nine

0:40:19.480 --> 0:40:22.520
<v Speaker 1>quarterback rating, and dk metcalf Was might take a chance

0:40:22.560 --> 0:40:26.560
<v Speaker 1>on the wide receiver on the Seahawks side, DeVante Freeman

0:40:26.600 --> 0:40:29.000
<v Speaker 1>will start with him. It's possible the Devil went down

0:40:29.040 --> 0:40:32.200
<v Speaker 1>to Georgia last week to possess Davante Freeman, who took

0:40:32.239 --> 0:40:34.440
<v Speaker 1>the field in the third quarter and punched Darreon Donald

0:40:34.560 --> 0:40:39.280
<v Speaker 1>securing an injection, who punches Aaron Donald, who punches a helmet.

0:40:40.200 --> 0:40:43.600
<v Speaker 1>I guess geez um. That's kind of Freeman season in

0:40:43.640 --> 0:40:46.520
<v Speaker 1>a nutshell. He's averaging a career low three point five

0:40:46.640 --> 0:40:50.160
<v Speaker 1>yards per carry. He hasn't scored a rushing touchdown since

0:40:50.400 --> 0:40:55.000
<v Speaker 1>before the Minneapolis miracle. Um. Seattle's run defense has been

0:40:55.000 --> 0:40:56.799
<v Speaker 1>a roller coaster. They're just the middle of the road

0:40:57.080 --> 0:41:00.719
<v Speaker 1>UH defense. But Ato Smith is out, so Freeman gets

0:41:00.800 --> 0:41:04.200
<v Speaker 1>a C grade. UH. A quarterback named Matt will start.

0:41:04.440 --> 0:41:06.640
<v Speaker 1>If it's Matt Ryan, he gets a C grade. If

0:41:06.680 --> 0:41:09.520
<v Speaker 1>it's Matt Schob, he's a bench grade. Ryan still nursing

0:41:09.600 --> 0:41:11.880
<v Speaker 1>a high ankle sprain, but might end up going. Dan

0:41:12.000 --> 0:41:14.600
<v Speaker 1>Quinn might force him to play because if the Falcons lose,

0:41:14.880 --> 0:41:17.520
<v Speaker 1>Quinn probably loses his job over the week nine. By

0:41:17.960 --> 0:41:20.320
<v Speaker 1>If Shab ends up going, he's got a fourteen to

0:41:20.440 --> 0:41:23.640
<v Speaker 1>twenty two touchdown to interception ratio in his last ten games,

0:41:24.480 --> 0:41:26.360
<v Speaker 1>And if Ryan ends up going, it will be with

0:41:26.520 --> 0:41:30.319
<v Speaker 1>a big, beefy ankle brace and a suspect offensive line.

0:41:31.000 --> 0:41:33.520
<v Speaker 1>If Shop is the starter, you downgrade all of these

0:41:33.560 --> 0:41:37.320
<v Speaker 1>wide receivers and tight ends all. So I have Julio

0:41:37.440 --> 0:41:40.360
<v Speaker 1>Jones as an A or a B IF shop starts

0:41:40.400 --> 0:41:42.680
<v Speaker 1>and Calvin Ridley as a C or A bench slot

0:41:42.920 --> 0:41:45.759
<v Speaker 1>wide receiver. Mohammed Sanu has traded the Pats earlier this week.

0:41:45.880 --> 0:41:49.359
<v Speaker 1>Of current active Falcons receivers, Julio has the most routes

0:41:49.440 --> 0:41:52.200
<v Speaker 1>run from the slot. Big time slot guys Michael Thomas

0:41:52.239 --> 0:41:54.880
<v Speaker 1>and Cooper Cup each had good days. Ridley has scored

0:41:54.920 --> 0:41:57.480
<v Speaker 1>in four of seven games and top sixty yards and

0:41:57.600 --> 0:42:01.080
<v Speaker 1>three of those but in the other one he's vanished

0:42:01.520 --> 0:42:04.600
<v Speaker 1>uh six yards, thirty two and thirty in the other contests.

0:42:04.880 --> 0:42:06.560
<v Speaker 1>I don't like him very much. He is very much

0:42:06.600 --> 0:42:09.400
<v Speaker 1>all or nothing. He gets Shakhill Griffin, who's the highest

0:42:09.480 --> 0:42:12.200
<v Speaker 1>rated of the Seahawks corners according to Pro Football Focus,

0:42:12.600 --> 0:42:15.200
<v Speaker 1>and finally Austin Hooper. He's getting an A grade. Hooper

0:42:15.200 --> 0:42:19.200
<v Speaker 1>has caught twenty of twenty two slot targets this year,

0:42:19.680 --> 0:42:21.440
<v Speaker 1>so they've been running him out of the slot a

0:42:21.480 --> 0:42:24.200
<v Speaker 1>little bit too um That might help with this new

0:42:24.239 --> 0:42:26.319
<v Speaker 1>trade as well. So the Seahawks have allowed the third

0:42:26.400 --> 0:42:28.360
<v Speaker 1>most yards to the tight end position this season, and

0:42:28.400 --> 0:42:30.719
<v Speaker 1>Hooper has been great. Cooper has been gred who do

0:42:30.760 --> 0:42:32.840
<v Speaker 1>you guess he's he's the highest scoring fantasy tight end

0:42:32.880 --> 0:42:35.239
<v Speaker 1>in most leagues. I don't think we saw that coming

0:42:36.040 --> 0:42:39.440
<v Speaker 1>is stuff. Is there any player you would take straight

0:42:39.520 --> 0:42:42.600
<v Speaker 1>up for Dalvin Cook if you were Dalvin Cook owner?

0:42:43.080 --> 0:42:46.960
<v Speaker 1>Is there any player you would take in that trade

0:42:47.080 --> 0:42:50.680
<v Speaker 1>straight up? I'd have to look at the schedule coming up.

0:42:50.760 --> 0:42:53.799
<v Speaker 1>But I mean McCaffrey and Barkley still come to mind. Yeah,

0:42:54.360 --> 0:42:56.759
<v Speaker 1>I would have to really do a schedule analysis on that,

0:42:57.640 --> 0:43:02.480
<v Speaker 1>make sure I thought about it. I don't think McCaffrey

0:43:02.560 --> 0:43:04.520
<v Speaker 1>is gonna get hurt or miss time or even have

0:43:04.640 --> 0:43:07.240
<v Speaker 1>his snaps are do you know you can't predict that stuff,

0:43:07.239 --> 0:43:11.280
<v Speaker 1>but he's playing snap right. Yeah. The thing about dangerous

0:43:11.400 --> 0:43:13.960
<v Speaker 1>McCaffrey and Correctly that I like is they don't really

0:43:14.000 --> 0:43:16.800
<v Speaker 1>have anybody behind them to take touches, and Alexander Madison

0:43:16.920 --> 0:43:19.000
<v Speaker 1>does take touches from Calvin Cook a little bit. So

0:43:19.560 --> 0:43:21.839
<v Speaker 1>I do like Barkley and McCaffrey a little bit better,

0:43:21.920 --> 0:43:25.000
<v Speaker 1>But that gap is getting really close. Yeah, they're also tight.

0:43:25.080 --> 0:43:27.600
<v Speaker 1>I don't think it wouldn't I couldn't do it straight up.

0:43:27.600 --> 0:43:31.240
<v Speaker 1>You'd have to offer me a little more. Stefon Diggs

0:43:31.360 --> 0:43:36.280
<v Speaker 1>just set the three game receiving record for the Vikings

0:43:36.400 --> 0:43:39.879
<v Speaker 1>for most yards took from Randy Moss on Thursday night.

0:43:40.560 --> 0:43:43.040
<v Speaker 1>Once Thealan gets back, do you think we get the

0:43:43.080 --> 0:43:45.799
<v Speaker 1>old Diggs back? Or do you think we get new

0:43:45.880 --> 0:43:48.600
<v Speaker 1>shiny Diggs? Do we get this version? It's worth noting

0:43:48.640 --> 0:43:52.600
<v Speaker 1>that they've played junk defenses the last three weeks, so

0:43:52.960 --> 0:43:55.399
<v Speaker 1>I think it's matchup based. If they're playing the worst

0:43:55.480 --> 0:43:58.520
<v Speaker 1>defenses in the league. Yeahs is gonna be great. All Yeah,

0:43:58.640 --> 0:44:00.480
<v Speaker 1>Although the Vikings still have the Dolphins on the skinning,

0:44:00.680 --> 0:44:02.239
<v Speaker 1>they get the Chiefs next week and that's not a

0:44:02.320 --> 0:44:06.480
<v Speaker 1>great secondary. Well, it's a much improved chat. We'll talk

0:44:06.520 --> 0:44:08.960
<v Speaker 1>about that one in a few minutes here. Coming up next,

0:44:09.040 --> 0:44:11.719
<v Speaker 1>let's answer three tough questions you can play along. Try

0:44:11.800 --> 0:44:18.120
<v Speaker 1>to go a perfect three and oh on Fantasy Football Weekly. No, don't,

0:44:43.760 --> 0:44:46.279
<v Speaker 1>it's Fantasy Football Weekly. I am bull Archie and my

0:44:46.520 --> 0:44:49.120
<v Speaker 1>co hosts are Matt Harrison at Twitter on Twitter at

0:44:49.400 --> 0:44:56.200
<v Speaker 1>Explosive Output, Scott Fish at Scott Fish twenty four, did

0:44:56.360 --> 0:45:00.480
<v Speaker 1>not Fish twenty four on Twitter. Boys, it's getting the

0:45:00.520 --> 0:45:06.200
<v Speaker 1>grinder with three tough questions. We traditionally start with tough

0:45:06.320 --> 0:45:09.960
<v Speaker 1>question number one. Now, with the forty niners. Will Emmanuel

0:45:10.040 --> 0:45:14.279
<v Speaker 1>Sanders most often be a wide receiver one, a wide

0:45:14.320 --> 0:45:18.560
<v Speaker 1>receiver to a flex or a bench player. Matt, you know,

0:45:18.760 --> 0:45:21.480
<v Speaker 1>we always traditionally start with tough question number one. I'd

0:45:21.480 --> 0:45:23.400
<v Speaker 1>like to mix it up next time and go with

0:45:23.680 --> 0:45:26.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, maybe next question we'll do tough question number three.

0:45:26.600 --> 0:45:33.359
<v Speaker 1>About that question number three? Now often be a wide receiver, one,

0:45:33.800 --> 0:45:36.880
<v Speaker 1>wide receiver to flex or bench. You didn't have to

0:45:36.960 --> 0:45:40.160
<v Speaker 1>read it against schedule is okay? Two matchups with Arizona

0:45:40.280 --> 0:45:42.640
<v Speaker 1>over the next four weeks, he'll be a wide receiver

0:45:42.760 --> 0:45:45.640
<v Speaker 1>one in those and against Atlanta in week fifteen. Other

0:45:45.680 --> 0:45:48.359
<v Speaker 1>than that, I don't love the matchups Carolina this week,

0:45:48.719 --> 0:45:51.360
<v Speaker 1>Green Bay, Baltimore, New Orleans, and the Rams in the

0:45:51.400 --> 0:45:54.560
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy Championship, which I feel will be like c starts.

0:45:55.000 --> 0:45:57.560
<v Speaker 1>So I think he's a flex. Okay, that's exactly what

0:45:57.640 --> 0:46:00.160
<v Speaker 1>I had. I had a flex. Uh, he'll have will

0:46:00.200 --> 0:46:03.960
<v Speaker 1>be matchup dependent. I think that this defense and the

0:46:04.080 --> 0:46:06.480
<v Speaker 1>run game Shanahan likes to do. I know that Shanahan

0:46:06.560 --> 0:46:08.600
<v Speaker 1>said this week that he wants Emmanuel Sanders to play

0:46:08.640 --> 0:46:10.120
<v Speaker 1>a lot this week and he wants to get him

0:46:10.160 --> 0:46:13.799
<v Speaker 1>really involved. But there's gonna be some growing pains there. Uh,

0:46:14.280 --> 0:46:16.719
<v Speaker 1>the defense in the run game they live off of that.

0:46:16.880 --> 0:46:19.800
<v Speaker 1>That's not a lot of passing. Jimmy g hasn't topped

0:46:19.840 --> 0:46:22.399
<v Speaker 1>three thirty three attempts yet this season, only top two

0:46:22.680 --> 0:46:26.799
<v Speaker 1>fifty yards twice, only averaging one passing touchdown per game.

0:46:26.840 --> 0:46:29.120
<v Speaker 1>And Kittle is the main guy there. I think I

0:46:29.200 --> 0:46:32.480
<v Speaker 1>think it's a flex for most of the season. Emmanuel

0:46:32.480 --> 0:46:37.000
<v Speaker 1>Sanders knows the Kyle Shanahan's system because Denver's offensive coordinator,

0:46:37.600 --> 0:46:42.640
<v Speaker 1>Rich scan Garrello was Shanahan's quarterback coach last year, so

0:46:42.760 --> 0:46:45.000
<v Speaker 1>he's running that offense. He walked right into this. He

0:46:45.120 --> 0:46:48.040
<v Speaker 1>knows the scheme already. He's got to learn a little terminology,

0:46:48.120 --> 0:46:49.839
<v Speaker 1>but he'll be able to hit the ground running as

0:46:49.960 --> 0:46:53.200
<v Speaker 1>early as this week. And you know, everything else in

0:46:53.280 --> 0:46:56.040
<v Speaker 1>San Francisco is working except the passing game. There's the

0:46:56.080 --> 0:46:57.880
<v Speaker 1>one thing that's not working in San Francisco for an

0:46:57.920 --> 0:47:01.319
<v Speaker 1>undefeated team. There's a lot out of impetus to make sure.

0:47:01.440 --> 0:47:03.600
<v Speaker 1>There's a reason they traded for him. They make sure

0:47:03.840 --> 0:47:08.760
<v Speaker 1>that he helps bring some um, some of the passing

0:47:08.800 --> 0:47:12.120
<v Speaker 1>attack that they need to correspond with the running success

0:47:12.239 --> 0:47:14.080
<v Speaker 1>That they've had. And it's not that Jimmy garoppolos bad.

0:47:14.160 --> 0:47:16.920
<v Speaker 1>He's completing sixty percent of his passes. He is a decent,

0:47:17.080 --> 0:47:19.640
<v Speaker 1>not elite, but a decent quarterback waiting for help. This

0:47:19.880 --> 0:47:22.080
<v Speaker 1>is the help that's arriving. And if you look last

0:47:22.160 --> 0:47:26.040
<v Speaker 1>year with Case Keenum as his quarterback in a much

0:47:26.120 --> 0:47:29.680
<v Speaker 1>worse offense, Sanders was a wide receiver to. He finished

0:47:29.680 --> 0:47:31.920
<v Speaker 1>the season as wide receiver twenty in the games that

0:47:32.000 --> 0:47:34.040
<v Speaker 1>he started the twelve games he played in before he

0:47:34.080 --> 0:47:37.200
<v Speaker 1>snapped as Achilles. If he was a wide receiver to

0:47:37.880 --> 0:47:40.960
<v Speaker 1>last year in that offense with Case Keenum, he's a

0:47:41.040 --> 0:47:44.160
<v Speaker 1>wide receiver too in this Kyle Shanahanna offense. But Keenom

0:47:44.239 --> 0:47:47.560
<v Speaker 1>does does use this lot a lot. I was just say,

0:47:47.640 --> 0:47:52.200
<v Speaker 1>Jimmy Garoppolo cans. They've got all those thosemiddling kids that

0:47:52.440 --> 0:47:55.600
<v Speaker 1>just haven't panned out for San Francisco. It's been it's

0:47:55.640 --> 0:48:00.440
<v Speaker 1>been frustrating, all those hopes and dreams like of meddling

0:48:00.560 --> 0:48:04.840
<v Speaker 1>kids from Scooby Doo, middling kids, middling medaling. George Kittle

0:48:04.960 --> 0:48:06.960
<v Speaker 1>speaking with the LS, staying on the forty nine, we

0:48:07.120 --> 0:48:09.240
<v Speaker 1>rarely do the same team twice in our three questions.

0:48:09.360 --> 0:48:12.160
<v Speaker 1>George Kittle has one touchdown in one game with more

0:48:12.239 --> 0:48:16.720
<v Speaker 1>than seventy yards. That's it. Which George Kittle is closer

0:48:16.800 --> 0:48:21.360
<v Speaker 1>to being the real George Kittle the eighteen version or

0:48:21.560 --> 0:48:26.000
<v Speaker 1>the twenty nineteen Virgin Scott stat Wise, it hasn't quite

0:48:26.040 --> 0:48:29.400
<v Speaker 1>been there. But as a player, the version he if

0:48:29.600 --> 0:48:32.080
<v Speaker 1>if you've watched the games, he he's made some great plays.

0:48:32.120 --> 0:48:35.320
<v Speaker 1>He's made some really good place it's just that passing

0:48:35.400 --> 0:48:38.279
<v Speaker 1>offense hasn't hit yet. And with Emmanuel Sanders coming, and

0:48:38.680 --> 0:48:40.760
<v Speaker 1>you know how we like to say, you know, rising

0:48:40.840 --> 0:48:43.160
<v Speaker 1>tide raises all boats. I think it's gonna be better

0:48:43.200 --> 0:48:46.600
<v Speaker 1>for Kittle that one touchdown he has. That's it. That

0:48:46.719 --> 0:48:49.080
<v Speaker 1>regression is coming. Positive regression is coming on there. And

0:48:49.160 --> 0:48:52.840
<v Speaker 1>listen to their schedule against the tight end, Cardinals thirty second,

0:48:52.880 --> 0:48:56.799
<v Speaker 1>Seahawks twenty nine, Cardinals, thirty second, Packers thirty one. He's

0:48:56.840 --> 0:48:58.600
<v Speaker 1>got a couple of tough matchups. But then in your

0:48:58.600 --> 0:49:02.440
<v Speaker 1>fantasy playoffs, he goes back to Falcons and ram against

0:49:02.520 --> 0:49:05.240
<v Speaker 1>the tight end. Okay, so there's a lot of great matchup.

0:49:05.320 --> 0:49:09.400
<v Speaker 1>So you're saying version is the real Matt what do

0:49:09.440 --> 0:49:12.840
<v Speaker 1>you got? I also have the version, because you need

0:49:12.920 --> 0:49:15.480
<v Speaker 1>to remember that Kittle is that two touchdowns called back

0:49:15.520 --> 0:49:18.400
<v Speaker 1>from penalties that were not his fault, one for illegal

0:49:18.520 --> 0:49:21.080
<v Speaker 1>formation where his tackle was lined up too far back,

0:49:21.480 --> 0:49:25.880
<v Speaker 1>one for offensive pass interfere pass interference on his fullback,

0:49:26.120 --> 0:49:29.840
<v Speaker 1>Kyle use Check. Add those thirty yards and two scores

0:49:29.960 --> 0:49:33.960
<v Speaker 1>into his fantasy points, and he's the fifth best tight

0:49:34.080 --> 0:49:37.839
<v Speaker 1>end in the league. He's tied for second in tight

0:49:37.920 --> 0:49:41.120
<v Speaker 1>end touchdowns, and he's fifth best in yards, So I

0:49:41.200 --> 0:49:44.600
<v Speaker 1>mean he's he's fine. San Francisco played last week in

0:49:44.760 --> 0:49:47.799
<v Speaker 1>basically a hurricane quagmire and only put up nine points

0:49:47.800 --> 0:49:51.279
<v Speaker 1>if you take if you take that game out, um,

0:49:51.600 --> 0:49:54.400
<v Speaker 1>San Francisco is the number eight scoring offense, so the

0:49:54.480 --> 0:49:57.960
<v Speaker 1>points are being generated by that offense. They just haven't

0:49:58.040 --> 0:50:01.279
<v Speaker 1>happened to go through the team's best receiving option. It's

0:50:01.320 --> 0:50:02.680
<v Speaker 1>kind of like the other week when we had that

0:50:02.760 --> 0:50:05.040
<v Speaker 1>question about Hopkins and we said the tight ends kept going,

0:50:05.440 --> 0:50:08.240
<v Speaker 1>that Hopkins finally got finally got it. So a positive

0:50:08.280 --> 0:50:12.000
<v Speaker 1>regression is in fact coming for George Kittle. Version is

0:50:12.120 --> 0:50:14.760
<v Speaker 1>the real version. He is not falling off a cliff,

0:50:15.000 --> 0:50:16.719
<v Speaker 1>and I think we're going to see it soon. Tough

0:50:16.880 --> 0:50:22.000
<v Speaker 1>question Number three. Now that Mason Rudolph is back, will

0:50:22.160 --> 0:50:25.600
<v Speaker 1>Juju Smith Schuster most often be a wide receiver one

0:50:25.800 --> 0:50:31.000
<v Speaker 1>a wide receiver to flex or bench matt Um. This

0:50:31.200 --> 0:50:34.400
<v Speaker 1>one was tough. It gave me some temporal lobe damage,

0:50:34.520 --> 0:50:36.320
<v Speaker 1>which is on the side of your brain. Just in

0:50:36.400 --> 0:50:38.920
<v Speaker 1>case you're wondering, I'm pretty sure that that's involved in

0:50:39.040 --> 0:50:42.360
<v Speaker 1>my short term memory, speech, musical rhythm, and some degree

0:50:42.400 --> 0:50:46.359
<v Speaker 1>of smell recognition. What is that? By the way, God,

0:50:46.480 --> 0:50:49.600
<v Speaker 1>is that you know he's not the one playing playing

0:50:49.640 --> 0:50:52.560
<v Speaker 1>the music that you can't recognize if that's what you're asking, Um,

0:50:53.719 --> 0:50:58.760
<v Speaker 1>I can recognize that. Outside of that weird Duck Hodges game. Yeah,

0:51:00.640 --> 0:51:03.960
<v Speaker 1>Juju has been okay, topping seventy five yards are scoring

0:51:03.960 --> 0:51:06.480
<v Speaker 1>in four of the five other games. He's running six

0:51:07.280 --> 0:51:09.560
<v Speaker 1>of his snaps out of the slot, which should keep

0:51:09.600 --> 0:51:11.719
<v Speaker 1>him locked up with lesser corners the rest of the way,

0:51:11.719 --> 0:51:15.040
<v Speaker 1>and there's a lot of good matchups for him, including Miami, Indie,

0:51:15.160 --> 0:51:19.160
<v Speaker 1>Cleveland twice, Arizona, Cincinnati, and the Jets. I feel like

0:51:19.280 --> 0:51:21.440
<v Speaker 1>his image is taking a hit and people are viewing

0:51:21.560 --> 0:51:23.680
<v Speaker 1>him as a wide receiver too right now, but I

0:51:23.760 --> 0:51:25.479
<v Speaker 1>think he has a good chance of returning wide receiver

0:51:25.600 --> 0:51:28.200
<v Speaker 1>one number. So I think he's a good trade candidate. Okay,

0:51:28.239 --> 0:51:30.800
<v Speaker 1>but wide receiver one is your answer question. Okay, just

0:51:30.840 --> 0:51:33.520
<v Speaker 1>want to be clear on that. Scott is Juju Smith

0:51:33.560 --> 0:51:36.680
<v Speaker 1>Schuster a wide receiver one wide receiver to flex or bench.

0:51:37.520 --> 0:51:42.799
<v Speaker 1>I'm going wide receiver to in uh. In the three

0:51:42.920 --> 0:51:47.439
<v Speaker 1>games where he was healthy, he went five, four, three,

0:51:47.960 --> 0:51:51.360
<v Speaker 1>one and seven seven or seven for seventy five, scoring

0:51:51.440 --> 0:51:53.880
<v Speaker 1>in two of them. The other game where he was

0:51:53.960 --> 0:51:56.479
<v Speaker 1>hurt with the toe and and Mason Rudolph even said

0:51:56.480 --> 0:51:58.760
<v Speaker 1>after the game, thanks to the wide receivers for stepping

0:51:58.840 --> 0:52:03.319
<v Speaker 1>up with who heard he played less slaps than normal.

0:52:03.800 --> 0:52:06.479
<v Speaker 1>That was his bad game. His other games seventy plus

0:52:06.520 --> 0:52:09.160
<v Speaker 1>and scored and twice of them twice scored twice out

0:52:09.200 --> 0:52:11.239
<v Speaker 1>of those three. So I'm going wide receiver too. I

0:52:11.320 --> 0:52:14.200
<v Speaker 1>think that's more likely for for the rest of the season. Yeah, Rudolf,

0:52:14.200 --> 0:52:15.239
<v Speaker 1>I don't have a lot to add to what you

0:52:15.320 --> 0:52:18.120
<v Speaker 1>guys had here. Rudolph isn't half bad. He's played two

0:52:18.200 --> 0:52:20.359
<v Speaker 1>full games and long parts of two others. Scored seven

0:52:20.440 --> 0:52:22.640
<v Speaker 1>times in two full games and parts of two others.

0:52:22.719 --> 0:52:25.320
<v Speaker 1>That's that's rock solid numbers right there. And you know,

0:52:25.440 --> 0:52:28.280
<v Speaker 1>just watching him play guy I can play the position.

0:52:28.360 --> 0:52:30.560
<v Speaker 1>I think he's gonna be okay. And you know, the best,

0:52:31.000 --> 0:52:35.040
<v Speaker 1>the best receivers ultimately get fed, and that's Juju. And

0:52:35.120 --> 0:52:37.719
<v Speaker 1>if you're a young quarterback like Mason Rudolph, who better

0:52:37.800 --> 0:52:40.520
<v Speaker 1>to throw the ball to than Juju Smith Schuster. The

0:52:40.640 --> 0:52:42.840
<v Speaker 1>only question is is he a wide receiver one or

0:52:42.880 --> 0:52:44.800
<v Speaker 1>wide receiver two? The rest of the way, I just

0:52:44.960 --> 0:52:47.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, we've not been I like Mason Rudolph, but

0:52:47.160 --> 0:52:49.399
<v Speaker 1>he's not been Roethlisberger. He's not gonna return wide receiver

0:52:49.520 --> 0:52:51.680
<v Speaker 1>one numbers, but I think wide receiver two sounds just

0:52:51.960 --> 0:52:55.440
<v Speaker 1>about perfect. Let's go to our one more matchup for

0:52:55.480 --> 0:52:59.879
<v Speaker 1>this segment, and it is the Jets taking on Jacksonville Sky.

0:53:00.280 --> 0:53:02.839
<v Speaker 1>It's it's gonna take a lot of guts to start

0:53:02.960 --> 0:53:05.279
<v Speaker 1>Jets after the way things have gone, and especially last

0:53:05.320 --> 0:53:08.719
<v Speaker 1>week against the Patriots. But the opportunity here is far better,

0:53:08.960 --> 0:53:10.880
<v Speaker 1>I know, And I told people to pick up Donald

0:53:10.960 --> 0:53:17.040
<v Speaker 1>for after the Patriots' right, I think he's gotten okay

0:53:17.120 --> 0:53:20.280
<v Speaker 1>match up here, but it's it is a really tough start.

0:53:21.080 --> 0:53:22.879
<v Speaker 1>I know that he had trouble last week. He looked

0:53:22.920 --> 0:53:26.800
<v Speaker 1>good at the game before against Dallas. Uh only but

0:53:27.040 --> 0:53:31.200
<v Speaker 1>only one team has allowed uh this sorry, this Jaguars

0:53:31.280 --> 0:53:34.040
<v Speaker 1>team has allowed three hundred plus two both Flacco and Mariota.

0:53:34.400 --> 0:53:36.640
<v Speaker 1>Ken me Thomas to be healthy and he might need

0:53:36.719 --> 0:53:40.520
<v Speaker 1>to lean on Crowder if not. I have a barely

0:53:40.640 --> 0:53:44.760
<v Speaker 1>a C grade on Donald here, so yes, start almost.

0:53:45.160 --> 0:53:47.160
<v Speaker 1>I almost want to bench him, but I'm giving him

0:53:47.160 --> 0:53:48.719
<v Speaker 1>a C grade. I'm trusting it, and then I want

0:53:48.760 --> 0:53:50.560
<v Speaker 1>to start him in a bunch of games going forward.

0:53:51.239 --> 0:53:57.359
<v Speaker 1>Uh Anderson, ah Man, Robbie Anderson, assuming Robbie Anderson does

0:53:57.480 --> 0:54:02.359
<v Speaker 1>not traded on Sunday morning. Yeah, Rob Robbie Anderson. I'm

0:54:02.400 --> 0:54:04.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm probably also starting. It's gonna be a tough one

0:54:04.960 --> 0:54:08.080
<v Speaker 1>against boy. I'm giving him a C grade. Um, but

0:54:08.280 --> 0:54:11.000
<v Speaker 1>he's gonna draw some tough coverage with a J boy.

0:54:11.280 --> 0:54:15.000
<v Speaker 1>I am well, I am probably benching Crowder though, and Thomas.

0:54:15.120 --> 0:54:17.000
<v Speaker 1>I know Donald's gonna get his yards, but it might

0:54:17.400 --> 0:54:19.360
<v Speaker 1>it might be moved around, and it might be some

0:54:19.480 --> 0:54:22.520
<v Speaker 1>of bell Um. The problem with Crowder is his targets

0:54:22.560 --> 0:54:26.000
<v Speaker 1>went from seventeen to nine to five. I know the

0:54:26.120 --> 0:54:30.720
<v Speaker 1>average looks good, but the trend doesn't. But the trend doesn't,

0:54:30.840 --> 0:54:33.640
<v Speaker 1>So I'm benching him, and I'm benching Thomas who is hurt.

0:54:34.280 --> 0:54:38.160
<v Speaker 1>Herndon maybe might not go, but if he does, I'm

0:54:38.400 --> 0:54:41.439
<v Speaker 1>I'm not starting him in his first game. Bell Derrick

0:54:41.480 --> 0:54:43.759
<v Speaker 1>Kennedy's game last year broke the Jaguars. Just in the

0:54:43.840 --> 0:54:46.160
<v Speaker 1>last three three games, the Jags are allowing a hundred

0:54:46.160 --> 0:54:48.439
<v Speaker 1>and fifty eight total yards per game to running backs

0:54:48.920 --> 0:54:51.960
<v Speaker 1>five point eight yards per carry over the last three games.

0:54:52.760 --> 0:54:55.239
<v Speaker 1>Um and that includes a Bengals game where mixing in

0:54:55.360 --> 0:54:58.239
<v Speaker 1>geo combined for eight yards. So somehow the other two

0:54:58.320 --> 0:55:01.920
<v Speaker 1>the beggars of Bengal offensive line couldn't do anything against them.

0:55:02.200 --> 0:55:04.520
<v Speaker 1>But the other games, I have more trust in Bell

0:55:04.560 --> 0:55:06.759
<v Speaker 1>than that. They have allowed a hundred plus total yards

0:55:06.800 --> 0:55:09.000
<v Speaker 1>to running backs in weeks five and seven, and with

0:55:09.080 --> 0:55:11.919
<v Speaker 1>the Jets it's pretty much all Bell, So I'm giving

0:55:11.960 --> 0:55:14.479
<v Speaker 1>him a B grade there. Yeah. On the other side,

0:55:14.719 --> 0:55:18.320
<v Speaker 1>Minshew is getting the bench against the Jets. The lusters

0:55:18.360 --> 0:55:21.040
<v Speaker 1>just kind of come off. He has barely thrown for

0:55:21.080 --> 0:55:25.000
<v Speaker 1>two yards, just one touchdown his last two games. He's

0:55:25.040 --> 0:55:28.680
<v Speaker 1>basically Mitchell Trabiskie now. It's how he's playing, how he's

0:55:28.719 --> 0:55:32.280
<v Speaker 1>playing now. The Jets have only allowed six passing touchdowns

0:55:32.360 --> 0:55:34.480
<v Speaker 1>in six games, and three of those were Tom Brady,

0:55:34.800 --> 0:55:38.279
<v Speaker 1>so so there's not much work there for But I'm

0:55:38.360 --> 0:55:41.160
<v Speaker 1>still giving his main guy, d J. Chark a C grade.

0:55:41.680 --> 0:55:46.000
<v Speaker 1>Um uh Marshawn Lattimore did shut him down, but he'll

0:55:46.040 --> 0:55:48.760
<v Speaker 1>get Tremaine Johnson, who just gave up a score to Dorset.

0:55:49.200 --> 0:55:51.840
<v Speaker 1>I think he might just get enough work. I'm benching

0:55:51.920 --> 0:55:55.759
<v Speaker 1>d d uh four net though a grade here. I

0:55:55.840 --> 0:55:59.520
<v Speaker 1>think it's a smash spot for Leonard four net. Touchdown

0:55:59.560 --> 0:56:01.879
<v Speaker 1>regression is coming in. The Jets have allowed the most

0:56:01.960 --> 0:56:04.760
<v Speaker 1>touchdowns to running backs in the NFL, allowing six different

0:56:04.840 --> 0:56:08.120
<v Speaker 1>running ruining backs to score. He's averaging twenty four point

0:56:08.239 --> 0:56:11.600
<v Speaker 1>six touches per game, but it's just the one touchdown

0:56:12.040 --> 0:56:14.759
<v Speaker 1>top ten and carries inside the ten, but just two

0:56:14.800 --> 0:56:16.960
<v Speaker 1>carries inside the five. If he starts getting that work,

0:56:17.000 --> 0:56:18.680
<v Speaker 1>he's gonna start scoring. And I think that this is

0:56:18.760 --> 0:56:21.120
<v Speaker 1>the spot makes sense. This might be a good time

0:56:21.160 --> 0:56:23.600
<v Speaker 1>to trade for Leonard four net between between now and

0:56:23.760 --> 0:56:26.719
<v Speaker 1>kick off, because I get the feeling that you're right.

0:56:26.800 --> 0:56:28.600
<v Speaker 1>The touchdowns are going to come because of all the

0:56:28.719 --> 0:56:31.279
<v Speaker 1>use and the success he's having everywhere but the end zone.

0:56:31.760 --> 0:56:34.960
<v Speaker 1>It's probably coming. Of course, the groin injuries also probably

0:56:35.000 --> 0:56:37.399
<v Speaker 1>coming for Leonard four net. So there's that. Every week,

0:56:37.480 --> 0:56:39.759
<v Speaker 1>you can play the Crush Charts Championship for free at

0:56:39.800 --> 0:56:42.799
<v Speaker 1>bamball dot com. When you assemble a better salary cap

0:56:42.840 --> 0:56:44.360
<v Speaker 1>team than mind, you get a shot at the week's

0:56:44.400 --> 0:56:48.280
<v Speaker 1>price pool of one thousand dollars. But more importantly, beating

0:56:48.320 --> 0:56:50.359
<v Speaker 1>me is how you get an entry into our week

0:56:50.480 --> 0:56:54.280
<v Speaker 1>seventeen Championship, where you'll battle me for the ten thousand

0:56:54.360 --> 0:56:57.319
<v Speaker 1>dollar grand prize for a fanball dot Com slash chart.

0:56:57.680 --> 0:57:00.440
<v Speaker 1>We'll be back in moments with more matchups and looting

0:57:01.400 --> 0:57:05.879
<v Speaker 1>the Giants taking on Detroit Ken Marvin Jones get even

0:57:05.960 --> 0:57:08.200
<v Speaker 1>one of the four touchdowns he put up last week,

0:57:08.239 --> 0:57:35.880
<v Speaker 1>we'll tell you when we come back. Fantasy Football Weekly returns.

0:57:35.920 --> 0:57:38.600
<v Speaker 1>We're diving back into the matchups. But first, did you

0:57:38.640 --> 0:57:41.520
<v Speaker 1>know you can play super Flex Salary Cap at fan

0:57:41.600 --> 0:57:44.200
<v Speaker 1>ball dot com. If you love starting two quarterbacks, go

0:57:44.320 --> 0:57:47.120
<v Speaker 1>to fanball dot com play our salary Cap DFS game.

0:57:47.280 --> 0:57:50.000
<v Speaker 1>Or if you love starting five wide receivers or four

0:57:50.080 --> 0:57:52.920
<v Speaker 1>tight ends, yeah that too, four running backs. Whenever you

0:57:53.000 --> 0:57:54.960
<v Speaker 1>got a lot of options option we want you to

0:57:54.960 --> 0:57:57.040
<v Speaker 1>play the way you want to play. That's own fall.

0:57:57.560 --> 0:58:00.160
<v Speaker 1>Carolina takes on San Francisco. It's all about career Jim

0:58:00.200 --> 0:58:03.440
<v Speaker 1>McCaffrey in a brutally tough matchup here, Niners run defense

0:58:03.880 --> 0:58:06.480
<v Speaker 1>not quite as nominating as its past defense, but it's

0:58:06.520 --> 0:58:09.440
<v Speaker 1>still very good. Opponents are running at four yards per carry.

0:58:09.760 --> 0:58:12.960
<v Speaker 1>No back has stopped eighty seven rushing yards or thirty

0:58:13.040 --> 0:58:16.080
<v Speaker 1>three passing yards. I get the feeling McCaffrey is so good.

0:58:16.120 --> 0:58:18.400
<v Speaker 1>Maybe he gets the eighty seven rushing yards and the

0:58:18.480 --> 0:58:20.400
<v Speaker 1>thirty three receiving yards, which you give him a hundred

0:58:20.440 --> 0:58:25.120
<v Speaker 1>yard game, and of particular salience to McCaffrey. Niners ranked

0:58:25.200 --> 0:58:28.720
<v Speaker 1>number one against running back receptions, number one against running

0:58:28.760 --> 0:58:32.760
<v Speaker 1>back receiving yards, number one against running back receiving touchdowns

0:58:32.880 --> 0:58:38.040
<v Speaker 1>with zero I gotta have a B grade a McCaffrey

0:58:38.160 --> 0:58:39.760
<v Speaker 1>center with the guts to give him a C grade

0:58:39.760 --> 0:58:43.040
<v Speaker 1>because he's just so good. But it's a brutal matchup.

0:58:43.880 --> 0:58:45.840
<v Speaker 1>All of the passing game is on the bench. Only

0:58:45.880 --> 0:58:49.080
<v Speaker 1>the Patriots have allowed fewer fantasy points to passers than

0:58:49.120 --> 0:58:51.560
<v Speaker 1>the Niners. They ranked number one in passing yards, allowed

0:58:51.960 --> 0:58:55.440
<v Speaker 1>one hundred fifty five passing yards per game. They're allowing

0:58:55.880 --> 0:59:00.400
<v Speaker 1>zero point eight passing touchdowns per game. That's it. And

0:59:00.520 --> 0:59:03.919
<v Speaker 1>get this, I can't even believe this stat. The last

0:59:04.080 --> 0:59:07.680
<v Speaker 1>three quarterbacks to face the Niners have thrown for one

0:59:07.880 --> 0:59:12.480
<v Speaker 1>hundred yards or less three straight How do you do that?

0:59:13.440 --> 0:59:16.120
<v Speaker 1>It's It's nuts. So Kyle Allen in the whole passing

0:59:16.160 --> 0:59:18.480
<v Speaker 1>game on the bench. Let's go to the San Francisco

0:59:18.560 --> 0:59:20.600
<v Speaker 1>side instead, where things are a little bit more interesting,

0:59:20.720 --> 0:59:23.120
<v Speaker 1>and beginning with the running backs. Tevin Coleman gets a

0:59:23.200 --> 0:59:26.280
<v Speaker 1>B grade. Here, forts continue to lead the NFL in

0:59:26.480 --> 0:59:29.960
<v Speaker 1>run ratio, and since Coleman's returned from injury, he's the

0:59:30.080 --> 0:59:33.200
<v Speaker 1>only Niners back with a carry inside the five yard line.

0:59:33.480 --> 0:59:36.600
<v Speaker 1>He will get the touchdowns that are to be had here. Meanwhile,

0:59:36.640 --> 0:59:39.360
<v Speaker 1>the Panthers have been very yielding inside the five yard line.

0:59:39.520 --> 0:59:42.960
<v Speaker 1>They've given up six touchdowns on nine carries from inside

0:59:43.000 --> 0:59:45.520
<v Speaker 1>the five. I liked Tevin Coleman with a B grade.

0:59:45.760 --> 0:59:48.320
<v Speaker 1>Matt Brita gets a C grade. He'll have to score

0:59:48.360 --> 0:59:51.960
<v Speaker 1>from distance. Conversely, then, his snaps have decreased each week

0:59:52.080 --> 0:59:54.360
<v Speaker 1>over the last month, which is troubling to me because

0:59:54.400 --> 0:59:57.440
<v Speaker 1>Brita is good. He'll need to score from distance. As

0:59:57.440 --> 1:00:00.560
<v Speaker 1>I mentioned both the Rams and Texans. Dams had at

1:00:00.640 --> 1:00:03.600
<v Speaker 1>least fifty rushing yards against Carolina, and maybe that's the

1:00:03.680 --> 1:00:05.720
<v Speaker 1>case here. So maybe we get the fifty ish rushing

1:00:05.800 --> 1:00:08.960
<v Speaker 1>yards and maybe Brita breaks one. Maybe C grade on

1:00:09.080 --> 1:00:12.520
<v Speaker 1>Matt Brita. Let's go to the passing game. Last time

1:00:12.560 --> 1:00:15.480
<v Speaker 1>we saw the Panthers, they were picking off Jameis Winston

1:00:15.600 --> 1:00:19.440
<v Speaker 1>five times. Last time we saw Garoppolo, he was slogging

1:00:19.480 --> 1:00:22.280
<v Speaker 1>through a monsoon in Washington and hadn't thrown a touchdown

1:00:22.320 --> 1:00:25.400
<v Speaker 1>in two games. I think it's your second quarterback. I

1:00:25.480 --> 1:00:27.600
<v Speaker 1>like Jimmy Garoppolo. I've got a C grade on him

1:00:27.640 --> 1:00:30.840
<v Speaker 1>here with a low ceiling. Panthers have allowed four hundred

1:00:31.280 --> 1:00:34.320
<v Speaker 1>and three hundred seventy four passing yards the past two weeks.

1:00:34.560 --> 1:00:36.720
<v Speaker 1>That's a lot of passing yards. So if he can

1:00:36.800 --> 1:00:40.400
<v Speaker 1>get the repetitions, I like Garoppolo here, but he never

1:00:40.520 --> 1:00:42.720
<v Speaker 1>gets that much work and that's the whole problem for him,

1:00:42.800 --> 1:00:47.040
<v Speaker 1>his volume opposing every opposing quarterback has scored against the Panthers.

1:00:47.160 --> 1:00:51.320
<v Speaker 1>I think he gets one ish touch down in this game.

1:00:51.640 --> 1:00:54.920
<v Speaker 1>We talked about Emmanuel Sanders in detail uh in the

1:00:55.080 --> 1:00:59.800
<v Speaker 1>in the previous segment, Broncos were running a Shanahan style system.

1:00:59.880 --> 1:01:01.760
<v Speaker 1>I think he gets enough us here that you can

1:01:01.840 --> 1:01:04.000
<v Speaker 1>consider him as a dart throw, but he won't be

1:01:04.080 --> 1:01:06.720
<v Speaker 1>on the field every play. And maybe the bigger issue

1:01:06.760 --> 1:01:09.720
<v Speaker 1>here is that elite cornerback James Bradberry could end up

1:01:09.760 --> 1:01:13.760
<v Speaker 1>shadowing Sanders because why not, who else are you gonna shadow?

1:01:14.160 --> 1:01:16.320
<v Speaker 1>And Bradbury hasn't a lot of touchdown and is giving

1:01:16.360 --> 1:01:20.080
<v Speaker 1>up a passer rating of forty two his coverage that

1:01:20.280 --> 1:01:22.400
<v Speaker 1>is nothing. So in fact, you know what, let's put

1:01:22.400 --> 1:01:24.600
<v Speaker 1>Sanders on the bench. I'm changing my mind. George Kittle

1:01:24.640 --> 1:01:27.680
<v Speaker 1>gets a B tough draw though he hasn't Caroline has

1:01:27.720 --> 1:01:30.800
<v Speaker 1>not allowed more than four catches or fifty seven yards

1:01:30.880 --> 1:01:34.000
<v Speaker 1>to any tight end this year, Panthers allowing just three

1:01:34.080 --> 1:01:36.840
<v Speaker 1>and thirty seven to the position on a per game basis.

1:01:38.200 --> 1:01:40.040
<v Speaker 1>That said, Caroline isn't facing a good tight ends and

1:01:40.040 --> 1:01:42.480
<v Speaker 1>certainly nobody a Kittles level either, So maybe they can

1:01:42.560 --> 1:01:44.560
<v Speaker 1>get something done after all, And I'm keeping him up

1:01:44.640 --> 1:01:48.280
<v Speaker 1>as a B grade because George Kettle is good. The

1:01:48.400 --> 1:01:52.360
<v Speaker 1>Giants take on Detroit, Matt and Daniel Jones coming off

1:01:52.480 --> 1:01:55.920
<v Speaker 1>a lousy game. Last time we saw him do you

1:01:56.000 --> 1:01:59.320
<v Speaker 1>like him better here against the Lions. I mean the

1:01:59.400 --> 1:02:01.640
<v Speaker 1>Lions deep it hasn't been very good and they did

1:02:01.800 --> 1:02:06.760
<v Speaker 1>just trade starting safety Quandre Digs to the Seahawks earlier

1:02:06.840 --> 1:02:09.440
<v Speaker 1>this week, so that bodes well for Daniel Jones. But

1:02:09.480 --> 1:02:12.120
<v Speaker 1>I can probably still only give him a C grade. UM.

1:02:12.280 --> 1:02:14.520
<v Speaker 1>I am giving Golden Tate to the B grade in

1:02:14.560 --> 1:02:18.240
<v Speaker 1>the revenge game, his first return to Ford Field. The

1:02:18.360 --> 1:02:21.320
<v Speaker 1>Vikings receivers put up two seven yards and two touchdowns

1:02:21.440 --> 1:02:24.400
<v Speaker 1>last week against the secondary. Tate has turned in back

1:02:24.480 --> 1:02:27.640
<v Speaker 1>to back six catch performances, topping eight yards in each

1:02:27.720 --> 1:02:30.080
<v Speaker 1>contest and adding a score in there. And with Sterling

1:02:30.120 --> 1:02:33.120
<v Speaker 1>Shepherd trending toward missing another week, Tate is in line

1:02:33.160 --> 1:02:35.080
<v Speaker 1>to lead the way as the favorite target of Daniel

1:02:35.160 --> 1:02:39.000
<v Speaker 1>Jones again. Plus Lion slot corner Justin Coleman has allowed

1:02:39.040 --> 1:02:42.520
<v Speaker 1>a league high five touchdowns in his coverage this year. UM,

1:02:43.200 --> 1:02:46.520
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to see Darius Slayton go against Darius slay

1:02:47.040 --> 1:02:51.880
<v Speaker 1>On both Darius is by the way, UM, but it

1:02:51.960 --> 1:02:53.919
<v Speaker 1>doesn't look like Darius slay is going to go. In fact,

1:02:53.960 --> 1:02:57.080
<v Speaker 1>I believe he has been ruled out. It's a huge

1:02:57.120 --> 1:02:59.920
<v Speaker 1>loss for that secondary. Slay by far their best cornerback,

1:03:00.120 --> 1:03:02.440
<v Speaker 1>and you saw what happened with Stefon Diggs once Sleigh

1:03:02.520 --> 1:03:05.400
<v Speaker 1>left the game last week, Diggs eight that secondary alive.

1:03:05.520 --> 1:03:08.520
<v Speaker 1>The problem is is Slaton only had two targets last week,

1:03:08.560 --> 1:03:10.040
<v Speaker 1>and I'm just nervous that he won't be part of

1:03:10.080 --> 1:03:12.280
<v Speaker 1>the game plan. Se Kuon Barkley gets an A and

1:03:12.360 --> 1:03:14.960
<v Speaker 1>their last three contest the Lions have allowed an average

1:03:15.000 --> 1:03:18.000
<v Speaker 1>of nearly one thirty rushing yards and forty four receiving

1:03:18.040 --> 1:03:22.200
<v Speaker 1>yards and seven running back touchdowns in three weeks. Dan

1:03:23.680 --> 1:03:27.160
<v Speaker 1>is gonna eat this week. Uh that that great rush

1:03:27.280 --> 1:03:29.720
<v Speaker 1>defense for the Detroit Lions is no more? Uh? I

1:03:29.760 --> 1:03:31.880
<v Speaker 1>forgot to mention Evan Ingram, who gets an A. Lines

1:03:31.920 --> 1:03:33.640
<v Speaker 1>have allowed over a hundred yards per game to the

1:03:33.680 --> 1:03:35.880
<v Speaker 1>tight end position over the last three weeks. I don't

1:03:35.880 --> 1:03:39.560
<v Speaker 1>think you forgot. You just saved the best some eight

1:03:39.600 --> 1:03:42.200
<v Speaker 1>grades there. Um. On the other side, I talked about

1:03:42.280 --> 1:03:44.200
<v Speaker 1>j D. Mckissic as might take a chance on me

1:03:44.360 --> 1:03:47.080
<v Speaker 1>running back. Let's talk about Ty Johnson, who I'm giving

1:03:47.120 --> 1:03:50.760
<v Speaker 1>a C grade two. Fair warning, the Lions aren't a

1:03:50.840 --> 1:03:54.320
<v Speaker 1>good running team. Despite Darryl Bevel being there with carry on,

1:03:54.560 --> 1:03:57.480
<v Speaker 1>they only averaged three point seven yards per carry as

1:03:57.520 --> 1:04:00.480
<v Speaker 1>a group and only had two rushing touchdowns on the season,

1:04:00.840 --> 1:04:02.880
<v Speaker 1>and when carry On went on, I r last year,

1:04:03.600 --> 1:04:07.000
<v Speaker 1>La Garrett Blunt, Zack Zenter and theo Ritic each had

1:04:07.080 --> 1:04:10.440
<v Speaker 1>double digit touches in games. Over the final six weeks

1:04:10.760 --> 1:04:13.120
<v Speaker 1>they went to a time share. I think that's what's

1:04:13.120 --> 1:04:15.760
<v Speaker 1>gonna happen again. If you're buying in on Tie being

1:04:15.800 --> 1:04:18.840
<v Speaker 1>a pseudo bell cow, this would be a great place

1:04:18.920 --> 1:04:21.200
<v Speaker 1>to play him, as the Giants have allowed two leadbacks

1:04:21.240 --> 1:04:24.120
<v Speaker 1>to top rushing yards in the last three weeks. But

1:04:24.200 --> 1:04:27.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm not buying in that. He's the lead dog here,

1:04:27.080 --> 1:04:29.920
<v Speaker 1>so he only gets a C grade. Matthew Stafford is

1:04:29.920 --> 1:04:32.480
<v Speaker 1>getting a B. He was dealing last week against the Vikings,

1:04:32.560 --> 1:04:35.800
<v Speaker 1>going for three sixty four and four. Normally we don't

1:04:35.840 --> 1:04:38.520
<v Speaker 1>advise you to chase numbers, but the lines just continued

1:04:38.560 --> 1:04:40.800
<v Speaker 1>to pass after Carryon went out with the injury, and

1:04:40.880 --> 1:04:43.240
<v Speaker 1>the Giants have allowed four different quarterbacks to top the

1:04:43.280 --> 1:04:45.960
<v Speaker 1>three yard mark this season. Thank Stafford's in line for

1:04:46.000 --> 1:04:48.720
<v Speaker 1>a good game. His main target last week was Marvin Jones,

1:04:48.760 --> 1:04:51.400
<v Speaker 1>who had four touchdowns. I'm giving him a B grade,

1:04:51.640 --> 1:04:54.640
<v Speaker 1>and jones last four touchdown game was the historic John

1:04:54.680 --> 1:04:57.600
<v Speaker 1>Tuvey take a chance on me moment in October of

1:04:59.720 --> 1:05:02.240
<v Speaker 1>Maybe it's worth noting that he followed up that October

1:05:03.080 --> 1:05:05.280
<v Speaker 1>game with a four catch for sixty six yards the

1:05:05.280 --> 1:05:09.280
<v Speaker 1>following leg but it's probably not worth it. Um square

1:05:09.320 --> 1:05:13.400
<v Speaker 1>off against the giants best cornerback option, Generous Jenkins, But

1:05:13.720 --> 1:05:16.400
<v Speaker 1>Jenkins has allowed three touchdowns in his coverage this season,

1:05:16.440 --> 1:05:18.920
<v Speaker 1>so Jones just been awful. He's just the best of

1:05:19.000 --> 1:05:21.640
<v Speaker 1>the world. He's the best of the lousiest, kind of

1:05:21.680 --> 1:05:24.640
<v Speaker 1>like the common man, you know, um Kenny Golladay. I'm

1:05:24.640 --> 1:05:26.080
<v Speaker 1>giving him an A grade, though it's gonna be a

1:05:26.120 --> 1:05:28.720
<v Speaker 1>big bounce back weak for Golliday after it disappointing two

1:05:28.800 --> 1:05:32.200
<v Speaker 1>targets against the Vikings. He faces quite possibly the worst

1:05:32.280 --> 1:05:35.800
<v Speaker 1>cover corner in the NFL. That's DeAndre Baker, who's already

1:05:35.800 --> 1:05:38.160
<v Speaker 1>allowed four d nine yards and three touches in his

1:05:38.240 --> 1:05:40.720
<v Speaker 1>coverage of this season. Both of those marks are bottom

1:05:40.840 --> 1:05:44.120
<v Speaker 1>six in the league. Finally, t J. Hockenson gets a

1:05:44.320 --> 1:05:46.680
<v Speaker 1>C grade, and it's not a really great C grade.

1:05:47.000 --> 1:05:50.240
<v Speaker 1>Hasn't topped four catches or thirty two yards since Week one.

1:05:50.720 --> 1:05:53.880
<v Speaker 1>Remember the Week one t J. Hockenson where Pipe Ben

1:05:55.080 --> 1:05:57.800
<v Speaker 1>it's been gone. The Giants haven't allowed a tight end

1:05:57.880 --> 1:06:01.120
<v Speaker 1>score since Week two, so he's pretty much a bench

1:06:01.200 --> 1:06:04.640
<v Speaker 1>and less sorely needed. Yeah, we talked earlier about some

1:06:04.760 --> 1:06:07.200
<v Speaker 1>of the tight end options you could go with. Cameron

1:06:07.280 --> 1:06:12.080
<v Speaker 1>Bright is probably a better play in all probability. Uh,

1:06:12.360 --> 1:06:15.680
<v Speaker 1>let's um, let's see would sneak in one more matchup

1:06:15.720 --> 1:06:18.520
<v Speaker 1>into this segment. Cleveland taking on New England. It's really

1:06:18.560 --> 1:06:21.320
<v Speaker 1>it's a must win game from a record standpoint for Cleveland,

1:06:21.400 --> 1:06:22.880
<v Speaker 1>which comes at a really bad times. They got the

1:06:22.920 --> 1:06:26.280
<v Speaker 1>Patriots coming. Yeah, exactly. Basically the whole Cleveland team is

1:06:26.320 --> 1:06:29.280
<v Speaker 1>on the bench against the Uh, there's one I'm gonna start,

1:06:29.360 --> 1:06:33.880
<v Speaker 1>but against this, right it is? It is? Yeah, Mayfield,

1:06:33.920 --> 1:06:35.560
<v Speaker 1>you'd only play if you're in like some kind of

1:06:35.640 --> 1:06:38.880
<v Speaker 1>race to the bottom league leading interception league. O. B

1:06:39.040 --> 1:06:41.360
<v Speaker 1>J is gonna face Gilmore. He at thirty eight yards

1:06:41.480 --> 1:06:44.160
<v Speaker 1>last time against Gilmore. No wide receiver to face Gilmore

1:06:44.200 --> 1:06:46.400
<v Speaker 1>has finished as a top twenty four wide receiver this year,

1:06:46.480 --> 1:06:49.800
<v Speaker 1>and he shadows every opposing team receiver. Right but chub

1:06:50.240 --> 1:06:52.880
<v Speaker 1>New England very very tough against the run, fewest rush

1:06:52.920 --> 1:06:56.360
<v Speaker 1>attempts allowed, hasn't allowed of running back, touchdown, etcetera, etcetera.

1:06:56.400 --> 1:06:58.560
<v Speaker 1>But Chup's getting the ball twenty two times a game.

1:06:59.040 --> 1:07:01.520
<v Speaker 1>He's probably going to be a C start on volume alone,

1:07:01.520 --> 1:07:04.560
<v Speaker 1>he's gonna make a little bit of something happen. He's

1:07:04.640 --> 1:07:07.200
<v Speaker 1>one of the better backs. They probably the best back

1:07:07.320 --> 1:07:10.480
<v Speaker 1>that they will if that's true. On the other side, Brady,

1:07:10.520 --> 1:07:13.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm given a B grade that he's averaging thirty nine

1:07:13.280 --> 1:07:16.800
<v Speaker 1>pass attempts per game. It's hard and they're never behind.

1:07:17.080 --> 1:07:20.040
<v Speaker 1>That's the funny thing. That's what's Yeah, it's crazy. The

1:07:20.200 --> 1:07:25.919
<v Speaker 1>Patriots never need to pass ever, and they're passing times

1:07:25.960 --> 1:07:28.800
<v Speaker 1>a game. Their offense is just always on the field

1:07:28.800 --> 1:07:32.240
<v Speaker 1>because of that defense. Luke falk is the only quarterback

1:07:32.280 --> 1:07:35.880
<v Speaker 1>who didn't throw multiple touchdowns against the brown seemed to

1:07:35.920 --> 1:07:38.800
<v Speaker 1>be bringing up up a lot um, so I gotta

1:07:38.800 --> 1:07:41.880
<v Speaker 1>be grade on Brady Edelman questionable with the chest injury,

1:07:41.960 --> 1:07:44.560
<v Speaker 1>should go seeing nearly ten targets per games, so I'm

1:07:44.560 --> 1:07:47.000
<v Speaker 1>giving him an A grade. Only two wide receivers had

1:07:47.040 --> 1:07:48.960
<v Speaker 1>nine or more targets against the Browns. They both went

1:07:49.000 --> 1:07:51.920
<v Speaker 1>over a hundred, So I like Edelman the rest of

1:07:51.920 --> 1:07:54.440
<v Speaker 1>the wide receivers, especially now with some new there, I'm

1:07:54.520 --> 1:07:56.280
<v Speaker 1>kind of benching. I'm not sure where it's gonna go.

1:07:57.080 --> 1:08:01.520
<v Speaker 1>Williams comes backward, Award comes back, Yeah, exactly, that really

1:08:01.600 --> 1:08:04.240
<v Speaker 1>changes things. Watson saw five targets last week, but I

1:08:04.480 --> 1:08:06.320
<v Speaker 1>don't know if that's going to stay consistent. But the

1:08:06.440 --> 1:08:09.480
<v Speaker 1>running backs A grade from Michelle, B grade for White.

1:08:09.520 --> 1:08:11.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry, I guess who leads the NFL and carries

1:08:11.880 --> 1:08:15.320
<v Speaker 1>inside the five. That's Tony Michelle, because that's the only

1:08:15.360 --> 1:08:19.000
<v Speaker 1>thing he can do is score from the one. He's trustworthy,

1:08:19.960 --> 1:08:23.080
<v Speaker 1>so trustworthy. Over the last three weeks, the Brown said

1:08:23.120 --> 1:08:26.559
<v Speaker 1>the worst run defense against fantasy running backs, second most attempts,

1:08:26.640 --> 1:08:28.920
<v Speaker 1>most trusting yards, most total yards in the league's worst

1:08:29.040 --> 1:08:32.320
<v Speaker 1>six point two yards per gary. Over that span, they

1:08:32.320 --> 1:08:34.439
<v Speaker 1>have allowed four running back touchdowns over that spent there's

1:08:34.439 --> 1:08:38.000
<v Speaker 1>still over five yards per carry on the season. And White, Uh,

1:08:38.120 --> 1:08:41.120
<v Speaker 1>he's second in receptions in the NFL behind Michael Thomas.

1:08:41.280 --> 1:08:44.840
<v Speaker 1>Right now, he's getting so much work. Nine targets of game.

1:08:44.880 --> 1:08:46.280
<v Speaker 1>So I have a B grade on him. Yeah. I

1:08:46.360 --> 1:08:48.519
<v Speaker 1>like that angle right there. That's that makes a ton

1:08:48.560 --> 1:08:51.120
<v Speaker 1>of sense. Our final topics are ahead. When we provide

1:08:51.160 --> 1:08:54.479
<v Speaker 1>you with three guys we believe will be hot waiver

1:08:54.560 --> 1:08:58.200
<v Speaker 1>wire pickups next week that you will want to grab

1:08:58.840 --> 1:09:02.600
<v Speaker 1>this week, whether you're ready for it or not. Premature

1:09:02.800 --> 1:09:34.960
<v Speaker 1>Speculation coming up next Fantasy Football Weekly. Welcome back Fantasy

1:09:35.000 --> 1:09:39.000
<v Speaker 1>Football Weekly. Remember all my player rankings available for free

1:09:39.040 --> 1:09:42.599
<v Speaker 1>at fanball dot com slash Charch, and you can play

1:09:42.640 --> 1:09:45.080
<v Speaker 1>against me for free for your share of our one

1:09:45.120 --> 1:09:48.439
<v Speaker 1>thousand dollar prize pool in the crush Charch Championship against

1:09:48.439 --> 1:09:52.720
<v Speaker 1>fanball dot Com slash Chart. Premature Speculation is probably the

1:09:52.800 --> 1:09:56.080
<v Speaker 1>most popular segment on the entire show. Each of our

1:09:56.120 --> 1:09:58.120
<v Speaker 1>hosts will provide a player who will be a hot

1:09:58.200 --> 1:10:00.720
<v Speaker 1>waiver wire pick up next we that you will want

1:10:00.720 --> 1:10:04.840
<v Speaker 1>to go get this week to frustrate those owners who

1:10:04.880 --> 1:10:07.800
<v Speaker 1>are a little behind the curve. They're trying to pick

1:10:07.840 --> 1:10:13.759
<v Speaker 1>that guy up and blammo, he's already on your team

1:10:14.040 --> 1:10:16.680
<v Speaker 1>because you use our time machine. Do we need to

1:10:17.120 --> 1:10:20.600
<v Speaker 1>say and do the time machine? Yeah? I think that

1:10:20.680 --> 1:10:26.439
<v Speaker 1>helps if you don't mind doing both. Let's begin with Matt,

1:10:26.479 --> 1:10:32.080
<v Speaker 1>who's your premature speculation player. Going back to Ted Gain again,

1:10:33.120 --> 1:10:36.000
<v Speaker 1>He's got a really good matchup this week against the Cardinals,

1:10:36.080 --> 1:10:38.400
<v Speaker 1>which I might have mentioned before, so people might wise

1:10:38.479 --> 1:10:40.759
<v Speaker 1>up to him if he goes off in this game. However,

1:10:42.040 --> 1:10:44.280
<v Speaker 1>he's going into a bye week next week, so you

1:10:44.360 --> 1:10:45.920
<v Speaker 1>might even be able to pick him up next week.

1:10:46.439 --> 1:10:48.600
<v Speaker 1>That should suppress his ownership just a little bit. But

1:10:48.720 --> 1:10:54.280
<v Speaker 1>after that his ownerships already pretty it's some ninety So

1:10:54.520 --> 1:10:56.439
<v Speaker 1>after that he gets Drew Brees back, and then he

1:10:56.520 --> 1:11:02.800
<v Speaker 1>has four straight quality matchups Atlanta, Tampa Carolina, then Atlanta again,

1:11:03.280 --> 1:11:06.400
<v Speaker 1>plus a week fifteen matchup against the Colts. That's a

1:11:06.439 --> 1:11:09.479
<v Speaker 1>fantasy playoff one there. The Colts having farewell against the

1:11:09.520 --> 1:11:11.920
<v Speaker 1>past either, especially against wide receivers. So it's kind of

1:11:12.000 --> 1:11:14.640
<v Speaker 1>a nice little speculative ad. I mean, if you get

1:11:14.680 --> 1:11:16.680
<v Speaker 1>Michael Thomas in a trade, that's great, But if you

1:11:16.760 --> 1:11:21.400
<v Speaker 1>can't get Gas free, Ted Gins free. Yeah, alright, uh,

1:11:21.640 --> 1:11:26.320
<v Speaker 1>let's let's go to Scott Fish, your premature speculation player. Sure,

1:11:26.520 --> 1:11:29.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm going with Jalen Samuel's. He was supposed to be

1:11:29.360 --> 1:11:31.559
<v Speaker 1>out for four to six weeks with the knee injury.

1:11:31.960 --> 1:11:35.320
<v Speaker 1>He practiced in full on Thursday and Friday. He has

1:11:35.400 --> 1:11:38.439
<v Speaker 1>Miami on Monday night, and if he does anything against Miami,

1:11:38.920 --> 1:11:41.479
<v Speaker 1>everybody's gonna try to pick him up next week. And

1:11:41.880 --> 1:11:44.400
<v Speaker 1>by the way, the number two running back always does

1:11:44.520 --> 1:11:49.000
<v Speaker 1>something against Miami exactly, and James Connor h illness week one,

1:11:49.320 --> 1:11:52.080
<v Speaker 1>knee injury, weeks two through three, ankle injury weeks fourth

1:11:52.120 --> 1:11:56.320
<v Speaker 1>through five, quad injury weeks three. At some point one

1:11:56.400 --> 1:11:58.559
<v Speaker 1>of these might catch up with him, and Jalen Samuels

1:11:58.640 --> 1:12:00.519
<v Speaker 1>might be your starter for Pittsburgh, So you get the

1:12:00.600 --> 1:12:03.400
<v Speaker 1>Miami matchup if you do it now, like before people

1:12:03.479 --> 1:12:07.240
<v Speaker 1>realize he's healthy again. Earlier in this show, what did

1:12:07.280 --> 1:12:11.240
<v Speaker 1>you tell our listeners about Gardner Minshew Scott He's starting

1:12:11.280 --> 1:12:13.880
<v Speaker 1>to turn into Mitch Robisky map or he's pump He's

1:12:13.920 --> 1:12:17.559
<v Speaker 1>pumpkin ing on pumpkin in on us right now, right

1:12:17.640 --> 1:12:22.280
<v Speaker 1>Gardner Minshew is turning into Gardner Minshew. Nick Foles returning

1:12:22.360 --> 1:12:25.960
<v Speaker 1>to practice. If you now, I know, I know that

1:12:26.080 --> 1:12:27.720
<v Speaker 1>if you're in a one quarterback league, you don't have

1:12:27.760 --> 1:12:29.080
<v Speaker 1>to go all the way down to Nick Foles or

1:12:29.120 --> 1:12:32.519
<v Speaker 1>Gardner Minshew. But increasingly we're playing QB flex from playing

1:12:32.520 --> 1:12:36.320
<v Speaker 1>in two quarterback leagues. Nick Foles has returned. The timetable

1:12:36.439 --> 1:12:38.920
<v Speaker 1>is approaching right now, and if Minshew is going to

1:12:38.960 --> 1:12:41.360
<v Speaker 1>continue to look like a backup, I think Nick Foles

1:12:41.400 --> 1:12:43.320
<v Speaker 1>is gonna be your starter before long Nick Foles won

1:12:43.400 --> 1:12:45.880
<v Speaker 1>the Super Bowl? Did he really? I would love to

1:12:45.920 --> 1:12:48.160
<v Speaker 1>hear all about that. I saw it. It was cool,

1:12:48.360 --> 1:12:50.760
<v Speaker 1>It was it cool. I watched that game too. A

1:12:50.840 --> 1:12:54.080
<v Speaker 1>lot of people watch that game. Was there? It was okay?

1:12:55.080 --> 1:12:58.679
<v Speaker 1>Had you enjoyed watching the Eagles score in the Viking Stadium?

1:12:58.720 --> 1:13:01.000
<v Speaker 1>After the Eagles knocked the Viking out of the playoffs.

1:13:01.120 --> 1:13:05.200
<v Speaker 1>We got revenge on him last week. That makes up

1:13:05.240 --> 1:13:07.400
<v Speaker 1>for it. I'm sure. Let's get back to our matchups,

1:13:07.520 --> 1:13:11.599
<v Speaker 1>beginning with Green Bay taking on the Kansas City Chiefs.

1:13:11.640 --> 1:13:14.080
<v Speaker 1>That is me so get this. Patrick Mahomes is out

1:13:14.120 --> 1:13:16.680
<v Speaker 1>of this game. But also for the Chiefs, out of

1:13:16.760 --> 1:13:19.920
<v Speaker 1>this game two member to two best members of their

1:13:19.960 --> 1:13:24.719
<v Speaker 1>defensive line, Frank Clark and Chris Jones. Also, they're starting

1:13:24.760 --> 1:13:28.320
<v Speaker 1>cornerback Kendall Fuller. Also they're starting left tackle Eric Fisher.

1:13:28.439 --> 1:13:31.479
<v Speaker 1>Also they're starting left guard Andrew Wiley. I thought for

1:13:31.560 --> 1:13:34.640
<v Speaker 1>sure those guys, the two offensive linement would be back

1:13:34.680 --> 1:13:37.920
<v Speaker 1>after the ten days off. No dice. That has really

1:13:38.040 --> 1:13:42.040
<v Speaker 1>suppressed the outcome and the of what's going to happen.

1:13:42.080 --> 1:13:44.400
<v Speaker 1>I think for the Chiefs, and I like the Packers

1:13:44.439 --> 1:13:46.640
<v Speaker 1>a lot more. Let's start on the Packers side with

1:13:46.720 --> 1:13:50.000
<v Speaker 1>this where I've got a B grade on Aaron Rodgers. Now,

1:13:50.040 --> 1:13:51.840
<v Speaker 1>I know he had six touchdowns last week, and so

1:13:51.920 --> 1:13:54.120
<v Speaker 1>you're automatically thinking about why wouldn't be an A grade.

1:13:54.720 --> 1:13:59.240
<v Speaker 1>But as a reminder, before the six touchdown game in

1:13:59.360 --> 1:14:02.599
<v Speaker 1>the eleven than games before that, he was averaging one

1:14:02.640 --> 1:14:07.000
<v Speaker 1>point two touchdown passes. It's very unlikely Davante Adams goes

1:14:07.040 --> 1:14:09.439
<v Speaker 1>in this one. He is doubtful for this game. So

1:14:09.640 --> 1:14:11.519
<v Speaker 1>I'm still showing a little bit of caution your plus,

1:14:12.360 --> 1:14:15.679
<v Speaker 1>five of the seven opposing quarterbacks to face Kansas City

1:14:16.080 --> 1:14:19.920
<v Speaker 1>have thrown zero or one touchdown. Five out of seven.

1:14:20.680 --> 1:14:24.439
<v Speaker 1>Nobody has top two yards since the opener. I think

1:14:24.479 --> 1:14:25.800
<v Speaker 1>you're you know, you're gonna have to make It's a

1:14:25.840 --> 1:14:27.840
<v Speaker 1>Sunday night game. You're gonna have to make your decision

1:14:27.880 --> 1:14:30.200
<v Speaker 1>on Rodgers before you have a final word, probably on

1:14:30.280 --> 1:14:32.120
<v Speaker 1>Davante Adams, but you can presume he's not gonna know.

1:14:32.560 --> 1:14:34.320
<v Speaker 1>I think the game script here is also gonna point

1:14:34.360 --> 1:14:36.720
<v Speaker 1>towards the Runners, and so just the B grade on

1:14:36.760 --> 1:14:38.960
<v Speaker 1>Aaron Rodgers, which I know is going to frustrate some people.

1:14:39.280 --> 1:14:42.400
<v Speaker 1>Marquez Valdes Scantling gets a B grade. As well as

1:14:42.439 --> 1:14:44.200
<v Speaker 1>one of the fastest players in the league. You saw

1:14:44.240 --> 1:14:47.040
<v Speaker 1>that long distance touchdown the seventy five yard or last week.

1:14:47.520 --> 1:14:52.200
<v Speaker 1>Um I like his frequent matchup against stone footed cornerback,

1:14:52.360 --> 1:14:55.960
<v Speaker 1>but Shod Breland Scaling is a four three guy, Brian

1:14:56.240 --> 1:14:58.799
<v Speaker 1>a four six guy. There are many four six cornerbacks

1:14:58.840 --> 1:15:01.080
<v Speaker 1>even in the league. And also Breedland, by the way,

1:15:01.160 --> 1:15:04.840
<v Speaker 1>ranks one first at his position by Pro Football Focus.

1:15:05.240 --> 1:15:12.120
<v Speaker 1>Marques Valdez Scantling also getting a starting grade. Geronimo Allison.

1:15:12.479 --> 1:15:15.880
<v Speaker 1>Why because Kendall Fuller's out, that's your slock cornerback. So

1:15:16.000 --> 1:15:19.960
<v Speaker 1>Allison becomes a dart throw the backup behind Kendall Fuller.

1:15:20.720 --> 1:15:26.559
<v Speaker 1>Rashad Fenton, a six round rookie, was zero career starts,

1:15:27.120 --> 1:15:32.639
<v Speaker 1>So Geronimo Allison dart throw starter in this one moving

1:15:32.720 --> 1:15:34.439
<v Speaker 1>oh and Jimmy Graham before I get off of the

1:15:34.439 --> 1:15:36.760
<v Speaker 1>passing game entirely for the Packers, Jimmy Graham gets a

1:15:36.840 --> 1:15:40.400
<v Speaker 1>B grade. Kansas City is allowing seven catches and sixty

1:15:40.439 --> 1:15:43.200
<v Speaker 1>plus yards per game to tight ends. You take out

1:15:43.280 --> 1:15:45.880
<v Speaker 1>last week's game against Denver where no offense dropped everything

1:15:45.920 --> 1:15:47.920
<v Speaker 1>in the Chiefs are allowing eight catches and seventy two

1:15:48.000 --> 1:15:50.080
<v Speaker 1>yards per game to tight ends. So I think Jimmy

1:15:50.080 --> 1:15:52.040
<v Speaker 1>Graham gets in the action. You can start him as well.

1:15:52.600 --> 1:15:55.040
<v Speaker 1>Now let's go to the runners, who I love in

1:15:55.080 --> 1:15:57.599
<v Speaker 1>this matchup, and they are going to run themselves to victory.

1:15:57.680 --> 1:15:59.680
<v Speaker 1>I think pretty easily for the Packers in this one.

1:16:00.240 --> 1:16:03.120
<v Speaker 1>Aaron Jones with a solid A grade. I think you've

1:16:03.160 --> 1:16:05.120
<v Speaker 1>got him as my number three running back this week.

1:16:05.600 --> 1:16:08.840
<v Speaker 1>Even with Williams healthy and effective, Jones remains the lead

1:16:08.920 --> 1:16:12.479
<v Speaker 1>dog in this offense. Offensive coordinator's dream of matchups where

1:16:12.479 --> 1:16:14.080
<v Speaker 1>you can get five yards per carry, and that's what

1:16:14.160 --> 1:16:16.719
<v Speaker 1>Kansas City is giving up is five per carry. Aaron

1:16:16.800 --> 1:16:19.360
<v Speaker 1>Jones is supposed to double digit rushes in every game,

1:16:19.680 --> 1:16:22.120
<v Speaker 1>and his use in the passing game is spiking sharply

1:16:22.200 --> 1:16:24.360
<v Speaker 1>over the past several games. I like that as well.

1:16:24.640 --> 1:16:26.719
<v Speaker 1>He has scored in five of the last six games.

1:16:27.120 --> 1:16:29.800
<v Speaker 1>This is a great opportunity for Aaron Jones, but that

1:16:29.920 --> 1:16:32.400
<v Speaker 1>doesn't mean you can't start Jamal Williams as well. I

1:16:32.560 --> 1:16:35.320
<v Speaker 1>like him too. Often when Kansas City has been has

1:16:35.439 --> 1:16:37.880
<v Speaker 1>faced a one two punch of runners, both guys have

1:16:37.960 --> 1:16:41.960
<v Speaker 1>gotten paid. Baltimore had two runners get paid. Houston had

1:16:42.000 --> 1:16:45.559
<v Speaker 1>to Indy had to In all of three of those cases,

1:16:45.640 --> 1:16:50.240
<v Speaker 1>first and second runners had solid Fantasy days Against Kansas City.

1:16:50.400 --> 1:16:52.439
<v Speaker 1>We've seen Jamal Williams get these out of the blue

1:16:52.520 --> 1:16:56.280
<v Speaker 1>heavy carry games Kansas City again giving a five yards

1:16:56.320 --> 1:16:58.160
<v Speaker 1>per carry, So why wouldn't this Why couldn't this be

1:16:58.240 --> 1:17:00.439
<v Speaker 1>one of them? Start Jamal Williams too with a grade

1:17:01.200 --> 1:17:03.840
<v Speaker 1>With Davante Adams out, some of you might be tempted

1:17:03.880 --> 1:17:06.320
<v Speaker 1>to roll the dice on Jake Cumro or Alan Lazard.

1:17:06.400 --> 1:17:08.280
<v Speaker 1>They split time between each other, and I don't think

1:17:08.280 --> 1:17:09.880
<v Speaker 1>I want to go quite that far down and already

1:17:09.920 --> 1:17:12.400
<v Speaker 1>give starting grades like nineteen different packers, so I'm not

1:17:12.439 --> 1:17:14.479
<v Speaker 1>going that far all right. So now let's go to

1:17:14.520 --> 1:17:17.200
<v Speaker 1>the Kansas City side. So Kansas City again, they're gonna

1:17:17.240 --> 1:17:19.200
<v Speaker 1>be with a backup quarterback, without their left tackle and

1:17:19.360 --> 1:17:23.760
<v Speaker 1>without their left guard, so obviously everybody gets punished, uh

1:17:23.840 --> 1:17:26.280
<v Speaker 1>in this start. Originally at the beginning of the week,

1:17:26.320 --> 1:17:28.200
<v Speaker 1>I like le Shan McCoy a lot more, but when

1:17:28.200 --> 1:17:29.680
<v Speaker 1>I thought he was gonna have an offensive line and

1:17:29.760 --> 1:17:32.640
<v Speaker 1>you beat the backers on the ground. But I'm i

1:17:32.800 --> 1:17:35.880
<v Speaker 1>gotta be I gotta show some concern here without without

1:17:35.960 --> 1:17:39.200
<v Speaker 1>the starting left guard and tackle. So even though I

1:17:39.240 --> 1:17:41.680
<v Speaker 1>think they want to get Lashan mc McCoy going, and

1:17:41.760 --> 1:17:43.720
<v Speaker 1>I think you'll get plenty of carries, and then the

1:17:43.800 --> 1:17:47.200
<v Speaker 1>Packers are allowing the fifth most rushing yards per game

1:17:47.320 --> 1:17:49.320
<v Speaker 1>and they are also giving up five yards per carry.

1:17:49.600 --> 1:17:51.519
<v Speaker 1>I can't get more than a C grade on Leashan

1:17:51.600 --> 1:17:56.120
<v Speaker 1>McCoy and this one, um, Damian Williams is just evaporated

1:17:56.200 --> 1:17:59.600
<v Speaker 1>from this offense. He's on the bench, declining snap and

1:18:00.200 --> 1:18:03.559
<v Speaker 1>counts in three weeks, three straight weeks. So unless there's

1:18:03.600 --> 1:18:06.360
<v Speaker 1>some kind of concerted effort to get Damian Williams going,

1:18:06.439 --> 1:18:08.400
<v Speaker 1>you can't start him at this point. Let's go to

1:18:08.479 --> 1:18:13.160
<v Speaker 1>the passing game. Matt Moore has got a wobbly C grade.

1:18:13.880 --> 1:18:16.360
<v Speaker 1>He's got the ten days lead time to adapt to

1:18:16.400 --> 1:18:18.680
<v Speaker 1>the starters role, and I like that part of it,

1:18:19.000 --> 1:18:21.640
<v Speaker 1>but it's and it is an inconsistent Green Bay secondary.

1:18:21.720 --> 1:18:23.839
<v Speaker 1>Three of the past four teams to face the Packers

1:18:23.880 --> 1:18:27.439
<v Speaker 1>have walked away with multiple touchdowns. Cornerback jere Alexander has

1:18:27.439 --> 1:18:30.200
<v Speaker 1>allowed touchdowns in three of the past four games. And

1:18:30.320 --> 1:18:33.200
<v Speaker 1>Andy Reid's an offensive wizard. I think he could coax

1:18:33.280 --> 1:18:37.400
<v Speaker 1>a solid fantasy game out of more in the range

1:18:37.439 --> 1:18:39.640
<v Speaker 1>of like two D thirty and one in one or

1:18:39.680 --> 1:18:43.120
<v Speaker 1>two touchdowns. That sounds like about it, though. All right,

1:18:43.160 --> 1:18:46.000
<v Speaker 1>let's let's talk about the receivers. Everybody but Tyreek Hill

1:18:46.120 --> 1:18:48.720
<v Speaker 1>is out. Uh. Tyree Hill has scored in both of

1:18:48.800 --> 1:18:52.280
<v Speaker 1>his full healthy games. He's averaging seventy seven yards since returning,

1:18:52.360 --> 1:18:55.840
<v Speaker 1>and his ridiculous speed makes an elite option. Despite the

1:18:55.880 --> 1:18:59.559
<v Speaker 1>massive downgrade and quarterbacking to Matt Moore. Packers slot cornerback

1:18:59.680 --> 1:19:02.360
<v Speaker 1>is train On Williams, who's one hundred and eight years old,

1:19:02.800 --> 1:19:07.000
<v Speaker 1>and here's Tyreek Hill. I don't think it is true.

1:19:07.040 --> 1:19:10.600
<v Speaker 1>We've we've checked the I D and UM so he's

1:19:10.640 --> 1:19:12.360
<v Speaker 1>a just a B start though with Matt Moore and

1:19:12.479 --> 1:19:15.599
<v Speaker 1>up again all the problems with the missing lineman. Travis

1:19:15.680 --> 1:19:18.600
<v Speaker 1>Kelsey remains a startable, but only a B grade. He

1:19:18.680 --> 1:19:22.200
<v Speaker 1>needs to block more. With Fisher and Wiley out, Kelsey

1:19:22.240 --> 1:19:25.040
<v Speaker 1>has been held under ninety yards and without a touchdown

1:19:25.120 --> 1:19:28.240
<v Speaker 1>for five straight games, which stinks. Green Bay is surrendered.

1:19:28.240 --> 1:19:30.880
<v Speaker 1>Only just started three scores to Oakland's tight ends, So

1:19:31.000 --> 1:19:34.360
<v Speaker 1>there's that um. Zach Ertz is the closest quality tight

1:19:34.479 --> 1:19:36.360
<v Speaker 1>end to face the Packers. He put up seven catches

1:19:36.400 --> 1:19:39.960
<v Speaker 1>sixty five yards. That sounds about right for for Travis

1:19:40.080 --> 1:19:43.800
<v Speaker 1>Kelsey as well. That was a that was a lot

1:19:43.840 --> 1:19:48.439
<v Speaker 1>of talking. Get really mad that you called Darren Waller

1:19:48.479 --> 1:19:51.040
<v Speaker 1>a quality tight end. Now that's probably true. He's probably

1:19:51.040 --> 1:19:54.000
<v Speaker 1>should be upset about that. Uh, let's go to Miami

1:19:54.160 --> 1:19:57.680
<v Speaker 1>taking on Pittsburgh. Matt is there anybody from Miami you

1:19:57.720 --> 1:20:01.800
<v Speaker 1>want to start in this game? No? Um, I'm gonna

1:20:01.840 --> 1:20:04.360
<v Speaker 1>do a lot less talking in this match. Like the

1:20:04.400 --> 1:20:06.719
<v Speaker 1>Dolphins running backs are on the bench. It's a stupid

1:20:06.800 --> 1:20:08.920
<v Speaker 1>time share as Mark Walton got most of the touches

1:20:08.960 --> 1:20:12.120
<v Speaker 1>and snaps and he's not even good. Kalin Balage vulture

1:20:12.160 --> 1:20:14.280
<v Speaker 1>to touch down near the stripe, and the Dolphins are

1:20:14.280 --> 1:20:17.160
<v Speaker 1>trying to trade Kenyan Drake, so they may either want

1:20:17.200 --> 1:20:19.760
<v Speaker 1>to feature him or hold him out of the game

1:20:19.800 --> 1:20:23.000
<v Speaker 1>if a deal is near one of the two. Who knows? Uh?

1:20:23.120 --> 1:20:26.480
<v Speaker 1>And the Steelers held the Ravens and Chargers good backfields

1:20:26.880 --> 1:20:30.280
<v Speaker 1>to one hundred total rushing yards in the last two games.

1:20:30.600 --> 1:20:34.639
<v Speaker 1>That's fifty per game. Uh, Stu Beard. I know Scott

1:20:34.920 --> 1:20:37.280
<v Speaker 1>thinks he's like the next Bo Jackson, but he's on

1:20:37.400 --> 1:20:40.040
<v Speaker 1>the bench. And the Dolphins wide receivers are as well.

1:20:40.600 --> 1:20:44.120
<v Speaker 1>Williams did see six catches. That's Preston Williams for eight

1:20:44.240 --> 1:20:46.680
<v Speaker 1>two last week. But Davante Parker was the guy who

1:20:46.720 --> 1:20:49.599
<v Speaker 1>saw the most targets and to score. And really it's

1:20:49.640 --> 1:20:52.400
<v Speaker 1>the Manka Fitzpatrick revenge game, that's what it is. I'm

1:20:52.439 --> 1:20:56.640
<v Speaker 1>sure he's told the Steelers all the Dolphins tricks and secrets. Um.

1:20:56.800 --> 1:20:59.479
<v Speaker 1>Since fitz Fitzpatrick came on the scene for the Steelers,

1:20:59.760 --> 1:21:02.920
<v Speaker 1>no wide receiver has topped seventy two yards and Pittsburgh

1:21:02.960 --> 1:21:05.280
<v Speaker 1>has only allowed two passing scores to white outs in

1:21:05.320 --> 1:21:08.320
<v Speaker 1>that time. Because you can't crack the Miami the Miami

1:21:08.400 --> 1:21:13.800
<v Speaker 1>offense without without inside knowledge knowledge make offense Patrick. That's

1:21:13.840 --> 1:21:16.000
<v Speaker 1>the key. That's why they got him. They went out

1:21:16.000 --> 1:21:18.880
<v Speaker 1>and traded a first round pick just for this game. UM.

1:21:19.040 --> 1:21:21.400
<v Speaker 1>James Conner on the other side, he's getting an A grade.

1:21:21.479 --> 1:21:24.240
<v Speaker 1>Connor should be pretty healthy post bye week. He's facing

1:21:24.280 --> 1:21:27.679
<v Speaker 1>a Dolphins defense that has allowed the most rushing attempts

1:21:27.720 --> 1:21:30.320
<v Speaker 1>and yards per game almost a hundred and forty rush

1:21:30.400 --> 1:21:33.080
<v Speaker 1>yards per game to running backs, and our bottom twelve

1:21:33.160 --> 1:21:36.840
<v Speaker 1>in yards per carry, rushing touchdowns and receiving touchdowns and

1:21:36.880 --> 1:21:40.000
<v Speaker 1>all over. Good game for Connor Juju Smith Schuster, I'm

1:21:40.080 --> 1:21:42.760
<v Speaker 1>giving a B and Deonte Johnson was charches take a

1:21:42.840 --> 1:21:46.760
<v Speaker 1>chance on me. Juju's usage has been frustrating, especially with

1:21:47.400 --> 1:21:53.240
<v Speaker 1>the duck Duck Hodges right there, hitting him for only

1:21:53.439 --> 1:21:56.760
<v Speaker 1>one catch last time out. Luckily, Mason Rudolph's back, who

1:21:56.840 --> 1:21:59.880
<v Speaker 1>threw two touchdowns to Juju in his last three games,

1:22:00.080 --> 1:22:02.799
<v Speaker 1>and the Dolphins have allowed the most wide receiver touchdowns

1:22:02.800 --> 1:22:06.400
<v Speaker 1>in the league. Vance McDonald, this is a guy that

1:22:06.880 --> 1:22:09.360
<v Speaker 1>we were kind of planting the flag in preseason as

1:22:09.479 --> 1:22:10.960
<v Speaker 1>a guy who had a chance to be a really

1:22:11.000 --> 1:22:15.160
<v Speaker 1>good player. Yeah, he's droppable. I don't agree. I do.

1:22:16.880 --> 1:22:20.960
<v Speaker 1>Since Nick Venette showed up. McDonald has four targets in

1:22:21.080 --> 1:22:23.400
<v Speaker 1>three games. Well, he's been hurt too, and he had

1:22:23.479 --> 1:22:27.439
<v Speaker 1>Duck Hodges is his quarterback. He's only averaging three targets

1:22:27.479 --> 1:22:30.280
<v Speaker 1>per game on the whole season. I know, but all

1:22:30.400 --> 1:22:32.880
<v Speaker 1>that i'd see, I see it the opposite way. I

1:22:33.040 --> 1:22:35.840
<v Speaker 1>think you get Mason Rudolph healthy and Vance McDonald healthy

1:22:35.880 --> 1:22:39.879
<v Speaker 1>off the by and the connections coming, and Nick Vannette's

1:22:39.880 --> 1:22:44.160
<v Speaker 1>there though he's the Jesse James replacement. That was the

1:22:44.200 --> 1:22:46.680
<v Speaker 1>whole reason We liked Vance McDonald at the beginning of

1:22:46.720 --> 1:22:49.960
<v Speaker 1>year because Jesse James is gone. It's Vance McDonald's party.

1:22:50.280 --> 1:22:53.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm not it's it's not his party anymore. It's Nick

1:22:53.200 --> 1:22:56.600
<v Speaker 1>Vannette's party. Vance McDonald might be invited, but it's not

1:22:56.680 --> 1:22:59.519
<v Speaker 1>a very good party either. I'll cry if I want to. Yeah,

1:23:00.360 --> 1:23:02.160
<v Speaker 1>that's it. That's it, all right, Let's go to our

1:23:02.200 --> 1:23:04.240
<v Speaker 1>final matchup. I thought maybe there was more to the

1:23:04.720 --> 1:23:08.360
<v Speaker 1>punctuation to that Oakland and taking on Houston. That is

1:23:08.400 --> 1:23:12.200
<v Speaker 1>our final matchup here. Josh Jacobs comes into this game hobbled,

1:23:12.280 --> 1:23:14.800
<v Speaker 1>but it sounds like he's going to try to play it.

1:23:14.920 --> 1:23:17.720
<v Speaker 1>Does it does? It's not a great matchup in in

1:23:17.840 --> 1:23:20.880
<v Speaker 1>the fact that Houston has given up only two games

1:23:20.920 --> 1:23:23.600
<v Speaker 1>over fifty yards rushing, and that was Christian McCaffrey and

1:23:23.600 --> 1:23:26.120
<v Speaker 1>Alvin Kamara. They're pretty good, and most of their yards

1:23:26.160 --> 1:23:28.559
<v Speaker 1>actually came through the air. Both had seventy plus through

1:23:28.560 --> 1:23:30.680
<v Speaker 1>the air. And that's not really Josh Jacob's game. Even

1:23:30.680 --> 1:23:33.360
<v Speaker 1>though he's getting a little bit more involved. I'm still

1:23:33.400 --> 1:23:36.160
<v Speaker 1>giving Jacobs a b though, because he's getting nineteen plus

1:23:36.240 --> 1:23:38.280
<v Speaker 1>touches a game and if he if he's good to

1:23:38.320 --> 1:23:41.120
<v Speaker 1>go nineteen plus touches, it's gonna it's enough volume to

1:23:41.160 --> 1:23:43.560
<v Speaker 1>get you something. And he's looked really good. So B

1:23:43.680 --> 1:23:46.200
<v Speaker 1>grade there in the passing game, car was your take

1:23:46.240 --> 1:23:48.360
<v Speaker 1>a chance on people for a lot of good reasons,

1:23:48.479 --> 1:23:50.839
<v Speaker 1>like Derek Carr and because of that, I like Tyrol

1:23:50.920 --> 1:23:53.240
<v Speaker 1>the Gazelle and I like Waller both with A grades.

1:23:53.280 --> 1:23:56.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean, Waller's the top five tight end. Hooper, Kelsey

1:23:56.360 --> 1:23:58.639
<v Speaker 1>and Ebron just had back to back to back double

1:23:58.720 --> 1:24:02.519
<v Speaker 1>digit Fantasy days again against this Houston Texans team. It's

1:24:02.600 --> 1:24:06.080
<v Speaker 1>Waller's turn now. Yeah, and uh, Tyroll Williams, all he's

1:24:06.080 --> 1:24:09.639
<v Speaker 1>done to score touchdowns in every full game yep, exactly

1:24:09.720 --> 1:24:13.120
<v Speaker 1>four games, four touchdowns. Oakland is devoid of other receiving options.

1:24:13.200 --> 1:24:16.120
<v Speaker 1>Really in Houston, it's kind of devoid of good good

1:24:16.160 --> 1:24:19.760
<v Speaker 1>defensive backs. Roby and Joseph both might be out with

1:24:19.800 --> 1:24:22.200
<v Speaker 1>hamstring injuries and games was just up put on I R.

1:24:22.280 --> 1:24:25.400
<v Speaker 1>So they might have no quarterbacks. Yes, how about that?

1:24:25.640 --> 1:24:28.800
<v Speaker 1>Tyroll Williams is a great start, great start this week.

1:24:28.840 --> 1:24:30.519
<v Speaker 1>I think he does. By the way I offered, I

1:24:30.560 --> 1:24:32.200
<v Speaker 1>offered up a trade to try to get him. I

1:24:32.320 --> 1:24:35.040
<v Speaker 1>just think that because he's been out of consciousness, out

1:24:35.080 --> 1:24:36.759
<v Speaker 1>of sight, out of mind. I think people have forgotten

1:24:36.800 --> 1:24:38.800
<v Speaker 1>that he was a locked starter for those first four

1:24:38.840 --> 1:24:41.840
<v Speaker 1>weeks with touchdowns in every game, and the fact that

1:24:41.880 --> 1:24:44.800
<v Speaker 1>the Raiders offense has been way better than we thought

1:24:44.840 --> 1:24:46.720
<v Speaker 1>they were going to be. I think this is a

1:24:46.760 --> 1:24:49.639
<v Speaker 1>good time to buy low and maybe your last chance

1:24:49.680 --> 1:24:52.360
<v Speaker 1>to buy low on Tyrolle Williams. Yeah. Really, I really

1:24:52.439 --> 1:24:54.960
<v Speaker 1>liked him coming into the year. On the other side,

1:24:55.040 --> 1:24:57.759
<v Speaker 1>Deshaun Watson, I'm giving a grade to Oakland is allowing

1:24:57.800 --> 1:25:00.679
<v Speaker 1>the second most passing yards and the most pas seen touchdowns.

1:25:00.760 --> 1:25:04.519
<v Speaker 1>Watson is averaging two point seven touchdowns and three two

1:25:04.600 --> 1:25:07.000
<v Speaker 1>yards per game. He he's a KEPI one this week.

1:25:07.120 --> 1:25:09.760
<v Speaker 1>Might be he was my number one ranked quarterback. He's

1:25:09.760 --> 1:25:15.120
<v Speaker 1>a QB one this week just this week, yes, next

1:25:15.160 --> 1:25:20.719
<v Speaker 1>week probably not. I meant overall QB uh dean because

1:25:20.720 --> 1:25:25.679
<v Speaker 1>of that. DeAndre Hopkins a grade uh yeah, will Fuller,

1:25:25.840 --> 1:25:28.120
<v Speaker 1>he did have that injury that we kind of mentioned

1:25:28.160 --> 1:25:31.479
<v Speaker 1>in three tough Questions might be coming, and Hopkins came

1:25:31.520 --> 1:25:34.479
<v Speaker 1>back A grade B grade. For Kenny Stills, he runs

1:25:34.520 --> 1:25:36.360
<v Speaker 1>a four three eight forty. He's going to be matched

1:25:36.439 --> 1:25:39.280
<v Speaker 1>up against Darrell Worley, who runs a four point six

1:25:39.360 --> 1:25:42.679
<v Speaker 1>four forty that's terrible, has established earlier in this segment.

1:25:42.800 --> 1:25:45.280
<v Speaker 1>Four six is a slow cornerback speed, as you'll find.

1:25:45.840 --> 1:25:49.040
<v Speaker 1>Did they ever measure the forties after the shouting Tom?

1:25:49.600 --> 1:25:52.040
<v Speaker 1>I wish they wish they make those guys run after

1:25:52.080 --> 1:25:55.760
<v Speaker 1>they've been Stills is like five six years into his career.

1:25:55.880 --> 1:25:59.120
<v Speaker 1>He's more than that. I mean his four a little bit.

1:25:59.280 --> 1:26:03.040
<v Speaker 1>So is Darrell war was like four years in. You

1:26:03.040 --> 1:26:06.160
<v Speaker 1>could be even slower. Now the Raiders have allowed thirty

1:26:06.200 --> 1:26:09.360
<v Speaker 1>two pass plays over twenty yards. That's worse than the NFL.

1:26:10.160 --> 1:26:13.160
<v Speaker 1>So be grade on still C grade on QT. He's

1:26:13.200 --> 1:26:15.320
<v Speaker 1>going to get Joiner, who is batting the slot this

1:26:15.439 --> 1:26:18.559
<v Speaker 1>year since transferring from safety. But I'm not sure how

1:26:18.600 --> 1:26:20.400
<v Speaker 1>the targets are gonna shake out. So I have him

1:26:20.439 --> 1:26:21.880
<v Speaker 1>on the bench for the or No, I do have

1:26:21.960 --> 1:26:26.320
<v Speaker 1>a C grade. I look back. I do have surprised yourself.

1:26:26.439 --> 1:26:28.960
<v Speaker 1>I surprised myself, but did my research. I had a

1:26:29.000 --> 1:26:32.040
<v Speaker 1>C grade for him, and somehow Fells Nakins are on

1:26:32.200 --> 1:26:34.679
<v Speaker 1>the bench though a tight end. Uh, I have Hide

1:26:34.760 --> 1:26:36.680
<v Speaker 1>on the bench too. I like Duke Johnson a lot

1:26:36.800 --> 1:26:41.240
<v Speaker 1>more this week. Yeah, Well, the only running backs to

1:26:41.320 --> 1:26:45.000
<v Speaker 1>top fifty six yards against the against the Raiders, we're

1:26:45.160 --> 1:26:48.880
<v Speaker 1>both vikings. Other than that, no other game. It's not

1:26:48.960 --> 1:26:51.320
<v Speaker 1>like the Raiders are shooting down run defense, but they're

1:26:51.360 --> 1:26:53.519
<v Speaker 1>so easy to pass on. It's just the path of

1:26:53.600 --> 1:26:55.800
<v Speaker 1>Lee Street. And that was fifty six rushing yards. The

1:26:55.880 --> 1:26:58.559
<v Speaker 1>receiving work, that's where it gets done. And that's Duke Johnson.

1:26:58.880 --> 1:27:01.200
<v Speaker 1>A couple of topics for you guys before we wrap

1:27:01.320 --> 1:27:04.760
<v Speaker 1>up the show. Lamar Jackson's on by from this point

1:27:04.840 --> 1:27:10.880
<v Speaker 1>going forward. Is Lamar Jackson the number one fantasy quarterback?

1:27:12.360 --> 1:27:16.400
<v Speaker 1>I mean, since Deshaun Watson's only a quarterback, a quarterback,

1:27:17.080 --> 1:27:19.360
<v Speaker 1>I don't I would not trade anybody for Lamar Jackson.

1:27:19.720 --> 1:27:21.840
<v Speaker 1>There's nobody. If you offered me anybody, I would I

1:27:21.840 --> 1:27:24.920
<v Speaker 1>would not take anybody Jacks. Same thing with the cook thing,

1:27:25.040 --> 1:27:28.839
<v Speaker 1>like these are even players, Deshaun Watson, maybe Patrick Mahomes

1:27:28.920 --> 1:27:32.000
<v Speaker 1>and Lamar Jackson. There even enough that No, let's not

1:27:32.120 --> 1:27:34.719
<v Speaker 1>make a straight up trade, like there needs to be incentive.

1:27:35.120 --> 1:27:38.880
<v Speaker 1>The only issue I see is I want to have

1:27:39.000 --> 1:27:41.160
<v Speaker 1>a first round by If I have Lamar Jackson, because

1:27:41.200 --> 1:27:46.320
<v Speaker 1>he gets at Buffalo in Week four, Tatis, that could

1:27:46.360 --> 1:27:48.559
<v Speaker 1>be your knockout blow right out of the playoffs. Right

1:27:48.600 --> 1:27:51.760
<v Speaker 1>before that, he has San Francisco in week thirteen. So

1:27:52.080 --> 1:27:55.599
<v Speaker 1>if you're very secure in being a first round by

1:27:55.760 --> 1:27:58.880
<v Speaker 1>participant in your playoffs, Lamar Jackson's great because he gets

1:27:58.920 --> 1:28:00.920
<v Speaker 1>the Jets and the Browns and final two weeks. Those

1:28:00.960 --> 1:28:03.640
<v Speaker 1>are not difficult matchups. But if you're gonna be in

1:28:03.680 --> 1:28:05.519
<v Speaker 1>a wild card game and you're gonna be relying on

1:28:05.640 --> 1:28:08.639
<v Speaker 1>Lamar Jackson, I'm a little nervous. There is Marky's Hollywood

1:28:08.680 --> 1:28:14.240
<v Speaker 1>Brown droppable. Yes, no, probably not, but I kind of

1:28:14.320 --> 1:28:17.040
<v Speaker 1>want to. He's right on the fringe. Yes, yeah, you say, yes,

1:28:17.360 --> 1:28:19.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm dropping it. I think in a standard league. I

1:28:19.920 --> 1:28:23.559
<v Speaker 1>think he's in a standard league definitely, Like like t J. Hockenson,

1:28:23.600 --> 1:28:26.160
<v Speaker 1>we got fooled in week one on those two guys,

1:28:26.520 --> 1:28:28.840
<v Speaker 1>I think, and he comes back healthy and he's gonna

1:28:28.880 --> 1:28:31.320
<v Speaker 1>more experience than everything. But by the way, bye weeknd

1:28:31.320 --> 1:28:33.080
<v Speaker 1>than Patriots. Yeah, you may be able to get him

1:28:33.120 --> 1:28:35.599
<v Speaker 1>back and get him back after the Patriots game. Hey,

1:28:35.640 --> 1:28:37.280
<v Speaker 1>if you love this show, go to famball dot com

1:28:37.360 --> 1:28:41.040
<v Speaker 1>slash charts for my free player rankings, my free one

1:28:41.120 --> 1:28:46.400
<v Speaker 1>thousand dollar weekly contest Guillotine leagues, podcasts, contests, auctions. Hey,

1:28:46.479 --> 1:28:48.160
<v Speaker 1>and by the way, many thanks everybody who takes the

1:28:48.200 --> 1:28:50.120
<v Speaker 1>time to rank and review the show on whatever your

1:28:50.160 --> 1:28:53.280
<v Speaker 1>podcasting platform of choices. We really appreciate that. Thank you

1:28:53.320 --> 1:29:02.840
<v Speaker 1>for listening to Fantasy Football Weekly Radio. Fantasy Football Weekly

1:29:03.000 --> 1:29:05.639
<v Speaker 1>is a production of I Heart Radio. For more podcasts

1:29:05.640 --> 1:29:08.000
<v Speaker 1>from my Heart Radio, visit the i heart Radio app,

1:29:08.040 --> 1:29:11.120
<v Speaker 1>Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to your favorite shows.