WEBVTT - 10/17:Fantasy Basketball Primer: 2019 Draft Preview

0:00:00.400 --> 0:00:02.760
<v Speaker 1>Hey, thanks for downloading the podcast. If you want to

0:00:02.800 --> 0:00:05.160
<v Speaker 1>listen live, all you have to do is download the

0:00:05.200 --> 0:00:09.399
<v Speaker 1>I Heart Radio app and search for Fantasy Sports Radio Network. Also,

0:00:09.440 --> 0:00:11.119
<v Speaker 1>if you want to catch this show on video, for

0:00:11.200 --> 0:00:14.040
<v Speaker 1>sure to check out Zoo TV channel seven nineteen and

0:00:14.040 --> 0:00:17.200
<v Speaker 1>that's where you can find sports Grids Fantasy Sports Network.

0:00:17.440 --> 0:00:21.520
<v Speaker 1>Enjoy the show and thanks so much for listening and

0:00:21.640 --> 0:00:25.160
<v Speaker 1>listen to me. This is the Fantasy Football Best Friends

0:00:25.160 --> 0:00:29.480
<v Speaker 1>Forever show. Start listening to us or suffer the consequences.

0:00:30.360 --> 0:01:04.920
<v Speaker 1>Listen t dudnit. Yeah right now as welcome Happy your

0:01:05.040 --> 0:01:18.240
<v Speaker 1>host Friday from five died from say Francis Frankne stand

0:01:18.319 --> 0:01:27.120
<v Speaker 1>ball ladies and tell in yours and with that we

0:01:27.200 --> 0:01:31.160
<v Speaker 1>will get you inside of Studio thirty four. This is

0:01:31.200 --> 0:01:34.759
<v Speaker 1>the BFFs. He is Frank Snaffle, I am Gregg saucepan

0:01:35.000 --> 0:01:39.280
<v Speaker 1>no e y today he's on assignment, Frankie. What's having it? Ry?

0:01:39.400 --> 0:01:42.680
<v Speaker 1>Happy Thursday to you. Very eventful Thursday night. We got

0:01:42.840 --> 0:01:46.959
<v Speaker 1>Thursday night football. We have the Yankees game four ALCS.

0:01:47.120 --> 0:01:49.040
<v Speaker 1>You will be at a hockey game tonight as well.

0:01:49.040 --> 0:01:51.360
<v Speaker 1>I mean there's a lot going on. Are you doing, buddy,

0:01:51.360 --> 0:01:53.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm doing great, man, I'm going to that hockey game

0:01:53.520 --> 0:01:57.040
<v Speaker 1>with her, buddy, y Y Town, you turned down the

0:01:57.080 --> 0:01:58.440
<v Speaker 1>in mine. Yeah. I wish I could have been a

0:01:58.480 --> 0:02:01.480
<v Speaker 1>part of it as well, but I've got something going on.

0:02:01.480 --> 0:02:04.720
<v Speaker 1>It's why i'm you know, dressed all snazzy. Also, I

0:02:04.760 --> 0:02:06.560
<v Speaker 1>really want to watch the Yankees and the football game.

0:02:07.640 --> 0:02:11.639
<v Speaker 1>It's pretty fun. One of my friends said, he's bringing his, uh,

0:02:11.800 --> 0:02:14.480
<v Speaker 1>his iPads he used as a what do you call it?

0:02:14.520 --> 0:02:17.960
<v Speaker 1>One of those things you connect to WiFi through. Okay,

0:02:18.200 --> 0:02:20.359
<v Speaker 1>so we can watch the Yankees from from the Ranger game.

0:02:20.880 --> 0:02:24.600
<v Speaker 1>Oh wow, Okay, that's pretty legit. Listen. I don't you

0:02:24.639 --> 0:02:26.400
<v Speaker 1>know me, I don't care about hockey. I care a

0:02:26.440 --> 0:02:29.399
<v Speaker 1>lot about the Yankees, but you know we don't get

0:02:29.400 --> 0:02:30.799
<v Speaker 1>a chance to hang on e Y all that much.

0:02:31.000 --> 0:02:32.640
<v Speaker 1>Sure wants to go to the game, Like, all right, man,

0:02:32.680 --> 0:02:35.160
<v Speaker 1>let's do it so you can hang out with e

0:02:35.400 --> 0:02:37.760
<v Speaker 1>Y in Town from Nashville. You know that Ey is

0:02:37.800 --> 0:02:41.600
<v Speaker 1>a big hockey guy and we are big basketball guys. Greggy,

0:02:41.639 --> 0:02:44.600
<v Speaker 1>which is uh where we landed today doing our fantasy

0:02:44.600 --> 0:02:46.840
<v Speaker 1>basketball preview show. I know a few people have been

0:02:46.919 --> 0:02:49.000
<v Speaker 1>hitting us up on Twitter asking us if we can

0:02:50.680 --> 0:02:52.680
<v Speaker 1>preview and yeah, We had our draft last night. We

0:02:52.680 --> 0:02:54.840
<v Speaker 1>had a PIT league draft, a twelve team head to

0:02:54.880 --> 0:02:57.280
<v Speaker 1>head points league, so we can work in some of

0:02:57.320 --> 0:02:59.400
<v Speaker 1>the results from that last night, kind of talk about

0:02:59.400 --> 0:03:01.840
<v Speaker 1>where some play years went. We go position by position.

0:03:01.880 --> 0:03:04.000
<v Speaker 1>We'll go over the first round, some sleepers and bust.

0:03:04.480 --> 0:03:08.560
<v Speaker 1>But fantasy basketball, to me kind of gets swept under

0:03:08.560 --> 0:03:11.600
<v Speaker 1>the rug because fantasy football is as massive as it is.

0:03:11.639 --> 0:03:15.760
<v Speaker 1>I understand the fantasy industry revolves around football, and rightfully so,

0:03:15.919 --> 0:03:18.000
<v Speaker 1>it is my favorite fantasy sports to play. It's a

0:03:18.040 --> 0:03:21.880
<v Speaker 1>lot of people's favorite fantasy sport to play, but basketball

0:03:21.960 --> 0:03:24.560
<v Speaker 1>is actually my favorite real life sport. It was a

0:03:24.560 --> 0:03:27.600
<v Speaker 1>sport that I played most growing up. Greg It's, you know,

0:03:27.639 --> 0:03:30.360
<v Speaker 1>outside of football, probably my favorite support to watch. I

0:03:30.480 --> 0:03:32.360
<v Speaker 1>enjoy the NBA game. I know a lot of people

0:03:32.560 --> 0:03:36.560
<v Speaker 1>basketball purists enjoy college football over the NBA. I I'm

0:03:36.600 --> 0:03:40.480
<v Speaker 1>all here for the storylines, the drama, the entertainment that

0:03:40.480 --> 0:03:43.080
<v Speaker 1>comes along with the NBA. So I do love playing

0:03:43.080 --> 0:03:45.240
<v Speaker 1>fantasy basketball, and I'm happy that we're able to do

0:03:45.280 --> 0:03:47.520
<v Speaker 1>this today. I'm happy that there's people that actually had

0:03:47.520 --> 0:03:51.640
<v Speaker 1>an appetite for fantasy basketball. Yeah, listen, I've gotten like

0:03:51.800 --> 0:03:54.240
<v Speaker 1>most fantasy players. I would say I was super into

0:03:54.320 --> 0:04:01.440
<v Speaker 1>fantasy basketball while back, and then I guess ever, I

0:04:01.440 --> 0:04:05.000
<v Speaker 1>came back here ish like the f A d S Y.

0:04:05.440 --> 0:04:07.800
<v Speaker 1>I was like, I like playing fantasy basketball. It's fine,

0:04:07.840 --> 0:04:09.760
<v Speaker 1>like knowing more about the NBA, and I've gotten really

0:04:09.800 --> 0:04:12.600
<v Speaker 1>into it, and you know, like most players like, I'm

0:04:12.640 --> 0:04:14.400
<v Speaker 1>back into DFS and I was playing and I was,

0:04:14.560 --> 0:04:16.480
<v Speaker 1>I feel like I'm good. And then I started losing

0:04:16.520 --> 0:04:19.960
<v Speaker 1>lots of money. But the season long game, it makes

0:04:19.960 --> 0:04:22.520
<v Speaker 1>me follow the NBA more often than not. And I

0:04:22.600 --> 0:04:25.640
<v Speaker 1>enjoyed that and it makes me happy. And immediately I'm

0:04:25.640 --> 0:04:28.000
<v Speaker 1>always be a baseball guy beforem a basketball guy. But

0:04:28.360 --> 0:04:30.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm excited to my fantasy basketball. I was excited to

0:04:30.120 --> 0:04:33.240
<v Speaker 1>get my first draft underway last night. We have a draft.

0:04:33.320 --> 0:04:34.800
<v Speaker 1>I have two drafts this weekend, one of which I

0:04:34.839 --> 0:04:36.960
<v Speaker 1>will propart taking in the other one night which it's

0:04:37.000 --> 0:04:39.040
<v Speaker 1>all on Frank's hands hold down the fort. But if

0:04:39.040 --> 0:04:41.320
<v Speaker 1>Frank's drafts similar to to do that he did last

0:04:41.400 --> 0:04:43.760
<v Speaker 1>night in a similar spot, we're pretty happy. Yeah, I

0:04:43.760 --> 0:04:45.560
<v Speaker 1>had the first pick last night. We have the first

0:04:45.560 --> 0:04:49.160
<v Speaker 1>pick over the weekend, participating in Adam Roynises League. Adam

0:04:49.240 --> 0:04:50.599
<v Speaker 1>Ynis you can hear on the fn T s Y

0:04:50.720 --> 0:04:53.520
<v Speaker 1>radio right now. We are don't just listen to the podcast.

0:04:53.560 --> 0:04:56.599
<v Speaker 1>We are the Champion's greggy. One might say that we were.

0:04:58.120 --> 0:05:00.760
<v Speaker 1>We had a little bit of the bubble last season

0:05:01.279 --> 0:05:04.359
<v Speaker 1>if we celebrated our Fantasy basketball championships. So hopefully we

0:05:04.440 --> 0:05:06.080
<v Speaker 1>go back to back. We were the number one pick

0:05:06.120 --> 0:05:08.120
<v Speaker 1>last year in that league as well, so I'm looking

0:05:08.160 --> 0:05:10.920
<v Speaker 1>forward to it. Uh. Frankoloso the first pick last night.

0:05:10.920 --> 0:05:12.720
<v Speaker 1>I like what he did for the most part. Couple

0:05:12.760 --> 0:05:14.760
<v Speaker 1>of things I would have done differently, obviously, but I

0:05:14.720 --> 0:05:16.240
<v Speaker 1>don't have a chance to you because I can't traft

0:05:16.279 --> 0:05:18.640
<v Speaker 1>on Saturday night. I'm sorry. Well, you know what. We

0:05:18.680 --> 0:05:20.839
<v Speaker 1>will consult and we will figure out players that we

0:05:20.880 --> 0:05:22.760
<v Speaker 1>both want, and I will try my best to integrate

0:05:22.960 --> 0:05:25.240
<v Speaker 1>those players that you want. Hopefully I can get Josh

0:05:25.279 --> 0:05:27.320
<v Speaker 1>richards in Ford say, the best part of Fantasy Basketball

0:05:27.400 --> 0:05:30.880
<v Speaker 1>Draft star, what's that? It's so quick. We were done

0:05:30.880 --> 0:05:32.600
<v Speaker 1>in our last night. It was good. Exactly an hour

0:05:32.720 --> 0:05:34.440
<v Speaker 1>last night. I didn't get out. It was awesome. I

0:05:34.520 --> 0:05:36.000
<v Speaker 1>love it. If we go over the first round, I

0:05:36.000 --> 0:05:37.560
<v Speaker 1>feel like that's the first thing we should do. We do.

0:05:37.680 --> 0:05:39.640
<v Speaker 1>We want to break in about a minute and a half,

0:05:40.000 --> 0:05:44.160
<v Speaker 1>So I probably passed on that. Alright, that's I mean,

0:05:44.880 --> 0:05:46.719
<v Speaker 1>there's just a lot to break down there. I don't

0:05:46.720 --> 0:05:48.839
<v Speaker 1>want to like star and then like literally in a

0:05:48.839 --> 0:05:50.920
<v Speaker 1>minute half. So I put out a poll before the show.

0:05:51.000 --> 0:05:52.680
<v Speaker 1>Let's just do this. Let's just do the first pick.

0:05:53.279 --> 0:05:55.440
<v Speaker 1>If you had the first overall pick, who would you take?

0:05:55.480 --> 0:05:58.360
<v Speaker 1>Because I put off the poll and as of now

0:05:58.360 --> 0:06:03.280
<v Speaker 1>there are thirty votes, one candidate has zero percent of

0:06:03.279 --> 0:06:06.400
<v Speaker 1>those votes. Uh, Jana san Compo is the leading vote

0:06:06.400 --> 0:06:07.960
<v Speaker 1>getter right now? Is that where you would go if

0:06:08.000 --> 0:06:11.040
<v Speaker 1>you have the first overall pick? Yeah, and that's what

0:06:11.200 --> 0:06:13.280
<v Speaker 1>we talked about. You're making me do this, you know,

0:06:13.360 --> 0:06:14.480
<v Speaker 1>I said, I you know, I don't want to do

0:06:14.560 --> 0:06:15.680
<v Speaker 1>what I'm saying. We don't have to do the whole

0:06:15.680 --> 0:06:16.960
<v Speaker 1>first round. I was just saying, let's go over to

0:06:16.960 --> 0:06:19.000
<v Speaker 1>the first pick overall. I would move. I would vote

0:06:19.279 --> 0:06:21.640
<v Speaker 1>for Yannas to the Kombo. I think that Jannest does

0:06:21.680 --> 0:06:24.720
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of everything. He has obviously multi position eligibility.

0:06:25.120 --> 0:06:27.920
<v Speaker 1>He's just can help you in all every category is

0:06:27.920 --> 0:06:29.839
<v Speaker 1>like category he doesn't help you in. There's a change

0:06:29.880 --> 0:06:32.720
<v Speaker 1>based on the format. Now, how about in a road

0:06:32.760 --> 0:06:34.520
<v Speaker 1>a league, right, because I'll bring this up to you

0:06:34.680 --> 0:06:37.720
<v Speaker 1>stupid All right, Well, I'm sorry. We participate in a

0:06:37.760 --> 0:06:41.080
<v Speaker 1>few Fantasy Baseball roadal leagues. The nfb k C if

0:06:41.080 --> 0:06:44.120
<v Speaker 1>you want to play some high stakes, is rotissory. And

0:06:44.160 --> 0:06:47.560
<v Speaker 1>I think that you can argue that Anthony Davis and

0:06:48.680 --> 0:06:51.880
<v Speaker 1>Karl Anthony Towns might be better rotissory players with the

0:06:51.920 --> 0:06:54.400
<v Speaker 1>number one overall pick Greg because they don't really have

0:06:54.440 --> 0:06:57.920
<v Speaker 1>any deficiencies in their game. I mean, Janice free throw

0:06:57.960 --> 0:07:00.000
<v Speaker 1>percentage is not great. I'm not gonna shoot me three.

0:07:00.040 --> 0:07:02.800
<v Speaker 1>E's Andy Davis and Karl Anthony Towns starting to shoot

0:07:02.839 --> 0:07:04.680
<v Speaker 1>more threes, starting to ball handle a little bit more

0:07:04.720 --> 0:07:06.800
<v Speaker 1>as well. I think Anthy Davis had like six or

0:07:06.839 --> 0:07:09.559
<v Speaker 1>seven assists last night and only twenty five minutes of play,

0:07:09.600 --> 0:07:11.880
<v Speaker 1>So I think it a rotistory league. You actually can

0:07:11.920 --> 0:07:14.400
<v Speaker 1>make the argument for a few other people. Overall, I

0:07:14.400 --> 0:07:17.680
<v Speaker 1>think Janie and James Harden are more often than not

0:07:17.760 --> 0:07:19.360
<v Speaker 1>if you just play a head to head categories league

0:07:19.400 --> 0:07:21.120
<v Speaker 1>or head to head points. Those are the two that

0:07:21.160 --> 0:07:23.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm considering most. Graig, Yeah, fair enough, Your Honest and

0:07:23.520 --> 0:07:27.680
<v Speaker 1>Harden both fine choices. Obviously, they both do everything. They

0:07:27.720 --> 0:07:29.720
<v Speaker 1>both play every night. Something you want to know, and

0:07:29.840 --> 0:07:31.480
<v Speaker 1>I know it is here on the left side, which

0:07:31.480 --> 0:07:35.000
<v Speaker 1>you can see right here, that you need to avoid

0:07:35.000 --> 0:07:37.520
<v Speaker 1>load management. And that's what I that's going to be

0:07:37.560 --> 0:07:39.800
<v Speaker 1>a key for us all throughout the next hour talking

0:07:39.840 --> 0:07:42.160
<v Speaker 1>about that. Whenever I had a decision between two players,

0:07:42.160 --> 0:07:44.080
<v Speaker 1>it was always about load management. And what I liked

0:07:44.080 --> 0:07:47.600
<v Speaker 1>about both Nice and Hardened and Karl Anthony Towns as well.

0:07:48.280 --> 0:07:50.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't expect them to really be rested. No, there

0:07:50.520 --> 0:07:52.520
<v Speaker 1>were times last year with Milwaukee having such a big

0:07:52.600 --> 0:07:54.840
<v Speaker 1>lead in the Eastern Conference where they did rest your

0:07:54.840 --> 0:07:57.840
<v Speaker 1>honest down the stretch. Hardenines doesn't get rested at all.

0:07:57.920 --> 0:08:01.480
<v Speaker 1>Karl Anthony Towns hates basing games. He didn't arrested at all.

0:08:02.120 --> 0:08:06.000
<v Speaker 1>After that, it kind of feels like everyone is kind

0:08:06.040 --> 0:08:07.760
<v Speaker 1>of at rich. So that's gonna be a theme I

0:08:07.800 --> 0:08:10.120
<v Speaker 1>think throughout the hours, trying to avoid some of those

0:08:10.160 --> 0:08:13.240
<v Speaker 1>players that have a load management issues. Let's talk about

0:08:13.280 --> 0:08:15.520
<v Speaker 1>that and a whole lot more here. I'll the BFS

0:08:19.040 --> 0:08:21.760
<v Speaker 1>want to be the next Daily Fantasy Millionaire, dunk on

0:08:21.800 --> 0:08:24.920
<v Speaker 1>your NBA DFS competition with Daily Rodal dot com and

0:08:25.120 --> 0:08:28.440
<v Speaker 1>dominate on fandel and DraftKings this season. Compete with the

0:08:28.480 --> 0:08:31.320
<v Speaker 1>pros with Daily rodal dot com optimizer and the most

0:08:31.400 --> 0:08:35.760
<v Speaker 1>accurate projections in NBA DFS plus line up alerts, breaking news,

0:08:35.920 --> 0:08:38.599
<v Speaker 1>lake swap support, and much more safe ten percent on

0:08:38.720 --> 0:08:42.360
<v Speaker 1>winning NBA DFS advice with promo code dunk. Visit Daily

0:08:42.440 --> 0:08:56.640
<v Speaker 1>Rodo dot com backslash dunk to learn more. If you

0:08:56.760 --> 0:09:01.160
<v Speaker 1>haven't done so already, make sure you check out the

0:09:01.200 --> 0:09:02.959
<v Speaker 1>poll that Mike Oardona was running right now. I know

0:09:03.120 --> 0:09:04.760
<v Speaker 1>he people have been talking about it throughout the dead.

0:09:04.760 --> 0:09:07.040
<v Speaker 1>They're gonna reveal the results on game time. But Mike

0:09:07.120 --> 0:09:09.800
<v Speaker 1>put out a poll in regards to the best young

0:09:09.880 --> 0:09:12.880
<v Speaker 1>baseball player in baseball, and then it's basketball Primer show.

0:09:12.880 --> 0:09:17.959
<v Speaker 1>We'll get into it, but fifteen for fifteen over the

0:09:18.040 --> 0:09:23.160
<v Speaker 1>next fifteen years, the question becomes, which baseball player would

0:09:23.160 --> 0:09:25.760
<v Speaker 1>you rather have? Ronald Kuna, labor tourist, want so, or

0:09:25.800 --> 0:09:27.120
<v Speaker 1>somebody else to feel a free to write it in.

0:09:27.400 --> 0:09:29.000
<v Speaker 1>Mike has pulled going on now they're gonna reveal the

0:09:29.040 --> 0:09:32.160
<v Speaker 1>results on game time Decisions coming up a little bit

0:09:32.240 --> 0:09:34.840
<v Speaker 1>later on today, Let's get it back into fantasy basketball.

0:09:34.960 --> 0:09:38.120
<v Speaker 1>Though Frankie and I mentioned I'm with you At the

0:09:38.200 --> 0:09:40.800
<v Speaker 1>number one pick, I'm going with Janice. Then I think

0:09:40.840 --> 0:09:42.440
<v Speaker 1>the decision is a little bit harder between Carl Anthony

0:09:42.480 --> 0:09:44.160
<v Speaker 1>Talents and James Harden. As a point to lead player

0:09:44.960 --> 0:09:47.720
<v Speaker 1>Alileen Harding, just because like he could explode for literally

0:09:47.760 --> 0:09:50.280
<v Speaker 1>seventy points and I thought that was nuts, so many

0:09:50.320 --> 0:09:53.000
<v Speaker 1>real points, not fantasy points. So I think that those

0:09:53.040 --> 0:09:56.480
<v Speaker 1>are clear top three. And then at four, the first

0:09:56.480 --> 0:09:58.560
<v Speaker 1>thing that comes to my mind is Steph Curry over

0:09:58.640 --> 0:10:01.679
<v Speaker 1>Anthony Davis. I think Curry being the one guy that

0:10:01.840 --> 0:10:04.640
<v Speaker 1>is there in Golden State. Little management certainly an issue,

0:10:04.800 --> 0:10:06.199
<v Speaker 1>but he's gonna be asked to do something that he's

0:10:06.240 --> 0:10:08.559
<v Speaker 1>never done before, which is carry and the complete low

0:10:08.640 --> 0:10:11.960
<v Speaker 1>Altklay Tompson without Kevin Durant uh that Andrea Goodalla, it's

0:10:12.040 --> 0:10:13.719
<v Speaker 1>him and Draymond Green. I thinks Steph Curry is just

0:10:13.800 --> 0:10:16.400
<v Speaker 1>gonna be an animal and fantasy basketball this year. He's

0:10:16.440 --> 0:10:19.160
<v Speaker 1>my number four player. Yeah, I think there's a clear

0:10:19.360 --> 0:10:23.160
<v Speaker 1>consensus top six greg the order of those players changes,

0:10:23.200 --> 0:10:25.000
<v Speaker 1>but I think the draft really starts at seven. So

0:10:25.160 --> 0:10:28.400
<v Speaker 1>for me, the top six players are Jana Santa Kumpo,

0:10:28.800 --> 0:10:33.200
<v Speaker 1>James Harden, Anthony Davis, Nicolai Yokis, Steph Curry, and Carl

0:10:33.200 --> 0:10:35.600
<v Speaker 1>Anthony town is not necessarily in that order, because again

0:10:35.640 --> 0:10:38.440
<v Speaker 1>I think all those players are interchangeable. It comes down

0:10:38.480 --> 0:10:40.880
<v Speaker 1>to what kind of drafter you are. If you are,

0:10:41.760 --> 0:10:43.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, if you are a risk taker and you

0:10:43.520 --> 0:10:45.720
<v Speaker 1>want to shoot for the most upside, then you are

0:10:45.800 --> 0:10:48.760
<v Speaker 1>probably taking Anthony Davis with the first overall pick, just

0:10:48.840 --> 0:10:52.200
<v Speaker 1>based on his ability to twenty eight and twelve, gets

0:10:52.240 --> 0:10:55.439
<v Speaker 1>defensive numbers, gets massive blocks, good percentages as well, starting

0:10:55.480 --> 0:10:57.480
<v Speaker 1>to shoot the three as well, but you have to

0:10:57.480 --> 0:11:00.560
<v Speaker 1>worry about the injury concerns, you know, maybe sits back

0:11:00.600 --> 0:11:03.640
<v Speaker 1>to back here or there throughout the course of the season. Um.

0:11:03.880 --> 0:11:06.800
<v Speaker 1>But just based on a per game basis, the player

0:11:06.840 --> 0:11:09.079
<v Speaker 1>who can have the most value, Andy Davis is definitely

0:11:09.200 --> 0:11:12.480
<v Speaker 1>in that mix. Um. But if you are a safer draft,

0:11:12.559 --> 0:11:14.199
<v Speaker 1>I mean, for me, I really like to build a

0:11:14.240 --> 0:11:17.400
<v Speaker 1>foundation with my first couple of picks, my first three

0:11:17.520 --> 0:11:19.959
<v Speaker 1>round picks. I really want safe players who I know

0:11:20.080 --> 0:11:22.680
<v Speaker 1>I can rely on, who are going to give me production, uh,

0:11:22.760 --> 0:11:24.760
<v Speaker 1>and then kind of take more risk once we get

0:11:24.760 --> 0:11:27.160
<v Speaker 1>into the middle rounds. So I would lean with the

0:11:27.200 --> 0:11:30.280
<v Speaker 1>Jana first overall. I would lean James Harden still second.

0:11:30.520 --> 0:11:32.360
<v Speaker 1>You know, I think Karl Anthony town is one of

0:11:32.400 --> 0:11:34.280
<v Speaker 1>the safest players in the league, and they're talking about

0:11:34.360 --> 0:11:36.720
<v Speaker 1>him having more of a role this season, the offense

0:11:36.800 --> 0:11:40.120
<v Speaker 1>running through him and him distributing the ball more as well.

0:11:40.240 --> 0:11:42.800
<v Speaker 1>So I could even get up to four five assistants

0:11:42.840 --> 0:11:44.959
<v Speaker 1>here for Karl Anthony Towns. But I do think that

0:11:45.040 --> 0:11:47.240
<v Speaker 1>there's a very clear top six, Greg and I don't

0:11:47.320 --> 0:11:49.959
<v Speaker 1>think that there is a wrong answer in any order.

0:11:50.080 --> 0:11:51.719
<v Speaker 1>I think Steph Curry is in that mix as well,

0:11:52.000 --> 0:11:54.120
<v Speaker 1>and I think that's fine. I think that top six

0:11:54.240 --> 0:11:57.200
<v Speaker 1>you're right is is abbutently clear. And it's interesting because

0:11:57.240 --> 0:11:59.840
<v Speaker 1>I had picked eight last night, right in the first round,

0:12:00.400 --> 0:12:06.839
<v Speaker 1>and I didn't know what to do at that spot.

0:12:07.120 --> 0:12:08.880
<v Speaker 1>Did you ask me? Man? I really loved Joel and

0:12:08.920 --> 0:12:11.120
<v Speaker 1>bead and like you want to talk about load management

0:12:11.120 --> 0:12:13.319
<v Speaker 1>issues like that is the definition for joean and be.

0:12:13.480 --> 0:12:15.439
<v Speaker 1>You know, out of e two games, you're getting a

0:12:15.520 --> 0:12:19.800
<v Speaker 1>max of like sixty here um and then Russell westbre

0:12:19.800 --> 0:12:22.480
<v Speaker 1>gonna playing alongside James Harden. Like, I didn't know what

0:12:22.640 --> 0:12:25.480
<v Speaker 1>to do at that spot, because I agree, you've got

0:12:25.559 --> 0:12:30.360
<v Speaker 1>six guys you're very comfortable taking. Then one I think

0:12:30.400 --> 0:12:32.079
<v Speaker 1>that there is a group, and I think this is

0:12:32.120 --> 0:12:34.400
<v Speaker 1>where format comes into play a little bit more. If

0:12:34.440 --> 0:12:37.760
<v Speaker 1>you play in a points league. I think that from

0:12:37.840 --> 0:12:41.880
<v Speaker 1>seven to nine, Russell Westbrook, Joel Embiad, and Lebron James

0:12:41.920 --> 0:12:44.280
<v Speaker 1>should go in that area because you know that when

0:12:44.360 --> 0:12:47.920
<v Speaker 1>they are on the court, those guys are all triple

0:12:48.000 --> 0:12:50.640
<v Speaker 1>double options. Lebron James looked great last night as well,

0:12:50.720 --> 0:12:53.040
<v Speaker 1>had a ridiculous pass. Uh. I don't know. I don't

0:12:53.080 --> 0:12:54.920
<v Speaker 1>know why I was watching preseason basketball, but I was.

0:12:55.360 --> 0:12:57.800
<v Speaker 1>But I do think pick seven and nine, Russell Westbrook

0:12:57.880 --> 0:13:00.559
<v Speaker 1>and Beat and Lebron James are in the area. I

0:13:00.559 --> 0:13:04.320
<v Speaker 1>would probably rank Um and Beat the highest of the bunch. Again,

0:13:04.360 --> 0:13:06.599
<v Speaker 1>he's a lot like Anthony Davis Greig. When he's on

0:13:06.720 --> 0:13:09.440
<v Speaker 1>the court, he's amazing. I mean, Joel and Beat again,

0:13:09.559 --> 0:13:11.960
<v Speaker 1>someone who can average close to thirty real life points.

0:13:12.160 --> 0:13:14.120
<v Speaker 1>He's gonna be over ten rebounds. He gets you, steals

0:13:14.120 --> 0:13:17.480
<v Speaker 1>in blocks, distributes a little bit, going to have solid percentages.

0:13:17.480 --> 0:13:19.160
<v Speaker 1>The field goal percentage not as high as you would

0:13:19.160 --> 0:13:20.760
<v Speaker 1>like it to be because he's starting to shoot a

0:13:20.800 --> 0:13:23.640
<v Speaker 1>little bit more from the outside, but his upside is

0:13:24.200 --> 0:13:26.679
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's up there. With all of these other

0:13:26.679 --> 0:13:28.360
<v Speaker 1>guys that we're talking about in the top six. So

0:13:28.600 --> 0:13:30.400
<v Speaker 1>if you are an upside player, I think and beat

0:13:30.440 --> 0:13:32.959
<v Speaker 1>his net mix. But if you play head to add categories, Greg,

0:13:33.520 --> 0:13:36.640
<v Speaker 1>I think that Damian Lillard isn't that conversation as well

0:13:36.800 --> 0:13:41.000
<v Speaker 1>because Rock Solid plays a ton of games every single year.

0:13:41.160 --> 0:13:42.760
<v Speaker 1>You told me this last night. The reason you took

0:13:42.760 --> 0:13:44.480
<v Speaker 1>c J. McCollum is you don't have to worry about

0:13:44.520 --> 0:13:47.760
<v Speaker 1>load management when it comes to Portland Trailblazers players. Damian

0:13:47.760 --> 0:13:50.599
<v Speaker 1>Lillard's gonna average twenty five points going to average you know,

0:13:50.720 --> 0:13:54.040
<v Speaker 1>six seven assists, um doesn't hurt your percentage. Is really

0:13:54.080 --> 0:13:57.760
<v Speaker 1>good free throw shooter might be the best contributor in

0:13:57.800 --> 0:14:00.199
<v Speaker 1>the free throw percentage department outside of James Hard in

0:14:00.320 --> 0:14:02.959
<v Speaker 1>the NBA. Uh. It doesn't do a lot defensively, but

0:14:03.240 --> 0:14:05.520
<v Speaker 1>just a really really safe pick. So I think once

0:14:05.559 --> 0:14:08.199
<v Speaker 1>you get to that like seven to ten range, you

0:14:08.400 --> 0:14:10.880
<v Speaker 1>you have a a few guys to choose from between

0:14:10.920 --> 0:14:14.680
<v Speaker 1>Russell Westbrook, Damian Lillard, Joel Embiad and Lebron James. Yeah.

0:14:14.720 --> 0:14:18.240
<v Speaker 1>I think so it's interesting because the reason he's kind

0:14:18.240 --> 0:14:19.760
<v Speaker 1>of a flip flop roles here because the reason I

0:14:19.880 --> 0:14:22.200
<v Speaker 1>haven't traditionally in the first round in the middle of

0:14:22.240 --> 0:14:25.480
<v Speaker 1>the first round gone after Damian Lillards because yeah, he's

0:14:25.600 --> 0:14:27.760
<v Speaker 1>he's good, but I felt like the other guys are

0:14:27.760 --> 0:14:30.360
<v Speaker 1>almost like league winners for you potentially, and Damian Lillard

0:14:30.400 --> 0:14:33.160
<v Speaker 1>almost seems like a level below that what he can

0:14:33.200 --> 0:14:35.080
<v Speaker 1>do and the categories that he could help you with,

0:14:35.360 --> 0:14:37.160
<v Speaker 1>So I've always had him a little bit lower. Same

0:14:37.200 --> 0:14:38.480
<v Speaker 1>with CJ McCollum. And he said it to me the

0:14:38.520 --> 0:14:40.000
<v Speaker 1>second I walked in here, like, hey, I was surprised

0:14:40.000 --> 0:14:42.640
<v Speaker 1>she took CJ McCollum last night because he's awesome at

0:14:42.680 --> 0:14:45.160
<v Speaker 1>scoring and he plays a lot of minutes. What else

0:14:45.200 --> 0:14:48.040
<v Speaker 1>does he do? And I didn't really have an answer

0:14:48.080 --> 0:14:50.480
<v Speaker 1>other than I got sniped on them and baya right,

0:14:50.560 --> 0:14:53.040
<v Speaker 1>like that was and you're right about that. And that's

0:14:53.080 --> 0:14:56.080
<v Speaker 1>why I felt like both Plazers players, despite being the

0:14:56.160 --> 0:14:58.600
<v Speaker 1>mar Key players in their team, despite the entire team

0:14:58.680 --> 0:15:03.520
<v Speaker 1>revolving around them, or just a little like, okay for

0:15:03.640 --> 0:15:07.720
<v Speaker 1>fantasy guys that you're fine having, but not somebody Demian

0:15:07.760 --> 0:15:11.200
<v Speaker 1>Lillard that I would want in place of Joel Embiad

0:15:11.200 --> 0:15:13.720
<v Speaker 1>who could win you a week, Russell Westbrook who win

0:15:13.760 --> 0:15:15.760
<v Speaker 1>you a week. I don't know that Damian Lillard could

0:15:15.760 --> 0:15:18.600
<v Speaker 1>do that. Damian Lillard, to me, is a lot like

0:15:19.240 --> 0:15:22.480
<v Speaker 1>Karl Anthony Towns or Yokih at his position because he's

0:15:22.560 --> 0:15:24.360
<v Speaker 1>just safe. If you want to take a player with

0:15:24.480 --> 0:15:27.040
<v Speaker 1>more upside than absolutely, you can go with the Joel embiad,

0:15:27.040 --> 0:15:28.760
<v Speaker 1>you can go with the Lebron James. If Lebron does

0:15:28.800 --> 0:15:33.360
<v Speaker 1>not get hurt and he plays seventy to seventy five games,

0:15:33.520 --> 0:15:36.760
<v Speaker 1>he will likely return top five value overall. But he's

0:15:36.800 --> 0:15:38.440
<v Speaker 1>getting up there in age. And if you were watching

0:15:38.520 --> 0:15:39.840
<v Speaker 1>last night, he saw a little start to see a

0:15:39.880 --> 0:15:41.680
<v Speaker 1>little bit of gray and the beard for Lebron James.

0:15:41.760 --> 0:15:43.880
<v Speaker 1>Not used to seeing that, but he's getting up there.

0:15:43.920 --> 0:15:45.880
<v Speaker 1>He missed a ton of games last year because of injuries.

0:15:45.960 --> 0:15:47.920
<v Speaker 1>It wouldn't surprise me if he sits out back to back.

0:15:48.040 --> 0:15:51.040
<v Speaker 1>So you have to take all of these things into consideration. Greg.

0:15:51.040 --> 0:15:52.800
<v Speaker 1>I think if you're talking about a points league, I

0:15:52.800 --> 0:15:54.680
<v Speaker 1>think Andre Drummond is in the mix as well, because

0:15:54.880 --> 0:15:57.800
<v Speaker 1>you don't have to worry about the bad free throw percentage.

0:15:58.120 --> 0:16:01.880
<v Speaker 1>You just have to worry about getting points and rebounds.

0:16:01.880 --> 0:16:04.240
<v Speaker 1>You know, that's the biggest differentiator between a head to

0:16:04.280 --> 0:16:07.560
<v Speaker 1>head categories or rotissary league versus a head to head

0:16:07.600 --> 0:16:09.880
<v Speaker 1>points league, and I head to head points league. You

0:16:10.000 --> 0:16:13.400
<v Speaker 1>can take these big men who have terrible free throw

0:16:13.480 --> 0:16:15.680
<v Speaker 1>percentage because they're gonna give you points, They're gonna give

0:16:15.680 --> 0:16:17.840
<v Speaker 1>you rebounds, they're gonna give you blocks. If you play

0:16:17.880 --> 0:16:21.480
<v Speaker 1>on Yahoo, the standard scoring is three fantasy points per

0:16:21.600 --> 0:16:25.200
<v Speaker 1>defensive statistic. That makes Andre Drummond and guys like Steven

0:16:25.240 --> 0:16:28.120
<v Speaker 1>Adams and Hassan Whiteside really good in points leagues because

0:16:28.160 --> 0:16:30.520
<v Speaker 1>they get a lot of defensive numbers. So I think

0:16:30.600 --> 0:16:33.560
<v Speaker 1>Hassan uh, Andre Drummond is in this mix as well

0:16:33.840 --> 0:16:36.440
<v Speaker 1>as a first round pick, probably more of a early

0:16:36.520 --> 0:16:38.560
<v Speaker 1>second round pick and a head to add categories or

0:16:38.640 --> 0:16:41.600
<v Speaker 1>rotissary league because he does bring down your free throw percentage. Yeah,

0:16:41.600 --> 0:16:42.880
<v Speaker 1>and I get it. And there's his re league with

0:16:42.920 --> 0:16:45.120
<v Speaker 1>free percentage of thing. Andre Drummond is always going to

0:16:45.240 --> 0:16:48.080
<v Speaker 1>hurt you. But as we have seen, man, Andre Donmonds awesome.

0:16:48.160 --> 0:16:50.080
<v Speaker 1>Like that's the type of player and I just I

0:16:50.240 --> 0:16:53.440
<v Speaker 1>just referenced it. I'm just playing my rankings here. Um,

0:16:53.840 --> 0:16:55.840
<v Speaker 1>that's the player that can win you a week by himself,

0:16:55.920 --> 0:16:58.680
<v Speaker 1>especially in the double double leagues. Where he is. He

0:16:58.800 --> 0:17:02.160
<v Speaker 1>is absolutely dominant in two different categories. Andre jalmand Is

0:17:02.800 --> 0:17:06.720
<v Speaker 1>has taken the leap forward, I think, and loan management

0:17:06.880 --> 0:17:09.760
<v Speaker 1>certainly not a thing when it comes to Andre Drummond.

0:17:10.200 --> 0:17:13.240
<v Speaker 1>Lots there. I'll throw this back your way if you

0:17:13.440 --> 0:17:15.800
<v Speaker 1>have picked twelve right and all these players that we

0:17:15.880 --> 0:17:19.080
<v Speaker 1>just talked about are gone, the Damian Lillards, Lebron James,

0:17:19.200 --> 0:17:22.240
<v Speaker 1>the Joel embiid Russell Westbrook. I was talking to Ronus

0:17:22.320 --> 0:17:25.000
<v Speaker 1>last night. We're participating in his draft. We have first picked,

0:17:25.040 --> 0:17:28.200
<v Speaker 1>he has twelfth pick, and he said twelve. Being twelve

0:17:28.280 --> 0:17:32.080
<v Speaker 1>picked this year is terrible because there's no give meers

0:17:32.200 --> 0:17:34.880
<v Speaker 1>off the ward. If you don't mind James Harden, Janice,

0:17:35.119 --> 0:17:39.360
<v Speaker 1>Anthony Davis, Yoki's Steph Curry, Karl Anthony Towns, Russell Westbrook,

0:17:39.440 --> 0:17:43.960
<v Speaker 1>Joel embiid, Lebron James, and Damian Lillard, that's ten. Let's

0:17:44.000 --> 0:17:46.320
<v Speaker 1>throw Andre Drummond in that mix as well. Who are

0:17:46.400 --> 0:17:48.200
<v Speaker 1>you going with at pick twelve? Because I think that

0:17:48.240 --> 0:17:50.480
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of players that you can just kind

0:17:50.480 --> 0:17:53.280
<v Speaker 1>of throw out there because people are gonna ask, well,

0:17:53.280 --> 0:17:55.000
<v Speaker 1>where do I take Kawhi Leonard? You know, because you

0:17:55.040 --> 0:17:57.480
<v Speaker 1>have to worry about risk management with him. Um, you

0:17:57.520 --> 0:17:59.080
<v Speaker 1>know it's just a spower. You should be targeting at

0:17:59.119 --> 0:18:01.199
<v Speaker 1>Ben Simmons. You to worry about free throw percentage there

0:18:01.240 --> 0:18:03.680
<v Speaker 1>as well. So if you had the wrap around this year,

0:18:03.960 --> 0:18:05.760
<v Speaker 1>what are you looking at? So the couple of guys

0:18:05.800 --> 0:18:08.560
<v Speaker 1>that come to my mind at that twelve thirteen spot,

0:18:09.640 --> 0:18:13.359
<v Speaker 1>I think you consider if you're looking at guard, you're

0:18:13.400 --> 0:18:16.080
<v Speaker 1>gonna consider Ben Simmons, as you mentioned. But the scoring

0:18:16.160 --> 0:18:18.840
<v Speaker 1>leaves you just like this is annoying. The shooting. Obviously,

0:18:19.359 --> 0:18:21.199
<v Speaker 1>Drew Holiday has been my guy this year. I think

0:18:21.320 --> 0:18:23.320
<v Speaker 1>Drew Holidays in for a massive, massive year. I was

0:18:23.320 --> 0:18:24.800
<v Speaker 1>pumped to get him in my spot in the second

0:18:24.880 --> 0:18:27.640
<v Speaker 1>round last night. Um, and I think Jimmy Butler helps

0:18:27.680 --> 0:18:29.960
<v Speaker 1>you in every category as well. I'd rather have Jimmy

0:18:30.000 --> 0:18:33.040
<v Speaker 1>Butler over Kakwain Leonard, which sounds crazy, but he's gonna

0:18:33.080 --> 0:18:35.240
<v Speaker 1>help you in every category and leave this Miami team.

0:18:35.440 --> 0:18:37.560
<v Speaker 1>You know it's crazy. Is the two players that I

0:18:37.720 --> 0:18:41.160
<v Speaker 1>like there didn't even mentioned excited to hear the who

0:18:41.200 --> 0:18:42.960
<v Speaker 1>those two are. On the other side. That's a tease

0:18:43.040 --> 0:18:44.600
<v Speaker 1>for you. We'll get in the second round. We'll get

0:18:44.640 --> 0:18:46.399
<v Speaker 1>us some sleepers we like as well as the players

0:18:46.440 --> 0:18:50.960
<v Speaker 1>to avoid here on the basketball primer, I want to

0:18:51.040 --> 0:18:53.560
<v Speaker 1>be the next Daily Fantasy millionaire. Don't go on your

0:18:53.680 --> 0:18:57.200
<v Speaker 1>NBA DFS competition with Daily Rodal dot com and dominate

0:18:57.320 --> 0:19:00.560
<v Speaker 1>on fandel and DraftKings this season. Compete the pros with

0:19:00.640 --> 0:19:04.240
<v Speaker 1>Daily Rodo dot Com optimizer and the most accurate projections

0:19:04.359 --> 0:19:07.760
<v Speaker 1>in NBA DFS plus line up alerts, breaking news, lake

0:19:07.880 --> 0:19:10.679
<v Speaker 1>swap support and much more. Save ten percent on winning

0:19:10.800 --> 0:19:14.320
<v Speaker 1>NBA DFS advice with promo code dunk. Visit Daily Rodo

0:19:14.520 --> 0:19:27.359
<v Speaker 1>dot com backslash dunk to learn more. With the NBA

0:19:27.520 --> 0:19:30.640
<v Speaker 1>season just around the corner, you can become Daily Rodo's

0:19:30.800 --> 0:19:34.840
<v Speaker 1>eighth Daily Fantasy Millionaire. Don't go your NBA DFS competition

0:19:34.880 --> 0:19:38.080
<v Speaker 1>and dolinate on vandel and draftings this upcoming year. We

0:19:38.160 --> 0:19:40.760
<v Speaker 1>believe with the pros. Compete with the pros the Daily

0:19:40.800 --> 0:19:44.159
<v Speaker 1>rodor dot com optimizer and the most accurate projections in

0:19:44.280 --> 0:19:45.960
<v Speaker 1>all of NBA d f s. Plus, you get a

0:19:45.960 --> 0:19:49.160
<v Speaker 1>lot of alerts, breaking news, lad stop supporting more. Save

0:19:49.240 --> 0:19:51.280
<v Speaker 1>temper cent on winning NBA d f as advice to

0:19:51.320 --> 0:19:54.680
<v Speaker 1>the promo code dunk Daily roder dot Com slash dunk

0:19:54.920 --> 0:19:57.359
<v Speaker 1>to learn more than's Daily Roder dot com slash don't

0:19:57.720 --> 0:19:59.720
<v Speaker 1>get your temper sent off now Daily Roder dot com

0:20:00.280 --> 0:20:03.800
<v Speaker 1>where millionaires are made back with you here on the

0:20:04.400 --> 0:20:09.400
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy Best Friend Forever Fantasy Basketball previous show, frankas anymore watching. Yeah,

0:20:09.400 --> 0:20:11.320
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of people watching, of course, Greig. Everyone

0:20:11.320 --> 0:20:13.960
<v Speaker 1>wants to see their bfs love it and probably haven't

0:20:13.960 --> 0:20:15.959
<v Speaker 1>You were back thinking great reviews on the show yesterday.

0:20:16.240 --> 0:20:20.679
<v Speaker 1>Didn't they missed us? Well, we're back. That's why we're back. Indeed,

0:20:20.800 --> 0:20:22.760
<v Speaker 1>all right, you asked me to wing a break. When

0:20:22.800 --> 0:20:25.280
<v Speaker 1>you're at the turn, when eleven guys are off the board,

0:20:25.800 --> 0:20:27.680
<v Speaker 1>what do you do at twelve? And I said both

0:20:27.720 --> 0:20:30.000
<v Speaker 1>of their team? I said, Drew Holiday comes to mind.

0:20:30.200 --> 0:20:33.720
<v Speaker 1>I said Ben Simmons comes to mind. And I said

0:20:33.880 --> 0:20:37.200
<v Speaker 1>Jimmy Butler comes to mind. And You're like, well, you

0:20:37.280 --> 0:20:39.840
<v Speaker 1>forgot to go. People who do you like in that spot?

0:20:41.359 --> 0:20:43.200
<v Speaker 1>I don't dislike the names that you brought up, but

0:20:43.320 --> 0:20:45.960
<v Speaker 1>personally I do like Bradley Beale and I like Luca

0:20:46.040 --> 0:20:48.679
<v Speaker 1>don Che as well. Luka Donte was awesome last year.

0:20:48.680 --> 0:20:51.240
<v Speaker 1>I expect him to improve on his efficiency having another

0:20:51.280 --> 0:20:53.960
<v Speaker 1>player on the court like Chris tas poor Zingis, and

0:20:54.080 --> 0:20:56.280
<v Speaker 1>he's someone that could just contribute all across the board.

0:20:56.480 --> 0:20:58.840
<v Speaker 1>You have to consider, you know, the free throw percentage.

0:20:59.080 --> 0:21:02.280
<v Speaker 1>Maybe he's in the low tomid seventies field goal percentage,

0:21:02.359 --> 0:21:05.679
<v Speaker 1>probably closer like a forty five percent shooter. You can

0:21:05.720 --> 0:21:07.240
<v Speaker 1>back that up later on with some big men, you

0:21:07.280 --> 0:21:09.159
<v Speaker 1>can help out your percentages. But someone that could just

0:21:09.200 --> 0:21:12.600
<v Speaker 1>contribute across the board close to twenty five points. He'll

0:21:12.640 --> 0:21:14.240
<v Speaker 1>give you seven or eight rebounds, will give you seven

0:21:14.280 --> 0:21:15.879
<v Speaker 1>or eight assists, will give you a steal per game

0:21:15.920 --> 0:21:17.480
<v Speaker 1>as well. He'll give you a couple of three pointers.

0:21:17.560 --> 0:21:19.600
<v Speaker 1>So I'm in a Luca Dontage and I think you know,

0:21:19.680 --> 0:21:23.000
<v Speaker 1>Bradley Beal doesn't have the same upside that Luca Dontag does,

0:21:23.080 --> 0:21:25.080
<v Speaker 1>but he's the main guy on his team. Greg. I mean,

0:21:25.160 --> 0:21:27.480
<v Speaker 1>who else on Washington is going to get their own buckets.

0:21:27.520 --> 0:21:30.280
<v Speaker 1>They just gave him a huge contract extension as well,

0:21:30.640 --> 0:21:32.840
<v Speaker 1>because he's a guy that can average twenty five points

0:21:32.840 --> 0:21:35.840
<v Speaker 1>per game, multiple threes, give you a steal, uh five

0:21:36.000 --> 0:21:40.159
<v Speaker 1>six rebounds, four five assists. Very very solid player, a

0:21:40.240 --> 0:21:42.879
<v Speaker 1>lot like Luka Donte and a more efficient player than

0:21:42.960 --> 0:21:44.960
<v Speaker 1>Luka Dontage as well. So I think both of those

0:21:45.000 --> 0:21:47.000
<v Speaker 1>players are in the mix going at the end of

0:21:47.119 --> 0:21:50.080
<v Speaker 1>the first round, beginning of the second round. I think

0:21:50.160 --> 0:21:52.800
<v Speaker 1>all of these players in that mix, depending on who

0:21:52.880 --> 0:21:55.320
<v Speaker 1>you want and depending on who uh you feel comfortable

0:21:55.359 --> 0:21:57.439
<v Speaker 1>with how you're building your team. I'm with you, man,

0:21:57.520 --> 0:21:59.040
<v Speaker 1>I have no issue with any of these guys. I

0:21:59.040 --> 0:22:01.359
<v Speaker 1>think they're kind of all up together. And then after

0:22:01.480 --> 0:22:03.760
<v Speaker 1>that you get to the point where you just need

0:22:03.840 --> 0:22:06.080
<v Speaker 1>to take your guy. And that's what I didn't do

0:22:06.280 --> 0:22:08.919
<v Speaker 1>last night. Would you coming on the air about Josh Richardson,

0:22:08.920 --> 0:22:11.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna jump right to it because we have an

0:22:11.600 --> 0:22:13.040
<v Speaker 1>hour to do this. I kinda want to jump around

0:22:13.040 --> 0:22:16.320
<v Speaker 1>and make sure we get everything in there. And my guy,

0:22:16.480 --> 0:22:18.680
<v Speaker 1>this one of my guys this year, and I've said

0:22:18.720 --> 0:22:21.000
<v Speaker 1>it off the air a lot, is Shy Guilder's Alexander.

0:22:21.000 --> 0:22:22.880
<v Speaker 1>I think he's in store for a monster monster season

0:22:23.119 --> 0:22:25.440
<v Speaker 1>with the Oklahoma City Thunder, and I think he should

0:22:25.440 --> 0:22:27.320
<v Speaker 1>be a focal point of that office. They need him

0:22:27.320 --> 0:22:29.800
<v Speaker 1>to be better and I think he will be. So

0:22:29.880 --> 0:22:33.440
<v Speaker 1>I want him, and yet I have him ranked as

0:22:33.600 --> 0:22:36.320
<v Speaker 1>my Let me look here, when number is this one, two,

0:22:36.440 --> 0:22:40.280
<v Speaker 1>three or four, four, six, seven, eight nine, thirteen ranked

0:22:40.320 --> 0:22:43.400
<v Speaker 1>shooting guard at Hills, James Harden and Jimmy Butler, Bradley Beal,

0:22:43.440 --> 0:22:45.359
<v Speaker 1>look Dodgic, Devin Booker, a whole bunch of these guys, right,

0:22:45.520 --> 0:22:47.440
<v Speaker 1>So he's never thirteen for me. He is the last

0:22:47.560 --> 0:22:50.720
<v Speaker 1>player in Tier three for me. And yet if you

0:22:50.800 --> 0:22:54.800
<v Speaker 1>look at ESPN, the rankings or Yahoo rankings, he's much lower.

0:22:55.720 --> 0:22:57.879
<v Speaker 1>So last night we did this draft on Yahoo and

0:22:57.960 --> 0:23:01.560
<v Speaker 1>I violated a rule of Annessey that doesn't matter where

0:23:01.600 --> 0:23:04.240
<v Speaker 1>anybody has a guy ranked, but where you have him ranked.

0:23:05.359 --> 0:23:09.000
<v Speaker 1>And he was ranked like twenty players after where my

0:23:09.119 --> 0:23:12.960
<v Speaker 1>draft spot was. So I took Josh Richardson, who is

0:23:13.040 --> 0:23:19.200
<v Speaker 1>my fifteen ranked shooting guard, ahead of Shy Gilder's Alexander

0:23:19.840 --> 0:23:21.360
<v Speaker 1>because I was like, you know what, I probably can

0:23:21.640 --> 0:23:24.880
<v Speaker 1>sneak him and get him on the way back. Frank

0:23:24.960 --> 0:23:27.080
<v Speaker 1>major that wasn't possible. And then of course Frank has

0:23:27.119 --> 0:23:29.640
<v Speaker 1>lauded in the chat, but everyone's, oh, great pick, Frank, Like, God,

0:23:29.760 --> 0:23:32.159
<v Speaker 1>damn it, that's what I should have done, and I

0:23:32.200 --> 0:23:35.400
<v Speaker 1>a made a mistaken I didn't Yeah, shake Gilds Alexander

0:23:35.480 --> 0:23:38.040
<v Speaker 1>going in that six seventh round range this year, I

0:23:38.040 --> 0:23:40.760
<v Speaker 1>think he's a breakout candidate, has point guard and shooting

0:23:40.800 --> 0:23:43.840
<v Speaker 1>guard eligibility. He was the focal point of the Paul

0:23:43.920 --> 0:23:46.159
<v Speaker 1>George trade. To be honest, the Clippers did not want

0:23:46.160 --> 0:23:48.920
<v Speaker 1>to trade away Shay Gild just Alexander, but in order

0:23:49.000 --> 0:23:52.760
<v Speaker 1>to sign Kawhi Leonard, they had to trade for Paul George.

0:23:53.119 --> 0:23:55.159
<v Speaker 1>Uh And you know, of course, yeah, you have an

0:23:55.160 --> 0:23:57.280
<v Speaker 1>opportunity to win a championship with Kawai and Paul George.

0:23:57.280 --> 0:23:59.600
<v Speaker 1>You gotta make it happen. But they were hesitant to

0:23:59.680 --> 0:24:02.080
<v Speaker 1>give him up and the numbers were not you know,

0:24:02.240 --> 0:24:04.399
<v Speaker 1>I opening last year, but he was a rookie and

0:24:04.520 --> 0:24:06.359
<v Speaker 1>got better as the season went along. I'm gonna have

0:24:06.440 --> 0:24:10.320
<v Speaker 1>a clear opportunity here playing the two against alongside Chris

0:24:10.400 --> 0:24:12.560
<v Speaker 1>Paul Danilo Gallinaria is on this team as well. But

0:24:13.040 --> 0:24:15.359
<v Speaker 1>I think shaikiel this Alexander is someone that can average

0:24:15.960 --> 0:24:20.720
<v Speaker 1>sixteen seventeen points per game, right around five rebounds and assists.

0:24:21.160 --> 0:24:24.000
<v Speaker 1>He's an efficient player, shot forty seven percent from the

0:24:24.040 --> 0:24:26.200
<v Speaker 1>field as a rookie, eight percent from the free throw

0:24:26.280 --> 0:24:29.199
<v Speaker 1>line over a steel per game as well. I think

0:24:29.200 --> 0:24:31.080
<v Speaker 1>he's someone I can average probably closer to a steal

0:24:31.119 --> 0:24:34.439
<v Speaker 1>and a half. Good defender very in on Shaikiela Alexander Greg.

0:24:34.520 --> 0:24:36.920
<v Speaker 1>I think he's one of those breakout candidate's going in

0:24:36.920 --> 0:24:41.679
<v Speaker 1>the middle rounds. Absolutely, Shiel Alexander much like uh Malcolm

0:24:41.680 --> 0:24:45.280
<v Speaker 1>Browndon even breakout candidate this year. New team, new role,

0:24:45.400 --> 0:24:48.760
<v Speaker 1>new responsibility for the player, somebody that's ever growing. But

0:24:49.000 --> 0:24:51.080
<v Speaker 1>the most popular sleeper for us and I probably in

0:24:51.119 --> 0:24:55.920
<v Speaker 1>the industry is bam Adebaya, who Jack Nicholson gift. But

0:24:56.080 --> 0:24:59.440
<v Speaker 1>as I was mentioning before I got snipe in the

0:24:59.480 --> 0:25:01.080
<v Speaker 1>fourth round, ma'am out of Bio because I knew I

0:25:01.080 --> 0:25:02.479
<v Speaker 1>couldn't let him get back to Frank at the four

0:25:02.520 --> 0:25:04.119
<v Speaker 1>or five serring because he would have been gone. So

0:25:04.240 --> 0:25:06.720
<v Speaker 1>I was gonna take him at my spot in the

0:25:06.800 --> 0:25:09.680
<v Speaker 1>fourth round, and I didn't get the opportunity to do that.

0:25:09.800 --> 0:25:13.080
<v Speaker 1>Why are people so in a band this year? Because

0:25:13.119 --> 0:25:16.840
<v Speaker 1>bama a Bio is a big man that can give

0:25:16.880 --> 0:25:19.960
<v Speaker 1>you double doubles and he's not gonna hurt your free

0:25:19.960 --> 0:25:22.480
<v Speaker 1>throw percentage. He's not an amazing free throw shooter, but

0:25:22.880 --> 0:25:24.920
<v Speaker 1>he is seventy three percent for his career. I'll take

0:25:25.000 --> 0:25:28.439
<v Speaker 1>that over. You know, Andre Drummonds fifty five percent. DeAndre

0:25:28.560 --> 0:25:30.680
<v Speaker 1>Jordan's very bad free throw shooter as well. Steven Adams

0:25:30.720 --> 0:25:33.320
<v Speaker 1>a bad free throw shooter. So Bama a bio um.

0:25:33.520 --> 0:25:36.080
<v Speaker 1>He's always shown us flashes. He's always someone that we've

0:25:36.160 --> 0:25:39.080
<v Speaker 1>used in DFS whenever Hassan Whiteside was out because we

0:25:39.200 --> 0:25:41.680
<v Speaker 1>know what the upside can be when Hassan Whiteside wasn't there. Well,

0:25:41.960 --> 0:25:45.160
<v Speaker 1>Hassan Whiteside is now on the Portland Trailblazers and bam

0:25:45.240 --> 0:25:47.000
<v Speaker 1>Atabio has come out and said he would like to

0:25:47.119 --> 0:25:49.640
<v Speaker 1>average fifteen, ten and five this year. If you look

0:25:49.680 --> 0:25:53.400
<v Speaker 1>at his per thirty six numbers, not really outlandish last

0:25:53.480 --> 0:25:57.280
<v Speaker 1>year per thirty six per thirty six, thirteen point seven

0:25:57.359 --> 0:25:59.880
<v Speaker 1>points per game, eleven rebounds, three and a half assists,

0:26:00.359 --> 0:26:03.119
<v Speaker 1>over a steel over all block per game. He's an

0:26:03.119 --> 0:26:06.560
<v Speaker 1>efficient player percent from the field last year. So there's

0:26:06.560 --> 0:26:08.760
<v Speaker 1>a lot to like about band At a bio. Someone

0:26:08.800 --> 0:26:11.320
<v Speaker 1>you can target in that fourth round range, Greg, you

0:26:11.440 --> 0:26:14.560
<v Speaker 1>might be drafting him close to his ceiling, but based

0:26:14.600 --> 0:26:17.199
<v Speaker 1>on what he can do defensively and be an efficient

0:26:17.240 --> 0:26:20.000
<v Speaker 1>offensive player, I think the sky is the limit when

0:26:20.040 --> 0:26:22.000
<v Speaker 1>it comes to Bam stepping up as a starting center

0:26:22.000 --> 0:26:24.520
<v Speaker 1>for the Miami Heat this season. A bio. Whenever he

0:26:24.600 --> 0:26:26.920
<v Speaker 1>got the opportunity in years past was when the minutes

0:26:26.960 --> 0:26:29.280
<v Speaker 1>were there, when a sou On Whiteside didn't play, I

0:26:29.359 --> 0:26:32.040
<v Speaker 1>am stepped up. They've called him a leader on this team. Now.

0:26:32.240 --> 0:26:35.040
<v Speaker 1>As long as Jimmy Butler doesn't like mentally f with him,

0:26:35.320 --> 0:26:38.560
<v Speaker 1>maam should be pretty good. Yeah he should. I'm I'm

0:26:38.880 --> 0:26:43.000
<v Speaker 1>on again. You know, good distributor doesn't hurt your percentages

0:26:43.440 --> 0:26:45.240
<v Speaker 1>in that fourth fifth round range. If you need a center,

0:26:45.280 --> 0:26:47.120
<v Speaker 1>bam at a bio is your guy only two three

0:26:47.200 --> 0:26:50.720
<v Speaker 1>turn Frank, you were salivating at the thought of Zion

0:26:50.760 --> 0:26:53.119
<v Speaker 1>Williamson falling to you, and I wanted to bring up

0:26:53.200 --> 0:26:55.720
<v Speaker 1>Zion and last year's the rolling overall pick DeAndre eight

0:26:55.760 --> 0:26:58.720
<v Speaker 1>and two players going around a similar spot and some

0:26:58.760 --> 0:27:00.520
<v Speaker 1>of the other rookies and trying to remember where we

0:27:00.560 --> 0:27:03.040
<v Speaker 1>should take these players. Let me leave eaton off the

0:27:03.080 --> 0:27:05.520
<v Speaker 1>side for now. Zion wis was the first overall pick

0:27:05.720 --> 0:27:07.880
<v Speaker 1>you wanted to two three turn. You just missed him.

0:27:08.119 --> 0:27:11.080
<v Speaker 1>Why does he belong there? I actually think that Zion

0:27:11.080 --> 0:27:13.320
<v Speaker 1>Williamson should be a mid second round pick right now,

0:27:13.400 --> 0:27:14.960
<v Speaker 1>and I would take him over some of the players

0:27:15.000 --> 0:27:17.000
<v Speaker 1>that went in the second round of this draft last night.

0:27:17.040 --> 0:27:19.440
<v Speaker 1>I would take him over Kyrie Irving. I would take

0:27:19.520 --> 0:27:21.520
<v Speaker 1>him over Paul George, who is probably gonna miss the

0:27:21.560 --> 0:27:24.879
<v Speaker 1>first month of the season recovering from dual shoulder surgery.

0:27:24.880 --> 0:27:27.600
<v Speaker 1>I would take him over Kemba Walker as well. You know,

0:27:27.680 --> 0:27:29.200
<v Speaker 1>we're getting a little bit of a glimpse of the

0:27:29.280 --> 0:27:32.200
<v Speaker 1>upside of Zion Williamson. And it's only the preseason and

0:27:32.280 --> 0:27:34.760
<v Speaker 1>this guy is scoring, you know, over twenty points per

0:27:34.800 --> 0:27:36.920
<v Speaker 1>game right now. He's shooting over seventy percent from the field,

0:27:37.080 --> 0:27:39.439
<v Speaker 1>and everyone thought, all right, he did that in college.

0:27:39.480 --> 0:27:41.720
<v Speaker 1>He's not gonna be able to play bullyball with players

0:27:41.760 --> 0:27:43.639
<v Speaker 1>in the NBA. I mean, these are grown men. They

0:27:43.720 --> 0:27:45.480
<v Speaker 1>have a lot more mass on them. They're taller than

0:27:45.600 --> 0:27:48.280
<v Speaker 1>Zion Williamson. He's a six ft six center. This isn't

0:27:48.320 --> 0:27:51.600
<v Speaker 1>gonna work out. Well, guess what's so far in the

0:27:51.680 --> 0:27:54.440
<v Speaker 1>preseason playing against other grown men. You know, he was

0:27:54.440 --> 0:27:57.160
<v Speaker 1>playing against Rudy Gobert last week, who is in All

0:27:57.320 --> 0:28:01.159
<v Speaker 1>NBA first team defensive player. He had his way with him.

0:28:01.200 --> 0:28:03.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean, Zion Williamson is the real deal. He's an

0:28:03.560 --> 0:28:05.760
<v Speaker 1>uber athlete. I think he's someone that comes in right

0:28:05.800 --> 0:28:08.680
<v Speaker 1>away averages over twenty points per game, probably seven to

0:28:08.760 --> 0:28:11.359
<v Speaker 1>eight rebounds, probably around three assists. I'm gonna give you

0:28:11.480 --> 0:28:15.560
<v Speaker 1>massive defensive numbers, really really good field goal percentage as well.

0:28:16.040 --> 0:28:18.879
<v Speaker 1>Three throw percentage might not be great, probably in that

0:28:19.040 --> 0:28:21.479
<v Speaker 1>you know sixty to sixty five percent range. You can

0:28:21.560 --> 0:28:23.959
<v Speaker 1>make that up if you have, you know, a Damian Lillard,

0:28:24.160 --> 0:28:26.159
<v Speaker 1>if you have a James Harden on your team. But

0:28:26.880 --> 0:28:29.240
<v Speaker 1>I think that Zion Williamson is gonna have a massive season.

0:28:29.440 --> 0:28:31.680
<v Speaker 1>I think he's worthy of a mid second round pick.

0:28:31.880 --> 0:28:34.040
<v Speaker 1>A lot of people were hyping up Terry Favors earlier

0:28:34.080 --> 0:28:36.680
<v Speaker 1>on in the Fantasy Basketball's draft season. I think that

0:28:36.720 --> 0:28:40.120
<v Speaker 1>they've been experimenting with a small ball lineup with Zion

0:28:40.200 --> 0:28:41.920
<v Speaker 1>at the five, and that's the way that the NBA

0:28:42.040 --> 0:28:44.360
<v Speaker 1>is trending right now as well. So I think he

0:28:44.600 --> 0:28:46.920
<v Speaker 1>is due for a massive season as a rookie. I

0:28:46.960 --> 0:28:48.480
<v Speaker 1>would take him in the middle of the second round.

0:28:48.960 --> 0:28:51.080
<v Speaker 1>They're enough middle of the second round. Four Zion Williams.

0:28:51.120 --> 0:28:53.240
<v Speaker 1>And what about the other rookies rank what about R. J.

0:28:53.400 --> 0:28:56.160
<v Speaker 1>Barrett with New York nixt what about John Lorant and

0:28:56.280 --> 0:28:59.520
<v Speaker 1>the Grizzlies, Darius Garland with Cleveland where did they all go?

0:29:00.520 --> 0:29:02.840
<v Speaker 1>I like John Moran as the next rookie off the

0:29:02.880 --> 0:29:06.280
<v Speaker 1>board for fantasy basketball. Probably better for a points league

0:29:06.280 --> 0:29:08.160
<v Speaker 1>because I don't think that his efficiency is going to

0:29:08.240 --> 0:29:10.800
<v Speaker 1>be great. But John Morant someone who you know last

0:29:10.880 --> 0:29:13.719
<v Speaker 1>year with Murray State was getting triple doubles. People were

0:29:13.760 --> 0:29:16.960
<v Speaker 1>comparing this guy to Russell Westbrook. Not the same level athlete.

0:29:17.000 --> 0:29:18.680
<v Speaker 1>He has a good athlete, but not the same level

0:29:18.760 --> 0:29:22.160
<v Speaker 1>as Russell Westbrook. Not the same scoring mentality either, in

0:29:22.280 --> 0:29:24.960
<v Speaker 1>my opinion, But I think John Moran someone that can

0:29:25.000 --> 0:29:29.320
<v Speaker 1>average fifteen points, maybe seven assists, four or five rebounds

0:29:29.360 --> 0:29:32.240
<v Speaker 1>as well in the fifth or sixth round range. Again,

0:29:32.240 --> 0:29:34.320
<v Speaker 1>I think he's better for a points league because I

0:29:34.360 --> 0:29:36.720
<v Speaker 1>do have some concern over the efficiency when it comes

0:29:36.760 --> 0:29:39.160
<v Speaker 1>to John Moran. Same thing for r J. Barrett. He

0:29:39.160 --> 0:29:41.040
<v Speaker 1>shouldn't go in that fourth, fifth round range. I think

0:29:41.080 --> 0:29:44.200
<v Speaker 1>he's more of a six seventh round player in a

0:29:44.480 --> 0:29:47.600
<v Speaker 1>points league. RJ. Barrett is somebody you want to target

0:29:47.640 --> 0:29:49.520
<v Speaker 1>in a points league. Last night, I think he shot

0:29:49.880 --> 0:29:52.520
<v Speaker 1>free for thirteen from the field. He's not a good shooter,

0:29:52.640 --> 0:29:54.520
<v Speaker 1>yet he's someone that can get to the basket. You

0:29:54.560 --> 0:29:56.520
<v Speaker 1>can create his own shot. He can get to the

0:29:56.560 --> 0:29:59.440
<v Speaker 1>free throw line. But he's not a good uh, he's

0:29:59.440 --> 0:30:01.400
<v Speaker 1>not a good shot shooting. Again, the field goal percentage

0:30:01.440 --> 0:30:03.200
<v Speaker 1>is not gonna be good. Wouldn't surprise me if he's

0:30:03.200 --> 0:30:06.360
<v Speaker 1>in the low forty percent range and he's not a

0:30:06.400 --> 0:30:09.160
<v Speaker 1>good free throw percentage free throw shooter yet either, he's

0:30:09.160 --> 0:30:12.960
<v Speaker 1>probably gonna be seventy percent, maybe sub seventy percent. So

0:30:13.400 --> 0:30:15.400
<v Speaker 1>they'll do a little bit of everything. He'll get some assists,

0:30:15.400 --> 0:30:18.400
<v Speaker 1>he'll get you some rebounds, maybe a steel per game.

0:30:19.200 --> 0:30:21.760
<v Speaker 1>But I would target him more so in a points league.

0:30:21.800 --> 0:30:24.120
<v Speaker 1>And that's six seventh round range, greg because the efficiency

0:30:24.240 --> 0:30:26.520
<v Speaker 1>I do think is going to be very bad. It's

0:30:26.520 --> 0:30:29.480
<v Speaker 1>gonna be in the low forty percent range. That's brutal.

0:30:29.720 --> 0:30:32.080
<v Speaker 1>Obviously that that could kill you a week and it

0:30:32.160 --> 0:30:35.200
<v Speaker 1>takes quite a bit to counteract that. Yeah, and the

0:30:35.480 --> 0:30:38.400
<v Speaker 1>next rookie that I would target is Ruby Hashimura. Actually

0:30:39.040 --> 0:30:41.200
<v Speaker 1>I would take him over Darius Garland. I think that

0:30:41.280 --> 0:30:44.520
<v Speaker 1>there's a clear opportunity for Japanese Jordan playing with the

0:30:44.560 --> 0:30:47.080
<v Speaker 1>Washington Wizards. They just don't have enough talent there. It's

0:30:47.080 --> 0:30:51.080
<v Speaker 1>Bradley Beale and who else you know, it's they have, Uh,

0:30:51.200 --> 0:30:54.320
<v Speaker 1>I think they have Dovis Bertans on that team. Obvis

0:30:54.400 --> 0:30:57.880
<v Speaker 1>pertends three point streamer there, but there's just really not

0:30:57.960 --> 0:31:00.320
<v Speaker 1>a lot of talent. So I think Ruey Hashimura someone

0:31:00.440 --> 0:31:02.360
<v Speaker 1>that can come close to averaging a double double in

0:31:02.440 --> 0:31:04.080
<v Speaker 1>his first season in the NBA. Not bad at all.

0:31:04.080 --> 0:31:05.960
<v Speaker 1>All Right, let's take a break. When we come back,

0:31:06.000 --> 0:31:08.720
<v Speaker 1>we're gonnah on a bunch of players that you should

0:31:08.760 --> 0:31:11.760
<v Speaker 1>not draft this year. These are the sleepers here the

0:31:11.800 --> 0:31:18.520
<v Speaker 1>bust it comes up next. Want to be the next

0:31:18.760 --> 0:31:22.280
<v Speaker 1>Daily Fantasy Millionaire. Dunk on your NBA DFS competition with

0:31:22.400 --> 0:31:25.640
<v Speaker 1>Daily Rodal dot com and dominate on fandel and draft

0:31:25.720 --> 0:31:28.280
<v Speaker 1>kings this season. Compete with the pros with Daily Rodal

0:31:28.400 --> 0:31:32.560
<v Speaker 1>dot Com optimizer and the most accurate projections in NBA DFS,

0:31:32.680 --> 0:31:35.760
<v Speaker 1>plus line up alerts, breaking news, lake swap support and

0:31:35.920 --> 0:31:39.160
<v Speaker 1>much more. Save ten percent on winning NBA DFS advice

0:31:39.240 --> 0:31:42.720
<v Speaker 1>with promo code dunk. Visit Daily Rodo dot com backslash

0:31:42.840 --> 0:32:00.080
<v Speaker 1>dunk to learn more. Final if it seven doesn't so

0:32:00.240 --> 0:32:07.040
<v Speaker 1>of the show's Frank, I'm Greggie as I take a

0:32:07.120 --> 0:32:11.760
<v Speaker 1>look at what I got here my rankings, which I

0:32:11.880 --> 0:32:14.960
<v Speaker 1>stepped from your rankings. Who are some players that when

0:32:15.000 --> 0:32:17.600
<v Speaker 1>you see their names come up, You're like, you know what,

0:32:18.720 --> 0:32:23.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm good. Kyrie Irving is one of those players I mentioned,

0:32:23.200 --> 0:32:24.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, going in the second round. It's just too

0:32:25.000 --> 0:32:27.600
<v Speaker 1>early for me. I understand he's an efficient player, um,

0:32:27.920 --> 0:32:31.000
<v Speaker 1>but he's dealt with so many injuries the past couple

0:32:31.000 --> 0:32:33.000
<v Speaker 1>of years. I still think the Brooklyn Nets are looking

0:32:33.040 --> 0:32:35.280
<v Speaker 1>more so at next season once Kevin Durant returns. So

0:32:35.600 --> 0:32:37.320
<v Speaker 1>are they really going to push Kye Irving. He's a

0:32:37.360 --> 0:32:39.600
<v Speaker 1>fine player, but in the second round range, you know,

0:32:39.680 --> 0:32:42.160
<v Speaker 1>I would rather target, you know, Drew Holiday, someone that

0:32:42.240 --> 0:32:44.360
<v Speaker 1>you like that's going in that area. I'd rather take

0:32:44.360 --> 0:32:46.120
<v Speaker 1>a Devin Booker. I'd rather, you know, pivot to a

0:32:46.160 --> 0:32:49.200
<v Speaker 1>big man, take a DeAndre Ayton or a Rudy Gobert

0:32:49.320 --> 0:32:53.000
<v Speaker 1>or Nicola Vuosovic. In my opinion, um, there's just too

0:32:53.040 --> 0:32:55.640
<v Speaker 1>many injury concerns when it comes to Kyrie Irving. Greg

0:32:56.160 --> 0:32:57.479
<v Speaker 1>uh And I think that, you know, some of these

0:32:57.520 --> 0:32:59.480
<v Speaker 1>Brooklyn Nets players around him are gonna step up. You know,

0:32:59.560 --> 0:33:02.240
<v Speaker 1>I liked argating Carris LeVert in the middle rounds and

0:33:02.800 --> 0:33:04.480
<v Speaker 1>Joe Harrin's is gonna be taking a lot of threes

0:33:04.520 --> 0:33:06.160
<v Speaker 1>for that team, and they have two big men who

0:33:06.200 --> 0:33:08.960
<v Speaker 1>can play in DeAndre Jordan and Jared Allen as well.

0:33:09.120 --> 0:33:12.880
<v Speaker 1>So Kye Irring talented player, but my opinion, second round

0:33:13.040 --> 0:33:16.000
<v Speaker 1>too early for me. Kyrie Irving is somebody that, like

0:33:16.160 --> 0:33:17.680
<v Speaker 1>last night when he was on the board and I

0:33:17.760 --> 0:33:21.120
<v Speaker 1>took you holiday over him, I'm like, I'm making a mistake.

0:33:22.000 --> 0:33:24.680
<v Speaker 1>And if you look at last year where he was

0:33:24.680 --> 0:33:28.440
<v Speaker 1>supposedly mostly healthy, it wasn't as good as fantasy owners

0:33:28.440 --> 0:33:30.680
<v Speaker 1>are certainly the Boston Celtics for having for so I

0:33:30.800 --> 0:33:33.840
<v Speaker 1>agree Kyrie Irving is somebody that I'm not really going

0:33:33.920 --> 0:33:37.200
<v Speaker 1>after this year because I'm concerned about load management for

0:33:37.360 --> 0:33:40.000
<v Speaker 1>him too, I'm I'm concerned what Spencer did when his

0:33:40.160 --> 0:33:43.080
<v Speaker 1>role is, what Carris Levert's role is, what Joe Harris's

0:33:43.200 --> 0:33:47.160
<v Speaker 1>role is. Yeah, Kyrie Irving is the superstar here. I

0:33:47.200 --> 0:33:49.440
<v Speaker 1>don't know that he helps me and enough categories that

0:33:49.520 --> 0:33:51.240
<v Speaker 1>I want to take a shot on him. I completely

0:33:51.280 --> 0:33:53.960
<v Speaker 1>agree with you much like I'm honestly avoiding. I told

0:33:54.000 --> 0:33:55.840
<v Speaker 1>you this when I came in today, Frankie, I wanted

0:33:55.880 --> 0:33:58.560
<v Speaker 1>Martin Rosen either, like I get what the Rosen is

0:33:58.560 --> 0:33:59.959
<v Speaker 1>good at and I get things he's been a fantasy

0:34:00.040 --> 0:34:02.360
<v Speaker 1>name state for so long, but with the Spurs you

0:34:02.400 --> 0:34:05.200
<v Speaker 1>always have that chance and have of being on the bench.

0:34:05.480 --> 0:34:07.240
<v Speaker 1>The Rosen doesn't help you in enough categories and now

0:34:07.240 --> 0:34:08.759
<v Speaker 1>he's a better three point shooting now that he's ever

0:34:08.840 --> 0:34:11.280
<v Speaker 1>been in his career. He doesn't help you enough anywhere.

0:34:11.640 --> 0:34:13.120
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to spend an early round pick on

0:34:13.160 --> 0:34:16.399
<v Speaker 1>the Rosen. You. Yeah, he's probably a better points league

0:34:16.440 --> 0:34:19.120
<v Speaker 1>player than a categories league. He contributes a little bit

0:34:19.200 --> 0:34:21.160
<v Speaker 1>across the board, you know, last year twenty one points,

0:34:21.440 --> 0:34:25.560
<v Speaker 1>five point six rebounds, uh six point to assists, but

0:34:25.719 --> 0:34:27.920
<v Speaker 1>doesn't shoot any threes, which is really tough because when

0:34:27.920 --> 0:34:30.400
<v Speaker 1>you draft your shooting garden, they give you nothing in

0:34:30.520 --> 0:34:32.920
<v Speaker 1>the three point department. It is tough to overcome that.

0:34:33.080 --> 0:34:35.880
<v Speaker 1>But no, he is durable. He's someone who's played seventy

0:34:35.920 --> 0:34:37.800
<v Speaker 1>four games in each of the past four seasons. So

0:34:38.080 --> 0:34:40.880
<v Speaker 1>I understand he's part of the Spurs who basically a

0:34:41.239 --> 0:34:44.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, created load management and giving players time off.

0:34:44.640 --> 0:34:47.279
<v Speaker 1>But those were the Tim Duncan's of the world, and

0:34:47.480 --> 0:34:49.839
<v Speaker 1>later on in their career managing nobly, you know, when

0:34:49.880 --> 0:34:52.640
<v Speaker 1>those guys were thirty five years old. Plus, I still

0:34:52.680 --> 0:34:55.480
<v Speaker 1>think that Demarda. Rosen is in a good spot right

0:34:55.480 --> 0:34:57.120
<v Speaker 1>at through another name back your way, someone who you

0:34:57.280 --> 0:35:00.200
<v Speaker 1>told me that you are openly avoiding and don't know

0:35:00.239 --> 0:35:02.439
<v Speaker 1>that I necessarily feel the same way. That's Draymond Green.

0:35:02.600 --> 0:35:05.040
<v Speaker 1>So tell everyone why you are avoiding Draymond Green right now.

0:35:05.160 --> 0:35:07.520
<v Speaker 1>So again, especially in points leaves, he's gonna help you

0:35:07.560 --> 0:35:10.240
<v Speaker 1>a lot in category that it's undeniable because he contributes

0:35:10.280 --> 0:35:12.759
<v Speaker 1>across the board in every category, but in points lead

0:35:12.800 --> 0:35:15.000
<v Speaker 1>at least in the past with Kevin Durant and Clay Thompson.

0:35:15.080 --> 0:35:17.840
<v Speaker 1>There Jamald Green has not been reliable. It is not

0:35:18.239 --> 0:35:21.040
<v Speaker 1>We have not seen playoff Draymond through at the regular season.

0:35:21.360 --> 0:35:24.200
<v Speaker 1>There's times where he just my friend doesn't show up,

0:35:24.520 --> 0:35:26.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, with so many of these players, like the CJ. McCollums,

0:35:26.880 --> 0:35:28.880
<v Speaker 1>like even DeMar De Rosen who I mentioned. You know

0:35:28.920 --> 0:35:31.799
<v Speaker 1>you're getting twenty points guarantee. This dude's gonna scores twenty

0:35:31.840 --> 0:35:33.600
<v Speaker 1>points of a couple of rebounds, of a couple of assists,

0:35:34.000 --> 0:35:35.400
<v Speaker 1>and you can put that you can be taking of

0:35:35.440 --> 0:35:39.799
<v Speaker 1>the bank. But from playing DFS with Draymond Green, you're

0:35:39.840 --> 0:35:42.640
<v Speaker 1>never getting that those twenty points you're gonna get like

0:35:43.719 --> 0:35:47.759
<v Speaker 1>another team points most likely and you really need him

0:35:47.800 --> 0:35:50.839
<v Speaker 1>to be playoff. Raymond where he's getting has the opportunity

0:35:50.840 --> 0:35:53.160
<v Speaker 1>and the ability to get you ten, ten, ten, and

0:35:53.239 --> 0:35:55.719
<v Speaker 1>then a couple of blocks, a couple of steals. When

0:35:55.760 --> 0:35:57.880
<v Speaker 1>he does all of that, there may not be a

0:35:58.000 --> 0:36:02.160
<v Speaker 1>more a more all the round player in fantasy basketball.

0:36:02.320 --> 0:36:05.040
<v Speaker 1>And then Draymond Green, how consistent is that going to

0:36:05.120 --> 0:36:07.279
<v Speaker 1>be over the eight two game period, Like, I can't

0:36:07.560 --> 0:36:10.680
<v Speaker 1>expect twenty points a night Draymond Green, you expect ten.

0:36:11.360 --> 0:36:14.320
<v Speaker 1>When it comes to rebounds, like, I don't know that

0:36:14.400 --> 0:36:16.520
<v Speaker 1>he tries this hard in the regular season, So maybe

0:36:16.560 --> 0:36:20.439
<v Speaker 1>you get like seven, that's fine, like ten and seven.

0:36:21.280 --> 0:36:22.719
<v Speaker 1>And when it comes to assist like is he gonna

0:36:22.719 --> 0:36:25.560
<v Speaker 1>be as active as he was in the postseason? Probably

0:36:25.600 --> 0:36:28.879
<v Speaker 1>not get like five of those. That's good, ten, seven

0:36:28.920 --> 0:36:31.520
<v Speaker 1>and five. It's a good game. It's not a great

0:36:31.560 --> 0:36:33.840
<v Speaker 1>game for where he's being drafted. I have no problem

0:36:34.080 --> 0:36:36.879
<v Speaker 1>drafting Draymond Green. I probably drafting Draymond Green where he goes.

0:36:37.280 --> 0:36:39.359
<v Speaker 1>He's going in the third fourth round range. Right now,

0:36:39.680 --> 0:36:42.200
<v Speaker 1>here's how I will I guess counter what you said, though,

0:36:42.400 --> 0:36:44.880
<v Speaker 1>it's they don't have Kevin Duran anymore. They don't have

0:36:45.040 --> 0:36:47.400
<v Speaker 1>Klay Thompson, Like maybe Klay Thompson returns later on in

0:36:47.440 --> 0:36:51.120
<v Speaker 1>the season, but it's Steph Curry, it's D'Angelo Russell, it's

0:36:51.160 --> 0:36:53.480
<v Speaker 1>just Draymond Green. I mean, that's basically they're Big three

0:36:53.600 --> 0:36:56.279
<v Speaker 1>right now. And I think that Draymond Green is gonna

0:36:56.280 --> 0:36:58.080
<v Speaker 1>be reliab to do more this year than he has

0:36:58.120 --> 0:37:00.640
<v Speaker 1>been in years past, because, look, they playing a stack

0:37:00.719 --> 0:37:04.080
<v Speaker 1>Western conference where they're not a lock to have home

0:37:04.239 --> 0:37:07.279
<v Speaker 1>court advantage in the NBA playoffs. Some might say that

0:37:07.320 --> 0:37:09.600
<v Speaker 1>they're not even a lock to make the NBA playoffs.

0:37:09.880 --> 0:37:12.839
<v Speaker 1>That's probably going a little bit too far, but they're

0:37:12.880 --> 0:37:14.919
<v Speaker 1>going to need Draymond Green to step up in order

0:37:15.000 --> 0:37:17.640
<v Speaker 1>to have a good season, in order to have a

0:37:17.719 --> 0:37:20.279
<v Speaker 1>good seed for the NBA playoffs. Greig, So, I think

0:37:20.320 --> 0:37:22.560
<v Speaker 1>Curry has a monster year. I liked Angelo Russell in

0:37:22.600 --> 0:37:24.759
<v Speaker 1>that third fourth round range, and I think that they're

0:37:24.800 --> 0:37:26.480
<v Speaker 1>going to have to rely on Draymond Green to do

0:37:26.560 --> 0:37:28.919
<v Speaker 1>more just because look at the rest of that team.

0:37:28.960 --> 0:37:32.040
<v Speaker 1>It's you know, Willie Calli Stein and Kevon Looney at center,

0:37:32.320 --> 0:37:34.839
<v Speaker 1>which is fine, but you know, it's not the talent

0:37:34.960 --> 0:37:37.240
<v Speaker 1>level that they've been at in years past. It's Alfonso

0:37:37.360 --> 0:37:40.160
<v Speaker 1>McKinney or Glenn Robinson the third starting at small forward.

0:37:40.239 --> 0:37:42.480
<v Speaker 1>So I think ultimately just those big three for the

0:37:42.480 --> 0:37:44.719
<v Speaker 1>Warriors are going to be relied on to do so

0:37:44.960 --> 0:37:47.319
<v Speaker 1>much for this team because they don't really have much else.

0:37:48.120 --> 0:37:50.279
<v Speaker 1>And I get that. I totally get that side of it.

0:37:50.800 --> 0:37:52.400
<v Speaker 1>We haven't seen it, and and you were somebody the

0:37:52.440 --> 0:37:55.600
<v Speaker 1>time Dangel Russell this year, and I understand that. I

0:37:55.719 --> 0:37:57.560
<v Speaker 1>have no idea what Danzel Russell is going to be

0:37:57.640 --> 0:37:59.480
<v Speaker 1>in that Warrior's offense. And you're right, he's gonna have

0:37:59.480 --> 0:38:01.520
<v Speaker 1>to carry this scoring load. But how is he gonna

0:38:01.560 --> 0:38:03.680
<v Speaker 1>be next to Steph Curry? He's not a shooter. That's

0:38:03.680 --> 0:38:06.000
<v Speaker 1>step or Clay are right, Like, he's gonna be the

0:38:06.000 --> 0:38:08.040
<v Speaker 1>primary ball handler with Steph gost de Mansion. I don't

0:38:08.120 --> 0:38:11.080
<v Speaker 1>know what to make of D'Angelo Russell. And how D'Angel Russell,

0:38:11.120 --> 0:38:14.439
<v Speaker 1>for instance, compares to Terry Rosier, right, Like, that's something

0:38:14.640 --> 0:38:16.960
<v Speaker 1>everyone's very very high on Terry Rosier. Who would you

0:38:17.000 --> 0:38:19.839
<v Speaker 1>rather hapen of those two guys? Russell Rosier, I'll still

0:38:19.920 --> 0:38:22.720
<v Speaker 1>take D'Angelo Russell. I like the upside with Terry Rozier,

0:38:22.840 --> 0:38:27.880
<v Speaker 1>but he legitimately might shoot from the field under forty

0:38:27.960 --> 0:38:32.000
<v Speaker 1>percent on I don't know, fifteen sixteen shots of games.

0:38:32.040 --> 0:38:34.560
<v Speaker 1>So if you play in the categories league, Terry Rozier

0:38:34.680 --> 0:38:37.160
<v Speaker 1>is going to sink your field goal percentage. He's gonna

0:38:37.200 --> 0:38:38.560
<v Speaker 1>turn the ball over a lot as well, But it

0:38:38.600 --> 0:38:41.120
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't surprise me if he averages eighteen to twenty points

0:38:41.160 --> 0:38:43.040
<v Speaker 1>seven assists per game. If you play in a head

0:38:43.040 --> 0:38:45.560
<v Speaker 1>to head points league where efficiency doesn't really matter as much,

0:38:45.719 --> 0:38:47.440
<v Speaker 1>then yeah, I love Rosier in that format. You know,

0:38:47.520 --> 0:38:49.880
<v Speaker 1>fourth round pick, definitely think that's worth it. When it

0:38:49.880 --> 0:38:52.880
<v Speaker 1>comes to D'Angel Russell, I trust Steve Kerry. I think

0:38:52.920 --> 0:38:54.520
<v Speaker 1>that he is going to figure this out. I think

0:38:54.520 --> 0:38:56.240
<v Speaker 1>he's one of the best head coaches in the NBA,

0:38:56.440 --> 0:38:58.440
<v Speaker 1>and I think we're gonna be reminded of that this

0:38:58.680 --> 0:39:02.160
<v Speaker 1>season a lot. Much like we've seen from James Harden

0:39:02.200 --> 0:39:04.560
<v Speaker 1>and Chris Paul the past couple of seasons, They're going

0:39:04.640 --> 0:39:08.560
<v Speaker 1>to stagger Steph Curry and D'anzel Russell. So maybe when

0:39:08.640 --> 0:39:10.480
<v Speaker 1>we hit the six minute mark in an NBA game,

0:39:10.560 --> 0:39:13.040
<v Speaker 1>Danzel Russell is gonna come out. He's going to come

0:39:13.040 --> 0:39:15.440
<v Speaker 1>back in to start the second quarter. Steph Curry is

0:39:15.480 --> 0:39:17.200
<v Speaker 1>going to take his break, you know, at the end

0:39:17.239 --> 0:39:19.000
<v Speaker 1>of the first quarter or maybe a little bit before that,

0:39:19.560 --> 0:39:21.560
<v Speaker 1>so that these guys are not really on the court

0:39:21.640 --> 0:39:24.400
<v Speaker 1>as much together. Down the stretch of games, they probably

0:39:24.440 --> 0:39:26.120
<v Speaker 1>won't have a choice but to be on the court together.

0:39:26.200 --> 0:39:28.279
<v Speaker 1>But the first three quarters, I think Steve Kerr is

0:39:28.280 --> 0:39:31.360
<v Speaker 1>gonna do a good job of staggering Danzel Russell and

0:39:31.400 --> 0:39:34.120
<v Speaker 1>Steph Curry being on the court together. And I think, frankly,

0:39:34.360 --> 0:39:37.000
<v Speaker 1>they're gonna need Steph Curry and Danzel Russells to score

0:39:37.040 --> 0:39:38.920
<v Speaker 1>a ton this season. They're gonna need, you know, probably

0:39:38.920 --> 0:39:40.719
<v Speaker 1>close to thirty points out of Curry, probably close to

0:39:40.800 --> 0:39:43.160
<v Speaker 1>twenty five out of Danzel Russell. So I would take

0:39:43.239 --> 0:39:46.000
<v Speaker 1>Russell because I think he's a more efficient player. I think,

0:39:46.120 --> 0:39:49.239
<v Speaker 1>you know, he'll probably still be round five assists, maybe

0:39:49.280 --> 0:39:51.800
<v Speaker 1>close to five rebounds, probably give you more three pointers

0:39:51.840 --> 0:39:54.359
<v Speaker 1>than Rosier as well. Uh, they're close, but I would

0:39:54.400 --> 0:39:57.319
<v Speaker 1>take to Danzel Russell. Another player that I absolutely despise

0:39:57.440 --> 0:40:01.040
<v Speaker 1>every year, and you know this, frank Dandrew Wiggins. He's

0:40:01.080 --> 0:40:03.840
<v Speaker 1>a terrible fantasy basketball player. All he does, his score,

0:40:04.040 --> 0:40:06.000
<v Speaker 1>he's all right in the points league, but in his

0:40:06.080 --> 0:40:08.520
<v Speaker 1>categories league do not draft. He's a so much worse

0:40:08.640 --> 0:40:10.600
<v Speaker 1>version of Tomorrow DeRos and C. J. McCollum is what

0:40:10.640 --> 0:40:13.720
<v Speaker 1>he is. Yeah, he's basically you know R J. Barrett.

0:40:13.719 --> 0:40:15.800
<v Speaker 1>I think Barrett's gonna do more of the peripheral stats

0:40:15.840 --> 0:40:18.080
<v Speaker 1>as well. I think Part's gonna get more assists. He's

0:40:18.080 --> 0:40:21.319
<v Speaker 1>probably gonna get more steals. Nothing. There was a year

0:40:21.440 --> 0:40:23.840
<v Speaker 1>eighteen points for a game, two and a half, assist,

0:40:23.960 --> 0:40:27.960
<v Speaker 1>five rebounds. You and I owned him were two years ago?

0:40:28.040 --> 0:40:30.359
<v Speaker 1>Did you have I had him? I didn't own him ever.

0:40:31.120 --> 0:40:32.600
<v Speaker 1>I owned him in one of my home leagues, but

0:40:32.719 --> 0:40:35.080
<v Speaker 1>I've never owned him in rhonuses league. You probably owned him.

0:40:35.400 --> 0:40:38.239
<v Speaker 1>Maybe I owned him two years ago. Maybe I owned

0:40:38.320 --> 0:40:40.120
<v Speaker 1>him in another league. I think I think it don't

0:40:40.120 --> 0:40:42.279
<v Speaker 1>do anything except score. I think it's the other league

0:40:42.280 --> 0:40:43.520
<v Speaker 1>that I owned him in a couple of years ago.

0:40:43.560 --> 0:40:45.239
<v Speaker 1>But I think people are I wanted to drop him.

0:40:45.320 --> 0:40:47.040
<v Speaker 1>I think that that's starting to be reflected in his

0:40:47.120 --> 0:40:49.719
<v Speaker 1>ADP though, Greg He's not sucks. You know, in years

0:40:49.760 --> 0:40:52.560
<v Speaker 1>past he was a fifth round pick, sixth round pick.

0:40:52.640 --> 0:40:55.239
<v Speaker 1>Now you're getting him sometimes seventh, eighth round range. Again.

0:40:55.360 --> 0:40:57.080
<v Speaker 1>You can take him in a head to head points league,

0:40:57.400 --> 0:40:59.800
<v Speaker 1>but in a head to ad categories league unless you

0:40:59.840 --> 0:41:02.280
<v Speaker 1>were really desperate for points at that point in the draft.

0:41:02.600 --> 0:41:04.239
<v Speaker 1>He's not really gonna do much out of that. He

0:41:04.320 --> 0:41:06.799
<v Speaker 1>doesn't shoot a lot of threes. He's, you know, kind

0:41:06.840 --> 0:41:08.560
<v Speaker 1>of like the Rosen where De Rosen is a shooting

0:41:08.560 --> 0:41:10.720
<v Speaker 1>guard that doesn't give you a lot of three point makes.

0:41:11.239 --> 0:41:13.120
<v Speaker 1>At least a Rosen gives you more rebounds, he gives

0:41:13.120 --> 0:41:16.240
<v Speaker 1>you more assists, he's more efficient from the field. Andrew

0:41:16.239 --> 0:41:18.759
<v Speaker 1>Wiggins scores points, doesn't really do much outside of that,

0:41:18.880 --> 0:41:21.040
<v Speaker 1>so only targeted him in a head to head points league.

0:41:22.640 --> 0:41:24.480
<v Speaker 1>Wiggins is not something that's all my raider. You want

0:41:24.520 --> 0:41:27.400
<v Speaker 1>a cheaper version of about of Andrew Wiggins. T J. Warren,

0:41:27.520 --> 0:41:29.600
<v Speaker 1>that's what he is. Yeah, that makes a lot of sense.

0:41:29.640 --> 0:41:31.279
<v Speaker 1>And you can get him what two rounds later, three

0:41:31.320 --> 0:41:33.719
<v Speaker 1>rounds later? Where did I pick him last night? Pick

0:41:33.760 --> 0:41:35.160
<v Speaker 1>a hundreds and like that. I think you got him

0:41:35.160 --> 0:41:37.840
<v Speaker 1>in the ninth round range. Whatever, it's good, it's good value.

0:41:38.920 --> 0:41:41.359
<v Speaker 1>That's your guy. You're a t J. Warren guy. Victor

0:41:41.400 --> 0:41:43.759
<v Speaker 1>Oladipo probably gonna miss the first three four months of

0:41:43.800 --> 0:41:46.880
<v Speaker 1>the year. They're going to need t J. Warren for

0:41:46.960 --> 0:41:49.359
<v Speaker 1>scoring they're gonna need sabonus to do more, and that's

0:41:49.400 --> 0:41:51.200
<v Speaker 1>where Malcolm Brogden comes in the mix as well. Now,

0:41:51.320 --> 0:41:54.319
<v Speaker 1>starting for the Indiana Pacers, we're call all other guys

0:41:54.360 --> 0:41:56.560
<v Speaker 1>you want to mention me about four minutes to go.

0:41:56.800 --> 0:41:58.439
<v Speaker 1>So who's all the guys you want to mention before

0:41:58.480 --> 0:42:01.480
<v Speaker 1>we wrap this one up? You brought up Terry ros Year.

0:42:01.520 --> 0:42:04.239
<v Speaker 1>He's someone that I'm targeting in that fourth fifth round range.

0:42:04.239 --> 0:42:07.000
<v Speaker 1>I will also bring up Caris LeVert and Dario Sarage.

0:42:07.080 --> 0:42:09.799
<v Speaker 1>These have been my guys for as long as they've

0:42:09.920 --> 0:42:11.919
<v Speaker 1>been in the league. You know, you watch Caros LeVert

0:42:11.960 --> 0:42:15.400
<v Speaker 1>early last season before he suffers the gruesome foot ankle injury,

0:42:15.600 --> 0:42:18.120
<v Speaker 1>and he was starting to take over as this team's

0:42:18.200 --> 0:42:20.600
<v Speaker 1>number one option. Well that's not gonna happen with Kyrie

0:42:20.640 --> 0:42:23.160
<v Speaker 1>Irving on the team, but with Kevin Durant out, he's

0:42:23.239 --> 0:42:25.399
<v Speaker 1>likely going to be the number two option. And he's

0:42:25.440 --> 0:42:27.719
<v Speaker 1>a good two way player. I think he's going to

0:42:27.800 --> 0:42:29.200
<v Speaker 1>be on the court a lot. He's gonna play over

0:42:29.280 --> 0:42:31.799
<v Speaker 1>thirty minutes per game. Could give you some defensive numbers.

0:42:31.840 --> 0:42:35.400
<v Speaker 1>I think he averages eighteen points a game, gives you

0:42:35.719 --> 0:42:38.279
<v Speaker 1>five six rebounds, gives you three or four assists, gives

0:42:38.320 --> 0:42:40.719
<v Speaker 1>you some defensive stats, shoots a couple of threes. I

0:42:40.800 --> 0:42:43.360
<v Speaker 1>think you know. Going in those middle rounds, Caris LeVert

0:42:43.440 --> 0:42:45.239
<v Speaker 1>is somebody that I would be targeting. And then a

0:42:45.320 --> 0:42:47.879
<v Speaker 1>little bit later on very surprising on Yahoo he has

0:42:48.160 --> 0:42:50.440
<v Speaker 1>center eligibility. I have no idea. I don't think this

0:42:50.520 --> 0:42:53.600
<v Speaker 1>guy has ever played center before. But keep it, keep

0:42:53.640 --> 0:42:55.239
<v Speaker 1>it in your the back of your mind if you're

0:42:55.280 --> 0:42:58.400
<v Speaker 1>drafting on Yahoo. Dario Sarige we saw a couple of

0:42:58.480 --> 0:43:00.759
<v Speaker 1>years ago. Greg had the monster season with the Philadelphia

0:43:00.800 --> 0:43:03.320
<v Speaker 1>seventies sixers. He was drafted early. I think he's a

0:43:03.440 --> 0:43:07.000
<v Speaker 1>very talented player. Last year traded to the Minnesota Timberwolves,

0:43:07.000 --> 0:43:09.120
<v Speaker 1>didn't really have a role on that team. Now he

0:43:09.280 --> 0:43:11.840
<v Speaker 1>lands with the Phoenix Suns. He's gonna start at the

0:43:11.920 --> 0:43:14.640
<v Speaker 1>four on a team that's going to run. They're gonna

0:43:14.680 --> 0:43:17.560
<v Speaker 1>play at a high pace. Ricky Rubio as the point guard,

0:43:17.680 --> 0:43:20.360
<v Speaker 1>is going to put players in position to succeed. I

0:43:20.440 --> 0:43:22.840
<v Speaker 1>do believe that. I think Dario Sartch is in position

0:43:22.920 --> 0:43:25.839
<v Speaker 1>for a bounce back season. Greg in that round eight

0:43:25.920 --> 0:43:28.920
<v Speaker 1>to ten range, fifteen points, seven rebounds, a couple of

0:43:28.960 --> 0:43:31.400
<v Speaker 1>three pointers, someone that could give you threes from the

0:43:31.440 --> 0:43:34.160
<v Speaker 1>big man position, I like Dario Sarich and Carres Lavert.

0:43:34.280 --> 0:43:35.879
<v Speaker 1>Is there anyone else that you're looking at in those

0:43:36.239 --> 0:43:38.439
<v Speaker 1>middle rounds or or maybe even some later round guys?

0:43:39.400 --> 0:43:42.439
<v Speaker 1>So for me, a guy that I I drafted last

0:43:42.520 --> 0:43:43.960
<v Speaker 1>night and actually thought he fell a little bit too

0:43:44.040 --> 0:43:47.320
<v Speaker 1>far brandon Ingram. I think Ingram Ingram falls into that

0:43:47.440 --> 0:43:49.279
<v Speaker 1>into that role where he missed a lot of the

0:43:49.320 --> 0:43:52.439
<v Speaker 1>season last year, um due to this was a heart

0:43:53.440 --> 0:43:56.000
<v Speaker 1>was horror? Was it stunny? It was something weird? Like

0:43:56.400 --> 0:43:58.320
<v Speaker 1>did I didn't really work out with the Los Angeles

0:43:59.040 --> 0:44:01.640
<v Speaker 1>Maybe something like that? It was it was something weird.

0:44:01.880 --> 0:44:04.719
<v Speaker 1>I know marquet Folds had the thoracic out. Well, you're right, yeah,

0:44:04.760 --> 0:44:06.920
<v Speaker 1>but Brandon Ingram was dealing with something you kind of

0:44:06.960 --> 0:44:08.480
<v Speaker 1>wish you would put on more strength. He does have

0:44:08.600 --> 0:44:10.799
<v Speaker 1>that frame frame, and I get that we new start

0:44:10.880 --> 0:44:12.279
<v Speaker 1>here with the New Orleans pelaty and I don't even

0:44:12.280 --> 0:44:14.080
<v Speaker 1>waiting even ran than Ingland to break out and really

0:44:14.120 --> 0:44:16.160
<v Speaker 1>they take over kind of we wore for Wiggins, but

0:44:16.280 --> 0:44:18.560
<v Speaker 1>now you're at this fresh story you're at and his

0:44:18.640 --> 0:44:20.440
<v Speaker 1>ADP has fallen to the point where like, all right,

0:44:20.480 --> 0:44:23.560
<v Speaker 1>I'll take I'll going in a similar range as Dario

0:44:23.600 --> 0:44:26.120
<v Speaker 1>Sarge round eight or round nine. I'll take him at

0:44:26.160 --> 0:44:28.080
<v Speaker 1>that spot and be like, all right, let's see what

0:44:28.160 --> 0:44:30.000
<v Speaker 1>this guy can do in New Orleans rounded by a cast.

0:44:30.080 --> 0:44:32.480
<v Speaker 1>It's really really good for him. A team that wants

0:44:32.520 --> 0:44:34.960
<v Speaker 1>to run the ball Alan under Alvin Gentry. I think

0:44:34.960 --> 0:44:38.520
<v Speaker 1>Brandon Ingram in that spot really solid target um. He

0:44:38.680 --> 0:44:41.800
<v Speaker 1>comes to mind. I think, looking at my list, Jonathan Isaac,

0:44:41.880 --> 0:44:43.719
<v Speaker 1>you have to mention, is somebody who could take another

0:44:43.840 --> 0:44:46.880
<v Speaker 1>speed another defensive numbers guys like, especially in head to

0:44:46.920 --> 0:44:49.920
<v Speaker 1>head categories, going into similar range right now as Brandon

0:44:50.080 --> 0:44:52.919
<v Speaker 1>Ingram in those mid rounds those you know, seven eight nine,

0:44:53.120 --> 0:44:55.279
<v Speaker 1>if you need defensive numbers in your draft. I mean,

0:44:55.320 --> 0:44:58.919
<v Speaker 1>this is someone that might average steal and a half

0:44:59.120 --> 0:45:01.239
<v Speaker 1>almost a blockbirgame over a block for a game play

0:45:01.280 --> 0:45:03.520
<v Speaker 1>small forward, power forward. I think the scoring goes up

0:45:03.520 --> 0:45:06.480
<v Speaker 1>a little bit going to rebound um playing the four

0:45:06.560 --> 0:45:08.880
<v Speaker 1>for that team, playing the three for the Orlando Magic.

0:45:08.920 --> 0:45:11.040
<v Speaker 1>But you know seven eight rebounds. I like it as well.

0:45:11.120 --> 0:45:12.960
<v Speaker 1>I like Jonathan Isaac all right, and I have to

0:45:12.960 --> 0:45:15.279
<v Speaker 1>ask you about one nick here. Mitchell Robinson is an

0:45:15.280 --> 0:45:17.160
<v Speaker 1>early round pick at center. We saw him fall in

0:45:17.200 --> 0:45:21.080
<v Speaker 1>our draft last night. O come. I think people are

0:45:21.080 --> 0:45:23.319
<v Speaker 1>worried about the playing time. Fitzdale kind of goes through

0:45:23.360 --> 0:45:25.759
<v Speaker 1>these wacky rotations where he just kind of plays whoever

0:45:25.880 --> 0:45:28.080
<v Speaker 1>is performing. But I think Mitch is in play for

0:45:28.160 --> 0:45:30.520
<v Speaker 1>a big year. Could average over two blocks per game,

0:45:30.680 --> 0:45:33.279
<v Speaker 1>could average a double double as well. I'm not as worried.

0:45:33.360 --> 0:45:35.000
<v Speaker 1>I think he gets around twenty eight minutes per game.

0:45:35.040 --> 0:45:37.239
<v Speaker 1>He's freak. Example, I am Greg Sauceman tomorrow on the

0:45:37.280 --> 0:45:40.360
<v Speaker 1>show we preview Week seven, my pick tonight's case. Have

0:45:40.480 --> 0:45:43.719
<v Speaker 1>a great night. We'll do it all again tomorrow. We hope,

0:45:43.800 --> 0:45:48.160
<v Speaker 1>go y eggs. I want to be the next Daily

0:45:48.280 --> 0:45:51.799
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy Millionaire. Dunk on your NBA DFS competition with Daily

0:45:51.880 --> 0:45:55.720
<v Speaker 1>Rodal dot Com and dominate on fandel and DraftKings this season.

0:45:55.800 --> 0:45:58.719
<v Speaker 1>Compete with the pros with Daily Rodal dot Com optimizer

0:45:58.800 --> 0:46:02.439
<v Speaker 1>and the most accurate objections in NBA DFS plus line

0:46:02.480 --> 0:46:05.399
<v Speaker 1>up alerts, breaking news, lake swap support, and much more.

0:46:05.560 --> 0:46:09.479
<v Speaker 1>Save ten on winning NBA DFS advice with promo code dunk.

0:46:09.719 --> 0:46:12.880
<v Speaker 1>Visit Daily road dot com backslash Dunk to learn more.

0:46:19.280 --> 0:46:24.560
<v Speaker 1>So what did that happen. What did Here's what you

0:46:24.640 --> 0:46:28.279
<v Speaker 1>missed on the BFFs. Franks on the first pick last night.

0:46:28.320 --> 0:46:30.000
<v Speaker 1>I like what he did for the most part. Couple

0:46:30.000 --> 0:46:31.800
<v Speaker 1>of things I would have done differently, obviously, but I

0:46:31.840 --> 0:46:33.279
<v Speaker 1>don't have a chance to you because I can't traft

0:46:33.320 --> 0:46:35.719
<v Speaker 1>On senter. I'm sorry. Well, you know what. We will

0:46:35.760 --> 0:46:37.960
<v Speaker 1>consult and we will figure out players that we both want,

0:46:38.000 --> 0:46:40.160
<v Speaker 1>and I will try my best to integrate those players

0:46:40.280 --> 0:46:42.239
<v Speaker 1>that you want. Hopefully I can get Josh Richardson fort

0:46:42.360 --> 0:46:44.160
<v Speaker 1>I say, the best part of fantasy basketball drafts are

0:46:44.280 --> 0:46:47.239
<v Speaker 1>what's that? It's so quick. We were done in our

0:46:47.320 --> 0:46:49.000
<v Speaker 1>last time. It was good exactly an hour last night.

0:46:49.080 --> 0:46:50.640
<v Speaker 1>I didn't get out. It was awesome. I love it.

0:46:50.800 --> 0:46:52.000
<v Speaker 1>If we go over the first round. I feel like

0:46:52.080 --> 0:46:53.400
<v Speaker 1>that's the first thing we should do. We do we

0:46:53.440 --> 0:46:55.160
<v Speaker 1>want to break in about a minute and a half.

0:46:55.520 --> 0:46:59.359
<v Speaker 1>So I probably passed on that, alright, that's I mean,

0:46:59.600 --> 0:47:01.480
<v Speaker 1>it wouldn't There's just a lot to break down. There is.

0:47:01.560 --> 0:47:03.640
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to like star and then like literally

0:47:03.640 --> 0:47:05.319
<v Speaker 1>in a minute half. So I put out a poll

0:47:05.320 --> 0:47:06.640
<v Speaker 1>before the show. Let's just do this. Let's just do

0:47:06.760 --> 0:47:09.279
<v Speaker 1>the first pick. If you had the first overall pick?

0:47:09.280 --> 0:47:11.279
<v Speaker 1>Who would you take? Because I put off the poll

0:47:11.680 --> 0:47:16.000
<v Speaker 1>and as of now there are thirty votes. One candidate

0:47:16.120 --> 0:47:19.719
<v Speaker 1>has zero percent of those votes. Uh, Yannampo is the

0:47:19.800 --> 0:47:21.520
<v Speaker 1>leading vote getter right now? Is that where you would

0:47:21.520 --> 0:47:24.320
<v Speaker 1>go if you have the first overall pick? Yeah, and

0:47:24.360 --> 0:47:26.400
<v Speaker 1>that's what we talked about. You're making me do this,

0:47:26.480 --> 0:47:27.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, I said, I you know I don't want

0:47:27.719 --> 0:47:28.719
<v Speaker 1>to do I say, we don't have to do the

0:47:28.760 --> 0:47:30.040
<v Speaker 1>whole first round. I was just saying, let's go over

0:47:30.080 --> 0:47:31.680
<v Speaker 1>to the first pick overall. I would move. I would

0:47:31.760 --> 0:47:34.400
<v Speaker 1>vote for Nat into the KOMBO. I think that yannest

0:47:34.440 --> 0:47:37.359
<v Speaker 1>does a little bit of everything. He has obviously multiposition eligibility.

0:47:37.760 --> 0:47:40.440
<v Speaker 1>He's just can help you at all every categories. Like

0:47:40.480 --> 0:47:42.439
<v Speaker 1>category he doesn't help you in. There's a change based

0:47:42.480 --> 0:47:45.360
<v Speaker 1>on the format. Now, how about in a road a league? Right?

0:47:45.360 --> 0:47:48.200
<v Speaker 1>Because I'll bring this up to you stupid All right, Well,

0:47:48.200 --> 0:47:50.959
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry. We participate in a few Fantasy Baseball road leagues,

0:47:51.480 --> 0:47:52.920
<v Speaker 1>but the n f B k C, if you want

0:47:52.920 --> 0:47:55.640
<v Speaker 1>to play some high stakes, is roads history. And I

0:47:55.680 --> 0:48:00.400
<v Speaker 1>think that you can argue that Anthony Davis and Anthony

0:48:00.440 --> 0:48:03.200
<v Speaker 1>Towns might be better rotistory players with the number one

0:48:03.239 --> 0:48:06.160
<v Speaker 1>overall pick Greg because they don't really have any deficiencies

0:48:06.640 --> 0:48:09.000
<v Speaker 1>in their game. I mean, Janice free throw percentage is

0:48:09.040 --> 0:48:11.719
<v Speaker 1>not great. I'm not gonna shoot me threes, and any Davis, Karl,

0:48:11.719 --> 0:48:14.040
<v Speaker 1>Anthony Towns starting to shoot more threes, starting to ball

0:48:14.080 --> 0:48:15.800
<v Speaker 1>hand a little bit more as well. I think Anthony

0:48:15.880 --> 0:48:17.759
<v Speaker 1>Davis had like six or seven assists last night and

0:48:17.760 --> 0:48:19.920
<v Speaker 1>only twenty five minutes of play. So I think in

0:48:19.960 --> 0:48:22.160
<v Speaker 1>a rotistory league you actually can make the argument for

0:48:22.360 --> 0:48:24.759
<v Speaker 1>a few other people. Overall, I think Janie and James

0:48:24.800 --> 0:48:27.480
<v Speaker 1>Harden are more often than not if you just play

0:48:27.480 --> 0:48:29.279
<v Speaker 1>a head to head categories league or head to head points,

0:48:29.560 --> 0:48:31.520
<v Speaker 1>those are the two that I'm considering most. Greig, Yeah,

0:48:31.560 --> 0:48:35.040
<v Speaker 1>fair enough, Your honest and Harden both fine choices. Obviously,

0:48:35.280 --> 0:48:37.560
<v Speaker 1>they both do everything. They both play every night. Something

0:48:37.560 --> 0:48:39.239
<v Speaker 1>you want to know, and I noticed is here on

0:48:39.280 --> 0:48:41.400
<v Speaker 1>the left side, and you can see right here that

0:48:42.520 --> 0:48:45.160
<v Speaker 1>you need to avoid load management. And that's what that's

0:48:45.200 --> 0:48:46.920
<v Speaker 1>going to be a key for us all throughout the

0:48:46.960 --> 0:48:49.160
<v Speaker 1>next hour talking about that. Whenever I had a decision

0:48:49.160 --> 0:48:51.120
<v Speaker 1>between two players, it was always about load management. And

0:48:51.200 --> 0:48:54.000
<v Speaker 1>what I liked about both Janice and Hardened and Karl

0:48:54.040 --> 0:48:57.000
<v Speaker 1>Anthony Towns as well. I don't expect them to really

0:48:57.000 --> 0:48:59.000
<v Speaker 1>be rested now. There were times last year with Milwaukee

0:48:59.000 --> 0:49:01.200
<v Speaker 1>having such a big lead in Eastern Conference where they

0:49:01.239 --> 0:49:04.080
<v Speaker 1>did rest honest down the stretch. Hard Engine doesn't get

0:49:04.120 --> 0:49:06.920
<v Speaker 1>rested at all. Karl Anthony Town's hates basing games. He

0:49:07.000 --> 0:49:10.880
<v Speaker 1>needn't get rested at all. After that, it kind of

0:49:10.920 --> 0:49:13.200
<v Speaker 1>feels like everyone is kind of at risk. So that's

0:49:13.200 --> 0:49:15.080
<v Speaker 1>gonna be a theme I think throughout the hour, just

0:49:15.080 --> 0:49:17.200
<v Speaker 1>trying to avoid some of those players that have the

0:49:17.280 --> 0:49:18.400
<v Speaker 1>load management issues.