WEBVTT - David Nevins: How Streaming Has Changed the Premium TV Game for Showtime

0:00:06.200 --> 0:00:10.320
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Strictly Business Varieties podcasts featuring conversations with industry

0:00:10.440 --> 0:00:14.240
<v Speaker 1>leaders about the business of entertainment. I'm Cynthia Littleton, Managing

0:00:14.360 --> 0:00:17.400
<v Speaker 1>editor of Television for Variety and Today, my guest in

0:00:17.480 --> 0:00:21.880
<v Speaker 1>Beverly Hills is David Nevins, President and CEO of Showtime Networks.

0:00:22.680 --> 0:00:25.799
<v Speaker 1>David is steering Showtime through a period of massive disruption

0:00:25.880 --> 0:00:29.760
<v Speaker 1>for the premium TV business. In our wide ranging conversation,

0:00:30.160 --> 0:00:33.000
<v Speaker 1>he talks about the new economics of direct to consumer

0:00:33.080 --> 0:00:36.640
<v Speaker 1>streaming and how it's changed the way Showtime operates. He

0:00:36.760 --> 0:00:40.760
<v Speaker 1>talks about the expansion of Showtime's programming mandate and what

0:00:40.880 --> 0:00:43.680
<v Speaker 1>it takes to compete for projects in the peak TV crush.

0:00:44.240 --> 0:00:47.480
<v Speaker 1>He also offers insights into the origins of Sasha Baron

0:00:47.560 --> 0:00:51.080
<v Speaker 1>Cohen's Who Is America and his thoughts on the coming

0:00:51.120 --> 0:00:57.560
<v Speaker 1>final season of Homework. David Evans, thanks so much for

0:00:57.600 --> 0:00:59.760
<v Speaker 1>making time for us. So glad to be here in

0:00:59.800 --> 0:01:03.680
<v Speaker 1>this glamorous hotel room. It's the life, you know, the

0:01:04.200 --> 0:01:06.480
<v Speaker 1>life of the CEO, the life of a media reporter,

0:01:07.080 --> 0:01:09.920
<v Speaker 1>one hotel room after another, get it done wherever it

0:01:09.959 --> 0:01:15.480
<v Speaker 1>has to get done. It's good, um, you know, for

0:01:15.520 --> 0:01:18.119
<v Speaker 1>the last couple of years, all anybody in TV can

0:01:18.160 --> 0:01:22.840
<v Speaker 1>talk about is how much TV there is. You've been

0:01:22.880 --> 0:01:26.360
<v Speaker 1>at the helm of Showtime now certainly programming wise, now

0:01:26.400 --> 0:01:29.600
<v Speaker 1>for going on eight years, going on nine years. How

0:01:29.959 --> 0:01:34.200
<v Speaker 1>that long? Right? I guess that's right. I was. I

0:01:34.240 --> 0:01:35.880
<v Speaker 1>was going to say seven going on eight, But I

0:01:35.880 --> 0:01:39.320
<v Speaker 1>think you're right, and you have your details, correct. I

0:01:40.160 --> 0:01:43.360
<v Speaker 1>I forget that my own history. Just I'll remind you

0:01:43.360 --> 0:01:45.640
<v Speaker 1>when your kid's birthdays are coming. Okay, fair enough? Today

0:01:45.720 --> 0:01:49.080
<v Speaker 1>is my son's birthday? Actually, happy birthday? There we go, Um,

0:01:50.240 --> 0:01:54.400
<v Speaker 1>what how has we know? You know, everybody's talking about

0:01:54.440 --> 0:01:58.080
<v Speaker 1>the arms race and programming and costs, But how has

0:01:58.760 --> 0:02:02.240
<v Speaker 1>What are some of the ways that the job of

0:02:02.280 --> 0:02:06.360
<v Speaker 1>programming a premium cable network has changed in ways that

0:02:06.440 --> 0:02:09.440
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't be intuitive to us, in terms of just the

0:02:09.560 --> 0:02:13.040
<v Speaker 1>enormity of competition? Are there things that you have to

0:02:13.080 --> 0:02:17.120
<v Speaker 1>do differently now because there is so much competition? I see,

0:02:17.160 --> 0:02:21.160
<v Speaker 1>it is all opportunity. I feel like the range of

0:02:21.200 --> 0:02:24.600
<v Speaker 1>the kinds of things that I can do has gotten

0:02:24.680 --> 0:02:29.160
<v Speaker 1>much more interesting. When I came to Showtime, we made

0:02:30.840 --> 0:02:37.919
<v Speaker 1>mostly uh half hour little half hour drama comedies, Californication,

0:02:38.880 --> 0:02:43.400
<v Speaker 1>and Nurse Jackie and Weeds. We had I think one

0:02:43.480 --> 0:02:48.560
<v Speaker 1>or two hour shows, Dexter being the most prominent of them.

0:02:48.639 --> 0:02:51.800
<v Speaker 1>And now I feel like I'm doing an animated show,

0:02:51.919 --> 0:02:56.480
<v Speaker 1>and I'm doing documentaries and news shows, and I'm doing

0:02:56.960 --> 0:03:00.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, really fresh, up to the minute things in

0:03:01.280 --> 0:03:08.400
<v Speaker 1>UH in the circus and really spontaneous, crazy shows like

0:03:08.440 --> 0:03:12.920
<v Speaker 1>who is America where? Um. You know, it was a

0:03:13.000 --> 0:03:16.480
<v Speaker 1>year and a half in the making, but the editing

0:03:16.520 --> 0:03:19.520
<v Speaker 1>and the tinkering is going on the last second. So

0:03:19.560 --> 0:03:21.640
<v Speaker 1>I do feel like the range of the kinds of

0:03:21.680 --> 0:03:26.880
<v Speaker 1>things I get to make has dramatically expanded. Um. But

0:03:26.919 --> 0:03:32.520
<v Speaker 1>I think you're asking a question about, you know, filling

0:03:32.680 --> 0:03:36.760
<v Speaker 1>a programming mandate in the age of UH, in the

0:03:36.800 --> 0:03:38.680
<v Speaker 1>age of streaming, in the age of a lot of

0:03:38.680 --> 0:03:43.920
<v Speaker 1>people trying to make premium television. UM, I think you

0:03:44.000 --> 0:03:48.840
<v Speaker 1>gotta go the extra mile to try to find originality. UM.

0:03:48.880 --> 0:03:53.600
<v Speaker 1>With so much stuff happening, it's UH. There's a lot

0:03:53.600 --> 0:03:56.400
<v Speaker 1>of people repeating themselves and a lot of people doing

0:03:57.720 --> 0:04:01.120
<v Speaker 1>UH playing in a similar or sandbox. So you've gotta

0:04:01.120 --> 0:04:04.680
<v Speaker 1>you gotta go further and harder for originality. And you know,

0:04:04.760 --> 0:04:07.080
<v Speaker 1>the good news is that the range of people who

0:04:07.080 --> 0:04:12.560
<v Speaker 1>want to do television h is greater than ever before.

0:04:12.720 --> 0:04:16.240
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I'm sitting there, I'm on a daily basis. Now.

0:04:16.400 --> 0:04:20.159
<v Speaker 1>It's people who have been the dominant players in the

0:04:20.200 --> 0:04:25.839
<v Speaker 1>movie business from uh Jim Carey to Russell Crowe too,

0:04:27.000 --> 0:04:32.560
<v Speaker 1>uh Jason blom or Scott Ruden to um Seth Rogan

0:04:32.839 --> 0:04:40.640
<v Speaker 1>or Ben Stiller. Um. Uh. It's it's a group of

0:04:40.680 --> 0:04:46.560
<v Speaker 1>people who probably wouldn't have been accessible uh for Showtime

0:04:47.320 --> 0:04:51.040
<v Speaker 1>six years ago. Um. And they're all interested in doing

0:04:51.480 --> 0:04:57.479
<v Speaker 1>great creative work for us. UM. But you gotta dig

0:04:57.520 --> 0:05:03.159
<v Speaker 1>a little harder, you and be a little bit more adventurous,

0:05:03.720 --> 0:05:06.320
<v Speaker 1>um than than the old days. But that's that's that's

0:05:06.360 --> 0:05:09.760
<v Speaker 1>the good news. Would you say from the time that

0:05:09.880 --> 0:05:12.080
<v Speaker 1>you certainly from the time that you started at Showtime

0:05:12.080 --> 0:05:15.400
<v Speaker 1>to now, would you say, you know, adjusting for inflation,

0:05:16.120 --> 0:05:22.440
<v Speaker 1>that the CBS Corporation is spending appreciably more on content. Definitely, absolutely,

0:05:22.480 --> 0:05:26.279
<v Speaker 1>where we are spending more. We're spending more on a

0:05:26.320 --> 0:05:31.320
<v Speaker 1>per episode basis. The level of production value that's expected

0:05:31.360 --> 0:05:34.680
<v Speaker 1>from us has gone up. And we're also spending more

0:05:34.920 --> 0:05:38.360
<v Speaker 1>because we're putting out more hours of original content than

0:05:38.560 --> 0:05:43.760
<v Speaker 1>than we did before, but our revenue has gone up

0:05:43.800 --> 0:05:46.920
<v Speaker 1>pretty dramatically in order to justify it. It's hard. It's

0:05:46.920 --> 0:05:49.039
<v Speaker 1>hard to spend more on programming if your revenue isn't

0:05:49.080 --> 0:05:51.119
<v Speaker 1>moving in the right direction. But our revenue is moving

0:05:51.120 --> 0:05:56.880
<v Speaker 1>in the right direction. Uh, so it pays for itself.

0:05:56.920 --> 0:06:01.279
<v Speaker 1>But no question about it. And uh we're we're always

0:06:01.320 --> 0:06:04.520
<v Speaker 1>pushing for more and trying to you know, we've gotta

0:06:04.560 --> 0:06:06.480
<v Speaker 1>keep pushing for more. We gotta get rewarded for it

0:06:06.720 --> 0:06:11.880
<v Speaker 1>with new subscribers. And in a streaming universe, Um, every

0:06:11.920 --> 0:06:15.560
<v Speaker 1>time you put something new that people are interested in,

0:06:15.720 --> 0:06:19.120
<v Speaker 1>it drives sign ups. You can also put new things

0:06:19.200 --> 0:06:22.719
<v Speaker 1>on that don't drive sign ups, um, you know, in

0:06:22.760 --> 0:06:24.919
<v Speaker 1>which case you're not investing your money as well as

0:06:24.960 --> 0:06:27.080
<v Speaker 1>you can. But as long as you're putting things out

0:06:27.080 --> 0:06:30.640
<v Speaker 1>there that has a defined audience that somebody is willing

0:06:30.680 --> 0:06:33.960
<v Speaker 1>to pay money for, you can justify it. It's I'd

0:06:34.000 --> 0:06:38.680
<v Speaker 1>be interested to see the link between you announcing that

0:06:38.800 --> 0:06:43.600
<v Speaker 1>something is coming and sign ups. So people people read

0:06:43.640 --> 0:06:45.839
<v Speaker 1>in the press that you're doing a Rodger Ales mini

0:06:45.880 --> 0:06:49.200
<v Speaker 1>series with Russell Crowe and maybe Nicole Kidman, and that

0:06:49.200 --> 0:06:53.640
<v Speaker 1>that gets people's interests. Like you, you can track. I

0:06:53.720 --> 0:06:56.479
<v Speaker 1>don't believe that. I think in the in the age

0:06:56.480 --> 0:06:59.919
<v Speaker 1>of the Internet, Um, it has to be instantaneous. So

0:07:00.720 --> 0:07:03.159
<v Speaker 1>I don't think that a press announce A press announcement

0:07:03.160 --> 0:07:10.080
<v Speaker 1>may create a glow, may create some brand awareness, some

0:07:10.280 --> 0:07:14.480
<v Speaker 1>brand halo. I don't think a press announcement drive sign ups,

0:07:14.560 --> 0:07:17.320
<v Speaker 1>and I don't think there's much evidence that it does.

0:07:17.640 --> 0:07:22.160
<v Speaker 1>We did the t c A yesterday. We were trending

0:07:22.200 --> 0:07:28.760
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter, Showtime is trending, shut up, and Dribble was trending. Uh,

0:07:29.080 --> 0:07:32.680
<v Speaker 1>Homeland was trending, David Nevians was trending. I don't think

0:07:32.680 --> 0:07:36.160
<v Speaker 1>that drove sign ups. Uh, it's not going to drive

0:07:36.200 --> 0:07:40.760
<v Speaker 1>the sign ups that Sunday's episode of Who Is America

0:07:40.880 --> 0:07:44.760
<v Speaker 1>or Sunday's episode of The Affair will drive. And you

0:07:44.800 --> 0:07:48.679
<v Speaker 1>know I see it every day. So there's a build

0:07:48.760 --> 0:07:51.600
<v Speaker 1>up of of of sign ups over the course of

0:07:51.600 --> 0:07:54.920
<v Speaker 1>the week. It peaks on Sunday, goes down a little

0:07:54.920 --> 0:07:56.960
<v Speaker 1>bit on Monday, and then keeps going down through the week,

0:07:56.960 --> 0:07:59.200
<v Speaker 1>and then starts building up again as we head towards

0:07:59.240 --> 0:08:05.560
<v Speaker 1>the weekend day Saturday Sunday peaking again. Um, and uh,

0:08:06.360 --> 0:08:10.800
<v Speaker 1>you've got to be instantaneous. So when it has to

0:08:10.880 --> 0:08:14.360
<v Speaker 1>be available. Um, I think in order to move an audience,

0:08:14.920 --> 0:08:17.000
<v Speaker 1>and for you as a programmer, that must be a

0:08:17.120 --> 0:08:20.200
<v Speaker 1>joy that now you can it is so easy to

0:08:20.280 --> 0:08:22.400
<v Speaker 1>sign up. I mean, you know in years past, it

0:08:22.560 --> 0:08:24.240
<v Speaker 1>was you had to call the cable company and stay

0:08:24.240 --> 0:08:26.560
<v Speaker 1>on for two hours and wait for two weeks. And

0:08:26.840 --> 0:08:30.120
<v Speaker 1>now people can literally push a button. Yeah. Well, the

0:08:30.120 --> 0:08:33.200
<v Speaker 1>thing that I always used to say because my background,

0:08:34.160 --> 0:08:36.920
<v Speaker 1>I was a network executive, broadcast network executive early in

0:08:36.960 --> 0:08:39.160
<v Speaker 1>my career, and then I was a producer. And when

0:08:39.200 --> 0:08:41.480
<v Speaker 1>I first came to showtime, it was the only form

0:08:41.480 --> 0:08:45.400
<v Speaker 1>of television, premium television, subscription television is the only form

0:08:45.480 --> 0:08:50.400
<v Speaker 1>where there was no direct correlation between programming and revenue. Uh.

0:08:50.559 --> 0:08:55.280
<v Speaker 1>If you sit at CBS or TNT r FX, you

0:08:55.280 --> 0:08:56.800
<v Speaker 1>can say, I'm gonna put the show on the air.

0:08:57.080 --> 0:09:01.679
<v Speaker 1>It's going to get one point six in demo and

0:09:01.960 --> 0:09:05.040
<v Speaker 1>that's going to be worth x amount of revenue. Uh.

0:09:05.160 --> 0:09:08.720
<v Speaker 1>With us, it was always so uh indirect. In fact,

0:09:08.800 --> 0:09:11.360
<v Speaker 1>you can always make the argument that less programming costs

0:09:11.400 --> 0:09:15.560
<v Speaker 1>less money and you're not gonna show any obvious loss

0:09:15.600 --> 0:09:19.680
<v Speaker 1>of subscribers. Um, it's gotten much more direct than that.

0:09:19.760 --> 0:09:23.760
<v Speaker 1>So now you can actually attribute revenue two shows and

0:09:24.440 --> 0:09:29.440
<v Speaker 1>it's UM, so you can immediately see the effect of

0:09:29.480 --> 0:09:31.280
<v Speaker 1>a show and a show that is growing. So show

0:09:31.320 --> 0:09:37.319
<v Speaker 1>like Who Is America which as growing, grew in ratings

0:09:37.559 --> 0:09:42.880
<v Speaker 1>weeks one to three and four, and uh most importantly

0:09:43.600 --> 0:09:47.880
<v Speaker 1>grows in UM we two had you know, Week one

0:09:47.960 --> 0:09:50.319
<v Speaker 1>was a very good sign up week Week two was

0:09:50.360 --> 0:09:53.079
<v Speaker 1>bigger than week one. That that never happened. So that's

0:09:53.120 --> 0:09:56.440
<v Speaker 1>clearly evidence of a show that is getting a ton

0:09:56.480 --> 0:09:59.520
<v Speaker 1>of word of mouth and getting in causing people to buy.

0:10:00.000 --> 0:10:03.120
<v Speaker 1>All of those people complaining that they were duped into

0:10:03.240 --> 0:10:07.079
<v Speaker 1>being Who Was American? The Sasha Brown Cohen Show, all

0:10:07.080 --> 0:10:10.679
<v Speaker 1>those people complaining that they were duped, that was like marketing. Yeah,

0:10:10.760 --> 0:10:14.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean I had a lot of powerful, important people

0:10:14.920 --> 0:10:17.600
<v Speaker 1>carrying the water for us, So that's always a good thing.

0:10:19.040 --> 0:10:22.360
<v Speaker 1>Let me just ask you how there was some commentary

0:10:22.360 --> 0:10:27.320
<v Speaker 1>about that show that Baron sas Sasha Brown Cohen's excuse me,

0:10:27.520 --> 0:10:35.360
<v Speaker 1>Sasha Baron Cohen's UM approach didn't play as well in

0:10:35.400 --> 0:10:38.319
<v Speaker 1>two thousand eighteen as it did a decade ago when

0:10:38.400 --> 0:10:41.840
<v Speaker 1>he was when he was on the Ali g Show.

0:10:41.880 --> 0:10:43.720
<v Speaker 1>Did you feel that when you watched it? Do you

0:10:43.800 --> 0:10:48.559
<v Speaker 1>do you accept that criticism. It felt a little out

0:10:48.600 --> 0:10:51.400
<v Speaker 1>of step with with our times right now. I don't.

0:10:51.679 --> 0:10:55.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think people there's it's a rough and

0:10:55.840 --> 0:10:58.760
<v Speaker 1>tumble world, and there's certain people when you know, there's

0:10:58.840 --> 0:11:04.720
<v Speaker 1>a certain sensitivity. But uh, he is a provocateur and

0:11:04.800 --> 0:11:08.160
<v Speaker 1>a brilliant artist, and I think it's really important to

0:11:08.240 --> 0:11:15.920
<v Speaker 1>create space for provocateurs to pro to provoke and and uh,

0:11:16.160 --> 0:11:24.400
<v Speaker 1>satirists to satire. And um, I I think he is

0:11:24.440 --> 0:11:28.000
<v Speaker 1>a fair editor. Uh what what he puts on the air,

0:11:28.040 --> 0:11:33.400
<v Speaker 1>he doesn't you know, he's an improv comedian, he he uh. Um.

0:11:33.559 --> 0:11:35.839
<v Speaker 1>The whole essence of improv is go where people will

0:11:35.920 --> 0:11:39.240
<v Speaker 1>lead you, and he lets people lead him down some

0:11:39.280 --> 0:11:42.000
<v Speaker 1>pretty crazy paths. And I think he's a truth teller

0:11:42.559 --> 0:11:49.319
<v Speaker 1>and uh so Uh, I think it's important in our

0:11:49.360 --> 0:11:55.840
<v Speaker 1>culture to allow comedians the space to provoke, do satire.

0:11:56.200 --> 0:11:59.679
<v Speaker 1>And I don't think there's anybody better than Sasha in

0:12:00.000 --> 0:12:05.199
<v Speaker 1>a pretating our times. Um yeah, I mean, I I don't.

0:12:05.400 --> 0:12:10.120
<v Speaker 1>I think he's he's he is a truth teller, and

0:12:10.160 --> 0:12:12.920
<v Speaker 1>I think he's fair and fair and how he puts

0:12:12.960 --> 0:12:15.559
<v Speaker 1>his episodes together. No one's ever accused him of editing

0:12:15.640 --> 0:12:22.600
<v Speaker 1>unfairly taking things out of Contextum, so he follows where

0:12:22.640 --> 0:12:27.680
<v Speaker 1>people where people lead. Um. You mentioned that that that

0:12:27.960 --> 0:12:31.640
<v Speaker 1>Who Was America was an eighteen month development process. That's

0:12:31.679 --> 0:12:34.760
<v Speaker 1>that's interesting. One thing I'm hearing from people is because

0:12:34.760 --> 0:12:37.160
<v Speaker 1>there is such a chase right now for creative talent

0:12:37.240 --> 0:12:41.040
<v Speaker 1>and programming, that development can be very accelerated, sometimes to

0:12:41.080 --> 0:12:43.760
<v Speaker 1>the detriment of the final product. But that sounds like

0:12:43.800 --> 0:12:46.840
<v Speaker 1>a very That sounds like the opposite. Yeah, I mean,

0:12:49.040 --> 0:12:51.400
<v Speaker 1>if you're going to be led by your creators, and

0:12:51.440 --> 0:12:53.800
<v Speaker 1>we try very hard to be led by by our

0:12:53.800 --> 0:12:56.560
<v Speaker 1>creators and give them the space and room and time

0:12:56.960 --> 0:13:00.319
<v Speaker 1>that they need. Um, sometimes you can go asked and

0:13:00.360 --> 0:13:02.000
<v Speaker 1>sometimes I like to go fast and send times. It

0:13:02.000 --> 0:13:06.800
<v Speaker 1>takes longer. And you know, Uh, this was a show

0:13:07.520 --> 0:13:10.120
<v Speaker 1>that had to be invented. The characters had to be invented,

0:13:10.160 --> 0:13:14.760
<v Speaker 1>the the concepts had to be invented. The look and

0:13:14.800 --> 0:13:17.360
<v Speaker 1>the feel and the prosthetics had to be invented. So

0:13:17.360 --> 0:13:19.440
<v Speaker 1>it took it took some time, and then it took

0:13:19.760 --> 0:13:25.360
<v Speaker 1>takes Uh. Um, you gotta you gotta do a lot

0:13:25.400 --> 0:13:28.199
<v Speaker 1>of different pieces to come over to come up with

0:13:28.920 --> 0:13:31.840
<v Speaker 1>uh stuff that is good enough to meet Sasha's barrier

0:13:32.000 --> 0:13:36.679
<v Speaker 1>for you know, his his bar for what works on television. Um,

0:13:36.760 --> 0:13:38.680
<v Speaker 1>so did he did he pitch this to you in

0:13:38.679 --> 0:13:41.040
<v Speaker 1>a nascent form or did he bring you some material

0:13:41.080 --> 0:13:43.920
<v Speaker 1>already shot that wetted your appetite? It was a nascent form,

0:13:44.000 --> 0:13:46.600
<v Speaker 1>nothing was shot. You know. We began to talk about

0:13:46.640 --> 0:13:50.240
<v Speaker 1>the possibility of you know, doing the undercover show that

0:13:51.200 --> 0:13:53.280
<v Speaker 1>he hadn't done for a very long time, and I

0:13:53.360 --> 0:13:56.240
<v Speaker 1>chased him really hard. So he was kind of he

0:13:56.280 --> 0:13:58.720
<v Speaker 1>was he was shocked by representatives or it was a

0:13:58.840 --> 0:14:01.959
<v Speaker 1>connection that you made torely with him. Representatives were involved.

0:14:03.640 --> 0:14:06.600
<v Speaker 1>Speaking of representatives, that's another interesting area of the business

0:14:06.679 --> 0:14:10.760
<v Speaker 1>right now. We are seeing you know, both CIA to

0:14:10.840 --> 0:14:13.679
<v Speaker 1>a greater degree endeavor the parent company of w M

0:14:13.720 --> 0:14:17.360
<v Speaker 1>E Are. They are both and now U t A

0:14:17.800 --> 0:14:20.040
<v Speaker 1>is even starting to get into the into the business

0:14:20.040 --> 0:14:23.200
<v Speaker 1>of production tiptoeing still but but it never in particular

0:14:23.280 --> 0:14:26.080
<v Speaker 1>is really building a roster. Does that concern you to

0:14:26.120 --> 0:14:31.440
<v Speaker 1>see another Yes, they could be another supplier, but they're there.

0:14:32.080 --> 0:14:35.200
<v Speaker 1>They're coming in with an agenda to help talent own

0:14:35.240 --> 0:14:37.880
<v Speaker 1>their control, their destiny. At a time when you want

0:14:37.880 --> 0:14:40.600
<v Speaker 1>to take showtime around the world, it's a lot easier

0:14:40.640 --> 0:14:42.880
<v Speaker 1>for you. I have a number of different feelings, like

0:14:42.960 --> 0:14:46.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm I'm supportive of anybody who wants to put more

0:14:46.800 --> 0:14:53.880
<v Speaker 1>capital into the production of of great television. And uh,

0:14:54.360 --> 0:14:57.400
<v Speaker 1>I think there are certain inherent conflicts of interest that

0:14:57.440 --> 0:15:00.440
<v Speaker 1>are that are dicey. It's not my issue, it's the

0:15:00.480 --> 0:15:05.920
<v Speaker 1>issue of the talent. So I think there's it's a

0:15:05.960 --> 0:15:11.360
<v Speaker 1>little dicey territory. But UM, I'm I have I have

0:15:11.440 --> 0:15:15.720
<v Speaker 1>a real open door policy, and I believe you know. UM,

0:15:15.840 --> 0:15:18.040
<v Speaker 1>somebody brings me a show that I feel like it's

0:15:18.040 --> 0:15:21.560
<v Speaker 1>going to be great for showtime, Uh, I want to

0:15:21.600 --> 0:15:23.680
<v Speaker 1>I want to facilitate that show getting on the air.

0:15:24.240 --> 0:15:26.760
<v Speaker 1>I have business priorities. It's really important to us to

0:15:27.320 --> 0:15:29.960
<v Speaker 1>own the distribution of our of our shows, and I

0:15:29.960 --> 0:15:34.920
<v Speaker 1>don't make any any bones about that. But um, because

0:15:34.960 --> 0:15:37.080
<v Speaker 1>of the way the success that we've been having, the

0:15:37.120 --> 0:15:43.480
<v Speaker 1>desirability of our programming, h nine times out of ten,

0:15:43.520 --> 0:15:48.200
<v Speaker 1>we can offer better distribution terms than anybody else. UM,

0:15:48.280 --> 0:15:53.120
<v Speaker 1>and we've had such dramatic increase in UM and the

0:15:53.160 --> 0:15:55.840
<v Speaker 1>desirability of our programming and ability to be packaged together

0:15:55.960 --> 0:15:59.200
<v Speaker 1>that more often than not, people want even big studios

0:15:59.240 --> 0:16:02.680
<v Speaker 1>want to take advantag of our our distribution deals. So

0:16:03.280 --> 0:16:05.640
<v Speaker 1>we're kind of working it out and in good ways

0:16:05.680 --> 0:16:10.240
<v Speaker 1>that I'm happy. UM. I think, uh, you know, if

0:16:10.240 --> 0:16:16.400
<v Speaker 1>you're in the talent representation business, UM, you got to

0:16:16.440 --> 0:16:22.040
<v Speaker 1>be clear about who you're working for. UM. But I'm

0:16:22.120 --> 0:16:24.680
<v Speaker 1>able to see the grays in it and the opportunities

0:16:24.720 --> 0:16:28.200
<v Speaker 1>and the opportunities for for showtime to be supplied by

0:16:28.560 --> 0:16:32.480
<v Speaker 1>UM some of the you know, agency back companies as

0:16:32.480 --> 0:16:35.480
<v Speaker 1>long as you're willing to put capital in and and uh,

0:16:36.560 --> 0:16:40.480
<v Speaker 1>we can work with them. And there's obviously you know,

0:16:40.680 --> 0:16:44.520
<v Speaker 1>they're going to get behind people with very big visions

0:16:44.720 --> 0:16:46.560
<v Speaker 1>and people that are going to come to the table

0:16:46.640 --> 0:16:49.880
<v Speaker 1>with you know, with likely with very provocative and very

0:16:49.960 --> 0:16:56.720
<v Speaker 1>kind of sizzling ideas. That's interesting. UM. So we do

0:16:56.800 --> 0:16:59.560
<v Speaker 1>business with all commerce. You know, I don't think in

0:16:59.560 --> 0:17:04.840
<v Speaker 1>this in this age, you can afford to uh close

0:17:04.920 --> 0:17:08.160
<v Speaker 1>off any avenues. Are you concerned at all that avenues

0:17:08.240 --> 0:17:11.040
<v Speaker 1>might be closing off to you? Though? We're seeing you know,

0:17:11.640 --> 0:17:15.160
<v Speaker 1>Disney and Fox are soon to be one and they

0:17:15.200 --> 0:17:19.080
<v Speaker 1>are talking very seriously about, you know, launching a truly

0:17:19.200 --> 0:17:23.320
<v Speaker 1>vertical integrated streaming platform that would that would be the

0:17:23.359 --> 0:17:26.760
<v Speaker 1>exclusive place of all Disney content. And you know you

0:17:26.800 --> 0:17:28.560
<v Speaker 1>don't do a ton of business with Disney. But one

0:17:28.600 --> 0:17:31.159
<v Speaker 1>of your one of your breakout shows this past year, Smilth,

0:17:31.680 --> 0:17:34.160
<v Speaker 1>came from ABC Studios. Does it concern you that there

0:17:34.200 --> 0:17:40.400
<v Speaker 1>might be some constriction, Well, I mean I think they're

0:17:40.440 --> 0:17:45.280
<v Speaker 1>clearly launching a streaming service that will be somewhat competitive

0:17:45.920 --> 0:17:49.600
<v Speaker 1>to us, So it means another another competitive competitor on

0:17:49.640 --> 0:17:53.400
<v Speaker 1>the block. Um, but that's not new. There's new entrance

0:17:53.600 --> 0:17:58.719
<v Speaker 1>entrance every day. And our brand is strong. Our relationship

0:17:58.760 --> 0:18:02.520
<v Speaker 1>with our customers wrong, our relationship with our distributors or

0:18:02.600 --> 0:18:07.679
<v Speaker 1>various distributors, whether it's Amazon or Comcast or UH direct

0:18:07.680 --> 0:18:10.960
<v Speaker 1>TV an A T and T which now owns my competitor,

0:18:11.200 --> 0:18:15.040
<v Speaker 1>So that the the environment has gotten more complicated Disney.

0:18:15.080 --> 0:18:18.560
<v Speaker 1>As I finished that sentence, Uh, Disney and A T

0:18:18.680 --> 0:18:22.879
<v Speaker 1>and T now own HBO. My are big competitor. UM

0:18:23.680 --> 0:18:25.359
<v Speaker 1>A T and T and Direct TV pay us a

0:18:25.400 --> 0:18:27.320
<v Speaker 1>lot of money every year, but they want to keep

0:18:27.359 --> 0:18:31.080
<v Speaker 1>selling us. So uh, it just it just makes for

0:18:31.160 --> 0:18:37.120
<v Speaker 1>strange bedfellows. And ultimately, uh, talent wants to go where

0:18:37.160 --> 0:18:40.520
<v Speaker 1>talent wants to go, and they tend to have uh

0:18:40.640 --> 0:18:43.159
<v Speaker 1>a fair amount of saying it. And if I create

0:18:43.520 --> 0:18:49.000
<v Speaker 1>a a successful platform that launches successful shows and create

0:18:49.359 --> 0:18:52.440
<v Speaker 1>a great creative environment, talent will keep wanting to come

0:18:52.480 --> 0:18:56.359
<v Speaker 1>the showtime. And I would bet that even in the

0:18:56.520 --> 0:19:00.639
<v Speaker 1>era of Disney creating whatever new streaming service are going

0:19:00.680 --> 0:19:03.760
<v Speaker 1>to create, there's still gonna be talent that studio that

0:19:04.359 --> 0:19:07.280
<v Speaker 1>wants to come this showtime that will have to be

0:19:07.320 --> 0:19:11.000
<v Speaker 1>allowed to come to showtime under acceptable deal terms in

0:19:11.119 --> 0:19:14.120
<v Speaker 1>order for them to be in business with the talent

0:19:14.160 --> 0:19:16.919
<v Speaker 1>that they want to be in business with. So I

0:19:17.000 --> 0:19:21.760
<v Speaker 1>think there's uh a pretty healthy ecosystem that is self policing.

0:19:23.480 --> 0:19:26.760
<v Speaker 1>That's how we look at it. Um. We we've seen

0:19:26.760 --> 0:19:29.360
<v Speaker 1>this before. We've seen the pendulum swing too. We want

0:19:29.359 --> 0:19:31.800
<v Speaker 1>to own everything too, well, maybe we want to play

0:19:31.840 --> 0:19:35.240
<v Speaker 1>the field. So it's an amazing moment. I want to

0:19:35.240 --> 0:19:38.360
<v Speaker 1>own everything. It's it's the economics are better and it's

0:19:38.400 --> 0:19:43.240
<v Speaker 1>better for us to own everything. But uh, I wouldn't

0:19:44.240 --> 0:19:49.080
<v Speaker 1>not want shameless And um there's there's shows with major

0:19:49.160 --> 0:19:51.960
<v Speaker 1>studios where I can we we we really do all

0:19:51.960 --> 0:19:55.000
<v Speaker 1>the distribution, but we share the ownership and we share

0:19:55.040 --> 0:19:59.600
<v Speaker 1>the upside that those deals are fine. Um, But you know,

0:20:00.040 --> 0:20:04.240
<v Speaker 1>we have a you know, there's just it's it's it's

0:20:04.280 --> 0:20:08.080
<v Speaker 1>gotten complicated. But our ability to be somewhat agnostic, to

0:20:08.200 --> 0:20:14.520
<v Speaker 1>be UM agnostic to the UM whoever supplying it to us,

0:20:14.920 --> 0:20:18.880
<v Speaker 1>to be not tied with a major distribution company we're

0:20:18.880 --> 0:20:21.800
<v Speaker 1>not tied. You know, we're not tied to Comcast, we're

0:20:21.840 --> 0:20:24.879
<v Speaker 1>not tied to direct TV gives us. There's things that

0:20:24.920 --> 0:20:26.800
<v Speaker 1>we can do that it is harder for some of

0:20:26.800 --> 0:20:31.360
<v Speaker 1>our competitors to do because we are actually an independent

0:20:32.119 --> 0:20:37.439
<v Speaker 1>UM company, you know, work Our company is CBS and Showtime,

0:20:37.800 --> 0:20:40.280
<v Speaker 1>which is small in the world that we live in.

0:20:40.320 --> 0:20:44.399
<v Speaker 1>But it also gives us flexibility deal flexibility that some

0:20:44.480 --> 0:20:47.600
<v Speaker 1>of my competitors don't have. We're not like Netflix, where

0:20:47.640 --> 0:20:50.920
<v Speaker 1>you know you're we'll pay you a little bit of premium.

0:20:51.240 --> 0:20:56.520
<v Speaker 1>You have no upside your uh, your international distribution can

0:20:56.520 --> 0:21:00.040
<v Speaker 1>take a nap. Your domestic syndication people they can I

0:21:00.119 --> 0:21:05.960
<v Speaker 1>can nap UM. Uh. We're still attractive place for independence

0:21:06.040 --> 0:21:12.360
<v Speaker 1>or the semi independence to do business UM because UM.

0:21:12.400 --> 0:21:17.840
<v Speaker 1>Because we can we can generate hits that have ancillary value. Certainly,

0:21:18.040 --> 0:21:23.320
<v Speaker 1>certainly you've you've proven that UM do you in the

0:21:23.440 --> 0:21:26.600
<v Speaker 1>world where everything so much is on demand, and there's

0:21:26.640 --> 0:21:29.120
<v Speaker 1>so much viewing tends to be done in a binge format.

0:21:29.359 --> 0:21:32.359
<v Speaker 1>Do you still think about programming flow? Do you still

0:21:32.480 --> 0:21:37.400
<v Speaker 1>program due to a certain extent? I mean, I mean

0:21:38.880 --> 0:21:43.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm using Shameless to launch Kidding to help Kidding get

0:21:43.880 --> 0:21:47.439
<v Speaker 1>off the ground, the new Gym Carey show Kidding from

0:21:47.520 --> 0:21:50.640
<v Speaker 1>Jim Carrey and Michelle Gandry, and that's that's coming up

0:21:50.640 --> 0:21:54.600
<v Speaker 1>in September, and uh, Kidding is going to have a

0:21:54.640 --> 0:21:58.480
<v Speaker 1>better shot for having Shameless in front of it. It's

0:21:58.640 --> 0:22:00.240
<v Speaker 1>far from the be all on the end at all.

0:22:00.359 --> 0:22:04.840
<v Speaker 1>I could easily launch Kidding without Shameless, but I think

0:22:04.840 --> 0:22:08.960
<v Speaker 1>there's a compatibility between those two shows. Uh Shameless was

0:22:09.000 --> 0:22:17.119
<v Speaker 1>helpful and launching um smelf and so it's to use

0:22:17.160 --> 0:22:20.119
<v Speaker 1>a double negative. It doesn't not matter, but it's way

0:22:20.200 --> 0:22:22.879
<v Speaker 1>less important than it used to be. And more important

0:22:23.119 --> 0:22:28.640
<v Speaker 1>is the continual introduction of new shows on a regular basis,

0:22:28.920 --> 0:22:32.199
<v Speaker 1>so there's new things to cause sign up behavior, So

0:22:32.200 --> 0:22:34.159
<v Speaker 1>people who are subscribing to es feel like they're always

0:22:34.200 --> 0:22:38.760
<v Speaker 1>getting something new and interesting. Right. Because the flip side

0:22:38.800 --> 0:22:41.560
<v Speaker 1>of making it much easier to sign up, it's much

0:22:41.600 --> 0:22:45.840
<v Speaker 1>easier to easy on, easy off, and so you better

0:22:45.880 --> 0:22:48.280
<v Speaker 1>continue to deliver and are the fact that we have

0:22:49.600 --> 0:22:55.760
<v Speaker 1>four of the six top scripted shows UH, and they

0:22:55.760 --> 0:22:57.520
<v Speaker 1>don't all air at the same time year they lay

0:22:57.560 --> 0:23:01.199
<v Speaker 1>out of the air. We're talking about Shameless and Billions

0:23:01.440 --> 0:23:08.320
<v Speaker 1>and the shy um and UH and Homeland UM, which

0:23:08.400 --> 0:23:12.840
<v Speaker 1>is not to mention Ray Donovan or who is America

0:23:13.160 --> 0:23:17.360
<v Speaker 1>or Kidding or smelf um. These we have more shows

0:23:17.400 --> 0:23:22.199
<v Speaker 1>that matter than the other premium competitors and UH, the

0:23:22.200 --> 0:23:26.280
<v Speaker 1>ability to lay them out across the year UH means

0:23:26.920 --> 0:23:29.359
<v Speaker 1>we have less of a churn issue than some of

0:23:29.359 --> 0:23:37.000
<v Speaker 1>our competitors. UM. On the in the area of of

0:23:37.040 --> 0:23:40.920
<v Speaker 1>like the documentary programming, the sports that you're going into,

0:23:41.040 --> 0:23:43.440
<v Speaker 1>your having a topical late night show coming up with

0:23:43.640 --> 0:23:49.560
<v Speaker 1>de Susan Marrow, Um, would you Those aren't the kind

0:23:49.560 --> 0:23:51.800
<v Speaker 1>of shows that have, you know, a big back end

0:23:51.800 --> 0:23:55.600
<v Speaker 1>for somebody down the road, But those are more important

0:23:55.640 --> 0:23:57.560
<v Speaker 1>to you in terms of expanding the breadth of what

0:23:57.640 --> 0:24:02.640
<v Speaker 1>you offer to make it to make showtime really sticky. UM,

0:24:02.800 --> 0:24:04.080
<v Speaker 1>we're able to get a lot of I mean I

0:24:04.400 --> 0:24:08.080
<v Speaker 1>look at different things differently, so news and documentary shows

0:24:08.119 --> 0:24:12.440
<v Speaker 1>like the Circus or UH, the Fourth of State, about

0:24:12.440 --> 0:24:15.720
<v Speaker 1>the new York Times or by the way, um, which

0:24:15.760 --> 0:24:19.720
<v Speaker 1>is Emmy nominated, and it is an incredible show. And

0:24:20.000 --> 0:24:22.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, it really sort of looked at the first

0:24:22.200 --> 0:24:24.200
<v Speaker 1>year of the Trump administration from the point of view

0:24:24.200 --> 0:24:26.359
<v Speaker 1>of the New York Times. And it gets watched. It's

0:24:26.359 --> 0:24:29.760
<v Speaker 1>getting watched. It got watched a lot last night, Um,

0:24:29.840 --> 0:24:33.199
<v Speaker 1>because people are catching up to it. It has a

0:24:33.320 --> 0:24:38.280
<v Speaker 1>long lifespan, and it's an incredible Uh, it's an incredible

0:24:38.320 --> 0:24:45.880
<v Speaker 1>document and so um ah, those things I think enriched

0:24:45.880 --> 0:24:48.880
<v Speaker 1>the experience and they create a lot of news off

0:24:48.880 --> 0:24:53.600
<v Speaker 1>the entertainment pages. Uh. You know, um, shut Up and Dribble,

0:24:53.600 --> 0:24:57.160
<v Speaker 1>which we announced yesterday. Um, you know, on the heels

0:24:57.280 --> 0:25:01.639
<v Speaker 1>of this trip Twitter attack from the White House towards

0:25:01.680 --> 0:25:05.240
<v Speaker 1>Lebron James over the weekend. Here's something we've been working

0:25:05.240 --> 0:25:08.840
<v Speaker 1>on for a year, smartly titled shut Up and Dribble,

0:25:08.880 --> 0:25:11.800
<v Speaker 1>based on the Laura Ingraham you know Laura A. Graham's

0:25:11.960 --> 0:25:15.200
<v Speaker 1>um warning at professional athletes. We just want to we

0:25:15.240 --> 0:25:16.560
<v Speaker 1>want to see a play ball. We don't want to

0:25:16.560 --> 0:25:21.520
<v Speaker 1>hear what you have to think. Um. Just you're when

0:25:21.520 --> 0:25:23.720
<v Speaker 1>you're able to have things that feel like they're in

0:25:23.760 --> 0:25:30.160
<v Speaker 1>the zeitgeist, they have enormous impact on your brand. So, uh,

0:25:30.200 --> 0:25:37.040
<v Speaker 1>that's the value of documentary filmmaking. UM the Trade also

0:25:37.119 --> 0:25:40.600
<v Speaker 1>Emmy nominated this year Matthew Heineman. And when last year's

0:25:40.600 --> 0:25:44.920
<v Speaker 1>Oscar sort of digging really deep into the drug epidemic

0:25:45.160 --> 0:25:49.480
<v Speaker 1>in America, really powerful piece of filmmaking gets got watched

0:25:49.480 --> 0:25:54.080
<v Speaker 1>a lot. I mean he's really showing, uh, the opioid

0:25:54.160 --> 0:25:57.920
<v Speaker 1>drug the drug crisis from point of view of people

0:25:57.960 --> 0:26:01.320
<v Speaker 1>living in Ohio and people out of the Mexican border

0:26:01.880 --> 0:26:05.120
<v Speaker 1>growing and shipping, and you're really inside on both sides.

0:26:05.640 --> 0:26:12.199
<v Speaker 1>UM boxing UM is a resurgent American sport that is

0:26:12.200 --> 0:26:16.640
<v Speaker 1>starting to take UM, starting to take market share back

0:26:16.680 --> 0:26:20.399
<v Speaker 1>from m m A. It's young, obviously male, but it

0:26:20.520 --> 0:26:25.280
<v Speaker 1>is it has young good demographics. People perceive boxing to

0:26:25.359 --> 0:26:29.400
<v Speaker 1>be an older person sport, but you know, great young

0:26:29.640 --> 0:26:35.920
<v Speaker 1>African American, Latino uh demos and uh with that goes

0:26:35.960 --> 0:26:39.440
<v Speaker 1>a lot of young white kids to watching boxing, and

0:26:39.840 --> 0:26:45.600
<v Speaker 1>uh it is UM it's become a real part of

0:26:45.600 --> 0:26:50.080
<v Speaker 1>who we are. And UM we have certain people exiting,

0:26:50.200 --> 0:26:53.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, some of our competition slowly exiting the business

0:26:53.800 --> 0:26:56.600
<v Speaker 1>and we become the dominant home and there's there's great

0:26:56.680 --> 0:26:58.639
<v Speaker 1>value and you know, I don't think we're gonna be

0:26:58.680 --> 0:27:03.040
<v Speaker 1>competing for uh NBA or NFL rights anytime soon, but

0:27:03.280 --> 0:27:06.679
<v Speaker 1>to be able to be the most important home for

0:27:07.600 --> 0:27:13.520
<v Speaker 1>a major sport has has real ongoing value and uh um.

0:27:13.520 --> 0:27:17.080
<v Speaker 1>You know, some of our biggest single night sign ups

0:27:17.160 --> 0:27:21.720
<v Speaker 1>are boxing events, so uh, you know, we're we're we're

0:27:21.760 --> 0:27:25.800
<v Speaker 1>bullish about that and so you know, we're offering we're

0:27:25.800 --> 0:27:29.919
<v Speaker 1>trying to be number one or number two and and

0:27:29.960 --> 0:27:34.320
<v Speaker 1>everything that we're doing UM, but we're slowly expanding the

0:27:34.400 --> 0:27:37.280
<v Speaker 1>range of what we're doing. Jesus and Marrow, I think

0:27:38.080 --> 0:27:43.000
<v Speaker 1>UH for people under thirty five is a home run

0:27:43.160 --> 0:27:47.040
<v Speaker 1>and I think they have unlimited potential to get uh

0:27:48.280 --> 0:27:52.360
<v Speaker 1>um to really to really get big. Those guys are

0:27:52.680 --> 0:27:56.240
<v Speaker 1>next league talent. They're not UM. And I think the

0:27:56.400 --> 0:27:59.960
<v Speaker 1>really original you know so much of Late Night Calm

0:28:00.000 --> 0:28:04.240
<v Speaker 1>and he kind of comes out of UM either that

0:28:04.480 --> 0:28:08.879
<v Speaker 1>night Show or the Daily Show and Jesus America come

0:28:08.920 --> 0:28:11.000
<v Speaker 1>from a different place, and I think they will the

0:28:11.040 --> 0:28:16.520
<v Speaker 1>Bronx Okays called the Bronx um and uh and they

0:28:16.600 --> 0:28:18.720
<v Speaker 1>just have their own voice, and I think they're gonna

0:28:18.760 --> 0:28:21.919
<v Speaker 1>be uh They're gonna be a long time force and

0:28:22.119 --> 0:28:23.960
<v Speaker 1>it is interesting that all these things that we're talking

0:28:24.000 --> 0:28:29.000
<v Speaker 1>about you never heard, you never rarely heard Showtime or

0:28:29.119 --> 0:28:31.840
<v Speaker 1>HBO in the context of something that was happening in

0:28:31.880 --> 0:28:35.720
<v Speaker 1>the headlines. And I think now we're in the headlines

0:28:35.760 --> 0:28:44.200
<v Speaker 1>a lot, you know, UH, UM, Sasha Baron Cohen makes headlines. UM,

0:28:44.440 --> 0:28:47.280
<v Speaker 1>shut Up and Dribble Yesterday makes headlines. Of course, it's

0:28:47.280 --> 0:28:51.800
<v Speaker 1>a headline when a long running, UH, celebrated show like Homeland,

0:28:52.200 --> 0:28:56.440
<v Speaker 1>UM announces it's going into its final season. UM. But

0:28:57.080 --> 0:29:00.880
<v Speaker 1>the ability for Sasha Baron Cohen to make front page

0:29:00.880 --> 0:29:04.200
<v Speaker 1>of the New York Times UM before it's even launched,

0:29:04.240 --> 0:29:09.200
<v Speaker 1>because major politicians are UM, you know, coming out talking

0:29:09.200 --> 0:29:14.640
<v Speaker 1>about their experience with the show. UM. It's UM. It's

0:29:14.640 --> 0:29:16.360
<v Speaker 1>good to make noise and it's good to make ways.

0:29:16.400 --> 0:29:20.520
<v Speaker 1>And I think that we've had a pretty consistent ability

0:29:21.080 --> 0:29:24.800
<v Speaker 1>to anticipate the zeitgeist and sort of be in the

0:29:24.880 --> 0:29:27.160
<v Speaker 1>right place at the right time. I mean, certainly Shut

0:29:27.240 --> 0:29:28.520
<v Speaker 1>Up and Dribble as a case of being in the

0:29:28.600 --> 0:29:30.240
<v Speaker 1>right place at the right time. So you have the

0:29:30.240 --> 0:29:34.680
<v Speaker 1>show about uh, the changing politics of being an African

0:29:34.720 --> 0:29:38.880
<v Speaker 1>American athlete, UH, centered on Lebron James and you're ready

0:29:38.920 --> 0:29:44.040
<v Speaker 1>to announce it on the Monday after Um, that was

0:29:44.080 --> 0:29:49.120
<v Speaker 1>the dominant Twitter story of the weekend, Trump versus Lebron No,

0:29:49.200 --> 0:29:51.040
<v Speaker 1>you couldn't buy that. So there's a certain amount of

0:29:51.080 --> 0:29:54.360
<v Speaker 1>luck involved in that. But it's also because we're uh,

0:29:54.400 --> 0:29:58.960
<v Speaker 1>we're fishing in the right waters. And you know, Vinny Malholtra,

0:29:59.080 --> 0:30:02.160
<v Speaker 1>who's buying you know, and making making the decisions on

0:30:02.200 --> 0:30:06.480
<v Speaker 1>our documentaries and making those decisions, is fishing in the

0:30:06.520 --> 0:30:13.040
<v Speaker 1>right waters and he's not, um, you know, he's you know,

0:30:13.120 --> 0:30:16.520
<v Speaker 1>we're doing stuff about the New York Times, about uh,

0:30:16.600 --> 0:30:20.560
<v Speaker 1>the FBI versus the presidency because we kind of saw

0:30:20.840 --> 0:30:22.920
<v Speaker 1>about a year ago that this was going to be

0:30:22.920 --> 0:30:25.720
<v Speaker 1>an important story and got Alex Gibney to do it.

0:30:25.800 --> 0:30:30.040
<v Speaker 1>And it's a historical documentary. But that's a fraught relationship

0:30:30.120 --> 0:30:36.560
<v Speaker 1>over time, um uh you know, And you have to

0:30:36.600 --> 0:30:41.200
<v Speaker 1>have people inside the organization who are who have their

0:30:41.200 --> 0:30:44.440
<v Speaker 1>finger on the pulse, um and care about that and

0:30:44.480 --> 0:30:47.640
<v Speaker 1>make that a brand priority in order to have those

0:30:48.360 --> 0:30:52.400
<v Speaker 1>lucky moments. I have to ask you, of course about Homeland.

0:30:52.440 --> 0:30:55.440
<v Speaker 1>That's got to be very for you personally. That was

0:30:55.800 --> 0:30:58.720
<v Speaker 1>literally the first show you greenlit when you came to showtime.

0:30:58.960 --> 0:31:01.080
<v Speaker 1>And you know, I don't have to tell you how

0:31:01.160 --> 0:31:03.640
<v Speaker 1>rare it is that something like that in eight years,

0:31:03.800 --> 0:31:07.720
<v Speaker 1>eight seasons now, going on nine seasons later, it's you know,

0:31:07.920 --> 0:31:11.000
<v Speaker 1>it's going to have a very triumphant exit, no doubt. Yeah,

0:31:11.040 --> 0:31:16.520
<v Speaker 1>I think you know, um, I you know, Homeland has

0:31:16.560 --> 0:31:19.640
<v Speaker 1>been a very special show. I think it's done an amazing,

0:31:19.640 --> 0:31:23.920
<v Speaker 1>amazing job of reinventing itself over time. I mean it

0:31:24.000 --> 0:31:28.960
<v Speaker 1>really began as the carry in Brodie story, UM, and

0:31:29.560 --> 0:31:33.040
<v Speaker 1>there was a huge question would it what would it

0:31:33.080 --> 0:31:39.120
<v Speaker 1>be after Brodie? UM? And I always knew and Alex

0:31:39.160 --> 0:31:42.360
<v Speaker 1>gonz always knew that there was a core, There was

0:31:42.400 --> 0:31:44.760
<v Speaker 1>a great character in Carrie Matheson, and there was a

0:31:44.800 --> 0:31:50.200
<v Speaker 1>core franchise and what is the place of America in

0:31:50.240 --> 0:31:53.120
<v Speaker 1>the world in the twenty one century? This complicated place,

0:31:53.720 --> 0:31:55.720
<v Speaker 1>and that was always the subject of the show through

0:31:55.720 --> 0:31:57.920
<v Speaker 1>the spy franchise. And he I think he did an

0:31:57.920 --> 0:32:02.200
<v Speaker 1>incredible job of reinventing it post that initial kind of

0:32:02.720 --> 0:32:07.240
<v Speaker 1>push pull kind of romance um story, and then he

0:32:07.280 --> 0:32:11.800
<v Speaker 1>reinvented it year after year and through very careful research,

0:32:12.000 --> 0:32:15.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, being a great storyteller and and really good

0:32:15.320 --> 0:32:19.040
<v Speaker 1>lines of Uh, information that's coming to him from the

0:32:19.040 --> 0:32:22.000
<v Speaker 1>State Department, CIA and all the people he talked to

0:32:22.080 --> 0:32:25.840
<v Speaker 1>in Washington. He's got good sources. Has made is reinvented

0:32:25.840 --> 0:32:30.080
<v Speaker 1>a show really well year after year. And Uh. When

0:32:30.080 --> 0:32:33.680
<v Speaker 1>they first started talking about Alex saying, I think I

0:32:33.760 --> 0:32:35.680
<v Speaker 1>might be done, I think I'm ready to be done.

0:32:35.800 --> 0:32:37.400
<v Speaker 1>You know, this is the third year of a three

0:32:37.480 --> 0:32:39.920
<v Speaker 1>year deal. I tried to have a little bit of

0:32:39.960 --> 0:32:42.200
<v Speaker 1>a cooling off period to make sure that he was

0:32:42.440 --> 0:32:48.720
<v Speaker 1>ready to be done. Um, and he was. When he

0:32:48.760 --> 0:32:51.200
<v Speaker 1>was steadfast about it, it felt like this is the

0:32:51.280 --> 0:32:53.240
<v Speaker 1>right time he's I think he's gonna have a great ending.

0:32:54.320 --> 0:32:58.880
<v Speaker 1>I think, Um. You know, Claire Daines and Manny Patinkin

0:32:59.040 --> 0:33:02.960
<v Speaker 1>have just had uh done incredible work. I think they've

0:33:03.000 --> 0:33:06.960
<v Speaker 1>loved their experiences. It's been a very happy experience for

0:33:07.040 --> 0:33:11.040
<v Speaker 1>everybody involved. You know. I also have to handed to

0:33:11.680 --> 0:33:15.120
<v Speaker 1>Howard Gordon, Leslie, Lincoln Gladder. They've all been there the

0:33:15.160 --> 0:33:20.280
<v Speaker 1>whole way. Um and um and Rick Rosen actually uh

0:33:20.720 --> 0:33:25.680
<v Speaker 1>endeavor age and who kind of represents everybody everybody involved.

0:33:25.840 --> 0:33:30.680
<v Speaker 1>And and while we're naming names, give to Bert Sulky,

0:33:31.320 --> 0:33:37.160
<v Speaker 1>uh Foxe uh, Gary Levine and Randy Rounkole at showtime,

0:33:37.200 --> 0:33:41.240
<v Speaker 1>and it's been a very happy experience for everyone involved.

0:33:41.240 --> 0:33:42.920
<v Speaker 1>And every one of those people has been there from

0:33:43.000 --> 0:33:48.000
<v Speaker 1>the beginning. UM, and I think it is will go

0:33:48.080 --> 0:33:51.600
<v Speaker 1>out a real winner as a programmer. Does it give

0:33:51.600 --> 0:33:53.400
<v Speaker 1>you a little uneas though, because it has been such

0:33:53.400 --> 0:33:57.560
<v Speaker 1>a cornerstone of your schedule. I believe in you know,

0:33:59.200 --> 0:34:04.200
<v Speaker 1>I believe last as long as your natural born life

0:34:04.280 --> 0:34:06.920
<v Speaker 1>and then uh and then move on. I believe in

0:34:06.960 --> 0:34:12.120
<v Speaker 1>the renewal of television. Uh. We have strong shows at

0:34:12.160 --> 0:34:14.640
<v Speaker 1>every stage of their lifestyle. We've got a brand new

0:34:14.680 --> 0:34:19.440
<v Speaker 1>show in uh, The Shy, which is showing real signs

0:34:19.719 --> 0:34:23.080
<v Speaker 1>of being a hit. We've got Billions, which just finished

0:34:23.120 --> 0:34:28.160
<v Speaker 1>season three stronger than ever um and was robbed, was

0:34:28.280 --> 0:34:32.360
<v Speaker 1>robbed of Emmy nominations. It's just not It's for whatever reason,

0:34:32.400 --> 0:34:37.800
<v Speaker 1>Billions is not nailed that particular popularity contest. And I

0:34:37.840 --> 0:34:42.640
<v Speaker 1>think it has something to do with uh, um, the

0:34:42.719 --> 0:34:48.080
<v Speaker 1>glossiness of it, the perceived brow nous of it. I'm

0:34:48.120 --> 0:34:51.440
<v Speaker 1>not sure, but it is as uh. I mean, I

0:34:51.520 --> 0:34:53.719
<v Speaker 1>reread a lot of scripts and as as you know,

0:34:54.239 --> 0:34:59.080
<v Speaker 1>it is as well written and well acted as any

0:34:59.120 --> 0:35:01.520
<v Speaker 1>of the shows that are that are nominated, so you know,

0:35:02.120 --> 0:35:05.800
<v Speaker 1>but anyway, UM, I feel great about where we stands.

0:35:05.840 --> 0:35:07.960
<v Speaker 1>We have we have shows that every every step. We

0:35:08.000 --> 0:35:10.480
<v Speaker 1>have not had too many follow years where there's been

0:35:10.800 --> 0:35:13.120
<v Speaker 1>nothing stick. We just add a new show and add

0:35:13.120 --> 0:35:15.640
<v Speaker 1>a new show and slightly picking up the pace of

0:35:15.640 --> 0:35:20.080
<v Speaker 1>adding the new shows. So I think, um, we're incredibly

0:35:20.080 --> 0:35:24.400
<v Speaker 1>well positioned for the future. Um, these last couple of

0:35:24.440 --> 0:35:29.640
<v Speaker 1>years have been have been great with um the Shy

0:35:29.680 --> 0:35:33.080
<v Speaker 1>and Smith and Billions and I think Kidding is gonna

0:35:33.120 --> 0:35:37.640
<v Speaker 1>matter and uh, and you know, two new shows I'm

0:35:37.680 --> 0:35:42.120
<v Speaker 1>really excited about in Black Monday with Don Cheetle and

0:35:42.960 --> 0:35:47.479
<v Speaker 1>Regina Hall and Andrew Reynolds and uh, then you're gonna

0:35:47.480 --> 0:35:50.279
<v Speaker 1>see Sitting on a Hill with Kevin Bacon and all

0:35:50.360 --> 0:35:53.160
<v Speaker 1>this Hodge and I think these are all sort of

0:35:53.239 --> 0:35:58.279
<v Speaker 1>going to be positive have positive impact on our on

0:35:58.360 --> 0:36:01.840
<v Speaker 1>our service. Have you talked at all, even in the

0:36:01.840 --> 0:36:06.000
<v Speaker 1>broad strokes with Alex Ganza about the vision, I'm not.

0:36:06.040 --> 0:36:10.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't expect you to give it to no, I

0:36:10.080 --> 0:36:13.880
<v Speaker 1>actually haven't. I mean I've had I know what he

0:36:13.960 --> 0:36:17.920
<v Speaker 1>was thinking a year or two years ago, because I

0:36:17.960 --> 0:36:20.680
<v Speaker 1>had this conversation with him, you know, along the way

0:36:20.760 --> 0:36:26.480
<v Speaker 1>in previous seasons. But in this period between uh, last

0:36:26.480 --> 0:36:29.160
<v Speaker 1>season and this season, when we were having the cooling

0:36:29.200 --> 0:36:33.000
<v Speaker 1>off period, are you sure you're you're ready to end it? Um?

0:36:33.040 --> 0:36:35.560
<v Speaker 1>I haven't. I have not pushed him on that conversation.

0:36:35.880 --> 0:36:37.480
<v Speaker 1>And I think now he's getting ready to go to

0:36:37.560 --> 0:36:41.239
<v Speaker 1>d C for his you know, with the with the

0:36:41.320 --> 0:36:44.040
<v Speaker 1>writing staff and actually some of the actors. I think

0:36:44.080 --> 0:36:47.080
<v Speaker 1>Claire is hoping to be part of it, but she's

0:36:47.080 --> 0:36:53.640
<v Speaker 1>also expecting about to have a baby. Um, And I

0:36:53.760 --> 0:36:56.600
<v Speaker 1>know better than to ask him too many questions before

0:36:56.600 --> 0:37:00.200
<v Speaker 1>he goes to d C. So Hill to all me

0:37:00.320 --> 0:37:03.040
<v Speaker 1>and his right time. So I knew, I knew where

0:37:03.080 --> 0:37:04.759
<v Speaker 1>his head was a year ago, but I'm not sure

0:37:04.760 --> 0:37:09.080
<v Speaker 1>where his head is today, to be honest. Another interesting

0:37:09.200 --> 0:37:11.839
<v Speaker 1>thing about Homeland is for all those people, all those

0:37:11.880 --> 0:37:15.759
<v Speaker 1>heavy hitters, Alex Leslie, Lincoln, Gladder to stayed with it.

0:37:16.000 --> 0:37:18.439
<v Speaker 1>Yeah that's amazing. You know, used to be to three

0:37:18.480 --> 0:37:20.800
<v Speaker 1>seasons and you know a shore runner would want to

0:37:20.800 --> 0:37:27.120
<v Speaker 1>go onto something else, and uh, it can work either way.

0:37:27.360 --> 0:37:30.399
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I'm not a verse in some situations too.

0:37:31.440 --> 0:37:34.000
<v Speaker 1>You've told the stories, you know, one writer has told

0:37:34.000 --> 0:37:36.600
<v Speaker 1>the stories in their brain against a certain concept and

0:37:36.640 --> 0:37:39.040
<v Speaker 1>then let's get somebody else's brain in there. So I'm

0:37:39.040 --> 0:37:42.319
<v Speaker 1>not against it, um, but it is a beautiful thing

0:37:42.320 --> 0:37:45.840
<v Speaker 1>when you have somebody really stay with the work of

0:37:46.000 --> 0:37:50.440
<v Speaker 1>art overtime, UH, make it really personal in the way

0:37:50.480 --> 0:37:54.320
<v Speaker 1>that you know, let's be honest, fundamentally, it's the mind

0:37:54.360 --> 0:38:01.200
<v Speaker 1>meld between Alex Sinclair. It's what at its core uh

0:38:01.239 --> 0:38:06.359
<v Speaker 1>and and Leslie has been a beautiful, beautiful realizer of that.

0:38:07.160 --> 0:38:10.920
<v Speaker 1>But you know, television at its deepest core is about

0:38:10.920 --> 0:38:14.200
<v Speaker 1>the back and forth between writer and actor. And UH,

0:38:16.440 --> 0:38:22.680
<v Speaker 1>I really admire the creative relationship that developed between Alex

0:38:23.080 --> 0:38:25.200
<v Speaker 1>and Claire, and I think it's a real tribute to

0:38:25.239 --> 0:38:30.680
<v Speaker 1>both of them as generous um, generous artists. They kind

0:38:30.680 --> 0:38:35.000
<v Speaker 1>of like, we're very careful to manage that relationship and

0:38:35.160 --> 0:38:38.480
<v Speaker 1>U um, Claire takes care of Alex and Alex takes

0:38:38.520 --> 0:38:40.520
<v Speaker 1>care of Claire, and it's a beautiful thing. And then

0:38:40.520 --> 0:38:47.319
<v Speaker 1>you have you know, Mandy and Leslie uh bringing their

0:38:47.400 --> 0:38:50.320
<v Speaker 1>top spin. It's it's it's kind of very exciting to watch.

0:38:50.719 --> 0:38:53.600
<v Speaker 1>Could we see continuing Adventures of Saul Barronson? Is there

0:38:53.640 --> 0:38:59.120
<v Speaker 1>any kind of franchising or spinoff even remotely possible. It's

0:38:59.160 --> 0:39:04.520
<v Speaker 1>always possible. I I think it's important that the show

0:39:06.680 --> 0:39:09.920
<v Speaker 1>come to an end, come to a great end before

0:39:10.000 --> 0:39:12.160
<v Speaker 1>any of that stuff is really you know, we're not

0:39:12.239 --> 0:39:15.720
<v Speaker 1>a broadcast network. Are not obliged to do something like that. Um.

0:39:15.760 --> 0:39:18.879
<v Speaker 1>I would always listen to it. Uh, you know, any

0:39:18.960 --> 0:39:23.359
<v Speaker 1>ideas that the core creators wanted to talk about, but

0:39:24.120 --> 0:39:26.560
<v Speaker 1>I wouldn't hold my breath. Or could it be the

0:39:26.640 --> 0:39:28.640
<v Speaker 1>kind of thing that would rest for a couple of

0:39:28.680 --> 0:39:31.880
<v Speaker 1>years and then maybe they might have an inspiration? Absolutely,

0:39:31.880 --> 0:39:35.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean I do believe that. Um As I say,

0:39:35.680 --> 0:39:39.640
<v Speaker 1>the core idea the franchise, which is, yes, it's a

0:39:39.680 --> 0:39:43.520
<v Speaker 1>spy franchise, but at its core, what is America's place

0:39:44.640 --> 0:39:50.239
<v Speaker 1>in a complicated century world? That will not be an

0:39:50.239 --> 0:39:54.919
<v Speaker 1>obsolete idea, you know until we get to the twenty

0:39:54.960 --> 0:39:59.200
<v Speaker 1>second century. You know that that that construct is kind

0:39:59.200 --> 0:40:02.000
<v Speaker 1>of you could adapted to your own challenge right now?

0:40:02.000 --> 0:40:06.040
<v Speaker 1>What is Showtime's place in an expanding programming universe? My

0:40:06.160 --> 0:40:08.840
<v Speaker 1>question for you. You became CEO just about two and

0:40:08.840 --> 0:40:11.920
<v Speaker 1>a half years ago. Um, what and you came up

0:40:11.920 --> 0:40:15.239
<v Speaker 1>as a programming executive at NBC in the in the

0:40:15.320 --> 0:40:19.239
<v Speaker 1>real you know, glory days of Muss TV Fox. You

0:40:19.280 --> 0:40:23.120
<v Speaker 1>worked as a producer. When you became the top executive

0:40:23.120 --> 0:40:25.759
<v Speaker 1>at showtime, what did you find You know, obviously you

0:40:25.800 --> 0:40:29.000
<v Speaker 1>brought an incredible programming resume, what did you find personally

0:40:29.760 --> 0:40:32.799
<v Speaker 1>hard or challenging or what was the learning curve for you?

0:40:32.840 --> 0:40:37.319
<v Speaker 1>Like to become a CEO. I find myself as motivated

0:40:37.320 --> 0:40:39.640
<v Speaker 1>by the business side as I do by the creative

0:40:39.640 --> 0:40:43.240
<v Speaker 1>side at this point in my career, and becoming CEO

0:40:43.400 --> 0:40:48.680
<v Speaker 1>two and a half years ago coincided with a radical

0:40:48.800 --> 0:40:53.080
<v Speaker 1>change and how we make our money uh UM. I

0:40:53.200 --> 0:40:58.000
<v Speaker 1>came in about six months before we launched O T

0:40:58.160 --> 0:41:03.560
<v Speaker 1>T and uh UM, and so I was sort of

0:41:03.880 --> 0:41:07.279
<v Speaker 1>there in the planning and has radically transformed our our organization,

0:41:07.680 --> 0:41:10.360
<v Speaker 1>how we market Who the people that we have in

0:41:10.360 --> 0:41:14.600
<v Speaker 1>our marketing department are. We have um a core group

0:41:14.719 --> 0:41:17.759
<v Speaker 1>of engineers. We never had engineers at at show time,

0:41:17.800 --> 0:41:21.120
<v Speaker 1>with exception that people who put put the signal up

0:41:21.120 --> 0:41:25.920
<v Speaker 1>on the satellite. But UM uh so all that is

0:41:26.360 --> 0:41:29.480
<v Speaker 1>really different. So I was kind of there for the

0:41:29.600 --> 0:41:33.640
<v Speaker 1>um you know, able to shape the transformation of an organization,

0:41:34.160 --> 0:41:37.799
<v Speaker 1>transformation of a of a of a culture. And I

0:41:37.840 --> 0:41:45.439
<v Speaker 1>find that incredibly motivating and fulfilling and uh so, um yeah,

0:41:45.440 --> 0:41:47.680
<v Speaker 1>in one sense, I stepping onto a moving train, but

0:41:47.960 --> 0:41:50.520
<v Speaker 1>um I was stepping onto a train that was moving

0:41:50.520 --> 0:41:54.480
<v Speaker 1>in a significantly different direction. And uh and really able

0:41:54.520 --> 0:41:58.520
<v Speaker 1>to shape that that that new direction. And so I

0:41:58.560 --> 0:42:03.360
<v Speaker 1>find that, you know, incredibly rewarding. Great, Well, congratulations on

0:42:03.400 --> 0:42:05.479
<v Speaker 1>your success today, Thank you so much for your time.

0:42:05.640 --> 0:42:11.000
<v Speaker 1>Thank you all right, thanks for listening. Be sure to

0:42:11.120 --> 0:42:13.960
<v Speaker 1>join us next week for another episode of Strictly Business

0:42:16.200 --> 0:42:16.239
<v Speaker 1>m