WEBVTT - Money Stuff Podcast: Stripe's John Collison

0:00:03.080 --> 0:00:18.480
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio news.

0:00:19.760 --> 0:00:22.599
<v Speaker 2>Hey Marin talks to money listeners. Hope you're preparing for

0:00:22.640 --> 0:00:24.960
<v Speaker 2>a lovely holiday break. We are going to be off

0:00:24.960 --> 0:00:26.920
<v Speaker 2>for a few weeks, resting up for another great year

0:00:26.920 --> 0:00:29.400
<v Speaker 2>of interviews. But do not worry. We're bringing you some

0:00:29.440 --> 0:00:31.920
<v Speaker 2>great stuff It doesn't do in the meantime. Starting with

0:00:32.000 --> 0:00:34.280
<v Speaker 2>another episode from our colleagues on the Money Stuff team,

0:00:34.560 --> 0:00:37.519
<v Speaker 2>hosts Matt Levine and Katie Greifeld spoke with John Collison,

0:00:37.520 --> 0:00:39.879
<v Speaker 2>the co founder and president of Stripe. It was a

0:00:39.920 --> 0:00:42.639
<v Speaker 2>really interesting conversation about the financial services business, the case

0:00:42.640 --> 0:00:46.120
<v Speaker 2>he's making for crypto, and why he doesn't think IBOs matter.

0:00:46.240 --> 0:00:48.400
<v Speaker 2>I disagree, by the way, enjoy and be sure to

0:00:48.400 --> 0:00:50.840
<v Speaker 2>catch more episodes by subscribing to The Money Stuff Feed.

0:00:53.640 --> 0:00:55.840
<v Speaker 3>So my idea for you guys is you guys just

0:00:55.920 --> 0:00:58.720
<v Speaker 3>have like regular normal boring ads on the podcast. I

0:00:58.760 --> 0:01:02.200
<v Speaker 3>think you need to do the post read ads for yeah,

0:01:02.360 --> 0:01:04.800
<v Speaker 3>say a lot that everything in securities, frauds is having

0:01:04.800 --> 0:01:06.280
<v Speaker 3>a bad night's sleep securities for us.

0:01:08.680 --> 0:01:10.960
<v Speaker 4>Well, like I could do like the men's shaving club

0:01:11.120 --> 0:01:13.000
<v Speaker 4>ads or something that could be fun too.

0:01:13.160 --> 0:01:15.039
<v Speaker 3>When buying short data out of the money called out.

0:01:16.520 --> 0:01:16.720
<v Speaker 5>Right.

0:01:16.920 --> 0:01:17.959
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, be good.

0:01:18.920 --> 0:01:21.840
<v Speaker 5>Hello, and welcome to The Money Stuff Podcast. I'm Matt Levine,

0:01:22.000 --> 0:01:24.160
<v Speaker 5>I write The Money Stuff Colm at Bloomberg.

0:01:23.720 --> 0:01:27.039
<v Speaker 4>Opinion, and I'm Katie Greifeld, a reporter for Bloomberg News

0:01:27.040 --> 0:01:28.679
<v Speaker 4>and an anchor for Bloomberg Television.

0:01:29.120 --> 0:01:29.400
<v Speaker 3>Katy.

0:01:29.440 --> 0:01:31.720
<v Speaker 5>Today we're doing something new. We are doing our first

0:01:31.760 --> 0:01:33.200
<v Speaker 5>interview on The Money Stuff Podcast.

0:01:33.319 --> 0:01:35.800
<v Speaker 4>Are you nervous, I'm pretty nervous. I'm a little bit

0:01:35.840 --> 0:01:36.400
<v Speaker 4>nervous too.

0:01:36.560 --> 0:01:39.080
<v Speaker 5>We're recording this after it happens, and we're not really nervous.

0:01:40.280 --> 0:01:41.720
<v Speaker 4>I'm still stressed out. To speak for.

0:01:41.680 --> 0:01:43.680
<v Speaker 5>Yourself, I'm pretty nervous. I haven't listened to it yet.

0:01:43.880 --> 0:01:47.440
<v Speaker 5>Today our guest is John Collinson Stripe. Stripe is a

0:01:47.480 --> 0:01:51.200
<v Speaker 5>payments and financial technology company, and John and his brother

0:01:51.280 --> 0:01:54.600
<v Speaker 5>and co founder Patrick are kind of tech industry celebrities.

0:01:55.080 --> 0:01:59.480
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, he's an Irish billionaire. He's from Limerick. That's cool.

0:02:00.120 --> 0:02:02.280
<v Speaker 5>He's wearing her Limerick jacket, but we'll probably get into

0:02:02.280 --> 0:02:03.160
<v Speaker 5>that during the podcast.

0:02:03.200 --> 0:02:05.480
<v Speaker 4>That's true. It's a little embarrassing that I.

0:02:05.400 --> 0:02:07.560
<v Speaker 5>Wore this medium amount of embarrassing.

0:02:07.800 --> 0:02:10.480
<v Speaker 4>I truly didn't mean to, but as I said to

0:02:10.480 --> 0:02:13.000
<v Speaker 4>you in our office, it was forty seven degrees. When

0:02:13.040 --> 0:02:15.840
<v Speaker 4>I left my apartment this morning pre dawn, and I

0:02:15.880 --> 0:02:20.079
<v Speaker 4>needed a top and this is my favorite medium weight jacket.

0:02:20.680 --> 0:02:23.120
<v Speaker 5>This is the behind the scenes content that Money Stuff

0:02:23.120 --> 0:02:27.239
<v Speaker 5>podcast listeners really crave. Yeah, let's jump right back.

0:02:27.120 --> 0:02:28.079
<v Speaker 4>Into that internetailed.

0:02:28.160 --> 0:02:29.920
<v Speaker 3>It should do.

0:02:29.960 --> 0:02:32.960
<v Speaker 5>Like a crashing transition to talking about striper.

0:02:34.160 --> 0:02:35.760
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, So how do you guys usually start these how

0:02:35.760 --> 0:02:36.720
<v Speaker 3>do you want? I guess you haven't done that.

0:02:36.760 --> 0:02:38.359
<v Speaker 5>You haven't done that, you could invent the product?

0:02:38.560 --> 0:02:41.160
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, start by review of the advertisements I've heard.

0:02:41.360 --> 0:02:45.440
<v Speaker 5>Yea, the podcast we start the podcast with much like this.

0:02:45.760 --> 0:02:48.760
<v Speaker 5>We walk into the room and bullshit for a bit

0:02:49.120 --> 0:02:52.360
<v Speaker 5>and then record that. Yeah, and then we eventually say

0:02:52.400 --> 0:02:54.680
<v Speaker 5>hello and welcome to the Money Stuff podcast, and we

0:02:54.680 --> 0:02:56.720
<v Speaker 5>talk about whatever the thing we're talking about today. So

0:02:56.760 --> 0:03:02.000
<v Speaker 5>now we're talking about Stripe capital markets. Yeah, okay, So listeners,

0:03:02.000 --> 0:03:04.560
<v Speaker 5>in podcasts with you, you talk a lot about your

0:03:04.560 --> 0:03:07.440
<v Speaker 5>interest in business history and like you've learned from the

0:03:07.480 --> 0:03:09.600
<v Speaker 5>tech companies of the past and the conglomerates of the

0:03:09.680 --> 0:03:13.080
<v Speaker 5>conglomerate wave. I have not heard you talk about the

0:03:13.160 --> 0:03:16.360
<v Speaker 5>lessons you've learned from financial services companies. And I write

0:03:16.360 --> 0:03:19.600
<v Speaker 5>about finance and think of Stripe in many ways as

0:03:19.639 --> 0:03:23.240
<v Speaker 5>like a financial services esque company here, like some evolution

0:03:23.280 --> 0:03:26.160
<v Speaker 5>of a financial services company. So I'm curious, like, I

0:03:26.200 --> 0:03:28.280
<v Speaker 5>don't know what you think about financial services.

0:03:28.960 --> 0:03:32.119
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, in general, we try to learn a lot from

0:03:32.240 --> 0:03:35.200
<v Speaker 3>other businesses, and Okay, one of the things I really

0:03:35.200 --> 0:03:37.520
<v Speaker 3>like is we live in a golden age of learning

0:03:37.560 --> 0:03:39.840
<v Speaker 3>about other businesses right now. And one of the reasons

0:03:39.880 --> 0:03:42.920
<v Speaker 3>I like this is because I think learning about other

0:03:42.960 --> 0:03:47.080
<v Speaker 3>businesses at some level learning about the world or certainly

0:03:47.080 --> 0:03:50.120
<v Speaker 3>the economy, because you know, you're getting sense for how

0:03:50.160 --> 0:03:53.960
<v Speaker 3>all the various entities work together. With financial services in particular,

0:03:54.880 --> 0:03:57.480
<v Speaker 3>you came up with the framing that you know, Stripe

0:03:57.520 --> 0:03:59.320
<v Speaker 3>is in a way kind of a new kind of

0:03:59.320 --> 0:04:00.560
<v Speaker 3>scaled investment bank.

0:04:00.760 --> 0:04:03.600
<v Speaker 5>Was it you're framing I think I said that. Yeah, yeah,

0:04:03.600 --> 0:04:05.320
<v Speaker 5>but I would love for you to tell me that's right.

0:04:05.400 --> 0:04:06.920
<v Speaker 5>That I'm assuming you'll tell me it's wrong.

0:04:07.120 --> 0:04:09.280
<v Speaker 3>No. I actually kind of like it because if you

0:04:09.280 --> 0:04:11.520
<v Speaker 3>think about what are the potential source of funding for

0:04:11.520 --> 0:04:13.040
<v Speaker 3>a business, Like if you want to scale up a business,

0:04:13.040 --> 0:04:14.440
<v Speaker 3>how can you fund it? There's three ways you can

0:04:14.480 --> 0:04:16.800
<v Speaker 3>fund a business. You can do it through debt, equity,

0:04:17.160 --> 0:04:20.120
<v Speaker 3>or retain earnings, and so if you just tick through

0:04:20.160 --> 0:04:23.159
<v Speaker 3>each one of those on the earning side, maybe that's

0:04:23.160 --> 0:04:25.280
<v Speaker 3>the place where a Stripe is kind of the most

0:04:25.320 --> 0:04:28.760
<v Speaker 3>directly doing this, where we're making it easier for businesses

0:04:28.800 --> 0:04:31.920
<v Speaker 3>to self fund their growth. And we see tons of

0:04:31.960 --> 0:04:35.520
<v Speaker 3>bootstrapped or kind of certainly airly monetizing businesses on the Stripe,

0:04:35.640 --> 0:04:37.880
<v Speaker 3>like with this customer and Stripe Photo Room, and they

0:04:37.920 --> 0:04:41.080
<v Speaker 3>do online kind of GENI powered photo editing. They're based

0:04:41.080 --> 0:04:43.560
<v Speaker 3>in France, and you know, maybe ten years ago they

0:04:43.600 --> 0:04:45.400
<v Speaker 3>would have you know, raised a whole bunch of VC

0:04:45.520 --> 0:04:47.600
<v Speaker 3>and scaled up that way. They're actually profitable within a

0:04:47.680 --> 0:04:50.520
<v Speaker 3>year and they've just kind of scaled up profitably since then.

0:04:50.800 --> 0:04:53.040
<v Speaker 3>Ninety eight percent of their business comes from outside France,

0:04:53.080 --> 0:04:54.520
<v Speaker 3>and so they're kind of selling this product to a

0:04:54.560 --> 0:04:56.720
<v Speaker 3>global audience and Stripes making it easy to do that.

0:04:56.920 --> 0:04:58.719
<v Speaker 3>And we've seen that in general, I guess the AI

0:04:58.800 --> 0:05:02.680
<v Speaker 3>companies in particular, where you know, during the social media boom,

0:05:02.800 --> 0:05:06.280
<v Speaker 3>maybe companies scaled up first with raising lots of VC

0:05:06.440 --> 0:05:09.000
<v Speaker 3>dollars and then later on figured out monetization. With a

0:05:09.040 --> 0:05:11.960
<v Speaker 3>lot of the AI companies, you know, open eye perplexity clause,

0:05:12.000 --> 0:05:13.800
<v Speaker 3>you know the photo room who I was mentioning, they

0:05:13.839 --> 0:05:16.719
<v Speaker 3>actually monetize from pretty early on using stripe, and so

0:05:16.760 --> 0:05:17.760
<v Speaker 3>that's one source of funding.

0:05:18.480 --> 0:05:23.160
<v Speaker 5>Stripe allows early stage companies to monetize so efficiently that

0:05:23.200 --> 0:05:25.160
<v Speaker 5>like there's less need for data and equity in the

0:05:25.200 --> 0:05:28.680
<v Speaker 5>world because companies can sell fund like you're putting vcs

0:05:28.720 --> 0:05:29.280
<v Speaker 5>out of business.

0:05:29.520 --> 0:05:32.480
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and obviously we think it's a more slightly more

0:05:33.680 --> 0:05:37.119
<v Speaker 3>healthy dynamic for the businesses. A classic trap that early

0:05:37.160 --> 0:05:40.960
<v Speaker 3>stage companies fall into is you know, and why combinators

0:05:41.000 --> 0:05:43.720
<v Speaker 3>say tries to get their companies to avoid falling into

0:05:43.720 --> 0:05:46.000
<v Speaker 3>this failure mode is kind of they raise money and

0:05:46.000 --> 0:05:49.040
<v Speaker 3>then they think kind of valuation milestones or any kind

0:05:49.040 --> 0:05:52.039
<v Speaker 3>of financial or investor milestones are the milestones that matter

0:05:52.080 --> 0:05:53.640
<v Speaker 3>for the business wheas obviously that's not the case. It's

0:05:53.640 --> 0:05:55.279
<v Speaker 3>are you building something of value in the world which

0:05:55.320 --> 0:05:57.880
<v Speaker 3>will generally be measured by does anyone want to buy it?

0:05:57.920 --> 0:05:59.560
<v Speaker 3>And so I think maybe it gets people on the

0:05:59.640 --> 0:06:02.400
<v Speaker 3>right lead board earlier on, where a revenue leader board

0:06:02.480 --> 0:06:04.480
<v Speaker 3>is just a much healthier leaderboard to be thinking about

0:06:04.600 --> 0:06:07.440
<v Speaker 3>than a fundraising valuation leaderboard. But we also play in

0:06:07.480 --> 0:06:09.599
<v Speaker 3>the other parts of the capital stack, where on the

0:06:09.680 --> 0:06:11.640
<v Speaker 3>debt side. I mean, you guys have probably watched this,

0:06:11.760 --> 0:06:14.680
<v Speaker 3>but banks have kind of gotten out of the SMB

0:06:14.839 --> 0:06:17.920
<v Speaker 3>lending space since the financial crisis, as just the compliance

0:06:17.920 --> 0:06:19.640
<v Speaker 3>costs have gone up, Like people do not go to

0:06:19.680 --> 0:06:21.840
<v Speaker 3>a bank for a five thousand dollars loan anymore. And

0:06:21.920 --> 0:06:26.200
<v Speaker 3>so we now lend through our lending partners billions of

0:06:26.240 --> 0:06:31.160
<v Speaker 3>dollars to startups. We do that entirely programmatically through amount models,

0:06:31.240 --> 0:06:33.000
<v Speaker 3>you know, cash flow based lending. So we're not looking

0:06:33.000 --> 0:06:34.880
<v Speaker 3>at the balance schee. We're not trying to do kind

0:06:34.880 --> 0:06:36.839
<v Speaker 3>of credit checks on the individual or something like that.

0:06:37.000 --> 0:06:38.960
<v Speaker 3>We're looking at the stream of cash flows. Is it

0:06:39.000 --> 0:06:41.960
<v Speaker 3>a healthy, reliable stream of cash flows that can support

0:06:42.000 --> 0:06:42.360
<v Speaker 3>some debt.

0:06:42.760 --> 0:06:45.960
<v Speaker 5>So you're doing the cash flows, you can see exactly.

0:06:45.760 --> 0:06:47.719
<v Speaker 3>We see the cash flows and people repay out of

0:06:47.720 --> 0:06:49.920
<v Speaker 3>the stripe cash flows. And so that is a new

0:06:50.120 --> 0:06:52.800
<v Speaker 3>kind of lending product that exists in the market. That

0:06:53.040 --> 0:06:54.719
<v Speaker 3>now again is you know, in the billions of dollars

0:06:54.720 --> 0:06:56.480
<v Speaker 3>in terms of the debt we're providing. It's kind of

0:06:56.520 --> 0:06:58.040
<v Speaker 3>ironic in a way. If you want to raise one

0:06:58.080 --> 0:07:00.440
<v Speaker 3>hundred million dollars of debt, that is a very competiti marks.

0:07:00.440 --> 0:07:02.240
<v Speaker 3>Lots of people are playing in that. If you want

0:07:02.279 --> 0:07:05.960
<v Speaker 3>to raise five thousand dollars of debt for your company,

0:07:06.120 --> 0:07:08.279
<v Speaker 3>it's actually much harder to get that than it was,

0:07:08.560 --> 0:07:11.160
<v Speaker 3>say twenty or thirty years ago. We've gone backwards there.

0:07:11.360 --> 0:07:14.760
<v Speaker 3>And then on the equity side, I think stripe atless

0:07:15.360 --> 0:07:20.440
<v Speaker 3>has actually helped make more companies investable because what a

0:07:20.440 --> 0:07:23.360
<v Speaker 3>lot of people don't realize is stripe aatleists are incorporation product.

0:07:23.600 --> 0:07:27.760
<v Speaker 3>But it lets companies where the founders might be in

0:07:27.800 --> 0:07:30.360
<v Speaker 3>Israel or might be you know, in Singapore or something

0:07:30.400 --> 0:07:34.040
<v Speaker 3>like that, create a US Delaware company and that makes

0:07:34.080 --> 0:07:35.880
<v Speaker 3>it much more investable. And so we've seen a lot

0:07:35.920 --> 0:07:39.679
<v Speaker 3>of foreign founders kind of virtually creating a US company,

0:07:39.800 --> 0:07:42.920
<v Speaker 3>which it just turns out foreign companies investors fim too scary.

0:07:43.440 --> 0:07:45.320
<v Speaker 5>So I guess I'm responsible for the framing that you're

0:07:45.360 --> 0:07:47.480
<v Speaker 5>sort of in somebody's a substitute for an investment back.

0:07:47.520 --> 0:07:49.360
<v Speaker 5>So like your framing is like increase the GDP of

0:07:49.400 --> 0:07:51.560
<v Speaker 5>the Internet, but like you know, you have these businesses

0:07:51.600 --> 0:07:56.200
<v Speaker 5>like incorporating companies, like what is the principle? And like

0:07:56.680 --> 0:07:58.360
<v Speaker 5>that was like a real investment backer. I was doing

0:07:58.400 --> 0:08:02.040
<v Speaker 5>like corporate derivatives, and like I assume you would never

0:08:02.200 --> 0:08:03.600
<v Speaker 5>get into that business.

0:08:03.240 --> 0:08:05.600
<v Speaker 3>But I am I wrong. We're certainly not planning on us.

0:08:05.960 --> 0:08:08.680
<v Speaker 3>We build products that are scalable in some way through

0:08:08.760 --> 0:08:12.080
<v Speaker 3>tech and so you know, Stripe itself. This past year

0:08:12.080 --> 0:08:14.720
<v Speaker 3>we did trillion dollars in payment through the strip platform.

0:08:14.800 --> 0:08:16.560
<v Speaker 3>That's still growing in a pretty healthy clip. The number

0:08:16.560 --> 0:08:19.480
<v Speaker 3>of businesses served is millions of dollars. And so if

0:08:19.520 --> 0:08:21.680
<v Speaker 3>there's something that is solved by just throwing an army

0:08:21.680 --> 0:08:23.240
<v Speaker 3>of people at it, I mean, you know, all the

0:08:23.280 --> 0:08:26.000
<v Speaker 3>investment banking firms are exceptional as recruiting armies of people,

0:08:26.080 --> 0:08:28.920
<v Speaker 3>and that is a very competitive space, whereas the space

0:08:28.960 --> 0:08:30.320
<v Speaker 3>of you know, like I was saying, with the lending

0:08:30.440 --> 0:08:32.679
<v Speaker 3>side of things, that was just an underserved marketers where

0:08:32.880 --> 0:08:34.560
<v Speaker 3>we came out it by talking to our customers and

0:08:34.559 --> 0:08:36.920
<v Speaker 3>they said, we really need growth capital. It's actually very

0:08:36.960 --> 0:08:39.400
<v Speaker 3>annoying for us to get us. And so I guess

0:08:39.400 --> 0:08:44.360
<v Speaker 3>we try to find the underserved spaces, and investment banking

0:08:44.440 --> 0:08:46.400
<v Speaker 3>for you know, certainly on the larger side does not

0:08:46.440 --> 0:08:47.240
<v Speaker 3>seem underserved.

0:08:47.320 --> 0:08:49.880
<v Speaker 4>Right now, I've listened to a lot of podcasts you've

0:08:49.920 --> 0:08:52.840
<v Speaker 4>been on in the past several weeks. So sorry, no, no,

0:08:52.920 --> 0:08:56.480
<v Speaker 4>it's been really interesting. You interviewed Charlie Munger, which was I.

0:08:56.480 --> 0:08:59.520
<v Speaker 3>Much prefer interviewing to being interviewed. So we'll come back

0:08:59.559 --> 0:09:00.960
<v Speaker 3>for the second round to this, right, you guys are

0:09:00.960 --> 0:09:01.440
<v Speaker 3>put on the spot.

0:09:01.559 --> 0:09:02.880
<v Speaker 4>That'll be a lot of fun. We'll put that on

0:09:02.880 --> 0:09:06.240
<v Speaker 4>the calendar. But at one point Charlie Munger started talking

0:09:06.280 --> 0:09:09.560
<v Speaker 4>about like banks and they're selling these sleazy products, and

0:09:09.640 --> 0:09:11.439
<v Speaker 4>of course I couldn't see if you were nodding along

0:09:11.559 --> 0:09:13.480
<v Speaker 4>and I were talking about, you know, whether you would chafe.

0:09:13.480 --> 0:09:16.640
<v Speaker 4>It's sort of the comparison to you know, an investment bank,

0:09:16.720 --> 0:09:18.199
<v Speaker 4>for example, but it sounds like you don't.

0:09:18.400 --> 0:09:20.959
<v Speaker 3>No, I don't. Investment banking provides a useful set of

0:09:20.960 --> 0:09:23.320
<v Speaker 3>services in the world. And okay, one things I really

0:09:23.360 --> 0:09:28.920
<v Speaker 3>like about the Money Stuff newsletter is a studied detachment

0:09:29.040 --> 0:09:31.199
<v Speaker 3>from what's going on where there are people and people

0:09:31.280 --> 0:09:33.680
<v Speaker 3>respond to incentives and that creates behaviors in the world.

0:09:33.880 --> 0:09:35.640
<v Speaker 3>I like, Matt does have views and you know, just

0:09:35.840 --> 0:09:38.720
<v Speaker 3>like crypto and you know, all sorts of things, and

0:09:38.760 --> 0:09:40.640
<v Speaker 3>you can kind of the views that occasionally come out,

0:09:40.760 --> 0:09:43.400
<v Speaker 3>but it's mostly this very detached view of what's going

0:09:43.400 --> 0:09:45.959
<v Speaker 3>on in the world. But the way we think about it,

0:09:46.040 --> 0:09:48.640
<v Speaker 3>like for for example, we think, you know, stripes scale

0:09:48.679 --> 0:09:51.839
<v Speaker 3>and revenue are actually pretty decent proxies for the value

0:09:51.840 --> 0:09:54.080
<v Speaker 3>stripe is providing in the world. That's not always the

0:09:54.080 --> 0:09:55.599
<v Speaker 3>case with the business. You could have an extract of

0:09:55.640 --> 0:09:58.560
<v Speaker 3>business somewhere, or monopolies or rent extraction or something like that.

0:09:59.000 --> 0:10:03.000
<v Speaker 3>But in our case we have very inforgmned buyers and

0:10:03.240 --> 0:10:05.520
<v Speaker 3>a very competitive market. There are lots of other places

0:10:05.520 --> 0:10:08.360
<v Speaker 3>people could go for payment acceptance or billing software or

0:10:08.360 --> 0:10:11.280
<v Speaker 3>something like that. And so generally, if customers are choosing

0:10:11.320 --> 0:10:13.360
<v Speaker 3>you and paying you money for a service, it's because

0:10:13.400 --> 0:10:15.520
<v Speaker 3>you're providing something of value that you can't get elsewhere.

0:10:15.679 --> 0:10:17.679
<v Speaker 3>And similar with investment banks. I think if people are

0:10:17.679 --> 0:10:20.120
<v Speaker 3>going to investment banks for a thing, that's probably because

0:10:20.160 --> 0:10:21.720
<v Speaker 3>they're providing some value to them. And so that's the

0:10:21.720 --> 0:10:24.400
<v Speaker 3>frameworkuy I tend to take. I think Charlie rest in

0:10:24.440 --> 0:10:28.360
<v Speaker 3>Peace generally took a lot of offense at where he

0:10:28.520 --> 0:10:33.720
<v Speaker 3>saw people hyping things, principal agent problems. You know, there's

0:10:33.760 --> 0:10:37.080
<v Speaker 3>a set of things that bothered him, Crypto Robinhood, mutual

0:10:37.080 --> 0:10:39.959
<v Speaker 3>fund advisors, and you know you could understand, I could

0:10:39.960 --> 0:10:41.439
<v Speaker 3>construct the Steelman for those cases.

0:10:41.480 --> 0:10:45.360
<v Speaker 5>I think there's a lot of opacity and pricing and

0:10:45.480 --> 0:10:49.400
<v Speaker 5>value in financial services that there's probably a less of

0:10:49.520 --> 0:10:51.439
<v Speaker 5>in your business, right, Like you're kind of charging a

0:10:51.480 --> 0:10:52.559
<v Speaker 5>transparent feed to people.

0:10:52.640 --> 0:10:54.439
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and certainly the more scaled something is, the more

0:10:54.440 --> 0:10:56.720
<v Speaker 3>price comparison they'll be, the more efficient the pricing will be.

0:10:56.840 --> 0:10:59.600
<v Speaker 3>Whereas yeah, there's more room for extracting price in the

0:11:00.360 --> 0:11:01.800
<v Speaker 3>when you get into bespoke deals.

0:11:02.440 --> 0:11:04.600
<v Speaker 5>So one thing I think of when I think give

0:11:04.679 --> 0:11:07.680
<v Speaker 5>investment banking is just serving as an advisor to CEOs

0:11:07.720 --> 0:11:09.920
<v Speaker 5>and sort of giving them general advice on their business.

0:11:09.960 --> 0:11:12.080
<v Speaker 5>And we were talking before about you know, you are

0:11:12.080 --> 0:11:15.160
<v Speaker 5>now interacting with a lot of big companies, and you

0:11:15.240 --> 0:11:18.679
<v Speaker 5>had some views on like the ability of a big

0:11:18.720 --> 0:11:21.720
<v Speaker 5>company to CEO to sort of understand her company, and

0:11:21.800 --> 0:11:24.320
<v Speaker 5>I'm I'd love for you to talk about them.

0:11:24.640 --> 0:11:30.040
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. I think people think that CEOs are able to

0:11:30.559 --> 0:11:33.520
<v Speaker 3>drive change in their organizations. I'm talking about organizations general,

0:11:33.520 --> 0:11:35.560
<v Speaker 3>I'm not talking about stripe. People think that a CEO

0:11:35.679 --> 0:11:37.680
<v Speaker 3>lands in a new job, they take over a company,

0:11:38.040 --> 0:11:40.840
<v Speaker 3>and they're able to just whip everything into shape and

0:11:40.960 --> 0:11:45.319
<v Speaker 3>change everything and I think the general experience of CEOs

0:11:45.360 --> 0:11:47.560
<v Speaker 3>and new jobs is that is not the case, and

0:11:47.800 --> 0:11:50.400
<v Speaker 3>organizations are pretty hard to change. And in fact, one

0:11:50.400 --> 0:11:53.760
<v Speaker 3>of the things that we believe strongly at Stripe is

0:11:54.600 --> 0:11:57.560
<v Speaker 3>it's very important for people to guess close to the

0:11:57.640 --> 0:12:02.600
<v Speaker 3>work or you will not be able to drive any meaningful,

0:12:02.720 --> 0:12:05.240
<v Speaker 3>useful change. And so like a bunch of different ways

0:12:05.240 --> 0:12:06.959
<v Speaker 3>in which we do that. It actually reminds me of

0:12:07.040 --> 0:12:10.200
<v Speaker 3>the lean manufacturing principle, you know. And they have all

0:12:10.200 --> 0:12:12.560
<v Speaker 3>these very nice aesthetic Japanese terms for things, and so

0:12:12.600 --> 0:12:14.760
<v Speaker 3>you know, there's the English equivalent permius for the Japanese terms,

0:12:14.840 --> 0:12:17.120
<v Speaker 3>but in them is gemba, which is this idea that

0:12:17.160 --> 0:12:19.880
<v Speaker 3>managers should, you know, walk the factory floor and solicit

0:12:19.920 --> 0:12:21.640
<v Speaker 3>ideas from the people who are on the production line

0:12:21.640 --> 0:12:24.280
<v Speaker 3>and things like that. And all companies, like a tech

0:12:24.280 --> 0:12:27.480
<v Speaker 3>company like Stripe, has its equivalents, and so we very

0:12:27.559 --> 0:12:34.160
<v Speaker 3>much encourage engineering managers to actually write code Stripe to

0:12:34.160 --> 0:12:35.839
<v Speaker 3>get the experience of what is it like working in

0:12:35.880 --> 0:12:39.319
<v Speaker 3>their corner of the code base problems our engineers running into.

0:12:39.520 --> 0:12:41.719
<v Speaker 3>I really enjoyed being CFO last year when we were

0:12:41.760 --> 0:12:44.480
<v Speaker 3>between CFOs, and one of the reasons I really enjoyed that. Again,

0:12:44.600 --> 0:12:48.880
<v Speaker 3>was getting closer to the actual numbers, the processes by

0:12:48.880 --> 0:12:51.200
<v Speaker 3>which we drive the business, Like we're going to hold

0:12:51.200 --> 0:12:54.040
<v Speaker 3>Stripe to a budget regardless, and aren't you interested in

0:12:54.080 --> 0:12:55.840
<v Speaker 3>how that process is actually set and how those numbers

0:12:55.840 --> 0:12:57.880
<v Speaker 3>are set and everything like that. So you know, I

0:12:57.920 --> 0:13:00.280
<v Speaker 3>say that I think every founder should be CFO their

0:13:00.360 --> 0:13:03.440
<v Speaker 3>business for at some point during its lifespan. It's it's

0:13:03.520 --> 0:13:06.400
<v Speaker 3>a very educational experienced.

0:13:05.760 --> 0:13:08.000
<v Speaker 5>Like product ideas. Did you do that and come away

0:13:08.000 --> 0:13:11.480
<v Speaker 5>with like we need to do accounting software? No?

0:13:11.480 --> 0:13:13.600
<v Speaker 3>No, or or? I mean, I mean maybe in an

0:13:13.600 --> 0:13:16.760
<v Speaker 3>abstract way, but again, stripes finance needs are are maybe

0:13:16.760 --> 0:13:19.040
<v Speaker 3>a little different from the broader ones. But again, I

0:13:19.080 --> 0:13:23.320
<v Speaker 3>just think for getting close to how the business actually runs,

0:13:23.600 --> 0:13:27.240
<v Speaker 3>that's maybe the thing that's hard for CEOs to do.

0:13:27.559 --> 0:13:29.160
<v Speaker 3>And you know, we try to do it from a

0:13:29.160 --> 0:13:31.599
<v Speaker 3>customer perspective a huge amount of Even some of the

0:13:31.600 --> 0:13:34.200
<v Speaker 3>products we're talking about, like Stripe Capital, they basically come

0:13:34.240 --> 0:13:37.760
<v Speaker 3>from us trying to spend more time with our customers

0:13:37.960 --> 0:13:40.360
<v Speaker 3>than our competitors do. And so you know, we'll start

0:13:40.360 --> 0:13:44.199
<v Speaker 3>every leadership team meeting at am Monday morning with hearing

0:13:44.240 --> 0:13:45.640
<v Speaker 3>from a customer We just asked them to come and

0:13:45.640 --> 0:13:47.520
<v Speaker 3>give us cand of feedback on the product. If you

0:13:47.559 --> 0:13:49.880
<v Speaker 3>were to sit in on those meetings, it's not an

0:13:49.960 --> 0:13:52.480
<v Speaker 3>A plus report card that we're getting. You know, there

0:13:52.520 --> 0:13:55.000
<v Speaker 3>are things they want us to fix. But I find

0:13:55.040 --> 0:13:58.680
<v Speaker 3>that it's easy for like product managers to overcomplicate things,

0:13:58.720 --> 0:13:59.960
<v Speaker 3>and you know, you can get in your own head

0:14:00.080 --> 0:14:03.080
<v Speaker 3>and construct some really convolutioned castle in the sky. And

0:14:03.080 --> 0:14:05.880
<v Speaker 3>there's nothing quite as grounding as hearing directly from a

0:14:05.920 --> 0:14:08.080
<v Speaker 3>customer talk about what is not working for them in

0:14:08.120 --> 0:14:09.360
<v Speaker 3>the product. And you know, we did the same on

0:14:09.559 --> 0:14:12.000
<v Speaker 3>Fridays with like an all company thing, bring customers to

0:14:12.000 --> 0:14:14.360
<v Speaker 3>talk to that. But any I think the essence of

0:14:14.360 --> 0:14:17.559
<v Speaker 3>this for CEOs is getting close to the actual production function,

0:14:17.840 --> 0:14:19.240
<v Speaker 3>and that is sometimes hard of them.

0:14:19.440 --> 0:14:22.160
<v Speaker 4>So I have two points. It's interesting to hear you

0:14:22.200 --> 0:14:24.120
<v Speaker 4>say that. First of all, my brain immediately goes to

0:14:24.160 --> 0:14:27.880
<v Speaker 4>Elon Musk, like on the factory floor at SpaceX and Tesla.

0:14:27.960 --> 0:14:30.160
<v Speaker 4>But it was interesting. We had Home Depot this week

0:14:30.280 --> 0:14:33.440
<v Speaker 4>announced that they were going to require corporate employees to

0:14:33.520 --> 0:14:37.520
<v Speaker 4>work eight hour factory shifts, which is interesting, like retail shifts.

0:14:37.680 --> 0:14:39.240
<v Speaker 3>So Starbucks did something similar.

0:14:38.960 --> 0:14:41.000
<v Speaker 4>Right, yeah, which makes a lot of sense, I mean,

0:14:41.400 --> 0:14:44.560
<v Speaker 4>especially in brutal jobs such as that one and then

0:14:44.600 --> 0:14:47.120
<v Speaker 4>the other thing. I mean, given that you do know

0:14:47.240 --> 0:14:49.800
<v Speaker 4>so much about his business history and you know, just

0:14:49.880 --> 0:14:52.240
<v Speaker 4>love looking at companies. But those eight a m. Meetings

0:14:52.280 --> 0:14:54.800
<v Speaker 4>where you're just talking to your different companies, like, you

0:14:54.880 --> 0:14:59.560
<v Speaker 4>see so many different types of companies, which is interesting, Yeah.

0:14:59.360 --> 0:15:01.680
<v Speaker 3>And it's definitely pretty interesting time. I think the behavior

0:15:01.760 --> 0:15:05.120
<v Speaker 3>we observe is that tech has been very well covered,

0:15:05.200 --> 0:15:07.320
<v Speaker 3>and so I think everyone knows broadly kind of what's

0:15:07.360 --> 0:15:09.880
<v Speaker 3>going on in the tech world. What we find interesting

0:15:10.080 --> 0:15:13.360
<v Speaker 3>is the businesses that are the Sherwan Williams of the world,

0:15:13.440 --> 0:15:15.800
<v Speaker 3>you know, the businesses that are ten twenty fifty, one hundred,

0:15:15.800 --> 0:15:18.000
<v Speaker 3>two hundred years old, and how they are adapting to

0:15:18.000 --> 0:15:20.720
<v Speaker 3>the modern world. And generally, what we find is that

0:15:21.560 --> 0:15:26.600
<v Speaker 3>COVID provided a useful long term change to those businesses

0:15:26.800 --> 0:15:30.840
<v Speaker 3>because those kinds of businesses all employed a chief Digital

0:15:30.840 --> 0:15:33.600
<v Speaker 3>Innovation Officer prior to COVID, and that person had a

0:15:33.600 --> 0:15:35.400
<v Speaker 3>team of ten people, and they produced all these slides

0:15:35.400 --> 0:15:37.040
<v Speaker 3>and ideas, and the ideas were pretty good, and the

0:15:37.040 --> 0:15:38.920
<v Speaker 3>company just ignored all them and just didn't do any

0:15:38.960 --> 0:15:40.560
<v Speaker 3>of them, and so they had the kind of idea

0:15:40.600 --> 0:15:44.280
<v Speaker 3>generation part and nothing happened, and then COVID happened, and

0:15:44.320 --> 0:15:48.840
<v Speaker 3>it was this oh moment where people they were forced

0:15:48.840 --> 0:15:51.000
<v Speaker 3>to adapt because you know, obviously the stores were locked

0:15:51.000 --> 0:15:53.360
<v Speaker 3>down or were not open, and so you maybe had

0:15:53.560 --> 0:15:56.320
<v Speaker 3>gym companies moving to a virtual training or something like that.

0:15:56.680 --> 0:15:59.520
<v Speaker 3>But that created a mandate for actually getting serious about

0:15:59.520 --> 0:16:04.080
<v Speaker 3>the digital stuf and we see much higher quality digital

0:16:04.080 --> 0:16:06.200
<v Speaker 3>execution coming out of that. And there's kind of a

0:16:06.200 --> 0:16:10.120
<v Speaker 3>few common patterns in what everyone's trying to do. I

0:16:10.120 --> 0:16:14.200
<v Speaker 3>think everyone is questioning their middlemen. I don't think middlemen

0:16:14.280 --> 0:16:16.440
<v Speaker 3>are going away, but they're questioning the middlemen and do

0:16:16.520 --> 0:16:19.880
<v Speaker 3>middlemen add value? And they are starting to do much

0:16:19.880 --> 0:16:23.320
<v Speaker 3>more direct customer relationship stuff. Part of that is the

0:16:23.360 --> 0:16:26.640
<v Speaker 3>product experience where you know, Hershey's using Stripe to sell

0:16:26.880 --> 0:16:30.400
<v Speaker 3>candy directly online and the customization and things like that.

0:16:30.880 --> 0:16:34.240
<v Speaker 3>And then everyone's just trying to build some kind of

0:16:34.240 --> 0:16:36.600
<v Speaker 3>recurring revenue. And so, you know, we think there's two

0:16:36.720 --> 0:16:38.280
<v Speaker 3>kinds of business in the world. There's those who have

0:16:38.320 --> 0:16:40.960
<v Speaker 3>recurring revenue and those who want recurring revenue. And people

0:16:40.960 --> 0:16:43.600
<v Speaker 3>talk about the engine, you know, the airplane engine, makers,

0:16:43.600 --> 0:16:45.200
<v Speaker 3>but power by the hour. You know, you actually don't

0:16:45.240 --> 0:16:48.240
<v Speaker 3>buy an engine, you buy you know specially exactly. You

0:16:48.640 --> 0:16:51.360
<v Speaker 3>might trust you know, the by the minute. But that

0:16:51.440 --> 0:16:54.040
<v Speaker 3>is actually what all companies are moving towards because it's

0:16:54.080 --> 0:16:55.800
<v Speaker 3>kind of better on both sides of the equation. And

0:16:55.840 --> 0:16:58.040
<v Speaker 3>obviously that's pretty complex from an implementation point of view,

0:16:58.080 --> 0:17:23.200
<v Speaker 3>and something intercomany stripe.

0:17:13.640 --> 0:17:16.160
<v Speaker 5>I did like the Strive fire side a while back,

0:17:16.200 --> 0:17:18.440
<v Speaker 5>and you're like, what should we do? And I was like,

0:17:18.560 --> 0:17:20.199
<v Speaker 5>you should fix paywalls. Have you done it?

0:17:21.160 --> 0:17:24.639
<v Speaker 3>We're getting there because one of us hard. Why is

0:17:24.680 --> 0:17:27.160
<v Speaker 3>it hard? Okay, it's hard for a few reasons. One,

0:17:28.200 --> 0:17:32.280
<v Speaker 3>I think people confuse paywalls with micropayments, and I think

0:17:32.440 --> 0:17:37.920
<v Speaker 3>more consumers want micropayments than publishers, where the publishers want macropayments.

0:17:37.960 --> 0:17:39.959
<v Speaker 5>I think nobody wants micropayments and everyone wants to talk

0:17:39.960 --> 0:17:40.280
<v Speaker 5>about it.

0:17:40.320 --> 0:17:42.760
<v Speaker 3>But okay, yeah, yeah, So anyway, once we move past

0:17:42.800 --> 0:17:49.120
<v Speaker 3>the micropayments thing, then it's hard because you ultimately need

0:17:49.160 --> 0:17:52.520
<v Speaker 3>to smooth the onboarding friction and you probably need some

0:17:53.080 --> 0:17:56.280
<v Speaker 3>cross publisher network. And you know, publishers are not they're competing,

0:17:56.359 --> 0:17:59.640
<v Speaker 3>They're maybe not inclined to work together, and then it's

0:17:59.720 --> 0:18:01.560
<v Speaker 3>just a bunch of tech upgrades which are actually kind

0:18:01.600 --> 0:18:04.639
<v Speaker 3>of somewhat prosaic long running projects, but you know, you

0:18:04.640 --> 0:18:05.960
<v Speaker 3>need to be able to have the patients to work

0:18:05.960 --> 0:18:08.040
<v Speaker 3>with the media company to spend a year or year

0:18:08.040 --> 0:18:09.920
<v Speaker 3>and a half upgrade in their stack. The way we've

0:18:10.040 --> 0:18:12.360
<v Speaker 3>ended up doing this is with our product link, which

0:18:12.400 --> 0:18:14.240
<v Speaker 3>is very simple. What is really starting to work. It

0:18:14.359 --> 0:18:16.520
<v Speaker 3>just remember you guys, maybe run into it on the internet.

0:18:16.640 --> 0:18:19.680
<v Speaker 3>It just remembers your credentials across websites and so if

0:18:19.680 --> 0:18:22.199
<v Speaker 3>you've bought on websites A with Stripe and you have

0:18:22.280 --> 0:18:24.920
<v Speaker 3>the box checked to remember your payment details, then you'll

0:18:24.960 --> 0:18:27.480
<v Speaker 3>be able to buy on site B without entering your

0:18:27.520 --> 0:18:30.520
<v Speaker 3>payment details again. And you might think it will lead

0:18:30.560 --> 0:18:32.600
<v Speaker 3>to a big increase in conversion if a lot of

0:18:32.840 --> 0:18:35.119
<v Speaker 3>consumers have their payment credentials remembered so they don't have

0:18:35.160 --> 0:18:37.040
<v Speaker 3>to type any extra data in they can just click buy,

0:18:37.320 --> 0:18:39.760
<v Speaker 3>And turns out it does. And there's obviously a virtuous

0:18:39.760 --> 0:18:42.399
<v Speaker 3>cycle here where you know, the more people sign up

0:18:42.400 --> 0:18:44.520
<v Speaker 3>for it, but denser the network gets. So that's really

0:18:44.560 --> 0:18:46.399
<v Speaker 3>starting to work. And so we have some media properties

0:18:46.400 --> 0:18:48.200
<v Speaker 3>starting to use that, and so what it means is

0:18:48.200 --> 0:18:50.639
<v Speaker 3>they get lots of people coming with credentials all pre

0:18:50.680 --> 0:18:52.440
<v Speaker 3>filled and they just need to hit by and so

0:18:52.480 --> 0:18:54.200
<v Speaker 3>then the commercial proposition just needs to work.

0:18:54.320 --> 0:18:56.359
<v Speaker 5>I just feel like the media payoll problem for me

0:18:56.520 --> 0:18:59.000
<v Speaker 5>is not even the payment credentials. It's once you've paid

0:18:59.000 --> 0:19:02.399
<v Speaker 5>for a payoll, keeping you logged in, you're on your

0:19:02.440 --> 0:19:06.320
<v Speaker 5>phone and computers. Yeah, you're like, you get something emailed

0:19:06.320 --> 0:19:07.600
<v Speaker 5>to you.

0:19:07.600 --> 0:19:09.720
<v Speaker 4>And just remember me. It's really frustrating.

0:19:09.920 --> 0:19:11.639
<v Speaker 3>We should and may get to that as well. I

0:19:11.680 --> 0:19:13.280
<v Speaker 3>agree that's that that's part two of it, to.

0:19:13.240 --> 0:19:15.200
<v Speaker 5>Mean, that's related to like online identity and the stuff

0:19:15.200 --> 0:19:18.359
<v Speaker 5>that people are crypti people are talking about. So I

0:19:18.359 --> 0:19:20.439
<v Speaker 5>also have listened to you on podcasts. One thing that

0:19:20.480 --> 0:19:24.359
<v Speaker 5>you've said is that when you started raising money for

0:19:24.400 --> 0:19:26.800
<v Speaker 5>a stripe, people are like, why isn't this a solve

0:19:26.920 --> 0:19:30.679
<v Speaker 5>problem exists? Can you tell us why it's not right

0:19:30.680 --> 0:19:32.480
<v Speaker 5>it wasn't or why is it isn't? Like why is

0:19:32.560 --> 0:19:36.159
<v Speaker 5>payments hard? And like there were payments companies before you, Like,

0:19:36.200 --> 0:19:37.919
<v Speaker 5>what's the thing that you're solving? They didn't.

0:19:38.600 --> 0:19:42.479
<v Speaker 3>It wasn't solved for a few reasons. Payments requires you

0:19:42.520 --> 0:19:45.480
<v Speaker 3>to be good at two very different things that are

0:19:45.560 --> 0:19:50.880
<v Speaker 3>quite distinct skill sets. There's technology and there's financial services.

0:19:51.080 --> 0:19:54.960
<v Speaker 3>And so prior to Stripe, you had some payment companies

0:19:55.000 --> 0:19:56.880
<v Speaker 3>that just did the technology layer. You know, they said,

0:19:56.880 --> 0:19:58.720
<v Speaker 3>we're an ic API and we plug into you know,

0:19:58.760 --> 0:20:00.720
<v Speaker 3>whatever bank you use. But that wasn't a good payment

0:20:00.720 --> 0:20:02.560
<v Speaker 3>experience because you would then try to sign up with

0:20:02.600 --> 0:20:05.080
<v Speaker 3>the bank and you know, it's spent a week shuffling

0:20:05.119 --> 0:20:08.560
<v Speaker 3>paperwork around or something like that. And so a huge

0:20:08.560 --> 0:20:11.679
<v Speaker 3>amount of what we do is at the intersection of

0:20:11.720 --> 0:20:15.760
<v Speaker 3>those things where you have AMLKYC considerations, where you know,

0:20:15.960 --> 0:20:19.840
<v Speaker 3>a Stripe is essentially aiming to look at the activity

0:20:20.200 --> 0:20:22.280
<v Speaker 3>going on on its platform and ensure that it is

0:20:22.520 --> 0:20:25.960
<v Speaker 3>lisit and you know, acceptable activity that's happening on the platform.

0:20:26.000 --> 0:20:28.600
<v Speaker 3>And so we do lots of cool mL work. You know,

0:20:28.640 --> 0:20:31.840
<v Speaker 3>we don't talk about it really that much publicly because

0:20:31.960 --> 0:20:34.400
<v Speaker 3>it is just what goes into operating a skilled platform

0:20:34.480 --> 0:20:36.919
<v Speaker 3>like this, but it's a huge amount of the special

0:20:36.960 --> 0:20:40.400
<v Speaker 3>sauce that makes Stripe tick. At the same time, the

0:20:40.440 --> 0:20:42.280
<v Speaker 3>tech has to be really good and nice and usable,

0:20:42.359 --> 0:20:45.240
<v Speaker 3>and customers really care about latency, they really care about

0:20:45.240 --> 0:20:48.160
<v Speaker 3>how easy the API integration experiences, and so I would

0:20:48.200 --> 0:20:52.160
<v Speaker 3>say companies prior to Stripe tended to pick a lane

0:20:52.200 --> 0:20:54.400
<v Speaker 3>a bit where you had a few purely tech companies

0:20:54.440 --> 0:20:56.520
<v Speaker 3>where you know, they'd say, we're a payment s gateway

0:20:56.520 --> 0:20:58.240
<v Speaker 3>and we just don't think about anything. We just handle

0:20:58.240 --> 0:21:00.960
<v Speaker 3>off the transaction of something someone else. Or there was

0:21:01.040 --> 0:21:04.320
<v Speaker 3>banks and they actually just generally outsourced the tech. They

0:21:04.320 --> 0:21:06.959
<v Speaker 3>didn't even really do it themselves, or if they did themselves,

0:21:07.000 --> 0:21:09.440
<v Speaker 3>they did not do it particularly well, and so it

0:21:09.480 --> 0:21:13.040
<v Speaker 3>was a very crummy experience for the developers actually using it.

0:21:13.080 --> 0:21:15.520
<v Speaker 3>And of course the tech changes Mobile was just coming

0:21:15.560 --> 0:21:17.760
<v Speaker 3>along as we were getting started. You know, the iPhone

0:21:17.760 --> 0:21:19.200
<v Speaker 3>app store came oute in two thousand and eight. We

0:21:19.240 --> 0:21:21.080
<v Speaker 3>started Stripe in two thousand and nine, so like we

0:21:21.080 --> 0:21:23.080
<v Speaker 3>were just in time for that, and so mobile was

0:21:23.080 --> 0:21:26.160
<v Speaker 3>a very relevant consideration. You know, even just the web

0:21:26.200 --> 0:21:29.159
<v Speaker 3>apps and SaaS and everything grew a huge amount, and

0:21:29.240 --> 0:21:31.639
<v Speaker 3>so I think the banks had not built for that

0:21:31.840 --> 0:21:33.960
<v Speaker 3>and did not build for that, and so there was

0:21:34.000 --> 0:21:36.720
<v Speaker 3>maybe a gap between the existing providers and there was

0:21:36.760 --> 0:21:38.080
<v Speaker 3>that sort of things that you have to be really

0:21:38.119 --> 0:21:40.119
<v Speaker 3>good at. There were huge number of things with Stripe

0:21:40.160 --> 0:21:42.640
<v Speaker 3>that we did buy intuitive feel they were not part

0:21:42.680 --> 0:21:46.080
<v Speaker 3>of a particularly deliberate tops down strategy that was written

0:21:46.080 --> 0:21:48.480
<v Speaker 3>down in the business plan, but ended up working out well.

0:21:48.800 --> 0:21:51.760
<v Speaker 3>And so one was our really early focus on developers,

0:21:51.760 --> 0:21:54.159
<v Speaker 3>where our go to market was through developers. We started

0:21:54.160 --> 0:21:56.280
<v Speaker 3>by selling to startups, and there was this really I

0:21:56.320 --> 0:21:58.960
<v Speaker 3>would say, kind of bottoms up sort of adoption motion.

0:21:59.400 --> 0:22:02.480
<v Speaker 3>But again, ltimately the product we're selling is a technical

0:22:02.520 --> 0:22:04.680
<v Speaker 3>API product, and so of course you should be thinking

0:22:04.680 --> 0:22:07.159
<v Speaker 3>about what the developers want. We just had the developer

0:22:07.200 --> 0:22:09.600
<v Speaker 3>focus because we were software engineers ourselves. We just wanted

0:22:09.600 --> 0:22:12.159
<v Speaker 3>to build a product that we thought was a good product.

0:22:12.400 --> 0:22:14.080
<v Speaker 3>But I think it ended up being more strategic than

0:22:14.119 --> 0:22:15.320
<v Speaker 3>we maybe realized in the beginning.

0:22:15.880 --> 0:22:19.880
<v Speaker 5>There's a lot of like mess in the legal and

0:22:20.040 --> 0:22:23.760
<v Speaker 5>like infrastructure of the payment system, and like your job

0:22:23.840 --> 0:22:26.440
<v Speaker 5>is to provide people a very clean abstraction to that mess.

0:22:26.480 --> 0:22:28.600
<v Speaker 5>And like that means handling all of the mess and

0:22:28.640 --> 0:22:30.320
<v Speaker 5>you know, actually going on and figuring stuff out and

0:22:30.359 --> 0:22:32.080
<v Speaker 5>then being able to put that in the back end

0:22:32.119 --> 0:22:33.960
<v Speaker 5>of your API. So the API is like a very

0:22:34.000 --> 0:22:35.960
<v Speaker 5>clean abstraction. Like is that?

0:22:37.000 --> 0:22:39.760
<v Speaker 3>Burne Hobart had a line that I liked in one

0:22:39.800 --> 0:22:42.520
<v Speaker 3>of his newsletters that stripe makes the financial system work

0:22:42.560 --> 0:22:45.320
<v Speaker 3>the way people think it already does, and that I

0:22:45.359 --> 0:22:47.760
<v Speaker 3>think is actually a pretty nice design principle for us.

0:22:48.000 --> 0:22:49.600
<v Speaker 3>And you know, maybe a good example of this.

0:22:49.680 --> 0:22:52.040
<v Speaker 5>Is see when I hear that I want you to

0:22:52.080 --> 0:22:55.080
<v Speaker 5>do like equity derivatives, I want you to do more

0:22:55.080 --> 0:22:55.880
<v Speaker 5>of this stuff in my world.

0:22:56.080 --> 0:22:58.840
<v Speaker 3>But I don't think we've a view on how it improved.

0:22:59.440 --> 0:23:01.320
<v Speaker 4>Maybe I just think more I do want to talk

0:23:01.320 --> 0:23:04.639
<v Speaker 4>about crypto. Yeah, we debated this internally, but when it

0:23:04.680 --> 0:23:08.679
<v Speaker 4>comes to the payments world, I mean, the conversation tends

0:23:08.720 --> 0:23:11.840
<v Speaker 4>to devolve into a crypto conversation because I feel like

0:23:11.840 --> 0:23:16.240
<v Speaker 4>crypto is trying to solve a lot of payments problems,

0:23:16.320 --> 0:23:19.920
<v Speaker 4>especially when it comes to cross border payments. And I'm

0:23:19.920 --> 0:23:21.760
<v Speaker 4>not asking you about like the price of bitcoin or

0:23:21.760 --> 0:23:23.879
<v Speaker 4>whether you're bullish on you know, number go up, But

0:23:24.280 --> 0:23:27.120
<v Speaker 4>when it comes to crypto and the problems that it's

0:23:27.119 --> 0:23:28.880
<v Speaker 4>trying to solve, I mean, how do you think about it?

0:23:29.240 --> 0:23:31.959
<v Speaker 3>We're quite excited about crypto at the moment. I interpret

0:23:32.000 --> 0:23:36.560
<v Speaker 3>money stuff as the house position as moderately cryptoskeptical, and

0:23:37.440 --> 0:23:39.640
<v Speaker 3>so I guess what I would say to a moderately

0:23:39.680 --> 0:23:43.919
<v Speaker 3>cryptoskeptical audience. They'd be two things. One, there are just

0:23:43.920 --> 0:23:47.199
<v Speaker 3>a bunch of scams and dodgy characters and everything like that.

0:23:47.440 --> 0:23:49.040
<v Speaker 3>But it kind of reminds me of I at the

0:23:49.040 --> 0:23:50.440
<v Speaker 3>first I grew up in Ireland. The first time I

0:23:50.480 --> 0:23:53.119
<v Speaker 3>went to Vegas was for a work conference there. It

0:23:53.359 --> 0:23:55.520
<v Speaker 3>was for a work conference, and you know, at the

0:23:55.600 --> 0:23:57.600
<v Speaker 3>Venetian or something like that, probably Money twenty to twenty

0:23:57.960 --> 0:24:02.200
<v Speaker 3>and you're going into the hotel past like all the

0:24:02.200 --> 0:24:04.800
<v Speaker 3>people smoking indoors and like the people just addicted to

0:24:04.840 --> 0:24:06.720
<v Speaker 3>the slot machines just pressing them again and again again,

0:24:06.720 --> 0:24:08.359
<v Speaker 3>and it's all the blinking lights and you know the

0:24:08.440 --> 0:24:10.320
<v Speaker 3>I guess the clatter of the coins paying out and

0:24:10.359 --> 0:24:15.000
<v Speaker 3>you have to walk past this degenerate gambling areas. Yeah,

0:24:15.000 --> 0:24:18.560
<v Speaker 3>it's a grim scene to get to your serious industry conference.

0:24:18.600 --> 0:24:21.359
<v Speaker 3>And those very surprising to me. And I don't know this.

0:24:21.440 --> 0:24:23.960
<v Speaker 3>There's something similar in crypto, where you have the casino

0:24:24.320 --> 0:24:27.320
<v Speaker 3>dogecoin value speculating part of us, and then there's people

0:24:27.320 --> 0:24:29.480
<v Speaker 3>doing all the serious work over in say stable coins

0:24:29.560 --> 0:24:31.760
<v Speaker 3>or something like that, and those two things just exist.

0:24:32.040 --> 0:24:35.040
<v Speaker 3>But I think one cannot use the existence of the

0:24:35.040 --> 0:24:38.320
<v Speaker 3>slots in the Vegas Casino to write off the work anomment,

0:24:38.359 --> 0:24:39.160
<v Speaker 3>stretching the analogy.

0:24:39.760 --> 0:24:45.080
<v Speaker 5>No, this is good, so because like, yeah, you're excited.

0:24:45.200 --> 0:24:48.960
<v Speaker 5>There's like your friend Peto eleven would say, it's a

0:24:49.400 --> 0:24:52.200
<v Speaker 5>kyic avoidance mechanism. Basically, it's like a yeah.

0:24:52.200 --> 0:24:55.000
<v Speaker 3>Well, the thing about crypto is there's been a lot

0:24:55.040 --> 0:24:58.080
<v Speaker 3>of hype on what crypto is useful for. And so

0:24:58.200 --> 0:24:59.520
<v Speaker 3>for example, if you go back and read the original

0:24:59.520 --> 0:25:01.160
<v Speaker 3>Bitcoin b or did a great read, it's a very

0:25:01.400 --> 0:25:04.280
<v Speaker 3>readable original paper. It actually used the word interchange in

0:25:04.280 --> 0:25:06.040
<v Speaker 3>there and talks about kind of the use of bitcoin

0:25:06.160 --> 0:25:09.639
<v Speaker 3>as a payment method. But bitcoin turned out to be

0:25:09.760 --> 0:25:12.359
<v Speaker 3>certainly stock bitcoin, you know, before lightning and everything like

0:25:12.400 --> 0:25:14.119
<v Speaker 3>that should have to be a horrible payment method like

0:25:14.160 --> 0:25:16.560
<v Speaker 3>slow expensive, let's all do you that. And now the

0:25:16.640 --> 0:25:20.080
<v Speaker 3>technology has matured through what has been kind of fourteen

0:25:20.160 --> 0:25:22.000
<v Speaker 3>years of development. I think the crypto haters used this

0:25:22.080 --> 0:25:23.879
<v Speaker 3>argument that like, well, you know, is the web in

0:25:23.960 --> 0:25:25.800
<v Speaker 3>ninety three for you know, many many years, whereas the

0:25:25.840 --> 0:25:28.240
<v Speaker 3>actual web coming along. But there's been fourteen years of

0:25:28.320 --> 0:25:31.399
<v Speaker 3>lots of technical development happening such that we've ended up

0:25:31.440 --> 0:25:34.320
<v Speaker 3>with much more advanced technologies, and so what you specifically

0:25:34.320 --> 0:25:38.320
<v Speaker 3>have now with stable coins is you have firstly, something

0:25:38.359 --> 0:25:40.240
<v Speaker 3>that's value doesn't change and so there's none of the

0:25:40.400 --> 0:25:42.720
<v Speaker 3>kind of speculation stuff that we're talking about. You have

0:25:42.720 --> 0:25:45.399
<v Speaker 3>something that's actually very technically scalable. So with the current

0:25:45.680 --> 0:25:49.159
<v Speaker 3>L two's there's no real scalability issues with them, and

0:25:49.320 --> 0:25:52.280
<v Speaker 3>you have a pretty sensible construct where in a way,

0:25:52.320 --> 0:25:54.440
<v Speaker 3>it's narrow banking. Right. We've been talking about narrow banking

0:25:54.480 --> 0:25:56.919
<v Speaker 3>in this country for decades and we've ended up with

0:25:57.000 --> 0:26:00.960
<v Speaker 3>narrow banking through stable coins, where say a good stable coin,

0:26:01.080 --> 0:26:04.440
<v Speaker 3>you know that like a PAXOS or a USDC. In

0:26:04.480 --> 0:26:06.760
<v Speaker 3>the case of USDC, it is fully backed by short

0:26:06.840 --> 0:26:10.159
<v Speaker 3>term treasuries. And that actually just seems like a pretty

0:26:10.160 --> 0:26:12.280
<v Speaker 3>good construct to me. And so you know, we now

0:26:12.320 --> 0:26:14.320
<v Speaker 3>make it where you can, you know, accept money and

0:26:14.359 --> 0:26:16.880
<v Speaker 3>strive via crypto. You can do some payouts things like that.

0:26:17.240 --> 0:26:20.120
<v Speaker 3>And the obvious thing that people say is true where

0:26:21.240 --> 0:26:24.120
<v Speaker 3>in the US you will be slightly too biased against

0:26:24.200 --> 0:26:26.439
<v Speaker 3>crypto because the US is the world's best currency. You know,

0:26:26.520 --> 0:26:28.959
<v Speaker 3>the US has the world's reserve currency where you get

0:26:29.000 --> 0:26:33.280
<v Speaker 3>to spend and green back exactly. And so of course

0:26:33.280 --> 0:26:35.080
<v Speaker 3>people in the US think the USD is awesome because

0:26:35.080 --> 0:26:37.440
<v Speaker 3>it is an awesome currency, whereas many people in many

0:26:37.440 --> 0:26:40.480
<v Speaker 3>other countries have a much more adversarial relationship with their

0:26:40.480 --> 0:26:42.840
<v Speaker 3>own currency. And I'm not even talking about Zimbabwe, though

0:26:42.840 --> 0:26:44.840
<v Speaker 3>it is true there. I'm talking about Turkey, which is

0:26:44.880 --> 0:26:49.399
<v Speaker 3>a very large country and economy and population, but people

0:26:49.400 --> 0:26:52.840
<v Speaker 3>there do not have, you know, full faith in the lira,

0:26:53.080 --> 0:26:54.920
<v Speaker 3>and they think about what's a better place to keep

0:26:54.960 --> 0:26:55.879
<v Speaker 3>money than lira.

0:26:56.320 --> 0:26:59.720
<v Speaker 5>I guess the other like US bias is that the

0:27:00.160 --> 0:27:03.879
<v Speaker 5>government really wants dollar payments to flow through the ky

0:27:03.960 --> 0:27:07.720
<v Speaker 5>Seed banking system, and like there's some suspicion that.

0:27:07.680 --> 0:27:10.560
<v Speaker 3>I think all the serious grown up crypto players today,

0:27:10.920 --> 0:27:13.400
<v Speaker 3>I mean they're subject to the fincent travel real they

0:27:13.440 --> 0:27:16.480
<v Speaker 3>are ky seeing the actors, and so if you go

0:27:16.560 --> 0:27:19.640
<v Speaker 3>through a crypto flow today, you will see the normal

0:27:19.720 --> 0:27:22.840
<v Speaker 3>frictions of dealing with a regulated financial product where you

0:27:22.880 --> 0:27:24.760
<v Speaker 3>are asked to provide your you know, last for your

0:27:24.840 --> 0:27:26.960
<v Speaker 3>social or upload a driver's license or things like that.

0:27:27.240 --> 0:27:29.760
<v Speaker 3>And so I think just in most of the crypto

0:27:29.880 --> 0:27:32.000
<v Speaker 3>use cases that are being top obviously that the sketchy

0:27:32.080 --> 0:27:34.000
<v Speaker 3>dark web stuff exists as well, But in most of

0:27:34.000 --> 0:27:36.800
<v Speaker 3>the use cases we are talking about where serious businesses

0:27:36.840 --> 0:27:39.439
<v Speaker 3>like Stripe or serious merchants are using crypto. It is

0:27:39.480 --> 0:27:42.560
<v Speaker 3>the custodial lyssis part of the crystals.

0:27:42.800 --> 0:27:44.840
<v Speaker 5>It's just sort of like an un chain like non

0:27:44.880 --> 0:27:46.320
<v Speaker 5>custodical transfer.

0:27:46.000 --> 0:27:48.360
<v Speaker 4>Like correct, Yeah, I'm true. I mean, if you look

0:27:48.400 --> 0:27:51.280
<v Speaker 4>into your crystal ball and you know, it's been fourteen

0:27:51.359 --> 0:27:54.160
<v Speaker 4>years since bitcoin was created. As you said, we've seen

0:27:54.200 --> 0:27:57.720
<v Speaker 4>a ton of technology advancements since then. I mean, you

0:27:57.720 --> 0:28:00.840
<v Speaker 4>said you're quite excited about crypto, but I mean, how

0:28:00.920 --> 0:28:02.680
<v Speaker 4>far can we run that out? Do you think it's

0:28:02.880 --> 0:28:05.520
<v Speaker 4>the future? For example, would you go that far if

0:28:05.560 --> 0:28:08.479
<v Speaker 4>you look fifty one hundred years into the future.

0:28:08.640 --> 0:28:11.120
<v Speaker 3>I don't think it's a singular future. And again there's

0:28:11.119 --> 0:28:13.400
<v Speaker 3>a bit of overpromising that's happened in the crypto world. Again,

0:28:13.440 --> 0:28:15.640
<v Speaker 3>I think that's what gets people's backed up. Actually. Speak

0:28:15.640 --> 0:28:18.800
<v Speaker 3>of Bern Hobart. We just Stripe Press published his new book.

0:28:18.920 --> 0:28:21.240
<v Speaker 3>The title is Boom and the piesis of the book

0:28:21.359 --> 0:28:26.040
<v Speaker 3>is that we generally view financial bubbles as societally net

0:28:26.080 --> 0:28:29.280
<v Speaker 3>negative because you know, they cause the misallocation of resources

0:28:29.280 --> 0:28:31.439
<v Speaker 3>and they cause you know, ultimately people lose out. And

0:28:31.520 --> 0:28:36.680
<v Speaker 3>he makes the argument that bubbles provide a societally useful

0:28:36.720 --> 0:28:40.840
<v Speaker 3>function by essentially coordinating effort. And you know, maybe the

0:28:41.160 --> 0:28:43.440
<v Speaker 3>dot com boom is incorrectly understood as a you know,

0:28:43.640 --> 0:28:46.040
<v Speaker 3>pets dot common webvan. It was really like by dollars

0:28:46.040 --> 0:28:47.840
<v Speaker 3>put into it, as you guys probably know, it was

0:28:47.880 --> 0:28:50.600
<v Speaker 3>a telecoms boom, and it was a fiber rollout boom.

0:28:50.640 --> 0:28:53.120
<v Speaker 3>But it led to the US having just amazing fiber

0:28:53.160 --> 0:28:55.320
<v Speaker 3>overcapacity that then led to the steady growth of the

0:28:55.360 --> 0:28:57.800
<v Speaker 3>Internet for the decades that followed. And so that's maybe

0:28:57.800 --> 0:28:59.960
<v Speaker 3>an example of it was a bubble, but it was

0:29:00.040 --> 0:29:02.800
<v Speaker 3>a societally useful bubble because then it alleged to this overcapacity.

0:29:02.880 --> 0:29:05.320
<v Speaker 3>This had lots of positive externalities. And I think you

0:29:05.400 --> 0:29:06.520
<v Speaker 3>make that argument about crypto.

0:29:06.840 --> 0:29:10.000
<v Speaker 5>This that argument made as crypto led to a build

0:29:10.000 --> 0:29:12.800
<v Speaker 5>out of GPUs that led to the AI boom.

0:29:13.160 --> 0:29:15.080
<v Speaker 3>Oh interesting, I wasn't even making that case. You could

0:29:15.080 --> 0:29:17.479
<v Speaker 3>make that argument too though obviously there was a lot

0:29:17.520 --> 0:29:20.479
<v Speaker 3>of GPU spent happening even even before crypto.

0:29:20.560 --> 0:29:20.640
<v Speaker 4>No.

0:29:20.720 --> 0:29:22.200
<v Speaker 3>I was just making the argument that I think the

0:29:22.240 --> 0:29:25.680
<v Speaker 3>speculative side of crypto, you could make the argument pulled

0:29:25.680 --> 0:29:29.120
<v Speaker 3>in attention and resources that was then used to build

0:29:29.200 --> 0:29:31.760
<v Speaker 3>the very boring useful parts of crypto, like you know

0:29:32.200 --> 0:29:35.200
<v Speaker 3>Ethereum two or against table coins or things like that.

0:29:35.680 --> 0:29:37.320
<v Speaker 5>We could talk more about this. Do you want to

0:29:37.320 --> 0:29:39.560
<v Speaker 5>make sure are we talking about the things you don't

0:29:39.560 --> 0:29:40.120
<v Speaker 5>want to talk about?

0:29:40.240 --> 0:29:43.240
<v Speaker 4>Yeah? Great, which we do want to talk about.

0:29:43.960 --> 0:29:48.040
<v Speaker 5>So another money stuff theme that we'll probably do on

0:29:48.040 --> 0:29:51.360
<v Speaker 5>our ad reads is that private markets are the new

0:29:51.360 --> 0:29:55.640
<v Speaker 5>public markets. You guys are among the poster children for that.

0:29:55.720 --> 0:29:59.160
<v Speaker 5>You're the CFO. Tell me about what it's like being private.

0:29:59.400 --> 0:30:01.760
<v Speaker 5>I don't know. I mean, how should I think about,

0:30:01.760 --> 0:30:04.480
<v Speaker 5>like the idea that, like, you're an enormous company and

0:30:04.600 --> 0:30:08.280
<v Speaker 5>you've stayed private and have no enthusiasm as far as

0:30:08.360 --> 0:30:10.480
<v Speaker 5>we know, for going public or even talking about this

0:30:10.960 --> 0:30:12.760
<v Speaker 5>twenty years ago, would you have been able to do that?

0:30:14.520 --> 0:30:17.240
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. We spend a lot of time internally at Stripe

0:30:17.280 --> 0:30:21.160
<v Speaker 3>thinking about the value of the Stripe business. I think

0:30:21.160 --> 0:30:23.000
<v Speaker 3>the external world spends a lot of time thinking about

0:30:23.000 --> 0:30:25.960
<v Speaker 3>the value of the Stripe stock price, which are related

0:30:26.080 --> 0:30:30.600
<v Speaker 3>but different things. We have definitely stayed private longer than

0:30:31.760 --> 0:30:34.160
<v Speaker 3>some people expected. I think we'll continue to stay private

0:30:34.160 --> 0:30:39.000
<v Speaker 3>longer than maybe some people expect. But there's no complex answer.

0:30:39.040 --> 0:30:41.560
<v Speaker 3>It's just a simple answer, which is, we don't think

0:30:41.760 --> 0:30:44.800
<v Speaker 3>companies should sleep walk into going public. We think they

0:30:44.840 --> 0:30:49.440
<v Speaker 3>should be deliberate about it. And why would stripe right

0:30:49.480 --> 0:30:52.720
<v Speaker 3>now and go public. It could be if we wanted

0:30:52.760 --> 0:30:56.240
<v Speaker 3>to sell stock broadly to a retail audience. That's not

0:30:56.320 --> 0:30:57.560
<v Speaker 3>something that we've had that you know, we just the

0:30:57.680 --> 0:31:00.320
<v Speaker 3>business is profitable, you know, we haven't needed to raise

0:31:00.520 --> 0:31:03.400
<v Speaker 3>very large amounts of capital. A traditional reason might be

0:31:03.640 --> 0:31:05.640
<v Speaker 3>return of capital, not just kind of a capital raise

0:31:05.680 --> 0:31:08.320
<v Speaker 3>for running the business, but return of capital to existing shareholders.

0:31:08.400 --> 0:31:10.560
<v Speaker 3>But again that's where you're maybe referencing. The private markets

0:31:10.560 --> 0:31:13.280
<v Speaker 3>have gotten deeper, and you know, in our case, we've

0:31:13.360 --> 0:31:16.840
<v Speaker 3>run two unlimited employee tenders, you know last year and

0:31:17.000 --> 0:31:20.160
<v Speaker 3>this year. You know, Sequoia just an LP tender where

0:31:20.200 --> 0:31:23.400
<v Speaker 3>they gave liquidity to some of their LPs. But liquidity

0:31:23.480 --> 0:31:25.960
<v Speaker 3>is available to people in the private markets, and so

0:31:26.000 --> 0:31:30.520
<v Speaker 3>it's more I think the default spring, where companies, you know,

0:31:30.560 --> 0:31:33.320
<v Speaker 3>as SaaS company would be started and you know, go

0:31:33.320 --> 0:31:35.320
<v Speaker 3>from zero to one hundred million ARRR and then just

0:31:35.440 --> 0:31:38.040
<v Speaker 3>run out and go public. Default is being questioned a

0:31:38.080 --> 0:31:40.239
<v Speaker 3>little bit in Silicon Valley. Obviously, lots of companies are

0:31:40.240 --> 0:31:42.800
<v Speaker 3>still going public, but the default is being questioned, and

0:31:42.840 --> 0:31:48.840
<v Speaker 3>the default is more of a Silicon Valley tech default

0:31:49.480 --> 0:31:52.600
<v Speaker 3>than maybe a broader global default. So like in financial

0:31:52.560 --> 0:31:55.959
<v Speaker 3>stud we know exactly so as Bloomberg employees, you may

0:31:56.000 --> 0:31:57.800
<v Speaker 3>be familiar with it, but Bloomberg is the example that

0:31:57.880 --> 0:32:01.360
<v Speaker 3>everyone cites. But if you just quickly run through financial services,

0:32:01.480 --> 0:32:04.240
<v Speaker 3>you know, take the world's leading market maker, Citadel Securities

0:32:04.240 --> 0:32:07.360
<v Speaker 3>private company, take the world's leading prop trade I'm probably

0:32:07.360 --> 0:32:09.640
<v Speaker 3>offending one of the world's leading in all these cases,

0:32:09.680 --> 0:32:11.640
<v Speaker 3>So don't defend anyone. But if you look at Jane Street,

0:32:11.640 --> 0:32:14.200
<v Speaker 3>you know which it's been reported on a lot these days,

0:32:14.240 --> 0:32:16.000
<v Speaker 3>just how good a business it is. You know, whether

0:32:16.000 --> 0:32:18.240
<v Speaker 3>they're at a ten billion profits run rate or something

0:32:18.280 --> 0:32:21.280
<v Speaker 3>like that, private company Fidelity, when the world's leading brokerages

0:32:21.560 --> 0:32:24.000
<v Speaker 3>private company Goldin Sachs, your former employer.

0:32:24.320 --> 0:32:26.560
<v Speaker 5>I assume that that A big difference is that a

0:32:26.560 --> 0:32:29.920
<v Speaker 5>lot like Chance Street writes very large checks. And the

0:32:29.960 --> 0:32:31.920
<v Speaker 5>Silicon Valley difference is not just that like you have

0:32:32.040 --> 0:32:33.800
<v Speaker 5>vcs you might be hunger to get at whereas like

0:32:33.800 --> 0:32:35.880
<v Speaker 5>said at all thosand but like it's also you have employees

0:32:35.880 --> 0:32:38.200
<v Speaker 5>who are getting paid in equity and they're getting tender

0:32:38.200 --> 0:32:40.320
<v Speaker 5>as every Oh yeah, like is it tender every year

0:32:40.400 --> 0:32:42.040
<v Speaker 5>just as good as publicly traded stock.

0:32:43.000 --> 0:32:44.880
<v Speaker 3>We think the tender every year is in nice solution.

0:32:45.120 --> 0:32:46.920
<v Speaker 3>And there are some things that would be different if

0:32:46.960 --> 0:32:48.440
<v Speaker 3>we're a public company for the better. There's some things

0:32:48.440 --> 0:32:50.480
<v Speaker 3>that'd be different as a public company for the worst.

0:32:50.520 --> 0:32:52.440
<v Speaker 3>And you get into you know, trading windows and who's

0:32:52.480 --> 0:32:55.080
<v Speaker 3>an insider and things like that. But it's thus far

0:32:55.120 --> 0:32:56.840
<v Speaker 3>work quite nicely for a solution.

0:32:57.040 --> 0:32:58.960
<v Speaker 4>So is that the model then? Like tender every year?

0:32:58.960 --> 0:33:00.360
<v Speaker 4>You've only done two, but.

0:33:00.920 --> 0:33:04.040
<v Speaker 3>We don't have forward looking plans to announce, and so

0:33:04.040 --> 0:33:05.800
<v Speaker 3>I come back to it at some stage with you know,

0:33:06.120 --> 0:33:08.120
<v Speaker 3>we could go do something that you don't expect, and

0:33:08.440 --> 0:33:10.720
<v Speaker 3>we're not announcing the plans because genuinely, it's not like

0:33:10.720 --> 0:33:12.760
<v Speaker 3>there's a written down plan at stride that we're going

0:33:12.800 --> 0:33:15.960
<v Speaker 3>to do this, this and then this. We are always

0:33:16.120 --> 0:33:20.360
<v Speaker 3>reevaluating it. But again, up to this point, it has

0:33:20.400 --> 0:33:22.920
<v Speaker 3>made more sense for us to grow as a capital

0:33:22.920 --> 0:33:26.000
<v Speaker 3>efficient private company, then it's made sense for us to

0:33:26.000 --> 0:33:27.160
<v Speaker 3>be a publican sure.

0:33:27.040 --> 0:33:29.560
<v Speaker 5>Like chancer, it just makes money every year and they

0:33:29.560 --> 0:33:31.400
<v Speaker 5>don't need to raise capital and so they just.

0:33:31.360 --> 0:33:33.480
<v Speaker 3>Seems like great business haze and money to people. Right.

0:33:33.600 --> 0:33:35.920
<v Speaker 5>I don't know what the economics that is, literally, but

0:33:35.960 --> 0:33:39.160
<v Speaker 5>they seem extremely good. But like, it does seem possible

0:33:39.160 --> 0:33:41.840
<v Speaker 5>that you could just make cash every year and fund

0:33:41.880 --> 0:33:43.720
<v Speaker 5>the business out of that and pay people out of

0:33:43.720 --> 0:33:44.360
<v Speaker 5>that and never.

0:33:44.200 --> 0:33:45.680
<v Speaker 3>Need to For twenty four, we're trying to make a

0:33:45.680 --> 0:33:47.360
<v Speaker 3>decision for twenty four, and for twenty five, we'll try

0:33:47.400 --> 0:33:49.000
<v Speaker 3>to make a decision for twenty five. So luckily it's

0:33:49.040 --> 0:33:50.920
<v Speaker 3>not the case that you're faced with a you know,

0:33:50.960 --> 0:33:52.360
<v Speaker 3>a fork in the road and you have to make

0:33:52.360 --> 0:33:55.000
<v Speaker 3>some kind of permanent decision. We do constantly re evaluate

0:33:55.040 --> 0:33:55.760
<v Speaker 3>it when.

0:33:55.600 --> 0:33:58.160
<v Speaker 5>I write about this topic. One concern that people have

0:33:58.480 --> 0:34:01.560
<v Speaker 5>is that there are a lot of cool companies, like

0:34:01.600 --> 0:34:05.320
<v Speaker 5>an increasing number of them, like fast growing, profitable companies

0:34:05.720 --> 0:34:08.320
<v Speaker 5>that or sorry, I should say fast growing, not profitable,

0:34:08.640 --> 0:34:12.560
<v Speaker 5>early stage companies, stage companies, high growth companies that don't

0:34:12.560 --> 0:34:15.960
<v Speaker 5>go public, and that deprives like ordinary investors of access

0:34:15.960 --> 0:34:19.239
<v Speaker 5>to those companies, and therefore it should be like made

0:34:19.280 --> 0:34:22.400
<v Speaker 5>easier to go public or whatever. Right, So for you

0:34:23.320 --> 0:34:24.880
<v Speaker 5>do you worry at all about that? From like a

0:34:24.920 --> 0:34:28.160
<v Speaker 5>systemic perspective that you're depriving like American retirement savers of

0:34:28.200 --> 0:34:30.880
<v Speaker 5>access to the stripe. And then two, you're not entirely

0:34:30.920 --> 0:34:34.280
<v Speaker 5>because there are people who are going around selling stripe

0:34:34.280 --> 0:34:36.560
<v Speaker 5>shares in a way that I believe you do not like.

0:34:37.120 --> 0:34:39.720
<v Speaker 5>And I don't know, like there's like a way around

0:34:39.800 --> 0:34:41.560
<v Speaker 5>of the barrier that you've set up. I guess.

0:34:42.160 --> 0:34:42.520
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:34:42.680 --> 0:34:45.719
<v Speaker 3>Look, I do think the debate over who should be

0:34:45.760 --> 0:34:52.040
<v Speaker 3>allowed by private assets is a good debate. And the

0:34:52.080 --> 0:34:54.560
<v Speaker 3>accredited investor rule is it's kind of an odd rule,

0:34:54.560 --> 0:34:56.440
<v Speaker 3>like we're able to take it for granted that it's

0:34:56.440 --> 0:34:59.280
<v Speaker 3>been around for a long time, but basically we define

0:35:00.280 --> 0:35:02.840
<v Speaker 3>investors as rich people, which is, you know, maybe some

0:35:03.080 --> 0:35:04.120
<v Speaker 3>a historic and.

0:35:04.680 --> 0:35:06.600
<v Speaker 5>In like a declining standard of rich where it's now

0:35:06.640 --> 0:35:08.160
<v Speaker 5>like sort of upper middle class people.

0:35:08.239 --> 0:35:10.680
<v Speaker 3>Correct. Yeah, So I think debate on that is a

0:35:10.680 --> 0:35:13.040
<v Speaker 3>good thing. In stripes case, you know, most of the

0:35:13.280 --> 0:35:17.720
<v Speaker 3>non employee ownership is through essentially kind of VC funds,

0:35:18.040 --> 0:35:22.480
<v Speaker 3>and the underlying VC fund ownership the LPs there tend

0:35:22.520 --> 0:35:26.080
<v Speaker 3>to be pension funds, college endowments. People. I think we

0:35:26.080 --> 0:35:28.239
<v Speaker 3>feel quite good about making money for it, and so

0:35:28.560 --> 0:35:30.840
<v Speaker 3>I don't think it's the case that's kind of broader society.

0:35:30.880 --> 0:35:33.440
<v Speaker 3>It doesn't get to benefit from the appreciation. I think

0:35:33.440 --> 0:35:36.080
<v Speaker 3>we feel quite good about the LP base of the

0:35:36.160 --> 0:35:38.399
<v Speaker 3>investors that are behind striving Again, I think that's another

0:35:38.400 --> 0:35:40.440
<v Speaker 3>thing that has allowed us to stay private for as

0:35:40.440 --> 0:35:42.480
<v Speaker 3>long as we have, which is actually the very long

0:35:42.560 --> 0:35:44.040
<v Speaker 3>term vcs. And I think if we had a different

0:35:44.040 --> 0:35:46.560
<v Speaker 3>set of vcs, we would have been less fortunate in

0:35:46.600 --> 0:35:48.720
<v Speaker 3>being able to grow Stripe as a private company because

0:35:48.760 --> 0:35:50.160
<v Speaker 3>maybe they would have felt the need for a win

0:35:50.280 --> 0:35:51.600
<v Speaker 3>or something like that. But I think luckily, you know,

0:35:51.600 --> 0:35:54.320
<v Speaker 3>Siquic Capital is one of the best VC firms that

0:35:54.320 --> 0:35:56.359
<v Speaker 3>there is that don't quite need to prove themselves.

0:35:56.080 --> 0:35:58.200
<v Speaker 5>And they probably count you as a win anyway, say again,

0:35:58.200 --> 0:36:01.479
<v Speaker 5>they probably count you as a win exactly yea, yeah.

0:36:01.640 --> 0:36:03.480
<v Speaker 3>And then on the I don't know what you call them,

0:36:03.520 --> 0:36:06.200
<v Speaker 3>but the firms out there the market.

0:36:05.960 --> 0:36:08.680
<v Speaker 5>I've taught on the podcast about Destiny Tech one hundred,

0:36:08.680 --> 0:36:13.600
<v Speaker 5>which has a private market. I was that fond situation

0:36:13.800 --> 0:36:16.239
<v Speaker 5>with like some Stripe forward contracts, and like there's like

0:36:16.280 --> 0:36:18.839
<v Speaker 5>a general there's like a market for forward contracts, which

0:36:18.880 --> 0:36:21.480
<v Speaker 5>all seem to be not really appreciate this.

0:36:21.480 --> 0:36:28.920
<v Speaker 3>It's not going to end well because generally hyping financial

0:36:28.960 --> 0:36:34.240
<v Speaker 3>assets has a bad history. It worked out badly with SPACs,

0:36:34.280 --> 0:36:38.439
<v Speaker 3>it worked out badly with icos, and it just tends

0:36:38.440 --> 0:36:40.520
<v Speaker 3>to work out badly, which is why it tends to

0:36:40.520 --> 0:36:43.520
<v Speaker 3>be regulated this. You know, financial regulators tried to rein

0:36:43.560 --> 0:36:47.560
<v Speaker 3>in the hyping of private assets, and so again, Stripe

0:36:47.600 --> 0:36:50.920
<v Speaker 3>is not a public company. We do not enable broad

0:36:50.920 --> 0:36:54.959
<v Speaker 3>retail ownership of Stripe stock, and so if people try

0:36:55.040 --> 0:37:01.759
<v Speaker 3>to back into that by having either company stock in

0:37:02.040 --> 0:37:05.080
<v Speaker 3>a vehicle that that is then available to public mark investors,

0:37:05.600 --> 0:37:07.759
<v Speaker 3>we just think it's not a good construct, Like it's

0:37:07.840 --> 0:37:11.600
<v Speaker 3>underdisclosed where people are buying an interest in things based

0:37:11.640 --> 0:37:14.839
<v Speaker 3>on name brand recognition but not based on going over

0:37:14.880 --> 0:37:17.680
<v Speaker 3>the financials or understanding what it actually is. They tend

0:37:17.680 --> 0:37:19.360
<v Speaker 3>to all be very high fees. I mean, it depends

0:37:19.360 --> 0:37:21.400
<v Speaker 3>on the vehicle, but they tend to be fairly distractive

0:37:21.440 --> 0:37:23.719
<v Speaker 3>in that way. And so we don't like it. We

0:37:23.760 --> 0:37:27.719
<v Speaker 3>don't we don't permit it, and I'm personally not a fan.

0:37:28.200 --> 0:37:30.520
<v Speaker 4>Is there much that you can do about it? Like

0:37:30.560 --> 0:37:32.960
<v Speaker 4>in the case of a Destiny Tech for example, that

0:37:33.040 --> 0:37:37.120
<v Speaker 4>says that you know they have Stripe forwards zuchrre Yeah,

0:37:37.280 --> 0:37:38.839
<v Speaker 4>I mean, what can you do?

0:37:38.920 --> 0:37:41.560
<v Speaker 3>We prohibit forward. So we had a bit of a

0:37:41.560 --> 0:37:42.200
<v Speaker 3>about that.

0:37:42.360 --> 0:37:45.520
<v Speaker 5>People do them anyway, can you then avoid them?

0:37:45.520 --> 0:37:48.360
<v Speaker 3>And I don't know where this goes.

0:37:48.480 --> 0:37:51.719
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, because right, I mean, it seems like they're prohibited

0:37:51.760 --> 0:37:52.960
<v Speaker 5>and people do them.

0:37:52.800 --> 0:37:54.880
<v Speaker 3>And yeah, we put it up on the website just

0:37:54.880 --> 0:37:57.240
<v Speaker 3>to make it abundantly clear, so everyone has the same information.

0:37:57.840 --> 0:38:00.520
<v Speaker 3>Instruments they're not allowed. So I don't know this areas

0:38:00.520 --> 0:38:02.520
<v Speaker 3>where people have to read the tea leaves or the

0:38:02.520 --> 0:38:05.120
<v Speaker 3>body language. We tried to make us abundantly clear get

0:38:05.120 --> 0:38:07.880
<v Speaker 3>out there with the semaphore flags. So this people are

0:38:07.920 --> 0:38:08.840
<v Speaker 3>not in any doubt.

0:38:08.840 --> 0:38:11.360
<v Speaker 4>On the topic of going public. It doesn't sound like

0:38:11.360 --> 0:38:13.759
<v Speaker 4>you're in any rush, obviously, you said in June, And

0:38:13.800 --> 0:38:16.279
<v Speaker 4>I thought this was interesting that many companies make the

0:38:16.320 --> 0:38:20.080
<v Speaker 4>decision to go public too early. That you personally see

0:38:20.160 --> 0:38:23.200
<v Speaker 4>tons of opportunities to change and grow the business quite

0:38:23.239 --> 0:38:26.239
<v Speaker 4>a lot, and I think it's interesting that you want

0:38:26.239 --> 0:38:28.920
<v Speaker 4>to stay private to do that, and I think a

0:38:28.920 --> 0:38:31.640
<v Speaker 4>lot of founders would agree with you. But just the

0:38:31.719 --> 0:38:34.560
<v Speaker 4>fact that you know, sort of like going public. You

0:38:34.600 --> 0:38:38.040
<v Speaker 4>see this as this sign of maturity and maybe that

0:38:38.120 --> 0:38:40.320
<v Speaker 4>you're not innovating as much as you would in the privates.

0:38:40.680 --> 0:38:41.000
<v Speaker 3>I don't know.

0:38:41.040 --> 0:38:43.560
<v Speaker 4>It kind of made me think of tech companies like

0:38:43.640 --> 0:38:47.120
<v Speaker 4>offering dividends, Like I remember when Meta started giving out

0:38:47.160 --> 0:38:50.239
<v Speaker 4>dividends earlier this year. Everyone was like, oh, well they're

0:38:50.360 --> 0:38:51.840
<v Speaker 4>old news now they're too mature.

0:38:52.320 --> 0:38:54.439
<v Speaker 3>Well, I think Meta is the wrong example to use

0:38:54.480 --> 0:38:57.160
<v Speaker 3>for that argument. I guess they currently seem to be

0:38:57.320 --> 0:39:00.400
<v Speaker 3>doing extraordinarily well in the AI race. And I'm not

0:39:00.440 --> 0:39:02.720
<v Speaker 3>making the claim that you know, one can as innovate

0:39:02.800 --> 0:39:05.080
<v Speaker 3>as a public company, because that is clearly an absurd

0:39:05.080 --> 0:39:07.360
<v Speaker 3>claim and you would just be kind of constantly slapped

0:39:07.360 --> 0:39:09.520
<v Speaker 3>in the face by counterexamples. And Meta would be the

0:39:09.560 --> 0:39:11.680
<v Speaker 3>perfect one where they just am of the ring glasses

0:39:11.680 --> 0:39:13.880
<v Speaker 3>and those look amazing, and again they're just nailing it

0:39:13.880 --> 0:39:16.440
<v Speaker 3>in the AI race, and so they're basically argument. I

0:39:16.480 --> 0:39:22.160
<v Speaker 3>do think that on the margin, if you are developing

0:39:22.560 --> 0:39:24.560
<v Speaker 3>large number of new products, if you have a fast

0:39:24.560 --> 0:39:27.359
<v Speaker 3>growing business, if you're constantly reinventing how the business works.

0:39:27.400 --> 0:39:30.359
<v Speaker 3>And again in our case, we are transforming Stripe from

0:39:30.360 --> 0:39:32.000
<v Speaker 3>not just being a payment's business to there are all

0:39:32.040 --> 0:39:34.240
<v Speaker 3>these new software lines of business that are much earlier

0:39:34.239 --> 0:39:36.360
<v Speaker 3>that are harder to predict how they grow. Everything like this.

0:39:36.600 --> 0:39:38.560
<v Speaker 3>You know, we're changing out the underlying payment methods. You know,

0:39:38.600 --> 0:39:42.120
<v Speaker 3>we talked about crypto, we didn't talk about around the world.

0:39:42.360 --> 0:39:44.600
<v Speaker 3>There are all these interesting trends happening in new payment

0:39:44.600 --> 0:39:47.600
<v Speaker 3>methods where basically bank transfers and things like UPI and

0:39:47.640 --> 0:39:49.600
<v Speaker 3>picks in Brazil and things like that are becoming much

0:39:49.600 --> 0:39:51.920
<v Speaker 3>more relevant to anyway, the huge amount of change. I

0:39:52.000 --> 0:39:57.319
<v Speaker 3>think on the margin, the public company valuation apparatus is

0:39:59.000 --> 0:40:00.640
<v Speaker 3>you see it how people you know, the quarterly earnings

0:40:00.680 --> 0:40:02.000
<v Speaker 3>and the miss and the beach and everything like that.

0:40:02.440 --> 0:40:07.399
<v Speaker 3>It is optimized for mature, predictable businesses, and indeed people

0:40:07.400 --> 0:40:11.000
<v Speaker 3>talk about kind of business predictability, whereas you know, for

0:40:11.080 --> 0:40:13.120
<v Speaker 3>a business that is still in the you know, in

0:40:13.160 --> 0:40:15.040
<v Speaker 3>the early stages like stripe, and we think about a

0:40:15.040 --> 0:40:16.759
<v Speaker 3>lot of new products on a five or ten year

0:40:16.840 --> 0:40:19.279
<v Speaker 3>time horizon. Again, I think on the margin, there are

0:40:19.320 --> 0:40:21.959
<v Speaker 3>some benefits to doing that as a private company because

0:40:22.000 --> 0:40:24.279
<v Speaker 3>you get to kind of completely retool the business as

0:40:24.280 --> 0:40:27.279
<v Speaker 3>you go without necessarily wondering about, you know, what will

0:40:27.280 --> 0:40:29.399
<v Speaker 3>the reception be for this in you know, the next

0:40:29.480 --> 0:40:30.480
<v Speaker 3>quarter's earnings release.

0:40:30.840 --> 0:40:34.719
<v Speaker 5>I know you're not in any phase of learning an

0:40:34.719 --> 0:40:36.680
<v Speaker 5>IPO but I was a capital markets banker, and I

0:40:36.680 --> 0:40:40.440
<v Speaker 5>know you've had thoughts about like the IPO process. I'm like,

0:40:40.560 --> 0:40:43.239
<v Speaker 5>I don't know if you're doing an IPO, like, what

0:40:43.320 --> 0:40:45.080
<v Speaker 5>would you change about the process.

0:40:45.320 --> 0:40:48.680
<v Speaker 3>I find all the debates about IPO mechanics really uninteresting

0:40:48.800 --> 0:40:50.880
<v Speaker 3>because it just doesn't matter. Like, if you have a

0:40:50.920 --> 0:40:53.520
<v Speaker 3>great business that's valuable for customers that millions of people

0:40:53.640 --> 0:40:56.000
<v Speaker 3>use and makes money as a result, you can do

0:40:56.080 --> 0:40:57.919
<v Speaker 3>whatever you want. Like, you know, I think Facebook would

0:40:57.920 --> 0:41:00.600
<v Speaker 3>say they bought the IPO, but they have likeable business,

0:41:00.640 --> 0:41:03.040
<v Speaker 3>so it doesn't matter and no one remembers it. And

0:41:03.080 --> 0:41:05.319
<v Speaker 3>then you can have like the world's best IPEO plan

0:41:05.360 --> 0:41:06.759
<v Speaker 3>and if the business isn't good, it doesn't matter. And

0:41:06.760 --> 0:41:08.840
<v Speaker 3>so people get into all these debates about direct listing

0:41:09.200 --> 0:41:11.960
<v Speaker 3>versus regular IPO, and then Bill Gurly complains that the

0:41:11.960 --> 0:41:14.640
<v Speaker 3>bankers are taking too many fees, and then it just

0:41:14.680 --> 0:41:17.760
<v Speaker 3>doesn't matter. Like build a great business and you could

0:41:18.239 --> 0:41:21.640
<v Speaker 3>write your prospectus on a cocktail napkin and it'll be fine.

0:41:21.640 --> 0:41:24.680
<v Speaker 5>This is like why Charlie Muker doesn't like financial services business,

0:41:24.800 --> 0:41:27.960
<v Speaker 5>because you're like, like, oh, this is real business.

0:41:28.320 --> 0:41:30.880
<v Speaker 3>It's true, but it's true right. Yeah. And the thing

0:41:31.000 --> 0:41:35.080
<v Speaker 3>is investors are smart. I think people try to do

0:41:35.120 --> 0:41:36.800
<v Speaker 3>too much of a song and a dance with investor

0:41:36.880 --> 0:41:40.520
<v Speaker 3>relations and try to you know, gin things up. And ultimately,

0:41:40.680 --> 0:41:43.080
<v Speaker 3>when you meet professional investors, you know they're really smart

0:41:43.080 --> 0:41:45.160
<v Speaker 3>and they can look through and understand the fundamental dynamics

0:41:45.160 --> 0:41:48.480
<v Speaker 3>of a business. And so the secret to good investor

0:41:48.520 --> 0:41:51.360
<v Speaker 3>relations is have a good business that's growing and is profitable.

0:41:51.520 --> 0:42:11.839
<v Speaker 4>Where people should do that exactly. Yeah, well, oh, you

0:42:11.880 --> 0:42:13.680
<v Speaker 4>have an airport. Do you want to talk about that?

0:42:13.800 --> 0:42:18.720
<v Speaker 4>Is that something? Okay? Why where did that come from?

0:42:19.200 --> 0:42:23.080
<v Speaker 3>Well? I should not be listened to for any rational

0:42:23.239 --> 0:42:24.440
<v Speaker 3>financial investment advisor.

0:42:25.040 --> 0:42:26.560
<v Speaker 4>I don't know. I don't have the pockets.

0:42:27.800 --> 0:42:31.120
<v Speaker 3>Well. No, I'm a pilot and an aviation and I

0:42:31.239 --> 0:42:33.279
<v Speaker 3>grew up interested in US and I've been flying since

0:42:33.280 --> 0:42:35.359
<v Speaker 3>I was a teenager and you know, still really love

0:42:35.400 --> 0:42:37.239
<v Speaker 3>to do it and I'm flying my spare time. And

0:42:37.320 --> 0:42:40.400
<v Speaker 3>so I would say it's not necessarily the most rational

0:42:40.480 --> 0:42:43.040
<v Speaker 3>business interest of mine. But the case the airport, so

0:42:43.360 --> 0:42:46.520
<v Speaker 3>Dublin basically is three airports, Doublin International, which you've been

0:42:46.560 --> 0:42:48.439
<v Speaker 3>to Dublin, that's the one you've been to. I guess

0:42:48.480 --> 0:42:50.200
<v Speaker 3>three if you can't the military airport a bet Donald

0:42:50.239 --> 0:42:52.360
<v Speaker 3>and then Western, which is the general aviation airports. And

0:42:52.400 --> 0:42:54.720
<v Speaker 3>so general aviation is all the stuff that is not airlines.

0:42:54.760 --> 0:42:56.680
<v Speaker 3>So it could be public service flights like search and

0:42:56.680 --> 0:42:59.239
<v Speaker 3>rescuer air ambulance. It could be flight training and you know,

0:42:59.239 --> 0:43:01.640
<v Speaker 3>people getting their licenses. It could be corporate jets, it

0:43:01.640 --> 0:43:04.200
<v Speaker 3>could be all this kind of stuff. And generally speaking,

0:43:04.800 --> 0:43:08.200
<v Speaker 3>the appropriate home for the general aviation stuff is not

0:43:08.280 --> 0:43:11.319
<v Speaker 3>where all the airlines are because they just don't mix

0:43:11.360 --> 0:43:14.520
<v Speaker 3>that well. And so most places will have you know,

0:43:14.520 --> 0:43:17.000
<v Speaker 3>if someone's doing flight training in New York, they'll not

0:43:17.040 --> 0:43:19.120
<v Speaker 3>do it at GfK. They'll do it you know, Westchester

0:43:19.239 --> 0:43:21.799
<v Speaker 3>or something like that. Yeah. Yeah, they really don't make welf.

0:43:22.120 --> 0:43:25.319
<v Speaker 3>And in the case of Dublin's Western Airport, I end

0:43:25.400 --> 0:43:27.000
<v Speaker 3>up buying it back in twenty twenty one, and it

0:43:27.080 --> 0:43:29.279
<v Speaker 3>needed a bunch of investment, and so I bought it

0:43:29.320 --> 0:43:32.000
<v Speaker 3>and we've been investing in giving it the facilities that

0:43:32.120 --> 0:43:35.400
<v Speaker 3>needs around you know, instrument landing capabilities and you know,

0:43:35.560 --> 0:43:38.279
<v Speaker 3>redoing the terminal and the capital stock and things like that,

0:43:38.560 --> 0:43:40.520
<v Speaker 3>and so it's partly I think it's good. I mean

0:43:40.560 --> 0:43:43.320
<v Speaker 3>they are in the US, they're not for profit businesses.

0:43:43.320 --> 0:43:46.600
<v Speaker 3>They don't be government owned and federally funded. Internationally, they

0:43:46.600 --> 0:43:48.279
<v Speaker 3>are like he throws, a for profit business and they

0:43:48.320 --> 0:43:50.640
<v Speaker 3>just make money off landing fees. And so I actually

0:43:50.680 --> 0:43:53.120
<v Speaker 3>think it will, in the fullness of time, be a

0:43:53.160 --> 0:43:55.480
<v Speaker 3>good business once it's kind of come out on the

0:43:55.520 --> 0:43:57.640
<v Speaker 3>right side of the growth curve. But it's also a

0:43:57.640 --> 0:43:58.560
<v Speaker 3>passion product.

0:43:58.280 --> 0:44:01.240
<v Speaker 4>Of min that's awesome. I mean not as an insult,

0:44:01.280 --> 0:44:04.719
<v Speaker 4>but I feel like to enjoy being a pilot, like

0:44:04.800 --> 0:44:06.760
<v Speaker 4>casually you have to be like a little bit crazy,

0:44:07.160 --> 0:44:09.879
<v Speaker 4>Like that seems like an insane proposition, but maybe I'm

0:44:09.920 --> 0:44:10.680
<v Speaker 4>just really risking.

0:44:10.960 --> 0:44:11.680
<v Speaker 5>So no, it just.

0:44:12.280 --> 0:44:16.000
<v Speaker 3>Requires a lot of discipline, you know, checklist discipline, and

0:44:16.520 --> 0:44:19.360
<v Speaker 3>you know recurrent training. I just went through some recurrent training,

0:44:19.440 --> 0:44:23.400
<v Speaker 3>and just I actually find it more interesting because obviously

0:44:23.440 --> 0:44:27.799
<v Speaker 3>aviation safety is generally talked about correctly as one of

0:44:27.880 --> 0:44:33.600
<v Speaker 3>the best examples of process optimization over the last you know,

0:44:33.800 --> 0:44:36.520
<v Speaker 3>five decades, where we have taken a system and just

0:44:36.560 --> 0:44:39.839
<v Speaker 3>improved the crap out of it until it's like so good.

0:44:39.960 --> 0:44:41.960
<v Speaker 3>If they talk out thing go by on Twitter recently,

0:44:42.000 --> 0:44:45.720
<v Speaker 3>where the FA doesn't mandate car seats on airplanes because

0:44:45.760 --> 0:44:48.520
<v Speaker 3>flying is so safe compared to driving that they are

0:44:48.560 --> 0:44:50.920
<v Speaker 3>worries that if they mandated car seats on airplanes, even

0:44:50.960 --> 0:44:53.839
<v Speaker 3>though like you have a tiny benefit, it would lead

0:44:53.880 --> 0:44:56.120
<v Speaker 3>to people choosing not to fly and choose to drive

0:44:56.160 --> 0:44:59.080
<v Speaker 3>instead and get into car accidents and therefore be net

0:44:59.120 --> 0:45:01.880
<v Speaker 3>less safe. Kind of funny that. You know, again, flying

0:45:01.880 --> 0:45:04.520
<v Speaker 3>an airplane feels like in principle it should be like

0:45:04.600 --> 0:45:06.200
<v Speaker 3>kind of hard to do, and driving car on the

0:45:06.200 --> 0:45:09.359
<v Speaker 3>ground should be easy to but permile. Obviously flying wins out.

0:45:09.440 --> 0:45:12.120
<v Speaker 3>And so again you have this decades and decades and

0:45:12.160 --> 0:45:15.080
<v Speaker 3>decades of history where we've taken the lessons of you know,

0:45:15.080 --> 0:45:17.040
<v Speaker 3>they say the rules and regulations, they are written in blood.

0:45:17.080 --> 0:45:19.160
<v Speaker 3>You know, we take the lessons of the previous accidents

0:45:19.200 --> 0:45:22.240
<v Speaker 3>that have happened and then we wrap them into future training.

0:45:22.280 --> 0:45:24.040
<v Speaker 3>And you know, generally, when you do pilot training, you're

0:45:24.080 --> 0:45:27.040
<v Speaker 3>studying a lot of specific accidents that happened and you

0:45:27.080 --> 0:45:29.279
<v Speaker 3>know what the learnings were for them. And so I

0:45:29.280 --> 0:45:33.759
<v Speaker 3>think if you're interested in systems design, engineering, process optimization,

0:45:33.880 --> 0:45:35.239
<v Speaker 3>things like that, lessons.

0:45:35.000 --> 0:45:37.160
<v Speaker 5>From piloting like inform your software engineering.

0:45:38.040 --> 0:45:40.920
<v Speaker 3>I mean, they're pretty separate, but I think the software

0:45:40.960 --> 0:45:44.279
<v Speaker 3>engineering brain tends to be attracted to flying, and you know,

0:45:44.280 --> 0:45:46.280
<v Speaker 3>you got Palo Alto Airport was a little general aviation

0:45:46.360 --> 0:45:49.240
<v Speaker 3>airport in the variance when the busy general aviation airports

0:45:49.239 --> 0:45:53.279
<v Speaker 3>in the entire country. Because I think engineering minds, of

0:45:53.320 --> 0:45:55.799
<v Speaker 3>which there are lots in Palo Alta, tend to enjoy it.

0:45:55.840 --> 0:45:58.399
<v Speaker 3>And again you're mixing you know, a kinesthetic skill and

0:45:58.560 --> 0:46:03.120
<v Speaker 3>meteorology and mechanical understanding of you know, a combustion engine

0:46:03.120 --> 0:46:06.600
<v Speaker 3>and all the attendance systems and you know airspace and

0:46:06.600 --> 0:46:07.239
<v Speaker 3>everything like that.

0:46:07.280 --> 0:46:10.000
<v Speaker 4>So it wasn't like fueled by you being in an

0:46:10.040 --> 0:46:12.319
<v Speaker 4>adrenaline junkie, like I want to go fast and I

0:46:12.360 --> 0:46:13.319
<v Speaker 4>want to fly in the.

0:46:13.280 --> 0:46:16.359
<v Speaker 3>Sky adrenaline Like if you're feeling adrenaline while flying, you're

0:46:16.400 --> 0:46:17.000
<v Speaker 3>doing something wrong.

0:46:17.239 --> 0:46:19.239
<v Speaker 4>You feel it all the time when flying, like, God,

0:46:19.280 --> 0:46:20.279
<v Speaker 4>I hope we stay in the air.

0:46:20.480 --> 0:46:23.000
<v Speaker 3>There was that, you know, you read entroon descentic Superie

0:46:23.000 --> 0:46:25.680
<v Speaker 3>and you know flying in Africa during the base nineteen

0:46:25.719 --> 0:46:28.360
<v Speaker 3>twenties in his case and you know, getting shot down

0:46:28.440 --> 0:46:30.439
<v Speaker 3>and all these kind of things, there clearly.

0:46:30.320 --> 0:46:32.360
<v Speaker 4>Was a that would make you feel something.

0:46:32.480 --> 0:46:34.239
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, that exactly. I think that kind of stuff would

0:46:34.239 --> 0:46:36.319
<v Speaker 3>make you feel something. But again in these days it

0:46:36.320 --> 0:46:40.120
<v Speaker 3>has become much more safety oriented and the cowboy stuff

0:46:40.120 --> 0:46:42.440
<v Speaker 3>has been pulled out. And again they actually describe one

0:46:42.440 --> 0:46:46.480
<v Speaker 3>of the cultural challenges that happened in the aviation industry

0:46:46.560 --> 0:46:49.560
<v Speaker 3>underwent was that we produced all these military pilots in

0:46:49.640 --> 0:46:51.919
<v Speaker 3>you know, the World War Two, in the Vietnam War,

0:46:52.200 --> 0:46:55.799
<v Speaker 3>and those people then went into you know, PanAm cockpits

0:46:56.040 --> 0:46:57.840
<v Speaker 3>and they actually kind of made bad captains in a

0:46:57.840 --> 0:46:59.759
<v Speaker 3>certain way because it was like very much shut up,

0:46:59.760 --> 0:47:03.520
<v Speaker 3>this is my cockpit. And so the CRM Crew Resource Management,

0:47:04.120 --> 0:47:08.360
<v Speaker 3>I guess thing basically was a multi decade efforts to

0:47:08.520 --> 0:47:11.680
<v Speaker 3>get rid of the the captain mindset and get towards

0:47:11.680 --> 0:47:13.560
<v Speaker 3>a collaborative problem solving a.

0:47:14.120 --> 0:47:17.360
<v Speaker 5>Lot of like I'm going on a like seven seven

0:47:17.960 --> 0:47:21.799
<v Speaker 5>the pilot landed fourteens line carriers, Like that's got to

0:47:21.800 --> 0:47:24.160
<v Speaker 5>be the safest possible way to fly, but apparently not, No,

0:47:24.239 --> 0:47:27.560
<v Speaker 5>he's gone rogue, not listening to his second officer or whatever.

0:47:27.960 --> 0:47:31.000
<v Speaker 3>Do European airlines have a different model than the US

0:47:31.080 --> 0:47:34.600
<v Speaker 3>airlines where they take pilots who have two hundred and

0:47:34.640 --> 0:47:36.919
<v Speaker 3>fifty hours only, which the US would consider very low,

0:47:37.080 --> 0:47:38.880
<v Speaker 3>and they put them in the right seat of airliners

0:47:39.000 --> 0:47:41.400
<v Speaker 3>and they have like a really strong safety record. And

0:47:41.440 --> 0:47:43.400
<v Speaker 3>so as you fly around an airliner in Europe, you

0:47:43.440 --> 0:47:45.680
<v Speaker 3>could have someone who only learned to fly a few

0:47:45.760 --> 0:47:47.640
<v Speaker 3>years ago. And the way they do that is a

0:47:47.719 --> 0:47:51.160
<v Speaker 3>huge amount of standardization, a huge amount of process orientation.

0:47:51.520 --> 0:47:54.160
<v Speaker 3>You know, people make fun of Ryanair for the hard landings,

0:47:54.200 --> 0:47:56.439
<v Speaker 3>you know, the Ryanair landing in Europe where they really

0:47:56.440 --> 0:47:58.359
<v Speaker 3>plunk it on the runway. That is one of their

0:47:58.400 --> 0:48:01.520
<v Speaker 3>safety SOPs where they say a positive landing, as it's

0:48:01.560 --> 0:48:03.920
<v Speaker 3>known in the industry, is safer because it reduces the

0:48:04.000 --> 0:48:06.560
<v Speaker 3>risk of hydroplaning if it's wet, and so it reduces

0:48:06.600 --> 0:48:08.160
<v Speaker 3>the like very small risk that you run off the

0:48:08.239 --> 0:48:09.600
<v Speaker 3>end of the runway if the runway is wet. But

0:48:09.640 --> 0:48:11.360
<v Speaker 3>we're just going to every landing, we're gonna plunk it

0:48:11.400 --> 0:48:15.480
<v Speaker 3>on and that's safer. But again it's generally process orientation,

0:48:16.120 --> 0:48:18.520
<v Speaker 3>standards and a lot of that kind of stuff that's

0:48:18.560 --> 0:48:21.680
<v Speaker 3>driven to safety and not excessive piloting skill. And again,

0:48:21.719 --> 0:48:24.759
<v Speaker 3>if you're relying on incredible piloting skill, something has gone

0:48:24.800 --> 0:48:26.560
<v Speaker 3>wrong in your system. Because we should be able to

0:48:26.719 --> 0:48:30.240
<v Speaker 3>have a seven seven seven full of passengers be safe

0:48:30.360 --> 0:48:32.879
<v Speaker 3>even if the pilots are fatigued or something like that.

0:48:33.239 --> 0:48:35.799
<v Speaker 4>That's wild. I did not know that about Ryan Air.

0:48:35.800 --> 0:48:37.480
<v Speaker 4>I feel like they should put that fact out there.

0:48:37.640 --> 0:48:40.520
<v Speaker 4>You know that it's intentional that we're plunking down.

0:48:40.600 --> 0:48:42.400
<v Speaker 3>That's true. Yeah, yeah, because you know it's quite yea

0:48:42.680 --> 0:48:46.040
<v Speaker 3>quite exactly. Yeah, attention to it.

0:48:46.000 --> 0:48:50.200
<v Speaker 4>Being uncomfortable, Well, everyone knows that's true.

0:48:50.280 --> 0:48:52.800
<v Speaker 5>That's true. That time calls and thanks for coming on

0:48:52.840 --> 0:48:55.200
<v Speaker 5>the Money Stuff Podcast. Thank you guys, it's fun.

0:48:55.600 --> 0:48:56.279
<v Speaker 4>Our first guest.

0:48:56.520 --> 0:49:06.000
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I'm honored, and that was the Money Stuff Podcast.

0:49:06.120 --> 0:49:08.120
<v Speaker 4>I'm Matt Levia and I'm Katie Greifeld.

0:49:08.480 --> 0:49:10.560
<v Speaker 5>You can find my work by subscribing to The money

0:49:10.560 --> 0:49:12.440
<v Speaker 5>Stuff newsletter at Bloomberg.

0:49:12.000 --> 0:49:14.479
<v Speaker 4>Dot com, and you can find me on Bloomberg TV

0:49:14.680 --> 0:49:18.360
<v Speaker 4>every day on Open Interest between nine to eleven am Eastern.

0:49:18.600 --> 0:49:20.279
<v Speaker 5>We'd love to hear from you. You can send an

0:49:20.320 --> 0:49:23.520
<v Speaker 5>email to Moneypod at Bloomberg dot net, ask us a

0:49:23.600 --> 0:49:25.000
<v Speaker 5>question and we might answer it on air.

0:49:25.440 --> 0:49:27.640
<v Speaker 4>You can also subscribe to our show wherever you're listening

0:49:27.680 --> 0:49:29.719
<v Speaker 4>right now and leave us a review. It helps more

0:49:29.719 --> 0:49:30.640
<v Speaker 4>people find the show.

0:49:31.360 --> 0:49:34.120
<v Speaker 5>The Money Stuff Podcast is produced by Anna Maserakus and

0:49:34.200 --> 0:49:37.040
<v Speaker 5>Moses on the special. Thanks this week to Stacey.

0:49:36.760 --> 0:49:39.680
<v Speaker 4>Wom Our theme music was composed by Blake Maples.

0:49:39.960 --> 0:49:42.640
<v Speaker 5>Brandon Francis Newnhim is our executive producer.

0:49:42.400 --> 0:49:44.600
<v Speaker 4>And Stage Bauman is Bloomberg's head of podcasts.

0:49:44.880 --> 0:49:47.239
<v Speaker 5>Thanks for listening to the Money Stuff podcast. We'll be

0:49:47.280 --> 0:49:48.800
<v Speaker 5>back next week with mar Stuff